Next Article in Journal
Development of an Artificial Neural Network for the Detection of Supporting Hindlimb Lameness: A Pilot Study in Working Dogs
Next Article in Special Issue
Genome-Wide Diversity Analysis of African Swine Fever Virus Based on a Curated Dataset
Previous Article in Journal
Sleep Characteristics in Dogs; Effect on Caregiver-Reported Problem Behaviours
Previous Article in Special Issue
Towards a Framework for High-Performance Simulation of Livestock Disease Outbreak: A Case Study of Spread of African Swine Fever in Vietnam
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 12
Issue 14
10.3390/ani12141754
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Development of a Multiplex Real-Time Quantitative PCR Assay for the Differential Detection of the Wild-Type Strain and the MGF505-2R, EP402R and I177L Gene-Deleted Strain of the African Swine Fever Virus

by
Kang Zhao
1,†,
Kaichuang Shi
1,2,*,†,
Qingan Zhou
2,†,
Chenyong Xiong
1,
Shenglan Mo
2,
Hongjin Zhou
1,
Feng Long
2,
Haina Wei
2,
Liping Hu
2 and
Meilan Mo
1,*
1
College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530005, China
2
Guangxi Center for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning 530001, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Animals 2022, 12(14), 1754; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12141754
Submission received: 31 May 2022 / Revised: 4 July 2022 / Accepted: 5 July 2022 / Published: 8 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue African Swine Fever – Knowledge, Theses, Facts)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

African swine fever (ASF) was first reported in August 2018 in China, and the naturally gene-deleted ASFV strain was first identified in 2020 in this country. The vaccine candidates that deleted some virulent genes from the virulent parental strains have also been reported in many countries. To differentiate the wild-type and gene-deleted ASFV strains, four pairs of specific primers and TaqMan probes targeting the ASFV B646L (p72), I177L, MGF505-2R and EP402R (CD2v) genes were designed. After optimizing the reaction conditions, a multiplex real-time qPCR assay for the differential detection of the wild-type and gene-deleted ASFV strains was developed. The assay was further used to test 4239 clinical samples, and 534 samples were positive for ASFV, of which 30 samples lacked B646L, I177L, MGF505-2R and/or EP402R genes. The assay showed high specificity, sensitivity and repeatability, and it provided a reliable method for evaluating ASFV in clinical samples.

Abstract

African swine fever virus (ASFV) causes African swine fever (ASF), a devastating hemorrhagic disease of domestic pigs and wild boars. Currently, the MGF505R, EP402R (CD2v) and I177L gene-deleted ASFV strains were confirmed to be the ideal vaccine candidate strains. To develop an assay for differentiating the wild-type and gene-deleted ASFV strains, four pairs of specific primers and TaqMan probes targeting the ASFV B646L (p72), I177L, MGF505-2R and EP402R (CD2v) genes were designed. A multiplex real-time qPCR assay for the differential detection of the wild-type and gene-deleted ASFV strains was developed after optimizing the reaction conditions, including the annealing temperature, primer concentration and probe concentration. The results showed that the multiplex real-time qPCR assay can specifically test the ASFV B646L (p72), I177L, MGF505-2R and EP402R (CD2v) genes with a limit of detection (LOD) of 32.1 copies/μL for the B646L (p72) gene, and 3.21 copies/μL for the I177L, MGF505-2R and EP402R (CD2v) genes. However, the assay cannot test for the classical swine fever virus (CSFV), porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV), porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV), porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2), PCV3 and pseudorabies virus (PRV). The assay demonstrated good repeatability and reproducibility with coefficients of variation (CV) less than 1.56% for both the intra- and inter-assay. The assay was used to test 4239 clinical samples, and the results showed that 12.60% (534/4239) samples were positive for ASFV, of which 10 samples lacked the EP402R gene, 6 samples lacked the MGF505-2R gene and 14 samples lacked the EP402R and MGF505-2R genes. The results indicated that the multiplex real-time qPCR developed in this study can provide a rapid, sensitive and specific diagnostic tool for the differential detection of the ASFV B646L, I177L, MGF505-2R and EP402R genes.

1. Introduction

African swine fever (ASF), which is caused by the ASF virus (ASFV), is an acute, hemorrhagic and infectious disease of domestic pigs and wild boars [1]. The highly virulent ASFV can cause acute ASF with nearly 100% mortality [2]. ASF was first identified in Kenya in 1921, in Europe in 1957 and in the Caucasus region and southern Russia in 2007 [3,4]. ASF has been reported in many Asian countries, including China, Korea, Mongolia, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, the Philippines and Indonesia, since 2018 [5,6]. ASF was recently reported again in the Dominican Republic and Haiti in 2021 almost 40 years after the last outbreak in these countries [7,8]. Currently, ASF is still an epidemic in some countries in Africa, Europe and Asia and pose a huge challenge to pork production [9,10]. ASF has caused huge economic losses to the swine industry worldwide since the 1920s and is listed as a notifiable disease to the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE).
The ASFV belongs to the family Asfarviridae, genus Asfivirus [11]. ASFV is an enveloped, double-stranded DNA virus with 170 to 193 kb genome, which encodes more than 168 kinds of proteins [12]. In recent times, twenty-four genotypes of ASFV strains were identified in different countries according to the sequences of the partial B646L (p72) gene [13]. To date, only genotypes I and II of ASFV strains have been reported outside Africa [14]. The ASFV was introduced into China in August 2018 [5] and led to a sharp reduction in pigs raised in China within a year [15]. In China, genotype II ASFV strains are the main circulating strains in the field, and genotype I ASFV strains have also been reported [16,17].
Vaccination with effective vaccines is one of the most useful strategies for preventing and controlling ASF. However, no effective commercial vaccine could be used for ASF in the field until May 2022. Recently, several highly effective and safe vaccine candidate strains with gene-deletion were reported [18,19]. For example, a recombinant ASFV vaccine candidate strain with the deletion of 121 nucleotides in the I177L gene has shown to protect pigs against the highly pathogenic ASFV isolates that are presently circulating in Europe and Asia [20,21,22]. In June 2022, the attenuated vaccine using the ASFV strain with 121 bp deletion in the I177L gene was officially approved for marketing in Vietnam to prevent ASF, which was the first commercial vaccine approved for clinical application in the world (http://link.gov.vn/vtUM759t, accessed on 8 June 2022). In addition, the MGF360-505R and EP402R gene-deleted vaccine, which has been developed in recent years, has become one of the ideal vaccine candidates [23,24,25,26]. These vaccine candidates are the most promising for commercial applications in the field in the future. Furthermore, natural MGF360-505R and EP402R (CD2v) gene-deleted ASFV strains, which show decreased virulence with lower morbidity and mortality, have been identified in several provinces in China [27]. Consequently, it is necessary to develop a rapid, specific and sensitive assay to differentiate the wild-type and gene-deleted ASFV strains.
The real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (real-time qPCR) offers great advantages for the detection and quantification of the targeted genome with high specificity, sensitivity and repeatability [28]. Currently, several real-time qPCR assays for the detection of ASFV have been reported. Single real-time qPCR assays have been developed for the detection of the wild-type ASFV strains [29,30,31,32] and of the MGF-360-12L, UK or I177L gene-deleted ASFV strains [33]. Multiplex real-time qPCR assays have been developed for the detection of the wild-type ASFV strains [34,35] and of the gene-deleted ASFV strains which lacked the MGF505-2R gene [36], the MGF505-2R and EP402R genes [37]. However, no assay for the simultaneous detection of the ASFV strains which lacks the MGF505-2R, EP402R and I177L genes has been reported until now. In this study, we developed a multiplex real-time qPCR assay for the differential detection of the wild-type ASFV strains and of the MGF505-2R, EP402R and I177L gene-deleted ASFV strains.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Viral Strains

The vaccine strains of CSFV (C vaccine strain), PRRSV (TJM-F92 vaccine strain), porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2, SX07 vaccine strain), porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV, SCJY-1 vaccine strain) and pseudorabies virus (PRV, Bartha-K61 vaccine strain) were purchased from Huapai Bioengineering Group Co., Ltd. (Chengdu, China). The clinical positive samples of ASFV, PCV3 and porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV) were provided by the Guangxi Center for Animal Disease Control and Prevention (CADC), China. These viruses were stored at −70 °C until they were used.

2.2. Clinical Samples

From January 2021 to December 2021, a total of 4239 clinical samples were collected from different pig farms, slaughterhouses, farmers’ markets and harmless disposal sites in Guangxi province, southern China. The samples included environmental swabs, nasopharyngeal swabs, whole blood and tissue samples (kidneys, spleens and lymph nodes). The samples were transported to our laboratory at conditions of 0–4 °C immediately after collection and were stored at −70 °C until they were used.

2.3. DNA Extraction

The homogenized material from the tissue samples, including kidneys, spleens and lymph nodes, was obtained using a blender (TIANLONG Scientific, Xi’an, China), freeze-thawed 3 times and centrifuged at 10,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were used for total nucleic acids extraction.
Each environmental sample (swab) and nasopharyngeal swab was diluted in a tube with 1.0 mL PBS (pH 7.2), vortexed for 10 s and centrifuged at 10,000× g for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were used for total nucleic acids extraction.
The anticoagulant whole blood samples with EDTA-Na2 (15 g/L) were vortexed for 10 s and centrifuged at 10,000× g for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were used for total nucleic acids extraction.
The total nucleic acids were extracted from 200 μL of the supernatants from the clinical samples using the GeneRotex 96 Automatic Nucleic Acid Extractor (TIANLONG Scientific, Xi’an, China) with Viral DNA/RNA Isolation Kit 4.0 (TIANLONG Scientific, Xi’an, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted nucleic acids were tested for ASFV by the developed multiplex real-time qPCR using the QuantStudio 6 qPCR system (ABI, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

2.4. Primers and Probes

Four pairs of specific primers and corresponding TaqMan probes were designed using the Primer Express Software v3.0 (ABI, Los Angeles, CA, USA), which targeted the conserved regions of the ASFV B646L gene, MGF505-2R gene, EP402R gene and I177L gene. The sequences of the primers and probes are shown in Table 1.

2.5. Construction of Standard Plasmids

Using ASFV DNA as a template, the targeted fragments of the B646L gene, MGF505-2R gene, EP402R gene and I177L gene were amplified by PCR, purified, ligated to the pMD18-T vector (TaKaRa, Beijing, China) and then transformed into E. coli DH5α competent cells. The positive clones were selected and grown at 37 °C for about 20 h. The recombinant plasmids were extracted, named as pASFV-B646L, pASFV-MGF505-2R, pASFV-EP402R and pASFV-I177L, respectively, and used as standard plasmids for developing the multiplex real-time qPCR. A NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to quantify the ultraviolet absorbance of the standard plasmids at 260 nm and 280 nm. The following formula was used to determine their concentrations: plasmid copy number (copies/μL) = (plasmid concentration × 10−9 × 6.02 × 1023)/(660 Dalton/bases × DNA length).
The sequences at both ends of the ASFV MGF505-2R, EP402R and I177L genes were artificially synthesized by TAKARA Biomedical Technology Co. Ltd. (TaKaRa, Beijing, China) and were cloned into the pMD18-T vector (TaKaRa, Beijing, China) to formulate synthetic plasmids without the MGF505-2R gene (pASFV-ΔMGF505-2R), EP402R gene (pASFV-ΔEP402R) and I177L gene (pASFV-ΔI177L). They were used as the MGF505-2R, EP402R and I177L gene-deleted controls. The sequences of pASFV-ΔMGF505-2R, pASFV-ΔEP402R and pASFV-ΔI177L are shown in Supplementary Table S1.

2.6. Optimization of the Reaction Conditions of the Multiplex Real-Time qPCR

The multiplex real-time qPCR was performed using the QuantStudio 6 qPCR system (ABI, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The annealing temperature and the concentrations of the primers and probes were determined by the following amplification parameters: 95 °C for 2 min, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s and 56 °C for 30 s. To determine the optimal reaction conditions for the multiplex real-time qPCR, the 20 μL of the fundamental systems was made as follows: 10 μL Premix Ex Taq (Probe qPCR) (TaKaRa, Beijing, China), 2 μL mixtures of the four standard plasmids (each with final concentration 108 copies/μL), 4 pairs of the primers and probes (each with different final concentration) and distilled water. The recombinant plasmids pASFV-B646L, pASFV-MGF505-2R, pASFV-EP402R and pASFV-I177L were used as templates. The different annealing temperatures (52 °C, 54 °C, 56 °C, 58 °C, 60 °C and 62 °C), primer concentrations (0.1 pmol/μL, 0.2 pmol/μL, 0.3 pmol/μL, 0.4 pmol/μL and 0.5 pmol/μL) and probe concentrations (0.1 pmol/μL, 0.2 pmol/μL, 0.3 pmol/μL, 0.4 pmol/μL and 0.5 pmol/μL) were used for amplification by an arrangement and combination test to obtain the optimal reaction conditions. At the end of each cycle, the fluorescent signals were determined.

2.7. Construction of Standard Curves

The standard plasmids pASFV-B646L, pASFV-MGF505-2R, pASFV-EP402R and pASFV-I177L were mixed together, serially diluted 10-fold from 3.21 × 108 to 3.21 × 102 copies/μL (final concentration) and used as templates to generate the standard curves of the developed multiplex real-time qPCR.

2.8. Specificity Analysis of the Multiplex Real-Time qPCR

The DNA or cDNA of the ASFV, PRRSV, CSFV, PCV2, PCV3, PEDV, PDCoV and PRV, as well as the recombinant gene-deleted plasmids pASFV-ΔMGF505-2R, pASFV-ΔEP402R and pASFV-ΔI177L, were used to evaluate the specificity of the developed assay. The sterilized distilled water was used as the negative control.

2.9. Sensitivity Analysis of the Multiplex Real-Time qPCR

The standard plasmids pASFV-B646L, pASFV-MGF505-2R, pASFV-EP402R and pASFV-I177L were mixed together, serially diluted 10-fold from 3.21 × 108 to 3.21 × 10−1 copies/μL (final concentration) for each plasmid and used as templates to evaluate the sensitivity of the developed assay.

2.10. Repeatability Analysis of the Multiplex Real-Time qPCR

The standard plasmids pASFV-B646L, pASFV-MGF505-2R, pASFV-EP402R and pASFV-I177L were mixed and 10-fold serially diluted. Three final concentrations of 3.21 × 108, 3.21 × 106 and 3.21 × 104 copies/μL for each plasmid were used to run the intra- and inter-assay tests. The coefficients of variation (CVs) were used to evaluate the repeatability and the reproducibility of the assay.

2.11. Test of Clinical Samples by the Multiplex Real-Time qPCR

The developed multiplex real-time qPCR assay was used to test 4239 clinical samples collected in Guangxi province, southern China, from January 2021 to December 2021.
At the same time, the above samples were tested for ASFV by the OIE-recommended real-time qPCR for ASFV [38] with a total volume of 25 μL, as shown in Table 2. The amplification was performed at 50 °C for 2 min and 95 °C for 10 min and then with 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 58 °C for 60 s, and the fluorescent signals at the end of each cycle were determined.
The coincidence rate between the developed multiplex real-time qPCR and the OIE-recommended real-time qPCR was evaluated.

2.12. Statistical Analysis

The statistical analyses were conducted by regression analysis, the Pearson’s correlation coefficient and an analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the GraphPad Prism version 7.04 software (GraphPad Software, Santiago, CA, USA) for linear regression and for the tested results of clinical samples.

3. Results

3.1. Construction of Standard Plasmids

The targeted fragments of the ASFV B646L gene, MGF505-2R gene, EP402R gene and I177L gene were amplified by PCR, purified and ligated to the pMD18-T vector (TaKaRa, Beijing, China), and they were then transferred to E. coli DH5α competent cells (TaKaRa, Beijing, China). Positive clones were cultivated, and the plasmid constructs were extracted and quantified. The results showed that the initial concentrations of the standard plasmids named pASFV-B646L, pASFV-MGF505-2R, pASFV-EP402R and pASFV-I177L were 4.51 × 1010 copies/μL, 3.21 × 1010 copies/μL, 3.86 × 1010 copies/μL and 5.16 × 1010 copies/μL, respectively.

3.2. Optimal Reaction Conditions of the Multiplex Real-Time qPCR

The standard plasmids were used to optimize the multiplex real-time qPCR reaction parameters, including the annealing temperature and the primer and probe concentrations using an arrangement and combination test.
The developed multiplex real-time qPCR (20 μL) contained 10 μL of Premix Ex Taq (TaKaRa, Beijing, China), P72-F/R (forward and reward primer) (20 pmol/μL) 0.2 μL each, P72-P probe (20 pmol/μL) 0.2 μL, I177L-F/R (forward and reward primer) (20 pmol/μL) 0.1 μL each, I177L-P probe (20 pmol/μL) 0.1 μL, EP402R-F/R (forward and reward primer) (20 pmol/μL) 0.2 μL each, EP402R-P probe (20 pmol/μL) 0.2 μL, MGF505-2R-F/R (forward and reward primer) (20 pmol/μL) 0.2 μL each, MGF505-2R-P probe (20 pmol/μL) 0.3 μL, 2 μL of total DNA/RNA and 5.8 μL of sterilized distilled water (Table 2). The amplification was performed at 95 °C for 10 s and then with 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s, 56 °C for 30 s, and the fluorescent signals at the end of each cycle were determined. A sample with a Ct value of ≤35 cycles was judged as positive, whereas a sample with a Ct value of >35 cycles was judged as negative.

3.3. Standard Curves of the Multiplex Real-Time qPCR

The multiplex real-time qPCR standard curves were generated using 10-fold serially diluted standard plasmids from 3.21 × 108 to 3.21 × 102 copies/μL (final concentration). The results showed that the corresponding slope of the equation, correlation coefficient (R2) and amplification efficiency (E) were as follows: −3.211, 0.999 and 104.9% for the B646L gene; −3.159, 0.999 and 107.3% for the I177L gene; −3.152, 0.999 and 107.6% for the EP402R gene; and −3.115, 0.998 and 109.4% for the MGF505-2R gene (Figure 1).

3.4. Specificity of the Multiplex Real-Time qPCR

The multiplex real-time qPCR assay was validated for specificity using DNA/cDNA from the ASFV, PRRSV, CSFV, PCV2, PCV3, PEDV, PDCoV and PRV and using recombinant plasmids pASFV-ΔMGF505-2R, pASFV-ΔEP402R and pASFV-ΔI177L. The results showed that only the ASFV generated positive amplification curves for the four fluorescence channels of FAM, VIC, Cy5 and Texas Red corresponding to the B646L gene, MGF505-2R gene, EP402R gene and I177L gene, respectively, whereas other viruses and plasmids did not generate amplification curves, indicating that the developed multiplex real-time qPCR could specifically test the B646L gene, MGF505-2R gene, EP402R gene and I177L gene of the ASFV (Figure 2).

3.5. Sensitivity of the Multiplex Real-Time qPCR

The standard plasmids pASFV-B646L, pASFV-MGF505-2R, pASFV-EP402R and pASFV-I177L were serially diluted 10-fold from 3.21 × 108 to 3.21 × 10−1 copies/μL (final concentration) and were used to determine the limit of detection (LOD) of the multiplex real-time qPCR. The results showed that the LOD of pASFV-B646L was 32.1 copies/μL, and the LOD of pASFV-MGF505-2R, pASFV-EP402R and pASFV-I177L was 3.21 copies/μL (Figure 3).

3.6. Repeatability of the Multiplex Real-Time qPCR

The repeatability and reproducibility of the developed multiplex real-time qPCR was evaluated using three concentrations of the standard plasmids: 3.21 × 108, 3.21 × 106 and 3.21 × 104 copies/μL (final concentration). The results showed that the coefficients of variation (CVs) of the intra- and inter-assay were from 0.26% to 0.92% and from 0.53% to 1.56%, respectively (Table 3).

3.7. Evaluation of Clinical Samples

A total of 4239 clinical samples were collected from January 2021 to December 2021 in Guangxi province, southern China, and were tested by the developed multiplex real-time qPCR. The results showed that 12.60% (534/4239) of samples were positive for the ASFV (Table 4). Out of the different sample types, the harmless disposal sites showed the highest positive rate of 28.34% (121/427), followed by the slaughterhouses with 17.30% (330/1980), the farmers’ markets with 10.70% (67/626) and the breeding farms with the lowest positive rate of 1.25% (15/1278). Additionally, the results showed that, of the 534 positive samples, 10 samples lacked the EP402R gene, 6 samples lacked the MGF505-2R gene, 14 samples lacked the EP402R and MGF505-2R genes and no sample lacked the I177L gene. Three different kinds of gene-deleted clinical samples are shown in Figure 4.
The clinical samples were also tested by the OIE-recommended real-time qPCR targeting the ASFV B646L gene [38]. The results of the developed multiplex real-time qPCR were consistent with the results of the OIE-recommended real-time qPCR. The coincidence rate of these two assays was 100%, suggesting good consistency between these two methods while using the B646L gene as a target.

4. Discussion

Currently, ASF is still an epidemic in Africa, the trans-Caucasus region, eastern Europe, the Russian Federation and Asia, which poses a great challenge to the pig industry and port trade all over the world [9,10]. At present, there is no completely effective way to prevent and control ASF, and strict biosafety and culling of the infected pigs are common measures to reduce the losses of this disease. The development of safe and effective vaccines is one of the key strategies. In order to generate attenuated ASF vaccines, virulent ASFV strains have had several virulence-associated genes deleted, such as I177L, 9GL, UK, EP402R (CD2v), DP148R, A238L, MGF505, MGF360, etc., and have shown decreased virulence and high efficacy to protect pigs infected with their parental strains [24,39,40]. Scientists from China and the United Kingdom have reported that the ASFV strains, which were deleted the MGF505 and MGF360 genes or the MGF505, MGF360 and EP402R (CD2v) genes, greatly attenuated their virulence and protected pigs from challenges with their parental trains [24,41]. Scientists from the USA and Vietnam have reported that the ASFV strain with the I177L gene deletion can also provide homology protection [20,21,22]. Furthermore, the naturally gene-deleted ASFV strains of MGF360-505R and EP402R genes, which show decreased virulence with lower morbidity and mortality, were identified in several provinces in China [27]. Therefore, to differentiate the wild-type strains and the gene-deleted strains, including the naturally gene-deleted strains and the man-made gene-deleted vaccine candidate strains, a rapid, sensitive and specific assay is necessary to differentially detect these ASFV strains.
The qRT-PCR/PCR is a rapid, specific, sensitive and accurate method for the detection of viral nucleic acids and can be conveniently used for the detection and quantification of viral swine pathogens [42,43]. In this study, a quadruplex real-time qPCR based on four pairs of specific primers and corresponding probes was developed, and it can be used for the differential detection of the wild-type and gene-deleted ASFV strains in one reaction. The assay showed high sensitivity with an LOD from 3.21 copies/μL to 32.1 copies/μL for different templates and can specifically test the ASFV B646L, I177L, MGF505-2R and EP402R genes without cross-reaction with other porcine viruses. Using this multiplex real-time qPCR assay, the ASFV strain with the B646L gene can be tested regardless of whether it is the wild-type or gene-deleted ASFV. The wild-type ASFV strain shows the simultaneous presence of these four genes, and the gene-deleted ASFV strain shows the deletion of one or more than one gene of the I177L, MGF505-2R and EP402R genes. The assay was verified for its practicality and usefulness by testing 4239 clinical samples in this study.
Since ASF was first reported in China in August 2018, this disease has spread rapidly throughout all provinces in mainland China in a short time [6,44]. In this study, a total of 4239 clinical samples form Guangxi province, southern China, were tested by the developed multiplex real-time qPCR. The results showed that 12.60% of samples were positive for ASFV, of which the positive rates of the harmless disposal sites, slaughterhouses, farmers’ markets and breeding farms were 28.34%, 17.30%, 10.70% and 1.25%, respectively, indicating that the ASFV was still a serious epidemic in Guangxi province, southern China. Of the 534 positive samples, 285 (53.37%) were environmental samples, which came from the harmless disposal sites, slaughterhouses, farmers’ markets and breeding farms. Since ASFV can survive for a long period in the environment [45], the viruses easily spread from these places through moving humans and vehicles. Therefore, it is very important to clean and disinfect the environments of these places, especially harmless disposal sites, to cut off the transmission of ASFV.
It is noteworthy that the gene-deleted ASFV strains are circulating in the field. Among the 534 ASFV-positive samples, 10 samples lacked the EP402R gene, 6 samples lacked the MGF505-2R gene, 14 samples lacked the EP402R and MGF505-2R genes and no sample lacked the I177L gene. This indicates that the wild-type and gene-deleted ASFV strains were simultaneously circulating in the field in Guangxi province, which further verified the existence of different gene-deleted ASFV strains in China [27]. They may be natural variations, or they may come from man-made illegal vaccines, which need to be further investigated and verified. At present, no I177L gene-deleted ASFV strain, which was verified to be an ideal vaccine candidate and has been approved officially to be used in the field as an attenuated vaccine since June 2022 in Vietnam [20], was found in the field in China. However, since the border between China and Vietnam is more than 1300 km, and since personnel and goods exchanges are frequent, the illegal trade of live pigs and pork products between these two countries is inevitable. Therefore, the I177L gene-deleted ASFV strain needs to be continuously monitored at present in the case of the transmission of this strain from Vietnam to China.

5. Conclusions

A multiplex real-time qPCR assay was successfully developed for the differential detection of the wild-type and gene-deleted ASFV strains in this study. The assay showed high specificity, sensitivity and repeatability, and it provided a reliable method for evaluating ASFV in clinical samples. The tested results of the clinical samples showed that harmless disposal sites, slaughterhouses and farmers’ markets in Guangxi province, southern China, are severely polluted by ASFV at present, which are important risk points for the prevention and control of ASF.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani12141754/s1, Table S1: The sequences of recombinant plasmids pASFV-ΔMGF505-2R, pASFV-ΔEP402R and pASFV-ΔI177L.

Author Contributions

K.S. contributed to the study design, laboratory supervision and manuscript writing and editing. K.Z. and Q.Z. contributed to experiments, data analysis and manuscript drafting. C.X., S.M., H.Z., F.L., H.W. and L.H. contributed to sample collection and data analysis. M.M. contributed to the study design and manuscript editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Key Research and Development Program (AB21238003) and the Science and Technology Major Project (AA17204057) of Guangxi Science and Technology Bureau, China, as well as the Agricultural Science and Technology Program (Z201954, Z202031) of Guangxi Agricultural and Rural Bureau, China.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The Guangxi Center for Animal Disease Control and Prevention (CADC) was approved by the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of China for the collection and detection of ASFV in clinical samples (approval No. 2018-154-25). This study was approved by the Guangxi CADC (No. 2020-A-01).

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained to use the clinical samples in this study from the owners of the animals.

Data Availability Statement

The data used in the analysis can be obtained from the authors on request.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Guangxi CADC for providing the viral strains and clinical samples that were used in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Galindo, I.; Alonso, C. African swine fever virus: A review. Viruses 2017, 9, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Sauter-Louis, C.; Conraths, F.J.; Probst, C.; Blohm, U.; Schulz, K.; Sehl, J.; Fischer, M.; Forth, J.H.; Zani, L.; Depner, K.; et al. African swine fever in wild boar in Europe—A review. Viruses 2021, 13, 1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Cwynar, P.; Stojkov, J.; Wlazlak, K. African swine fever status in Europe. Viruses 2019, 11, 310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Sanchez-Vizcaino, J.M.; Mur, L.; Martinez-Lopez, B. African swine fever: An epidemiological update. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2012, 59 (Suppl. S1), 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhou, X.; Li, N.; Luo, Y.; Liu, Y.; Miao, F.; Chen, T.; Zhang, S.; Cao, P.; Li, X.; Tian, K.; et al. Emergence of African swine fever in China, 2018. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2018, 65, 1482–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Mighell, E.; Ward, M.P. African swine fever spread across Asia, 2018–2019. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2021, 68, 2722–2732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gonzales, W.; Moreno, C.; Duran, U.; Henao, N.; Bencosme, M.; Lora, P.; Reyes, R.; Núñez, R.; De Gracia, A.; Perez, A.M. African swine fever in the Dominican Republic. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2021, 68, 3018–3019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. OIE-WAHIS Immediate Notification: African Swine Fever Virus Haiti, Reported on 2021-09-19, Report IDIN_151732. Available online: https://wahis.oie.int/#/report-info?reportId=39928 (accessed on 19 September 2021).
  9. Danzetta, M.L.; Marenzoni, M.L.; Iannetti, S.; Tizzani, P.; Calistri, P.; Feliziani, F. African swine fever: Lessons to learn from past eradication experiences: A systematic review. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gaudreault, N.N.; Madden, D.W.; Wilson, W.C.; Trujillo, J.D.; Richt, J.A. African swine fever virus: An emerging DNA arbovirus. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Alonso, C.; Borca, M.; Dixon, L.; Revilla, Y.; Rodriguez, F.; Escribano, J.M.; Ictv Report Consortium. ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Asfarviridae. J. Gen. Virol. 2018, 99, 613–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, G.; Xie, M.; Wu, W.; Chen, Z. Structures and functional diversities of ASFV proteins. Viruses 2021, 13, 2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Achenbach, J.E.; Gallardo, C.; Nieto-Pelegrín, E.; Rivera-Arroyo, B.; Degefa-Negi, T.; Arias, M.; Jenberie, S.; Mulisa, D.D.; Gizaw, D.; Gelaye, E.; et al. Identification of a new genotype of African swine fever virus in domestic pigs from Ethiopia. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2017, 64, 1393–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Giammarioli, M.; Gallardo, C.; Oggiano, A.; Iscaro, C.; Nieto, R.; Pellegrini, C.; Dei Giudici, S.; Arias, M.; De Mia, G.M. Genetic characterization of African swine fever viruses from recent and historical outbreaks in Sardinia (1978–2009). Virus Genes 2011, 42, 377–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tao, D.; Sun, D.; Liu, Y.; Wei, S.; Yang, Z.; An, T.; Shan, F.; Chen, Z.; Liu, J. One year of African swine fever outbreak in China. Acta Trop. 2020, 211, 105602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Njau, E.P.; Domelevo Entfellner, J.B.; Machuka, E.M.; Bochere, E.N.; Cleaveland, S.; Shirima, G.M.; Kusiluka, L.J.; Upton, C.; Bishop, R.P.; Pelle, R.; et al. The first genotype II African swine fever virus isolated in Africa provides insight into the current Eurasian pandemic. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 13081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sun, E.; Huang, L.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, J.; Shen, D.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Huo, H.; Wang, W.; Huangfu, H.; et al. Genotype I African swine fever viruses emerged in domestic pigs in China and caused chronic infection. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2021, 10, 2183–2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Teklue, T.; Sun, Y.; Abid, M.; Luo, Y.; Qiu, H.J. Current status and evolving approaches to African swine fever vaccine development. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2020, 67, 529–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wu, K.; Liu, J.; Wang, L.; Fan, S.; Li, Z.; Li, Y.; Yi, L.; Ding, H.; Zhao, M.; Chen, J. Current state of global African swine fever vaccine development under the prevalence and transmission of ASF in China. Vaccines 2020, 8, 531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tran, X.H.; Le, T.T.P.; Nguyen, Q.H.; Do, T.T.; Nguyen, V.D.; Gay, C.G.; Borca, M.V.; Gladue, D.P. African swine fever virus vaccine candidate ASFV-G-DeltaI177L efficiently protects European and native pig breeds against circulating Vietnamese field strain. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2021. Early View. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Borca, M.V.; Ramirez-Medina, E.; Silva, E.; Vuono, E.; Rai, A.; Pruitt, S.; Espinoza, N.; Velazquez-Salinas, L.; Gay, C.G.; Gladue, D.P. ASFV-G-I177L as an effective oral nasal vaccine against the Eurasia strain of Africa swine fever. Viruses 2021, 13, 765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Borca, M.V.; Ramirez-Medina, E.; Silva, E.; Vuono, E.; Rai, A.; Pruitt, S.; Holinka, L.G.; Velazquez-Salinas, L.; Zhu, J.; Gladue, D.P. Development of a highly effective African swine fever virus vaccine by deletion of the I177L gene results in sterile immunity against the current epidemic Eurasia strain. J. Virol. 2020, 94, e02017-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. O’Donnell, V.; Holinka, L.G.; Gladue, D.P.; Sanford, B.; Krug, P.W.; Lu, X.; Arzt, J.; Reese, B.; Carrillo, C.; Risatti, G.R.; et al. African swine fever virus Georgia isolate harboring deletions of MGF360 and MGF505 genes is attenuated in swine and confers protection against challenge with virulent parental virus. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 6048–6056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Chen, W.; Zhao, D.; He, X.; Liu, R.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Li, F.; Shan, D.; Chen, H.; Zhang, J.; et al. A seven-gene-deleted African swine fever virus is safe and effective as a live attenuated vaccine in pigs. Sci. China Life Sci. 2020, 63, 623–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Monteagudo, P.L.; Lacasta, A.; López, E.; Bosch, L.; Collado, J.; Pina-Pedrero, S.; Correa-Fiz, F.; Accensi, F.; Navas, M.J.; Vidal, E.; et al. BA71DeltaCD2: A new recombinant live attenuated African swine fever virus with cross-protective capabilities. J. Virol. 2017, 91, e01058-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Lopez, E.; Bosch-Camós, L.; Ramirez-Medina, E.; Vuono, E.; Navas, M.J.; Muñoz, M.; Accensi, F.; Zhang, J.; Alonso, U.; Argilaguet, J.; et al. Deletion mutants of the attenuated recombinant ASF virus, BA71DeltaCD2, show decreased vaccine efficacy. Viruses 2021, 13, 1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Sun, E.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Z.; He, X.; Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Wang, W.; Huang, L.; Xi, F.; Huangfu, H.; et al. Emergence and prevalence of naturally occurring lower virulent African swine fever viruses in domestic pigs in China in 2020. Sci. China Life Sci. 2021, 64, 752–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Saijo, M.; Morikawa, S.; Kurane, I. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction for virus infection diagnostics. Expert Opin. Med. Diagn. 2008, 2, 1155–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. King, D.P.; Reid, S.M.; Hutchings, G.H.; Grierson, S.S.; Wilkinson, P.J.; Dixon, L.K.; Bastos, A.D.; Drew, T.W. Development of a TaqMan® PCR assay with internal amplification control for the detection of African swine fever virus. J. Virol. Methods 2003, 107, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, A.; Jia, R.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, J.; Qi, Y.; Chen, Y.; Liu, D.; Zhao, J.; Shi, H.; Zhang, J.; et al. Development of a novel quantitative real-time PCR assay with lyophilized powder reagent to detect African swine fever virus in blood samples of domestic pigs in China. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2020, 67, 284–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, Y.; Xu, L.; Noll, L.; Stoy, C.; Porter, E.; Fu, J.; Feng, Y.; Peddireddi, L.; Liu, X.; Dodd, K.A.; et al. Development of a real-time PCR assay for detection of African swine fever virus with an endogenous internal control. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2020, 67, 2446–2454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Trinh, T.B.N.; Truong, T.; Nguyen, V.T.; Vu, X.D.; Dao, L.A.; Nguyen, T.L.; Ambagala, A.; Babiuk, S.; Oh, J.; Song, D.; et al. Development of a novel real-time PCR assay targeting p54 gene for rapid detection of African swine fever virus (ASFV) strains circulating in Vietnam. Vet. Med. Sci. 2021, 7, 2268–2272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Velazquez-Salinas, L.; Ramirez-Medina, E.; Rai, A.; Pruitt, S.; Vuono, E.A.; Espinoza, N.; Gladue, D.P.; Borca, M.V. Development real-time PCR assays to genetically differentiate vaccinated pigs from infected pigs with the Eurasian strain of African swine fever virus. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 768869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhan, Y.; Zhang, L.H.; Lin, Y.; Cai, Y.F.; Zou, Y.W.; Hao, Z.Y.; Luo, Z.H.; Wang, N.D.; Deng, Z.B.; Yang, Y.; et al. Development and preliminary testing of a probe-based duplex real-time PCR assay for the detection of African swine fever virus. Mol. Cell Probes 2021, 59, 101764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Li, X.; Hu, Y.; Liu, P.; Zhu, Z.; Liu, P.; Chen, C.; Wu, X. Development and application of a duplex real-time PCR assay for differentiation of genotypes I and II African swine fever viruses. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2022. Early View. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Guo, Z.; Li, K.; Qiao, S.; Chen, X.X.; Deng, R.; Zhang, G. Development and evaluation of duplex TaqMan real-time PCR assay for detection and differentiation of wide-type and MGF505-2R gene-deleted African swine fever viruses. BMC Vet. Res. 2020, 16, 428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lin, Y.; Cao, C.; Shi, W.; Huang, C.; Zeng, S.; Sun, J.; Wu, J.; Hua, Q. Development of a triplex real-time PCR assay for detection and differentiation of gene-deleted and wild-type African swine fever virus. J. Virol. Methods. 2020, 280, 113875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. OIE. African swine fever. In Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals; OIE: Paris, France, 2019; Available online: https://www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/tahm/3.08.01_ASF.pdf (accessed on 19 September 2021).
  39. Wang, T.; Luo, R.; Sun, Y.; Qiu, H.J. Current efforts towards safe and effective live attenuated vaccines against African swine fever: Challenges and prospects. Infect. Dis. Poverty 2021, 10, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, L.; Wang, X.; Mao, R.; Zhou, Y.; Yin, J.; Sun, Y.; Yin, X. Research progress on live attenuated vaccine against African swine fever virus. Microb. Pathog. 2021, 158, 105024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rathakrishnan, A.; Connell, S.; Petrovan, V.; Moffat, K.; Goatley, L.C.; Jabbar, T.; Sánchez-Cordón, P.J.; Reis, A.L.; Dixon, L.K. Differential effect of deleting members of African swine fever virus multigene families 360 and 505 from the genotype II Georgia 2007/1 isolate on virus replication, virulence and induction of protection. J. Virol. 2022, 96, e0189921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hawkins, S.F.C.; Guest, P.C. Multiplex analyses using real-time quantitative PCR. Methods Mol. Biol. 2017, 1546, 125–133. [Google Scholar]
  43. Hoffmann, B.; Beer, M.; Reid, S.M.; Mertens, P.; Oura, C.A.; van Rijn, P.A.; Slomka, M.J.; Banks, J.; Brown, I.H.; Alexander, D.J.; et al. A review of RT-PCR technologies used in veterinary virology and disease control: Sensitive and specific diagnosis of five livestock diseases notifiable to the World Organization for Animal Health. Vet. Microbiol. 2009, 139, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Ma, M.; Wang, H.H.; Hua, Y.; Qin, F.; Yang, J. African swine fever in China: Impacts, responses, and policy implications. Food Policy 2021, 192, 102065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mazur-Panasiuk, N.; Żmudzki, J.; Woźniakowski, G. African swine fever virus—Persistence in different environmental conditions and the possibility of its indirect transmission. J. Vet. Res. 2019, 63, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Animals 12 01754 g001a 550Animals 12 01754 g001b 550
Figure 1. Dynamic curves and standard curves of the multiplex real-time qPCR: The dynamic curves were generated by using the recombinant standard plasmids pASFV-B646L (A), pASFVI177L (B), pASFV-MGF505-2R (C) and pASFVEP402R (D). The standard curves (E) were generated from the dynamic curves. In (A–D), the plasmid concentrations of curves 1 to 7 ranged from 3.21 × 108 copies/µL to 3.21 × 102 copies/µL (final concentration).
Figure 1. Dynamic curves and standard curves of the multiplex real-time qPCR: The dynamic curves were generated by using the recombinant standard plasmids pASFV-B646L (A), pASFVI177L (B), pASFV-MGF505-2R (C) and pASFVEP402R (D). The standard curves (E) were generated from the dynamic curves. In (A–D), the plasmid concentrations of curves 1 to 7 ranged from 3.21 × 108 copies/µL to 3.21 × 102 copies/µL (final concentration).
Animals 12 01754 g001aAnimals 12 01754 g001b
Animals 12 01754 g002 550
Figure 2. Specificity analysis of the multiplex real-time qPCR: 1a: pASFV-B646L; 1b: pASFV-I177L; 1c: pASFV-MGF505-2R; 1d: pASFV-EP402R; 2: pASFV-ΔI177L; 3: pASFV-ΔMGF505-2R; 4: pASFV-ΔEP402R; 5: CSFV; 6: PRRSV; 7: PCV2; 8: PCV3; 9: PEDV; 10: PDCoV; 11: PRV; 12: Negative control.
Figure 2. Specificity analysis of the multiplex real-time qPCR: 1a: pASFV-B646L; 1b: pASFV-I177L; 1c: pASFV-MGF505-2R; 1d: pASFV-EP402R; 2: pASFV-ΔI177L; 3: pASFV-ΔMGF505-2R; 4: pASFV-ΔEP402R; 5: CSFV; 6: PRRSV; 7: PCV2; 8: PCV3; 9: PEDV; 10: PDCoV; 11: PRV; 12: Negative control.
Animals 12 01754 g002
Animals 12 01754 g003 550
Figure 3. Sensitivity analysis of the multiplex real-time qPCR: The dynamic curves were generated by using the recombinant standard plasmids pASFV-B646L (A), pASFVI177L (B), pASFV-MGF505-2R (C) and pASFVEP402R (D). In (A–D), the plasmid concentrations of curves 1 to 10 ranged from 3.21 × 108 copies/µL to 3.21 × 10−1 copies/μL (final concentration); 11: Negative control.
Figure 3. Sensitivity analysis of the multiplex real-time qPCR: The dynamic curves were generated by using the recombinant standard plasmids pASFV-B646L (A), pASFVI177L (B), pASFV-MGF505-2R (C) and pASFVEP402R (D). In (A–D), the plasmid concentrations of curves 1 to 10 ranged from 3.21 × 108 copies/µL to 3.21 × 10−1 copies/μL (final concentration); 11: Negative control.
Animals 12 01754 g003
Animals 12 01754 g004 550
Figure 4. Evaluation of the clinical samples by the multiplex real-time qPCR: (A) ASFV-positive sample that lacked MGF505-2R and EP402R genes; (B) ASFV-positive sample that lacked EP402R gene; (C) ASFV-positive sample that lacked MGF505-2R gene. Curves 1a, 1b, 1c and 1d are the dynamic curves of the standard plasmids pASFV-B646L, pASFV-I177L, pASFV-MGF505-2R and pASFV-EP402R, respectively, which were used as positive controls. Curves 2a, 2b, 2c and 2d are the dynamic curves of the ASFV B646L, I177L, MGF505-2R and EP402R genes in the clinical samples, respectively. Curve 3: Negative control.
Figure 4. Evaluation of the clinical samples by the multiplex real-time qPCR: (A) ASFV-positive sample that lacked MGF505-2R and EP402R genes; (B) ASFV-positive sample that lacked EP402R gene; (C) ASFV-positive sample that lacked MGF505-2R gene. Curves 1a, 1b, 1c and 1d are the dynamic curves of the standard plasmids pASFV-B646L, pASFV-I177L, pASFV-MGF505-2R and pASFV-EP402R, respectively, which were used as positive controls. Curves 2a, 2b, 2c and 2d are the dynamic curves of the ASFV B646L, I177L, MGF505-2R and EP402R genes in the clinical samples, respectively. Curve 3: Negative control.
Animals 12 01754 g004
Table
Table 1. Primer and probe sequences used in this study.
Table 1. Primer and probe sequences used in this study.
Target GeneNameSequences (5′→3′)Amplicon (bp)
B646LP72-FGGCGTATAAAAAGTCCAGGAAATTC79
P72-RTTCGGCGAGCGCTTTATC
P72-PFAM-TCACCAAATCCTTTTGCGATGCAAGCT-BHQ1
MGF505-2R505-2R-FAGTCATGCACGGCATATACAA153
505-2R-RGGTTTAAACCGTGCCACATCC
505-2R-PVIC-ACGCGGCCACCCAATTCAGAGAC-BHQ1
EP402REP402R-FTACTACATGCGTCCCTCAACAC182
EP402R-RAATGGCGGGATATTGGGTAGT
EP402R-PCY5-ACCGTGTCCTCCACCCAAACCAT-BHQ2
I177LI177L-FGGCATAATTATCAAATGCGAAGGG122
I177L-RTGGAAAGTTAATGATCAGGGCTT
I177L-PTexas Red-AATCCTAGCTTGCCGGTAATGGCT-BHQ2
Table
Table 2. The reaction system of the multiplex real-time qPCR and the OIE-recommended real-time qPCR.
Table 2. The reaction system of the multiplex real-time qPCR and the OIE-recommended real-time qPCR.
Multiplex Real-Time qPCROIE-Recommended Real-Time qPCR
ReagentVolume (μL)Final Concentration (nM)ReagentVolume (μL)Final Concentration (nM)
Premix Ex Taq (2×)101×Premix Ex Taq (2×)12.51×
P72-F (20 μM)0.2200P72-P1 (50 μM)12000
P72-R (20 μM)0.2200P72-P2 (50 μM)12000
P72-P (20 μM)0.2200P72-P (5 μM)1200
I177L-F (20 μM)0.1100///
I177L-R (20 μM)0.1100///
I177L-P (20 μM)0.1100///
EP402R-F (20 μM)0.2200///
EP402R-R (20 μM)0.2200///
EP402R-P (20 μM)0.2200///
MGF505-2R-F (20 μM)0.2200///
MGF505-2R-R (20 μM)0.2200///
MGF505-2R-P (20 μM)0.3300///
Template2/Template2.5/
Distilled waterUp to 20/Distilled waterUp to 25/
Table
Table 3. Repeatability and reproducibility analysis of the multiplex real-time qPCR.
Table 3. Repeatability and reproducibility analysis of the multiplex real-time qPCR.
PlasmidConcentration
(Copies/μL)		Ct Values of Intra-Assay for RepeatabilityCt Values of Inter-Assay for Reproducibility
X ¯ SDCV (%) X ¯ SDCV (%)
pASFV-B646L3.21 × 10812.60 0.10 0.80 12.69 0.13 1.01
3.21 × 10618.45 0.16 0.88 18.45 0.11 0.62
3.21 × 10424.53 0.18 0.71 24.75 0.30 1.20
pASFV-I177L3.21 × 10812.41 0.07 0.59 12.45 0.10 0.84
3.21 × 10618.42 0.17 0.92 18.37 0.13 0.69
3.21 × 10424.44 0.23 0.92 24.37 0.20 0.83
pASFV-MGF505-2R3.21 × 10812.57 0.090.62 12.59 0.17 1.36
3.21 × 10618.70 0.170.89 18.75 0.21 1.10
3.21 × 10424.81 0.11 0.43 24.79 0.160.63
pASFV-EP402R3.21 × 10813.18 0.07 0.53 13.29 0.13 0.99
3.21 × 10619.05 0.09 0.46 19.03 0.30 1.56
3.21 × 10425.13 0.07 0.26 25.19 0.13 0.53
Table
Table 4. Evaluation of the clinical samples (positive/total) (percentage).
Table 4. Evaluation of the clinical samples (positive/total) (percentage).
SourceTissueEnvironmental SwabWhole BloodNasopharyngeal SwabTotal
Pig farm/2/107 (1.87%) c11/1134 (0.97%)3/37 (8.11%)15/1278 (1.25%) d
Slaughterhouse58/480 (12.08%) b214/752 (28.46%) a//330/1908 (17.30%) b
Farmer’s market14/175 (8.00%) b53/451 (11.75%) b//67/626 (10.70%) c
Harmless disposal site105/365 (28.77%) a16/62 (25.81%) a//121/427 (28.34%) a
Total177/1020 (17.35%) B285/1372 (20.77%) A11/1134 (0.97%) D3/37 (8.11%) C534/4239 (12.60%)
Note: The data in the same column which are marked with different small letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). The data in the last line which are marked with different capital letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). The harmless disposal site is the place where dead pigs are concentrated from one or more different pig farms for harmless treatment.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, K.; Shi, K.; Zhou, Q.; Xiong, C.; Mo, S.; Zhou, H.; Long, F.; Wei, H.; Hu, L.; Mo, M. The Development of a Multiplex Real-Time Quantitative PCR Assay for the Differential Detection of the Wild-Type Strain and the MGF505-2R, EP402R and I177L Gene-Deleted Strain of the African Swine Fever Virus. Animals 2022, 12, 1754. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12141754

AMA Style

Zhao K, Shi K, Zhou Q, Xiong C, Mo S, Zhou H, Long F, Wei H, Hu L, Mo M. The Development of a Multiplex Real-Time Quantitative PCR Assay for the Differential Detection of the Wild-Type Strain and the MGF505-2R, EP402R and I177L Gene-Deleted Strain of the African Swine Fever Virus. Animals. 2022; 12(14):1754. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12141754

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Kang, Kaichuang Shi, Qingan Zhou, Chenyong Xiong, Shenglan Mo, Hongjin Zhou, Feng Long, Haina Wei, Liping Hu, and Meilan Mo. 2022. "The Development of a Multiplex Real-Time Quantitative PCR Assay for the Differential Detection of the Wild-Type Strain and the MGF505-2R, EP402R and I177L Gene-Deleted Strain of the African Swine Fever Virus" Animals 12, no. 14: 1754. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12141754

APA Style

Zhao, K., Shi, K., Zhou, Q., Xiong, C., Mo, S., Zhou, H., Long, F., Wei, H., Hu, L., & Mo, M. (2022). The Development of a Multiplex Real-Time Quantitative PCR Assay for the Differential Detection of the Wild-Type Strain and the MGF505-2R, EP402R and I177L Gene-Deleted Strain of the African Swine Fever Virus. Animals, 12(14), 1754. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12141754

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop