Next Article in Journal
What’s in a Click? The Efficacy of Conditioned Reinforcement in Applied Animal Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Changes in Acute Phase Proteins in Bitches after Laparoscopic, Midline, and Flank Ovariectomy Using the Same Method for Hemostasis
Previous Article in Journal
The Use of Pork from Entire Male and Immunocastrated Pigs for Meat Products—An Overview with Recommendations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Urinary Reference Values and First Insight into the Urinary Proteome of Captive Giraffes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 10
Issue 10
10.3390/ani10101756
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Serum Health Biomarkers in African and Asian Elephants: Value Ranges and Clinical Values Indicative of the Immune Response

by
Katie L. Edwards
1,*,†,
Michele A. Miller
2,
Jessica Siegal-Willott
3 and
Janine L. Brown
1
1
Center for Species Survival, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, 1500 Remount Road, Front Royal, VA 22630, USA
2
Department of Science and Innovation-National Research Foundation Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, South African Medical Research Council Centre for Tuberculosis Research, Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town 8000, South Africa
3
Department of Wildlife Health Sciences, Smithsonian Institution’s National Zoological Park and Conservation Biology Institute, Washington, DC 20008, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Current address: North of England Zoological Society, Chester Zoo, Caughall Road, Upton-by-Chester CH2 1LH, UK.
Animals 2020, 10(10), 1756; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101756
Submission received: 11 August 2020 / Revised: 18 September 2020 / Accepted: 25 September 2020 / Published: 27 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomarkers in Animal Health and Disease)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Biomarkers are biological molecules found in the blood or other fluids or tissues that can indicate normal or abnormal processes or disease. Developing tools to measure biomarkers that indicate immune function and establishing concentrations observed within a species is an important first step in their use for managing health and understanding disease processes. Here we report assays, observed value ranges, and concentrations during illness or injury for seven immune biomarkers measured in the serum of African and Asian elephants under human care. Concentrations were variable in both clinical and non-clinical samples, but all seven biomarkers were elevated in at least one case and most increased in response to routine vaccination in a single Asian elephant. These tools provide an exciting avenue for monitoring health status and helping diagnose and treat health problems in wildlife species, like elephants.

Abstract

Serum biomarkers indicative of inflammation and disease can provide useful information regarding host immune processes, responses to treatment and prognosis. The aims of this study were to assess the use of commercially available anti-equine reagents for the quantification of cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), interleukins (IL) 2, 6, and 10) in African (Loxodonta africana, n = 125) and Asian (Elephas maximus, n = 104) elephants, and alongside previously validated anti-human reagents for acute-phase proteins (serum amyloid A and haptoglobin), calculate species-specific biomarker value ranges. In addition, we used opportunistically collected samples to investigate the concentrations of each biomarker during identified clinical cases of illness or injury, as a first step to understanding what biomarkers may be useful to managing elephant health. Immune biomarkers were each elevated above the calculated species-specific value ranges in at least one clinical case, but due to variability in both clinical and non-clinical samples, only serum amyloid A was significantly higher in clinical compared to non-clinical paired samples, with tendencies for higher TNF-α and IL-10. We also detected increased secretion of serum amyloid A and all five cytokines following routine vaccination of a single Asian elephant, indicating that these biomarkers can be beneficial for studying normal immune processes as well as pathology. This study indicates that assays developed with commercial reagents can be used to quantify health biomarkers in wildlife species and identifies several that warrant further investigation to elucidate immune responses to various pathologies.

1. Introduction

Serum biomarkers indicative of immune function are important health assessment tools in human medicine [1,2,3,4,5] and studies of laboratory and domesticated animal species [6,7,8,9,10,11]. Measurements of acute-phase proteins (APPs) and cytokines aid in detecting pathologies, understanding disease processes and susceptibility, monitoring disease progression, and assessing the efficacy of treatments. APPs form an integral part of the acute-phase response, contributing to the innate immune system. Changes in APPs have been observed in cases of inflammation, infection, neoplasia, stress and trauma, playing a role in promoting healing, and restoring homeostasis [12]. Prior to activation, APPs are generally present in negligible amounts and characterized by the speed and scale of production [7]. With some, a rapid, high magnitude response is associated with acute inflammatory events. Others of moderate concentration remain elevated for more prolonged periods, associated with chronic inflammation. Thus, the evaluation of APPs in serum enables interpretation of the clinical progression of inflammatory responses, and the potential to distinguish between chronic and acute conditions [13]. Furthermore, the relatively rapid response of the acute-phase response makes measuring APP concentrations useful for identifying sub-clinical disease before clinical signs are manifested [12]. APPs have been measured in a variety of wildlife species in recent years, including Asian [14,15,16] and a single African elephant [17] to assess the response to pathologies such as elephant endotheliotropic herpesvirus (EEHV), pododermatitis, trauma, and infection. In elephants, serum amyloid A (SAA) is considered to be a major APP, increasing rapidly in response to acute inflammation, whereas haptoglobin (HP) responds more moderately and may be reflective of more chronic inflammation [15].
Cytokines are protein mediators of the immune response, associated with recruiting, proliferating, activating, differentiating, and otherwise regulating immune cells. Cytokines may be pro-inflammatory, secreted at the beginning of an immune response, or anti-inflammatory, secreted to downregulate the immune response and prevent over-activation. There are numerous cytokines associated with cell-mediated, humoral, and innate immune responses, which can be highly informative regarding immune activation and progression in response to a variety of pathologies. Typically, Th1 cytokines such as IFN-ɣ, IL-2, and TNF-α stimulate cell-mediated immunity to help combat intracellular pathogens (e.g., viruses), whereas Th2 cytokines, including IL-10 and IL-6, promote humoral immune responses, targeting extracellular pathogens (e.g., extracellular bacteria and parasites). Indeed, the combination of cytokines produced can reflect the type and stage of the immune response [18], as well as provide prognostic information regarding the likelihood or progression of disease [19,20]. Some cytokine mRNAs have been characterized in Asian elephants [21,22] and studied previously [23,24,25,26,27]; however, measures of circulating protein concentrations through different pathological processes are lacking, as are typical values observed within a species or population to better interpret results.
Several health problems affect elephants both in situ and ex situ that could benefit from a better understanding of underlying disease processes and improved tools for detection and monitoring. Elephant endotheliotropic herpesvirus hemorrhagic disease (EEHV HD) affects almost one in four Asian elephant calves born in zoos globally [28], as well as African elephants [17,29,30], and in captive and wild populations in Asia [31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. One proposed hypothesis for the severity of EEHV HD could be that immunologically naïve calves fail to mount an effective immune response to keep up with viral replication [38]. A better understanding of how the host immune system responds to the virus would therefore be beneficial and could help assess the efficacy of treatment and novel vaccination options, once they become available. Elephants are also susceptible to infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the same causative agent as that for human tuberculosis (TB). Around 10% of elephants currently residing in North America have tested positive for TB, with cases also identified in Europe [39,40], Australasia [41], Africa [42,43], and Asia [44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51]. Although active disease can be detected via culturing trunk secretions, it is not possible to diagnose subclinical infection with current methodologies. Understanding the host immune response to infection could yield important information regarding the transition from subclinical to active infection, susceptibility to disease, and the efficacy of various treatments.
In addition to infectious disease, biomarkers indicative of inflammation and immune function would improve the ability to detect and manage other common pathologies. A recent survey of elephant health in North America highlighted gastrointestinal issues, skin lesions and wounds, lameness and foot lesions, eye issues, tusk and sulcus injuries, and dental disorders as prevalent pathology types [52]. Similarly, Miller et al. [53] highlighted injuries, parasitism, gastrointestinal disease, and infectious disease as being responsible for elephant morbidity and mortality in Asia. All these pathologies are associated with inflammation and immune activation, and therefore tools to help with sub-clinical detection, diagnosis and treatment would benefit overall elephant health. To-date, published reference ranges only exist for two APPs, SAA and HP, in Asian elephants [16]; none have yet been established for African elephants. The goal of this study was to establish and validate assays for several other candidate biomarkers using commercially available reagents and calculate reference intervals for African and Asian elephants in North American zoos. Although reference interval calculations were conducted using standard methodology [54], we hereafter refer to these as species-specific value ranges because underlying health issues without overt clinical signs cannot be ruled out. Specifically, we analyzed APPs (SAA and HP) and cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interferon-gamma (IFN-ɣ), interleukins 2 (IL-2), 6 (IL-6) and 10 (IL-10)) and compared values to individuals exhibiting clinical signs of illness or injury, or prior to death. To add to the current literature available, we also report serum chemistry value ranges from the same population, representing a large sample-set analyzed in the same laboratory.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Subjects, Sample Collection, and Assessment of Health Status

Single serum samples were obtained from 229 elephants housed at 69 institutions in North America. Subjects included 125 African (18 male, 107 female) and 104 Asian (18 male, 86 female) elephants aged 4 to 65 years. Additional serum samples were collected opportunistically from elephants with active clinical pathology at the time of sample collection (n = 10) and prior to death (n = 10), and from the same individuals when no clinical signs were present, a minimum of one month before or after the clinical sample. Weekly serum samples collected prior to and following routine vaccination with tetanus toxoid (1 mL intramuscularly) and Imrab 3 (1 mL intramuscularly) were also collected from a female Asian elephant, aged 21 years. Active clinical cases and conditions present at necropsy were determined by the attending veterinarian or pathologist. Blood samples were collected according to phlebotomy protocols at each institution, typically from an ear vein while the elephant was under behavioral restraint. After being allowed to clot at room temperature for 1 h, serum was separated and frozen at −20 °C before shipment to the Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute for analysis. This research was approved by the Smithsonian National Zoo (NZP-ACUC #11-10, #15-03, and #18-18) and where applicable, was reviewed and approved by participating zoo research and animal care committees.

2.2. Acute Phase Protein Analysis

SAA and HP were measured using an RX Daytona automated clinical chemistry analyzer (Randox Industries-US Ltd., Kearneysville, WV, USA). Commercially available reagents, calibrators, and two-level controls were used (Eiken Chemical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan and Tridelta Tri-DD, Boonton, NJ, USA, respectively). The technical ranges were 0.1 to 500 mg/L and 0.01 to 2.5 mg/mL, respectively. The analyzer was subject to routine quality control measurements throughout the study, with normal and elevated controls for each analyte maintained within 2 standard deviations (SD) of the respective lot-specific target value. Samples were typically analyzed neat, but some with HP above the technical range were diluted 1:5 or 1:10 in calibrator diluent as needed.

2.3. Cytokine Enzyme Immunoassays

TNF-α was measured using an equine TNF-α enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (Invitrogen ESS0017; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Frederick, MD, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Table 1). In brief, anti-equine TNF-α coating antibody was diluted in carbonate-bicarbonate buffer (0.2 M, pH 9.4), and 100 µL added to each well of a 96-well microtiter plate (Costar, Corning Life Sciences, Tewkesbury, MA, USA). Following incubation at room temperature overnight, coating antibody solution was aspirated, and wells were blocked with a Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (D-PBS; 8 mM Na2HPO4, 2 mM KH2PO4, 0.14 M NaCl, 10 mM KCl, pH 7.4.) solution containing 4% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 5% sucrose, for a minimum of 1 h. Blocking buffer was aspirated and 50 µL standards, controls, or samples added in duplicate, before incubation for 1 h at room temperature while shaking at 500 RPM. Recombinant equine TNF-α standards were serially diluted in reagent diluent (4% BSA in D-PBS, pH 7.4), and additionally diluted to provide high and low concentration control samples. Serum was typically run neat or diluted up to 1:20 in reagent diluent as needed. Plates were then washed three times (0.05% TweenTM-20 in D-PBS, pH 7.4), before 100 µL per well of anti-equine TNF-α detection antibody was added and incubated for a further 1 h at room temperature while shaking at 500 RPM. Following a further three washes, 100 µL per well streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase (diluted 1:400 in reagent diluent) was added and incubated for 30 min at room temperature while shaking at 500 RPM. After a final wash step, 100 µL of chromogenic substrate solution was added per well, incubated in the dark for 20 min at room temperature, stopped with 100 µL stop solution and absorbance measured at 450 nm with a reference of 570 nm.
IFN-ɣ, IL-2, and IL-10 were measured using equine Duosets (R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) according to modified manufacturer’s instructions (Table 1). In brief, goat anti-equine coating antibody was diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 8.1 mM Na2HPO4, 1.5 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.4), and 100 µL was added to each well of a 96-well microtiter plate (Costar). Following incubation at room temperature overnight, the coating antibody solution was aspirated, and plates were washed three times with wash buffer (0.05% Tween TM-20 in PBS, pH 7.4) and then blocked with a 4% BSA, 5% sucrose PBS solution for a minimum of 1 h. Blocking buffer was aspirated and 50 µL standards, controls, and samples added in duplicate, before incubation for 2 h at room temperature while shaking at 500 RPM. Recombinant equine standards and control samples were diluted in 50% fetal bovine serum (FBS) in reagent diluent (1% BSA in PBS, pH 7.4). Serum samples were typically run neat or diluted up to 1:20. Plates were then washed three times before 100 µL per well of biotinylated goat anti-equine detection antibody (diluted in reagent diluent without FBS) was added and incubated for a further 2 h at room temperature while shaking at 500 RPM. Following a further three washes, 100 µL per well streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase (diluted 1:200 in reagent diluent without FBS) was added and incubated in the dark for 20 min at room temperature. After a final wash step, 100 µL of substrate solution (high kinetic TMB peroxidase substrate, Moss, Inc., Pasadena, MD, USA) was added per well, incubated in the dark at room temperature, stopped with 50 µL of stop solution (1N HCl), and absorbance measured at 450 nm with a reference of 570 nm. Anti-equine IL-1β and IL-4 Duoset antibodies (Table 1) also showed good cross-reactivity with both African and Asian elephant serum following a similar protocol except for dilution of detection antibody in 2% FBS in reagent diluent. However, intermittent issues with elevated background prevented the measurement of IL-1β and IL-4 for the remainder of this study. IL-6 was measured using goat anti-equine antibodies (Table 1) with a protocol similar to that described for Duosets, except that standards and controls were diluted in reagent diluent without FBS. All EIAs were biochemically validated according to the manufacturer’s recommendations prior to the start of the study by performing spike and recovery and linearity assessments with elephant serum [55,56]. Inter-assay coefficients of variation were maintained below 15% for high and low concentration controls on all assays.

2.4. Serum Chemistries

Twenty-two serum analytes (Alanine aminotransferase, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, bilirubin, calcium, carbon dioxide, chloride, cholesterol, creatine kinase, creatinine, gamma glutamyl transferase, glucose, iron, lactate dehydrogenase, magnesium, phosphorus, potassium, sodium, total protein, triglycerides, and urea nitrogen) were measured in each sample using a Dimension® Xpand Plus automated clinical chemistry analyzer (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Malvern, PA, USA). The analyzer was subject to routine quality control measurements throughout the study, with two-level controls maintained within manufacturer specifications.

2.5. Value Range Calculation

Value ranges for African and Asian elephants under human care were calculated for each serum biomarker according to reference interval guidelines from the American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology [54]. Value ranges for serum chemistry parameters were generated using the robust method, and immune biomarkers using the nonparametric method, all using the “referenceIntervals” package [57] in R statistical software [58], version 3.6.1. Outlying values were identified using Cook’s distance and were removed prior to calculation; all value ranges represent 95% of the population and are reported with 90% confidence intervals.

2.6. Statistical Analyses

Each of the 29 analytes (2 APP, 5 cytokine, and 22 serum chemistry) used for determining value ranges were compared by species (125 African and 104 Asian) using a Mann–Whitney Wilcoxon test. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare each of the seven immune biomarkers (2 APP, 5 cytokine) in individuals that exhibited clinical signs of illness to control samples taken from the same individual when no clinical signs were exhibited. All analyses were conducted in R [58], version 3.6.1, with alpha set to 0.05.

3. Results

Concentrations of SAA (p < 0.001), HP (p < 0.001), TNF-α (p = 0.011), IFN-ɣ (p = 0.025), and IL-2 (p = 0.029) were higher in Asian elephants, with IL-6 (p = 0.464) and IL-10 (p = 0.139) not differing between species (Table 2). Value ranges calculated for APPs and cytokines are presented in Table 2. A summary of APP and cytokine concentrations in individuals with active clinical signs of injury or illness is shown in Table 3, and around the time of death in Table 4. SAA was elevated above species-specific value ranges in 10/12 clinical cases (Table 3) and 5/10 individuals at or leading up to death (Table 4), with the highest concentrations (251.82 mg/L) observed in an African elephant with bronchopneumonia. Overall, SAA was higher in individuals with active clinical signs of illness or injury compared to the same individuals when no clinical signs were apparent (p = 0.004; Figure 1a). HP was elevated in 5/12 clinical cases (Table 3) and 2/10 individuals leading up to death (Table 4), with the highest concentrations observed in an Asian elephant that had become recumbent and unable to rise. Average HP concentrations did not differ between individuals with clinical signs compared to those without (Figure 1b) (p = 0.477).
Cytokine concentrations were elevated above the species-specific value ranges in several clinical cases (Table 3), including pododermatitis, systemic infection, acute lameness, ventral edema, and tusk infection. Overall, TNF-α was higher in individuals with active clinical signs of illness or injury compared to when no clinical signs were apparent (p = 0.021), IL-10 tended to be higher during active clinical cases (p = 0.059), whereas IFN-ɣ, IL-2, and IL-6 did not differ significantly despite higher mean concentrations in clinical cases (Figure 1). One female African elephant, representing two clinical cases (tusk injury and infection), had TNF-α concentrations considerably higher than all other individuals tested. When samples from this individual were excluded from the paired comparison, TNF-α in clinical samples only tended to be higher than non-clinical samples (p = 0.068). In many cases, cytokines were only mildly elevated and did not exceed the upper value range or were below the detection limit of the assays; in no cases were all seven biomarkers elevated concurrently. By contrast, routine vaccination of a female Asian elephant against tetanus and rabies stimulated an increase in SAA and all cytokines (Figure 2). Concentrations were all below assay detection at nine and two days prior to vaccination but increased from 7 (SAA), 12 (IFN-γ, IL-2), or 19 (TNF-α, IL-10) days post-vaccination. IL-6 showed a similar pattern to that of IFN-γ and IL-2, but peak concentrations could only be extrapolated, so instead are presented as optical density (OD).
Descriptive statistics and calculated value ranges for 22 serum biochemistries are provided in Table 5. Compared to previously published data [59], value ranges in our study were narrower for albumin, alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin, calcium, cholesterol (Asians only), creatinine, gamma glutamyl transferase, glucose (Africans only), iron, magnesium, potassium, total protein, and urea nitrogen. Except for alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, creatinine, carbon dioxide, and glucose, all other biochemistries differed significantly between species (p ≤ 0.04).

4. Discussion

The determination of circulating biomarker concentrations is useful for identifying abnormal processes or disease and is increasingly used in human and animal medicine. However, a lack of validated assays and information on typical concentrations observed has hampered the use of these biomarkers in wildlife medicine. Here, we report the development of enzyme immunoassays for analysis of five cytokines in African and Asian elephants using commercially available anti-equine antibodies. We also determined species-specific value ranges for these cytokines and two APPs in African and Asian elephants in human care and quantified each of these biomarkers in a variety of active clinical cases to investigate their value in identifying underlying immunological changes. Elevated concentrations above species-specific value ranges were observed for all biomarkers in association with at least one active clinical case, but not all. With all clinical cases combined, SAA was significantly elevated over paired non-clinical cases, with tendencies for higher TNF-α and IL-10.
This study focused on the ability to measure cytokines at the protein level (i.e., secreted) as opposed to cytokine expression at the RNA level, which has been used to investigate tuberculosis [21,23,24,26] and EEHV [27] infection in Asian elephants previously. The main advantage of this approach is that we can utilize cryopreserved serum samples that are already collected for routine veterinary and management purposes, allowing a longitudinal perspective on changes in immune function required for a better understanding of physiological and pathological processes. Serum is regularly collected from elephants for routine reproductive and health monitoring, and quantification of circulating biomarkers would be feasible without the need for additional processing to stabilize RNA to prevent degradation or changes in gene expression ex vivo. Enzyme immunoassays also have an advantage in that the equipment and reagents are relatively inexpensive, so they have the potential for use around the world.
The value range calculated for SAA in Asian elephants was similar to that previously published by Isaza et al. [16], based on a sample of 35 Asian elephants with the upper reference interval at 47.5 mg/L and upper confidence interval at 55.9 mg/L. Clinically abnormal elephants have been described with levels from 30 to 300 mg/L (C. Cray, personal.commumication). In contrast, the HP value range calculated from this dataset was higher than that of Isaza and colleagues, who reported an upper reference interval of 1.13 mg/mL and upper confidence interval of 1.26 mg/mL. For the Asian elephants in our population, the HP value range was more than three times higher. Although the age ranges of elephants from these two sample sets were similar (this study, 4 to 65 years; Isaza et al., 3 to 66 years), higher HP concentrations could perhaps indicate more chronic conditions may have been present in our larger dataset. It is important to note that although we used established reference interval methodology, our calculated value ranges cannot be considered healthy reference intervals as there may have been underlying conditions in this population that were undetected. We used a statistical technique to remove outliers—a conservative approach recommended where underlying health conditions cannot be readily ascertained [54], so the presented ranges likely are broader than for a truly healthy sample, and instead represent values that may be observed within a population under human care. Due to our sample size and recommendations that reference intervals are not reliable with less than 20 individuals, we were unable to separate data to calculate value ranges separately by sex or by age category, which could be explored further for potential differences once samples from additional individuals are available. Similarly, because our dataset contains only individuals from an ex situ population, further investigation will be required to determine how these may compare to free-ranging elephants.
African elephant reference intervals/value ranges for APPs have not been published previously, but Bronson et al. [17] reported concentrations of SAA and HP in an African elephant with EEHV hemorrhagic disease. In that case, a peak concentration of 88.4 mg/L SAA was observed on Day 2 of illness, and 3.4 mg/mL HP on Day 14, both of which exceeded the value ranges that we have calculated for African elephants in this study. APPs increase as part of the innate inflammatory acute phase response; typically, major APPs increase 10 to 1000-fold within 24 to 48 h of a stimulus, moderate APPs 5 to 10 fold within a few days, and minor APPs increase more slowly, peaking around two-fold [12] after four to six days [15]. Here we describe increases in SAA up to 30-fold, and HP two to three-fold above the upper value range. Similar to other reports [15,16], these data suggest that in elephants, SAA may constitute a major APP associated with acute inflammation, whereas HP may reflect more chronic changes.
Although clear differences in cytokine concentrations were not detected between paired clinical and non-clinical samples, all cytokines were elevated in at least one clinical case, including lameness, pododermatitis, systemic and tusk infections, and tusk injury. Foot and joint pathology is common in elephants, representing 11.7% (foot lesions) and 12.3% (lameness and/or stiffness) of clinical events reported for the same population over the course of 12 months [52], and so improved tools for managing these conditions would be beneficial to elephant well-being. Here we detected increased concentrations of all cytokines associated with lameness and/or pododermatitis; however, no single biomarker was consistently elevated in all cases. Across species, researchers have explored different cytokines in relation to similar pathology. For example, chronically lame dairy cows exhibited higher concentrations of TNF-α and IFN-γ [60], horses with laminitis had increases in both Th1 and Th2 cytokines [61], vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus aethiops sabaeus) with osteoarthritic changes secrete increased amounts of inflammatory cytokines [62], and dogs with pododermatitis had significant over-expression of IL-6 and IL-10 [63]. Furthermore, cytokine over-expression can play a role in both rheumatoid [64] and osteoarthritis [65], and cytokine-modulating treatments are utilized in humans [66] and some animal species [67,68]. Additional research targeting specific musculoskeletal pathologies common in elephants, and how different immune biomarkers are up- or down-regulated throughout the progression of disease and response to treatment would be beneficial to inform disease management.
The immune response to infection can also be detected through altered cytokine production. For example, IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-10 expression is increased in Asian elephants seropositive for tuberculosis [26], and TNF-α and IFN-γ are upregulated in in vitro stimulated immune cells from elephants with EEHV [27]. In this study, an Asian elephant with a systemic infection exhibited elevated IL-10, IFN-γ, and TNF-α compared to paired non-clinical sample concentrations in the same individual. This is similar to models of systemic inflammation where increased TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-6, and IL-10 have all been reported [69]. Localized infections also elicit immune responses that can be measured in circulation. Anatolian buffaloes with infectious skin lesions exhibit elevated TNF-α and IL-6 compared to healthy controls [70], and here tusk infections were associated with increased pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-10, respectively.
Differences in cytokine concentrations between clinical and non-clinical samples were not always clear in this study. However, elevated biomarker concentrations in non-clinical samples could reflect sub-clinical levels of immune activation [71,72] or age-related degenerative changes in immune function [73,74]. Detection of cytokines in clinically normal animals has also been reported when investigating specific pathologies in other species. For example, IL-6 and IL-8 were significantly higher in dogs with acute diarrhea but were also detectable in 28% and 44% of non-diarrheic dogs, respectively [75]. Our results also indicate individual differences/outlier values that are yet to be explained. In one case, a female African elephant with a tusk injury and subsequent chronic infection exhibited substantially elevated TNF-α compared to all other individuals, but on retrospective testing, concentrations were elevated prior to the injury and persisted within a range of 17,000 to 66,000 pg/mL for at least five years before and after this event. TNF-α is a pro-inflammatory cytokine associated with trauma and infection but has also been associated with autoimmune processes [76]. Chronically elevated concentrations such as these may indicate underlying pathology that warrants further investigation. Clearly, additional studies are required to improve our understanding of immune biomarkers in elephants, ideally with larger sample sizes specifically selected for particular types of pathology and incorporating longitudinal sample collection to distinguish individual variability from clinical changes.
In addition to assessing changes relating to pathology, measuring serum biomarkers indicative of the immune response can also be beneficial to understanding and monitoring the response to vaccination [77], to determine whether the immune system is responding appropriately. Here, we report biomarker responses to tetanus and rabies vaccination of a female Asian elephant that may indicate the progression and development of acquired immunity. Although concentrations of SAA increased by seven days post-vaccination, the cytokine response was not detected until at least 12 days following vaccination, with anti-inflammatory IL-10 being the last to increase. This is a similar timeline to that reported by Humphreys et al. [78], where serum anti-IgG titers to tetanus toxoid increased two to three weeks following vaccination.
Biomarker analyses in humans, livestock, and laboratory species often utilize species-specific antibodies; however, these are generally lacking for most wildlife species. Molecular characterizations of Asian elephant IFN-γ [21], and more recently IL-1β, and IL-8 [22] have paved the way for elephant-specific antibodies [79,80]. However, lack of homologous assays should not preclude exploration of immune biomarkers for understanding health and disease in wildlife. Numerous studies have used commercial reagents in several wildlife species to validate and/or assess population-level differences in cytokines, including the cheetah [81], bottlenose dolphin [82], and pinnipeds [83], setting the basis for more detailed pathology-specific investigations, as has begun for APPs [15,84,85,86,87]. However, reagents must be tested and assays validated before use because not all are suitable (e.g., porcine reagents for Florida manatee [88] and African and Asian elephant (Edwards, unpublished)). The commercially available anti-equine (cytokines) and anti-human (APPs) reagents used in this study successfully cross-reacted with elephant proteins, suggesting they can be used to assess the elephant immune response to inflammation and disease.
Finally, although more widely reported, many of the serum chemistry value ranges calculated in the current study were narrower than those previously published [59]. The reference ranges provided by Fowler and Mikota include data from captive and wild elephants of both species, both sexes and a variety of ages, and are a compilation of at least a dozen sources. Thus, the removal of lab to lab variability in our dataset may have contributed to the narrower value ranges for many analytes. One exception was alanine aminotransferase, where our calculated value range of 0.00 to 8.03 IU/L in African and 0.00 to 5.89 IU/L in Asian elephants had a wider range and a greater maximum than that (1.5 to 3.0 IU/L) reported in Fowler and Mikota [59]. Although the clinical significance of this difference is not clear, higher concentrations can be associated with muscle damage. Of the 22 serum biochemistries included here, 17 differed significantly between African and Asian elephants, highlighting the need to build robust reference intervals independently for these species.

5. Conclusions

The ability to measure circulating biomarkers may provide additional information to detect sub-clinical signs of inflammation and provide an insight into the nature of the immune response, which may not be revealed during routine examination or assessment of serum biochemistries and complete blood counts. Here we report validation, value ranges, and clinical values for two APPs and five cytokines, in African and Asian elephants in human care. Although these biomarkers are non-specific, if an animal exhibits an increase in APPs or cytokines, this information could help veterinarians decide if further diagnostic investigations are warranted. By applying multiple different biomarkers including pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory, Th1 and Th2 cytokines, and major and minor APPs, the combination could provide valuable information regarding the underlying immune response that can guide further diagnostics, treatment, and prognosis. Additionally, these biomarkers can indicate the immune response to routine vaccination, and so could be used for assessing the response to interventions. Further research is vital to our understanding of immune processes underlying different pathologies, and how biomarker concentrations may differ between age categories, sexes and other physiological states, and between captive and free-ranging animals. These and other potential biomarkers provide an exciting avenue for monitoring of health status and helping diagnose and treat health problems in wildlife species, like elephants, managed under human care.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.L.E., M.A.M., and J.L.B.; Data curation, K.L.E.; Formal analysis, K.L.E.; Funding acquisition, K.L.E. and J.L.B.; Investigation, K.L.E.; Methodology, K.L.E.; Project administration, K.L.E. and J.L.B.; Resources, J.S.-W.; Supervision, M.A.M. and J.L.B.; Validation, K.L.E.; Visualization, K.L.E.; Writing—original draft, K.L.E.; Writing—review & editing, K.L.E., M.A.M., J.S.-W., and J.L.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a Morris Animal Foundation Training Fellowship Grant (D15ZO-403), a Smithsonian Institution George E. Burch Postdoctoral Fellowship, a Friends of the National Zoo (FONZ) Conservation Grant, the Smithsonian Women’s Committee and Jan Sanders. Sample collection was supported by a National Leadership Grant from the Institute of Museum and Library Services (LG-25-10- 0033-10). Miller was supported partially by the South African government through the South African Medical Research Council and the National Research Foundation South African Research Chair Initiative (grant #86949).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank participating institutions for providing serum and access to health records, Carolyn Cray at the University of Miami Acute Phase Protein Laboratory for initial APP analyses, Center for Animal Care Sciences at the Smithsonian National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute for serum biochemistries, and Matthew Gomez Romero for lab assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Chan, T.; Gu, F. Early diagnosis of sepsis using serum biomarkers. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2011, 11, 487–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Harris, V.K.; Sadiq, S.A. Disease biomarkers in multiple sclerosis. Mol. Diagn. Ther. 2009, 13, 225–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jesneck, J.L.; Mukherjee, S.; Yurkovetsky, Z.; Clyde, M.; Marks, J.R.; Lokshin, A.E.; Lo, J.Y. Do serum biomarkers really measure breast cancer? BMC Cancer 2009, 9, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Lembo, A.; Neri, B.; Tolley, J.; Barken, D.; Carroll, S.; Pan, H. Use of serum biomarkers in a diagnostic test for irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment. Pharm. Therap. 2009, 29, 834–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wallenstein, M.B.; Jelliffe-Pawlowski, L.L.; Yang, W.; Carmichael, S.L.; Stevenson, D.K.; Ryckman, K.K.; Shaw, G.M. Inflammatory biomarkers and spontaneous preterm birth among obese women. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016, 29, 3317–3322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Eckersall, P.D.; Bell, R. Acute phase proteins: Biomarkers of infection and inflammation in veterinary medicine. Vet. J. 2010, 185, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cray, C.; Zaias, J.; Altman, N.H. Acute phase response in animals: A review. Comp. Med. 2009, 59, 517–526. [Google Scholar]
  8. McIlwraith, C.W. Use of synovial fluid and serum biomarkers in equine bone and joint disease: A review. Equine Vet. J. 2005, 37, 473–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kuleš, J.; Mrljak, V.; Rafaj, R.B.; Selanec, J.; Burchmore, R.; Eckersall, P.D. Identification of serum biomarkers in dogs naturally infected with Babesia canis canis using a proteomic approach. BMC Vet. Res. 2014, 10, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Bannikov, G.; Hinds, C.; Rajala-Schultz, P.; Premanandan, C.; Rings, D.; Lakritz, J. Serum haptoglobin–matrix metalloproteinase 9 (Hp–MMP 9) complex as a biomarker of systemic inflammation in cattle. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2011, 139, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Finkelman, F.D.; Shea-Donohue, T.; Goldhill, J.; Sullivan, C.A.; Morris, S.C.; Madden, K.B.; Gause, W.C.; Urban, J.F., Jr. Cytokine regulation of host defense against parasitic gastrointestinal nematodes: Lessons from studies with rodent models. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1997, 15, 505–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Cray, C. Acute phase proteins in animals. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. 2012, 105, 113–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Horadagoda, N.U.; Knox, K.M.G.; Gibbs, H.A.; Reid, S.W.J.; Horadagoda, A.; Edwards, S.E.R.; Eckersall, P.D. Acute phase proteins in cattle: Discrimination between acute and chronic inflammation. Vet. Rec. 1999, 144, 437–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bertelsen, M.F.; Kjelgaard-Hansen, M.; Grondahl, C.; Heegaard, P.M.H.; Jacobsen, S. Identification of acute phase proteins and assays applicable in nondomesticated mammals. J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 2009, 40, 199–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Stanton, J.J.; Cray, C.; Rodriguez, M.; Arheart, K.L.; Ling, P.D.; Herron, A. Acute phase protein expression during elephant endotheliotropic herpesvirus-1 viremia in Asian elephants (Elephas maximus). J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 2013, 44, 605–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Isaza, R.; Wiedner, E.; Hiser, S.; Cray, C. Reference intervals for acute phase protein and serum protein electrophoresis values in captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus). J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2014, 26, 616–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Bronson, E.; McClure, M.; Sohl, J.; Wiedner, E.; Cox, S.; Latimer, E.M.; Pearson, V.R.; Hayward, G.S.; Fuery, A.; Ling, P.D. Epidemiologic evaluation of elephant endotheliotropic herpesvirus 3B infection in an African elephant (Loxodonta africana). J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 2017, 48, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kuby Immunology, 6th ed.; Kindt, T.J.; Osborne, B.A.; Goldsby, R.A. (Eds.) W.H. Freeman Company: New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  19. Rau, S.; Kohn, B.; Richter, C.; Fenske, N.; Kuechenhoff, H.; Hartmann, K.; Hartle, S.; Kaspers, B.; Hirschberger, J. Plasma interleukin-6 response is predictive for severity and mortality in canine systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis. Vet. Clin. Path 2007, 36, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Islam, R.; Kumar, H.; Nandi, S.; Rai, R.B. Determination of anti-inflammatory cytokine in periparturient cows for prediction of postpartum reproductive diseases. Theriogenology 2013, 79, 974–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sreekumar, E.; Janki, M.B.V.; Arathy, D.S.; Hariharan, R.; Premraj, C.A.; Rasool, T.J. Molecular characterization and expression of Interferon-gamma of Asian elephant (Elephas maximus). Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2007, 118, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Swami, S.K.; Vijay, A.; Nagarajan, G.; Kaur, R.; Srivastava, M. Molecular characterization of pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin-1β and interleukin-8 in Asian elephant (Elephas maximus). Anim. Biotechnol. 2016, 27, 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Landolfi, J.A.; Mikota, S.K.; Chosy, J.; Lyashchenko, K.P.; Giri, K.; Gairhe, K.; Terio, K.A. Comparison of systemic cytokine levels in Mycobacterium spp. seropositive and seronegative Asian elephants (Elephas maximus). J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 2010, 41, 445–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Landolfi, J.A.; Miller, M.; Maddox, C.; Zuckermann, F.; Langan, J.N.; Terio, K.A. Differences in immune cell function between tuberculosis positive and negative Asian elephants. Tuberculosis 2014, 94, 374–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Landolfi, J.A.; Schultz, S.A.; Mikota, S.K.; Terio, K.A. Development and validation of cytokine quantitative, real time RT-PCR assays for characterization of Asian elephant immune responses. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2009, 131, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Landolfi, J.A.; Terio, K.A.; Miller, M.; Junecko, B.F.; Reinhart, T. Pulmonary tuberculosis in Asian elephants (Elephas maximus): Histologic lesions with correlation to local immune responses. Vet. Pathol. 2015, 52, 535–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Srivorakul, S.; Guntawang, T.; Kochagul, V.; Photichai, K.; Sittisak, T.; Janyamethakul, T.; Boonprasert, K.; Khammesri, S.; Langkaphin, W.; Punyapornwithaya, V. Possible roles of monocytes/macrophages in response to elephant endotheliotropic herpesvirus (EEHV) infections in Asian elephants (Elephas maximus). PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0222158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Hayward, G.S. Conservation: Clarifying the risk from herpesvirus to captive Asian elephants. Vet. Rec. 2012, 170, 202–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Latimer, E. Current knowledge of EEHV in African elephants (Loxodonta africana). In Proceedings of the 16th International Elephant Conservation and Research Symposium, Limpopo, South Africa, 21–25 October 2019. [Google Scholar]
  30. Fayette, M. Fatal elephant endotheliotropic herpesvirus 3 infection in two captive African elephants (Loxodonta africana). In Proceedings of the 16th International Elephant Conservation and Research Symposium, Limpopo, South Africa, 21–25 October 2019. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zachariah, A.; Zong, J.C.; Long, S.Y.; Latimer, E.M.; Heaggans, S.Y.; Richman, L.K.; Hayward, G.S. Fatal herpesvirus hemorrhagic disease in wild and orphan Asian elephants in Southern India. J. Wildl. Dis. 2013, 49, 381–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Sripiboon, S.; Tankaew, P.; Lungka, G.; Thitaram, C. The occurrence of elephant endotheliotropic herpesvirus in captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus): First case of EEHV4 in Asia. J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 2013, 44, 100–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bouchard, B.; Xaymountry, B.; Thongtip, N.; Lertwatcharasarakul, P.; Wajjwalku, W. First reported case of elephant endotheliotropic herpes virus infection in Laos. J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 2014, 45, 704–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. EEHV Advisory Group. Available online: www.eehvinfo.org (accessed on 22 July 2020).
  35. Long, S.Y.; Latimer, E.M.; Hayward, G.S. Review of elephant endotheliotropic herpesviruses and acute hemorrhagic disease. ILAR J. 2015, 56, 283–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Boonprasert, K.; Punyapornwithaya, V.; Tankaew, P.; Angkawanish, T.; Sriphiboon, S.; Titharam, C.; Brown, J.L.; Somgird, C. Survival analysis of confirmed elephant endotheliotropic herpes virus cases in Thailand from 2006–2018. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0219288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Oo, Z.M.; Aung, Y.H.; Aung, T.T.; San, N.; Tun, Z.M.; Hayward, G.S.; Zachariah, A. Elephant endotheliotropic herpesvirus hemorrhagic disease in Asian elephant calves in logging camps, Myanmar. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2020, 26, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Fuery, A.; Leen, A.M.; Peng, R.S.; Wong, M.C.; Liu, H.; Ling, P.D. Asian elephant T-cell responses to elephant endotheliotropic herpesvirus. J. Virol. 2018, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Lewerin, S.S.; Olsson, S.L.; Eld, K.; Roken, B.; Ghebremichael, S.; Koivula, T.; Kallenius, G.; Bolske, G. Outbreak of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection among captive Asian elephants in a Swedish zoo. Vet. Rec. 2005, 156, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Pavlik, I.; Ayele, W.Y.; Parmova, I.; Melicharek, I.; Hanzlikova, M.; Svejnochova, M.; Kormendy, B.; Nagy, G.; Cvetnic, Z.; Katalinic-Jankovic, V.; et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis in animal and human populations in six Central European countries during 1990–1999. Vet. Med. Czech 2003, 48, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Stephens, N.; Vogelnest, L.; Lowbridge, C.; Christensen, A.; Marks, G.B.; Sintchenko, V.; McAnulty, J. Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from an Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) to a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and humans in an Australian zoo. Epidemiol. Infect. 2013, 141, 1488–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Kerr, T.J.; de Waal, C.R.; Buss, P.E.; Hofmeyr, J.; Lyashchenko, K.P.; Miller, M.A. Seroprevalence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in free-ranging African elephants (Loxodonta africana) in Kruger National Park, South Africa. J. Wildl. Dis. 2019, 55, 923–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Miller, M.A.; Buss, P.E.; Roos, E.O.; Hausler, G.; Dippenaar, A.; Mitchell, E.; Van Schalkwyk, O.L.; Robbe-Austerman, S.; Waters, W.; Sikar-Gang, A. Fatal tuberculosis in a free-ranging African elephant and one health implications of human pathogens in wildlife. Front. Vet. Sci. 2019, 6, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Paudel, S.; Mikota, S.K.; Nakajima, C.; Gairhe, K.P.; Maharjan, B.; Thapa, J.; Poudel, A.; Shimozuru, M.; Suzuki, Y.; Tsubota, T. Molecular characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from elephants of Nepal. Tuberculosis 2014, 94, 287–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Mikota, S.K.; Gairhe, K.; Giri, K.; Hamilton, K.; Miller, M.; Paudel, S.; Lyashchenko, K.; Larsen, R.S.; Payeur, J.B.; Waters, W.R.; et al. Tuberculosis surveillance of elephants (Elephas maximus) in Nepal at the captive-wild interface. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2015, 61, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Angkawanish, T.; Wajjwalku, W.; Sirimalaisuwan, A.; Mahasawangkul, S.; Kaewsakhorn, T.; Boonsri, K.; Rutten, V.P. Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection of domesticated Asian elephants, Thailand. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2010, 16, 1949–1951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Lassausaie, J.; Bret, A.; Bouapao, X.; Chanthavong, V.; Castonguay-Vanier, J.; Quet, F.; Mikota, S.K.; Theoret, C.; Buisson, Y.; Bouchard, B. Tuberculosis in Laos, who is at risk: The mahouts or their elephants? Epidemiol. Infect. 2015, 143, 922–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zachariah, A.; Pandiyan, J.; Madhavilatha, G.K.; Mundayoor, S.; Chandramohan, B.; Sajesh, P.K.; Santhosh, S.; Mikota, S.K. Mycobacterium tuberculosis in wild Asian elephants, Southern India. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2017, 23, 504–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Verma-Kumar, S.; Abraham, D.; Dendukuri, N.; Cheeran, J.V.; Sukumar, R.; Balaji, K.N. Serodiagnosis of tuberculosis in Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) in Southern India: A latent class analysis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e49548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ong, B.L.; Ngeow, Y.F.; Razak, M.F.; Yakubu, Y.; Zakaria, Z.; Mutalib, A.R.; Hassan, L.; Ng, H.F.; Verasahib, K. Tuberculosis in captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) in Peninsular Malaysia. Epidemiol. Infect. 2013, 141, 1481–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yakubu, Y.; Ong, B.L.; Zakaria, Z.; Hassan, L.; Mutalib, A.R.; Ngeow, Y.F.; Verasahib, K.; Razak, M. Evidence and potential risk factors of tuberculosis among captive Asian elephants and wildlife staff in Peninsular Malaysia. Prev. Vet. Med. 2016, 125, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Edwards, K.L.; Miller, M.A.; Carlstead, K.; Brown, J.L. Relationships between housing and management factors and clinical health events in elephants in North American zoos. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0217774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Miller, D.; Jackson, B.; Riddle, H.S.; Stremme, C.; Schmitt, D.; Miller, T. Elephant (Elephas maximus) health and management in Asia: Variations in veterinary perspectives. Vet. Med. Int. 2015, 2015, 614690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Friedrichs, K.R.; Harr, K.E.; Freeman, K.P.; Szladovits, B.; Walton, R.M.; Barnhart, K.F.; Blanco-Chavez, J. ASVCP reference interval guidelines: Determination of de novo reference intervals in veterinary species and other related topics. Vet. Clin. Path 2012, 41, 441–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Spike-and-Recovery and Linearity-of-Dilution Assessment, (2007). Available online: http://tools.thermofisher.com/content/sfs/brochures/TR0058-Spike-and-Recovery.pdf (accessed on 22 July 2020).
  56. Spike and Recovery Protocol for Validating Untested Samples in R&D Systems DuoSets®, (2010). Available online: https://www.thermofisher.com/cn/zh/home/life-science/protein-biology/protein-biology-learning-center/protein-biology-resource-library/pierce-protein-methods/overview-elisa/spike-recovery-linearity-assessment.html (accessed on 22 July 2020).
  57. Finnegan, D. ReferenceIntervals: Reference Intervals. R Package Version 1.1.1. 2014. [Google Scholar]
  58. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2013; ISBN 3-900051-07-0:2014. [Google Scholar]
  59. Fowler, M.E.; Mikota, S.K. Biology, Medicine, and Surgery of Elephants, 1st ed.; Blackwell Publishing: Ames, IA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  60. Herzberg, D.; Strobel, P.; Ramirez-Reveco, A.; Werner, M.; Bustamante, H. Chronic inflammatory lameness increases cytokine concentration in the spinal cord of dairy cows. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Belknap, J.K.; Giguere, S.; Pettigrew, A.; Cochran, A.M.; Van Eps, A.W.; Pollitt, C.C. Lamellar pro-inflammatory cytokine expression patterns in laminitis at the developmental stage and at the onset of lameness: Innate vs. adaptive immune response. Equine Vet. J. 2007, 39, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Stone, A.V.; Vanderman, K.S.; Willey, J.S.; Long, D.L.; Register, T.C.; Shively, C.A.; Stehle, J.R.; Loeser, R.F.; Ferguson, C.M. Osteoarthritic changes in vervet monkey knees correlate with meniscus degradation and increased matrix metalloproteinase and cytokine secretion. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2015, 23, 1780–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Breathnach, R.M.; Fanning, S.; Mulcahy, G.; Bassett, H.F.; Jones, B.R.; Daly, P. Evaluation of Th-1-like, Th-2-like and immunomodulatory cytokine mRNA expression in the skin of dogs with immunomodulatory-responsive lymphocytic-plasmacytic pododermatitis. Vet. Dermatol. 2006, 17, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Okamoto, Y.; Nishida, M. Cytokine balance in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Yakugaku Zasshi-J. Pharm. Soc. Jpn. 2001, 121, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Chevalier, X.; Mugnier, B.; Bouvenot, G. Targeted anti-cytokine therapies for osteoarthritis. Bull. Acad. Natl. Med. 2006, 190, 1411–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Venkatesha, S.H.; Dudics, S.; Acharya, B.; Moudgil, K.D. Cytokine-modulating strategies and newer cytokine targets for arthritis therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 887–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Wooley, P.H.; Whalen, J.D.; Chapman, D.L.; Berger, A.E.; Richard, K.A.; Aspar, D.G.; Staite, N.D. The effect of an interleukin-1 receptor antagonist protein on type-II collagen-induced arthritis and antigen-induced arthritis in mice. Arthritis Rheum. 1993, 36, 1305–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Frisbie, D.D.; Ghivizzani, S.C.; Robbins, P.D.; Evans, C.H.; McIlwraith, C.W. Treatment of experimental equine osteoarthritis by in vivo delivery of the equine interleukin-1 receptor antagonist gene. Gene Ther. 2002, 9, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Seemann, S.; Zohles, F.; Lupp, A. Comprehensive comparison of three different animal models for systemic inflammation. J. Biomed. Sci. 2017, 24, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kabu, M.; Sayin, Z. Concentrations of serum amyloid A, haptoglobin, tumour necrosis factor and interleukin-1 and-6 in Anatolian buffaloes naturally infected with dermatophytosis. Vet. Med. Czech 2016, 61, 133–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Loyi, T.; Kumar, H.; Nandi, S.; Mathapati, B.S.; Patra, M.K.; Pattnaik, B. Differential expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in endometrial tissue of buffaloes with clinical and sub-clinical endometritis. Res. Vet. Sci. 2013, 94, 336–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Wani, M.Y.; Dhama, K.; Latheef, S.K.; Singh, S.D.; Tiwari, R. Correlation between cytokine profile, antibody titre and viral load during sub-clinical chicken anaemia virus infection. Vet. Med. Czech 2014, 59, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Bruunsgaard, H.; Pedersen, M.; Pedersen, B.K. Aging and proinflammatory cytokines. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 2001, 8, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Deng, X.H.; Bertini, G.; Xu, Y.Z.; Yan, Z.; Bentivoglio, M. Cytokine-induced activation of glial cells in the mouse brain is enhanced at an advanced age. Neuroscience 2006, 141, 645–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Prakash, N.; Stumbles, P.; Mansfield, C.S. Concentrations of interleukin-6, -8, -10 and tumour necrosis factor-alpha in the faeces of dogs with acute diarrhoea. N. Z. Vet. J. 2019, 67, 138–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Palucka, A.K.; Blanck, J.-P.; Bennett, L.; Pascual, V.; Banchereau, J. Cross-regulation of TNF and IFN-α in autoimmune diseases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 3372–3377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Kurup, S.P.; Tewari, A.K. Induction of protective immune response in mice by a DNA vaccine encoding Trypanosoma evansi beta tubulin gene. Vet. Parasitol. 2012, 187, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Humphreys, A.F.; Tan, J.; Peng, R.; Benton, S.M.; Qin, X.; Worley, K.C.; Mikulski, R.L.; Chow, D.C.; Palzkill, T.G.; Ling, P.D. Generation and characterization of antibodies against Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) IgG, IgM, and IgA. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0116318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Angkawanish, T.; Morar, D.; van Kooten, P.; Bontekoning, I.; Schreuder, J.; Maas, M.; Wajjwalku, W.; Sirimalaisuwan, A.; Michel, A.; Tijhaar, E.; et al. The elephant interferon gamma assay: A contribution to diagnosis of tuberculosis in elephants. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2013, 60, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Paudel, S.; Villanueva, M.A.; Mikota, S.K.; Nakajima, C.; Gairhe, K.P.; Subedi, S.; Rayamajhi, N.; Sashika, M.; Shimozuru, M.; Matsuba, T.; et al. Development and evaluation of an interferon-gamma release assay in Asian elephants (Elephas maximus). J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2016, 78, 1117–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Franklin, A.D.; Crosier, A.E.; Vansandt, L.M.; Mattson, E.; Xiao, Z. Induction of cytokine production in cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) peripheral blood mononuclear cells and validation of feline-specific cytokine assays for analysis of cheetah serum. J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 2015, 46, 306–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. De Guise, S.; Levin, M.; Gebhard, E.; Jasperse, L.; Burdett Hart, L.; Smith, C.R.; Venn-Watson, S.; Townsend, F.; Wells, R.; Balmer, B.; et al. Changes in immune functions in bottlenose dolphins in the northern Gulf of Mexico associated with the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Endanger. Species Res. 2017, 33, 291–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Levin, M.; Romano, T.; Matassa, K.; De Guise, S. Validation of a commercial canine assay kit to measure pinniped cytokines. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2014, 160, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Canisso, I.F.; Ball, B.A.; Cray, C.; Squires, E.L.; Troedsson, M.H. Use of a qualitative horse-side test to measure serum amyloid A in mares with experimentally induced ascending placentitis. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2015, 35, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Canisso, I.F.; Ball, B.A.; Cray, C.; Williams, N.M.; Scoggin, K.E.; Davolli, G.M.; Squires, E.L.; Troedsson, M.H. Serum amyloid A and haptoglobin concentrations are increased in plasma of mares with ascending placentitis in the absence of changes in peripheral leukocyte counts or fibrinogen concentration. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2014, 72, 376–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Cray, C.; Rodriguez, M.; Fernandez, Y. Acute phase protein levels in rabbits with suspected Encephalitozoon cuniculi infection. J. Exot. Pet Med. 2013, 22, 280–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Sheldon, J.D.; Johnson, S.P.; Hernandez, J.A.; Cray, C.; Stacy, N.I. Acute-phase responses in healthy, malnourished, and Otostrongylus-infected juvenile northern elephant seals (Mirounga angustirostris). J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 2017, 48, 767–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Levin, M.; Jasperse, L.; Gebhard, E.; Rousselet, E.; Walsh, C. Lack of cross-reactivity of human and porcine reagents to quantify manatee (Trichechus manatus) cytokines. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2018, 203, 57–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Animals 10 01756 g001 550
Figure 1. Paired concentrations of serum biomarkers (a) SAA (p = 0.004), (b) HP, (c) TNF-α (p = 0.021), (d) TNF-α outliers removed, (e) IFN-ɣ, (f) IL-2, (g) IL-6, and (h) IL-10 in individuals with or without active clinical signs present. The calculated upper limits of the species-specific value ranges are denoted by dashed (E.m.) or dotted (L.a.) horizontal lines.
Figure 1. Paired concentrations of serum biomarkers (a) SAA (p = 0.004), (b) HP, (c) TNF-α (p = 0.021), (d) TNF-α outliers removed, (e) IFN-ɣ, (f) IL-2, (g) IL-6, and (h) IL-10 in individuals with or without active clinical signs present. The calculated upper limits of the species-specific value ranges are denoted by dashed (E.m.) or dotted (L.a.) horizontal lines.
Animals 10 01756 g001
Animals 10 01756 g002a 550Animals 10 01756 g002b 550
Figure 2. Response to tetanus and rabies vaccination in an adult female Asian elephant, aged 21 years: (a) SAA, (b) HP, (c) TNF-α, (d) IFN-γ, (e) IL-2, (f) IL-6, and (g) IL-10. Dashed line denotes the day of vaccination, day 0.
Figure 2. Response to tetanus and rabies vaccination in an adult female Asian elephant, aged 21 years: (a) SAA, (b) HP, (c) TNF-α, (d) IFN-γ, (e) IL-2, (f) IL-6, and (g) IL-10. Dashed line denotes the day of vaccination, day 0.
Animals 10 01756 g002aAnimals 10 01756 g002b
Table
Table 1. Information for cytokine enzyme immunoassays validated for African and Asian elephants.
Table 1. Information for cytokine enzyme immunoassays validated for African and Asian elephants.
CytokineSupplierReagentsStandard RangeAntibody Concentration
CaptureDetection
Tumor necrosis factor-alpha
(TNF-α)		Thermo Scientific/InvitrogenESS00173.9–1000 pg/mL *1:1001:100
Interferon-gamma (IFN-ɣ)R&D SystemsDuoset DY158615.6–4000 pg/mL *0.4 μg/mL0.4 μg/mL
Interleukin 1β
(IL-1β)		R&D SystemsDuoset DY3340125–8000 pg/mL0.8 μg/mL0.15 μg/mL
Interleukin 2
(IL-2)		R&D SystemsDuoset DY161315.6–4000 pg/mL *2.0 μg/mL0.2 μg/mL
Interleukin 4
(IL-4)		R&D SystemsDuoset DY180931.2–2000 pg/mL0.8 μg/mL0.8 μg/mL
Interleukin 6
(IL-6)		R&D SystemsAF1886/BAF1886/
1886-EL		0.1–25 ng/mL *0.4 μg/mL0.4 μg/mL
Interleukin 10
(IL-10)		R&D SystemsDuoset DY16050.078–20 ng/mL *0.4 μg/mL0.1 μg/mL
* Assay sensitivity was increased throughout the course of assay development, so samples at the lower end of detection may be higher than the final range given here.
Table
Table 2. Descriptive statistics and calculated value ranges (with 90% confidence intervals, CI) for serum acute-phase proteins and cytokines from 125 African (L.a.) and 104 Asian (E.m.) elephants under human care.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics and calculated value ranges (with 90% confidence intervals, CI) for serum acute-phase proteins and cytokines from 125 African (L.a.) and 104 Asian (E.m.) elephants under human care.
AnalyteSpeciesMeanSDMedianMinimumMaximumN aValue RangeLower CI bUpper CI
SAA (mg/L)L.a.4.1626.250.100.10251.821230.10–6.91-6.38–8.38
* E.m.16.0447.051.840.10231.92980.10–37.62-23.98–53.25
HP (mg/mL)L.a.1.360.741.400.195.451240.21–2.350.18–0.232.25–2.40
* E.m.1.961.571.830.1910.501000.24–4.000.18–0.292.95–4.93
TNF-α (pg/mL)L.a.311.891783.6915.6015.6017,381.8412315.60–748.10-309.31–1031.38
* E.m.336.351249.4825.2915.6010,484.7810115.60–1355.83-1319.30–1929.39
IFN-ɣ (pg/mL)L.a.745.732094.2662.5062.5019,176.9912262.50–3565.07-2424.93–4021.17
* E.m.3564.5516,761.9762.5062.50124,117.2610262.50–13,317.40-6888.22–22,342.10
IL-2 (pg/mL)L.a.293.91866.31125.00125.008651.83123125.00–1043.61-762.66–1444.99
* E.m.309.881303.44125.00125.0012,770.0096125.00–1438.85-1096.83–2499.38
IL-6 (ng/mL)L.a.1.856.150.390.3951.591160.39–4.63-4.55–7.04
E.m.2.027.370.390.3956.15930.39–6.20-2.38–8.92
IL-10 (ng/mL)L.a.0.921.850.310.3116.041200.31–2.73-1.39–3.53
E.m.4.2530.390.310.31303.27990.31–18.00-17.04–32.16
a Number of samples used for value range calculation after outlier removal. b For all biomarkers except HP, the lower end of the calculated value range is the limit of detection so no lower CI could be calculated. * Species has higher concentrations at p < 0.05 level.
Table
Table 3. Acute-phase protein and cytokine concentrations in African (L.a) and Asian (E.m) elephants with active clinical cases. Numbers in bold exceed the upper end of the calculated value range for that species.
Table 3. Acute-phase protein and cytokine concentrations in African (L.a) and Asian (E.m) elephants with active clinical cases. Numbers in bold exceed the upper end of the calculated value range for that species.
SpeciesClinical EventAge
(Years)		SexSAA
(mg/L)		HP
(mg/mL)		TNF-α
(pg/mL)		IFN-ɣ
(pg/mL)		IL-2
(pg/mL)		IL-6
(ng/mL)		IL-10
(ng/mL)
E.mPododermatitis49F10.002.36<15.60117.08<125.00<0.391.74
E.mPododermatitis46F193.808.0010,484.78<15.60<125.00<0.39<0.31
E.mSystemic infection39F136.000.80324.842419.97ND<0.3975.27
E.mEnteritis3M149.204.55<15.60ND<125.00NDND
E.mLameness19F137.003.30<15.60719.28<125.002.00<0.31
E.mLameness41F0.100.32689.34124,117.2612,770.00>125.00 a303.27
E.mVentral edema42F51.501.0255.573025.281215.14>125.00 a11.53
E.mRecumbent/unable to rise36F233.7011.0073.041129.42<125.00<0.39<0.31
L.aTusk injury42F141.404.6547,475.75<62.50<125.00<0.39<0.31
L.aTusk infection42F147.403.5537,935.20399.53<125.00<0.100.38
L.aTusk infection34M48.602.0957.531284.34<125.004.553.00
L.aSepticemia7M184.906.15121.29ND20.85NDND
a Above the measurable range of the current assay system when diluted 1:5, ND: not determined.
Table
Table 4. Acute-phase protein and cytokine concentrations in African and Asian elephants prior to death. Numbers in bold exceed the upper end of the calculated value ranges for that species.
Table 4. Acute-phase protein and cytokine concentrations in African and Asian elephants prior to death. Numbers in bold exceed the upper end of the calculated value ranges for that species.
SpeciesAssociated Conditions Found at NecropsyDays Prior to DeathAge
(Years)		SexSAA
(mg/L)		HP
(mg/mL)		TNF-α
(pg/mL)		IFN-ɣ
(pg/mL)		IL-2
(pg/mL)		IL-6
(ng/mL)		IL-10
(ng/mL)
E.mDeteriorating health, anemia, thrombocytopenia, B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma, ventral edema058F42.300.07128.84<62.50<125.00<3.90<0.31
E.mSepsis, dental disease, ulcerative dermatitis1137F59.500.0135.831100.66<125.00<0.10<0.31
E.mDeteriorating health, neoplasia: uterine adenocarcinoma, anaplastic sarcoma, lymphoma, uterine adenoma, degenerative osteoarthritis, ventral edema154F207.346.9598.400<62.50<125.00<0.39<0.31
L.aDegenerative cardiovascular disease, ventral edema/ascites, loss of condition, thoracic abscess143F0.100.30<15.60<62.50<125.00<0.10<0.31
L.aDeteriorating health, degenerative joint disease, recumbent, unable to rise038F0.101.9583.82<62.50272.420.100.70
L.aDeteriorating health, degenerative joint disease, recumbent, unable to rise055F0.102.13111.02<62.50<125.00<0.10<0.31
L.aDeteriorating health, degenerative joint disease, recumbent, unable to rise045F0.100.43<15.60<62.50389.08<0.100.62
L.aBronchopneumonia, degenerative joint disease1932M251.825.45<15.60429.08<125.00<0.39<0.31
L.aDeteriorating health, pneumonia, pododermatitis, gastrointestinal ulcers, ulcerative dermatitis, ventral edema734F153.940.26<15.60<62.50<125.00<0.39<0.31
L.aDeteriorating health, septic peritonitis1647F5.451.49100.89<62.50<125.00<0.39<0.31
Table
Table 5. Descriptive statistics and calculated value ranges (with 90% confidence intervals, CI) for serum chemistries from 125 African (L.a.) and 104 Asian (E.m.) elephants under human care.
Table 5. Descriptive statistics and calculated value ranges (with 90% confidence intervals, CI) for serum chemistries from 125 African (L.a.) and 104 Asian (E.m.) elephants under human care.
AnalytePublished Range aSpeciesMeanSDMedianMin.Max.N bValue RangeLower CIUpper CI
Alanine aminotransferase
(IU/L)		1.5–3.0*L.a.3.623.024.000.0022.001140.00–8.030.00–0.007.66–8.67
E.m.2.512.042.000.008.00920.00–5.890.00–0.004.96–6.49
Albumin
(g/dL)		1.5–3.5*L.a.2.900.502.901.605.501202.29–3.472.21–2.393.41–3.58
E.m.2.730.332.801.503.50992.23–3.272.13–2.303.21–3.35
Alkaline phosphatase
(IU/L)		60–450L.a.83.9439.7275.0030.00231.0011622.10–119.8313.65–29.83111.87–127.98
E.m.84.3243.1576.5033.00322.0010029.48–120.8422.20–37.34112.69–129.60
Aspartate aminotransferase
(IU/L)		15–35L.a.15.8712.0914.004.00124.001230.79–26.040.00–2.9823.71–28.21
E.m.14.337.0113.000.0039.00982.13–24.340.74–3.4022.69–26.01
Bilirubin
(mg/dL)		0.2–1.0L.a.0.180.040.180.100.361190.10–0.240.09–0.110.24–0.25
*E.m.0.190.050.190.060.34990.10–0.280.09–0.120.27–0.29
Calcium
(mg/dL)		9–12*L.a.10.810.9110.708.2015.001179.48–11.929.32–9.6411.75–12.10
E.m.10.420.9910.308.5016.001019.06–11.598.87–9.2511.42–11.78
Carbon dioxide
(mEq/L)		20–28L.a.20.253.1220.1013.6031.2012114.50–25.5713.84–15.1124.87–26.30
E.m.20.573.1720.3515.4041.0010215.47–24.9014.83–16.1124.23–25.66
Chloride
(mEq/L)		100–115L.a.90.148.0989.0074.00131.0011777.71–99.7775.96–79.5798.33–101.56
*E.m.94.1011.9891.0074.00169.0010272.38–107.3469.38–75.28104.38–110.22
Cholesterol
(mg/dL)		26–68*L.a.62.4513.2561.0023.0099.0011739.89–83.3537.09–42.3680.50–86.34
E.m.40.6312.7140.0025.00144.0010324.49–54.7322.45–26.5152.70–56.80
Creatine kinase
(IU/L)		50–250*L.a.185.57224.61146.0048.002422.001230.00–305.430.00–12.86273.03–340.35
E.m.112.65121.4375.504.00771.00980.00–203.270.00–0.00171.52–237.80
Creatinine
(mg/dL)		1.0–2.0L.a.1.360.291.300.702.501170.91–1.680.85–0.971.62–1.73
E.m.1.390.371.300.903.701000.86–1.790.81–0.921.73–1.88
Gamma glutamyl transferase
(U/L)		4–35*L.a.18.083.5218.009.0028.0011811.84–23.3611.16–12.6122.56–24.21
E.m.15.135.5413.008.0039.00975.42–21.084.07–6.3119.54–22.54
Glucose
(mg/dL)		60–116L.a.79.9813.1680.0049.00137.0011958.07–99.8755.19–60.8497.32–102.36
E.m.78.4918.3976.0037.00137.009647.88–104.8844.04–51.55100.02–109.72
Iron
(μg/dL)		60–150*L.a.79.4225.6377.0015.00190.0012035.12–117.5530.02–40.54111.70–123.40
E.m.59.0219.7656.0013.00123.0010022.53–92.4717.96–26.7787.60–98.00
Lactate dehydrogenase
(IU/L)		250–500*L.a.263.1390.08259.0076.00673.00119112.90–393.2995.43–129.97376.24–410.99
E.m.180.03110.62158.0010.00711.00990.10–303.210.00–23.58277.41–329.26
Magnesium
(mg/dL)		1.4–2.6*L.a.2.180.312.101.403.301201.61–2.691.54–1.662.63–2.77
E.m.1.960.261.901.503.101011.45–2.351.37–1.482.24–2.41
Phosphorus
(mg/dL)		4.0–6.0*L.a.4.670.774.602.608.001213.34–5.923.18–3.505.77–6.08
E.m.4.460.854.402.107.10963.05–5.552.86–3.265.36–5.74
Potassium
(mEq/L)		3.0–6.0*L.a.4.920.484.903.806.401184.09–5.674.00–4.195.57–5.78
E.m.4.810.804.603.709.50993.63–5.633.48–3.775.47–5.80
Sodium
(mEq/L)		120–140L.a.131.5811.16129.00111.00183.00116115.15–142.22112.54–117.61139.90–144.78
*E.m.136.3016.46131.00107.00235.00100106.98–153.73102.89–111.00149.95–157.78
Total protein
(g/dL)		6–12L.a.8.190.838.206.3012.901186.98–9.356.82–7.159.19–9.50
*E.m.8.440.798.506.0010.101007.10–9.906.89–7.309.72–10.10
Triglycerides
(mg/dL)		15–60L.a.34.2021.8528.005.00140.001190.00–60.050.00–0.3054.61–65.35
*E.m.37.8319.7336.000.0099.00982.68–66.310.00–6.9661.86–70.94
Urea nitrogen
(mg/dL)		5–20L.a.6.432.677.001.0014.001201.42–11.160.87–1.9210.62–11.72
*E.m.11.264.4411.004.0045.001025.28–16.204.51–6.1015.41–16.99
a Fowler, M.E., Mikota, S.K., 2006. Biology, Medicine, and Surgery of Elephants, First Edition. Blackwell Publishing, Ames, Iowa, USA. b Number of samples used for value range calculation after outlier removal. * Species has higher concentrations at p < 0.05 level.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Edwards, K.L.; Miller, M.A.; Siegal-Willott, J.; Brown, J.L. Serum Health Biomarkers in African and Asian Elephants: Value Ranges and Clinical Values Indicative of the Immune Response. Animals 2020, 10, 1756. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101756

AMA Style

Edwards KL, Miller MA, Siegal-Willott J, Brown JL. Serum Health Biomarkers in African and Asian Elephants: Value Ranges and Clinical Values Indicative of the Immune Response. Animals. 2020; 10(10):1756. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101756

Chicago/Turabian Style

Edwards, Katie L., Michele A. Miller, Jessica Siegal-Willott, and Janine L. Brown. 2020. "Serum Health Biomarkers in African and Asian Elephants: Value Ranges and Clinical Values Indicative of the Immune Response" Animals 10, no. 10: 1756. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101756

APA Style

Edwards, K. L., Miller, M. A., Siegal-Willott, J., & Brown, J. L. (2020). Serum Health Biomarkers in African and Asian Elephants: Value Ranges and Clinical Values Indicative of the Immune Response. Animals, 10(10), 1756. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101756

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop