Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Music on Livestock: Cattle, Poultry and Pigs
Next Article in Special Issue
Mutation Characteristics and Phylogenetic Analysis of Five Leishmania Clinical Isolates
Previous Article in Journal
Target-AID-Mediated Multiplex Base Editing in Porcine Fibroblasts
Previous Article in Special Issue
Molecular Characterization of Blastocystis sp. in Camelus bactrianus in Northwestern China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genotyping and Zoonotic Potential of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in Stray Dogs Sheltered from Shanghai, China

National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research), NHC Key Laboratory of Parasite and Vector Biology, WHO Collaborating Center for Tropical Diseases, National Center for International Research on Tropical Diseases, Shanghai 200025, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2021, 11(12), 3571; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11123571
Submission received: 12 November 2021 / Revised: 10 December 2021 / Accepted: 13 December 2021 / Published: 16 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Advances in Parasite Epidemiology and Population Genetics)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Enterocytozoon bieneusi is the most prevalent species with zoonotic risks in humans and various livestock, wildlife and companion mammals. Dogs being the most popular companion animals of humans become more and more regarded recently. The present study reported the total E. bieneusi positive rate of 8.8% (24/272), and 8 genotypes including three known (genotypes EbpA, Henan V and Type IV) and 5 novel genotypes (genotypes SHZJD1–5) in stray dogs from Shanghai but sheltered in Zhenjiang, Jiangsu Province, China. In addition, all the genotypes here were all clustered into group 1 with zoonotic potential.

Abstract

Microsporidia are considered to be highly diverged and specialized parasites, and can infect a wide variety of vertebrate and invertebrate hosts. Enterocytozoon bieneusi is the most prevalent species in humans and various livestock, wildlife, and companion mammals. Dogs being the most popular companion animals of humans become more and more regarded. In this study, 272 fecal specimens were collected from stray dogs from Shanghai, but the dogs were adopted in a shelter in Zhenjiang, Jiangsu Province, China. E. bieneusi was examined by PCR amplification of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region and sequence analysis. The total positive rate of E. bieneusi was 8.8% (24/272). Moreover, 8 genotypes were found, including three known (genotypes EbpA, Henan V and Type IV) and 5 novel genotypes (genotypes SHZJD1–5). Two samples were positive for two genotypes, one was positive fortype SHZJD4 and Henan V, the other was positive for Henan V and Type IV. In addition, phylogenetic analysis showed all genotypes obtained in this study were all clustered into the zoonotic group 1. Therefore, the risk of zoonotic transmission of pathogens such as E. bieneusi from stray dogs to humans potentially threaten human health, and it is time to strengthen their health management.

1. Introduction

Microsporidia are obligate eukaryotic intracellular pathogens, including more than 200 microsporidian genera and nearly 1500 species. Aproximately 17 species have been reported in mammals including humans, among which Enterocytozoon bieneusi (E. bieneusi) was the most common in humans and wild, domesticand companion mammals worldwide [1,2,3,4]. Infection with E. bieneusi could cause chronic diarrhea and wasting syndrome in immunocompromised patients, such as HIV/AIDS patients and organ transplant recipients [5,6]. In immunocompetent individuals, it is mainly associated with self-limited diarrhea and malabsorption [4,5,7].
Recently, pets especially dogs or cats, have been a part of modern life with the increasing consumption capacity [8]. Meanwhile, more and more stray dogs/cats unfortunately appeared in cities or countries. These animals have been considered to be potential conserved hosts of various pathogens especially intestinal parasites [9]. Now, it has been reported that E. bieneusi may be transmitted between humans and animals through contaminated fomites, water and food [10,11].
Recently, molecular analysis combined with genotyping have been considered to be a standard tool to genetically characterize E. bieneusi. Nested PCR amplification and sequence analysis of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of the rRNA gene have been widely used in identifying and describing the genotypes of E. bieneusi [12]. So far, at least 500 genotypes of E. bieneusi have been defined based on ITS gene, which were classified into 11 phylogenetic groups. Group 1 and group 2 cover the most of zoonotic genotypes, whereas groups 3–11 seem to have strong host specificity [13].
In view of dogs are the most important companion animals of humans, and more and more stray dogs appear in the society, the present study aimed to describe the prevalence and genotypes of E. bieneusi through molecular characterization in adopted stray dogs from Shanghai, China.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sources and Collection of Specimens

A total of 272 fecal samples from post-weaning dogs (264 Canis lupus familiaris, two huskies, two golden retrievers, two samoyeds, one wolf dog and one bulldog) were obtained in a shelter in Zhenjiang, Jiangsu Province, China, while the stray dogs were all transferred from Shanghai. Samples were collected individually from each dog using a sterile glove and placed in a faeces container, and then were put into a box with ice. All the specimens were sent to the laboratory and stored at −20 °C until use.

2.2. DNA Extraction and PCR Amplification

QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) was used to extract genomic DNA according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted DNA was stored at −30 °C until used in the PCR amplification. The presence of E. bieneusi DNA was confirmed by amplifying of an approximately 390 bp fragment including the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the rRNA gene. The primers and PCR thermal cycler parameters used in the present study have been described in our previous study [5]. Briefly, PCR mixtures (25 μL) were composed of 12.5 μL of Taq mix (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), 1 μL each of the forward and reverse primers (10 μM) (Sunny Biotechnology, Shanghai, China), 1 μL of DNA template and 9.5 μL of nuclease-free water (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The positive control (E. bieneusi-positive DNA) and negative control (nuclease-free water) samples were added in each PCR run. All the samples were conducted by PCR for three times to make sure the authenticity of the results. The PCR products were examined by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis with GelRed staining (Biotium Inc., Hayward, CA, USA) and observed using a gel imaging system.

2.3. Sequencing and Molecular Analysis

All the positive secondary amplification products were sequenced in both directions on an ABI 3730 DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using a Big Dye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems) at Sunny Biotechnology, Shanghai. The obtained sequences were assembled using contigexpress. The genotypes of E. bieneusi were confirmed by aligning with the published sequences in GenBank and analysed using Clustal X 1.83 (https://clustalx.software.informer.com/, accessed on 11 October 2021).

2.4. Phylogenetic Analysis

A phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the ITS region sequences using the neighbour-joining (NJ) method in the software MEGA 7.0 (https://www.megasoftware.net/home, accessed on 8 October 2021). The representative nucleotide sequences of different E. bieneusi groups were downloaded from GenBank. Bootstrap analysis was used to assess the robustness of clusters using 1000 replicates.

2.5. Nucleotide Sequence Accession Numbers

The obtained new nucleotide sequences from this study were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers OK481084-OK481088.

3. Results

3.1. Occurrence of E. bieneusi in Stray Dogs

In the present study, 24 (8.8%) in 272 fecal samples from dogs (one samoyed and 23 Canis lupus familiaris) were positive for E. bieneusi by PCR amplification of the ITS regions. Furthermore, 12 female and 12 male dogs were identified to be E. bieneusi-positive among 133 female and 139 male dogs.

3.2. Genetic Characterizations of E. bieneusi in Stray Dogs

Of the 24 E. bieneusi-positive specimens, 8 genotypes were detected including three known genotypes (EbpA, Henan V and Type IV) and 5 novel genotypes (genotypes SHZJD1-SHZJD5). The most prevalent genotype was Type IV (41.7%, 10/24), followed by SHZJD1 (25.0%, 6/24) and EbpA (12.5%, 3/24), genotypes SHZJD2-SHZJD4 identified in one sample each. Moreover, the remaining two samples were detected to be positive for two genotypes, one was positive for genotypesSHZJD4 and Henan V, and the other was positive for Henan V and Type IV (Table 1). In addition, the sequences of genotypes SHZJD2-SHZJD4 have the largest similarities while genotype SHZJD1 was obviously different from them based on sequence analysis (Table 2).

3.3. Phylogenetic Analysis

Phylogenetic and nucleotide sequence analysis showed that all genotypes including the novel genotypes (SHZJD1-SHZJD5) and the known genotypes (EbpA, Type IV and Henan V) obtained in this study were clustered into group 1 (Figure 1), indicating the stray dogs posed potentially zoonotic transmission of E. bieneusi.

4. Discussion

The study presented the positive percentage of E. bieneusi in stray dogs sheltered from Shanghai by nested PCR amplification based on the ITS regions, and a total of 24 samples (8.8%, 24/272) were identified to be positive for E. bieneusi, which is similar to the reported infection rate in Spain (8.7%) [14] and Switzerland (8.3%) [15]. In view of the molecular investigations of E. bieneusi infection in stray dogs worldwide, the infection rate varied from 0 to 20.5% [3,16,17,18,19]. Moreover, farm dogs were the most reported on the surveys of this parasite infection in China [20,21,22,23,24,25] followed by pet dogs [3,25,26], with the highest infection rate of 40.74% in Hebei and 11.7% in Henan respectively. In other countries, the most E. bieneusi infection investigations of dogs were household dogs, with infection rate from 0.8% to 19.2% [15,26,27,28,29,30,31]. The E. bieneusi infection of pet dogs was from 4.4% to 11.8% [32,33,34,35], and that in undefined dogs have reported to be 43.8% [1], which is higher than other sources of dogs. In addition, dogs from clinics have also been detected E. bieneusi infection [23,36] (Table 3). It was speculated that the differences in infection rate in dogs may be potentially attributed to the different exposure probability to the potential pathogens in various living conditions, feeding modes, geographical distributions or other factors [13,37,38].
Of the 24 E. bieneusi-positive specimens, 8 genotypes were detected, including three known genotypes (EbpA, Henan V and Type IV) and 5 novel genotypes (SHZJD1-SHZJD5). Genotype Type IV was the dominant genotype which was found in 41.7% (10/24) of E. bieneusi isolates. Type IV was widely distributed in both humans and animals. The second one was the novel genotype SHZJD1 with 6 samples. To the best of our knowledge, genotype HenanV was first found in dogs, and in fact it has been found in humans [39] and monkeys [40]. The presence of common zoonotic genotypes EbpA and Type IV were found dogs, which is consistent with previous studies in Colombia [41], Henan [40], Shandong [24] and Xinjiang [25,42] (Table 3). Interestingly, two samples were positive for two genotypes in the study based on all of the genes being amplified at least three times and all PCR-positive products were sequenced successfully in both directions for accurate analysis, with one being positive for type SHZJD4 and Henan V, the other was positive for Henan V and Type IV. To our knowledge, there was only one previous report on coinfection of this parasite [25]. In addition, most stray dogs live in various complicated environment might contribute to coinfection. It has been reported that coinfection of different genotypes is prone to mutation or genetic recombination which may pose a greater threat to public health [43].
In recent years, companion animals particularly dogs play an important role in the family life, so the opportunities for intimate contact between dogs and humans continue to increase, which is accompanied by an increasing risk of exposure to certain diseases from dogs to humans. In fact, the five cities of Beijing, Shanghai, Chongqing, Wuhan and Guangzhou have been recognized as ‘Pet City’ [8] and it was estimated that there were at least 74 million pets at the end of 2018 and there were a lot of stray dogs in China [43]. According to the World Health Organization, there were nearly 200 million stray dogs worldwide [9]. In China, it was estimated that there were about 40 million stray dogs in China by the end of 2019 (https://www.sohu.com/a/362578244_100060664, accessed on 11 November 2021). And dogs have been reported to be associated with more than 60 zoonotic diseases, such as the ones caused by protozoa, helminths and arthropods, which are dangerous to public health [8,9,44,45]. Stray dogs are also considered to be a risk factor for many diseases such as rabies or echinococcus [46,47]. The feces from stray dogs might also pose threat to water or soil resources or the surroundings. Ingestion of parasitic stages through contaminated water or food is the most important transmission route for human infection. Contact with soil is also an important route for human especially children because they are often exposure to contaminated soil while playing in sandpits or playgrounds in the park [45]. In addition, stray dogs often keep in close contact with pet dogs or other companion animals, which act as another potential infection route [48]. Now, reports about the illegal centralized transportation of stray animals including dogs are increasing, which is unfavourable for the management of animals, and there might be potential disease transmission during the cross-regional transportation [38]. Furthermore, some animal protectionists occasionally adopt stray animals as pets, which also increase the potential risk of exposure to zoonotic diseases.
Stray dogs or sheltered dogs are not well protected against parasites, it may be attributed to lack of inadequate education for people or sufficient economic resources for dogs. The living environment of stray dogs may favor the zoonotic parasites transmission [9]. The observation of E. bieneusi infection in stray dogs give us important warning that dog food should be used to feed dogs instead of uncooked meat or fish and regular deworming is important. Better management and control capabilities should be taken to prevent the human-animal transmission caused by pathogens carried by pets, such as people should not keep in close contact with pets, or pets should not be allowed to enter public green spaces or the riverside. What’s more, the feces of dogs should be cleaned timely and correctly especially in public places.
Here, we described the genetic characteristics of E. bieneusi in fecal DNA samples from stray dogs using nested PCR-based sequencing of the ITS region. Zoonotic E. bieneusi genotypes were identified in this study but the transmission route was poorly understood. However, the contamination resulted from stray dogs with parasitic infection is a growing public health concern. Therefore, molecular investigations should be conducted in the future surveys.
There are some limitations in the present study. First, stool samples were collected after excretion, rather than collected directly from the rectum of each dog, it may be contaminated with each other due to space sharing in the shelter. Second, this is a cross-sectional survey on the E. bieneusi infection of stray dogs from Shanghai but sheltered in Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, no more informaiton on the original locations of dogs was provided, and no overall number of stray dogs in the region, making it difficult to assess their representativeness generally.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we detected the presence of E. bieneusi with positive rate of 8.8% in stray dogs in China. Based on PCR amplification of TIS gene, 5 novel genotypes (SHZJD1 to SHZJD5) and three known genotypes (EbpA, Henan V and Type IV) were identified with Type IV being the predominant genotype, exhibiting potential zoonotic transmission. Phylogenetic analysis showed that all the genotypes belonged to group 1. For public health, further investigation on the transmission dynamics of human-companion animals and the potential transmission risk during transportation should be required. In addition, better health management needs to be taken to assure dogs’ health and prevent the potential threats to public health.

Author Contributions

J.Y. and J.C. conceived the study. H.L., J.X. and J.Y. conducted sample collection, detection and molecular characterization. H.L. and J.Y. performed the result analysis. J.Y., Y.S. and J.C. contributed to experimental materials. H.L. and J.Y. drafted and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project, China (Nos. 2018ZX10201002-009 and 2018ZX10713001-004), and the National Key R&D Program of China, China (No. 2017YFD0500400). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of the National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (reference No. 2019003) on 8 August 2019.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The sequences that supports the finding of this study is openly available in the GenBank database at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nucleotide/ (accessed on 13 October 2021) under accession number OK481084-OK481088.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Amer, S.; Kim, S.; Han, J.I.; Na, K.J. Prevalence and genotypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in wildlife in Korea: A public health concern. Parasites Vectors 2019, 12, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Deng, L.; Yue, C.J.; Chai, Y.J.; Wang, W.Y.; Su, X.Y.; Zhou, Z.Y.; Wang, L.Q.; Li, L.Y.; Liu, H.F.; Zhong, Z.J.; et al. New genotypes and molecular characterization of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in pet birds in Southwestern China. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2019, 10, 164–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Karim, M.R.; Dong, H.; Yu, F.; Jian, F.; Zhang, L.; Wang, R.; Zhang, S.; Rume, F.I.; Ning, C.; Xiao, L. Genetic diversity in Enterocytozoon bieneusi isolates from dogs and cats in China: Host specificity and public health implications. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 3297–3302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Liu, H.; Shen, Y.; Yin, J.; Yuan, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Pan, W.; Hu, Y.; Cao, J. Prevalence and genetic characterization of Cryptosporidium, Enterocytozoon, Giardia and Cyclospora in diarrheal outpatients in China. BMC Infect. Dis. 2014, 14, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Liu, H.; Jiang, Z.; Yuan, Z.; Yin, J.; Wang, Z.; Yu, B.; Zhou, D.; Shen, Y.; Cao, J. Infection by and genotype characteristics of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in HIV/AIDS patients from Guangxi Zhuang autonomous region, China. BMC Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hunter, P.R.; Nichols, G. Epidemiology and clinical features of Cryptosporidium infection in immunocompromised patients. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2002, 15, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Matos, O.; Lobo, M.L.; Xiao, L. Epidemiology of Enterocytozoon bieneusi Infection in Humans. J. Parasitol. Res. 2012, 2012, 981424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Wu, Y.; Wang, J.; Song, Q.; Meng, F.; Ba, X.; Liu, W. A survey of the current status of pet market in Wuhan. China. Anim. Husb. Vet. Med. 2007, 11, 145–147. [Google Scholar]
  9. Otranto, D.; Dantas-Torres, F.; Mihalca, A.D.; Traub, R.J.; Lappin, M.; Baneth, G. Zoonotic Parasites of Sheltered and Stray Dogs in the Era of the Global Economic and Political Crisis. Trends Parasitol. Trends Parasitol. 2017, 33, 813–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Desoubeaux, G.; Nourrisson, C.; Moniot, M.; De Kyvon, M.A.; Bonnin, V.; De La Bretonniere, M.E.; Morange, V.; Bailly, E.; Lemaignen, A.; Morio, F.; et al. Genotyping Approach for Potential Common Source of Enterocytozoon bieneusi Infection in Hematology Unit. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2019, 25, 1625–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Santin, M.; Fayer, R. Microsporidiosis: Enterocytozoon bieneusi in domesticated and wild animals. Res. Vet. Sci. 2011, 90, 363–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Santin, M.; Fayer, R. Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotype nomenclature based on the internal transcribed spacer sequence: A consensus. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 2009, 56, 34–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, W.; Xiao, L. Ecological and public health significance of Enterocytozoon bieneusi. One Health 2021, 12, 100209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Del, A.C.; Izquierdo, F.; Navajas, R.; Pieniazek, N.J.; Miro, G.; Alonso, A.I.; Da, S.A.; Fenoy, S. Enterocytozoon bieneusi in animals: Rabbits and dogs as new hosts. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 1999, 46, 8S–9S. [Google Scholar]
  15. Mathis, A.; Breitenmoser, A.C.; Deplazes, P. Detection of new Enterocytozoon genotypes in faecal samples of farm dogs and a cat. Parasite 1999, 6, 189–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Delrobaei, M.; Jamshidi, S.; Shayan, P.; Ebrahimzade, E.; Ashrafi, T.I.; Rezaeian, M.; Rezaeian, M.; Mirjalali, H. Molecular Detection and Genotyping of Intestinal Microsporidia from Stray Dogs in Iran. Iran J. Parasitol. 2019, 14, 159–166. [Google Scholar]
  17. Santin, M.; Cortes, V.J.; Fayer, R. Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes in dogs in Bogota, Colombia. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2008, 79, 215–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Abe, N.; Kimata, I.; Iseki, M. Molecular evidence of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in Japan. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2009, 71, 217–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Li, W.; Li, Y.; Song, M.; Lu, Y.; Yang, J.; Tao, W.; Jiang, Y.; Wan, Q.; Zhang, S.; Xiao, L. Prevalence and genetic characteristics of Cryptosporidium, Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Giardia duodenalis in cats and dogs in Heilongjiang province, China. Vet. Parasitol. 2015, 208, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zhao, W.; Zhang, W.; Yang, Z.; Liu, A.; Zhang, L.; Yang, F.; Wang, R.; Ling, H. Genotyping of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in Farmed Blue Foxes (Alopex lagopus) and Raccoon Dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in China. PLoS ONE. 2015, 10, e0142611. [Google Scholar]
  21. Yang, Y.; Lin, Y.; Li, Q.; Zhang, S.; Tao, W.; Wan, Q.; Jiang, Y.; Li, W. Widespread presence of human-pathogenic Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotype D in farmed foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in China: First identification and zoonotic concern. Parasitol. Res. 2015, 114, 4341–4348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xu, C.; Ma, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, X.X.; Zhao, J.P.; Ba, H.X.; Du, R.; Xing, X.M.; Wang, Q.K.; Zhao, Q. Prevalence, risk factors and molecular characterization of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in five provinces of Northern China. Acta Trop. 2016, 161, 68–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Li, W.C.; Qin, J.; Wang, K.; Gu, Y.F. Genotypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in Dogs and Cats in Eastern China. Iran J. Parasitol. 2018, 13, 457–465. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Ma, Y.Y.; Ma, Y.T.; Nie, L.B.; Li, T.S.; Peng, J.J.; Cong, W.; Zou, Y.; Zhu, X.Q. Prevalence and genotype distribution of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in farmed raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in Shandong Province, eastern China. Parasitol. Res. 2020, 119, 1873–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhang, X.; Wang, Z.; Su, Y.; Liang, X.; Sun, X.; Peng, S.; Lu, H.; Jiang, N.; Yin, J.; Xiang, M.; et al. Identification and genotyping of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in China. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2011, 49, 2006–2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Xu, H.; Jin, Y.; Wu, W.; Li, P.; Wang, L.; Li, N.; Feng, Y.; Xiao, L. Genotypes of Cryptosporidium spp., Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Giardia duodenalis in dogs and cats in Shanghai, China. Parasites Vectors 2016, 9, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Cao, Y.; Tong, Q.; Zhao, C.; Maimaiti, A.; Chuai, L.; Wang, J.; Ma, D.; Qi, M. Molecular detection and genotyping of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in pet dogs in Xinjiang, Northwestern China. Parasite 2021, 28, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lores, B.; Del, A.C.; Arias, C. Enterocytozoon bieneusi (microsporidia) in faecal samples from domestic animals from Galicia, Spain. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 2002, 97, 941–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Galvan-Diaz, A.L.; Magnet, A.; Fenoy, S.; Henriques-Gil, N.; Haro, M.; Gordo, F.P.; Millan, J.; Miro, G.; Del, A.C.; Izquierdo, F. Microsporidia detection and genotyping study of human pathogenic E. bieneusi in animals from Spain. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e92289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Al-Herrawy, A.Z.; Gad, M.A. Microsporidial Spores in Fecal Samples of Some Domesticated Animals Living in Giza, Egypt. Iran J. Parasitol. 2016, 11, 195–203. [Google Scholar]
  31. Piekarska, J.; Kicia, M.; Wesolowska, M.; Kopacz, Z.; Gorczykowski, M.; Szczepankiewicz, B.; Kvac, M.; Sak, B. Zoonotic microsporidia in dogs and cats in Poland. Vet. Parasitol. 2017, 246, 108–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Dashti, A.; Santin, M.; Cano, L.; de Lucio, A.; Bailo, B.; de Mingo, M.H.; Koster, P.C.; Fernandez-Basterra, J.A.; Aramburu-Aguirre, J.; Lopez-Molina, N.; et al. Occurrence and genetic diversity of Enterocytozoon bieneusi (Microsporidia) in owned and sheltered dogs and cats in Northern Spain. Parasitol. Res. 2019, 118, 2979–2987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhang, Y.; Koehler, A.V.; Wang, T.; Cunliffe, D.; Gasser, R.B. Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes in cats and dogs in Victoria, Australia. BMC Microbiol. 2019, 19, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Lobo, M.L.; Xiao, L.; Cama, V.; Stevens, T.; Antunes, F.; Matos, O. Genotypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in mammals in Portugal. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 2006, 53 (Suppl. S1), S61–S64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Askari, Z.; Mirjalali, H.; Mohebali, M.; Zarei, Z.; Shojaei, S.; Rezaeian, T.; Rezaeian, M. Molecular Detection and Identification of Zoonotic Microsporidia Spore in Fecal Samples of Some Animals with Close-Contact to Human. Iran J. Parasitol. 2015, 10, 381–388. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Phrompraphai, T.; Itoh, N.; Iijima, Y.; Ito, Y.; Kimura, Y. Molecular detection and genotyping of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in family pet dogs obtained from different routes in Japan. Parasitol. Int. 2019, 70, 86–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, H.; Xu, N.; Yin, J.; Yuan, Z.; Shen, Y.; Cao, J. Prevalence and multilocus genotyping of potentially zoonotic Giardia duodenalis in pigs in Shanghai, China. Parasitology 2019, 146, 1199–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Liu, H.; Ni, H.; Xu, J.; Wang, R.; Li, Y.; Shen, Y.; Cao, J.; Yin, J. Genotyping and zoonotic potential of Cryptosporidium and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in pigs transported across regions in China. Microb. Pathog. 2021, 154, 104823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jamshidi, S.; Tabrizi, A.S.; Bahrami, M.; Momtaz, H. Microsporidia in household dogs and cats in Iran; a zoonotic concern. Vet. Parasitol. 2012, 185, 121–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Wang, L.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, G.; Guo, M.; Liu, L.; Feng, Y.; Xiao, L. Zoonotic Cryptosporidium species and Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes in HIV-positive patients on antiretroviral therapy. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2013, 51, 557–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Karim, M.R.; Wang, R.; He, X.; Zhang, L.; Li, J.; Rume, F.I.; Dong, H.; Qi, M.; Jian, F.; Zhang, S.; et al. Multilocus sequence typing of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in nonhuman primates in China. Vet. Parasitol. 2014, 200, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, Y.; Xin, L.; Zhao, A.; Xu, C.; Wang, T.; Jing, B.; Qi, M. Molecular detection and genotypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in farmed mink (Neovison vison), blue foxes (Alopex lagopus), and raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in Xinjiang, China. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2021, 14, 211–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Jiang, N.; Yin, H.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Z.; Chi, X.; Wang, S. Research progress on co-infection of H9N2 subtype Avian Influenza Virus with Other Pathogens. China Anim. Husb. Vet. Med. 2021, 48, 3447–3455. [Google Scholar]
  44. Macpherson, C.N. Human behaviour and the epidemiology of parasitic zoonoses. Int. J. Parasitol. 2005, 35, 1319–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Szwabe, K.; Blaszkowska, J. Stray dogs and cats as potential sources of soil contamination with zoonotic parasites. Ann. Agric Environ. Med. 2017, 24, 39–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Arechiga, C.N.; Karunaratna, D.; Aguilar, S.A. Control of canine rabies in developing countries: Key features and animal welfare implications. Rev. Sci. Tech. 2014, 33, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gong, Q.L.; Ge, G.Y.; Wang, Q.; Tian, T.; Liu, F.; Diao, N.C.; Nie, L.B.; Zong, Y.; Li, J.M.; Shi, K.; et al. Meta-analysis of the prevalence of Echinococcus in dogs in China from 2010 to 2019. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2021, 15, e0009268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Gamble, L.; Gibson, A.D.; Shervell, K.; Lohr, F.; Otter, I.; Mellanby, R.J. The problem of stray dogs. Rev. Sci. Tech. 2018, 37, 543–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationships of the 5 novel genotypes (SHZJD1 to SHZJD5) and three known genotypes (EbpA, Henan V and Type IV) of E. bieneusi identified in this study inferred from a neighbour-joining analysis of internal transcribed spacer (ITS) gene sequences based on genetic distances calculated by the Kimura two-parameter model. Numbers on the branches are percent bootstrapping values from 1000 replicates. The E. bieneusi genotype CSK2 (KY706128) from a white kangaroo was used as the outgroup. The black filled-in triangles and circles indicate novel and known genotypes identified in this study, respectively.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationships of the 5 novel genotypes (SHZJD1 to SHZJD5) and three known genotypes (EbpA, Henan V and Type IV) of E. bieneusi identified in this study inferred from a neighbour-joining analysis of internal transcribed spacer (ITS) gene sequences based on genetic distances calculated by the Kimura two-parameter model. Numbers on the branches are percent bootstrapping values from 1000 replicates. The E. bieneusi genotype CSK2 (KY706128) from a white kangaroo was used as the outgroup. The black filled-in triangles and circles indicate novel and known genotypes identified in this study, respectively.
Animals 11 03571 g001
Table 1. Prevalence and genotype distribution of E. bieneusi isolates of stray dogs in Shanghai.
Table 1. Prevalence and genotype distribution of E. bieneusi isolates of stray dogs in Shanghai.
InfectionGenotypesNo. of Positive
KnownEbpA3
Type IV10
NovelSHZJD16
SHZJD21
SHZJD31
SHZJD41
MixedHenanV + SHZJD41
HenanV + Type IV1
Table 2. Variation of the ITS gene sequences of E. bieneusi isolates in dogs.
Table 2. Variation of the ITS gene sequences of E. bieneusi isolates in dogs.
GenotypeNucleotide at Position (ITS)Genbank No.
137187193199201207219223237239241244245250264268271282
Novel
SHZJD1ATTTGATTAGGAAATATGOK481086
SHZJD2GCTTGACGGGGGGATAGAOK481088
SHZJD3GCTTGACGGGGGAACGGAOK481085
SHZJD4GCTTGGCGGGGGAATAGAOK481084
SHZJD5GCCTGACGGGGGAATAGAOK481087
Known
EbpAATTTTATTGGGGAGTAGAMN179306
Type IVGCTTGACGGGGGAATAGAAF267141
HenanVGCTCGACGGAAGAATAGAKJ651439
Table 3. Prevalence and genotype distribution of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in dogs worldwide.
Table 3. Prevalence and genotype distribution of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in dogs worldwide.
County/ProvinceSource; Infection RateGenotype (No.)Reference
ColombiaS, 15.0 (18/120)1: Type IV (1), WL11 (1); 11: PtEb IX (16)[17]
PolandH, 4.9 (4/82)1: D (2); 11: PtEb IX (2)[31]
SpainH, 19.2 (14/73)1: A (7)[29]
SpainH, 0.8 (2/237)2: BEB6 (1); 11: PtEb IX (1)[32]
SpainH, 11.8 (2/17)N/A[28]
SpainH, 8.7 (4/46)N/A[14]
SwitzerlandF, 8.3 (3/36)11: PtEb IX (3)[15]
AustraliaH, 4.4 (15/342)1: D (5); 3: VIC_dog1 (1); 11: PtEb IX (9)[33]
IranS, 5.3 (4/75)1: D (4)[16]
IranP, 11.8 (2/17)N/A[35]
IranC, 25.8 (8/100)N/A[40]
EgyptH, 13 (14/108)N/A[30]
JapanP, 5.0 (1/20); S, 1.7 (1/59)11: PtEb IX (2)[18]
JapanP, 4.4 (26/597)11: PtEb IX(26)[36]
KoreaU, 43.8 (21/48)1: D(8); Korea-WL1(8); Korea-WL1(6); Korea-WL1(1)[1]
China---
JilinP, 7.7 (2/26)2: CHN5 (1), CHN6 (1)[44]
HenanP, 11.7 (23/197); S, 20.5 (31/151)1: O (4), D (3), EbpA (2), macaque3 (2), CD1-CD4, EbpC, Peru8, PigEBITS5 and Type IV (1 each); 2: CD6 (1); 7: CD5 (1); 11: PtEb IX (26), CD8 (4), CD7 (2), WW8 (1)[39]
HeilongjiangP, 7.2 (18/249); S, 0.0 (0/18)1: D (1), EbpC (2), NED1 (1), NED2 (1); 11: PtEb IX (14), NED3 (1), NED4 (1)[19]
ShanghaiH, 7.8 (8/102); P, 5.5 (21/383)1: D (1); 11: PtEb IX (28)[22]
AnhuiC, 9.3(20/215)1: PtEb IX(12),EbpC(4),CHD1(2),CHD2 (2)[23]
ZhejiangC, 7(7/100)1: PtEb IX(4), CHD 3(3)[19]
ShandongF, 6.5 (23/356)1: D(8), Peru8(3), Type IV(11); 2:CHG1(1)[24]
HeilongjiangF, 4.1 (2/49)1: D (1), CHN-R1 (1)[20]
HeilongjiangF, 10.5 (17/162)1: D (14), CHN-DC1 (1), and CHN-DC1/WildBoar3 (1)[21]
HeilongjiangF, 2.5 (1/40)CHN-DC1 (1)[22]
HebeiF, 40.74(22/54)1: CHN-DC1 (1), CHN–F1 (3), NCF2 (15), NCR1 (2)[20]
JilinF, 30.91 (34/110)1: CHN-DC1 (7), CHN–F1 (6), D (5), NCF2 (11), NCR2 (5)[20]
LiaoningF, 15.28 (11/72)1: CHN–F1 (1), D (4), NCF2 (6)[20]
XinjiangH, 2.6(1/39)1: EbpA(1)[43]
XinjiangP, 6.3(38/604)11: PtEb IX (19); 1: EbpC (12), D (2), CD9 (1), Type IV (1), CD11 (1), CD12 (1), CD13 (1)[27]
ShanghaiS, 8.8(24/272)1: TypeIV(10); EbpA(3); SHZJD1(6); SHZJD2(1); SHZJD3(1); SHZJD5(1); SHZJD4 + HenanV (1); HenanV + Type IV (1)This study
Note: The data of this study are updated on the basis of the previous literature. a C, clinic; F, farm; H, household; P, pet; S, stray; U, undefined; Z, zoo; b Genotyping study using confirmed E. bieneusi-positive isolates.; c N/A, not available.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, H.; Xu, J.; Shen, Y.; Cao, J.; Yin, J. Genotyping and Zoonotic Potential of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in Stray Dogs Sheltered from Shanghai, China. Animals 2021, 11, 3571. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11123571

AMA Style

Liu H, Xu J, Shen Y, Cao J, Yin J. Genotyping and Zoonotic Potential of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in Stray Dogs Sheltered from Shanghai, China. Animals. 2021; 11(12):3571. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11123571

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Hua, Jie Xu, Yujuan Shen, Jianping Cao, and Jianhai Yin. 2021. "Genotyping and Zoonotic Potential of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in Stray Dogs Sheltered from Shanghai, China" Animals 11, no. 12: 3571. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11123571

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop