Next Article in Journal
Supplementation of Mixed Organic Acids Improves Growth Performance, Meat Quality, Gut Morphology and Volatile Fatty Acids of Broiler Chicken
Previous Article in Journal
Transcription Regulator YgeK Affects the Virulence of Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 11
Issue 11
10.3390/ani11113019
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Changes in Proximate Chemical and Mineral Compositions of Different Sex Categories of Mutton during the Dry-Curing Process

by
Marina Krvavica
1,*,
Jelena Đugum
2,
Marijana Drinovac Topalović
1,
Andrijana Kegalj
1,
Iva Ljubičić
1 and
Miljenko Konjačić
3
1
Marko Marulic Polytechnic of Knin, Krešimirova 30, 22300 Knin, Croatia
2
Ministry of Agriculture, Ul. Grada Vukovara 78, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
3
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska Cesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2021, 11(11), 3019; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113019
Submission received: 29 July 2021 / Revised: 11 October 2021 / Accepted: 18 October 2021 / Published: 20 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Small Ruminants)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The older raw mutton categories are considered to be of poor quality and are poorly accepted by consumers, primarily because of the toughness and intense odor. Therefore, they are most often used in the production of various meat products. In Dalmatia, mutton is mainly processed into a traditional dry-cured product called kaštradina. Its quality depends on the age and sex, and the kaštradina of the castrated and fattened rams (wethers) are the best accepted by consumers. This study examined the influence of sex and castration on the proximate chemical and mineral compositions of raw mutton and kaštradina as indicators of their quality. Meat is primarily a source of protein and a significant source of minerals (phosphorus, iron, zinc, potassium) in the human diet. Therefore, it is important to determine which factors influence their composition the most. The results showed that sex and castration significantly affected the salt content and the proximate chemical and mineral compositions of raw mutton and kaštradina that could affect the quality (nutritive and sensory) of kaštradina. The findings suggested that the raw mutton of wethers and ewes could be a better-quality raw material for production of kaštradina than could the ram mutton.

Abstract

The aim of this research was to determine the effect of sex, castration, and processing on the chemical properties of mutton in the production of kaštradina—a traditional Dalmatian dry-cured meat product. Therefore, the carcasses of 20 ewes (E), 20 rams (R), and 20 wethers (W) of the Dalmatian pramenka breed were processed by dry-curing. On the 1st, 35th, and 60th days of processing, the samples from the scapulae were taken, then the proximate chemical, NaCl, and mineral analyses were performed, and significant differences between most of the parameters were found. Unlike W, the R samples contained significantly more proteins (p < 0.01), NaCl (p < 0.05), and potassium (p < 0.05) and less fat (p < 0.05). Furthermore, compared to the W and R categories, the E category of kaštradina contained significantly more calcium (p < 0.05). The higher contents of intramuscular fat, potassium, and calcium and lower content of NaCl could positively affect the sensory (marbling, flavor, juiciness, and tenderness) and chemical (fatty acid profile) properties of kaštradina. These findings suggest that the W and E raw mutton could be a better-quality raw material for production of kaštradina than could the R, but further research is needed for a more comprehensive picture of its quality.

1. Introduction

Dry-cured mutton, called kaštradina or koštradina, is an autochthonous dry-cured meat product made of mutton, which can rarely be found on the Croatian market today. It is a semi-permanent or permanent dry-cured meat product from sheep or goat meat produced by salting, smoking, drying, and maturing [1]. Kaštradina production is mainly based on animals culled from breeding, female and male (ewes and rams), fattened male castrates, and barren sheep. However, in Dalmatia the highest quality is considered to be kaštradina produced from the mutton of castrated and fattened rams (wethers) [1,2]. Furthermore, the culled animals are difficult to sell and they achieve a low market price. Therefore, they achieve the best price through the production of kaštradina [2].
Since 2011, kaštradina has been on the List of Croatian gastronomic heritage dishes [3] and it is highly appreciated, especially among Dalmatian consumers. Generally, the quality of processed meat depends on raw meat quality and production technology. The quality of carcasses and meat depends on several factors that can generally be divided into internal or genetic (species, genotype, sex, age, weight) [4,5] and external or environmental factors (breeding and feeding technology, ante- and postmortem procedures) [6,7]. All of them affect the muscle structure and the course of biochemical processes in the muscles before and after slaughter, which further affects the technological, physical-chemical, sensory, and nutritional properties of meat and meat products [8]. The effect of these factors on meat quality of different animal species and categories has been investigated so far [9] and it was found that the quality of lamb meat depends on slaughter weight and fattening, sex and castration, age, and genotype [10,11,12,13]. However, there is relatively little research on the carcass and meat quality properties of older sheep categories and the factors that affect their quality [14,15]. Except for age [5], gender also affects the meat quality. Meat obtained by castrates has a less intense odor than the meat of adult sheep and especially of entire rams [13]. Additionally, its chemical composition (especially fat and protein content) is more similar to the meat of females than the meat of entire males [13,16]. Castration, i.e., the removal of the testes, reduces testosterone production (the most important androgen hormone) and its serum levels decline over time [17,18]. Since testosterone stimulates protein synthesis and increases the capacity for muscular development and growth rate [19], castration leads to reductions in growth rate and muscular development and increases fat deposition. Castration also affects other chemical properties such as fatty and amino acid profiles [13,20].
In general, meat is a significant source of minerals, especially phosphorus, iron, and zinc, and contains significantly more potassium than sodium and less calcium. Although some authors state that their content is quite uniform concerning the animal species and anatomical position [21], the mineral composition of meat can also vary because of genetic, physiological (gender), and environmental (diet) factors [22]. The results of several studies on the effect of sex on the content of minerals in meat are inconsistent. Some authors found a significant effect of gender on the content of minerals in meat [23], while others found little or no effect [24]. However, the mineral content of processed meat, especially dry-cured meat products, is significantly large, due to the increased sodium content as a consequence of the salting process. High-sodium intake poses a risk to human health, especially the cardiovascular and renal systems [25], and it is necessary to pay attention to its daily intake. Furthermore, due to coarser muscle structure, hardness, excessive fat content, and specific (unpleasant) odor and aroma, the meat of adult sheep, especially of uncastrated rams, which is often repulsive to consumers, is not suitable for fresh use. Therefore, processing technology is an additional factor in the quality of not only kaštradina but of meat products in general. However, previous research on kaštradina and similar indigenous dried-meat products from sheep meat is mainly of gastronomic and historical natures, and only some state the product properties and processing technology of kaštradina and other indigenous sheep meat products [1,2,26,27].
Consequently, as a part of a research study on the technology and quality properties of kaštradina, this study aimed to determine the impact of gender and castration on the basic chemical and mineral composition of Dalmatian traditional dry-cured kaštradina processed from three sex categories (ewes, wethers, and entire rams), such as proximate chemical composition, NaCl content, and composition of macro- and microelements.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Production of Dalmatian Kaštradina

A total of 60 sheep carcasses of the local Dalmatian pramenka breed, bred traditionally by grazing and hay, were purchased on the Dalmatian market (from a local slaughterhouse). The carcasses came from the following sex categories: 20 ewes (E), 20 rams (R), and 20 wethers (W) castrated at least 6 months before slaughter. The slaughter was carried out in mid-December, at the end of the mating season. At the slaughter, the animals were 3 to 5 years old and the average weights of cold carcasses of the above categories were 22.92 ± 3.25 kg, 29.11 ± 3.21 kg, and 26.20 ± 3.44 kg, respectively. For the production of kaštradina, carcasses were cut into six parts (two whole legs with hind-shank, two blade shoulders with the fore-shank, and two rest of the halves called “kora”) according to the traditional Dalmatian manner: After cutting each carcass in half, the whole leg (with hind-shank) was separated from each half by making the section from the loin and paunch between the last lumbar vertebra and the first cross vertebra, and then the shoulder blade with the fore-shank was separated from the neck, chest, and ribs by a circular-elliptical incision through the natural muscle connection. The rest, the third part of the half that is called “kora” (crust) in Dalmatia, includes the neck, part of the ribs under the shoulder blade, chest, ribs, back, loin, and paunch [1,2]. The meat samples for analyses of chemical and micro- and macroelements’ compositions were taken from the shoulder with the fore-shank. These cut carcasses’ parts went through the following process: dry-salting by sea salt (7% per kg of meat), drying + smoking and ripening. After 10 days the meat was removed from the salt, washed, drained, and put into the smoking-drying chamber. The combination of drying and cold smoking was used for 10 days. Cold smoke produced by pyrolyzing of hardwoods was applied two times (days) over 10 days. Then the meat was moved into the drying-ripening chambers with a controlled microclimate until the end of the process. During the processing, the temperature and the RH were controlled (salting: up to +4 °C; drying + smoking: +8 to +22 °C, RH 55–85%; ripening: +12 to +18 °C, RH 65–75%). The total length of the whole process was 60 days.

2.2. Sampling

The meat samples were taken from the shoulders of three sex categories three times during processing, on the 1st, 35th, and 60th days of processing (10 samples per category × 3 processing times; a total of 30 samples per category), each time from other shoulders. The samples were taken by a longitudinal incision on the caudal side of the shoulder from angulus caudalis scapulae to tuber olecranii on processus olecranii ulnae, and a piece of meat of approximately 200 g was separated, which included the following muscles: M. triceps (tricipitis) brachii (caput laterale, caput caudale et caput mediale) and M. tensor fasciae antebrachii. All visible adipose and connective tissue from the samples were removed, after which they were individually vacuum-packaged, coded, frozen, and stored at −20 °C until analysis. Immediately before the chemical analysis, the frozen samples were homogenized in a commercial electric meat grinder to achieve a visually homogeneous mixture.

2.3. Chemical Analyses

Proximate chemical analysis and analysis of macro- and microelements were carried out on both raw and matured samples of lean kaštradina. Fat, protein, moisture, and ash and sodium chloride contents were determined according to methods recommended by the AOAC [28] and according to Kasap et al. [24]. Results were expressed as wt% of the sample.
Determination of the content of macro- and microelements (Ca, P, Mg, Na, K, Mn, Cu, Zn, and Fe) was performed according to Kasap et al. [24].
All the analyses were done in duplicate and the average score for each sample was used for statistical analysis.

2.4. Statistical Analyses

Assessment of the effect of the mutton category (gender and castration) and length of the processing on the chemical properties (proximate chemical properties, content of NaCl, composition of macro- and microelements) was performed using the software package SAS (Cary, NC, USA) [29]. Data were analyzed using GLM and MIXED statistical procedure according to the model:
Yijk = µ + Si + Tj + Mijk + eijkl
where Yijk is measured property, µ is overall mean value for the property, Si is effect of category (i = 1, 2, 3), Tj is effect of the processing length (j = 1, 2, 3), Mijk is initial mass of shoulder (covariable in the model), and eijkl is unexplained effect.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Proximate Chemical Properties of Raw Mutton and Kaštradina

The shoulder muscles of different categories of sheep (ewes, wethers, and entire rams) in this study contained, on average, 74.81% water, 19.82% protein, 4.41% fat, and 0.99% ash. According to this study, the influence of sex and castration on the proximate chemical composition of mutton was determined (Table 1). The content of most chemical ingredients (except water) in raw mutton (first day of processing) was significantly different among the categories (ewes, wethers, and entire rams). The differences in fat content (from 2.4% in the meat of uncastrated rams and 5.08% in the meat of ewes to 7.3% in the meat of wethers) were significant among all three categories. In contrast, the protein and ash contents in the meat of ewes and rams were similar and significantly higher than the content found in the meat of wethers, although, if observed through their share in dry matter (DM), they were significantly different among all three categories. These results partially coincide with the common assumption that the meat of castrates in chemical composition, especially in fat content, is very similar to the meat of females and generally contains more fat than the meat of whole male animals [30,31,32,33]. Okeudo and Moss [34] found the highest content of fat in the meat of ewes and wethers (2.50% and 2.37%), while the content in the meat of uncastrated rams was significantly lower (1.91%). Additionally, other authors [34,35] emphasized the higher proportion of intramuscular lipids in the meat of castrated boars compared to gilts, stating that this is expected given that castration stimulates intramuscular fat accumulation [36]. Many authors reported the effect of castration vs. intact males on the content of fat and protein in meat, explaining that by removing the testes that produce males’ natural anabolic steroids, testosterone and estrogen, their production is reduced [37,38]. In particular, testosterone is associated with a positive nitrogen balance, increased proteins, and decreased fat proportion in carcass [13,39].
Further, although the differences in water content in raw mutton among the studied categories were not statistically significant, there was an evident trend of decreasing water content with increasing fat content in meat, since the Pearson correlation (Table 2) between water and fat was negative (n = −0.63; p < 0.01), which is consistent with the research of Hoffman et al. [10]. Additionally, the contents of proteins and fat per DM (P/DM; F/DM) showed that the lower the proteins’ content in raw meat, the higher the fat content, since the Pearson correlation (Table 2) between proteins and DM (n = 0.79; p < 0.001) was higher than that between fat and DM (n = 0.63; p < 0.01). Investigating the production of traditional dry-cured mutton (in the Balkans region called “stelja”), Dumić [40] stated that the proximate chemical composition of raw mutton (M. sartorius) consisted of 71.33% to 72.74% water, 21.56% to 21.88% protein, 4.33% to 5.23% fat, and 1.07% to 1.14% ash, which is quite similar to the results of this study. In addition, females’ meat was also found to contain more fat than entire ram meat (similar to the results of Okeudo and Moss [41]). Consequently, a decrease in protein and ash content in castrated meat was reported, consistent with the results of other authors [41,42,43].
Changes in the proximate chemical composition of the processed mutton in the production of kaštradina were primarily the result of dehydration and concentration of chemical components in the muscles, since the reduction of water content after 35 days and 60 days of processing were about 26% and 36%, respectively. The influence of sex and castration on the chemical composition of kaštradina was evident after 35 and 60 days of processing, where the relationships among the three different categories (ewes, wethers, and rams) were similar to those found in fresh meat. Furthermore, the chemical composition of kaštradina after 35 days of processing was similar to the composition stated by Dumić [40] in the research of the mentioned “stelja” (46.42% to 49.67% of water, 34.66% to 37.12% of proteins, 6.99% to 8.31% of fat, and 7.34% to 9.29% of ash), which differed significantly only in fat content (kaštradina from this study contained more fat). That can be explained by the influence of anatomical position (shoulder muscles generally contain more fat than the leg muscles). Furthermore, in comparison with the results of Ganić et al. [44], sheep “stelja” (M. longissimus thoracis et lumborum) from Bosnia and Hercegovina contained significantly more fat than the kaštradina (26.30% in industrial production and 30.92% in craft production) and significantly less proteins (19.90–21.09%), while the values of the other two indicators were similar (40.93–45.75% of water and 5.15–6.83% of ash). The optimal content of intramuscular fat is of great importance for the quality of dry-cured meat products. Many studies have reported its positive effect on sensory characteristics of dry-cured meat products, such as marbling, flavor, juiciness, and tenderness, and the effect on fatty acid composition [45].
Regarding the NaCl content in the kaštradina, it can be assumed that the castration procedure affected salt reduction in kaštradina after 35 and 60 days of processing (p < 0.05), while a significant effect of gender was not found, since the differences between ewes and entire rams were not significant. Significantly lower NaCl content in the kaštradina of wethers at the end of processing (60th day) was probably due to higher DM and fat content, which confirmed the high Pearson correlation coefficient (Table 2) between NaCl and DM (n = 0.88; p < 0.001) and NaCl and F/DM (n = 0.89; p < 0.001) The results of other authors [1,26,40,44,46] showed significant variability in the NaCl content (3.5% to 11.05%) of similar types of dry-cured mutton that have been traditionally produced in the Balkan region.

3.2. Macro- and Microelements of Raw Mutton and “Kaštradina”

This study identified significant differences in the mineral composition of different categories (ewes, wethers, and rams) of raw and processed mutton (Table 3). Regardless of the different relations in mineral content among categories, the lowest contents of macro- and microelements were found in the samples of the wethers’ category, in which a significantly higher content of fat was found, which supports the claim of some authors [47] that fattier meat contains less (up to one-third less) macro- and microelements’ content due to lower inorganic content (ash). There are numerous studies of the mineral composition of lamb [24,48,49,50,51] in contrast to the mineral composition of older categories of mutton [52,53,54], while the data on the mineral composition of dry-cured mutton cannot be found in the available data base.
Table 3 shows that raw mutton of three categories (ewes, wethers, and rams) in the kaštradina production differed in K, Na, Zn, and Fe compositions. However, only the content of K in the rams’ category was significantly higher than that found in the other two categories, while the content of Na, Zn, and Fe was significantly lower in the wethers’ category only in comparison to the ewes’ category. Since all macro- and microelements were less present in the wethers’ category of meat, only the difference in K content can be considered as the influence of sex, while the differences in Na, Zn, and Fe contents were obviously due to castration, i.e., increased fat content and reduced content of ash. The higher content of K in the R category (intact adult males) in the present study could be explained by the higher physical activity of rams during mating season. Since the slaughter was performed at the end of the mating season, greater physical activity during matting is implicated in the fatigue process, in which the K+ ions are released from contracting muscles in the extracellular compartment [55,56]. Another possible hypothesis is that the higher content of K in R (intact adult male), compared to E (intact adult females) and W category (castrated adult males), is promoted by gender differences. Namely, numerous studies have provided evidence of testosterone vasodilatory activity on the potassium channel-opening effect [57]. Therefore, although serum testosterone levels were not measured in this study, as intact rams (R category) were slaughtered at the end of the mating season, it is very likely that circulating testosterone levels in rams’ serum were high [38,58]. Research of other authors on the sex influence on the mineral composition of meat is different. Thus, many authors report a more significant influence of the geographical breeding region (soil composition and grazing) than the influence of sex [51,59,60]. However, Mioč et al. [50] point out the insignificant influence of sex and breed on the mineral composition of lamb of Istrian sheep and Dalmatian pramenka breed. Concerning the results of this research, a very similar mineral composition was found for lamb of Istrian and Dalmatian pramenka breeds [50] and Spanish Churra breed [48], all bred in the Mediterranean region, so the geographical area of breeding could be the predominant factor of mineral composition of meat (effect of soil composition). However, other factors such as gender and castration are also important.
Changes in the mineral composition of kaštradina during processing generally follow the trend established in fresh meat. However, the data in Table 3 confirm the significant effect of processing on all minerals, which is probably due to dehydration and concentration of mineral composition, since Pearson coefficients (n) between individual minerals and DM and water are highly positive and negative, respectively (Table 2). However, during the salting phase, a smaller amount of minerals could also be lost through the loss of meat juice. In addition, significant differences in the content of particular macro- and microelements among specific categories in kaštradina after 60 days of processing were found in the content of all elements except the Cu content. Additionally, a significantly higher content of Ca was found in the kaštradina of E category after 35 and 60 days of processing. Potassium and calcium ions are known to participate in muscle contraction, and calcium ions are necessary for the activity of the endogenous proteolytic enzymes, calpain and calpastatin, that play a key role in postmortem tenderization of skeletal muscles [61]. Therefore, it is to be expected that the higher contents of Ca and K could improve the sensory properties of kaštradina, especially its tenderness [61].

4. Conclusions

The results of this research indicate a significant influence of sex and castration as well as the dry-curing process on the proximate chemical and mineral compositions of raw mutton and kaštradina. A higher intramuscular fat content and a lower content of NaCl found in the kaštradina of wethers and ewes could affect its sensory and nutritional properties. Additionally, higher contents of Ca and K found in kaštradina of ewes and rams, respectively, could affect its sensory properties, especially tenderness. These differences suggest the mutton of ewes and wethers could be a better-quality raw material in kaštradina production than could the meat of rams. However, further research on chemical and sensory properties is needed to provide a more comprehensive picture of its quality.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.K. (Marina Krvavica); Formal analysis, M.K. (Marina Krvavica), A.K., and I.L.; Investigation, M.K. (Marina Krvavica), A.K. and I.L.; Methodology, M.K. (Marina Krvavica) and M.K. (Miljenko Konjačić); Project administration, A.K. and I.L.; Resources, M.K. (Marina Krvavica); Supervision, M.D.T. and M.K. (Miljenko Konjačić); Validation, J.Đ. and M.D.T.; Visualization, M.K. (Marina Krvavica) and M.K. (Miljenko Konjačić); Writing—original draft, M.K. (Marina Krvavica) and M.D.T.; Writing—review and editing, J.Đ., M.D.T., A.K. and I.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to the project agreement.

Acknowledgments

The manuscript was funded by Marko Marulić, Polytechnic of Knin, Kralja Petra Krešimira 30, 22300 Knin, Croatia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Krvavica, M.; Friganović, E.; Đugum, J.; Kegalj, A. Dalmatinska kaštradina (koštradina). MESO Prvi Hrvat. Časopis o Mesu 2009, 5, 285–290. [Google Scholar]
  2. Krvavica, M.; Mioč, B.; Konjačić, M.; Friganović, E.; Ganić, A.; Kegalj, A. Weight loss in the processing of dry-cured mutton: Effect of age, gender and processing technology. Agric. Conspec. Sci. 2011, 76, 345–348. [Google Scholar]
  3. NG 69/05:2011. Rules on Establishing a Special Standard-Croatian Indigenous Cuisine. National Gazette, Official Gazette of the Republic of Croatia. 2011. Available online: https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2011_06_60_1332.html (accessed on 12 January 2021).
  4. Martins, J.M.; Fialho, R.; Albuquerque, A.; Neves, J.; Freitas, A.; Tirapicos Nunes, J.; Charneca, R. Portuguese Local Pig Breeds: Genotype Effects on Meat and Fat Quality Traits. Animals 2020, 10, 905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hopkins, D.L.; Mortimer, S.I. Effect of genotype and age on sheep meat quality and a case study illustrating integration of knowledge. Meat Sci. 2014, 98, 544–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jin, S.; Pang, Q.; Yang, H.; Diao, X.; Shan, A.; Feng, X. Effects of dietary resveratrol supplementation on the chemical composition, oxidative stability and meat quality of ducks (Anas platyrhynchos). Food Chem. 2021, 363, 130263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Luo, Y.; Wang, B.; Liu, C.; Su, R.; Hou, Y.; Yao, D.; Zhao, L.; Su, L.; Jin, Y. Meat quality, fatty acids, volatile compounds, and antioxidant properties of lambs fed pasture versus mixed diet. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 7, 2796–2805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Okeudo, N.J.; Moss, B.W. Interrelationships amongst carcass and meat quality characteristics of sheep. Meat Sci. 2005, 69, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Watkins, P.J.; Rose, G.; Salvatore, L.; Allen, D.; Tucman, D.; Warner, R.D.; Dunshea, F.R.; Pethich, D.W. Age and nutrition influence the concentrations of three branched chain fatty acids in sheep fat from Australian abattoirs. Meat Sci. 2010, 86, 594–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Hoffman, L.C.; Muller, M.; Cloete, S.W.P.; Schmidt, D. Comparison of six crossbred lamb types: Sensory, physical and nutritional meat quality characteristics. Meat Sci. 2003, 65, 1265–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ponnampalam, E.N.; Hopkins, D.L.; Butler, K.L.; Dunshea, F.R.; Warner, R.D. Genotype and age effects on sheep meat production 2. Carcass quality traits. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 2007, 47, 1147–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kaić, A.; Mioč, B.; Kasap, A.; Levart, A. Physicochemical properties of meat of Lika Pramenka lambs raised under semi-extensive production system: Effects of sex, slaughter weight and season. Vet. Arh. 2016, 86, 229–241. [Google Scholar]
  13. Nian, Y.; Allen, P.; Harrison, S.M.; Kerry, J.P. Effect of castration and carcass suspension method on the quality and fatty acid profile of beef from male dairy cattle. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 4339–4350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mioč, B.; Krvavica, M.; Vnučec, I.; Držaić, V.; Prpić, Z.; Kegalj, A. Klaonički pokazatelji i odlike trupova travničke pramenke. Stočarstvo 2011, 65, 179–188. [Google Scholar]
  15. Mioč, B.; Antunović, Z.; Širić, I.; Kasap, A.; Kaić, A.; Novoselec, J.; Klir Šalavardić, Ž.; Šubara, Š.; Držaić, V. Carcass and meat quality characteristics of Istrian sheep. In Proceedings of the 56th Croatian & 16th International Symposium on Agriculture, Vodice, Croatia, 5–10 September 2021; pp. 645–649. [Google Scholar]
  16. Field, R.A. Effect of Castration on Meat Quality and Quantity. J. Anim. Sci. 1971, 32, 849–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Habeeb, I.A. Effect of intratesticular injection of ethanol on testicular histology, testosterone level and some sperm characteristics in local rams. Basrah J. Vet. Res. 2015, 14, 231–239. [Google Scholar]
  18. Nishiyama, T. Serum testosterone levels after medical or surgical androgen deprivation: A comprehensive review of the literature. Urol. Oncol. 2014, 32, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Cafferky, J.; Hamill, R.M.; Allen, P.; O’Doherty, J.V.; Cromie, A.; Sweeney, T. Effect of Breed and Gender on Meat Quality of M. longissimus thoracis et lumborum Muscle from Crossbred Beef Bulls and Steers. Foods 2019, 8, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Nagamine, I.; Sunagawa, K. Effects of the castration on the growth, meat production and odors in male goats. Anim. Behav. Manag. 2017, 53, 137–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rogowski, B. Die Ernährungsphysiologische Bedeutung von Fleisch und Fett, Beiträgezur Chemie und Physic des Fleiches. Kulmb. Reihe 1981, 2, 38–56. [Google Scholar]
  22. Doyle, J.J. Genetic and nongenetic factors affecting the elemental composition of human and other animal tissues—A review. J. Anim. Sci. 1980, 50, 1173–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kučević, D.; Papović, T.; Tomović, V.; Plavšić, M.; Jajić, I.; Krstović, S.; Stanojević, D. Influence of Farm Management for Calves on Growth Performance and Meat Quality Traits Duration Fattening of Simmental Bulls and Heifers. Animals 2019, 11, 941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Kasap, A.; Kaić, A.; Širić, I.; Antunović, Z.; Mioč, B. Proximate and mineral composition of M. longissimus thoracis et lumborum of suckling lambs from three Croatian indigenous breeds reared in outdoor conditions. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2017, 17, 274–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. de Wardener, H.E.; MacGregor, G.A. Harmful effects of dietary salt in addition to hypertension. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2002, 16, 213–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Prgomet, A. Prilog Poznavanja Proizvodnje I Svojstava Kaštradine U Dalmaciji. Master’s Thesis, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia, 1970. [Google Scholar]
  27. Krvavica, M. Autohtoni suhomesnati proizvodi od ovčjeg i kozjeg mesa. In Proceedings of the Zbornik Radova 2. Hrvatski Kongres O Ruralnom Turizmu Koncepcija Dugoročnog Razvoja Ruralnog Turizma, Mali Lošinj, Croatia, 21–25 April 2010; pp. 387–393. [Google Scholar]
  28. Association of Official Analytical Chemists [AOAC]. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 17th ed.; Horwitz, W., Ed.; AOAC International: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  29. SAS Institute Inc. SAS®9.4 Statements: Reference; SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  30. Mostert, R.; Hoffman, L.C. Effect of gender on the meat quality characteristics and chemical composition of kudu (Tragelaphus strepsiceros), an African antelope species. Food Chem. 2007, 104, 565–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tejeda, J.F.; Peña, R.E.; Andrés, A.I. Effect of live weight and sex on physico-chemical and sensorial characteristics of Merino lamb meat. Meat Sci. 2008, 80, 1061–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Vnučec, I.; Držaić, V.; Mioč, B.; Prpić, Z.; Antunović, Z.; Kegalj, A. Effect of sex on meat chemical composition and fatty acid composition in suckling Pag sheep lambs. Vet. Arh. 2016, 86, 217–227. [Google Scholar]
  33. Okeudo, N.J.; Moss, B.W. Intramuscular lipid and fatty acid profile of sheep comprising four sex-types and seven slaughter weights produced following commercial procedure. Meat Sci. 2007, 76, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Alonso, V.; Campo Mdel, M.; Español, S.; Roncalés, P.; Beltrán, J.A. Effect of crossbreeding and gender on meat quality and fatty acid composition in pork. Meat Sci. 2009, 81, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Latorre, M.A.; Lázaro, R.; Garciá, M.I.; Nieto, M.; Mateos, G.G. Effect of sex and terminal sire genotype on performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of pigs slaughtered at 117 kg body weight. Meat Sci. 2003, 65, 1369–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Barton Gade, P.A. Meat and fat quality of boars, castrates and gilts. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1987, 16, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Unruh, J.A. Effects of endogenous and exogenous growth-promoting compounds on carcass composition, meat quality and meat nutritional value. J. Anim. Sci. 1986, 62, 1441–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ahn, J.-S.; Kwon, E.-G.; Lee, H.-J.; Lee, E.-M.; Hwang, S.-M.; Cho, S.-R.; Kim, K.-W.; Kim, U.-H.; Won, J.-I.; Jin, S.; et al. Effect of Hemi-Castration on the Productivity, Histological Characteristics, and Economic Efficacy of Korean Beef Cattle. Animals 2021, 11, 2490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Schanbacher, B.D. Manipulation of endogenous and exogenous hormones for red meat production. J. Anim. Sci. 1984, 59, 1621–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Dumić, S. Važnija Svojstva Kvaliteta Sjeničke Stelje Kao Osnova Za Zaštitu Oznake Porekla. Master’s Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Beograd, Serbia, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  41. Wellington, G.H.; Hogue, D.E.; Foote, R.H. Growth, carcass characteristics and androgen concentrations of gonad-altered ram lambs. Small Rumin. Res. 2003, 48, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Madruga, M.S.; Narain, N.; Souza, J.G.; Costa, R.G. Castration and slaughter age effects on fat components of “Mestiço” goat meat. Small Rumin. Res. 2001, 42, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Okeudo, N.J.; Moss, B.W. Production performance and meat quality characteristics of sheep comprising four sex-types over a range of slaughter weights produced following commercial practice. Meat Sci. 2008, 80, 522–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ganić, A.; Smajić, A.; Bijeljac, S.; Brdarić, N.; Zahirović, L.; Jesenković, L.; Operta, S.; Omanović, H. Komparacija osnovnih kvalitativnih parametara ovčje stelje proizvedene u industrijskim uslovima i zanatskoj proizvodnji. In Proceedings of the 20th Scientific-Professional Conference of Agriculture and Food Industry, Neum, Bosnia and Hercegovina, 30 September–3 October 2009; pp. 117–123. [Google Scholar]
  45. Krvavica, M.; Lasić, D.; Kljusurić, J.G.; Đugum, J.; Janović, Š.; Milovac, S.; Bošnir, J. Chemical Characteristics of Croatian Traditional Istarski pršut (PDO) Produced from Two Different Pig Genotypes. Molecules 2021, 26, 4140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Čaušević, Z.; Milanović, A.; Glogovac, Ž.; Lelek, M.; Rahim, A.A. Tehnologija proizvodnje ovčje stelje i pastrme sa naglašenim utjecajem salamurenja na njihov kvalitet. Rad. Poljopr. Fak. Univ. U Sarajev. 1984, 36, 127–139. [Google Scholar]
  47. Rede, R.; Petrović, L.J. Tehnologija Mesa I Nauka O Mesu, 1st ed.; Faculty of Technology, University of Novi Sad: Novi Sad, Serbia, 1997; p. 399. [Google Scholar]
  48. Osorio, M.T.; Zumalacárregui, J.M.; Bermejo, B.; Lozano, A.; Figueira, A.C.; Mateo, J. Effect of ewe‘s milk versus milk-replacer rearing on mineral composition of succling lamb meat and liver. Small Rumin. Res. 2007, 68, 296–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Miguélez, E.; Zumalacárregui, J.M.; Osorio, M.T.; Beteta, O.; Mateo, J. Carcass characteristics of suckling lambs protected by the PGI “Lechazo de Castilla y Leon” European quality label: Effect of breed, sex and carcass weight. Meat Sci. 2006, 73, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Mioč, B.; Vnučec, I.; Prpić, Z.; Pavić, V.; Antunović, Z.; Barać, Z. Effect of breed on mineral composition of meat from light lambs. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 8, 273–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Reykdal, O.; Rabieh, S.; Steingrimsdottir, L.; Gunnlaugsdottir, H. Minerals and trace elements in Icelandic dairy products and meat. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2011, 24, 980–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Studzinski, T.; Valkuska, G.; Saddour, A. Content of lead, cadmium, copper and zinc in the liver, kidneys, skeletal muscle and brain of lamb and adult sheep. Bromatol. Chem. Toksykol. 1992, 25, 355–360. [Google Scholar]
  53. Viljoen, M.; Hoffman, L.C.; Brand, T.S. Prediction of the chemical composition of Mutton with near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Small Rumin. Res. 2007, 69, 88–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Rekanović, S.; Grujić, R.; Vučić, G.; Hodžić, E. Mineral composition of traditional sheep meat products in dependence on the thermal treatment. J. Hyg. Eng. Des. 2019, 29, 92–98. [Google Scholar]
  55. Sejersted, O.M.; Sjøgaar, G. Dynamics and Consequences of Potassium Shifts in Skeletal Muscle and Heart during Exercise. Physiol. Rev. 2000, 80, 1411–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Demirtaş, B.; Parkan, C.; Atmaca, M. Exercise-Induced Physiological Fatigue in Horses: Review. Turk. Klin. J. Vet. Sci. 2015, 6, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jones, R.D.; Pugh, P.J.; Jones, T.H.; Channer, K.S. The vasodilatory action of testosterone: A potassium-channel opening or a calcium antagonistic action? Br. J. Pharmacol. 2003, 138, 733–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Sanni, A.A.; Arowolo, R.O.A.; Olayemi, F.O. Preliminary study on the effect of castration and testosterone replacement on testosterone level in the New Zealand male rabbit. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 11, 10146–10148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hoffman, L.C.; Kritzinger, B.; Ferreira, A.V. The effects of region and gender on the fatty acid, amino acid, mineral, myoglobin and collagen contents of impala (Aepyceros melampus) meat. Meat Sci. 2005, 69, 551–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sun, S.; Guo, B.; Wei, Y.; Fan, M. Multi-element analysis for determining the geographical origin of mutton from different regions of China. Food Chem. 2011, 124, 1151–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tizioto, P.C.; Gromboni, C.F.; Nogueira, A.R.D.A.; de Souza, M.M.; Mudadu, M.D.A.; Tholon, P.; Rosa, A.D.N.; Tullio, R.R.; Medeiros, S.R.; Nassu, R.T.; et al. Calcium and potassium content in beef: Influences on tenderness and associations with molecular markers in Nellore cattle. Meat Sci. 2014, 96, 436–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table
Table 1. Proximate chemical composition of different categories of raw mutton and kaštradina in different processing times, %.
Table 1. Proximate chemical composition of different categories of raw mutton and kaštradina in different processing times, %.
CategoryParameters, %
WaterDMProteinsFatAshNaClP/DMF/DMA/DM
1st day of processing
Ewes74.2825.7220.44 a5.08 a1.06 a-79.47 a19.75 a4.12 a
Wethers74.4225.5817.86 b7.30 b0.83 b-70.14 b28.22 b3.26 b
Rams75.7324.2720.64 a2.40 c1.09 a-85.20 c9.70 c4.50 a
SE0.460.460.460.690.04-2.382.560.15
P0.5960.2840.0070.038<0.001-0.0440.0090.029
35th day of processing
Ewes48.5251.4833.28 a10.44 a8.16 a5.48 a64.65 a20.28 a15.88 a
Wethers48.8951.5127.57 b17.31 b4.85 b3.70 b53.64 b33.71 b9.50 b
Rams49.4650.5435.25 a7.79 c6.73 c4.99 a69.77 c15.38 c13.32 c
SE0.840.910.790.790.340.311.231.520.70
P0.8320.407<0.0010.0210.0420.0390.0250.0190.045
60th day of processing
Ewes38.27 a61.73 a37.87 a15.63 a8.25 a5.89 a61.35 a25.32 a13.37 a
Wethers37.68 a62.32 a31.38 b23.48 b7.68 a4.37 b50.42 b37.56 b12.37 a
Rams39.13 b60.87 b41.94 a9.25 c9.07 b6.49 a68.89 c15.21 c14.91 b
SE0.540.541.221.350.220.291.962.050.40
P0.0280.0410.0030.0080.0480.0030.0370.0060.025
Day of processing
1st day74.81 a25.19 a19.82 a5.41 a0.99 a-79.05 a17.12 a3.96 a
35th day48.96 b51.18 b33.53 b10.18 b6.58 b4.7365.59 b19.89 a12.90 b
60th day38.36 c61.64 c37.06 c16.12 c8.33 c5.5860.22 b26.03 b13.55 b
SE0.370.390.831.020.200.231.772.050.41
P<0.001<0.0010.005<0.001<0.0010.003<0.0010.007<0.001
DM—dry matter; P/DM—proteins per DM; F/DM—fat per DM; A/DM—ash per DM; SE—standard error; a, b, c—different letters within the same column indicate significant differences among sex groups (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 2. Pearson correlation matrix (n) of the investigated variables.
Table 2. Pearson correlation matrix (n) of the investigated variables.
VariablesCaPMgKNaMnCuZnFeWaterDMProteinFatAshNaClP/DMF/DM
Ca1----------------
P0.711---------------
Mg0.760.971--------------
K0.590.960.931-------------
Na0.840.750.810.691------------
Mn0.800.770.820.720.811-----------
Cu0.630.650.650.530.520.611----------
Zn0.780.900.930.830.800.800.711---------
Fe0.730.700.690.620.640.820.560.691--------
Water−0.78−0.62−0.70−0.52−0.80−0.68−0.65−0.81−0.531-------
DM0.780.620.700.520.800.680.650.810.53−1.001------
Protein0.750.820.830.760.800.760.620.840.65−0.790.791-----
Fat0.30−0.030.08−0.130.280.140.280.270.04−0.630.630.021----
Ash0.810.750.810.680.870.780.650.860.61−0.910.910.910.301---
NaCl0.830.790.830.720.940.800.590.850.63−0.880.880.880.300.941--
P/DM0.06−0.25−0.15−0.310.06−0.060.040.01−0.17−0.380.38−0.250.940.040.061-
F/DM0.770.610.710.540.840.700.590.780.51−0.930.930.740.530.950.890.301
A/DM0.790.670.740.590.920.730.520.780.54−0.900.900.750.490.890.960.290.93
DM—dry matter; P/DM—proteins per DM; F/DM—fat per DM; A/DM—ash per DM.
Table
Table 3. Macro- and microelements of different categories of raw mutton and kaštradina in different processing times (mg/kg).
Table 3. Macro- and microelements of different categories of raw mutton and kaštradina in different processing times (mg/kg).
CategoryMacro- and Microelements, mg/kg Sample
CaPMgKNaMnCuZnFe
1st day of processing
Ewes42.621866.70198.233211.60 a859.90 ab0.07810.8130.61 a30.79 a
Wethers34.101743.70189.383028.20 a785.90 b0.06210.7521.87 b24.70 b
Rams37.851930.70208.883571.70 b891.60 a0.07500.9028.17 ab26.17 ab
SE3.8467.987.2879.9631.910.00510.072.411.83
P0.3950.0980.4860.0060.0490.9120.3940.0310.049
35th day of processing
Ewes107.62 a2551.30 ab282.45 ab4245.80 a20,339.20 a0.1840 a1.10 a56.12 ab46.66 a
Wethers65.84 b2114.30 a238.39 a3619.90 a13,594.50 b0.1119 b0.93 b50.62 b29.17 b
Rams79.66 b2985.20 b323.67 b5227.00 b21,157.20 a0.1516 ab1.03 ab66.06 a41.47 a
SE7.01134.6012.94251.881663.840.01420.053.643.48
P0.043<0.001<0.0010.0340.0170.0290.0480.0190.027
60th day of processing
Ewes134.41 a3009.90 a327.48 a4774.80 a22,232.10 a0.1996 a1.5276.34 a62.43 a
Wethers99.02 b2408.10 b288.61 b3796.70 b15,173.50 b0.1353 b1.2972.60 a35.17 b
Rams103.33 b3614.10 c385.24 c6290.60 c20,725.80 ab0.1857 a1.3692.99 b42.40 b
SE7.17104.6610.1145.601863.260.01280.083.373.15
P0.0380.0090.047<0.0010.0160.0280.4720.004<0.001
Day of processing
1st day38.19 a1847.03 a198.83 a3270.50 a845.80 a0.0717 a0.82 a26.88 a27.22 a
35th day84.37 b2550.27 b281.50 b4364.23 b18,363.63 b0.1492 b1.02 b57.60 b39.10 b
60th day112.25 c3010.70 c333.78 c4954.03 c19,377.13 b0.1735 b1.39 c80.64 c46.67 c
SE4.2988.288.13164.72939.980.00770.042.162.20
P<0.0010.004<0.0010.034<0.001<0.0010.002<0.0010.041
SE—standard error; a, b, c—different letters within the same column indicate significant differences among sex groups (p < 0.05).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Krvavica, M.; Đugum, J.; Topalović, M.D.; Kegalj, A.; Ljubičić, I.; Konjačić, M. Changes in Proximate Chemical and Mineral Compositions of Different Sex Categories of Mutton during the Dry-Curing Process. Animals 2021, 11, 3019. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113019

AMA Style

Krvavica M, Đugum J, Topalović MD, Kegalj A, Ljubičić I, Konjačić M. Changes in Proximate Chemical and Mineral Compositions of Different Sex Categories of Mutton during the Dry-Curing Process. Animals. 2021; 11(11):3019. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113019

Chicago/Turabian Style

Krvavica, Marina, Jelena Đugum, Marijana Drinovac Topalović, Andrijana Kegalj, Iva Ljubičić, and Miljenko Konjačić. 2021. "Changes in Proximate Chemical and Mineral Compositions of Different Sex Categories of Mutton during the Dry-Curing Process" Animals 11, no. 11: 3019. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113019

APA Style

Krvavica, M., Đugum, J., Topalović, M. D., Kegalj, A., Ljubičić, I., & Konjačić, M. (2021). Changes in Proximate Chemical and Mineral Compositions of Different Sex Categories of Mutton during the Dry-Curing Process. Animals, 11(11), 3019. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113019

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop