Next Article in Journal
Behavioural Indicators of Pain and Suffering in Arthropods and Might Pain Bite Back?
Previous Article in Journal
Integrated Comparative Transcriptome and circRNA-lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA ceRNA Regulatory Network Analyses Identify Molecular Mechanisms Associated with Intramuscular Fat Content in Beef Cattle
Previous Article in Special Issue
Stem Cells in Domestic Animals: Applications in Health and Production
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 13
Issue 16
10.3390/ani13162601
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Isolation of Vascular Wall Mesenchymal Stem Cells from the Thoracic Aorta of Adult Göttingen Minipigs: A New Protocol for the Simultaneous Endothelial Cell Collection

by
Chiara Bernardini
1,2,
Debora La Mantia
1,*,
Roberta Salaroli
1,
Domenico Ventrella
1,
Alberto Elmi
1,
Augusta Zannoni
1,2 and
Monica Forni
2,3
1
Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Ozzano dell’Emilia, 40064 Bologna, Italy
2
Health Sciences and Technologies-Interdepartmental Center for Industrial Research (CIRI-SDV), Alma Mater Studiorum—University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
3
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2023, 13(16), 2601; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13162601
Submission received: 19 July 2023 / Revised: 9 August 2023 / Accepted: 10 August 2023 / Published: 12 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Collection Stem Cells in Domestic Animals: Applications in Health and Production)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

It has been widely demonstrated that blood vessels are sources of multipotent progenitor cells, including mesenchymal stem cells. These stem cellular populations persist throughout adulthood and can be isolated from both microvascular and large vessels. Increasing evidence suggests that vascular stem cells, together with other cell populations residing in blood vessels, such as endothelial cells, are involved in physiological and pathological vascular remodeling. In the present paper, we described, for the first time, a new improved method to isolate a pure population of vascular wall cells showing a preserved mesenchymal tri-lineage differentiative potential from thoracic aorta of Göttingen Minipigs, preserving and also collecting endothelial cells. Considering the increasing interest in the use of Göttingen Minipigs as an animal model for cardiovascular diseases, the results obtained in the present research open the way to plan in vitro vascular remodeling experiments by using in co-culture system vascular mesenchymal stem cells and endothelial cells.

Abstract

Two main classes of perivascular multipotent populations have been described: the microvascular pericytes and the vascular wall mesenchymal stem cells (VW-MSCs). VW-MSCs are isolated from large vessels in many species and they participate in vascular remodeling together with other cellular components such as endothelial cells. Considering that the Göttingen Minipigs are widely used in Europe as a translational model in the field of cardiovascular diseases, the aim of the present research was to isolate VW-MSCs from the adult aorta of Göttingen Minipigs while preserving and also collecting endothelial cells. The results obtained in the present research demonstrated that this new protocol allows us to obtain a pure population of VW-MSCs and endothelial cells. VW-MSCs from Göttingen Minipigs responded fully to the MSC minima international criteria, being positive to CD105, CD90, and CD44 and negative to CD45 and CD34. Moreover, VW-MSCs presented a differentiative potential towards osteogenic, chondrogenic, and adipogenic lineages. Overall, the present protocol, preserving the viability and phenotypic features of the two isolated populations, opens future possibilities of using minipig VW-MSCs and endothelial cells in in vitro vascular remodeling studies.

1. Introduction

It is now widely known that embryonic blood vessels are home to stem cells niches identified as natural precursors of mesenchymal stem cells; moreover, it has been demonstrated that these niches are also present in adulthood [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. The microvascular pericytes [10,11] and the vascular wall mesenchymal stem cells (VW-MSCs) [12,13,14] are the two main classes of perivascular multipotent populations. A complex interaction between the progenitor cells and the terminally differentiated resident cells, like endothelial cells, occurs during post-natal life, concurrent with normal organ turnover but also with tissue pathologic remodeling, including inflammatory diseases, fibrosis and atherosclerosis [15,16,17,18]. VW-MSCs are isolated in large vessels in many species including humans [19], mice [20], rats [12] and bovines [2], and they are described as multipotent progenitors for postnatal vasculogenesis and angiogenesis [21]. In pigs, we isolated for the first time a population of VW-MSCs resident in the aorta of 3-month-old commercial hybrid pigs [22]. Porcine VW-MSCs (pVW-MSCs) cultured in vitro possess a typical MSC phenotype, maintain the osteogenic, chondrogenic and adipogenic trilineage potential and have the ability to differentiate in all the components of a mature vessel [23]. In addition, we have demonstrated that pVW-MSC secretome is enriched with bioactive factors, such as growth factors, cytokines and chemokines, that can modulate the immune response and promote angiogenesis [24,25].
In general, MSCs isolated from pigs represent an excellent translational model in the field of regenerative medicine due to the close similarity of pig MSCs to human ones [26,27,28,29]. Overall, the pig is a relevant animal model for preclinical studies using MSCs or MSC-derived infusions [30,31,32,33,34]. The possibility of creating in vitro models mimicking the angiogenic remodeling that occurs in vivo after tissue damage is certainly strategic for the success of regenerative medicine therapy [35]. In the last decade, miniature swine has been preferred to hybrid pigs for their small size, genetic stability and health status, making them a translational research model that is extremely helpful in biomedical research [36,37,38]. In particular, Göttingen Minipigs are widely used in Europe as a translational model in the field of cardiovascular diseases [39,40,41].
A deep phenotyping is increasingly needed for customized therapeutic approaches in the field of precision medicine, including for cardiovascular diseases [42]. Considering the influence of different cell populations on disease phenotype, it is highly relevant to set up methods to collect different cell populations from the same experimental animal to plan in vitro 3D heterotypic experiments.
By matching and optimizing two distinct protocols set up previously for the isolation of endothelial cells (pAECs, porcine aortic endothelial cells) [43] and VW-MSCs [22], the aim of the present research was to isolate both cell types from the adult aorta of a single Göttingen Minipig.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Reagents

Dulbecco phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS) with calcium and magnesium, Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS), trypsin-EDTA, antibiotic–antimycotic 100× (15240062), gentamicin, recombinant human epidermal growth factor (hEGF), Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium: Nutrient Mixture F-12 (DMEM/F12), Hanks Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) with calcium and magnesium, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), diaminobenzidine, FluoroshieldTM with DAPI histology mounting medium, glucose and 2-[4-(2-hydroxyethyl) piperazin-1-yl] ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), collagenase IA were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Betadine 10% cutaneous solution was purchased from Meda Pharma Spa (Milan, Italy). Endothelial Cell Medium (Human Endothelial SFM 11111044), DMEM, heat inactivated FBS, Trypsine 0.25%, StemPro Adipogenesis Differentiation Kit, the StemPro Osteogenesis Differentiation Kit, and the StemPro Chondrogenesis Differentiation Kit were purchased from Life Technologies (Carslab, CA, USA)). The Pericyte Growth Medium was purchased from PromoCell (Promocell, Heidelberg, Germany).
All plastic supports for primary cell culture were purchased from Corning–Beckton–Dickinson (Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).
The antibodies used for the immunofluorescence (IF) and flow cytometry analyses (FC) are listed in Table 1 and were purchased from AbD Serotec (Kidlington, UK); Abcam (Cambridge, UK), Biolegend (San Diego, CA,USA) and Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

2.2. Animal Description

To reduce the number of animals utilized, tissue samples were collected from animals enrolled in an experimental lactation study approved by the Italian Ministry of Health as dictated by D.Lgs 26/2014 (approval n° 32/2021-PR). All procedures were performed in compliance with ARRIVE guidelines. At the end of the experimental trial, sows, acquired by Ellegaard Göttingen Minipigs A/S (Dalmose, Denmark), were group housed with a light/dark cycle of 12:12 and hand fed with a standard commercial diet (Micropigs 9AB20; Mucedola srl, Settimo Milanese Italy). Pens were equipped with both chewable and wooden environmental enrichments. On the day of sacrifice, animals were sedated intramuscularly (IM) with 5 mg/kg of tiletamine/zolazepam (Zoletil, Virbac, Carros, France) and euthanized upon barbiturate overdose (Sodium thiopental 60 mg/kg; Pentothal sodium, MSD Animal Health srl, Madison, NJ, USA). Thoracic aortic traits (11 ± 2 cm; n = 3) were surgically removed and collected from 3 Göttingen Minipigs.

2.3. Histological Examination

Portions of 1 cm long portions from the aorta, pre and post enzymatic digestion, were embedded in OCT and frozen in isopentane cooled in liquid nitrogen. Ten-micrometer-thick sections were cut with a Leica CM1950cryostat (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany), then left to adhere to a microscope slide and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) according to the standard procedure. Images were obtained using a Nikon digital camera (DS-Qi2 Monochrome Digital Microscope Camera) installed on a Nikon epifluorescence microscope Eclipse E600 and analyzed with NIS-Elements BR Ver5.30.00 digital image software (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).

2.4. Cell Isolation

pAEC and VW-MSC isolation from minipigs (mpAECs and mpVW-MSCs, respectively) were obtained by modifying two methods previously developed and described (Figure 1) for the isolation of porcine aortic endothelial cells (pAECs) and porcine vascular wall mesenchymal stem cells (pVW-MSCs) [22,43] from hybrid commercial pigs.
The explanted vessel was cleaned before being moved to the laboratory. Two additional washes were performed using Endothelial Medium plus 1× antibiotic–antimycotic (ECm 1% anti-anti), before transferring the vessel under a laminar flow hood.
All excess tissue was removed from the vessels and the aorta was cannulated. The lumen of the vessel was gently washed twice with ECm 1% anti-anti to remove the residual blood and then was filled with 0.2% collagenase IA solution and incubated at 38.5 °C. To recover the endothelial layer, collagenase solution containing cellular suspension was collected after 20 min of incubation in a sterile 50 mL tube, and the enzymatic reaction was stopped with an equal volume of 10% FBS. Then, the vessel was washed with 15 mL ECm (1% anti-anti) to collect the residual cell clusters. The cellular suspensions were centrifuged at 500× g for 10 min. The supernatant was discarded, and the cellular pellet was resuspended in ECm containing 10% FBS and 1× antibiotic–antimycotic solution and seeded in a 75 cm2 tissue culture flask (BD Primaria, BD Bioscience (Haryana, India)). The aorta was refilled with 0.2% collagenase IA solution and incubated for an additional 2 h at 38.5 °C. Collagenase solution containing cellular suspension was then recovered in a 50 mL tube, and the vessel was washed twice with DPBS and 1× antibiotic–antimycotic to collect the residual cell clusters. Collagenase enzymatic activity was then stopped by addition of an equal volume of 10% FBS. The cellular suspensions were centrifuged at 500× g for 10 min. The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was resuspended in high glucose (hg) DMEM, to which a 10% FBS and 10× antibiotic–antimycotic solution (hgDMEM-10×) was added and seeded in a 75 cm2 tissue culture flask (BD Primaria, BD Bioscience).

2.5. Cell Expansion

mpAECs at the first passage were detached and expanded for at least three passages in EC medium containing 5% FBS and 1% antibiotic–antimycotic solution.
mpVW-MSCs at the first passage were detached and expanded in PGM medium to maintain their multipotent potential. Doubling times were calculated for both cell populations as indicated previously [44].
The freezing protocol for both mpAECs and mpVW-MSCs consisted of detaching cells at 70% of confluence using 0.25% Trypsin EDTA, washing them in DPBS, and counting and suspending them at a concentration of 0.5 × 106 cells/mL in a freezing medium consisting of 10% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)+ 90% FBS. Cells were dispensed in cryovials tubes and were slowly cooled in a Mr. Frosty freezing container placed in a freezer at −80 °C before transferring to the nitrogen liquid biobank the following day.

2.6. Cell Characterization by Flow Cytometry Analysis

To confirm the endothelial or mesenchymal immunophenotype, flow cytometry analysis was performed. Briefly, 2 × 105 cells were resuspended in 100 μL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and incubated for 1 h at 4 °C in the dark with appropriate fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies at the titers reported in Table 1. Unstained controls, to evaluate the inherent background for autofluorescence, were obtained by omitting primary antibodies. After incubation, cells were washed twice and resuspended in 200 μL of PBS, then analyzed with MacsQuant Analyzer10 (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). For CD34 staining, after the first incubation with the primary antibody, cells were washed and incubated with PE-conjugated secondary antibody (Table 1) for 40 min at 4 °C in the dark. Data were analyzed using Flowlogic™ software (https://flowlogic.software/) (Inivai Technologies, Mentone, VIC, Australia).

2.7. mpAEC In Vitro Angiogenesis Assay

To verify the mpAECs ability to create a capillary-like network, an in vitro angiogenesis assay was carried out using 8-slide chambers (BD Falcon Bedford, MA, USA) coated with 100 μL of undiluted Geltrex™ LDEV-Free Reduced Growth Factor Basement Membrane Matrix (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). Extracellular matrix coating was carried out 1 h before the cell seeding in a humidified incubator at 38.5 °C and 5% CO2; then, 8 × 105 mpAECs were seeded and incubated for 18 h. Images were acquired at 0, 3 and 18 h using a digital camera installed on a Nikon phase contrast microscope and analyzed by Image J 64 open software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). Then, mpAECs were gently washed with DPBS and fixed with 4% of paraformaldehyde, and immunohistochemistry staining for CD31 was performed as previously described [23].

2.8. mpVW-MSC Cell Adhesion Assay

To verify mpVW-MSCs ability to adhere to each other, forming a spheroid [45], the hanging drop method was used; 5 mL of DPBS was placed at the bottom of a Petri dish to create a hydration chamber, then drops of 6 × 104 cells in 10 µL of PGM medium were seeded on the cover of the dish. Then, the cover was overturned and incubated at 5% CO2 and 38.5 °C. After 24 h, spheroids were checked for morphology and dimensions by an Eclipse E600 epifluorescence microscope equipped with a Nikon digital camera and ACT-2U software for image capturing (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).

2.9. Mesenchymal Trilineage Differentiation Potential

To verify mpVW-MSCs ability to differentiate in the three mesenchymal lineage, mpVW-MSCs were cultured with a StemPro Adipogenesis Differentiation Kit, a StemPro Osteogenesis Differentiation Kit, a StemPro Chondrogenesis Differentiation Kit (all purchased from GIBCO-Life Technologies), or in standard culture conditions with PGM medium (control cells) for 21 days. After that, the cells were stained with OilRedO, Alizarin Red, and Alcian Blue (all purchased by Sigma-Aldrich) as indicated by the manufacturer’s protocol.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

Doubling time data were analyzed by a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a post hoc Tukey comparison test (p < 0.05) (GraphPad Prism 5 software). Flow cytometry data were analyzed with a Student’s t test comparing the MFI of the negative control and the MFI of single stained cells (p < 0.05) in each cell population.

3. Results

3.1. mpAECs and mpVW-MSCs Isolation

Sections from the minipig aorta wall before enzymatic digestion showed all the normal three layers: intima, media, and adventitia. The intima appeared as a flattened unicellular layer of endothelial cells (Figure 2a). After the two consecutive collagenase treatments, the endothelial cell layer, including the basal lamina, was detached and approximately one-sixth of the tunica media was digested (Figure 2b). After 24 h (Figure 2c), cells collected from the first digestion time (20 min) were attached to the plastic flask and they showed a typical endothelial morphology by growing flat in small island; after approximately 1 week, the cells reached the confluence, forming a compact monolayer (Figure 2d,e).
The cells collected after the second digestion time (2 h) and after the selective protocol described previously [22] displayed a stellate- or elongate-shaped morphology with centrally placed oval or round nuclei (Figure 2f); they grew slowly and reached confluence approximately after 3 weeks, showing a spindle shape fibroblast-like morphology (Figure 2g,h).

3.2. mpAEC and mpVW-MSC Characterization

The three primary mpAEC cell lines were successfully expanded in EC medium for three passages. They maintained the typical endothelial morphology (Figure 3a); the mean doubling time of the three primary cell lines was 35.30 ± 4.63 h. Cytometric analysis showed that all the cellular population were clearly positive to CD31 (Figure 3b) and cells seeded on an extracellular matrix showed the ability to create a capillary-like network. In particular, three hours after cell seeding, mpAECs were already aligned to form a network (Figure 3c). The capillary-like network was fully formed after 18 h (Figure 3d), and cells clearly expressed the endothelial marker VE-cadherin (Figure 3e,f). No differences were observed among the three primary cellular lines.
The three primary mpVW-MSC lines cultured in no selective medium showed a typical spindle shape, fibroblast-like morphology and occasionally spherical formations sprouted from the cellular monolayer (Figure 4a). When cultured using the hanging drop technique, mpVW-MSCs were able to form compact spheroids with a mean diameter of 770.40 ± 69.79 µm (Figure 4b); no significant differences were observed among the three primary cellular lines. mpVW-MSCs expanded in PGM medium showed a typical perivascular mesenchymal cell morphology: a small cell body with thin and long cellular extensions (Figure 4c,d). No differences were observed among the three primary cellular lines (Figure S1).
A flow cytometric analysis showed a typical MSC profile. In alignment with the criteria for MSC characterization, the cell populations were positive for the mesenchymal stemness markers CD105, CD90, and CD44 and for the specific vascular wall MSC marker CD56, whereas they were completely negative for the hematopoietic markers CD45 and CD34 (Figure 5).

3.3. mpVW-MSC Trilieaneage Potential

mpVW-MSCs were able to differentiate towards osteo, chondro, and adipocyte phenotypes. The cells displayed osteogenic (Alizarin Red stain Figure 6a,c), chondrogenic (Alcian Blue stain Figure 6e,g), and adipogenic (OilRedO stain Figure 6i,m) differentiation potentials after 21 days of treatment with differentiating culture media (Figure 6). Cells grown in pro-osteogenic medium for 21 days formed a typical center of bone enucleation that was positive to Alazarin red (Figure 6a,c); no positivity was observed in control cells (Figure 6b,d). mpVW-MSCs grown in pro-condrogenic medium clumped together, forming long bundles and secreting extracellular matrix, and were positive to Alcian Blue (Figure 6e,g). No positivity stain was observed in control cells (Figure 6f,h). pVW-MSCs grown in pro-adipogenic medium demonstrated the intercytoplasmic presence of fat vesicles that were positive for oil red staining (Figure 6i,k). No fat vesicles were observed in control cells (Figure 6j,l).

4. Discussion

Increasing studies indicate Göttingen Minipigs as an excellent translational model to study cardiovascular diseases [39,46,47,48,49,50], even in consideration of their propensity to develop various disorders of the metabolic syndrome, including obesity, insulin resistance, glucose intolerance, dyslipidemia, and atherosclerosis [39,51,52,53,54,55,56]. Clinical applications of mesenchymal stem-cell-based tissue engineering are promising due to the specific properties of these cells, i.e., high regenerative capacity, proliferative potential, immunomodulatory activity, and low immunogenicity [57]. Isolation of porcine MSCs from bone marrow (BM) was reported by several investigators [26,58,59,60]. Porcine MSCs were also isolated from various sources such as umbilical cord Wharton’s jelly [61,62], peripheral blood [63], amniotic fluid [64], umbilical cord blood (UCB) [65], adipose tissue [66], and the thoracic aortic wall [22]. The isolation of MSCs from the bone marrow of 14–16-month-old female Göttingen Minipigs was described for the first time in 2010 by Agay et al. [67]; then, they were also isolated from adipose tissue [68] and cardiac tissue [69].
The cross-talk between MSCs and endothelial cells in the vascular network is a known reality and the potential effects of this interaction are also well known [70]. In the presence of inflammatory stimuli, MSCs are able to increase the self-repair activity of endothelial cells, and this action appears to be carried out by increasing production of soluble factors; therefore, MSC transplantation is considered as a potential way to slow down the development of atherosclerosis [71]. Tissue engineering studies stress the need for autologous cell-based approaches, but clarification of processes that support the innate cellular capacity to remodel and form vasculature is still needed. In 3D eterotypic cultures, endothelial cell sprouting is dependent from MSC position in EC-MSC co-culture spheroids evidencing that the communication between different cell populations can define network formation [72].
In terms of the development of ex vivo and in vitro models, and to encourage the use of methods complementary to the in vivo ones, it could be of high interest to have cells of different types but belonging to the same subject, which could reconstitute in vitro multi-cellular models that can recapitulate the animal from which they were derived.
In the present study, we reported the simultaneous isolation of vascular wall mesenchymal stem cells and endothelial cells from the thoracic aorta of adult Göttingen Minipigs. The protocol described in the present research was developed from two distinct protocols for the isolation of endothelial cells [43] and VW-MSCs from the thoracic aorta of hybrid commercial pigs [22]. The new optimized protocol allows to isolate mpVW-MSCs resident in the first layers of the tunica media, as described for those cells isolated from commercial hybrid pigs [22]. mpMSCs showed a fibroblast-like morphology when cultured with a non-selective medium, as described by the International Society for Cellular Therapy [73] concerning the minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. Occasionally, in the first stage of growth, spheroid cellular formations spontaneously sprouted; the ability to form compact spheroids is a well-demonstrated ability of MSCs grown in particular conditions of no attached culture. In the present research, the mpVW-MSC’s ability to grow in a spheroid structure was confirmed when cells were cultured by the hanging drop technique. However, when mpVW-MSCs were cultured in a specific medium for multipotent pericytes, the cell morphology changed towards a phenotype characteristic of perivascular cells with a small cell body, thin and long cellular extensions [23]. A flow cytometric analysis showed a typical MSC profile in line with the criteria for vascular MSC characterization and in agreement with those observed in hybrid commercial pigs. Overall, the results obtained demonstrated that the protocol applied guaranteed the isolation of a pure population of VW-MSCs from Göttingen Minipigs.
Moreover, the present protocol allowed the isolation of endothelial cells from the tunica intima, preserving their viability and phenotype. Our previous protocol did not permit to collect endothelial cells (EC), but damaged them after excessive vessel manipulation and enzymatic digestion times, while mpAECs obtained with this new protocol were viable and exhibited the endothelial peculiar feature to form a capillary-like network if cultured on an extracellular matrix, confirming what was previously shown for pAECs [74].

5. Conclusions

In this paper, we described for the first time the isolation of mesenchymal stem cells from the thoracic aorta of Göttingen Minipigs by using an improved method that preserves the endothelial cell population. The ability to isolate both endothelial cells and vascular mesenchymal stem cells from the same vessel will be useful in planning in vitro 3D heterotypic experiments for studying the contribution of these cellular populations and the cell–cell interactions in physiological and pathological vascular remodeling.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani13162601/s1, Figure S1: Representative images of mpVW-MSCs from the three primary cell lines (MG9, MG11, MG12 respectively). Scale bar 100 µm.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.B. and M.F.; methodology, C.B., D.L.M., D.V., A.E. and R.S.; formal analysis, C.B., D.L.M., R.S. and A.Z.; data curation, C.B., D.L.M. and R.S.; writing—original draft preparation, C.B. and D.L.M.; visualization, C.B., D.L.M. and R.S.; supervision, A.Z.; funding acquisition, M.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Monica Forni, grant number: RFO 2021.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Italian Ministry of Health as dictated by D.Lgs 26/2014 (approval n° 32/2021-PR).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alessandri, G.; Girelli, M.; Taccagni, G.; Colombo, A.; Nicosia, R.; Caruso, A.; Baronio, M.; Pagano, S.; Cova, L.; Parati, E. Human Vasculogenesis Ex Vivo: Embryonal Aorta as a Tool for Isolation of Endothelial Cell Progenitors. Lab. Investig. 2001, 81, 875–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Tintut, Y.; Alfonso, Z.; Saini, T.; Radcliff, K.; Watson, K.; Boström, K.; Demer, L.L. Multilineage Potential of Cells from the Artery Wall. Circulation 2003, 108, 2505–2510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Majka, S.M.; Jackson, K.A.; Kienstra, K.A.; Majesky, M.W.; Goodell, M.A.; Hirschi, K.K. Distinct Progenitor Populations in Skeletal Muscle Are Bone Marrow Derived and Exhibit Different Cell Fates during Vascular Regeneration. J. Clin. Investig. 2003, 111, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bautch, V.L. Stem Cells and the Vasculature. Nat. Med. 2011, 17, 1437–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Psaltis, P.J.; Harbuzariu, A.; Delacroix, S.; Holroyd, E.W.; Simari, R.D. Resident Vascular Progenitor Cells—Diverse Origins, Phenotype, and Function. J. Cardiovasc. Transl. Res. 2011, 4, 161–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Tang, Z.; Wang, A.; Yuan, F.; Yan, Z.; Liu, B.; Chu, J.S.; Helms, J.A.; Li, S. Differentiation of Multipotent Vascular Stem Cells Contributes to Vascular Diseases. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Lin, C.-S.; Lue, T.F. Defining Vascular Stem Cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2013, 22, 1018–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Murray, I.R.; West, C.C.; Hardy, W.R.; James, A.W.; Park, T.S.; Nguyen, A.; Tawonsawatruk, T.; Lazzari, L.; Soo, C.; Péault, B. Natural History of Mesenchymal Stem Cells, from Vessel Walls to Culture Vessels. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2014, 71, 1353–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, L.; Issa Bhaloo, S.; Chen, T.; Zhou, B.; Xu, Q. Role of Resident Stem Cells in Vessel Formation and Arteriosclerosis. Circ. Res. 2018, 122, 1608–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Corselli, M.; Crisan, M.; Murray, I.R.; West, C.C.; Scholes, J.; Codrea, F.; Khan, N.; Péault, B. Identification of Perivascular Mesenchymal Stromal/Stem Cells by Flow Cytometry. Cytom. A 2013, 83, 714–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Craig, D.J.; James, A.W.; Wang, Y.; Tavian, M.; Crisan, M.; Péault, B.M. Blood Vessel Resident Human Stem Cells in Health and Disease. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2022, 11, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Howson, K.M.; Aplin, A.C.; Gelati, M.; Alessandri, G.; Parati, E.A.; Nicosia, R.F. The Postnatal Rat Aorta Contains Pericyte Progenitor Cells That Form Spheroidal Colonies in Suspension Culture. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2005, 289, C1396–C1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Iurlaro, M.; Scatena, M.; Zhu, W.-H.; Fogel, E.; Wieting, S.L.; Nicosia, R.F. Rat Aorta-Derived Mural Precursor Cells Express the Tie2 Receptor and Respond Directly to Stimulation by Angiopoietins. J. Cell Sci. 2003, 116, 3635–3643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Invernici, G.; Emanueli, C.; Madeddu, P.; Cristini, S.; Gadau, S.; Benetti, A.; Ciusani, E.; Stassi, G.; Siragusa, M.; Nicosia, R.; et al. Human Fetal Aorta Contains Vascular Progenitor Cells Capable of Inducing Vasculogenesis, Angiogenesis, and Myogenesis in Vitro and in a Murine Model of Peripheral Ischemia. Am. J. Pathol. 2007, 170, 1879–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Psaltis, P.J.; Simari, R.D. Vascular Wall Progenitor Cells in Health and Disease. Circ. Res. 2015, 116, 1392–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Klein, D. Vascular Wall-Resident Multipotent Stem Cells of Mesenchymal Nature within the Process of Vascular Remodeling: Cellular Basis, Clinical Relevance, and Implications for Stem Cell Therapy. Stem Cells Int. 2016, 2016, 1905846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Feng, R.; Ullah, M.; Chen, K.; Ali, Q.; Lin, Y.; Sun, Z. Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Mitigate Ageing-Associated Arterial Stiffness and Hypertension. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2020, 9, 1783869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nassiri, S.M.; Rahbarghazi, R. Interactions of Mesenchymal Stem Cells with Endothelial Cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2014, 23, 319–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pasquinelli, G.; Tazzari, P.L.; Vaselli, C.; Foroni, L.; Buzzi, M.; Storci, G.; Alviano, F.; Ricci, F.; Bonafè, M.; Orrico, C.; et al. Thoracic Aortas from Multiorgan Donors Are Suitable for Obtaining Resident Angiogenic Mesenchymal Stromal Cells. Stem Cells 2007, 25, 1627–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Da Silva Meirelles, L.; Chagastelles, P.C.; Nardi, N.B. Mesenchymal Stem Cells Reside in Virtually All Post-Natal Organs and Tissues. J. Cell Sci. 2006, 119, 2204–2213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Pacilli, A.; Pasquinelli, G. Vascular Wall Resident Progenitor Cells: A Review. Exp. Cell Res. 2009, 315, 901–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zaniboni, A.; Bernardini, C.; Alessandri, M.; Mangano, C.; Zannoni, A.; Bianchi, F.; Sarli, G.; Calzà, L.; Bacci, M.L.; Forni, M. Cells Derived from Porcine Aorta Tunica Media Show Mesenchymal Stromal-like Cell Properties in in Vitro Culture. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2014, 306, C322–C333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Zaniboni, A.; Bernardini, C.; Bertocchi, M.; Zannoni, A.; Bianchi, F.; Avallone, G.; Mangano, C.; Sarli, G.; Calzà, L.; Bacci, M.L.; et al. In Vitro Differentiation of Porcine Aortic Vascular Precursor Cells to Endothelial and Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2015, 309, C320–C331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Bernardini, C.; Bertocchi, M.; Zannoni, A.; Salaroli, R.; Tubon, I.; Dothel, G.; Fernandez, M.; Bacci, M.L.; Calzà, L.; Forni, M. Constitutive and LPS-Stimulated Secretome of Porcine Vascular Wall-Mesenchymal Stem Cells Exerts Effects on in Vitro Endothelial Angiogenesis. BMC Vet. Res. 2019, 15, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Dothel, G.; Bernardini, C.; Zannoni, A.; Spirito, M.R.; Salaroli, R.; Bacci, M.L.; Forni, M.; Ponti, F.D. Ex Vivo Effect of Vascular Wall Stromal Cells Secretome on Enteric Ganglia. World J. Gastroenterol. 2019, 25, 4892–4903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ringe, J.; Kaps, C.; Schmitt, B.; Büscher, K.; Bartel, J.; Smolian, H.; Schultz, O.; Burmester, G.R.; Häupl, T.; Sittinger, M. Porcine Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Induction of Distinct Mesenchymal Cell Lineages. Cell Tissue Res. 2002, 307, 321–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Casado, J.G.; Gomez-Mauricio, G.; Alvarez, V.; Mijares, J.; Tarazona, R.; Bernad, A.; Sanchez-Margallo, F.M. Comparative Phenotypic and Molecular Characterization of Porcine Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Different Sources for Translational Studies in a Large Animal Model. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2012, 147, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bharti, D.; Shivakumar, S.B.; Subbarao, R.B.; Rho, G.-J. Research Advancements in Porcine Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2016, 11, 78–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. La Mantia, D.; Bernardini, C.; Zannoni, A.; Salaroli, R.; Wang, C.; Bencivenni, S.; Forni, M. Efficacy of Stem Cell Therapy in Large Animal Models of Ischemic Cardiomyopathies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Animals 2022, 12, 749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Grøgaard, H.K.; Sigurjonsson, O.E.; Brekke, M.; Kløw, N.E.; Landsverk, K.S.; Lyberg, T.; Eriksen, M.; Egeland, T.; Ilebekk, A. Cardiac Accumulation of Bone Marrow Mononuclear Progenitor Cells after Intracoronary or Intravenous Injection in Pigs Subjected to Acute Myocardial Infarction with Subsequent Reperfusion. Cardiovasc. Revasc Med. 2007, 8, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Krause, U.; Harter, C.; Seckinger, A.; Wolf, D.; Reinhard, A.; Bea, F.; Dengler, T.; Hardt, S.; Ho, A.; Katus, H.A.; et al. Intravenous Delivery of Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells Limits Infarct Size and Improves Left Ventricular Function in the Infarcted Porcine Heart. Stem Cells Dev. 2007, 16, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Halkos, M.E.; Zhao, Z.-Q.; Kerendi, F.; Wang, N.-P.; Jiang, R.; Schmarkey, L.S.; Martin, B.J.; Quyyumi, A.A.; Few, W.L.; Kin, H.; et al. Intravenous Infusion of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Enhances Regional Perfusion and Improves Ventricular Function in a Porcine Model of Myocardial Infarction. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2008, 103, 525–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liao, S.; Zhang, Y.; Ting, S.; Zhen, Z.; Luo, F.; Zhu, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Sun, S.; Lai, W.-H.; Lian, Q.; et al. Potent Immunomodulation and Angiogenic Effects of Mesenchymal Stem Cells versus Cardiomyocytes Derived from Pluripotent Stem Cells for Treatment of Heart Failure. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2019, 10, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Charles, C.J.; Li, R.R.; Yeung, T.; Mazlan, S.M.I.; Lai, R.C.; de Kleijn, D.P.V.; Lim, S.K.; Richards, A.M. Systemic Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Reduce Myocardial Infarct Size: Characterization With MRI in a Porcine Model. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2020, 7, 601990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chamberlain, M.D.; West, M.E.D.; Lam, G.C.; Sefton, M.V. In Vivo Remodelling of Vascularizing Engineered Tissues. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2015, 43, 1189–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bollen, P.; Ellegaard, L. The Göttingen Minipig in Pharmacology and Toxicology. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 1997, 80 (Suppl. S2), 3–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Simianer, H.; Köhn, F. Genetic Management of the Göttingen Minipig Population. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 2010, 62, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Flisikowska, T.; Egli, J.; Flisikowski, K.; Stumbaum, M.; Küng, E.; Ebeling, M.; Schmucki, R.; Georges, G.; Singer, T.; Kurome, M.; et al. A Humanized Minipig Model for the Toxicological Testing of Therapeutic Recombinant Antibodies. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2022, 6, 1248–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Brenner, G.B.; Giricz, Z.; Garamvölgyi, R.; Makkos, A.; Onódi, Z.; Sayour, N.V.; Gergely, T.G.; Baranyai, T.; Petneházy, Ö.; Kőrösi, D.; et al. Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-Chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs. J. Vis. Exp. 2021, 170, e61901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Miyagawa, S.; Mizoguchi, H.; Fukushima, S.; Imanishi, Y.; Watabe, T.; Harada, A.; Sakai, Y.; Sawa, Y. New Regional Drug Delivery System by Direct Epicardial Placement of Slow-Release Prostacyclin Agonist Promise Therapeutic Angiogenesis in a Porcine Chronic Myocardial Infarction. J. Artif. Organs 2021, 24, 465–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Atiq, F.; Van de Wouw, J.; Sorop, O.; Heinonen, I.; De Maat, M.P.M.; Merkus, D.; Duncker, D.J.; Leebeek, F.W.G. Endothelial Dysfunction, Atherosclerosis, and Increase of von Willebrand Factor and Factor VIII: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Swine. Thromb. Haemost. 2021, 121, 676–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Leopold, J.A.; Loscalzo, J. Emerging Role of Precision Medicine in Cardiovascular Disease. Circ. Res. 2018, 122, 1302–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Bernardini, C.; Zannoni, A.; Turba, M.E.; Fantinati, P.; Tamanini, C.; Bacci, M.L.; Forni, M. Heat Shock Protein 70, Heat Shock Protein 32, and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Production and Their Effects on Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Apoptosis in Porcine Aortic Endothelial Cells. Cell Stress. Chaperones 2005, 10, 340–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Bernardini, C.; La Mantia, D.; Salaroli, R.; Zannoni, A.; Nauwelaerts, N.; Deferm, N.; Ventrella, D.; Bacci, M.L.; Sarli, G.; Bouisset, M.; et al. Development of a Pig Mammary Epithelial Cell Culture Model as a Non-Clinical Tool for Studying Epithelial Barrier—A Contribution from the IMI-ConcePTION Project. Animals 2021, 21, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cesarz, Z.; Tamama, K. Spheroid Culture of Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Stem Cells Int. 2016, 2016, 9176357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Segal, J.B.; McNamara, R.L.; Miller, M.R.; Kim, N.; Goodman, S.N.; Powe, N.R.; Robinson, K.; Yu, D.; Bass, E.B. The Evidence Regarding the Drugs Used for Ventricular Rate Control. J. Fam. Pract. 2000, 49, 47–59. [Google Scholar]
  47. Popov, A.F.; Dorge, H.; Hinz, J.; Schmitto, J.D.; Stojanovic, T.; Seipelt, R.; Didilis, V.; Schoendube, F.A. Accelerated Intimal Hyperplasia in Aortocoronary Internal Mammary Vein Grafts in Minipigs. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2008, 3, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Schuleri, K.H.; Boyle, A.J.; Centola, M.; Amado, L.C.; Evers, R.; Zimmet, J.M.; Evers, K.S.; Ostbye, K.M.; Scorpio, D.G.; Hare, J.M.; et al. The Adult Göttingen Minipig as a Model for Chronic Heart Failure after Myocardial Infarction: Focus on Cardiovascular Imaging and Regenerative Therapies. Comp. Med. 2008, 58, 568–579. [Google Scholar]
  49. Roh, J.; Hill, J.A.; Singh, A.; Valero-Muñoz, M.; Sam, F. Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Heterogeneous Syndrome, Diverse Preclinical Models. Circ. Res. 2022, 130, 1906–1925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Correia, C.; Wang, Q.-D.; Linhardt, G.; Carlsson, L.G.; Ulfenborg, B.; Walentinsson, A.; Rydén-Markinhutha, K.; Behrendt, M.; Wikström, J.; Sartipy, P.; et al. Unraveling the Metabolic Derangements Occurring in Non-Infarcted Areas of Pig Hearts With Chronic Heart Failure. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2021, 8, 753470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jacobsson, L. Comparison of Experimental Hypercholesterolemia and Atherosclerosis in Male and Female Mini-Pigs of the Göttingen Strain. Artery 1989, 16, 105–117. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  52. Manno, R.A.; Grassetti, A.; Oberto, G.; Nyska, A.; Ramot, Y. The Minipig as a New Model for the Evaluation of Doxorubicin-Induced Chronic Toxicity. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2016, 36, 1060–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ludvigsen, T.P.; Pedersen, S.F.; Vegge, A.; Ripa, R.S.; Johannesen, H.H.; Hansen, A.E.; Löfgren, J.; Schumacher-Petersen, C.; Kirk, R.K.; Pedersen, H.D.; et al. 18F-FDG PET/MR-Imaging in a Göttingen Minipig Model of Atherosclerosis: Correlations with Histology and Quantitative Gene Expression. Atherosclerosis 2019, 285, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Duvivier, V.; Creusot, S.; Broux, O.; Helbert, A.; Lesage, L.; Moreau, K.; Lesueur, N.; Gerard, L.; Lemaitre, K.; Provost, N.; et al. Characterization and Pharmacological Validation of a Preclinical Model of NASH in Göttingen Minipigs. J. Clin. Exp. Hepatol. 2022, 12, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Johansen, T.; Hansen, H.S.; Richelsen, B.; Malmlöf, R. The Obese Göttingen Minipig as a Model of the Metabolic Syndrome: Dietary Effects on Obesity, Insulin Sensitivity, and Growth Hormone Profile. Comp. Med. 2001, 51, 150–155. [Google Scholar]
  56. Ludvigsen, T.P.; Kirk, R.K.; Christoffersen, B.Ø.; Pedersen, H.D.; Martinussen, T.; Kildegaard, J.; Heegaard, P.M.H.; Lykkesfeldt, J.; Olsen, L.H. Göttingen Minipig Model of Diet-Induced Atherosclerosis: Influence of Mild Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetes on Lesion Severity and Markers of Inflammation Evaluated in Obese, Obese and Diabetic, and Lean Control Animals. J. Transl. Med. 2015, 13, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Caplan, A.I. Why Are MSCs Therapeutic? New Data: New Insight. J. Pathol. 2009, 217, 318–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bosch, P.; Pratt, S.L.; Stice, S.L. Isolation, Characterization, Gene Modification, and Nuclear Reprogramming of Porcine Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Biol. Reprod. 2006, 74, 46–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Liu, J.; Hu, Q.; Wang, Z.; Xu, C.; Wang, X.; Gong, G.; Mansoor, A.; Lee, J.; Hou, M.; Zeng, L.; et al. Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Myocardial Repair. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2004, 287, H501–H511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Jin, H.-F.; Kumar, B.M.; Kim, J.-G.; Song, H.-J.; Jeong, Y.-J.; Cho, S.-K.; Balasubramanian, S.; Choe, S.-Y.; Rho, G.-J. Enhanced Development of Porcine Embryos Cloned from Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2007, 51, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Mitchell, K.E.; Weiss, M.L.; Mitchell, B.M.; Martin, P.; Davis, D.; Morales, L.; Helwig, B.; Beerenstrauch, M.; Abou-Easa, K.; Hildreth, T.; et al. Matrix Cells from Wharton’s Jelly Form Neurons and Glia. Stem Cells 2003, 21, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Carlin, R.; Davis, D.; Weiss, M.; Schultz, B.; Troyer, D. Expression of Early Transcription Factors Oct-4, Sox-2 and Nanog by Porcine Umbilical Cord (PUC) Matrix Cells. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2006, 4, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Faast, R.; Harrison, S.J.; Beebe, L.F.S.; McIlfatrick, S.M.; Ashman, R.J.; Nottle, M.B. Use of Adult Mesenchymal Stem Cells Isolated from Bone Marrow and Blood for Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer in Pigs. Cloning Stem Cells 2006, 8, 166–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Sartore, S.; Lenzi, M.; Angelini, A.; Chiavegato, A.; Gasparotto, L.; De Coppi, P.; Bianco, R.; Gerosa, G. Amniotic Mesenchymal Cells Autotransplanted in a Porcine Model of Cardiac Ischemia Do Not Differentiate to Cardiogenic Phenotypes. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2005, 28, 677–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Kumar, B.M.; Yoo, J.-G.; Ock, S.-A.; Kim, J.-G.; Song, H.-J.; Kang, E.-J.; Cho, S.-K.; Lee, S.-L.; Cho, J.-H.; Balasubramanian, S.; et al. In Vitro Differentiation of Mesenchymal Progenitor Cells Derived from Porcine Umbilical Cord Blood. Mol. Cells 2007, 24, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  66. Huang, T.; He, D.; Kleiner, G.; Kuluz, J. Neuron-like Differentiation of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells from Infant Piglets in Vitro. J. Spinal Cord. Med. 2007, 30 (Suppl. S1), S35–S40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Agay, D.; Scherthan, H.; Forcheron, F.; Grenier, N.; Hérodin, F.; Meineke, V.; Drouet, M. Multipotent Mesenchymal Stem Cell Grafting to Treat Cutaneous Radiation Syndrome: Development of a New Minipig Model. Exp. Hematol. 2010, 38, 945–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hanson, S.E.; Kleinbeck, K.R.; Cantu, D.; Kim, J.; Bentz, M.L.; Faucher, L.D.; Kao, W.J.; Hematti, P. Local Delivery of Allogeneic Bone Marrow and Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Cutaneous Wound Healing in a Porcine Model. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2016, 10, E90–E100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Mohsin, S.; Troupes, C.D.; Starosta, T.; Sharp, T.E.; Agra, E.J.; Smith, S.; Duran, J.M.; Zalavadia, N.; Zhou, Y.; Kubo, H.; et al. Unique Features of Cortical Bone Stem Cells Associated With Repair of the Injured Heart. Circ. Res. 2015, 117, 1024–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Luu, N.T.; McGettrick, H.M.; Buckley, C.D.; Newsome, P.N.; Rainger, G.E.; Frampton, J.; Nash, G.B. Crosstalk between Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Endothelial Cells Leads to Downregulation of Cytokine-Induced Leukocyte Recruitment. Stem Cells 2013, 31, 2690–2702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lin, Y.-L.; Yet, S.-F.; Hsu, Y.-T.; Wang, G.-J.; Hung, S.-C. Mesenchymal Stem Cells Ameliorate Atherosclerotic Lesions via Restoring Endothelial Function. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2015, 4, 44–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Vorwald, C.E.; Joshee, S.; Leach, J.K. Spatial Localization of Endothelial Cells in Heterotypic Spheroids Influences Notch Signaling. J. Mol. Med. 2020, 98, 425–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Dominici, M.; Le Blanc, K.; Mueller, I.; Slaper-Cortenbach, I.; Marini, F.; Krause, D.; Deans, R.; Keating, A.; Prockop, D.; Horwitz, E. Minimal Criteria for Defining Multipotent Mesenchymal Stromal Cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy Position Statement. Cytotherapy 2006, 8, 315–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Bernardini, C.; Zannoni, A.; Bertocchi, M.; Tubon, I.; Fernandez, M.; Forni, M. Water/Ethanol Extract of Cucumis sativus L. Fruit Attenuates Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Inflammatory Response in Endothelial Cells. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2018, 18, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Animals 13 02601 g001
Figure 1. Summary scheme of the mpVW-MSCs and mpAECs isolation protocol. The image shows schematically the new protocol derived from two different methods, previously set up for the isolation of aortic endothelial cells and vascular wall mesenchymal stem cells obtained from hybrid commercial pigs. Minipig vascular wall mesenchymal stem cells (mpVW-MSCs); minipig aortic endothelial cells (mpAECs) (Created with BioRender.com, Agreement number: MR25PADPU8) [22,43].
Figure 1. Summary scheme of the mpVW-MSCs and mpAECs isolation protocol. The image shows schematically the new protocol derived from two different methods, previously set up for the isolation of aortic endothelial cells and vascular wall mesenchymal stem cells obtained from hybrid commercial pigs. Minipig vascular wall mesenchymal stem cells (mpVW-MSCs); minipig aortic endothelial cells (mpAECs) (Created with BioRender.com, Agreement number: MR25PADPU8) [22,43].
Animals 13 02601 g001
Animals 13 02601 g002
Figure 2. Representative images of thoracic aorta segments before enzymatic digestion with the typical three layers: the tunica intima (TI), the tunica media (TM), and the tunica adventitia (TA) (a); after two consecutive collagenase digestion treatments, the tunica intima was dissolved while the tunica media was partially digested (b); (a,b) scale bar = 1 mm. Representative images of small endothelial cellular islands after 24 h of isolation (c) and after reaching confluence (d,e). Representative images of VW-MSCs with elongated shape morphology at ~25% confluence (f) and the typical spindle shape fibroblast-like morphology at full confluence (g,h); scale bar 100 µm.
Figure 2. Representative images of thoracic aorta segments before enzymatic digestion with the typical three layers: the tunica intima (TI), the tunica media (TM), and the tunica adventitia (TA) (a); after two consecutive collagenase digestion treatments, the tunica intima was dissolved while the tunica media was partially digested (b); (a,b) scale bar = 1 mm. Representative images of small endothelial cellular islands after 24 h of isolation (c) and after reaching confluence (d,e). Representative images of VW-MSCs with elongated shape morphology at ~25% confluence (f) and the typical spindle shape fibroblast-like morphology at full confluence (g,h); scale bar 100 µm.
Animals 13 02601 g002
Animals 13 02601 g003
Figure 3. Representative images of mpAEC characterization: morphology (a) and cytometric analysis of CD31 marker: histogram shows the percentage of cells expressing or not CD31 in the green Area Under the Curve (AUC); the relative negative control consists of cells with no antibody incubation (blue AUC) (n = 3), (b), and the formation of a capillary-like endothelial network (c,d). Immunofluorescence analysis of VE-cadherin (e,f); nuclei are stained with DAPI (blue), (a,e,f) scale bar = 100 µm; (c,d) scale bar 500 µm.
Figure 3. Representative images of mpAEC characterization: morphology (a) and cytometric analysis of CD31 marker: histogram shows the percentage of cells expressing or not CD31 in the green Area Under the Curve (AUC); the relative negative control consists of cells with no antibody incubation (blue AUC) (n = 3), (b), and the formation of a capillary-like endothelial network (c,d). Immunofluorescence analysis of VE-cadherin (e,f); nuclei are stained with DAPI (blue), (a,e,f) scale bar = 100 µm; (c,d) scale bar 500 µm.
Animals 13 02601 g003
Animals 13 02601 g004
Figure 4. Representative images of mpVW-MSC morphology, showing the adhesive spindle shape cellular morphology with the formation of sporadic spheroidal structures, scale bar 100 µm (a); mpVW-MSC spheroid formation when cultured via the hanging drop method, scale bar 500 µm (b); mpVW-MSC morphology when the cells were grown in a PGM medium in sub-confluence and when reaching confluence (c,d), scale bar 100 µm.
Figure 4. Representative images of mpVW-MSC morphology, showing the adhesive spindle shape cellular morphology with the formation of sporadic spheroidal structures, scale bar 100 µm (a); mpVW-MSC spheroid formation when cultured via the hanging drop method, scale bar 500 µm (b); mpVW-MSC morphology when the cells were grown in a PGM medium in sub-confluence and when reaching confluence (c,d), scale bar 100 µm.
Animals 13 02601 g004
Animals 13 02601 g005
Figure 5. Representative image of immunophenotyping characterization of mpMVW-MSCs by a flow cytometry analysis. Each histogram shows the percentage of cells expressing or not markers in the Area Under the Curve (AUC); the relative negative control consists of cells with no antibody incubation (blue AUC), for CD45 and CD34, stacked histograms relative to positive and negative signals are shown (n = 3).
Figure 5. Representative image of immunophenotyping characterization of mpMVW-MSCs by a flow cytometry analysis. Each histogram shows the percentage of cells expressing or not markers in the Area Under the Curve (AUC); the relative negative control consists of cells with no antibody incubation (blue AUC), for CD45 and CD34, stacked histograms relative to positive and negative signals are shown (n = 3).
Animals 13 02601 g005
Animals 13 02601 g006
Figure 6. Representative images of mpVW-MSC osteogenic (a–d), chondrogenic (e–h) and adipogenic differentiation (i–l). After 21 days in specific pro-osteogenic medium, mpVW-MSCs formed bone enucleation aggregates positive to Alizarin red staining (a,c). Extracellular matrix production when cells were grown in pro-condrogenic medium (Alcian blue staining figure (e,g). Fat vesicle presence in mpVW-MSCs cultured in pro adipogenic medium (i,k). The negative control is represented by cells grown in standard culture conditions with PGM medium ((b,d) Alazarin red staining; (f,h) alcian blue staining, (j,l) Oil red staining). Scale bar (e,f,i,j) 100 µm; (c,d,g,h,k,l) 50 µm.
Figure 6. Representative images of mpVW-MSC osteogenic (a–d), chondrogenic (e–h) and adipogenic differentiation (i–l). After 21 days in specific pro-osteogenic medium, mpVW-MSCs formed bone enucleation aggregates positive to Alizarin red staining (a,c). Extracellular matrix production when cells were grown in pro-condrogenic medium (Alcian blue staining figure (e,g). Fat vesicle presence in mpVW-MSCs cultured in pro adipogenic medium (i,k). The negative control is represented by cells grown in standard culture conditions with PGM medium ((b,d) Alazarin red staining; (f,h) alcian blue staining, (j,l) Oil red staining). Scale bar (e,f,i,j) 100 µm; (c,d,g,h,k,l) 50 µm.
Animals 13 02601 g006
Table 1. List of antibodies used for immunofluorescence (IF) and flow cytometry (FC) analyses.
Table 1. List of antibodies used for immunofluorescence (IF) and flow cytometry (FC) analyses.
AntibodyP. NumberSpeciesSupplierDilution
Primary
CD45-APCK252-1E4mouseAbD Serotec10 µL/106 cells
CD90-APCAb139364mouseAbcam10 µL/106 cells
CD105-FITCAb53318mouseAbcam20 µL/106 cells
CD56-PE304606mouseBiolegend10 µL/106 cells
CD44-PerPC103036ratBiolegend10 µL/106 cells
CD34 unconjugatedAb81289rabbitAbcam1:60
CD31-unconjugatedMCA1746mouseAbD Serotec1:50
VE-CadherinMCA1748GAratAbD Serotec1:25
Secondary
Anti-Rabbit-PEAb97070goatAbcam1:200
Anti-Mouse-FITCF4143goatSigma-Aldrich1:100
Anti-rat-FITCF1763rabbitSigma-Aldrich1:200
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bernardini, C.; Mantia, D.L.; Salaroli, R.; Ventrella, D.; Elmi, A.; Zannoni, A.; Forni, M. Isolation of Vascular Wall Mesenchymal Stem Cells from the Thoracic Aorta of Adult Göttingen Minipigs: A New Protocol for the Simultaneous Endothelial Cell Collection. Animals 2023, 13, 2601. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13162601

AMA Style

Bernardini C, Mantia DL, Salaroli R, Ventrella D, Elmi A, Zannoni A, Forni M. Isolation of Vascular Wall Mesenchymal Stem Cells from the Thoracic Aorta of Adult Göttingen Minipigs: A New Protocol for the Simultaneous Endothelial Cell Collection. Animals. 2023; 13(16):2601. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13162601

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bernardini, Chiara, Debora La Mantia, Roberta Salaroli, Domenico Ventrella, Alberto Elmi, Augusta Zannoni, and Monica Forni. 2023. "Isolation of Vascular Wall Mesenchymal Stem Cells from the Thoracic Aorta of Adult Göttingen Minipigs: A New Protocol for the Simultaneous Endothelial Cell Collection" Animals 13, no. 16: 2601. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13162601

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop