Next Article in Journal
Automatically Identifying Sickness Behavior in Grazing Lambs with an Acceleration Sensor
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparison of Two Preoperative Radiographic Methods for Assessing Tibial Tuberosity Advancement to Achieve a Postoperative Patella Tendon Angle of 90° in Dogs
Previous Article in Journal
Equine Crofton Weed (Ageratina spp.) Pneumotoxicity: What Do We Know and What Do We Need to Know?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Internet-Based Survey on Physical Activity and Incidence of Injury in Active Working Dogs
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 13
Issue 13
10.3390/ani13132084
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Autologous Microfragmented Adipose Tissue on Healing of Tibial Plateau Levelling Osteotomies in Dogs: A Prospective Clinical Trial

by
Luca Pennasilico
1,
Caterina Di Bella
1,
Sara Sassaroli
1,
Alberto Salvaggio
2,
Francesco Roggiolani
2 and
Angela Palumbo Piccionello
1,*
1
School of Bioscience and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, 62024 Matelica, Italy
2
TéchneVet, 62024 Matelica, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2023, 13(13), 2084; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13132084
Submission received: 2 June 2023 / Revised: 20 June 2023 / Accepted: 21 June 2023 / Published: 23 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Diagnostic and Treatment Methods for Joint Diseases in Dogs and Cats)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Bone healing is a proliferative physiological process mediated by a complex interaction between biological and biomechanical mechanisms. Major complications of fracture repair and osteotomies include delayed union, non-union, and malunion. Adipose stem cells (ADSCs) have been shown to have positive effects on bone healing. In response to microenvironment signals, ADSCs can differentiate into osteogenic-like cells; moreover, they produce several cytokines and growth factors that are directly involved in bone healing. In clinical practice, ADSCs are often not administered as a pure isolate but rather as a constituent of microfragmented adipose tissue (MFAT) due to processing time and legislative restrictions. The purpose of this prospective, randomised, blinded, in vivo clinical study was to estimate the effect of autologous MFAT on bone healing in dogs who underwent tibial plateau levelling osteotomy. The results suggest that administration of MFAT is safe, cost-effective, minimally invasive, saves time, and could accelerate the bone healing of osteotomies or acute fractures. Additionally, the canine model adopted in this study could play a key role in developing successful treatments for translational medicine.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of autologous microfragmented adipose tissue (MFAT) applied after mechanical fragmentation and assess these effects radiographically in bone healing in dogs subjected to tibial plateau levelling osteotomy (TPLO). Twenty dogs with unilateral cranial cruciate ligament disease were enrolled and randomly assigned to the treatment group (MFAT) or the control group (NT). The MFAT group underwent TPLO and autologous MFAT intra-articular administration, while the NT group underwent TPLO alone. Adipose tissue was collected from the thigh region, and MFAT was obtained by mechanical fragmentation at the end of the surgery. The patients were subjected to X-ray examination preoperatively, immediately postoperatively (T0), and at 4 (T1) and 8 (T2) weeks postoperatively. Two radiographic scores that had previously been described for the evaluation of bone healing after TPLO were used. A 12-point scoring system (from 0 = no healing to 12 = complete remodelling) was used at T0, T1, and T2, while a 5-point scoring system (from 0 = no healing to 4 = 76–100% of healing) was used at T1 and T2. The median healing scores were significantly higher at T1 and T2 for the MFAT group compared with the NT group for the 12-point (p < 0.05) and 5-point (p < 0.05) scoring systems. The intra-articular injection of autologous microfragmented adipose tissue can accelerate bone healing after TPLO without complications.

1. Introduction

Cranial cruciate ligament rupture (CCLR) is the most common acquired cause of pelvic limb lameness in dogs [1,2]. The aetiology is not entirely clear, but degenerative or conformational causes (such as excessive inclination of the tibial plateau, intercondylar notch stenosis, or insufficient nutritive supply core of the ligament) are most commonly associated with a traumatic event [3,4,5,6]. Since 1952, several surgeries have been described for the treatment of CCLR in dogs; they can be subdivided into intra- or extracapsular reconstruction of the ligament and corrective osteotomies [7,8,9,10]. The latter are the most recent conception: they aim to modify the stifle joint biomechanics by neutralising the cranial tibial thrust (CTT) [11,12]. Among these procedures, tibial plateau levelling osteotomy (TPLO) is one of the most used and shows satisfactory outcomes [13,14,15,16].
Although it is a standardised surgical procedure with a high clinical success rate, TPLO is not without its complications; reported among these are mechanical failure with a loss of reduction prior to the attainment of bone union and delayed bone union or non-union [17,18,19,20]. Strategies to treat these consolidation delays are continuously being evaluated [19,21]. Since TPLO is executed following a standardised protocol, this standardisation of the technique facilitates the study of potential promotors of bone healing in a clinical setting [19,22,23,24,25].
Numerous studies have highlighted the osteogenic power of adipose stem cells (ADSCs) and their use, alone or in association with biomaterials, in the repair of bone defects or to increase the speed of bone healing [26,27,28]. Based on in vivo and in vitro studies, the induction of ADSCs leads to several changes: increased expression of osteogenic genes, including runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) and osterix (OSX); increased alkaline phosphatase activity and calcium phosphate mineralised extracellular matrix; and increased osteocalcin, osteopontin, and collagen type I protein [29,30]. In general, mesenchymal stem cells have a fundamental role in primary and secondary bone healing, differentiating into osteoblasts and chondrocytes to complete the repair of bone [31,32,33].
In clinical practice, autologous ADSCs are often not administered as a pure isolate but rather as a constituent of the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) [34,35]. The advantages of SVF include its abundant stem cell content, ease of extraction, the availability of tissue, and the minimal invasiveness of the harvest [36,37]. Certain articles have reported promising results regarding the application of SVF in bone healing [38,39]. Saxer et al. [39] demonstrated that SVF cells, without expansion or exogenous priming, can spontaneously form bone tissue and vessel structures within a fracture microenvironment. In addition, Kim et al. [40] highlighted the osteogenic potential of SVF in vitro and the increase in bone healing with a scaffold seeded with SVF compared with the scaffold alone in a rabbit model.
SVF isolation involves the use of enzymatic digestion of adipose tissue, a process that is expensive, time-consuming, and strictly regulated by the good manufacturing procedure of the European Parliament (EC regulation no. 1394/2007). Therefore, it can only be performed in specialised laboratories [41,42]. In this scenario, companies have developed automatic closed devices that allow the mechanical processing of adipose tissue [43,44]. The mechanical disaggregation of fat tissue results in microfragmented adipose tissue (MFAT), sometimes referred to as SVF from MFAT [37,44]. Microfragmented adipose tissue contains all the cells found in adipose tissue, including adipocytes, and preserves the microenvironment of the perivascular niche. For this reason, it has a greater paracrine and immunomodulatory effect then enzymatic SVF, albeit with fewer stem cells [44,45,46,47].
In human medicine, studies have shown the potentiality of MFAT administration in plastic surgery, wound and fistula healing, and in management of degenerative chronic diseases (osteoarthrosis and diabetes) [48,49,50,51,52]. On the other hand, the scientific literature concerning the use of MFAT in veterinary medicine is very limited [53,54,55,56]. To our knowledge, there have been no previous studies evaluating the effect of MFAT on bone healing in either human or veterinary medicine. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of autologous adipose micrografts, obtained by mechanical fragmentation, on the healing of procedural osteotomies in dogs subjected to TPLO.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethics Statement

This clinical study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Clinical Study in Animal Patients of the University of Camerino with approval number Prot. 06/23. Informed consent was obtained from the owners of all the dogs.

2.2. Animals

Twenty mixed-breed dogs with unilateral naturally occurring CCL disease were prospectively enrolled in the study. The diagnosis of complete CCL rupture was based on orthopaedic examination, and it was confirmed intraoperatively. Each dog was subjected to general, orthopaedic, and neurological physical examination, in order to exclude other relatable pathologies. In addition, the blood cell count and biochemistry profile were obtained. Dogs with concurrent orthopaedic, neurological, or metabolic disease were excluded from the study, as well as dogs with contralateral CCL disease. Only dogs with body condition scores between 4 and 6 (on a scale of 1–9) were considered. Ten dogs were randomly assigned to the treatment group (MFAT) and the other ten to the control group (NT).

2.3. Surgical Procedures

Each TPLO was performed by the same expert orthopaedic surgeon as described previously [13].
The subjects were positioned in dorsolateral recumbency. The affected limb and surgical field were aseptically prepared. A craniomedial surgical approach to the proximal tibia was performed with sartorius muscle dissection and popliteus muscle detachment from the bone caudal aspect. Cefazoline (Teva s.r.l., Milan, Italy) was administered intravenously (22 mg/kg) approximately 30 min before the skin incision, and a second administration was given after 90 min.
The plate and radial saw blade were selected by the surgeon according to the reported surgical technique indications and the surgeon’s choice [57]. DePuy Synthes TPLO Locking Plates (DePuy Synthes, Oberdorf, Switzerland) were used. All osteotomies were compressed with the placement of two conventional screws in compression. During the osteotomy and drilling, copious saline solution irrigation was used to prevent thermal bone necrosis. The surgical site was then sutured routinely using USP 2/0 absorbable monofilament thread (polydioxanone). Arthrotomy or arthroscopy was not performed on any dog. At the end of surgery, a soft padded bandage was applied for 48 h in order to reduce postoperative oedema. Rescue analgesia was administrated if needed. In the postoperative period, the dogs received antibiotic therapy for 6 days (Cefadroxil 20 mg/kg BID OS, Cefa-Cure Tabs, MSD Animal Health, Segrate, Italy) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory therapy for 10 days (carprofen 3 mg/kg SID OS; Rymadil, Zoetis s.r.l., Roma, Italy).

2.4. Isolation, Preparation and Inoculation of MFAT

During TPLO, about 4 g of thigh subcutaneous fat was harvested from dogs of the MFAT group. The fat was processed with the Rigenera® (Human Brain Wave, Turin, Italy) system, a mechanical disruptor of biological tissue. It consists of a motorised apparatus that allows a sterile and disposable capsule (Rigeneracons®) to mechanically disrupt the tissue placed inside. Each Rigeneracons® is made up of a helical blade controlled by an electric motor that rotates it at 80 rpm, thus allowing a precise, uniform, and constant cut. Furthermore, at the end of each helix there is a metal filter containing 100 holes of about 50 µm, each of which has six micro-scalpels. The desegregated and filtered tissue is collected at the bottom of the capsule and, through a syringe connector, it is possible to aspirate and use the preparation. Approximately 1 mL of the obtained MFAT was inoculated intra-articularly in dogs of the MFAT group; the dogs of the NT group did not receive an inoculation. Intra-articular inoculation of the stifle joint was performed with a medial para-patellar approach and an 18G needle.

2.5. Radiographic Evaluations

The patients were subject to an X-ray exam preoperatively, immediately after surgery (T0), and at 4 (T1) and 8 (T2) weeks after surgery. Radiographs of the stifle joint were taken in the mediolateral and caudocranial views with the animal sedated. Only patients that showed good compression (no visible gap) on a postoperative X-ray were included in the study. The mediolateral view was performed with the stifle and tarsus joints flexed at 90° and the femoral condyles superimposed over each other. The caudocranial view involved the medial cortex of the calcaneus intersecting the middle of the tibial trochlear with the patella superimposed centrally between the femoral condyles. At T0, each patient was evaluated for the degree of osteoarthritis (OA) according to a modified Kellgren–Lawrence scale from 0 (absence of OA) to 4 (highest degree of OA) [58].
Two radiographic scores, described previously [19,22] for the evaluation of bone healing after TPLO, were adopted by an expert (>20 years of experience) blinded radiologist. A 12-point scoring system (from 0 = no healing to 12 = complete remodelling) was used at T0, T1, and T2 (Table 1), while a 5-point scoring system (from 0 = no healing to 4 = 76–100% healing) was used at T1 and T2 (Table 2).

2.6. Statistical Analysis

A sample size analysis was performed considering our preliminary data in dogs. Power calculation was conducted for a two-tailed t-test considering the mean of the 5-point scoring system as the reference parameter, with a power of 0.95 and an alpha error of 0.05 (G*Power Version 3.1.9.3). The test suggested that a minimum of 16 dogs could be sufficient to detected significant differences, with an effect size of 1.30 [59]. Statistical analysis was performed using MedCalc software version 9.2.10. All data were tested for normality with the Shapiro–Wilk test and are reported as the mean ± standard deviation. Parametric data were analysed with a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measurements. A p-value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Enrolled Patients

The following patients were enrolled: four American Staffordshire Terriers, two American Pit Bull Terriers, two German Shepherds, three Labrador Retrievers, one Golden Retriever, one Rottweiler, two Cane Corso Italiano, two Deutscher Boxers, and three mixed-breed dogs. The mean weight was 30.37 ± 8.25 kg (31.98 ± 7.38 kg for the MFAT group; 28.75 ± 9.13 kg for the NT group; p = 0.396), and the mean age was 4 ± 1.74 years (3.9 ± 2.2 year for the MFAT group; 4.1 ± 1.52 years for the NT group; p = 0.806) at the time of surgery.

3.2. Surgical Variables

The mean preoperative tibial plateau angle (TPA) was 27° ± 2.06° (range 23–30°) and the mean postoperative TPA was 4.8° ± 1.4° (range 2–7°). There were no differences in the preoperative and postoperative TPA between the MFAT and NT groups (p = 0.92 and p = 0.789, respectively). Eighteen 3.5-mm TPLO plates (six 3.5-mm broad plates, eight 3.5-mm standard plates, and four 3.5-mm small plates) and two 2.7-mm TPLO plates were used. The mean surgical time was 70 ± 2.31 min in the MFAT group and 64 ± 3.97 in the NT group. The average preparation time for MFAT was 5 min (range 4–6 min).

3.3. Radiographic Examination

No subjects were excluded; all subjects showed satisfying radiographic compression of the tibial osteotomy immediately after surgery (T0). Preoperatively there were no differences in the osteoarthritis degree between the MFAT and NT groups (1.9 ± 1.1 and 2 ± 1.05, respectively) (p = 0.838). Radiographic evaluation was also performed at 4 and 8 weeks after surgery (T1 and T2, respectively) for all patients. Bone healing was significantly (p < 0.05) increased at T1 and T2 compared with T0 in both the MFAT and NT groups (Figure 1 and Figure 2). At T1, the 12- and 5-point scores were significantly (p < 0.05) higher for the MFAT group (7.28 ± 0.75 and 3 ± 0.57, respectively) compared with the NT group (5.71 ± 1.38 and 2.14 ± 0.69, respectively). At T2, the MFAT group showed a greater bone healing based on higher 12- and 5-point scores (10.85 ± 1.77 and 3.85 ± 0.37, respectively) than the NT group (9.71 ± 1.6 and 3.28 ± 0.48, respectively) (p < 0.05) (Figure 3 and Figure 4).
There were significant differences (p < 0.05) in the subjective degree of callus formation and the degree of rounding of the distal step at the osteotomy site between the MFAT group (2.6 ± 0.51 and 1.3 ± 0.48, respectively) and the NT group (1.6 ± 0.69 and 1 ± 0.66, respectively) at T1. At T2, the differences in the subjective degree of callus formation and the degree of rounding of the distal step at the osteotomy site were significantly different (p < 0.05) between the MFAT group (3.6 ± 0.51 and 1.8 ± 0.42, respectively) and the NT group (2.9 ± 0.73 and 1.6 ± 0.51, respectively) (Figure 5 and Figure 6). In addition, there were significant differences (p < 0.05) in the 12-point score, the 5-point score, the subjective degree of callus formation, and the degree of rounding of the distal step at the osteotomy site in the same group between T1 and T2.

4. Discussion

Although some studies have demonstrated that ADSCs can promote bone healing in certain bone segments, this is the first study to evaluate the efficacy of an adipose autologous micrograft on the acute bone healing of osteotomy gaps in subjects undergoing TPLO. Our results show a significantly stronger osteogenic response at 30 days post-operatively compared with the group not having received MFAT. These results can be attributed to the effectiveness of the complex heterogeneous mixture of cells in MFAT: ADSCs, endothelial progenitor cells, smooth muscle cells, pericytes, fibroblasts, preadipocytes, myeloid cells, haematopoietic cells, monocytes, lymphocytes, and granulocytes, as described previously [60,61].
The stem cells contained in MFAT are directly involved in the bone remodelling process. Specifically, they can differentiate into osteoblasts to promote bone formation and to secrete various cytokines which stimulate the differentiation of progenitor cells into endothelial cells to promote neoangiogenesis, with a beneficial effect on bone healing. In particular, ADSCs upregulate the expression of angiogenic (hepatocyte growth factor [HGF] and vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF]), haematopoietic (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF]), and bone-formation-promoting (bone morphogenetic protein 2 [BMP-2] and transforming growth factor beta [TGF-β]) cytokines [62]. In other words, ADSCs favour the deposition of bone tissue by stimulating osteogenesis and angiogenesis. The literature mostly describes the use of pure stem cells together with autologous or synthetic scaffolds. The results are promising, especially in the treatment of bone defects; however, Topleau et al. [63] recently reported that SVF can also induce osteogenesis without invasive techniques involving bone grafting or alloplastic scaffolds. Saxer et al. [39] have even demonstrated that SVF can form vascular structures and bone tissue within a fracture, without expansion or exogenous priming. MFAT increases TGF-β1 expression in rats with fractures and large bone defects. TGF-β1 is a growth factor that modulates bone healing primarily through the stimulation of undifferentiated mesenchymal cells by inducing osteoblast proliferation [64,65,66].
In our hands, the harvesting and preparation of the autologous subcutaneous tissue by mechanical disaggregation was simple and fast: it took no more than 6 min in total. Compared with bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells, MFAT is an easily accessible and rich source of stem cells that can be prepared intraoperatively with minimal manipulation and no expansion. Overall, there are several characteristics of adipose tissue that have made it the most promising and appreciated source of stem cells: less painful sampling and a stem cell yield 500 times higher than that obtained from bone marrow (only 0.001–0.01% of the harvested bone marrow cells are mesenchymal stem cells), especially in elderly subjects [66,67,68,69,70]. For these reasons, in clinical routine, MFAT is often used rather than pure stem cells from bone marrow [45,71].
Several techniques, alone or in combination, have been described for nonenzymatic isolation of SVF, including filtration, centrifugation, vibration, disruption, shearing, and vortexing. Using a mechanical disruptor to obtain MFAT is easy, affordable (with a relatively low cost of equipment and consumables), and relatively quick [72]. Mechanical procedures for isolating SVF from adipose tissue represent a valid alternative to the enzymatic method, bypassing the ‘minimal manipulation’ limits strictly regulated by European laws [73]. In accordance with the human literature [74], in a recent study involving dogs [43], researchers sampled adipose tissue from the thigh. Subcutaneous adipose tissue is a more accessible and abundant source of stem cells than visceral adipose tissue [75]. Conversely, it represents a less suitable sampling site in older or emaciated subjects [76,77]. In our case, there were no difficulties in fat tissue collection, which was performed at the same time as the TPLO surgical approach.
Fat-tissue excision could provide a much higher number of nucleated cells compared with liposuction [78]. Liposuction involves the use of vacuum pressure that is more traumatic for the tissue, leading to adipocyte structural disruption [79]. On the contrary, direct excision represents a more delicate harvesting technique and creates large fat particles that preserve stromal constituents, providing structural support for adipocytes and proliferating stem cells [80]. In addition, a tumescent solution used for liposuction can reduce ADSC survival [81]. The fragmentation of adipose tissue represents a suitable mechanical approach with a cell yield and viability that are comparable to enzymatic procedures. According to the literature, we think that, to date, MFAT is the way to go in clinical regenerative applications involving adipose tissue due to processing time and legislative restrictions [82].
MFAT was inoculated intra-articularly immediately after surgery. As reported by Taroni et al. [25], after TPLO surgery, mesenchymal stem cells and their secreted substances contained in the synovial fluid come into contact with the osteotomy site. This route of administration is minimally invasive (only one injection with an 18G needle) and does not intervene directly at the osteotomy site. Therefore, this simple procedure lends itself to being used easily and speedily in a clinical setting.
In our study, the majority of subjects in both groups showed >70% radiographic bone healing with at least three continuous cortices 8 weeks after TPLO. However, the MFAT group showed increased bone healing and callus density compared with the NT group at both T1 and T2. In particular, the MFAT group showed an acceleration of bone healing at the first follow-up (4 weeks after TPLO). Callus formation, a ‘step’ distal to the osteotomy, and reduced visibility of the osteotomy line were significantly increased in the MFAT group at the latest follow-up (T2). The T1 results agree with a similar study evaluating the effect of ADSCs on bone healing in dogs undergoing tibial tuberosity advancement surgery; however, the results did not show significant differences between the treated group and the control group in the subsequent follow-up (at 60 days) [83]. Franco et al. [84] reported that the use of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in association with ADSC administration stimulated bone healing after a tibial fracture. They reported promising results: in their study, clinical bone healing occurred on average 28.5 and 70.3 days after treatment, respectively, in the stem cell and control groups. The use of a minimally invasive surgical approach in fracture repair preserves soft tissue blood supply (especially from muscle structures), periosteal vasculature, and early fracture haematoma. The MIPO technique and ADSC administration play a key role in promoting and accelerating callus formation, maturation, and remodelling by protecting the vascular network and enhancing neoangiogenesis. These two techniques in combination could certainly yield very interesting results and, above all, fully embrace the goal of minimal invasiveness if MFAT is used as source of ADSCs.
In contrast to some previous studies [23,85], which evaluated radiographic bone healing after TPLO using nonspecific scales, we assessed radiographic assessment by using two radiographic scores that have been described for the evaluation of bone healing after TPLO with more accurate results and a minimal margin of error. For this reason, the radiographic examination included two orthogonal TPLO views (mediolateral and caudocranial). We chose to assess bone healing with X-ray examination because it is widely available and has great practicality.
Among the limitations of the study, we can include the lack of a second-level diagnostic technique such as computed tomography and a histology that could characterise the formation of the bone callus. However, according to Italian legislation, clinical patients cannot be subjected to radiation or a bone biopsy if they do not need it (i.e., if it is only for research purposes). Other limitations of this study include the small number of cases enrolled and the lack of an intermediate time between T1 and T2.
In the future, it might be interesting to evaluate the progression of osteoarthritis in the knee joint treated with MFAT after TPLO surgery compared with a control group.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we can state that the mechanical disaggregation of adipose tissue represents a rapid and easy-to-perform method to prepare autologous MFAT that accelerates bone healing after an osteotomy without complications. Additional studies are needed to truly understand the effect of MFAT on bone healing in pathological conditions that can lead to delayed union or non-union.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, L.P. and A.P.P.; methodology, L.P. and C.D.B.; formal analysis, L.P., A.S., F.R. and S.S.; investigation, L.P., A.S., F.R., S.S. and A.P.P.; resources, L.P. and A.P.P.; data curation, L.P. and C.D.B.; writing—original draft preparation, L.P.; writing—review and editing, A.P.P.; visualisation, C.D.B.; supervision, A.P.P.; project administration, A.P.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Animal Welfare Body of the University of Camerino and received formal institutional approval in accordance with national and European law, with approval number Prot. 06/23.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The clinical data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Witsberger, T.H.; Villamil, J.A.; Schultz, L.G.; Hahn, A.W.; Cook, J.L. Prevalence of and risk factors for hip dysplasia and cranial cruciate ligament deficiency in dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2008, 232, 1818–1824. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Sellon, D.C.; Marcellin-Little, D.J. Risk factors for cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs participating in canine agility. BMC Vet. Res. 2022, 18, 39. [Google Scholar]
  3. Griffon, D.J. A review of the pathogenesis of canine cranial cruciate ligament disease as a basis for future preventive strategies. Vet. Surg. 2010, 39, 399–409. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Comerford, E.J.; Smith, K.; Hayashi, K. Update on the aetiopathogenesis of canine cranial cruciate ligament disease. Vet. Comp. Orthop. Traumatol. 2011, 24, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Terhaar, H.M.; Muir, P.; Baker, L.A.; Binversie, E.E.; Chi, J.; Sample, S.J. Contribution of habitual activity to cruciate ligament rupture in Labrador retrievers. Vet. Comp. Orthop. Traumatol. 2020, 33, 82–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kyllar, M.; Čížek, P. Cranial cruciate ligament structure in relation to the tibial plateau slope and intercondylar notch width in dogs. J. Vet. Sci. 2018, 19, 699–707. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bergh, M.S.; Sullivan, C.; Ferrell, C.L.; Troy, J.; Budsberg, S.C. Systematic review of surgical treatments for cranial cruciate ligament disease in dogs. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 2014, 50, 315–321. [Google Scholar]
  8. Moore, K.W.; Read, R.A. Cranial cruciate ligament rupture in the dog—A retrospective study comparing surgical techniques. Aust. Vet. J. 1995, 72, 281–285. [Google Scholar]
  9. Arnoczky, S.P. The over-the-top procedure: A technique for anterior cruciate ligament substitution in the dog. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 1979, 15, 283–290. [Google Scholar]
  10. Geels, J.J.; Roush, J.K.; Hoskinson, J.J.; McLaughlin, R.M. Evaluation of an intracapsular technique for the treatment of cranial cruciate ligament rupture. Vet. Comp. Orthop. Traumatol. 2000, 13, 197–203. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kim, S.E.; Pozzi, A.; Kowaleski, M.P.; Lewis, D.D. Tibial osteotomies for cranial cruciate ligament insufficiency in dogs. Vet. Surg. 2008, 37, 111–125. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gordon-Evans, W.J.; Griffon, D.J.; Bubb, C.; Knap, K.M.; Sullivan, M.; Evans, R.B. Comparison of lateral fabellar suture and tibial plateau leveling osteotomy techniques for treatment of dogs with cranial cruciate ligament disease. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2013, 243, 675–680. [Google Scholar]
  13. Slocum, B.; Slocum, T.D. Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy for repair of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in the canine. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small Anim. Pract. 1993, 23, 777–795. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hans, E.C.; Barnhart, M.D.; Kennedy, S.C.; Naber, S.J. Comparison of complications following tibial tuberosity advancement and tibial plateau levelling osteotomy in very large and giant dogs 50 kg or more in body weight. Vet. Comp. Orthop. Traumatol. 2017, 30, 299–305. [Google Scholar]
  15. Krotscheck, U.; Nelson, S.A.; Todhunter, R.J.; Stone, M.; Zhang, Z. Long term functional outcome of tibial tuberosity advancement vs. tibial plateau leveling osteotomy and extracapsular repair in a heterogeneous population of dogs. Vet. Surg. 2016, 45, 261–268. [Google Scholar]
  16. Corr, S.A.; Brown, C. A comparison of outcomes following tibial plateau levelling osteotomy and cranial tibial wedge osteotomy procedures. Vet. Comp. Orthop. Traumatol. 2007, 20, 312–319. [Google Scholar]
  17. Fitzpatrick, N.; Solano, M.A. Predictive variables for complications after TPLO with stifle inspection by arthrotomy in 1000 consecutive dogs. Vet. Surg. 2010, 39, 460–474. [Google Scholar]
  18. Conkling, A.L.; Bennett Fagin, R.; Daye, M. Comparison of tibial plateau angle changes after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy fixation with conventional or locking screw technology. Vet. Surg. 2010, 39, 475–481. [Google Scholar]
  19. Franklin, S.P.; Burke, E.E.; Holmes, S.P. The effect of platelet-rich plasma on osseous healing in dogs undergoing high tibial osteotomy. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0177597. [Google Scholar]
  20. Bergh, M.S.; Peirone, B. Complications of tibial plateau levelling osteotomy in dogs. Vet. Comp. Orthop. Traumatol. 2012, 25, 349–358. [Google Scholar]
  21. Bhan, K.; Patel, R.; Hasan, K.; Pimplé, M.; Sharma, S.; Nandwana, V.; Basta, M. Fracture nonunions and delayed unions treated with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy: A clinical series. Cureus 2021, 13, e17067. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Kieves, N.R.; MacKay, C.S.; Adducci, K.; Rao, S.; Goh, C.; Palmer, R.H.; Duerr, F.M. High energy focused shock wave therapy accelerates bone healing. Vet. Comp. Orthop. Traumatol. 2015, 28, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Kieves, N.R.; Canapp, S.O.; Lotsikas, P.J.; Christopher, S.A.; Leasure, C.S.; Canapp, D.; Gavin, P.R. Effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on radiographic healing of tibial plateau leveling osteotomies in dogs: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Vet. Surg. 2018, 47, 614–622. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Stewart, S.K. Fracture non-union: A review of clinical challenges and future research needs. Malays. Orthop. J. 2019, 13, 1. [Google Scholar]
  25. Taroni, M.; Cabon, Q.; Fèbre, M.; Cachon, T.; Saulnier, N.; Carozzo, C.; Maddens, S.; Labadie, F.; Robert, C.; Viguier, E. Evaluation of the effect of a single intra-articular injection of allogeneic neonatal mesenchymal stromal cells compared to oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory treatment on the postoperative musculoskeletal status and gait of dogs over a 6-month period after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy: A pilot study. Front. Vet. Sci. 2017, 4, 83. [Google Scholar]
  26. Akpancar, S.; Tatar, O.; Turgut, H.; Akyildiz, F.; Ekinci, S. The current perspectives of stem cell therapy in orthopedic surgery. Arch. Trauma Res. 2016, 5, e37976. [Google Scholar]
  27. Yoshida, Y.; Matsubara, H.; Fang, X.; Hayashi, K.; Nomura, I.; Ugaji, S.; Hamada, T.; Tsuchiya, H. Adipose-derived stem cell sheets accelerate bone healing in rat femoral defects. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0214488. [Google Scholar]
  28. Rada, T.; Reis, R.L.; Gomes, M.L. Adipose tissue-derived stem cells and their application in bone and cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. 2009, 15, 113–125. [Google Scholar]
  29. Tapp, H.; Hanley, E.N., Jr.; Patt, J.C.; Gruber, H.E. Adipose-derived stem cells: Characterization and current application in orthopaedic tissue repair. Exp. Biol. Med. 2009, 234, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  30. Qomi, R.T.; Sheykhhasan, M. Adipose-derived stromal cell in regenerative medicine: A review. World J. Stem Cells. 2017, 9, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Gou, W.; Lu, Q.; Peng, J.; Lu, S. Role of mesenchymal stem cells in bone regeneration and fracture repair: A review. Int. Orthop. 2013, 37, 2491–2498. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ghiasi, M.S.; Chen, J.; Vaziri, A.; Rodriguez, E.K.; Nazarian, A. Bone fracture healing in mechanobiological modeling: A review of principles and methods. Bone Rep. 2017, 6, 87–100. [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhu, H.; Liu, Y.L.; Chen, J.D.; Li, H.; Liu, Y.X.; Xu, F.F.; Jang, X.X.; Zhang, Y.; Mao, N. Effect of osteogenically and adipogenically differentiated bone mesenchymal stem cells from mouse on osteoclast formation. Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 2012, 20, 1187–1190. [Google Scholar]
  34. Han, S.; Sun, H.M.; Hwang, K.C.; Kim, S.W. Adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction cells: Update on clinical utility and efficacy. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 2015, 25, 145–152. [Google Scholar]
  35. Gentile, P.; Sterodimas, A.; Pizzicannella, J.; Dionisi, L.; De Fazio, D.; Calabrese, C.; Garcovich, S. Systematic review: Allogenic use of stromal vascular fraction (SVF) and decellularized extracellular matrices (ECM) as advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMP) in tissue regeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4982. [Google Scholar]
  36. Mehranfar, S.; Rad, I.A.; Mostafav, E.; Akbarzadeh, A. The use of stromal vascular fraction (SVF), platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and stem cells in the treatment of osteoarthritis: An overview of clinical trials. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2019, 47, 882–890. [Google Scholar]
  37. Palumbo Piccionello, A.; Riccio, V.; Senesi, L.; Volta, A.; Pennasilico, L.; Botto, R.; Rossi, G.; Tambella, A.M.; Galosi, L.; Marini, C.; et al. Adipose micro-grafts enhance tendinopathy healing in ovine model: An in vivo experimental perspective study. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2021, 10, 1544–1560. [Google Scholar]
  38. Rhee, S.C.; Ji, Y.H.; Gharibjanian, N.A.; Dhong, E.S.; Park, S.H.; Yoon, E.S. In vivo evaluation of mixtures of uncultured freshly isolated adipose-derived stem cells and demineralized bone matrix for bone regeneration in a rat critically sized calvarial defect model. Stem Cells Dev. 2011, 20, 233–242. [Google Scholar]
  39. Saxer, F.; Scherberich, A.; Todorov, A.; Studer, P.; Miot, S.; Schreiner, S.; Guven, S.; Tchang, L.A.H.; Haugh, M.; Heberer, M.; et al. Implantation of stromal vascular fraction progenitors at bone fracture sites: From a rat model to a first-in-man study. Stem Cells 2016, 34, 2956–2966. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kim, A.; Kim, D.H.; Song, H.R.; Kang, W.H.; Kim, H.J.; Lim, H.C.; Cho, D.G.; Bae, J.H. Repair of rabbit ulna segmental bone defect using freshly isolated adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction. Cytotherapy 2012, 14, 296–305. [Google Scholar]
  41. François, P.; Rusconi, G.; Arnaud, L.; Mariotta, L.; Giraudo, L.; Minonzio, G.; Veran, J.; Bertrand, B.; Dumoulin, C.; Grimaud, F.; et al. Inter-center comparison of good manufacturing practices-compliant stromal vascular fraction and proposal for release acceptance criteria: A review of 364 productions. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2021, 12, 373. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. De Francesco, F.; Mannucci, S.; Conti, G.; Dai Prè, E.; Sbarbati, A.; Riccio, M. A non-enzymatic method to obtain a fat tissue derivative highly enriched in adipose stem cells (ASCs) from human lipoaspirates: Preliminary results. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2061. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. De Francesco, F.; Riccio, V.; Biswas, R.; Busato, A.; Di Bella, C.; Serri, E.; Sbarbati, A.; Zavan, B.; Riccio, M.; Palumbo Piccionello, A. In Vitro characterization of canine microfragmented adipose tissue non-enzymatically extracted from the thigh and lumbar regions. Animals 2021, 11, 3231. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Tremolada, C. Microfractured Adipose Tissue Graft (lipogems) and Regenerative Surgery. J. Orthop. Res. Ther. 2022, 7, 1210. [Google Scholar]
  45. Vezzani, B.; Shaw, I.; Lesme, H.; Yong, L.; Khan, N.; Tremolada, C.; Péault, B. Higher pericyte content and secretory activity of microfragmented human adipose tissue compared to enzymatically derived stromal vascular fraction. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2018, 7, 876–886. [Google Scholar]
  46. Copcu, H.E. A new classification for adipose-derived stromal-cell systems. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2022, 10, e4712. [Google Scholar]
  47. Trivisonno, A.; Alexander, R.W.; Baldari, S.; Cohen, S.R.; Di Rocco, G.; Gentile, P.; Magalon, G.; Magalon, J.; Miller, R.B.; Womack, H.; et al. Intraoperative strategies for minimal manipulation of autologous adipose tissue for cell-and tissue-based therapies: Concise review. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2019, 8, 1265–1271. [Google Scholar]
  48. Raffaini, M.; Tremolada, C. Micro fractured and purified adipose tissue graft (Lipogems®) can improve the orthognathic surgery outcomes both aesthetically and in postoperative healing. CellR4 2014, 2, e1118. [Google Scholar]
  49. Striano, R.D.; Battista, V.; Bilboo, N. Non-responding knee pain with osteoarthritis, meniscus and ligament tears treated with ultrasound guided autologous, micro-fragmented and minimally manipulated adipose tissue. Open J. Regen. Med. 2017, 6, 17–26. [Google Scholar]
  50. Lonardi, R.; Leone, N.; Gennai, S.; Trevisi Borsari, G.; Covic, T.; Silingardi, R. Autologous micro-fragmented adipose tissue for the treatment of diabetic foot minor amputations: A randomized controlled single-center clinical trial (MiFrAADiF). Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2019, 10, 223. [Google Scholar]
  51. Cattaneo, G.; De Caro, A.; Napoli, F.; Chiapale, D.; Trada, P.; Camera, A. Micro-fragmented adipose tissue injection associated with arthroscopic procedures in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2018, 19, 176. [Google Scholar]
  52. Giori, A.; Tremolada, C.; Vailati, R.; Navone, S.E.; Marfia, G.; Caplan, A.I. Recovery of function in anal incontinence after micro-fragmented fat graft (Lipogems®) injection: Two years follow up of the first 5 cases. CellR4 2015, 3, e1544. [Google Scholar]
  53. Botto, R.; Riccio, V.; Galosi, L.; Rossi, G.; Vincenzetti, S.; Tambella, A.M.; De Francesco, F.; Pennasilico, L.; Riccio, M.; Salvaggio, A.; et al. Effects of intra-articular autologous adipose micrograft for the treatment of osteoarthritis in dogs: A prospective, randomized, controlled study. Animals 2022, 12, 1844. [Google Scholar]
  54. Pennasilico, L.; Di Bella, C.; Botto, R.; Murgia, E.; Riccio, V.; Piccionello, A.P. Use of micro-grafts in a chronic infected open wound after limb amputation in a cat. Vet. Med. 2021, 66, 448–455. [Google Scholar]
  55. Zeira, O.; Scaccia, S.; Pettinari, L.; Ghezzi, E.; Asiag, N.; Martinelli, L.; Zahirpour, D.; Dumas, M.P.; Konar, M.; Lupi, D.V.; et al. Intra-articular administration of autologous micro-fragmented adipose tissue in dogs with spontaneous osteoarthritis: Safety, feasibility, and clinical outcomes. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2018, 7, 819–828. [Google Scholar]
  56. Pavarotti, G.S.; Hivernaud, V.; Brincin, M.; Roche, R.; Barreau, P.; Festy, F.; Gauthier, O. Evaluation of a single intra-articular injection of autologous adipose tissue for the treatment of osteoarthritis: A prospective clinical study in dogs. Vet. Comp. Orthop. Traumatol. 2020, 33, 258–266. [Google Scholar]
  57. Fujino, H.; Honnami, M.; Mochizuki, M. Preoperative planning for tibial plateau leveling osteotomy based on proximal tibial width. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2020, 82, 661–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Kohn, M.D.; Sassoon, A.A.; Fernando, N.D. Classification in btief: Kellgren-Lawrence classification of osteoarthritis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2016, 474, 1886–1893. [Google Scholar]
  59. Faul, F.; Erdfelder, E.; Lang, A.G.; Bunchner, A. G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 2007, 39, 175–191. [Google Scholar]
  60. Nguyen, A.; Guo, J.; Banyard, D.A.; Fadavi, D.; Toranto, J.D.; Wirth, G.A.; Payadar, K.J.; Evans, G.R.D.; Widgerow, A.D. Stromal vascular fraction: A regenerative reality? Part 1: Current concepts and review of the literature. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthetic Surg. 2016, 69, 170–179. [Google Scholar]
  61. Busato, A.; De Francesco, F.; Biswas, R.; Mannucci, S.; Conti, G.; Fracasso, G.; Conti, F.; Riccio, V.; Riccio, M.; Sbarbati, A. Simple and rapid non-enzymatic procedure allows the isolation of structurally preserved connective tissue micro-fragments enriched with SVF. Cells 2020, 10, 36. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  62. Trzyna, A.; Banaś-Ząbczyk, A. Adipose-derived stem cells secretome and its potential application in “stem cell-free therapy”. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 878. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  63. Toplu, G.; Ozcelik, D.; Serin, M.; Erdem, H.; Topacoglu, A.T. Adipose tissue-derived stromal vascular fraction increases osteogenesis in an experimental design zygomatic bone defect model. J. Craniofacial Surg. 2017, 28, 2179–2182. [Google Scholar]
  64. Poniatowski, Ł.A.; Wojdasiewicz, P.; Gasik, R.; Szukiewicz, D. Transforming growth factor Beta family: Insight into the role of growth factors in regulation of fracture healing biology and potential clinical applications. Mediat. Inflamm. 2015, 2015, 137823. [Google Scholar]
  65. Sarahrudi, K.; Thomas, A.; Mousavi, M.; Kaiser, G.; Köttstorfer, J.; Kecht, M.; Hajdu, S.; Aharinejad, S. Elevated transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-β1) levels in human fracture healing. Injury 2011, 42, 833–837. [Google Scholar]
  66. Sananta, P.; Dradjat, R.S.; Rosandi, R.D.; Siahaan, L.D. TGF-1 biomarker level evaluation on fracture healing in a murine model with a bone defect after stromal vascular fraction application. Med. Glas 2022, 19, 63–67. [Google Scholar]
  67. Bukowska, J.; Szóstek-Mioduchowska, A.Z.; Kopcewicz, M.; Walendzik, K.; Machcińska, S.; Gawrońska-Kozak, B. Adipose-derived stromal/stem cells from large animal models: From basic to applied science. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 2021, 17, 719–738. [Google Scholar]
  68. Strioga, M.; Viswanathan, S.; Darinskas, A.; Slaby, O.; Michalek, J. Same or not the same? Comparison of adipose tissue-derived versus bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem and stromal cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2012, 21, 2724–2752. [Google Scholar]
  69. Tsuji, W.; Rubin, J.P.; Marra, K.G. Adipose-derived stem cells: Implications in tissue regeneration. World J. Stem Cells 2014, 6, 312. [Google Scholar]
  70. El-Badawy, A.; Amer, M.; Abdelbaset, R.; Sherif, S.N.; Abo-Elela, M.; Ghallab, Y.H.; Abdelhamid, H.; Ismail, Y.; El-Badri, N. Adipose stem cells display higher regenerative capacities and more adaptable electro-kinetic properties compared to bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 37801. [Google Scholar]
  71. Guo, J.; Nguyen, A.; Banyard, D.A.; Fadavi, D.; Toranto, J.D.; Wirth, G.A.; Paydar, K.Z.; Evans, G.R.D.; Widgerow, A.D. Stromal vascular fraction: A regenerative reality? Part 2: Mechanisms of regenerative action. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthetic Surg. 2016, 69, 180–188. [Google Scholar]
  72. Oberbauer, E.; Steffenhagen, C.; Wurzer, C.; Gabriel, C.; Redl, H.; Wolbank, S. Enzymatic and non-enzymatic isolation systems for adipose tissue-derived cells: Current state of the art. Cell Regen. 2015, 4, 7. [Google Scholar]
  73. Yoshimura, K.; Shigeura, T.; Matsumoto, D.; Sato, T.; Takaki, Y.; Aiba-Kojima, E.; Sato, K.; Inoue, K.; Koshima, I.; Gonda, K. Characterization of freshly isolated and cultured cells derived from the fatty and fluid portions of liposuction aspirates. J. Cell Phys. 2006, 208, 64–76. [Google Scholar]
  74. Dai Prè, E.; Busato, A.; Mannucci, S.; Vurro, F.; De Francesco, F.; Riccio, V.; Sbarbati, A. In vitro characterization of adipose stem cells non-enzymatically extracted from the thigh and abdomen. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3081. [Google Scholar]
  75. Neupane, M.; Chang, C.C.; Kiupel, M.; Yuzbasiyan-Gurkan, V. Isolation and characterization of canine adipose–derived mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng. 2008, 14, 1007–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Hendawy, H.; Uemura, A.; Ma, D.; Namiki, R.; Samir, H.; Ahmed, M.F.; El-Husseiny, H.M.; Chieh-Jen, C.; Tanaka, R. Tissue harvesting site effect on the canine adipose stromal vascular fraction quantity and quality. Animals 2021, 11, 460. [Google Scholar]
  77. Astor, D.E.; Hoelzler, M.G.; Harman, R.; Bastian, R.P. Patient factors influencing the concentration of stromal vascular fraction (SVF) for adipose-derived stromal cell (ASC) therapy in dogs. Can. J. Vet. Res. 2013, 77, 177–182. [Google Scholar]
  78. Yaylacı, S.; Kaçaroğlu, D.; Hürkal, Ö.; Ulaşlı, A.M. An enzyme-free technique enables the isolation of a large number of adipose-derived stem cells at the bedside. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 8005. [Google Scholar]
  79. Fontes, T.; Brandão, I.; Negrão, R.; Martins, M.J.; Monteiro, R. Autologous fat grafting: Harvesting techniques. Ann. Med. Surg. 2018, 36, 212–218. [Google Scholar]
  80. Gause, T.M.; Kling, R.E.; Sivak, W.N.; Marra, K.G.; Rubin, J.P.; Kokai, L.E. Particle size in fat graft retention: A review on the impact of harvesting technique in lipofilling surgical outcomes. Adipocyte 2014, 3, 273–279. [Google Scholar]
  81. Francis, A.; Wang, W.Z.; Goldman, J.J.; Fang, X.H.; Williams, S.J.; Baynosa, R.C. Enhancement of viable adipose-derived stem cells in lipoaspirate by buffering tumescent with sodium bicarbonate. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open 2019, 7, e2138. [Google Scholar]
  82. Aronowitz, J.A.; Lockhart, R.A.; Cloe, S. Hakakian. Mechanical versus enzymatic isolation of stromal vascular fraction cells from adipose tissue. Springerplus 2015, 4, 713. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Rocha dos Santos, C.; da Rocha Filgueiras, R.; Furtado Malard, P.; Rodrigues da Cunha Barreto-Vianna, A.; Nogueira, K.; da Silva Leite, C.; Maurício Mendes de Lima, E. Mesenchymal stem cells in osteotomy repair after tibial tuberosity advancement in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament injury. J. Exp. Orthop. 2018, 5, 17. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Franco, G.G.; Minto, B.W.; Dreibi, R.M.; Costa Junior, J.S.; Dias, L.G.G.G. Percutaneous application of allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell in dogs submitted to minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of the tibia. Acta Cirúrgica Bras. 2021, 36, e360206. [Google Scholar]
  85. Hoffer, M.J.; Griffon, D.J.; Schaeffer, D.J.; Johnson, A.L.; Thomas, M.W. Clinical applications of demineralized bone matrix: A retrospective and case-matched study of seventy-five dogs. Vet. Surg. 2008, 37, 639–647. [Google Scholar]
Animals 13 02084 g001 550
Figure 1. Mediolateral view of subjects treated with microfragmented adipose tissue (MFAT) immediately after tibial plateau levelling osteotomy (TPLO) (a) and after 8 weeks (c), showing a significant degree of rounding of the distal step at the osteotomy site and callus formation (black arrow). Mediolateral radiographs of control group subject immediately after TPLO (b) and after 8 weeks (d), showing a minimal degree of callus formation (white arrow).
Figure 1. Mediolateral view of subjects treated with microfragmented adipose tissue (MFAT) immediately after tibial plateau levelling osteotomy (TPLO) (a) and after 8 weeks (c), showing a significant degree of rounding of the distal step at the osteotomy site and callus formation (black arrow). Mediolateral radiographs of control group subject immediately after TPLO (b) and after 8 weeks (d), showing a minimal degree of callus formation (white arrow).
Animals 13 02084 g001
Animals 13 02084 g002 550
Figure 2. Caudocranial view of subjects treated with microfragmented adipose tissue (MFAT) immediately after tibial plateau levelling osteotomy (TPLO) (a) and after 8 weeks (c), demonstrating no osteotomy line visibility (black arrow). Caudocranial radiographs of control group subject immediately after TPLO (b) and after 8 weeks (d), demonstrating osteotomy line visibility (white arrow).
Figure 2. Caudocranial view of subjects treated with microfragmented adipose tissue (MFAT) immediately after tibial plateau levelling osteotomy (TPLO) (a) and after 8 weeks (c), demonstrating no osteotomy line visibility (black arrow). Caudocranial radiographs of control group subject immediately after TPLO (b) and after 8 weeks (d), demonstrating osteotomy line visibility (white arrow).
Animals 13 02084 g002
Animals 13 02084 g003 550
Figure 3. Radiographic healing based on the 12-point scoring system at T1 (4 weeks) and T2 (8 weeks) for the microfragmented adipose tissue (MFAT) group (red) and the control (NT) group (green). * indicates a significant difference between the groups (p < 0.05); x indicates a significant difference within the same group between T1 and T2 (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Radiographic healing based on the 12-point scoring system at T1 (4 weeks) and T2 (8 weeks) for the microfragmented adipose tissue (MFAT) group (red) and the control (NT) group (green). * indicates a significant difference between the groups (p < 0.05); x indicates a significant difference within the same group between T1 and T2 (p < 0.05).
Animals 13 02084 g003
Animals 13 02084 g004 550
Figure 4. Radiographic healing based on the 5-point scoring system at T1 (4 weeks) and T2 (8 weeks) for the microfragmented adipose tissue (MFAT) group (red) and the control (NT) group (green). * indicates a significant difference between the groups (p < 0.05); x indicates a significant difference within the same group between T1 and T2 (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Radiographic healing based on the 5-point scoring system at T1 (4 weeks) and T2 (8 weeks) for the microfragmented adipose tissue (MFAT) group (red) and the control (NT) group (green). * indicates a significant difference between the groups (p < 0.05); x indicates a significant difference within the same group between T1 and T2 (p < 0.05).
Animals 13 02084 g004
Animals 13 02084 g005 550
Figure 5. The degree of rounding of the distal step at the osteotomy site at T1 (4 weeks) and T2 (8 weeks) for the microfragmented adipose tissue (MFAT) group (red) and the control (NT) group (green). * indicates a significant difference between the groups (p < 0.05); x indicates a significant difference within the same group between T1 and T2 (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. The degree of rounding of the distal step at the osteotomy site at T1 (4 weeks) and T2 (8 weeks) for the microfragmented adipose tissue (MFAT) group (red) and the control (NT) group (green). * indicates a significant difference between the groups (p < 0.05); x indicates a significant difference within the same group between T1 and T2 (p < 0.05).
Animals 13 02084 g005
Animals 13 02084 g006 550
Figure 6. The subjective degree of callus formation at T1 (4 weeks) and T2 (8 weeks) for the microfragmented adipose tissue (MFAT) group (red) and the control (NT) group (green). * indicates a significant difference between the groups (p < 0.05); x indicates a significant difference within the same group between T1 and T2 (p < 0.05).
Figure 6. The subjective degree of callus formation at T1 (4 weeks) and T2 (8 weeks) for the microfragmented adipose tissue (MFAT) group (red) and the control (NT) group (green). * indicates a significant difference between the groups (p < 0.05); x indicates a significant difference within the same group between T1 and T2 (p < 0.05).
Animals 13 02084 g006
Table
Table 1. The 12-point scoring system with the specific parameters evaluated for bone healing [19,22].
Table 1. The 12-point scoring system with the specific parameters evaluated for bone healing [19,22].
12-Point Scoring System
Cortical continuity (0–4)0 = no cortical continuity
1 = one continuous cortex
2 = two continuous cortices
3 = three continuous cortices
4 = four continuous cortices
Osteotomy line visibility (0–2) 0 = osteotomy line visibility
1 = osteotomy line barely visible
2 = no osteotomy line visible
Subjective degree of callus formation or
remodelling (0–4)		0 = none
1 = minimal
2 = moderate
3 = remodelled
4 = healed
Degree of rounding of the distal step at the osteotomy
site (0–2)		0 = none
1 = mild
2 = significant
Table
Table 2. The 5-point scoring system with the percentage of bone healing associated with each score [22].
Table 2. The 5-point scoring system with the percentage of bone healing associated with each score [22].
5-Point Scoring System
0No healing
11–25% healing
226–50% healing
351–75% healing
476–100% healing
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pennasilico, L.; Di Bella, C.; Sassaroli, S.; Salvaggio, A.; Roggiolani, F.; Piccionello, A.P. Effects of Autologous Microfragmented Adipose Tissue on Healing of Tibial Plateau Levelling Osteotomies in Dogs: A Prospective Clinical Trial. Animals 2023, 13, 2084. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13132084

AMA Style

Pennasilico L, Di Bella C, Sassaroli S, Salvaggio A, Roggiolani F, Piccionello AP. Effects of Autologous Microfragmented Adipose Tissue on Healing of Tibial Plateau Levelling Osteotomies in Dogs: A Prospective Clinical Trial. Animals. 2023; 13(13):2084. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13132084

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pennasilico, Luca, Caterina Di Bella, Sara Sassaroli, Alberto Salvaggio, Francesco Roggiolani, and Angela Palumbo Piccionello. 2023. "Effects of Autologous Microfragmented Adipose Tissue on Healing of Tibial Plateau Levelling Osteotomies in Dogs: A Prospective Clinical Trial" Animals 13, no. 13: 2084. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13132084

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop