Effects of Leaving Amputated Ovaries Intra-Abdominally during Elective Bilateral Standing Laparoscopic Ovariectomy in Equids
Abstract
:Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Cases and Presurgical Management
2.2. Surgical Procedure
2.3. Post-Operative Management
2.4. Hormone Profile Analysis
2.5. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
General Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Röcken, M.; Mosel, G.; Seyrek-Intas, K.; Seyrek-Intas, D.; Litzke, F.; Verver, J.; Rijkenhuizen, A.B. Unilateral and bilateral laparoscopic ovariectomy in 157 mares: A retrospective multicenter study. Vet. Surg. 2011, 40, 1009–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Palmer, S.E. Standing laparoscopic laser technique for ovariectomy in five mares. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1993, 203, 279–283. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Hanson, C.A.; Galuppo, L.D. Bilateral laparoscopic ovariectomy in standing mares: 22 cases. Vet. Surg. 1999, 28, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shoemaker, R.W.; Read, E.K.; Duke, T.; Wilson, D.G. In situ coagulation and transection of the ovarian pedicle: An alternative to laparoscopic ovariectomy in juvenile horses. Can. J. Vet. Res. 2004, 68, 27–32. [Google Scholar]
- Cokelaere, S.M.; Martens, A.M.; Wiemer, P. Laparoscopic ovariectomy in mares using a polyamide tie-rap. Vet. Surg. 2005, 34, 651–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hendrickson, D. Laparoscopic cryptorchidectomy and ovariectomy in horses. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 2006, 22, 777–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, M.; Hendrickson, D.A. A review of equine standing laparoscopic ovariectomy. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2008, 28, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hendrickson, D.A. Complications of laparoscopic surgery. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 2009, 24, 557–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodgerson, D.H.; Brown, M.P.; Watt, B.C.; Keoughan, C.G.; Hanrath, M. Hand-assisted laparoscopic technique for removal of ovarian tumors in standing mares. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2002, 220, 1503–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Devick, I.F.; Leise, B.S.; Rao, S.; Hendrickson, D.A. Evaluation of post-operative pain after active desufflation at completion of laparoscopy in mares undergoing ovariectomy. Can. Vet. J. 2018, 59, 261–266. [Google Scholar]
- Colbath, A.C.; Hackett, E.S.; Lesser, C.S.; Hendrickson, D.A. Left paralumbar laparoscopic bilateral ovariectomy in mares. Vet. Surg. 2017, 46, 574–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ragle, C.A.; Southwood, L.L.; Schnieder, R.K. Injury to abdominal wall vessels during laparoscopy in three horses. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1998, 212, 87–89. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Hendrickson, D.A.; Wilson, D.G. Instrumentation and techniques for laparoscopic and thorascopic surgery in the horse. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 1996, 12, 235–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seabaugh, K.A.; Goodrich, L.R.; Bohn, A.A.; Morley, P.S.; Hendrickson, D.A. A comparison of peritoneal fluid values in mares following bilateral laparoscopic ovariectomy using a vessel sealing and dividing device versus placement of two ligating loops. Vet. J. 2014, 202, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Van Hoogmoed, L.M.; Galuppo, L.D. Laparoscopic ovariectomy using the endo-GIA stapling device and endo-catch pouches and evaluation of analgesic efficacy of epidural morphine sulfate in 10 mares. Vet. Surg. 2005, 34, 646–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walmsley, J.P. The Sir Frederick Hobday memorial lecture: Review of equine laparoscopy and an analysis of 158 laparoscopies in the horse. Equine Vet. J. 1999, 31, 456–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shettko, D.L. Complications in laparoscopic surgery. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 2000, 16, 377–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crist, D.W.; Gadacz, T.R. Complications of laparoscopic surgery. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 1993, 73, 265–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodgerson, D.H.; Hanson, R.R. Ligature slippage during standing laparoscopic ovariectomy in a mare. Can. Vet. J. 2000, 41, 395–397. [Google Scholar]
- Rodgerson, D.H.; Belknap, J.K.; Wilson, D.A. Laparoscopic ovariectomy using sequential electrocoagulation and sharp transection of the equine mesovarium. Vet. Surg. 2001, 30, 572–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hand, R.; Rakestraw, P.; Taylor, T. Evaluation of a vessel-sealing device for use in laparoscopic ovariectomy in mares. Vet. Surg. 2002, 31, 240–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Habermehl, N.L. Heifer ovariectomy using the Willis spay instrument: Technique, morbidity and mortality. Can. Vet. J. 1993, 34, 664–667. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Stabenfeldt, G.H.; Hughes, J.P.; Kennedy, P.C.; Meagher, D.M.; Neely, D.P. Clinical findings, pathological changes and endocrinological secretory patterns in mares with ovarian tumours. J. Reprod. Fert. Suppl. 1979, 27, 277–285. [Google Scholar]
- Hughes, J.P.; Stabenfeldt, G.H.; Kennedy, P.C. The estrous cycle and selected functional and pathologic ovarian abnormalities in the mare. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Large 1980, 2, 225–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCue, P.M.; Roser, J.F.; Munro, C.J.; Liu, I.K.M.; Lasley, B.L. Granulosa cell tumors of the equine ovary. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 2006, 22, 799–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ellenberger, C.; Bartmann, C.P.; Hoppen, H.-O.; Kratzsch, J.; Aupperle, H.; Klug, E.; Schoon, D.; Schoon, H.-A. Histomorphological and immunohistochemical characterization of equine granulosa cell tumors. J. Comp. Path. 2007, 136, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almeida, J.; Ball, B.A.; Conley, A.J.; Place, N.J.; Liu, I.K.M.; Scholtz, E.L.; Mathewson, L.; Stanley, S.D.; Moeller, B.C. Biological and clinical significance of anti-Müllerian hormone determination in blood serum of the mare. Theriogenology 2011, 76, 1393–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Devick, I.F.; Leise, B.S.; McCue, P.M.; Rao, S.; Hendrickson, D.A. Evaluation of ovarian histopathology, pre- and post-operative endocrinological analysis and behaviour alterations in 27 mares undergoing bilateral standing laparoscopic ovariectomy. Can. Vet. J. 2020, 61, 181–186. [Google Scholar]
- Holl, K.; Lundin, E.; Kaasila, M.; Kaasila, M.; Grankvist, K.; Afanasyeva, Y.; Hallmans, G.; Lehtinen, M.; Pukkala, E.; Surcel, H.-M.; et al. Effects of long term storage on hormone measurements in samples from pregnant women: The experience of the Finnish Materinity Cohort. Acta Oncol. 2008, 47, 406–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Comstock, G.W.; Burke, A.E.; Edward, P.N.; Gordon, G.B.; Hoffman, S.C.; Helzlsouer, K.J. Effects of repeated freeze-thaw cycles on concentrations of cholesterol, micronutrients, and hormones in human plasma and serum. Clin. Chem. 2001, 47, 139–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
TESTOSTERONE Normal Reference Range: 20–45 pg/mL | INHIBIN A Normal Reference Range: 2–60 pg/mL | AMH Normal Reference Range: 0.1–6.9 ng/mL | PROGESTERONE Reference Range for Absent Active Luteal Tissue: 0.1–0.5 ng/mL | ESTRONE SULFATE Normal Reference Range: 0.1–6.0 ng/mL | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PREOP | POSTOP | PREOP | POSTOP | PREOP | POSTOP | PREOP | POSTOP | PREOP | POSTOP | |
MARE #1 | 36.4 pg/mL | 28.4 pg/mL | 16.9 pg/mL | 2.22 pg/mL * | 1.88 ng/mL | 0.046 ng/mL | 0.01 ng/mL * | 0.030 ng/mL * | 0.01 ng/mL * | 0.01 ng/mL * |
MOLLY | 29.8 pg/mL | 25.3 pg/mL | 3.10 pg/mL * | 2.85 pg/mL * | 0.01 ng/mL * | 0.01 ng/mL * | 1.85 ng/mL | 0.46 ng/mL | 0.30 ng/mL | 0.19 ng/mL |
MARE #2 | 25.8 pg/mL | 14.2 pg/mL | 8.63 pg/mL | 3.21 pg/mL * | 0.99 ng/mL | 0.01 ng/mL * | 0.01 ng/mL * | 0.01 ng/mL * | 0.01 ng/mL * | 0.01 ng/mL * |
MARE #3 | 42.6 pg/mL | 23.7 pg/mL | 1.73 pg/mL * | 4.98 pg/mL | 1.70 ng/mL | 0.01 ng/mL * | 0.04 ng/mL * | 0.01 ng/mL * | 0.01 ng/mL * | 0.01 ng/mL * |
MARE #4 | 29.9 pg/mL | 25.9 pg/mL | 7.65 pg/mL | 3.76 pg/mL * | 0.17 ng/mL | 0.06 ng/mL | 0.02 ng/mL * | 0.01 ng/mL * | 0.01 ng/mL * | 0.01 ng/mL * |
Range | Median | Standard Error | p-Value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Testosterone (pg/mL) | PRE-OP | 25.8–42.6 | 29.9 | 3.0 | 0.063 |
POST-OP | 14.2–28.4 | 25.3 | 2.4 | ||
Inhibin A (pg/mL) | PRE-OP | 1.73–16.90 | 7.65 | 2.67 | 0.188 |
POST-OP | 2.22–4.98 | 3.21 | 0.47 | ||
Amh (ng/mL) | PRE-OP | 0.01–1.88 | 0.99 | 0.38 | 0.125 |
POST-OP | 0.01–0.06 | 0.01 | 0.01 | ||
Progesterone (ng/mL) | PRE-OP | 0.01–1.85 | 0.02 | 0.37 | 0.375 |
POST-OP | 0.01–0.46 | 0.01 | 0.09 | ||
Estrone Sulfate (ng/mL) | PRE-OP | 0.01–0.30 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 1.000 |
POST-OP | 0.01–0.19 | 0.01 | 0.04 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Devick, I.F.; Hendrickson, D.A. Effects of Leaving Amputated Ovaries Intra-Abdominally during Elective Bilateral Standing Laparoscopic Ovariectomy in Equids. Animals 2021, 11, 232. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010232
Devick IF, Hendrickson DA. Effects of Leaving Amputated Ovaries Intra-Abdominally during Elective Bilateral Standing Laparoscopic Ovariectomy in Equids. Animals. 2021; 11(1):232. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010232
Chicago/Turabian StyleDevick, Ian F., and Dean A. Hendrickson. 2021. "Effects of Leaving Amputated Ovaries Intra-Abdominally during Elective Bilateral Standing Laparoscopic Ovariectomy in Equids" Animals 11, no. 1: 232. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010232
APA StyleDevick, I. F., & Hendrickson, D. A. (2021). Effects of Leaving Amputated Ovaries Intra-Abdominally during Elective Bilateral Standing Laparoscopic Ovariectomy in Equids. Animals, 11(1), 232. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010232