Effect of Hen Genotype and Laying Time on Egg Quality and Albumen Lysozyme Content and Activity
Abstract
:Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Tůmová, E.; Skřivan, M.; Englmaierová, M.; Zita, L. The effect of genotype, housing system and egg collection time on egg quality in egg type hens. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 54, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bílková, B.; Świderská, Z.; Zita, L.; Laloë, D.; Charles, M.; Beneš, V.; Stopka, P.; Vinkler, M. Domestic Fowl Breed Variation in Egg White Protein Expression: Application of Proteomics and Transcriptomics. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 11854–11863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Krawczyk, J.; Calik, J. Quality assessment of eggs laid by hens included in programmes for the conservation of animal genetic resources. Zywn. Nauk. Technol. Jakosc/Food. Sci. Technol. Qual. 2018, 25, 140–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sokołowicz, Z.; Krawczyk, J.; Dykiel, M. Effect of alternative housing system and hen genotype on egg quality characteristics. Emirates J. Food Agric. 2018, 30, 695–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lewko, L.; Krawczyk, J.; Calik, J. Effect of genotype and some shell quality traits on lysozyme content and activity in the albumen of eggs from hens under the biodiversity conservation program. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 100863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krawczyk, J.; Lewko, L.; Calik, J. Effect of laying hen genotype, age and some interior egg quality traits on lysozyme content. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2021, 21, 1119–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gumułka, M.; Andres, K.; Krawczyk, J.; Calik, J. Research Note: The nutritional value of eggs from native Polish Crested chickens and commercial hybrids that have been stored in various conditions. Poult. Sci. 2022, 101, 101579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sokołowicz, Z.; Krawczyk, J.; Dykiel, M. Effect of outdoor access on quality of eggs from Sussex hens (S-66). EPS 2018, 82, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krawczyk, J. Effect of layer age and egg production level on changes in quality traits of eggs from hens of conservation breeds and commercial hybrids. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2009, 9, 185–193. [Google Scholar]
- Javůrková, V.; Krkavcová, E.; Kreisinger, J.; Hyršl, P.; Hyánková, L. Effects of experimentally increased in ovo lysozyme on egg hatchability, chicks complement activity, and phenotype in a precocial bird. J. Exp. Zool. Part A Ecol. Genet. Physiol. 2015, 323, 497–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tomczyk, Ł.; Szablewski, T.; Cegielska-Radziejewska, R. Wartość odżywcza jaj konsumpcyjnych pozyskiwanych od kur niosek utrzymywanych w różnych systemach. Zywn. Nauk. Technol. Jakosc/Food. Sci. Technol. Qual. 2016, 6, 20–27. [Google Scholar]
- Banaszewska, D.; Biesiada-Drzazga, B.; Ostrowski, D.; Drabik, K.; Batkowska, J. The impact of breeder age on egg quality and lysozyme activity. Turkish J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2019, 43, 583–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Javůrková, V.G.; Pokorná, M.; Mikšík, I.; Tůmová, E. Concentration of egg white antimicrobial and immunomodulatory proteins is related to eggshell pigmentation across traditional chicken breeds. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 6931–6941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pavlovski, Z.; Vitorović, D.; Škrbić, Z.; Vračar, S. Influence of limestone particle size in diets for hens and oviposition time on eggshell quality. Acta Vet. Brno. 2000, 50, 37–42. [Google Scholar]
- Tůmová, E.; Zita, L.; Hubený, M.; Skřivan, M.; Ledvinka, Z. The effect of oviposition time and genotype on egg quality characteristics in egg type hens. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2007, 52, 26–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kowalska, E.; Kucharska-Gaca, J.; Kuźniacka, J.; Lewko, L.; Gornowicz, E.; Biesek, J.; Adamski, M. Quality of eggs, concentration of lysozyme in albumen, and fatty acids in yolk in relation to blue lupin-rich diet and production cycle. Animals 2020, 10, 735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Myint, S.L.; Kinoshita, K.; Shimogiri, T.; Ibrahim, H.R.; Tsusaki, T.; Tanoue, T.; Kawabe, K.; Maeda, Y.; Okamoto, S. Effect of polymorphism in egg white lysozyme on muramidase and antibacterial activities as well as hatchability in the Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica). J. Anim. Sci. 2012, 90, 1747–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kinoshita, K.; Myint, S.L.; Shimogiri, T.; Ibrahim, H.R.; Kawabe, K.; Okamoto, S.; Lee, Y.P.; Matsuda, Y.; Maeda, Y. Chicken ovotransferrin variants OTFB and OTFC harboring substitution of GAT (Asp) to AAT (Asn) in the codon 500 and their antimicrobial activity. J. Poult. Sci. 2016, 53, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tyler, C. Studies on egg shells. II.—A method for marking and counting pores. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1953, 4, 266–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leśnierowski, G.; Kijowski, J. Methods for testing enzymatic activity and quantification of lysozyme from chicken egg protein. Przem. Spoż. 1995, 12, 476–479. [Google Scholar]
- Nowaczewski, S.; Lewko, L.; Kucharczyk, M.; Stuper-Szablewska, K.; Rudzińska, M.; Cegielska-Radziejewska, R.; Biadała, A.; Szulc, K.; Tomczyk, Ł.; Kaczmarek, S.; et al. Effect of laying hens age and housing system on physicochemical characteristics of eggs. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2021, 21, 291–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- National Research Institute of Animal Production, Poland. Available online: www.bioroznorodnosc.izoo.krakow.pl/drob/kury (accessed on 28 February 2023).
- Petričević, V.; Škrbić, Z.; Lukić, M.; Petričević, M.; Dosković, V.; Rakonjac, S.; Marinković, M. Effect of genotype and age of laying hens on the quality of eggs and egg shells. Sci. Pap. Ser. D Anim. Sci. 2017, 60, 166–170. [Google Scholar]
- Hocking, P.M.; Bain, M.; Channing, C.E.; Fleming, R.; Wilson, S. Genetic variation for egg production, egg quality and bone strength in selected and traditional breeds of laying fowl. Br. Poult. Sci. 2003, 44, 365–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tůmová, E.; Ledvinka, Z.; Skřivan, M.; Englmaierová, M.; Zita, L. Effect of time of oviposition on egg quality in egg meat type hens. SAB 2008, 39, 269–272. [Google Scholar]
- Silversides, F.G.; Budgell, K. The relationships among measures of egg albumen height, pH, and whipping volume. Poult. Sci. 2004, 83, 1619–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sokołowicz, Z.; Krawczyk, J.; Dykiel, M. Wpływ czasu przechowywania na jakość i właściwości funkcjonalne jaj od kur objętych w Polsce programem ochrony. Zywn. Nauk. Technol. Jakosc/Food. Sci. Technol. Qual. 2016, 2, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vlčková, J.; Tůmová, E.; Míková, K.; Englmaierová, M.; Okrouhlá, M.; Chodová. Changes in the quality of eggs during storage depending on the housing system and the age of hens. Poultry Sci. 2019, 98, 6187–6193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trziszka, T.; Dobrzański, Z.; Skiba, T.; Kopeć, W. Effects of Breeding and Housing Systems of Layers on Egg Quality. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2007, 57, 583–586. [Google Scholar]
- Salejda, A.M.; Grażyna, K. Bioaktywne składniki jaja kurzego—Możliwości aplikacyjne w biokonserwacji mięsa oraz jego przetworów. Bromatol. Chem. Toksykol. 2014, 47, 72–81. [Google Scholar]
- Rizzi, C.; Marangon, A. Quality of organic eggs of hybrid and Italian breed hens. Poult. Sci. 2012, 91, 2330–2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muszyński, S.; Kasperek, K.; Świątkiewicz, S.; Arczewska-Włosek, A.; Wiącek, D.; Donaldson, J.; Dobrowolski, P.; Arciszewski, M.B.; Luis Valverde Piedra, J.; Krakowiak, D.; et al. Assessing Bone Health Status and Eggshell Quality of Laying Hens at the End of a Production Cycle in Response to Inclusion of a Hybrid Rye to a Wheat–Corn. Diet. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lewko, L.; Gornowicz, E. Egg albumen quality as affected by bird origin. J. Cent. Eur. Agric. 2009, 10, 455–464. [Google Scholar]
Time of Egg Collection (h) | Strain Symbol | Egg Weight (g) | Albumen Weight (g) | Percentage of Egg Albumen (%) | Albumen Height (mm) | Haugh Unit | Albumen pH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7:00 | H-22 | 64.6 | 39.3 | 60.7 | 7.12 a | 82.9 | 7.80 a |
R-11 | 58.8 a | 24.6 a | 58.8 a | 6.61 | 81.9 | 7.90 a | |
Ż-33 | 60.0 | 34.3 | 57.2 | 4.78 | 67.9 | 8.21 a | |
Z-11 | 58.5 | 35.6 | 60.8 | 5.26 a | 68.9 a | 8.05 | |
Mean | 60.5 x | 36.0 x | 59.4 | 5.94 | 75.4 | 7.99 x | |
13:00 | H-22 | 66.1 | 40.2 | 60.7 | 7.72 b | 86.2 | 7.62 b |
R-11 | 63.9 b | 40.4 b | 63.0 b | 7.07 | 82.8 | 7.67 b | |
Ż-33 | 60.9 | 35.7 | 58.6 | 5.13 | 69.4 | 7.89 b | |
Z-11 | 57.8 | 24.7 | 60.1 | 4.71 b | 66.7 b | 8.16 | |
Mean | 62.2 y | 37.7 y | 60.6 | 6.16 | 76.3 | 7.84 y | |
SEM | 0.473 | 0.455 | 0.439 | 0.120 | 0.852 | 0.024 | |
Significance of differences (p value) | |||||||
Collection time | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.16 | 0.09 | 0.38 | 0.00 | |
Genotype | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
Genotype × collection time | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.18 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.00 |
Time of Egg Collection (h) | Strain Symbol | Yolk Weight (g) | Percentage of Yolk Weight (%) | Yolk Colour | Yolk pH | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L* | a* | b* | |||||
7:00 | H-22 | 19.2 | 29.8 | 51.3 | 16.7 | 39.7 | 6.06 a |
R-11 | 18.8 | 32.1 | 49.4 | 16.3 | 32.4 | 6.25 a | |
Ż-33 | 20.3 | 33.7 | 49.3 | 18.2 | 32.5 | 6.16 a | |
Z-11 | 17.8 | 30.4 | 51.0 | 15.7 | 32.7 | 6.45 a | |
Mean | 19.0 | 31.5 | 50.3 | 16.7 | 34.3 | 6.23 x | |
13:00 | H-22 | 19.9 | 30.2 | 49.9 | 18.0 | 39.7 | 5.93 b |
R-11 | 19.8 | 31.0 | 48.8 | 16.9 | 32.2 | 6.08 b | |
Ż-33 | 19.7 | 32.5 | 49.3 | 16.2 | 26.7 | 5.98 b | |
Z-11 | 17.9 | 31.0 | 49.2 | 15.4 | 28.2 | 6.25 b | |
Mean | 19.3 | 31.2 | 49.3 | 16.6 | 31.7 | 6.06 y | |
SEM | 0.153 | 0.205 | 0.279 | 0.297 | 0.959 | 0.017 | |
Significance of differences (p value) | |||||||
Collection time | 0.22 | 0.36 | 0.08 | 0.88 | 0.14 | 0.00 | |
Genotype | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.19 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
Genotype × collection time | 0.20 | 0.12 | 0.66 | 0.20 | 0.57 | 0.63 |
Time of Egg Collection (h) | Strain Symbol | Shell Weight (g) | Shell Thickness (µm) | Shell Colour | Shell Porosity (pores/cm2) | Shell Crushing Strength (N) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L* | a* | b* | ||||||
7:00 | H-22 | 6.11 | 363 | 92.6 | 0.11 | 4.14 | 44.3 | 40.4 |
R-11 | 5.34 | 340 | 75.0 | 7.64 a | 19.5 | 44.1 | 38.2 | |
Ż-33 | 5.41 | 332 | 83.4 | 3.17 | 16.0 | 34.9 | 36.6 | |
Z-11 | 5.09 | 322 | 86.4 | 0.63 | 13.8 | 40.0 | 31.9 | |
Mean | 5.49 | 339 | 84.4 | 2.58 | 13.4 | 40.8 x | 36.8 | |
13:00 | H-22 | 5.98 | 352 | 93.0 | 0.99 | 3.03 | 47.1 | 36.3 |
R-11 | 5.72 | 340 | 74.9 | 8.84 b | 19.9 | 46.1 | 41.5 | |
Ż-33 | 5.43 | 330 | 83.4 | 3.44 | 15.4 | 37.8 | 33.2 | |
Z-11 | 5.16 | 328 | 87.4 | 0.65 | 12.8 | 42.0 | 33.5 | |
Mean | 5.57 | 338 | 84.7 | 2.98 | 12.8 | 43.2 y | 36.1 | |
SEM | 0.058 | 2.64 | 0.633 | 0.350 | 0.580 | 0.510 | 0.839 | |
Significance of differences (p value) | ||||||||
Collection time | 0.42 | 0.72 | 0.60 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.00 | 0.71 | |
Genotype | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
Genotype × collection time | 0.36 | 0.65 | 0.81 | 0.41 | 0.62 | 0.96 | 0.29 |
Time of Egg Collection (h) | Strain Symbol | Lysozyme Content (%) | Lysozyme Activity (U/mL) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thick Albumen | Thin Albumen | Thick Albumen | Thin Albumen | ||
7:00 | H-22 | 0.171 | 0.303 | 36,412 | 64,323 |
R-11 | 0.160 | 0.311 | 34,003 | 66,164 | |
Ż-33 | 0.174 | 0.312 | 36,978 | 66,448 | |
Z-11 | 0.172 | 0.289 | 36,270 | 48,737 | |
Mean | 0.169 | 0.289 | 35,916 | 61,418 | |
13:00 | H-22 | 0.162 | 0.307 | 34,428 | 65,314 |
R-11 | 0.153 | 0.303 | 32,444 | 64,464 | |
Ż-33 | 0.170 | 0.314 | 36,128 | 66,731 | |
Z-11 | 0.173 | 0.225 | 36,695 | 47,746 | |
Mean | 0.164 | 0.287 | 34,924 | 61,064 | |
SEM | 0.002 | 0.004 | 391 | 854 | |
Significance of differences (p value) | |||||
Collection time | 0.318 | 0.742 | 0.191 | 0.732 | |
Genotype | 0.006 | 0.000 | 0.007 | 0.000 | |
Genotype × collection time | 0.395 | 0.787 | 0.691 | 0.791 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Krawczyk, J.; Lewko, L.; Sokołowicz, Z.; Koseniuk, A.; Kraus, A. Effect of Hen Genotype and Laying Time on Egg Quality and Albumen Lysozyme Content and Activity. Animals 2023, 13, 1611. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13101611
Krawczyk J, Lewko L, Sokołowicz Z, Koseniuk A, Kraus A. Effect of Hen Genotype and Laying Time on Egg Quality and Albumen Lysozyme Content and Activity. Animals. 2023; 13(10):1611. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13101611
Chicago/Turabian StyleKrawczyk, Józefa, Lidia Lewko, Zofia Sokołowicz, Anna Koseniuk, and Adam Kraus. 2023. "Effect of Hen Genotype and Laying Time on Egg Quality and Albumen Lysozyme Content and Activity" Animals 13, no. 10: 1611. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13101611
APA StyleKrawczyk, J., Lewko, L., Sokołowicz, Z., Koseniuk, A., & Kraus, A. (2023). Effect of Hen Genotype and Laying Time on Egg Quality and Albumen Lysozyme Content and Activity. Animals, 13(10), 1611. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13101611