Next Article in Journal
Changes in the Populations of Two Lymnaeidae and Their Infection by Fasciola hepatica and/or Calicophoron daubneyi over the Past 30 Years in Central France
Next Article in Special Issue
Acid–Base, Gas, Ions, and Glucose Analysis in Follicular Fluid in Holstein-Friesian Dairy Cows Is Associated with the Follicle Size in Poland
Previous Article in Journal
Cytogenetic Analysis of the Bimodal Karyotype of the Common European Adder, Vipera berus (Viperidae)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genomic Prediction for Abortion in Lactating Holstein Dairy Cows
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Commentary

Revisiting the Timing of Insemination at Spontaneous Estrus in Dairy Cattle

by
Fernando López-Gatius
1,2
1
Agrotecnio Centre, 25198 Lleida, Spain
2
Subunit, Transfer in Bovine Reproduction SLu, 22300 Barbastro, Spain
Animals 2022, 12(24), 3565; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12243565
Submission received: 23 November 2022 / Revised: 9 December 2022 / Accepted: 13 December 2022 / Published: 16 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Dairy Cattle Reproduction)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The possibility of artificial insemination (AI), mainly in dairy cattle, revolutionized animal and human reproduction procedures over the 20th century. In effect, AI in dairy cattle is considered the most important technological advancement in the field of animal breeding. Cows show estrous behavior over an 8-to-20 h period yet they are refractory to the bull some 10–12 h before ovulation. As spermatozoa need to persist in the female reproductive tract for 6–8 h before they are capable of fertilization, in the past 80 years the time interval for AI in cattle with fresh or frozen-thawed semen has been 24–6 h before ovulation. Recent evidence suggests this interval should be reduced.

Abstract

Cows show spontaneous estrus over 8–20 h but become refractory to the bull about 10–12 h before ovulation. This indicates that ovulation occurs 10–12 h after the end of estrus behavior, yet spermatozoa from the bull ejaculate need to undergo maturation and capacitation for 6 to 8 h in the female reproductive tract before they are capable of fertilization. Traditionally, the onset of estrus has been considered the best timing for artificial insemination (AI) in cattle, that is, 6 to 24 h from the first signs of estrus. However, recent findings suggest this interval should be reduced to 16 to 6 h before ovulation, bringing it closer to the end of estrus. In this review, the end of estrus rather than its onset is proposed as the best guide for AI timing in dairy cattle, and physiological indicators of late estrus are discussed such as relaxation of the intravaginal part of the uterus, a lower cervical mucus viscosity and a softer pre-ovulatory follicular consistency as simple cues indicating a cow is ready for service.

1. Introduction

Cattle, like other ruminants, have been used to transform vegetable products into milk and meat from the beginning of agriculture, cattle breeding being one of the pillars of economic development since the Neolithic period [1]. In fact, social relationships among animal species, man being one of them, have been key to the evolution of the human species [2]. Examples of the outcome of these relationships include human fertility concepts derived from early knowledge of animal physiology [3]; man–cow interactions [4] leading to the genetic mutation that enables humans to produce lactase so that milk can be ingested over a lifetime; or the production of a vaccine against smallpox using material from cows since the 18th century [5]. More recently, the introduction of artificial insemination (AI), mainly in dairy cattle, revolutionized procedures of animal and human reproduction over the 20th century [6,7,8]. Indeed, for more than 80 years now, AI in dairy cattle has been considered the most important technological advancement in animal breeding [9,10,11]. The development of AI was prompted by the intensification of dairy farming. The reproductive records of cows are essential for AI. Additionally, the training of inseminators is a significant contribution to the successful commercial application of AI to dairy cattle breeding [12,13]. In consequence, inseminator training and improvements in the act of inseminating remain topics of great interest [14,15,16,17]. However, the correct detection of estrus remains a challenge [18,19,20,21,22] determining that some 20% of inseminations may be performed in pregnant cows [21].
Behavioral signs of estrus are a predictor of the time of ovulation and a guide to the optimal time of insemination. It is generally accepted that ovulation occurs 10–12 h after the end of estrus. Cows may show a period of standing estrus of 8–20 h but become refractory to the bull about 10–12 h before ovulation. Spermatozoa need to remain in the female reproductive tract for 6 to 8 h before they are capable of fertilization, and capacitated spermatozoa must be present in the fallopian tubes at the moment of ovulation [23,24,25,26,27]. The risk of the ageing of gametes, particularly the postovulatory oocyte, becomes critical at the time of AI in cattle [28,29,30]. Owing to the challenges of correctly detecting estrus, hormonal protocols for fixed-time AI (FTAI) have been incorporated into routine intensive dairy farming reproductive management programs [31,32,33,34]. However, most Ais worldwide are performed at spontaneous estrus and hormone treatments have met with strong consumer opposition in some countries. In addition, the use of sex-sorted semen has increased enormously over the last decade [35,36,37,38] and, in beef cattle, this practice has recently been recommended only in cows expressing estrus following FTAI protocols [39,40]. In the present report, findings are reviewed that could help identify the optimal time of AI in dairy cattle undergoing spontaneous estrus.

2. The Timing of Insemination

The optimal time of AI was established using fresh semen in the classic studies by Trimberger and Davis [41] and Trimberger [42]. Cows were examined by palpation per rectum at two-hour intervals during and following the standing behavior of estrus (not secondary signs) to locate the end of estrus and time of ovulation [42]. Highest conception rates (79%) were obtained when cows were inseminated in the middle to end of estrus (24 to 6 h before ovulation). For comparative purposes, these early data provided by Trimberger [42] are presented for 12 h intervals in Table 1.
These findings led to the extensively used “a.m.-p.m.” guidelines. These state that cows detected to be in estrus in the morning (a.m.) should be submitted for AI that afternoon (p.m.), and cows in estrus in the afternoon should be inseminated the next morning. Subsequent studies confirmed earlier work in which best results were obtained when heifers or cows were inseminated with fresh or frozen semen 7 to 18 h after the detection of estrus [43,44,45,46,47,48]. However, in two extensive studies involving a total of 51,947 Ais, differences were not detected between cows receiving a single mid-morning AI, when most cows would be in early or mid-estrus [49], and cows inseminated once daily compared to the a.m.–p.m. guidelines [50]. These wide ranges in the optimum time to inseminate cows may reflect the effect of a variable frequency of estrus observation, or variable efficiency of the technologies used to detect cows in estrus.
More recently, using frozen-thawed semen in tie-stalled cows, Sumiyoshi et al. [22] obtained a conception rate of 63% when AI was performed 30 to 6 h before ovulation, which was significantly higher than the conception rates resulting from inseminations performed earlier or later than this interval. Estrus was confirmed according to eight estrous signs: first, swelling and hyperemia of the vulva by visual observation, then swelling and relaxation of the intravaginal part of the uterus and opening of the external uterine orifice using a sterile speculum, viscosity of the cervical mucus, and contraction of the uterus and diameter of the uterine horn on transrectal ultrasonography. Ovulation was assessed at 6 h intervals by rectal ultrasonography. Table 1 shows the data recorded at 12 h intervals.
The use of automated estrus detection technologies potentially offers a high level of accuracy [51,52,53,54,55]. Using frozen-thawed semen, Roelofs et al. [56] investigated the effects of the insemination-ovulation interval on embryo quality seven days post-AI. The time of ovulation following estrus onset (as determined through pedometers or visual observation) was assessed every 4 h by rectal ultrasonography. When data were stratified by 12 h intervals, good quality embryo rates were significantly higher for AI before ovulation than after ovulation (Table 1). Accordingly, the highest percentage of good quality embryos (67.6%) was detected when AI was performed 24 to 12 h before ovulation. Within this interval, the percentage of good embryos increased to 89% when AI was performed 16 to 13 h before ovulation. In the same study, fertilization rates were significantly higher when AI was conducted between 36–24 h and 24–12 h before ovulation (85% and 82%, respectively) compared to AI after ovulation (56%) [56].
In a further study using frozen-thawed semen, the highest pregnancy rate (50.8%) was recorded for AIs performed 16 to 0 h before ovulation [57]. Pregnancy rates were significantly lower for AIs executed 32 to 16 h before ovulation (28.7%) and for AIs executed after ovulation (20%). The time of ovulation was assessed every 12 h by rectal ultrasonography following AI [57]. Using frozen sex-sorted semen, which is a sub fertile inseminate compared to conventional semen [35,36,37,38], AI intervals 0 to 32 h from the onset of estrus did not affect conception rates [58]. However, conception rates were higher in response to AI conducted −4 to 4 h (57.1%) compared to −12 to −4 h (37.7%) or 12–20 h (30.3%) from the end of estrus, whereas using conventional semen, the AI interval from estrus onset and end did not affect conception rates. These authors suggested that the time of estrus end is a better indicator of optimal AI timing for sex-sorted semen than the time of estrus onset.
While high conception rates can be obtained when AI is performed within a wide range of hours, 30 to 6 h before ovulation, it seems that embryo quality and ovulation time [56,57,58] suggest this interval should be reduced. This reduction could improve pregnancy rates under certain circumstances such as when semen quality is poor.

3. Is End-Estrus the Best Guide for the Timing of Insemination?

Based on standing estrus as the most accurate sign of this stage, intervals between estrus onset and ovulation range from 16 to 61 h, averaging 27 to 40 h [59,60,61,62]. In contrast, intervals between estrus end and ovulation range from 3 to 18 h and average at 9 to 12 h [42,43,63]. Therefore, the end of standing behavior is a more accurate predictor of ovulation time than estrus onset. The problem, however, is that not all cycling cows show standing estrus [42,43,64,65,66,67]. In fact, the percentage of cows in estrus that stand to be mounted has declined from 80% to 50% over the last decades [68]. Grouping different behavioral estrous signs, 95% of cows were detected to be in estrus, intervals from estrus onset and end to ovulation being highly variable among cows [64]. High individual variability in both intervals relative to the time of ovulation has also been described using automated activity monitors [53,57,69,70]. This limits their use as a practical predictor of ovulation. However, both the visual and automated detection of estrus indicate there is an increase in physical activity that peaks and then declines. This makes it easy to conduct AI towards the end of each cow’s interval of estrus. Currently the use of automated systems does not usually exceed 20% of dairy herds [71,72] and standing estrus can be detected in at least 50% of cows on remaining farms [64].

4. Physiological Indicators of Late Estrus

Along with decreased estrous behavior activity, some physiological signs can be used as predictors of end estrus at the time of AI. Using a sterile speculum, relaxation of the intravaginal part of the uterus is very apparent from 18 to 6 h before ovulation [73,74] and this has been considered the optimal time for AI [74]. Between 24 and 6 h before ovulation, the cervical mucus reduces its viscosity to a maximum, becoming highly hydrated [73,75], its ultrastructural and physical properties markedly changing at the end of manifest estrus [76]. A lower cervical mucus viscosity at AI has been associated with a higher pregnancy rate [46]. To time AI, the routine testing of mucus obtained from the vagina [77] may help differentiate between early estrus, when mucus is less hydrated (Figure 1A), and late estrus, when it is more hydrated (Figure 1B). Finally, the consistency of the pre-ovulatory follicle at AI may also indicate the optimal time for AI. During estrus, rectal palpation of the pre-ovulatory follicle, irrespective of its size, reveals the sequence: young follicle (early estrus: firm/soft), mature follicle (late estrus: very soft), and finally ovulatory follicle (after estrus: emptied) [78,79,80]. In an extensive study involving 2365 AIs, the highest pregnancy rate was observed in cows with a mature follicle at AI [81]. In this study, the warm period of the year, which clearly impairs fertility in the geographic area of the study [82,83], had no negative impact on the fertility of cows with a mature follicle at insemination [81].
Careful examination of the reproductive organs should cause no harm to the animal [84]. Uterine stimulation triggers the release of oxytocin [85,86] and palpation of the ovaries may shorten the interval from end estrus to ovulation [63]. These effects are similar to those induced by mating [85,87] or by traditional AI techniques [85]. The incorporation of exams of the genital organs into AI routines should improve the success of this procedure.

5. Concluding Remarks

The onset of estrus behavior as a predictor of the time of ovulation has traditionally been considered the best guide to time AI. However, this reference has two negative aspects. First, its high individual variability and, second, it is difficult to accurately locate the true onset of estrus. In contrast, once a cow has been detected in estrus, its peaking activity and decline in this activity towards the end of estrus may be a better reference to estimate when ovulation will take place.
The time interval 24 to 6 h before ovulation is widely accepted as the optimal time for insemination. However, recent findings suggest this interval should be reduced to 16 to 6 h before ovulation [56,57,58]. In other words, AI closer to end-estrus is a better insemination time. As ovulation occurs 10–12 h following the end of estrus behavior [23,24,25,26], physiological indicators of late estrus such as ready for service may be simply and directly detected at AI [73,74,75,81]. Thus, by better predicting the ovulation time, pregnancy rates to AI may be improved [57].
Insemination of the cow is the last, but not the least important stage of reproduction. The act of insemination requires knowledge of the reproductive anatomy and physiology of the cow, practice, and a good tactile-mental image of the normal estrus signs of the genital organs. The inseminator’s first objective should be to positively identify the optimal time of AI in a cow detected in estrus. Ovarian, uterine and vaginal findings may be significant predictors of AI outcomes. Rejection of cows that are not ready for service is a further opportunity to improve the success of AI programs. This type of intervention should increase the pregnancy rate during the optimum breeding period.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data provided have been extracted from the cited references.

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Ana Burton for editorial assistance with the English version.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zeuner, F.E. The history of the domestication of cattle. In Man and Cattle; Mourant, A.E., Zeuner, E.F., Eds.; Royal Antropological Institute: London, UK, 1963; pp. 9–19. [Google Scholar]
  2. Zeuner, F.E. A History of Domesticated Animals; Hutchinson: London, UK, 1963; pp. 15–35. [Google Scholar]
  3. López-Gatius, F.; Hunter, R.H.F. Fertility, fecundity and the creative instinct. Gynecol. Obstet. Hum. Reprod. 2018, 47, 581–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Curry, A. Archaeology: The milk revolution. Nature 2013, 500, 20–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Smith, K.A. Edward Jenner and the small pox vaccine. Front. Immunol. 2011, 2, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Verberckmoes, S.; Van Soom, A.; de Kruif, A. Intra-uterine insemination in farm animals and humans. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2004, 39, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ombelet, W.; Van Robays, J. Artificial insemination history: Hurdles and milestones. Facts Views Vis. Obgyn 2015, 7, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Hunter, R.H.F.; López-Gatius, F. From sperm to embryos; lessons learnt from Tim Rowson’s career. Theriogenology 2021, 172, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Foote, R.H. Review: Dairy cattle reproductive physiology research and management--past progress and future prospects. J. Dairy Sci. 1996, 79, 980–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Funk, D.A. Major advances in globalization and consolidation of the artificial insemination industry. J. Dairy Sci. 2006, 89, 1362–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Lewis, N.M.; Canedo-Ribeiro, C.; Rathje, C.C.; Jennings, R.L.; Danihel, M.; Bosman, L.M.; Silvestri, G.; Griffin, D.K. The economic burden of chromosome translocations and the benefits of enhanced screening for cattle breeding. Animals 2022, 12, 1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Foote, R.H. The artificial insemination. In New Technologies in Animal Breeding; Brackett, B.G., Seidel, G.E., Seidel, S.M., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1981; pp. 13–39. [Google Scholar]
  13. López-Gatius, F. Factors of a noninfectious nature affecting fertility after artificial insemination in lactating dairy cows. A review. Theriogenology 2012, 77, 1029–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dalton, J.C.; Robinson, J.Q.; Price, W.J.; DeJarnette, J.M.; Chapwanya, A. Artificial insemination of cattle: Description and assessment of a training program for veterinary students. J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 104, 6295–6303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lech, M.; Wilkowska, M.; Kwasniewicz, A.; Graczyk, S.; Grzeczka, A.; Kulus, J.; Gehrke, M.; Kolomak, I.; Jaskowski, J.M. Progress in acquiring skills in cattle rectal examination by veterinary students consulting their acquired experience and professional motivation. Med. Weter. 2022, 78, 450–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Koch, J.; Weber, L.P.; Heppelmann, M.; Freise, F.; Klingelmann, M.; Bachmann, L. Effect of different thawing methods for frozen bull semen and additional factors on the conception rate of dairy cows in artificial insemination. Animals 2022, 12, 2330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mellado, M.; Treviño, L.M.; Chavez, M.I.; Véliz, F.G.; Macías-Cruz, U.; Avendaño-Reyes, L.; García, J.E. Fertility of Holstein cows and heifers submitted to timed artificial insemination and receiving one or two doses (12 h apart) of semen. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2022. Advance online publication. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Foote, R.H. Estrus detection and estrus detection aids. J. Dairy Sci. 1975, 58, 248–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Senger, P.L. The estrus detection problem: New concepts, technologies, and possibilities. J. Dairy Sci. 1994, 77, 2745–2753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Diskin, M.G.; Sreenan, J.M. Expression and detection of oestrus in cattle. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 2000, 40, 481–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Roelofs, J.; López-Gatius, F.; Hunter, R.H.F.; van Eerdenburg, F.J.C.M.; Hanzen, C.H. When is a cow in estrus? Clinical and practical aspects. Theriogenology 2010, 74, 327–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sumiyoshi, T.; Tanaka, T.; Kamomae, H. An investigation of the time period within which frozen-thawed semen delivers a high conception rate in lactating dairy cows. J. Reprod. Dev. 2020, 66, 277–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Hammond, J. The Physiology of Reproduction in the Cow; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1927; pp. 9–111. [Google Scholar]
  24. Laing, J. Observations on the survival time of the spermatozoa in the genital tract of the cow and its relation to fertility. J. Agric. Sci. 1945, 35, 72–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hunter, R.H.F.; Wilmut, I. Sperm transport in the cow: Peri-ovulatory redistribution of viable cells within the oviduct. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 1984, 24, 597–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hunter, R.H.F. Sperm release from oviduct epithelial binding is controlled hormonally by peri-ovulatory graafian follicles. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2008, 75, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Suarez, S.S. Regulation of sperm storage and movement in the mammalian oviduct. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2008, 52, 455–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Hunter, R.H.F. Ageing of the unfertilized cow egg in vivo: How soon is fertility compromised? Vet. Rec. 1989, 124, 489–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hunter, R.H.F.; Greve, T. Could artificial insemination of cattle be more fruitful? Penalties associated with ageing eggs. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 1997, 32, 137–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Saacke, R.G. Insemination factors related to timed AI in cattle. Theriogenology 2008, 70, 479–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Rabiee, A.R.; Lean, I.J.; Stevenson, M.A. Efficacy of Ovsynch program on reproductive performance in dairy cattle: A meta-analysis. J. Dairy Sci. 2005, 88, 2754–2770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Macmillan, K. L Recent advances in the synchronization of estrus and ovulation in dairy cows. J. Reprod. Dev. 2010, 56, S42–S47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Carvalho, P.D.; Santos, V.G.; Giordano, J.O.; Wiltbank, M.C.; Fricke, P.M. Development of fertility programs to achieve high 21-day pregnancy rates in high-producing dairy cows. Theriogenology 2018, 114, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. López-Gatius, F. Ovarian response to prostaglandin F2α in lactating dairy cows: A clinical update. J. Reprod. Dev. 2022, 68, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Vishwanath, R.; Moreno, J.F. Review: Semen sexing—Current state of the art with emphasis on bovine species. Animal 2018, 12, s85–s96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Marques, M.O.; Morotti, F.; Lorenzetti, E.; Bizarro-Silva, C.; Seneda, M.M. Intensified use of TAI and sexed semen on commercial farms. Anim. Reprod. 2018, 15, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Reese, S.; Pirez, M.C.; Steele, H.; Kölle, S. The reproductive success of bovine sperm after sex-sorting: A meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 17366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Seidel, G.E., Jr.; DeJarnette, J.M. Applications and world-wide use of sexed semen in cattle. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2021. Advance online publication. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Thomas, J.M.; Locke, J.; Bonacker, R.C.; Knickmeyer, E.R.; Wilson, D.J.; Vishwanath, R.; Arnett, A.M.; Smith, M.F.; Patterson, D.J. Evaluation of SexedULTRA 4M™ sex-sorted semen in timed artificial insemination programs for mature beef cows. Theriogenology 2019, 123, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Perry, G.A.; Walker, J.A.; Rich, J.; Northrop, E.J.; Perkins, S.D.; Beck, E.E.; Sandbulte, M.D.; Mokry, F.B. Influence of Sexcel™ (gender ablation technology) gender-ablated semen in fixed-time artificial insemination of beef cows and heifers. Theriogenology 2020, 146, 140–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Trimberger, G.W.; Davis, H.P. Breeding efficiency in dairy cattle bred at various stages of estrus by artificial insemination. J. Dairy Sci. 1943, 26, 757–759. [Google Scholar]
  42. Trimberger, G.W. Conception rate in dairy cattle by insemination at various intervals before and after ovulation. J. Dairy Sci. 1944, 27, 659–660. [Google Scholar]
  43. Hall, J.G.; Branton, C.; Stone, E.J. Estrus, estrous cycles, ovulation time, time of service, and fertility of dairy cattle in Louisiana. J. Dairy Sci. 1959, 42, 1086–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gwazdauskas, F.C.; Whitter, W.D.; Vinson, W.E.; Pearson, R.E. Evaluation of reproductive efficiency of dairy cattle with emphasis on time of breeding. J. Dairy Sci. 1986, 69, 290–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rankin, T.A.; Smith, W.R.; Shanks, R.D.; Lodge, J.R. Timing of insemination in dairy heifers. J. Dairy Sci. 1992, 75, 2840–2845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. López-Gatius, F.; Labèrnia, J.; Santolaria, P.; Rutllant, J.; López-Béjar, M. The relationship of rheological behavior of the vaginal fluid at the time of insemination to the pregnancy rate in dairy cows. Theriogenology 1997, 48, 865–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Nebel, R.L.; Dransfield, M.G.; Jobst, S.M.; Bame, J.H. Automated electronic systems for the detection of oestrus and timing of AI in cattle. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2000, 60, 713–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Dalton, J.C.; Nadir, S.; Bame, J.H.; Noftsinger, M.; Nebel, R.L.; Saacke, R.G. Effect of time of insemination on number of accessory sperm, fertilization rate, and embryo quality in nonlactating dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2001, 84, 2413–2418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Nebel, R.L.; Walker, W.L.; McGilliard, M.L.; Allen, C.H.; Heckman, G.S. Timing of artificial insemination of dairy cows: Fixed time once daily versus morning and afternoon. J. Dairy Sci. 1994, 77, 3185–3191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Foote, R.H. Time of artificial insemination and fertility in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 1979, 62, 355–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. At-Taras, E.E.; Spahr, S.L. Detection and characterization of estrus in dairy cattle with an electronic heatmount detector and an electronic activity tag. J. Dairy Sci. 2001, 84, 792–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cavalieri, J.; Flinker, L.R.; Anderson, G.A.; Macmillan, K.L. Characteristics of oestrus measured using visual observation and radiotelemetry. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2003, 76, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Roelofs, J.B.; van Eerdenburg, F.J.; Soede, N.M.; Kemp, B. Pedometer readings for estrous detection and as predictor for time of ovulation in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 2005, 64, 1690–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Borchers, M.R.; Bewley, J.M. An assessment of producer precision dairy farming technology use, prepurchase considerations, and usefulness. J. Dairy Sci. 2015, 98, 4198–4205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Reith, S.; Hoy, S. Review: Behavioral signs of estrus and the potential of fully automated systems for detection of estrus in dairy cattle. Animal 2018, 12, 398–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Roelofs, J.B.; Graat, E.A.; Mullaart, E.; Soede, N.M.; Voskamp-Harkema, W.; Kemp, B. Effects of insemination-ovulation interval on fertilization rates and embryo characteristics in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 2006, 66, 2173–2181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Hockey, C.D.; Morton, J.M.; Norman, S.T.; McGowan, M.R. Improved prediction of ovulation time may increase pregnancy rates to artificial insemination in lactating dairy cattle. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2010, 45, e239–e248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Furukawa, E.; Kanno, C.; Yanagawa, Y.; Katagiri, S.; Nagano, M. Relationship between the timing of insemination based on estrus detected by the automatic activity monitoring system and conception rates using sex-sorted semen in Holstein dairy cattle. J. Reprod. Dev. 2022, 68, 295–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Walker, W.L.; Nebel, R.L.; McGilliard, M.L. Time of ovulation relative to mounting activity in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 1996, 79, 1555–1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Augusto, L.; Weitze, K.F.; Otto, F.; Maciel, S.; Tomo, P. Onset and duration of oestrus related to the time of ovulation and fertility in a herd of Nguni cattle in south Mozambique. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 1997, 32, 303–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Pinheiro, O.L.; Barros, C.M.; Figueiredo, R.A.; do Valle, E.R.; Encarnação, R.O.; Padovani, C.R. Estrous behavior and the estrus-to-ovulation interval in Nelore cattle (Bos indicus) with natural estrus or estrus induced with prostaglandin F2 alpha or norgestomet and estradiol valerate. Theriogenology 1998, 49, 667–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Saumande, J.; Humblot, P. The variability in the interval between estrus and ovulation in cattle and its determinants. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2005, 85, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wishart, D.F. Observations on the oestrous cycle of the Friesian heifer. Vet. Rec. 1972, 90, 595–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Roelofs, J.B.; van Eerdenburg, F.J.; Soede, N.M.; Kemp, B. Various behavioral signs of estrous and their relationship with time of ovulation in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 2005, 63, 1366–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Cutullic, E.; Delaby, L.; Causeur, D.; Michel, G.; Disenhaus, C. Hierarchy of factors affecting behavioural signs used for oestrus detection of Holstein and Normande dairy cows in a seasonal calving system. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2009, 113, 22–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Garcia, E.; Hultgren, J.; Fällman, P.; Geust, J.; Algers, B.; Stilwell, G.; Gunnarsson, S.; Rodriguez-Martinez, H. Intensity of oestrus signalling is the most relevant indicator for animal well-being in high-producing dairy cows. Vet. Med. Int. 2011, 2011, 540830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Gaude, I.; Kempf, A.; Strüve, K.D.; Hoedemaker, M. Comparison of visual and computerized estrous detection and evaluation of influencing factors. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2017, 184, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Dobson, H.; Walker, S.L.; Morris, M.J.; Routly, J.E.; Smith, R.F. Why is it getting more difficult to successfully artificially inseminate dairy cows? Animal 2008, 2, 1104–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Valenza, A.; Giordano, J.O.; Lopes, G.; Vincenti, L.; Amundson, M.C.; Fricke, P.M. Assessment of an accelerometer system for detection of estrus and treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone at the time of insemination in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95, 7115–7127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Tippenhauer, C.M.; Plenio, J.L.; Madureira, A.; Cerri, R.; Heuwieser, W.; Borchardt, S. Factors associated with estrous expression and subsequent fertility in lactating dairy cows using automated activity monitoring. J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 104, 6267–6282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Denis-Robichaud, J.; Cerri, R.; Jones-Bitton, A.; LeBlanc, S.J. Survey of reproduction management on Canadian dairy farms. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 9339–9351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Adenuga, A.H.; Jack, C.; Olagunju, K.O.; Ashfield, A. Economic viability of adoption of automated oestrus detection technologies on dairy farms: A review. Animals 2020, 10, 1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Sumiyoshi, T.; Tanaka, T.; Kamomae, H. Relationships between the appearances and changes of estrous signs and the estradiol-17β peak, luteinizing hormone surge and ovulation during the periovulatory period in lactating dairy cows kept in tie-stalls. J. Reprod. Dev. 2014, 60, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Sumiyoshi, T.; Endo, N.; Tanaka, T.; Kamomae, H. Evaluation of criteria for optimal time AI postulated by estrous signs in lactating dairy cows kept in tie-stalls. J. Reprod. Dev. 2017, 63, 597–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. López-Gatius, F.; Rutllant, J.; Labèrnia, J.; Ibarz, A.; López-Béjar, M.; Santolaria, P. Rheological behavior of the vaginal fluid of dairy cows at estrus. Theriogenology 1996, 46, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Rutllant, J.; López-Béjar, M.; López-Gatius, F. Ultrastructural and rheological properties of bovine vaginal fluid and its relation to sperm motility and fertilization: A review. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2005, 40, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Sturman, H.; Oltenacu, E.A.; Foote, R.H. Importance of inseminating only cows in estrus. Theriogenology 2000, 53, 1657–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Studer, E. Palpation of the genital tract for prediction of estrus in the cow. Vet. Med. Small Anim. Clin. 1975, 70, 1337–1341. [Google Scholar]
  79. Hanzen, C. Estrus—Behavior patterns and methods of detection—A review. Ann Méd. Vét. 1981, 125, 617–633. [Google Scholar]
  80. Keenan, L.R.J. Routine evaluation of the reproductive tract and pregnancy diagnosis in the cow. Irish Vet. J. 1984, 38, 132–135. [Google Scholar]
  81. López-Gatius, F. Feeling the ovaries prior to insemination. Clinical implications for improving the fertility of the dairy cow. Theriogenology 2011, 76, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. López-Gatius, F. Is fertility declining in dairy cattle? A retrospective study in northeastern Spain. Theriogenology 2003, 60, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. López-Gatius, F.; Hunter, R.H.F. Clinical relevance of pre-ovulatory follicular temperature in heat-stressed lactating dairy cows. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2017, 52, 366–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Sumiyoshi, T.; Endo, N.; Tanaka, T.; Kamomae, H. No adverse effect of confirmation of ovulation by rectal palpation and ultrasonography after artificial insemination on formation, development, and function of the corpus luteum and conception rate in cows. J. Reprod. Dev. 2022. Advance Online Publication. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Hays, R.L.; Vandemark, N.L. Effect of stimulation of the reproductive organs of the cow on the release of an oxytocin-like substance. Endocrinology 1953, 52, 634–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Vandemark, N.L.; Hays, R.L. Uterine motility responses to mating. Am. J. Physiol. 1952, 170, 518–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Marion, G.B.; Smith, V.R.; Wiley, T.E.; Barrett, G.R. The effect of sterile copulation on time of ovulation in dairy heifers. J. Dairy Sci. 1950, 33, 885–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Cervical mucus viscosity can be used to differentiate between early estrus (mucus less hydrated) (A), and late estrus (mucus more hydrated) (B) [73,74,75,76]. Mucus samples were obtained from the cranial vagina with the help of a plastic inseminating sheath attached to a 50 mL syringe [75]. The time interval from A to B was 16 h.
Figure 1. Cervical mucus viscosity can be used to differentiate between early estrus (mucus less hydrated) (A), and late estrus (mucus more hydrated) (B) [73,74,75,76]. Mucus samples were obtained from the cranial vagina with the help of a plastic inseminating sheath attached to a 50 mL syringe [75]. The time interval from A to B was 16 h.
Animals 12 03565 g001
Table 1. Effects of insemination-ovulation interval on conception and rate of good quality embryos.
Table 1. Effects of insemination-ovulation interval on conception and rate of good quality embryos.
AI-ovulation Interval (a)Conception
(n = 132) [42]
Conception
(n = 100) [22]
Good Quality Embryos
(n = 122) [56]
Before ovulation
>24 h8/15 (53.3%)10/26 (38.5%)11/27 (40.7%) *
12–24 h23/29 (79.3%)18/28 (64.3%)23/34 (67.6%) **
0–12 h19/28 (67.9%)16/31 (51.6%)12/29 (41.4%) ***
After ovulation
0–12 h14/40 (35%)3/12 (25%)2/32 (6.3%) ****
Ovulation assessedEvery 2 hEvery 6 hEvery 4 h
(a) Values with different superscripts within columns denote significant differences detected by logistic regression procedures (*, ****: p = 0.01; **, ****: p < 0.0001; ***, ****: p = 0.004).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

López-Gatius, F. Revisiting the Timing of Insemination at Spontaneous Estrus in Dairy Cattle. Animals 2022, 12, 3565. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12243565

AMA Style

López-Gatius F. Revisiting the Timing of Insemination at Spontaneous Estrus in Dairy Cattle. Animals. 2022; 12(24):3565. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12243565

Chicago/Turabian Style

López-Gatius, Fernando. 2022. "Revisiting the Timing of Insemination at Spontaneous Estrus in Dairy Cattle" Animals 12, no. 24: 3565. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12243565

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop