Next Article in Journal
Does Biological Denitrification Inhibition (BDI) in the Field Induce an Increase in Plant Growth and Nutrition in Apium graveolens L. Grown for a Long Period?
Next Article in Special Issue
Special Issue “Salmonella: Pathogenesis and Host Restriction”
Previous Article in Journal
Microbial Communities in Permafrost Soils of Larsemann Hills, Eastern Antarctica: Environmental Controls and Effect of Human Impact
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Salmonella enterica Plasmidome as a Reservoir of Antibiotic Resistance
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 8
Issue 8
10.3390/microorganisms8081203
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Iron-Uptake Systems of Chicken-Associated Salmonella Serovars and Their Role in Colonizing the Avian Host

by
Dinesh H. Wellawa
1,2,
Brenda Allan
1,
Aaron P. White
1,2 and
Wolfgang Köster
1,2,*
1
Vaccine & Infectious Disease Organization-International Vaccine Centre, University of Saskatchewan, 120 Veterinary Rd., Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E3, Canada
2
Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5B4, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2020, 8(8), 1203; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8081203
Submission received: 15 July 2020 / Revised: 30 July 2020 / Accepted: 31 July 2020 / Published: 7 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Salmonella: Pathogenesis and Host Restriction)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Iron is an essential micronutrient for most bacteria. Salmonella enterica strains, representing human and animal pathogens, have adopted several mechanisms to sequester iron from the environment depending on availability and source. Chickens act as a major reservoir for Salmonella enterica strains which can lead to outbreaks of human salmonellosis. In this review article we summarize the current understanding of the contribution of iron-uptake systems to the virulence of non-typhoidal S. enterica strains in colonizing chickens. We aim to address the gap in knowledge in this field, to help understand and define the interactions between S. enterica and these important hosts, in comparison to mammalian models.

1. Introduction

The genus Salmonella is composed of two species, Salmonella enterica and Salmonella bongori. Salmonella enterica is subdivided into six subspecies; enterica (I), arizonae (IIIa), diarizonae (IIIb), houtenae (IV), salamae (II) and indica (VI), based on antigenic properties (somatic (O), flagellar (H1, H2) and capsule (K) antigens) and biochemical properties [1,2,3]. Salmonella bongori predominantly resides as commensal in ectotherms and except for a few incidences, mammalian infections are rare [4,5]. It is hypothesized that adaptation to different niches paved the pathway for speciation of S. enterica and S. bongori from a common ancestor by means of gene gain, gene loss and conjugation events [6,7,8]. Salmonella enterica contains >2600 serovars which can infect insects, wild birds, reptiles and mammals. A significant proportion of human salmonellosis (>99%) are caused by serovars under subspecies I (enterica) hence it is the most important category in terms of public health. Clinical manifestation of salmonellosis can vary among serovars. The gastroenteritis-causing strains are collectively known as non-typhoidal Salmonella (NTS) strains and this review mainly focuses on NTS. Gastroenteritis is associated with intestinal inflammation and diarrhea without fever in general. NTS strains have the capacity to infect broad livestock species, yet chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) are known to be a major reservoir. This is supported by epidemiological data indicating that poultry represent a major epicenter for human salmonellosis (non-typhoidal) globally (Table 1) [9,10].

1.1. Iron Homeostasis by Salmonella in a Nutshell: Regulation and Iron-Uptake Systems

Iron is an indispensable element for S. enterica. Key enzymes involved in bacterial metabolism depend on iron as a cofactor including DNA synthesis and repair enzymes [16]. Due to its transitional nature, iron can be either Fe2+/Fe3+ at physiological pH (7.2). In anaerobic environments, Fe2+ can be dominant over ferric iron, while Fe3+ can be abundant in aerobic conditions. Salmonella has established various mechanisms to internalize iron depending on its availability. In this review, we will discuss several important iron-uptake systems available in chicken-associated NTS strains (Figure 1). For more detail about iron homeostasis in bacteria in general, readers are directed to several references [16,17,18,19,20,21].

1.2. Ferric Uptake Regulator (Fur)-Mediated Regulation of Iron Uptake, Storage and Utilization

In addition to its innumerable beneficial effects, iron also catalyzes toxic metabolites such as superoxides, hydroxyl free radicals through Haber-Weiss and Fenton reactions in vivo which can damage bacterial DNA, iron-sulfur clusters, hence being harmful unless regulated [22,23]. The regulation is mainly under an auto-regulated protein called ferric uptake regulator (Fur) [24]. Fur acts as a repressor for most promoters related to iron uptake [25,26,27]. Under iron rich conditions, Fur binds to Fe2+, which causes Fur dimerization and subsequent binding to a consensus DNA sequence called the “fur box” (GATAATGATAATCATTATC), often present in promoter-containing regions. Binding overlaps the RNA polymerase (RNAP) binding sequence in the promoter region of iron-regulated genes [28]. This, in turn, hinders transcription of genes by the RNAP. Under iron-depleted conditions, Fe2+ dissociates from the dimer, the blockade for RNAP is removed, and iron-regulated genes are expressed. Apart from serving as a direct transcriptional repressor, Fur positively regulates iron storage and iron utilization genes via small RNAs called RyhB (E. coli) or its homologues (RfrA/B in Salmonella) [29,30]. For an example, under iron-rich conditions Fur upregulates iron storage proteins called bacterioferritins in E. coli via RyhB [31]. First, Fur-Fe2+ represses ryhB transcription and downregulates RyhB accumulation in the cell. Low intracellular RyhB concentration in turn alleviates RyhB-mediated destruction of mRNA transcripts and leads to the upregulation of iron storage proteins. The network of interacting partners by RyhB and its homologs have added more complexity to the Fur mediated iron regulation and interactosome of these RNAs are under active research [32].

1.3. Uptake of Ferric (Fe3+) Iron via Siderophores

Fe3+ is insoluble and often sequestered by host proteins (i.e., hemoglobin, transferrin, lactoferrin) or bound in complexes (Fe(OH)3) outside the host. Salmonella secrets high-affinity iron-binding molecules called siderophores (500–1000 da) to hijack Fe3+. Two siderophores belonging to the catecholate type are well-characterized: enterobactin and salmochelin. Enterobactin is nature’s superglue for Fe3+ which forms an incredibly stable complex with ferric ion at Kf = 1049 (Kf = formation constant) [33]. Chemically it is designated as the cyclic trilactone of N-2,3-dihyroxybenzoyl-l-serine. N-2,3-dihyroxybenzoyl l-serine (DBS) is the building block of enterobactin which undergoes cyclization to accommodate iron by six coordinated oxygen atoms in three DBS units. DBS itself can scavenge Fe3+ with low affinity [34]. Salmonella uses nonribosomal peptide synthesis pathways (NRPS) encoded by entBCDE (Figure 1C) to generate enterobactin in the cytoplasm which is then exported by EntS located in the inner membrane [35]. Except for some chicken-specific Salmonella serovars, all other chicken-associated-Salmonella produce enterobactin [36]. Enterobactin can be further linearized due to the action of hydrolase enzymes (IroE) located in the bacterial periplasm before secretion (Figure 1C). The linearized forms of the enterobactin (Ent-trimer, Ent-dimer) retain the ability to scavenge ferric iron, but with reduced affinity compared to its cyclic form (Kf = 1043) [33]. Once the secreted enterobactin and linearized forms are iron-loaded, they are taken up by their cognate receptors in the Salmonella outer membrane. Cyclic and linearized forms of enterobactin (ex; Ent-trimer) specifically bind to FepA. Evidence has suggested that enterobactin break down products like DBS, can be transported via Cir, FepA and IroN once loaded with Fe3+ [37]. These receptors share sequence similarity and follow the same general structure [18]. They are composed of a 22 antiparallel stranded β-barrel (which forms the channel) and an N-terminal globular domain referred to as the “plug” or “cork”. The energy generated by the proton motive force in the inner membrane is coupled to the outer membrane receptors via the TonB-ExbB-ExbD complex to achieve siderophore internalization (passage through the upper binding pocket), then migration through the channel (plug undergoes conformational changes) into the periplasm. Internalized iron is then released by degradation of enterobactin using Fes enzymes located in the cytoplasm.
Enterobactin can be glycosylated by a glycosyl transferase enzyme, IroB, to form salmochelin [38]. Glycosylation affixes glucose molecules to enterobactin thus forming the more hydrophilic salmochelin. It has been hypothesized that salmochelin is produced to counteract iron starvation mounted by the host. This has been supported by the observation that salmochelin is a better iron scavenger than enterobactin in presence of serum albumin and also it is not bound by the mammalian innate molecule lipocalin 2 (Lcn-2) which captures apo-enterobactin or Fe3+-enterobactin to impede iron scavenging by bacteria [39,40]. Lcn-2 is secreted by phagocytic cells (macrophages, neutrophils) and epithelial cells during host’s inflammatory response. Glycosylation of the enterobactin moiety sterically hinders the binding capacity of Lcn-2 and therefore salmochelin is considered a “stealth” siderophore. IroB can sequentially synthesize several versions of salmochelin termed mono glycosylated enterobactin (MGE), di-glycosylated enterobactin (DGE/S4) and tri-glycosylated enterobactin (TGE) [38,39]. Work done by Lin et al., 2005 has further demonstrated that the periplasmic enzyme IroE can linearize salmochelin to linear trimer (linearized TGE/S3-not shown in the Figure 1C), linear dimer (DGE/S2), MGE trimer, linear C-glycosylated (DBS)2 (S1) and linear monomer (SX) in vitro [39]. Also, the authors showed that IroD, a cytoplasmic esterase, can degrade the salmochelin forms into its building blocks (DBS) thus releasing the iron into the bacterial cytoplasm [40]. Salmochelins have high specificity for outer membrane receptor IroN and are subjected to TonB-dependant uptake like other siderophores.
Some NTS serovars produce aerobactin, a mixed type of siderophore known as citrate-hydroxamate type. Aerobactin is synthesized by a NRPS pathway utilizing enzymes encoded in the iucABCD operon. During synthesis, l-lysine is first converted to N6-acetyl-N6-hydroxy-l-lysine and then complexed into a citric acid backbone [41]. The iron complex formation constant of aerobactin (Kf = 1023) is weaker than that of enterobactin [42]. Aerobactin follows the same rule as catecholate-type siderophores regarding its uptake (Iut receptor) and TonB-dependant transport into the bacterial periplasm. Once in the periplasm, aerobactin is transported through the binding-protein-dependent ABC transport system FhuBCD [43]. FhuBCD also mediates the energy-dependant uptake of ferrichromes and coprogen from the environment (Figure 1A) [43].
A less common class of siderophores which can be found in Salmonella serovars are phenolate type siderophores such as yersiniabactin (Ybt). Ybt is abundantly produced in Yersinia species encoded by a genomic island called high pathogenicity island 1(HPI) [44]. HPI 1 is absent from most Salmonella enterica serovar subspecies 1 [44] and hence its distribution in Salmonella serovars is low. Seven proteins (HMWP1, HMWP2, YbtD, YbtE, YbtS, YbtT and YbtU) have been described in Ybt synthesis from the precursor isochorismic acid in Yersinia species. The final product is a four-ring structure composed of salicylate, one thiazolidine and two thiazoline rings. Ybt shows a higher affinity for Fe3+ (Kf = 1036) than aerobactin, hence it is a potent iron chelator. Once loaded with iron, yersiniabactin is taken up by the Psn/FyuA receptor in the outer membrane and then shuttled through the YbtPQ ABC transporter across the inner membrane (not shown in the figure).

1.4. Uptake of Ferrous Iron (Fe2+) via FeoABC, SitABCD and MntH

Ferrous iron is water-soluble and can readily pass through the outer membrane porin proteins into the periplasm following the concentration gradient. Once in the periplasmic space, Salmonella can take up Fe2+ via 3 systems: FeoABC, SitABCD and MntH. FeoABC belongs to a family of transporters that have high specificity for Fe2+. For the FeoABC system, the FeoB permease forms a channel in the inner membrane and FeoA and FeoC interact with FeoB in the cytoplasm. The N-terminal, cytoplasmic portion of FeoB contains a G-protein domain which can perform GTP binding and hydrolysis. Therefore, Feo-mediated Fe2+ uptake is coupled to GTP hydrolysis and signal transduction. For the latest structure and biology of the FeoABC system, readers are directed to two recent articles [45,46].
SitABCD is an ABC transporter family protein complex allowing the passage of primarily Mn2+ in alkaline pH but capable of transporting Fe2+ with low affinity [47]. Kehres et al., 2002 showed that SitABCD of Salmonella Typhimurium only transported Fe2+ when the concentration of Fe2+ reached 1 µM or higher in vitro [47]. MntH was also dominant in transporting Mn2+ rather than Fe2+. It was evident that uptake of Mn2+ was independent of pH, while Fe2+ transport increased by the acidic pH [47]. Further, it was revealed that affinity for Fe2+ to MntH was much lower than to SitABCD and only transported ferrous iron when it reached a concentration of higher than 1 µM in vitro [47]. Since the free, labile iron level is believed to be extremely low in biological fluids (<10−18M) and tissues, the role of SitABCD and MntH in ferrous iron transport is hypothesized to be of relatively minor significance compared to Feo-mediated iron uptake. The FeoABC system is recognized as the main ferrous iron transporter for many Enterobacteriaceae [48].

2. Emergence of Chicken-Associated Invasive NTS: The Iron Link

NTS strains are mainly asymptomatic colonizers in adult chickens, but strains of certain serovars can be fatal when infecting day-old chicks [49,50]. The major chicken-associated NTS serovars with potential to cause human epidemics are listed in Table 2. In countries belonging to the European Union (EU), the majority of breeders and layers were infected with Salmonella Enteritidis (SEn) while broilers were dominantly colonized by Salmonella Virchow (SVr) [51]. In contrast to the EU countries, Salmonella Kentucky (SKn) has been the predominant serovar isolated from poultry products in North America [10,52]. Generally, there is a high genetic synteny among NTS serovars (listed in Table 2) of chicken origin at core genomic levels [53]. Table 2 has only listed some the genetic differences which may be linked to virulence in chickens or humans.
The chicken host has been a hotspot for shaping new NTS pathotype strains that can cause extraintestinal diseases in humans due to bacteremia, often with antimicrobial resistant (AMR) phenotypes. NTS bacteremia can lead to severe inflammation within different organs, leading to organ dysfunction and sometimes death (Figure 2). In these more systemic infections, antibiotics are required for successful treatment. Salmonella Heidelberg (SHb) and SVr are among the top-four NTS serovars with highest invasiveness indices (proportion of bacteremia from total isolates) globally for which chickens act as a reservoir [75,76,77,78]. Apart from that, Salmonella Typhimurium (STm) and SEn are cumulatively responsible for the highest human epidemics globally with potential to cause blood-borne infections [79]. Comparative genomic analysis has predicted that Salmonella pathogenicity islands (SPI), adhesin molecules (fimbriae, invasins), secretion systems, virulence plasmid (spv), toxins, multidrug resistant genomic islands and colonization factors have a role in causing blood-borne infection in humans [52,53,57,58,80,81]. Another important virulence trait that has been overlooked in NTS serovars is iron uptake. As summarized in Table 2, there is a general trend in strains of important NTS serovars to acquire additional iron-uptake systems. Kajanchi et al. (2017) reported that a significant number of STm strains, isolated from chickens, turkeys and humans, carried ColV plasmids which encoded genes for divalent metal uptake (sitABCD) and Fe3+ uptake via synthesis, secretion and translocation of aerobactin (iucABCD, iut) [62]. The plasmid encoded sitABCD was phylogenetically distinct from the chromosomally encoded loci. The effect of having two sitABCD operons for clonal expansion and/or virulence is still unknown. ColV plasmids have been associated with SKn strains and to a lesser extent with SHb strains in the USA that were isolated from poultry [55]. For SKn, there was a significant fitness defect in colonizing the chicken cecum in strains lacking pColV [55]. In addition, systemic dissemination and the ability to cause splenic lesions was reduced in pColV null background compared to the pColV positive strain, indicating that genetic factors carried in pColV plasmids are important virulence determinants during extraintestinal disease [55]. SKn is an emerging pathogen which can cause blood-born infections in humans [82,83,84], thus ColV plasmid-encoded factors including iron uptake functions most likely contribute to overall virulence.
The aerobactin operon (iucABCD), also carried on pColV plasmids, is of particular interest, because normally its prevalence is low in most Salmonella [42]. Aerobactin-producing NTS serovars (SEn, STm, SVr,SIn etc) were highly associated with human salmonellosis caused by ingestion of contaminated poultry products in Spain [85]. In some reports, it has been documented that aerobactin production is exclusively linked to blood-born infection rather gastroenteritis, as aerobactin-producing NTS serovars were exclusively isolated from human blood [86,87]. In fact, some of the properties of aerobactin can provide NTS serovars a better survivability during systemic dissemination, even though affinity to Fe3+ of aerobactin is lower than most other siderophores. Some of these features include: higher transfer rate of Fe3+ from transferrin receptors to aerobactin in the serum, higher solubility, low wastage of resources during aerobactin production (recycled) and rapid secretion out of the cells to be available for ferric uptake compared to enterobactin, which tends to accumulate in the inner-membrane [42]. The iron in the mucosal surface of the gastrointestinal tract is mainly bound by lactoferrins which has a high affinity for iron (Kf = 1020) like transferrin [88,89]. Therefore, secretion of additional siderophores such as aerobactin may provide NTS strains a competitive advantage for multiplication and invasion into the gastrointestinal tract. In addition, aerobactin is not bound by Lcn-2 which will provide a defense against Lcn-2-mediated iron starvation during inflammation. So, in the bottom line, aerobactin can be involved not only in the systemic phase of infection but also in enteric infection. The pColV plasmids are well-distributed among E. coli strains and it is believed that chicken-associated NTS strains may have acquired the pColV from an avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC) strain. APEC strains cause high morbidity and mortality in chickens (colibacillosis) due to their ability to cause septicemia [90]. Dozois et al., 2003 showed that among pathogen-specific gene clusters expressed in APEC strains, both aerobactin and salmochelin were important for virulence in chickens [91]. Further, significant reduction of colibacillosis-associated pathology was observed in an aerobactin-knockout APEC strain carrying ColV plasmids [92]. In a similar manner the hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae strain solely uses aerobactin to confer its hypervirulent phenotype which leads to septicemia in humans [93]. By all these means, acquiring aerobactin production may indeed cause the chicken-associated NTS serovars to become more virulent once infected in humans. There are number of other genetic factors encoded on pColV plasmids which can contribute to virulence, including the iss gene associated with increased serum survival in APEC strains [94]. Therefore, experimental approaches will be necessary to study the role of aerobactin encoded on pColV regarding virulence of NTS serovars in chickens and humans.
A recently emerging poultry-associated multidrug resistant Salmonella Infantis (SIn) lineage, harbored yersiniabactin secretion systems (irp) on pESI like plasmids [71,95]. As mentioned earlier, yersiniabactin is rarely present in Salmonella strains and its role is unknown regarding the existence in chicken-associated NTS strains. Yersiniabactin can sequester copper iron apart from ferric, to form a stable complex (yersiniabactin-cupric) which resists proteasomal degradation. In a series of experiments conducted by Chaturvedi and colleagues, they were able to show that the yersiniabactin-cupric complex neutralized superoxide (super oxide dismutase-like activity) generated in phagosomes which gave uropathogenic E coli bacteria, a survival advantage in vitro and in vivo [96,97]. This new paradigm for the role of yersiniabactin in virulence is highly applicable to NTS serovars, because Salmonella enterica species do need to resist copper (Cu2+) accumulation inside macrophages for the survival [98]. Once accumulated in the cytoplasm of macrophages, Cu2+ oxidized into a Cu1+ which is toxic to bacteria. So, co-expression of yersiniabactin and catecholate siderophores (enterobactin, salmochelin) in the SIn strain may provide a survival advantage by facilitating iron acquisition as well resistance to copper-mediated toxicity.
The acquisition of siderophore secretion and metal iron-uptake systems in chicken-associated NTS serovars might be linked to their invasive phenotypes in humans but more studies are needed to confirm their role. Whether they are important for the pathogenesis in chickens remains a question to be answered.

3. Iron Uptake in NTS Virulence: Chicken vs. Mammalian Models

Most of our understanding related to the role of iron-regulated gene clusters in Salmonella pathogenesis has derived from experimental infection with Salmonella Typhimurium (STm) using mouse models and mammalian cell culture assays. Due to differences in how pathogens interact with avian environments, we cannot directly extrapolate this information to chickens [111,112]. The relationship of virulence with various iron-uptake systems in pathogenic bacteria including Salmonella enterica species has been extensively reviewed [16,17,18,19,20,21,113]. Unfortunately, limited data in chicken models and avian cell lines remains a barrier to understanding the host–pathogen interactions of the iron-uptake system in Salmonella serovars. Here we discuss the potential role of iron-uptake systems in NTS serovars towards infection and colonization in chickens compared to mammals. Some of the gaps in knowledge which need to be addressed in poultry are summarized in Figure 3.

3.1. Feo-Mediated Fe2+ Uptake Involved in Rapid Colonization of the Gut and Systemic Spread

To identify differentially expressed gene profiles of STm isolated during colonization of the lumen of the chicken cecum (compared to in vitro cultures), Harvey et al., 2011, detected the upregulation of the sitABCD operon [123]. In contrast, the major Fe2+ uptake facilitator, the FeoABC system, was not differentially expressed during the same experiment. However, these researchers only assessed gene expression at 16 hours post-infection in newly hatched chicks so they may not have been able to capture the full spectrum of iron-regulated gene expression over time [123]. The sitABCD gene cluster was a major virulence factor in an avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC) strain causing colibacillosis in a chicken air sac model [124]. Evidence suggested that manganese uptake was more important than the Fe2+ uptake during extraintestinal phase in APEC strains [124]. In contrast, both Mn2+ and Fe2+ uptake contributed to the full virulence of STm to cause typhoid disease in mice [125]. Portillo et al., 1992 estimated that 1 µM of free Fe2+ prevailed inside the STm containing vacuole within Madin-Darby canine kidney cells and it was sufficient for replication, for at least 8 h of infection [126]. This suggested that Fe2+ iron uptake might be more important than Fe3+ in the initial stages of STm establishment in the gastrointestinal tract. Supporting this hypothesis, Tsolis et al., 1996, showed that the lack of the Feo system significantly reduced the fecal shedding of STm in mice (C57BL/6) at day 4 post-challenge while a Fe3+ uptake null strain was recovered at a level similar to the wildtype [127]. In line with these findings, Costa et al., 2017 showed that Feo-mediated iron uptake provided a fitness advantage for STm, during gastrointestinal colonization (fecal shedding) via intragastrical route in a streptomycin-pretreated mouse (C57BL/6) colitis model at 2 days post-infection [128].
Similar to mammals, chickens mediate Fe2+ egress from macrophages by expressing NRAMP-1 (Natural Resistance-Associated Protein 1) in the phagosomal membrane [129]. The action of NRAMP-1 is thought to limit the free, labile iron pool available to intracellular pathogens [130]. Thus, it is very likely that Feo-mediated ferrous iron uptake plays a crucial role for Salmonella to establish systemic infections in chicken. NRAMP-1 expression has been linked to Salmonella-resistance in certain chicken genetic lines (White Leghorn W1) [131]. The susceptible chicken line (CC) had a conservative mutation in the amino acid residue located at 223 (Arg223→Gln223) of NRAMP-1, which was highly predictive of a functional anomaly in the NRAMP- 1 protein [131]. Consistent with this finding, authors observed that only 15% birds survived to a parenteral challenge of STm in the susceptible chicken line (CC) 7 days post-infection while almost all birds survived in the resistant chicken line [131]. However, the mortality rate of the susceptible chicken line was comparable to the resistant chicken line beyond day 7 post-infection irrespective of the NRAMP-1 status [131]. This reflected that Fe2+ starvation in presence of a functional NRAMP-1 certainly did limit rapid systemic spread of the STm in chicken but bacteria somehow adopted the new iron status in chicken and survived, pertaining their virulence during persistent infection. Future studies are needed to examine the iron distribution during Salmonella pathogenesis in chicken (cecal colonization and extraintestinal dissemination) and how this will shape overall regulation of iron-uptake systems in NTS serovars.
While further experiments are warranted to investigate the role of Fe2+uptake in relationship to the NRAMP-1 status in chicken lines, mouse models of infections have provided some insight into the interplay between NRAMP-1 and Feo-mediated iron uptake. Feo-mediated iron uptake provided a competitive advantage during persistent infection of STm (SL1344-calf virulent isolate) in both NRAMP-positive and -negative backgrounds of mice [132]. Authors observed that a Δfeo STm strain was significantly reduced in its ability to colonize deeper tissue in the gut such as Peyer’s patches (PP), mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN), as well as liver and spleen during a mixed infection [132]. Mice were orally challenged resembling natural infection with Salmonella. In the same study, it was documented that the lack of Feo-mediated Fe2+ uptake affected the overall iron homeostasis in a STm strain during a single infection challenge model [132]. The study revealed that the Δfeo STm strain compensated the requirement of iron by upregulating siderophore-mediated Fe3+ uptake (enterobactin, salmochelin) systems during systemic infection (liver and spleen) [132]. Interestingly, this upregulation of siderophore-mediated ferric uptake resulted in increased bacterial burden in the liver and spleen during persistent infection in NRAMP+/+ mice [132]. There are growing numbers of evidence indicating that Salmonella preferentially resided in hemo-phagocytosed macrophages in the liver and spleen during infection [133,134,135]. One plausible explanation for this might be the abundant source of iron that Salmonella can exploit during degradation of erythrocytes (Fe3+/Fe2+) in those macrophages. Hence hypersecretion of siderophores may benefit growing Salmonella under such conditions. Expression of iron-uptake systems certainly may differ among different types of tissues the bacterium has to encounter or might vary due to host responses. For example, transferrin-bound iron (Fe3+) in the intestines provides a good source of iron for Salmonella and the uptake can be facilitated by the stress-induced norepinephrine hormone which is produced abundantly in the mesenteric organs both in chickens and mice [136].
Highlights-1:
(i)
Feo-mediated ferrous iron uptake is important for rapid colonization by and systemic spread of Salmonella Typhimurium in NRAMP+/+ mice. We predict the same in chicken–NTS interaction.
(ii)
Feo may not be essential for persistent infection in mouse models due to redundancy of various iron-uptake systems. This includes Mn2+ uptake via SitABCD and MntH, and uptake of siderophores.
(iii)
NTS predilects to iron-rich hemophagocytes during systemic infection.

3.2. Siderophore Synthesis Is Important During Persistent Infection and Bacteremia

Iron restriction is well-studied related to antimicrobial properties of egg white in vitro [137,138,139,140,141,142]. Kang et al., 2006, showed that a ΔentF strain of SEn which was unable to produce a catecholate siderophore, was significantly attenuated in its ability to survive in egg albumen in vitro which suggested that siderophore production is an important virulence determinant during internal contamination of the eggs [143]. The egg is enriched with a variety of iron chelators such as ovotransferrin (in egg white) and phosphovitin (in yolk) hence it is very likely that potent ferric hijacking systems will benefit Salmonella in colonizing the eggs during transovarian transmission. Van Immerseel et al., 2010, proposed the hypothesis that stress-induced survival mechanisms governed by SEn led to egg-associated human outbreaks due to the fact that eggs possessed an arsenal of antimicrobial properties [144]. However, in-vivo gene expression studies did not identify iron-uptake systems as differentially expressed gene clusters during oviduct colonization or egg contamination [145,146]. Gene expression studies have been conducted using an intravenous challenge model which is an unnatural route of infection in hens. So, it might be possible that gene expression of Salmonella during intravenous challenge might be different compared to oral infection in hens. Siderophore-mediated ferric iron uptake has not been identified as a major virulence determinant during colonization in the gut and systemic infection in chicken, so far. There are not enough studies performed using iron-homeostasis-related mutants of Salmonella to investigate their role in infection, colonization and transmission in a chicken model. In a series of experiments executed by Rabsch et al., 2003, it was proposed that siderophore degradation product such as N-2,3-dihyroxybenzoyl-l-serine (DBS) will be more important in colonization and systemic spread in the absence of an active siderophore uptake system in chicken [37]. The authors confirmed this hypothesis in a mouse model of infection (intragastric route) using a ΔfepA ΔiroN Δcir strain of STm (SL1344) which was significantly attenuated in colonization of the cecum and systemic spread, which in contrast was not observed in a ΔfepA ΔiroN mutant (enterobactin and salmochelin uptake deficient). In a chicken model, SEn strains carrying fepA iroN mutation profiles behaved similarly as in mice indicating that siderophore uptake was not essential during early colonization events [37]. Interestingly, the authors concluded that in BALB/c mice who are intrinsically susceptible to Salmonella infection, salmochelin was not important to cause infection. All these data have to be used cautiously due to following reasons; (i) N-2,3-dihyroxybenzoyl-l-serine (DBS) is not occurring naturally in the environment. It needs to be synthesized (entABCDE) or liberated as a byproduct due to action of Fes and IroE (Figure 1) on enterobactin/salmochelin. So, if DBSs are important so is the siderophore synthesis. When uptake routes are blocked spontaneous breakdown of siderophores can be a rapid process. (ii) At a given time, siderophores and its degraded products (enterobactin, salmochelins, Ent-trimer, Ent-dimer, DGE-trimer, DBS etc.) can be present and this cocktail may have a biological role in vivo. For example, degradation to more soluble form such as DBS, enables Salmonella to internalize iron rapidly. The mixture of derivatives might also exhaust the immune system in mounting an effective antibody response (antibodies against one particular siderophore derivative will spare others in the mixture) [147,148]. (iii) The genetic background of the host organism will have a major effect on the outcome of animal experiments. For example, the importance of iron-uptake systems described in mice that are genetically susceptible or resistant to Salmonella has been contrasting [149,150]. This will most likely be applicable to chickens as well (Salmonella-resistant and -susceptible chicken lines). Another crucial factor is the age of the birds: e.g., chicks (weak immune system) vs. adult chickens.
Fe3+ uptake via FepB (periplasmic binding protein for some catecholate type siderophores) has been identified as an absolute requirement for the persistent infection in mice (Sv129S6-Nramp1+/+) with STm (SL1344) [151]. FepB is needed to shuttle Fe3+ bound to enterobactin, salmochelin or DBS (2,3-dihydrobenzoic acids), from the periplasm to the inner membrane transport components (Figure 1A). The ΔfepB of STm dramatically lowered the bacterial recovery below the detection limit in most of the tissues examined in mice (cecum, MLN, PP, liver and spleen) [151]. Most importantly, the authors in these studies showed that siderophore synthesis (enterobactin, salmochelin) played a significant role in gastrointestinal colonization and systemic spread during persistent infection [151].
Salmochelin synthesis and export have been identified as major virulence factors during bacteremia in mice (C3H, Nramp+) measured by mortality after intraperitoneal injection of STm [152]. Parenteral injection of STm carrying a mutation in tonB which completely blocked all siderophore uptake has previously been shown to significantly increase the LD50 in mice compared to the challenge with wildtype STm [127]. Further, in a study which analyzed differentially expressed genes in STm-SL1344 by transcriptomic and proteomics techniques, enterobactin synthesis and uptake genes were highly upregulated during systemic infection in a mouse (C57BL/6) model [153]. Most interesting finding of that study was, in addition to enterobactin, salmochelin-related genes were upregulated in immune-deficient mice background (deficient in ROS generation) but not in wildtype mice background [153]. In the same study high bacterial growth has been observed in spleen of immune-deficient mice which may have been linked to a high demand of iron for growth of STm [153]. It is well-documented that salmochelin provides a defense against Lcn-2-mediated enterobactin chelation by the host during inflammation (mouse colitis model) [154]. Hence it is possible that mice with deficiency in respiratory burst effect, may rely on antimicrobial mechanisms such as more Lcn-2 secretion to limit Salmonella replication in phagocytic cells. Also, serum is considered as an extremely low iron compartment for pathogens in vertebrates [155]. Serum iron is mostly bound to transferrin, albumin and ferritins. In the presence of serum albumin, enterobactin is not considered as an efficient iron chelator as it is rapidly cleared [156,157]. Hence secretion of stealth siderophores (aerobactin, salmochelin and yersiniabactin) will be beneficial for NTS serovars during bacteremia.
The extracellular fatty acid-binding protein (ExFABP) of chickens has been identified as the chicken equivalent of Lcn-2 [158]. Its overall structure is similar to Lcn-2 yet it has a more extended positively charged calyx (which is the binding pocket for ligands) with two binding specificities: one for siderophores and the other for lysophosphatidic acid [158]. Interestingly, the calyx of Ex-FABP accommodates one form of salmochelin, mono- glycosylated enterobactin (MGE/S1) which is not normally bound by Lcn-2 [158]. Lcn-2 cannot bind to any salmochelin derivatives. So, the “chicken lipochalin-2” seems to be more potent in withholding iron compared to Lcn-2 during Salmonella infection. There is ample evidence for expression of Ex-FABP in the cecum associated with inflammation of day-old chicks when infected by NTS [159,160]. Chicken egg white which has antibacterial properties against Salmonella in vitro also contains Ex-FABP [145]. Adult chickens generate a more tolerogenic response towards non-typhoidal Salmonella (NTS) infection [161,162]. The inflammation induced in adult chicken is transient yet sufficient enough to contain the bacteria in the gut while some may spread systemically to colonize spleen and liver. Significant inflammation in the liver and spleen has not been observed in more mature birds except for follicular lesion [161]. The lack of marked inflammatory response in adult chicken towards NTS infection is an indication that some of the stealth siderophore secretion might not be essential during the colonization process compared to mammals.
Highlights-2:
(i)
Ferric iron uptake mechanisms are important for persistent infection.We predict similar results for chicken as those found in mouse models because bioavailability of iron is expected to be low in most compartments of the host.
(ii)
Aerobactin, salmochelin and yersiniabactin provide a serum resistance during bacteremia and systemic infection. This may explain the siderophore link towards chicken-associated virulent NTS serovars.
(iii)
The role of stealth siderophores of NTS in adult chickens during colonization may be nonessential due to tolerogenic response.

4. Opening the Pandora’s Box of Gallus-Iron-Salmonella Interaction

Iron uptake is a primary virulence factor for Salmonella. But how each iron-uptake system partakes in pathogenesis in a chicken model still needs a thorough investigation. This is intriguing because chickens are the major reservoir for Salmonella; yet we know least about its interactions with the host. We want to highlight some of the important aspects which need to be addressed in future experiments using chickens as model related to the Gallus-Iron-Salmonella interaction. This will certainly lay a platform to discuss the potential for developing therapeutics targeted at iron homeostasis in Salmonella.

4.1. Nutritional Immunity Status in Chicken during Salmonella Infection

Nutritional immunity is defined as part of the host’s innate immune response to withhold essential nutrients, including iron, from invading pathogens [163]. The interplay between iron-withholding mechanisms in chicken and iron homeostasis in Salmonella during pathogenesis is largely unknown. The interaction between siderophores and extracellular fatty acid binding protein (ExFABP), which is part of chicken-iron-withholding strategy, has recently been well-documented in eggs [164]. A study revealed that SEn has to synthesize stealth siderophores such as salmochelin to overcome iron starvation induced by ExFABP (chelation of Fe3+-enterobactin) in egg white in vitro [164]. Ovotransferrin, synthesized by oviduct cells, is a transferrin family protein which transports iron into the growing embryo. It is the major constituter of egg albumin. The iron complex formation constant of ovotransferrin (iron affinity of the C lobe is 1018 and N lobe is 1014 ) is low compared to most siderophores secreted by Salmonella hence iron restriction is not the major mechanism behind its antibacterial effect [165]. Egg yolk is the major iron store for growing embryos and almost all iron is bound to phosvitin. The affinity of phosvitin to iron is comparable to ovotransferrin (Kf = 1018) [166]. So, Salmonella can rely on enterobactin (Kf = 1049) rather on the expression of stealth siderophore to hijack iron from phosvitins, unless ExFABP is expressed in sufficient amounts. However, currently there is no evidence that stealth siderophores are indeed expressed to counteract ExFABP-mediated nutritional immunity in chickens during colonization in various tissue in vivo.
Adaptation to an iron-deficiency status in humans plays an important role in resistance to bacterial and viral infections [167]. The response is also termed as hypoferremia of inflammation or anemia of inflammation (AI). The key player for hypoferremic response is recognized as hepcidin, the master regulator for iron metabolism in humans and it is believed to be hepcidin independent in chickens (chicken genome seems to lack hepcidin up to date) [168,169,170]. Inflammation caused by pathogenic invasion induces hepcidin secretion from liver [171]. Hepcidin mediates ferroportin (Fpn) degradation which inhibits iron efflux from macrophages and iron absorption from intestines [172]. Fpn degradation also affects hepatocytes which increases their ferritin levels and the ability to store accumulated iron. All these mechanisms lead to a significant drop in the serum iron level (hypoferremia). The low level of iron in the serum may limit bacteremia, yet current evidence suggested that the burden of NTS increased in systemic infection-related sites such as the spleen during hypoferremic response in mice [173,174,175]. Similarly, infection with chicken-specific serovars such as Salmonella Gallinarum and Salmonella Pullorum led to anemia of inflammation (AI) in chicken with increased bacterial burden in spleen and liver [176]. The increased Salmonella colonization in the “systemic sites” correlated with a spike in the iron content both in mice and chickens. The reason for such a spike of iron in spleen can be partly due to the accelerated red blood cell turnover rate triggered by inflammation induced hypoferremia response. It has been documented that in mammals the half-life of red blood cells decreased dramatically during AI response and led to increased destruction of red blood cells by macrophages in spleen and liver [177]. Since Salmonella can profit from the iron abundancy (Fe2+/Fe3+) in hemophagocytic cells [132], they may preferentially rely on a specific iron uptake system during AI. Supporting this hypothesis, the African lineage of iNTS (invasive NTS) strain Salmonella Typhimurium 313 (ST313) appears not to rely on salmochelin-mediated Fe3+ uptake during systemic infection in mice [178]. There is a strong association of African linage of iNTS strains with malaria parasites which increase intracellular iron levels in macrophages [179]. An abundance of the Fe 2+ pool may have inherently adapted the ST313 to reduce the expression of stealth siderophore uptake systems which are a metabolically demanding process to produce. There is currently no experimental data indicating the occurrence of AI in chicken during NTS infection. Broader host range serovars such as NTS strains colonize mainly the gastrointestinal tract without overt inflammation in adult birds. In such a situation, AI will not be profound. Virulence of NTSs varies according to serovars and chicken susceptibility depends on their genetic background and the age of the birds. For example, NTS such as STm and SEn do cause systemic inflammation during enteric infection in young chickens. They are also capable of infecting the yolk sac in young birds leading to the development of omphalitis. Yolk sac infections result in high mortality due to septicemia [180]. The role of iron-uptake systems of NTS, when the host undergoes hypoferremia needs to be investigated in a chicken model of infection. It will be especially important to examine iron distribution in compartments such as blood, liver, spleen and gastrointestinal tract of chickens following infection. Research on iron-regulated gene expression combined with proteomic studies is needed to assess how each iron-uptake system is regulated in parallel to anemia of inflammation.

4.2. Non-Canonical Function of Siderophores: Defense against Respiratory Burst and Immunomodulatory Function

There are growing number of evidences suggesting that siderophores have other biological functions apart from Fe3+ uptake [181]. One such alternative function is defense against oxidative stress provided by catecholate siderophores [182,183,184]. The mechanism behind the enterobactin-mediated defense against reactive oxygen species is currently been investigated. One of the mechanisms suggested that Ent-trimer (Figure 1C) which is the linearized molecule of enterobactin, participates in ROS scavenging by providing hydroxyl groups from the freed end of the backbone [185]. Generation of a robust respiratory burst is a key mechanism to kill Salmonella inside phagocytic cells [186]. In this regard, catecholate siderophore production will provide a survival advantage inside macrophages which is a major replication niche during systemic dissemination and colonization. Also, it may be plausible that synthesis of catecholate siderophores will be important irrespective of iron limitation inside phagocytic cells because of their diverse functions apart from iron scavenging. Some of the phagocytic cells in the chicken immune system do not induce a strong respiratory burst effect to Salmonella. The chicken lacks neutrophils yet has heterophils that are functionally equivalent to neutrophils. Heterophils are unable to synthesize myeloperoxidases and rely on a repertoire of antimicrobial peptides to kill bacteria instead of respiratory burst [114,187,188]. It has been documented that enterobactin inhibited the myeloperoxidases activity in E coli and provided a survival advantage in inflamed gut [184]. Hence it is important to investigate the interplay between enterobactin and heterophils during gastrointestinal colonization. Macrophages from Salmonella-resistant chicken lines (SALI) showed more pronounced respiratory burst effect while susceptible and inbred lines had low, variable level respectively [189]. So future experiments are warranted in chickens to investigate the role of siderophore-mediated defense against reactive oxygen and nitrogen species.
Holden et al., 2016, showed that siderophores produced by Klebsiella pneumoniae (enterobactin, salmochelin and yersiniabactin) can induce inflammation in lung epithelial tissue by stabilizing the hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) in C57BL/6 mice [190]. In a previous study, Holden et al., 2014, showed that enterobactin together with Lcn-2 can potentiate the induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines in cultured murine lung epithelial cells through chelation of iron [191]. These data are highly suggestive that siderophores can mount an inflammation in vivo. Inflammatory cytokines liberated will help to attract macrophages and dendritic cells to the infective loci and subsequent systemic spread. It will be interesting to investigate whether siderophores facilitate systemic infection by induction of inflammation at different colonization sites in chicken by NTS serovars. Enterobactin-mediated iron chelation has been documented to polarize the macrophage from M1 phenotype to M2 phenotype in bone-marrow-derived cells [192]. M2 phenotype of macrophages will safeguard intracellular pathogen such as Salmonella by avoiding generating an oxidative killing mechanism [193]. Chicken has low number of resident macrophages in organs and relies on bone-marrow-derived monocytes to migrate to the inflammatory loci for pathogen control [187]. Presence of distinct M1 (killing/towards inflammatory) and M2 (healing/towards adaptive response) phenotypes [194] of chicken macrophages is yet to be fully elucidated. Further studies are needed to unravel how Salmonella mediates iron homeostasis in infected chicken macrophages as this microenvironment may impose a different iron status during polarization [195].

5. Concluding Remarks

Our understanding of iron in infection and immunity remains close to its infancy due to the complex nature of the interaction and ever-growing Salmonella serovars found in nature. Concerning chickens as a reservoir, it will be pivotal to understand how iron-regulated genes of Salmonella are expressed during pathogenesis in a chicken model of infection (Figure 3). Enhanced detection of in vivo siderophore production during colonization in different chicken host niches in situ will be key in understanding their role in the future. Experiments are needed to address how iron metabolism and homeostasis in the chicken are regulated in response to NTS infection. There are other metal uptake systems (Mn2+, Cu, Zn2+) apart from iron uptake which are not well-characterized in a chicken model regarding their role in NTS colonization. We believe that these efforts to understand the involvement of iron homeostasis in pathogenesis of NTS will pave the way for the development of a successful therapeutic strategy in the poultry industry to limit chicken-associated Salmonella “spillovers” to humans and the environment.

Author Contributions

D.H.W. and W.K. designed the study, collected data and created the figures; D.H.W., W.K., B.A. and A.P.W. wrote the manuscript. Figures are created with BioRenders.com (https://biorender.com/) subscribed to D.H.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Alberta Agriculture and Forestry: 2018F145R, Chicken Farmers of Saskatchewan: KOE2018002, Egg Farmers of Alberta: 2018F145R, Canadian Poultry Research Council: KOE2018002, Chicken Farmers of Canada: 1433-19.

Acknowledgments

We thank Po-King S. Lam, Colette Wheler and Arshud Dar for fruitful discussions. Work in the laboratory of W.K. was supported through funds from the Chicken Farmers of Canada (CFC), the Canadian Poultry Research Council (CPRC), the Saskatchewan Chicken Industry Development Fund (SCIDF), the Canadian Poultry Research Council/Agri-Food (Canada), Egg Farmers of Alberta (EFA), the Department of Alberta Agriculture and Forestry (AAF), the Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture—Agriculture Development Fund (ADF) and Egg Farmers of Canada (EFC). This report was published with the permission of the Director of VIDO-InterVac as journal series number 898.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ryan, M.P.; O’Dwyer, J.; Adley, C.C. Evaluation of the complex nomenclature of the clinically and veterinary significant pathogen Salmonella. Biomed Res. Int. 2017, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Tindall, B.; Grimont, P.; Garrity, G.; Euzeby, J. Nomenclature and taxonomy of the genus Salmonella. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 521–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Grimont, P.A.; Weill, F.-X. Antigenic formulae of the Salmonella serovars. Who Collab. Cent. Ref. Res. Salmonella 2007, 9, 1–166. [Google Scholar]
  4. Giammanco, G.M.; Pignato, S.; Mammina, C.; Grimont, F.; Grimont, P.A.; Nastasi, A.; Giammanco, G. Persistent endemicity of Salmonella bongori 48: z35: In southern Italy: Molecular characterization of human, animal, and environmental isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2002, 40, 3502–3505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Aleksic, S.; Heinzerling, F.; Bockemühl, J. Human infection caused by salmonellae of subspecies II to VI in Germany, 1977–1992. Z. Bakteriol. 1996, 283, 391–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Desai, P.T.; Porwollik, S.; Long, F.; Cheng, P.; Wollam, A.; Clifton, S.W.; Weinstock, G.M.; McClelland, M. Evolutionary genomics of Salmonella enterica subspecies. MBio 2013, 4, e00579-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Porwollik, S.; Wong, R.M.-Y.; McClelland, M. Evolutionary genomics of Salmonella: Gene acquisitions revealed by microarray analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 8956–8961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Fricke, W.F.; Mammel, M.K.; McDermott, P.F.; Tartera, C.; White, D.G.; LeClerc, J.E.; Ravel, J.; Cebula, T.A. Comparative genomics of 28 Salmonella enterica isolates: Evidence for CRISPR-mediated adaptive sublineage evolution. J. Bacteriol. 2011, 193, 3556–3568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Li, M.; Havelaar, A.H.; Hoffmann, S.; Hald, T.; Kirk, M.D.; Torgerson, P.R.; Devleesschauwer, B. Global disease burden of pathogens in animal source foods, 2010. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0216545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ferrari, R.G.; Rosario, D.K.; Cunha-Neto, A.; Mano, S.B.; Figueiredo, E.E.; Conte-Junior, C.A. Worldwide epidemiology of Salmonella serovars in animal-based foods: A meta-analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 85, e00591-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Borges, K.A.; Furian, T.Q.; De Souza, S.N.; Tondo, E.C.; Streck, A.F.; Salle, C.T.P.; de Souza Moraes, H.L.; Do Nascimento, V.P. Spread of a major clone of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis in poultry and in salmonellosis outbreaks in Southern Brazil. J. Food Prot. 2017, 80, 158–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wei, S.-H.; Huang, A.S.; Liao, Y.-S.; Liu, Y.-L.; Chiou, C.-S. A large outbreak of salmonellosis associated with sandwiches contaminated with multiple bacterial pathogens purchased via an online shopping service. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2014, 11, 230–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Kinross, P.; Van Alphen, L.; Urtaza, J.M.; Struelens, M.; Takkinen, J.; Coulombier, D.; Mäkelä, P.; Bertrand, S.; Mattheus, W.; Schmid, D. Multidisciplinary investigation of a multicountry outbreak of Salmonella Stanley infections associated with turkey meat in the European Union, August 2011 to January 2013. Eurosurveillance 2014, 19, 20801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hörmansdorfer, S.; Messelhäußer, U.; Rampp, A.; Schönberger, K.; Dallman, T.; Allerberger, F.; Kornschober, C.; Sing, A.; Wallner, P.; Zapf, A. Re-evaluation of a 2014 multi-country European outbreak of Salmonella Enteritidis phage type 14b using recent epidemiological and molecular data. Euro Surveill. 2017, 22, 17-00196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Ford, L.; Wang, Q.; Stafford, R.; Ressler, K.-A.; Norton, S.; Shadbolt, C.; Hope, K.; Franklin, N.; Krsteski, R.; Carswell, A. Seven Salmonella Typhimurium outbreaks in Australia linked by trace-back and whole genome sequencing. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2018, 15, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Andrews, S.C.; Robinson, A.K.; Rodríguez-Quiñones, F. Bacterial iron homeostasis. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 27, 215–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wooldridge, K.G.; Williams, P.H. Iron uptake mechanisms of pathogenic bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 1993, 12, 325–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Krewulak, K.D.; Vogel, H.J. Structural biology of bacterial iron uptake. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2008, 1778, 1781–1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Ratledge, C.; Dover, L.G. Iron metabolism in pathogenic bacteria. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 2000, 54, 881–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Miethke, M.; Marahiel, M.A. Siderophore-based iron acquisition and pathogen control. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2007, 71, 413–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Sheldon, J.R.; Heinrichs, D.E. Recent developments in understanding the iron acquisition strategies of gram positive pathogens. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2015, 39, 592–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Imlay, J.A. Oxidative Stress. Ecosal Plus 2009, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Liochev, S.I.; Fridovich, I. The Haber-Weiss cycle—70 years later: An alternative view. Redox Rep. 2002, 7, 55–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Stojiljkovic, I.; Hantke, K. Functional domains of theescherichia coli ferric uptake regulator protein (fur). Mol. Gen. Genet. 1995, 247, 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bagg, A.; Neilands, J. Ferric uptake regulation protein acts as a repressor, employing iron (II) as a cofactor to bind the operator of an iron transport operon in Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 1987, 26, 5471–5477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tsolis, R.M.; Bäumler, A.J.; Stojiljkovic, I.; Heffron, F. Fur regulon of Salmonella typhimurium: Identification of new iron-regulated genes. J. Bacteriol. 1995, 177, 4628–4637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Foster, J.W.; Hall, H.K. Effect of Salmonella typhimurium ferric uptake regulator (fur) mutations on iron-and pH-regulated protein synthesis. J. Bacteriol. 1992, 174, 4317–4323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Carpenter, B.M.; Whitmire, J.M.; Merrell, D.S. This is not your mother’s repressor: The complex role of fur in pathogenesis. Infect. Immun. 2009, 77, 2590–2601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Oglesby-Sherrouse, A.G.; Murphy, E.R. Iron-responsive bacterial small RNAs: Variations on a theme. Metallomics 2013, 5, 276–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Kim, J.N.; Kwon, Y.M. Genetic and phenotypic characterization of the RyhB regulon in Salmonella Typhimurium. Microbiol. Res. 2013, 168, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Massé, E.; Gottesman, S. A small RNA regulates the expression of genes involved in iron metabolism in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 4620–4625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Figueroa-Bossi, N.; Bossi, L. Sponges and predators in the small RNA world. Regulating with RNA in Bacteria and Archaea. microbiolspec 2018, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Scarrow, R.C.; Ecker, D.J.; Ng, C.; Liu, S.; Raymond, K.N. Iron (III) coordination chemistry of linear dihydroxyserine compounds derived from enterobactin. Inorg. Chem. 1991, 30, 900–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hantke, K. Dihydroxybenzolyserine—a siderophore for E. coli. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1990, 67, 5–8. [Google Scholar]
  35. Raymond, K.N.; Dertz, E.A.; Kim, S.S. Enterobactin: An archetype for microbial iron transport. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 3584–3588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Langridge, G.C.; Fookes, M.; Connor, T.R.; Feltwell, T.; Feasey, N.; Parsons, B.N.; Seth-Smith, H.M.; Barquist, L.; Stedman, A.; Humphrey, T. Patterns of genome evolution that have accompanied host adaptation in Salmonella. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 863–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Rabsch, W.; Methner, U.; Voigt, W.; Tschäpe, H.; Reissbrodt, R.; Williams, P.H. Role of receptor proteins for enterobactin and 2, 3-dihydroxybenzoylserine in virulence of Salmonella enterica. Infect. Immun. 2003, 71, 6953–6961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Hantke, K.; Nicholson, G.; Rabsch, W.; Winkelmann, G. Salmochelins, siderophores of Salmonella enterica and uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains, are recognized by the outer membrane receptor IroN. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 3677–3682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Lin, H.; Fischbach, M.A.; Liu, D.R.; Walsh, C.T. In vitro characterization of salmochelin and enterobactin trilactone hydrolases IroD, IroE, and Fes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 11075–11084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Bister, B.; Bischoff, D.; Nicholson, G.J.; Valdebenito, M.; Schneider, K.; Winkelmann, G.; Hantke, K.; Süssmuth, R.D. The structure of salmochelins: C-glucosylated enterobactins of Salmonella enterica §. Biometals 2004, 17, 471–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Oves-Costales, D.; Kadi, N.; Challis, G.L. The long-overlooked enzymology of a nonribosomal peptide synthetase-independent pathway for virulence-conferring siderophore biosynthesis. Chem. Commun. 2009, 43, 6530–6541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. De Lorenzo, V.; Martinez, J. Aerobactin production as a virulence factor: A reevaluation. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 1988, 7, 621–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Köster, W. ABC transporter-mediated uptake of iron, siderophores, heme and vitamin B12. Res. Microbiol. 2001, 152, 291–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Oelschlaeger, T.; Zhang, D.; Schubert, S.; Carniel, E.; Rabsch, W.; Karch, H.; Hacker, J. The high-pathogenicity island is absent in human pathogens of Salmonella enterica subspecies I but present in isolates of subspecies III and VI. J. Bacteriol. 2003, 185, 1107–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Lau, C.K.; Krewulak, K.D.; Vogel, H.J. Bacterial ferrous iron transport: The Feo system. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2016, 40, 273–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sestok, A.E.; Linkous, R.O.; Smith, A.T. Toward a mechanistic understanding of Feo-mediated ferrous iron uptake. Metallomics 2018, 10, 887–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kehres, D.G.; Janakiraman, A.; Slauch, J.M.; Maguire, M.E. SitABCD is the alkaline Mn2+ transporter of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 2002, 184, 3159–3166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Cartron, M.L.; Maddocks, S.; Gillingham, P.; Craven, C.J.; Andrews, S.C. Feo–transport of ferrous iron into bacteria. Biometals 2006, 19, 143–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dhillon, A.; Alisantosa, B.; Shivaprasad, H.; Jack, O.; Schaberg, D.; Bandli, D. Pathogenicity of Salmonella enteritidis phage types 4, 8, and 23 in broiler chicks. Avian Dis. 1999, 43, 506–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Roy, P.; Dhillon, A.; Shivaprasad, H.; Schaberg, D.; Bandli, D.; Johnson, S. Pathogenicity of different serogroups of avian salmonellae in specific-pathogen-free chickens. Avian Dis. 2001, 45, 922–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hazards, E.P.o.B.; Koutsoumanis, K.; Allende, A.; Alvarez-Ordóñez, A.; Bolton, D.; Bover-Cid, S.; Chemaly, M.; De Cesare, A.; Herman, L.; Hilbert, F. Salmonella control in poultry flocks and its public health impact. EFSA J. 2019, 17, e05596. [Google Scholar]
  52. Shah, D.H.; Paul, N.C.; Sischo, W.C.; Crespo, R.; Guard, J. Population dynamics and antimicrobial resistance of the most prevalent poultry-associated Salmonella serotypes. Poult. Sci. 2017, 96, 687–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Suez, J.; Porwollik, S.; Dagan, A.; Marzel, A.; Schorr, Y.I.; Desai, P.T.; Agmon, V.; McClelland, M.; Rahav, G.; Gal-Mor, O. Virulence gene profiling and pathogenicity characterization of non-typhoidal Salmonella accounted for invasive disease in humans. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e58449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Waters, V.L.; Crosa, J.H. Colicin V virulence plasmids. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1991, 55, 437–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Johnson, T.J.; Thorsness, J.L.; Anderson, C.P.; Lynne, A.M.; Foley, S.L.; Han, J.; Fricke, W.F.; McDermott, P.F.; White, D.G.; Khatri, M. Horizontal gene transfer of a ColV plasmid has resulted in a dominant avian clonal type of Salmonella enterica serovar Kentucky. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e15524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Cheng, Y.; Pedroso, A.A.; Porwollik, S.; McClelland, M.; Lee, M.D.; Kwan, T.; Zamperini, K.; Soni, V.; Sellers, H.S.; Russell, S.M. rpoS-Regulated core genes involved in the competitive fitness of Salmonella enterica serovar Kentucky in the intestines of chickens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 502–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Hoffmann, M.; Zhao, S.; Pettengill, J.; Luo, Y.; Monday, S.R.; Abbott, J.; Ayers, S.L.; Cinar, H.N.; Muruvanda, T.; Li, C. Comparative genomic analysis and virulence differences in closely related Salmonella enterica serotype Heidelberg isolates from humans, retail meats, and animals. Genome Biol. Evol. 2014, 6, 1046–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Dhanani, A.S.; Block, G.; Dewar, K.; Forgetta, V.; Topp, E.; Beiko, R.G.; Diarra, M.S. Genomic comparison of non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica serovars Typhimurium, Enteritidis, Heidelberg, Hadar and Kentucky isolates from broiler chickens. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0128773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Branchu, P.; Bawn, M.; Kingsley, R.A. Genome variation and molecular epidemiology of Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium pathovariants. Infect. Immun. 2018, 86, e00079-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Mulvey, M.R.; Boyd, D.A.; Olson, A.B.; Doublet, B.; Cloeckaert, A. The genetics of Salmonella genomic island 1. Microbes Infect. 2006, 8, 1915–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Guiney, D.G.; Fierer, J. The role of the spv genes in Salmonella pathogenesis. Front. Microbiol. 2011, 2, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Khajanchi, B.K.; Hasan, N.A.; Choi, S.Y.; Han, J.; Zhao, S.; Colwell, R.R.; Cerniglia, C.E.; Foley, S.L. Comparative genomic analysis and characterization of incompatibility group FIB plasmid encoded virulence factors of Salmonella enterica isolated from food sources. BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Petrovska, L.; Mather, A.E.; AbuOun, M.; Branchu, P.; Harris, S.R.; Connor, T.; Hopkins, K.L.; Underwood, A.; Lettini, A.A.; Page, A. Microevolution of monophasic Salmonella typhimurium during epidemic, United Kingdom, 2005–2010. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2016, 22, 617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Huehn, S.; Bunge, C.; Junker, E.; Helmuth, R.; Malorny, B. Poultry-associated Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar 4, 12: d:− reveals high clonality and a distinct pathogenicity gene repertoire. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 1011–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Thomson, N.R.; Clayton, D.J.; Windhorst, D.; Vernikos, G.; Davidson, S.; Churcher, C.; Quail, M.A.; Stevens, M.; Jones, M.A.; Watson, M. Comparative genome analysis of Salmonella Enteritidis PT4 and Salmonella Gallinarum 287/91 provides insights into evolutionary and host adaptation pathways. Genome Res. 2008, 18, 1624–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Wuyts, V.; Denayer, S.; Roosens, N.H.; Mattheus, W.; Bertrand, S.; Marchal, K.; Dierick, K.; De Keersmaecker, S.C. Whole genome sequence analysis of Salmonella Enteritidis PT4 outbreaks from a national reference laboratory’s viewpoint. PLoS Curr. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Silva, C.A.; Blondel, C.J.; Quezada, C.P.; Porwollik, S.; Andrews-Polymenis, H.L.; Toro, C.S.; Zaldívar, M.; Contreras, I.; McClelland, M.; Santiviago, C.A. Infection of mice by Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis involves additional genes that are absent in the genome of serovar Typhimurium. Infect. Immun. 2012, 80, 839–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Clayton, D.J.; Bowen, A.J.; Hulme, S.D.; Buckley, A.M.; Deacon, V.L.; Thomson, N.R.; Barrow, P.A.; Morgan, E.; Jones, M.A.; Watson, M. Analysis of the role of 13 major fimbrial subunits in colonisation of the chicken intestines by Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis reveals a role for a novel locus. BMC Microbiol. 2008, 8, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Bachmann, N.L.; Petty, N.K.; Zakour, N.L.B.; Szubert, J.M.; Savill, J.; Beatson, S.A. Genome analysis and CRISPR typing of Salmonella enterica serovar Virchow. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Nguyen, S.V.; Harhay, D.M.; Bono, J.L.; Smith, T.P.; Fields, P.I.; Dinsmore, B.A.; Santovenia, M.; Wang, R.; Bosilevac, J.M.; Harhay, G.P. Comparative genomics of Salmonella enterica serovar Montevideo reveals lineage-specific gene differences that may influence ecological niche association. Microb. Genom. 2018, 4, e000202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Franco, A.; Leekitcharoenphon, P.; Feltrin, F.; Alba, P.; Cordaro, G.; Iurescia, M.; Tolli, R.; D’Incau, M.; Staffolani, M.; Di Giannatale, E. Emergence of a clonal lineage of multidrug-resistant ESBL-producing Salmonella Infantis transmitted from broilers and broiler meat to humans in Italy between 2011 and 2014. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0144802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Bogomazova, A.N.; Gordeeva, V.D.; Krylova, E.V.; Soltynskaya, I.V.; Davydova, E.E.; Ivanova, O.E.; Komarov, A.A. Mega-plasmid found worldwide confers multiple antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella Infantis of broiler origin in Russia. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019, 319, 108497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Aviv, G.; Elpers, L.; Mikhlin, S.; Cohen, H.; Vitman Zilber, S.; Grassl, G.A.; Rahav, G.; Hensel, M.; Gal-Mor, O. The plasmid-encoded Ipf and Klf fimbriae display different expression and varying roles in the virulence of Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis in mouse vs. avian hosts. PLoS Pathog. 2017, 13, e1006559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Alba, P.; Leekitcharoenphon, P.; Carfora, V.; Amoruso, R.; Cordaro, G.; Di Matteo, P.; Ianzano, A.; Iurescia, M.; Diaconu, E.L.; Study Group, E.-E.-A.N. Molecular epidemiology of Salmonella Infantis in Europe: Insights into the success of the bacterial host and its parasitic pESI-like megaplasmid. Microb. Genom. 2020, 6, e000365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Foley, S.; Lynne, A.; Nayak, R. Salmonella challenges: Prevalence in swine and poultry and potential pathogenicity of such isolates. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 86, E149–E162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Salisbury, A.-M.; Leeming, G.; Nikolaou, G.; Kipar, A.; Wigley, P. Salmonella Virchow infection of the chicken elicits cellular and humoral systemic and mucosal responses, but limited protection to homologous or heterologous re-challenge. Front. Vet. Sci. 2014, 1, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Stanaway, J.D.; Parisi, A.; Sarkar, K.; Blacker, B.F.; Reiner, R.C.; Hay, S.I.; Nixon, M.R.; Dolecek, C.; James, S.L.; Mokdad, A.H. The global burden of non-typhoidal salmonella invasive disease: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 1312–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Jones, T.F.; Ingram, L.A.; Cieslak, P.R.; Vugia, D.J.; Tobin-D’Angelo, M.; Hurd, S.; Medus, C.; Cronquist, A.; Angulo, F.J. Salmonellosis outcomes differ substantially by serotype. J. Infect. Dis. 2008, 198, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Rabsch, W.; Tschäpe, H.; Bäumler, A.J. Non-typhoidal salmonellosis: Emerging problems. Microbes Infect. 2001, 3, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Foley, S.L.; Nayak, R.; Hanning, I.B.; Johnson, T.J.; Han, J.; Ricke, S.C. Population dynamics of Salmonella enterica serotypes in commercial egg and poultry production. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 4273–4279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. den Bakker, H.C.; Switt, A.I.M.; Govoni, G.; Cummings, C.A.; Ranieri, M.L.; Degoricija, L.; Hoelzer, K.; Rodriguez-Rivera, L.D.; Brown, S.; Bolchacova, E. Genome sequencing reveals diversification of virulence factor content and possible host adaptation in distinct subpopulations of Salmonella enterica. BMC Genom. 2011, 12, 425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Lo-Ten-Foe, J.; Van Oers, J.; Kotsopoulos, A.; Buiting, A. Pulmonary colonization with Salmonella enterica serovar Kentucky in an intensive care unit. J. Hosp. Infect. 2007, 67, 105–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Neelambike, S.; Shivappa, S.G. A Fatal Case of Acute Gastroenteritis with Sepsis due to Salmonella enterica Serovar Kentucky in an Immunocompetent Patient: A Case Report. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2019, 13, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Collard, J.-M.; Place, S.; Denis, O.; Rodriguez-Villalobos, H.; Vrints, M.; Weill, F.-X.; Baucheron, S.; Cloeckaert, A.; Struelens, M.; Bertrand, S. Travel-acquired salmonellosis due to Salmonella Kentucky resistant to ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone and co-trimoxazole and associated with treatment failure. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2007, 60, 190–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Carramiñana, J.J.; Yangüela, J.; Blanco, D.; Rota, C.; Agustín, A.I.; Herrera, A. Potential virulence determinants of Salmonella serovars from poultry and human sources in Spain. Vet. Microbiol. 1997, 54, 375–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Visca, P.; Filetici, E.; Anastasio, M.; Vetriani, C.; Fantasia, M.; Orsi, N. Siderophore production by Salmonella species isolated from different sources. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1991, 79, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Rabsch, W.; Reissbrodt, R. Investigations of Salmonella strains from different clinical-epidemiological origin with phenolate and hydroxamate (aerobactin)--siderophore bioassays. J. Hyg. Epidemiol. Microbiol. Immunol. 1988, 32, 353–360. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  88. Baker, E.N.; Anderson, B.F.; Baker, H.M.; Day, C.L.; Haridas, M.; Norris, G.E.; Rumball, S.V.; Smith, C.A.; Thomas, D.H. Three-dimensional structure of lactoferrin in various functional states. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1994, 357, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kell, D.B.; Heyden, E.L.; Pretorius, E. The Biology of Lactoferrin, an Iron-Binding Protein That Can Help Defend Against Viruses and Bacteria. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Dho-Moulin, M.; Fairbrother, J.M. Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC). Vet. Res. BioMed Central 1999, 30, 299–316. [Google Scholar]
  91. Dozois, C.M.; Daigle, F.; Curtiss, R. Identification of pathogen-specific and conserved genes expressed in vivo by an avian pathogenic Escherichia coli strain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 247–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Ling, J.; Pan, H.; Gao, Q.; Xiong, L.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, D.; Gao, S.; Liu, X. Aerobactin synthesis genes iucA and iucC contribute to the pathogenicity of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli O2 strain E058. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e57794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Russo, T.A.; Olson, R.; MacDonald, U.; Beanan, J.; Davidson, B.A. Aerobactin, but not yersiniabactin, salmochelin, or enterobactin, enables the growth/survival of hypervirulent (hypermucoviscous) Klebsiella pneumoniae ex vivo and in vivo. Infect. Immun. 2015, 83, 3325–3333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Nolan, L.K.; Horne, S.; Giddings, C.; Foley, S.; Johnson, T.; Lynne, A.; Skyberg, J. Resistance to serum complement, iss, and virulence of avian Escherichia coli. Vet. Res. Commun. 2003, 27, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Aviv, G.; Tsyba, K.; Steck, N.; Salmon-Divon, M.; Cornelius, A.; Rahav, G.; Grassl, G.A.; Gal-Mor, O. A unique megaplasmid contributes to stress tolerance and pathogenicity of an emergent S almonella enterica serovar Infantis strain. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 16, 977–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Chaturvedi, K.S.; Hung, C.S.; Giblin, D.E.; Urushidani, S.; Austin, A.M.; Dinauer, M.C.; Henderson, J.P. Cupric yersiniabactin is a virulence-associated superoxide dismutase mimic. ACS Chem. Biol. 2014, 9, 551–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Chaturvedi, K.S.; Hung, C.S.; Crowley, J.R.; Stapleton, A.E.; Henderson, J.P. The siderophore yersiniabactin binds copper to protect pathogens during infection. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2012, 8, 731–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Osman, D.; Waldron, K.J.; Denton, H.; Taylor, C.M.; Grant, A.J.; Mastroeni, P.; Robinson, N.J.; Cavet, J.S. Copper homeostasis in Salmonella is atypical and copper-CueP is a major periplasmic metal complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 25259–25268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Guerrero, M.L.F.; Aguado, J.M.; Arribas, A.; Lumbreras, C.; de Gorgolas, M. The spectrum of cardiovascular infections due to Salmonella enterica: A review of clinical features and factors determining outcome. Medicine 2004, 83, 123–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Shimoni, Z.; Pitlik, S.; Leibovici, L.; Samra, Z.; Konigsberger, H.; Drucker, M.; Agmon, V.; Ashkenazi, S.; Weinberger, M. Nontyphoid Salmonella bacteremia: Age-related differences in clinical presentation, bacteriology, and outcome. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1999, 28, 822–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Acheson, D.; Hohmann, E.L. Nontyphoidal salmonellosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2001, 32, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Hall, R.L.; Partridge, R.; Venkatraman, N.; Wiselka, M. Invasive non-typhoidal Salmonella infection with multifocal seeding in an immunocompetent host: An emerging disease in the developed world. Case Rep. 2013, 2013, bcr2012008230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Brnčić, N.; Gorup, L.; Strčić, M.; Abram, M.; Mustač, E. Breast abscess in a man due to Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012, 50, 192–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Hibbert, B.; Costiniuk, C.; Hibbert, R.; Joseph, P.; Alanazi, H.; Simard, T.; Dennie, C.; Angel, J.B.; O’Brien, E.R. Cardiovascular complications of Salmonella enteritidis infection. Can. J. Cardiol. 2010, 26, e323–e325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Schloesser, R.L.; Schaefer, V.; Groll, A.H. Fatal transplacental infection with non-typhoidal Salmonella. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 2004, 36, 773–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Ispahani, P.; Slack, R. Enteric fever and other extraintestinal salmonellosis in University Hospital, Nottingham, UK, between 1980 and 1997. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2000, 19, 679–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Huang, J.-L.; Hung, J.-J.; Wu, K.-C.; Lee, W.-I.; Chan, C.-K.; Ou, L.-S. Septic arthritis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: Salmonella and nonsalmonella infections compared. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2006, 36, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Hakim, S.; Davila, F.; Amin, M.; Hader, I.; Cappell, M.S. Infectious aortitis: A life-threatening endovascular complication of nontyphoidal salmonella bacteremia. Case Rep. Med. 2018, 2018, 6845617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Laohapensang, K.; Rutherford, R.B.; Arworn, S. Infected aneurysm. Ann. Vasc. Dis. 2010, 3, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Wu, H.-M.; Huang, W.-Y.; Lee, M.-L.; Yang, A.D.; Chaou, K.-P.; Hsieh, L.-Y. Clinical features, acute complications, and outcome of Salmonella meningitis in children under one year of age in Taiwan. BMC Infect. Dis. 2011, 11, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Kaiser, P. Advances in avian immunology—prospects for disease control: A review. Avian Pathol. 2010, 39, 309–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Davison, F. The importance of the avian immune system and its unique features. Avian Immunol. 2014, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Agoro, R.; Mura, C. Iron Supplementation Therapy, A Friend and Foe of Mycobacterial Infections? Pharmaceuticals 2019, 12, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Penniall, R.; Spitznagel, J.K. Chicken neutrophils: Oxidative metabolism in phagocytic cells devoid of myeloperoxidase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1975, 72, 5012–5015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Clench, M.H.; Mathias, J.R. The avian cecum: A review. Wilson Bull. 1995, 107, 93–121. [Google Scholar]
  116. Foley, S.L.; Johnson, T.J.; Ricke, S.C.; Nayak, R.; Danzeisen, J. Salmonella pathogenicity and host adaptation in chicken-associated serovars. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2013, 77, 582–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Gantois, I.; Eeckhaut, V.; Pasmans, F.; Haesebrouck, F.; Ducatelle, R.; Van Immerseel, F. A comparative study on the pathogenesis of egg contamination by different serotypes of Salmonella. Avian Pathol. 2008, 37, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Desmidt, M.; Ducatelle, R.; Haesebrouck, F. Pathogenesis of Salmonella enteritidis phage type four after experimental infection of young chickens. Vet. Microbiol. 1997, 56, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Johnston, C.E.; Hartley, C.; Salisbury, A.-M.; Wigley, P. Immunological changes at point-of-lay increase susceptibility to Salmonella enterica Serovar enteritidis infection in vaccinated chickens. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e48195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Oladeinde, A.; Cook, K.; Orlek, A.; Zock, G.; Herrington, K.; Cox, N.; Plumblee Lawrence, J.; Hall, C. Hotspot mutations and ColE1 plasmids contribute to the fitness of Salmonella Heidelberg in poultry litter. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0202286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Wigley, P.; Hulme, S.; Rothwell, L.; Bumstead, N.; Kaiser, P.; Barrow, P. Macrophages isolated from chickens genetically resistant or susceptible to systemic salmonellosis show magnitudinal and temporal differential expression of cytokines and chemokines following Salmonella enterica challenge. Infect. Immun. 2006, 74, 1425–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Andino, A.; Hanning, I. Salmonella enterica: Survival, colonization, and virulence differences among serovars. Sci. World J. 2015, 2015, 520179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Harvey, P.; Watson, M.; Hulme, S.; Jones, M.; Lovell, M.; Berchieri, A.; Young, J.; Bumstead, N.; Barrow, P. Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium colonizing the lumen of the chicken intestine grows slowly and upregulates a unique set of virulence and metabolism genes. Infect. Immun. 2011, 79, 4105–4121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Sabri, M.; Caza, M.; Proulx, J.; Lymberopoulos, M.H.; Brée, A.; Moulin-Schouleur, M.; Curtiss, R.; Dozois, C.M. Contribution of the SitABCD, MntH, and FeoB metal transporters to the virulence of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli O78 strain χ7122. Infect. Immun. 2008, 76, 601–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. Boyer, E.; Bergevin, I.; Malo, D.; Gros, P.; Cellier, M. Acquisition of Mn (II) in addition to Fe (II) is required for full virulence of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Infect. Immun. 2002, 70, 6032–6042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Portillo, F.G.d.; Foster, J.W.; Maguire, M.E.; Finlay, B.B. Characterization of the micro-environment of Salmonella typhimurium–containing vacuoles within MDCK epithelial cells. Mol. Microbiol. 1992, 6, 3289–3297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Tsolis, R.M.; Bäumler, A.J.; Heffron, F.; Stojiljkovic, I. Contribution of TonB-and Feo-mediated iron uptake to growth of Salmonella typhimurium in the mouse. Infect. Immun. 1996, 64, 4549–4556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  128. Costa, L.F.; Mol, J.P.; Silva, A.P.C.; Macêdo, A.A.; Silva, T.M.; Alves, G.E.; Winter, S.; Winter, M.G.; Velazquez, E.M.; Byndloss, M.X. Iron acquisition pathways and colonization of the inflamed intestine by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Int. J. Med Microbiol. 2016, 306, 604–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Liu, W.; Kaiser, M.; Lamont, S. Natural resistance-associated macrophage protein 1 gene polymorphisms and response to vaccine against or challenge with Salmonella enteritidis in young chicks. Poult. Sci. 2003, 82, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Forbes, J.R.; Gros, P. Divalent-metal transport by NRAMP proteins at the interface of host–pathogen interactions. Trends Microbiol. 2001, 9, 397–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Hu, J.; Bumstead, N.; Barrow, P.; Sebastiani, G.; Olien, L.; Morgan, K.; Malo, D. Resistance to salmonellosis in the chicken is linked to NRAMP1 and TNC. Genome Res. 1997, 7, 693–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  132. Nagy, T.A.; Moreland, S.M.; Detweiler, C.S. S almonella acquires ferrous iron from haemophagocytic macrophages. Mol. Microbiol. 2014, 93, 1314–1326. [Google Scholar]
  133. Pilonieta, M.C.; Moreland, S.M.; English, C.N.; Detweiler, C.S. Salmonella enterica infection stimulates macrophages to hemophagocytose. mBio 2014, 5, e02211-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Nix, R.N.; Altschuler, S.E.; Henson, P.M.; Detweiler, C.S. Hemophagocytic macrophages harbor Salmonella enterica during persistent infection. PLoS Pathog 2007, 3, e193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Sánchez-Moreno, P.; Olbrich, P.; Falcón-Neyra, L.; Lucena, J.M.; Aznar, J.; Neth, O. Typhoid fever causing haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in a non-endemic country–first case report and review of the current literature. Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clin. 2019, 37, 112–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Williams, P.; Rabsch, W.; Methner, U.; Voigt, W.; Tschäpe, H.; Reissbrodt, R. Catecholate receptor proteins in Salmonella enterica: Role in virulence and implications for vaccine development. Vaccine 2006, 24, 3840–3844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Wellman-Labadie, O.; Picman, J.; Hincke, M. Comparative antibacterial activity of avian egg white protein extracts. Br. Poult. Sci. 2008, 49, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Baron, F.; Gautier, M.; Brule, G. Factors involved in the inhibition of growth of Salmonella enteritidis in liquid egg white. J. Food Prot. 1997, 60, 1318–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Kang, H.; Loui, C.; Clavijo, R.; Riley, L.; Lu, S. Survival characteristics of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis in chicken egg albumen. Epidemiol. Infect. 2006, 134, 967–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Réhault-Godbert, S.; Guyot, N.; Nys, Y. The golden egg: Nutritional value, bioactivities, and emerging benefits for human health. Nutrients 2019, 11, 684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Qin, X.; He, S.; Zhou, X.; Cheng, X.; Huang, X.; Wang, Y.; Wang, S.; Cui, Y.; Shi, C.; Shi, X. Quantitative proteomics reveals the crucial role of YbgC for Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis survival in egg white. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019, 289, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Julien, L.A.; Baron, F.; Bonnassie, S.; Nau, F.; Guérin, C.; Jan, S.; Andrews, S.C. The anti-bacterial iron-restriction defence mechanisms of egg white; the potential role of three lipocalin-like proteins in resistance against Salmonella. BioMetals 2019, 32, 453–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  143. Sattar Khan, M.; Nakamura, S.; Ogawa, M.; Akita, E.; Azakami, H.; Kato, A. Bactericidal action of egg yolk phosvitin against Escherichia coli under thermal stress. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 1503–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Van Immerseel, F. Stress-induced survival strategies enable Salmonella Enteritidis to persistently colonize the chicken oviduct tissue and cope with antimicrobial factors in egg white: A hypothesis to explain a pandemic. Gut Pathog. 2010, 2, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  145. Raspoet, R.; Appia-Ayme, C.; Shearer, N.; Martel, A.; Pasmans, F.; Haesebrouck, F.; Ducatelle, R.; Thompson, A.; Van Immerseel, F. Microarray-based detection of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis genes involved in chicken reproductive tract colonization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 7710–7716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Gantois, I.; Ducatelle, R.; Pasmans, F.; Haesebrouck, F.; Van Immerseel, F. Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis genes induced during oviduct colonization and egg contamination in laying hens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 6616–6622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Luo, M.; Lin, H.; Fischbach, M.A.; Liu, D.R.; Walsh, C.T.; Groves, J.T. Enzymatic tailoring of enterobactin alters membrane partitioning and iron acquisition. ACS Chem. Biol. 2006, 1, 29–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Moore, D.G.; Yancey, R.; Lankford, C.; Earhart, C. Bacteriostatic enterochelin-specific immunoglobulin from normal human serum. Infect. Immun. 1980, 27, 418–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Benjamin, W.; Turnbough, C.; Posey, B.; Briles, D. The ability of Salmonella typhimurium to produce the siderophore enterobactin is not a virulence factor in mouse typhoid. Infect. Immun. 1985, 50, 392–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Yancey, R.J.; Breeding, S.; Lankford, C. Enterochelin (enterobactin): Virulence factor for Salmonella typhimurium. Infect. Immun. 1979, 24, 174–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Nagy, T.A.; Moreland, S.M.; Andrews-Polymenis, H.; Detweiler, C.S. The ferric enterobactin transporter Fep is required for persistent Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium infection. Infect. Immun. 2013, 81, 4063–4070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  152. Crouch, M.L.V.; Castor, M.; Karlinsey, J.E.; Kalhorn, T.; Fang, F.C. Biosynthesis and IroC-dependent export of the siderophore salmochelin are essential for virulence of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Mol. Microbiol. 2008, 67, 971–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Oshota, O.; Conway, M.; Fookes, M.; Schreiber, F.; Chaudhuri, R.R.; Yu, L.; Morgan, F.J.; Clare, S.; Choudhary, J.; Thomson, N.R. Transcriptome and proteome analysis of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium systemic infection of wild type and immune-deficient mice. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0181365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  154. Raffatellu, M.; George, M.D.; Akiyama, Y.; Hornsby, M.J.; Nuccio, S.-P.; Paixao, T.A.; Butler, B.P.; Chu, H.; Santos, R.L.; Berger, T. Lipocalin-2 resistance confers an advantage to Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium for growth and survival in the inflamed intestine. Cell Host Microbe 2009, 5, 476–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  155. Anderson, G.J.; Frazer, D.M. Current understanding of iron homeostasis. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2017, 106, 1559S–1566S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  156. Konopka, K.; Bindereif, A.; Neilands, J. Aerobactin-mediated utilization of transferrin iron. Biochemistry 1982, 21, 6503–6508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Montgomerie, J.; Bindereif, A.; Neilands, J.; Kalmanson, G.; Guze, L. Association of hydroxamate siderophore (aerobactin) with Escherichia coli isolated from patients with bacteremia. Infect. Immun. 1984, 46, 835–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Correnti, C.; Clifton, M.C.; Abergel, R.J.; Allred, B.; Hoette, T.M.; Ruiz, M.; Cancedda, R.; Raymond, K.N.; Descalzi, F.; Strong, R.K. Galline Ex-FABP is an antibacterial siderocalin and a lysophosphatidic acid sensor functioning through dual ligand specificities. Structure 2011, 19, 1796–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Matulova, M.; Varmuzova, K.; Sisak, F.; Havlickova, H.; Babak, V.; Stejskal, K.; Zdrahal, Z.; Rychlik, I. Chicken innate immune response to oral infection with Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis. Vet. Res. 2013, 44, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. Rychlik, I.; Elsheimer-Matulova, M.; Kyrova, K. Gene expression in the chicken caecum in response to infections with non-typhoid Salmonella. Vet. Res. 2014, 45, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  161. Withanage, G.; Wigley, P.; Kaiser, P.; Mastroeni, P.; Brooks, H.; Powers, C.; Beal, R.; Barrow, P.; Maskell, D.; McConnell, I. Cytokine and chemokine responses associated with clearance of a primary Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium infection in the chicken and in protective immunity to rechallenge. Infect. Immun. 2005, 73, 5173–5182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  162. Setta, A.; Barrow, P.; Kaiser, P.; Jones, M. Early immune dynamics following infection with Salmonella enterica serovars Enteritidis, Infantis, Pullorum and Gallinarum: Cytokine and chemokine gene expression profile and cellular changes of chicken cecal tonsils. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2012, 35, 397–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Weinberg, E.D. Nutritional immunity: Host’s attempt to withhold iron from microbial invaders. JAMA 1975, 231, 39–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Julien, L.A.; Fau, C.; Baron, F.; Bonnassie, S.; Guérin-Dubiard, C.; Nau, F.; Gautier, M.; Karatzas, K.A.; Jan, S.; Andrews, S.C. The three lipocalins of egg-white: Only Ex-FABP inhibits siderophore-dependent iron sequestration by Salmonella Enteritidis. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Giansanti, F.; Leboffe, L.; Pitari, G.; Ippoliti, R.; Antonini, G. Physiological roles of ovotransferrin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 2012, 1820, 218–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Hegenauer, J.; Saltman, P.; Nace, G. Iron (III)-phosphoprotein chelates: Stoichiometric equilibrium constant for interaction of iron (III) and phosphorylserine residues of phosvitin and casein. Biochemistry 1979, 18, 3865–3879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Denic, S.; Agarwal, M.M. Nutritional iron deficiency: An evolutionary perspective. Nutrition 2007, 23, 603–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Muckenthaler, M.U.; Rivella, S.; Hentze, M.W.; Galy, B. A red carpet for iron metabolism. Cell 2017, 168, 344–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  169. Drakesmith, H.; Prentice, A.M. Hepcidin and the iron-infection axis. Science 2012, 338, 768–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  170. Hilton, K.B.; Lambert, L.A. Molecular evolution and characterization of hepcidin gene products in vertebrates. Gene 2008, 415, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Wessling-Resnick, M. Iron homeostasis and the inflammatory response. Ann. Rev. Nutr. 2010, 30, 105–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  172. Ganz, T. Hepcidin—a regulator of intestinal iron absorption and iron recycling by macrophages. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Haematol. 2005, 18, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Moreira, A.C.; Neves, J.V.; Silva, T.; Oliveira, P.; Gomes, M.S.; Rodrigues, P.N. Hepcidin-(in) dependent mechanisms of iron metabolism regulation during infection by Listeria and Salmonella. Infect. Immun. 2017, 85, e00353-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  174. Kim, D.-K.; Jeong, J.-H.; Lee, J.-M.; Kim, K.S.; Park, S.-H.; Kim, Y.D.; Koh, M.; Shin, M.; Jung, Y.S.; Kim, H.-S. Inverse agonist of estrogen-related receptor γ controls Salmonella typhimurium infection by modulating host iron homeostasis. Nat. Med. 2014, 20, 419–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Willemetz, A.; Beatty, S.; Richer, E.; Rubio, A.; Auriac, A.; Milkereit, R.J.; Thibaudeau, O.; Vaulont, S.; Malo, D.; Canonne-Hergaux, F. Iron-and hepcidin-independent downregulation of the iron exporter ferroportin in macrophages during Salmonella infection. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Hill, R.; Smith, I.; Mohammadi, H.; Licence, S. Altered absorption and regulation of iron in chicks with acute Salmonella gallinarum infection. Res. Vet. Sci. 1977, 22, 371–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Ganz, T. Anemia of inflammation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 381, 1148–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Canals, R.; Hammarlöf, D.L.; Kröger, C.; Owen, S.V.; Fong, W.Y.; Lacharme-Lora, L.; Zhu, X.; Wenner, N.; Carden, S.E.; Honeycutt, J. Adding function to the genome of African Salmonella Typhimurium ST313 strain D23580. PLoS Biol. 2019, 17, e3000059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  179. Lokken, K.L.; Stull-Lane, A.R.; Poels, K.; Tsolis, R.M. Malaria parasite-mediated alteration of macrophage function and increased iron availability predispose to disseminated nontyphoidal Salmonella infection. Infect. Immun. 2018, 86, e00301-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  180. Allan, B.; Wheler, C.; Köster, W.; Sarfraz, M.; Potter, A.; Gerdts, V.; Dar, A. In Ovo Administration of Innate Immune Stimulants and Protection from Early Chick Mortalities due to Yolk Sac Infection. Avian Dis. 2018, 62, 316–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Johnstone, T.C.; Nolan, E.M. Beyond iron: Non-classical biological functions of bacterial siderophores. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 6320–6339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  182. Adler, C.; Corbalán, N.S.; Seyedsayamdost, M.R.; Pomares, M.F.; de Cristóbal, R.E.; Clardy, J.; Kolter, R.; Vincent, P.A. Catecholate siderophores protect bacteria from pyochelin toxicity. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e46754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  183. Adler, C.; Corbalan, N.S.; Peralta, D.R.; Pomares, M.F.; de Cristóbal, R.E.; Vincent, P.A. The alternative role of enterobactin as an oxidative stress protector allows Escherichia coli colony development. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e84734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Singh, V.; San Yeoh, B.; Xiao, X.; Kumar, M.; Bachman, M.; Borregaard, N.; Joe, B.; Vijay-Kumar, M. Interplay between enterobactin, myeloperoxidase and lipocalin 2 regulates E. coli survival in the inflamed gut. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  185. Peralta, D.R.; Adler, C.; Corbalán, N.S.; Paz García, E.C.; Pomares, M.F.; Vincent, P.A. Enterobactin as part of the oxidative stress response repertoire. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0157799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  186. Vazquez-Torres, A.; Jones-Carson, J.; Mastroeni, P.; Ischiropoulos, H.; Fang, F.C. Antimicrobial actions of the NADPH phagocyte oxidase and inducible nitric oxide synthase in experimental salmonellosis. I. Effects on microbial killing by activated peritoneal macrophages in vitro. J. Exp. Med. 2000, 192, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  187. Stabler, J.; McCormick, T.; Powell, K.; Kogut, M. Avian heterophils and monocytes: Phagocytic and bactericidal activities against Salmonella enteritidis. Vet. Microbiol. 1994, 38, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Brooks, R.; Bounous, D.; Andreasen, C. Functional comparison of avian heterophils with human and canine neutrophils. Comp. Haematol. Int. 1996, 6, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Wigley, P.; Hulme, S.D.; Bumstead, N.; Barrow, P.A. In vivo and in vitro studies of genetic resistance to systemic salmonellosis in the chicken encoded by the SAL1 locus. Microbes Infect. 2002, 4, 1111–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Holden, V.I.; Breen, P.; Houle, S.; Dozois, C.M.; Bachman, M.A. Klebsiella pneumoniae siderophores induce inflammation, bacterial dissemination, and HIF-1α stabilization during pneumonia. MBio 2016, 7, e01397-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  191. Holden, V.I.; Lenio, S.; Kuick, R.; Ramakrishnan, S.K.; Shah, Y.M.; Bachman, M.A. Bacterial siderophores that evade or overwhelm lipocalin 2 induce hypoxia inducible factor 1α and proinflammatory cytokine secretion in cultured respiratory epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 2014, 82, 3826–3836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  192. Saha, P.; Xiao, X.; Yeoh, B.S.; Chen, Q.; Katkere, B.; Kirimanjeswara, G.S.; Vijay-Kumar, M. The bacterial siderophore enterobactin confers survival advantage to Salmonella in macrophages. Gut Microbes 2019, 10, 412–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Lathrop, S.K.; Binder, K.A.; Starr, T.; Cooper, K.G.; Chong, A.; Carmody, A.B.; Steele-Mortimer, O. Replication of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in human monocyte-derived macrophages. Infect. Immun. 2015, 83, 2661–2671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  194. Benoit, M.; Desnues, B.; Mege, J.-L. Macrophage polarization in bacterial infections. J. Immunol. 2008, 181, 3733–3739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  195. Galván-Peña, S.; O’Neill, L.A. Metabolic reprograming in macrophage polarization. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 420. [Google Scholar]
Microorganisms 08 01203 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation of iron-uptake systems in non-typhoidal Salmonella strains. (A) Fe3+ uptake systems. Enterobactin, salmochelin and aerobactin are secreted (e.g., through EntS and IroC) to sequester Fe3+ and then bind to their cognate receptors in the outer membrane (OM). Coprogen and ferrichrome are other ferric iron chelators present in the environment. Energy is generated through the proton motive force (PMF) in the cytoplasmic membrane (CM) and transduced to the receptor by the Ton complex (TonB-ExbB-ExbD). The energized receptor undergoes a conformational change which opens the pathway to mediate uptake of the iron-loaded siderophores into the periplasm (PP). The iron-liganded siderophores bind to periplasmic binding proteins (FhuD, FepB) which then shuttle them through ABC family permeases into the cytosol. 1,2 represent linearized forms of enterobactin and salmochelin respectively. (B) Fe2+ uptake systems. Ferrous iron in aqueous medium travels though porin channels in the OM according to the concentration gradient. FeoABC is specific for Fe2+ uptake. Both MntH and SitABCD are divalent metal transporters. (C) Forms of siderophores. Cyclic forms of enterobactin and salmochelin are hydrolyzed by the iro gene cluster to produce linearized forms of iron chelators.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of iron-uptake systems in non-typhoidal Salmonella strains. (A) Fe3+ uptake systems. Enterobactin, salmochelin and aerobactin are secreted (e.g., through EntS and IroC) to sequester Fe3+ and then bind to their cognate receptors in the outer membrane (OM). Coprogen and ferrichrome are other ferric iron chelators present in the environment. Energy is generated through the proton motive force (PMF) in the cytoplasmic membrane (CM) and transduced to the receptor by the Ton complex (TonB-ExbB-ExbD). The energized receptor undergoes a conformational change which opens the pathway to mediate uptake of the iron-loaded siderophores into the periplasm (PP). The iron-liganded siderophores bind to periplasmic binding proteins (FhuD, FepB) which then shuttle them through ABC family permeases into the cytosol. 1,2 represent linearized forms of enterobactin and salmochelin respectively. (B) Fe2+ uptake systems. Ferrous iron in aqueous medium travels though porin channels in the OM according to the concentration gradient. FeoABC is specific for Fe2+ uptake. Both MntH and SitABCD are divalent metal transporters. (C) Forms of siderophores. Cyclic forms of enterobactin and salmochelin are hydrolyzed by the iro gene cluster to produce linearized forms of iron chelators.
Microorganisms 08 01203 g001
Microorganisms 08 01203 g002 550
Figure 2. Bacteremia-induced complications by non-typhoidal Salmonella. Generally, 5% of gastroenteritis cases develop into bacteremia-associated complications in immunocompetent people. However the burden of NTS bacteremia is higher in immunocompromised patients and children under 5 years old (can reach up to 34%). Data related to epidemiology has been obtained from a variety of published case reports and outbreak analysis. [99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110].
Figure 2. Bacteremia-induced complications by non-typhoidal Salmonella. Generally, 5% of gastroenteritis cases develop into bacteremia-associated complications in immunocompetent people. However the burden of NTS bacteremia is higher in immunocompromised patients and children under 5 years old (can reach up to 34%). Data related to epidemiology has been obtained from a variety of published case reports and outbreak analysis. [99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110].
Microorganisms 08 01203 g002
Microorganisms 08 01203 g003 550
Figure 3. Interaction of non-typhoidal Salmonella strains with chicken and the environment. The role of iron-uptake systems during key steps of Salmonella life cycle illustrated here needs to be investigated in chicken models in future [50,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122].
Figure 3. Interaction of non-typhoidal Salmonella strains with chicken and the environment. The role of iron-uptake systems during key steps of Salmonella life cycle illustrated here needs to be investigated in chicken models in future [50,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122].
Microorganisms 08 01203 g003
Table
Table 1. Some of the global incidences of human salmonellosis linked to poultry.
Table 1. Some of the global incidences of human salmonellosis linked to poultry.
SerotypeSourceYear(s)Geographical RegionNo of Cases aReferences
EnteritidisChicken (shell eggs) 2010USA1939 bCDC 2020 d
Enteritidis
Virchow		Chicken2010 (from 2007)Brazil>260[11]
Enteritidis
Virchow		Chicken 2010Taiwan>1000[12]
StanleyTurkey (meat)2011–2013EU710[13]
HeidelbergChicken (meat)2011USA190CDC 2020 d
Infantis
Newport
Lille		Chicks, ducklings (live)2012USA195CDC 2020 d
HeidelbergChicken (meat)2013USA634CDC 2020 d
TyphimuriumChicks, ducklings (live)2013USA356CDC 2020 d
EnteritidisChicken (eggs)2014EU>400[14]
Multiple NTS cChicks, ducklings (live)2014USA363CDC 2020 d
Multiple NTSChicks, ducklings (live)2015USA252CDC 2020 d
Multiple NTSChicks, ducklings (live)2016USA895CDC 2020 d
TyphimuriumChicken (egg)2015–2016Australia272[15]
EnteritidisChicken (eggs)2016–presentEU1656ECDC 2020 e
Multiple NTS Chicks, ducklings (live)2017USA1120CDC 2020 d
TyphimuriumChicken (salad)2018USA265CDC 2020 d
ReadingTurkey2018USA358CDC 2020 d
EnteritidisChicken (processed meat)2017–2019Canada584Public Health Service 2020 f
EnteritidisChicks, ducklings (live)2019USA1134CDC 2020 d
a Number of reported incidences. b Estimated due to inadequate reporting. c More than 3 NTS serovars were involved. d According to the online data published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2020 June (https://www.cdc.gov/Salmonella/outbreaks.html). e According to the online data published by the European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention in 2020, June (https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/infectious-diseases-and-public-health/salmonellosis/threats-and-outbreaks). f Public Health Services, Canada website (https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/salmonellosis-salmonella.html). NTS: non-typhoidal Salmonella.
Table
Table 2. Most prevalent chicken-associated NTS serovars with public-health risk.
Table 2. Most prevalent chicken-associated NTS serovars with public-health risk.
Salmonella SerovarGenetic/Phenotypic SignaturesRole Related to Virulence in Chicken or Human References
Kentucky (SKn) (1) Colicin production (pColV)
(2) Salmonella genomic island 1 (SGI1)
(3) RpoS regulated gene cluster: csg (curli), prpBCDE (propionate catabolism)
(4) Lack of Saf and Sef fimbria
(5) Additional iron uptake carried in pColV; siderophores- aerobactin & salmochelin, sit operon (Mn2+, Fe2+ uptake)		(1) Increased colonization in chicken gut
(2) Multidrug resistant (MDR) including 3rd generation cephalosporin, ciprofloxacin resistant *,
(3) Upregulated in chicken cecal explants
(4) Decreased invasiveness in humans compared to other NTS
(5) NDA (no data available)		[54,55,56]
Heidelberg (SHb) (6) Type IV secretion (T4SS)
(7) SopE (T3SS1 effector) duplication in the chromosome
(8) Salmonella atypical fimbria (safABCD)
(9) Additional iron uptake carried in pColV; siderophore-aerobactin 		(6) Dissemination of antibiotics resistance and efficient survival in macrophages
(7) Invasion into epithelial cells and induce inflammation
(8) Only presented in the outbreak strain linked to human salmonellosis.
(9) NDA		[55,57,58]
Typhimurium (STm)(10) Salmonella genomic island 1 (SGI1)
(11) Salmonella genomic island 4 (SGI4)
(12) Plasmid encoded factors; mig-5, rck, spv (Salmonella plasmid virulence), pef ,
(13) Additional iron uptake in pColV; aerobactin, salmochelin
sit operon (Mn2+, Fe2+)		(10) Sequence type DT104 showed Increased egg contamination compared to SEn phage type 4, contains ACSSuT # drug-resistant phenotype
(11) Heavy metal resistant in DT104
(12) colonization in chicken gut, systemic spread
(13) NDA		[59,60,61,62]
Typhimurium mono phasic variant (STmv) (DT193/DT120)(14) Phase 2 flagellin not expressed (fljBA operon)
(15) SGI-4
(16) Lack of Salmonella plasmid virulence locus,
(17) Lack of Gifsy prophages		(14) Predicted to be an adaptation related to the expansion of reservoir host
(15) resistant to heavy metals copper and zinc
(16) less invasive in humans
(17) NDA		[59,63,64]
Enteritidis (SEn)(18) pSLA5 plasmid
(19) Plasmid encoded factors; mig-5, rck, spv (Salmonella plasmid virulence), pef
(20) Peg fimbria		(18) Associated with recent outbreaks in the EU.
(19) Colonization in chicken gut, systemic spread
(20) Generally unique to Enteritidis. Facilitates cecal colonization in chickens 		[65,66,67,68]
Virchow (SVr)(21) Salmonella Typhi colonization factor: TcfA
(22) Novel SopE effector 		(21) TcfA fimbriae provides tissue tropism in invasion into human cells. Role in chickens unknown
(22) Associated with invasive nature of SVQ1 strain linked to outbreaks in Australia 		[53,69]
Montevideo (SMv) (23) Typhoid-associated virulence factors; TcfA fimbria, cytolethal toxin B etc. (23) Predicted to increase tissue tropism and invasions in humans. Role in chickens unknown[53,70]
Infantis (SIn)(24) Plasmid-encoded factors;(pESI like);
  • MDR; Extended spectrum beta lactamases (blaCTX-M-65)
  • Additional ferric uptake system; yersiniabactin (irp),
  • Fimbria: E coli K88, Infantis plasmid fimbriae (ipf)
(24) Associated in human outbreaks. Also, plasmid-encoded fimbria were contributed a colonization in the gastrointestinal tract of chicks [71,72,73,74]
* Global pandemic strain of SKn with ciprofloxacin resistant, ST198-X1-SGI1 originated from chickens. # ACSSuT = ampicillin, chloramphenicol, streptomycin, sulfamethoxazole and tetracycline.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wellawa, D.H.; Allan, B.; White, A.P.; Köster, W. Iron-Uptake Systems of Chicken-Associated Salmonella Serovars and Their Role in Colonizing the Avian Host. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1203. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8081203

AMA Style

Wellawa DH, Allan B, White AP, Köster W. Iron-Uptake Systems of Chicken-Associated Salmonella Serovars and Their Role in Colonizing the Avian Host. Microorganisms. 2020; 8(8):1203. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8081203

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wellawa, Dinesh H., Brenda Allan, Aaron P. White, and Wolfgang Köster. 2020. "Iron-Uptake Systems of Chicken-Associated Salmonella Serovars and Their Role in Colonizing the Avian Host" Microorganisms 8, no. 8: 1203. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8081203

APA Style

Wellawa, D. H., Allan, B., White, A. P., & Köster, W. (2020). Iron-Uptake Systems of Chicken-Associated Salmonella Serovars and Their Role in Colonizing the Avian Host. Microorganisms, 8(8), 1203. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8081203

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop