Next Article in Journal
Immune Parameters in Chickens Treated with Antibiotics and Probiotics during Early Life
Next Article in Special Issue
Natural Feed Additives and Novel Approaches for Healthy Rabbit Breeding
Previous Article in Journal
Potential Use of Tannin Extracts as Additives in Semen Destined for Cryopreservation: A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dietary Supplementation with Agave tequilana (Weber Var. Blue) Stem Powder Improves the Performance and Intestinal Integrity of Broiler Rabbits
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 12
Issue 9
10.3390/ani12091131
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Current Knowledge on the Bioavailability of Thymol as a Feed Additive in Humans and Animals with a Focus on Rabbit Metabolic Processes

by
Iveta Placha
1,*,
Kristina Bacova
1,2 and
Lukas Plachy
3,4
1
Centre of Biosciences of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology, Soltesovej 4-6, 040 01 Kosice, Slovakia
2
University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Komenskeho 73, 041 81 Kosice, Slovakia
3
1st Department of Cardiology, East Slovak Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Ondavska 8, 040 11 Kosice, Slovakia
4
Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University in Kosice, Trieda SNP 457/1, 040 11 Kosice, Slovakia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2022, 12(9), 1131; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12091131
Submission received: 2 March 2022 / Revised: 22 April 2022 / Accepted: 26 April 2022 / Published: 28 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Feed Additives and Novel Approaches for Healthy Rabbit Breeding)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

This review provides general information on the possible health benefits in animals and humans of herbal additives, particularly thymol, whose phenolic group is responsible for the neutralisation of free radicals, and information concerning its detection through body action, bioavailability and mechanisms in rabbits. Plants containing thymol have been used in traditional medicine for the treatment of various diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases, cancer and diabetes. Although a great number of in vitro studies of cardiovascular and cancer diseases are available, in vivo studies that confirm these findings have not been sufficiently reported. To determine the beneficial dose, further clinical studies are necessary, with preclinical comprehensive research on animal models.

Abstract

The aim of this review is to describe the therapeutic effect of thymol on various human diseases, followed by its bioavailability in humans and animals. Based on our knowledge from the current literature, after thymol addition, thymol metabolites—mostly thymol sulphate and glucuronide—are detected in the plasma and urine of humans and in the plasma, intestinal content, faeces and tissues in rats, pigs, chickens, horses and rabbits after enzymatic cleavage. In rabbits, thymol absorption from the gastrointestinal tract, its distribution within the organism, its accumulation in tissues and its excretion from the organism have been described in detail. It is necessary and important for these studies to suggest the appropriate dose needed to achieve the required health benefits not only for animals but also for humans. Information from this review concerning the mode of action of thymol in animal organisms could also be applied to human medicine and may help in the utilisation of herbal medicine in humans and in veterinary healthcare. This review summarises the important aspects of thymol’s effects on health and its bioavailability in organisms, particularly in rabbits. In future, herbal-based drugs must be extensively investigated in terms of their mode of action, efficiency of administration and clinical effect.

1. Introduction

For many years now, the positive effects of aromatic plants and herbs in the treatment of various diseases have been well documented. Many effective and conventional drugs originate from plants, and, historically, they represent the first pharmacological compounds used in the treatment of many diseases [1,2,3]. Scientists have focused their attention on the composition of herbal extracts, the detection of their active compounds and their mode of action to ensure an effective therapeutic and nutritional dosage [4]. To understand the mechanism of action of these compounds and to determine their interaction with food and drugs, their absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion all need to be investigated [5,6].
Currently, the widespread antibiotic resistance presents a global health problem, and it has forced medical researchers to return to the pre-antibiotic era [7,8]. For this reason, the development of new drugs of natural origin presents a big challenge for scientists [9,10]. More than half of the drugs approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are composed of natural compounds from medicinal plants [11]. About 50% of modern drugs, and more than 60% of anti-cancer drugs, are developed from phytochemicals [12]. According to Chen et al. [13] and Newman et al. [14], plants and their natural compounds have been used as sources of antibiotics, analgesics, cardioprotective and other drugs for more than 5000 years. Currently, collaboration between the World Health Organization (WHO), the FDA, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the pharmaceutical industry is necessary in order to utilise the vast potential of traditional medicine for the development of herbal drugs for the treatment of different diseases [15]. Despite the fact that aromatic plants and herbs are considered natural and safer than synthetic drugs, they may present a risk of serious adverse effects [16]. For this reason, researchers have suggested that food and drug interactions must be extensively evaluated in terms of their absorption, excretion, distribution and metabolism [5,6].
Many gastrointestinal and respiratory diseases in pigs, poultry and young cattle [17,18,19] and mastitis in adult cattle [20] are very often treated with antibiotics [21]. Bacteria that are spread into the environment by the excrement of farm animals carry antimicrobial resistance genes [22], and they are directly, or by food consumption, transmitted to humans [23,24]. The preventive use of medicinal plants may help to lower the use of antibiotics for the treatment of farm animals [25]. However, this statement is not mentioned in any national strategy on antibiotic resistance [26]. In recent decades, veterinarians and farmers have shown increased interest in using herbal medicine with the goal of reducing the use of antibiotics [27]. In order to explore strategies to minimise the development of antimicrobial resistance, more clinical veterinary studies using medicinal plants are required [21].
In recent years, plant secondary metabolites and plant-derived extracts have received extensive attention. Thymol, a major compound of thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.), exhibits antioxidant properties related to its phenolic structure, which adsorbs and neutralises free radicals. Several preclinical studies have well documented the pharmacological properties of thymol on animal models, but thymol also exhibits multi-pharmacological properties against various human diseases [28,29,30,31].
Thymol has been evaluated in many studies, which confirmed its therapeutic uses for the treatment of disorders affecting the cardiovascular, nervous, respiratory and digestive systems [32,33,34,35].
WHO reported, that cardiovascular diseases accounted for the highest number of deaths in 2019, and they are expected to reach 22.2 million deaths in 2030 [36]. For this reason, finding safe, non-toxic and effective drugs for prevention of these diseases is a hot topic of research. As natural candidates, some medicinal plants could meet the requirements for such pharmacological effects [37]. The active components of medicinal plants, due to their chemical structure and ability to reduce and scavenge the production of free radicals, improve the activity of antioxidant enzymes and are able to downregulate the oxidative stress of the organism [38]. In the opinion of Chang et al. [37], natural medicinal plants could be less toxic than synthetic antioxidants. Accumulating evidence suggests that flavonoids, phenolics and saponin from medical plants could reduce oxidative stress [16]. Moreover, some phenolic phytochemicals have anti-carcinogenic and anti-inflammatory effects [37,39]. Local inflammation and oxidative stress are involved in the pathogenesis of endothelial dysfunction and, consequently, in the progression of atherosclerosis [30]. Oxidative stress, by way of regulating inflammation and stimulating vascular smooth muscle, plays a key role in the pathogenesis of hypertension, atherosclerosis and myocardial injury [37, 40,41,42]. Oxidative stress represents an imbalance between free radical formation and antioxidant defence. An excessive amount of free radicals attack lipids in cells and cause their dysfunction, which induces the process of atherogenesis [43].
De Brito Alves et al. [44] suppose that the dietary intake of phenolic compounds could prevent hypertension through the beneficial impact on the gut microbiome. As much as 90–95% of phenolic compounds are accumulated in the large intestine, where they are converted into active metabolites by gut microbiota and, in turn, can modulate gut microbial composition by supporting the growth of certain beneficial bacteria [45,46]. Natarajan et al. [47] suggested that short-chain fatty acids, the major final product of faecal bacterial activity, could be responsible for lowering blood pressure. However, future studies are necessary to find a relationship between plant-derived phenolic compounds and the gut microbiome in connection with the prevention of hypertension [44,48]. In order to test the possible mechanism of action of these compounds, it would be interesting to design in vitro culture models that simulate intestinal tract conditions or to find a suitable animal model [30, 49]. Yu et al. [30] showed that rabbits, in comparison with other laboratory animals, are the most suitable model for the study of atherosclerosis in humans due to their similar lipoprotein metabolism.
The strong antimicrobial properties of thymol have been suggested by several studies. Thymol can be useful in the therapy of intestinal problems and respiratory infections [50]. Based on the studies of Komaki et al. [51] and Asadbegi et al. [52], the extract of T. vulgaris is considered as neuroprotective and is used to prevent anxiety. Thymol’s phenolic structure neutralises free radicals and exhibits redox properties [30]. In addition to in vitro and in vivo studies, clinical studies are required to establish the most effective way and dosage regimen of thymol administration [50].
To find the therapeutically relevant effects of plant compounds, reliable pharmacokinetic studies in humans are necessary [53]. An appropriate dose that would ensure the expected effect, absorption and excretion of phenolic compounds after thyme extract intake was studied in humans by Rubió et al. [54] and Kohlert et al. [55]. These data may also be important in the context of the safe application of herbal medicinal products [53]. However, relatively few studies on the bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of thymol, particularly in humans, are available to date [55]. To monitor phenolic consumption, hydroxytyrosol metabolites were analysed as a biomarker. However, the results showed its low specificity [54]. The authors showed that the metabolites of thymol, thymol sulphate and glucuronide were more specific, and they established the relationship between exposure and effect more precisely.
Present studies do not only focus their attention on the chemical composition and pharmacology of medicinal plants; their main objectives are the study of metabolites, the products of cell metabolism and their mechanism of action [56]. In order to propose the optimal dosage regimen, it is necessary to take into account that the metabolites of plant compounds could probably be deconjugated to the parental compounds and express their pharmacological activity in this way [54, 55]. Thymol sulphate and thymol glucuronide are the main metabolites of thymol, but, unfortunately, there is no information whether these compounds are active or inactive forms [50]. Thyme has often been used in folk medicine, and, recently, scientists have focused their attention on the pharmacodynamic activities of compounds in vitro, as well as their bioavailability in target organs [55].
The present review focuses in greater detail on the application of thymol as a natural feed additive in humans and animals to improve their health, with the aim being to substitute synthetic drugs. The limited information available on the bioactivity of thymol and its metabolites in organisms suggested to us to summarise the current knowledge of its absorption, distribution, accumulation and excretion. In the following sections, we try to compile all of the available literature in order to provide information concerning the tissues in which thymol and its metabolites have been detected to date and to describe the processes of its biotransformation, absorption, distribution, deposition and elimination and bioavailability in human and animal organisms.

2. Detection of Thymol and Its Metabolites in Humans and Animals

The pharmacodynamic activities of thyme extract or essential oil have been demonstrated in vitro. To confirm the beneficial effect of thymol found in vitro, its absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion need to be detected in vivo [55]. To the best of our knowledge, thymol distribution in tissues in vivo has only been detected in more recent studies by several authors. To better understand the bioavailability of thymol in animal organisms and to establish the suitable concentration for beneficial effects on animal health, its metabolic path needs to be understood at the molecular level [57,58]. Little is known about the bioactivity of thymol and its metabolites, as there are only few studies that have analysed thymol in body tissues (Table 1).
According to our knowledge, the first study dealing with the metabolic fate of thymol, particularly its metabolite thymol glucuronide in the urine of rabbits and humans, was studied by Takada et al. [59]. The next early study was the examination of the glucuronide and sulphate conjugates of thymol as well as its isomer carvacrol in rat urine by Austgulen et al. [60]. Kraus and Ternes [61] detected thymol in egg yolk but not in albumin after the addition of thyme extract to laying hens. The transition of thymol from food into the yolk represented 0.006%.
The bioavailability of thymol as the main compound of thyme essential oil after the oral administration of a single dose of Bronchipret® tablets (equivalent to 1.08 mg thymol) to humans was examined by Kohlert et al. [53]. No thymol was detected in plasma and urine; however, its metabolites thymol sulphate and glucuronide were found and excreted in urine, and sulphate was also detected in plasma. Thalhamer et al. [62] detected metabolite p-cymene-2,5-diol and its oxidised form (p-cymene-2,5-dione) as the main products after a single oral administration of 50 mg of thymol to humans. The authors showed that human metabolism leads to the preferred hydroxylation of the aromatic system of thymol. In comparison with the results of Austgulen et al. [60], they found that some of the metabolites that were found in rat metabolism (p-cymene-3,9-diol and p-cymene-3,7-diol) could not be detected in human samples and vice versa (p-cymene-2,3-diol and p-cymene-3,8-diol detected in human samples). For this reason, future studies of thymol metabolism in different species of vertebrates are necessary [63]. Michiels et al. [64] demonstrated that the absorption of thymol in piglets was intensive in the stomach and the proximal segments of the small intestine, and they also found rapid renal excretion of free and conjugated thymol. With the detected percentage of intake recovered in bile determined to be 4.1%, they showed that enterohepatic recycling cannot be neglected. Thymol concentrations have also been detected in the plasma, milk, liver, kidney and fat of cattle after intramammary administration of a herbal product containing the essential oil of Thymus vulgaris [65,66]. According to the studies of Kohlert et al. [55], Rubió et al. [67] and Rubió et al. [68], the free form of thymol could not be detected in plasma, but thymol conjugates originating from biotransformation in humans and animals were detected. Thymol glucuronide was found for the first time in rat plasma after a single oral dose of 1.5 g of thyme extract to animals, containing 44.32 µM of thymol [68]. The presence of thymol in blood plasma after enzymatic cleavage of the conjugates was detected in the plasma of horses after the administration of Bronchipret® TP tablets with a thymol content of about 15 mg (the thymol concentration in plasma ranged from 62.4 to 315.9 ng/mL) by Van den Hoven et al. [69]. Haselmeyer et al. [70] detected thymol in broiler chickens fed with thyme herb (thymol concentrations in feed were 5–55 mg/kg). They found that thymol was quantified in the small intestine (115.5–1289.5 ng/g DM), the caecum (101.2–663.1 ng/g DM) and plasma (47.3–412.2 ng/mL), and it was only detected at the highest doses following enzymatic cleavage in the muscle and liver. However, the levels detected were relatively low. Haselmeyer [71] investigated the absorption of different thymol concentrations (2, 10 and 20 ug/mL) through the small intestine mucosa using the ex vivo method and Ussing chambers. He found that thymol concentrations in the mucosa/submucosa reached 7.5, 9.9 and 8.45% from the initial concentrations. Zitterl-Eglseer et al. [72] fed piglets with Biomin® P.E.P 1000 feed additive (essential oil blended from oregano, anise and citrus peels; the main compounds thymol and carvacrol) and detected thymol at a low concentration in plasma (15.4 ng/mL), kidney (23.4 ng/g) and faeces (24.4 ng/g). In the study conducted by Hagmuller et al. [73], Thymi herba was given as a feed additive to weanling piglets at different concentrations (0.1, 0.5 and 1%). Thymol was detectable in all plasma samples, and the thymol level increased with greater amounts of thyme herbs. Fernandez et al. [74] validated for the first time an analytical extraction procedure (a headspace solid-phase microextraction technique followed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry) as a method to detect and quantify thymol in the faeces and egg yolk of Japanese quail.
The thymol concentrations in the plasma, duodenal wall, liver, kidney, breast muscle and content of all the intestinal segments of broiler chickens were analysed after 4 weeks of consumption of thyme essential oil by Oceľová [63] and Oceľová et al. [75]. Thymol was determined through the length of the intestinal tract for the first time in these studies, and the results obtained pointed to intensive thymol absorption in the proximal part of the small intestine. They detected 37% of the thymol duodenal content in the duodenal wall, which confirmed its efficient absorption from the intestinal tract. The authors pointed to intensive metabolism in the liver and the subsequent transport of thymol to the kidneys, as the thymol concentration detected in the liver was 11 times lower than in the kidney. The lowest concentration of thymol was detected in muscle tissue. Pisarčíková et al. [76] focused their attention on detecting the two main thymol metabolites of the second phase of biotransformation processes, thymol sulphate and glucuronide in plasma, in the duodenal wall and liver. Thymol sulphate was detected at all levels of thyme essential oil addition (0.01, 0.05 and 0.1%), and the highest concentration was found in the duodenal wall, with the lowest in the liver. Thymol glucuronide was only detected in all biological samples at the highest thyme essential oil concentration (0.1%).
The small number of these studies indicates that there is insufficient information about thymol distribution in animal and human tissues despite the fact that the beneficial effect of thymol depends on its absorption and accumulation in the organism. In this section, we summarised the current knowledge of thymol and its metabolite deposition in different tissues.
Table
Table 1. Detection of thymol and its metabolites in the bodies of humans and animals.
Table 1. Detection of thymol and its metabolites in the bodies of humans and animals.
Animal
Species		Applied FormDetectable CompoundsSamplesReferences
humanthymol/orallythymol glucuronide
thymol sulphate
thymohydroquinone sulphate
thymol		urine[59]
humanBronchipret® TP/orally
(equivalent to 1.08 mg thymol)		thymol sulphateplasma, urine[55]
thymol glucuronideurine
humanthymol/orallyp-cymene-2,5-diol
p-cymene-2,3-diol
p-cymene-3-ol-8-ene		urine[62]
humandried thyme/orallythymol sulphate
caffeic acid sulphate
hydroxyphenylpropionic acid sulphate
plasma[67]
thymol sulphate
caffeic acid sulphate
hydroxyphenylpropionic acid sulphate
thymol glucuronide		urine
rabbitthymol/orallyglucuronic acid
ethereal sulphuric acid
thymol		urine[59]
rabbitthymol/orallythymolplasma, small intestinal wall, liver, kidney, spleen, caecum, colon, muscle, faeces[58]
ratthymol/orallyp-cymene-2,5-diol
p-cymene-3,9-diol
p-cymene-3,7-diol
thymol		urine[60]
ratthyme extract/orallythymol sulphateplasma[68]
laying henthyme extract/orallyp-cymene-2,3-diol
thymol		egg yolk[61]
Japanese quailthymol/orallythymolegg yolk, faeces[74]
broiler chickendried Thymi herba/orallythymolplasma, small intestine, caecum, liver, muscle[70]
broiler chickenthyme essential oil/orallythymolplasma, liver, kidney, muscle, duodenal wall, gut content[63]
broiler chickenthyme essential oil/orallythymol sulphate
thymol glucuronide		plasma, duodenal wall, liver[76]
pigletessential oil/orally
(carvacrol, thymol, eugenol and trans-cinnamaldehyde)		carvacrol
thymol
eugenol
plasma[64]
carvacrol
thymol
eugenol
trans-cinnamaldehyde		small intestine
carvacrol
thymol
eugenol
trans-cinnamaldehyde		bile
carvacrol
thymol
eugenol		urine
pigletBiomin® P.E.P 1000 (main compounds thymol and carvacrol)/orallythymolplasma, kidney, faeces[72]
pigletThymi herba/orallythymolplasma[73]
bovinePhyto-Mast (essential oil of Thymus vulgaris and oregano)/intramammarythymolmilk, plasma, liver, kidney, fat[65]
dairy cattlePhyto-Mast (essential oil of Thymus vulgaris and oregano)/intramammarythymolmilk, plasma, liver, kidney, fat[66]
horseBronchipret (equivalent to 2–4 g thyme extract)/orallythymolplasma[69]

3. Bioavailability of Thymol Generally and in Rabbits as Model Animal

To describe the metabolic processes of thymol in an organism, we chose the rabbit as a model animal because it represents an appropriate model for the evaluation of the bioavailability of nutrients. Phytogenic compounds and other foreign substances after oral administration are absorbed from the intestine, metabolised and eliminated from the organism. Once they reach the intestine or liver, they are converted during biotransformation processes (phase I and phase II) to more hydrophilic forms, and their pharmacological properties usually differ compared to the parental compound. It is also important to emphasise that metabolites can probably be deconjugated to the parental compound and express their pharmacological activity in this way. The major reactions occurring during phase I are oxidation, reduction and hydrolysis; phase II reactions are also called conjugation reactions and include glucuronidation, sulphation, acetylation, methylation, conjugation with glutathione and conjugation with amino acids [77,78,79,80,81,82].
The intestine plays an important role as a site for the absorption as well as biotransformation of thymol [63,76]. Thymol or its metabolites, after biotransformation processes in the intestinal wall, can be transported back into the intestinal lumen or are converted back to the parental compounds and redistributed within the organism through the systemic circulation [78]. Some part of the compounds are transported by the mesenteric vein into the liver, where they are metabolised, excreted into the duodenum in bile and again reabsorbed [57,78]. Bacova et al. [58] found 15% of thymol in the liver compared with the intestinal wall, which demonstrates the intensive absorption of thymol from the intestinal wall through the vena portae to the liver.
Oceľová [63] and Bacova et al. [58] detected significantly higher levels of thymol in the kidney in comparison with the liver and plasma, which shows that, although the liver is the most important organ where biotransformation processes occur, kidney microsomes are probably more effective. Kohlert et al. [55] showed that thymol metabolites are able to be reabsorbed in the proximal part of the kidney tubule, are cleaved by enzymes located in the brush border and are again reabsorbed.
There are some barriers that the compounds must pass through during their metabolic path in the organism, and they limit their absorption [63, 79]. The first-pass metabolism in the intestine decreases the number of molecules reaching the blood circulation, and then the first-pass metabolism in the liver represents another barrier for the distribution of compounds in the organism. In addition to this, many efflux transporters are bound mainly with lipophilic molecules, which are rapidly excreted from the organism, greatly limiting their bioavailability [58,78,80,81,82]. These biotransformation processes are probably the reason why only a trace amount of thymol is found in the muscle and fat tissues of broilers [70,77] and rabbits [58].
The rabbit’s digestive processes represent a complex system of the separation of digestible and indigestible parts of ingested food in the proximal colon [83]. The most important mechanism by which nutrients are released from ingested food is microbial fermentation in the caecum. The products of fermentation are either absorbed directly through the caecal wall or are re-ingested as caecotrophs [84]. The caecum and colon are the most important parts of a rabbit’s digestive system in connection with the original feature of digestion, caecotrophy. Bacova et al. [57], Bacova et al. [58] and Placha et al. [85], after thymol addition to a rabbit’s diet for 21 days and after its withdrawal from feed for the next 7 days, found a 6 times (7 times after withdrawal) higher concentration in plasma than in the intestinal wall. The authors attribute this finding to the metabolic processes that are present mainly in the caecum and that are responsible for the amount of thymol in caecotrophs. They stated that the mucus that covers the caecotrophs protects them, that the processes of fermentation continue until they reach the intestine and that thymol could be released and again reabsorbed into systemic circulation. The authors showed that, even though thymol was withdrawn, the metabolic processes of thymol were active, which was probably the consequence of caecotrophy.
Studying thymol bioavailability in different tissues is essential to understand its mechanism of action in target organs in which it can exert its biological role. Oral bioavailability represents the fraction of administered thymol reaching the systemic circulation and is a key parameter that affects its efficacy. Therefore, to propose an appropriate dose, the study of its oral bioavailability has received significant attention. However, only a few studies on thymol oral bioavailability have been carried out to date.
The organ bioavailability barriers to thymol are depicted in Figure 1.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, this literature review reports the future perspectives of modern thymol application in humans and animals. This review summarises the available literature on thymol application as a feed additive in humans and animals, with emphasis on its metabolic route and oral bioavailability. The presented data represent the available scientific information regarding the urgent need for more studies to precisely understand the metabolic processes and biological activity of thymol and its metabolites within organisms. This information will be useful for researchers, drug and pharmaceutical industries and the medical and veterinary sectors.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation: I.P.; writing—review and editing: K.B. and L.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for its contents.

Funding

This research was funded by the Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry for Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic and the Slovak Academy of Sciences (VEGA 2/0009/20).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The study did not report any data.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank to native English language editor, David McLean for improving the written English of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Giacometti, J.; Kovacevic, D.B.; Putnik, P.; Gabric, D.; Bilusic, T.; Kresic, G.; Stulic, V.; Barba, F.J.; Chemat, F.; Barbosa-Canovas, G.; et al. Extraction of bioactive compounds and essential oils from Mediterranesn herbs by conventional and green innovative techniques: A review. Food. Res. Int. 2018, 113, 245–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Oliveira, M.S.; Almeida, M.M.; Salazar, M.L.A.R.; Pires, F.C.S.; Bezzera, F.W.F.; Cunha, V.M.B.; Cordeiro, R.M.; Urbina, G.R.O.; Silva, A.P.S.; Pinto, R.H.H.; et al. Potential of medicinal use of essential oils from aromatic plants. In Potential of Essential Oils; El-Shemy, H., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018; pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Schmidt, B.; Ribnicky, D.M.; Poulev, A.; Logendra, S.; Cefalu, W.T.; Raskin, I. A natural history of botanical therapeutics. Metab. Clin. Exp. 2008, 57 (Suppl. S1), S3–S9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Giannenas, I.; Sidiropoulou, E.; Bonos, E.; Christaki, E.; Florou-Paneri, P. The history of herbs, medicinal and aromatic plants, and their extracts: Past, current situation and future perspectives. In Feed Additives, Aromatic Plants and Herbs in Animal Nutrition and Health; Florou-Paneri, P., Christaki, E., Giannenas, I., Eds.; Elsevier Academic Press, Inc.: London, UK, 2020; pp. 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  5. Genser, D. Food and drug Interaction: Consequences for the nutrition/health status. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2008, 52 (Suppl. S1), 29–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ribeiro dos Santos, R.; Andrade, M.; Sanches-Silva, A.; De Melo, N.R. Essential oils for food application: Natural substances with established biological activities. Food Bioprocess. Technol. 2017, 11, 43–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Brown, E.D.; Wright, G.D. Antibacterial drugs discovery in the resistance era. Nature 2016, 529, 336–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Atanasov, A.G.; Waltenberger, B.; Pferschy-Wenzig, E.M.; Linder, T.; Wawrosch, C.; Uhrin, P.; Temml, V.; Wang, L.; Schwaiger, S.; Heiss, E.H.; et al. Discovery and resupply of pharmacologically active plant-derived natural products: A review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2015, 33, 1582–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Tortorella, E.; Tedesco, P.; Esposito, P.F.; January, G.G.; Fani, R.; Jaspars, M.; de Pascale, D. Antibiotics from deep-sea microorganisms: Current discoveries and perspectives. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Penesyan, A.; Khelleberg, S.; Egan, S. Development of novel drugs from marine surface associated microorganisms. Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 438–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Chavan, S.S.; Damale, M.G.; Devanand, B.S.; Sangshetti, J.N. Antibacterial and antifungal drugs from natural source: A review of clinical development. Nat. Prod. Clin. Trials 2018, 1, 114–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Boucher, H.W.; Ambrose, P.G.; Chambers, H.F.; Ebright, R.H.; Jezek, A.; Murray, B.E.; Newland, J.G.; Ostrowsky, B.; Rex, J.H. White paper: Developing antimicrobial drugs for resistane pathogens, narrow-spectrum indivations, and unmet needs. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 216, 228–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Chen, S.; Song, J.; Sun, C.; Xu, J.; Zhu, Y.; Verpoorte, R.; Fan, T.P. Herbal genomics: Examining the biology of traditional medicines. Science 2015, 347, S27–S29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Newman, D.J.; Cragg, G.M. Natural products as sources of new drugs from 1981 to 2014. J. Nat. Prod. 2016, 79, 629–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Anand, U.; Jacobo-Herrera, N.; Altemimi, A.; Lakhssassi, N. A comprehensive review on medicicnal plants as antimicrobial therapeutics: Potential avenues of biocompatible grug discovery. Metabolites 2019, 9, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Raskin, I.; Ribnicky, D.M.; Komarnytsky, S.; Ilic, N.; Poulev, A.; Borisjuk, N.; Brinker, A.; Moreno, D.A.; Ripoll, C.; Yakoby, N.; et al. Plants and human health in the twenty-first century. Trends Biotechnol. 2002, 20, 522–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. European Medicines Agency (EMA) 2014. Sales of Veterinary Antimicrobial Agents in 26 EU/EEA Countries in 2012. Available online: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/enGB/document_libraryReport/2014/10/WC500175671.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2022).
  18. Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office 2019. Statistics and Reports. Swiss Antibiotic Resistance Report 2018. Available online: www.blv.admin.ch/blv/en/home/tiere/publikationen-und-forschung/statistiken-berichte-tiere (accessed on 1 March 2022).
  19. Bennett, R.M.; Christiansen, K.; Clifton-Hadley, R.S. Direct costs of endemic diseases of farm animals in Great Britain. Vet. Rec. 1999, 145, 376–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bradley, A. Bovine mastitis: An evolving disease. Vet. J. 2002, 164, 116–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mertenat, D.; Dal Cero, M.; Vogl, C.R.; Ivemeyer, S.; Meier, B.; Maeschli, A.; Hamburger, M.; Walkenhorst, M. Ethnoveterinary knowledge of farmers in bilingual regions of Switzerland – is there potential to extend veterinary options to reduce antimicrobial use? J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 246, 112184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Woolhouse, M.; Ward, M.; van Bunnik, B.; Farrar, J. Antimicrobial resistance in humans, livestock and the wider environment. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2015, 370, 1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Second Joint FAO/OIE/WHO Expert Workshop on Non-human Antimicrobial Usage and Antimicrobial Resistance: Management Options, Oslo, Norway, 15–18 March 2004. Available online: www.oie.int/doc/ged/D895.PDF (accessed on 1 March 2022).
  24. Marshall, B.M.; Levy, S.B. Food animals and antimicrobials: Impacts on human health. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 24, 718–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Maeschli, A.; Schmidt, A.; Ammann, W.; Schurtenberger, P.; Maurer, E.; Walkenhorst, M. Einfluss eines komplementarmedizinischen telefonischen Beratungssystems auf den Antibiotikaeinsatz bei Nutztieren in der Schweiz. Complement. Med. Res. 2019, 26, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ayrle, H.; Mevissen, M.; Kaske, M.; Nathues, H.; Grutzner, N.; Melzig, M.; Walkenhorst, M. Medicinal plants – prophylactic and therapeutic options for gastrointestinal and respiratory diseases in calves and piglets? A systematic review. BMC Vet. Res. 2016, 12, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Kupper, J.; Walkenhorst, M.; Ayrle, H.; Mevissen, M.; Demuth, D.; Naegeli, H. Online-Informationssystem für die Phytotherapie bei Tieren. Schweiz. Arch. Tierheilkd. 2018, 10, 589–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Lou, S.N.; Hsu, Y.S.; Ho, C.T. Flavonoid compositions and antioxidant activity of calamondin extracts prepared using different solvents. J. Food Drug Anal. 2014, 22, 290–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Do, Q.D.; Angkawijaya, A.E.; Tran-Nguyen, P.L.; Huynh, L.H.; Soetaredjo, F.E.; Ismadji, S.; Ju, Y.H. Effect of extraction solvent on total phenol content, total flavonoid content, and antioxidant activity of Limnophila aromatica. J. Food Drug Anal. 2014, 22, 296–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Yu, Y.M.; Chao, T.Y.; Chang, W.C.; Chang, M.J.; Lee, M.F. Thymol reduces oxidative stress, aortic intimal thickening, and inflammation-related gene expression in hyperlipidemic rabbits. J. Food Drug Anal. 2016, 24, 556–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Meeran, M.F.N.; Javed, H.; Taee, H.A.; Azimullah, S.; Ojha, S.K. Pharmacological properties and molecular mechanisms of thymol: Prospects for its therapeutic potential and pharmaceutical development. Front. Pharmacol. 2017, 8, 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Castillo-Espaňa, P.; Cisneros-Estrada, A.; Garduno-Ramirez, M.L.; Hernandez-Abreu, O.; Ramirez, R.; Estrada-Soto, S. Preliminary ethnopharmacological survey of plants used in Mexico for the treatment of hypertension. Phcog. Rev. 2009, 3, 41–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Giordani, R.; Hadef, Y.; Kaloustian, J. Compositions and antifungal activities of essential oils of some Algerian aromatic plants. Fitoterapia 2008, 79, 199–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Al-Bayati, F.A. Synergistic antibacterial activity between Thymus vulgaris and Pimpinella anisum essential oils and methanol extracts. J. Ethnophamacol. 2008, 116, 403–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nikolić, M.; Glamočlija, J.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R.; Calheha, R.; Fernandes, A.; Markovič, T.; Markovič, D.; Giweli, A.; Sokovič, M. Chemical composition, antimicrobial, antioxidant and antitumor activity of Thymus serpyllum L., Thymus algeriensis Boiss. and Reut and Thymus vulgaris L. essential oils. Ind. Cros. Prod. 2014, 52, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Roth, G.A.; Forouzanfar, M.H.; Moran, A.E.; Barber, R.; Nguyen, G.; Feigin, V.L.; Naghavi, M.; Mensah, G.A.; Murray, C.J.L.; Phil, D. Demographic and epidemiologic drivers of global cardiovascular mortality. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 372, 1333–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Chang, X.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, W.; Zhao, Z.; Sun, J. Natural drugs a treatment strategy for cardiovascular disease through the regulation of oxidative stress. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2020, 2020, 5430407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Senoner, T.; Dichtl, W. Oxidative stress in cardiovascular diseases: Still a therapeutic target? Nutrient 2019, 11, 2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Costa, G.; Fortuna, A.; Gonçalves, D.; Figueiredo, I.V.; Falcão, A.; Batista, M.T. Pharmacokinetics of Cymbopogon citratus infusion in rats after single oral dose administration. SOJ Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 4, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Suen, J.; Thomas, J.; Kranz, A.; Vun, S.; Miller, M. Effect of flavonoids on oxidative stress and inflammation in adults at risk of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review. Healthcare 2016, 4, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Al-Rawi, N.H.; Shahid, A.M. Oxidative stress, antioxidants, and lipid profile in the serum and saliva of individuals with coronary heart disease: Is there a link with periodontal health? Minerva Stomatol. 2017, 66, 212–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pignatelli, P.; Menichelli, D.; Pastori, D.; Violi, F. Oxidative stress and cardiovascular disease: New insights. Kardiol. Pol. 2018, 76, 713–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Harrison, D.; Griendling, K.K.; Landmesser, U.; Hornig, B.; Drexler, H. Role of oxidative stress in atherosclerosis. Am. J. Cardiol. 2003, 91, 7A–11A. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. de Brito Alves, J.L.; de Sousa, V.P.; Cavalcanti Neto, M.P.; Magnani, M.; de Andrade Braga, V.; da Costa-Silva, J.H.; Leandro, C.G.; Vidal, H.; Pirola, L. New insights on the use of dietary polyphenols or probiotics for the management of arterial hypertension. Front. Physiol. 2016, 7, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Selma, M.V.; Espín, J.C.; Tomás-Barberán, F.A. Interaction between phenolics and gut microbiota: Role in human health. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 6485–6501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tomas-Barberan, F.A.; Selma, M.V.; Espin, J.C. Interactions of gut microbiota with dietary polyphenols and consequences to human health. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2016, 19, 471–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Natarajan, N.; Hori, D.; Flavahan, S.; Steppan, J.; Flavahan, N.A.; Berkowitz, D.E.; Pluznick, J.L. Microbial short chain fatty acid metabolites lower blood pressure via endothelial G protein-coupled receptor 41. Physiol. Genom. 2016, 48, 826–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Calderón-Pérez, L.; Gosalbes, M.J.; Yuste, S.; Valls, R.M.; Pedret, A.; Llauradó, E.; Jimenez-Hernandez, N.; Artacho, A.; Pla-Paga, L.; Companys, J.; et al. Gut metagenomic and short chain fatty acids signature in hypertension: A cross-sectional study. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 6436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Calderon-Pérez, L.; Llauradó, E.; Companys, J.; Pla-Paga, L.; Pedret, A.; Rubió, L.; Gosalbes, M.J.; Yuste, S.; Sola, R.; Valls, R.M. Interplay between dietary phenolic compound intake and the human gut microbiome in hypertension: A cross-sectional study. Food Chem. 2021, 344, 128567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Salehi, B.; Mishra, A.P.; Shukla, I.; Sharifi-Rad, M.; Contreras, M.D.M.; Segura-Carretero, A.; Fathi, H.; Nasrabadi, N.N.; Kobarfard, F.; Sharifi-Rad, J. Thymol, thyme, and other plant sources: Health and potential uses. Phytother. Res. 2018, 32, 1688–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Komaki, A.; Hoseini, F.; Shahidi, S.; Baharlouei, H. Study of the effect of extract of Thymus vulgaris on anxiety in male rats. J. Tradit. Complem. Med. 2016, 6, 257–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Asadbegi, M.; Yaghmaei, P.; Salehi, I.; Komaki, A.; Ebrahim-Habibi, A. Investigation of thymol effect on learning and memory impairment induced by intrahippocampal injection of amyloid beta peptide in high fat diet-fed rats. Metab. Brain Dis. 2017, 32, 827–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kohlert, C.; van Rensen, I.; März, R.; Schindler, G.; Graefe, E.U.; Veit, M. Bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of natural volatile terpenes in animals and humans. Planta Med. 2000, 66, 495–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Rubió, L.; Macià, A.; Castell-Auví, A.; Pinent, M.; Blay, M.T.; Ardévol, A.; Romero, M.P.; Motilva, M.J. Effect of the co-occurring olive oil and thyme extracts on the phenolic bioaccessibility and bioavailability assessed by in vitro digestion and cell models. Food Chem. 2014, 149, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kohlert, C.; Schindler, G.; März, R.W.; Abel, G.; Brinkhaus, B.; Derendorf, H.; Gräfe, E.U.; Veit, M. Systemic availability and pharmacokinetics of thymol in humans. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2002, 42, 731–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Thomford, N.E.; Senthebane, D.A.; Rowe, A.; Munro, D.; Seele, P.; Maroyi, A.; Dzobo, K. Natural products for drug discovery in the 21st century: Innovations for novel drug discovery. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Bacova, K.; Zitterl-Eglseer, K.; Chrastinova, L.; Laukova, A.; Madarova, M.; Gancarcikova, S.; Sopkova, D.; Andrejcakova, Z.; Placha, I. Effect of thymol addition and withdrawal on some blood parameters, antioxidative defence system and fatty acid profile in rabbit muscle. Animals 2020, 10, 1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Bacova, K.; Zitterl Eglseer, K.; Karas Räuber, G.; Chrastinova, L.; Laukova, A.; Takacsova, M.; Pogany Simonova, M.; Placha, I. Effect of sustained administration of thymol on its bioaccessibility and bioavailability in rabbits. Animals 2021, 11, 2595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Takada, M.; Agata, I.; Sakamoto, M.; Yagi, N.; Hayashi, N. On the metabolic detoxication of thymol in rabbit and man. J. Toxicol. Sci. 1979, 4, 341–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Austgulen, L.; Solheim, E.; Scheline, R. Metabolism in rats of p-cymene derivatives: Carvacrol and thymol. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 1987, 61, 98–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Krause, E.L.; Ternes, W. Bioavailability of the antioxidative thyme compounds thymol and p-cymene-2,3-diol in egg. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 1999, 209, 140–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Thalhamer, B.; Buchberger, W.; Waser, M. Identification of thymol phase I metabolites in human urine by headspace sorptive extraction combined with thermal desorption and gas chromatography mass spectrometry. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2011, 56, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Oceľová, V. Plant additives in relation to the animal gastrointestinal tract and metabolism of their main compounds. Master’s Thesis, Institute of Animal Physiology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Košice, Slovakia, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  64. Michiels, J.; Missotten, J.; Dierick, N.; Fremaut, D.; Maene, P.; De Smet, S. In vitro degradation and in vivo passage kinetics of carvacrol, thymol, eugenol and trans-cinnamaldehyde along the gastrointestinal tract of piglets. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2008, 88, 2371–2381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Armorini, S.; Yeatts, J.E.; Mullen, K.A.E.; Mason, S.E.; Mehmeti, E.; Anderson, K.L.; Washburn, S.P.; Baynes, R.E. Development of a HS-SPME-GC-MS/MS method for the quantitation of thymol and carvacrol in bovine matrices and to determine residue depletion in milk and tissues. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 7856–7865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Mason, S.E.; Mullen, K.A.E.; Anderson, K.L.; Washburn, S.P.; Yeatts, J.L.; Baynes, R.E. Pharmacokinetic analysis of thymol, carvacrol and diallyl disulfide after intramammary and topical applications in healthy organic dairy cattle. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2017, 34, 740–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Rubió, L.; Farràs, M.; de la Torre, R.; Macià, A.; Romero, M.P.; Valls, R.M.; Solà, R.; Farré, M.; Fitó, M.; Motilva, M.J. Metabolite profiling of olive oil and thyme phenols after a sustained intake of two phenol-enriched olive oils by humans: Identification of compliance markers. Food Res. Int. 2014, 65, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Rubió, L.; Serra, A.; Chen, C.Y.O.; Macià, A.; Romero, M.P.; Covas, M.I.; Solà, R.; Motilva, M.J. Effects of co-occurring components from olive oil and thyme extracts on antioxidant status and their bioavailability in acute ingestion in rats. Food Funct. 2014, 5, 740–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Van den Hoven, R.; Zappe, H.; Zitterl-Eglseer, K.; Jugl, M.; Franz, C. Study of the effect of Bronchipret on the lung function of five Austrian saddle horses suffering recurrent airway obstruction (heaves). Vet. Rec. 2003, 152, 555–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Haselmeyer, A.; Zentek, J.; Chizzola, R. Effects of thyme as a feed additive in broiler chickens on thymol in gut contents, blood plasma, liver and muscle. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2015, 95, 504–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Haselmeyer, A. Wirkung von Thymian als Futterzusatz beim Broiler. Ph.D. Thesis, Veterinärmedizinischen Universität, Wien, Austria, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  72. Zitterl-Eglseer, K.; Wetscherek, W.; Stoni, A.; Kroismayr, A.; Windisch, W. Bioavailability of essential oils of a phytobiotic feed additive and impact of performance and nutrient digestibility in weaned piglets. Bodenkult. J. Land Manag. Food Environ. 2008, 59, 121–129. [Google Scholar]
  73. Hagmüller, W.; Jugl-Chizzola, M.; Zitterl-Eglseer, K.; Gabler, C.; Spergser, J.; Chizzola, R.; Franz, C. The use of Thymi Herba as feed additive (0.1%, 0.5%, 1.0%) in weanling piglets with assessment of the shedding of haemolysing E. coli and the detection of thymol in the blood plasma. Berl. Münch. Tierärztl. Wochenschr. 2005, 119, 50–54. [Google Scholar]
  74. Fernandez, M.E.; Palacio, M.A.; Labaque, M.C. Thymol detection by solid-phase microextraction in faeces and egg yolk of Japanese quail. J. Chromatogr. B 2017, 1044, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Oceľová, V.; Chizzola, R.; Battelli, G.; Pisarcikova, J.; Faix, S.; Gai, F.; Placha, I. Thymol in the intestinal tract of broiler chickens after sustained administration of thyme essential oil in feed. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2019, 103, 204–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Pisarčíková, J.; Oceľová, V.; Faix, Š.; Plachá, I.; Calderón, A.I. Identification and quantification of thymol metabolites in plasma, liver and duodenal wall of broiler chickens using UHPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2017, 31, e3881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Oceľová, V.; Chizzola, R.; Pisarčíková, J.; Novak, J.; Ivanišinová, O.; Faix, Š. Effect of thyme essential oil supplementation on thymol content in blood plasma, liver, kidney and muscle in broiler chickens. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2016, 11, 1545–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Singh, R.; Hu, M. Drug metabolism in gastroinestinal tract. In Oral Bioavailability: Basic Principles, Advanced Concepts, and Applications; Hu, M., Li, X., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011; pp. 91–109. [Google Scholar]
  79. Hu, M.; Li, X. Barriers to oral bioavailability-an overview. In Oral Bioavailability: Basic Principles, Advanced Concepts, and Applications; Hu, M., Li, X., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  80. Parkinson, A. Biotransformation of Xenobiotics. In Cassaret & Doull’s Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poisons, 6th ed.; Klaassen, C.D., Ed.; The McGraw-Hill Companies: New York, NY, USA, 2001; pp. 133–224. [Google Scholar]
  81. Rozman, K.K.; Klaassen, C.D. Absorption, distribution, and excretion of toxicants. In Cassaret & Doull’s Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poisons, 6th ed.; Klaassen, C.D., Ed.; The McGraw-Hill Companies: New York, NY, USA, 2001; pp. 107–132. [Google Scholar]
  82. Timbrell, J.A. Factors Affecting Toxic Responses: Disposition. Principles of Biochemical Toxicology, 4th ed.; Informa Healthcare USA, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 35–74. [Google Scholar]
  83. Davies, R.R.; Davies, J.A.E.R. Rabbit gastrointestinal physiology. Vet. Clin. North Am. Exot. Anim. Pract. 2003, 6, 139–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Campbell-Ward, M.L. Gastrointestinal physiology and nutrition. In Ferrets, Rabbits, and Rodents: Clinical Medicine and Surgery, 3rd ed.; Quesenberry, K.E., Carpenter, J.W., Eds.; Elsevier: Saint-Louis, MI, USA, 2012; pp. 183–192. [Google Scholar]
  85. Placha, I.; Bacova, K.; Zitterl-Eglseer, K.; Laukova, A.; Chrastinova, L.; Madarova, M.; Zitnan, R.; Strkolcova, G. Thymol in fattening rabbit diet, its bioavailability and effects on intestinal morphology, microbiota from caecal content and immunity. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2021, 106, 368–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Animals 12 01131 g001 550
Figure 1. Organ bioavailability barriers to thymol (based on [79]).
Figure 1. Organ bioavailability barriers to thymol (based on [79]).
Animals 12 01131 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Placha, I.; Bacova, K.; Plachy, L. Current Knowledge on the Bioavailability of Thymol as a Feed Additive in Humans and Animals with a Focus on Rabbit Metabolic Processes. Animals 2022, 12, 1131. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12091131

AMA Style

Placha I, Bacova K, Plachy L. Current Knowledge on the Bioavailability of Thymol as a Feed Additive in Humans and Animals with a Focus on Rabbit Metabolic Processes. Animals. 2022; 12(9):1131. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12091131

Chicago/Turabian Style

Placha, Iveta, Kristina Bacova, and Lukas Plachy. 2022. "Current Knowledge on the Bioavailability of Thymol as a Feed Additive in Humans and Animals with a Focus on Rabbit Metabolic Processes" Animals 12, no. 9: 1131. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12091131

APA Style

Placha, I., Bacova, K., & Plachy, L. (2022). Current Knowledge on the Bioavailability of Thymol as a Feed Additive in Humans and Animals with a Focus on Rabbit Metabolic Processes. Animals, 12(9), 1131. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12091131

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop