Next Article in Journal
Uncoupling Foam Fractionation and Foam Adsorption for Enhanced Biosurfactant Synthesis and Recovery
Next Article in Special Issue
Transmission of Escherichia coli from Manure to Root Zones of Field-Grown Lettuce and Leek Plants
Previous Article in Journal
Processing of Metals and Metalloids by Actinobacteria: Cell Resistance Mechanisms and Synthesis of Metal(loid)-Based Nanostructures
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Role of Pea (Pisum sativum) Seeds in Transmission of Entero-Aggregative Escherichia coli to Growing Plants
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification and Characterization of 33 Bacillus cereus sensu lato Isolates from Agricultural Fields from Eleven Widely Distributed Countries by Whole Genome Sequencing

by
Athanasios Zervas
1,
Marie Rønne Aggerbeck
1,
Henrietta Allaga
2,
Mustafa Güzel
3,
Marc Hendriks
4,
IIona Jonuškienė
5,
Orsolya Kedves
2,
Ayse Kupeli
6,
Janja Lamovšek
7,
Pascal Mülner
8,
Denise Munday
9,
Şahin Namli
6,
Hilal Samut
6,
Ružica Tomičić
10,
Zorica Tomičić
11,
Filiz Yeni
6,
Raida Zribi Zghal
12,13,
Xingchen Zhao
14,
Vincent Sanchis-Borja
15 and
Niels Bohse Hendriksen
1,*
1
Department of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark
2
Department of Microbiology, University of Szeged, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
3
Department of Food Engineering, Hitit University, 19030 Çorum, Turkey
4
Wageningen Plant Research, Wageningen University, 6708PB Wageningen, The Netherlands
5
Department of Organic Chemistry, Kaunas University of Technology, 50254 Kaunas, Lithuania
6
Department of Food Engineering, Middle East Technical University, 06800 Ankara, Turkey
7
Plant Protection Department, Agricultural Institute of Slovenia, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
8
Graz University of Technology, 8010 Graz, Austria
9
Sumitomo Chemical Agro Europe, 1260 Nyon, Switzerland
10
Faculty of Technology, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
11
Institute of Food Technology, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
12
Sfax Preparatory Engineering Institute, Sfax University, P.O. Box 1172, 3000 Sfax, Tunisia
13
Centre of Biotechnology of Sfax, Biopesticides Laboratory, P.O. Box 1177, 3018 Sfax, Tunisia
14
Laboratory of Food Microbiology and Food Preservation, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
15
Micalis Institute, INRA, Université Paris-Saclay, 78 350 Jouy-en-Josas, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2020, 8(12), 2028; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8122028
Submission received: 10 November 2020 / Revised: 4 December 2020 / Accepted: 12 December 2020 / Published: 18 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Human Pathogens in Primary Production Systems)

Abstract

:
The phylogeny, identification, and characterization of 33 B. cereus sensu lato isolates originating from 17 agricultural soils from 11 countries were analyzed on the basis of whole genome sequencing. Phylogenetic analyses revealed all isolates are divided into six groups, which follows the generally accepted phylogenetic division of B. cereus sensu lato isolates. Four different identification methods resulted in a variation in the identity of the isolates, as none of the isolates were identified as the same species by all four methods—only the recent identification method proposed directly reflected the phylogeny of the isolates. This points to the importance of describing the basis and method used for the identification. The presence and percent identity of the protein product of 19 genes potentially involved in pathogenicity divided the 33 isolates into groups corresponding to phylogenetic division of the isolates. This suggests that different pathotypes exist and that it is possible to differentiate between them by comparing the percent identity of proteins potentially involved in pathogenicity. This also reveals that a basic link between phylogeny and pathogenicity is likely to exist. The geographical distribution of the isolates is not random: they are distributed in relation to their division into the six phylogenetic groups, which again relates to different ecotypes with different temperature growth ranges. This means that we find it easier to analyze and understand the results obtained from the 33 B. cereus sensu lato isolates in a phylogenetic, patho-type and ecotype-oriented context, than in a context based on uncertain identification at the species level.

1. Introduction

Bacillus cereus sensu lato, also known as the B. cereus group, consists of Gram-positive, rod-shaped, spore-forming bacilli, commonly isolated from soil, and other environmental and food matrices. The founders of the group are the well-known species B. cereus sensu stricto (s.s.), an opportunistic pathogen and food spoiler, B. anthracis, the etiological agent of anthrax, and B. thuringiensis, an entomopathogen, with specific strains widely used as biocontrol agents. The group also encompasses species of minor economic or medical importance, such as B. weihenstephanensis, B. mycoides and B. pseudomycoides. Since 2011, another 15 species have been described as plausible members of the group, however, the taxonomic and phylogenetic relationships of these bacteria are still unclarified. During the last 20 years, genotypic methods have revealed that the traditional practical classification and identification methods are not necessarily consistent with the group’s phylogenetic classification. Notably, fluorescent amplified fragment-length polymorphism patterns (AFLP) and multiple locus sequence typing (MLST) have revealed the existence of three broad phylogenetic clades further divided into seven major groups, mentioned as phylogenetic groups I to VII [1,2,3]. These, often, do not correspond to their phenotypic identification, e.g., strains affiliated to B. thuringiensis are found in at least four of the phylogenetic groups since their specific insecticidal feature is plasmid-borne and can be horizontally transferred [1]. Lately, whole genome sequencing has been used for analyzing the phylogeny of the group. Liu et al. [4] analyzed 224 B. cereus group strains by the Genome BLAST (Basic Local Assignment Search Tool) Distance Phylogeny approach based on digital DNA:DNA hybridization. Their analysis separated the strains into 30 clusters, representing eleven known, partially merged species, and accordingly, 19–20 putative novel species. This approach has recently been used to describe a general automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy [5]. Bazinet [6], who analyzed 498 B. cereus group genomes with different phylogenetic analysis tools, found that, irrespective of data source and analysis methodology, the three-clade and seven-group classification system was recapitulated, suggesting that the broad phylogenetic structure suggested by AFLP and MLST has been inferred correctly. Recently, Carroll et al. [7] used an average nucleotide identity (ANI) approach to make a proposal for a new taxonomic nomenclature of the B. cereus group by analyzing 2231 genomes, proposing 18 genomo-species to exist, of which six are undescribed. However, the analysis maintained the known overall phylogenetic structure with three clades and seven groups. In addition, they identified outlying groups—groups that still need to be characterized in detail.
Guinebretiere et al. [2] recognized an adaptation to different growth temperatures within the B. cereus group, concurrent with the above-mentioned seven phylogenetic groups, for example, group VI members are psychro-coldtolerant with a growth range of between 5 and 37 °C, while members of group VII are thermotolerant with a growth range between 20 and 50 °C. This adaptation has been corroborated by a strong observed relationship between divergence in ribosomal proteins, the seven phylogenetic groups and an adaptation of the B. cereus group to different temperature growth ranges [8]. These findings, along with other studies, suggested that the B. cereus group should be considered a single evolutionary unit characterized by clonal expansion and adaptation to various environmental factors that led to the formation of distinct phenotypes, also mentioned as ecotypes, within major phylogenetic lineages [9,10,11]. These suggestions relate to the fact that cytotoxic activity levels and toxin distribution vary accordingly to the phylogenetic group, implying that the group differs in food poisoning potential [12].
The pathogenicity of B. cereus group bacteria is, apart from anthrax and some anthrax-like diseases, caused by B. anthracis and a few B. cereus strains, notably two gastro-intestinal diseases, although several somatic diseases have also been described [13]. The two gastro-intestinal diseases are the emetic syndrome and diarrheal syndrome. The emetic syndrome is caused by the toxin cereulide, which is pre-formed in food and it is primarily observed in a distinct subgroup within the phylogenetic group III of B. cereus [14]. The diarrheal syndrome has notably been linked to three pore-forming enterotoxins thought to be produced in the intestine. They are two three-component toxins: the nonhemolytic enterotoxin (Nhe), the hemolytic toxin (Hbl) and the single protein cytotoxin (CytK). However, phospholipases, sphingomyelinases, hemolysins, proteinases and peptidases likely represent additional virulence factors involved in the syndrome [14]. These enterotoxins and additional virulence factors are broadly distributed among the members of the B. cereus group. Carroll et al. [15] developed a tool for identifying the enterotoxins and some additional virulence factors for whole genome sequenced B. cereus group members.
The aims of this paper are to identify and characterize 34 whole genome sequenced strains isolated from agricultural soils from eleven countries in a phylogenetic context. The analyses are based on different tools available for identification based on whole genome sequences (WGS) and are compared to an ecotype approach for characterization, including temperature growth range and presence of virulence factors.

2. Materials and Methods

Surface soil samples were collected from 17 fields in 11 countries spanning approximately 2100 km from north to south (Denmark to Tunisia) and 1500 km west to east (Belgium to Turkey) during January 2019. Details about the localities are given in Table 1.
The soil samples were gently mixed in sterile plastic bags. Approximately 2.5 g of the mixed soil was added to 25 mL demineralized water and further mixed for 5 min by a multi-wrist shaker (Lab-line, speed 5). Afterwards, 10 mL of the suspensions were heat-treated in a water bath (65 °C for 35 min). Ten-fold serial dilutions of the suspensions were plated on T3 sporulation agar [16] and incubated for one day at 30 °C. Two colonies having a rugose, ice-crystal-like appearance and a diameter > 1 mm were randomly selected as being B. cereus sensu lato and sub-cultured on T3-agar.
For DNA preparation, bacterial cultures were plated on Luria-Bertani (LB) agar and incubated overnight at 30 °C. Bacterial biomass, corresponding to a 1–2 mm diameter colony, was transferred to 200 μL Tris-EDTA buffer. Bacteria were lysed by incubation at 102 °C for 10 min, and debris was removed by centrifugation at 15,000× g for 3 min. The DNA-containing supernatant was transferred to a new microcentrifuge tube and stored at 4 °C. Multiplex PCR for the affiliation of the bacteria to the B. cereus-group were run as described in Hansen et al. [17]. PCR of the 16S-23S rRNA gene (rDNA) spacer region with the L1-G1 [18] primer set was used as a control of DNA quality and for the procedure. PCR products were visualized by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis, using MW VI (Roche) as the molecular weight marker, on an Azure c200 gel imaging system (Azure Biosystems, Dublin, CA, USA).
Thirty-four isolates for whole genome sequencing were grown on Luria Bertani broth (LB) at room temperature for 24 h. DNA was extracted using the Ultraclean Microbial DNA isolation kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and quantified on a Qubit 2.0 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Sequencing libraries were prepared using the Nextera XT sample preparation kit (Illumina, Cambridge, United Kingdom) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The libraries were sequenced on the Illumina Nextseq 500 platform using the 150 bp pair-end reads technology. The obtained raw reads were trimmed for quality, their adapters removed using fastp [19], and de novo assemblies were performed using SPAdes (version 3.14.1, St. Peterburg, Russia). Annotations of the assembled draft genomes were done using Prokka (version 1.14.5, Carlton, Australia) under default settings and databases [20].
MLST analysis on the selected strains was performed using the Center for genomic epidemiology platform for MLST [21]. This service uses a B. cereus MLST scheme developed by Priest et al. [1] for the analysis. The affiliation of the strains to the phylogenetic group by MLST was done using the group of its nearest neighbor, for which the affiliation is known in the MLST database.
Traditional identification was based on colony morphology, delineation to the B. cereus group by PCR, reaction on mannitol Egg Yolk Polymyxin agar plates, phase contrast microscopy and differentiation of B. cereus and B. weihenstephanensis by the presence of the gene for the cold-shock protein cspA variant specific for this species identified in the whole genome sequence [22].
Full-length 16S rRNA sequences from each sample were extracted from the resulting annotations from Prokka and aligned using MAFFT v 7.450 [23] with default settings, implemented in Geneious Prime 2020.2 (Biomatters, Auckland, New Zeland). A phylogenetic tree was constructed on RAxML (version 4.0 implemented in Geneious Prime) [24] using the GTR GAMMA model under the “Rapid Bootstrapping and search for best-scoring ML tree” algorithm with 100 bootstraps replicates, embedded in Geneious Prime 2020.2 [24].
In silico taxonomic classification of the isolates based on ANI using their draft-assembled genomes was performed using Btyper3 under default settings and adding the virulence flag to check for biovars Anthracis or Emeticus [7].
In silico taxonomic classification of the isolates based on digital DNA:DNA hybridization using their draft assembled genomes was performed using TYGS [5].
Virulence-based classification of the isolates in this analysis was performed using Btyper [15]. This tool was used for classifying isolates to phylogenetic groups based on the sequence of panC using the default setting corresponding to “draft genomes”, as described in the program’s manual (https://github.com/lmc297/BTyper).
Complete and draft genome assemblies analyzed in this investigation are deposited in GenBank under BioProject PRJNA681344.

3. Results

In this study, we isolated 34 B. cereus group bacteria from 17 agricultural fields originating from 11 countries (Table 1) based on colony morphology. The identity of the isolates as Bacillus cereus sensu lato was confirmed by a multiplex PCR assay. All the 34 isolates were whole genome sequenced. The overall genomic features of the isolates are presented in Table 2. The estimated number of bases and coding sequences (CDS) for isolate N32 is approximately two times the size of that estimated for the other 33 isolates (Table 2). Further analysis with the isolate N32 revealed that it was composed of two species related to B. cereus sensu lato and Lysinibacillus spp. For that reason, N32 is omitted from further analysis.
The estimated number of bases and CDS vary between 5.5 and 7.1 MB and 5550 and 6433, respectively. Averages for the number of bases are 6.0 MB and 5965 for the CDS. In comparison, the number of contigs varies between 173 and 4682, with an average of 709. The number of tRNA and rRNA genes varies between 91 and 139 and 6 and 20, respectively.
Results of WGS-based MLST of the 33 isolates are presented on Table 3. The isolates comprise 29 sequence types (ST), of which 11 are new, while 11 of these sequence types are determined with some uncertainty, as no allele in the current database matches with 100% identity and coverage to the seven analyzed genes. Three of the isolates belong to sequence type 12, two belong to sequence types 56 and 434, and the remaining 26 isolates belong to different sequence types. Table 3 also highlights the six different phylogenetic groups (based on panC sequences) to which the isolates belong. According to Guinebretièere et al. [2], these groups are referred to as group I, II, III, IV, V and VI, to which 1, 3, 1, 10, 8 and 10 isolates belong, respectively. The division of the isolates into these groups was confirmed by the MLST analysis; however, in the case of some isolates, there is a level of uncertainty as the MLST profile is new.
Figure 1 shows a phylogenetic tree for the 33 isolates based on Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI). The phylogenetic tree indicates that this methodology divides the isolates into six major groups (I–VI). This division of the isolates between these groups corresponds exactly to the division based on panC sequencing and MLST.
The identification of the isolates to the species level was performed by four different methods (Table 4). Twenty-three of the isolates were identified as B. cereus and the rest as B. weihenstephanensis by traditional identification. According to 16 rRNA gene sequence analysis, twelve isolates were identified as B. cereus, eight as B. mycoides, seven as B. wiedmanii, two as B. thuringiensi and one as B. pseudomycoides or B. toyonenisis, while two were identified as Bacillus sp. and one isolate was not identified. The ANI-based tool in Btyper3 identified six isolates as B. cereus SS, four as B. cereus Biovar thuringiensis, ten as B. mycoides, eight as B. toyonensis, four as B. mosaicus and one as B. pseudomycoides. The isolates identified as B. cereus biovar thuringiensis possessed either Cry75Aa3 (N1), Vip1Ad1 and Vip2Ba2 (N2), or Vip1Ad1 and Vip2Ad1 (N25 and N27). The TYGS tool based on DNA:DNA in silico hybridization identified ten isolates as B. toyonensis, three as B. mycoides, two as B. cereus, two as B. proteolyticus, one as B. pseudomycoides and one as B. wiedmanii, while 14 isolates were identified as belonging to seven new species.
The relation between the panC and MLST classification of the isolates into six phylogenetic groups is shown in Table 4. The relation to the traditional identification is clear as the B. cereus belongs to group I, II, III, IV and V, while B. weihenstephanensis belongs to group VI. For the identification based on 16S rRNA genes, it is not clear, as, e.g., the isolates belonging to B. wiedmanii belong to groups II, IV and V, together with isolates identified as four other species, while B. mycoides constitute group VI, together with one B. wiedmanii. For the identification by the ANI-based method, the relation is clear, as the four identified species belong separately to groups I, IV, V or VI, while group II and III isolates belong to the newly proposed species B. mosaicus. For the DNA:DNA hybridization-based method, the relationship is unclear, except for the strains identified as B. toyonensis, which all except one belong to group 5. It is also worth taking into account that none of the 33 isolates belong to the same species, when identified by the four methods.
Table 5 shows the percentage identity of nineteen translated virulence genes to the genes found in the BTyper virulence database [15]. We restricted the analysis to genes for the virulence factors and omitted regulatory elements. Further, we omitted bceT, as the existence of this gene is debated [25].
It appears from the table that when isolates 21 (the only group I isolate) and 16 (the only group III isolate) are not taken into account, the seventeen of the nineteen virulence genes are found in almost all the isolates, except for cytK2, which is restricted to six of the isolates from group IV (6 out of 10) and one from group V (1 of 8), and for hlyII, which is present in two out of three of the isolates of group II and in eight out of ten of the isolates of group IV. Statistical analysis (Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0.05, Table 5) reveals that, for all the translated genes, significant differences exist between the percent identity of at least two of the phylogenetic groups II, IV, V and VI. Group IV isolates have statistically significantly higher identity than group VI isolates for all genes except the sphingomyelinase (sph), while significant differences exist between group VI and groups II and V. For sph, significant differences exist between isolates of group II and the isolates from the other three groups. This association between the percent identity to the standard genes and the phylogenetic groups is further evidenced in a principal component analysis (PCA) performed to determine how the isolates cluster in a two-dimensional (2D) scatterplot according to phenotype combinations (Figure 2). We plotted the isolates according to their coordinates in the principal component 1 (F1) and 2 (F2). Using this coordinate system, four groups of isolates could be distinguished. It appears from the figure that F1 and F2 account for most of the initial variability in the data, with F1 describing the largest part (60.83%). The squared cosines of the variables show that the percentage identity of all the genes, except sph, are linked to the first axis, while sph is linked to the second. The PCA separates the isolates into four groups, strongly relating to their phylogenetic groups. Isolates from groups IV, V and VI comprise three clusters, with the fourth cluster comprised of the three group II isolates along with the single group III isolate. The single group I isolate is clustered outside of these four groups. The four clusters are significantly different from each other (Kruskal–Wallis tests, p > 0.001). It is also worth mentioning that genes for the production of the emetic toxin are not identified in any of the isolates. Genes for the biosynthesis of the anthrax capsule were restricted to isolate N31 (N.B. Hendriksen, Department of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Denmark. The gene for the protein was detected in the WGS of isolate N31 by Btyper, 2020).
Figure 3 shows the distribution of the 33 isolates divided into six phylogenetic groups in relation to the yearly mean temperature of the country where the soils were collected (https://www.weatherbase.com). The distribution is not random, as revealed by Chi-square analysis (p < 0.05). This seems to be caused by a higher number of isolates belonging to a phylogenetic group with a growth range above 10 °C present in countries with mean temperatures above the median temperature of all the eleven countries, and then the opposite for the isolates belonging to phylogenetic groups having a growth starting below 10 °C, which are more prevalent in countries with median temperatures below or equal to the median temperature of all the eleven countries.

4. Discussion

The genome of 33 B. cereus group isolates was whole genome sequenced using Illumina Nextseq. The assembled contigs of the 33 isolates shared comparable genome size and GC-content similar to values previously reported for B. cereus group strains [26] The same is the case with the number of tRNA and rRNA genes. The number of contigs varies between 173 and 4682, however the sequencing depth was sufficient to cover the breadth of the genomes. This fragmentation of the assemblies might be caused by the relatively low GC-content, the presence of several extra-chromosomal elements and highly abundant repeat elements [27,28]. In spite of this variation in fragmentation of the assemblies, the predicted number of proteins are similar among the isolates and comparable to numbers previously reported [26],
The considerable diversity among the 33 isolates, evidenced by the presence of 29 STs, including 11 new ones, most likely reflects that they are soil bacteria that occupy diverse ecological habitats that can survive as spores in soil reservoirs [14,29]. Some of the sequence types are determined with some uncertainty, because no allele in the current database matches with 100% identity to all seven of the analyzed alleles. The high correspondence between the division of the isolates into six phylogenetic groups by panC, MLST and ANI analyses is in accordance with the analysis done by Carroll et al. [15] and by Bazinet [6].
The isolates were identified at the species level with four different procedures and resulted in different outputs, as none of the isolates was identified as the same species with all four procedures. The number of species identified by the different procedures varies between 2 and 13. Traditional identification, based on several tests, divided the isolates into the species B. cereus and B. weihenstephanensis. Recently, it has been demonstrated that B. weihenstephanensis is a later synonym for B. mycoides [30].
Identification based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing divided the isolates into six B. cereus group species, while three isolates were not identified to this group. The isolates identified as B. cereus, B. wiedmannii and B. toyonensis are members of more than one of the phylogenetic groups, while isolates belonging to B. mycoides, B. thuringiensis and B. pseudomycoides only belong to one group; however, B. thuringiensis and B. pseudomycoides are only represented by two or one isolate, respectively. Limitations in the use of 16S rRNA gene sequencing for the phylogenetic-based classification of the B. cereus group have previously been shown [31]. The identification of species with Btyper3 is based on WGS and uses a threshold of 92.5% ANI for genomo-species clusters [7]. This methodology divides the isolates into the species B. mosaicus, B. cereus SS, B. toyonensis, B. mycoides and B. pseudomycoides, and further, four of the isolates belonging to B. cereus SS are Biovar thuringiensis. This identification reflects the division of the isolates into phylogenetic groups as four of the species correspond to a phylogenetic group, while B. mosaicus corresponds to the two neighboring groups II and III. The chosen threshold at 92.5% ANI deviates from the widely accepted 95% ANI threshold for current species definition [32], and it was chosen to create a strong relationship between identification to the species level and the known phylogenetic structure. If a threshold at 95% ANI is chosen for analyzing the 33 isolates, one isolate each of the species B. mosaicus and B. mycoides must be considered as a new undescribed species according to Figure 1. Further, it must be noted that the Btyper3-based identification means that: (i) some isolates which by traditional methods would be identified as B. cereus are now considered as the new species B. mosaicus, (ii) isolates which do not have a rhizoid growth on agar plates are identified as B. mycoides or B. pseudomycoides and (iii) isolates possessing genes such as Cry75Aa3 and different vegetative insecticidal proteins are considered as Biovar thuringiensis, although they do not produce crystal proteins, a key identification characteristic for B. thuringiensis.
The TYGS-based identification is based on in silico DNA:DNA hybridization and species delimitation as described by Meier-Kolthoff et al. [5]. Based on the procedure, the 33 isolates are divided into the species B. cereus, B. wiedmanii, B. toyonensis, B. proteolyticus, B. mycoides, B. pseudomycoides and seven new species. This division of the isolates into species does not correspond to the phylogenetic division of the isolates into six groups. Indeed, although all isolates affiliated to phylogenetic group V are identified as B. toyonensis, two isolates also identified as B. toyonensis are affiliated to groups II and VI. The three new species comprising more than one isolate affiliated to the species are all restricted to one phylogenetic group, and this might reflect that the B. cereus group has a clonal phylogenetic structure [3]. The difference between the ANI-based and the TYGS-based identification reflects that the two methods interpret the phylogeny of the B. cereus group differently and use different definitions for the affiliation of isolates to species.
The identification performed by four different procedures points to the importance of describing how identification at the species level for the B. cereus group members has been executed.
Most of the 33 isolates across species and phylogenetic groups possessed seventeen of the nineteen analyzed genes for virulence factors, which corresponds to previous results [7,29]. It has also been found previously that cytK2 and hlyII are restricted to phylogenetic groups II, III and IV, and that those genes producing the emetic toxin and the B. anthracis capsule are notably restricted to a few clonal clusters in group III [7,15]. We reported a close association between percentage identity of the genes at the protein level to selected standard genes and the distribution of the isolates into six phylogenetic groups. Earlier reports have shown that cytotoxicity varies between the phylogenetic groups, and that nheA and nheB, hblA and hblD and cytK genes are polymorphic [8,33,34]. It is unknown for most of these virulence factors whether different variants vary in virulence, except for CytK, which exists in two forms, CytK1 and CytK2, that exhibit 89% sequence identity at the protein level. The two CytK proteins differ in their biological effects, as CytK-2 forms pores with a lower conductance than those made by CytK-1 [34,35,36], and compared to CytK-2, CytK-1 displays a higher toxicity towards human intestinal Caco-2 and Vero cells [35]. This indicates that the variability in the sequences of the different virulence factors can affect their biological effects. This question needs to be investigated further for the other polymorphic virulence factors present in the B. cereus group in the future.
Our data also show that distribution of the isolates is related to the mean temperatures of the countries, as the distribution is related to the phylogenetic groups, which in relation to temperature, relates to different ecotypes [2,10,11]. In other words, isolates of the most cold-adapted groups, II, V and VI, are more common in colder soils, while isolates of more mesophylic groups, I, III and IV, prevail in more temperate soils. The relationship between temperature and the geographical distribution of B. cereus has been investigated earlier and shown by von Stetten et al. [37].
In conclusion, the phylogeny, identification and characterization of 33 B. cereus sensu lato isolates originating from 17 agricultural soils from 11 countries were analyzed on the basis of whole genome sequencing. Phylogenetic analyses divided the isolates into six groups that follow the phylogenetical division of B. cereus sensu lato proposed by several authors [1,2,3,6,7]. Identifications were based on four different methods with varied results, as none of the isolates were identified as the same species by all four methods: only the recent identification method proposed by Carroll et al. [7] directly reflected the phylogeny of the isolates. This points to the importance of describing the basis and method used for the identification. The presence and percent identity of the protein product of 19 genes potentially involved in pathogenicity divided the 33 isolates into four statistically different clusters, which corresponds to the generally accepted phylogenetic groups II, IV, V and VI. Phylogenetic groups I and III were each only presented by one isolate. This shows that different pathotypes exist and that it is possible to differentiate between them by comparing the percent identity of proteins potentially involved in pathogenicity. It also shows that a basic link between phylogeny and pathogenicity exists. Finally, the geographical distribution of the isolates was not random: they were distributed in relation to their division into the six phylogenetic groups, which again relates to different ecotypes with different temperature growth ranges [2,10,11]. This means that we find it easier to analyze and understand the results obtained about the 33 B. cereus sensu lato isolates in a phylogenetic, patho-type and ecotype-oriented context, than in a context based on a method-dependent identification at the species level.

Author Contributions

A.Z., M.R.A., H.A., M.G., M.H., I.J., O.K., A.K., J.L., P.M., D.M., Ş.N., H.S., R.T., Z.T., F.Y., R.Z.Z., X.Z., V.S.-B. and N.B.H. were all involved in conceiving and designing the research, in the collection of soil samples, performing the laboratory work and the analysis of data. A.Z. did the sequencing and the basal bio-informatics. N.B.H. wrote the manuscript. A.Z. and N.B.H. created the figures. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was supported by the European Cooperation in Science and Technology’s COST-action 16110 “Control of Human Pathogenic Microorganisms in Plant Production Systems (HUPLANTcontrol)” and is a result of the training school “Bacillus—identification, phylogeny and potential pathogenicity” hosted by the Department of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Denmark, and planned by N.B.H. The supporters had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We want to thank Klaus Condé Christensen, Tania Begovic and Tina Thane for technical assistance and other kinds of help during the training school. We are grateful to Jennifer Upfold for revising the English text.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be interpreted as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Priest, F.G.; Barker, M.; Baillie, L.W.J.; Holmes, E.C.; Maiden, M.C.J. Population structure and evolution of the Bacillus cereus group. J. Bacteriol. 2004, 186, 7959–7970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Guinebretiere, M.H.; Thompson, F.L.; Sorokin, A.; Normand, P.; Dawyndt, P.; Ehling-Schulz, M.; De Vos, P. Ecological diversification in the Bacillus cereus Group. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 10, 851–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Okinaka, R.T.; Keim, P. The Phylogeny of Bacillus cereus sensu lato. Microbiol. Spectr. 2016, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Liu, Y.; Lai, Q.L.; Goker, M.; Meier-Kolthoff, J.P.; Wang, M.; Sun, Y.M.; Shao, Z.Z. Genomic insights into the taxonomic status of the Bacillus cereus group. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Meier-Kolthoff, J.P.; Goker, M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bazinet, A.L. Pan-genome and phylogeny of Bacillus cereus sensu lato. BMC Evol. Biol. 2017, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Carroll, L.M.; Wiedmann, M.; Kovac, J. Proposal of a Taxonomic Nomenclature for the Bacillus cereus Group Which Reconciles Genomic Definitions of Bacterial Species with Clinical and Industrial Phenotypes. Mbio 2020, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Fiedoruk, K.; Drewnowska, J.M.; Daniluk, T.; Leszczynska, K.; Iwaniuk, P.; Swiecicka, I. Ribosomal background of the Bacillus cereus group thermotypes. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Helgason, E.; Tourasse, N.J.; Meisal, R.; Caugant, D.A.; Kolsto, A.B. Multilocus sequence typing scheme for bacteria of the Bacillus cereus group. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 191–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Drewnowska, J.M.; Swiecicka, I. Eco-Genetic Structure of Bacillus cereus sensu lato Populations from Different Environments in Northeastern Poland. PLoS ONE 2013, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Swiecicka, I.; Bartoszewicz, M.; Kasulyte-Creasey, D.; Drewnowska, J.M.; Murawska, E.; Yernazarova, A.; Mahillon, J. Diversity of thermal ecotypes and potential pathotypes of Bacillus thuringiensis soil isolates. FEMS. Microbiol. Ecol. 2013, 85, 262–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Guinebretiere, M.H.; Velge, P.; Couvert, O.; Carlin, F.; Debuyser, M.L.; Nguyen-The, C. Ability of Bacillus cereus Group Strains To Cause Food Poisoning Varies According to Phylogenetic Affiliation (Groups I to VII) Rather than Species Affiliation. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010, 48, 3388–3391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Bottone, E.J. Bacillus cereus, a Volatile Human Pathogen. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2010, 23, 382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Ehling-Schulz, M.; Lereclus, D.; Koehler, T.M. The Bacillus cereus Group: Bacillus Species with Pathogenic Potential. Microbiol. Spectr. 2019, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Carroll, L.M.; Kovac, J.; Miller, R.A.; Wiedmann, M. Rapid, High-Throughput Identification of Anthrax-Causing and Emetic Bacillus cereus Group Genome Assemblies via BTyper, a Computational Tool for Virulence-Based Classification of Bacillus cereus Group Isolates by Using Nucleotide Sequencing Data. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Travers, R.S.; Martin, P.A.W.; Reichelderfer, C.F. Selective Process for Efficient Isolation of Soil Bacillus spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1987, 53, 1263–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Hansen, B.M.; Leser, T.D.; Hendriksen, N.B. Polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of Bacillus cereus group cells. Fems Microbiol. Lett. 2001, 202, 209–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Willumsen, P.A.; Johansen, J.E.; Karlson, U.; Hansen, B.M. Isolation and taxonomic affiliation of N-heterocyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-transforming bacteria. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 67, 420–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, S.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, Y.; Gu, J. fastp: An ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, 884–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Seemann, T. Prokka: Rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2068–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Larsen, M.V.; Cosentino, S.; Rasmussen, S.; Friis, C.; Hasman, H.; Marvig, R.L.; Lund, O. Multilocus Sequence Typing of Total-Genome-Sequenced Bacteria. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012, 50, 1355–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Lechner, S.; Mayr, R.; Francis, K.P.; Pruss, B.M.; Kaplan, T.; Wiessner-Gunkel, E.; Scherer, S. Bacillus weihenstephanensis sp. nov. is a new psychrotolerant species of the Bacillus cereus group. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1998, 48, 1373–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Katoh, K.; Misawa, K.; Kuma, K.; Miyata, T. MAFFT: A novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 3059–3066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hansen, B.M.; Hoiby, P.E.; Jensen, G.B.; Hendriksen, N.B. The Bacillus cereus bceT enterotoxin sequence reappraised. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2003, 223, 21–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. NCBI. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/browse#!/prokaryotes/bacillus%20cereus (accessed on 5 November 2020).
  27. Klassen, J.L.; Currie, C.R. Gene fragmentation in bacterial draft genomes: Extent, consequences and mitigation. BMC Genom. 2012, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Cahill, M.J.; Koser, C.U.; Ross, N.E.; Archer, J.A.C. Read Length and Repeat Resolution: Exploring Prokaryote Genomes Using Next-Generation Sequencing Technologies. PLoS ONE 2010, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Ceuppens, S.; Boon, N.; Uyttendaele, M. Diversity of Bacillus cereus group strains is reflected in their broad range of pathogenicity and diverse ecological lifestyles. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2013, 84, 433–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Liu, Y.; Lai, Q.L.; Shao, Z.Z. Genome analysis-based reclassification of Bacillus weihenstephanensis as a later heterotypic synonym of Bacillus mycoides. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bavykin, S.G.; Lysov, Y.P.; Zakhariev, V.; Kelly, J.J.; Jackman, J.; Stahl, D.A.; Cherni, A. Use of 16S rRNA, 23S rRNA, and gyrB gene sequence analysis to determine phylogenetic relationships of Bacillus cereus group microorganisms (vol 42, pg 3711, 2004). J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006, 44, 2676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Jain, C.; Rodriguez-R, L.M.; Phillippy, A.M.; Konstantinidis, K.T.; Aluru, S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Beecher, D.J.; Wong, A.C.L. Tripartite haemolysin BL: Isolation and characterization of two distinct homologous sets of components from a single Bacillus cereus isolate. Microbiology-Sgm 2000, 146, 1371–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Fagerlund, A.; Ween, A.; Lund, T.; Hardy, S.P.; Granum, P.E. Genetic and functional analysis of the cytK family of genes in Bacillus cereus. Microbiology-Sgm 2004, 150, 2689–2697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Hardy, S.P.; Lund, T.; Granum, P.E. CytK toxin of Bacillus cereus forms pores in planar lipid bilayers and is cytotoxic to intestinal epithelia. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2001, 197, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lund, T.; De Buyser, M.L.; Granum, P.E. A new cytotoxin from Bacillus cereus that may cause necrotic enteritis. Mol. Microbiol. 2000, 38, 254–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. von Stetten, F.; Mayr, R.; Scherer, S. Climatic influence on mesophilic Bacillus cereus and psychrotolerant Bacillus weihenstephanensis populations in tropical, temperate and alpine soil. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 1, 503–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI)-based phylogenetic tree of 33 B. cereus s.l. constructed by MASH clustering. Nine strains referring to different species within the group are included. Further, the affiliation of the different clusters’ relations to the proposed phylogenetic groups I–VII [2] is shown.
Figure 1. Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI)-based phylogenetic tree of 33 B. cereus s.l. constructed by MASH clustering. Nine strains referring to different species within the group are included. Further, the affiliation of the different clusters’ relations to the proposed phylogenetic groups I–VII [2] is shown.
Microorganisms 08 02028 g001
Figure 2. Principal component analysis (PCA) of presence and identity of 19 potential genes in 33 B. cereuscereus sensu lato isolates with their affiliation to six phylogenetic groups shown. F1 relates to the percentage identity of all the genes, except sph, and F2 relates to the percentage identity of sph. Each isolate (blue spots) was plotted according to its values in PC analysis.
Figure 2. Principal component analysis (PCA) of presence and identity of 19 potential genes in 33 B. cereuscereus sensu lato isolates with their affiliation to six phylogenetic groups shown. F1 relates to the percentage identity of all the genes, except sph, and F2 relates to the percentage identity of sph. Each isolate (blue spots) was plotted according to its values in PC analysis.
Microorganisms 08 02028 g002
Figure 3. Numbers of 33 B. cereus sensu lato isolates in five phylogenetic groups in relation to the annual mean temperature of soils from which they are isolated. Blue refers to numbers of isolates from soils with an annual mean temperature below or equal to the median annual temperature (10.2 °C) of the 17 soils, and brown refers to numbers of isolates from soils with temperature above the median temperature. The temperature growth range of the six phylogenetic groups are shown [2].
Figure 3. Numbers of 33 B. cereus sensu lato isolates in five phylogenetic groups in relation to the annual mean temperature of soils from which they are isolated. Blue refers to numbers of isolates from soils with an annual mean temperature below or equal to the median annual temperature (10.2 °C) of the 17 soils, and brown refers to numbers of isolates from soils with temperature above the median temperature. The temperature growth range of the six phylogenetic groups are shown [2].
Microorganisms 08 02028 g003
Table 1. Origin and characteristics of agricultural fields used for isolation of B. cereus sensu lato bacteria.
Table 1. Origin and characteristics of agricultural fields used for isolation of B. cereus sensu lato bacteria.
Isolate NumberCountryGPS-CoordinatesMeters above Sea LevelCropYearly Mean Temperature (°C)
N1 and N2Lithuania54.864
23.941
50Vegetables6.4
N3 and N4Tunisia34.5117
10.4924
200Olive trees18.1
N5 and N6Netherlands51.966
5.655
9Leak9.2
N7 and N8Slovenia46.1434
14.5580
265Oat10.4
N9 and N10Switzerland46.3919
6.21164
450Livestock9.2
N11 and N12Hungary47.3827
17.4992
135Maize 11.1
N13 and N14Hungary46.0559
19.2622
95Pea 11.1
N15 and N16Serbia45.1908
19.2101
88Fallow11.3
N17 and N18Serbia45.1908
19.2101
88Fallow11.3
N19 and N20Turkey39.9672
32.6623
938Lemon10.9
N21 and N22Turkey40.0808
34.1200
780 Wheat, Barley10.9
N23 and N24Turkey39.9040
32.6345
900Garden10.9
N25 and N26Turkey39.5456
33.4436
1000Grass10.9
N27 and N28Turkey40.0047
32.5142
1066 Grass10.9
N29 and N30Denmark55.697
12.103
5Grass7.8
N31 and N32Germany52.359
13.308
42Potato10.2
N33 and N34Belgium51.138
3.938
6 Tree Nursery10.2
Table 2. Overall whole genome characteristics of 33 B. cereus sensu lato isolates. Bases = number of nucleotides, Contigs = number of contigs, CDS = number of coding sequences, tRNA = number of tRNA genes, rRNA = number of rRNA genes; GC-content = percentage guanine-cytosine content
Table 2. Overall whole genome characteristics of 33 B. cereus sensu lato isolates. Bases = number of nucleotides, Contigs = number of contigs, CDS = number of coding sequences, tRNA = number of tRNA genes, rRNA = number of rRNA genes; GC-content = percentage guanine-cytosine content
IsolateBasesContigsCDStRNArRNAGC content
N16589056148663321391234.87
N2620859336261121161034.7
N3598126013945801981035.18
N4562837428355771151135.01
N560393394356023120935.08
N6605009185861021391235.33
N77090662468260571291437.86
N8596338239260541021235.2
N9573101656357301121235.31
N10564876041056471281135.25
N11601532828658691091235.06
N126179004190059021251635.4
N13592043830458531121334.9
N1456878703325733132835.17
N15604025145559651261234.99
N16578350240557691201135.09
N176225349391619898734.91
N1859769553495862941035.05
N19631039113056317105935.3
N2063664759896433104835.18
N21604727880560411122035.48
N22568654842556891221135.1
N2362463562796250105734.76
N2460836673326065100734.92
N256552745545637596634.68
N2663464599796410101735.18
N276484007279636091634.67
N28599658332060031021035,13
N2956036794845593951135.18
N305706629631566599935.3
N3159964292745885941134.98
N33552870829055501091435.32
N345640513173561692935.28
Table 3. PanC and multiple loci sequence typing (MLST) characterization of 33 B. cereus sensu lato isolates. * Determined with uncertainty: ? = New profile. glp (glycerol uptake facilitator protein), gmk (guanylate kinase, putative), ilvD (dihydroxy-acid dehydratase), pta (phosphate acetyltransferase), pur (phosphoribosylaminoimidazolecarboxamide), pycA (pyruvate carboxylase), tpi (triosephosphate isomerase).
Table 3. PanC and multiple loci sequence typing (MLST) characterization of 33 B. cereus sensu lato isolates. * Determined with uncertainty: ? = New profile. glp (glycerol uptake facilitator protein), gmk (guanylate kinase, putative), ilvD (dihydroxy-acid dehydratase), pta (phosphate acetyltransferase), pur (phosphoribosylaminoimidazolecarboxamide), pycA (pyruvate carboxylase), tpi (triosephosphate isomerase).
NRCountryPhylogenetic Group (panC)MLST Profileglpgmkilvptapurpyctpi
N1Lithuaniaclade 4?148 *484558517
N2Lithuaniaclade 4?2858283 *45 *58877
N3Tunesiaclade 522343263542394163
N4Tunesiaclade 4100916617094721
N5Nederlandsclade 26168153117711139380
N6Nederlandsclade 2? *11056111*188649626
N7Sloveniaclade 64342621126104783218
N8Sloveniaclade 6? *274115227200195170163 *
N9Switzerlandclade 6428108511301211099279
N10Switzerlandclade 64342621126104783218
N11Hungaryclade 5? *8726 *78902734130
N12Hungaryclade 5?8726789027322030
N13Hungaryclade 423157725813
N14Hungaryclade 2? *118 *35171 *22962026
N15Serbiaclade 572 *4326 *3540394130
N16Serbiaclade 31766 *229 *5271240281183190
N17Serbiaclade 527883263542397130
N18Serbiaclade 51484 *4326784239 *7130 *
N19Turkeyclade 6? *75 *104 *303 *15 *103 *202 *128 *
N20Turkeyclade 4561577272613
N21Turkeyclade 1? *13413274253844435 *
N22Turkeyclade 4413881111127
N23Turkeyclade 4121577271013
N24Turkeyclade 5886435035125704130
N25Turkeyclade 4121577271013
N26Turkeyclade 4561577272613
N27Turkeyclade 4121577271013
N28Turkeyclade 6?810221535911
N29Denmarkclade 6635 *2621104 *6827*3218
N30Denmarkclade 6? *10813910415 *2219279
N31Austriaclade 54878326143133914130
N33Belgiumclade 625410363515947011
N34Belgiumclade 6734251022165832311
Table 4. Identification of 33 B. cereus sensu lato by four different methods.
Table 4. Identification of 33 B. cereus sensu lato by four different methods.
IsolateCountryPhylogenyTraditional16S RNA geneSpecies ANISpecies DNA/DNA
N21Turkeyclade 1B. cereusB. cereusB. pseudomycoidesB pseudomycoides
N14Hungaryclade 2B. cereusB. cereusB. mosaicusB toyonensis
N16Serbiaclade 2B. cereusB. cereusB. mosaicusNew species 2
N5Nederlandsclade 2B. cereusB. cereusB. mosaicusNew species 3
N6Nederlandsclade 2B. cereusB. cereusB. mosaicusNew species 5
N1Lithuaniaclade 4B. cereusB. cereusB. cereus s.s.
biovar Thuringiensis;
B. thuringiensis
New species 1
N13Hungaryclade 4B. cereusB. cereusB. cereus s.s.B. wiedmanii
N2Lithuaniaclade 4B. cereusB. cereusB. cereus s.s.
biovar Thuringiensis;
B. thuringiensis
New species 1
N20Turkeyclade 4B. cereusB. cereusB. cereus s.s.New species 7
N22Turkeyclade 4B. cereusB. cereusB. cereus s.s.B cereus
N23Turkeyclade 4B. cereusB. mycoidesB. cereus s.s.New species 7
N25Turkeyclade 4B. cereusB. mycoidesB. cereus s.s.
biovar Thuringiensis;
B. thuringiensis
New species 7
N26Turkeyclade 4B. cereusB. mycoidesB. cereus s.s.New species 7
N27Turkeyclade 4B. cereusB. mycoidesB. cereus s.s.
biovar Thuringiensis;
B. thuringiensis
New species 7
N4Tunesiaclade 4B. cereusB. mycoidesB. cereus s.s.Bacillus cereus
N11Hungaryclade 5B. cereusB. mycoidesB. toyonensisB toyonensis
N12Hungaryclade 5B. cereusB. mycoidesB. toyonensisB. toyonensis
N15Serbiaclade 5B. cereusB. mycoidesB. toyonensisB.toyonensis
N17Serbiaclade 5B. cereusB. pseudomycoidesB. toyonensisB toyonensis
N18Serbiaclade 5B. cereusB. spB. toyonensisB toyonensis
N24Turkeyclade 5B. cereusB. sp.B. toyonensisB toyonensis
N3Tunesiaclade 5B. cereusB. thuringiensisB. toyonensisB. toyonensis
N31Austriaclade 5B. cereusB. thuringiensisB. toyonensisB toyonensis
N10Switzerlandclade 6B. weihenstephanensisB. toyonensisB. mycoidesB toyonensis
N19Turkeyclade 6B. weihenstephanensisB. wiedmaniiB. mycoidesNew species 6
N28Turkeyclade 6B. weihenstephanensisB. wiedmaniiB. mycoidesB. mycoides
N29Denmarkclade 6B. weihenstephanensisB. wiedmaniiB. mycoidesNew species 4
N30Denmarkclade 6B. weihenstephanensisB. wiedmaniiB. mycoidesNew species 4
N33Belgiumclade 6B. weihenstephanensisB. wiedmaniiB. mycoidesB mycoides
N34Belgiumclade 6B. weihenstephanensisB. wiedmaniiB. mycoidesB mycoides
N7Sloveniaclade 6B. weihenstephanensisB. wiedmaniiB. mycoidesB. proteolyticus
N8Sloveniaclade 6B. weihenstephanensisNot identifiedB. mycoidesBacillus proteolyticus
N9Switzerlandclade 6B. weihenstephanensisB. mycoidesB. mycoidesNew species 4
Table 5. Presence and percentage identity to the translated genes found in the BTyper virulence database of 19 genes potentially involved in pathogenesis at the protein level in 33 B. cereus sensu lato isolates.
Table 5. Presence and percentage identity to the translated genes found in the BTyper virulence database of 19 genes potentially involved in pathogenesis at the protein level in 33 B. cereus sensu lato isolates.
IsolateGroupcerAcerBclocytK2entAentFMhblAhblBhblChblcDhlyIIinhA1inhA2nheAnheBnheCplcAplcBsph
N21I8900091718908588083867486790890
N14II9590980969495879499094969610095949598
N16II958896094929996991009694969710094969596
N5II968999094959586941009693979710095949697
N6II9590950979598879599959496979995949598
N1IV10094999898979998981000989999100999510091
N13IV100959909595999898100999499100100989610091
N2IV10094999997929998981000989999100989510090
N20IV100989909595999898100999499100100989610090
N22IV1009599100999799991001001001001001001009910010092
N23IV100959909593999898100999499100100989610091
N25IV1009599979594999898100999498100100989610091
N26IV10009909595999898100999499100100989610090
N27IV1009599979594999898100999498100100989610091
N4IV100959999989599989910099949999100989710092
N11V9890910979093869499096979710093909894
N12V9989920959092869499096979710094909993
N15V9889930969095859599094979610094909893
N17V9989009790958695100094979610094909993
N18V9989009790958695100094979610094909993
N24V9989930979095869599094979610094919993
N3V9889930969095869599094979610094909893
N31V99899398979095869499095979710093919993
N10VI988997088889287849409193949993939892
N19VI988789088906965790091949610094959892
N28VI958797088879788939809195971009209590
N29VI978800888991878494093969510093929791
N30VI9889980888890878896091949610093939892
N33VI9587980948891898993091939710093939591
N34VI958795093889887939909195959894939591
N7VI988997088889287849409193949993939892
N8VI91889808885918784920919295999409189
N9VI988798087899089889609193969993929892
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zervas, A.; Aggerbeck, M.R.; Allaga, H.; Güzel, M.; Hendriks, M.; Jonuškienė, I.; Kedves, O.; Kupeli, A.; Lamovšek, J.; Mülner, P.; et al. Identification and Characterization of 33 Bacillus cereus sensu lato Isolates from Agricultural Fields from Eleven Widely Distributed Countries by Whole Genome Sequencing. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 2028. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8122028

AMA Style

Zervas A, Aggerbeck MR, Allaga H, Güzel M, Hendriks M, Jonuškienė I, Kedves O, Kupeli A, Lamovšek J, Mülner P, et al. Identification and Characterization of 33 Bacillus cereus sensu lato Isolates from Agricultural Fields from Eleven Widely Distributed Countries by Whole Genome Sequencing. Microorganisms. 2020; 8(12):2028. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8122028

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zervas, Athanasios, Marie Rønne Aggerbeck, Henrietta Allaga, Mustafa Güzel, Marc Hendriks, IIona Jonuškienė, Orsolya Kedves, Ayse Kupeli, Janja Lamovšek, Pascal Mülner, and et al. 2020. "Identification and Characterization of 33 Bacillus cereus sensu lato Isolates from Agricultural Fields from Eleven Widely Distributed Countries by Whole Genome Sequencing" Microorganisms 8, no. 12: 2028. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8122028

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop