Next Article in Journal
Composition of Slow-Growing Male Chicken’s Meat and Bone Quality as Affected by Dietary Moringa oleifera Lam. Meal
Next Article in Special Issue
Mitochondrial DNA and Distribution Modelling Evidenced the Lost Genetic Diversity and Wild-Residence of Star Tortoise, Geochelone elegans (Testudines: Testudinidae) in India
Previous Article in Journal
Alleviation of Catching and Crating Stress by Dietary Supplementation of Bacillus subtilis in Pekin Ducks
Previous Article in Special Issue
Climate Change and Dispersal Ability Jointly Affects the Future Distribution of Crocodile Lizards
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 12
Issue 24
10.3390/ani12243481
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Description of a New Cobra (Naja Laurenti, 1768; Squamata, Elapidae) from China with Designation of a Neotype for Naja atra

by
Sheng-Chao Shi
1,2,3,
Gernot Vogel
4,
Li Ding
3,
Ding-Qi Rao
5,
Shuo Liu
6,
Liang Zhang
7,
Zheng-Jun Wu
1,2,* and
Ze-Ning Chen
1,2,3,*
1
Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education for Ecology of Rare and Endangered Species and Environmental Protection, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, China
2
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Rare and Endangered Animal Ecology, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, China
3
CAS Key Laboratory of Mountain Ecological Restoration and Bioresource Utilization & Ecological Restoration Biodiversity Conservation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China
4
Society for Southeast Asian Herpetology, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany
5
Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China
6
Kunming Natural History Museum of Zoology, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China
7
Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Institute of Zoology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510260, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2022, 12(24), 3481; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12243481
Submission received: 14 November 2022 / Revised: 5 December 2022 / Accepted: 5 December 2022 / Published: 9 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Evolution, Diversity, and Conservation of Herpetofauna)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Cobras (Naja Laurenti, 1768) are a group of well-known highly venomous snakes, which cause numerous cases of snakebites every year, especially in South Asia and Southern China. Taxonomic framework is essential for the medical treatment of snake bites and accurate antivenin development. However, the taxonomy of Asian cobras is still puzzling, especially for the widespread species Monocled Cobra (N. kaouthia Lesson, 1831). This study provided new materials and understanding for the taxonomy of this species by combining mitochondrial phylogenetic analysis and morphological comparisons based on samples from a vast area in Asia. The results showed that the Chinese population of N. kaouthia represents a new species. This study also provided new data for N. atra and designated a neotype for it. Furthermore, the subspecies N. naja polyocellata was resurrected and recognized as a full species, N. polyocellata comb. nov., and the subspecies N. sumatrana miolepis was also resurrected. This study highlighted the necessity to evaluate the effectiveness of cobra antivenin based on a comprehensive taxonomic framework.

Abstract

Taxonomic frameworks for medically important species such as cobras (genus Naja Laurenti, 1768; Squamata, Elapidae) are essential for the medical treatment of snake bites and accurate antivenin development. In this paper, we described the former N. kaouthia populations recorded from China as a new species and designated a neotype for N. atra-based morphological and mitochondrial phylogenetic analysis. The new species N. fuxi sp. nov. was morphologically diagnosed from N. kaouthia by (1) regular single narrow crossband present on the middle and posterior parts of the dorsum (3–15, 7.9 ± 2.7, n = 32) and the dorsal surface of the tail (1–6, 4.2 ± 1.1, n = 32) of both adults and juveniles, buff-colored with dark fringes on both edges, vs. South Asian populations (n = 39) and Southeast Asian populations (n = 35) without cross bands, with irregular cross bands or multiple light-colored crossbands pairs, or densely woven lines; (2) small scales between the posterior chin shields, usually three (40%) or two (37%), rarely four (13%), or one (10%) (n = 30) vs. mostly one (81%) and rarely two (19%) (n = 28); (3) ventrals 179–205 (195.4 ± 6.7, n = 33) vs. South Asian populations 179–199 (188.7 ± 5.9, n = 12); Southeast Asian populations 168–186 (177.8 ± 4.9, n = 18). Phylogenetically, the new species forms an independent sister clade to the clade including N. atra, N. kaouthia, N. oxiana and N. sagittifera. Furthermore, the subspecies N. naja polyocellata should be resurrected and recognized as a full species, N. polyocellata comb. nov., and the subspecies N. sumatrana miolepis should be resurrected.

1. Introduction

Cobras of the genus Naja Laurenti, 1768 are a group of well-known highly venomous snakes that cause numerous cases of envenomation every year over an enormous geological area, especially in South Asia, southern China [1,2] and Southeast Asia. Under the current taxonomy framework, the composition of cobra toxins differs within species from different geographical populations, which could lead to antivenin deficiencies [3,4,5,6]. Recent studies on elapid species have shown that widespread medically important species may still require taxonomic revisions [5,7]. It seems necessary to examine the current taxonomy for those species with geographical variation in venom toxins.
Asiatic cobras have a complex taxonomic history (e.g., [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]). All Asiatic cobra populations were previously considered as a single species, Naja naja (Linnaeus, 1758) (in older references also referred to as Naja tripudians) with multiple subspecies and color variants [19,20]. Currently, twelve Asian species are regarded as valid (Figure 1): N. atra Cantor, 1842; N. arabica Scortecci 1932; N. kaouthia Lesson 1831; N. mandalayensis Slowinski and Wüster, 2000; N. naja (Linnaeus, 1758); N. oxiana (Eichwald, 1831); N. philippinensis Taylor, 1922; N. sagittifera Wall, 1913; N. samarensis Peters, 1861; N. siamensis Laurenti, 1768; N. sputatrix Boie, 1827 and N. sumatrana Müller, 1887 [21,22,23]. These species all belong to the subgenus Naja Laurenti, 1768 except N. arabica Scortecci, 1932, which is assigned to the subgenus Uraeus Wagler, 1830 [24].
The Monocled Cobra, Naja kaouthia, is widely recorded in northeastern India, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Nepal, Myanmar, Cambodia, Laos, Northern Malaysia, Southern Vietnam, Thailand and southern China [25] and was firstly described from Bengal by Lesson (1831). However, recent research implied that considerable diversification has occurred among different geographical populations (China, Thailand and Bangladesh) of this species [5,26,27,28,29]. Multiple variations among populations of N. kaouthia regarding coloration, spitting behavior and especially venom toxin composition were found; the venom of the Yunnan population of N. kaouthia lacks α-cobratoxin while that of the Thailand population has it [3,4,5,6]. These findings suggest that currently N. kaouthia may include multiple species and multiple populations, especially the Yunnan Population, necessitating further taxonomic research.
Cobras recorded from China were once regarded as one species with two subspecies under the name Naja naja [30] but later became regarded as two species, namely N. atra and N. kaouthia [31]. The N. kaouthia in China was recorded from southwestern China, including South and Southwestern part of Yunnan, Southwestern part of Sichuan, Xizang (Tibet Autonomous Region), and Guangxi [30,31,32]. The N. atra in China was recorded from southern China, south of the Yangtze River, including Zhejiang, Fujian, Taiwan, Guangdong, Hainan, Guangxi, Macao, Hongkong, Jiangxi, Anhui, Hubei, Hunan and Guizhou [30,31]. A comprehensive study on N. atra (including samples from multiple sites in southern China and northern Vietnam, covering nearly all distribution areas) has shown that the lineage from Yunnan Province, China is deeply divergent from samples from other localities [33]. However, the type locality of N. atra is Zhoushan Island, Zhejiang Province, eastern China. This leads to a taxonomic puzzle about the status of cobras from Yunnan.
To further understand these problems, we compiled a data set including a series of fresh cobra samples from China together with available cobra sequences and reconstructed a comprehensive mitochondrial phylogenetic tree. Together with morphological data based on 143 specimens and photos of 208 living individuals of nine taxa from Asia, we found the populations of Naja kaouthia from southwestern China represent a new species that we described herein. We also designated a neotype for N. atra for future taxonomic study on the genus.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling

In this study, a total of 14 “Naja kaouthia” specimens and 6 N. atra specimens from China were collected (Table 1). Specimens were euthanized and then fixed in 80% ethanol before deposition in the Herpetology Museum of Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, China (CIB). Other abbreviations for institutions are as follows: Kunming Institution of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China (KIZ); Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, Vienna, Austria (NMW), Zoologisches Museum Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany (ZMH); Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, China (GXNU); Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum (formerly Forschunginstitut und Museum) “Alexander Koenig,” Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany (ZFMK); Naturhistorisches Museum Basel, Basel, Switzerland (NMBA); Museum für Naturkunde (formerly Zoologischen Museum), Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions-und Biodiversitätsforschung, Universität-Humboldt zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany (ZMB).

2.2. Molecular Phylogenetic Analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from muscle or liver tissues using QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). We sequenced three mitochondrial genes for analysis: cytochrome b (cyt b) (primers cited from Burbrink et al. [34]), NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4 (ND4) (primers cited from Arevalo et al. [35]) and cytochrome C oxidase 1 (COI) (primers cited from Che et al. [36]). PCR amplifications were performed in 25 μL reactions (12.5 μL I-5 2×High-Fidelity Master Mix, 10 μL ddH2O, 1 μL F-primers, 1 μL R-primers, 0.5 μL DNA template) under the following cycling conditions: initial denaturation for 2 min at 95 °C, 35 cycles with denaturation at 94 °C for 40 s, annealing at different temperatures (48.5 °C for cyt b and COI, 56 °C for ND4) for 25 s, extension at 72 °C for 15 s, and final extension for 2 min at 72 °C. PCR products were sequenced by Beijing Qingke New Industry Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China. Raw trace files for sequences were edited in Genious 7 (Biomatters Limited, Auckland, New Zealand) before constructing alignments using MEGA 7 ([37]). Due to differences in taxon sampling for each gene, we reconstructed separate alignments for phylogenetic analysis. The first one was based on a concatenated sequence alignment using cyt b and ND4, while the other was based solely on COI. Sequences were uploaded to GenBank (accession numbers see in Table 1). Available cyt b, ND4 and COI sequences of all 12 recognized Asian cobra species and 20 of 21 recognized African cobra species (except Naja nana [38]) were downloaded from GenBank (Table 1). Our DNA dataset employed sequences of 86 specimens from GenBank and 20 specimens collected in this study. Ophiophagus hannah was chosen as an outgroup according to Li [39]. Optimal models of sequence evolution of nucleotide substitution were identified by Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) using Partition finder 2.1.1 [40]. We performed maximum likelihood (ML) analysis using RaxML v8 [41]. The first ML analysis was implemented in RaxML v8 [41] following the GTRGAMMA model with 1000 fast bootstrap replicates to assess node support. We considered bootstrap proportions of 70% or greater to be strong support for existence of a clade following [42]. The best evolution models are shown in Supplementary Table S1. Bayesian inference phylogenetic trees were inferred using MrBayes 3.2 [43]. We used a random starting tree and four independent runs with a maximum of 20 million generations each, sampled every 1000. Runs were stopped when the average standard deviation of split frequencies had reached 0.001. The first 25% of each run were discarded as burn-in. Nodes with Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) of 0.95 and above were considered well supported [44]. Genetic distance between species with uncorrected p-distance model was estimated using MEGA 7.

2.3. Morphological Analysis

Measurements of head and head scales were taken with digital calipers and rounded to the nearest 0.1 mm; snout–vent length and tail length were taken with a measuring tape and rounded to the nearest 1 mm. Terminology and descriptions follow Slowinski (1994), Vogel et al., (1994) and Kuch et al. (2005) [45,46,47]. Morphometric and meristic characters are abbreviated as follows: total length (TL), from the tip of snout to the tip of tail; snout–vent length (SVL), from the tip of snout to anterior margin of cloaca; tail length (TaL), from posterior margin of cloaca to the tip of tail; ratio of tail length to total length (TaL/TL); head length (HL), from snout tip to the end of parietals suture; head width (HW) was measured at the widest part of the head on posterior side; head height (HH), at the maximal highest part of the head; interorbital distance (IOD); the dorsal scale rows (DSR) were counted at one head length behind the head, at midbody, and at one head length before the vent; ventral scales (VEN) were counted according to Dowling [48], half ventrals were counted as one. The enlarged shield(s) anterior to the first ventral were regarded as preventral(s); for subcaudals (SC), the first scale under the tail meeting its opposite was regarded as the first subcaudal scale, and the unpaired terminal scute was not included in the number of subcaudals; paired scales on the head were counted on both sides of the head and presented in left/right order; supralabials (SL); infralabials (IL) were considered scales and shields that are completely below a supralabial and border the gap between lips. The number of crossbands on the body (BB) and on the tail (BT) were counted. Sex was determined by making a small incision caudal to the vent to visually inspect for the existence of hemipenes. Hemipenis terminology follows Dowling (1951), and the organs were prepared based on Jiang [49]. Fangs adjusted for spitting or not were judged according to Wüster and Thorpe [17] and Young et al. [50]. For morphological comparison, a total of 143 specimens from 12 taxa were examined and photos of 208 living cobras from Asia from institutional and personal collections and the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) were analyzed (Supplementary Table S2). Morphological data for some congeners of the subgenus Naja were obtained from the literature (Supplementary Table S3). The statistical summaries of scale counts are presented as ranges (Mean ± Standard deviation, Sample size).

3. Results

3.1. Molecular Results

The concatenated alignment for cyt b and ND4 was 1687 bp in length (1028 + 659 bp, respectively) and contained a total of 33 taxa of Naja. The phylogenetic trees resulted in essentially identical topologies by BI and ML analysis on cyt b + ND4 (Figure 2). The resulting phylogeny showed a topology similar to that of recent studies [27,51]. N. arabica formed a clade (K; bootstrap proportions/BPP 100/1.00) with the African cobra subgenus Uraeus, which is similar to the phylogeny in Trape et al. (2009) [52]. All other Asian cobras (subgenus Naja) formed a large sister clade (clade H; 97/1.00) to the subgenus Uraeus. These Asian cobras were divided into three smaller clades: the basal N. naja clade (J; 100/1.00), the Southeastern Asian clade (I; 100/1.00) ((((N. sumatrana + N. siamensis) + N. mandalayensis,) + (N. samarensis + N. philippinensis)) + N. sputatrix), and the Pan-Asian clade (E; 69/0.91) (the “N. kaouthia” from Southwestern China + (((Southeastern Asian N. kaouthia + N. sagittifera) + N. oxiana) + N. atra)) based on cyt b + ND4. The samples of Naja atra from southern and southeastern China clustered in a clade (D; 100/1.00), and further formed a larger clade (C; 90/1.00) with southeastern Asian N. kaouthia, N. sagittifera, and N. oxiana. The sample under the name N. atra from Yunnan, Southwestern China clustered with “N. kaouthia” from Sichuan and Yunnan, Southwestern China, and formed an independent clade (F; 100/1.00) in the Pan-Asian clade. The samples of southeastern Asia N. kaouthia from Myanmar to Vietnam formed a clade (A; 98/1.00) sister to insular species N. sagittifera.
The COI alignment was 627 bp in length and contained ten taxa of Naja. The BI and ML analysis resulted in essentially identical topologies (Figure 3). The N. kaouthia from South Asia (India and Bangladesh) formed a clade (L; 99/1.00), which formed a larger clade (M; 57/0.94) with Southeastern Asian clade (A; 98/0.98). The “N. kaouthia” samples from Southwestern China formed a clade paraphyletic to the south and Southeastern N. kaouthia clade (M) and N. atra clade (D).
From the aspect of genetic distance, considerable divergence existed between different clades under the name N. kaouthia. The Southwestern China clade (F) was divergent from the South Asian clade (L, 2.0–3.0% for COI) and Southeast Asian clade (A) (2.5–2.9% for COI, 5.3–6.7% for cyt b). These are comparable to the genetic distance between of N. kaouthia Southwestern China clade and N. atra (2.5–3.2% for COI; 4.1–5.0% for cyt b), N. kaouthia South Asian clade and N. atra (2.7–3.4% for COI, 4.6–6.3% for cyt b) (Table 2 and Table 3). The latter two species were long regarded as separated species [25,31,53,54]. The genetic distances between the Southwestern China clade and Southeastern Asian clade of N. kaouthia are also comparable for some other known species pairs from Asia: N. siamensis and N. sumatrana (4.3–5.0% for cyt b), N. siamensis and N. mandalayensis (3.2–3.9% for cyt b), N. sumatrana and N. mandalayensis (3.2–3.9% for cyt b). Considerable divergence also existed between the South Asian clade (L) and Southeast Asian clade (A) of N. kaouthia (1.8–2.4% for COI).
For genetic divergence within a clade, samples of “N. kaouthia” with large geographical distance had a small divergence. The samples of the Southeast Asian clade had minor genetic divergences (0.0% to 1.2% for cyt b) between geographical populations from Southern Myanmar, Southern Thailand, and Vietnam, whose largest geographical distance is more than 1300 km. In contrast, the insular species N. sagittifera, which originated in the Andaman Islands, had a larger genetic divergence (2.4–2.5% for cyt b) with the N. kaouthia Southeast Asian clade, which is about 300 km away. The genetic divergence between samples of the N. kaouthia Southwestern China clade were minor (0.0–0.3% for cyt b, 0.0–0.2 for COI) while they are maximally separated by about 500 km. The genetic distances between the samples of N. kaouthia South Asia clade (Rangpur, Bangladesh and Mizoram, India; geographical distance about 400 km) were 0.0–0.6 for COI. These minor genetic distances within clades of N. kaouthia were distinctly smaller than those between the Southwestern China clade and Southeastern Asian clade, which further indicated that the latter is interspecific.

3.2. Morphological Results and Taxonomic Conclusion

Comparisons of selected morphological characters and spitting behavior for the subgenus Naja are listed in Supplementary Table S3.
The “Naja kaouthia” from Sichuan and Yunnan, Southwestern China is morphologically different from the N. kaouthia from South Asian and Southeast Asian populations by (1) regular single narrow crossband present on the middle and posterior parts of the dorsum (3–15, 7.9 ± 2.7, n = 32) and dorsal surface of tail (1–6, 4.2 ± 1.1, n = 32) of both adults and juveniles, buff-colored with dark fringes on both edges, vs. South Asian populations (n = 39) and Southeast Asian populations (n = 35) without cross bands or with irregular cross bands or multiple light-colored cross bands pairs or densely woven lines; (2) small scales between posterior chin shields were usually three (40%) or two (37%), rarely four (13%), or one (10%, n = 30) vs. one for the South Asian clade (n = 8) and mostly one (72%) and rarely two (28%) for the Southeastern Asian clade (n = 18); (3) ventrals 179–205 (195.4 ± 6.7, n = 33) vs. the South Asian clade 179–199 (188.7 ± 5.9, n = 12) and Southeast Asian clade 168–186 (177.8 ± 4.9, n = 18).
In conclusion, the samples of “Naja kaouthia” from Southwestern China represent a new species, which is phylogenetically and morphologically different from N. kaouthia from South Asia and Southeastern Asia.

3.3. Taxonomic Account

3.3.1. Naja atra Cantor, 1842

Figure 4A, Figure 5 and Figure 6A,B
[English name: Chinese Cobra]
[Chinese name: 舟山眼镜蛇]
Synonyms:
Naja tripudians nigra Gray, 1834
Naja tripudians var. scopinucha Cope 1859
Naja tripudians var. larrata Steindachner 1867 (nomen praeoccupatum)
Naja tripudians var. unicolor W.C.H. Peters in Martens, 1876 (nomen substitutum)
Naia tripudians var. fasciata–Boulenger 1896 (populations of part b from Kiu Kiang, Canton and Hainan)
Remark. Naja atra Cantor, 1842 was described from Chusan (=Zhoushan 舟山, Zhejiang Province), China and no holotype has been designated [25,55]. According to Lin et al. [33], samples of Naja atra from vast areas across southern China (except two samples from Yunnan, which are allocated to the new species described in this paper) and Northern Vietnam form two clades with a small divergence (Vietnam + southern China + southwestern China; eastern + southeastern China) based on analysis of 12 microsatellite loci and 1117 bp of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. This supports the synonymisation of Naja tripudians var. scopinucha Cope, 1859 (type locality: Canton River), Naja tripudians var. larrata Steindachner, 1867 (type locality: Hongkong), Naja tripudians var. unicolor Peters, 1876 (substitute name), Naia tripudians var. fasciata Boulenger, 1896 (part b) (Kiukiang, Canton, Hainan) with Naja atra Cantor, 1842. To avoid future confusion with other Asiatic Naja species, we designate a neotype from the type locality Zhoushan Island, Zhejiang, China, and redescribe this species based on examined specimens from Southern China. The identification of these examined specimens of N. atra were further confirmed by their localities at or near the sampling localities of clade A & B of Lin et al. [33]. Descriptions are based on 30 specimens examined from Southern China and photos of six unvouchered living individuals from Fujian and Guangdong provinces, China (Supplementary Table S2).
Neotype. CIB 12273, subadult female, collected from Zhoushan Island, Zhejiang Province, China, in July 1983.
Diagnoses. This species is characterized by the following combination of characters: (1) body scales smooth, scale rows at anterior body 20–27 (23.7 ± 1.7, n = 29), mid-body 19–23 (20.8 ± 1.0, n = 31), posterior body 15 (n = 29); (2) ventrals 161–175 (170.9 ± 3.2), subcaudals 33–50 (45.0 ± 3.7) (n = 29); (3) total length for adults 1041–1412 mm (1215.1 ± 117.6 mm), tail length 130–222 mm (176.9 ± 25.6 mm) (n = 13), tail length/total length 0.119–0.164 (0.146 ± 0.012, n = 19, including adults and juveniles); (4) usually one small scale between posterior chin shields (72%) rarely two (28%) (n = 29); (5) dorsum mostly dark or deep brown in adults and juveniles, few specimens are light brown; (6) throat pale usually without dark mottling, distinct ventrolateral throat spots, followed by a broad dark or deep brown band; (7) hood markings mostly formed as a pale heart-shaped with a dark center and two small dark dots on the side; (8) most adults and juveniles with narrow light-colored crossbands on dorsal middle and posterior body 5–21 (11.3 ± 3.7, n = 27) and dorsal tail 1–7 (4.6 ± 1.8, n = 26); (9) hemipenial spines on distal part weakly connected at base, arranged in rows; and (10) fangs not modified for spitting, venom discharge orifice large; however one case of spitting was observed in captivity [56].
Description of Neotype. (Figure 4A) Head moderate, triangular, widest at middle parietals. Body dimensions: snout-vent length 730 mm, tail length 122 mm, head length 20.2 mm (snout to end of parietal suture), head width 19.8 mm, head height 8.8 mm, distance between eyes 10.3 mm.
Body scalation. Ventrals 175, subcaudals 45 pairs. Dorsal scales smooth, rows 22-21-15; elongated, gradually broader toward ventrals; vertebral scales similar with adjacent dorsal scales.
Head scalation. Scales smooth. Rostral slightly visible in dorsal view. Nasals large, divided, nostril vertically oval, larger than half the eye, surrounded by prenasal anteriorly and postnasal for the remainder of the sides. Loreal scale absent. Preocular 1/1 (left/right), bordering widely with third supralabial, supraocular, prefrontal, and slightly with eye, internasals and postnasals. Internasal paired, widely in contact with each other. Prefrontal paired, in shape of right trapezoid, in broad contact with one another. Frontal moderate, longer than wide, shield-shaped. Parietals large and paired, largest length about 1.4 times of frontal length, each bordering frontal, upper two supraoculars, anterior and posterior temporals, and two small scales on dorsal head. Eyes rounded, moderate, vertical diameter equal to height of border of fourth supralabial. Postoculars 3/3, middle postocular larger than the two other ones, much smaller than preocular, the lowest widely in contact with fourth and fifth supralabials. Temporals 2+3/2+2; lower anterior temporals hexagonal, longer than high; lowest posterior temporal is largest on lateral head, shape irregular. Supralabials 7/7; first two smallest, bordering nasals; third and fourth higher than wide, bordering eye; the seventh longest. Mental triangular in front and ventral view of head. Infralabials 9/9; first to third in contact with anterior chin shields; the first pair contacting each other, and anterior edge of anterior chin shields; the fourth in contact with both anterior and posterior chin shields; the fifth small and poorly developed, barely seen in ventral view of head, leaving the fourth in broad contact with the sixth; the sixth in contact with posterior chin shields; the seventh to ninth elongated, not contacting chin shields. The two pairs of chin shields butterfly shaped. Only one elongated scale separating posterior chin shield.
Coloration in preservative. Dorsal and upper lateral head brown, lower head paler, sutures of the first to sixth supralabials and fourth to seventh supralabials partially edged with narrow deep brown borders. Dorsum and tail deep brown, 16 light brown crossbands present on body, covering one row of dorsal scales, with narrow dark fringes, crossbands indistinct anteriorly, gradually distinct on posterior body and tail. Seven light brown crossbands present on dorsal tail, with clear dark fringes. Most crossbands on body and tail bifurcate near ventrals, with a dark spot at the base of crossbands. Hood markings mostly pale brown, heart-shaped; with a distinct larger dark core patch and two smaller dark side patches, broadly in contact with pale brown edges of the side of the neck. A small dark patch present on borders of eighth ventral scale. Dorsal scales between hood marking and small dark patch pale brown. Ventral surfaces of head and neck mostly white, stained with light yellow; first broad band on ventrals dark, commencing at 14th ventral and covering almost five ventrals; three ventrals (19th–21st) after first dark band almost yellowish-cream, then becoming gradually brown, completely deep brown by the 24th ventral; ventrals after 24th mostly uniformly deep brown, a few with pale lateral edges due to light brown crossbands on dorsum partially intruding upon ventrals; cloacal shield and subcaudals light brown, paler at places where light brown crossbands on dorsal tail intrude.
Fang. Fangs firm, short, tip reaching middle of fourth supralabial; not modified for spitting, venom discharge orifice relatively large and elongated.
Hemipenes. (Figure 6A,B) Description based on five adult males (Supplementary Table S2). Hemipenis bilobed, slender, covered with dense small spines, smaller and sparser at proximal part, larger and denser on distal part; spines on distal part weakly connected at base, arranged in rows. Two pairs of distinctly developed lateral folds present on the trunk from sulcate view, nearly identical, highly raised and covered with dense spines. Lower lobes located at two-thirds of the trunk, near the base; upper lobes raise at two-thirds of the trunk and reach the first third; a transverse constriction divides the lobes from asulcate view. Sulcus forked, centripetally spiral to the top at asulcate side, tip of sulcus not visible from sulcate view. Sulcus lip well developed and raised, covered with dense spines. Hemipenes reaching the 10th–12th subcaudal when not everted, forked at 6th–9th subcaudal; hemipenial retractor muscle reaching 29th–30th subcaudal, forked at 11th–14th subcaudal. Bifurcation ratio 59–67%, hemipenes length/snout-vent length 3.5–4.6%.
Variation. (Figure 5) Body length for adults 891–1194 (894 ± 181) mm, total length 1041–1412 (1215 ± 118) mm (n = 13). The coloration on the body is mostly dark or deep brown on adults as well as juveniles or hatchlings. Crossbands on body are regular on most individuals (64%, n = 36) while crossbands on a small part of population are irregular (some forked) (31%), or absent (6%). Hood markings mostly heart-shaped (79%, n = 33) with two small dark dots (82%, n = 33); mostly one (72%, n = 29), rarely two (28%), small scales between posterior chin shields. The first ventral crossband begins between at the level of 12th–17th (14.2 ± 1.1, n = 33) ventrals.
Distribution. Central and eastern South China (areas south of the Yangtze River: Zhejiang, Fujian, Southern Anhui, Jiangxi, Hunan, Western Hubei, Guizhou, Guangdong, Guangxi, Hainan, Taiwan), northern Vietnam.

3.3.2. Naja kaouthia Lesson, 1831

Figure 3A, Figure 4A and Figure 5
[English name: Monocled Cobra]
[Chinese name: 孟加拉眼镜蛇]
Naja kaouthia Lesson, 1831. Holotype: unknown (fide Leviton et al., 2003)
Synonyms:
Naja tripudians var. fasciata Gray 1830
Naja larvata Cantor, 1839
Naga tripudians monocellata Nicholson, 1874
Naja tripudians viridis Wall, 1913a
Naja kaothia–Wall, 1913b (nomen incorrectum)
Naja naja kauothia–Kabara and Fischer, 1972 (nomen incorrectum)
Naja kauthia–Khole, 1991 (nomen incorrectum)
Naja kauthia suphanensis Nutaphand, 1986
Naja naja combodia Khole, 1991 (lapsus calami)
Remarks. Present samples of Naja kaouthia from the South Asian population and Southeast Asian population form sister clades. Since the type locality of N. kaouthia is the Bengal region [57], those specimens from northeastern India, Bangladesh and adjacent areas including Bhutan, Nepal, and southern Tibet Autonomous Region, China should be treated as N. kaouthia sensu stricto [5,26,27,28,29]. The following diagnoses of N. kaouthia are based on data from South Asia, including data of 13 preserved specimens and 32 living individuals. Measurements and scale counts of three adult females and one adult male were cited from Lalremsanga et al. [58]. Data of living individuals were based on photos of from literatures [28,32,59,60], personal collections of Vogel Gernot and Vivek R Sharma, and GBIF.com) (Supplementary Table S2).
Diagnoses: (1) body scales smooth, scale rows at anterior body 22–29 (26.3 ± 2.2, n = 12), mid-body 19–28 (21.4 ± 2.3, n = 13), posterior body 13–20 (14.8 ± 1.8, n = 12); (2) ventrals 179–199 (188.7 ± 5.9, n = 12), subcaudals 46–57 (52.8 ± 2.9, n = 13); (3) total length for adults 937–1712 mm (1266.4 ± 248.1 mm, n = 10), tail length 137–225 mm (174.1 ± 30.0 mm, n = 10), tail length/total length 0.126–0.159 (0.139 ± 0.009, n = 11, including adults and juveniles); (4) small scale between posterior chin shields mostly one (81%), rarely two (19%, n = 28); (5) dorsum of adults mostly brown, juveniles olive-brown, yellowish-brown, or deeper; (6) dorsal middle and posterior body and dorsal tail without crossbands or with irregular cross bands or multiple light-colored cross bands pairs or densely woven lines; (7) throat pale without dark mottling, ventrolateral throat spots usually distinct, usually followed by a broad dark band, the band occasionally light brown; (8) hood pattern usually a monocellate light brown or white circle, often with a large deep colored center and two lateral dots; in few cases, monocellate pattern absent; (9) populations from lowlands of Bangladesh and adjacent area with multiple light-colored crossbands pairs or dense woven lines on body, or few with one or two clear crossbands on neck after hood, populations from mountainous area in southern slope of Himalayan without crossbands on body except few with one or two crossbands after hood, populations from Thailand and peninsular Malaysia light brown, populations from southern Vietnam deep brown; (10) spitting venom.
Fangs. (Description based on examination of one adult female CIB 12285 from southern Tibet, China) Firm and short, not exceeding third supralabial; not modified for spitting, venom discharge orifice relatively large and elongated.
Variation. (Figure 7) The coloration of South Asian clade Naja kaouthia varies between geographical regions. The populations from the lowlands (Odisha, West Bengal and Tripura of India; Bangladesh) (Figure 7A–E) are yellowish-brown or deep brown dorsally, usually with distinct multiple dense light-colored crossbands, or at least a distinct broad crossband on the neck behind the hood pattern; only one out of 16 individuals uniformly brown dorsally. The populations from southern slope of Himalayan Mountains (Mizoram, Assam, and Sikkim of India; Bhutan, Nepal) uniformly brown in adults and mostly olive-brown or deep brown in juveniles. Hood pattern usually a monocled light brown or white circle, often with a large deep colored center and two lateral dots; in few cases, monocled pattern absent (Figure 7F) or connected with light colored patches on lateral neck (Figure 7G). Adults and juveniles from lowlands in West Bengal and adjacent areas without multiple light-colored crossbands on body or solely with one or two clear crossbands on neck after hood markings, only small part of populations from mountainous area along southern slopes of Himalayas without multiple crossbands on body.
The Southeastern Asian clade is also morphologically different across regions in coloration. Adults from Thailand and peninsular Malaysia are light brown, the population from southern Vietnam is deep brown; juveniles usually darker, blackish brown, olive brown, or light brown (Figure 8). Ventrals of South Asian population 168–186 (177.8 ± 4.9, n = 18); subcaudals 49–58 (54.7 ± 2.4, n = 18); scale rows at anterior body 25–31 (27.0 ± 1.9, n = 20), mid-body 20–23 (21.2 ± 0.7, n = 19), posterior body 15–17 (15.4 ± 0.8, n = 19); venom spitting behavior was not observed [17,50].
Distribution. South Asian clade: Northeastern India, Nepal, Bhutan, southern Xi-zang Autonomous Region (Tibet) of China, Bangladesh. Southeastern Asian clade: Southern Myanmar, central and southern Thailand, Cambodia, central and southern Laos, southern Vietnam, Malay Peninsula.

3.3.3. Naja fuxi sp. nov. Shi, Vogel, Chen, Ding

Figure 4C, Figure 6C,D, Figure 9 and Figure 10.
ZooBank LSID: E13EEB16-7256-4589-8D22-F708B2692D86
Chresonyms:
Naja naja kaouthia—Zhao et al., 1998; Yang and Rao, 2008
Naja kaouthia—Zhao, 2003
Naja atra—Lin et al., 2012 (Clade C)
Naja kaouthia—Huang, 2021
Holotype. Adult male CIB DL2018053147 (Figure 4D), collected from Tongde Town, Renhe District, Panzhihua City, Sichuan Province, China (26.710278° N, 101.564167° E, 1400 m a.s.l.) on 31 May 2018, by Ze-Ning Chen and Li Ding. The holotype is a roadkill but was only barely damaged.
Paratypes. (33 specimens) One adult female CIB DL2018081005 collected from Renhe District, Panzhihua, Sichuian Province, China (26.466293° N, 101.740758° E, 1248 m a.s.l.) on 10 August 2018, by Li Ding. One adult female CIB 101318; four adult males CIB 012303, CIB 012295, CIB 012288, CIB 012289; four juvenile females CIB 012290–012292, CIB 012294; and one juvenile male CIB 012293 were collected from Miyi Cunty, Panzhihua City, Sichuan Province in 1985. One adult male CIB 098874 and adult female CIB 098875 were collected from Longhua village, Caocang Town, Miyi Conty, Panzhihua City, Sichuan Province, China (26.5628° N, 102.0402° E, 1373 m a.s.l.) by Yue-Ying Chen and Bo Cai on 19 December 2012. One unknown sex juvenile CIB DL0096 from Yanbian, Panzhihua, Sichuan, China. Six juveniles from Jiangcheng, Pu’er, Yunnan, China, including two females (CIB DL000070, CIB DL YNJC0068), three males (CIB DL000022, CIB DL000239, CIB DL000020) and one unknown sex (CIB DL R428). Two adults (male CIB 012296, female CIB 012297) and three female juveniles (CIB 012298–CIB 012300) from Lushui, Nujiang, Yunnan, China. Two adults from Yunnan, China (male CIB 012302, female CIB 012301) without accurate locality. One male juvenile KIZ 2020090301 from Menglian, Pu’er, Yunnan, China. One male juvenile KIZ 2020091201 from Ximeng, Pu’er, Yunnan, China. Three from Simao, Pu’er, Yunnan, China (male juvenile KIZ 20180801 and KIZ F20180066, male adult KIZ 090071). One male adult CIB 83796 from China without specific locality.
Diagnoses. (1) body scales smooth, scale rows at anterior body 19–29 (23.8 ± 3.1, n = 32), mid-body 19–27 (20.9 ± 1.5, n = 33), posterior body 12–19 (15.3 ± 2.9, n = 33); (2) ventrals 179–205 (195.4 ± 6.7, n = 33), subcaudals 45–61 (51.4 ± 9.7, n = 33); (3) total length in adults 690–1366 mm (1039.5 ± 207.6 mm, n = 15), tail length 110–201 mm (145.9 ± 27.8 mm, n = 15), tail length/total length 0.128–0.162 (0.141 ± 0.009, n = 32, including adults and juveniles); (4) small scales between posterior chin shields mostly three (40%) or two (37%), rarely four (13%) or one (10%) (n = 30); (5) dorsum light brown in adults, deep brown or black in juveniles (n = 32); (6) throat pale usually without dark mottling, ventrolateral throat spots distinct, followed by a broad light brown band; (7) hood markings usually a pale oval marking with narrow dark inner and outer border (73%), sometimes irregular residual patterns of a monocle (20%), rarely indistinguishable (7%), no dark side spots in any individual (n = 30); (8) both adults and juveniles with clear regular single narrow buff cross bands with dark fringes on middle, posterior dorsum 3–15 (7.9 ± 2.7, n = 32) and dorsal tail 1–6 (4.2 ± 1.1, n = 32); (9) hemipenial spines on distal part well connected at base, forming calyculate fold; (10) fangs not modified for spitting, venom discharge orifice relatively large.
Comparisons. The new species has long been identified as Naja kaouthia, but it is different from the latter by: (1) regular single narrow crossbands present on middle and posterior parts of the dorsum (3–15, 7.9 ± 2.7, n = 32), and dorsal surface of tail (1–6, 4.2 ± 1.1, n = 32) of both adults and juveniles, buff-colored with dark fringes on both edges vs. South Asian populations (n = 39) and Southeast Asian populations (n = 35) without crossbands or with irregular cross bands or multiple light-colored cross bands pairs or densely woven lines; (2) small scales between posterior chin shields usually three (40%) or two (37%), rarely four (13%) or one (10%) (n = 30) vs. mostly one (81%), rarely two (19%) (n = 28); (3) ventrals 179–205 (195.4 ± 6.7, n = 33) vs. South Asian populations 179–199 (188.7 ± 5.9, n = 12); Southeast Asian populations 168–186 (177.8 ± 4.9, n = 18).
The new species differs from Naja atra by: (1) ventrals 179–205 (195.4 ± 6.7, n = 33) vs. ventrals 161–175 (170.9 ± 3.2, n = 29); (2) small scales between posterior chin shields usually three (40%) or two (37%), rarely four (13%) or one (10%) (n = 30) vs. usually one (72%), rarely two (28%), n = 29; (3) dorsum coloration of adults light brown, crossbands on body and tail with dark fringes (n = 32) vs. usually dark, pale cross bands without recognizable fringes (n = 36); (4) hood markings mostly a pale oval marking with narrow dark inner and outer border (73%), some have an irregular residual pattern of a monocle (20%), others indistinguishable (7%), no dark side spots (n = 30) vs. mostly formed by a pale heart-shape (79%) with a dark center and two small lateral dark dots (n = 33); (5) hemipenial spines on distal part well connected at base, forming calyculate fold vs. spines on distal part weakly connected at base, arranged in rows.
From other cobras from South Asia, the new species differs as follows: from Naja naja by (1) hood markings usually form a complete monocle, in a few specimens incomplete, rarely absent vs. spectacle-shaped; (2) throat pattern distinct, lateral spots encroach on lowest dorsal scale row vs. throat pattern indistinct, lateral spots encroach on second dorsal scale row [14]; (3) regular single narrow crossbands present on middle and posterior parts of the dorsum (3–15, 7.9 ± 2.7, n = 32), and dorsal surface of tail (1–6, 4.2 ± 1.1, n = 32) of both adults and juveniles, buff-colored with dark fringes on both edges vs. mostly without regular light-colored crossbands on body (83%), some with brown and yellow densely woven lines on body (17%) (n = 46).
The new species differs from Naja oxiana by (1) fewer subcaudal scales 45–61 (51.4 ± 9.7, n = 33) vs. males 63–71 (68.0 ± 2.0); females 57–70 (63.3 ± 2.7); (2) hood markings usually as a distinct pale oval markings with narrow dark inner and outer borders vs. usually indistinct; (3) throat marking distinct, with lateral spots vs. throat marking indistinct, lateral spots absent; (4) crossbands on adults not present on neck vs. present [14].
The new species differs from Naja sagittifera by (1) more ventral scales 179–205 (195.4 ± 6.7, n = 33) vs. 175–176 (175.40 ± 0.55, n = ?) () for males, 183 for one female); (2) dorsum coloration light brown in adults, dark brown in juveniles, regular narrow crossbands with dark fringes on body and tail of adults as well as juveniles vs. juveniles dark with irregular or shark-fin-like outlines; (3) distribution confirmed in southwestern China and expected in adjacent Indochina vs. restricted to the Andaman Islands.
Differences from cobras from southeastern Asia: the new species differs from Naja mandalayensis by (1) hood markings usually a distinct pale oval marking with narrow dark inner and outer border vs. hood markings absent; (2) throat pale, followed by a broad light brown crossband vs. throat dark, followed by two or three dark broad crossbands; (3) fangs not adapted for spitting, venom discharge orifice large vs. adapted for spitting, discharge orifice smaller.
The new species differs from Naja philippinensis by (1) hood markings usually a distinct pale oval marking with narrow dark inner and outer border (vs. without any distinctive markings anteriorly); (2) subcaudal scales 51.4 ± 9.7 (45–61, n = 33) (vs. 38–47); (3) distribution confirmed to southwestern China, expected in adjacent Indochina (vs. endemic to Philippines).
The new species differs from Naja samarensis by (1) more ventrals 179–205 (195.4 ± 6.7, n = 33) vs. 170–179 (174.2 ± 2.4, n = 19); (2) dorsal scales near vent usually 15 rows vs. 13 rows; (3) dorsum coloration of adults light brown, regular narrow crossbands on body and tail with dark fringes vs. color above brown to black, usually with a trace of a light lateral line on outer two scales rows; (4) throat pale vs. throat and first few ventrals yellowish; (5) distribution confirmed to southwestern China, expected in adjacent Indochina vs. endemic to Philippines.
The new species differs from Naja siamensis by (1) more ventrals 179–205 (195.4 ± 6.7, n = 33) vs. 153–174 (? ± ?, n = 67); (2) hood markings usually monocellate, a pale oval marking with narrow dark inner and outer border vs. U-, V-, or H-shaped spectacle; (3) dorsum coloration in adults light brown, with single regular buff crossbands with dark fringes on body and tail vs. brightly contrasting black and white pattern in central plain of Thailand, also in Laos; uniformly blackish-brown or black in southeastern and western Thailand.
The new species differs from Naja sputatrix by (1) regular narrow crossbands present on body and tail of adults and juveniles with dark fringes vs. never any light dorsal crossbands (except, on rare occasions, a light band behind the hood); (2) throat area pale, lateral spots distinct vs. no clearly defined light throat area, or very dusky and indistinct; lateral spots often missing; (3) adults usually with clear hood markings vs. usually lacking; (4) venom discharge orifice on fang relatively large vs. relatively small.
The new species differs from Naja sumatrana by (1) small scales between posterior chin shields usually three (40%) or two (37%), rarely four (13%) or one (10%) (n = 30) vs. one (78%) or two (22%), (n = 9); (2) dorsum coloration of adults light brown vs. color above black or dark brown; (3) regular single narrow crossbands present on middle and posterior parts of the dorsum (3–15, 7.9 ± 2.7, n = 32), and dorsal surface of tail (1–6, 4.2 ± 1.1, n = 32) of both adults and juveniles, buff-colored with dark fringes on both edges vs. mostly without light-colored crossbands on body (88%), some juveniles with three to seven narrow light-colored crossbands at posterior body (12%), n = 51; (4) a broad light brown crossband present on after throat vs. venter dark or light but without a distinctive black crossband on anterior portion.
Description of holotype. Adult male. Head broad, triangular, widest at middle parietals. Body dimensions: snout-vent length 800 mm; tail length 135 mm, about 14% of total length; head length 30.3 mm (snout to end of parietal suture); maximum head width 19.8 mm, about 65% of head length; maximum head height 12.8 mm, about 42% of head length; distance between eyes 14.2 mm, 47% of head length.
Body scalation. Ventrals 190, preventrals 2; subcaudals 50, paired, terminating in a spine. Dorsal scales smooth, 20 on neck, 20 at midbody, 15 one head length ahead of vent; elongated, gradually broader toward ventrals; vertebral scales similar to dorsal scales.
Head scalation. Scales smooth. Rostral nearly U-shaped, slightly visible in dorsal view. Nasals large, including one prenasal and one postnasal, nostril mainly surrounded by postnasal. External nares moderate, higher than wide, half of vertical diameter of eye. Preocular 1/1, bordering widely with third supralabial, supraocular, prefrontal, and slightly with eye, internasals and postnasals. Loreal scale absent. Internasal paired, widely contact with each other. Prefrontal paired, in shape of right trapezoid, widely contact each other. Frontal moderate, shield-shaped, size similar as prefrontal. Parietals paired, large, largest length about 1.6 times of frontal length, each bordering frontal, supraocular, upper postocular, anterior and posterior temporals, and two small scales on upper side of the head. Eyes rounded; moderate, vertical diameter equals height of fourth supralabial. Postoculars 3/3, similar in size, about half of preocular, the lowest widely in contact with the fourth and fifth supralabial. Temporals 2+3/2+3; lower anterior temporals hexagonal, longer than high; lowest posterior temporal largest, shape irregular. Supralabials 7/7; first two smallest, bordering nasals; third and fourth higher than wide, bordering eye; the seventh longest. Mental triangular in front and ventral view of head. Infralabials 9/9; the first to third in contact with anterior chin shields, the first contact with each other, and anterior edge of anterior chin shields; the fourth contacting both anterior and posterior chin shields; the fifth small and poorly developed, barely seen in ventral view of head, leaving the fourth in broad contact with the sixth; the sixth in contact with posterior chin shields; the seventh to ninth elongated, not contacting chin shields. The two pairs of chin shields form a butterfly shape. A total of three scales separating posterior chin shield, arranged in a “Λ”-shape; first of them much smaller than gulars behind, contacting both anterior chin shields; posterior two scales elongated, broadly contacting each other.
Coloration in preservative. Head pattern: Dorsal head uniformly light brown; lateral head gradually paler on supralabials; ventral head uniformly cream white. Dorsal pattern: Dorsum light brown; six buff crossbands present on middle to posterior body, width about length of one dorsal scale, with faint dark fringes, not bifurcate near ventrals. A brown monocellate marking with dark edges and dark oval core present on the hood, not reaching ventrals. Interstitial skin feebly lighter than dorsal scales. Dorsal tail also light brown with four crossbands similar with those on body (Figure 8A). Ventral pattern (Figure 8B): throat pale, ventrals 1st–13th cream white; first ventral crossband covering ventrals 14th–19th, faintly brown, the 19th ventral paler; a small dark patch present on ventrolateral neck at lateral edge of 9th–10th ventral and the first row of dorsal scales; ventrals 20th–24th cream; ventrals 25th and following uniformly pale brown except several ventrals more paler at position opposing crossbands on dorsum; coloration on middle and posterior venter similar with coloration on the first broad crossband; two small dark patches present on skin between lateral edge of eighth and ninth with first row of dorsal scales. Ventral tail uniformly pale.
Coloration in life. Similar to coloration in preservative, generally browner.
Fangs. Fangs firm, short, not exceed third supralabial; not modified for spitting, venom discharge orifice relatively large and elongated.
Hemipenes. (Figure 6C,D). Description based on three adult males (Supplementary Table S2). Hemipenis bilobed, covered with dense small spines, spines smaller and sparser at proximal part, larger and denser on distal part; spines on distal part well connected at base, forming calyculate fold. Two pairs of weak lateral folds present on the trunk from sulcate view, nearly identical, covered with dense spines. Lower lobes located at three-fourths of the trunk; upper lobes raised at three-fourths of the hemipenes and reaching the base; a transverse constriction divide the lobes from asulcate view. Two pairs of longitudinal folds present above and below the constriction, feebly raised; longitudinal folds above reaching middle of the lobes and joined near the constriction; longitudinal folds below parallel and short, located at three-fourths of the trunk. Sulcus forked, centripetally spiral to the top, tip of sulcus not visible from sulcate view. Sulcus lip well developed and raised, covered with dense spines. Hemipenes reaching eleventh subcaudal when not extruded, hemipenial retractor muscle reaching 23rd subcaudal. Bifurcation ratio 64–71%, hemipenes length/snout–vent length 3.3–4.1%.
Variation. (Figure 9 and Figure 10) Body length for adults 578–1165 mm (894 ± 181 mm, n = 16), total length 690–1366 mm (1040 ± 208 mm, n = 16). The colorations of dorsum and first ventral crossband of juveniles and hatchlings with body length smaller than 578 mm are generally much darker than in larger specimens (Figure 9A,C,E). Coloration on middle and posterior venter of adults mostly uniformly yellowish-cream (Figure 10B,D), light brown near tail; ventral coloration of juveniles is deep brown or dark (Figure 9F), most individuals or hatchings (76%, n = 17) with ambiguous light colored crossbands on middle and posterior ventral surface (Figure 9F). The dorsal head of one female paratype (CIB DL2018081005) is almost pale brown, much lighter than dorsum colorations (Figure 9A and Figure 10A). Hood markings mostly monocellate (76%), some specimens with irregular residual patterns of monocle (21%) (Figure 9C), rarely without any pattern (3%, n = 29) (Figure 9C), all specimens checked without dark side spots. Small scales between posterior chin shields usually two (37%) or three (40%), rarely one (10%) or four (13%) (n = 30). The first ventral cross band start from 12th–16th (16.0th ± 4.4, n = 31) ventral.
Etymology. The new species is named after Fuxi (伏羲), one of the human ancestors in Chinese mythologies, usually depicted in cultural relics as half-man and half-snake. The common postures of Fuxi resembles a cobra in reared status; this species is named for the impact that snake had in human culture. The specific nomen is a noun in apposition. To identify this species quickly when dealing with snakebites, we suggest “Brown Banded Cobra” as a common English name, for its unique coloration with a brown body and light crossbands on the body and tail. For the Chinese name, we suggest “西南眼镜蛇” (Xī Nán Yǎn Jìng Shé) as it is distributed in the southwestern part of China.
Distribution and ecology. The Brown Banded Cobra is currently known from tropical and southern subtropical areas of southwestern China at elevations between 1000–1400 m. Specimens examined in this study are recorded from Renhe District and Miyi County, Panzhihua Prefecture, southwestern Sichuan Province, and Jiangcheng County, Simao District, Menglian County, Ximeng County, and Pingbian County, Yunan Province. This species was also reported from western Guangxi [30,31,32]. This species is expected to be found in adjacent areas including western Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and southwestern Guizhou Province of China, northeastern Myanmar, northern Laos, northern Thailand, and northwestern Vietnam.
This species was found on gentle slopes of open bush or edges of the forest (Figure 10G,H) during daytime. One individual was kept in captivity for about one year and lived well, being fed on mice and toads. According to Yang and Rao [61], the brown banded cobra has a wide spectrum of food including frogs, snakes, birds, and small mammals. Local people from Yunnan Province reported that this species sometimes sneaks into villages and preys on chicks. Local people from Menglian County observed five to dozens of individuals gathering in an abandoned termite nest during winter in Yunnan Province [61]. The Brown-Banded Cobra is venomous, and easily provoked. This species is the perpetrator that caused the largest number of snakebites in Xishuangbanna, Yunnan Province, based on an analysis of 126 snake bite cases caused from 2007 to 2014 [62].

4. Discussion

4.1. The Taxonomy of Some Asian Cobras

The population of Naja naja (=N. polyocellata comb. nov.) from Sri Lanka: Naja naja, is widely distributed throughout the India subcontinent and Sri Lanka [22,25]. There are multiple color and pattern variations within the populations in the present geographical distribution of N. naja, which resulted in the description of five subspecies by Deraniyagala [8,9,10,11] from the Indian subcontinent, namely N. n. gangetica Deraniyagala, 1945 (Gangetic Plain), N. n. madrasiensis Deraniyagala, 1945 (Southern India), N. n. indusi Deraniyagala, 1960 (Northwestern India, Pakistan), N. n. bombaya Deraniyagala, 1961 (Maharashtra of western India), and N. n. karachiensis Deraniyagala, 1961 (a black form from southern Pakistan), and one subspecies from Sri Lanka, N. n. polyocellata Deraniyagala 1939. These subspecies were synonymized with N. naja by Wüster [16] and further discussed based upon a morphometric character analysis [14]. However, the insular population of Sri Lanka is different from continental populations by having 15 or more (sometimes up to 20) dark ventral bands vs. one to four bands [8,10,14]. Furthermore, the venom composition of the Sri Lanka population is different from that of the Indian populations in quality and quantity, whereas the antibody binding affinities towards venom of the Sri Lanka population is lower than that of the Indian populations [4]. The Sri Lanka population is divergent from continental populations from Pakistan and Nepal with distinct genetic distance (4.3–4.9% for cyt b), which is larger than those between some known specie pairs N. siamensis and N. mandalayensis (3.2–3.9% for cyt b), N. sumatrana and N. mandalayensis (3.2–3.9% for cyt b). These indicates that the subspecies N. naja polyocellata Deraniyagala, 1939 should be resurrected and recognized as a full species, N. polyocellata comb. nov. Deraniyagala, 1939. Further taxonomic research that combines molecular, morphological and ecological methods is needed for the N. naja complex.
The populations of Naja sumatrana (=N. s. miolepis) from Borneo and Palawan Islands: These populations were described as a subspecies Naia tripudians miolepis Boulenger, 1896 based on their juveniles having a unique “V”-shaped hood pattern [19]. It was synonymized with N. sumatrana by Wüster [15] based on a morphometric character analysis. The N. sumatrana sample from the Philippines (distributed in Palawan Islands) clustered into a clade with one sample from Malaysia (Figure 2). Additionally, it is divergent from two samples from Indonesia and Malaysia with genetic distance (2.9–3.4% for cyt b). These support the resurrection of the subspecies N. sumatrana miolepis Boulenger, 1896. However, further studies on adult morphological comparisons and distribution boundary of N. sumatrana sumatrana and N. sumatrana miolepis are still needed to determine whether they are different species.
The population of southeastern Asian Naja kaouthia (= N. naja isanensis?): A cream-colored subspecies, N. kaouthia suphanensis, Nutaphand,1986 was described from central Thailand [63]. The subspecies was then synonymized with N. kaouthia by Wüster [13] based on a multivariate morphometric analysis between N. k. suphanensis and N. kaouthia from central Thailand, but no specimens from or near the type locality of N. kaouthia, the Bengal region [57], were included in the analysis. The southeastern Asian N. kaouthia population from Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam differs from N. kaouthia from the lowlands in Bengal and adjacent areas by usually no crossbands on body and a few (usually one or two) clear crossbands on neck after the hood marking (21%) (n = 24) vs. parallel light-colored crossband pairs or densely woven lines on body and tail, or at least with a clear crossband on the neck behind the hood markings (n = 24)). However, the coloration of southeastern Asian population is similar to populations of N. kaouthia from the southern slope of the Himalayan Mountains and the Southeast Asian N. kaouthia population do not spit venom (based on the observation of more than 100 individuals), whereas multiple cases (n > 16) were recorded in populations from eastern India and Nepal [59,64]. A cryptic species was proposed from the northeastern population of N. kaouthia by Ratnarathorn et al. [5]. This population is the phylogenetic sister to N. atra (“N. naja”) and N. kaouthia from Thailand based on the Control Region with weak support (BPP 0.65) (Figure S1 of [5]). However, the northeastern population is sister to N. siamensis based on partial cyt b (about 603 bp) with much stronger support (BPP 0.986) (Figure S2 of [5]). Due to only four operational taxonomic units (OTUs) (N. atra, N. siamensis, the northeastern population of N. kaouthia, and N. kaouthia) were included in the analysis, the phylogenetic position of the cryptic species is still doubtful. A brown spitting population of cobra with indistinct spectacle mark from northeastern Thailand has been described as N. naja isanensis Nutaphand, 1982 [65] and it was treated as a color variety of N. siamensis by Wüster and Thorpe [66]. This population is possibly phylogenetically the sister to N. siamensis, and morphologically resembles “N. kaouthia” from Thailand due to the brown coloration and indistinct spectacle mark, so, it is possible the nomen Naja naja isanensis represents the northeastern population of N. kaouthia in Ratnarathorn et al. [5]. Since the samples of N. kaouthia from Myanmar to Vietnam form a clade (A; 98/1.00) sister to insular species N. sagittifera and have minor genetic divergence within clade (0.0% to 1.2% for cyt b), these samples should represent the same species or subspecies. However, the name for this taxon remains unsolved; the status of subspecies N. k. suphanensis and N. n. isanensis needs to be further studied.

4.2. Geographical Variations of N. kaouthia

The coloration form of N. kaouthia varies among geographic regions. Those specimens from the southern slope of the southeastern Himalayas (Sikkim, Bhutan and southern Tibet, China) have typically monocellate hood markings and uniformly brown dorsum coloration. However, specimens from West Bengal and adjacent Odisha, India demonstrated clear crossbands of various forms. Similar situation is also found in N. atra, no mitochondrial gene differentiation was apparent among different ventral color morphs, the color morph is more related to the geographic populations [33]. The venom composition of N. kaouthia varies between the southern Himalayan population and lowland population from West Bengal [6]. These geographic variations might be related to ecological differences. To clarify these questions, biogeographic research for N. kaouthia based on comprehensive sampling in these areas is highly recommended to build a strong framework for snakebite medical treatment and antivenin development.

4.3. Spitting Behavior and Venom Discharge Orifice

The venom discharge orifice on fangs of N. atra, N. kaouthia and N. fuxi are relatively large and elongated. N. atra and N. kaouthia were listed as non-spitting species according to Wüster and Thorpe [16] and Young et al. [50]. However, there are cases reported for N. kaouthia spitting venom in eastern India and Nepal [59,64]. There is also a case for N. atra from southern China spitting venom with description for relative venom discharge orifice [56]. According to personal observation on N. fuxi sp. nov. by Liang Zhang, the cobra could spit venom as far as about 0.6 m. The venom discharge orifices of the Asian cobras in Clade I (except N. sumatrana miolepis, unknown) are small, while those for species in clade D are relatively larger [17,56,67] (this study). The Asian spitter clade J originated ~2.5 Ma, which is contemporaneous with the beginning of the quaternary glaciation [51,68]. The less spitting-adapted species of clade D with larger venom discharge orifices, also originated ~2.5 Ma (Figure S14 of [51]). This suggests that venom spiting behavior evolved independently twice in subgenus Naja and the latter one (clade D) might be relevant to climate change and distribution change of H. erectus during the quaternary glaciation.

5. Conclusions

Our results led to taxonomic revisions of some Asian cobras: (1) the former Chinese population of N. kaouthia represents a new species, N. fuxi sp. nov.; (2) the subspecies N. naja polyocellata was resurrected and recognized as a full species N. polyocellata comb. nov.; (3) the subspecies N. sumatrana miolepis was resurrected. This study highlights the necessity to evaluate effectiveness of cobra antivenin based on comprehensive taxonomic frameworks. However, there are still some open questions about the systematics of widespread species such as N. kaouthia. The taxonomy of Asian cobras still needs further revision. A wide international collaboration network is recommended to construct a solid taxonomic framework of these medically important species for the common well-being of Asian people.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani12243481/s1. Supplementary Table S1. Best evolution models of each partition combination; Supplementary Table S2. Materials included for morphological analysis in this study; Supplementary Table S3. Morphological comparisons for 13 taxa of Asian cobras subgenus Naja based on selected characters. References [12,14,17,18,28,32,51,56,58,59,60,64,69,70] are cited in the supplementary materials.

Author Contributions

S.-C.S., Z.-N.C. and G.V. designed the study, S.-C.S., Z.-N.C. and G.V. examined materials, Z.-N.C., L.D., D.-Q.R., S.L. and L.Z. performed the field work, S.-C.S. drafted the manuscript, G.V., L.D., Z.-N.C., D.-Q.R., S.L., L.Z. and Z.-J.W. revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study is supported by the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (STEP, Grant No. 2019QZKK05010503), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDA23080101) to Jiang Jianping, National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC grant: 32200379, 32160131, 31760623), Guangxi Natural Science Foundation, China (AD21220058), Science and Technology Innovation Project of Guangdong Forestry (2020KJCX005), the Biodiversity Survey, Monitoring and Assessment program of Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China (2019HB2096001006).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Laboratory Animal Care and Animal Ethics Committee of Guangxi Normal University (protocol code No. 202211-001 and date of approval 2 November 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Van Wallach (Harvard University), Patrick David (Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle) and all reviewers for providing valuable suggestions on the manuscript. We are especially grateful for Jinlong Ren and Junjie Huang (CIB) who kindly helped with preparing, measurements, photographing, and suggestions on descriptions of hemipenes. We thank Jiatang Li (CIB) for kindly sharing two samples N. atra. We thank Binqing Zhu (Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China) for providing photos of Naja atra from Lishui, Zhejiang Province, and Mt. Wuyi, Fujian Province, China. We thank Vivek R Sharma and Choggyal Taz for kindly providing the photos of N. kaouthia from India and Bhutan. We are grateful for Teo Eng Wah for providing photos of N. kaouthia Selangor, Peninsular Malaysia. We thank Hoang Van Chung (Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology) for sharing information about cobras in northern Vietnam. We thank Ning-Ning Lu, Shuang Wu, Yi-Ge Piao, Lei Lei and Lin-Feng Xu from CIB for their help with the lab work. We are grateful for the Institute of Health and Epidemic Prevention of Logistics Department of Xizang Military Region, Chinese People’s Liberation Army for donating the N. kaouthia specimen from Southern Medog, Tibet, China (CIB 12285) to CIB. Furthermore, we thank the following collection curators, who gave access to specimens under their care and helped us while we visited their respective institutions Denis Vallan and Marc Borer (NMBA), Silke Schweiger and Georg Gassner (NMW), Dennis Rödder and Wolfgang Böhme (ZFMK), JakobHallermann (ZMH), Oliver Rödel and Frank Tillack (ZMB), Ke Lv (CIB).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study, in the analyses or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Alirol, E.; Sharma, S.K.; Bawaskar, H.S.; Kuch, U.; Chappuis, F. Snake bite in South Asia: A review. PLoS Negl.Trop. Dis. 2010, 4, e603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Gong, X.C.; Yang, W.F. Epidemiology of venomous snakebites in China. J. Emerg. Tradit. Chin. Med. 2012, 21, 778–780. [Google Scholar]
  3. Wei, J.-F.; Lü, Q.-M.; Jin, Y.; Li, D.-S.; Xiong, Y.-L.; Wang, W.-Y. Alpha-neurotoxins of Naja atra and Naja kaouthia snakes in different regions. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin 2003, 35, 683–688. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Sintiprungrat, K.; Watcharatanyatip, K.; Senevirathne, W.D.S.T.; Chaisuriya, P.; Chokchaichamnankit, D.; Srisomsap, C.; Ratanabanangkoon, K. A comparative study of venomics of Naja naja from India and Sri Lanka, clinical manifestations and antivenomics of an Indian polyspecific antivenom. J. Proteom. 2015, 132, 131–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ratnarathorn, N.; Harnyuttanakorn, P.; Chanhome, L.; Evans, S.E.; Day, J.J. Geographical differentiation and cryptic diversity in the monocled cobra, Naja kaouthia (Elapidae), from Thailand. Zool. Scr. 2019, 48, 711–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Senji Laxme, R.R.; Khochare, S.; de Souza, H.F.; Ahuja, B.; Suranse, V.; Martin, G.; Whitaker, R.; Sunagar, K. Beyond the ‘big four’: Venom profiling of the medically important yet neglected Indian snakes reveals disturbing antivenom deficiencies. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Chen, Z.N.; Shi, S.C.; Vogel, G.; Ding, L.; Shi, J.S. Multiple lines of evidence reveal a new species of Krait (Squamata, Elapidae, Bungarus) from Southwestern China and Northern Myanmar. ZooKeys 2021, 1025, 35–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Deraniyagala, P.E.P. A new colour variety of cobra from Ceylon & South India. Ceylon J. Sci. 1939, 20, 233–235. [Google Scholar]
  9. Deraniyagala, P.E.P. The taxonomy of the cobras of southeastern Asia, Part 2. Spolia Zeylan. 1961, 29, 205–232. [Google Scholar]
  10. Deraniyagala, P.E.P. Some new races of the Python, Chrysopelea, binocellate cobra and Tith-Polonga inhabiting Ceylon and India. Spoloa Zeylan. 1945, 24, 103–113. [Google Scholar]
  11. Deraniyagala, P.E.P. The taxonomy of the cobras of southeastern Asia. Spolia Zeylan. 1960, 29, 41–63. [Google Scholar]
  12. Slowinski, J.B.; Wüster, W. A new cobra (Elapidae: Naja) from Myanmar (Burma). Herpetologica 2000, 56, 257–270. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wüster, W. Taxonomic changes and toxinology: Systematic revisions of the asiatic cobras (Naja naja complex). Toxicon 1995, 34, 99–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wüster, W. The cobras of the genus Naja in Inida. Hamadryad 1998, 23, 15–32. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wüster, W.; Thorpe, R.S. Population affinities of the Asiatic cobra (Naja naja) species complex in south-east Asia: Reliability and random resampling. Linn. Soc. Lond. Biol. J. 1989, 36, 391–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wüster, W.; Thorpe, R.S. Asiatic cobras: Population systematics of the Naja naja species complex (Serpentes: Elapidae) in India and Central Asia. Herpetologica 1992, 48, 69–85. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wüster, W.; Thorpe, R.S. Dentitional phenomena in cobras revisited: Spitting and fang structure in the Asiatic species of Naja (Serpentes: Elapidae). Herpetologica 1992, 48, 424–434. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wüster, W.; Warrell, D.A.; Jintakune, P. Redescription of Naja siamensis (Serpentes: Elapidae), a widely overlooked spitting cobra from S.E. Asia: Geographic variation, medical importance and designation of a neotype. J. Zool. 1997, 243, 771–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Boulenger, G.A. Colubridae (Opisthoglyphae and Proteroglyphae), Amblycephalidae, and Viperidae. Catalogue of the snakes in the British Museum (Natural History). In Order of the Trustees; 1896; Volume 3. [Google Scholar]
  20. Nicholson, E. Indian Snakes: An Elementary Treatise on Ophiology with a Descriptive Catalogue of the Snakes Found in India and the Adjoining Countries; Higgibotham and Company: Fort Worth, TX, USA, 1874. [Google Scholar]
  21. Linnaeus, C. Holmiae: Laurentii Salvii. In Systemae Naturae per Regna Tria Naturae, Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, Cum Characteribus, Differentiis, Synonymis, Locis; Emanuel, B., Ed.; Impensis Georg: Leipzig, Germany, 1758. [Google Scholar]
  22. Wallach, V.; Williams, K.L.; Boundy, J. Snakes of the World. A Catalogue of Living and Extinct Species; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  23. Uetz, P. The reptile database turns 20. Herpetol. Rev. 2006, 47, 330–334. [Google Scholar]
  24. Wallach, V.; Wüster, W.; Broadley, D.G. In praise of subgenera: Taxonomic status of cobras of the genus Naja Laurenti (Serpentes: Elapidae). Zootaxa 2009, 2236, 26–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Uetz, P.; Freed, P.; Hošek, J. The Reptile Database. 2022. Available online: http://www.reptile-database.org (accessed on 26 October 2022).
  26. Attarde, S.; Khochare, S.; Iyer, A.; Dam, P.; Martin, G.; Sunagar, K. Venomics of the enigmatic Andaman Cobra (Naja sagittifera) and the preclinical failure of Indian antivenoms in Andaman and Nicobar islands. Front. Pharm. 2021, 12, 768210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kazemi, E.; Nazarizadeh, M.; Fatemizadeh, F.; Khani, A.; Kaboli, M. The phylogeny, phylogeography, and diversification history of the westernmost Asian cobra (Serpentes: Elapidae: Naja oxiana) in the Trans-Caspian region. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 11, 2024–2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kundu, S.; Lalremsanga, H.T.; Rahman, M.M.M.; Ahsan, F.; Biakzuala, L.; Kumar, V.; Chandra, K.; Siddiki, A.M.A.M.Z. DNA barcoding elucidates the population genetic diversity of venomous cobra species (Reptilia: Elapidae) in Indo-Bangladesh region. Mitochondrial DNA B 2020, 5, 2525–2530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Supikamolseni, A.; Ngaoburanawit, N.; Sumontha, M.; Chanhome, L.; Suntrarachun, S.; Peyachoknagul, S.; Srikulnath, K. Molecular barcoding of venomous snakes and species-specific multiplex PCR assay to identify snake groups for which antivenom is available in Thailand. Genet. Mol. Res 2015, 14, 13981–13997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zhao, E.M.; Huang, M.H.; Zong, Y. Fauna Sinica, Reptilia, Squamata. Serpentes; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhao, E.M. Coloured Atlas of Reptiles of Sichuan; China Forestry Press: Beijing, China, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  32. Muansanga, L.; Biakzuala, L.; Rinsanga, L.; Vanlalchhuana, M.; Hmar, Z.G.; Vanlalhrima; Romalsawma; Lianzela, S.; Vanlalhriatzuala; Laltlanchhuaha, H.; et al. Natural history notes. Naja kaouthia (Monocled cobra): Diet and reproduction. Herpetol. Rev. 2020, 51, 356. [Google Scholar]
  33. Lin, L.H.; Qu, Y.F.; Li, H.; Zhou, K.Y.; Ji, X. Genetic structure and demographic history should inform conservation: Chinese cobras currently treated as homogenous show population divergence. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e36334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Burbrink, F.T.; Lawson, R.; Slowinski, J.B. Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of the polytypic North American rat snake (Elaphe obsoleta): A critique of the subspecies concept. Evolution 2000, 54, 2107–2118. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Arevalo, E.; Davis, S.K.; Sites Jr, J.W. Mitochondrial DNA sequence divergence and phylogenetic relationships among eight chromosome races of the Sceloporus grammicus complex (Phrynosomatidae) in central Mexico. Syst. Biol. 1994, 43, 387–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Che, J.; Chen, H.M.; Yang, J.X.; Jin, J.Q.; Jiang, K.; Yuan, Z.Y.; Murphy, R.W.; Zhang, Y.P. Universal COI primers for DNA barcoding amphibians. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2012, 12, 247–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Collet, M.; Jean-Francois, T. Une nouvelle et remarquable espèce de naja semi-aquatique (Elapidae, sous-genre Boulengerina Dollo, 1886) de la République Démocratique du Congo. Bull. Société Herpétologique Fr. 2020, 173, 41–52. [Google Scholar]
  39. Li, J.N.; Liang, D.; Wang, Y.; Guo, P.; Zhang, P.; Huang, S.; Zhang, P. A large-scale systematic framework of Chinese snakes based on a unified multilocus marker system. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2020, 148, 106807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Lanfear, R.; Calcott, B.; Ho, S.Y.; Guindon, S. Partition Finder: Combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2012, 29, 1695–1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Hillis, D.M.; Bull, J.J. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 1993, 42, 182–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ronquist, F.; Teslenko, M.; Van Der Mark, P.; Ayres, D.L.; Darling, A.; Höhna, S.; Larget, B.; Liu, L.; Suchard, M.A.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61, 539–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Huelsenbeck, J.P.; Ronquist, F.; Nielsen, R.; Bollback, J.P. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 2001, 294, 2310–2314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Slowinski, J.B. A Phylogenetic Analysis of Bungarus (Elapidae) Based on Morphological Characters. J. Herpetol. 1994, 28, 440–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Vogel, G.; David, P.; Pauwels, O.S. A review of morphological variation in Trimeresurus popeiorum (Serpentes: Viperidae: Crotalinae), with the description of two new species. Zootaxa 2004, 727, 1–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kuch, U.; Kizirian, D.; Truong, N.Q.; Lawson, R.; Donnelly, M.A.; Mebs, D. A new species of Krait (Squamata: Elapidae) from the Red River System of Northern Vietnam. Copeia 2005, 2005, 818–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Dowling, H.G. A proposed standard system of counting ventrals in snakes. Br. J. Herpetol. 1951, 1, 97–99. [Google Scholar]
  49. Jiang, K. A method for evaginating the hemipenis of Preserved snakes. Sich. J. Zool. 2010, 29, 122–123. [Google Scholar]
  50. Young, B.A.; Dunlap, K.; Koenig, K.; Singer, M. The buccal buckle: The functional morphology of venom spitting in cobras. J. Exp. Biol. 2004, 207, 3483–3494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Kazandjian, T.D.; Petras, D.; Robinson, S.D.; van Thiel, J.; Greene, H.W.; Arbuckle, K.; Casewell, N.R. Convergent evolution of pain-inducing defensive venom components in spitting cobras. Science 2021, 371, 386–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Trape, J.F.; Chirio, L.; Broadley, D.G.; Wüster, W. Phylogeography and systematic revision of the Egyptian cobra (Serpentes: Elapidae: Naja haje) species complex, with the description of a new species from West Africa. Zootaxa 2009, 2236, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wüster, W.; Thorpe, R.S.; Cox, M.J.; Jintakune, P.; Nabhitabhata, J. Population systematics of the snake genus Naja (Reptilia: Serpentes: Elapidae in Indochina: Multivariate morphomertrics and comparative mitochondrial DNA sequencing (cytochrome oxidase I). J. Evol. Biol. 1995, 8, 493–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Huang, S. Sinoophis; The Strait Publishing & Distribution Group: Fuzhou, China, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  55. Cantor, T.E. Zoology of Chusan; Bennett, J., Ed.; Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles: Calcutta, India, 1842. [Google Scholar]
  56. Paterna, A. Spitting behaviour in the Chinese cobra Naja atra. Herpetol. Bull. 2019, 148, 22–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lesson, R.P. Catalogue des Reptiles qui font partie d’une Collection zoologique recueille dans l’Inde continentale ou en Afrique, et apportée en France par M. Lamare-Piquot. Bull. Sci. Nat. Géologie 1831, 25, 119–123. [Google Scholar]
  58. Lalremsanga, H.T.; Senthil Kumar, N. Annexure—IX Project Completion Report: Large-Scale DNA Barcoding Assessment of Snakes in Mizoram, Indo-Myanmar Biodiversity Hotspot; Mizoram University: Mizoram, India, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  59. Santra, V.; Wüster, W. Natural history notes. Naja kaouthia (Monocled cobra): Behavior/Spitting. Herpetol. Rev. 2017, 48, 455–456. [Google Scholar]
  60. Ashaharraza, K.; Lalremsanga, H.T. Notes on the diet of the Monocled Cobra Naja kaouthia Lesson, 1831 with a report on a predator of the King Cobra Ophiophagus hannah (Cantor, 1836). Sauria 2020, 42, 45–48. [Google Scholar]
  61. Yang, D.T.; Rao, D.Q. Amphibia and Reptilia of Yunnan; Yunnan Science and Technology Press: Kuming, China, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  62. Rao, S.; Bai, J. Experience of observation and nursing of 126 cases of snake bites. Med. Pharm. Yunnan 2016, 37, 127–129. [Google Scholar]
  63. Nutaphand, W. Cobra; Pata Zoo Publications: Bangkok, Thailand, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  64. Giri, R.; Baral, R.; Giri, R.; Shah, K.B.; Tillack, F. First records of the spitting behaviour of monocled cobra (Naja kaouthia) from Nepal. Russ. J. Herpetol. 2021, 28, 122–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Tumwipat, B.; Nutaphand, W. The Treatment of Poisonous Snakebite Victims and the Poisonous Snakes of Thailand; Peekhanet Print Shop: Bangkok, Thailand, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  66. Wüster, W.; Thorpe, R.S. Naja siamensis, a cryptic species of venomous snake revealed by mtDNA sequencing. Experientia 1994, 50, 75–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Slowinski, J.B.; Keogh, J.S. Phylogenetic relationships of elapid snakes based on cytochrome b mtDNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol 2000, 15, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Han, F.; Bahain, J.-J.; Deng, C.; Boëda, E.; Hou, Y.; Wei, G.; Huang, W.; Garcia, T.; Shao, Q.; He, C.; et al. The earliest evidence of hominid settlement in China: Combined electron spin resonance and uranium series (ESR/U-series) dating of mammalian fossil teeth from Longgupo cave. Quat. Int. 2017, 434, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Auffenberg, W. The herpetofauna of Komodo, with notes on adjacent areas. Bull. Fla. State Mus. Biol. Sci. 1980, 25, 39–156. [Google Scholar]
  70. Leviton, A.E.; Brown, R.M.; Siler, C.D. The dangerously venomous snakes of the Philippine Archipelago. In The Coral Triangle: The 2011 Hearst Biodiversity Philippine Expedition; Williams, G.C., Gosliner, T.M., Eds.; California Academy of Sciences: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
Animals 12 03481 g001 550
Figure 1. Distributions of cobras in Asia. Distribution data were adjusted from IUCN https://www.iucnredlist.org (accessed on 26 October 2022).
Figure 1. Distributions of cobras in Asia. Distribution data were adjusted from IUCN https://www.iucnredlist.org (accessed on 26 October 2022).
Animals 12 03481 g001
Animals 12 03481 g002 550
Figure 2. Phylogenetic trees of the genus Naja inferred by Bayesian analyses (BI) based on concatenated mitochondrial gene alignment for 1028 bp cyt b and 659 bp ND4. Both bootstrap supports (BS) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) are indicated on each of the corresponding node. Support values for weekly supported (BS < 50, BPP < 0.50) nodes are indicated as “-”.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic trees of the genus Naja inferred by Bayesian analyses (BI) based on concatenated mitochondrial gene alignment for 1028 bp cyt b and 659 bp ND4. Both bootstrap supports (BS) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) are indicated on each of the corresponding node. Support values for weekly supported (BS < 50, BPP < 0.50) nodes are indicated as “-”.
Animals 12 03481 g002
Animals 12 03481 g003 550
Figure 3. Phylogenetic trees of the genus Naja inferred by Bayesian analyses (BI) based on 627 bp mitochondrial gene COI. Both bootstrap supports (BS) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) are indicated on each of the corresponding node. Support values for weekly supported (BS < 50, BPP < 0.50) nodes are indicated as “-”.
Figure 3. Phylogenetic trees of the genus Naja inferred by Bayesian analyses (BI) based on 627 bp mitochondrial gene COI. Both bootstrap supports (BS) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) are indicated on each of the corresponding node. Support values for weekly supported (BS < 50, BPP < 0.50) nodes are indicated as “-”.
Animals 12 03481 g003
Animals 12 03481 g004 550
Figure 4. Body and head morphological comparisons between Naja atra (A), N. kaouthia South Asian clade (B), N. kaouthia Southeastern Asian clade (C) and N. fuxi sp. nov. (D). (A) subadult female (body length 730 mm) neotype of N. atra CIB12273 from Zhoushan Island, Zhejiang Province; (B) adult female N. kaouthia ZMH R04803 from Port Canning, West Bengal, India; (C) adult male ZMH R02885 of N. kaouthia from Bangkok, Thailand; (D) adult male holotype of N. fuxi sp. nov. CIB DL2018053147 from Panzhihua, Sichuan, China. 1: dorsal body; 2: ventral body; 3: dorsal head; 4: ventral head; 5: lateral head. (A,D) photographed by Sheng-Chao Shi; (B,C) by Gernot Vogel.
Figure 4. Body and head morphological comparisons between Naja atra (A), N. kaouthia South Asian clade (B), N. kaouthia Southeastern Asian clade (C) and N. fuxi sp. nov. (D). (A) subadult female (body length 730 mm) neotype of N. atra CIB12273 from Zhoushan Island, Zhejiang Province; (B) adult female N. kaouthia ZMH R04803 from Port Canning, West Bengal, India; (C) adult male ZMH R02885 of N. kaouthia from Bangkok, Thailand; (D) adult male holotype of N. fuxi sp. nov. CIB DL2018053147 from Panzhihua, Sichuan, China. 1: dorsal body; 2: ventral body; 3: dorsal head; 4: ventral head; 5: lateral head. (A,D) photographed by Sheng-Chao Shi; (B,C) by Gernot Vogel.
Animals 12 03481 g004
Animals 12 03481 g005 550
Figure 5. Naja atra in life. (A) Adult from Qingtian, Zhejiang, China; (B–D) one adult (B,C) and another (D) from Lishui, Zhejiang, China; (E) juvenile from Wuyi, Fujian, China; (F,G) one adult from Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; (H) adult from Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. (A–E) Photographed by Bin-Qing Zhu; (F–H) photographed by Liang Zhang.
Figure 5. Naja atra in life. (A) Adult from Qingtian, Zhejiang, China; (B–D) one adult (B,C) and another (D) from Lishui, Zhejiang, China; (E) juvenile from Wuyi, Fujian, China; (F,G) one adult from Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; (H) adult from Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. (A–E) Photographed by Bin-Qing Zhu; (F–H) photographed by Liang Zhang.
Animals 12 03481 g005
Animals 12 03481 g006 550
Figure 6. Hemipenis of Naja atra ((A) CIB LJT-FJ22020060; (B) CIB LJT-GD2020103) and N. fuxi sp. nov. ((C) KIZ 030071; (D) CIB DL2018053147). Sulcate, asulcate, lateral and top view from left to right. Photographed by Jun-Jie Huang and Jin-Long Ren.
Figure 6. Hemipenis of Naja atra ((A) CIB LJT-FJ22020060; (B) CIB LJT-GD2020103) and N. fuxi sp. nov. ((C) KIZ 030071; (D) CIB DL2018053147). Sulcate, asulcate, lateral and top view from left to right. Photographed by Jun-Jie Huang and Jin-Long Ren.
Animals 12 03481 g006
Animals 12 03481 g007 550
Figure 7. South Asian Naja kaouthia in life. (A,B) Two adults from Jhargram, West Bengal, India; (C) Individual from Kolkata outskirts of West Bengal, India; (D) Adult from Siliguri, North Bengal region of West Bengal, India; (E) Individual from Bhuvneshwar, Odisha, India; (F,G) two juveniles from Mizoram, India; (H) Individual from Samtse town, Bhutan. ((A–E) photographed by Vivek R Sharma; (F,G) photographed by Gernot Vogel; (H) photographed by Choggyal Taz).
Figure 7. South Asian Naja kaouthia in life. (A,B) Two adults from Jhargram, West Bengal, India; (C) Individual from Kolkata outskirts of West Bengal, India; (D) Adult from Siliguri, North Bengal region of West Bengal, India; (E) Individual from Bhuvneshwar, Odisha, India; (F,G) two juveniles from Mizoram, India; (H) Individual from Samtse town, Bhutan. ((A–E) photographed by Vivek R Sharma; (F,G) photographed by Gernot Vogel; (H) photographed by Choggyal Taz).
Animals 12 03481 g007
Animals 12 03481 g008 550
Figure 8. Southeastern Asian Naja kaouthia in life. (A,B) a juvenile from Selangor, Peninsular Malaysia; (C) an adult from Chang Wat Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand; (D) a juvenile from Samut Prakan, Thailand; (E) an adult from Surat Thani, Thailand; (F) an adult from Ranong, Thailand; (G,H) two adults from Duc Trong, Lam Dong, Vietnam. (A) was photographed by Dr. Teo Eng Wah. Other photos were cited from iNaturalist.org occurrence dataset https://doi.org/10.15468/ab3s5x via GBIF.org (licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) by following photographer: Gregory Greene ((C) record No. 2006052432), Wich’yanan L ((D) record No. 3090707753), Mintkhaosok ((E) record No. 3325726349), Knotsnake ((F) record No. 3384192379), Herpingvietnam ((G) record No. 2557801804), Leonid A. Neymark ((H) record No. 2366151765).
Figure 8. Southeastern Asian Naja kaouthia in life. (A,B) a juvenile from Selangor, Peninsular Malaysia; (C) an adult from Chang Wat Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand; (D) a juvenile from Samut Prakan, Thailand; (E) an adult from Surat Thani, Thailand; (F) an adult from Ranong, Thailand; (G,H) two adults from Duc Trong, Lam Dong, Vietnam. (A) was photographed by Dr. Teo Eng Wah. Other photos were cited from iNaturalist.org occurrence dataset https://doi.org/10.15468/ab3s5x via GBIF.org (licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) by following photographer: Gregory Greene ((C) record No. 2006052432), Wich’yanan L ((D) record No. 3090707753), Mintkhaosok ((E) record No. 3325726349), Knotsnake ((F) record No. 3384192379), Herpingvietnam ((G) record No. 2557801804), Leonid A. Neymark ((H) record No. 2366151765).
Animals 12 03481 g008
Animals 12 03481 g009 550
Figure 9. Paratypes of Naja fuxi sp. nov. (A,B) Dorsal and ventral view of adult female paratype CIB DL2018081005 from type locality Panzhihua, Sichuan before preservation; (C,D) Dorsolateral and ventral view of adult male KIZ030071 from Simao, Pu’er, Yunnan in preservative; (E,F) Dorsal and ventral view of juvenile CIB YNJC0068 from Jiangcheng, Yunnan, China before preservation. (Photographed by Sheng-Chao Shi).
Figure 9. Paratypes of Naja fuxi sp. nov. (A,B) Dorsal and ventral view of adult female paratype CIB DL2018081005 from type locality Panzhihua, Sichuan before preservation; (C,D) Dorsolateral and ventral view of adult male KIZ030071 from Simao, Pu’er, Yunnan in preservative; (E,F) Dorsal and ventral view of juvenile CIB YNJC0068 from Jiangcheng, Yunnan, China before preservation. (Photographed by Sheng-Chao Shi).
Animals 12 03481 g009
Animals 12 03481 g010 550
Figure 10. Naja fuxisp. nov. in life and habitats. (A,B) Dorsolateral view and hood pattern of adult female paratype CIB DL2018081005 from Panzhihua, Sichuan, China; (C,D) Dorsolateral and front view of an unvouchered adult from Jiangcheng, Pu’er, Yunnan, China; (E,F), two adults from Wenshan, Yunnan, China; (G) Subtropical Forest at type locality Panzhihua, Sichuan, China; (H) Tropical monsoon forest and farmland at Jiangcheng, Pu’er, Yunnan, China. (Photos (A,B,H) by Sheng-Chao Shi; (C,D,G) by Li Ding; (E,F) by Liang Zhang).
Figure 10. Naja fuxisp. nov. in life and habitats. (A,B) Dorsolateral view and hood pattern of adult female paratype CIB DL2018081005 from Panzhihua, Sichuan, China; (C,D) Dorsolateral and front view of an unvouchered adult from Jiangcheng, Pu’er, Yunnan, China; (E,F), two adults from Wenshan, Yunnan, China; (G) Subtropical Forest at type locality Panzhihua, Sichuan, China; (H) Tropical monsoon forest and farmland at Jiangcheng, Pu’er, Yunnan, China. (Photos (A,B,H) by Sheng-Chao Shi; (C,D,G) by Li Ding; (E,F) by Liang Zhang).
Animals 12 03481 g010
Table
Table 1. Samples analyzed in this study.
Table 1. Samples analyzed in this study.
Sample IDTaxaVoucher NumbersLocality cyt bND4COI
1Naja kaouthiaWW 585Chumphon Province, ThailandGQ359507 EU624209
2N. kaouthiaisolate 818ThailandMT346707MT346903
3N. kaouthia UnknownLR880477
4N. kaouthiaisolate 813VietnamMT346706MT346902
5N. kaouthiaisolate 812VietnamMT346705MT346901
6N. kaouthiaCAS 206602Ayeyarwady, MyanmarAF217835AY058982
7N. kaouthiaisolate 839 MyanmarMT346708MT346904
8N. kaouthiaNKA3Bangkok, Thailand AB920185
9N. kaouthiaNKA2Bangkok, Thailand AB920184
10N. kaouthiaNKA1Bangkok, Thailand AB920183
11N. kaouthiaPUCZM/X/SL787Mizoram, India MH107858
12N. kaouthiaPUCZM/X/SL774Mizoram, India MH107857
13N. kaouthiaPUCZM/X/SL773Mizoram, India MH107856
14N. kaouthiaCUZSI81Badarganj, Rangpur, Bangladesh KM521202
15N. kaouthiaMZMU1163Aizawl, Mizoram, India MT348385
16N. kaouthiaMZMU982Mizoram University Campus, India MT348386
17N. kaouthiaMZMU1170Aizawl, Mizoram, India MT348387
18N. kaouthiaMZMU998Mizoram University Campus, India MT348388
19N. kaouthiaMZMU1426Mizoram University Campus, India MT348389
20N. kaouthiaMZMU1195Mizoram University Campus, India MT348390
21N. sagittiferaisolate 400UnknownMT346720MT346916
22N. sagittiferaisolate 1815UnknownMT346721MT346917
23N. oxianaisolate 838UnknownMT346714MT346910
24N. oxianaisolate 832UnknownMT346713MT346909
25N. atraLJT-FJ2020060Dongping Mountain, Xiamen, Fujian, ChinaON221325ON221392
26N. atraGXNU 2021070801Zhoushan Island, Zhejiang, ChinaON221326
27N. atraC29Eastern ChinaJN160670
28N. atraisolate 793Taiwan, ChinaMT346704MT346900
29N. atraRN1570Taiwan, China KP749826
30N. atraRN1298Taiwan, China KP749825
31N. atraCIB 20190430Wuyishan, Fujian, ChinaON221327
32N. atraCIB 2021042007Luofushan, Guangdong, ChinaON221328
33N. atraCIB CR430Guangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaON221329ON237986ON221393
34N. atraCIB 093930Purchased from Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, ChinaEU913475EU913475EU913475
35N. atraC17Southcentral ChinaJN160658
36N. atraLJT-GD2020103Dinghu Mountain, Zhaoqing, Guangdong, ChinaON221330
37N. fuxi sp. nov.KIZ 090071Simao, Pu’er, Yunnan, ChinaON221331 ON237987
38N. fuxi sp. nov.KIZ F20180066Simao, Pu’er, Yunnan, ChinaON221332 ON237988
39N. fuxi sp. nov.KIZ 20180801Simao, Pu’er, Yunnan, ChinaON221333 ON237989
40N. fuxi sp. nov.KIZ 2020090301Menglian, Pu’er, Yunnan, ChinaON221334ON221394ON237990
41N. fuxi sp. nov.KIZ 2020091201Ximeng, Pu’er, Yunnan, ChinaON221335ON221395ON237991
42N. fuxi sp. nov. (“N. atra”)C31Pingbian, Yunnan, China, ChinaJN160672
43N. fuxi sp. nov.CIB YNJC0022Jiangcheng, Pu’er, Yunnan, ChinaON221336ON221396ON237992
44N. fuxi sp. nov.CIB DL000020Jiangcheng, Pu’er, Yunnan, ChinaON221337ON221397ON237993
45N. fuxi sp. nov.CIB DL000070Jiangcheng, Pu’er, Yunnan, ChinaON221338ON221398ON237994
46N. fuxi sp. nov.CIB DL000096Jiangcheng, Pu’er, Yunnan, ChinaON221339 ON237995
47N. fuxi sp. nov.CIB DL000249Jiangcheng, Pu’er, Yunnan, ChinaON221340ON221399ON237996
48N. fuxi sp. nov.CIB 2018053147Panchizhua, Sichuan, ChinaON221341 ON237997
49N. fuxi sp. nov.CIB 098874Miyi, Panzhihua, Sichuan, ChinaON221342 ON237998
50N. fuxi sp. nov.CIB 098875Miyi, Panzhihua, Sichuan, ChinaON221343 ON237999
51N. fuxi sp. nov.CIB YS2Yanyuan, Panzhihua, Sichuan, ChinaON221344ON221400ON238000
52N. fuxi sp. nov. (“N. kaouthia”)CHS026China MK064598
53N. fuxi sp. nov. (“N. kaouthia”)CHS726China MK064840
54N. sumatrana sumatranaisolate 589IndonesiaMT346737MT346933
55N. sumatrana sumatranaisolate 587MalaysiaMT346736MT346932
56N. sumatrana sumatranaisolate 586MalaysiaMT346735MT346931
57N. sumatrana sumatranaisolate 295IndonesiaMT346734MT346930
58N. sumatrana sumatranaisolate 294IndonesiaMT346733MT346929
59N. sumatrana miolepisisolate 1827PhilippinesMT346738MT346934
60N. sumatrana miolepisisolate 188MalaysiaMT346732MT346928
61N. sumatranaNSU1 Thailand AB920186
62N. siamensisisolate 811Viet NamMT346728MT346926
63N. siamensisisolate 810Viet NamMT346727MT346925
64N. siamensisisolate 26ThailandMT346725MT346923
65N. siamensisSC01fBangkok, Thailand LC086063
66N. siamensisNSI3Rayong, Thailand AB920188
67N. siamensisNSI2Bangkok, Thailand AB920187
68N. mandalayensisCAS 204375-6Monywa, MyanmarAF155211
69N. samarensisisolate 1803PhilippinesMT346723MT346919
70N. samarensisisolate 1806PhilippinesMT346724MT346920
71N. samarensisisolate 841PhilippinesMT346722MT346918
72N. philippinensisisolate 1828 PhilippinesMT346719MT346915
73N. philippinensisisolate 1825 PhilippinesMT346718MT346914
74N. sputatrixisolate 584IndonesiaMT346730MT346922
75N. sputatrixisolate 583IndonesiaMT346729MT346921
76N. najaZMUVAS8Pakistan MK936173
77N. najaisolate 579NepalMT346711MT346907
78N. polyocellata comb. nov.isolate 581Sri LankaMT346712MT346908
79N. najaZMUVAS21Pakistan MK941841
80N. najaBDS80/CUZSI80Pirganj, Rangpur, Bangladesh KM521201
81N. najaDUZM_S052.1 Dhaka, Bangladesh MT215095
82N. arabicaisolate 1678/WW 1678 Taif, Saudi ArabiaGQ387104GQ387075
83N. hajeisolate 1653 northern NigeriaGQ387099GQ387070
84N. senegalensisisolate 2018MaliGQ387112GQ387083
85N. anchietaeisolate 1892 BotswanaMT346741GQ387087
86N. annuliferaisolate 881ZimbabweGQ359504GQ359586
87N. niveaisolate 1482UnknownMT346760MT346936
88N. mossambicaisolate 882ZimbabweMT346655MT346848
89N. nigricinctaisolate 877NamibiaMT346661MT346854
90N. asheiisolate 1394KenyaMT346647MT346842
91N. nigricollisisolate 3103KenyaMT346680MT346874
92N. katiensisisolate 2022SenegalMT346653MT346845
93N. nubiaeisolate 837EgyptGQ359497GQ359579
94N. pallidaisolate 1080TanzaniaGQ359496GQ359578
95N. annulataisolate 2717Republic of the CongoMT346700MT346896
96N. christyiisolate PM147Democratic Republic of the CongoMT346701MT346897
97N. savannulaisolate 2046BeninMH337600MH337406
98N. subfulvaisolate 2654South AfricaMH337633MH337439
99N. melanoleucaisolate 2721Democratic Republic of the CongoMH337589MH337395
100N. peroescobariisolate 1197 Sao Tome and PrincipeMH337634MH337440
101N. guineensisisolate 2491TogoMH337580MH337386
102N. multifasciataisolate 4313Democratic Republic of the CongoMT346702MT346898
103N. annulataUPRP:558270Impongui, Likouala, Republic of the Congo MH274482
104N. melanoleucaUPRP:558271Impongui, Likouala, Republic of the Congo MH274485
105N. nubiaeUSNM:Herp:589595Tadjourah, Day (village), Djibouti MG700028
106Ophiophagus hannahCIB093929UnkownEU921899EU921899
Table
Table 2. Uncorrected p-distances based on cyt b genes for subgenus Naja. (Values in %).
Table 2. Uncorrected p-distances based on cyt b genes for subgenus Naja. (Values in %).
No.Species (Sample Numbers in Table 1)12345678910111213
1Naja kaouthia Southeast Asia (Myanmar; Thailand; Vietnam) (1–7)0.0–1.2
2N. sagittifera presumed Andaman Islands (21–22)2.4–2.90.0
3N. oxiana Unkown locality (23–24)5.0–5.55.3–5.40.0
4N. atra Southern and Southeastern China (25–28, 31–36)4.6–6.36.1–6.75.2–5.80.1–2.1
5N. fuxisp. nov. Southwestern China (Sichuan and Yunnan) (37–51)5.3–6.76.2–6.44.3–4.44.1–5.00.0–0.3
6N. sumatrana sumatrana Indonesia and Malaysia (54–58)8.2–9.28.5–8.97.4–7.86.9–7.66.7–7.50.0–1.2
7N. sumatrana miolepis (Malaysia and Philippines (59–60)8.4–9.17.8–8.37.57.6–8.47.6–7.82.9–3.40.2
8N. siamensis Viet Nam and Thailand (62–64)9.7–0.99.1–9.78.4–9.18.8–10.18.1–8.94.3–5.04.7–5.00.0–1.7
9N. mandalayensis Monywa, Myanmar (68)8.7–9.08.47.78.0–8.87.43.2–3.53.95.0–5.4/
10N. samarensis Philippines (68–71)9.7–10.49.4–9.58.48.8–9.78.1–8.55.3–6.05.8–6.07.1–7.65.70.0–0.3
11N. philippinensis Philippines (72–73)9.7–10.19.4–9.58.49.0–9.48.1–8.25.0–5.44.7–5.06.5–6.85.44.30.0
12N. sputatrix Indonesia (74–75)9.2–10.08.6–8.88.3–8.57.7–8.57.6–8.24.3–4.85.4–5.76.2–6.64.9–5.46.3–6.96.2–6.50.5
13N. naja Pakistan and Nepal (76–77)9.5–11.59.2–10.97.9–9.48.7–10.49.8–10.49.2–1079.8–10710.0–11.310.5–10.710.6–11.511.4–11.88.1–9.91.4
14N. polyocellatacomb. nov. Sri Lanka (78)10.7–11.310.48.79.5–10.49.1–9.39.4–9.89.6–9.810.0–10.610.010.8–11.111.79.7–10.24.3–4.9
Table
Table 3. Uncorrected P-distance of subgenus Naja based on COI genes. (Values in %).
Table 3. Uncorrected P-distance of subgenus Naja based on COI genes. (Values in %).
No.Species (Sample Numbers in Table 1)1234567
1Naja kaouthia Southeast Asia (Bangkok, Thailand) (8–10)0.0
2N. kaouthia South Asia (Mizoram, India and Rangpur, Bangladesh) (11–20)1.8–2.40.0–0.6
3N. atra southeastern China (Zhejiang, Taiwan, Guangdong) (26, 29, 30, 34)2.7–3.43.1–4.20.2–0.6
4N. fuxisp. nov. Southwestern China (Sichuan and Yunnan) (37–41, 43–53)2.5–2.92.0–3.02.5–3.20.0–0.2
5N. sumatrana Thailand (61)6.5 6.2–6.96.1–6.36.0–6.4
6N. siamensis Thailand (Chon Buri, Rayong, Bangkok) (65–67)5.6 5.6–6.25.7–6.55.4–5.83.7–4.00.0–0.3
7N. naja Pakistan and Bangladesh (79–81)7.7 8.1–8.97.5–8.27.4–8.08.5 8.6–8.70.0
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shi, S.-C.; Vogel, G.; Ding, L.; Rao, D.-Q.; Liu, S.; Zhang, L.; Wu, Z.-J.; Chen, Z.-N. Description of a New Cobra (Naja Laurenti, 1768; Squamata, Elapidae) from China with Designation of a Neotype for Naja atra. Animals 2022, 12, 3481. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12243481

AMA Style

Shi S-C, Vogel G, Ding L, Rao D-Q, Liu S, Zhang L, Wu Z-J, Chen Z-N. Description of a New Cobra (Naja Laurenti, 1768; Squamata, Elapidae) from China with Designation of a Neotype for Naja atra. Animals. 2022; 12(24):3481. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12243481

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shi, Sheng-Chao, Gernot Vogel, Li Ding, Ding-Qi Rao, Shuo Liu, Liang Zhang, Zheng-Jun Wu, and Ze-Ning Chen. 2022. "Description of a New Cobra (Naja Laurenti, 1768; Squamata, Elapidae) from China with Designation of a Neotype for Naja atra" Animals 12, no. 24: 3481. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12243481

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop