Next Article in Journal
Species Traits Drive Long-Term Population Trends of Common Breeding Birds in Northern Italy
Next Article in Special Issue
Managing Gut Microbiota through In Ovo Nutrition Influences Early-Life Programming in Broiler Chickens
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Quadratus Lumborum Block as Part of an Opioid-Free Anaesthesia for Canine Ovariohysterectomy
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Feeding Restriction on the Microbiota and Metabolome Response in Late-Phase Laying Hens
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Dietary Tributyrin on Growth Performance, Biochemical Indices, and Intestinal Microbiota of Yellow-Feathered Broilers

1
School of Life Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan 528000, China
2
Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510000, China
3
Kaiping Lvhuang Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Development Co., Ltd., Jiangmen 529000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2021, 11(12), 3425; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11123425
Submission received: 17 October 2021 / Revised: 21 November 2021 / Accepted: 27 November 2021 / Published: 1 December 2021

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Various antibiotic products in poultry production are gradually being banned around the world due to the adverse problems including the antibiotic residues and antibiotic resistance. Tributyrin was a potential alternative to antibiotics. The results of the present study indicated that tributyrin could improve the growth performance by modulating blood biochemical indices and the cecal microflora composition of yellow-feathered broilers. To the best of our knowledge, few studies investigated the effects of tributyrin on intestinal microbiota and its relationship with growth performance in broilers. This will provide a scientific basis for the application of tributyrin in animal husbandry in this post-antibiotic era.

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of tributyrin on growth performance, biochemical indices and intestinal microbiota of yellow-feathered broilers. 360 one-day-old chicks were randomly allocated to three treatments with six replicates of 20 chicks each, including a normal control group (NC), an antibiotic group (PC), and a tributyrin (250 mg/kg) group (TB) for 63 days. The results showed that compared with the control, the feed conversion ratio (FCR) in the TB group decreased during the d22 to d42 (p < 0.05) and overall, the final weight and FCR of broilers tended to increase and decrease, respectively. Moreover, the TB group showed the highest creatine concentrations at the entire period (p < 0.05). TB treatment increased the Bacteroidetes relative abundance and decreased Firmicutes. Principal coordinates analysis yielded clear clustering of the three groups. Linear discriminant analysis effect size analysis found seven differentially abundant taxa in the TB group, including several members of Bacteroidedetes. The relative abundance of Eisenbergiella, Phascolarctobacterium, Megasphaera and Intestinimonas increased in tributyrin-treated broilers. Spearman correlation analysis identified a correlation between Eisenbergiella abundance and overall feed efficiency. These results demonstrated that tributyrin could improve the growth performance by modulating blood biochemical indices and the cecal microflora composition of broilers.

1. Introduction

Sub-therapeutic antibiotics have been extensively used in the poultry industry for nearly 70 years to improve growth performance and disease resistance [1]. However, due to the rapid emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and its potential threat to human health, an antibiotic ban in animal husbandry has been widely implemented, especially in the European Union in 2006 [2] and China in 2020 [3]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to find safe alternatives with no residual effect in this post-antibiotic era.
Increasing evidence suggests that butyrate is a potential alternative to antibiotics accounted for the fact that it can act as the major energy source of the colon [4], reduce pathogen colonization [5,6], improve intestinal barrier function [7], and exert anti-inflammatory properties [8]. However, the unpleasant odor and the rapid metabolism of butyric acid have limited its application in the livestock and poultry industry [9]. To overcome these drawbacks, there is increasing interest in developing butyric acid derivatives. Tributyrin is a triglyceride containing three molecules of butyric acid [10]. Previous research has shown that tributyrin improved growth performance in Eimeria maxima-infected broilers [11]. Moreover, dietary supplementation with 1000 mg/kg tributyrin improved eggshell quality and follicle-stimulating hormone secretion in broiler breeders with different egg-laying rates [12]. Tributyrin has the ability to converse the pepsinogen into pepsin, thus increasing the activity of the proteolytic enzymes and protein digestion [13]. A previous study reported that tributyrin increased the growth performance of weaned piglets accompanied with improvement of lipid metabolism and the protein digestibility for decreasing blood urea [14], a negative indicator of lean gain and feed efficiency [15]. He, et al. [16] reported that diet supplementation with 0.1% tributyrin could efficiently attenuate abnormal lipid metabolism in intrauterine growth retardation piglets.
It is widely acknowledged that the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) of chickens harbors a diverse community of microorganisms, which could reportedly positively affect nutrition absorption, immune system development, and disease resistance [17]. In this regard, intestinal microbiota and their metabolic products could influence the productivity and health of chickens [18]. Interestingly, the avian GIT bacteria has been documented to be modulated by diets and feed additives, such as probiotics, prebiotics and organic acids [18,19]. In recent years, the accelerated development of high throughput sequencing technology has expanded our understanding of diet, gut microbiota, and host interaction. Patrone, et al. [20] reported that diets supplemented with 0.2% tributyrin could positively affect gut microbial communities and the performance of weaning piglets. Likewise, supplementation with 5 g/kg monobutyrin and tributyrin was found to attenuate excessive inflammation in high-fat diet-fed mice by modulating the intestinal microbiota and decreasing liver cholesterol concentrations [21]. Furthermore, the intestinal microbiota can modulate the host health by regulating the biochemical profile, which could be reflected by blood biochemical indices and intestinal metabolic profiles [22,23]. However, to the best of our knowledge, few studies investigated the effects of tributyrin on intestinal microbiota in poultry. Therefore, we hypothesized that dietary tributyrin supplementation improved the growth performance of broilers by modulating plasma biochemical indices and the cecal microflora composition. Accordingly, this study investigated the effect of dietary tributyrin on the growth performance, blood biochemical indices, and intestinal microbiota of yellow-feathered broilers, aiming to find the potential microbiota for better growth performance of broilers.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Design and Diets

A total of 360 one-day-old female yellow-feathered broiler chicks were randomly allocated to three treatment groups of 120. Each group had six replicates with 20 chicks per replicate. The birds in the control group (NC) were fed a basal diet, while the antibiotic group (PC) and the tributyrin group (TB) fed a basal diet supplemented with a combination of 250 mg/kg nosiheptide and 200 mg/kg oxytetracycline calciuma, and 250 mg/kg tributyrin, respectively. The basal diets (Table 1) were formulated to meet the nutritional requirements of broilers recommended by the Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China (2004). The tributyrin products that contained 50% tributyrin and silica as a carrier were purchased by Guangdong Herbio Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China. The experiment period lasted 63 days and was divided into a starter phase (1–21 d), grower phase (22–42 d) and finisher phase (43–63 d). During the grower phase, 20 chicks with one replicate were assigned to a single page (65 × 60 × 40 cm), and each replicate was kept in two cages of this size during the grower phase and finisher phase. Chicks were reared in an environmentally controlled room with fresh water and feed provided ad libitum. The room temperature was maintained at 32 °C to 34 °C for the first three days and then reduced by 3 °C to 5 °C per week to achieve a final temperature of 26 °C. The light was provided for 23 h for the first week with a reduction to 16 h thereafter.

2.2. Growth Performance and Organ Indices

At the day 21, 42 and 63 after 12 h feed withdrawal, the body weight and the feed residues within each replicate was recorded, and the average daily gain, the average feed intake and feed conversion ratio of each replicate were calculated and adjusted for mortality, which was recorded daily.
After weighting at the day 21, 42 and 63, one chicken close to the average weight of each replicate was selected, weighed, collected blood samples and tissue, and slaughtered by exsanguination. The liver, bursa of Fabricius and spleen were collected and washed with cold sterile PBS to remove the attached impurity. The organ weights were recorded and the organ indices were expressed as the percentage of body weight.

2.3. Analyses of Plasma Biochemical Indicators

At the day 21, 42 and 63, the blood samples (5 mL) were collected into ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) tubes by wing-vein puncture. The plasma was then obtained by centrifuged of the whole blood at 3500× g for 10 min at 4 °C and stored at −80 °C until biochemical indices analysis. Plasma (1 mL) was analyzed for uric acid, lactate dehydrogenase, creatinine, alkaline phosphatase, cholesterol, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase using a Biochemical Analyzer Architect C8000 (Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA). These plasma biochemical indices were measured with corresponding reagent kits all from Fangcheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China).

2.4. Microbial Analysis

On day 63, five of the selected six chickens per group were used for cecal microbiota analysis. The cecal contents were aseptically collected and stored at −80 °C after being snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. Total genome DNA from cecal digesta was extracted using QIAamp (Tiangen, Beijing, China). DNA concentration and purity were detected by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis. The V3/V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified by using the primer 341F (5′-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3′) and primer 805R (5′-GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3′), and samples were sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq platform. Sequences were analyzed using the QIIME software package (QIIME development team, http://qiime.org/index.html, accessed on 16 October 2021) [24]. The raw data were filtered first and the clean sequences were joined and analyzed following the standard QIIME pipeline. High-quality sequences were clustered into operational taxonomic unit (OTU) at 97% similarity and the representative OTU sequences were assigned taxonomy based on the SILVA database [25]. Shared and unique OTUs among three groups were visualized using a Venn diagram. The alpha diversity was calculated respectively by package vegan and plotted with graphpad prism 7.0. For beta-diversity analysis, a principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) was conducted based on Bray-Curtis distance with statistical significance determined by permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) using R package. The differences in the relative abundances of microbiota were analyzed by linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe, http://huttenhower.sph.harvard.edu/lefse/, accessed on 16 October 2021) and STAMP with t-test [26]. The Spearman correlation between growth performance and the representative genus was plotted as a heatmap using the R package pheatmap.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons test using GraphPad Prism 7.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). The tabular data are presented as means, standard error of the mean, and probability values. Statistical significance was accepted at a p < 0.05 and tendency at p < 0.1.

3. Results

3.1. Effects of Tributyrin on Growth Performance

The effects of dietary tributyrin on the growth performance of yellow-feathered broilers are shown in Table 2. The final weight in the PC group was significantly higher than in the NC group (p < 0.05). In the PC group, the average daily gain (ADG) tended to increase compared with the control from day 1–63 (p = 0.063). Compared with the NC, the TB group decreased the feed conversion ratio (FCR) during the growth phase (22–42 d) (p < 0.05) and overall (p = 0.068) and showed a tendency to increase the final weight (p = 0.089). There were no significant differences in ADG and average daily feed intake (ADFI) (p > 0.05).

3.2. Effects of Tributyrin on Organ Indices

As shown in Table 3, no significant differences in organ indices including bursa, spleen, and liver were observed at all phases among the three groups (p > 0.05).

3.3. Effects of Tributyrin on Biochemical Indices

As shown in Table 4, compared with the NC group, dietary antibiotic supplementation increased the uric acid concentration on day 21, while dietary tributyrin supplementation decreased on day 63 (p < 0.05). Lactate dehydrogenase activity was the highest in the control broilers on day 42 (p < 0.05). Significantly higher creatine concentrations were observed in the TB group than in the NC and PC groups on day 21, 42, and 63 (p < 0.05). Broilers treated with antibiotics showed higher alanine transaminase (ALT) activities than the TB group broilers on day 63 and NC broilers on day 21 and day 63 (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in alkaline phosphatase, cholesterol, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, aspartate transaminase (AST), and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase at all sampling days.

3.4. Effects of Tributyrin on Intestinal Microbiota

A total of 1347 OTUs were identified in the cecal samples obtained from yellow-feathered broilers. The number of shared OTUs among the three groups was 489, and the numbers of OTUs specific for NC, PC and TB groups were 272, 119 and 81, respectively (Figure 1a). The composition of the top 10 phyla and top 15 genera in the cecal contents of broilers is shown in Figure 1b,c. The predominant phyla were Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Tenericute, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia, contributing to 99% of the whole phyla. Compared with the NC and PC groups, broilers in the TB group had a higher relative abundance of Bacteroidetes and a lower abundance of Firmicutes. Dominant microbiota in cecal contents at the genus level consisted of Bacteroides, unidentified_Ruminococcaceae, Barnesiella, Lactobacillus, Akkermansia, Faecalibacterium, unidentified_Lachnospiraceae, and Gallibacterium.
Regarding alpha and beta diversity of cecal microbiota in yellow-feathered broilers, results are shown in Figure 2. For alpha diversity indices, including observed_species, PD_whole_tree, shannon, simpson, chao1 and ace, no significant differences were found among the three groups (Figure 2a). Furthermore, beta diversity showed differences between groups (Figure 2b, p < 0.05). Likewise, the principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) based on Bray-Curtis distance revealed clear clustering of the three groups, though there was no significant difference between the NC and PC groups. The first principal components (PC1) accounted for 40% of the total variance in gut microbiota composition and the second principal components (PC2) accounted for 19% of the variation. The PC1 axis of the PCoA clearly separated the bacterial communities between the NC and TB groups.
The effect size measurements (LEfSe) analysis identified 18 biomarkers with LDA scores greater than four. Furthermore, seven bacterial taxa were found to be enriched in the TB group, including Bacteroidales (order), Bacteroidia (class), Bacteroidedetes (phylum), Bacteroides_barnesiae (species), Selenomonadales (order), Negatlvlcutes (class), and Lactobacillus_mucase (species). Moreover, Lactobacillus (genus), Lactobacillaceae (family), Lactobacillales (order), Bacilli (class), Lactobacillus_aviarius (species) were enriched in the PC group, while Ruminococcaceae (family), Clostridiales (order), Clostridia (class), Firmicutes (phylum), unidentified_Ruminacaccaceae (genus), Clostridium_papyrosolvens (species) were enriched in the NC group (Figure 3).
Welch’s t-test was further applied to identify the microbial composition differences at the order and genus levels between two groups, including NC vs. TB and PC vs. TB (Figure 4). In tributyrin-treated broilers, an increase in the relative abundance of Bacteroidales at the order level and lower Clostridiales abundance was observed, while the relative abundance of Eisenbergiella, Phascolarctobacterium, Megasphaera and Intestinimonas was increased. Moreover, in the TB group, a lower relative abundance of unidentified_Ruminococcaceae was found than in the NC group. After tributyrin supplementation, the relative abundance of Lachnoclostridium and Lactobacillus were increased and decreased, respectively, compared with the PC group.
Finally, the results of Spearman’s correlation analysis between growth performance during day1 to 63 and the top 35 genera in the yellow-feathered broilers are presented in Figure 5. The average abundance of the genera unidentified_Mollicutes was positively correlated with BW and ADG, whereas the genera of Megamonas, Sutterell and Eisenbergiella were negatively correlated with ADG and BW, ADFI, and FCR, respectively.

4. Discussion

Dietary supplementation with tributyrin has been demonstrated to improve animal production performance and disease resistance in monogastrics [27,28,29] and ruminants [30]. Notably, the positive effect of tributyrin may be attributed to the production of butyrate, which can promote the proliferation and differentiation of intestinal mucosal cells and improve nutrient absorption and utilization [31,32]. However, the efficacy of tributyrin as a growth promoter remains a matter of debate. It has been reported that dietary tributyrin administration at 1840 mg/kg increased the ADG, FCR and beneficial bacterial population in Arbor Acres (AA) broiler chickens under an isocaloric feeding regime [33]. Moreover, diets with a 0.2% mixture of butyric acid glycerides (mono-, di- and tri-glycerides) increased live weight at slaughtering and FCR of Ross 308 female chickens [34]. In contrast, tributyrate glyceride at 500 ppm or 2000 ppm did not change the ADG or FCR in Ross 308 and Ross 708 broilers; however, it modulated lipid metabolism and reduced abdominal fat deposition [35]. In the present study, we found that dietary supplementation with tributyrin increased the final weight and decreased the FCR in the entire phase; however, the difference failed to reach statistical significance. This discrepancy could be due to many factors, including different additions, breed, age, and different experimental conditions.
Blood biochemical indices usually reflect the physiological and metabolic status of animals. Creatinine, urea, and uric acid are widely acknowledged as reliable indicators for kidney function, as they are nitrogenous and protein end products of a catabolic process that are generally excreted by the kidney [36]. Elevated concentration of these plasma indices indicate kidney damage while decreasing their concentration helps to reduce the development of kidney disease [37]. In this regard, tributyrin has previously been reported to reduce kidney damage in dairy cows under heat stress by decreasing the concentration of creatinine, aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin, and the inflammatory response of immune cells [38]. Our results showed that tributyrin decreased the creatinine during all phases and uric acid levels during the last phase, indicating that tributyrin may have a potent protective effect on renal dysfunction. The mechanisms underlying this protective effect remain largely unknown, warranting further studies. Notably, we found that the uric acid concentration in the TB group was decreased on day 63 due to tributyrin’s previously documented long-term ability to reduce uricase activity [39]. Moreover, uric acid is a water-soluble antioxidant that inhibits oxidative damage and protects cell membranes and DNA [40,41]. The decreased uric acid concentration in TB groups contributed to the alleviation of oxidative injury of broilers. It was reported that elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity together with alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) could serve as indicators of liver damage [42]. A previous study showed that the activity of ALT and AST in Japanese quails supplemented with sodium butyrate had no significant effects at day 21 but significantly decreased at day 42 [7]. Consistently, the current study showed that treatment with tributyrin reduced the ALT activity at day 63 and LDH at day 42, suggesting that tributyrin seems to protect the broilers from liver injury during the late phase.
It is widely acknowledged that commensal gut microbiota plays a crucial role in maintaining host animal’s health and normal physiology [17]. Accumulating evidence indicates Firmicutes dominate the cecal microflora in chickens [43,44]. Nonetheless, our study showed that Bacteroidetes was the dominant phylum of cecal contents in the TB group, accounting for more than 80%, whereas Firmicutes accounted for less than 20%, which was consistent with the literature [45]. Furthermore, our LEfSe results showed that the Bacteroides phylum and its class Bacteroidia, order Bacteroidales, species Bacteroides_barnesiae, were potential biomarkers in the TB group. Bacteroides are anaerobic gram-negative rods that are considered the major bacteria involved in producing SCFA [46]. Given that Bacteroides possess large repertoires of carbohydrate utilization genes [47], it can be inferred that Bacteroides can improve the host’s nutrient digestion and absorption through carbohydrate metabolism in tributyrin-treated chickens. Interestingly, a previous study reported the association between beneficial bacteria Bacteroides in the avian gut and increased growth performance, body weight gain, breast muscle yield and low abdominal fat [48]. Further research has shown that Bacteroides were significantly more abundant in the high feed efficiency (low FCR) group [45], indicating the low FCR and high final weight may be due to the increased Bacteroides in the TB group.
The genera Eisenbergiella and Lachnoclostridium belonging to the Lachnospiraceae family, Intestinimonas and Megasphaera, have been reported to be important butyrate producers residing in the intestinal microbiota [49,50,51]. The high relative abundance of genera Eisenbergiella, Lachnoclostridium, Megasphaera and Intestinimonas observed in the present study indicated that tributyrin strongly helped stimulate the synthesis of butyrate, the preferred energy source for the intestinal epithelial cells [52]. Additionally, the Lachnospiraceae family can reportedly degrade starch and nonstarch polysaccharides to produce organic acids [53], thereby decreasing the expression of virulence factors from pathogens like Salmonella [54]. Furthermore, Lachnospiraceae has been documented to be consistently depleted in people with acute colitis, suggesting its beneficial effects on maintaining intestinal homeostasis [55]. However, a previous study showed high Eisenbergiella abundance in infected mice, suggesting its association with gut dysbiosis [56]. There is limited information about the biological function of this genus, especially in birds, therefore needing further explore. Spearman correlation analysis in our study showed that Eisenbergiella was negatively correlated with FCR, suggesting that the low FCR in the TB group may be attributed to the increased abundance of Eisenbergiella. Tributyrin treatment was also found to increase Phascolarctobacterium abundance. A high-fat diet is reportedly more likely to result in an increased abundance of Phascolarctobacterium [57]. Phascolarctobacterium is a propionate producer, and a decline in the abundance of this genus has been associated with colonic inflammation [58]. In our study, the increased abundance of this genus in the TB group seemed to improve the host immune response to a certain extent.
In conclusion, dietary tributyrin supplementation decreased the FCR during the growth phase and as well as overall. Furthermore, it showed a tendency to increase the final weight. Tributyrin increased the creatine concentrations at the entire period and changed the cecal microflora composition of yellow-feathered broilers on day 63. Furthermore, spearman correlation analysis in the current study showed that Eisenbergiella was negatively correlated with FCR, suggesting that the low FCR in the TB group might be attributed to the increased Eisenbergiella abundance. These findings provided a new insight into the application of tributyrin as a potential antibiotic alternative in broiler industry by modulating the intestinal microbiota composition. Further research should explore the evolution of the cecal microbiota in TB-supplemented broilers and confirm the relationship between the Eisenbergiella and FCR.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.Z.; methodology, G.X. and L.Z.; software, L.G.; validation, Q.Q. and C.Z.; formal analysis, L.G. and L.Z.; data curation, H.Z.; writing-original draft preparation, L.G.; writing-review and editing, L.G. and X.F.; visualization, L.G.; supervision, X.Y.; project administration, W.H.; funding acquisition, H.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Guangdong Province Modern Agriculture Poultry Industry technology system innovation team construction project (2020KJ128), Special Foundation for Key Research Area of Educational Commission of Guangdong Province (2019KZDZX2006), Guangdong Science and Technology Innovation Strategy Special Fund (DZX20192520309), the Scientific Research Foundation in the Higher Education Institutions of Educational Commission of Guangdong Province (2017GCZX006), the Special fund for scientific innovation strategy-construction of high level Academy of Agriculture Science (202107TD).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Foshan University (Approval ID: FOSU#19-025).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

Author W.H. was employed by company Kaiping Lvhuang Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Development Co., Ltd. (Jiangmen, China) and the author has no conflict of interest. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Muaz, K.; Riaz, M.; Akhtar, S.; Park, S.; Ismail, A. Antibiotic Residues in Chicken Meat: Global Prevalence, Threats, and Decontamination Strategies: A Review. J. Food Prot. 2018, 81, 619–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Union, E. Ban on Antibiotics as Growth Promoters in Animal Feed Enters into Effect. 2006. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_05_1687 (accessed on 16 October 2021).
  3. Echemi. The Feed Prohibition Order Came into Effect in July. 2020. Available online: https://www.echemi.com/cms/110309.html (accessed on 16 October 2021).
  4. Hamer, H.M.; Jonkers, D.; Venema, K.; Vanhoutvin, S.; Troost, F.J.; Brummer, R.J. Review article: The role of butyrate on colonic function. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2008, 27, 104–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Onrust, L.; Baeyen, S.; Haesebrouck, F.; Ducatelle, R.; Immerseel, F.V. Effect of in feed administration of different butyrate formulations on Salmonella Enteritidis colonization and cecal microbiota in broilers. Vet. Res. 2020, 51, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Namkung, H.; Yu, H.; Gong, J.; Leeson, S.J.P. Antimicrobial activity of butyrate glycerides toward Salmonella Typhimurium and Clostridium perfringens. Poult. Sci. 2011, 90, 2217–2222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Elnesr, S.S.; Ropy, A.; Abdel-Razik, A.H. Effect of dietary sodium butyrate supplementation on growth, blood biochemistry, haematology and histomorphometry of intestine and immune organs of Japanese quail. Animal 2019, 13, 1234–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Silva, J.P.B.; Navegantes-Lima, K.C.; Oliveira, A.L.B.; Rodrigues, D.V.S.; Gaspar, S.L.F.; Monteiro, V.V.S.; Moura, D.P.; Monteiro, M.C. Protective Mechanisms of Butyrate on Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2018, 24, 4154–4166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Biagi, G.; Piva, A.; Moschini, M.; Vezzali, E.; Roth, F.X. Performance, intestinal microflora, and wall morphology of weanling pigs fed sodium butyrate. J. Anim. Sci. 2007, 85, 1184–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Szentirmai, E.; Millican, N.S.; Massie, A.R.; Kapas, L. Butyrate, a metabolite of intestinal bacteria, enhances sleep. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 7035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Hansen, V.L.; Kahl, S.; Proszkowiec-Weglarz, M.; Jiménez, S.C.; Miska, K.B. The effects of tributyrin supplementation on weight gain and intestinal gene expression in broiler chickens during Eimeria maxima-induced coccidiosis. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 100984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhao, S.; Zhang, K.; Ding, X.; Celi, P.; Wang, J. The impact of dietary supplementation of different feed additives on performances of broiler breeders characterized by different egg-laying rate. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 6091–6099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sakdee, J.; Poeikhamph, T.; Rakangthon, C.; Poungpong, K.; Bunchasak, C. Effect of tributyrin supplementation in diet on production performance and gastrointestinal tract of healthy nursery pigs. Pak. J. Nutr. 2016, 15, 954–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Sotira, S.; Dell’Anno, M.; Caprarulo, V.; Hejna, M.; Pirrone, F.; Callegari, M.L.; Tucci, T.V.; Rossi, L. Effects of Tributyrin Supplementation on Growth Performance, Insulin, Blood Metabolites and Gut Microbiota in Weaned Piglets. Animals 2020, 10, 726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Whang, K.Y.; Easter, R.A. Blood urea nitrogen as an index of feed efficiency and lean growth potential in growing-finishing swine. Asian Australas. J. Anim. 2000, 13, 811–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. He, J.; Dong, L.; Xu, W.; Bai, K.; Lu, C.; Wu, Y.; Huang, Q.; Zhang, L.; Wang, T. Dietary Tributyrin Supplementation Attenuates Insulin Resistance and Abnormal Lipid Metabolism in Suckling Piglets with Intrauterine Growth Retardation. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0136848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shang, Y.; Kumar, S.; Oakley, B.; Kim, W.K. Chicken Gut Microbiota: Importance and Detection Technology. Front. Vet. Sci 2018, 5, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Abramowicz, K.; Krauze, M.; Ognik, K. Use of Bacillus subtilis PB6 enriched with choline to improve growth performance, immune status, histological parameters and intestinal microbiota of broiler chickens. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2020, 60, 625–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yadav, S.; Jha, R.J. Strategies to modulate the intestinal microbiota and their effects on nutrient utilization, performance, and health of poultry. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2019, 10, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Patrone, V.; Miragoli, F.; Prandini, A.; Sigolo, S.; Callegari, M.L. Implications of Tributyrin on Gut Microbiota Shifts Related to Performances of Weaning Piglets. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 854. [Google Scholar]
  21. Nguyen, T.D.; Prykhodko, O.; Hallenius, F.F.; Nyman, M. Effects of monobutyrin and tributyrin on liver lipid profile, caecal microbiota composition and SCFA in high-fat diet-fed rats. J. Nutr. Sci. 2017, 6, e51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Park, I.; Zimmerman, N.P.; Smith, A.H.; Rehberger, T.G.; Lillehoj, E.P.; Lillehoj, H.S. Dietary Supplementation with Bacillus subtilis Direct-Fed Microbials Alters Chicken Intestinal Metabolite Levels. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Rowland, I.; Gibson, G.; Heinken, A.; Scott, K.; Swann, J.; Thiele, I.; Tuohy, K. Gut microbiota functions: Metabolism of nutrients and other food components. Eur. J. Nutr. 2018, 57, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Caporaso, J.G.; Kuczynski, J.; Stombaugh, J.; Bittinger, K.; Bushman, F.D.; Costello, E.K.; Fierer, N.; Peña, A.G.; Goodrich, J.K.; Gordon, J.I.; et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 2010, 7, 335–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Quast, C.; Pruesse, E.; Yilmaz, P.; Gerken, J.; Schweer, T.; Yarza, P.; Peplies, J.; Glöckner, F.O. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 41, D590–D596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Parks, D.H.; Tyson, G.W.; Hugenholtz, P.; Beiko, R.G. STAMP: Statistical analysis of taxonomic and functional profiles. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 3123–3124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Chen, G.; Zhuo, R.; Ding, H.; Yang, K.; Xue, J.; Zhang, S.; Chen, L.; Yin, Y.; Fang, R. Effects of dietary tributyrin and physterol ester supplementation on growth performance, intestinal morphology, microbiota and metabolites in weaned piglets. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Sotira, S.; Dell’Anno, M.; Caprarulo, V.; Hejna, M.; Pirrone, F.; Callegari, M.L.; Tucci, T.V.; Rossi, L. Dietary tributyrin improves reproductive performance, antioxidant capacity, and ovary function of broiler breeders. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 101429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liang, H.; Ji, K.; Ge, X.; Xi, B.; Chen, X. Tributyrin Plays an Important Role in Regulating the Growth and Health Status of Juvenile Blunt Snout Bream (Megalobrama amblycephala), as Evidenced by Pathological Examination. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Inabu, Y.; Murayama, K.; Inouchi, K.; Sugino, T. The effect of tributyrin supplementation to milk replacer on plasma glucagon-like peptide 2 concentrations in pre-weaning calves. Anim. Sci. J. 2019, 90, 1185–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Siavoshian, S.; Segain, J.P.; Kornprobst, M.; Bonnet, C.; Cherbut, C.; Galmiche, J.-P.; Blottière, H.M. Butyrate and trichostatin A effects on the proliferation/differentiation of human intestinal epithelial cells: Induction of cyclin D3 and p21 expression. Gut 2000, 46, 507. [Google Scholar]
  32. Liu, J.D.; Bayir, H.O.; Cosby, D.E.; Cox, N.A.; Williams, S.M.; Fowler, J. Evaluation of encapsulated sodium butyrate on growth performance, energy digestibility, gut development, and Salmonella colonization in broilers. Poult. Sci. 2017, 96, 3638–3644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hu, Q.; Yin, F.; Li, B.; Guo, Y.; Yin, Y. Dietary Tributyrin Administration Improves Intestinal Morphology and Selected Bacterial and Short-Chain Fatty Acid Profiles in Broilers Under an Isocaloric Feeding Regime. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 715712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Antongiovanni, M.; Buccioni, A.; Petacchi, F.; Leeson, S.; Minieri, S.; Martini, A.; Cecchi, R.J.I. Butyric acid glycerides in the diet of broiler chickens: Effects on gut histology and carcass composition. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2010, 6, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bedford, A.; Yu, H.; Hernandez, M.; Squires, E.J.; Leeson, S.; Hou, Y.; Gong, J. Response of Ross 308 and 708 broiler strains in growth performance and lipid metabolism to diets containing tributyrate glycerides. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2017, 98, 98–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Elazab, S.T.; Elshater, N.S.; Kishaway, A.T.Y.; Ei-Emam, H.A. Cinnamon Extract and Probiotic Supplementation Alleviate Copper-Induced Nephrotoxicity via Modulating Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and Apoptosis in Broiler Chickens. Animals 2021, 11, 1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhou, F.; Yu, G.; Wang, G.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Wang, W.; Chen, N. Association of serum uric acid levels with the incident of kidney disease and rapid eGFR decline in Chinese individuals with eGFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and negative proteinuria. Clin. Exp. Nephrol. 2019, 23, 871–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Guo, W.; Liu, J.; Yang, Y.; Ma, H.; Gong, Q.; Kan, X.; Ran, X.; Cao, Y.; Wang, J.; Fu, S.J. Rumen-bypassed tributyrin alleviates heat stress by reducing the inflammatory responses of immune cells. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 348–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, A.; Wang, Y.; Liao, X.D.; Wu, Y.; Liang, J.B.; Laudadio, V.; Tufarelli, V. Sodium butyrate mitigates in vitro ammonia generation in cecal content of laying hens. Environ. Sci. Pollut Res. Int. 2016, 23, 16272–16279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Becker, B.F. Towards the physiological function of uric acid. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1993, 14, 615–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Spitsin, S.V.; Scott, G.S.; Kean, R.B.; Mikheeva, T.; Hooper, D.C. Protection of myelin basic protein immunized mice from free-radical mediated inflammatory cell invasion of the central nervous system by the natural peroxynitrite scavenger uric acid. Neurosci. Lett. 2000, 292, 137–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ozer, E.K.; Goktas, M.T.; Kilinc, I.; Bariskaner, H.; Iskit, A.B.J.B.; Biomedecine, P. Celecoxib administration reduced mortality, mesenteric hypoperfusion, aortic dysfunction and multiple organ injury in septic rats. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2016, 86, 583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Shaufi, M.A.M.; Sieo, C.C.; Chong, C.W.; Gan, H.M.; Ho, Y.W. Deciphering chicken gut microbial dynamics based on high-throughput 16S rRNA metagenomics analyses. Gut Pathog. 2015, 7, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Rychlik, I. Composition and Function of Chicken Gut Microbiota. Animals 2020, 10, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Huang, Y.; Lv, H.; Song, Y.; Sun, C.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, S. Community composition of cecal microbiota in commercial yellow broilers with high and low feed efficiencies. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 100996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rios-Covian, D.; Salazar, N.; Gueimonde, M.; de Los Reyes-Gavilan, C.G. Shaping the metabolism of intestinal Bacteroides population through diet to improve human health. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Cho, K.H.; Cho, D.; Wang, G.R.; Salyers, A.A. New regulatory gene that contributes to control of Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron starch utilization genes. J. Bacteriol. 2001, 183, 7198–7205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Zheng, M.; Mao, P.; Tian, X.; Guo, Q.; Meng, L. Effects of dietary supplementation of alfalfa meal on growth performance, carcass characteristics, meat and egg quality, and intestinal microbiota in Beijing-you chicken. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 2250–2259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dahiya, D.; Renuka, D.A.; Shandilya, U.; Puniya, A.; Shukla, P. New-generation probiotics: Perspectives and applications. In Microbiome and Metabolome in Diagnosis, Therapy, and Other Strategic Applications; Elsevier Ltd., Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherland, 2019; pp. 417–424. [Google Scholar]
  50. Klaering, K.; Hanske, L.; Bui, N.; Charrier, C.; Blaut, M.; Haller, D.; Plugge, C.M.; Clavel, T. Intestinimonas butyriciproducens gen. nov., sp. nov., a butyrate-producing bacterium from the mouse intestine. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2013, 63, 4606–4612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Khan, A.; Chattopadhyay, P.; Devi, P.; Pandey, R. Epigenetics of Host–Human Gut Microbiome Interactions; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  52. Ríos-Covián, D.; Ruas-Madiedo, P.; Margolles, A.; Gueimonde, M.; De Los Reyes-gavilán, C.G.; Salazar, N. Intestinal short chain fatty acids and their link with diet and human health. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Biddle, A.; Stewart, L.; Blanchard, J.; Leschine, S. Untangling the Genetic Basis of Fibrolytic Specialization by Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae in Diverse Gut Communities. Diversity 2013, 5, 627–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Immerseel, F.V.; Buck, J.D.; Pasmans, F.; Velge, P.; Bottreau, E.; Fievez, V.; Haesebrouck, F.; Ducatelle, R. Invasion of Salmonella enteritidis in avian intestinal epithelial cells in vitro is influenced by short-chain fatty acids. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2003, 85, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Packey, C.D.; Sartor, R.B. Commensal bacteria, traditional and opportunistic pathogens, dysbiosis and bacterial killing in inflammatory bowel diseases. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2009, 22, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Bao, J.; Zheng, H.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, X.; He, L.; Qi, W.; Wang, T.; Guo, B.; Guo, G.; Zhang, Z. Echinococcus granulosus infection results in an increase in Eisenbergiella and Parabacteroides genera in the gut of mice. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Ariefdjohan, M.W.; Dilk, A.; Brown-Esters, O.N.; Savaiano, D.A. Intestinal Microbiota and Diet in Health. In Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 811–834. [Google Scholar]
  58. Bajer, L.; Kverka, M.; Kostovcik, M.; Macinga, P.; Dvorak, J.; Stehlikova, Z.; Brezina, J.; Wohl, P.; Spicak, J.; Drastich, P. Distinct gut microbiota profiles in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and ulcerative colitis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 23, 4548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The Venn diagram and bacterial community composition of yellow-feathered broilers on day 63. (a) The Venn diagram of OTUs. Microbial composition in the cecum at the phylum (b) or genus (c) level. Taxa with relative abundance < 1% were combined into “other”. Abbreviations: NC, control group; PC, antibiotic group; TB, tributyrin group.
Figure 1. The Venn diagram and bacterial community composition of yellow-feathered broilers on day 63. (a) The Venn diagram of OTUs. Microbial composition in the cecum at the phylum (b) or genus (c) level. Taxa with relative abundance < 1% were combined into “other”. Abbreviations: NC, control group; PC, antibiotic group; TB, tributyrin group.
Animals 11 03425 g001
Figure 2. Diversity analyses of microbial communities among groups. (a) Alpha diversity analysis. (b) Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) based on Bray-Curtis distance. Abbreviations: NC, control group; PC, antibiotic group; TB, tributyrin group.
Figure 2. Diversity analyses of microbial communities among groups. (a) Alpha diversity analysis. (b) Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) based on Bray-Curtis distance. Abbreviations: NC, control group; PC, antibiotic group; TB, tributyrin group.
Animals 11 03425 g002
Figure 3. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) analysis (p < 0.05, LDA > 4.0) of the intestinal microbes. The prefixes “p”, “c”, “o”, “f”, “g” and “s” represent the annotated level of phylum, class, order, family, genus and species. Abbreviations: NC, control group; PC, antibiotic group; TB, tributyrin group.
Figure 3. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) analysis (p < 0.05, LDA > 4.0) of the intestinal microbes. The prefixes “p”, “c”, “o”, “f”, “g” and “s” represent the annotated level of phylum, class, order, family, genus and species. Abbreviations: NC, control group; PC, antibiotic group; TB, tributyrin group.
Animals 11 03425 g003
Figure 4. T-test analysis for the significant changes of differential microbiota at genus and order level in the cecal contents of yellow-feathered broilers. (a) NC vs. TB at genus level. (b) PC vs. TB at genus level. (c) NC vs. TB at order level. (d) PC vs. TB at order level. Abbreviations: NC, control group; PC, antibiotic group; TB, tributyrin group; g, genus; o, order.
Figure 4. T-test analysis for the significant changes of differential microbiota at genus and order level in the cecal contents of yellow-feathered broilers. (a) NC vs. TB at genus level. (b) PC vs. TB at genus level. (c) NC vs. TB at order level. (d) PC vs. TB at order level. Abbreviations: NC, control group; PC, antibiotic group; TB, tributyrin group; g, genus; o, order.
Animals 11 03425 g004
Figure 5. The Spearman correlation analysis of cecal microbial species at genus level with growth performance of yellow-feathered broilers. Spearman correlation coefficients are represented by color ranging from red, positive correlation (0.6), to blue, negative correlation (−0.6). * indicates statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). ** indicates extremely significant difference (p < 0.01). Abbreviations: BW, body weight; ADFI, average daily feed intake; ADG, average daily gain; FCR, feed conversion ratio.
Figure 5. The Spearman correlation analysis of cecal microbial species at genus level with growth performance of yellow-feathered broilers. Spearman correlation coefficients are represented by color ranging from red, positive correlation (0.6), to blue, negative correlation (−0.6). * indicates statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). ** indicates extremely significant difference (p < 0.01). Abbreviations: BW, body weight; ADFI, average daily feed intake; ADG, average daily gain; FCR, feed conversion ratio.
Animals 11 03425 g005
Table 1. The ingredient and nutrient level of the basal diet.
Table 1. The ingredient and nutrient level of the basal diet.
Day 1–21Day 22–42Day 43–63
Feed ingredients (%)
Corn61.0063.2665.52
Soybean meal32.0028.0024.00
Corn gluten meal1.502.003.00
Soybean oil1.402.503.50
Limestone1.411.411.35
Dicalcium phosphate1.331.331.33
DL-Methionine (99%)0.180.150.12
L-Lysine-HCl (78%)0.180.180.18
Wheat middling0.110.170.00
Vitamin-mineral premix a1.001.001.00
Calculated nutrient composition b
ME (MJ/kg)12.1212.5412.96
CP (%)19.9118.6317.60
Lys (%)1.091.000.92
Met (%)0.510.460.42
Ca (%)0.870.880.84
Available Phosphorus (%) 0.420.400.38
a The premix provided the following per kg of diet: VA, 6000 IU; VD3, 2000 IU; VE, 30 mg; VK3, 2 mg; VB1, 3 mg; VB2, 5 mg; pantothenic acid, 800 mg; choline chloride, 1500 mg; nicotinic acid, 30 mg; pyridoxine, 3 mg; folic acid, 500 mg; biotin, 0.2 mg; VB12, 1 mg; Fe, 100 mg; Cu, 8 mg; Mn, 100 mg; Zn, 100 mg; I, 0.42 mg; Se, 0.3 mg. Sodium Chloride, 3000 mg; b Values were calculated from data provided by Feed Database in China (2004).
Table 2. Effects of tributyrin on growth performance of yellow-feathered broilers.
Table 2. Effects of tributyrin on growth performance of yellow-feathered broilers.
Items Treatment SEMp-Value
NCPCTB
Initial BW, g36.5736.9537.410.50 0.519
Final BW, g1581.96 b1624.97 a1609.8413.56 0.103
ADG, g/d
1–21 d16.9817.7317.550.28 0.185
22–42 d34.0334.4035.940.59 0.524
43–63 d26.2327.1026.400.57 0.286
1–63 d25.7426.4126.240.35 0.064
ADFI, g/d
1–21 d27.2626.9627.500.44 0.185
22–42 d72.3972.9870.990.85 0.542
43–63 d79.7982.5680.050.95 0.798
1–63 d59.8160.8359.510.56 0.363
FCR
1–21 d1.611.521.570.02 0.061
22–42 d2.13 b2.122.04 a0.03 0.349
43–63 d3.043.053.030.06 0.617
1–63 d2.322.302.270.02 0.341
Results are presented as mean, SEM, p value (n = 6). a,b In a row, means assigned different lowercase letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). Abbreviations: NC, control group; PC, antibiotic group; TB, tributyrin group; SEM, standard error of mean. BW, body weight; ADG, average daily gain; ADFI, average daily feed intake; FCR, feed conversion ratio.
Table 3. Effects of tributyrin on organ indices of yellow-feathered broilers.
Table 3. Effects of tributyrin on organ indices of yellow-feathered broilers.
Items (% BW) Treatment SEMp-Value
NCPCTB
Bursa index
21 d0.26 0.25 0.24 0.0070.5053
42 d0.18 0.23 0.21 0.0080.0748
63 d0.11 0.13 0.11 0.0050.1552
Spleen index
21 d0.17 0.19 0.18 0.0060.7373
42 d0.18 0.17 0.17 0.0050.6141
63 d0.16 0.17 0.14 0.0070.1878
Liver index
21 d3.53 3.48 3.87 0.0830.1168
42 d2.46 2.20 2.41 0.0620.2286
63 d1.66 1.59 1.73 0.0390.3232
Abbreviations: NC, control group; PC, antibiotic group; TB, tributyrin group; SEM, standard error of mean (n = 6).
Table 4. Effects of tributyrin on biochemical indices of yellow-feathered broilers.
Table 4. Effects of tributyrin on biochemical indices of yellow-feathered broilers.
Items Treatment SEMp-Value
NCPCTB
Uric acid (μmol/L)
21 d181.50 b269.67 a219.67 ab12.020.0034
42 d211.33226.16177.169.860.1102
63 d257.50 a241.66 ab212.33 b7.390.0290
Lactate dehydrogenase (U/L)
21 d551.00440.33539.8323.910.1105
42 d733.83 a524.16 b461.66 b34.540.0003
63 d539.83540.83440.0020.240.0548
Creatinine (μmol/L)
21 d5.50 a6.00 a4.50 b0.190.0014
42 d5.16 a4.83 a3.33 b0.280.0087
63 d5.00 a4.83 a3.50 b0.220.0021
Alkaline phosphatase (U/L)
21 d1182.16722.331312.50118.670.0967
42 d318.33187.00207.0039.640.3675
63 d64.8378.3379.668.800.7710
Cholesterol (mmol/L)
21 d3.533.483.700.120.7758
42 d3.983.643.700.130.5541
63 d3.563.103.550.090.0752
Triacylglycerols (mmol/L)
21 d0.440.500.620.030.0191
42 d0.580.530.520.030.6933
63 d0.510.530.590.020.4078
High density lipoprotein (mmol/L)
21 d2.462.282.440.070.5421
42 d2.582.342.520.090.5494
63 d2.332.032.240.060.1862
Low density lipoprotein (mmol/L)
21 d0.730.820.720.030.5318
42 d0.660.720.630.030.4990
63 d0.750.640.790.040.3524
Alanine aminotransferase (U/L)
21 d2.00 b3.16 a2.66 ab0.180.0216
42 d1.832.001.830.130.8644
63 d2.00 b3.16 a2.16 b0.16610.0019
Aspartate aminotransferase (U/L)
21 d201.50222.66212.164.880.2180
42 d196.16218.16187.837.110.2052
63 d214.00210.66221.836.840.8111
γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (U/L)
21 d27.6626.8323.501.300.4096
42 d28.8322.6626.161.290.1488
63 d24.6626.6623.331.230.5671
Results are presented as mean, SEM and p value (n = 6). a,b In a row, means assigned different lowercase letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). Abbreviations: NC, control group; PC, antibiotic group; TB, tributyrin group; SEM, standard error of mean.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gong, L.; Xiao, G.; Zheng, L.; Yan, X.; Qi, Q.; Zhu, C.; Feng, X.; Huang, W.; Zhang, H. Effects of Dietary Tributyrin on Growth Performance, Biochemical Indices, and Intestinal Microbiota of Yellow-Feathered Broilers. Animals 2021, 11, 3425. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11123425

AMA Style

Gong L, Xiao G, Zheng L, Yan X, Qi Q, Zhu C, Feng X, Huang W, Zhang H. Effects of Dietary Tributyrin on Growth Performance, Biochemical Indices, and Intestinal Microbiota of Yellow-Feathered Broilers. Animals. 2021; 11(12):3425. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11123425

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gong, Li, Gengsheng Xiao, Liwei Zheng, Xia Yan, Qien Qi, Cui Zhu, Xin Feng, Weilong Huang, and Huihua Zhang. 2021. "Effects of Dietary Tributyrin on Growth Performance, Biochemical Indices, and Intestinal Microbiota of Yellow-Feathered Broilers" Animals 11, no. 12: 3425. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11123425

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop