Next Article in Journal
Fermentative Quality and Animal Acceptability of Ensiled Persimmon Skin with Absorbents for Practical Use in Ruminant Feed
Previous Article in Journal
Aeromonas veronii Infection in Commercial Freshwater Fish: A Potential Threat to Public Health
Article

Economic and Welfare Impacts of Providing Good Life Opportunities to Farm Animals

1
Bristol Vet School, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford BS40 5DU, UK
2
School of Agriculture, Food and the Environment, Royal Agricultural University, Cirencester GL7 6JS, UK
3
Sustainable Agriculture Sciences Department, Rothamsted Research, North Wyke, Okehampton EX20 2SB, UK
4
Agriculture and Land Management, ADAS, Portview Road, Bristol BS11 9JE, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2020, 10(4), 610; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040610
Received: 11 March 2020 / Revised: 24 March 2020 / Accepted: 26 March 2020 / Published: 2 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Welfare)
An input-based framework to evaluate positive welfare opportunities for farm animals presents a case for incorporating quality of life measures into farm assurance schemes, thereby encouraging more producers to deliver higher welfare. Using an original dataset of UK laying hen farms that uniquely connects input-based measures of positive welfare to outcome-based measures of both positive and negative welfare, this study investigates the feasibility of evaluating positive welfare within certification schemes from both scientific and financial viewpoints.
Existing animal welfare standards for legislation and food certification programmes are primarily designed to avoid harms to the livestock, with minimal consideration given to their behavioural freedoms. Recent research has shown, however, that animal welfare should not only be evaluated by the absence of negative states but also by the presence of “good life” or positive experiences enjoyed by animals. The objective of the present study is to investigate the scientific validity and on-farm cost implications of utilising potential input-based measures of positive welfare as part of evaluation criteria for farm assurance schemes. Building upon the Farm Animal Welfare Council’s concept of good life opportunities, an assessment was undertaken on 49 noncaged laying hen farms across the UK by measuring on-farm resources to facilitate positive experiences alongside commonly measured metrics for welfare outcomes. The financial cost of providing these resources on each enterprise was also estimated using a farm-scale costing tool. The results suggested that 63% of resource needs that facilitate the behaviour opportunities of laying hens are already being provided by these producers, far above legal and commercial requirements. This practice attracts no reward mechanism or direct financial benefit under the current market structure. Additional provision of opportunities was positively associated with behavioural outcomes, but only limited impact was observed on health and productivity measures. Economic modelling indicated that significant room exists to further improve welfare scores on these farms, on average by 97%, without incurring additional costs. Together we argue that these results can be seen as evidence of market failure since producers are providing positive welfare value to society that is not being currently recognised. It is therefore contended that measuring and rewarding the supply of good life opportunities could be a novel policy instrument to create an effective marketplace that appropriately recognises high welfare production. View Full-Text
Keywords: quality of life; positive experience; resource tiers; economic analysis; laying hens quality of life; positive experience; resource tiers; economic analysis; laying hens
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Stokes, J.E.; Mullan, S.; Takahashi, T.; Monte, F.; Main, D.C.J. Economic and Welfare Impacts of Providing Good Life Opportunities to Farm Animals. Animals 2020, 10, 610. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040610

AMA Style

Stokes JE, Mullan S, Takahashi T, Monte F, Main DCJ. Economic and Welfare Impacts of Providing Good Life Opportunities to Farm Animals. Animals. 2020; 10(4):610. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040610

Chicago/Turabian Style

Stokes, Jessica E., Siobhan Mullan, Taro Takahashi, Federica Monte, and David C.J. Main 2020. "Economic and Welfare Impacts of Providing Good Life Opportunities to Farm Animals" Animals 10, no. 4: 610. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040610

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop