Next Article in Journal
Effects of Roughage Quality and Particle Size on Rumen Parameters and Fatty Acid Profiles of Longissimus Dorsi Fat of Lambs Fed Complete Feed
Next Article in Special Issue
Direct Phenotyping and Principal Component Analysis of Type Traits Implicate Novel QTL in Bovine Mastitis through Genome-Wide Association
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Environmental and Productive Factors on the Biodiversity of Lactic Acid Bacteria Population from Sheep Milk
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Analysis of Nubian Ibex Reveals Candidate Positively Selected Genes That Contribute to Its Adaptation to the Desert Environment

by
Vivien J. Chebii
1,2,*,
Samuel O. Oyola
3,
Antoinette Kotze
4,5,
Jean-Baka Domelevo Entfellner
2,
J. Musembi Mutuku
2,6 and
Morris Agaba
1,2
1
School of Life Science and Bioengineering, Nelson Mandela Africa Institution of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 447, Arusha 23306, Tanzania
2
Biosciences Eastern and Central Africa—International Livestock Research Institute (BecA-ILRI) Hub, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
3
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
4
South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, P.O. Box 754, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
5
Department of Genetics, University of the Free State, P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa
6
Current Address: Central and West African Virus Epidemiology (WAVE), Pôle Scientifique et d’Innovation de Bingerville, Université Félix Houphouët-Boigny, Abidjan 01 BP V34, Cote d’Ivoire
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2020, 10(11), 2181; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10112181
Submission received: 28 September 2020 / Revised: 31 October 2020 / Accepted: 3 November 2020 / Published: 22 November 2020

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The Nubian ibex is a wild relative of the domestic goat found in hot deserts of Northern Africa and Arabia. The domestic goat is an important livestock species that is mainly found in arid and semi-arid regions of Africa and Asia. The Nubian ibex is well adapted to challenging environments in hot deserts characterized by high diurnal temperatures, intense solar radiation, and scarce water resources. It is therefore important to understand the genetic basis of its adaptation for scientific and economic importance. To identify genes with adaptive traits, the Nubian ibex genome was sequenced and compared with that of related mammals. We identified twenty-five genes under selection in the Nubian ibex that play diverse biological roles such as immune response, visual development, signal transduction, and reproduction. Three other genes under adaptive evolution involved in protective functions of the skin against damaging solar radiation in the desert were identified in Nubian ibex genome. Our finding provides valuable genomic insights into the adaptation of Nubian ibex to desert environments. The genomic information generated in this study can be used in developing appropriate breeding programs aimed at enhancing adaptation of local goats to less favorable habitats in response to changing climates.

Abstract

The domestic goat (Capra hircus) is an important livestock species with a geographic range spanning all continents, including arid and semi-arid regions of Africa and Asia. The Nubian ibex (Capra nubiana), a wild relative of the domestic goat inhabiting the hot deserts of Northern Africa and the Arabian Peninsula, is well-adapted to challenging environments in hot deserts characterized by intense solar radiation, thermal extremes, and scarce water resources. The economic importance of C. hircus breeds, as well as the current trends of global warming, highlights the need to understand the genetic basis of adaptation of C. nubiana to the desert environments. In this study, the genome of a C. nubiana individual was sequenced at an average of 37x coverage. Positively selected genes were identified by comparing protein-coding DNA sequences of C. nubiana and related species using dN/dS statistics. A total of twenty-two positively selected genes involved in diverse biological functions such as immune response, protein ubiquitination, olfactory transduction, and visual development were identified. In total, three of the twenty-two positively selected genes are involved in skin barrier development and function (ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 12, Achaete-scute family bHLH transcription factor 4, and UV stimulated scaffold protein A), suggesting that C. nubiana has evolved skin protection strategies against the damaging solar radiations that prevail in deserts. The positive selection signatures identified here provide new insights into the potential adaptive mechanisms to hot deserts in C. nubiana.

1. Introduction

The Nubian ibex (Capra nubiana), is one of the nine species of the Capra genus, which also includes the domesticated goat (Capra hircus) [1]. Capra species inhabit diverse environments ranging from extreme cold deserts of Siberia (Capra sibirica), through the rugged high altitude ranges in Ethiopia (Capra walie), and moderate environments of the Zagros mountains (Capra aegagrus) to extremely hot deserts of northern Africa and Arabia (Capra nubiana) [2]. C. nubiana population is estimated to be approximately 2500 and is categorized as Vulnerable on the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List [3,4]. C. nubiana thrives well in challenging environmental conditions characterized by high diurnal temperatures, intense solar radiation, and limited water supply. In contrast, the domestic goat is a more versatile species that is found in all major agro-ecological zones in Africa and Asia. While C. nubiana is adapted to harsh desert environments, a large proportion of the domestic goats occur in semi-arid zones where the climate is expected to become hotter and drier as predicted by climate change models [5]. C. nubiana has adaptive phenotypes such as a shiny waterproof coat that reflects harsh sunlight and minimizes water losses through the skin [2]. The genetic basis behind C. nubiana’s adaptation to its environment, however, need to be identified, and could translate into useful information for breeding programs in livestock species in the context of the global effects of climate change.
The genetic basis of adaptation is detectable using genomic data through the comparison of sequence data from the target species with that of a suitable reference. A genome-wide comparison of the relative rate of nonsynonymous (dN) versus synonymous substitutions (dS) in protein-coding genes, with the ratio denoted as ω = dN/dS, is an established approach for detecting adaptive evolution processes of a given species among its “peer” [6,7,8]. A ratio ω < 1 indicates negative (purifying) selection, ω = 1 indicates neutral evolution, while ω > 1 indicates positive selection (adaptive evolution) driving the fixation of amino acid changes [9,10]. The dN/dS statistic was initially developed to detect positive selection in individual genes; however, it has been scaled up to detect selection in protein-coding genes at a whole-genome level [10,11]. The dN/dS statistic has been used with success to detect positively selected genes in several species such as viruses [12,13], bacteria [14,15], plants [16,17,18], and higher vertebrates [19,20,21,22,23,24].
The dN/dS statistics is a robust computational tool for detecting protein evolution in genomes with a good correlation with experimental methods such as gene expression studies [25,26]. Protein evolution studies in highland fish, Gymnocypris przewalskii, showed that a set of adaptive immune system genes were under positive selection, with high expression after parasitic infection [25]. Similarly, positively selected genes involved in feeding habits in tsetse flies were shown to be highly expressed in organs associated with feeding success such as salivary glands and midgut [26].
The maximum likelihood method based on comparative genomics implemented in the PAML package is widely used to estimate the dN/dS ratio as a measure of protein evolution [27]. Protein evolution analyses using dN/dS statistics have provided clues into the diverse adaptations seen in mammalian species [19,28,29]. For instance, a genome-wide comparison between giraffe and okapi showed that bone development genes (Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor-like 1 and Notch Receptor 4) were under positive selection in the giraffe, and are likely associated with the elongated body structure [28]. The giraffes’ distinct stature and body morphology are thought to be a feeding adaptation, which enables it to feed on tall acacia trees in savanna landscapes [28]. Genome sequence comparison of dromedary and bactrian camels with alpaca showed that camels have evolved adaptive mechanisms to cope with environmental stresses in deserts as evidenced by positive selection of oxidative stress response genes (Endoplasmic Reticulum Protein 44 and Microsomal glutathione S-transferase 2) [19]. Similarly, genome-wide comparisons of fifty-four ruminants showed that bovids which inhabits grasslands displayed signals of positive selection in cursorial locomotion genes (angiotensin I converting enzyme and erythropoietin) which are important for endurance [21]. Comparative genomic sequence analysis of reindeer with nine other mammalian species showed that vitamin D metabolism genes (Cytochrome P450 Family 27 Subfamily B Member 1 and Cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase) were under selection [30]. Selection of vitamin D metabolism genes is an adaptive mechanism that enables reindeer to produce high levels of vitamin D needed for calcium absorption and body fat oxidation, which are required to survive in Arctic environments [30].
The objective of this study was to identify candidate protein-coding genes that can underlie the adaptation of C. nubiana to its desert environment.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Samples

The animal sample used in this study was obtained from the National Zoological Garden, Pretoria, South Africa. A liver tissue sample collected postmortem from a seven month old female C. nubiana that died of natural causes was requested from the National Zoological Garden biobank. Additional information of the C. nubiana used in this study is provided in Supplemental File S1. Genomic DNA was isolated using the phenol-chloroform extraction method. The extracted DNA was quantified using the Nanodrop 2000C spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. Woltham, Ma, USA), and the quality was assessed using electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gel. The National Zoological Gardens approved all animal procedures for tissue sampling (Ethical clearance number: NZG/P14/13).

2.2. Sequence Data Generation

Approximately 200 ng of the purified genomic DNA was used to construct a library of insert size of 450 bp using TruSeq Nano library prep kit following the manufacturers’ protocol (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The library was sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform in High Output mode using a Hiseq SBS kit V4. Library to produce paired-end sequence with a 125 bp read length. Library preparation and sequencing were done at the Agricultural Research Council’s Biotechnology Platform (ARC-BTP) based at the Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute campus, Pretoria, South Africa. The quality of the raw sequence reads were assessed using FastQC version 0.10.065 [31]. Adapters, PCR duplicates, and overrepresented sequences were trimmed off using Trimmomatic version 0.32 [32]. The genome size was predicted from the trimmed paired-end sequence reads using Kmergenie version 1.7016 [33].

2.3. Identification of Single Nucleotide Variants (SNVs) between C. Nubiana and the Domestic Goat

Paired-end sequence reads that passed the quality control assessment were aligned to the domestic goat reference genome (ARS1 assembly: GCA_001704415.1) [34] using Burrows–Wheeler Alignment Maximal Exact Match algorithm (BWA-MEM) version 0.7.15 [35] using default. SAMtools was used to convert the Sequence Alignment Map (SAM) file into indexed and sorted Binary Alignment/Map (BAM) format [36]. Single nucleotide variant calls against the domestic goat reference genome were generated using SAMtools mpileup [36] with parameters set to -q 30 -Q 30, where -q 30 sets the minimum mapping quality and Q 30 sets the minimum base quality. The mpileup output file (Binary Call Format (BCF)) file, was redirected to the BCFtools view program to convert it to Variant Call Format (VCF) format [36]. The variant calls were then filtered using vcfutils.pl varFilter with the minimum and maximum read depths set to 6 and 100 reads, respectively [36]. The transition-to-transversion (Ti/Tv) ratio, a parameter used to assess the specificity of new SNP calls [37], was estimated using vcftools version 0.1.15 [38]. Functional annotations of the SNVs were performed using Variant Effect Predictor (VEP) tool version 96 [39] with Capra hircus genome (ARS1 assembly: GCA_001704415.1) as the reference [34].

2.4. Capra Nubiana and Capra Hircus Protein-Coding DNA Sequences (CDS)

The C. nubiana genome assembled from the Illumina short reads in this study was highly fragmented; hence the protein-coding DNA sequences were generated from the domestic goat coding DNA sequences. All CDS for Capra hircus genome assembly GCA_001704415.1 downloaded from Ensembl BioMart [40] were used as template to generate corresponding C. nubiana gene models. Briefly, a custom-made bash script was used to replace nucleotides in the coding DNA sequences of the domestic goat assembly with the corresponding C. nubiana alleles based on the homozygous coding SNVs positions identified in the variant calling pipeline above (Section 2.3). Visual inspections of randomly selected C. nubiana CDS were carried out by comparing it side by side with the corresponding domestic goat CDS. The visual inspection confirmed that the domestic goat allele at the SNVs positions were successfully replaced with C. nubiana alleles. The bash script, coding DNA sequences of the domestic goat, C. nubiana and, SNVs annotation file used are provided at Figshare (https://figshare.com/s/36c4effaa8d50c08f0f7).

2.5. Protein-Coding DNA Sequences (CDS) for Positive Selection Analysis

Detection of positive selection signatures using branch-site model requires that the branches in a phylogeny tree is partitioned into foreground and background branches. It is expected that the foreground branches have sites evolving under positive selection, while background branches will have sites evolving under negative, purifying, or natural selection. The protein-coding DNA sequences for C. nubiana were generated from the domestic goat CDS as described in Section 2.4. All CDS for each of the background species (domestic goat, cattle, sheep, wild yak, American bison, horse, donkey, tiger, cat, dog, pig, and panda) were downloaded from Ensembl v.97 [41]. The Tibetan antelope and water buffalo CDS were obtained from the genome data, downloaded from Genbank [42]. The data source for each of the taxa is provided in Supplemental File S2.

2.6. Single Gene Ortholog Identification

The assembled CDS of C. nubiana, C. hircus, and the background species were used to identify single-copy gene orthologs. The single-copy gene orthologs shared among the 15 species were identified using reciprocal best hit (RBH) approach implemented using blastn [43,44] with parameters set to: e-value of 1 × 10−10, coverage > 70%, and percentage identity > 50%. Pairwise orthologs were derived between C. nubiana CDS and each of the 14 species and the intersection across all the pairs were used to construct a combined single-copy gene set. A gene pair was considered an ortholog if they appeared as the best hits of each other in the pairwise homology search. Single-copy gene set present in at least seven species including the core species (C. hircus and C. nubiana) was retained for subsequent analysis.

2.7. The dN/dS Analysis

The CDS of the single-copy gene orthologs were translated to the corresponding polypeptides using the mod_translate program [45], and any sequence with internal stop codons was discarded. The polypeptides sequences were aligned using the MUSCLE program version 3.8.1551 [46], and the resulting alignments were used to guide coding sequence alignments using the RevTrans program version 1.4 [45]. The CDS alignments were used to construct phylogeny trees using the PhyML package, version 3.0 [47]. C. nubiana leaf in each of the phylogeny tree was labeled as the foreground branch, while the other species were set as background using the ETE toolkit, version 3.1.2 [48].
Based on the sequence alignment of each gene set of the single-copy gene orthologs and the corresponding phylogenetic tree, dN/dS analysis was carried out using revised branch-site model A [49] implemented in CodeML program of the PAML package, version 4.7a [50]. The CodeML parameters used are provided in Supplemental File S3. The genes with significant p-values (<0.05) based on Likelihood Ratio Test (LRT) X2-analysis were considered to be under adaptive evolution and were selected as the initial positively selected genes (PSGs) list. Since the branch-site model is sensitive to the taxa sample size [51], the initial candidate PSGs were re-analyzed after adding more data to the core set such that each gene set had a minimum of ten and a maximum of nineteen sequences. The additional CDS corresponding to each PSG used for re-analysis were obtained from even-toe ungulates from which sequences were available in public databases. Furthermore, amino acid sites of the final candidate genes under positive selection were identified using the Bayes Empirical Bayes (BEB) algorithm [52]. A site was considered to be positively selected when the posterior probability was greater than 80% [52]. Additional paired-end sequence reads for two C. nubiana individuals were downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) under Sequence Read Archive (SRA) accession number SRR8437789 and SRR8437792 and analyzed following a similar approach used in Section 2.3. The animal samples for the additional two C. nubiana individuals were obtained from Egypt and Saudi Arabia [53]. SNV sites across the three C. nubiana individuals were extracted using a bash script.

2.8. Functional Annotation of the Positively Selected Genes (PSG) and Sites

The gene ontology (GO) terms assignments for the PSGs were found by searching the genes in Ensembl Goat Genes v.97 using Biomart [40], while additional gene functions were sourced from the literature. Gene enrichment analysis was carried out using The Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) version 6.8 [54]. Furthermore, functional impact analysis of the amino acid substitutions in positively selected sites of the candidate genes was carried out using Polyphen-2 (Polymorphism Phenotyping-2) [55]. Polyphen-2 was run with default cutoff values. Amino acid substitutions with score < 0.2 were considered to be benign, scores between 0.2–0.85 were considered as a possibly damaging variant, while scores between 0.85–1 were considered as probably damaging.

3. Results

3.1. Genome Sequence and SNVs Calling

The C. nubiana genome sequence was determined by constructing paired-end libraries followed by sequencing using Illumina Hiseq 2500 yielding approximately 900 million raw reads. A total of 781 million paired-end sequence reads were retained after quality control analysis, representing ~37x sequence coverage of the estimated 2.63 Gbp C. nubiana genome. The clean paired-end sequence reads mapped to approximately 98% of the domestic goat reference genome (ARS1 genome version). Genome sequence comparison of C. nubiana and the domestic goat yielded a total of 19,468,467 SNVs sites; 16,443,766 of them were homozygous SNVs. Most of the SNVs were located in the non-coding regions of the genome (intergenic: 69.2%, intronic: 29.6%), and the remaining small percentage (0.7%) were located in the exonic regions. The alignment file and SNVs data are provided in Figshare https://figshare.com/s/3041e34bc83934ba5797.

3.2. Positively Selected Genes in Capra Nubiana

Homozygous C. nubiana SNVs alleles were projected to C. hircus CDS to generate a total of 19,418 C. nubiana CDS. Subsequent orthologs identification yielded a total of 15,527 single-copy gene orthologs shared by C. nubiana, C. hircus, and at least seven of the fifteen selected background taxa. The initial dN/dS analysis using a minimum of seven and a maximum of fifteen species as the background data showed that 34 genes were under positive selection in C. nubiana. Using additional background taxa data (minimum of ten and maximum of nineteen species), we confirmed 28 out of the initial 34 candidate genes to be under positive selection in C. nubiana. Approximately 98% of the SNV sites shown to be under positive selection in 22 genes were consistent across three C. nubiana individuals. The BEB analysis showed that 42 amino acid sites in the 22 candidate genes were under selection.
Functional impact analysis of amino acid substitutions conducted using Polyphen-2 at the sites identified as positively selected by BEB algorithm in the candidate genes showed that 17 amino acid changes were classified as “possibly damaging” or “probably damaging,” while 13 were classified as “benign.” The possibly damaging or probably damaging amino acid substitutions are likely to alter the protein structure and function. Positively selected gene list, sites, and the functional impact of the corresponding amino acid substitutions are provided in Table 1 and Supplemental File S4.
The gene ontology (GO) assignments showed that the positively selected genes are involved in diverse molecular functions such as protein binding, ATP binding, olfactory receptor activity, serine-type endopeptidase activity, metal ion binding, and G protein-coupled receptor activity. Additionally, other positively selected genes are involved in biological processes that include: camera-type eye development, prostaglandin metabolic processes, signal transduction, G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, transmembrane transport, protein ubiquitination, DNA replication, positive regulation of Notch signaling pathway, negative regulation of systemic arterial blood pressure, spermatogenesis and oocyte development were identified. The gene ontology terms are provided in Supplemental File S5. Additionally, we found positively selected genes such as ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 12 (ABCA12), Achaete-scute family bHLH transcription factor 4 (ASCL4), and UV stimulated scaffold protein A (UVSSA) that are involved in 10 GO biological processes such as keratinization, ceramide transport, the establishment of the skin barrier, lipid transport, skin development, transcription-coupled nucleotide-excision repair, and response to ultra-violet (UV) radiation, which may play different roles in desert environment adaptations.

3.3. Skin Development and Barrier Function Genes under Positive Selection in C. Nubiana

In total, three of the twenty-two positively selected genes identified in this study are involved in skin barrier development and functions (ABCA12, ASCL4, and UVSSA). The ABCA12 gene, a member of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters is found in chromosome 2 of the domestic goat (ARS1 assembly). The ABCA12 gene had one amino acid substitution (M570T) with a BEB posterior probability of 94% classified as ‘possibly damaging’ (Polyphen-2 score of 0.74). The positively selected site in ABCA12 is outside the known functional domains for this gene. Gene ontology (GO) terms associated with ABCA12 include lipid transport activity, keratinocyte differentiation, ceramides transport, surfactant homeostasis, and establishment of skin barrier. An illustration of the gene tree and multiple sequence alignment data used for positive selection analysis of ABCA12 is provided in Figure 1.
Achaete-scute family (basic helix-loop-helix) bHLH transcription factor 4 (ASCL4) is a transcriptional regulatory protein found in chromosome 5 of the domestic goat (ARS1 assembly). The ASCL4 gene had one amino acid substitution (S30L) with a BEB posterior probability of 99.9%, which is not within the known gene functional domain. Functional impact analysis of the amino acid substitution (S30L) predicted it to be ‘probably damaging’ (Polyphen-2 score of 0.99). The ASCL4 gene is one of the five homologs of drosophila Achaete-Scute basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors (ASCL1, ASCL2, ASCL3, and ASCL5) [54]. The ASCL1 and ASCL2 genes are involved in the development and differentiation of neural crest cells in the sympathetic system, ASCL3 is involved in the development of the duct cells in salivary glands and ASCL5 is expressed in the brain, though its function is yet to be determined [56,57]. GO terms associated with ASCL4 include; transcription, regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter, and skin development. An illustration of the gene tree and multiple sequence alignment data used for positive selection analysis of ASCL4 is provided in Supplemental File S6.
UV-stimulated scaffold protein A (UVSSA), a DNA repair gene found in chromosome 6 of the domestic goat (ARS1) assembly, had two amino acid substitutions (D361G and A517T). The amino acid change at position 361 had a BEB posterior probability of 91.7% classified as ‘probably damaging’ (Polyphen-2 score of 0.992). While the mutation at position 517 had a BEB posterior probability of 89.7 classified as benign. The amino acid replacement at position 361 of UVSSA gene is located in the DUF2043 domain. Gene ontology terms associated with the UVSSA gene include transcription-coupled nucleotide-excision repair, response to UV, and protein ubiquitination. An illustration of the gene tree and multiple sequence alignment data used for positive selection analysis of UVSSA is provided in Supplemental File S6.

4. Discussion

4.1. Whole-Genome Mapping, Single Nucleotide Variant Calling, and Annotation

The C. nubiana genome was sequenced to a depth of 37x, a sufficient coverage recommended for SNVs detections [58]. Mapping of C. nubiana sequence reads to the domestic goat reference genome showed that 98% of the reads mapped to unique sites; an indication of high-quality sequence data for detections of genetic variants [58].Approximately, 19 million SNVs identified in this study are comparable to the number identified in other interspecies studies; for instance, a total of 18.2 million SNVs were detected by comparing donkey with horse genome [59]. The SNVs transition to transversion (Ts/Tv) ratio was 2.39 which is close to the empirical human Ts/Tv ratio (>2.1), this indicates a relatively low potential random sequencing errors [37,60].
The analysis was based on one individual C. nubiana and the domestic goat (C. hircus), which acted as a proxy for the respective species. A key presumption made in this study was that the differences between the species reflect the 2.85 million years of divergence, and they are more likely to be fixed in the respective species [61]. Inevitably, some of the SNVs discovered here might be linked to that individual C. nubiana and the domestic goat from whom the ARS1 assembly was developed; however, we are confident that the majority of the SNVs identified reflect species–specific fixed variations. Validation of SNVs showed that 98% of the SNV sites shown to be under positive selection in 22 genes were consistent across the three C. nubiana individuals, thus confirming our assertation that the majority of the selection signals detected in this study reflect species-specific fixed variations.

4.2. Positively Selected Genes in Capra Nubiana

A total of twenty-two genes involved in diverse biological functions were shown to be under positive selection in C. nubiana. A total of nineteen of the positively selected genes are involved in visual development (Serine protease 56 and ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 5), blood pressure regulation (Prostaglandin I2 synthase and Rho GTPase activating protein 42), reproduction (Meiosis Specific With Coiled-Coil Domain, Storkhead box 2 and Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 subunit beta), and ion transport (Atpase H+ transporting V1 subunit E2 and Matrix AAA peptidase interacting protein 1). In addition, genes involved in signal transduction (Olfactory receptor 2G2-like, Olfactory receptor 1P1 and Putative olfactory receptor 52P1), protein ubiquitination (F-box protein 21), regulation of Notch signaling pathway (Nucleolus and neural progenitor protein), angiogenesis (Multimerin 2), and phagocytosis (Toll-like receptor adaptor molecule 2) were shown to be under selection in C. nubiana. The functional roles for most of the positively selected genes identified in C. nubiana are less clear. Further studies need to be carried out to delineate their possible adaptive roles. However, three genes ABCA12, ASCL4, and UVSSA involved in skin barrier development and function, which may have a role in adaptations to desert environments, were shown to be under positive selection in C. nubiana.

4.3. Skin Development and Barrier Function Genes under Positive Selection in C. Nubiana

C. nubiana is exposed to high diurnal temperatures and intense solar radiation that are likely to increase the rate of water loss through the skin or induce skin damages. This implies that excellent epidermal barrier system is needed to minimize water losses through the skin as reflected by C. nubianas’ shiny waterproof coat [2]. Genes involved in skin barrier development such as ABCA12 and ASCL4 displayed strong selection signals in C. nubiana. ABCA12 is a keratinocyte transmembrane protein that transports lipids and ceramides via lamellar granules, which form the skin–lipid barrier in the stratum corneum [62]. The skin barrier provides protection against solar radiation, water loss, and pathogens [63]. Mutations within ABCA12 conserved domains are linked to skin disorders known as ichthyosis, a condition whereby patients are unable to accumulate lipids in the stratum corneum, hence are exposed to life-threatening water loss through the skin [64,65] Functional impact analysis of the amino acid substitution in ABCA12 showed that the change is likely to alter the protein structure and functions. We hypothesize that these functional changes maybe the genetic basis behind C. nubiana adaptation to its desert environment.
Similarly, ASCL4 a basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) protein was under selection in C. nubiana. Basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins including the ASCL4 gene play key roles in nervous system development; however, recent evidence has shown that they are also important in epidermal development [66]. The function of ASCL4 is not known, but its expression is restricted to the skin and especially the fetal skin [67] where it may, among other roles, be involved in the development and growth of hair follicles [68]. Functional impact analysis of the amino acid substitution in the ASCL4 gene showed that the change is likely to alter the protein structure and functions. The identification of ABCA12 and ASCL4 as positively selected in C. nubiana provides evidence of their possible roles in the skin barrier development, where they may be of significance in adaptation to hot desert conditions.
In addition to an elaborate skin barrier, C. nubiana has evolved genetic mechanisms in response to the damaging ultraviolet radiations (UV) in the desert. In this study, we identified a DNA repair gene (UVSSA) putatively involved in protecting C. nubiana from the damaging desert solar radiation to be under positive selection. The UVSSA gene removes impaired DNA located in actively transcribed genes in response to UV damage [69]. Mutations in the UVSAA gene are linked to UV-sensitive syndrome in humans, and impaired transcription-coupled nucleotide-excision repair system [70]. We suggest that UVSSA in C. nubiana may have a role in repairing DNA damages induced by intense solar radiation in the hot deserts.

5. Conclusions

This study showed that comparative analysis of protein-coding genes is a robust method for detecting signals of selection in genomes. A total of twenty-two genes that play diverse biological roles in C. nubiana were identified to be under positive selection. In total, three out of the twenty-two genes (ABCA12, ASCL4, and UVSSA) are involved in skin barrier development and function. Therefore, we conclude that C. nubiana has evolved skin protection strategies to minimize water losses and the damaging effects of solar radiation in the hot desert habitats where it thrives. The study further demonstrated that a comparison of wild relatives of the domestic goat is useful for identifying candidate genes that can be used in breeding programs aimed at improving the domestic goat to adapt to challenging environments. The results of this study are limited the by use of few individuals, hence the candidate genes identified in this study need further confirmation through empirical studies to delineate their possible roles in adaptations. The identification of key genes involved in the adaptation to the desert environment in C. nubiana may have applications in breeding programs, and form a valuable genomic resource for further adaptive evolution studies in Capra species.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/11/2181/s1. Supplemental File S1: Codeml control files, Supplemental File S2: Data sources of the taxa used for positive selection analysis, Supplemental File S3: Positively selected amino acid sites and impact on gene function, Supplemental File S4: Gene ontology terms for positively selected genes, Supplemental File S5: ASCL4 and UVSSA gene phylogenetic trees and sequence alignments used for positive selection analysis, Supplemental File S6. ASCL4 and UVSSA gene phylogenetic trees and sequence alignments used for positive selection analysis.

Author Contributions

V.J.C. carried out the research and wrote the manuscript. M.A. conceived, designed the experiment and obtained the research funding. M.A., J.M.M., J.-B.D.E., A.K. and S.O.O. provided input on analysis and result interpretations. All authors participated in useful discussions, revised and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

The research was funded by Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA) through grants to Biosciences eastern and central Africa—International Livestock Research Institute (BecA—ILRI Hub) (Grant number: UF2011/55504/UD/UP). Vivien Chebii graduate fellowship was funded by the Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst (DAAD) and was supplemented by BecA-ILRI Hub through the Africa Biosciences Challenge Fund (ABCF) program. The ABCF Program is funded by the Australian Department for Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) through the BecA-CSIRO partnership, the Syngenta Foundation for Sustainable Agriculture (SFSA), the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), the UK Department for International Development (DFID), and the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the National Zoological Gardens of South Africa’s biobank who provided C. nubiana sample. We thank Moses Ogugo for technical support in DNA preparation and shipment and Joyce Njuguna and John Juma for bioinformatics support. The bioinformatics analyzes were carried out using the high performance clusters (HPC) at the Biosciences eastern and central Africa—International Livestock Research Institute (BecA—ILRI Hub).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Availability of Data and Materials

The sequence data (FASTQ) files used in this study have been deposited in to the National Centre of Biotechnology Information (NCBI) under Bioproject accession number PRJNA674751.

References

  1. Pidancier, N.; Jordan, S.; Luikart, G.; Taberlet, P. Evolutionary history of the genus Capra (Mammalia, Artiodactyla): Discordance between mitochondrial DNA and Y-chromosome phylogenies. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2006, 40, 739–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Castelló, J.R.; Huffman, B.; Groves, C. Bovids of the World Antelopes, Gazelles, Cattle, Goats, Sheep, and Relatives; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shackleton, D.M.; Caprinae Specialist Group. Wild Sheep and Goats and their Relatives.Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. for Caprinae; IUCN: Cambridge, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  4. Alkon, P.U.; Harding, L.; Jdeidi, T.; Masseti, M.; Nader, I.; de Smet, K.; Cuzin, F.; Saltz, D. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Capra Nubiana 2008, E.T3796A10084254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Henry, B.K.; Eckard, R.J.; Beauchemin, K.A. Review: Adaptation of ruminant livestock production systems to climate changes. Animal 2018, 12, s445–s456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Goldman, N.; Yang, Z. A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1994, 11, 725–736. [Google Scholar]
  7. Yang, Z.; Nielsen, R. Codon-Substitution Models for Detecting Molecular Adaptation at Individual Sites Along Specific Lineages. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2002, 19, 908–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Zhang, J.; Nielsen, R.; Yang, Z. Evaluation of an improved branch-site likelihood method for detecting positive selection at the molecular level. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2005, 22, 2472–2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Yang, Z.; Nielsen, R.; Goldman, N.; Pedersen, A.-M.K. Codon-Substitution Models for Heterogeneous Selection Pressure at Amino Acid Sites. Genetics 2000, 155, 431–449. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Yang, Z. Likelihood ratio tests for detecting positive selection and application to primate lysozyme evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1998, 15, 568–573. [Google Scholar]
  11. Nielsen, R.; Yang, Z. Likelihood models for detecting positively selected amino acid sites and applications to the HIV-1 envelope gene. Genetics 1998, 148, 929–936. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Bedi, S.K.; Prasad, A.; Mathur, K.; Bhatnagar, S. Positive selection and evolution of dengue type-3 virus in the Indian subcontinent. J. Vector Borne Dis. 2013, 50, 188–196. [Google Scholar]
  13. Yang, Z. Maximum Likelihood Estimation on Large Phylogenies and Analysis of Adaptive Evolution in Human Influenza Virus A. J. Mol. Evol. 2000, 51, 423–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Rocha, E.P.C.; Smith, J.M.; Hurst, L.D.; Holden, M.T.G.; Cooper, J.E.; Smith, N.H.; Feil, E.J. Comparisons of dN/dS are time dependent for closely related bacterial genomes. J. Theor. Biol. 2006, 239, 226–235. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Soyer, Y.; Orsi, R.H.; Rodriguez-Rivera, L.D.; Sun, Q.; Wiedmann, M. Genome wide evolutionary analyses reveal serotype specific patterns of positive selection in selected Salmonella serotypes. BMC Evol. Biol. 2009, 9, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Qian, J.; Liu, Y.; Chao, N.; Ma, C.; Chen, Q.; Sun, J.; Wu, Y. Positive selection and functional divergence of farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase genes in plants. BMC Mol. Biol. 2017, 18, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. De La Torre, A.R.; Li, Z.; Van de Peer, Y.; Ingvarsson, P.K. Contrasting Rates of Molecular Evolution and Patterns of Selection among Gymnosperms and Flowering Plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 34, 1363–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. You, H.; Liu, Y.; Minh, T.N.; Lu, H.; Zhang, P.; Li, W.; Xiao, J.; Ding, X.; Li, Q. Genome-wide identification and expression analyses of nitrate transporter family genes in wild soybean (Glycine soja). J. Appl. Genet. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wu, H.; Guang, X.; Al-Fageeh, M.B.; Cao, J.; Pan, S.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, L.; Abutarboush, M.H.; Xing, Y.; Xie, Z.; et al. Camelid genomes reveal evolution and adaptation to desert environments. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Han, M.V.; Demuth, J.P.; McGrath, C.L.; Casola, C.; Hahn, M.W. Adaptive evolution of young gene duplicates in mammals. Genome Res. 2009, 19, 859–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Chen, L.; Qiu, Q.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, K.; Lin, Z.; Li, Z.; Bibi, F.; Yang, Y.; Wang, J.; Nie, W.; et al. Large-scale ruminant genome sequencing provides insights into their evolution and distinct traits. Science 2019, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xu, S.; Tian, R.; Lin, Y.; Yu, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Niu, X.; Wang, X.; Yang, G. Widespread positive selection on cetacean TLR extracellular domain. Mol. Immunol. 2019, 106, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. McGowen, M.R.; Grossman, L.I.; Wildman, D.E. Dolphin genome provides evidence for adaptive evolution of nervous system genes and a molecular rate slowdown. Proc. Biol Sci. 2012, 279, 3643–3651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Roux, J.; Privman, E.; Moretti, S.; Daub, J.T.; Robinson-Rechavi, M.; Keller, L. Patterns of positive selection in seven ant genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2014, 31, 1661–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Tong, C.; Li, M. Transcriptomic signature of rapidly evolving immune genes in a highland fish. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020, 97, 587–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Freitas, L.; Mesquita, R.; Schrago, C. Survey for positively selected coding regions in the genome of the hematophagous tsetse fly Glossina morsitans identifies candidate genes associated with feeding habits and embryonic development. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2020, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, Z. PAML 4: Phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Agaba, M.; Ishengoma, E.; Miller, W.C.; McGrath, B.C.; Hudson, C.N.; Bedoya Reina, O.C.; Ratan, A.; Burhans, R.; Chikhi, R.; Medvedev, P.; et al. Giraffe genome sequence reveals clues to its unique morphology and physiology. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Qiu, Q.; Zhang, G.; Ma, T.; Qian, W.; Wang, J.; Ye, Z.; Cao, C.; Hu, Q.; Kim, J.; Larkin, D.M.; et al. The yak genome and adaptation to life at high altitude. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44, 946–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Lin, Z.; Chen, L.; Chen, X.; Zhong, Y.; Yang, Y.; Xia, W.; Liu, C.; Zhu, W.; Wang, H.; Yan, B.; et al. Biological adaptations in the Arctic cervid, the reindeer (Rangifer tarandus). Science 2019, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Andrews, S. FastQC A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data. Available online: http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc (accessed on 15 June 2018).
  32. Bolger, A.M.; Lohse, M.; Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2114–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Chikhi, R.; Medvedev, P. Informed and automated k-mer size selection for genome assembly. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bickhart, D.M.; Rosen, B.D.; Koren, S.; Sayre, B.L.; Hastie, A.R.; Chan, S.; Lee, J.; Lam, E.T.; Liachko, I.; Sullivan, S.T.; et al. Single-molecule sequencing and chromatin conformation capture enable de novo reference assembly of the domestic goat genome. Nat. Genet. 2017, 49, 643–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Li, H.; Durbin, R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 2010, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Li, H.; Handsaker, B.; Wysoker, A.; Fennell, T.; Ruan, J.; Homer, N.; Marth, G.; Abecasis, G.; Durbin, R.; Genome Project Data Processing, S. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 2078–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. DePristo, M.A.; Banks, E.; Poplin, R.; Garimella, K.V.; Maguire, J.R.; Hartl, C.; Philippakis, A.A.; del Angel, G.; Rivas, M.A.; Hanna, M.; et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Danecek, P.; Auton, A.; Abecasis, G.; Albers, C.A.; Banks, E.; DePristo, M.A.; Handsaker, R.E.; Lunter, G.; Marth, G.T.; Sherry, S.T.; et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 2156–2158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. McLaren, W.; Gil, L.; Hunt, S.E.; Riat, H.S.; Ritchie, G.R.S.; Thormann, A.; Flicek, P.; Cunningham, F. The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor. Genome Biol. 2016, 17, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Kinsella, R.J.; Kähäri, A.; Haider, S.; Zamora, J.; Proctor, G.; Spudich, G.; Almeida-King, J.; Staines, D.; Derwent, P.; Kerhornou, A.; et al. Ensembl BioMarts: A hub for data retrieval across taxonomic space. Database 2011, 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Zerbino, D.R.; Achuthan, P.; Akanni, W.; Amode, M.R.; Barrell, D.; Bhai, J.; Billis, K.; Cummins, C.; Gall, A.; Girón, C.G.; et al. Ensembl 2018. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, D754–D761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Clark, K.; Karsch-Mizrachi, I.; Lipman, D.J.; Ostell, J.; Sayers, E.W. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, D67–D72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Altschul, S.F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol 1990, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ward, N.; Moreno-Hagelsieb, G. Quickly Finding Orthologs as Reciprocal Best Hits with BLAT, LAST, and UBLAST: How Much Do We Miss? PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e101850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Wernersson, R.; Pedersen, A.G. RevTrans: Multiple alignment of coding DNA from aligned amino acid sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 3537–3539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Edgar, R.C. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1792–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Guindon, S.; Dufayard, J.-F.; Lefort, V.; Anisimova, M.; Hordijk, W.; Gascuel, O. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: Assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 2010, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Huerta-Cepas, J.; Serra, F.; Bork, P. ETE 3: Reconstruction, Analysis, and Visualization of Phylogenomic Data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1635–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Yang, Z.; dos Reis, M. Statistical properties of the branch-site test of positive selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28, 1217–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Anisimova, M.; Bielawski, J.P.; Yang, Z. Accuracy and power of bayes prediction of amino acid sites under positive selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2002, 19, 950–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Yang, Z.; Wong, W.S.; Nielsen, R. Bayes empirical bayes inference of amino acid sites under positive selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2005, 22, 1107–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Dennis, G.; Sherman, B.T.; Hosack, D.A.; Yang, J.; Gao, W.; Lane, H.C.; Lempicki, R.A. DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery. Genome Biol. 2003, 4, R60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Adzhubei, I.; Jordan, D.M.; Sunyaev, S.R. Predicting functional effect of human missense mutations using PolyPhen-2. Curr. Protoc. Hum. Genet. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Wang, C.-Y.; Shahi, P.; Huang, J.T.W.; Phan, N.N.; Sun, Z.; Lin, Y.-C.; Lai, M.-D.; Werb, Z. Systematic analysis of the achaete-scute complex-like gene signature in clinical cancer patients. Mol. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 6, 7–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Ball, D.W.; Azzoli, C.G.; Baylin, S.B.; Chi, D.; Dou, S.; Donis-Keller, H.; Cumaraswamy, A.; Borges, M.; Nelkin, B.D. Identification of a human achaete-scute homolog highly expressed in neuroendocrine tumors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 5648–5652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Wu, L.; Yavas, G.; Hong, H.; Tong, W.; Xiao, W. Direct comparison of performance of single nucleotide variant calling in human genome with alignment-based and assembly-based approaches. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bertolini, F.; Scimone, C.; Geraci, C.; Schiavo, G.; Utzeri, V.; Chiofalo, V.; Fontanesi, L. Next Generation Semiconductor Based Sequencing of the Donkey (Equus asinus) Genome Provided Comparative Sequence Data against the Horse Genome and a Few Millions of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms. PLoS ONE 2015, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Mei, C.; Wang, H.; Zhu, W.; Wang, H.; Cheng, G.; Qu, K.; Guang, X.; Li, A.; Zhao, C.; Yang, W.; et al. Whole-genome sequencing of the endangered bovine species Gayal (Bos frontalis) provides new insights into its genetic features. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 19787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Suleski, M.; Hedges, S.B. TimeTree: A Resource for Timelines, Timetrees, and Divergence Times. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 34, 1812–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dogan, H.; Can, H.; Otu, H.H. Whole genome sequence of a Turkish individual. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e85233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhou, C.; Zhang, W.; Wen, Q.; Bu, P.; Gao, J.; Wang, G.; Jin, J.; Song, Y.; Sun, X.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Comparative Genomics Reveals the Genetic Mechanisms of Musk Secretion and Adaptive Immunity in Chinese Forest Musk Deer. Genome Biol. Evol. 2019, 11, 1019–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Akiyama, M. The roles of ABCA12 in epidermal lipid barrier formation and keratinocyte differentiation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2014, 1841, 435–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Jensen, J.M.; Proksch, E. The skin’s barrier. G. Ital. Dermatol. Venereol. Organo Uff. Soc. Ital. Dermatol. Sifilogr. 2009, 144, 689–700. [Google Scholar]
  64. Kelsell, D.P.; Norgett, E.E.; Unsworth, H.; Teh, M.T.; Cullup, T.; Mein, C.A.; Dopping-Hepenstal, P.J.; Dale, B.A.; Tadini, G.; Fleckman, P.; et al. Mutations in ABCA12 underlie the severe congenital skin disease harlequin ichthyosis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2005, 76, 794–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Scott, C.A.; Rajpopat, S.; Di, W.L. Harlequin ichthyosis: ABCA12 mutations underlie defective lipid transport, reduced protease regulation and skin-barrier dysfunction. Cell Tissue Res. 2013, 351, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Quan, X.J.; Hassan, B.A. From skin to nerve: Flies, vertebrates and the first helix. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2005, 62, 2036–2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Jonsson, M.; Bjorntorp Mark, E.; Brantsing, C.; Brandner, J.M.; Lindahl, A.; Asp, J. Hash4, a novel human achaete-scute homologue found in fetal skin. Genomics 2004, 84, 859–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Rezza, A.; Wang, Z.; Sennett, R.; Qiao, W.; Wang, D.; Heitman, N.; Mok, K.W.; Clavel, C.; Yi, R.; Zandstra, P.; et al. Signaling Networks among Stem Cell Precursors, Transit-Amplifying Progenitors, and their Niche in Developing Hair Follicles. Cell Rep. 2016, 14, 3001–3018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Sarasin, A. UVSSA and USP7: New players regulating transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair in human cells. Genome Med. 2012, 4, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Nakazawa, Y.; Sasaki, K.; Mitsutake, N.; Matsuse, M.; Shimada, M.; Nardo, T.; Takahashi, Y.; Ohyama, K.; Ito, K.; Mishima, H.; et al. Mutations in UVSSA cause UV-sensitive syndrome and impair RNA polymerase IIo processing in transcription-coupled nucleotide-excision repair. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44, 586–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. An illustration of the ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 12 (ABCA12) phylogeny tree and alignment data used for dN/dS analysis. (A) The maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree from ABCA12 amino acid sequences of 16 species used for dN/dS analysis. (B) The multiple sequence alignment of the 16 species used of dN/dS analysis showing amino acid site (M570T) under positive selection in ABCA12 gene.
Figure 1. An illustration of the ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 12 (ABCA12) phylogeny tree and alignment data used for dN/dS analysis. (A) The maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree from ABCA12 amino acid sequences of 16 species used for dN/dS analysis. (B) The multiple sequence alignment of the 16 species used of dN/dS analysis showing amino acid site (M570T) under positive selection in ABCA12 gene.
Animals 10 02181 g001
Table 1. Positively selected genes in C. nubiana.
Table 1. Positively selected genes in C. nubiana.
Ensembl Gene IdGene NamePositively Selected Sites with BEB Posterior Probability > 0.8Polyphen-2 Functional Impact Analysis
ENSCHIT00000003090Storkhead box 2T734V, N835TBenign
ENSCHIT00000004084Atpase H+ transporting V1 subunit E2M72NPossibly damaging
ENSCHIT00000004434Olfactory receptor 2G2-likeF73TProbably damaging
ENSCHIT00000008957Serine protease 56Q424L, R425G, R436WBenign, probably damaging, benign
ENSCHIT00000010253Matrix AAA peptidase interacting protein 1T76A, Q93PBenign
ENSCHIT00000012782Putative olfactory receptor 52P1M67LPossibly damaging
ENSCHIT00000015750Prostaglandin I2 synthaseR320H, D411EPossibly damaging, benign
ENSCHIT00000018881F-box protein 21S603A, E606G, K615E, E620GBenign
K616RPossibly damaging
ENSCHIT00000026283Zinc finger and SCAN domain containing 23P213NProbably damaging
ENSCHIT00000028977UV stimulated scaffold protein AD361G, A517TProbably damaging benign
E99QProbably damaging
ENSCHIT00000030384F-box and WD repeat domain containing 2L82CProbably damaging
ENSCHIT00000000612Multimerin 2 S214HProbably damaging
ENSCHIT00000015914Toll like receptor adaptor molecule 2I213NBenign
ENSCHIT00000016318Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 subunit betaK83I, K205EPossibly damaging
ENSCHIT00000020934LY6/PLAUR domain containing 6B A7T, F16LBenign
ENSCHIT00000028741ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 12M570TPossibly damaging
ENSCHIT00000035903PATJ crumbs cell polarity complex componentV249I, I1739VBenign
I1738FProbably damaging
ENSCHIT00000036547Rho gtpase activating protein 42I502L, M770TBenign
W773RProbably damaging
ENSCHIT00000040177Achaete-scute family bhlh transcription factor 4L30SProbably damaging
ENSCHIT00000040379Olfactory receptor 1P1A133TBenign
V135D, H159CPossibly damaging
ENSCHIT00000034768Tripartite motif containing 16D159L, S515LBenign
ENSCHIT00000041152Centrosomal protein 112K338GUnknown
Posterior probabilities were obtained from Bayes Empirical Bayes (BEB) analysis. The positively selected sites column shows the position of the amino acid substitutions in respective genes; where T for example in (T734V) represent the ancestral amino acid, 734 indicates the position, while V is the C. nubiana amino acid.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chebii, V.J.; Oyola, S.O.; Kotze, A.; Domelevo Entfellner, J.-B.; Musembi Mutuku, J.; Agaba, M. Genome-Wide Analysis of Nubian Ibex Reveals Candidate Positively Selected Genes That Contribute to Its Adaptation to the Desert Environment. Animals 2020, 10, 2181. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10112181

AMA Style

Chebii VJ, Oyola SO, Kotze A, Domelevo Entfellner J-B, Musembi Mutuku J, Agaba M. Genome-Wide Analysis of Nubian Ibex Reveals Candidate Positively Selected Genes That Contribute to Its Adaptation to the Desert Environment. Animals. 2020; 10(11):2181. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10112181

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chebii, Vivien J., Samuel O. Oyola, Antoinette Kotze, Jean-Baka Domelevo Entfellner, J. Musembi Mutuku, and Morris Agaba. 2020. "Genome-Wide Analysis of Nubian Ibex Reveals Candidate Positively Selected Genes That Contribute to Its Adaptation to the Desert Environment" Animals 10, no. 11: 2181. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10112181

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop