Native Sheep Breeds in Poland—Importance and Outcomes of Genetic Resources Protection Programmes
Abstract
:Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Global Sheep Genetic Resources
3. Programmes for the Conservation of Genetic Resources of Farm Animals in Poland
4. Polish Native Sheep Breeds
5. Financial Support for Actions Related to the Conservation of Genetic Resources
6. Activities Performed as Part of the Coordination of Protection Programmes
- -
- selection of sheep breeds for the conservation programme when it is necessary to include an endangered breed
- -
- selection for the purpose of the conservation programme of animals and flocks when new breeds are introduced
- -
- drawing up complete documentation necessary for the implementation of measures under the programme, procedures, sample documents to be submitted by recipients under farm and environment programmes
- -
- maintenance and management of a database on national genetic resources of sheep
- -
- maintaining a website devoted to the implementation of sheep and goat genetic resources protection programmes (Figure 2)
- -
- updating data on Polish sheep and goat breeding in the European Farm Animal Biodiversity Information System (EFABIS) (Figure 2)
- -
- cooperation with FAO and other international organisations on the implementation of the World Action Plan for Animal Genetic Resources
- -
- activities related to the popularisation of native sheep breeds through publication of scientific research results on native sheep breeds, organisation of national and regional exhibitions of native animal breeds, symposia, trainings, and scientific conferences.
- -
- research: the currently conducted scientific research concerns the characteristics of the quality of products from native breeds of sheep in terms of nutritional and health-promoting values, their use in maintaining the biodiversity of naturally valuable areas, as well as the assessment of genetic variability of the population with the use of modern molecular biology tools
- -
- projects: the research project “BIOSTRATEG—The directions of use and the conservation of farm animal genetic resources under sustainable development” carried out in the recent period at the NRIAP. It was an interdisciplinary concept of comprehensive research related to the protection and the use of the potential of native animal breeds, including sheep, in low-input production systems, paying particular attention to the dietary and health-promoting properties of products and the development of naturally valuable areas. The impact of animal, biotechnological, and economic sciences on the socio-economic and natural environment by enabling the use of the latest technologies and solutions for the protection of animal genetic resources in order to optimally use their production potential
7. Results of Sheep Protection Programmes Implementation
7.1. Increase in Population Size
7.2. Associated Actions
7.2.1. Ecosystem Services
7.2.2. Culture-Forming Functions
7.2.3. Development of the Traditional Products Market
7.2.4. “Native Breed” Certification
7.2.5. Farm Tourism and Other Forms of Local Entrepreneurship
7.3. Increase in Public Awareness
8. Vulnerability of Native Sheep Breeds
9. Conclusions and Perspectives
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zeder, A. Domestication and early agriculture in the Mediterranean Basin: Origins, diffusion, and impact. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 33, 11597–11604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Scherf, B.D. World Watch List for Domestic Animal Diversity, 3rd ed.; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2000; Available online: https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=XF9660113 (accessed on 15 July 2020).
- FAO. Status and Trends of Animal Genetic Resources. 2018. Available online: https://www.fao.org/animal-genetics/breed-database/dad-is/en/2019,CGRFA/WG-AnGR-10/18/Inf.3 (accessed on 1 March 2022).
- Kawęcka, A.; Gurgul, A.; Miksza-Cybulska, A. The use of SNP microarrays for biodiversity studies of sheep. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2016, 4, 975–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Duchev, Z. New Breed Classification System. The New Interface and the Status of Implementation. In Proceedings of the ERFP WG Documentation and Information Meeting, Thessaloniki, Greece, 5–6 March 2014; Available online: https://www.rfp-europe.org/fileadmin/SITE_ERFP/WG_Docu/new_breeds_class.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2022).
- Krupiński, J.; Polak, G. Conservation of livestock biodiversity in conditions of sustainable agriculture. Przegl. Hod. 2018, 5, 5–8. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Krupiński, J. Protection of genetic resources of farm animals in Poland. Wiad. Zoot. 2008, 1, 1–10. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Krupiński, J.; Martyniuk, E.; Krawczyk, J.; Baran, J.; Bielański, P.; Bobak, L.; Calik, J.; Chełmińska, A.; Kawęcka, A.; Kowalska, D.; et al. 15th anniversary of coordination of animal genetic resources conservation programmes at the National Research Institute of Animal Production. Przegl. Hod. 2017, 4, 30–36. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Martyniuk, E.; Chełmińska, A.; Krupiński, J.; Pasternak, M. Implementation of National Strategy: Actors and action. Przegl. Hod. 2017, 4, 36–43. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Kawęcka, A.; Krupiński, J. Sheep in the Polish Carpathians: Genetic resources conservation of the Podhale Zackel and Coloured Mountain Sheep. Geomat. Landmanagement Landsc. 2014, 1, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sikora, J.; Kawęcka, A.; Puchała, M.; Obrzut, J.; Miksza-Cybulska, A.; Krupiński, J. Current state of breeding the sheep participating in the genetic resources conservation programme. Wiad. Zoot. 2015, 4, 70–75. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Sikora, J.; Kawęcka, A.; Pasternak, M.; Puchała, M. Dynamics of breeding native breeds of sheep in the years 2008–2016. Wiad. Zoot. 2018, 4, 159–165. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Krupiński, J.; Martyniuk, E.; Pasternak, M.; Chełmińska, A. Implementation of the National Strategy for the sustainable use and conservation of livestock genetic resources: Achievements and challenges. Przegl. Hod. 2018, 4, 29–31. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Journal of Laws of 2021 Item 36. The Act of December 10, 2020 on the Organization of Breeding and Reproduction of Farm Animals. Available online: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20210000036/O/D20210036.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2022).
- Polish Union of Sheep Producers (PSBU) Data: 2006. 2021. Available online: http://www.pzow.pl/ (accessed on 1 March 2022).
- National Research Institute of Animal Production (NRIAP) Data: 2006, 2021. Available online: http://owce.bioroznorodnosc.izoo.krakow.pl/ (accessed on 1 March 2022).
- Kawęcka, A.; Radkowska, I.; Szewczyk, M.; Radkowski, A. Cultural sheep grazing in conservation of valuable plant communities using the example of the hala majerz. Wiad. Zoot. 2017, 5, 189–197. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Kawęcka, A.; Pasternak, M.; Słoniewska, D.; Miksza-Cybulska, A.; Bagnicka, E. Quality of mountain sheep milk used for the production of traditional cheeses. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2020, 1, 299–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kawęcka, A.; Radkowska, I.; Sikora, J. Concentratıons of selected bıoactıve components ın tradıtıonal cheeses made from goat, cow and sheep’s mılk. J. Elem. 2020, 25, 431–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kawęcka, A.; Pasternak, M. Nutritional value of żentyca, a traditional Polish sheep whey product—Preliminary results. J. Elem. 2020, 25, 1509–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kawęcka, A.; Pasternak, M. Nutritional and dietetic quality of milk and traditional cheese made from the milk of native breeds of sheep and goats. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2022, 50, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kawęcka, A.; Sikora, J.; Gąsior, R.; Puchała, M.; Wojtycza, K. Comparison of carcass and meat quality traits of the native Polish Heath lambs and the Carpathian kids. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2022, 50, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radomski, P.; Moskała, P.; Krupiński, J. Certification and promotion of products as a chance for the development of farms, which keep native breeds of farm animals. In Book of Abstracts of the 70th Annual Meeting of the European Federation of Animal Science; Wageningen Academic Publishers: Ghent, Belgium, 2019; p. 119. [Google Scholar]
- Paraponiak, P.; Pietruczuk, U. Keeping conservation breed sheep in organic and agritourism farms. Wiad. Zoot. 2011, 1, 11–146. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Chełmińska, A.; Radomski, P.; Mikosz, P.; Moskała, P. Exhibitions of native breeds of farm animals in the activities of the National Rural Network of RDP for 2007–2013. Wiad. Zoot. 2015, 1, 163–169. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- European Commission Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006 of 15 December 2006 Laying Down Detailed Rules for the Application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 on Support for Rural Development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD). Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex:32006R1974 (accessed on 1 March 2022).
- Gandini, G.; Ollivier, L.; Danell, B.; Distl, O.; Georgudis, A.; Groeneveld, E.; Martyniuk, E.; van Arendonk, J.; Woolliams, J. Criteria to assess the degree of endangerment of livestockbreeds in Europe. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2005, 91, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alderson, L. Breeds at Risk. Criteria and Classification. In Proceedings of the Joint ERFP/RBI/RBST Workshop, London, UK, 16–17 February 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Polak, G.; Krupiński, J.; Martyniuk, E.; Calik, J.; Kawęcka, A.; Krawczyk, J.; Majewska, A.; Sikora, J.; Sosin-Bzducha, E.; Szyndler Nędza, M.; et al. The risk status of polish local breeds under conservation programmes—New approach. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2021, 1, 125–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Breed | Population Size | % in the Program | Utility Type 1 | Body Weight (kg) | Wool Type 2 | Prolificacy (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sheep with mixed wool | ||||||
Coloured Mountain Sheep (POG B) | 2670 | 80.52 | multi-purpose * | ♂ 55 ♀ 45 | coarse | 125–130 |
Podhale Zackel (CP) | 9434 | 84.40 | multi-purpose | ♂ 65 ♀ 45 | coarse | 125–130 |
Polish Mountain Sheep (POG) | 550 | 62 | multi-purpose | ♂ 65 ♀ 45 | coarse | 125–130 |
Wrzosówka (WRZ) | 9584 | 86.85 | sheepskin | ♂ 40 ♀ 32 | coarse | ≥150 |
Świniarka (ŚW) | 2805 | 79.43 | general-purpose | ♂ 40–50 ♀25–35 | coarse | 120 |
Long-wool sheep | ||||||
Kamieniecka (KAM) | 6437 | 87.93 | dual-purpose ** | ♂ 90–110 ♀ 60–70 | fine | 140 |
Olkuska (OLK) | 1520 | 77.96 | prolificacy | ♂ 50 ♀ 45 | fine | ≥ 180 |
Pomeranian (POM) | 8946 | 91.99 | dual-purpose | ♂ 80–110 ♀ 65–75 | fine | 140 |
Polish Pogórza sheep (PG) | 2090 | 74.59 | dual-purpose | ♂ 70–90 ♀ 55–60 | fine | 130 |
Lowland sheep | ||||||
Wielkopolska (WLKP) | 9750 | 80.69 | dual-purpose | ♂ 100–120 ♀ 65–75 | fine | 140 |
Żelaźnieńska (ŻEL) | 2500 | 78.84 | dual-purpose | ♂ 100–115 ♀ 55–65 | fine | 170 |
Corriedale (KOR) | 2306 | 82.57 | dual-purpose | ♂ 100–130 ♀ 65–90 | fine | 130 |
Uhruska (UHR) | 8441 | 88.67 | dual-purpose | ♂ 95–110 ♀ 55–80 | fine | 150 |
Merino sheep | ||||||
Old-type Polish Merino (MST) | 9336 | 81.82 | dual-purpose | ♂ 90–100 ♀ 60–70 | fine | ≥ 125 |
Coloured Merino (MB) | 926 | 85.21 | dual-purpose | ♂ 80–100 ♀ 55–65 | fine | 135 |
Meat sheep | ||||||
Black-headed (CZG) | 4384 | 79.54 | meat | ♂ 90–110 ♀ 65–80 | fine | 120–140 |
White-headed meat sheep (BOM) | 1200 | 70.33 | meat | ♂ 110–130 ♀ 70–80 | fine | 150 |
Product | Class | Data Registration in EU |
---|---|---|
Bryndza Podhalańska | 1.3.—Cheeses | PDO, 12 June 2007 |
Oscypek | 1.3.—Cheeses | PDO, 14 February 2008 |
Redykołka | 1.3.—Cheeses | PDO, 1 December 2009 |
Jagnięcina Podhalańska | 1.1. Fresh meat and offal | PGI, 9 October 2012 |
Breed | Total Score (Points) | Risk Status |
---|---|---|
Pomeranian | 2.6 | EM * |
Podhale Zackel | 2.5 | EM |
Old-type Polish Merino | 2.4 | EM |
Uhruska | 2.3 | EM |
Wielkopolska | 2.2 | EM |
Wrzosówka | 2.2 | EM |
Żelaźnieńska | 1.9 | E ** |
Black-headed | 1.9 | E |
Kamieniecka | 1.9 | E |
Corriedale | 1.8 | E |
Olkuska | 1.8 | E |
Świniarka | 1.8 | E |
Coloured Mountain Sheep | 1.8 | E |
Polish Pogórza sheep | 1.6 | E |
Coloured Merino | 1.3 | E |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kawęcka, A.; Pasternak, M.; Miksza-Cybulska, A.; Puchała, M. Native Sheep Breeds in Poland—Importance and Outcomes of Genetic Resources Protection Programmes. Animals 2022, 12, 1510. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12121510
Kawęcka A, Pasternak M, Miksza-Cybulska A, Puchała M. Native Sheep Breeds in Poland—Importance and Outcomes of Genetic Resources Protection Programmes. Animals. 2022; 12(12):1510. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12121510
Chicago/Turabian StyleKawęcka, Aldona, Marta Pasternak, Anna Miksza-Cybulska, and Michał Puchała. 2022. "Native Sheep Breeds in Poland—Importance and Outcomes of Genetic Resources Protection Programmes" Animals 12, no. 12: 1510. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12121510
APA StyleKawęcka, A., Pasternak, M., Miksza-Cybulska, A., & Puchała, M. (2022). Native Sheep Breeds in Poland—Importance and Outcomes of Genetic Resources Protection Programmes. Animals, 12(12), 1510. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12121510