Next Article in Journal
Infection of Cronobacter sakazakii ST1 Producing SHV-12 in a Premature Infant Born from Triplet Pregnancy
Next Article in Special Issue
Impact of Elevated Levels of Dissolved CO2 on Performance and Proteome Response of an Industrial 2′-Fucosyllactose Producing Escherichia coli Strain
Previous Article in Journal
The Terrestrial Plastisphere: Diversity and Polymer-Colonizing Potential of Plastic-Associated Microbial Communities in Soil
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimization of Culture Conditions for Oxygen-Tolerant Regulatory [NiFe]-Hydrogenase Production from Ralstonia eutropha H16 in Escherichia coli
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Microbiota Dynamics of Mechanically Separated Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste during Composting

Research Center of Biotechnology, Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119071 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2021, 9(9), 1877; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9091877
Submission received: 16 July 2021 / Revised: 13 August 2021 / Accepted: 2 September 2021 / Published: 3 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Strategies for the Efficient Development of Microbial Bioprocesses)

Abstract

:
Mechanical-biological treatment of municipal solid waste (MSW) facilitates reducing the landfill workload. The current research aimed to study general activity parameters, content, functions, and diversity of fungal and prokaryotic microbiota in mechanically separated organic fraction of MSW (ms-OFMSW) composting, without using bulking agents and process-promoting additives. During 35 days of composting, vigorous emission of CO2 (max. 129.4 mg CO2 kg−1 h−1), NH3 (max. 0.245 mg NH3 kg−1 h−1), and heat release (max. 4.28 kJ kg−1 h−1) occurred, indicating intense microbial activity. Immediately following the preparation of the composting mixture, eight genera of lactic acid bacteria and fungal genera Rhizopus, Aspergillus, Penicillium, Agaricus, and Candida were predominant. When the temperature increased to more than 60 °C, the microbial biodiversity decreased. Due to succession, the main decomposers of ms-OFMSW changed. The Bacillaceae family, the genera Planifilum, Thermobifida, and Streptomyces, and the fungal genera Thermomyces and Microascus were involved in the processes of organic matter mineralization at the high-temperature and later stages. The biodiversity of the microbiota increased at the stages of cooling and maturation under conditions of relatively high nitrogen content. Thus, the microbial community and its succession during ms-OFMSW composting were characterized for the first time in this work.

1. Introduction

It is estimated that by 2050 the production global of municipal solid waste (MSW) will grow to 3.4 billion tons per year [1]. The disposal of MSW in landfills is an unavoidable reality and remains the predominant waste processing method regardless of a country’s income.
MSW is subjected to mechanical-biological treatment (MBT) [2], including (i) recovery of recyclable fractions and separation of materials with a high calorific value for the production of fuel from waste [3]; (ii) mechanical separation of a fraction ≤70 mm containing >50% of the biodegradable organic fraction (OFMSW); and (iii) aerobic high-temperature microbiological stabilization (composting) of mechanically separated OFMSW (ms-OFMSW) [4,5]. As a result, biostabilized residual waste (BSRW) is obtained [6], which is further subjected to disposal at landfills [7]. MBT of waste reduces the emission of harmful and fetid substances into the atmosphere, the formation of dangerous filtrates from the landfill body, and the volume of waste disposed of, thereby increasing the duration of landfill use [6].
OFMSW comprises 42 to 75% of the total MSW content [1]. The composition of OFMSW depends on various factors, such as the season, climate, and geographical location, but, on average, OFMSW consists of about 30–69% carbohydrates (starch, cellulose, and hemicellulose), 5–10% proteins, and 10–40% lipids [5].
Successful composting of organic substrates occurs if suitable conditions are provided for the microbial community development: optimal humidity, oxygen access, temperature, and stirring [8]. At the initial stage, the organic matter (OM) decomposers are mainly bacteria and fungi. During the subsequent thermophilic phase, the population of fungi reduces. At the final stage of composting, fungi and bacteria that decompose recalcitrant OM appear. Microbial composition and diversity affect the level of mineralization and microbiota activity, especially in stressful conditions (high temperature, presence of toxic compounds) [9,10]. The more diverse the microbial community, the more resistant it becomes. High microbial diversity implies the presence of a significant number of different types of destructors that are mutually beneficial and contribute to the simultaneous decomposition of various organic substances by the community. High biodiversity in the high-temperature composting stage promotes the effective biodegradation of organic matter, and deep stabilization of the compost is promoted during cooling and maturation [10].
Metabolic changes in microorganisms involved in the bioprocess lead to changes in respiration intensity [11] and heat release. Respirometry is often used to assess aerobic processes in solid-phase cultivation and indicates the degree of potential mineralization or decomposition of the material [11,12]. In the absence of high microbial activity, the respiration rate is low; therefore, the material is more stable. The calculation of the respirometric index is recommended by the European Commission to confirm the stability of waste [12].
It should be noted that OFMSW composting has been studied in sufficient detail on model substrates with various bulking agents or a mixture of food and plant waste (grass, leaves) [11,13,14]. In our opinion, that does not fully correspond to actual waste, such as ms-OFMSW. Few studies have investigated composting of ms-OFMSW obtained at MBT plants. Thus, this research is urgently needed.
Numerous studies are devoted to the respirometrical estimation of the general biological activity during OFMSW composting [6,11,12], and the bacterial community and its relationship with the physicochemical parameters of composting [6,7,14]. However, there is insufficient research showing the development of both prokaryotic and fungal components of microbiota combined with environmental factors during ms-OFMSW composting. Understanding the succession of the total microbiota (bacteria, archaea, fungi) will deepen knowledge about ms-OFMSW composting and improve the waste processing technology, such as via the creation of an effective inoculum. Therefore, the data on the microbial community of ms-OFMSW will form the basis for future studies on the isolation of enrichment and pure microbial cultures, and the creation of active consortia and their usage as starting cultures to enhance degradation in general or of particular compounds (e.g., plastic).
The current research aimed to study the general biological activity indicators, composition, function, and biodiversity of fungal and prokaryotic communities to determine the effectiveness of ms-OFMSW composting without the introduction of bulking agents, or chemical or microbial additives.
Therefore, the objectives of this work were as follows: (i) to investigate the composition of microbial communities predominant at each stage of ms-OFMSW composting and the presence of functional genes in the course of composting; (ii) to assess the relationship of the microbial diversity and composition with environmental parameters and indicators of biological activity (biogenic element flows and heat release).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Composting Material

Ms-OFMSW from an MBT plant (Dolgoprudny city district, Moscow region) served as a substrate for composting. At the MBT plant, incoming MSW was sorted on drum separators with 70 mm cells into two fractions: (1) a wet fraction with a size less than or equal to 70 mm with a high content of biodegradable waste (ms-OFMSW); (2) a dry fraction >70 mm, enriched with materials having a significant calorific value, mainly plastic. Samples of ms-OFMSW were obtained at the industrial composting plant of the Grunt Eco company in the Moscow region (coordinates of the point: 55.540794, 38.079914). Waste samples were collected for two days in June 2020, having a total volume of about 100 L. The composition of the sample is shown in Table S1.
The two fractions were crushed separately using an industrial shredder SHR 220–600 (Tula Machines, Tula, Russia) with 20 mm grid cells. We used the homogenization recommendations of Lacorte et al. [15] during laboratory experiment preparation and sampling stages. After mixing the crushed fractions, 30 dm3 of the material was placed in three containers of 10 dm3 each for composting.

2.2. Experimental Setup

The composting process was carried out for 98 days in laboratory conditions using an experimental setup comprising a multi-chamber bioreactor for aerobic solid-phase biodegradation of organic waste, according to the scheme described earlier [16].
The experimental setup was operated as follows. A container with ms-OFMSW having a volume of 10 dm3 (4836 ± 657 g) was placed in a chamber. The containers were made of a polymer material with 5 mm perforations in the walls and bottom to provide aeration. The temperature in each chamber was maintained independently at the current substrate temperature of ±0.2 °C using a heating element and an IVTM-7/2S temperature regulator (Eksis, Moscow, Russia).
The substrate was aerated for 98 days with air of ambient temperature and consumption of 0.04 L min−1 kg−1 dry OM using a compressor and RMS-A-0.035 GUZ-2 rotameters (Pribor-M, Korolyov, Russia). The gas composition of the substrate atmosphere was determined daily with an MAG-6 S-1 gas analyzer (Eksis, Moscow, Russia): CO2, NH3, and H2S. The temperature mode in the substrate was monitored continuously. Tap water was added to the substrate to compensate for losses caused by evaporation so that the water content was maintained at 60%. Moistening was carried out on the sampling days after taking substrate samples. There were three replicates of the experiment.

2.3. Determination of the Composted Mass Parameters

Samples for physicochemical and molecular microbiological studies were taken on the day of the experiment start (day 0) and then on days 7, 14, 21, 28, 56, and 98. For molecular microbiological analysis, 200 mL of the substrate was taken from each container from different places; the resulting combined sample of 600 mL was homogenized and sieved through a KP-131 sieve (Ruspribor, Saint Petersburg, Russia) having 0.5 mm cells. The latter fraction (about 100 mL) was ground with a pestle in a mortar. Then, a sample of 1.5 mL was placed in a sterile Eppendorf-type tube and frozen at a temperature of −20 °C.
The values of pH, electrical conductivity (EC), water content, organic matter (OM), total organic carbon (C), NH4+ and NO3 content, germination index (GI), total Kjeldahl nitrogen (N), and C/N were measured and calculated as described previously [17]. The water-soluble compounds, pH, EC, and GI were determined from a suspension of the sample (10 g) in 300 mL distilled water [18]. Measurements of pH and EC were taken using an ANION 4150 laboratory analyzer (Ifraspak-Analit, Novosibirsk, Russia). The water content (%) was determined by the thermogravimetric method on an EVLAS-2M humidity analyzer (Sibagropribor, Novosibirsk, Russia). The OM content was determined using the thermogravimetric method at 430 °C [19] using a PM-16M-1200 muffle furnace (EVS, Saint Petersburg, Russia). The total organic carbon (%) was estimated as OM:1.8 [20]. The soluble NH4+ and NO3 were determined on a Hach Lange DR 5000 spectrophotometer (Hach, Düsseldorf, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s manual: NH4+ was measured with Nessler’s reagent, and NO3 was measured by the method based on cadmium reduction. The Kjeldahl total nitrogen (N, %) in the dry matter was determined by sample mineralization in a DKL 6 automatic digester (Velp Scientifica, Usmate, Italy) under conditions of heating up to 420 °C with concentrated sulfuric acid in the presence of hydrogen peroxide, and a mixed catalyst with subsequent distillation of ammonium into a boric acid solution using an UDK 139 semiautomatic distillation system (Velp Scientifica, Usmate, Italy) and titration with hydrochloric acid on an Easy Plus titrator, model Easy pH (METTLER TOLEDO, Greifensee, Switzerland). The C/N ratio was calculated using experimental data. The effect of BSRW on plant growth was assessed by seed germination and the root length of Raphanus sativus based on the germination index (GI, %) calculation [21]. The measurements were performed in three replicates. Initial substrate parameters are given in Table 1.

2.4. Heat Release

The thermal energy spent on the substrate self-heating was calculated according to a well-known expression, also applicable in the practice of composting calculations [24,25], kJ kg−1 h−1:
q = (Cc (T2 − T1))/τ,
where: T1, T2—initial and final substrate temperature, respectively, °C; τ—time between measurements, h.
The calculated weighted average value of the ms-OFMSW heat capacity was found considering the heat capacity of the components and their content in the mixture (Table S1) and was 1.68 kJ kg−1 °C−1. The published data for OFMSW confirm the obtained value of the heat capacity: 2.18–2.50 kJ kg−1 °C−1 [26]; 1.86–4.09 kJ kg−1 °C−1 [27]; 1.67–3.90 kJ kg−1 °C−1 at a bulk density of 350–725 kg m−3 [28].

2.5. Profiling of Prokaryotic and Fungal Communities Based on 16S rRNA GENE and Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS)

The composition of the microbial community was analyzed by the number of 16S rRNA genes and ITS copies. The processes of DNA isolation, PCR, and Illumina MiSeq high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene region and ITS were performed by general techniques and were described in our earlier work [17]. For each sample, isolation of DNA was undertaken without replication; for each DNA sample, library preparation and sequencing were undertaken in duplicate.
The primary processing of the raw reads was carried out as described earlier [29]. All 16S rRNA gene sequence reads were then processed by the SILVAngs 1.3 pipeline [30] using the default settings: 98% similarity threshold was used for creating operational taxonomic units (OTUs) tables; 93% was the minimal similarity to the closest relative that was used for classification (other reads were assigned as “No Relative”). All ITS sequence reads were processed by the Knomics-Biota [31] using the “ITS fungi” pipeline, where the reads were classified by mapping against the UNITE database version 7.2 (QIIME release, version, accessed date: 1 December 2017) using the BWA-MEM algorithm (BWA version 0.7.12-r1039). A 97% similarity threshold was used for creating OTUs. The 16S rRNA gene library of each sample consisted of 5000 reads, and ITS library consisted of 10,000 reads.
Search for the genes of different degradation pathways was carried out using the KEGG [32] online service. Based on the data on the representation of taxa in the libraries, putative physiological and biochemical properties of the prokaryotic communities were determined using the iVikodak software package [33]. The contribution of various groups of prokaryotes to the metabolic pathways during the period of the highest potential functional activity (day 21 of composting) was also evaluated using the KEGG database. The heatmaps of the most abundant (>1% in respect to prokaryotic/fungal biota) community members at the genus level and heatmap representing physiological and biochemical properties were constructed using the online resource ClustVis [34]. Clusterization of samples shown in the genera distribution heatmap was performed in ClustVis using correlation distance and average linkage. Chao1 [35] and Shannon indices were calculated for prokaryotic and fungal communities by the SILVAngs 1.3 pipeline and Knomics-Biota “ITS fungi’’ pipeline, respectively.

2.6. Statistical Data Analysis

Throughout the study, three replicates of each measurement were performed. The data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the least significant difference test. The test of significance was determined at p < 0.05. The results are presented in the form of an “average value ± standard deviation” of three replicates. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was used to determine the relationships between different variables. The significance of the Pearson correlation coefficients was tested at α = 0.05 [36].

3. Results

3.1. Primary Composting Parameters

3.1.1. Temperature Regime and Thermal Energy

The initial substrate temperature was 28.4 °C, which was 6.5 °C higher than the ambient value, Figure 1a. A rapid increase in temperature to 45.9 °C was observed in the first 8 h (the heating rate was 2.2 °C h−1), then the temperature growth slowed four-fold, and over the next 10 h the temperature increased to 52 °C (0.6 °C h−1). The heating slowdown was caused by exceeding the temperature range of the tolerance of the microorganisms that dominate at this stage of the process and an insufficient number of thermophilic bacteria, which caused a further increase in temperature. The slowdown was followed by an increase to 64.6 °C on day 4 (the heating rate was 0.2 °C h−1) and a subsequent decrease to 60.3 °C on day 7. The temperature decrease was caused by a decrease in microbial activity due to the drying of the composted mass. Moistening on day 7 activated microorganisms that caused a temperature rise to a maximum of 69.0 ± 0.9 °C on day 8. A similar sharp temperature increase on days 14, 21, 28, and 56 also occurred due to moistening. On day 98, the substrate temperature approached the ambient temperature.
The heat of biological reactions was spent on heating the substrate and loss to the environment. The dynamics of cumulative thermal energy showed two zones when heat losses exceeded its formation, Figure S1. During the observations, 256.2 kJ of biological thermal energy was spent on increasing the temperature of 1 kg of substrate. The maximum heat release was observed in the first 4 h (4.28 kJ kg−1 h−1). During the first 87 h (3.5 days), the heat generation continuously exceeded the losses. In total, during this period, 60.81 kJ kg−1 was spent on raising the mass temperature (with an average of 0.7 kJ kg−1 h−1). There was an excess of biological heat generation over its losses to the environment for 571 h in the entire composting period, which was an average of 0.45 kJ kg−1 h−1.

3.1.2. Gaseous Emissions

In the first 35 days of composting, the CO2 level in the exhaust air was 4.2 vol.% at an airflow rate of 0.04 L min−1 kg−1 dry matter (DM), Figure 1b. The microbial respiration rate (by CO2 formation) during the active period of composting (35 days) was 43.1 mg CO2 kg−1 h−1 (per DM) on average, and the maximum was 129.4 mg CO2 kg−1 h−1. On day 98, the microbial respiration rate was 4.6 mg CO2 kg−1 h−1.
In total, during the period of 98 days, the OM mineralization in CO2 form was 36,277 mg CO2 kg−1 DM (9795 mg C-CO2 kg−1 DM). The measured OM mineralization included the released CO2 from microbial decomposition and CH4 obtained in anaerobic processes. The value of CH4 in the exhaust air during composting was from 0.1 to 0.7 vol.%, with an average emission intensity of 1.4 mg CH4 kg−1 h−1. Overall, during the composting period, OM mineralization in CH4 form was 3251 mg CH4 kg−1 DM (2438 mg C-CH4 kg−1 DM). Thus, the mineralization of organic carbon in CO2 and CH4 form was in the ratio of 4:1 (9795:2438).
The NH3 emission was the highest on days 4–8 and ranged from 5.75 ± 0.46 to 5.87 ± 0.41 mg NH3 kg−1, with a maximum rate of 0.245 mg NH3 kg−1 h−1, Figure 1c. Rapid self-heating and reaching a temperature over 60 °C led to significant NH3 emissions. During the experiment period, nitrogen losses in NH3 form constituted 95.4 mg NH3 kg−1 DM. H2S emission was absent in the concentration that the device is able to detect.
Stirring (a–e in Figure 1a) provided the involvement of new substrate particles in the aerobic degradation process and consequently enhanced the microbial activity. Stirring and moistening of the substrate explain the wave pattern of temperature, CO2, and NH3 emission dynamics. Wong et al. [37] showed the same phenomenon during composting.

3.1.3. Physicochemical Substrate Parameters

The OM content decreased by 59% from 64.81 ± 5.83 to 26.81 ± 1.88% in 98 days, Figure 2a. The most significant decrease (by 50%) occurred in the first 56 days. Total organic carbon (C) decreased in 98 days from 36.0 ± 3.2 to 14.9 ± 1.0%. Total Kjeldahl nitrogen decreased from 1.57 ± 0.20 to 1.15 ± 0.10% in 56 days and then increased to 1.68 ± 0.12%.
The maximum water loss, determined by weight loss, was observed in the first 28 days (209–352 g kg−1) due to the high-temperature conditions during this period. Wang et al. [38] also showed a significant decrease in water content (71 to 29%). The pH of the initial ms-OFMSW was low, at 5.5 ± 0.3, Figure 2b. Composting caused an increase in pH to close to neutral values (7–8). The EC of ms-OFMSW decreased in the first 14 days and then increased sharply, reaching the highest value on day 21, of 1839 ± 138 μS cm−1 (see Figure 2b). From day 56 to 98, the EC changed slightly from 989 ± 56 to 975 ± 87 μS cm−1. Low EC at the end of the experiment indicates the end of active OM mineralization.
The ammonium (NH4+) content significantly decreased from 653 ± 31 to 452 ± 46 mg kg−1 in the first 7 days of composting, Figure 2c. Later, an increase in the NH4+ content was observed on days 14–21, reaching a maximum value of 935 ± 62 mg kg−1. Subsequently, the ammonium content decreased to 38 ± 4 mg kg−1 on day 98. A similar trend was observed in the nitrate (NO3) dynamics: during the first 7 days, NO3 was not detected, and on day 21, its content reached a maximum value of 3812 ± 268 mg kg−1. The NO3 content on day 98 of composting was 722 ± 64 mg kg−1.

3.1.4. Stability Indicators

The C/N ratio of ms-OFMSW in the experiment decreased from 22.9 ± 1.4 to 8.9 ± 0.3, Figure 2d, due to significant OM mineralization and an increased nitrogen proportion to the maturation stage. This indicator is important for composting, both from a technological point of view and for the development of the microbial community. With a lack of nitrogen in the substrate, the rate of organic biodegradation decreases, and, conversely, an excess of nitrogen compounds leads to the emission of ammonia in a significant amount [39]. In addition, in our earlier work we were able to show that at high C/N, the biodiversity of the microbiota was lower than at lower values of C/N [17].
Initially, ms-OFMSW inhibited plant growth and development. As composting proceeded, the substrate phytotoxicity decreased, and it began to stimulate plant growth. Thus, GI increased from 69.5 ± 5.6% to 117.9 ± 4.7% in 98 days. The nitrification index (ratio of NH4+ and NO3 content) reached a maximum value on day 56, of 13.87 ± 0.97. NI decreased to 0.05 on day 98, which indicated the BSRW (compost) stability at the end of the experiment [40].

3.2. Microbial Community Composition

3.2.1. Fungal Community

Before composting (day 0), fungi from the phylum Mucoromycota (59%) dominated in ms-OFMSW. During composting, the phylum Ascomycota prevailed, with a relative abundance of at least 87%. A significant abundance of Basidiomycota was detected on days 0 and 7, of 5 and 10%, respectively. On day 0, 59% of the community was represented by the genus Rhizopus, and yeasts Candida (13%), Clavispora (3%), and Kazachstania (6%) were abundant (Figure 3). Thus, the yeast Saccharomycetes and the mold fungi Mucoraceae were the dominant groups in the initial ms-OFMSW.
The Aspergillus genus abundance was considerable on day 7 (32%) and, at the same time, fungi of the genus Thermomyces (23%) dominated. Based on the abundance of these organisms in the previous and subsequent periods, it can be concluded that Aspergillus belonged to the fungi of the heating stage and Thermomyces belonged to the high-temperature stage. The genera Agaricus (7%) and Penicillium (8%) can also be attributed to the typical fungi of the heating stage. On day 14, Microascus prevailed in the community (73%); the genera Wardomyces and Pseudogymnoascus comprised 5% of the fungal community each. All known Pseudogymnoascus strains grow at low temperatures. We could not exclude new, thermotolerant species discovery. Some fungi (e.g., Wardomyces, Microascaceae, Geomyces, and Acrostalagmus) were not detected at the onset of composting but evolved significantly during the process. These fungi may be introduced into the initial substrate in a non-detectable number or in the form of spores together with soil particles on the surface of potatoes, wood chips, and other components of MSW. Fungal spores are poorly detected by general molecular techniques. Clustering samples from different composting stages showed that the community composition on days 7–14 was significantly different from that on days 21–28. Similar communities were formed on days 21–56 when Thermomyces completely dominated (93–99%). At the beginning of the maturation phase (98 days), Microascus (24%) and Thermomyces (57%) prevailed in the ms-OFMSW fungal community.

3.2.2. Prokaryotic Community

Phyla Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Gemmatinomonadetes were detected in the prokaryotic community of ms-OFMSW. The abundance of Firmicutes gradually decreased with the composting time—from 89% on day 0 to 28% on day 98. The Actinobacteria abundance, on the contrary, increased during composting (up to 33–38% on days 21–98). By day 98, the proportions of Proteobacteria (15%), Gemmatinomonadetes (6%), and Bacteroidetes (6%) increased in the community. Archaea were poorly represented in the BSRW community. They accounted for less than 1% of the total abundance of prokaryotes. The reason for their low abundance was that archaea are usually oligotrophic and develop more slowly than bacteria [41] or develop under conditions of strict anaerobiosis (methanogens), which are created in a limited volume of compost. The latter is consistent with a low content of methane in the gas phase.
The initial ms-OFMSW community was significantly different from the remainder, which is clearly shown by the clustering of samples (Figure 4). The order Lactobacillales dominated in the feedstock microbiota: Leuconostoc (12%), Weissella (12%), Lacticaseibacillus (3%), Companilactobacillus (8%), Lactiplantibacillus (14%), Levilactobacillus (11%) and Limosilactobacillus (5%), Figure 4. Concurrently, Klebsiella (2%) and Corynebacterium (3%) were present in the substrate.
In the high-temperature stage, bacteria of the genus Bacillus actively developed. Their maximal abundance was on day 7 (33%), then the value gradually decreased over time. Thermobifida, Streptomyces, and Planifilum appeared in significant abundance on day 7 and were present in ms-OFMSW until the end of composting. The abundance of Thermobifida on days 7–28 varied within the range of 13–17%. The abundance of Streptomyces reached a maximum (16%) on day 21. The genus Planifilum comprised 16% on day 7, and then its abundance decreased to 5% on day 28. On days 28 and 56, Oceanobacillus (6–7%) and Saccharomonospora (5–6%) were considerably presented in the community. On day 56, Bacillus (12%), Thermobifida (14%), Streptomyces (7%), and Planifilum (6%) remained dominant. On day 98, the dominant genera in the community changed slightly. At the high-temperature stage, the cooling stage, and the beginning of maturation, the prokaryotic microbiota was similar.

3.2.3. Potential Abilities of the Prokaryotic Community

At all composting stages, the main metabolic pathways involved in microbial growth and OM biodegradation were present in the microbiome (Figure S2). Despite the active aeration, methane metabolism genes were significantly presented in the community. According to KEGG analysis actinomycetes Streptomyces and Thermobifida made the main contribution to the metabolism of carbohydrates (starch and sucrose metabolism), methane, and fatty acid degradation at the high-temperature stage (Figure S3). Bacteria of Bacillus and SO134 (closely related to Gemmatimonas) also played a significant role in these metabolic pathways at the thermophilic stage. The detection of enzymes that degrade benzoate, the main intermediate in the degradation of aromatic hydrocarbons, and genes responsible for the conversion of aromatic hydrocarbons (styrene, toluene) indicates the potential activity of the studied communities throughout the experiment. For most communities, their potential ability to decompose styrene, toluene, naphthalene, chlorohydrocarbons, and other xenobiotics was revealed.

3.3. Microbial Biodiversity

The biodiversity of the microbial community was assessed by the Shannon and Chao1 indices and the OTU number, Table 2. The Shannon index of the prokaryotic community had the lowest value (2.52) on day 7, probably due to the death of certain prokaryotes when the temperature rose to 60 °C and higher. By day 98, the OTE number, and Chao1 and Shannon indices, significantly increased. The initial fungal diversity was high (Shannon index 3.15). Then, on days 14–28, all fungal biodiversity indicators decreased, probably due to an increase in the temperature, similar to the prokaryotic community. By day 28, the Shannon index decreased to 0.12. However, by day 98, the biodiversity of the fungal community recovered to the Shannon index value of 1.67.

3.4. Relationship between Physicochemical Processes and Microbial Dynamics

Pearson correlation coefficients (p < 0.05) were calculated to identify the relationship between the microbial community and the physicochemical parameters of composting (Table S2). A positive correlation with the CO2 emission was observed for the genera Bacillus, Aeribacillus, and Tepidimicrobium. A positive correlation with C was shown for the genera Novibacillus, Thermobifida, Saccharomonospora, Oceanobacillus, and Penicillium and the Bacillaceae family. Temperature significantly correlated with the abundance of certain bacteria (Paenibacillus, Aeribacillus, Ureibacillus, Vulgatibacter and SO134). The abundance of the genera Bacillus, Aeribacillus, Ureibacillus, Tepidimicrobium, Geobacillus, Planifilum, Penicillium, and Aspergillus positively correlated with the NH3 emission. A positive correlation with pH was shown for the genera Aeribacillus, Ureibacillus, Geobacillus, Oceanobacillus, and SO134. The number of Streptomyces, Paenibacillus, and Penicillium positively correlated with the N content.
For the prokaryotic community, a significant negative relationship between biodiversity and the C/N ratio was shown. The prokaryotic Chao1 index negatively correlated with the OM and C content. Thus, while OM mineralization proceeded, a more complex and diverse community formed. The prokaryotic biodiversity increased, possibly due to a change in the range of organic substances, the reproduction of new organisms, and maintenance of the microbiota from the previous composting stages. Presumably, a C/N ratio decrease enhanced the development of various forms of prokaryotes due to an increase in the N content, which is a limiting factor for microbial growth. The Chao1 index of the prokaryotic microbiota positively correlated with the GI. The fungal biodiversity indices did not show a significant correlation with environmental parameters.

4. Discussion

The obtained results allow us to analyze the relationship between physical and chemical composting process parameters, and microbial community composition and biodiversity changes. The heating and activity of mesophilic microorganisms took place during the primary MSW processing during its accumulation, collection, transportation, and sorting. Thus, the high-temperature stage began much earlier than in similar research [38]. Furthermore, after about 35 days of active biodegradation, the cooling and maturation stages, final stabilization, and acquisition of BSRW followed.

4.1. Microbial Processes during the Substrate Preparation and Heating

Yeasts Candida, Clavispora, and Kazachstania, mold fungi of the genus Rhizopus, and lactic acid bacteria of the genera Leuconostoc, Weissella, Lactiplantibacillus, and Levilactobacillus were significantly represented in the initial ms-OFMSW. The genera Penicillium, Aspergillus, and Agaricus can also be attributed to the fungal dominants of the initial substrate. Though Penicillium is considered mesophilic, it has been detected during high-temperature composting by other researchers [42,43,44]. These microorganisms used easily degradable OM, whose content was initially high in ms-OFMSW. As a result of their metabolism, organic acids were produced that influenced the pH value on day 0. The predominance of acid-forming organisms in the community and a low pH at the beginning of composting were also shown in other studies [6,45,46,47,48]. In the research of Jurado et al. [7], Lactobacillales dominated the community throughout the entire industrial composting of OFMSW. In the current study, about a week passed from MSW collecting to the start of composting. During this period, due to the activity of facultative anaerobic microorganisms, an accumulation of acids occurred. Increased water content during the pretreatment of waste (it was not controlled in this stage) could also be a trigger for the development of yeast, Rhizopus, and lactic acid bacteria. In addition, during the experiment, with a total water content maintained at about 60%, some parts could have higher moisture due to the microzonality of the ms-OFMSW. In our early work, fresh food waste had a neutral pH value (6.9); then, in the first week of composting, the pH value decreased to 4.4 [17]. Therefore, the substrate acidification in the current work occurred before the composting started during the primary MSW processing due to the metabolism of the previously mentioned fungi and bacteria. The biodiversity indicators of the waste microbiota before composting were relatively high due to the favorable conditions for a vast range of microorganisms (aerobic, anaerobic, and microaerophilic conditions, moderate temperatures, and the maximal range of organic substances). As a result of the diverse microbiota activity, the temperature rose to 52 °C, and the CO2 level increased to 2 g CO2 day−1 kg−1 DM at the onset of composting.

4.2. Microbial Processes in the High-Temperature Stage

A sharp increase in temperature during the first day to 50 and 60 °C for 2–7 days triggered a significant change in the microbiota composition and contributed to thermophilic microorganisms, as also found by Ryckeboer et al. [14]. Under the influence of changes in temperature and the food source, microbial succession occurred. The prokaryotic microbiota diversity temporarily decreased on day 7, and on day 14, the fungal diversity significantly decreased. A rapid temperature rise and its maintenance for a long period (up to 28 days) were also revealed in research by Awasthi et al. and Zhang et al. [13,39]. The vigorous NH3 emission accompanied the decomposition of ms-OFMSW OM in the first week of composting. According to the correlations, the genera Bacillus, Aeribacillus, Ureibacillus, Tepidimicrobium, Geobacillus, Planifilum, Penicillium, and Aspergillus probably participated in ammonification. The fungal genera Thermomyces, Agaricus, Aspergillus, Penicillium, and Microascus that prevailed during the high-temperature composting stage formed various hydrolytic thermostable enzymes, and, thus, they actively participated in the decomposition of biopolymers [39,44,49]. During the high-temperature stage of the process, the typical prokaryotic groups were the genera Bacillus, Thermobifida, Planifilum, and Streptomyces. At the stage onset, a transition from the dominance of Lactobacillales to Bacillales occurred, as shown in the study by Graça et al. [6]. On day 7, Bacillus and related genera (Ureibacillus, Aeribacillus, and Geobacillus) mineralized the easily degradable OM and, according to correlations, increased the pH to slightly alkaline values. Bacillus species are known to secrete catabolic enzymes, such as proteases, which, through proteolysis, promote ammonification and contribute to pH increase [48]. Bacteria of the Bacillales order made a significant contribution to the decomposition of lignocellulose in the works by Antunes et al., Che et al., and Zhu et al. [45,50,51]. Thermophilic microorganisms Thermobifida and Planifilum were prominent participants in the recalcitrant OM decomposition and humus formation during composting [39,51,52]. During composting experiments by Xu et al. [53], Thermobifida was the main contributor to aerobic chemoheterotrophy, xylanolysis, cellulolysis, and methylotrophy. The Gemmatinomonadetes phylum was represented only by the SO134 group (closely related to Gemmatimonas), which was constantly present in the community, starting from the high-temperature stage. Lüneberg et al. [54] mentioned this microorganism in arid soils research. It is likely that its reproduction in the compost is associated with water loss caused by periodic evaporation. However, there is little information about Gemmatimonas and SO134 activity in compost; in the present work these bacteria contributed to the methane metabolism (probably to the methylotrophy process), and decomposition of carbohydrates and lipids. The Streptomyces genus was present during the high-temperature stage and cooling and was an essential participant in composting because its species can decompose lignin and cellulose [55,56] and secrete antimicrobial substances that inhibit the development of plant and human pathogens. The enzymes produced by Streptomyces have the potential to decompose toxic industrial and household waste [57].
As a result of the easily degradable OM oxidation and the decomposition of the polymers by the thermophilic bacteria and fungi, the most intense CO2 emission occurred at the high-temperature stage, which was also revealed by other researchers [58,59]. The mineralization of organic C and N positively correlated with the abundance of the genera Bacillus, Aeribacillus, and Tepidimicrobium. A positive correlation between OM content and abundance of microorganisms Novibacillus, Thermobifida, Saccharomonospora, Oceanobacillus, and Penicillium indicated their possible involvement in the decomposition of ms-OFMSW. The CH4 emission and a significant number of methane metabolism genes in the microbiome indicated the activity of an anaerobic community, which included the bacteria Tepidimicrobium, Caldicoprobacter, and Limnochorda. In the research by Che et al. [50], Tepidimicrobium and Caldicoprobacter contributed significantly to waste composting due to their ability to decompose proteins and carbohydrates.
During the first week, the decrease in the NH4+ content was associated with a high level of ammonia emission and an active process of assimilation of nitrogen compounds for microbial growth. On days 7–28, the NH3 emission decreased six-fold, apparently due to protein depletion as the primary source of released ammonia and activation of the nitrification process. The nitrification resulted in an increase in NO3 content on days 7–21. The most significant nitrification activity during the high-temperature stage was revealed in our earlier research [17].
In the microbiome of ms-OFMSW, which contained many synthetic polymer compounds, there were a significant number of genes for the degradation of various xenobiotics. Therefore, ms-OFMSW may be suitable for isolating relevant microorganisms for study and further biotechnological application.

4.3. Microbial Processes at the Cooling and Maturation Stage

Microascus and Thermomyces continued to dominate during cooling and maturation, which indicated the ongoing decomposition of biopolymers, especially plant residues. At cooling and maturation stages, the composition of the prokaryotic community also differed little from that during the high-temperature stage. Bacillus, Planifilum, Streptomyces, Thermobifida, etc., had significant abundance during composting due to these microorganisms’ broad functional activity range, aimed at the decomposition of easily degradable and recalcitrant OM. The decrease in the NH4+ level occurred due to the end of active ammonification because most of the proteins and amino acids were consumed. Possibly, nitrogen fixation contributed to an N content increase at the late composting stages. According to the correlation analysis, Streptomyces and Paenibacillus may be involved in the nitrogen fixation process. Nitrogen-fixing microorganisms have been detected within the genus Planifilum and Thermobifida, and the Bacillaceae family (including the genus Paenibacillus), in composting research [55,60]. Thus, nitrogen accumulation may occur due to a significant range of bacteria that make up the compost community. The accumulation of nitrogen enhanced the biodiversity of the prokaryotic community. Due to the use of various energy substrates of compost and, consequently, the growth and reproduction of microorganisms, the prokaryotic community at the maturation stage was the most diverse, which was revealed in the works by Galitskaya et al., Graça et al., Mironov et al., and Ryckeboer et al. [6,14,17,47]. As a result of the activity of fungi and prokaryotes during aerobic solid-phase waste processing, a stable, non-toxic compost, which stimulates plant growth, was obtained.

5. Conclusions

For the first time, the research of a successive change in the microbiota composition during ms-OFMSW composting was conducted.
Ms-OFMSW contains a fully functional microbial community, which gradually evolves under the influence of physical and chemical factors and effectively decomposes the organic matter of the waste.
The initial biodegradation processes occurred due to the metabolism of lactic acid bacteria Leuconostoc, Weissella, Lactiplantibacillus, and Levilactobacillus, mold fungi Rhizopus, Agaricus, Penicillium, and Aspergillus, and yeasts Candida, Clavispora, and Kazachstania.
The main biodestructors at the high-temperature stage were bacteria of the genera Bacillus, Streptomyces, Thermobifida, and Planifilum, and fungi of the genera Thermomyces and Microascus. The same microorganisms were predominant in the ms-OFMSW during cooling and maturation, probably due to the wide range of degradation capabilities.
Anaerobic degradation zones were formed in ms-OFMSW when oxygen was significantly consumed, confirmed by methane emission, methane metabolism genes in the microbiome, and anaerobic hydrolytic bacteria (Tepidimicrobium and Caldicoprobacter) in the community.
The potential high functional diversity of the prokaryotic community was revealed. Therefore, ms-OFMSW can be used to isolate microorganisms that are biodestructors of xenobiotics (plastic, among others), and to create starter cultures to intensify the ms-OFMSW composting process.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms9091877/s1, Table S1: Morphological composition of ms-OFMSW (fraction <70 mm) and the heat capacity of its components, Table S2: Pearson correlations between microbiological and environmental variables, Figure S1: Heat release during composting Figure S2: The heat map of prokaryotic microbiota functional profiles on day 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 56, and 98 of composting. Figure S3: Dendrograms showing key microorganisms and their phylogenetic lines involved in metabolism of: (a) starch and sucrose, (b) methane, (c) fatty acid degradation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.M., A.V. and Y.N.; methodology, V.M., A.V. and Y.N.; software, V.M., A.V., D.S., A.M. and Y.N., validation, V.M., A.V., D.S., A.M. and Y.N.; formal analysis, A.V., D.S., A.M.; investigation, V.M., A.V., D.S., A.M. and Y.N.; resources, V.M.; data curation, A.V., D.S., A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, V.M., A.V., D.S., A.M. and Y.N.; writing—review and editing, V.M., A.V., D.S., A.M. and Y.N.; visualization, V.M., A.V., D.S.; supervision, Y.N.; project administration, V.M., Y.N.; funding acquisition, V.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project mk-18-29-25035 and partially by the RF Ministry of Science and Higher Education.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Seruga, P.; Krzywonos, M.; Seruga, A.; Niedźwiecki, Ł.; Pawlak-Kruczek, H.; Urbanowska, A. Anaerobic Digestion Performance: Separate Collected vs. Mechanical Segregated Organic Fractions of Municipal Solid Waste as Feedstock. Energies 2020, 13, 3768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Vaverková, M.D.; Elbl, J.; Voběrková, S.; Koda, E.; Adamcová, D.; Mariusz Gusiatin, Z.; Al Rahman, A.; Radziemska, M.; Mazur, Z. Composting versus mechanical–biological treatment: Does it really make a difference in the final product parameters and maturity. Waste Manag. 2020, 106, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ashkiki, A.R.; Felske, C.; McCartney, D. Impacts of seasonal variation and operating parameters on double-stage trommel performance. Waste Manag. 2019, 86, 36–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Di Lonardo, M.C.; Lombardi, F.; Gavasci, R. Quality evaluation and improvement of mechanically–biologically treated municipal solid waste in view of a possible recovery. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 12, 3243–3254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. López-Gómez, J.P.; Latorre-Sánchez, M.; Unger, P.; Schneider, R.; Coll Lozano, C.; Venus, J. Assessing the organic fraction of municipal solid wastes for the production of lactic acid. Biochem. Eng. J. 2019, 150, 107251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Graça, J.; Murphy, B.; Pentlavalli, P.; Allen, C.C.R.; Bird, E.; Gaffney, M.; Duggan, T.; Kelleher, B. Bacterium consortium drives compost stability and degradation of organic contaminants in in-vessel composting process of the mechanically separated organic fraction of municipal solid waste (MS-OFMSW). Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2021, 13, 100621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jurado, M.M.; Camelo-Castillo, A.J.; Suárez-Estrella, F.; López, M.J.; López-González, J.A.; Estrella-González, M.J.; Síles-Castellano, A.B.; Moreno, J. Integral approach using bacterial microbiome to stabilize municipal solid waste. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 265, 110528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Herrmann, R.F.; Shann, J.F. Microbial Community Changes during the Composting of Municipal Solid Waste. Microb. Ecol. 1997, 1, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Farrell, M.; Griffith, G.W.; Hobbs, P.J.; Perkins, W.T.; Jones, D.L. Microbial diversity and activity are increased by compost amendment of metal-contaminated soil. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2009, 71, 94–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Beffa, T.; Blanc, M.; Marilley, L.; Fischer, J.L.; Lyon, P.-F.; Aragno, M. Taxonomic and Metabolic Microbial Diversity during Composting. In The Science of Composting; De Bertoldi, M., Sequi, P., Lemmes, B., Papi, T., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1996; pp. 149–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Martínez-Valdez, F.J.; Martínez-Ramírez, C.; Martínez-Montiel, L.; Favela-Torres, E.; Soto-Cruz, N.O.; Ramírez-Vives, F.; Saucedo-Castañeda, G. Rapid mineralisation of the Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 180, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Barrena, R.; Pagans, E.; Faltys, G.; Sánchez, A. Effect of inoculation dosing on the composting of source-selected organic fraction of municipal solid wastes. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2006, 81, 420–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Awasthi, M.K.; Pandey, A.K.; Bundela, P.S.; Khan, J. Co-composting of organic fraction of municipal solid waste mixed with different bulking waste: Characterization of physicochemical parameters and microbial enzymatic dynamic. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 182, 200–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ryckeboer, J.; Mergaert, J.; Coosemans, J.; Deprins, K.; Swings, J. Microbiological aspects of biowaste during composting in a monitored compost bin. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 94, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Lacorte, S.; Bono-Blay, F.; Cortina, M. Sample Homogenization. Compr. Sampl. Sample Prep. 2012, 1, 65–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mironov, V.V.; Bochkova, E.A.; Gannesen, A.V.; Vanteeva, A.V.; Russkova, Y.I.; Nozhevnikova, A.N. Dynamics of Biological Processes during Composting of Anaerobically Digested Wastewater Sludge. Microbiology 2020, 89, 470–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mironov, V.; Vanteeva, A.; Merkel, A. Microbiological Activity during Co-Composting of Food and Agricultural Waste for Soil Amendment. Agronomy 2021, 11, 928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zorpas, A.A.; Loizidou, M. Sawdust and natural zeolite as a bulking agent for improving quality of a composting prod-uct from anaerobically stabilized sewage sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 7545–7552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Navarro, A.; Cegarra, J.; Roig, A.; Garcia, D. Relationships between organic matter and carbon contents of organic wastes. Bioresour. Technol. 1993, 44, 203–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Arrigoni, J.P.; Paladino, G.; Garibaldi, L.A.; Laos, F. Inside the small-scale composting of kitchen and garden wastes: Thermal performance and stratification effect in vertical compost bins. Waste Manag. 2018, 76, 284–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cesaro, A.; Belgiorno, V.; Guida, M. Compost from organic solid waste: Quality assessment and European regulations for its sustainable use. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2015, 94, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Palaniveloo, K.; Amran, M.A.; Norhashim, N.A.; Mohamad-Fauzi, N.; Peng-Hui, F.; Hui-Wen, L.; Kai-Lin, Y.; Jiale, L.; Chian-Yee, M.G.; Jing-Yi, L.; et al. Food Waste Composting and Microbial Community Structure Profiling. Processes 2020, 8, 723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Castaldi, P.; Garau, G.; Deiana, P.; Melis, P. Evolution of carbon compounds during municipal solid waste composting: Suitability of chemical and biochemical parameters in defining the stability and maturity of the end product. Dyn. Soil Dyn. Plant 2009, 3, 17–31. [Google Scholar]
  24. Haug, R.T. The Practical Handbook of Compost Engineering; Routledge: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Irvine, G.; Lamont, E.R.; Antizar-Ladislao, B. Energy from Waste: Reuse of Compost Heat as a Source of Renewable Energy. Int. J. Chem. Eng. 2010, 2010, e627930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Manjunatha, G.S.; Chavan, D.; Lakshmikanthan, P.; Singh, L.; Kumar, S.; Kumar, R. Specific heat and thermal conductivity of municipal solid waste and its effect on landfill fires. Waste Manag. 2020, 116, 120–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hanson, J.L.; Yeşiller, N.; Onnen, M.T.; Liu, W.-L.; Oettle, N.K.; Marinos, J.A. Development of numerical model for predicting heat generation and temperatures in MSW landfills. Waste Manag. Landfill Process. 2013, 33, 1993–2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Faitli, J.; Magyar, T.; Erdélyi, A.; Murányi, A. Characterization of thermal properties of municipal solid waste landfills. Waste Manag. 2015, 36, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kallistova, A.; Merkel, A.; Kanapatskiy, T.; Boltyanskaya, Y.; Tarnovetskii, I.; Perevalova, A.; Kevbrin, V.; Samylina, O.; Pimenov, N. Methanogenesis in the Lake Elton saline aquatic system. Extremophiles 2020, 24, 657–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Quast, C.; Pruesse, E.; Yilmaz, P.; Gerken, J.; Schweer, T.; Yarza, P.; Peplies, J.; Glöckner, F.O. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, D590–D596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Efimova, D.; Tyakht, A.; Popenko, A.; Vasilyev, A.; Altukhov, I.; Dovidchenko, N.; Odintsova, V.; Klimenko, N.; Loshkarev, R.; Pashkova, M.; et al. Knomics-Biota—A system for exploratory analysis of human gut microbiota data. BioData Min. 2018, 11, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. KEGG PATHWAY Database. Available online: https://www.genome.jp/kegg/pathway.html (accessed on 3 September 2021).
  33. Syranidou, E.; Karkanorachaki, K.; Amorotti, F.; Repouskou, E.; Kroll, K.; Kolvenbach, B.; Corvini, P.F.-X.; Fava, F.; Kalogerakis, N. Development of tailored indigenous marine consortia for the degradation of naturally weathered polyethylene films. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0183984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. ClustVis: A Web Tool for Visualizing Clustering of Multivariate Data. Available online: https://biit.cs.ut.ee/clustvis/ (accessed on 3 September 2021).
  35. Chao, A.; Lee, S.-M. Estimating the Number of Classes via Sample Coverage. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1992, 87, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Strode, P.; Brokaw, A. Using biointeractive resources to teach Mathematics and Statistics in Biology. P Strode A Brokaw 2015, 2015, 39. [Google Scholar]
  37. Wong, J.W.C.; Karthikeyan, O.P.; Selvam, A. Biological nutrient transformation during composting of pig manure and paper waste. Environ. Technol. 2017, 38, 754–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, X.; Cui, H.; Shi, J.; Zhao, X.; Zhao, Y.; Wei, Z. Relationship between bacterial diversity and environmental parameters during composting of different raw materials. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 198, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zhang, L.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Z.; Chen, G.; Wang, L. Dynamic changes of the dominant functioning microbial community in the compost of a 90-m3 aerobic solid state fermentor revealed by integrated meta-omics. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 203, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Estrella-González, M.J.; Suárez-Estrella, F.; Jurado, M.M.; López, M.J.; López-González, J.A.; Siles-Castellano, A.B.; Muñoz-Mérida, A.; Moreno, J. Uncovering new indicators to predict stability, maturity and biodiversity of compost on an industrial scale. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 313, 123557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Insam, H.; de Bertoldi, M. Chapter 3 Microbiology of the composting process. In Waste Management Series, Compost Science and Technology; Diaz, L.F., de Bertoldi, M., Bidlingmaier, W., Stentiford, E., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 25–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hashimoto, H.; Iwaasa, T.; Yokotsuka, T. Thermostable Acid Protease Produced by Penicillium duponti K1014, a True Thermophilic Fungus Newly Isolated from Compost. Appl. Microbiol. 1972, 24, 986–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wang, H.; Fan, B.; Hu, Q.; Yin, Z. Effect of inoculation with Penicillium expansum on the microbial community and maturity of compost. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 11189–11193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tian, X.; Yang, T.; He, J.; Chu, Q.; Jia, X.; Huang, J. Fungal community and cellulose-degrading genes in the composting process of Chinese medicinal herbal residues. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 241, 374–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Antunes, L.P.; Martins, L.F.; Pereira, R.V.; Thomas, A.M.; Barbosa, D.; Lemos, L.N.; Silva, G.M.M.; Moura, L.M.S.; Epamino, G.W.C.; Digiampietri, L.A.; et al. Microbial community structure and dynamics in thermophilic composting viewed through metagenomics and metatranscriptomics. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 38915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bonito, G.; Isikhuemhen, O.S.; Vilgalys, R. Identification of fungi associated with municipal compost using DNA-based techniques. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 1021–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Galitskaya, P.; Biktasheva, L.; Saveliev, A.; Grigoryeva, T.; Boulygina, E.; Selivanovskaya, S. Fungal and bacterial successions in the process of co-composting of organic wastes as revealed by 454 pyrosequencing. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0186051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Partanen, P.; Hultman, J.; Paulin, L.; Auvinen, P.; Romantschuk, M. Bacterial diversity at different stages of the composting process. BMC Microbiol. 2010, 10, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Di Piazza, S.; Houbraken, J.; Meijer, M.; Cecchi, G.; Kraak, B.; Rosa, E.; Zotti, M. Thermotolerant and Thermophilic Mycobiota in Different Steps of Compost Maturation. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Che, J.; Bai, Y.; Li, X.; Ye, J.; Liao, H.; Cui, P.; Yu, Z.; Zhou, S. Linking microbial community structure with molecular composition of dissolved organic matter during an industrial-scale composting. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 405, 124281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Zhu, N.; Gao, J.; Liang, D.; Zhu, Y.; Li, B.; Jin, H. Thermal pretreatment enhances the degradation and humification of lignocellulose by stimulating thermophilic bacteria during dairy manure composting. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 319, 124149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yu, Z.; Tang, J.; Liao, H.; Liu, X.; Zhou, P.; Chen, Z.; Rensing, C.; Zhou, S. The distinctive microbial community improves composting efficiency in a full-scale hyperthermophilic composting plant. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 265, 146–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Xu, Z.; Qi, C.; Zhang, L.; Ma, Y.; Li, J.; Li, G.; Luo, W. Bacterial dynamics and functions for gaseous emissions and humification in response to aeration intensities during kitchen waste composting. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 337, 125369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lüneberg, K.; Schneider, D.; Siebe, C.; Daniel, R. Drylands soil bacterial community is affected by land use change and different irrigation practices in the Mezquital Valley, Mexico. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Buzón-Durán, L.; Pérez-Lebeña, E.; Martín-Gil, J.; Sánchez-Báscones, M.; Martín-Ramos, P. Applications of Streptomyces spp. Enhanced Compost in Sustainable Agriculture. In Biology of Composts, Soil Biology; Meghvansi, M.K., Varma, A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 257–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Devi, P.; Kandasamy, S.; Chendrayan, K.; Uthandi, S. Laccase producing Streptomyces bikiniensis CSC12 isolated from compost. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2016, 6, 794–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kumar, M.; Kumar, P.; Das, P.; Solanki, R.; Kapur, M.K. Potential applications of extracellular enzymes from Streptomyces spp. in various industries. Arch Microbiol. 2020, 202, 1597–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Duan, Y.; Awasthi, S.K.; Liu, T.; Zhang, Z.; Awasthi, M.K. Evaluation of integrated biochar with bacterial consortium on gaseous emissions mitigation and nutrients sequestration during pig manure composting. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 291, 121880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Jiang, J.; Liu, X.; Huang, Y.; Huang, H. Inoculation with nitrogen turnover bacterial agent appropriately increasing nitrogen and promoting maturity in pig manure composting. Waste Manag. 2015, 39, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Zhang, W.; Yu, C.; Wang, X.; Hai, L. Increased abundance of nitrogen transforming bacteria by higher C/N ratio reduces the total losses of N and C in chicken manure and corn stover mix composting. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 297, 122410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The temperature regime and gaseous emissions. (a) temperature: 1—substrate; 2—ambient; 3—approximation of the substrate temperature (R2 = 0.67 p < 0.05); a–e—stirring and moistening; (b) CO2 emission: 4—approximation (R2 = 0.4 p < 0.05); (c) NH3 emission: 5—approximation (R2 = 0.54 p < 0.05).
Figure 1. The temperature regime and gaseous emissions. (a) temperature: 1—substrate; 2—ambient; 3—approximation of the substrate temperature (R2 = 0.67 p < 0.05); a–e—stirring and moistening; (b) CO2 emission: 4—approximation (R2 = 0.4 p < 0.05); (c) NH3 emission: 5—approximation (R2 = 0.54 p < 0.05).
Microorganisms 09 01877 g001
Figure 2. Changes in chemical and physical parameters and stability indicators: (a) relative OM, C, N content; (b) pH and EC; (c) NH4+ and NO3 content; (d) stability indicators: GI, NI, C/N.
Figure 2. Changes in chemical and physical parameters and stability indicators: (a) relative OM, C, N content; (b) pH and EC; (c) NH4+ and NO3 content; (d) stability indicators: GI, NI, C/N.
Microorganisms 09 01877 g002aMicroorganisms 09 01877 g002b
Figure 3. The heat map of the distribution of the most relatively abundant (>1%) fungal genera on days 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 56, and 98 of composting. The genus abundance was calculated by dividing the sequence proportions by the total sequence count in the sample. The relative abundance of the genus is shown by the color.
Figure 3. The heat map of the distribution of the most relatively abundant (>1%) fungal genera on days 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 56, and 98 of composting. The genus abundance was calculated by dividing the sequence proportions by the total sequence count in the sample. The relative abundance of the genus is shown by the color.
Microorganisms 09 01877 g003
Figure 4. The heat map of the distribution of the most relatively abundant (>1%) prokaryotic genera on days 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 56, and 98 of composting. The genus abundance was calculated by dividing the sequence proportions by the total sequence count in the sample. The relative abundance of the genus is shown by color.
Figure 4. The heat map of the distribution of the most relatively abundant (>1%) prokaryotic genera on days 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 56, and 98 of composting. The genus abundance was calculated by dividing the sequence proportions by the total sequence count in the sample. The relative abundance of the genus is shown by color.
Microorganisms 09 01877 g004
Table 1. The principal physical, chemical, biological, and physicochemical parameters of the initial ms-OFMSW.
Table 1. The principal physical, chemical, biological, and physicochemical parameters of the initial ms-OFMSW.
ParameterUnitsValue *Optimal Limits
pHpH units5.5 ± 0.36.5–8.0 [22]
Electrical conductivity (EC)µS cm−11670 ± 124
Water content%60.26 ± 3.0150–60% [22]
40–50% [23]
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (N)%1.57 ± 0.16
NH4+mg kg−1653 ± 31
NO3mg kg−10.0 ± 0.0
Organic matter (OM)%64.81 ± 5.83
Total organic carbon (C)%36.0 ± 3.2
C/N 22.9 ± 1.425–30 [11,22,23]
Germination index (GI)%69.5 ± 5.6
*—average value ± standard deviation of three replicates.
Table 2. Biodiversity of prokaryotic and fungal communities.
Table 2. Biodiversity of prokaryotic and fungal communities.
Sample,
Days
Number of OTUsChao1Shannon Index (Path)
Prokaryotes
0116639443.07
7132442892.52
14119351432.70
21146152212.85
28114634863.05
56136857003.38
98178177244.13
Fungi
02152663.15
73513984.95
141452181.88
21961760.28
2839950.12
56751250.63
98821511.67
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mironov, V.; Vanteeva, A.; Sokolova, D.; Merkel, A.; Nikolaev, Y. Microbiota Dynamics of Mechanically Separated Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste during Composting. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1877. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9091877

AMA Style

Mironov V, Vanteeva A, Sokolova D, Merkel A, Nikolaev Y. Microbiota Dynamics of Mechanically Separated Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste during Composting. Microorganisms. 2021; 9(9):1877. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9091877

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mironov, Vladimir, Anna Vanteeva, Diyana Sokolova, Alexander Merkel, and Yury Nikolaev. 2021. "Microbiota Dynamics of Mechanically Separated Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste during Composting" Microorganisms 9, no. 9: 1877. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9091877

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop