Next Article in Journal
Sex-Specific Movement Responses of Reeves’s Pheasant to Human Disturbance: Importance of Body Characteristics and Reproductive Behavior
Next Article in Special Issue
Analysis of Movements and Behavior of Bighead Carps (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) Considering Fish Passage Energetics in an Experimental Vertical Slot Fishway
Previous Article in Journal
Relationship among Sex, Skin Color, and Production Parameters of Broiler in Pectoral Myopathies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spatial Learning of Individual Cichlid Fish and Its Effect on Group Decision Making
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

What Forms, Maintains, and Changes the Boldness of Swimming Crabs (Portunus trituberculatus)?

1
The Key Laboratory of Mariculture, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, 5 Yushan Road, Qingdao 266003, China
2
School of Biological and Ecological Engineering, Dongying Vocational Institute, 129 Fuqian Street, Dongying 257091, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2022, 12(13), 1618; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12131618
Submission received: 17 May 2022 / Revised: 22 June 2022 / Accepted: 22 June 2022 / Published: 23 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Behavioral Ecology of Aquatic Animals)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The formation and maintenance mechanism of personality is a hot topic in personality research. The boldness of the swimming crab (Portunus trituberculatus) has the greatest influence on its behavior, but the physiological factors leading to the stability of and difference in boldness are not yet clear. In this study, the factors affecting the formation and maintenance of and change in the boldness of swimming crabs are investigated from the perspectives of behavior, physiology, and neurotransmitters. The results show that the differences in boldness among crabs remain consistent for a long time and are closely related to the body’s energy and neurotransmitter metabolism.

Abstract

Boldness of personality is an important theme in animal behavior and has significant ecological and evolutionary consequences. Studies on boldness in crustaceans typically focus on their behavior, while relatively few studies have focused on the formation and maintenance of and change in boldness, such as energy metabolism and neurotransmission. In this study, we measured the boldness of swimming crabs (Portunus trituberculatus) and analyzed the relationship between boldness and oxygen consumption rate, energy concentration, and the relative expression of energy-metabolism-related and 5-HT genes in mRNA. The results showed that boldness remained stable across repeated tests but changed under dangerous conditions. Swimming crabs could be divided into bold and shy individuals. Bold individuals consumed oxygen at a significantly higher rate than shy individuals. Lactate and glucose concentrations in hemolymph were significantly lower in bold individuals than in shy individuals, and mRNA relative expression of Na+/K+-ATPase and 5-HT genes was significantly higher in bold than in shy individuals. Preliminary results indicate that energy metabolism and neurotransmitters may underlie the formation and maintenance of personality characteristics of swimming crabs. Swimming crabs also exhibit behavioral flexibility in order to cope with risks. This may be an adaptation to their complex environments.

1. Introduction

Animal personality is the behavioral tendencies differing across individuals but consistent over time and across contexts within individuals [1]. Boldness is an evaluation of an animal’s willingness to take risks in order to obtain more food resources or reproductive opportunities and an aspect of personality that describes animals’ responses to potential risks in their habitat [2,3,4]. The fiddler crab (Uca mjoebergi) and the hermit crab (Pagurus bernhardus) are typical species in the study of boldness and have been studied widely [5,6]. In personality research, the stability of behavioral character is the consistency of behavioral differences among individuals over time and under different conditions [7]. Personality (stability in behavior) has been studied primarily in aquatic species such as crayfish (Astacus astacus) and fiddler crab (U. mjoebergi) [5,8]. Behavioral plasticity, in contrast, means that animals adapt to environmental changes (including adverse environments) by changing their behavior [9]. The complementary relationship between behavioral plasticity and personality stability is of great evolutionary significance [10]. With feedback mechanisms and survival strategies underpinned by particular trade-offs, some of the best contenders within a population have different personalities in the same environment.
A difference in energy metabolism is one internal basis for differences in animal personality [9]. Different metabolic rates represent differences in the concentrations of energy sources such as glycogen and glucose, which are required for physiological functions and behaviors. Generally, individuals with high metabolic rates move faster, explore more, and are more likely to be identified as bold individuals. This pattern has been observed in terrestrial animals such as great tits (Parus major) and lizards (Zootoca vivipara) [2,11] and aquatic animals such as Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and Arctic char (Salvelimus alpinus) [12]. Kucharski et al. and Velando et al. found that differences in animal personality are regulated by genes related to energy metabolism [13,14]. However, the relationship between the personalities of crustaceans and the regulation of energy metabolism has only been discussed in crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) and fiddler crab (U. mjoebergi) [15,16], and the relevant research needs to be expanded.
Swimming crab (Portunus trituberculatus), well known for aggression and boldness [4], is a typical species in the study of aquatic animal personality [4,17]. However, the physiological metabolism affecting boldness is still unclear. In order to answer this question—“What forms, maintains, and changes the boldness of swimming crab?”, we studied the boldness of swimming crab in captivity. Video recordings of three boldness measurements were used to quantify the boldness of swimming crabs, and the stability of boldness and behavioral plasticity was analyzed. In addition, to measure the stability of boldness when the environment changes, a simulated dangerous situation with hemolymph added was used in repeated measures. Energy-metabolism-related indicators, including oxygen consumption rates, concentrations of energy sources, and mRNA expression levels of related genes, were examined in order to reveal the relationship between boldness and the regulation of energy metabolism in swimming crabs. These results provide a reference for the personality characteristics and underlying mechanisms of crustaceans and a behavioral basis for genetic variation and natural selection [18].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animal Collection and Maintenance

This experiment was conducted in July and August 2020 at the Key Laboratory of Mariculture, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China. Male swimming crabs (mean carapace width: 100.36 ± 7.23 mm, N = 90) were collected from an aquaculture facility in Jiaozhou, Shandong Province. The swimming crabs were housed individually in a glass aquarium (45 × 30 × 30 cm) for two weeks prior to the start of the experiment. During the acclimatization period, one crab was housed in each aquarium in continuously aerated water held at 24 ± 1 °C and 30‰ salinity under a 12 L:12 D photoperiod. Water was changed at a rate of 1/3 per day using seawater that was aerated for 24 h, filtered with an 80-mesh strainer, and adjusted to the target temperature before use. Manila clams (Ruditapes philippinarum) (shell length: 31.0–34.0 mm) were provided once daily (0800), and the shells, excrement, and clams were removed three h after feeding.

2.2. Experimental Process and Sample Collection

After the acclimatization period, healthy swimming crabs (N = 43) in the intermolt period with intact appendages were selected for the experiment. The boldness of the swimming crabs was measured using a personality observation system, which consisted of a monitor, camera, trapdoor, shelter, and observation box (Figure 1). The system was not aerated in order to reduce interference during experiments. In order to avoid interference from activities and other distractions, the recordings were carried out in a quiet room under uniform lighting. The lighting and water conditions were the same as during the acclimatization period except that there was no aeration. In this experiment, the boldness of each swimming crab was measured three times within an interval of one week [19]. During the first measurement, fresh seawater was added to the observation box (depth 40 cm), and the swimming crab was placed in a shelter for 10 min for adaptation. After that, the trapdoor was opened, and filming continued for 24 h (Boldness week 1). After the first measurement, the crab was returned to the acclimatization aquarium and housed as before. After one week, the second measurement was conducted using an identical process (Boldness week 2). After another week, the third measurement was conducted. During the third measurement (Boldness week 3), 5 mL of swimming crab hemolymph was added to the seawater in the observation box and mixed gently before recording in order to simulate a dangerous environment [20]. The rest of the process was identical to that of the previous two measurements. A total of 43 individuals were recorded, and their boldness was calculated by quantifying and analyzing the videos. Boldness was calculated as time outside of the shelter/total recording time [21].
After three measurements of boldness, the crabs’ oxygen consumption rates (OCRs) were measured after three days of acclimation. The respiratory container was a beaker (5 L) with connected inlet and outlet pipes sealed with rubber plugs. The water flow rate was adjusted using a valve. Prior to measurement, individuals were housed in the respiratory container for 24 h, and the valve was closed for 45 min for measurement (flowing water method, more details in [22]). In addition, three blank containers were prepared. YSI (Teflo Pro20,YSI Inc., Yellow Springs, USA) was used to measure the concentration of dissolved oxygen in the water at the beginning and end of the measurement period, and the OCR was calculated according to the following formula:
O C R ( mgO 2 · g 1 · h 1 ) = ( C 0 C t ) × V × W 1 × T 1
where C0 (mg·mL−1) represents the oxygen concentration in the blank container, Ct (mg·mL−1) represents the oxygen concentration in the respiratory container at the end of the experiment, V represents the volume of the respiratory container, W represents the wet weight of the crab, and T represents the duration of the measurement.
After OCR measurement, crabs were returned to their aquaria and maintained for seven days. After that, crabs were anesthetized in ice and placed on an ice tray, and 500 μL hemolymph was removed from the base of the last pereiopod by piercing the arthrodial membrane with a syringe. The hemolymph was stored in liquid nitrogen. Muscle was removed from both sides of the cheliped, placed in a 1.5 mL centrifugal tube, and stored in liquid nitrogen. After 24 h at 4 °C, the hemolymph was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant of the hemolymph and muscle was taken and stored at −80 °C until further analysis. The lactate and glucose concentrations in the hemolymph, the glycogen concentration in the muscle, and the relative expressions of mRNA energy-metabolism-related and 5-HT genes in the cheliped muscle were quantified.

2.3. Data Collection and Measurement

2.3.1. Determination of Boldness

After the behavior was recorded, three repeated measures of boldness were calculated as time outside of the shelter/total recording time. Only the results of the first measure were used in the bold–shy individual dichotomy. The classification was completed by a personality analysis method based on machine learning (PAML) [4]. In this method, the elbow method was used to find the optimal number of groups. K-means clustering analysis was adopted for the boldness results. After that, support vector machine (SVM), a classical supervised learning algorithm, was used to obtain a maximum-margin hyperplane, separating the samples into different personality (bold/shy) groups based on the distance from the point to the hyperplane [4].

2.3.2. Energy Sources

The glucose and lactate concentrations in hemolymph and the glycogen concentration in the cheliped muscle were measured using commercial assay kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China). The glucose concentration in hemolymph (mmol·L−1) was measured using the glucose oxidase–peroxidase method. The lactate concentration in hemolymph (mmol·L−1) was measured using the NBT colorimetric method. The glycogen concentration (mg·g−1) in cheliped muscle was measured using the anthrone–sulfuric acid colorimetric method. An automatic microplate reader (Synergy2, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used to read all absorbance values.

2.3.3. mRNA Relative Expression of Energy-Metabolism-Related and 5-HT Genes

  • RNA extraction and reverse transcription
Trizol reagent (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) was used to extract total RNA from the cheliped muscle tissue of swimming crabs. The extraction process was carried out on ice. Following extraction, a NanoDrop300 nucleic acid detector was used to detect the concentration and purity of total RNA and ensure that the detection result of A260/A280 = 1.8–2.0; 1% agarose gel electrophoresis was used to evaluate whether the RNA was contaminated or degraded. cDNA was then synthesized using reverse transcription with a HiScript III qPCR Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). After reverse transcription, cDNA was stored at −20 ℃ for subsequent analysis.
  • mRNA expression of related genes
mRNA expression of Na+/K+-ATPase, NADH ubiquinone reductase (NADH-QR), cytochrome c oxidase (CCO), AMPKα, 5-HT, and reference gene β-actin (GenBank accession no. FJ641977) were detected using real-time quantitative RT-PCR (see Table 1 for primer sequence). The CCO (GenBank accession no. ARO92230.1) and NADH-QR (GenBank accession no. 123511446) primer sequences were derived from Ren and Pan [23]. The AMPKα (GenBank accession no. SRP018007) primer sequences were derived from Lu et al. [24]. The Na+/K+-ATPase primer sequences were derived from Xie et al. [25]. The 5-HT primer sequences were derived from Wang et al. [26].
The fluorescence quantitative determination was carried out using the ChamQ™ SYBR Color reagent (Vazyme, Nanjing, China); 0.4 μL cDNA was used in the measurement. The upstream primer, downstream primer, and corresponding reagent for the corresponding gene were added for amplification. The mRNA relative expression was calculated by 2−ΔΔCt. During measurement, the expression specificity of corresponding genes was identified via the melting curve. The amplification system and conditions of RT-qPCR were as follows:
PCR amplification system (20 μL): 2 × ChamQ SYBR Color qPCR Master Mix 10 μL, upstream primer and downstream primer 0.4 μL each, cDNA 0.2 μL, and DEPCH2O 7.2 μL. The PCR amplified condition consisted of pre denaturation (95 °C, 30 s); cyclic reaction (95 °C, 10 s; 60 °C, 30 s), including 30 cycles; melting curve (95 °C, 15 s; 60 °C, 60 s; 95 °C, 15 s); and insulation (4 °C).

2.4. Data Analysis

SPSS 24.0 was used for all data analysis. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (mean ± SD). The repeated measurements of boldness were analyzed using the generalized linear mixed model (GLMM). When analyzing boldness, a skewed distribution was used, and the residuals were checked for normal distribution to assess model fit. The ID of crabs was set as the random factor, and the three repeated measure of boldness was set as the fixed factor. Post-hoc comparisons between the three times were also calculated with the calculation module. Other results were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. A Duncan post-hoc comparison test was used to evaluate differences among the three repeated measurements. The correlation between boldness and energy metabolism was analyzed using Spearman’s rank correlation. A chi-squared test was used to compare the numbers of bold and shy individuals. An independent sample t-test was used to analyze the differences in energy content and related gene expression between bold and shy individuals. Prior to analysis, the Shapiro–Wilk method was used to test the normality of the data, and Levene’s test was used to examine the homogeneity of variance. Data that did not meet the standards of normality and homogeneity of variance were transformed using arcsine and logarithm; p < 0.05 was treated as the significant level of difference in all analyses.

3. Results

3.1. Cluster Analysis of Boldness

Crabs were divided into bold and shy individuals based on the K-means clustering results (Figure 2). The boldness scores of bold individuals ranged from about 0.3–1.0, while those of shy individuals mostly ranged from 0.0–0.3 (Figure 2). The number of bold individuals (N = 13) was significantly lower than that of shy individuals (N = 30) ( χ 1 , 42 2 = 6.721, p < 0.05), and the boldness of bold individuals was significantly higher than that of shy individuals.

3.2. Stability of Boldness

Repeated measurements showed that boldness increased significantly with time (F = 21.502, p < 0.001), but there was no significant difference in boldness between the first and the second week (t = 4.383, p = 0.096). Boldness scores were significantly higher in the third week than in both the first (t = 10.504, p < 0.001) and the second week (t = 6.302, p < 0.001) (Figure 3).

3.3. OCR

There was a significant positive correlation between boldness and OCR in swimming crabs. Individuals with high boldness had a higher OCR (Figure 4A), and the OCR of bold individuals was significantly higher than that of shy individuals (t = 5.876, p = 0.020) (Figure 4B).

3.4. Energy Source

There was no significant correlation between boldness and glycogen concentration in cheliped muscle (Figure 5(A-1)). However, there was a significant negative correlation between boldness and glucose and lactate concentrations in hemolymph (Figure 5(B-1,C-1)); individuals with high boldness scores had lower glucose and lactate concentrations in hemolymph. Glucose (t = 6.446, p = 0.015) and lactate (t = 5.452, p = 0.025) concentrations in the hemolymph of bold individuals were significantly lower than in the hemolymph of shy individuals (Figure 5(B-2,C-2)), but there was no significant difference in glycogen concentration (t = 0.690, p = 0.411) (Figure 5(A-2)).

3.5. mRNA Relative Expression of Energy-Metabolism-Related and 5-HT Genes

Boldness was not significantly correlated with the mRNA relative expression of NADH (Figure 6(B-1)), CCO (Figure 6(C-1)), or AMPK (Figure 6(D-1)) in cheliped muscle tissue. The mRNA relative expression of Na+/K+-ATPase (Figure 6(A-1)) and 5-HT (Figure 6(E-1)) was significantly positively correlated with boldness, and the expression of Na+/K+-ATPase and 5-HT genes was significantly up-regulated in individuals with high boldness scores. The expression of the two genes in bold individuals was significantly higher than in shy individuals (Na+/K+-ATPase: t = 6.211, p = 0.033; 5-HT: t = 3.463, p = 0.017) (Figure 6(A-2,E-2)), while NADH (t = 4.728, p = 0.258) (Figure 6(B-2)), CCO (t = 2.571; p = 0.772) (Figure 6(C-2)), and AMPK (t = 2.082, p = 0.344) (Figure 6(D-2)) did not differ significantly among groups.

4. Discussion

The balance between personality stability and behavioral plasticity has become a growing area of interest for researchers [27]. In a relative study of crustaceans, Hazlett first observed both personality stability and behavioral plasticity in hermit crabs (Pagurus bernhardus) [20]. Recent studies have confirmed that the boldness of hermit crabs (P. bernhardus) does not change when the color of their shells changes [28]. However, unsuitable temperatures can change intraindividual variation in exploration behavior between individuals [29]. In this study, differences in boldness between individual swimming crabs were significant (Figure 2) and stable across the first two repeated measurements. During the third measurement, this time in a seemingly dangerous situation, boldness scores significantly increased (Figure 3). This showed both personality stability and behavioral plasticity in swimming crabs. In this study, the boldness of bold and shy crabs increased significantly in cases of danger; the possible reason is that, as a species with high aggression, frequent movement and higher boldness may be an effective means to respond to danger [30,31]. This result also shows that a different personality does not affect plasticity when at risk.
Many studies have shown that the formation and maintenance mechanisms of personality are closely related to energy metabolism [15,32]. This study found that boldness was significantly positively correlated with OCR, and the OCR of bold individuals was significantly higher than that of shy individuals (Figure 4), indicating that metabolic rate differences may be closely related to differences in boldness [33,34]. There was no significant relationship between boldness and glycogen content in cheliped muscle, and there was no significant difference in glycogen content between bold and shy individuals. This may be because swimming crabs in this experiment were provided with adequate clams, leading to almost identical concentrations of the major energy storage molecules (glycogen) in the bold and shy individuals [35]. This finding is similar to that in blue crabs (Panopeus herbstii) [21]. The boldness of swimming crabs was significantly negatively correlated with the concentrations of both glucose and lactate in hemolymph (Figure 5(B-1,C-1)), such that the concentrations of glucose and lactate in the hemolymph of bold crabs were significantly lower than those of shy crabs (Figure 5(B-2,C-2)). This is consistent with the result of OCRs of bold crabs being higher than those of shy crabs (Figure 4). This may be because the metabolic rates of bold individuals are higher than those of shy individuals, resulting in the difference in glucose concentrations in hemolymph [36]; this is consistent with research investigating OCRs and personality in carp (Cyprinus carpio) [37]. Lactate is produced through anaerobic respiration, and lactate content reflects the energy supply intensity of anaerobic respiration. In this study, the boldness of swimming crabs was significantly positively correlated with lactate concentrations in hemolymph, indicating higher anaerobic respiration intensity in bold individuals. These results are consistent with our previous findings that anaerobic respiration intensity in bold swimming crabs is higher while fighting [38]. Therefore, the differences in metabolic rate and energy substance content may be one of the internal mechanisms driving the formation and maintenance of boldness in swimming crabs.
The energy state of an individual is the result of energy production and consumption [39]; 90% of ATP is produced by the oxidative phosphorylation pathway of mitochondria [26]. CCO and NADH, two key enzymes regulating this process, are closely related to individuals’ levels of oxidative phosphorylation [40]. The results of this experiment showed that there was no correlation between the boldness of crabs and the relative expression of CCO and NADH mRNA in muscle tissue (Figure 6(B-1,C-1)), and there was no significant difference in mRNA relative expression between bold and shy individuals (Figure 6(B-2,C-2)), indicating that energy production is not related to differences in boldness. AMPK is a key protein in the regulation of individual energy metabolism [41]. In this study, there was no significant correlation between the mRNA relative expression of AMPK and boldness (Figure 6(D-1)), nor was there a significant difference in the mRNA relative expression of AMPK between bold and shy individuals (Figure 6(D-2)), indicating that ATP production in the muscle tissue did not cause the difference in boldness. Na+/K+-ATPase is one of the important proteins involved in ion transportation, representing individual energy consumption [42]. In this study, the mRNA relative expression of Na+/K+-ATPase was significantly correlated with boldness (Figure 6(A-1)) and the mRNA relative expression in the bold individuals was significantly higher than in the shy individuals (Figure 6(A-2)), indicating that the bold individuals consumed more energy than the shy individuals. Thus, the difference in the regulation of energy metabolism between bold and shy individuals lies in energy consumption rather than energy production.
Personality differences are influenced not only by energy metabolism but also by neurotransmitters and hormones [43,44]. Studies have shown that increased 5-HT content can significantly reduce aggression in vertebrates [45] but significantly increase the heart rate, activity, and sociality of crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) [16]. In this study, the mRNA relative expression of 5-HT genes was significantly correlated with boldness (Figure 6(E-1)), and the mRNA relative expression of bold individuals was significantly higher than that of shy individuals (Figure 6(E-2)), indicating that 5-HT may significantly increase the boldness of swimming crabs. The differences in mRNA relative expression may be another cause of personality difference.

5. Conclusions

This study has demonstrated that boldness in P. trituberculatus exhibits personality stability across repeated measurements and behavioral plasticity in a dangerous situation. Individual boldness is significantly correlated with OCR, glucose concentration, and lactate concentration, and the difference in energy metabolism regulation lies in energy consumption, which may be the internal mechanism underlying differences in the boldness of swimming crabs. In addition, the relative expression of 5-HT gene mRNA may be another mechanism driving these differences. The formation and maintenance of animal personality, leading to stable behavioral and physiological differences (which is an influence factor generating variation [18]), is an important factor affecting evolution. The factors influencing animal personality are complex [15,46]. Much more research is needed to fully elucidate the mechanisms of animal personality formation, maintenance, and change.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.Z. and X.S.; methodology, W.Y.; validation, B.Z. and F.W.; investigation, X.S.; resources, W.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, B.Z.; writing—review and editing, X.S.; visualization, W.Y.; supervision, F.W.; project administration, F.W.; funding acquisition, F.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Plan, grant number 2020YFD0900203, and the Yellow River Delta Industry Leading Talents Project.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted (Animal Research and Ethics Committees of Ocean University of China (http://www.ouc.edu.cn/2022/0413/c59a367443/pagem.psp) (accessed on 25 December 2020)). Before sample collection, the crabs were placed on ice as anesthesia. No crabs were hurt in other procedures. After the experiment, the remaining crabs were supplied with a separated area, fed, and returned to the aquaculture facility at the location of collection. No licenses or permits were required for this study.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the article. Further information is available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our great appreciation to the editor and reviewers for their constructive comments on the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cabrera, D.; Nilsson, J.R.; Griffen, B.D. The development of animal personality across ontogeny: A cross-species review. Anim. Behav. 2021, 173, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Carere, C.; van Oers, K. Shy and bold great tits (Parus major): Body temperature and breath rate in response to handling stress. Physiol. Behav. 2004, 82, 905–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rudin, F.S.; Briffa, M. Is boldness a resource-holding potential trait? Fighting prowess and changes in startle response in the sea anemone, Actinia equina. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2012, 279, 1904–1910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Yang, C.; Su, X.; Liu, D.; Guo, Z.; Wang, F.; Lu, Y. A New Method of Aquatic Animal Personality Analysis Based on Machine Learning (PAML): Taking Swimming Crab Portunus trituberculatus as an Example. Front. Mari. Sci. 2020, 7, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Reaney, L.T.; Backwell, P.R.Y. Risk-taking behavior predicts aggression and mating success in a fiddler crab. Behav. Ecol. 2007, 18, 521–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Courtene-Jones, W.; Briffa, M. Boldness and asymmetric contests: Role- and outcome-dependent effects of fighting in hermit crabs. Behav. Ecol. 2014, 25, 1073–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Briffa, M.; Rundle, S.D.; Fryer, A. Comparing the strength of behavioural plasticity and consistency across situations: Animal personalities in the hermit crab Pagurus bernhardus. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2008, 275, 1305–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Vainikka, A.; Rantala, M.J.; Niemelä, P.; Hirvonen, H.; Kortet, R. Boldness as a consistent personality trait in the noble crayfish, Astacus astacus. Acta Ethol. 2010, 14, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Favreau, F.-R.; Goldizen, A.W.; Fritz, H.; Blomberg, S.P.; Best, E.C.; Pays, O. Within-population differences in personality and plasticity in the trade-off between vigilance and foraging in kangaroos. Anim. Behav. 2014, 92, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Smith, B.R.; Blumstein, D.T. Fitness consequences of personality: A meta-analysis. Behav. Ecol. 2008, 19, 448–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Le Galliard, J.-F.; Paquet, M.; Cisel, M.; Montes-Poloni, L.; Franklin, C. Personality and the pace-of-life syndrome: Variation and selection on exploration, metabolism and locomotor performances. Funct. Ecol. 2013, 27, 136–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cutts, C.J.; Adams, C.E.; Campbell, A. Stability of physiological and behavioural determinants of performance in Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2001, 58, 961–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kucharski, R.; Maleszka, J.; Foret, S.; Maleszka, R. Nutritional control of reproductive status in honeybees via DNA methylation. Science 2008, 319, 1827–1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Velando, A.; Costa, M.M.; Kim, S.-Y.; Holman, L. Sex-specific phenotypes and metabolism-related gene expression in juvenile sticklebacks. Behav. Ecol. 2017, 28, 1553–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Briffa, M.; Sneddon, L.U.; Wilson, A.J. Animal personality as a cause and consequence of contest behaviour. Biol. Lett. 2015, 11, 20141007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Listerman, L.R.; Deskins, J.; Bradacs, H.; Cooper, R.L. Heart rate within male crayfish: Social interactions and effects of 5-HT. Comp. Biochem. Phys. A 2000, 125, 251–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Su, X.; Sun, Y.; Liu, D.; Wang, F.; Liu, J.; Zhu, B. Agonistic behaviour and energy metabolism of bold and shy swimming crabs Portunus trituberculatus. J. Exp. Biol. 2019, 222, jeb188706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Wolf, M.; Weissing, F.J. Animal personalities: Consequences for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2012, 27, 452–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Coleman, K.; Wilson, D.S. Shyness and boldness in pumpkinseed sunfish: Individual differences are context-specific. Anim. Behav. 1998, 56, 927–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Hazlett, B.A. Behavioral plasticity in crustacea: Why not more? J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 1995, 193, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Belgrad, B.A.; Karan, J.; Griffen, B.D. Individual personality associated with interactions between physiological condition and the environment. Anim. Behav. 2017, 123, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Ding, S.; Wang, F.; Dong, S.; Li, Y. Comparison of the respiratory metabolism of juvenile Litopenaeus vannamei cultured in seawater and freshwater. J. Ocean Univ. China 2013, 13, 331–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ren, Q.; Pan, L. Digital gene expression analysis in the gills of the swimming crab (Portunus trituberculatus) exposed to elevated ambient ammonia-N. Aquaculture 2014, 434, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lu, Y.; Zhang, D.; Wang, F.; Dong, S. Hypothermal effects on survival, energy homeostasis and expression of energy-related genes of swimming crabs Portunus trituberculatus during air exposure. J. Therm. Biol. 2016, 60, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Xie, X.Y.; Zhang, B.; Li, J.H.; Fan, Q.X.; Zhang, Y.; Mu, D.G.; Li, W.P.; Xu, M.; Zhao, P.T.; Jin, F.G. Sodium tanshinone iia sulfonate attenuates seawater aspiration-induced acute pulmonary edema by up-regulating Na(+),K(+)-ATPase activity. Exp. Lung. Res. 2011, 37, 482–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wang, L.; Pan, L.; Ding, Y.; Ren, X. Effects of low salinity stress on immune response and evaluating indicators of the swimming crab Portunus trituberculatus. Aquac. Res. 2018, 49, 659–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chapman, B.B.; Hegg, A.; Ljungberg, P. Sex and the syndrome: Individual and population consistency in behaviour in rock pool prawn Palaemon elegans. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e59437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Briffa, M.; Twyman, C. Do I stand out or blend in? Conspicuousness awareness and consistent behavioural differences in hermit crabs. Biol. Lett. 2011, 7, 330–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Briffa, M.; Bridger, D.; Biro, P.A. How does temperature affect behaviour? Multilevel analysis of plasticity, personality and predictability in hermit crabs. Anim. Behav. 2013, 86, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Takahashi, M.; Suzuki, N.; Koga, T. Burrow defense behaviors in a sand-bubbler crab, Scopimera globosa, in relation to body size and prior residence. J. Ethol. 2001, 19, 93–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liang, Q.; Su, X.; Wang, F.; Zhu, B.; He, M. The Developmental Plasticity of Boldness and Aggressiveness in Juvenile and Adult Swimming Crab (Portunus trituberculatus). Front. Mar. Sci. 2020, 7, 1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mittelbach, G.G.; Ballew, N.G.; Kjelvik, M.K.; Fraser, D. Fish behavioral types and their ecological consequences. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2014, 71, 927–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Briffa, M.; Elwood, R.W. Use of energy reserves in fighting hermit crabs. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2004, 271, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Gribben, P.E.; O’Connor, J.; Pedini, L.; Biro, P.A. Personality and plasticity: Consistent responses within-, but not across-temperature situations in crabs. Behaviour 2013, 150, 799–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Decker, R.A.; Griffen, B.D. Correlating context-specific boldness and physiological condition of female sand fiddler crabs (Uca pugilator). J. Ethol. 2012, 30, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, S.; Fu, S.J. Effects of food availability on metabolism, behaviour, growth and their relationships in a triploid carp. J. Exp. Biol. 2018, 221, 4711–4719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Huntingford, F.A.; Andrew, G.; Mackenzie, S.; Morera, D.; Coyle, S.M.; Pilarczyk, M.; Kadri, S. Coping strategies in a strongly schooling fish, the common carp Cyprinus carpio. J. Fish. Biol. 2010, 76, 1576–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhu, B.; Wang, F.; Su, X.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, H. Effect of different amount of food and female resource on competitive strategy and agonistic behavior of swimming crab (Portunus trituberculatus). Aquaculture 2021, 536, 736471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Careau, V.; Thomas, D.; Humphries, M.M.; Re´ale, D. Energy metabolism and animal personality. Oikos 2008, 117, 641–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Iftikar, F.I.; MacDonald, J.; Hickey, A.J.R. Thermal limits of portunid crab heart mitochondria: Could more thermo-stable mitochondria advantage invasive species? J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2010, 395, 232–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Frederich, M.; O′Rourke, M.R.; Furey, N.B.; Jost, J.A. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) in the rock crab, Cancer irroratus: An early indicator of temperature stress. J. Exp. Biol. 2009, 212, 722–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Weihrauch, D.; Morris, S.; Towle, D.W. Ammonia excretion in aquatic and terrestrial crabs. J. Exp. Biol. 2004, 207, 4491–4504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Coppens, C.M.; de Boer, S.F.; Koolhaas, J.M. Coping styles and behavioural flexibility: Towards underlying mechanisms. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 2010, 365, 4021–4028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Filby, A.L.; Paull, G.C.; Hickmore, T.F.; Tyler, C.R. Unravelling the neurophysiological basis of aggression in a fish model. BMC Genom. 2010, 11, 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Saudou, F.; Amara, D.A.; Dierich, A.; LeMeur, M.; Ramboz, S.; Segu, L.; Buhot, M.-C.; Hen, R. Enhanced aggressive behavior in mice lacking 5-HT1B receptor. Science 1994, 265, 1875–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Broadhurst, H.E.; Morrell, L.J. Group size and individual ‘personality’ influence emergence times in hermit crabs. Biosci. Horiz. Int. J. Stud. Res. 2018, 11, hzy011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Observation system used to record personality behaviors. Note: (A) monitor, (B) camera, (C) observation box, (D) shelter (length × width × height: 30 × 20 × 20 cm), (E) trapdoor (length × width: 20 × 20 cm).
Figure 1. Observation system used to record personality behaviors. Note: (A) monitor, (B) camera, (C) observation box, (D) shelter (length × width × height: 30 × 20 × 20 cm), (E) trapdoor (length × width: 20 × 20 cm).
Animals 12 01618 g001
Figure 2. The result of clustering analysis based on boldness.
Figure 2. The result of clustering analysis based on boldness.
Animals 12 01618 g002
Figure 3. Differences in the results of three repeat boldness tests of swimming crabs. Note: The white line represents the median boldness within the group, and the white rectangle represents the mean boldness within the group. Different capital letters represent significant differences between groups (p < 0.05). The diamonds represent outliers in the data.
Figure 3. Differences in the results of three repeat boldness tests of swimming crabs. Note: The white line represents the median boldness within the group, and the white rectangle represents the mean boldness within the group. Different capital letters represent significant differences between groups (p < 0.05). The diamonds represent outliers in the data.
Animals 12 01618 g003
Figure 4. Correlation analysis of OCR and boldness (A) and difference in OCR between bold and shy individuals (B). Note: The white line represents the median boldness within the group, and the white rectangle represents the mean boldness within the group. Asterisk represents significant differences between groups (“*”: p < 0.05; “**”: p < 0.01). The diamonds represent outliers in the data.
Figure 4. Correlation analysis of OCR and boldness (A) and difference in OCR between bold and shy individuals (B). Note: The white line represents the median boldness within the group, and the white rectangle represents the mean boldness within the group. Asterisk represents significant differences between groups (“*”: p < 0.05; “**”: p < 0.01). The diamonds represent outliers in the data.
Animals 12 01618 g004
Figure 5. Correlation analysis between boldness and glycogen (A-1) in cheliped muscle, glucose (B-1) and lactate (C-1) in hemolymph, and the corresponding differences between bold and shy individuals (A-2,B-2,C-2). Note: The white line represents the median boldness within the group, and the white rectangle represents the mean boldness within the group. Asterisk represents significant differences between groups (“*”: p < 0.05; “**”: p < 0.01). The diamonds represent outliers in the data.
Figure 5. Correlation analysis between boldness and glycogen (A-1) in cheliped muscle, glucose (B-1) and lactate (C-1) in hemolymph, and the corresponding differences between bold and shy individuals (A-2,B-2,C-2). Note: The white line represents the median boldness within the group, and the white rectangle represents the mean boldness within the group. Asterisk represents significant differences between groups (“*”: p < 0.05; “**”: p < 0.01). The diamonds represent outliers in the data.
Animals 12 01618 g005
Figure 6. Correlation analysis between boldness and mRNA relative expression levels of Na+/K+-ATPase (A-1), NADH (B-1), CCO (C-1), AMPK (D-1), and 5-HT (E-1) in cheliped muscle, and differences in mRNA relative expression between bold and shy individuals (A-2,B-2,C-2,D-2,E-2). Note: The white line represents the median boldness within the group, and the white rectangle represents the mean boldness within the group. Asterisk represents significant differences between groups (“*”: p < 0.05; “**”: p < 0.01). The diamonds represent outliers in the data.
Figure 6. Correlation analysis between boldness and mRNA relative expression levels of Na+/K+-ATPase (A-1), NADH (B-1), CCO (C-1), AMPK (D-1), and 5-HT (E-1) in cheliped muscle, and differences in mRNA relative expression between bold and shy individuals (A-2,B-2,C-2,D-2,E-2). Note: The white line represents the median boldness within the group, and the white rectangle represents the mean boldness within the group. Asterisk represents significant differences between groups (“*”: p < 0.05; “**”: p < 0.01). The diamonds represent outliers in the data.
Animals 12 01618 g006aAnimals 12 01618 g006b
Table 1. Sequences of specific primers.
Table 1. Sequences of specific primers.
GenesPrimer Sequence
CCOForward5′-GGCTACCAGCAGTGACA-3′
Reverse5′-ATGGCTGCCTCTCTCACCT-3′
NADH-QRForward5′-CAATCATCGCACAGGAGAG-3′
Reverse5′-CCAGACGCTGTCGTTTCAA-3′
Na+/K+-ATPaseForward5′-TACAAGAACGGAGACAACGA-3′
Reverse5′-TCAAGCGACACACTTTCCTCT-3′
AMPKαForward5′-5GCAATAGCAGGCGTACAACA-3′
Reverse5′-CTTCTGCCCTTTGATGATGAG-3′
5-Hydroxytryptamine receptor 1Forward5’-TGTTAGCATTGCCCAGGT-3′
Reverse5′-AGTCTCTATCCCGAGGTTCTAC-3′
β-actinForward5′-TGCTGTCCTTGTACGCCTCC-3′
Reverse5′-CAGACGCAGGATAGCGTGA-3′
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhu, B.; Su, X.; Yu, W.; Wang, F. What Forms, Maintains, and Changes the Boldness of Swimming Crabs (Portunus trituberculatus)? Animals 2022, 12, 1618. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12131618

AMA Style

Zhu B, Su X, Yu W, Wang F. What Forms, Maintains, and Changes the Boldness of Swimming Crabs (Portunus trituberculatus)? Animals. 2022; 12(13):1618. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12131618

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhu, Boshan, Xianpeng Su, Weiping Yu, and Fang Wang. 2022. "What Forms, Maintains, and Changes the Boldness of Swimming Crabs (Portunus trituberculatus)?" Animals 12, no. 13: 1618. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12131618

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop