Next Article in Journal
Co-Occurrence of Domestic Dogs and Gastropod Molluscs in Public Dog-Walking Spaces and Implications for Infection with Angiostrongylus vasorum: A Preliminary Study
Previous Article in Journal
The Relationship between Animal Welfare and Antimicrobial Use in Italian Dairy Farms
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Dog–Owner Relationship: Refinement and Validation of the Italian C/DORS for Dog Owners and Correlation with the LAPS
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 11
Issue 9
10.3390/ani11092576
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

The Research of Standardized Protocols for Dog Involvement in Animal-Assisted Therapy: A Systematic Review

by
Antonio Santaniello
1,*,
Susanne Garzillo
1,
Serena Cristiano
2,
Alessandro Fioretti
1 and
Lucia Francesca Menna
1,*
1
Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Productions, University of Naples Federico II, 80134 Naples, Italy
2
SInAPSi Center, University of Naples Federico II, 80133 Naples, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2021, 11(9), 2576; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092576
Submission received: 12 August 2021 / Revised: 26 August 2021 / Accepted: 30 August 2021 / Published: 2 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into the Physiological and Ethological Dimensions of Human-Animal Interactions)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Animal-assisted therapies (AATs), as discussed in this review, are structured interventions, involving pets, for patients suffering from different diseases. Although many studies have highlighted the beneficial effects of these interventions on the well-being and health of the humans given the dogs, there are few studies that highlight the involved dogs themselves. Therefore, in this study, we carried out a systematic review to investigate the characteristics of the dogs involved in AATs. Based on the results, in most papers, there is a lack of general information on the dog(s) involved, including the methods used to choose and train the dog and the animal’s health status. These results highlight the need for standardized, specific methods to choose and train the dog and also suggest the need for univocal health protocols to ensure the animal’s welfare, as well as the final results of the therapeutic intervention.

Abstract

Dogs are considered the most important species involved in animal-assisted therapy (AAT), and the scientific literature focuses on the benefits linked to the involvement of dogs in various therapeutic areas. In this study, we carried out a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, exploring the scientific literature from the last 5 years (2016–2021) on three databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) to highlight the characteristics of the dogs involved in AATs. Based on the scientific literature relevant to such dogs, we considered different parameters (i.e., number, age, sex, breed, temperament, methods of choice and training, health status, research goals, and activities with dogs) to include studies in our paper. After screening 4331 papers identified on the searched databases, we selected 38 articles that met the inclusion criteria. Analysis of the included articles showed that the characteristics of the dogs were neglected. Our findings indicated a lack of information about the dogs, as well as the absence of standardized and univocal criteria for dog selection, training programs, and health protocols.

1. Introduction

According to some archaeological evidence, the domestication of dogs took place more than 30,000 years ago and was fundamental for the evolution of humans [1]. The dog was the first species to be domesticated. This domestication process was born from an extraordinary event in which suitable ecological conditions allowed the coexistence and, therefore, the formation of a relationship between human and dog. The coevolution between human and dog has created a unique interspecific relationship that has spread across cultures around the world and has survived by changing over the years [2]. Dogs were selected to cooperate with humans through domestication and, thus, evolved some genetic predispositions that allowed them to develop skills shared with humans [3,4,5], representing a case of convergent evolution between two species [6]. Dogs have various interspecific abilities due to their ability to read behavior and understand human communication. Dogs pay attention to social signals, can respond appropriately to human facial expressions [7], and are able to look at a human face and follow that person’s gaze [8]. In particular, dogs can extract and integrate emotional information and discriminate between positive and negative human emotions [9], as well as recognize the vocalizations of emotions felt by people [10]. One of the greatest skills of dogs is their ability to read the non-verbal language of humans [11]. This strong interspecific bond has been demonstrated by studies on attachment between dogs and humans. The close behavioral correspondence between dogs and human is widely recognized and gives the animals the necessary fundamental bonds of attachment to form a relationship [12,13]. These social skills have made it possible to involve dogs as valid co-therapists in AAT. Indeed, the dog is the main species involved in the scientific literature on AAT [14,15,16].
As reported by the International Association of Human-Animal Interaction (IAHAIO) White paper [17] regarding the field of animal-assisted interventions (IAAs), AATs are structured therapeutic interventions directed and/or provided by health, education, and/or human service professionals [17].
AATs represent an adequate expression of integrated medicine according to the One-Health approach. According to the 12 Manhattan Principles, recognizing the link between human beings and animals will help safeguard and improve the health of the community. Using this approach, we consider a zooanthropological vision of healthcare that studies and applies an interspecific relationship between humans and animals in both healthcare/therapeutic and educational contexts.
Current theories concerning the mechanisms responsible for the therapeutic benefits of AATs agree on the idea that animals possess unique qualities that can facilitate and contribute to the success of a therapy [18]. Furthermore, developing a relationship with an animal in therapy can lead to positive changes in cognition and behavior through the acquisition of new skills, as well as the acceptance of personal actions and responsibilities [16,19]. The current research regarding the effects of AATs has primarily addressed human health outcomes. The therapeutic benefits are both physiological (i.e., a reduction in stress, heart rate, etc.) and psychological (i.e., treatment of post-traumatic stress) [20]. Most studies focused on the benefits that a therapy dog can provide in different areas, such as autism spectrum disorder [21,22], stress [23,24], Alzheimer’s disease [25], the school environment [26,27], rehabilitation [28,29], the hospital environment [30,31], and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) [32,33].
As the dog is the focus of AAT interventions, scientific studies should not ignore, in particular in materials and methods, defining and/or declaring the characteristics of the dog involved (age, sex, breed, temperament, tests for the choice, health, and behavioural check), since they influence the progress and the effects of such interventions [15,16,18,19,20]. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to outline the characteristics of dogs involved in AAT by highlighting the information reported by relevant scientific literature over the last 5 years.

2. Materials and Methods

This review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) [34] using the following steps: (1) preparation of a database search to detect potentially related articles, (2) assessment of the relevance of papers, (3) the evaluation of eligibility, and (4) data extraction.

2.1. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

In this Systematic Review, although we also explored the possibility of a grey-literature search, only original English studies (published or in press) were included, while reviews, meta-analyses, retrospective studies, case reports, commentaries, notes, and letters to the editor were excluded.
Moreover, only papers published during the last 5 years (from 2016 until 31 May 2021) were selected to ensure a more complete overview of the recent scientific literature.
Only articles reporting on therapeutic interventions with dogs (AAT) were included, while studies concerning other types of AAIs (e.g., animal-assisted activity and animal-assisted education) were excluded.

2.2. Search Strategy and Data Sources

In our study, published scientific literature was selected by searching three electronic scientific databases: PubMed [35], Scopus [36], and Web of Science [37].
The systematic search was performed by two researchers (S.G. and S.C.) independently using the following strings: “Animal-Assisted Therapy” and “dog”, “Dog-therapy”, “Dog-assisted therapy”, “Canine-assisted therapy”, and “Canine-assisted psychotherapy”. All terms were selected based on international reference guidelines [17,38].
Other related papers, including references from the selected papers, were revised and used as sources of supplementary information.

2.3. Study Selection and Data Extraction

The relevant information was extracted from each paper included in this systematic review to achieve our stated goal. All data were entered into an Excel data set. We included data related to the characteristics of the dogs (i.e., number, age, sex, and breed), whether the dog was handled or owned, methods for choosing the dog, the temperament and training of the dog, and the health and behavioral status of the dog. Additional data were extracted to facilitate identification of each study (i.e., first name and year of publication).
The search query identified 114 articles (69 in PubMed, 32 in Scopus, and 13 on the Web of Science). After evaluating the titles and abstracts of all articles, we selected the papers; after removing irrelevant and duplicate papers, only papers published in journals indexed on the Pubmed [35], Scopus [36], and Web of Science [37] were included. Ultimately, a total of 38 papers met the inclusion criteria. Figure 1 illustrates the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flow-chart process [34] for study selection.
The inter-judge agreement was calculated (and independently identified by two judges) as a measure of reliability and assessed by Cohen’s kappa. The minimum reliability value was ≥0.81, indicating strong agreement between the judges. Every disagreement was solved through intervention of the senior author (A.S.).

3. Results

The preliminary database search returned a total of 4331 documents. After removing the duplicates and irrelevant results, 114 articles were obtained for the complete revision of the full text. Following the final evaluation, 38 articles were included in the systematic review. The results are shown in three tables. Table 1 includes the general characteristics of the dogs. Table 2 contains information regarding the research goals and activities with the dogs. Table 3 provides the selection, training methods, and information about the health status of the dogs, including whether or not the dog belonged to the handler.
An overview of the results is presented in the following histogram chart (Figure 2).

3.1. General Information on Dogs

Two articles were published in 2021 [39,40], 9 studies were published in 2020 [41,49], 15 were published in 2019 [50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64], 3 were published in 2018 [65,66,67], 6 were published in 2017 [68,69,70,71,72,73], and 3 were published in 2016 [74,75,76]. Between 1 and 17 dogs were included in the studies. Nine studies did not specify the number of dogs [40,42,51,55,67,70,72,73,75]. The ages of the dogs ranged between 18 months and 13 years. Eight studies worked with dogs ranging from 1 to 5 years of age [41,43,44,50,55,57,59,61,66], and three studies worked with dogs 5 years or older [53,58,76]. Two studies, on the other hand, involved dogs with a wider age range (from 2 to 10 years [63], and 4, 6, and 8 years [65]). Two studies did not specify the age in years but only that the dogs were adults [47,72]. The remaining 20 articles did not indicate the dog’s age. Six studies included dogs of both sexes [39,47,55,59,61,65]. In two studies, all dogs were male [44,52], and in eight studies, all dogs were female [41,43,50,53,57,58,66,76]. The remaining 22 studies did not specify the sex of the dog. The breeds predominantly found in the results were Retrievers (Labrador, Golden, and Labradoodle), individually or together. The remaining studies worked with high breeds or crosses. Ten studies did not specify the breed of the dog [39,42,49,60,68,69,70,72,74,75].

3.2. Research Goals and Activities with Dog

In the AAT activity reports, almost all the works described the activities carried out with the dog; only one study did not release any information [40]. The sessions described had a duration between 10 min and 1 h. Activities included social [56], physical [39,55,59,60,62,66], and free [42,43,48,49,51,57,64,68,73] interactions; activities of rehabilitation [46,76]; psychomotor activities; and socialization [52]. Other activities included grooming, feeding, and stroking [54,58,61,67,70,75]; playing with the dog; and engaging in obedience exercises [45,50,65,72,74,75]. In one study, children read in the company of the dog [47]. Finally, in most studies, the role of the dog was focused on reducing anxiety and stress and improving mood. In four studies, the dogs worked with autistic patients [41,48,60], and in one study, the dogs also worked with Down-syndrome patients [52]. Four papers focused on the elderly to improve the physiological parameters of heart disease [66], Alzheimer’s disease [62], the perception of pain in geriatrics [59], and cognitive functions among patients with dementia [60]. In two papers, the dogs supported patients with oncological diseases [67,70]. Three studies carried out psychological rehabilitation [46] with inmates [72] and schizophrenia [74]. Other work focused on improving communication and social skills [44,45,47,49,51,63,76]. Finally, one study explored the use of support dogs during dental sessions [61].

3.3. Methods for Choosing the Dog, Dog Temperament, Dog Training, and Health Status (i.e., Behavioral Veterinary Medical Examination and Health Protocols) of Dogs

As a method for choosing the dog, five papers used test administration [41,44,51,65,72], while three papers evaluated AAT certifications [50,53,56]. Seven studies evaluated accredited programs as a method of inclusion [39,40,43,61,69,73,76]. All other studies did not include this information. To validate the dog’s temperament, most studies tested docility, socialization, or type of training. Thirty-two papers did not report any information on the temperament of the dogs. For training, almost all papers reported membership in accredited associations or programs as the source of dog training, but the type of training was rarely mentioned. Nine papers did not offer any information on the type of dog training [45,47,52,57,58,61,69,70,74]. Furthermore, dogs were examined by a behavioral veterinarian in only seven studies [41,44,63,67,72,74,76]. In terms of health protocols, almost all the reviewed works applied vaccinations and parasitic treatments. In 19 studies, no information on health protocols was provided.
Finally, in only three studies [55,70,76] was the dog handler also the owner. In most of the studies, whoever worked with the dog was only a handler, or it was not specified whether the handler was also the owner of the dog. The remaining 12 studies did not include this information.

4. Discussion

Dogs are some of the most frequently involved animals in AATs due to their long history of coevolution with humans and their numerous beneficial effects, which have been widely described in the literature [14,15,16].
However, although studies on dogs are numerous, many important aspects remain overlooked [20]. In most of the selected articles, there was often a lack of information regarding the general characteristics of the dog, such as the number of dogs involved in the AAT, as well as the age, sex, and breed of each dog. This is probably because other aspects of research are given importance, while the dogs have been overlooked while representing an integral and fundamental part of the AAT’s team [14,15,16]. In particular, data on the dog’s temperament are presented in very few studies [45,49,50,52,59,63,65,68,73], thereby neglecting the importance of who the dog is; in this way, the dog’s vision as the “other”, a unique subject with its own personality, is lost. The methods used to select dogs are also not exhaustively presented. Accredited methods of selection are rarely mentioned. Some works cited various tests carried out [44,51,65,76], others cited certifications [41,43,50,53,56,61], and others cited self-contained training programs [39,69]. This vast heterogeneity in choice protocols is linked to the lack of univocal tests to select a dog most suitable for a certain type of AAT and the overall lack of standardized selection criteria for the dogs involved. Furthermore, most of the works limited themselves to only mentioning the names of accredited associations or programs without describing the training methods of the dogs in detail. This result indicates a lack of unique educational training programs among the dogs involved.
In terms of the relationship between dog and handler [11,16,77], based on our results, the handler was reported to be the owner of the dog in very few studies [55,70,76], while most of the remaining studies did not specify whether the handler was also the owner of the dog. This is a very important aspect, as the relational dimension is essential for an effective intervention [16,77,78,79]. Furthermore, it was previously shown that the relational factors between dogs and owners influence the performance of the dog [78]. As other studies already reported, good attachment and a harmonious relationship between dog and owner can increase safety, reduce stress factors in the dog, and improve the dog’s performance [79]. Therefore, an interspecific relationship in an AAT can positively affect the final results of the intervention [80]. An equally important aspect that was neglected in the analyzed works concerns the applied health protocols. Few studies preventively examined dogs using a behavioral veterinarian, the only professional figure able to certify the suitability of a dog with respect to the absence of behavioral diseases [41,44,49,63,67,72,74,76]. This aspect is of fundamental importance for the safety of users involved in AAT to prevent zoonotic risks [81,82,83]. In addition, in some studies, the health protocols used to ensure the safety of the setting and the users/patients involved in the interventions were not mentioned or specified [40,42,43,45,47,48,49,50,52,55,56,57,59,60,64,65,66,71,74,75]. This result indicates the absence of standardized reference health protocols, which could yield dangerous consequences linked to zoonotic risks, especially since AATs are often given to immunosuppressed patients [84,85,86,87].
In terms of the types of activities carried out by the dogs during AATs, our results are in accordance with previous research findings [88], which highlighted the limitations of current studies due to a lack of information on the welfare indicators of dogs—particularly how different interventions (in terms of duration and frequency), the environmental factors of the setting, human manipulation, animal characteristics, etc. can influence these indicators. We also noted the physiological and behavioral variations that can occur in response to the actions of the handler or the patient, suggesting that we should measure the personality and stress levels not only of the dogs but also of the people involved, which represents a potential area of future research on interspecific relationships.
Therefore, we strongly suggest a greater awareness of scholars on the need to investigate on welfare, considering not only stress parameters, but also the pleasure indicators of dog during an AAT intervention.
In today’s society, dogs are recognized as sentient beings, as they are endowed with their own personalities [89,90] and emotions [91]. The data reported by Horowitz [89]—similar to the data reported in the present review—underline that in human–animal interactions, dogs are strongly neglected; however, since dogs are now considered to be sentient beings, their roles must be more seriously considered.

Limitations

This study has several limitations. The heterogeneity of the data collected in this systematic review did not allow for adequate statistical evaluation of the different characteristics analyzed in each paper, as the examined data did not refer to universally shared protocols. Moreover, certain characteristics were not always presented or described. However, these data can be considered an important index of the heterogeneity that characterizes the scientific literature related to the characteristics and roles of dogs in AATs. Furthermore, these characteristics reinforce the need to develop and disseminate general protocols to facilitate the use of globally recognized tools and allow, at the same time, a greater focus on the dog.

5. Conclusions

Based on our results, the characteristics of the dogs involved in therapy are rarely considered, as such factors were neither described nor investigated in detail in most of the reviewed studies. With a contemporary and scientifically validated understanding of dogs as sentient beings, species characteristics and dog individuality must be seriously considered. Our results show that the parameters most requiring in-depth analyses are related to the choice, temperament, and training of the dog and health protocols. Furthermore, greater attention should be given to interspecific relationships and the factors that influence them, as well as the interspecific relational skills of each individually chosen animal and its relationship with the owner, such as attachment styles and relational reciprocity between the animals, patients, and members of the working group. All these factors will affect the animal’s welfare, the safety of the therapeutic setting, and achievement of the study’s goals. The strength of these therapies lies in the involvement of dogs, which offers its own languages and abilities that determine activation of the emotional, cognitive, and behavioral dynamics responsible for the various positive effects observed in previous studies. Therefore, it is necessary to implement standardized and univocal protocols that emphasize the role of the dog and facilitate a paradigm change capable of underscoring the importance of and respect for the individuality of each dog, not only the benefits the dog can bring.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S. and L.F.M.; methodology, A.S., S.G. and S.C.; data curation, A.S.; writing—original draft preparation, S.G. and S.C.; writing—review and editing, A.S., A.F. and L.F.M.; supervision, L.F.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon request to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, G.-D.; Zhai, W.; Yang, H.-C.; Wang, L.; Zhong, L.; Liu, Y.-H.; Fan, R.-X.; Yin, T.-T.; Zhu, C.-L.; Poyarkov, A.D.; et al. Out of southern East Asia: The natural history of domestic dogs across the world. Cell Res. 2015, 26, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Serpell, J.A. Commensalism or Cross-Species Adoption? A Critical Review of Theories of Wolf Domestication. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hare, B.; Brown, M.; Williamson, C.; Tomasello, M. The Domestication of Social Cognition in Dogs. Science 2002, 298, 1634–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Topál, J.; Gergely, G.; Erdőhegyi, A.; Csibra, G.; Miklosi, A. Differential Sensitivity to Human Communication in Dogs, Wolves, and Human Infants. Science 2009, 325, 1269–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Miklósi, A.; Topál, J. What does it take to become ‘best friends’? Evolutionary changes in canine social competence. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2013, 17, 287–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hare, B.; Tomasello, M. Human-like social skills in dogs? Trends Cogn. Sci. 2005, 9, 439–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Nagasawa, M.; Murai, K.; Mogi, K.; Kikusui, T. Dogs can discriminate human smiling faces from blank expressions. Anim. Cogn. 2011, 14, 525–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Miklósi, A.; Kubinyi, E.; Topál, J.; Gácsi, M.; Virányi, Z.; Csányi, V. A Simple Reason for a Big Difference: Wolves Do Not Look Back at Humans, but Dogs Do. Curr. Biol. 2003, 13, 763–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Albuquerque, N.; Guo, K.; Wilkinson, A.; Savalli, C.; Otta, E.; Mills, D. Dogs recognize dog and human emotions. Biol. Lett. 2016, 12, 20150883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Andics, A.; Miklósi, A. Neural processes of vocal social perception: Dog-human comparative fMRI studies. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2018, 85, 54–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Meyer, I.; Forkman, B. Nonverbal Communication and Human–Dog Interaction. Anthrozoös 2014, 27, 553–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Prato-Previde, E.; Nicotra, V.; Fusar Poli, S.; Pelosi, A.; Valsecchi, P. Do dogs exhibit jealous behaviors when their owner attends to their companion dog? Anim. Cogn. 2018, 21, 703–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Prato-Previde, E.; Nicotra, V.; Pelosi, A.; Valsecchi, P. Pet dogs’ behavior when the owner and an unfamiliar person attend to a faux rival. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0194577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Bert, F.; Gualano, M.R.; Camussi, E.; Pieve, G.; Voglino, G.; Siliquini, R. Animal assisted intervention: A systematic review of benefits and risks. Eur. J. Integr. Med. 2016, 8, 695–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Santaniello, A.; Dicé, F.; Carratú, R.C.; Amato, A.; Fioretti, A.; Menna, L.F. Methodological and Terminological Issues in Animal-Assisted Interventions: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews. Animals 2020, 10, 759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Menna, L.F.; Santaniello, A.; Todisco, M.; Amato, A.; Borrelli, L.; Scandurra, C.; Fioretti, A. The Human–Animal Relationship as the Focus of Animal-Assisted Interventions: A One Health Approach. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. International Association of Human Animal Interaction Organizations (IAHAIO) IAHAIO White Paper 2018, Updated for The IAHAIO Definitions for Animal Assisted Intervention and Guidelines for Wellness of Animals Involved in AAI. Available online: https://iahaio.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/iahaio-white-paper-2018-english.pdf (accessed on 29 March 2021).
  18. Kruger, K.A.; Serpell, J.A. Animal-assisted interventions in mental health: Definitions and Theoretical Foundations. In Handbook on Animal-Assisted Therapy; Fine, A.H., Ed.; Academic Press: Boston, MA, USA, 2010; pp. 33–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Menna, L.F. The scientific approach to Pet therapy. In The Method and Training According to the Federiciano Model, 1st ed.; University of Naples Federico II: Napoli, Italy, 2018; ISBN 979-12-200-3991-8. [Google Scholar]
  20. Glenk, L.M. Current Perspectives on Therapy Dog Welfare in Animal-Assisted Interventions. Animals 2017, 7, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Kręgiel, A.; Zaworski, K.; Kołodziej, E. Effects of animal-assisted therapy on parent-reported behaviour and motor activity of children with autism spectrum disorder. Health Probl. Civiliz. 2019, 13, 273–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hill, J.R.; Ziviani, J.; Driscoll, C. “The connection just happens”: Therapists’ perspectives of canine-assisted occupational therapy for children on the autism spectrum. Aust. Occup. Ther. J. 2020, 67, 550–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mims, D.; Waddell, R. Animal Assisted Therapy and Trauma Survivors. J. Evid.-Inf. Soc. Work 2016, 13, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wood, E.; Ohlsen, S.; Thompson, J.; Hulin, J.; Knowles, L. The feasibility of brief dog-assisted therapy on university students stress levels: The PAwS study. J. Ment. Health 2017, 27, 263–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Santaniello, A.; Garzillo, S.; Amato, A.; Sansone, M.; Di Palma, A.; Di Maggio, A.; Fioretti, A.; Menna, L.F. Animal-Assisted Therapy as a Non-Pharmacological Approach in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Retrospective Study. Animals 2020, 10, 1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Anderson, H.A.; Hayes, S.L.; Smith, J.P. Animal-Assisted Therapy in Pediatric Speech-Language with a Preschool Child with Severe Language Delay: A Single-Subject Design. Internet J. Allied Health Sci. Pract. 2019, 17, 1540–1580. [Google Scholar]
  27. Griscti, O.; Camilleri, L. The impact of dog therapy on nursing students’ heart rates and ability to pay attention in class. Int. J. Educ. Res. 2019, 99, 101498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Grabowska, I.; Ostrowska, B. Evaluation of the effectiveness of canine assisted therapy as a complementary method of rehabilitation in disabled children. Physiother. Q. 2018, 26, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wolan-Nieroda, A.; Dudziak, J.; Drużbicki, M.; Pniak, B.; Guzik, A. Effect of Dog-Assisted Therapy on Psychomotor Development of Children with Intellectual Disability. Children 2020, 8, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ávila-Álvarez, A.; Pardo-Vázquez, J.; De-Rosende-Celeiro, I.; Jácome-Feijoo, R.; Torres-Tobío, G. Assessing the Outcomes of an Animal-Assisted Intervention in a Paediatric Day Hospital: Perceptions of Children and Parents. Animals 2020, 10, 1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jensen, C.L.; Bibbo, J.; Rodriguez, K.E.; O’Haire, M.E. The effects of facility dogs on burnout, job-related well-being, and mental health in paediatric hospital professionals. J. Clin. Nurs. 2021, 30, 1429–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Beetz, A.; Schöfmann, I.; Girgensohn, R.; Braas, R.; Ernst, C. Positive Effects of a Short-Term Dog-Assisted Intervention for Soldiers With Post-traumatic Stress Disorder—A Pilot Study. Front. Vet. Sci. 2019, 6, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Bergen-Cico, D.; Smith, Y.; Wolford, K.; Gooley, C.; Hannon, K.; Woodruff, R.; Spicer, M.; Gump, B. Dog Ownership and Training Reduces Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms and Increases Self-Compassion Among Veterans: Results of a Longitudinal Control Study. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2018, 24, 1166–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzla, J.; Altman, D.G. PRISMA Group: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta- analyses: The PRISMA statement. Int. J. Surg. 2010, 8, 336–341. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. PubMed. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed (accessed on 31 May 2021).
  36. Science Direct Scopus. Available online: https://www.scopus.com (accessed on 31 May 2021).
  37. Web of Science. Available online: https://clarivate.com/products/web-of-science/ (accessed on 31 May 2021).
  38. Pet Partners. Available online: https://petpartners.org/learn/ (accessed on 9 May 2021).
  39. Mueller, M.K.; Anderson, E.C.; King, E.K.; Urry, H.L. Null effects of therapy dog interaction on adolescent anxiety during a laboratory-based social evaluative stressor. Anxiety Stress. Coping 2021, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Allen, B.; Shenk, C.E.; Dreschel, N.E.; Wang, M.; Bucher, A.M.; Desir, M.P.; Chen, M.J.; Grabowski, S.R. Integrating Animal-Assisted Therapy Into TF-CBT for Abused Youth With PTSD: A Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial. Child. Maltreat. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hill, J.; Ziviani, J.; Driscoll, C.; Teoh, A.L.; Chua, J.M.; Cawdell-Smith, J. Canine Assisted Occupational Therapy for Children on the Autism Spectrum: A Pilot Randomised Control Trial. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2020, 50, 4106–4120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Vincent, A.; Heima, M.; Farkas, K.J. Therapy Dog Support in Pediatric Dentistry: A Social Welfare Intervention for Reducing Anticipatory Anxiety and Situational Fear in Children. Child Adolesc. Soc. Work J. 2020, 37, 615–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kashden, J.; Lincoln, C.R.; Finn-Stevenson, M. Curriculum-Based Animal-Assisted Therapy in an Acute Outpatient Mental Health Setting. J. Contemp. Psychother. 2020, 51, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rodrigo-Claverol, M.; Malla-Clua, B.; Marquilles-Bonet, C.; Sol, J.; Jové-Naval, J.; Sole-Pujol, M.; Ortega-Bravo, M. Animal-Assisted Therapy Improves Communication and Mobility among Institutionalized People with Cognitive Impairment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 5899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jorgenson, C.; Clay, C.J.; Kahng, S. Evaluating preference for and reinforcing efficacy of a therapy dog to increase verbal statements. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 2019, 53, 1419–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pruskowski, K.A.; Gurney, J.M.; Cancio, L.C. Impact of the implementation of a therapy dog program on burn center patients and staff. Burns 2019, 46, 293–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rousseau, C.X.; Tardif-Williams, C.Y. Turning the Page for Spot: The Potential of Therapy Dogs to Support Reading Motivation Among Young Children. Anthrozoös 2019, 32, 665–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wijker, C.; Van Der Steen, S.; Spek, A.; Leontjevas, R.; Enders-Slegers, M.-J. Social Development of Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder During Dog-Assisted Therapy: A Detailed Observational Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 5922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Vidal, R.; Vidal, L.; Ristol, F.; Domènec, E.; Segú, M.; Vico, C.; Gomez-Barros, N.; Ramos-Quiroga, J.A. Dog-Assisted Therapy for Children and Adolescents with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders a Randomized Controlled Pilot Study. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Machová, K.; Procházková, R.; Eretová, P.; Svobodová, I.; Kotík, I. Effect of Animal-Assisted Therapy on Patients in the Department of Long-Term Care: A Pilot Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Costa, J.B.; Ichitani, T.; Juste, F.S.; Cunha, M.C.; De Andrade, C.R.F. Ensaio Clínico de Tratamento da Gagueira: Estudo piloto com variável monitorada, participação do cão na sessão de terapia. CoDAS 2019, 31, e20180274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Griffioen, R.E.; Van Der Steen, S.; Verheggen, T.; Enders-Slegers, M.; Cox, R. Changes in behavioural synchrony during dog-assisted therapy for children with autism spectrum disorder and children with Down syndrome. J. Appl. Res. Intellect. Disabil. 2019, 33, 398–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Nilsson, M.L.; Funkquist, E.; Edner, A.; Engvall, G. Children report positive experiences of animal-assisted therapy in paediatric hospital care. Acta Paediatr. 2019, 109, 1049–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Muela, A.; Azpiroz, J.; Calzada, N.; Soroa, G.; Aritzeta, A. Leaving A Mark, An Animal-Assisted Intervention Programme for Children Who Have Been Exposed to Gender-Based Violence: A Pilot Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Thompkins, A.M.; Adkins, S.J.; Leopard, M.; Spencer, C.; Bentley, D.; Bolden, L.; Jagielski, C.H.; Richardson, E.; Goodman, A.M.; Schwebel, D.C. Dogs as an Adjunct to Therapy: Effects of Animal-Assisted Therapy on Rehabilitation Following Spinal Cord Injury. Anthrozoös 2019, 32, 679–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ambrosi, C.; Zaiontz, C.; Peragine, G.; Sarchi, S.; Bona, F. Randomized controlled study on the effectiveness of animal-assisted therapy on depression, anxiety, and illness perception in institutionalized elderly. Psychogeriatrics 2018, 19, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Pérez-Sáez, E.; Pérez-Redondo, E.; González-Ingelmo, E. Effects of Dog-Assisted Therapy on Social Behaviors and Emotional Expressions: A Single-Case Experimental Design in 3 People with Dementia. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry Neurol. 2019, 33, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Perez, M.; Cuscaden, C.; Somers, J.F.; Simms, N.; Shaheed, S.; Kehoe, L.A.; Holowka, S.A.; Aziza, A.A.; Shroff, M.M.; Greer, M.-L.C. Easing anxiety in preparation for pediatric magnetic resonance imaging: A pilot study using animal-assisted therapy. Pediatr. Radiol. 2019, 49, 1000–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rodrigo-Claverol, M.; Casanova-Gonzalvo, C.; Malla-Clua, B.; Rodrigo-Claverol, E.; Jové-Naval, J.; Ortega-Bravo, M. Animal-Assisted Intervention Improves Pain Perception in Polymedicated Geriatric Patients with Chronic Joint Pain: A Clinical Trial. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Protopopova, A.; Matter, A.L.; Harris, B.; Wiskow, K.M.; Donaldson, J.M. Comparison of contingent and noncontingent access to therapy dogs during academic tasks in children with autism spectrum disorder. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 2019, 53, 811–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Cruz-Fierro, N.; Vanegas-Farfano, M.; González-Ramírez, M.T.; Fierro, C.; Farfano, V.; Ramírez, G. Dog-Assisted Therapy and Dental Anxiety: A Pilot Study. Animals 2019, 9, 512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Sánchez-Valdeón, L.; Fernández-Martínez, E.; Loma-Ramos, S.; López-Alonso, A.I.; Bayón-Darkistade, J.E.; Ladera, V. Canine-Assisted Therapy and Quality of Life in People with Alzheimer-Type Dementia: Pilot Study. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Wijker, C.; Leontjevas, R.; Spek, A.; Enders-Slegers, M.-J. Effects of Dog Assisted Therapy for Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder: An Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2019, 50, 2153–2163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Grajfoner, D.; Harte, E.; Potter, L.M.; McGuigan, N. The Effect of Dog-Assisted Intervention on Student Well-Being, Mood, and Anxiety. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Dell, C.; Chalmers, D.; Stobbe, M.; Rohr, B.; Husband, A. Animal-assisted therapy in a Canadian psychiatric prison. Int. J. Prison. Health 2019, 15, 209–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Handlin, L.; Nilsson, A.; Lidfors, L.; Petersson, M.; Uvnäs-Moberg, K. The Effects of a Therapy Dog on the Blood Pressure and Heart Rate of Older Residents in a Nursing Home. Anthrozoös 2018, 31, 567–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Silva, N.B.; Osório, F.L. Impact of an animal-assisted therapy programme on physiological and psychosocial variables of paediatric oncology patients. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0194731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Ward-Griffin, E.; Klaiber, P.; Collins, H.K.; Owens, R.L.; Coren, S.; Chen, F.S. Petting away pre-exam stress: The effect of therapy dog sessions on student well-being. Stress Health 2018, 34, 468–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Binfet, J.-T.; Passmore, H.-A.; Cebry, A.; Struik, K.; McKay, C. Reducing university students’ stress through a drop-in canine-therapy program. J. Ment. Health 2017, 27, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Chubak, J.; Hawkes, R.; Dudzik, C.; Foose-Foster, J.M.; Eaton, L.; Johnson, R.H.; MacPherson, C.F. Pilot Study of Therapy Dog Visits for Inpatient Youth with Cancer. J. Pediatr. Oncol. Nurs. 2017, 34, 331–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Giuliani, F.; Jacquemettaz, M. Animal-assisted therapy used for anxiety disorders in patients with learning disabilities: An observational study. Eur. J. Integr. Med. 2017, 14, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Contalbrigo, L.; De Santis, M.; Toson, M.; Montanaro, M.; Farina, L.; Costa, A.; Nava, F.A. The Efficacy of Dog Assisted Therapy in Detained Drug Users: A Pilot Study in an Italian Attenuated Custody Institute. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Fiocco, A.J.; Hunse, A.M. The Buffer Effect of Therapy Dog Exposure on Stress Reactivity in Undergraduate Students. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Calvo, P.; Fortuny, J.R.; Guzmán, S.; Macías, C.; Bowen, J.; García, M.L.; Orejas, O.; Molins, F.; Tvarijonaviciute, A.; Cerón, J.J.; et al. Animal Assisted Therapy (AAT) Program as a Useful Adjunct to Conventional Psychosocial Rehabilitation for Patients with Schizophrenia: Results of a Small-scale Randomized Controlled Trial. Front. Psychol. 2016, 7, 631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Swall, A.; Ebbeskog, B.; Hagelin, C.L.; Fagerberg, I. ‘Bringing respite in the burden of illness’—dog handlers’ experience of visiting older persons with dementia together with a therapy dog. J. Clin. Nurs. 2016, 25, 2223–2231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Menna, L.F.; Santaniello, A.; Gerardi, F.; Di Maggio, A.; Milan, G. Evaluation of the efficacy of animal-assisted therapy based on the reality orientation therapy protocol in Alzheimer’s disease patients: A pilot study. Psychogeriatrics 2016, 16, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kerepesi, A.; Dóka, A.; Miklosi, A. Dogs and their human companions: The effect of familiarity on dog–human interactions. Behav. Process. 2015, 110, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Payne, E.; Bennett, P.; McGreevy, P. Current perspectives on attachment and bonding in the dog–human dyad. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 2015, 8, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Zilcha-Mano, S.; Mikulincer, M.; Shaver, P.R. An attachment perspective on human–pet relationships: Conceptualization and assessment of pet attachment orientations. J. Res. Pers. 2011, 45, 345–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Solomon, J.; Beetz, A.; Schöberl, I.; Gee, N.; Kotrschal, K. Attachment security in companion dogs: Adaptation of Ainsworth’s strange situation and classification procedures to dogs and their human caregivers. Attach. Hum. Dev. 2018, 21, 389–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Murthy, R.; Bearman, G.; Brown, S.; Bryant, K.; Chinn, R.; Hewlett, A.; George, B.G.; Goldstein, E.J.; Holzmann-Pazgal, G.; Rupp, M.E.; et al. Animals in Healthcare Facilities: Recommendations to Minimize Potential Risks. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2015, 36, 495–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Hardin, P.; Brown, J.; Wright, M.E. Prevention of transmitted infections in a pet therapy program: An exemplar. Am. J. Infect. Control 2016, 44, 846–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Linder, D.E.; Siebens, H.C.; Mueller, M.; Gibbs, D.M.; Freeman, L.M. Animal-assisted interventions: A national survey of health and safety policies in hospitals, eldercare facilities, and therapy animal organizations. Am. J. Infect. Control 2017, 45, 883–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Elad, D. Immunocompromised patients and their pets: Still best friends? Vet. J. 2013, 197, 662–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Santaniello, A.; Varriale, L.; Dipineto, L.; Borrelli, L.; Pace, A.; Fioretti, A.; Menna, L. Presence of Campylobacterjejuni and C. coli in Dogs under Training for Animal-Assisted Therapies. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Santaniello, A.; Garzillo, S.; Amato, A.; Sansone, M.; Fioretti, A.; Menna, L.F. Occurrence of Pasteurella multocida in Dogs Being Trained for Animal-Assisted Therapy. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Santaniello, A.; Sansone, M.; Fioretti, A.; Menna, L.F. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Occurrence of ESKAPE Bacteria Group in Dogs, and the Related Zoonotic Risk in Animal-Assisted Therapy, and in Animal-Assisted Activity in the Health Context. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Horowitz, A. Considering the “Dog” in Dog–Human Interaction. Front. Veter. Sci. 2021, 8, 2821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ley, J.M.; Pauleen, C.; Bennett, P.C.; Grahame, J.C. A refinement and validation of the Monash Canine Personality Questionnaire (MCPQ). Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2009, 116, 220–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Fratkin, J.L.; Sin, D.L.; Patali, E.A.; Gosling, S.D. Personality consistency in dogs: A metaanalysis. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e54907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Kujala, M.V. Canine emotions as seen through human social cognition. Anim. Sentience 2017, 2, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Animals 11 02576 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow diagram of the steps followed in the search strategy.
Figure 1. Flow diagram of the steps followed in the search strategy.
Animals 11 02576 g001
Animals 11 02576 g002 550
Figure 2. Overview of the results.
Figure 2. Overview of the results.
Animals 11 02576 g002
Table
Table 1. Results of general information regarding dogs involved in the included papers.
Table 1. Results of general information regarding dogs involved in the included papers.
First Author, YearGeneral Information on DogsReference
NoAge (Years)SexBreed
Mueller M., 202148–13m/fn.a.[39]
Allen B., 2021n.a.n.a.n.a.Labrador[40]
Hill J., 202013fLabradoodle[41]
Vincent A., 2020n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.[42]
Kashden J., 202012fpoodle mix[43]
Rodrigo-Claveron M., 202015mGerman shepherd[44]
Jorgenson C., 20201n.a.n.a.Labrador[45]
Pruskowski K., 20206n.a.n.a.Golden, Poodle, Labrador, Shetland sheepdogs, Collie[46]
Rousseau C. X., 20205adultm/fBernese mountain dog, Maltese, Yorkshire terrier[47]
Wijker C., 20204n.a.n.a.Labrador crossbreeds, Poodles[48]
Vidal R., 20202n.a.n.a.n.a.[49]
Machova K., 201915fBorder Collie[50]
Costa J., 2019n.a.n.a.n.a.Golden[51]
Griffioen R., 20192n.a.mLabrador, Labradoodle[52]
Nilsson M., 201916fLabradoodle[53]
Muela A., 20194n.a.n.a.Labrador, Golden[54]
Thompkins A., 2019n.a.>18 monthsm/fGolden, Terrier mix, Havanese, Labrador[55]
Ambrosi C., 20196n.a.n.a.golden, flat-coated[56]
Perez-Saez E., 201913fLabrador[57]
Perez M., 2019110fLabrador[58]
Rodrigo-Claverol M., 201934–3m/fGolden, Cavalier King Charles[59]
Protopopova A., 20193n.a.n.a.n.a.[60]
Cruiz- Fierro N., 20194average age of 40 monthsm/fEnglish shepherd, Cchnauzer, Border Collie, Labrador[61]
Sánchez-Valdeón L., 20191n.a.n.a.Labrador[62]
Wijker C., 2019132–10n.a.Labradors, Labrador crossbreeds, Poodles, Golden, Golden crossbreeds, and a German Wirehaired Pointer.[63]
Grajfoner, 20197n.a.n.a.Labrador, lhasa apso, Cocker Spaniels, Golden, Collie-Spaniel, Border Collie[64]
Dell C., 201834, 6, 8m/fBoxer and Bulldog[65]
Handlin L., 201812fLabradoodle[66]
Silva N.B., 2018n.a.n.a.n.a.Labrador, golden[67]
Ward-Griffin E., 20177–12n.a.n.a.n.a.[68]
Binfet J., 201715–17n.a.n.a.n.a.[69]
Chubak J., 2017n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.[70]
Giuliani F., 20171n.a.n.a.Border Collie[71]
Contalbrigo L., 2017n.a.adultn.a.n.a.[72]
Fiocco A., 2017n.a.n.a.n.a.Irish setter, Schnoodle, Miniature Poodles, Greyhound, King Charles Spaniel, Golden, and Australian Cattle Dog[73]
Calvo P., 20165n.a.n.a.n.a.[74]
Swall A., 2016n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.[75]
Menna L.F., 201617fLabrador[76]
Legend. f: female; m: male; n.a.: not available; min: minutes; h: hour.
Table
Table 2. Results of information on the “research goals” and “activities with the dog” in the included papers.
Table 2. Results of information on the “research goals” and “activities with the dog” in the included papers.
First Author, YearResearch GoalsActivities with DogReference
Mueller M., 2021reduce anxiety when experiencing a social stressorsocial and physical interactions[39]
Allen B., 2021improve the severity of PTSD symptomsn.a.[40]
Hill J., 2020achievement of occupational goals among autistic children7 sessions for 1 h occupational activities[41]
Vincent A., 2020reducing anxiety and situational fear among children1 h of free interactions[42]
Kashden J., 2020improve mood in an outpatient setting20 weeks of sessions lasting 50 min
Mutt-i-grees curriculum, which is based on the concepts of human–dog interactions		[43]
Rodrigo-Claveron M., 2020improve communication and mobility of people with cognitive impairments2 session per week for 6 months, physical interactions[44]
Jorgenson C., 2020increase verbal statements through various contingencies3–7 sessions per day, 1–2 days a week (30 min/1 h)
Playing with the dog		[45]
Pruskowski K., 2020improving duration and quality of rehabilitation sessions and physical therapyrehabilitation activities: walking with the dog; caregiving activities: brushing, petting[46]
Rousseau C.X., 2019supporting reading motivation among young children45 min per session, children read in the company of the dog[47]
Wijker C., 2020improving the social development of adults with autism spectrum disorder60 min session, interaction activities[48]
Vidal R., 2019improvements in social skills, a reduction in internalized and externalized symptomatologyweekly sessions of 45 min over 3 months, interaction activities.[49]
Machova K., 2019positively activate hospitalized patients12 weeks of sessions lasting 20 min walks, playing ball, obedience exercises[50]
Costa J., 2019stuttering treatment12 weeks of sessions lasting 50 min.
Passive participation: the dog was wearing a vest containing pictures, words, and phrases.
Active participation: selected an object. Participants were allowed to interact with the dog voluntarily during all sessions. Free interactions		[51]
Griffioen R., 2019help children with autism-spectrum disorder and Down syndrome (behavioral synchrony)6 weekly sessions of 30 min psychomotor and socialization activities, obstacle course[52]
Nilsson M., 2019complementary treatment in pediatric hospital carea calm period and an active period with tricks guided by the handler[53]
Muela A., 2019reduce the internalizing and externalizing symptoms associated with traumatic stress disorder in children exposed to domestic violence14 weeks of sessions lasting 1 h
playing, carrying out tasks such as grooming and feeding, etc.		[54]
Thompkins A., 2019improve affect, reduce stress, and reduce affect for red pain in individuals undergoing occupational therapy during rehabilitation from traumatic SCIsphysical interactions[55]
Ambrosi C., 2019effectiveness on depression and anxiety among institutionalized elderly individuals10 sessions per week for 30 min of verbal and nonverbal social interactions, stroking the dog, giving or throwing food or a toy[56]
Perez-Saez E., 2019improving social behaviors and emotional expression among people with dementiafree interactions[57]
Perez M., 2019reducing anxiety in pediatric patients preparing for MRI20–60 min of the interaction included sitting near the dog, petting the dog, and engaging in low-level play[58]
Rodrigo-Claverol M., 2019improving pain perception in polymedicated geriatric patients with chronic joint pain12 weekly sessions of 60 min of physical interactions[59]
Protopopova A., 2019improving academic tasks in children with autism spectrum disorder30 min session, once per day, 2–3 days per week, free interactions[60]
Cruiz-Fierro N., 2019help control anxiety during dental procedurestouching or stroking the dog during periods of stress[61]
Sánchez-Valdeón L., 2019improving the quality of life of people with Alzheimer’s diseaseweekly session (1 h) for 12 months, physical interactions[62]
Wijker C., 2019reducing stress and improving social awareness and communication among adults with ASD2 h per day (non-consecutive), maximum of 2 days per week[63]
Griffioen R.E., 2019improve students’ mood, well-being, and anxiety1 session for 20 min handler and dog interactions or dog-only interactions[64]
Dell C., 2018improve welfare of prisoners24 sessions over 8 months
30 min experiential learning with the dog, basic obedience (e.g., sit, heel)		[65]
Handlin L., 2018improve systolic blood pressure/rate and heart disease among the elderlyphysical activity (stroking, playing, etc.)[66]
Silva N.B., 2018improve physiological and psychosocial variables of pediatric oncology patients30 min session per week caregiving activities, socialization, sensorial and upper limb stimulation[67]
Ward-Griffin E., 2017reducing pre-exam stress among students90 min session, free interactions with the dogs[68]
Binfet J., 2017reduce stress among college studentsdrop-in program
once a week, variable time,
spending time with the dog		[69]
Chubak J., 2017potential benefits for young people hospitalized with cancer20 min of stroking the dog, the dog showing a trick to the patient[70]
Giuliani F., 2017benefits for individuals with difficulties learning30 min playing ball, petting, and brushing the dog[71]
Contalbrigo L., 2017helping in the rehabilitation of drug-addicted prisonersonce a week for 6 months (60 min):
cooperative games, problem solving games, agility dog path, role playing, obedience exercises, contact and care activities, olfactory discrimination games, exercises of communication with the body, free interactions		[72]
Fiocco A., 2017buffering effect of stress responses among college students10 min free interactions[73]
Calvo P., 2016rehabilitation for patients with schizophrenia6 months of biweekly 1 h sessions, emotional bonding, dog walking, and dog training with play[74]
Swall A., 2016promote human welfare and stimulate training of physical, social, and cognitive functions.the activities for the patient included close contact with the dog by touching its fur, cuddling, and talking, searching for hidden sweets, throwing balls, or other activities[75]
Menna L.F., 2016the therapeutic approach was based on the stimulation of cognitive functions such as attention, language skills, and spatial–temporal orientation.intervention occurred once a week for 45 min over a 6-month period. Activities with the dog were based on the formal ROT protocol[76]
Legend. n.a.: Not Available; SCI: Spinal Cord Injury; MRI: Magnetic Resonance Imaging; ASD: Autism Spectrum Disorder; ROT: Reality Orientation Therapy.
Table
Table 3. Results of information on “Choice of dog”, “Dog training”, “Health Status”, and “Dog ownership” in the included papers.
Table 3. Results of information on “Choice of dog”, “Dog training”, “Health Status”, and “Dog ownership” in the included papers.
First Author, YearChoice of DogDog TrainingHealth StatusDog OwnershipReference
Methods of ChoosingTemperamentBehavioral Veterinary Medical ExaminationHealth Protocols
Mueller M., 2021Pet Partners Programn.a.Pet Partners Programn.a.yesn.a.[39]
Allen B., 2021retired service dogsn.a.local service dog organizationn.a.n.a.n.a.[40]
Hill J., 2020examination temperament and behaviorn.a.obedienceyesyeshandled[41]
Vincent A., 2020n.a.n.a.Therapy Dogs International or Pet Partnersn.a.n.a.handled[42]
Kashden J., 2020independently licensed therapy dog training facilityn.a.12 weeks, standard therapy dog trainingn.a.n.a.handled[43]
Rodrigo-Claveron M., 2020Liackhoff testn.a.clicker trainingyesyesn.a.[44]
Jorgenson C., 2020n.a.Assistance Dogs Internationaln.a.n.a.n.a.handled[45]
Pryskowski K., 2020n.a.n.a.American Kennel Club canine good citizen. Therapy organization: Therapy Animals of San Antonio, Pet Partners, and Alliance of Therapy Dogsn.a.yeshandled[46]
Rousseau C. X., 2020n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.handled[47]
Wijker C., 2020n.a.n.a.Dutch Service dog Foundationn.a.n.a.handled[48]
Vidal R., 2020n.a.trained and tested to work with peopleCTAC Method (Center of dog assisted Therapy)yesn.a.n.a.[49]
Machova K., 2019AAT certificationinterest in working with people, no aggressivityobedience, to cope with stressful situationsn.a.n.a.handled[50]
Costa J., 2019tested for desirable reactions in responses to unknown people; unpredictable visual and sound stimuli; aggressive human voice; threatening gestures; places with a large concentration of people;n.a.Instituto Cão Terapeuta and Amor Canino Terapia organizationsn.a.yeshandled[51]
Griffioen R., 2019n.a.mild-manneredn.a.n.a.n.a.handled[52]
Nilsson M., 2019certificated for use with children in health caren.a.trained for use with children in health caren.a.yeshandled[53]
Muela A., 2019n.a.n.a.positive reinforcement techniquesn.a.yesn.a.[54]
Thompkins A., 2019n.a.n.a.Hand in Pawn.a.n.a.owned[55]
Ambrosi C., 2019certification aptitude tests for therapy dogsn.a.professionally trainedn.a.n.a.handled[56]
Perez-Saez E., 2019n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.[57]
Perez M., 2019n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.yeshandled[58]
Rodrigo-Claverol M., 2019n.a.suitable characterIlerkan Associationn.a.n.a.n.a.[59]
Protopopova A., 2019n.a.n.a.American Kennel Club Canine Good Citizen evaluation. All dogs are certified through and registered with a national therapy dog registry (e.g., Pet Partners, Alliance of Therapy Dogs)n.a.n.a.handled[60]
Cruiz- Fierro N., 2019certification Council for Professional Dog Trainers (CCPDT)n.a.n.a.n.a.yeshandled[61]
Sánchez-Valdeón L., 2019n.a.socialized, had a stable, friendly naturetrained for this purpose by a canine specialistn.a.yesn.a.[62]
Wijker C., 2019n.a.trained and tested to work with peopleDutch service dog foundation (guidelines to protect and monitor animal welfare)yesyesn.a.[63]
Grajfoner, 2019n.a.n.a.therapet, Canine Concern Scotland Trust (Scottish Charity No)n.a.n.a.handled[64]
Dell C., 2018screening, orientation, evaluation, and placementmild-mannered, energetic, or laid-backSt. John’s Ambulance Therapy Dog programn.a.n.a.handled[65]
Handlin L., 2018n.a.n.a.1 year, “Vårdhundskolan” (Sweden)n.a.n.a.handled[66]
Silva N.B., 2018n.a.n.a.docility, obedience training, and socializationyesyeshandled[67]
Ward-Griffin E., 2017n.a.no history of aggression or biting, good obedience, and friendly interactions with strangersVancouver ecoVillage Therapy Dog Programmen.a.yeshandled[68]
Binfet J., 2017BARK programn.a.n.a.n.a.yeshandled[69]
Chubak J., 2017n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.yesowned[70]
Giuliani F., 2017n.a.n.a.Swiss Romande Cynology Federationn.a.n.a.n.a.[71]
Contalbrigo L., 2017simulation testn.a.specifically trained to perform do-assisted interventions with various kinds of patients; well-socializedyesyeshandled[72]
Fiocco A., 2017St. John’s Ambulance Therapy Dog programdocile mannertrained to interact with people in a docile mannern.a.yesn.a.[73]
Calvo P., 2016n.a.n.a.n.a.yesn.a.n.a.[74]
Swall A., 2016n.a.n.a.the dog is trained to know how to approach the person in a soft, gentle way (Swedish Standard Institute)n.a.n.a.handled[75]
Menna L.F., 2016according to Federico II Model of Healthcare Zooanthropologyn.a.educational program for pet therapy at the La Voce del Cane Dog Educational Centre, which follows the guidelines of the Italian National Educational Sports Centeryesyesowned[76]
Legend. n.a.: Not Available.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Santaniello, A.; Garzillo, S.; Cristiano, S.; Fioretti, A.; Menna, L.F. The Research of Standardized Protocols for Dog Involvement in Animal-Assisted Therapy: A Systematic Review. Animals 2021, 11, 2576. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092576

AMA Style

Santaniello A, Garzillo S, Cristiano S, Fioretti A, Menna LF. The Research of Standardized Protocols for Dog Involvement in Animal-Assisted Therapy: A Systematic Review. Animals. 2021; 11(9):2576. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092576

Chicago/Turabian Style

Santaniello, Antonio, Susanne Garzillo, Serena Cristiano, Alessandro Fioretti, and Lucia Francesca Menna. 2021. "The Research of Standardized Protocols for Dog Involvement in Animal-Assisted Therapy: A Systematic Review" Animals 11, no. 9: 2576. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092576

APA Style

Santaniello, A., Garzillo, S., Cristiano, S., Fioretti, A., & Menna, L. F. (2021). The Research of Standardized Protocols for Dog Involvement in Animal-Assisted Therapy: A Systematic Review. Animals, 11(9), 2576. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092576

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop