Next Article in Journal
Analysis of the Bacterial Diversity of Paipa Cheese (a Traditional Raw Cow’s Milk Cheese from Colombia) by High-Throughput Sequencing
Next Article in Special Issue
pH and Phosphate Induced Shifts in Carbon Flow and Microbial Community during Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion
Previous Article in Journal
Recombinant of the Staphylococcal Bacteriophage Lysin CHAPk and Its Elimination against Streptococcus agalactiae Biofilms
Previous Article in Special Issue
Microbial and Phenyl Acid Dynamics during the Start-up Phase of Anaerobic Straw Degradation in Meso- and Thermophilic Batch Reactors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Isolation of an Obligate Mixotrophic Methanogen That Represents the Major Population in Thermophilic Fixed-Bed Anaerobic Digesters

1
School of Life Sciences, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0392, Japan
2
Kajima Technical Research Institute, Chofu, Tokyo 182-0036, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2020, 8(2), 217; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020217
Submission received: 19 December 2019 / Revised: 1 February 2020 / Accepted: 4 February 2020 / Published: 6 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Anaerobic Digestion)

Abstract

:
Methanothermobacter Met2 is a metagenome-assembled genome (MAG) that encodes a putative mixotrophic methanogen constituting the major populations in thermophilic fixed-bed anaerobic digesters. In order to characterize its physiology, the present work isolated an archaeon (strain Met2-1) that represents Met2-type methanogens by using a combination of enrichments under a nitrogen atmosphere, colony formation on solid media and limiting dilution under high partial pressures of hydrogen. Strain Met2-1 utilizes hydrogen and carbon dioxide for methanogenesis, while the growth is observed only when culture media are additionally supplemented with acetate. It does not grow on acetate in the absence of hydrogen. The results demonstrate that Methanothermobacter sp. strain Met2-1 is a novel methanogen that exhibits obligate mixotrophy.

1. Introduction

Methanogens are archaea that produce methane as the catabolic end product [1]. In nature, methanogens play important roles in organic-matter decomposition under anaerobic conditions [1]. In addition, they are essential members of microbiomes in anaerobic digesters that convert organic wastes into fuel gas [2]. It is known that two types of methanogens mainly contribute to anaerobic digestion, one that produces methane from carbon dioxide using hydrogen/formate as reducing powers (hydrogenotrophic methanogen), and the other that produces methane from acetate (acetoclastic methanogen) [1].
Thermophilic fixed-bed anaerobic digesters (TFDs) facilitate high-rate conversion of organic wastes into methane [3], and commercial TFDs are operated in Japan and other countries for the treatment of food and brewery wastes [4]. Recently, in order to characterize microbes that contribute to the efficient methanogenesis in TFDs, microbiomes established in laboratory-scale TFDs were analyzed by metagenomic and metatranscriptomic approaches [5]. It has been found that metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) Mes1 and Met2 represent two major populations that account for over 30% and 20%, respectively, of the total biofilm populations in TFD [5]. Among them, Mes1 exhibits substantial similarities to Methanosarcina thermophila [6] in terms of phylogeny, gene contents and genome structures. On the other hand, although Met2 is considered to be affiliated with the genus Methanothermobacter based on 16S rRNA- and mcrA-gene sequences, substantial differences are found in gene contents and genome structures between Met2 and authentic Methanothermobacter strains, such as Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus ΔH [7]. In particular, reconstructed catabolic pathways indicate that the Met2 MAG does not code for a carbon-monoxide dehydrogenase/acetyl-CoA synthase complex (CODH/ACS), one of the essential enzymes in the methanogenic pathways [8]. This finding suggests the possibility that Met2 is incapable of utilizing the acetyl-CoA pathway for CO2 fixation and also of producing methane from acetate. It is therefore considered that Met2 utilizes CO2/H2 only for conserving energy by methanogenesis, while acetate is used as a carbon source. Based on these assumptions, Met2 is likely a novel obligate mixotrophic methanogen that is entirely different from autotrophic hydrogenotrophic methanogens belonging to the genus Methanothermobacter. Furthermore, obligate mixotrophy is not well appreciated for methanogens. It is also noteworthy that, in the TFD biofilm, Met2 outgrows Met20, another reconstructed MAG that constitutes 0.2% of the total biofilm populations. Met20 is closely related to M. thermautotrophicus and codes for CODH/ACS [5]. We deduce that Met2-type methanogens have ecological advantages over other hydrogenotrophic methanogens in TFD biofilms, and phenotypes associated with the lack of CODH/ACS would be relevant.
Given the physiological perspectives on MAG Met2 inferred from the metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analyses [5], an archaeon that represents Met2-type methanogens was isolated and examined for its physiological properties. The primary purpose of the present work was therefore to isolate archaeal strains corresponding to Met2. Phylogenetic and physiological characteristics of an isolate is reported in this article.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Isolation Source and Sampling

A laboratory-scale TFD was operated at 55 °C as described previously [5]. When methane was stably produced at an organic-loading rate of approximately 3 grams liter−1 day−1, biofilm was sampled by inserting a syringe into the digester and immediately spiked into butyl rubber-sealed anaerobic vials containing medium 119 (Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany) and either H2/CO2 (80%/20%) or pure nitrogen gas.

2.2. Cultivation in Liquid Media

Liquid cultivation was conducted in butyl rubber-sealed vials (110 mL in capacity) containing 50 mL of medium 119 at 65 °C. Modified 119 media were also used, and compositions of these media were specified where necessary. The head space in a vial was filled either with pure nitrogen gas or with H2/CO2 gas. A vial was inoculated with a microbial suspension using a syringe, after a vial was sealed with a butyl-rubber cap and aluminum crimp. Microbial cells in liquid media were counted using a fluorescence microscope (BX60, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), after cells were sampled using a syringe and stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) [9]. For physiological characterization of an isolate, a culture vial prepared as described above was inoculated with 0.5 mL of a pre-grown culture, and the growth was analyzed as described above. Purity of a culture was checked by repeated microscopic and sequencing analyses.

2.3. Cultivation on Solid Media

Solid slant media (30 mL in volume) were formed in butyl rubber-sealed vials (50 mL in capacity) using gellan gum (0.9%) (Wako Pure Chemicals, Osaka, Japan) as a solidification agent. Slants contained medium 119 supplemented with ampicillin (100 mg L−1) and vancomycin (200 mg L−1), and the head-space gas was H2/CO2. Cell suspension was streaked on the surface of solid media using a syringe, after vials were sealed with butyl-rubber caps and the head-space gas was replaced with H2/CO2. Cells were grown at 65 °C, picked using needles in an anaerobic chamber (Bactron, Sheldon Manufacturing, Cornelius, OR, USA) and immediately inoculated into liquid media in vials.

2.4. Gas Analyses

Methane, hydrogen, nitrogen, and carbon dioxide in the head space of a vial were measured using a gas chromatograph (GC-14A, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a thermal conductivity detector and a molecular sieve 5A 60–80/Porapack Q 80–100 column (Shimadzu). The column, injection, and detector temperatures were 50 °C, 100 °C, and 80 °C, respectively [10].

2.5. Phylogenetic Analyses

DNA was extracted from a liquid culture using a Fast DNA Spin Kit for Soil (MP Bio Japan, Tokyo, Japan). Amplification of a 16S rRNA gene fragment was conducted using primers 515F and 1492R according to methods described elsewhere [11]. Amplification of a mcrA gene fragment was conducted using primers mcr1F and mcr1R according to methods described previously [12]. PCR products were purified using a QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Tokyo, Japan) and sequenced by a standard procedure. Nucleotide sequences were analyzed using the Blast program (NCBI, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), and phylogenetic trees were constructed using a MEGA5 software [13].
Nucleotide sequences determined in the present study are deposited in the DDBJ, EMBL, and NCBI nucleotide sequence databases under accession numbers LC514466 to LC514469.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Colony Isolation

Vials containing medium 119 and H2/CO2 were inoculated with the TFD biofilm suspension and incubated at 65 °C for promoting the growth of methanogens. The present study employed 65 °C, since thermophilic Methanosarcina, such as Ms. thermophila are unable to grow at this temperature [14]. The medium contained yeast extract, acetate, formate, sludge fluid and a fatty-acid mixture as organic ingredients. After methane was detected in the head space, the culture was spread onto the solid slant media containing medium 119. Colonies were formed several days after commencing the cultivation concomitant with the detection of methane in the head space. Several colonies were transferred to the liquid media, and resultant methanogenic cultures were used for the sequencing of 16S rRNA and mcrA genes. It was found that mcrA sequences determined for colonies were 100% identical to that of MAG Met20 [5], but not of Met2. Besides, 16S rRNA gene sequences for colonies were 100% identical to that of M. thermautotrophicus ΔH. We were unable to compare 16S rRNA gene sequences of the colonies to that of Met20 deposited in the database, since there was no overlap between them. It should however be noted that the 16S rRNA gene sequence of Met20 is 100% identical to that of strain ΔH [5].
One of the isolates is named strain Met20-1. Microscopic observation showed that cells of strain Met20-1 were extended rods (Figure 1A), similar to those reported previously for strain ΔH [10]. Since our previous work detected MAG Met20 as a minor population (0.2% of the total biofilm populations) in TFD biofilms [5], this minor methanogen outcompeted Met2 under the high hydrogen partial pressure in the initial enrichment culture and eventually isolated.
In the next trial, methanogens were enriched from the TFD biofilm in medium 119 under the nitrogen atmosphere to suppress the growth of methanogens that rapidly grow under the H2/CO2 atmosphere (e.g., strain Met20-1). It was expected that acidogenic bacteria, such as those represented by MAG Coprothermobacter Cop3 [5], would produce hydrogen and acetate and promote the syntrophic growth of Met2 methanogens as was the situation deduced for microbiomes in TFD biofilms. Methanogenic enrichment cultures were streaked onto the slant media, and colonies formed on these slants under the H2/CO2 atmosphere were grown in the liquid media for determining sequences of 16S rRNA and mcr genes. The 16S rRNA gene analyses revealed the presence of bacteria closely related to Coprothermobacter proteolyticus [15], while the mcrA gene analyses detected the Met2 sequence. In addition, two different morphotypes of cells were observed under the microscope in liquid cultures (Figure 1B), and it was considered that cocci were Coprothermobacter cells, while filaments were Methanothermobacter cells related to Met2. Studies have shown that Coprothermobacter and Methanothermobacter grow under hydrogen-mediated syntrophic interactions and form tight co-aggregates [16]. It was therefore considered that the separation of these two microbes by colony formation on solid media would be difficult.

3.2. Limiting Dilution

It has been reported that the growth of Coprothermobacter is suppressed in the presence of hydrogen gas at high partial pressures [16]. In order to eliminate Coprothermobacter cells from the Met2/Coprothermobacter mixed culture (Figure 1B), we employed a limiting-dilution approach under the H2/CO2 (80%/20%) atmosphere. In this approach, we eliminated the fatty-acid mixture and sludge fluid from medium 119, since these were considered to be potential substrates for Coprothermobacter. A methanogenic culture at the highest dilution was spread onto the slant medium, and colonies formed on the slants were cultivated in the modified 119 liquid medium for the phylogenetic and microscopic analyses. It was found that 16S rRNA and mcrA sequences determined for the colonies were 100% identical to those of MAG Met2. In addition, the microscopic observation showed that cells were solely filamentous, and coccal cells were not present (Figure 1C). From these results, we conclude that a methanogenic archaeon that represents Met2-type methanogens is successfully isolated, and the isolate is named Met2-1. It is interesting that cells of strain Met2-1 are much longer than those of strain Met20-1 (Figure 1). The isolation of strain Met2-1 allows us to investigate physiological features of methanogens that constitute major populations in TFDs.

3.3. Phylogenetic Characteristics

Sequences for 16S rRNA and mcrA genes were used to phylogenetically characterize strain Met2-1 (Figure 2). As shown in these figures, this archaeon is affiliated with the genus Methanothermobacter, while it is relatively distantly related to authentic Methanothermobacter strains, such as M. thermautotrophicus ΔH. On the other hand, it is shown that strain Met2-1 is closely related to two methanogens, Methanothermobacter tenebrarum and Methanothermobacter crinale. Percent identities in the partial 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain Met2-1 to those of M. tenebrarum, M. crinale, M. thermautotrophicus are 99.7%, 99.6%, and 96.6%, respectively, while those in the partial mcrA gene sequence are 92.9%, 93.2%, and 82.7%, respectively.
M. tenebrarum was isolated from formation water in a natural gas field [17], while M. crinale was isolated from oil sands sampled from a high-temperature underground oil reservoir [18]. We are interested in the fact that the dominant methanogen in the high-temperature anaerobic digester (strain Met2-1) is more closely related to thermophilic methanogens that thrive in subsurface oil/gas fields than to those found in anaerobic digesters.

3.4. Growth Characteristics

From the metagenomic data reported in our previous study [5], it was predicted that strain Met2-1 is an obligate mixotrophic methanogen that does not possess CODH/ACS and requires both acetate and H2/CO2 for growth. In order to address this hypothesis, strain Met2-1 was grown in three different culture systems, namely, acetate plus H2/CO2, only H2/CO2 and only acetate, and growth trends of Met2-1 were compared with those of the autotrophic hydrogenotrophic methanogen, M. thermautotrophicus ΔH (Figure 3). In this analysis, we used a modified 119 medium that contained neither formate, fatty-acid mixture nor sludge fluid. In addition, the amount of yeast extract was decreased from 1.0 to 0.1 g L−1.
Figure 3 shows that, while a substantial amount of methane is produced by strain Met2-1 in the absence of acetate, its growth is largely suppressed without acetate. Strain Met2-1 slightly grows on H2/CO2 in the absence of acetate, while this growth is considered to be dependent on some organics in yeast extract. It is shown that the growth trends of strain Met2-1 are entirely different from those of ΔH, since methanogenesis and growth of strain ΔH are not affected by acetate. Both strains did not grow on acetate (in the absence of H2/CO2). These results support the idea that strain Met2-1 is an obligate mixotrophic methanogen that requires both H2/CO2 and acetate for growth.
It has been reported that the two Methanothermobacter strains closely related to strain Met2-1, M. tenebrarum and M. crinale, are hydrogenotrophic methanogens, while acetate is required for their growth [17,18]. Among them, a draft genome is available for M. tenebrarum, while M. crinale has not yet been sequenced. Although a solid conclusion cannot be obtained with a draft genome, genes coding for CODH/ACS are not found in M. tenebrarum. On the other hand, genomes of other Methanothermobacter strains, including M. marburgensis, M. thermautotrophicus and M. wolfeii code for CODH/ACS.

4. Conclusions

The present work isolated Methanothermobacter sp. Met2-1 that represents the dominant populations in TFDs. It is demonstrated that strain Met2-1 requires both H2/CO2 and acetate for growth and represents obligate mixotrophic methanogens. This strain is considered to be affiliated with the genus Methanothermobacter, while it is closely related to some methanogens isolated from underground oil fields.
From the results reported herein, it is suggested that methanogens represented by Met2-1 grow under syntrophic interactions with acidogenic bacteria, such as Coprotermobacter, where acetate, H2 and CO2 transfer between these microbes. It is likely that these methanogens constitute the major population in TFDs with the ability to efficiently establish the syntrophic interactions.
A prominent feature of the present work is that the isolation procedure developed in the work is useful for isolating methanogens that thrive under syntrophic interactions with acidogenic bacteria. In the procedure, special attention is paid to suppress methanogens that rapidly grow under high partial pressures of hydrogen and to eliminate acidogenic bacteria from syntrophic cultures. Since the procedure would be widely applicable to isolating ecologically important methanogens from a variety of anaerobic environments, we expect that our work will advance our understanding of the ecology and physiology of yet uncultured methanogens in the natural and engineered environments.

Author Contributions

M.N. conducted experiments. Y.U. operated digesters. M.N., A.K. and K.W. analyzed data. A.K., Y.U. and K.W. designed research. All authors contributed to the preparation of this manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Japan Society for Promotion of Science (KAKENHI, grant 15H01753).

Acknowledgments

We thank Nanako Amano for technical and administrative support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Thauer, R.K.; Kaster, A.K.; Seedorf, H.; Buckel, W.; Hedderich, R. Methanogenic archaea: Ecologically relevant differences in energy conservation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2008, 6, 579–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Weiland, P. Biogas production: Current state and perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 85, 849–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tatara, M.; Makiuchi, T.; Ueno, Y.; Goto, M.; Sode, K. Methanogenesis from acetate and propionate by thermophilic down-flow anaerobic packed-bed reactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 4786–4795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kobayashi, T.; Tang, Y.; Urakami, T.; Morimura, S.; Kida, K. Digestion performance and microbial community in full-scale methane fermentation of stillage from sweet potato-shochu production. J. Environ. Sci. 2014, 26, 423–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kouzuma, A.; Tsutsumi, M.; Ishii, S.; Ueno, Y.; Abe, T.; Watanabe, K. Non-autotrophic methanogens dominate in anaerobic digesters. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Zinder, S.H.; Sowers, K.R.; Ferry, J.G. Methanosarcina thermophila sp. nov., a thermophilic, acetotrophic, methane-producing bacterium. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1985, 35, 522–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Smith, D.R.; Doucette-Stamm, L.A.; Deloughery, C.; Lee, H.; Dubois, J.; Aldredge, T.; Bashirzadeh, R.; Blakely, D.; Cook, R.; Gilbert, K.; et al. Complete genome sequence of Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum ΔH: Functional analysis and comparative genomics. J. Bacteriol. 1997, 179, 7135–7155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Ferry, J.G. Enzymology of one-carbon metabolism in methanogenic pathways. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 1999, 23, 13–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ueoka, N.; Kouzuma, A.; Watanabe, K. Electrode plate-culture methods for colony isolation of exoelectrogens from anode microbiomes. Bioelectrochemistry 2018, 124, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ishii, S.; Kosaka, T.; Hori, K.; Hotta, Y.; Watanabe, K. Coaggregation facilitates interspecies hydrogen transfer between Pelotomaculum thermopropionicum and Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 7838–7845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Watanabe, K.; Kodama, Y.; Kaku, N. Diversity and abundance of bacteria in an underground oil-storage cavity. BMC Microbiol. 2002, 2, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lever, M.A.; Teske, A.P. Diversity of methane-cycling archaea in hydrothermal sediment investigated by general and group-specific PCR primers. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 81, 1426–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Tamura, K.; Peterson, D.; Peterson, N.; Stecher, G.; Nei, M.; Kumar, S. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28, 2731–2739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Zinder, S.H.; Mah, R.A. Isolation and characterization of a thermophilic strain of Methanosarcina unable to use H2-CO2 for methanogenesis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1979, 38, 996–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Etchebehere, C.; Pavan, M.E.; Zorzópulos, J.; Soubes, M.; Muxí, L. Coprothermobacterplatensis sp. nov., a new anaerobic proteolytic thermophilic bacterium isolated from an anaerobic mesophilic sludge. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1998, 48, 1297–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Kato, T.; Urushibata, W.; Morikawa, M. Studies on microbial symbiosis in a methanogenic high temperature subsurface petroleum reservoir. J. Environ. Biotechnol. 2016, 16, 31–38. [Google Scholar]
  17. Nakamura, K.; Takahashi, A.; Mori, C.; Tamaki, H.; Mochimaru, H.; Nakamura, K.; Takamizawa, K.; Kamagata, Y. Methanothermobacter tenebrarum sp. nov., a hydrogenotrophic, thermophilic methanogen isolated from gas-associated formation water of a natural gas field. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2013, 63, 715–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Cheng, L.; Dai, L.; Li, X.; Zhang, H.; Lu, Y. Isolation and characterization of Methanothermobacter crinale sp. nov., a novel hydrogenotrophic methanogen from the Shengli oil field. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 5212–5219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Fluorescent micrographs of DAPI-stained cells grown from colonies on sold media under methanogenic conditions. (A) Cells cultivated from a colony formed on slants containing medium 119 after methanogens were enriched under the H2/CO2 gas (strain Met20-1). (B) Cells from a colony formed on slants containing medium 119 after methanogens were enriched under the nitrogen gas. (C) Cells from a colony formed on slants containing the modified 119 medium after limiting dilution under the H2/CO2 gas (strain Met2-1). (A) Bar (5 μm) in panel (A) also applies to panels (B,C).
Figure 1. Fluorescent micrographs of DAPI-stained cells grown from colonies on sold media under methanogenic conditions. (A) Cells cultivated from a colony formed on slants containing medium 119 after methanogens were enriched under the H2/CO2 gas (strain Met20-1). (B) Cells from a colony formed on slants containing medium 119 after methanogens were enriched under the nitrogen gas. (C) Cells from a colony formed on slants containing the modified 119 medium after limiting dilution under the H2/CO2 gas (strain Met2-1). (A) Bar (5 μm) in panel (A) also applies to panels (B,C).
Microorganisms 08 00217 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic trees based on 16S rRNA gene sequences (A) and mcrA sequences (B) showing phylogenetic relationships among archaea affiliated with the genus Methanothermobacter. Methanothermus fervidus DSM 2088 is used as the outgroup. Bootstrap values (100 trials, only values greater than 50 are shown) are indicated at branching points. Sequence divergences are indicated with bars, and accession numbers are shown in parentheses.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic trees based on 16S rRNA gene sequences (A) and mcrA sequences (B) showing phylogenetic relationships among archaea affiliated with the genus Methanothermobacter. Methanothermus fervidus DSM 2088 is used as the outgroup. Bootstrap values (100 trials, only values greater than 50 are shown) are indicated at branching points. Sequence divergences are indicated with bars, and accession numbers are shown in parentheses.
Microorganisms 08 00217 g002
Figure 3. Methanogenesis (A,C) and growth (B,D) of Methanothermobacter sp. Met2-1 (A,B) and M. thermautrotrophicus ΔH (C,D) on three different substrates.
Figure 3. Methanogenesis (A,C) and growth (B,D) of Methanothermobacter sp. Met2-1 (A,B) and M. thermautrotrophicus ΔH (C,D) on three different substrates.
Microorganisms 08 00217 g003

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nagoya, M.; Kouzuma, A.; Ueno, Y.; Watanabe, K. Isolation of an Obligate Mixotrophic Methanogen That Represents the Major Population in Thermophilic Fixed-Bed Anaerobic Digesters. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 217. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020217

AMA Style

Nagoya M, Kouzuma A, Ueno Y, Watanabe K. Isolation of an Obligate Mixotrophic Methanogen That Represents the Major Population in Thermophilic Fixed-Bed Anaerobic Digesters. Microorganisms. 2020; 8(2):217. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020217

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nagoya, Misa, Atsushi Kouzuma, Yoshiyuki Ueno, and Kazuya Watanabe. 2020. "Isolation of an Obligate Mixotrophic Methanogen That Represents the Major Population in Thermophilic Fixed-Bed Anaerobic Digesters" Microorganisms 8, no. 2: 217. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020217

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop