Next Article in Journal
Ultrasound, Dacryocystorhinography and Morphological Examination of Normal Eye and Lacrimal Apparatus of the Donkey (Equus asinus)
Next Article in Special Issue
Biometric Indices, Physio-Metabolic Responses and Carcass Quality in Rohu (Labeo rohita) during Feed Deprivation
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Packaging Type and Aging on the Meat Quality Characteristics of Water Buffalo Bulls
Previous Article in Special Issue
Toxic Effects on Bioaccumulation, Hematological Parameters, Oxidative Stress, Immune Responses and Tissue Structure in Fish Exposed to Ammonia Nitrogen: A Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 12
Issue 2
10.3390/ani12020131
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecular Characterization and Response of Prolyl Hydroxylase Domain (PHD) Genes to Hypoxia Stress in Hypophthalmichthys molitrix

by
Xiaohui Li
1,2,3,†,
Meidong Zhang
1,†,
Chen Ling
1,
Hang Sha
1,
Guiwei Zou
1,* and
Hongwei Liang
1,2,*
1
Yangtze River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Wuhan 430223, China
2
Key Laboratory of Aquatic Genomics, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Yangtze River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Science, Wuhan 430223, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Developmental Biology of Feshwater Fish, College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Animals 2022, 12(2), 131; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12020131
Submission received: 20 October 2021 / Revised: 1 January 2022 / Accepted: 4 January 2022 / Published: 6 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Physiological Responses in Fishes)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Hypoxia is a common challenge for aquatic organisms, and prolyl hydroxylase domain (PHD) proteins play important roles in hypoxic adaptation by regulating the stability of the hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha subunit (HIF-1α). In this study, the full-length cDNAs of three PHD genes were obtained from Hypophthalmichthys molitrix, which is an important freshwater fish and sensitive to low oxygen tension. The amino acid sequence analysis and phylogenetic analysis of PHDs were performed among various species. Furthermore, the expression patterns and the transcriptional responses of H. molitrix PHD genes to acute hypoxia, continued hypoxia, and reoxygenation were explored in different tissues. Our study preliminarily explored the physiological regulation functions of PHD genes at the transcriptional level when addressing the hypoxic challenge and provided a foundation for future systematic explorations of the molecular mechanisms underlying hypoxia adaptation in silver carp.

Abstract

As an economically and ecologically important freshwater fish, silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) is sensitive to low oxygen tension. Prolyl hydroxylase domain (PHD) proteins are critical regulators of adaptive responses to hypoxia for their function of regulating the hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha subunit (HIF-1α) stability via hydroxylation reaction. In the present study, three PHD genes were cloned from H. molitrix by rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE). The total length of HmPHD1, HmPHD2, and HmPHD3 were 2981, 1954, and 1847 base pair (bp), and contained 1449, 1080, and 738 bp open reading frames (ORFs) that encoded 482, 359, and 245 amino acids (aa), respectively. Amino acid sequence analysis showed that HmPHD1, HmPHD2, and HmPHD3 had the conserved prolyl 4-hydroxylase alpha subunit homolog domains at their C-termini. Meanwhile, the evaluation of phylogeny revealed PHD2 and PHD3 of H. molitrix were more closely related as they belonged to sister clades, whereas the clade of PHD1 was relatively distant from these two. The transcripts of PHD genes are ubiquitously distributed in H. molitrix tissues, with the highest expressional level of HmPHD1 and HmPHD3 in liver, and HmPHD2 in muscle. After acute hypoxic treatment for 0.5 h, PHD genes of H. molitrix were induced mainly in liver and brain, and different from HmPHD1 and HmPHD2, the expression of HmPHD3 showed no overt tissue specificity. Furthermore, under continued hypoxic condition, PHD genes exhibited an obviously rapid but gradually attenuated response from 3 h to 24 h, and upon reoxygenation, the transcriptional expression of PHD genes showed a decreasing trend in most of the tissues. These results indicate that the PHD genes of H. molitrix are involved in the early response to hypoxic stress, and they show tissue-specific transcript expression when performing physiological regulation functions. This study is of great relevance for advancing our understanding of how PHD genes are regulated when addressing the hypoxic challenge and provides a reference for the subsequent research of the molecular mechanisms underlying hypoxia adaptation in silver carp.

1. Introduction

Prolyl hydroxylase domain (PHD) proteins are oxygen-dependent enzymes, belonging to Fe (II) and 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase family, which can regulate processes such as erythrocyte formation, angiogenesis, and heart development [1]. This family has three members, including PHD1, PHD2, and PHD3. PHDs are evolutionarily well-conserved proteins and share a similar C-terminal catalytic domain [2]. However, in addition to the typical C-terminal catalytic domain, PHD2 comprises a N-terminal myeloid (Myeloid, Nervy, DEAF-1) zinc finger structure (ZF-MYND), whereas PHD1 and PHD3 have lost this domain during the process of evolution [3]. PHDs were first found in Caenorhabditis elegans and named egl-9 family hypoxia-inducible factor 2, 1, 3 (EGLN2, 1, 3) [4], and then named as hypoxia inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase (HPH3, 2, 1) because they can hydroxylate the Pro402/564 site in the oxygen-dependent degradation domain (ODDD) of the hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α) [5].
Oxygen homeostasis is crucial for development, survival, and normal function of all animals [6,7]. Hypoxia can cause stress responses and even damage to organisms. In organisms, cells regulate some genes and proteins to adapt to hypoxia stress through oxygen receptors and signal transduction pathways [8]. HIF-1 signaling pathway is the most studied for its important regulatory effects in reducing oxygen consumption and increasing oxygen delivery [9], and in this pathway, the role of prolyl hydroxylase domain (PHDs) is particularly important for their function of regulating the hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) stability [10,11].
PHDs are important oxygen-sensing molecular switches in cells, and oxygen is necessary for PHDs catalytic activity [12]. Under normoxia condition, the PHDs hydroxylate the proline residues (Pro-402/564) of HIF-1α. Subsequently, the hydroxylated HIF-1α was recognized by von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein (VHL), combined to form a complex, and degraded by the E3 ubiquitin-degrading enzyme system mediated by the tumor suppressor protein [13]. However, under hypoxia, the catalytic activity of PHDs is inhibited [14]. Therefore, HIF-1α cannot be degraded by the E3 ubiquitin-degrading enzyme system, resulting in the accumulation of HIF-1α [15]. HIF-1α then binds to hypoxia inducible factor-1 beta (HIF-1β) in the nucleus to form a heterodimer, which could bind to its downstream hypoxia response element (HRE) to regulate gene expression, including oxygen sensor mobilization, oxygen transport, blood vessel, and erythropoietin production [16,17,18]. Therefore, as upstream regulatory genes of HIFs, PHDs have been confirmed to be critical mediators for the adaptive response to hypoxia [19,20].
To date, there have been fewer reports on the molecular and physiological studies of fish PHD genes. PHD2 was cloned and identified from Megalobrama amblycephala [21] and Sillago sihama [22], respectively, and the results showed that the expression patterns of PHD2 were different in these two species under hypoxic conditions. Moreover, the MaPHD1 and MaPHD3 were also cloned and identified [23,24]. The MaPHD1 encodes two protein isoforms generated by alternative initiation, and both isoforms were distributed in the nucleus, therein the senior one promoted cell proliferation [23]. MaPHD3 has two transcripts generated by alternative splicing, and both transcripts were up-regulated under hypoxia. Further evidence is needed to determine whether PHDs play different regulatory roles under hypoxia in different fish species [24]. Hypophthalmichthys molitrix, one of the most important aquaculture fish species in China, shows poor environmental hypoxia tolerance, making it hard to adapt to the hypoxic environment [25]. Therefore, it would be more meaningful for us to study the regulation functions of PHD genes in this highly hypoxia-sensitive fish.
In the present study, we aimed to analyze the expression patterns of PHD genes in different tissues and explore the transcriptional responses of PHD genes to acute hypoxia, continued hypoxia, and reoxygenation. These results will be of great relevance for advancing our understanding of how PHD genes perform physiological regulation functions when addressing the hypoxic challenge and provide a reference for the subsequent research of the molecular mechanisms underlying hypoxia adaptation in silver carp.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Fish

All silver carp used in this study were cultured in the Experimental Farm of Yangtze River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences (YFI). Fish (100 ± 10 g) were stocked in tanks and allowed to acclimate for 7 days before starting the trail. The tanks were connected to an aerator to keep dissolved oxygen (DO; 6.5 ± 0.3 mg/L) stable.

2.2. Exposure and Tissue Collection

Silver carp were randomly selected from the acclimated fish for the experiment. Under a constant temperature (27.0 ± 0.5 °C), the normoxic condition (DO = 6.5 ± 0.3 mg/L) was maintained by inputting an amount of air, whereas the hypoxic conditions was created by rapidly filling nitrogen into the water. At the same time, the DO was monitored continuously using a water quality analyzer (HQ30D, Hach, Loveland, CO, USA).
The whole test process is inclusive of two parts, including the acute hypoxia experiment, and the continuous hypoxia-reoxygenation experiment. For acute hypoxia stress, silver carp were exposed to water at DO values of 2.5 mg/L (AH-2.5), 1.5 mg/L (AH-1.5), 0.5 mg/L (AH-0.5), and 0.25 mg/L (AH-0.25) for 0.5 h, respectively. For the continuous hypoxia-reoxygenation experiment, silver carp were first exposed to water at DO values of 1.5 ± 0.3 mg/L for 3 h (CH-3), 6 h (CH-6), 12 h (CH-12), and 24 h (CH-24), respectively, and after 24 h continuous hypoxia treatment, silver carp were secondly subjected to normoxic condition (DO = 6.5 ± 0.3 mg/L) to reoxygenate for 3 h (R-3), 6 h (R-6), 12 h (R-12), and 24 h (R-24). Before the start of the hypoxia experiment, fifteen fish (three replicates, each with 5 fish) were randomly selected from the acclimated fish as the control group (CK). After the exposure, fifteen fish were sampled at each time point (three replicates, each with 5 fish) during the acute hypoxia experiment, and continuous hypoxia-reoxygenation experiment. All fish were anaesthetized with a 0.05% solution of MS-222 before sampling. In the control group, tissue samples of liver, brain, heart, gill, muscle, intestine, kidney, and spleen were collected. In the experimental groups, tissue samples of liver, brain, heart, gill, and muscle were collected. The tissues were excised, and frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen, then stored at −80 °C until use. The experimental procedures were performed according to the standards of the Animal Care Policy of YFI.

2.3. Full-Length cDNA Cloning of PHD Genes

Full-length cDNAs of PHD genes were obtained by using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE). First, total RNA was isolated from the liver tissue of silver carp according to the instructions of Trizol reagent. Then, the concentration of the extracted RNA was detected by ultra-micro spectrophotometer (NP80, IMPLEN, München, Germany) and the integrity of RNA was detected by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis. Finally, first-strand cDNA was reverse-transcribed from the total RNA using HiScript® Ⅲ 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (+gDNA wiper) (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Primers (PHD1-P-F/R, PHD2-P-F/R, and PHD3-P-F/R) based on the predicted sequences of silver carp from our full-length transcriptome data (unpublished) were designed (Table 1). The PCR reactions were performed by denaturation at 98 °C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 98 °C for 10 s, annealing at 65 °C for 10 s, and elongation at 72 °C for 10 s; with an additional elongation at 72 °C for 2 min after the last cycle. The PCR products were detected by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis and sequenced by the Wuhan Tianyihuiyuan Biotech Company (Wuhan, China).
Subsequently, 5′ and 3′ RACE were performed using SMARTer RACE 5′/3′ kit (Takara, Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The nested-PCR technique was employed with the gene-specific primers (GSP5/3-1 and GSP5/3-2) and universal primer (UPM or UPM short). The primers were designed using Primer Premier 5.0 software, and the sequences of the primers are listed in Table 1. The nested-PCR thermocycling conditions were as follows: 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 25 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 68 °C for 45 s, 72 °C for 3 min. In both 5′ and 3′ RACE, the first-strand cDNA was used as the template of the primary amplification, and the diluted primary PCR product was used as the template of the second amplification. 5′/3′-RACE PCR was carried out in a reaction volume as follows: 25 µL 2× SeqAmp buffer, 1 µL SeqAmp DNA polymerase, 2.5 µL cDNA template, 1 µL gene-specific primer (10 µmol/L), and 5 µL 10× Universal Primer A Mix (UPM). Deionized water was then added to achieve a total of 50 µL reaction volume. The PCR products were resolved using electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel and purified using a gel extraction kit (D2500-02, Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, USA). Next, the purified products were ligated to vector pMD18T, and the recombinant plasmids were then transformed into competent Escherichia coli DH5α cells. Positive clones were screened and sequenced by the Wuhan Tianyihuiyuan Biotech Company.

2.4. Sequence and Evolutionary Analysis

The cDNA sequences of PHD genes were obtained by assembling the forward and reverse sequencing reads using the DNAMAN software. The online software ORF Finder (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/orffinder/, accessed on 31 March 2021) was used to identify the open reading frame (ORF) in the sequence. The ORFs were translated into amino acid sequence and their basic physicochemical properties were predicted using ExPASy-ProtParam tool (https://web.expasy.org/protparam/, accessed on 1 April 2021). Then the online software SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de, accessed on 3 April 2021) and NCBI online CDD (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi, accessed on 3 April 2021) were used to analyze the domains in the deduced protein sequences. Alignments of deduced amino acid sequences were carried out using the ClustalW program. Gaps were removed manually. A Neighbor-Joining (NJ) phylogenetic tree was constructed with 1000 bootstrap replicates using MEGA X (Mega Limited, AKL, New Zealand). The evolutionary distances were computed using the JTT matrix-based method and in the units of the number of amino acid substitutions per site. The rate variation among sites was modeled with a gamma distribution (shape parameter = 1). This analysis involved 40 amino acid sequences. All ambiguous positions were removed for each sequence pair (pairwise deletion option). There were a total of 243 positions in the final dataset. Moreover, the maximum-likelihood (ML) tree was constructed through IQ-TREE version 1.5.5 [26] under the best-fitting model as estimated by ModelFinder implemented in IQTree with 1000 bootstrap replicates.

2.5. Reverse Transcription-Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR)

The expression patterns of PHD genes and the transcriptional responses of PHD genes to hypoxia were investigated using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Total RNAs were isolated from each tissue of the silver carp using Trizol reagent. After DNase treatment, 1000 ng of total RNA was reverse-transcribed to single-strand cDNA using a HiScript® Ⅲ 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (+gDNA wiper) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The primer pairs PHD1-Y- F/R for HmPHD1, PHD2-Y- F/R for HmPHD2, and PHD3-Y- F/R for HmPHD3 were used (Table 1). Before RT-qPCR analysis, the standard curves for primer pair of HmPHD1, HmPHD2, and HmPHD3 were generated by regression of Cq values and a series of ten-fold cDNA dilutions. Primer amplification efficiency was calculated from the slope of the corresponding standard curve, and the efficiency of PHD1-Y-F/R, PHD2-Y-F/R, and PHD3-Y-F/R was 97.63%, 92.49%, and 98.93%, respectively. The hypoxic-stable reference gene β-actin was used as the control [25] (Table 1). The RT-qPCR was performed using the ChamQTM Universal SYBR® qPCR Master Mix (GeneBio Systems, Canada) with the following thermal cycling conditions: 95 °C for 30 s, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, and 60 °C for 30 s. Each experiment was performed independently for three times. The relative expression levels of PHD genes were normalized to that of β-actin quantification using the 2−△△Ct method.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The qRT-PCR data were expressed as mean ± SE. Statistical analysis (t-test) was performed using SPSS version 24.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 for all analyses.

3. Results

3.1. Molecular Characterization of PHD cDNAs in H. molitrix

Three full-length HmPHD cDNAs were obtained (Table S1). The HmPHD1 cDNA comprised 2981 base pair (bp) in length, contained a 225 bp 5′ untranslated region (UTR), a 1449 bp ORF encoding a polypeptide of 482 amino acid (aa) residues, and a 1307 bp 3′ UTR including a putative polyadenylation signal (AATAAA) and a poly (A) tail. The HmPHD2 cDNA consisted of a 150 bp 5′ UTR, a 1080 bp ORF encoding a polypeptide of 359 aa residues, and a 724 bp 3′ UTR. The HmPHD3 cDNA contained a 75 bp of 5′ UTR, a 738 bp of ORF encoding a polypeptide of 245 aa residues, and a 1307 bp 3′ UTR. The full-length cDNA sequences and corresponding predicted protein sequences of PHD genes of H. molitrix are shown in Figures S1–S3.
The amino acid sequences of H. molitrix PHD proteins were highly similar to those of other species at the C-terminus, with typical P4HC (prolyl 4-hydroxylase alpha subunit homolog) domains in HmPHD1 (amino acid position 263–451), HmPHD2 (amino acid position 141–327), and HmPHD3 (amino acid position 34–220), which is the characteristic of the Fe (II) and 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase family. The HmPHD2 protein also contained the typical motifs, MYND (myeloid, Nervy, and DEAF-1) type zinc finger interaction domain (Figure 1). The nucleotide sequence of PHD1, PHD2, and PHD3 of H. molitrix shared 92.74%, 94.99%, and 94.67% identity with their counterparts in M. amblycephala, and 45.76%, 57%, and 58.70% with their counterparts in Homo sapiens, respectively.
These results showed that HmPHD1 had the longest sequence length, while HmPHD3 had the shortest sequence length with the loss of amino acids occurring in its N-terminal part. C-terminal conserved domain was spared in all three proteins, while HmPHD2 also retained a unique N-terminal domain, indicating that these three proteins shared similar functions and HmPHD2 also had distinctive functions.

3.2. Evolutionary Relationships of PHD Genes

To further clarify the evolutionary relationships of PHD genes among various species, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the NJ method based on the putative amino acid sequences from different vertebrate species, including H. molitrix. The PHD genes were classified into three big clusters, and HmPHD2 and HmPHD3 were more closely related as they belonged to sister clades, whereas the clade of HmPHD1 was relatively distant from these two. Additionally, the PHD genes of H. molitrix and M. amblycephala were clustered into a same clade, indicating that H. molitrix and M. amblycephala had a closer evolutionary relationship. Moreover, the phylogenetic tree showed that PHD genes of H. molitrix were most closely related to the genes from other cyprinids (Figure 2). Furthermore, the maximum-likelihood (ML) tree constructed through IQ-TREE is presented in Figure S4. The two phylogenetic trees were identical, thus the results were consistent.

3.3. Transcriptional Expression Patterns of PHD Genes in H. molitrix

The transcripts of PHD genes were detected in all sampled tissues from H. molitrix. As shown in Figure 3, the high expression level of HmPHD1 was found in liver and heart, followed by those in muscle and brain, while relatively low expression was detected in intestine, gill, kidney, and spleen. The HmPHD2 mRNA was abundantly expressed in muscle, followed by that in heart, gill, and intestines. The HmPHD3 mRNA had the highest expression level in liver. When compared with that of HmPHD1 and HmPHD3, the mRNA level of HmPHD2 was higher in gill and muscle, and was lower in liver, brain, intestines, kidney, and spleen, hence in contrast to HmPHD2, HmPHD1, and HmPHD3 exhibited similar tissue distributions (Figure 3).

3.4. Transcriptional Response of PHD Genes in H. molitrix to Acute Hypoxia

The relative expression of PHD genes in different tissues (liver, brain, heart, gill, and muscle) of H. molitrix was analyzed under acute hypoxia stress. As shown in Figure 4, the mRNA levels of PHD genes increased significantly mainly in liver and brain (p < 0.05) under different low oxygen concentrations. The expression of HmPHD1 and HmPHD2 in heart and gill decreased significantly at DO of 2.5 mg/L (p < 0.05), while the expression of HmPHD3 was elevated in heart and gill under acute hypoxia. Moreover, the mRNA levels of HmPHD1 and HmPHD3 in muscle increased significantly under the DO of 2.5 mg/L, 1.5 mg/L, and 0.5 mg/L (p < 0.05), while HmPHD2 expression in muscle decreased significantly at DO of 2.5 mg/L compared with that under normoxic condition (p < 0.05).
These results showed that, under acute hypoxia for 0.5 h, all three PHD genes were induced in liver and brain, which indicated that brain and liver were the major organs for PHD genes to exert their function in H. molitrix. Different from HmPHD1 and HmPHD2, HmPHD3 showed a similar expression trend in all tissues, suggesting HmPHD3 played roles with no overt tissue specificity under acute hypoxia conditions. Furthermore, among four different oxygen concentrations, PHD genes had the most extensive responses in DO of 1.5 mg/L and 0.5 mg/L, implying that these two DO were the best-fitted to study the transcriptional response of PHD genes to acute hypoxia in H. molitrix.

3.5. Transcriptional Response of PHD Genes to Continued Hypoxia and Reoxygenation in H. molitrix

The expression patterns of H. molitrix PHD genes in response to continuous hypoxic stress and reoxygenation were further investigated. As shown in Figure 5, the mRNA levels of HmPHD1, HmPHD2, and HmPHD3 in liver and brain increased significantly compared with those under normoxia after 3 h of hypoxia (p < 0.05) and remained relatively high until 24 h of hypoxic stress. The mRNA levels of HmPHD1 and HmPHD2 in heart and gill decreased significantly under 3 h of hypoxia stress (p < 0.05), while the expression of HmPHD3 was increased significantly compared with normoxia (p < 0.05). The mNRA levels of HmPHD1, HmPHD2, and HmPHD3 in muscle were increased significantly at 3 h under hypoxic stress (p < 0.05), and then decreased with time. Under hypoxic stress for 12 h and 24 h, the mRNA levels of HmPHD1 and HmPHD3 in muscle were still significantly higher than that under normoxic conditions (p < 0.05), while the expression level of HmPHD2 was significantly lower than that under normoxic conditions. After 3 h of reoxygenation, the HmPHD2 and HmPHD3 expression levels were lower than those under normoxia in the detected tissues (liver, brain, heart, gill, and muscle). After reoxygenation for 24 h, the expression levels of HmPHD1, HmPHD2, and HmPHD3 in gills all returned to their levels under normoxic conditions (p > 0.05).
These results showed that, in addition to liver and brain, muscle is a main organ that involved continued hypoxia stress. Except for HmPHD1 and HmPHD2 in heart and brain, three genes exhibited an obviously rapid but gradually attenuated response to continued hypoxic stress, implying that PHD genes were mainly involved in the early regulation of response to low-oxygen stress. Upon reoxygenation, the transcriptional expression of PHD genes showed a decreasing trend in most tissues, confirming that PHD genes were sensitive to oxygen in H. molitrix.

4. Discussion

Hypoxic conditions often occurs in aquaculture settings. In high-density fish farming, the intensity and duration of hypoxia depend on aeration capacity, fish biomass, feeding rate, etc. Changes in temperature promote high carbon dioxide emissions, and subsequently increased episodes of local acute hypoxia in the wild and in aquaculture ponds [27]. Silver carp, living in the upper water body and feeding on phytoplankton, are sensitive to variation in the DO content. A sudden lack of oxygen will result in mortality among the fish, reducing algae availability and triggering water pollution, and eventually leading to pond turnover [28]. Thus, it is necessary to study the responses and adaptive mechanisms to hypoxia challenge in silver carp.
In the present study, the full-length cDNA sequences of H. molitrix PHD genes were obtained. Multiple alignment showed that these encoded proteins belonged to the Fe (II) and 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase superfamily and were composed of similar functional domains, i.e., the 2-oxoglutarate (2OG)-Fe (II) oxygenase superfamily domain and P4Hc (prolyl 4-hydroxylase alpha subunit homologues) domain. The 2OG-Fe (II) oxygenase superfamily domain is a characteristic domain of PHDs, which is important in the regulation of hypoxia inducible transcription factors [29]. The P4Hc domain is the hydroxylation functional domain of PHD, which catalyzes the proline hydroxylation of collagen to form 4-hydroxyproline [30]. Furthermore, it is the domain responsible for the hydroxylation of HIF-1α as a regulatory factor of the hypoxia response [31,32]. Therefore, these conserved domains indicate that the PHD1, PHD2, and PHD3 proteins of H. molitrix have similar functions, and the same conserved domains are found in PHDs of other species, such as Mus musculus and X. laevis [33,34]. However, the MYND zinc finger domain in the N-terminal of HmPHD2 was the main difference between PHD proteins in H. molitrix [35,36], and this domain is unique to PHD2 proteins among the PHD family in vertebrates. This MYND zinc finger domain can anchor the N-terminus of PHD2 to mitochondria or the endoplasmic reticulum membrane via the protein FKBP prolyl isomerase 8 (FKBP38) [37]. Among the PHD homologous family in metazoans, PHD2 represents the most primitive form according to its conserved amino acids and its domain structure [32,36,38]. Phylogenetic analysis showed that PHD1 proteins, PHD2 proteins, and PHD3 proteins in different fish clustered into a large clade respectively, indicating that PHD were relatively conservative in evolution. The phylogenetic tree analysis also showed that PHD2 and PHD3 are more closely related to each other than they are to PHD1, which suggested that PHD2 and PHD3 may have similar functions [39].
The PHD mRNAs were expressed but with different levels in various tissues of H. molitrix under normoxic condition. The HmPHD1 expression level was the highest in liver and heart, which was similar to the results that PHD1 mRNA is highly expressed in the testis, followed by the liver, heart, brain, and kidney in human [40]. The HmPHD2 mRNA was highly expressed in muscle, heart, gill, and intestine, while the HmPHD3 mRNA was highly expressed in liver, heart, muscle, and intestine. This was consistent with the results from M. amblycephala, in which the expression level of MaPHD2 was the highest in muscle [23] and lower in other tissues, while MaPHD3 [24] was highly expressed in the liver. However, our data were inconsistent with the results that PHD2 and PHD3 had the highest expression in heart, followed by brain and kidney, in mammals [40]. In addition, HmPHD2 expression was complementary to that of HmPHD3 in various tissues. This was consistent with studies in Xenopus laevis. XlPHD2 was mainly expressed in the eyes, brain, and intestinal tract, but showed low expression in the liver, pancreas, and kidney; XlPHD3 was highly expressed in the liver, pancreas, and kidney, but showed lower expression in the eyes, brain, and intestinal tract [35]. In mammals, each PHD shows a different hydroxylation preference for HIF-αs [41]. Specific silencing of PHD2 with short interfering RNAs proved that PHD2 should be the main cellular oxygen sensor setting the low steady-state levels of HIF-1α in normoxia [38]. However, the PHD1/PHD3 double knockout mouse showed preferential HIF-2α rather than HIF-1α stabilization in liver [42]. Loss of PHD1 catalytic activity in breast cancer cells inhibits estrogen-dependent tumorigenesis, and PHD1 depletion also impairs the fitness of lung, brain, and hematopoietic cancer lines [43].
Under acute hypoxic stress, the HmPHD1 was upregulated significantly in the liver, brain, and muscle, but downregulated significantly in heart and gill. The expression of MaPHD1 in the heart also decreased after hypoxia treatment [23]. In a study of Sillago sihama, the expression of the SsPHD1 in heart and gills increased significantly after hypoxic treatment [22]. This might be caused by the different intensity and duration of hypoxic treatment or the species-specific expression patterns under hypoxic conditions. The HmPHD2 and HmPHD3 showed the same changing trend in the liver and brain under acute hypoxia stress, and their expression levels were significantly increased. This was consistent with the results on M. amblycephala. During hypoxic exposure, the expression levels of MaPHD2 [21] and MaPHD3 [24], were significantly increased in the liver and brain. In the heart, gill, and muscle, the expression of HmPHD2 decreased significantly, while the expression of HmPHD3 increased significantly. This is also consistent with the results on the cyprinid fish M. amblycephala. In M. amblycephala, the expression level of MaPHD2 [21] was decreased in blood, head, kidney, muscle, and gill after hypoxia stress, while the expression of MaPHD3 [24] increased significantly in the blood, liver, spleen, muscle, brain, gill, heart, intestine, and kidney tissues. However, in the non-carp species S. sihama, the expression of SsPHD2 increased significantly and the expression of SsPHD3 decreased significantly in gill after hypoxic stress, contrary to the results of the present study [22]. The expression of MaPHD3 showed no overt tissue specificity under acute hypoxia conditions, which might be possibly related to the HREs in its promoter potently bonded by HIF-1α [24]. This suggested that PHD genes play similar but not exactly the same roles in response to hypoxic stress in different fish. In closely related fish (such as cyprinids), PHD genes are likely to play more consistent roles in the same tissues.
Under continued hypoxia stress, PHD activity is repressed by insufficient oxygen concentrations, and the variation in the levels of transcripts of PHD genes might be induced to relieve this repression. However, organisms adapted to a hypoxic environment over time accompanied with the decrease of PHD genes expression. The expression levels of PHD genes in the detected tissues were lower than normal after 3 h of reoxygenation, which might reflect the recovery of hydroxylation of HIF-1α by PHDs as oxygen receptors after the recovery of oxygen, and the elimination of a large amount of accumulated HIF-1α, such that the expression levels of PHD genes decreased. After 24 h of reoxygenation, the expression of PHD genes in gill returned to the same level as normaxia, which suggested the organizational superiority of the gill in coping with hypoxia stress compared with that of other tissues. Gill was directly exposed to water throughout the experiment [44] and was likely to be the earliest tissue to detect the DO decrease under hypoxia, such that the PHD genes in gill returned to normal levels after reoxygenation faster than they did in the other organs. The brain and heart, playing important roles in the survival of the organism, were protected by the redistribution of oxygen in the blood. The expression levels of HmPHD2 and HmPHD3 in the brain were restored to normoxic levels after reoxygenation. Similar results have also been reported in Pelteobagrus vachelli, which were inferred from the blood flow rearrangement in the brain during hypoxia challenge [45]. However, after 24 h of reoxygenation, the expression levels of HmPHD1 in liver, brain, heart, and muscle; 2 in muscle and heart; and HmPHD3 in muscle and liver still had not recovered to normoxic levels. In the study on S. sihama, the expression levels of SsPHD2 and SsPHD3 returned to normoxic levels in gill and heart after reoxygenation for 24 h [22]. This might be caused by the different conditioning treatments. In the present study, H. molitrix were exposed to reoxygenate after 24 h of hypoxia, while in the study of S. sihama [22], the reoxygenation was performed after 4 h of hypoxia, indicating that continuous hypoxic stress would cause serious damage to the heart tissue, such that a recovery period of 24 h was not sufficient to allow the expression levels of the HmPHD1, HmPHD2, and HmPHD3 to fully recover.
In the present study, because of the limitations of our detection conditions, we mainly focus on the changes of PHD genes in the levels of transcripts. However, evaluating the activity of the PHDs in the different tissues at different times were meaningful, and we will try to master the technique to assess the activity of PHDs in the further studies.

5. Conclusions

Three full-length PHD cDNAs were obtained from H. molitrix by RACE. The amino acid sequences of PHD1, PHD2, and PHD3 from H. molitrix were highly similar to those of other species at the C-terminus with typical P4HC domains. The evolutionary relationships of PHD genes among various species were clarified with a phylogenetic tree, and HmPHD2 and HmPHD3 were more closely related. The transcripts of PHD genes are ubiquitously distributed in H. molitrix tissues, with the highest expressional level of HmPHD1 and HmPHD3 in liver, and HmPHD2 in muscle. Under acute hypoxic condition, PHD genes showed a tendency of increased expression mainly in the liver and brain. Meanwhile, under continued hypoxic condition, the expression of PHD genes was up-regulated significantly after hypoxic treatment for 3 h, and then maintained their relatively high expression level up to 24 h, and upon reoxygenation, the transcriptional expression of PHD genes showed a decreasing trend in most tissues. This study is of great relevance for advancing our understanding of how PHDs perform regulation functions at the transcriptional level when addressing the hypoxic challenge and provides a reference for the subsequent research of the molecular mechanisms underlying hypoxia adaptation in silver carp.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani12020131/s1. Figure S1: Full length cDNA sequence and protein sequence of HmPHD1. Figure S2: Full length cDNA sequence and protein sequence of HmPHD2. Figure S3: Full length cDNA sequence and protein sequence of HmPHD3. Figure S4: The maximum-likelihood (ML) tree constructed through IQ-TREE. Table S1: The sequence of full-length cDNA of three PHD genes in Hypophthalmichthys molitrix.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.L.; methodology, X.L. and M.Z.; software, M.Z. and H.S.; formal analysis, X.L.; investigation, X.L., M.Z., H.S. and C.L.; resources, G.Z.; data curation, X.L. and M.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, X.L. and M.Z.; writing—review and editing, H.L.; supervision, H.L.; project administration, H.L.; funding acquisition, G.Z. and H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFD0900302); the Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund, CAFS (NO. 2020TD33 and 2021C002); the Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA (CARS-45); the Key Laboratory of Healthy Freshwater Aquaculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of China [grant number ZJK202109]; the National Freshwater Aquatic Germplasm Resource Center (FGRC18537); and State Key Laboratory of Developmental Biology of Freshwater Fish.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by Animal Experimental Ethical Inspection of Laboratory Animal Centre, Yangtze River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences (protocol code: 2020lixiaohui02).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

bpBase pair
PHDProlyl hydroxylase domain
HmPHDPHD genes of H. molitrix
HmPHDPHD proteins of H. molitrix
ORFsOpen reading frames
DODissolved oxygen
HIFsHypoxia-inducible factors
ODDDOxygen dependent degradation domain
VHLVon Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein
HREHypoxia response element
YFIYangtze River Fisheries Research Institute
AHAcute hypoxia
CKControl group
RT-PCRReverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction
RACERapid amplification of cDNA ends
aaamino acid

References

  1. Giaccia, A.J.; Simon, M.C.; Johnson, R. The biology of hypoxia: The role of oxygen sensing in development, normal function, and disease. Genes Dev. 2004, 18, 2183–2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Huang, J.; Zhao, Q.; Mooney, S.M.; Lee, F.S. Sequence determinants in hypoxia-inducible factor-1α for hydroxylation by the prolyl hydroxylases PHD1, PHD2, and PHD3. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 39792–39800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Rytknen, K.T.; Williams, T.A.; Renshaw, G.M.; Primmer, C.R.; Nikinmaa, M. Molecular Evolution of the Metazoan PHD-HIF Oxygen-Sensing System. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28, 1913–1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Epstein, A.C.; Gleadle, J.; McNeill, L.; Hewitson, K.; O’rourke, J.; Mole, D.; Mukherji, M.; Metzen, E.; Wilson, M.; Dhanda, A.; et al. C. elegans EGL-9 and Mammalian Homologs Define a Family of Dioxygenases that Regulate HIF by Prolyl Hydroxylation. Cell 2001, 107, 43–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Bruick, R.K. A conserved family of prolyl-4-hydroxylases that modify HIF. Science 2001, 294, 1337–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Taylor, C.T.; Pouyssegur, J. Oxygen, Hypoxia, and Stress. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2007, 1113, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hochachka, P.W.; Lutz, P.L. Mechanism, origin, and evolution of anoxia tolerance in animals. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B 2001, 130, 435–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Abdel-Tawwab, M.; Monier, M.N.; Hoseinifar, S.H.; Faggio, C. Fish response to hypoxia stress: Growth, physiological, and immunological biomarkers. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 45, 997–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kaelin, W.G., Jr.; Ratcliffe, P.J. Oxygen sensing by metazoans: The central role of the HIF hydroxylase pathway. Mol. Cell 2008, 30, 393–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Piontkivska, H.; Chung, J.S.; Ivanina, A.; Sokolov, E.; Techa, S.; Sokolova, I. Molecular characterization and mRNA expression of two key enzymes of hypoxia-sensing pathways in eastern oysters Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin): Hypoxia-inducible factor α (HIF-α) and HIF-prolyl hydroxylase (PHD). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part D Genom. Proteom. 2011, 6, 103–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Semenza, G.L. HIF-1, O2, and the 3 PHDs: How animal cells signal hypoxia to the nucleus. Cell 2001, 107, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. He, M.; Zhou, C.; Lu, Y.; Mao, L.; Xi, Y.; Mei, X.; Wang, X.; Zhang, L.; Yu, Z.; Zhou, Z. Melatonin antagonizes nickel-induced aerobic glycolysis by blocking ROS-mediated HIF-1α/miR210/ISCU axis activation. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2020, 2020, 5406284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Maxwell, P.H.; Wiesener, M.S.; Chang, G.W.; Clifford, S.C.; Vaux, E.C.; Cockman, M.E.; Wykoff, C.C.; Pugh, C.W.; Maher, E.R.; Ratcliffe, P.J. The tumour suppressor protein VHL targets hypoxia-inducible factors for oxygen-dependent proteolysis. Nature 1999, 399, 271–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Majmundar, A.J.; Wong, W.J.; Simon, M.C. Hypoxia-inducible factors and the response to hypoxic stress. Mol. Cell 2010, 40, 294–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Kong, P.; Yu, K.N.; Yang, M.; Almahi, W.A.; Nie, L.; Chen, G.; Han, W. Micheliolide Enhances Radiosensitivities of p53-Deficient Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer via Promoting HIF-1α Degradation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Freedman, S.J.; Sun, Z.; Poy, F.; Kung, A.L.; Eck, M.J. Structural basis for recruitment of CBP/p300 by hypoxia-inducible factor-1α. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 5367–5372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Wenger, R.; Stiehl, D.; Camenisch, G. Integration of Oxygen Signaling at the Consensus HRE. Sci. STKE 2005, 2005, re12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. He, Y.; Munday, J.S.; Perrott, M.; Wang, G.; Liu, X. Association of age with the expression of hypoxia-inducible factors HIF-1α, HIF-2α, HIF-3α and VEGF in lung and heart of tibetan sheep. Animals 2019, 9, 673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Aragonés, J.; Fraisl, P.; Baes, M.; Ca Rmeliet, P. Oxygen sensors at the crossroad of metabolism. Cell Metab. 2009, 9, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. McMahon, S.; Charbonneau, M.; Grandmont, S.; Richard, D.; Dubois, C. Transforming growth factor beta1 induces hypoxia-inducible factor-1 stabilization through selective inhibition of PHD2 expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 24171–24181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Wang, H.; Huang, C.; Chen, N.; Zhu, K.; Chen, B.; Wang, W.; Wang, H. Molecular characterization and mRNA expression of HIF-prolyl hydroxylase-2 (phd2) in hypoxia-sensing pathways from Megalobrama amblycephala. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B 2015, 186, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lin, X.H.; Ye, M.H.; Seatan, W.; Pan, Y.Y.; Chen, F.Y.; Huang, Y.; Zhu, C.H.; Li, G.L.; Tian, C.X. Sequence Characteristics and mRNA Expression Analysis of the phds Gene Family in Silver Sillago (Sillago sihama) under Hypoxia Stress. J. Guangdong Ocean Univ. 2020, 40, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chen, N.; Huang, C.X.; Huang, C.H.; He, Y.; Chen, T.S.; Zhu, D.M.; Liu, H.; Wang, W.M.; Wang, H.L. The molecular characterization, expression pattern and alternative initiation of Megalobrama amblycephala Hif prolyl hydroxylase Phd1. Gene 2018, 678, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chen, N.; Huang, C.H.; Chen, B.X.; Liu, H.; Wang, W.M.; Gul, Y.; Wang, H.L. Alternative splicing transcription of Megalobrama amblycephala HIF prolyl hydroxylase PHD3 and up-regulation of PHD3 by HIF-1α. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 469, 737–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, X.; Li, F.; Zou, G.; Feng, C.; Sha, H.; Liu, S.; Liang, H. Physiological responses and molecular strategies in heart of silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) under hypoxia and reoxygenation. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part D Genom. Proteom. 2021, 40, 100908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Nguyen, L.T.; Schmidt, H.A.; Von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sun, J.L.; Zhao, L.L.; Wu, H.; Liu, Q.; Liao, L.; Luo, J.; Lian, W.Q.; Cui, C.; Jin, L.; Ma, J.D.; et al. Acute hypoxia changes the mode of glucose and lipid utilization in the liver of the largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides). Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 713, 135157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, G.; Yin, S.; Mao, J.; Liang, F.; Zhao, C.; Li, P.; Zhou, G.; Chen, S.; Tang, Z. Integrated analysis of mRNA-seq and miRNA-seq in the liver of Pelteobagrus vachelli in response to hypoxia. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Pektas, S.; Knapp, M.J. Substrate preference of the HIF-prolyl hydroxylase-2 (PHD2) and substrate-induced conformational change. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2013, 126, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Myllyharju, J. Prolyl 4-hydroxylases, key enzymes in the synthesis of collagens and regulation of the response to hypoxia, and their roles as treatment targets. Ann. Med. 2008, 40, 402–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Myllyharju, J. Prolyl 4-hydroxylases, master regulators of the hypoxia response. Acta Physiol. 2013, 208, 148–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Semenza, G.L.; Bels, D.D.; Corazza, F.; Kappler, M.; Eckert, A.W. Oxygen sensing, homeostasis, and disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 365, 537–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Minamishima, Y.A.; Moslehi, J.; Padera, R.F.; Bronson, R.T.; Liao, R.; Kaelin, W.G. A Feedback Loop Involving the Phd3 Prolyl Hydroxylase Tunes the Mammalian Hypoxic Response In Vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2009, 29, 5729–5741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Han, D.; Wen, L.; Chen, Y. Molecular Cloning of phd1 and Comparative Analysis of phd1, 2, and 3 Expression in Xenopus laevis. Sci. World J. 2012, 2012, 689287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Moslehi, J.; Minamishima, Y.A.; Shi, J.; Neuberg, D.; Charytan, D.M.; Padera, R.F.; Signoretti, S.; Liao, R.; Kaelin, W.G. Loss of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor Prolyl Hydroxylase Activity in Cardiomyocytes Phenocopies Ischemic Cardiomyopathy. Circulation 2010, 122, 1004–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Taylor, M.S. Characterization and comparative analysis of the EGLN gene family. Gene 2001, 275, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Barth, S.; Edlich, F.; Berchner-Pfannschmidt, U.; Gneuss, S.; Camenisch, G. Hypoxia-inducible Factor Prolyl-4-hydroxylase PHD2 Protein Abundance Depends on Integral Membrane Anchoring of FKBP38. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 23046–23058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Edurne, B.; Emmanuel, B.; Amandine, G.; Véronique, V.; Danièle, R.; Jacques, P. HIF prolyl-hydroxylase 2 is the key oxygen sensor setting low steady-state levels of HIF-1alpha in normoxia. EMBO J. 2003, 22, 4082–4090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Shen, R.J.; Jiang, X.Y.; Pu, J.W.; Zou, S.M. HIF-1α and -2α genes in a hypoxia-sensitive teleost species Megalobrama amblycephala: cDNA cloning, expression and different responses to hypoxia. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2010, 157, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Lieb, M.E.; Menzies, K.; Moschella, M.C.; Ni, R.; Taubman, M.B. Mammalian EGLN genes have distinct patterns of mRNA expression and regulation. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2002, 80, 421–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Appelhoff, R.J.; Tian, Y.M.; Raval, R.R.; Turley, H.; Harris, A.L.; Pugh, C.W.; Ratcliffe, P.J.; Gleadle, J.M. Differential function of the prolyl hydroxylases PHD1, PHD2, and PHD3 in the regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 38458–38465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Takeda, K.; Cowan, A.; Fong, G.H. Essential role for prolyl hydroxylase domain protein 2 in oxygen homeostasis of the adult vascular system. Circulation 2007, 116, 774–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhang, Q.; Gu, J.; Li, L.; Liu, J.; Luo, B.; Cheung, H.W.; Boehm, J.S.; Ni, M.; Geisen, C.; Root, D.E.; et al. Control of cyclin D1 and breast tumorigenesis by the EglN2 prolyl hydroxylase. Cancer Cell 2009, 16, 413–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Gillis, J.A.; Tidswell, O. The Origin of Vertebrate Gills. Curr. Biol. 2017, 27, 729–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Zhang, G.; Mao, J.; Liang, F.; Chen, J.; Zhao, C.; Yin, S.; Wang, L.; Tang, Z.; Chen, S. Modulated expression and enzymatic activities of Darkbarbel catfish, Pelteobagrus vachelli for oxidative stress induced by acute hypoxia and reoxygenation. Chemosphere 2016, 151, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Animals 12 00131 g001 550
Figure 1. Alignment of H. molitrix PHDs deduced aa sequences with M. amblycephala and Homo sapiens. The GenBank accession numbers are indicated on the left of the alignment. The MYND-type zinc finger domain is included as a black straight line. The P4Hc homology region is included as an open box. The 2OG-Fe dioxygenase domain is included as a gray straight line.
Figure 1. Alignment of H. molitrix PHDs deduced aa sequences with M. amblycephala and Homo sapiens. The GenBank accession numbers are indicated on the left of the alignment. The MYND-type zinc finger domain is included as a black straight line. The P4Hc homology region is included as an open box. The 2OG-Fe dioxygenase domain is included as a gray straight line.
Animals 12 00131 g001
Animals 12 00131 g002 550
Figure 2. The phylogenetic tree of PHD genes constructed using neighbor-joining method in MEGA X. The bootstrap values mentioned at nodes were derived after 1000 replications. Each sequence is the name of the species and its GenBank accession number. PHDs of H. molitrix are marked by line.
Figure 2. The phylogenetic tree of PHD genes constructed using neighbor-joining method in MEGA X. The bootstrap values mentioned at nodes were derived after 1000 replications. Each sequence is the name of the species and its GenBank accession number. PHDs of H. molitrix are marked by line.
Animals 12 00131 g002
Animals 12 00131 g003 550
Figure 3. Tissue distributions of the transcripts of PHD genes in H. molitrix with β-actin as the positive control. Data were shown as mean ± SE (n = 3).
Figure 3. Tissue distributions of the transcripts of PHD genes in H. molitrix with β-actin as the positive control. Data were shown as mean ± SE (n = 3).
Animals 12 00131 g003
Animals 12 00131 g004 550
Figure 4. Relative expression levels of PHD genes in the liver, brain, heart, gill, and muscle after normoxia (CK), 0.5 h of hypoxia at 2.5 mg/L (AH-2.5), 1.5 mg/L (AH-1.5), 0.5 mg/L (AH-0.5), and 0.25 mg/L (AH-0.25), respectively. RT-qPCR data presented as mean ± SE. Significant differences at p < 0.05 are labeled with “*”, and p < 0.01 are labeled with “**”. AH: acute hypoxia.
Figure 4. Relative expression levels of PHD genes in the liver, brain, heart, gill, and muscle after normoxia (CK), 0.5 h of hypoxia at 2.5 mg/L (AH-2.5), 1.5 mg/L (AH-1.5), 0.5 mg/L (AH-0.5), and 0.25 mg/L (AH-0.25), respectively. RT-qPCR data presented as mean ± SE. Significant differences at p < 0.05 are labeled with “*”, and p < 0.01 are labeled with “**”. AH: acute hypoxia.
Animals 12 00131 g004
Animals 12 00131 g005 550
Figure 5. Relative expression levels of PHD genes in the liver, brain, heart, gills, and muscle after normoxia (CK), continued hypoxic at 3 h (CH-3), 6 h (CH-6), 12 h (CH-12), and 24 h (CH-24), and reoxygenation at 3 h (R-3), 6 h (R-6), 12 h (R-12), and 24 h (R-24). Values are shown as mean ± SE (n = 3). Significant differences at p < 0.05 are labeled with “*”, and p < 0.01 are labeled with “**”. CH: continued hypoxia (DO; 1.5 ± 0.3 mg/L). R: reoxygenation (DO; 6.5 ± 0.3 mg/L).
Figure 5. Relative expression levels of PHD genes in the liver, brain, heart, gills, and muscle after normoxia (CK), continued hypoxic at 3 h (CH-3), 6 h (CH-6), 12 h (CH-12), and 24 h (CH-24), and reoxygenation at 3 h (R-3), 6 h (R-6), 12 h (R-12), and 24 h (R-24). Values are shown as mean ± SE (n = 3). Significant differences at p < 0.05 are labeled with “*”, and p < 0.01 are labeled with “**”. CH: continued hypoxia (DO; 1.5 ± 0.3 mg/L). R: reoxygenation (DO; 6.5 ± 0.3 mg/L).
Animals 12 00131 g005
Table
Table 1. Primers used for PCR.
Table 1. Primers used for PCR.
Primer NamesPrimer Sequences (5′–3′)Application
PHD1-P-FGCTTTTGAAGGAGTTGAAGAGTGGGTCDS amplification
PHD1-P-RGTCCGTCGCCGTTAGGATTGTC
PHD2-P-FGGGAAAATGGAGAACCTGATGAAGTG
PHD2-P-RTTGTGGCATAGGCTGGCTGGAC
PHD3-P-FCCGAGGCTACTTTTACGTGGATAATTT
PHD3-P-RGCATACCTTGTAGCATAGGACGGTTG
UPM shortCTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGC5′ and 3′ RACE
UPMCTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGCAAGCAGTGGTATCAACGCAGAGT
PHD1-GSP5-1ACCCATTTCAAGCCTCCTCCTTTT5′ RACE
PHD1-GSP5-2AAGTCCTGTCCCCGTGAGCATG
PHD2-GSP5-1GCACGTCCTCCAGAATACTGCGTC
PHD2-GSP5-2CACCCGCTTGTGCTTCTTCCAG
PHD3-GSP5-1ATTTTATCCCCTCTGATGTTTGTCCTG
PHD3-GSP5-2CCGTCGTTGAGAATCCCACAGTAA
PHD1-GSP3-1TGGACAATCCTAACGGCGACG3′ RACE
PHD1-GSP3-2TGGGAGGGGAAGGGGCAGGGAGGTT
PHD2-GSP3-1ATAACCCTAACGGAGATGG
PHD2-GSP3-2CATTGAGCCCAAGTTTGA
PHD3-GSP3-1GTGTGGGTCAACTGGGCAAAAGCAT
PHD3-GSP3-2GCCGCTGCGTCACCTGTAT
PHD1-Y-FTCGGAAATGCCTAATGGACTGRT-qPCR
PHD1-Y-RGCTTTGTGCCCATTGTGATG
PHD2-Y- FCGACACTGTAACGGGAAACTGG
PHD2-Y-RTCTGGAAAGATCCGCAAAAGG
PHD3-Y- FAGTTCGAGACTTTGGCTGTC
PHD3-Y-RCCCCTCTGATGTTTGTCCTG
β-actin FGAACCCCAAAGCCAACAG
β-actin RCAGAGTCCATCACGATACCAG
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, X.; Zhang, M.; Ling, C.; Sha, H.; Zou, G.; Liang, H. Molecular Characterization and Response of Prolyl Hydroxylase Domain (PHD) Genes to Hypoxia Stress in Hypophthalmichthys molitrix. Animals 2022, 12, 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12020131

AMA Style

Li X, Zhang M, Ling C, Sha H, Zou G, Liang H. Molecular Characterization and Response of Prolyl Hydroxylase Domain (PHD) Genes to Hypoxia Stress in Hypophthalmichthys molitrix. Animals. 2022; 12(2):131. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12020131

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Xiaohui, Meidong Zhang, Chen Ling, Hang Sha, Guiwei Zou, and Hongwei Liang. 2022. "Molecular Characterization and Response of Prolyl Hydroxylase Domain (PHD) Genes to Hypoxia Stress in Hypophthalmichthys molitrix" Animals 12, no. 2: 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12020131

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop