Next Article in Journal
Exploring Immunohistochemistry in Fish: Assessment of Antibody Reactivity by Western Immunoblotting
Next Article in Special Issue
Development of Nested Polymerase Chain Reaction with Novel Specific Primers for Detection of Tritrichomonas muris Infection in Laboratory Mice
Previous Article in Journal
Ductal Architecture: Corrosion Casting of Canine Mammary Glands Using an Intraductal Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Molecular Characterization of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis, Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Escherichia coli in Dairy Goat Kids with Diarrhea in Partial Regions of Shaanxi Province, China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecular Identification and Genotyping of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. in Cattle in Representative Areas of Shanxi Province, North China

1
Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Jinzhong 030801, China
2
Research Center for Parasites & Vectors, College of Veterinary Medicine, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
3
Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health of Higher Education of Yunnan Province, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2023, 13(18), 2929; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13182929
Submission received: 7 July 2023 / Revised: 4 September 2023 / Accepted: 12 September 2023 / Published: 15 September 2023

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. are zoonotic intestinal protozoa, which cause intestinal diseases in humans and animals. So far, the prevalence of these two parasites in cattle in Shanxi Province remains unknown. Thus, the present study collected 795 fecal samples from cattle in Shanxi Province and these fecal samples were examined for presence of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. using molecular methods. The prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in cattle in Shanxi Province was 2.9% (23/795), and all of the positive samples were identified as C. andersoni. The prevalence of Blastocystis sp. in cattle in Shanxi Province was 13.0% (103/795), including five known subtypes (ST1, ST10, ST14, ST21 and ST26) and three unknown subtypes. Furthermore, the genetic diversity and distribution of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. were further explored through the analysis of DNA sequences and phylogenetic trees. This study reveals the presence and prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. in cattle in Shanxi Province for the first time, and provides baseline data for the control and prevention of both parasites in cattle in Shanxi Province.

Abstract

Both Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. are common intestinal protozoa, which can cause zoonotic diseases and economic losses to livestock industry. To evaluate the prevalence and genetic population structure of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. in beef and dairy cattle in Shanxi Province, north China, a total of 795 fecal samples were collected from beef and dairy cattle in three representative counties in Shanxi Province, and these fecal samples were examined using molecular approaches based on 18S small-subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp., respectively. Among 795 cattle fecal samples, 23 were detected as Cryptosporidium-positive and 103 were detected as Blastocystis-positive, and the overall prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. in cattle in Shanxi Province was 2.9% and 13.0%, respectively. For Cryptosporidium spp., DNA sequence analysis indicated that all 23 positive samples were identified as C. andersoni. Furthermore, five known subtypes (ST1, ST10, ST14, ST21 and ST26) and three unknown subtypes of Blastocystis sp. were detected among 103 positive samples using DNA sequence analysis. This study reported the occurrence and prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. in cattle in Shanxi Province for the first time, which extends the geographical distribution of these two zoonotic parasites and provides baseline data for the prevention and control of these two important zoonotic parasites in cattle in Shanxi Province.

1. Introduction

Cryptosporidium spp. is one of the six major pathogens causing diarrheal diseases in ruminants, and can also cause gastrointestinal diseases in a variety of vertebrate hosts including domestic animals, wild animals and humans [1,2,3]. The life cycle of Cryptosporidium spp. consists of five developmental stages: trophozoites, schizophytes, gametophytes, zygotes and oocysts, of which the oocysts excreted with the host’s feces are infectious [4]. Up to now, 44 species of Cryptosporidium spp. and more than 120 genotypes have been reported worldwide [5]. A large amount of research has indicated that C. andersoni, C. parvum, C. bovis and C. ryanae are the main causative agents of cryptosporidiosis in cattle [5,6]. In addition, C. andersoni, C. parvum and C. bovis can infect not only cattle but also humans [5]. Cryptosporidiosis is highly correlated with the immune status of the host [7]. Normally, the typical symptoms, such as dehydration and diarrhea, occur in cattle following infection with Cryptosporidium spp., and abdominal pain or vomiting have been occasionally reported in very few cattle.
Blastocystis sp. is an anaerobic zoonotic parasite found in most mammals and birds in many countries [8,9]. The most typical morphotype of Blastocystis sp. is the vacuolar form, which is also the most common form in cattle [10]. At present, increasing studies indicate that Blastocystis sp. isolates detected in different hosts around the world can be divided into 32 subtypes (STs) according to the SSU rRNA sequences of Blastocystis sp. [11]. Among these subtypes, ST1-9, ST12 and ST24 were mostly presented in humans, of which ST1-4 and ST3 were the mostly prevalent subtypes in humans and children with diarrhea, respectively [12]. Subtypes ST10, ST11 and ST13-17 were mainly detected in animals, ST1-7, ST10 and ST12-15 were generally identified in ungulates, and ST1, ST2, ST4 and ST6-8 were reported in birds [13]. The latest epidemiological surveys indicated that Blastocystis sp. has infected one to two billion people around the world [14,15]. Cattle, one of the most common hosts of Blastocystis sp., were usually asymptomatic after infection with Blastocystis sp., whereas diarrhea, abdominal pain and other gastrointestinal symptoms might occur in immunocompromised individuals [16].
Shanxi Province is an agricultural province combining mountains and rivers in north China. Its rich natural grassland and crop straw resources have created superior conditions for the development of high-quality beef cattle and dairy cows. Infection with Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. may not only affect the health of cattle in Shanxi Province, but also the health of humans and other animals through transmission via the fecal–oral route, resulting potential public health problems. Cattle are considered important hosts for both Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp., and there have been no relevant reports about the infection of both parasites in cattle in Shanxi Province until now. Thus, the objectives of the present study were to investigate the prevalence and genetic structure of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. in cattle in Shanxi Province, north China.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Sample Size

This study used a cross-sectional study design with a simple random sampling procedure to assess the prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. in representative areas of Shanxi Province. The sample size was determined using the formula given by Thrusfield [17], with the 95% confidence intervals and 5% precision value.
n = 1.96 2 × P e x p 1 P e x p d 2
  • n = the required sample size;
  • Pexp = expected prevalence;
  • d = desired absolute precision.
Based on the reported prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in cattle in China, the expected prevalence was taken as 11.9% [18]. The sample size was calculated as 161 of each study area using the above formula.

2.2. Fecal Sample Collection and Preparation

In November 2020, 795 fecal samples of beef cattle (401) and dairy cattle (394) were collected from three representative counties located in northern, central and southern Shanxi Province (34°34′–40°44′ N, 110°14′–114°33′ E). As shown in Figure 1, a total of 209, 313 and 273 cattle fecal samples were collected from Shanyin County, Qi County and Jishan County, respectively. All fecal samples were obtained from captive cattle, with 525 female cattle and 270 male cattle. Sampled cattle feces were collected from three age groups, including 286 cattle younger than 12 months, 195 cattle aged 12–18 months, and 314 cattle older than 18 months. With the consent of the owner, all fecal samples were collected from the top center of fresh feces freely excreted by the cattle to ensure no contamination. Each sample was individually packaged to prevent cross-contamination between samples. The packaged samples were briefly stored in a low-temperature environment, and transported to the laboratory and stored at −20 °C.

2.3. DNA Extraction and PCR Amplification

For each fecal sample, approximately 200 mg mixed feces was used to extract the genomic DNA by using the Omega E.Z.N.A.® Stool DNA kit (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instruction, and the extracted genomic DNA was stored in a freezer at −20 °C until PCR amplification. Subsequently, the prevalence and genotypes of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. in cattle were examined via PCR targeting the 830 bp region of the SSU rRNA gene and the 613 bp region of the SSU rRNA gene, respectively [19,20]. The primers used in this study are summarized in Table 1. The 25 μL PCR mixture contained 2.5 μL of 10×PCR Buffer (Mg2+ free), 2 μL of dNTPs, 25 mM of MgCl2, 1.25 U of Ex-Taq, 1 μM of each primer, 2 μL of DNA samples and 14.75 μL of ddH2O. The reagents used in PCR amplification were purchased from TaKaRa Biotech Ltd. (Dalian, China). The reaction conditions and parameters for the amplification of the SSU rRNA gene from Cryptosporidium spp. were as follows: initial denaturation (94 °C for 5 min); denaturation (94 °C for 30 s), annealing (56 °C for 30 s for the primary PCR and 58 °C for 30 s for the secondary PCR) and extension (72 °C for 30 s) for 35 cycles; and final extension (72 °C for 10 min). For amplification of the SSU rRNA gene of Blastocystis sp., the PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation (95 °C for 3 min); denaturation (94 °C for 1 min), annealing (65 °C for 1 min) and extension (72 °C for 1 min) for 35 cycles; and final extension (72 °C for 2 min). The positive control (DNA of each parasite previously verified by sequencing) and negative control (reagent-grade water) were added to each PCR round to ensure the reliability of the results. The PCR products were examined using gel electrophoresis in 2% agarose with ethidium bromide, and the positive products were sent to Sangon Biotech Ltd. (Shanghai, China) for two-directional sequencing.

2.4. Sequencing and Phylogenetic Analysis

In this study, the obtained DNA sequences of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. were proofread and edited with Chromas Pro v2.1.3 software. On the National Center for Biotechnology Information website (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 6 August 2020), the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) was applied to align the DNA sequences with the reported DNA sequences of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. to determine the genotypes. The phylogenetic trees were constructed based on the Neighbor-Joining (NJ) method and the Kimura 2-parameter model using Mega 11.0, and 1000 replicates (bootstrap value) were selected to assess the robustness of the findings [14,21,22].

2.5. Statistical Analysis

In this study, the correlation between the prevalence and risk factors (regions, ages and genders) of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. was statistically analyzed using Chi-square (χ2) test in software SPSS 26.0 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA), respectively. In addition, the strength of the association between prevalence and test conditions was assessed by calculating the odds ratio (ORs) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The difference is considered significant when the p-value is <0.05.

3. Results

3.1. The Prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. in Cattle in Shanxi Province

In this study, 23 out of 795 cattle fecal samples from three representative counties of Shanxi Province were screened as Cryptosporidium-positive using nested PCR amplification of the SSU rRNA gene, with an overall prevalence of 2.9% (Table 2). Notably, the highest prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. was observed in Jishan County (7.0%, 19/273), followed by Qi County (1.3%, 4/313) and Shanyin County (0.0%, 0/209). There were significant differences in the prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in the three study areas (p < 0.001). The prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in male cattle (3.0%, 8/270) was higher than that in females (2.9%, 15/525), but the difference is not statistically significant (p = 0.933). Likewise, there was no significant difference (p = 0.852) in Cryptosporidium spp. prevalence among the age groups, because a similar prevalence was found in different age groups (Table 2). In this study, the prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in beef cattle and dairy cattle was 4.7% (19/401) and 1.0% (4/394), respectively, and the difference is statistically significant (p = 0.002).
Based on the amplification of the SSU rRNA gene of Blastocystis sp., a total of 103 Blastocystis-positive samples were detected, and the overall Blastocystis sp. prevalence in cattle in Shanxi Province was 13.0% (Table 3). Specifically, the highest prevalence of Blastocystis sp. was detected in Jishan County (32.2%, 88/273), significantly higher than that in Shanyin County (3.8%, 8/209) and Qi County (2.2%, 7/313). A significant difference in the prevalence of Blastocystis sp. was observed among the three study regions (p < 0.001). In addition, the prevalence of Blastocystis sp. was 8.9% (24/270) in male cattle and 15.0% (79/525) in female cattle, and the difference is statistically significant (p < 0.05). Among age groups, the highest prevalence of Blastocystis sp. was detected in cattle aged from 12 to 18 months (15.4%, 30/195), followed by cattle older than 18 months (12.4%, 39/314) and younger than 12 months (11.9%, 34/286); however, the differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.499). In addition, the prevalence of Blastocystis sp. in beef cattle (19.7%, 79/401) was significantly higher than that in dairy cattle (6.1%, 24/394) (p < 0.001).
Regarding Cryptosporidium spp., 4 and 19 positive samples were detected in dairy cattle in Qi County and beef cattle in Jishan County, respectively. In Shanyin County and Qi County, the prevalence of Blastocystis sp. in dairy cattle was 3.8% and 5.1%, respectively, and no positive fecal samples were detected for beef cattle. The prevalence of Blastocystis sp. in dairy cattle and beef cattle in Jishan County was 35.3% and 18.4%, respectively. The prevalence of Blastocystis sp. in female cattle (44.1%) was higher than that in males (18.8%), and there were no significant differences in age distribution. Furthermore, only 1.5% of the beef cattle (6/401) were detected as positive for co-infection of both Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. in Jishan County. Among them, one was male and five cattle were female, and all cattle were aged over 12 months (Table 4).

3.2. Distribution of Genetic Diversity and Phylogenetic Analysis of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. in Cattle in Shanxi Province

The nucleotide sequences of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. obtained in this study were submitted to the GenBank database and the accession numbers are listed in Table 5. As shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3, the phylogenetic trees of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. were constructed by using the Neighbor-Joining (NJ) method with the Kimura 2-parameter model, and the parameters were set to 1000 replicates (bootstrap) [14,22]. The Cryptosporidium-positive DNA sequences obtained in this study represented C. andersoni and are distributed in the same cluster in Figure 2. Specifically, the ON054428 sequence showed a 100% similarity to that of KX710086 (zebra), MH754166 (cattle), MK841325 (camel), MK982513 (Macaca mulatta), MT636368 (hamster) and MT648437 (swan), respectively. Furthermore, 103 Blastocystis-positive samples were identified to represent five known subtypes (ST1, ST10, ST14, ST21 and ST26) and three unknown subtypes of Blastocystis sp. using DNA sequences analysis, and the prevalent subtype in cattle in Shanxi Province was ST10 (n = 63). Notably, only two subtypes (ST10 and ST26) were detected in cattle in Shanyin County, and three unknown subtypes were found in cattle in Jishan County. The subtype ST10 was the dominant subtype in both beef and dairy cattle (Table 6); however, this subtype (ST10) was not detected in cattle in Qi County. A comparison of sequence homology showed that multiple DNA sequences of Blastocystis sp. identified in this study show 100% homology to reported DNA sequences in the GenBank database; for example, the sequence ON062425 (ST10) has 100% homology with MW850528 (sheep) and the sequence ON110351 (ST21) has 100% homology with MZ265405 (goat) and MW887929 (white-tailed deer). Also, the sequences ON062433 (ST26) and MW887932 (cattle) were 100% identical. Of the three unknown subtypes of Blastocystis sp. detected in this study, two of them were closely related to ST1, and the other was closely related to ST21 and ST26.

4. Discussion

An increasing number of studies have shown that Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. pose public health problems and cause economic losses to animal husbandry [23,24,25,26,27]. Prior to the present study, the prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. in cattle in Shanxi Province remained unknown. In this study, the prevalence and population genetic structure of both Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. in cattle in Shanxi Province were analyzed for the first time. The overall prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. in cattle in Shanxi Province was 2.9% (23/795) and 13.0% (103/795), respectively, as shown in Table 7 and Table 8, which, respectively, summarize the epidemiological data of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. in cattle in China. The prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. in cattle in Shanxi Province was lower than that in some provinces of China. We speculated that the oocysts of Cryptosporidium spp. shed intermittently and solid walls may have resulted in false negativity and the lower prevalence detected in this study. However, only seven published studies reported Blastocystis sp. in cattle in China, which is not sufficient to explain well the possible reasons for the large difference in Blastocystis sp. prevalence in cattle, and the assessment of the prevalence and virulence of Blastocystis sp. in cattle requires further research.
Regarding the difference in prevalence among reported areas of China, we speculated that the reasons for the statistically significant difference in the prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. among different regions may be related to the geographical locations [13,18,22,28], regional environmental conditions [24,28,29], raising management patterns [14,30,31], immune status of hosts [13,28] and sampling methods [28]. For example, according to the reported surveys of Cryptosporidium spp. infection in many provinces of China and Blastocystis sp. in 31 countries in Asia, the geographical locations and environmental conditions are important influencing factors for differences in prevalence [26,32]. Studies on the prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. in free-grazing cattle in China indicated that cattle management practices can cause large epidemiological differences [14,30]. In addition, previous reports have shown that differences in the prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. in cattle are closely related to host immune status [6,28,33,34]. There are also many reports indicating that the sampling seasons [13,35,36], number of samples [14] and detection methods [22] also affect the results.
Table 7. The prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in cattle in China.
Table 7. The prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in cattle in China.
AreaNo. Positive/TotalPrevalence (%)Gene LocusYearsReferences
Anhui Province23/9552.4SSU rRNA2018[6]
Beijing city21/8222.6SSU rRNA, Gp602014–2015[28]
Gansu Province59/14144.2SSU rRNA, Gp602015[37]
Shanghai city303/81837.0SSU rRNA2015–2016[38]
Guangdong Province63/14404.4SSU rRNA2016[39]
Heilongjiang Province27/4236.4SSU rRNA, Gp602019[40]
Jiangxi Province71/55612.8SSU rRNA2019[41]
Sichuan Province40/27814.4SSU rRNA, Gp602016–2017[42]
Taiwan60/22626.5SSU rRNA2017–2018[43]
Yunnan Province65/44214.7SSU rRNA, Gp602019–2020[44]
Tibet3/4420.7SSU rRNA2016[30]
Hebei Provinces and Tianjin city10/10401.0SSU rRNA, Gp602016[45]
Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region70/18273.8SSU rRNA2013[46]
Table 8. The prevalence of Blastocystis sp. in cattle in China.
Table 8. The prevalence of Blastocystis sp. in cattle in China.
AreaNo. Positive/TotalPrevalence (%)Gene LocusYearsReferences
Qinghai Province278/102727.1SSU rRNA2016–2017[47]
Jiangxi Province305/55654.9SSU rRNA2019[33]
Heilongjiang Province14/1479.5SSU rRNA2010–2016[48]
Yunnan Province119/98712.1SSU rRNA2017–2018a
Shaanxi Province92/37124.8SSU rRNA2018a
Anhui Province0/9550SSU rRNA2018a
Guangdong Province9/4791.9SSU rRNA2016a
a: literature data published in China.
In this study, we found that the prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. (7.0%, 19/273) and Blastocystis sp. (32.2%, 88/273) in Jishan County was significantly higher than that in Qi County and Shanyin County. Similarly, the previous investigation in the same study area showed that the highest prevalence of Enterocytozoon bieneusi was also detected in cattle in Jishan County [49]. Furthermore, we found that the prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. in the three representative counties was gradually increased with increasing latitude. Villalobos-Segura et al. mentioned that latitude can affect the prevalence of parasites [50]. In addition, the prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. may be affected by the sampling seasons. In the study of seasonal variations in the prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in cattle in the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, the highest prevalence was detected in summer [51]. Previous studies showed that the prevalence of Blastocystis sp. in pigs in Korea varies greatly according to the seasons, with the highest prevalence in winter and autumn [52].
Data on the prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in different gender groups of cattle in Shanxi Province indicated that the prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in male cattle (3.0%, 8/270) was higher than that in female cattle (2.9%, 15/525) with no statistically significant difference among gender groups (p = 0.933). However, no significant difference was observed between male cattle (10.2%, 13/128) and female cattle (4.1%, 6/145) in Jishan County. Similar to the results of this study, a survey of Cryptosporidium spp. infection in beef and dairy cattle in Peninsular Malaysia showed no significant correlation between Cryptosporidium spp. prevalence and gender factors [53]. However, Elmahallawy et al. from Egypt reported that the female calves were more susceptible to Cryptosporidium spp. than males [54]. Therefore, the role of gender as a risk factor for Cryptosporidium spp. infection needs to be elucidated through more research in the future. Regarding Blastocystis sp., the prevalence of Blastocystis sp. in the female cattle in this study was 15.0% (79/525), higher than that in the males (8.9%, 24/270). In addition, the present study indicated that a statistically significant difference was found in prevalence among different gender groups (p < 0.05), which was consistent with a previous report of Blastocystis sp. prevalence in pigs in China by Zou et al. [55]. Moreover, statistical analysis indicated that similar significant differences were observed in prevalence among different genders and types of cattle in Jishan County.
The highest prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. was detected in cattle older than 18 months (3.2%, 10/314), followed by cattle aged 12–18 months (3.1%, 6/195) and younger than 12 months (2.4%, 7/286), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.852). However, many studies showed that younger animals were more susceptible to Cryptosporidium spp. due to their compromised immune system [18,28,44,56]. In the farms sampled in this study, calves were separately fed in enclosures with more suitable temperature and humidity, which may be one of the reasons for the low prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in calves. The highest prevalence of Blastocystis sp. was found in cattle aged 12 to 18 months (15.4%, 30/195), followed by cattle older than 18 months (12.4%, 39/314) and younger than 12 months (11.9%, 34/286), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.499). The results of Blastocystis sp. prevalence were similar to previous studies in cattle in China [57] and in Korea [58]. The correlation between the age of animals or humans and the prevalence of Blastocystis sp. has also been mentioned in other studies [59,60,61,62], but no fully consistent conclusions have been drawn due to the heterogeneity of sample sizes in different age groups.
In this study, the prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. in beef cattle was higher than that in dairy cattle, and the prevalence was significantly different between the two types of cattle. In Jishan County, this difference in prevalence was more significant. Similar results have been found in previous studies in China’s Shaanxi Province and Korea. The prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in beef cattle and dairy cattle in Shaanxi Province was 4.5% (38/847) and 2.6% (32/1224), respectively [63]. In Korea, a survey showed that the prevalence of Blastocystis sp. in beef cattle was higher than that in dairy cattle [58]. We speculated that the differences in prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. in beef cattle and dairy cattle in this study might be due to the differences in management patterns on different farms due to different types of cattle. In addition, differences in sanitation and parasite control measures across farms may also affect the prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp.. C. andersoni was the only Cryptosporidium species detected in cattle in this study. Recently, there have been relevant studies demonstrating that C. andersoni is the most prevalent species of Cryptosporidium spp. in cattle over one year, and it was also a common species of Cryptosporidium spp. detected in humans [64,65]. C. andersoni is also the most prevalent species in calves 2–12 months old in many regions of China, but not in other areas of the world. According to phylogenetic analysis, the C. andersoni identified in cattle was closely clustered with the C. andersoni isolated in humans (Figure 2). Five known subtypes (ST1, ST10, ST14, ST21 and ST26) and three unknown subtypes of Blastocystis sp. were detected in cattle in this study. Among these subtypes, ST10 was the predominant subtype in cattle worldwide [9,66]. Approximately 80% of ruminants were infected with the subtype ST10, posing a higher economic loss [57]. Subtype ST1 is one of nine major zoonotic subtypes infecting humans [9]. As shown in Figure 3, three unknown subtypes detected in this study were respectively clustered into a single branch, and their zoonotic potential still needs to be assessed. These findings suggested that effective measures must be taken to control and prevent C. andersoni infection in cattle in the study areas, and its zoonotic potential should also be taken into consideration in executing control strategies.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the overall prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in cattle in Shanxi Province was 2.9%, and all positive samples were identified as C. andersoni. The overall prevalence of Blastocystis sp. in cattle in Shanxi Province was 13.0%, five known subtypes and three unknown subtypes were detected, and the dominant subtype was ST10. There were significant differences in the prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. in cattle from different regions. In addition, significant differences in the prevalence of Blastocystis sp. were found among the different genders. These findings not only enrich the knowledge of the population genetic structure of both parasites, but also provide baseline data for the control and prevention of these two zoonotic parasites in animals and humans.

Author Contributions

S.-C.X., W.-W.G. and X.-Q.Z. conceived and designed the study. Y.L., Y.-Y.L. and J.-J.M. performed the experiments and analyzed the data. Y.L. wrote the manuscript. W.-B.Z., Q.L. and W.-W.G. participated in the collection of fecal samples and implementation of the study. S.-C.X. participated in data analysis. S.-C.X. and X.-Q.Z. critically revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Shanxi Province Excellent Doctoral Work Award—Scientific Research Project (Grant No. SXBYKY2021019), the Fund for Shanxi “1331 Project” (Grant No. 20211331-13), the Research Fund of Shanxi Province for Introduced High-level Leading Talents (Grant No. RFSXIHLT202101) and the Special Research Fund of Shanxi Agricultural University for High-level Talents (Grant No. 2021XG001). The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data sets supporting the results of this article have been submitted to GenBank and accession numbers are shown in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Innes, E.A.; Chalmers, R.M.; Wells, B.; Pawlowic, M.C. A one health approach to tackle cryptosporidiosis. Trends Parasitol. 2020, 36, 290–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Relat, R.M.B.; O’connor, R.M. Cryptosporidium: Host and parasite transcriptome in infection. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2020, 58, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Desai, A.N. Cryptosporidiosis. JAMA 2020, 323, 288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Thompson, R.C.; Olson, M.E.; Zhu, G.; Enomoto, S.; Abrahamsen, M.S.; Hijjawi, N.S. Cryptosporidium and cryptosporidiosis. Adv. Parasitol. 2005, 59, 77–158. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Ryan, U.; Zahedi, A.; Feng, Y.; Xiao, L. An update on zoonotic Cryptosporidium species and genotypes in humans. Animals 2021, 11, 3307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Liu, X.; Tang, L.; Li, W.; Li, C.; Gu, Y. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. and Enterocytozoon bieneusi from large-scale cattle farms in Anhui Province, China. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2022, 84, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Caccio, S.M.; Chalmers, R.M. Human cryptosporidiosis in Europe. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2016, 22, 471–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Stensvold, C.R.; Tan, K.S.W.; Clark, C.G. Blastocystis. Trends Parasitol. 2020, 36, 315–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shams, M.; Shamsi, L.; Sadrebazzaz, A.; Asghari, A.; Badali, R.; Omidian, M.; Hassanipour, S. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the global prevalence and subtypes distribution of Blastocystis sp. infection in cattle: A zoonotic concern. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2021, 76, 101650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rauff-Adedotun, A.A.; Mohd Zain, S.N.; Farah Haziqah, M.T. Current status of Blastocystis sp. in animals from Southeast Asia: A review. Parasitol. Res. 2020, 119, 3559–3570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Lai, P.; Li, Y.; Song, J.; Qi, M.; Zhao, G. Molecular characterization of Blastocystis sp. in Camelus bactrianus in Northwestern China. Animals 2021, 11, 3016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Jiménez, P.A.; Jaimes, J.E.; Ramírez, J.D. A summary of Blastocystis subtypes in North and South America. Parasites Vectors 2019, 12, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ma, L.; Qiao, H.; Wang, H.; Li, S.; Zhai, P.; Huang, J.; Guo, Y. Molecular prevalence and subtypes of Blastocystis sp. in primates in Northern China. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2020, 67, 2789–2796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Deng, L.; Yao, J.; Chen, S.; He, T.; Chai, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Shi, X.; Liu, H.; Zhong, Z.; Fu, H.; et al. First identification and molecular subtyping of Blastocystis sp. in zoo animals in Southwestern China. Parasites Vectors 2021, 14, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Scanlan, P.D.; Stensvold, C.R. Blastocystis: Getting to grips with our guileful guest. Trends Parasitol. 2013, 29, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bahrami, F.; Babaei, E.; Badirzadeh, A.; Riabi, T.R.; Abdoli, A. Blastocystis, urticaria, and skin disorders: Review of the current evidences. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2020, 39, 1027–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Thrusfield, M. Veterinary Epidemiology; Blackwell Science Ltd.: New York, NY, USA, 1995; pp. 180–186. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gong, C.; Cao, X.F.; Deng, L.; Li, W.; Huang, X.M.; Lan, J.C.; Xiao, Q.C.; Zhong, Z.J.; Feng, F.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Epidemiology of Cryptosporidium infection in cattle in China: A review. Parasite 2017, 24, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, Y.; Zhang, B.; Li, J.; Yu, S.; Zhang, N.; Liu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Ma, N.; Cai, Y.; et al. Development of a quantitative real-time PCR assay for detection of Cryptosporidium spp. infection and threatening caused by Cryptosporidium parvum subtype IIdA19G1 in diarrhea calves from Northeastern China. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2021, 21, 179–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ma, Y.T.; Liu, Q.; Xie, S.C.; Li, X.D.; Ma, Y.Y.; Li, T.S.; Gao, W.W.; Zhu, X.Q. Prevalence and subtypes of Blastocystis in alpacas, vicugna pacos in Shanxi Province, China. Korean J. Parasitol. 2020, 58, 181–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Kumar, S. MEGA11: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 3022–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liang, X.X.; Zou, Y.; Li, T.S.; Chen, H.; Wang, S.S.; Cao, F.Q.; Yang, J.F.; Sun, X.L.; Zhu, X.Q.; Zou, F.C. First report of the prevalence and genetic characterization of Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. in yunling cattle in Yunnan Province, southwestern China. Microb. Pathog. 2021, 158, 105025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. El-Alfy, E.S.; Nishikawa, Y. Cryptosporidium species and cryptosporidiosis in Japan: A literature review and insights into the role played by animals in its transmission. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2020, 82, 1051–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Guo, Y.; Ryan, U.; Feng, Y.; Xiao, L. Emergence of zoonotic Cryptosporidium parvum in China. Trends Parasitol. 2022, 38, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Popruk, S.; Adao, D.E.V.; Rivera, W.L. Epidemiology and subtype distribution of Blastocystis in humans: A review. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2021, 95, 105085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rauff-Adedotun, A.A.; Meor Termizi, F.H.; Shaari, N.; Lee, I.L. The coexistence of Blastocystis spp. in humans, animals and environmental sources from 2010–2021 in Asia. Biology 2021, 10, 990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Attah, A.O.; Sanggari, A.; Li, L.I.; Nik Him, N.; Ismail, A.H.; Meor Termizi, F.H. Blastocystis occurrence in water sources worldwide from 2005 to 2022: A review. Parasitol. Res. 2023, 122, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, F.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Z.; Li, J.; Wang, C.; Zhao, J.; Hu, S.; Wang, R.; Zhang, L.; Wang, M. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia duodenalis in dairy cattle in Beijing, China. Vet. Parasitol. 2016, 219, 61–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zahedi, A.; Ryan, U. Cryptosporidium—An update with an emphasis on foodborne and waterborne transmission. Res. Vet. Sci. 2020, 132, 500–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Chang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Li, D.; Wang, L.; Zheng, S.; Wang, R.; Zhang, S.; Li, J.; et al. Genotyping and identification of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis and Enterocytozoon bieneusi from free-range Tibetan yellow cattle and cattle-yak in Tibet, China. Acta Trop. 2020, 212, 105671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Murakoshi, F.; Xiao, L.; Matsubara, R.; Sato, R.; Kato, Y.; Sasaki, T.; Fukuda, Y.; Tada, C.; Nakai, Y. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in grazing beef cattle in Japan. Vet. Parasitol. 2012, 187, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Feng, Y.; Xiao, L. Molecular epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis in China. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Li, S.; Wang, P.; Zhu, X.Q.; Zou, Y.; Chen, X.Q. Prevalence and genotypes/subtypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Blastocystis sp. in different breeds of cattle in Jiangxi Province, southeastern China. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2022, 98, 105216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Deng, L.; Wojciech, L.; Gascoigne, N.R.J.; Peng, G.; Tan, K.S.W. New insights into the interactions between Blastocystis, the gut microbiota, and host immunity. PLoS Pathog. 2021, 17, e1009253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhao, W.; Zhou, H.; Huang, Y.; Xu, L.; Rao, L.; Wang, S.; Wang, W.; Yi, Y.; Zhou, X.; Wu, Y.; et al. Cryptosporidium spp. in wild rats (Rattus spp.) from the Hainan Province, China: Molecular detection, species/genotype identification and implications for public health. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2019, 9, 317–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Garcia-Livia, K.; Martin-Alonso, A.; Foronda, P. Diversity of Cryptosporidium spp. in wild rodents from the Canary Islands, Spain. Parasites Vectors 2020, 13, 445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wang, Y.; Cao, J.; Chang, Y.; Yu, F.; Zhang, S.; Wang, R.; Zhang, L. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia duodenalis in dairy cattle in Gansu, northwest China. Parasite 2020, 27, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cai, M.; Guo, Y.; Pan, B.; Li, N.; Wang, X.; Tang, C.; Feng, Y.; Xiao, L. Longitudinal monitoring of Cryptosporidium species in pre-weaned dairy calves on five farms in Shanghai, China. Vet. Parasitol. 2017, 241, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liang, N.; Wu, Y.; Sun, M.; Chang, Y.; Lin, X.; Yu, L.; Hu, S.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, S.; Cui, Z.; et al. Molecular epidemiology of Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy cattle in Guangdong Province, South China. Parasitology 2019, 146, 28–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xue, N.Y.; Liu, F.; Tao, W.F.; Zhao, Q.; Qiu, H.Y.; Hu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wei, X.Y.; Wang, W.; Gao, D.; et al. Molecular detection of Cryptosporidium spp. and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in Longjiang Wagyu cattle in Northeastern China. Microb. Pathog. 2020, 149, 104526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, S.; Zou, Y.; Wang, P.; Qu, M.R.; Zheng, W.B.; Wang, P.; Chen, X.Q.; Zhu, X.Q. Prevalence and multilocus genotyping of Cryptosporidium spp. in cattle in Jiangxi Province, southeastern China. Parasitol. Res. 2021, 120, 1281–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhong, Z.; Dan, J.; Yan, G.; Tu, R.; Tian, Y.; Cao, S.; Shen, L.; Deng, J.; Yu, S.; Geng, Y.; et al. Occurrence and genotyping of Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium in pre-weaned dairy calves in central Sichuan province, China. Parasite 2018, 25, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Lee, H.H.; Lee, J.Y.; Liu, S.S.; Chen, C.C.; Hsu, H.Y. Cryptosporidium parvum infection and management-based risk factors of dairy calves in Taiwan. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2021, 83, 1838–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Meng, Y.W.; Shu, F.F.; Pu, L.H.; Zou, Y.; Yang, J.F.; Zou, F.C.; Zhu, X.Q.; Li, Z.; He, J.J. Occurrence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy cattle and dairy buffalo in Yunnan Province, southwest China. Animals 2022, 12, 1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Hu, S.; Liu, Z.; Yan, F.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, L.; Jian, F.; Zhang, S.; Ning, C.; Wang, R. Zoonotic and host-adapted genotypes of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in dairy cattle in Hebei and Tianjin, China. Vet. Parasitol. 2017, 248, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Qi, M.; Wang, R.; Jing, B.; Jian, F.; Ning, C.; Zhang, L. Prevalence and multilocus genotyping of Cryptosporidium andersoni in dairy cattle and He cattle in Xinjiang, China. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2016, 44, 313–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ren, M.; Song, J.K.; Yang, F.; Zou, M.; Wang, P.X.; Wang, D.; Zhang, H.J.; Zhao, G.H.; Lin, Q. First genotyping of Blastocystis in yaks from Qinghai Province, northwestern China. Parasites Vectors 2019, 12, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, J.; Gong, B.; Yang, F.; Zhang, W.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, A. Subtype distribution and genetic characterizations of Blastocystis in pigs, cattle, sheep and goats in northeastern China’s Heilongjiang Province. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2018, 57, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, Y.Y.; Qin, R.L.; Mei, J.J.; Zou, Y.; Zhang, Z.H.; Zheng, W.B.; Liu, Q.; Zhu, X.Q.; Gao, W.W.; Xie, S.C. Molecular detection and genotyping of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in beef cattle in Shanxi Province, north China. Animals 2022, 12, 2961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Villalobos-Segura, M.D.C.; Garcia-Prieto, L.; Rico-Chavez, O. Effects of latitude, host body size, and host trophic guild on patterns of diversity of helminths associated with humans, wild and domestic mammals of Mexico. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2020, 13, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, K.; Wu, Y.; Jing, B.; Xu, C.; Chen, Y.; Yu, F.; Wei, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Cui, Z.; Qi, M.; et al. Seasonal monitoring of Cryptosporidium species and their genetic diversity in neonatal calves on two large-scale farms in Xinjiang, China. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 2022, 69, e12878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Paik, S.; Jung, B.Y.; Lee, H.; Hwang, M.H.; Han, J.E.; Rhee, M.H.; Kim, T.H.; Kwon, O.D.; Kwak, D. Molecular detection and subtyping of Blastocystis in Korean pigs. Korean J. Parasitol. 2019, 57, 525–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Abdullah, D.A.; Ola-Fadunsin, S.D.; Ruviniyia, K.; Gimba, F.I.; Chandrawathani, P.; Lim, Y.a.L.; Jesse, F.F.A.; Sharma, R.S.K. Molecular detection and epidemiological risk factors associated with Cryptosporidium infection among cattle in Peninsular Malaysia. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2019, 14, e00035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Elmahallawy, E.K.; Sadek, H.A.; Aboelsoued, D.; Aloraini, M.A.; Alkhaldi, A.a.M.; Abdel-Rahman, S.M.; Bakir, H.Y.; Arafa, M.I.; Hassan, E.A.; Elbaz, E.; et al. Parasitological, molecular, and epidemiological investigation of Cryptosporidium infection among cattle and buffalo calves from Assiut Governorate, upper Egypt: Current status and zoonotic implications. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 899854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Zou, Y.; Yang, W.B.; Zou, F.C.; Lin, R.Q.; Zhu, X.Q.; Hou, J.L. Molecular detection and subtype distribution of Blastocystis in farmed pigs in southern China. Microb. Pathog. 2021, 151, 104751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Naguib, D.; El-Gohary, A.H.; Mohamed, A.A.; Roellig, D.M.; Arafat, N.; Xiao, L. Age patterns of Cryptosporidium species and Giardia duodenalis in dairy calves in Egypt. Parasitol. Int. 2018, 67, 736–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Zhu, W.; Tao, W.; Gong, B.; Yang, H.; Li, Y.; Song, M.; Lu, Y.; Li, W. First report of Blastocystis infections in cattle in China. Vet. Parasitol. 2017, 246, 38–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lee, H.; Lee, S.H.; Seo, M.G.; Kim, H.Y.; Kim, J.W.; Lee, Y.R.; Kim, J.H.; Kwon, O.D.; Kwak, D. Occurrence and genetic diversity of Blastocystis in Korean cattle. Vet. Parasitol. 2018, 258, 70–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Beyhan, Y.E.; Yilmaz, H.; Cengiz, Z.T.; Ekici, A. Clinical significance and prevalence of Blastocystis hominis in Van, Turkey. Saudi Med. J. 2015, 36, 1118–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, P.; Li, S.; Zou, Y.; Hong, Z.W.; Wang, P.; Zhu, X.Q.; Song, D.P.; Chen, X.Q. Prevalence and subtype distribution of Blastocystis sp. in diarrheic pigs in Southern China. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Li, J.; Dong, H.; Karim, M.R.; Yang, X.; Chao, L.; Liu, S.; Song, H.; Zhang, L. Molecular identification and subtyping of Blastocystis sp. in hospital patients in Central China. Eur. J. Protistol. 2021, 79, 125796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Song, J.; Yang, X.; Ma, X.; Wu, X.; Wang, Y.; Li, Z.; Liu, G.; Zhao, G. Molecular characterization of Blastocystis sp. in Chinese bamboo rats (Rhizomys sinensis). Parasite 2021, 28, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhao, G.H.; Ren, W.X.; Gao, M.; Bian, Q.Q.; Hu, B.; Cong, M.M.; Lin, Q.; Wang, R.J.; Qi, M.; Qi, M.Z.; et al. Genotyping Cryptosporidium andersoni in cattle in Shaanxi Province, Northwestern China. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e60112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Wu, Y.; Gong, B.; Liu, X.; Jiang, Y.; Cao, J.; Yao, L.; Li, H.; Liu, A.; Shen, Y. Identification of uncommon Cryptosporidium viatorum (a Novel Subtype XVcA2G1c) and Cryptosporidium andersoni as well as common Giardia duodenalis assemblages A and B in humans in Myanmar. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 614053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Tarekegn, Z.S.; Tigabu, Y.; Dejene, H. Cryptosporidium infection in cattle and humans in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Parasite Epidemiol. Control 2021, 14, e00219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hublin, J.S.Y.; Maloney, J.G.; Santin, M. Blastocystis in domesticated and wild mammals and birds. Res. Vet. Sci. 2021, 135, 260–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. A map showing the sampling sites in Shanxi Province in this study. The map was made by ArcGIS10.8 and based on data from the Resource and Environmental Science and Data Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The color of red, gray and green in the map of Shanxi Province represent the northern, central and southern regions of Shanxi Province, respectively.
Figure 1. A map showing the sampling sites in Shanxi Province in this study. The map was made by ArcGIS10.8 and based on data from the Resource and Environmental Science and Data Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The color of red, gray and green in the map of Shanxi Province represent the northern, central and southern regions of Shanxi Province, respectively.
Animals 13 02929 g001
Figure 2. The Neighbor-Joining (NJ) method was used to analyze the phylogenetic relationship of Cryptosporidium species and/or genotypes identified in this study (marked with circles) and reported DNA sequences. Bootstrap value is shown when >50%.
Figure 2. The Neighbor-Joining (NJ) method was used to analyze the phylogenetic relationship of Cryptosporidium species and/or genotypes identified in this study (marked with circles) and reported DNA sequences. Bootstrap value is shown when >50%.
Animals 13 02929 g002
Figure 3. The Neighbor-Joining (NJ) method was used to analyze the phylogenetic relationship of Blastocystis subtypes identified in this study (marked with triangles) and reported DNA sequences. Bootstrap value is shown when >50%.
Figure 3. The Neighbor-Joining (NJ) method was used to analyze the phylogenetic relationship of Blastocystis subtypes identified in this study (marked with triangles) and reported DNA sequences. Bootstrap value is shown when >50%.
Animals 13 02929 g003
Table 1. Nested PCR amplification of the SSU rRNA gene in Cryptosporidium spp. and PCR amplification of the SSU rRNA gene in Blastocystis sp.
Table 1. Nested PCR amplification of the SSU rRNA gene in Cryptosporidium spp. and PCR amplification of the SSU rRNA gene in Blastocystis sp.
ParasiteLociPrimer IDPrimer Sequences (5′-3′)Annealing Temperature (°C)Fragment Length (bp)Reference
CryptosporidiumSSU rRNAF1CCCATTTCCTTCGAAACAGGA56 [19]
R1TTCTAGAGCTAATACATGCG
F2AAGGAGTAAGGAACAACCTCCA58830
R2GGAAGGGTTGTATTATTAGATAAAG
BlastocystisSSU rRNAF1ATCTGGTTGATCCTGCCAGT65613[20]
R1GAGCTTTTTAACTGCAACAACG
Table 2. The prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in cattle in Shanxi Province.
Table 2. The prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in cattle in Shanxi Province.
FactorCategoriesNo. SamplesNo. of PositivePrevalence% (95% CI)OR (95% CI)p-Value
RegionShanyi County2090--<0.001
Qi County31341.3 (0–2.5)1
Jishan County273197.0 (3.9–10.0)5.8 (1.9–17.2)
GenderFemale525152.9 (1.4–4.3)10.933
Male27083.0 (0.9–5.0)1.0 (0.4–2.5)
AgeM < 1228672.4 (0.7–4.2)10.852
12 ≤ M ≤ 1819563.1 (0.7–5.5)1.3 (0.4–3.8)
M > 18314103.2 (1.2–5.1)1.3 (0.5–3.5)
TypeDairy cattle39441.0 (0–2.0)10.002
Beef cattle401194.7 (2.7–6.8)4.8 (1.6–14. 4)
Total 795232.9 (1.7–4.1)
-: indicates no data available; M: month.
Table 3. The prevalence of Blastocystis sp. in cattle in Shanxi Province.
Table 3. The prevalence of Blastocystis sp. in cattle in Shanxi Province.
FactorCategoriesNo. SamplesNo. of PositivePrevalence% (95% CI)OR (95% CI)p-Value
RegionShanyin County20983.8 (1.2–6.4)1.7 (0.6–4.9)<0.001
Qi County31372.2 (0.6–3.9)1
Jishan County2738832.2 (26.7–37.8)20.8 (9.4–45.9)
GenderFemale5257915.0 (12.0–18.1)1.8 (1.1–2.9)0.014
Male270248.9 (5.5–12.3)1
AgeM < 122863411.9 (8.1–15.6)10.499
12 ≤ M ≤ 181953015.4 (10.3–20.4)1.3 (0.8–2.3)
M > 183143912.4 (8.8–16.1)1.1 (0.6–1.7)
TypeBeef cattle4017919.7 (15.8–23.6)3.8 (2.3–6.1)<0.001
Dairy cattle394246.1 (3.7–8.5)1
Total 79510313.0 (10.6–15.3)
M: month.
Table 4. Distribution of the prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. among risk factors in our study.
Table 4. Distribution of the prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. among risk factors in our study.
CategoriesGenderAgeType
FemaleMaleM < 1212 ≤ M ≤ 18M > 18Beef CattleDairy Cattle
Cryptosporidium spp.Shanyin County0
(0/184)
0
(0/25)
0
(0/95)
0
(0/0)
0
(0/114)
0
(0/0)
0
(0/209)
Qi County1.0%
(2/196)
1.7%
(2/117)
2.6%
(3/116)
1.1%
(1/93)
0
(0/104)
0
(0/177)
2.9%
(4/136)
Jishan County4.1%
(6/145)
10.2%
(13/128)
5.3%
(4/75)
4.9%
(5/102)
10.4%
(10/96)
8.5%
(19/224)
0
(0/49)
Blastocystis sp.Shanyin County4.3%
(8/184)
0
(0/25)
8.4%
(8/95)
0
(0/0)
0
(0/114)
0
(0/0)
3.8%
(8/209)
Qi County3.6%
(7/196)
0
(0/117)
2.6%
(3/116)
0
(0/93)
3.8%
(4/104)
0
(0/177)
5.1%
(7/136)
Jishan County44.1%
(64/145)
18.8%
(24/128)
30.7%
(23/75)
29.4%
(30/102)
36.5%
(35/96)
35.3%
(79/224)
18.4%
(9/49)
Table 5. The nucleotide sequence data of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. obtained in this study.
Table 5. The nucleotide sequence data of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. obtained in this study.
ParasiteTypeSubtypesAccession Numbers
CryptosporidiumBeef cattle-ON054428, ON054429, ON054430, ON054431
Dairy cattle-ON102776, ON102777, ON102778
BlastocystisBeef cattleST1ON062437
ST10ON062422, ON062423, ON062424, ON062425, ON062426, ON062427, ON062428, ON062429, ON062430, ON062431
ST14ON062435
ST21ON062434
ST26ON062432, ON062433
Unknown subtypeON062436
Dairy cattleST1ON110348
ST10ON110349
ST14ON110350
ST21ON110351
ST26ON110352
Unknown subtypeON110353
Unknown subtypeON110354
Table 6. Subtype distribution of Blastocystis sp. in cattle in three representative counties of Shanxi Province.
Table 6. Subtype distribution of Blastocystis sp. in cattle in three representative counties of Shanxi Province.
FactorsCategoriesNo. SamplesNo. of PositiveSubtype (n)
RegionShanyi County2098ST10 (7), ST26 (1)
Qi County3137ST1 (1), ST10 (2), ST14 (2), ST21 (1), ST26 (1)
Jishan County27388ST1 (3), ST10 (54), ST14 (6), ST21 (3), ST26 (19), unknown subtypes (3)
TypeBeef cattle40179ST1 (3), ST10 (48), ST14 (6), ST21 (2), ST26 (19), unknown subtype (1)
Dairy cattle39424ST1 (1), ST10 (15), ST14 (2), ST21 (2), ST26 (2), unknown subtypes (2)
ST: subtype.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liang, Y.; Liu, Y.-Y.; Mei, J.-J.; Zheng, W.-B.; Liu, Q.; Gao, W.-W.; Zhu, X.-Q.; Xie, S.-C. Molecular Identification and Genotyping of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. in Cattle in Representative Areas of Shanxi Province, North China. Animals 2023, 13, 2929. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13182929

AMA Style

Liang Y, Liu Y-Y, Mei J-J, Zheng W-B, Liu Q, Gao W-W, Zhu X-Q, Xie S-C. Molecular Identification and Genotyping of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. in Cattle in Representative Areas of Shanxi Province, North China. Animals. 2023; 13(18):2929. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13182929

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liang, Yao, Ya-Ya Liu, Jin-Jin Mei, Wen-Bin Zheng, Qing Liu, Wen-Wei Gao, Xing-Quan Zhu, and Shi-Chen Xie. 2023. "Molecular Identification and Genotyping of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. in Cattle in Representative Areas of Shanxi Province, North China" Animals 13, no. 18: 2929. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13182929

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop