Next Article in Journal
Whole Blood Transcriptome Profiling Reveals Positive Effects of Olive Leaves-Supplemented Diet on Cholesterol in Goats
Previous Article in Journal
Direct Phenotyping and Principal Component Analysis of Type Traits Implicate Novel QTL in Bovine Mastitis through Genome-Wide Association
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 11
Issue 4
10.3390/ani11041149
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecular Identification of Trypanosoma evansi Isolated from Arabian Camels (Camelus dromedarius) in Riyadh and Al-Qassim, Saudi Arabia

by
Dina M. Metwally
1,2,*,
Isra M. Al-Turaiki
3,*,
Najwa Altwaijry
4,
Samia Q. Alghamdi
5 and
Abdullah D. Alanazi
6,7
1
Department of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt
3
Department of Information Technology, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Computer Science, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
5
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Al-Baha University, Al-Baha 1988, Saudi Arabia
6
Department of Biological Science, Faculty of Science and Humanities, Shaqra University, Ad-Dawadimi 11911, Saudi Arabia
7
Department of Medical Laboratory, Alghad International Colleges for Applied Medical Science, Tabuk 47913, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2021, 11(4), 1149; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11041149
Submission received: 9 March 2021 / Revised: 14 April 2021 / Accepted: 15 April 2021 / Published: 17 April 2021
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

We investigated the occurrence of the parasite Trypanosoma evansi in camels in Saudi Arabia. Despite being undetectable in thin blood smears obtained from the camels, polymerase chain reaction findings show that nearly half the camels were infected with parasites. Infection causes a significant financial burden to camel breeders and owners. Detection of the parasite reduces financial losses and improves camel mortality. We conclude that polymerase chain reaction is more effective than microscopy at identifying T. evansi infection in camels.

Abstract

We analyzed the blood from 400 one-humped camels, Camelus dromedarius (C. dromedarius), in Riyadh and Al-Qassim, Saudi Arabia to determine if they were infected with the parasite Trypanosoma spp. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) gene was used to detect the prevalence of Trypanosoma spp. in the camels. Trypanosoma evansi (T. evansi) was detected in 79 of 200 camels in Riyadh, an infection rate of 39.5%, and in 92 of 200 camels in Al-Qassim, an infection rate of 46%. Sequence and phylogenetic analyses revealed that the isolated T. evansi was closely related to the T. evansi that was detected in C. dromedarius in Egypt and the T. evansi strain B15.1 18S ribosomal RNA gene identified from buffalo in Thailand. A BLAST search revealed that the sequences are also similar to those of T. evansi from beef cattle in Thailand and to T. brucei B8/18 18S ribosomal RNA from pigs in Nigeria.

1. Introduction

Trypanosoma evansi is a protozoan parasite of both the intra- and extra-vascular fluids of mammals that causes the disease Surra throughout the tropical and subtropical regions of the world [1]. T. evansi has a varied host range that includes many animals, and it is especially prevalent in horses and camels. It is transmitted mechanically by the hematophagous flies Tabanus, Chrysops, Atylotus, Lyperosia, Haematopota, and Stomoxys. The disease, which can be fatal, causes decreased milk production, anemia, weight loss, and abortion [2,3]. It is broadly distributed in Africa, Asia, Central and South America, the Canary Islands, and recently, in France and Spain [2]. Surra is a serious disease that is difficult to treat and for which there is no vaccine. It is the most dangerous protozoan disease that affects camels, and it can lead to widespread economic losses. In Saudi Arabia, which has a camel population estimated at nearly 1.3 million, these losses can be staggering. Thousands of live camels are imported yearly from Arabian Gulf countries, Somalia, Sudan, and Djibouti [4]. The camels, which are mainly used as pack animals and as sources of meat, milk, skin, and leather, play an important role in transportation in the desert and rural lifestyles. Previous epidemiological, serological, biochemical, and hematological studies have been conducted in camels from Saudi Arabia [5,6,7,8,9,10]. However, there is little information on trypanosomiasis infections in Saudi animals at the molecular level [11]. Based on trypanosomal DNA detection in blood samples, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing is a good method for diagnosis of trypanosomiasis. PCR is adaptive and sensitive enough to identify the infection in all phases [12].
Several sequences, such as ribosomal DNA, internal spacer transcribed region (ITS), kinetoplast DNA, and variable surface glycoprotein (VSG), are reliable T. evansi detection targets [10,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. ITS-1 and ITS-2 are useful for species delineation and inference of Trypanosoma spp. phylogenetical relations [22,23], particularly when morphological characters are limited. Phylogenetic analysis of ITS sequences was used in [24] for the study of T. rangeli polymorphism. In T. brucei [25], T. congolense [26], and T. evansi, genetic variation in intra-species Trypanosoma has already been identified using PCR-based approaches. The goal of this study is to use internal transcribed spacer 1 primers (ITS-1) to investigate and distinguish the genetic relationship between isolates of T. evansi from camels in Riyadh and Al-Qassim, Saudi Arabia.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethical Statement

This study (IRB number: SH 11-2020) was approved by The Official Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Sciences and Humanities, Shaqra University, Saudi Arabia.

2.2. Study Area

This study was performed in two separate regions of Saudi Arabia: the central region (around Riyadh) and the Emirate of Al-Qassim Province. Riyadh city (latitude: 24°380 North, longitude: 46°430 East) is located in the central region of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. It has an exceptionally dry climate; summer temperatures rise during the day but drop at night, changing drastically from to 43 °C to 35 °C. During the winter months, the temperature drops severely and may reach as low as 0 °C. Riyadh is 600 m above sea level with a few valleys and resource-rich sand hills. The Emirate of Al-Qassim Province is located in the heart of the country near the geographic center of the Arabian Peninsula. It extends between 26.2078° North and 43.4837° East, and it has a typical desert climate. The Emirate of Al-Qassim Province is known for its cool, rainy winters and hot summers, which are less humid than those of Riyadh.

2.3. Collection of Camel Blood Samples

During the period between June 2020 and January 2021, 400 Arabian Camels (C. dromedarius) were randomly selected as follows: 200 camels from Riyadh (67 males, 133 females) and 200 camels from Al-Qassim (71 males, 129 females); camels 4 years and older were considered to be adults. All camels were examined for trypanosomiasis. Blood samples were collected in Vacutainer tubes containing Ethylene Diamine Tetra Acetic acid (EDTA) (BD Vacutainer® Tube, Gribbles Pathology, VIC, Australia) and then divided into two parts. One part was used for microscopy examination, and the other was preserved at −20 °C for the extraction of the DNA of trypanosomes for PCR. The samples were transported to the Parasitological Laboratory of the Biological Sciences Department, Faculty of Technology and Humanities, Shaqra University. For microscopy examination of samples, thin blood smears were air-dried and fixed in methanol. Samples were then stained in a phosphate-buffered saline with a 10% solution of Giemsa (pH 7.2) for four hours in order to perform parasitological analysis. Samples were then analyzed by light microscopy at a magnification of ×40 with an oil immersion objective [27].

2.4. DNA Extraction and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

Total genomic DNA (gDNA) was isolated using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (250) (Cat No./ID: 69506, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and 50 µL or 100 µL of buffer, as dictated by the manufacturer’s protocol. The 250–270 bp region of ITS-1 was amplified using the primer pairs described in Table 1 [16] and a thermal cycler (Variety® 96-well thermal cycler, model 9902, Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). The Primer genes are specific to Trypanosoma-related parasites and subspecies, and amplifying a 250 bp, 400 bp, 480 bp and 700 bp for the regions of ITS-1 of T. vivax, T. simiae, T. brucei, and T. congolense savannah, respectively [16,28]. This process was performed in 50 µL of a mixture containing 25 µL of DreamTac DNA polymerase Master Mix 2× (Thermo Scientific ™, UK), 1 µL of each primer, and 2 µL of DNA template. The reaction was brought to a total volume of 50 µL with PCR-grade water (Invitrogen, UK). All tests included positive and negative controls. The PCR program consisted of a denaturing step of 95 °C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturing at 95 °C for 30 s, primer annealing at 58 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min for extension and final extension step was performed at 72 °C for 5 min. Samples were kept at 4 °C. The PCR product was analyzed by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis that included 10 μL/mL Syber safe (Thermo Scientific™, UK), which had a trace acetate EDTA buffer at 100 V for 45 min and photographed with a UV imaging system (Imagconat Laz4000, GE Healthcare Life Sciences, UK). The size of each product was estimated by comparing it with a 100 bp gene ruler DNA ladder marker (Thermo Scientific UK, UK) [11].

2.5. Nucleotide Sequences of the ITS-1 Gene and Phylogenetic Tree Analysis

To verify the presence of T. evansi, positive samples were posted to Macrogen Europe (Netherlands) for sequencing of the ITS-1 region using forward ITS-1 CF and reverse ITS-1 BR primers. The results were compared with existing sequences from the NCBI GenBank. The sequences were processed using Geneious Prime Build 07-04-2020 08:42 [28]. As a pre-processing step, all sequences underwent truncation using an error probability method with a limit of 0.05 on both sides. Related sequences were retrieved from GenBank after performing a BLAST [29] search. Multiple sequence alignments were generated using CLUSTAL Omega [30] implemented in the Geneious software. The phylogenetic tree was created using the neighbor-joining method [31] with a Tamura_Nei model and 10,000 replicates.

2.6. ID of Query Sequence

All sequences were deposited in Genbank and assigned accession numbers. Riyadh samples: MW598372, MW579327, and MW579326. Qassim samples: MW598374, MW598373, MW580859, and MW580858.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

All data were recorded and filtered in an MS Excel spreadsheet before being analyzed using SPSS version 20. Feedback statistics were used to calculate the spread of the infection. Chi-square was used to compare prevalence of T. evansi between regions. Results were considered significant at p ≤ 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Blood Smear Examination and PCR Amplification of T. evansi

Trypanosoma evansi infections were not microscopically observed in the thin blood smear samples from Riyadh or Al-Qassim province (Figure 1A). However, the PCR-positive rates for T. evansi in blood samples from Riyadh and Al-Qassim province were 39.5% and 46%, respectively (Table 2). PCR results with ITS-1 primers revealed a molecular weight of 500 bp (Figure 1B). The prevalence of T. evansi in young male camels from Riyadh and Al-Qassim was 54.5% and 60%, respectively; the prevalence in adult males was 37.8% and 37%, respectively. The infection rate in young female camels was 40.4% and 60%, respectively, and in adult female camels from Riyadh and Al-Qassim, it was 35.8% and 50%, respectively (Table 3). It was found that the sex and age of the animals had no significant effect on the prevalence of infection in either location.

3.2. Nucleotide Sequence Analysis of the ITS-1 Gene

The pairwise identity of Riyadh sequences was 97.9%, while it was 97.6% for the Qassim sequences. Overall, the seven sequences shared 95% pairwise identity and had a guanine-cytosine (GC) content of 42.4%.
A BLAST search showed that the sequences are similar to T. evansi SANTE-FANO-HS, isolated from ticks infesting Canis lupus familiaris in Egypt (MG564285), T. evansi genes for 18 S ribosomal RNA identified in Egypt from dromedary camels (C. dromedarius)
(AB551919-AB551922), T. evansi strain B15.1 18 S ribosomal RNA gene identified in Thailand from buffalo (AY912271-AY912276), T. evansi from beef cattle (LAM19) in Thailand (EF545999-EF546045), and T. brucei B8/18 18S ribosomal RNA genes from pigs in Thailand and Nigeria (AF306772-AF306777).
A phylogenetic tree constructed from these sequences is shown in Figure 2. JN673394 (T. vivax) was used as the outgroup. The samples from this study are grouped in a clade with T. evansi from C. dromedarius in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

4. Discussion

There have been many published studies on the characterization of trypanosomes in general and of T. evansi in particular. Among these, the molecular targets that were used are the actin gene [32], the VSG gene [33], and ITS-1 and ITS-2 genes [22,23] of T. evansi. The ITS region has been commonly used to identify T. evansi [34], and ITS-1 is an appropriate target for the detection of trypanosomes using PCR. Four hundred blood samples were collected from two geographical regions of Saudi Arabia, and 171 samples were successfully amplified. According to this analysis (Table 2), Al-Qassim Province has a higher prevalence of T. evansi (46%) than does Riyadh (39.5%). PCR analysis provides higher sensitivity than does microscopic analysis of blood smears and is recommended for the diagnosis of trypanosomiasis [35].
This survey showed a higher prevalence of T. evansi in camels in these regions than has been recorded in other surveys from different regions of Saudi Arabia. For instance, 195 camels from Al-Jouf Province (in the northern part of Saudi Arabia) were examined, and 25% of them were infected with T. evansi [10]. Other microscopy and serological tests have been used to investigate T. evansi infection in camels. Studies that utilized direct thin blood smear testing have produced results showing 2% or 13.2% rates of trypanosomiasis infection in Saudi Arabia as a whole [5,6]. Another study showed a 5.5% rate of infection among camels in the Al-Qassim region [7]. The reported incidence rate of T. evansi in camels in different areas of Saudi Arabia varied between 0% and 40% [8]. The prevalence of T. evansi infection in Saudi Arabia was 39.4% [9]. In contrast, Alanazi and colleagues [11] reported a higher prevalence: 51% and 49.4% among camels in Riyadh and Al-Qassim, respectively.
Results also varied between neighboring countries. In Iraq, for instance, the prevalence of Trypanosoma spp. was confirmed by blood smears to be 31.87% [36]. Studies of Trypanosoma spp. in Egypt have shown a prevalence of 4.5%–74.4% [35,37,38,39].
Epidemiological molecular analysis has produced results between 33.9% and 42.1% [18]. These discrepancies may be due to management differences, the climate in which the specimens were collected, or the sample sizes of the tested animals.
The results of this study show no significant difference between the prevalence of T. evansi in Riyadh and Al-Qassim. This outcome is contrary to other results from Saudi Arabia [8,10] and from other countries [21,35]. This study’s results also show no significant influence by sex on the prevalence of T. evansi, which is consistent with some prior studies [21,35] and inconsistent with others [6,36] that reported male camels had a higher rate of infection than did females in both Saudi Arabia and Iraq. In addition, the present results show no significant effect of age on the rate of T. evansi infection. These results disagree with several previous studies [11,21,36]. The high infection rate in adult female camels may be due to several factors, such as travelling through areas where the vector burden is high, low management, stress, drought, insufficient grass, and favoritism by biting flies [21].
Each Trypanosoma spp. has unique ITS-1 PCR lengths that were the basis for differentiation between different Trypanosoma spp. [11,15,16]. The ITS-1 PCR product size is 250 bp, 400 bp, and 480 bp for the T. vivax, T. simiae, and T. brucei subspecies, respectively, and 700 bp for T. congolense savannah.
The phylogenetic analysis of ITS-1 sequences using Geneious Prime Build 2020-04-07 08:42 disclosed a rooted tree with T. vivax ITS-1 as an outgroup. The seven Saudi Arabian T. evansi isolates have been grouped into the same clade with T. evansi isolate from Australia [40], beef cattle (LAM19) identified in Thailand [41], Japanese isolates, and Thailand buffalo (B15). This clade is contained within a larger clade that includes T. evansi isolates identified in Egypt from dromedary camels, C. dromedarius [23], and from the same in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia [11], T. brucei from pigs in Nigeria [42], and T. evansi isolates SANTE-FANO-HS from ticks infesting Canis lupus familiaris in Egypt. This study indicates that the ancestral root of T. evansi is T. brucei, a result that has been obtained in similar prior studies [43,44]. Previous research into T. evansi has shown that PCR is a more specific, sensitive, and accurate method for the detection of T. evansi in camel blood samples than are other approaches that have previously been used in Saudi Arabia. However, in samples from C. dromedarius in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (accession number MH087230) [11], tests were unable to determine the inter- and intraspecific genetic diversity of the parasites. Our samples were grouped into one clade with T. evansi.
The limitation of this study lies in using only the ITS1- PCR for testing of the samples, which is general and not specific for T. evansi (T. evansi type B). Therefore, RoTat 1.2 VSG-PCR is recommended for specific trypanosomiasis detection (T. evansi type A). In addition, only seven samples were randomly selected from the positive samples for sequencing and phylogenetic analysis. More samples should be investigated in future studies.

5. Conclusions

This study reported that PCR is a more specific, sensitive, and reliable tool for the detection of T. evansi in camel blood samples than are the other methods previously used in Saudi Arabia. The results demonstrate the necessity for more detailed phylogenetic analyses and identification of Trypanosoma evansi with more taxa and molecular markers. For instance, amplification of the RoTat 1.2 VSG gene should be performed in order to further distinguish among the closely related Trypanosoma spp.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.D.A.; methodology, A.D.A.; software, S.Q.A.; formal analysis, D.M.M.; I.M.A.-T.; N.A.; investigation, A.D.A.; resources, S.Q.A.; data curation, D.M.M.; writing—original draft preparation, D.M.M.; I.M.A.-T.; N.A.; S.Q.A.; A.D.A.; writing—review and editing, D.M.M.; I.M.A.-T.; N.A.; S.Q.A.; A.D.A.; visualization, D.M.M.; I.M.A.-T.; N.A; S.Q.A.; supervision, A.D.A.; project administration, D.M.M.; A.D.A.; funding acquisition, I.M.A.-T.; N.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research project was supported by a grant from the Research Center of the Female Scientific and Medical Colleges, the Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study (IRB number: SH 11-2020) was approved by The Official Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Sciences and Humanities, Shaqra University, Saudi Arabia.

Data Availability Statement

All important data are presented in this document.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Deanship of Scientific Research, Shaqra University, and the Staff Members of the Biological Science Department, Faculty of Science and Humanities, Shaqra University, for their kind technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The researchers declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Luckins, A.G. Trypanosoma evansi in Asia. Parasitol Today 1988, 4, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Luckins, A.G.; Dwinger, R.H. Non-tsetse-transmitted animal trypanosomiasis. Trypanosomiases 2004, 269–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Duquesne, M.; Holzmuller, P.; Lai, D.H.; Dargantes, A.; Lun, Z.R.; Jittaplapong, S. Trypanosoma evansi and Surra: A review and perspectives on origin, history, distribution, taxonomy, morphology, hosts, and pathogenic effects. Biomed. Res. Int. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. General Authority for Statistics, 2015: Detailed results of the Agriculture Census; Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Saudi Arabia, 2015; p. 421.
  5. Kasim, A.A. Detection of Trypanosoma evansi in the Arabian camel. J. Coll. Sci. 1984. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hussein, H.S.; Al-Asgah, N.A.; Al-Khalifa, M.S.; Diab, F.M. The blood parasites of indigenous livestock in Saudi Arabia. Arab Gulf. J. Sci. Res. 1991, 9, 143–160. [Google Scholar]
  7. Omer, O.H.; Magzoub, M.; Haroun, E.M.; Mahmoud, O.M.; Hamid, Y.A. Diagnosis of Trypanosoma evansi in Saudi Arabian Camels (Camelus dromedarius) by the passive haemagglutination test and Ag-ELISA. J. Vet. Med. B 1998, 45, 627–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Al-Khalifa, M.S.; Hussein, H.S.; Diab, F.M.; Khalil, G.M. Blood parasites of livestock in certain regions in Saudi Arabia. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2009, 16, 63–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Al-Afaleq, A.I.; Elamin, E.A.; Fatani, A.; Homeida, A.G. Epidemiological aspects of camel trypanosomosis in Saudi Arabia. J. Camel Pract. Res. 2015, 22, 231–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Elwathig, M.; Faye, B.; Thevenon, S.; Ravel, S.; Bossard, G. Epidemiological surveys of camel trypanosomosis in Al-Jouf, Saudi Arabia based on PCR and ELISA. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2016, 212–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Alanazi, A.D.; Puschendorf, R.; Alyousif, M.S.; Al-khalifa, M.S.; Alharbi, S.A.; Al Sheri, Z.S.; Said, A.E.; Alanazi, I.O.; Al-Mohammed, H.I. Molecular epidemiological studies on Trypanosoma evansi type a and type b in camels (Camelus dromedaries) from five different regions of Saudi Arabia using the ITS-1 rDNA and rotat 1.2 VSG gene. J. Egypt Soc. Parasitol. 2018, 48, 241–250. [Google Scholar]
  12. Clausen, P.H.; Wiemann, A.; Patzelt, R.; Kakaire, D.; Poetzsch, C.; Peregrine, A.; Mehlitz, D. Use of a PCR assay for the specific and sensitive detection of Trypanosoma spp. in naturally infected dairy cattle in peri-urban Kampala, Uganda. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1998, 849, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Urakawa, T.; Verloo, D.; Moens, L.; Büscher, P.; Majiwa, P.A. Trypanosoma evansi: Cloning and expression in Spodoptera fugiperda insect cells of the diagnostic antigen RoTat1.2. Exp. Parasitol. 2001, 99, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Verloo, D.; Magnus, E.; Büscher, P. General expression of RoTat 1.2 variable antigen type in Trypanosoma evansi isolates from a different origin. Vet. Parasitol. 2001, 97, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cox, A.; Tilley, A.; McOdimba, F.; Fyfe, J.; Eisler, M.; Hide, G.; Welburn, S. A PCR-based assay for detection and differentiation of African trypanosome species in blood. Exp. Parasitol. 2005, 111, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Njiru, Z.K.; Constantine, C.C.; Guya, S.; Crowther, J.; Kiragu, J.M.; Thompson, R.C.; Dávila, A.M. The use of ITS-1 rDNA PCR in detecting pathogenic African trypanosomes. Parasitol. Res. 2005, 95, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sengupta, P.P.; Balumahendiran, M.; Suryanarayana, V.V.; Raghavendra, A.G.; Shome, B.R.; Gajendragad, M.R.; Prabhudas, K. PCR-based diagnosis of surra-targeting VSG gene: Experimental studies in small laboratory rodents and buffalo. Vet. Parasitol. 2010, 171, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Salim, B.; Bakheit, M.A.; Kamau, J.; Nakamura, I.; Sugimoto, C. Molecular epidemiology of camel trypanosomiasis based on ITS-1 rDNA and RoTat 1.2 VSG gene in Sudan. Parasit. Vectors 2011, 4, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Birhanu, H.; Gebrehiwot, T.; Goddeeris, B.M.; Büscher, P.; Van Reet, N. New Trypanosoma evansi type B isolates from Ethiopia dromedary camels. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016, 10, e0004556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Sumbria, D.; Singla, L.D.; Sharma, A.; Bal, M.S.; Kumar, S. Multiplex PCR for detection of Trypanosoma evansi and Theileria equi in equids of Punjab, India. Vet. Parasitol. 2015, 211, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tehseen, S.; Jahan, N.; Desquesnes, M.; Shahzad, M.I.; Qamar, M.F. Field investigation of Trypanosoma evansi and comparative analysis of diagnostic tests in horses from Bahawalpur, Pakistan. Turkish J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2017, 41, 288–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Khuchareontaworn, S.; Singhaphan, P.; Viseshakul, N.; Chansiri, K. Genetic diversity of Trypanosoma evansi in buffalo based on internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2007, 69, 487–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Amer, S.; Ryu, O.; Tada, C.; Fukuda, Y.; Inoue, N.; Nakai, Y. Molecular identification and phylogenetic analysis of Trypanosoma evansi from dromedary camels (Camelus dromedarius) in Egypt, a pilot study. Acta Trop. 2011, 117, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Grisard, E.C.; Campbell, D.A.; Romanha, A.J. Mini-exon gene sequence polymorphism among Trypanosoma rangeli strains isolated from distinct geographical regions. Parasitology 1999, 118, 375–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Agbo, E.E.; Majiwa, P.A.; Claassen, H.J.; te Pas, M.F. Molecular variation of Trypanosoma brucei subspecies as revealed by AFLP fingerprinting. Parasitology 2002, 124, 349–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Omanwar, S.; Singh, R.K.; Butchaiah, G.; Rao, J.R. DNA polymorphism in Trypanosoma evansi isolates defined by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA-PCR. Vet. Rec. 2001, 148, 244–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Njiru, Z.K.; Constantine, C.C.; Gitonga, P.K.; Thompson, R.C.; Reid, S.A. Genetic variability of Trypanosoma evansi isolates detected by inter-simple sequence repeat anchored-PCR and microsatellite. Vet. Parasitol. 2007, 147, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Geneious Prime. Available online: http://www.geneious.com/ (accessed on 7 April 2020).
  29. Altschul, S.F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sievers, F.; Wilm, A.; Dineen, D.; Gibson, T.J.; Karplus, K.; Li, W.; Lopez, R.; McWilliam, H.; Remmert, M.; Söding, J.; et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011, 7, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Saitou, N.; Nei, M. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987, 4, 406–425. [Google Scholar]
  32. Li, S.Q.; Yang, W.B.; Lun, Z.R.; Ma, L.J.; Xu, S.M.; Chen, Q.L.; Song, X.W.; Kang, J.; Yang, L.Z. Immunization with recombinant actin from Trypanosoma evansi induces protective immunity against T. evansi, T. equiperdum, and T. brucei infection. Parasitol. Res. 2009, 104, 429–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sengupta, P.P.; Balumahendiran, M.; Balamurugan, V.; Rudramurthy, G.R.; Prabhudas, K. Expressed truncated N-terminal variable surface glycoprotein (VSG) of Trypanosoma evansi in E. coli exhibits immunoreactivity. Vet. Parasitol. 2012, 187, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Beltrame-Botelho, I.T.; Gaspar-Silva, D.; Steindel, M.; Dávila, A.M.; Grisard, E.C. Internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of Trypanosoma rangeli ribosomal DNA (rDNA): A useful marker for inter-specific differentiation. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2005, 5, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Barghash, S.M.; Darwish, A.M.; Abou-ElNaga, T.R. Molecular characterization and phylogenetic analysis of Trypanosoma evansi from local and imported camels in Egypt. J. Phylogenetics Evol. Biol. 2016, 4, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Al-Amery, A.M.; Faraj, A.A.; Majeed, S.A. Detection of haemoprotozoa in camels in Al Najaf province, Iraq. Int. J. Adv. Biol. Res. 2017, 7, 238–241. [Google Scholar]
  37. Abdel-Rady, A. Comparison of card agglutination test and parasitological methods for the diagnosis of camel trypanosomosis in Egypt. In Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference on Camels, Qassim, Saudia Arabian, 9–11 May 2006; pp. 571–576. [Google Scholar]
  38. Zayed, A.A.; Habeeb, S.M.; Allam, N.A.; Ashry, H.M.; Mohamed, A.H.; Ashour, A.A.; Taha, H.A. A critical comparative study of parasitological and serological differential diagnostic methods of Trypanosoma evansi infections in some farm animals in Egypt. Am. Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2010, 8, 633–642. [Google Scholar]
  39. El-Haig, M.M.; Youssef, A.I.; El-Gayar, A.K. Molecular and parasitological detection of Trypanosoma evansi in camels in Ismailia, Egypt. Vet. Parasitol. 2013, 198, 214–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Taylor, T.K.; Boyle, D.B.; Bingham, J. Development of a TaqMan PCR assay for the detection of Trypanosoma evansi, the agent of Surra. Vet. Parasitol. 2008, 153, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Areekit, S.; Singhaphan, P.; Kanjanavas, P.; Khuchareontaworn, S.; Sriyapai, T.; Pakpitcharoen, A.; Chansiri, K. Genetic diversity of Trypanosoma evansi in beef cattle based on internal transcribed spacer region. Inf. Genet. Evol. 2008, 8, 484–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Agbo, E.C.; Majiwa, P.A.; Claassen, E.J.; Roos, M.H. The measure of molecular diversity within the Trypanosoma brucei subspecies Trypanosoma brucei and Trypanosoma brucei gambiense as revealed by genotypic characterization. Exp. Parasitol. 2001, 99, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Stevens, J.R.; Noyes, H.A.; Dover, G.A.; Gibson, W.C. The ancient and divergent origins of the human pathogenic trypanosomes, Trypanosoma brucei and T. cruzi. Parasitology 1999, 118, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Ibrahim, H.; Malele, I.; Nyingilili, H.; Sadeq, S.; Brooks, D.; Ali, N. Phylogenetic analysis of Trypanosoma evansi in naturally infected camels from Sudan based on ribosomal DNA sequences citation. Am. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 4, 75–82. [Google Scholar]
Animals 11 01149 g001 550
Figure 1. (A) Blood smear from camel was free of visible infection with Trypanosoma spp. (B) Agarose gel (1.5%) electrophoretogram with 100-bp DNA ladder. PCR analysis of the ITS-1 gene revealed a 500 bp band derived from T. evansi isolates from different camels (lanes 1–7).
Figure 1. (A) Blood smear from camel was free of visible infection with Trypanosoma spp. (B) Agarose gel (1.5%) electrophoretogram with 100-bp DNA ladder. PCR analysis of the ITS-1 gene revealed a 500 bp band derived from T. evansi isolates from different camels (lanes 1–7).
Animals 11 01149 g001
Animals 11 01149 g002 550
Figure 2. Genetic relationships between samples in the current study and other species. Retrieved from GenBank.
Figure 2. Genetic relationships between samples in the current study and other species. Retrieved from GenBank.
Animals 11 01149 g002
Table
Table 1. Primers used to amplify the ITS-1 gene using DNA extracted from T. evansi.
Table 1. Primers used to amplify the ITS-1 gene using DNA extracted from T. evansi.
GenePrimersSequencesReferences
ITS-1ITS-1 CF5′-CCGGAAGTTCACCGATATTG-3′[16]
ITS-1 BR5′-TGCTGCGTTCTTCAACGAA-3′
Table
Table 2. Prevalence of T. evansi in camels from Riyadh and Al-Qassim.
Table 2. Prevalence of T. evansi in camels from Riyadh and Al-Qassim.
Region *No.Microscopic ExaminationPCR (ITS-1)
Riyadh2000:00 (0%)79 (39.5%)
Al-Qassim2000:00 (0%)92 (46%)
* Collection sites were grouped according to the geographic region of the stocks used in this study. There was no significant difference (p ≤ 0.05) between Riyadh and Al-Qassim in the prevalence of T. evansi. ITS-1: internal transcribed spacer 1 gene.
Table
Table 3. Prevalence of T. evansi among different categories of camels.
Table 3. Prevalence of T. evansi among different categories of camels.
CategoriesRiyadhAl-Qassim
No. of ExaminedNo. of Infected% of InfectedNo. of ExaminedNo. of Infected% of Infected
Young male camels221254.5%251560%
Adult male camels451737.80%461737%
Young female camels522140.40%492040.80%
Adult female camels812935.80%804050%
χ2The chi-square statistic is 2.62. The p-value is 0.45. The result is not significant at p ≤ 0.05.The chi-square statistic is 4.53. The p-value is 0.21 The result is not significant at p ≤ 0.05.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Metwally, D.M.; Al-Turaiki, I.M.; Altwaijry, N.; Alghamdi, S.Q.; Alanazi, A.D. Molecular Identification of Trypanosoma evansi Isolated from Arabian Camels (Camelus dromedarius) in Riyadh and Al-Qassim, Saudi Arabia. Animals 2021, 11, 1149. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11041149

AMA Style

Metwally DM, Al-Turaiki IM, Altwaijry N, Alghamdi SQ, Alanazi AD. Molecular Identification of Trypanosoma evansi Isolated from Arabian Camels (Camelus dromedarius) in Riyadh and Al-Qassim, Saudi Arabia. Animals. 2021; 11(4):1149. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11041149

Chicago/Turabian Style

Metwally, Dina M., Isra M. Al-Turaiki, Najwa Altwaijry, Samia Q. Alghamdi, and Abdullah D. Alanazi. 2021. "Molecular Identification of Trypanosoma evansi Isolated from Arabian Camels (Camelus dromedarius) in Riyadh and Al-Qassim, Saudi Arabia" Animals 11, no. 4: 1149. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11041149

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop