The Effects of Flavomycin and Colistin Sulfate Pre-Treatment on Ileal Bacterial Community Composition, the Response to Salmonella typhimurium and Host Gene Expression in Broiler Chickens
1
State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Department of Animal Nutrition & Feed Science, College of Animal Science & Technology, China Agricultural University, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, China
2
Department of Basic Veterinary Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, China
3
China Animal Husbandry Group, Fengtai District, Beijing 100070, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2019, 7(11), 574; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7110574
Submission received: 15 October 2019
/
Revised: 9 November 2019
/
Accepted: 14 November 2019
/
Published: 18 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Gut Microbiota)
Abstract
:The composition of the bacterial community affects the intestinal health and growth performance of broiler chickens. The main purpose of this study was to explore the effects of flavomycin and colistin sulfate on the resistance to Salmonella typhimurium infection, ileal bacteria and intestinal health. In total, 396 1-day-old broiler chickens were randomly divided into six groups. Two groups were fed each one of the diets—the control diet (CON), the flavomycin at 10 mg/kg diet (AntiG+), and the colistin sulfate at 40 mg/kg diet (AntiG−), for 5 days. Then, one of each of the two groups was challenged with S. typhimurium on the 8th day; these were named CONS, AntiG+S and AntiG−S, respectively. The results showed that S. typhimurium significantly reduced the feed intake and body weight gain, and increased the feed conversion ratio (p < 0.05). It also increased the inflammatory expressions of NF-κB and MyD88 genes (p < 0.05); and reduced the expressions of claudin-1, occludin and mucin-2 (p < 0.05) tight junction genes in the intestines. S. typhimurium significantly reduced ileal bacterial diversity indexes of observed-species, chao1 and Shannon (p < 0.05). Compared with AntiG+S group, AntiG−S group increased the body weight gain of broiler chickens (p < 0.05), reduced the expression of inflammatory genes (p < 0.05) and intestinal permeability to fluorescein isothiocyanate (p < 0.05). AntiG-S group also improved the ileal bacterial diversity indexes of observed-species and Shannon (p < 0.05). There were many significant correlations between intestinal bacteria, intestinal gene expressions and intestinal morphology (p < 0.05). This study indicated that pre-constructed AntiG− bacteria could against a S. typhimurium infection by inhibiting the expressions of intestinal inflammation genes and increasing the diversity of intestinal bacteria.
1. Introduction
Salmonella, as a Gram-negative bacteria is a serious cause of foodborne diseases in humans and livestock around the world; it provides a significant inducement towards morbidity, mortality and economic loss in broiler production [1]. In more than 2500 Salmonella serotypes, Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica contains no less than 1500 serotypes, which includes Salmonella typhimurium and Salmonella enteritidis. This subspecies is present in more than 99% of human salmonellosis [2]. S. typhimurium is the most common serotype associated with livestock diseases [3,4]. The Salmonella infection in broiler chickens mainly causes intestinal health problems that seriously reduce growth performance and increases the spread of drug-resistant genes [5]. The increase of beneficial microorganisms in the intestines, such as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacteria, can against the Salmonella infections [6]. Therefore, changing the composition of gut microbes can be used as a strategy to resist the challenge of Salmonella and improve the growth performance of animals [7].
Both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria have effects on intestinal tissue immunity and play an important role in maintaining intestinal mucous integrity, although the properties of Gram staining for bacteria are not associated with their pathogenicity. Gram staining is an important classification standard for bacteria and relates to antibiotic action. Flavomycin as a phosphorylated polysaccharide antibiotic, and its antibacterial mechanism is to inhibit the reproduction of bacteria by interfering with the biosynthesis of the structural polysaccharide peptide in the cell wall [8]. The growth-promoting principle of flavomycin may be that it improves the digestion of energy and protein in the feed [9]. The antibacterial spectrum of flavomycin is narrow, being mainly effective on Gram-positive bacteria. Its effect on Gram-negative bacteria is very weak [10]. Colistin sulfate as an alkaline peptide antibiotic, mainly used to prevent the infection of sensitive bacteria and to promote the growth of livestock and poultry [11]. Colistin sulfate can combine with the free phosphate of lipoprotein in the cell membrane. That reduces the cell membrane surface tension and increases the permeability of the membrane, resulting in cytoplasm outflow and cell death [12]. Colistin sulfate has a strong inhibitory effect on Gram-negative bacteria, especially Escherichia coli and Salmonella, while it has no effect on Gram-positive bacteria and fungi [13]. Therefore, consumption of flavomycin or colistin sulfate can specifically inhibit the growth of Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacteria to construct different intestinal bacteria.
Changing the composition of intestinal bacteria has a powerful influence on the intestinal health and the growth performance of broiler chicken. These microorganisms interact with intestinal epithelial cells to change the intestinal morphology. Studies have shown that Salmonella infection in broiler chicken caused intestinal immune responses and improved the inflammation-related gene expressions of IFNγ, IL-12, and IL-18 [14]. The resistance to Salmonella can be improved by regulating the intestinal bacteria [6]. A large number of previous studies have focused on the therapeutic effect of antibiotics against S. typhimurium infection [15,16]. There has been no such research on the resistance of S. typhimurium through the early construction of different intestinal bacteria.
Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the effects of Gram-negative or positive intestinal bacterial communities constructed by flavomycin or colistin sulfate, on the growth performance, intestinal bacteria, intestinal morphology and expression of intestinal mucosal genes in broiler chickens. At the same time, the resistances of these constructed, different intestinal bacterial communities to Salmonella infection were studied.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Design and Sample Collection
The animal protocol was approved by Chinese Agricultural University Laboratory Animal Welfare and Animal Experimental Ethical Committee (permit number AW16109102-1, 15 September, 2014). In this experiment, a total of 396 1-day-old Arbor Acres broiler chickens were divided into six treatment groups, each with 6 repetitions of 11 broiler chickens. The three diets used consisted of a control diet (Table 1), flavomycin at 10 mg/kg in the control diet, and colistin sulfate at 40 mg/kg in the control diet. For each diet, two groups of broiler chickens were assigned, for 5 days. Then, the treatment diets were replaced with the control diet to build the intestinal bacteria of—the control group (CON), anti-gram-positive bacteria group (Anti G+) and anti-Gram-negative bacteria group (Anti G−). On the 8th day of feeding, one of each of the above two groups for the three diets were administered 1 × 109 CFU of S. typhimurium per chicken, and named CONS, Anti G+S and Anti G−S, respectively. The temperature in the bird room was kept at about 35 °C for the first week; then, it gradually dropped and remained at 25 °C. The relative humidity of the environment was maintained at 65–70%. The light remained for 24 h during the first 3 days; that was followed by 23 h of light and 1 h of darkness. The number of dead chickens was recorded every day. At the 14th, 21st and 42th days, the feed intake, body weight gain, feed conversion ratio and mortality rate were calculated.
On the 14th and 21st days, one chicken was randomly selected to be weighed and slaughtered from each repetition. The ileal content was collected and frozen by liquid nitrogen and stored in −80 °C for 16S rDNA Sequencing. About a 0.5 cm terminal ileum segment was cut and fixed in 4% polyformaldehyde solution in each case. The mucosal tissues of the intestinal segments were gently scraped with glass slides. The mucosal tissues were frozen with liquid nitrogen and stored in −80 °C for Real-time PCR.
2.2. DNA Extraction and 16S rDNA Sequencing of Ileal Microbes
The DNA of ileal contents on the 21st day was extracted by TIANamp Stool DNA Kit (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China). The DNA concentration was determined by Nano Drop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., DE, USA). Two samples in the same treatment group were mixed with an equivalent amount of DNA to obtain a representative sample, so that each group had three representative samples for sequencing. The V3–V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rDNA was sequenced and analyzed by Beijing Nohe Bioinformatics Technology Co., Ltd. The sequencing data was analyzed according to QIIME processes [17].
The raw sequencing data were submitted to the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) of NCBI, and the SRA accession number is PRJNA577381.
2.3. Ileum Histomorphology
The paraffin embedded tissues were cut into thicknesses of 0.5 μm. Each glass slide reflects the morphology of an about 0.5 cm intestinal segment. The slides were processed and stained with hematoxylin-eosin (H&E). The sections were observed and analyzed by SmartV350D analysis system (Jieda Technology Development Co Ltd., Jiangsu, China). Ten intact intestinal villi were randomly selected for each section. The height of each intestinal villus and the corresponding crypt depth were determined. The villus height was based on the vertical height from the opening of the intestinal gland to the top of the villus. The crypt depth was based on the vertical height from the muscular layer of the mucosa to the opening of the intestinal gland.
2.4. Detection of Ileal Permeability by Serum Method
On the 14th day, one chicken was randomly selected from each repetition. The intestinal segment, about 2 cm before the junction of the ileum and cecum, was taken and placed in a silica gel dish which contained Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS) buffer. The gas composition 95% O2 and 5% CO2 was maintained. The intestinal segment was cut and rinsed to remove the intestinal contents. Then, the intestinal serosa layer was stripped to keep the mucosa intact. The intestinal segments were loaded into the Ussing Chamber splint and placed in the compartment. The mucosal side compartment was injected with 3.5 mL HBSS buffer containing 2 mg/mL fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran (FITC), and the serosal side was injected with the same volume of HBSS buffer. 300 μL solution in serosal side was taken after 60 min. The ileal permeability was measured by a fluorescent-concentrate of FITC-dextran under a 485/525 nm dual-wavelength multifunctional microplate reader. On the 21st day, one chicken was randomly selected from each group. The chickens were injectedwith 1 mL of 10 mg/mL FITC-dextran solution. The blank control group was injected with the same volume of distilled water. After 3 h, venous sinus blood was collected to separate the serum by 3000× g centrifuging for 10 min. The FITC-dextran fluorescence-concentration standard curve was calculated under 485/525 nm dual-wavelength multifunctional microplate reader, and the FITC-dextran content in serum was detected. Intestinal permeability was tested according to previous report [18].
2.5. Myeloperoxidase (MPO) Activity in the Ileal Mucosa
On the 14th and 21st days, one chicken was randomly selected from each repetition. The middle and posterior segments of the ileum were cut to open by scissors. The mucosal tissues of the intestinal segments were gently scraped with glass slides and weighed in centrifugal tubes. The chickens were frozen with liquid nitrogen and then transferred to a freezer at −80 °C for preservation. The MPO activity was determined in accordance with the corresponding kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Biological Company, Nanjing, China).
2.6. Total RNA Extraction and Quantitative Real Time PCR
The RNA of ileal tissue was extracted by Trizol according to the instructions (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Each group had six repetitions. The concentration and quality of RNA were measured by Nano-300 spectrophotometer (Yuanpinghao Biotechnology Co., Ltd., beijing, China). The reverse transcription of RNA was performed by Revert AidTM First Strand Gene Synthesis Kit (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Dalian, China). The real-time quantitative PCR was performed by ABI7500 real-time quantitative PCR instrument (Applied Biosystems Inc, Foster City, CA, USA) and SYBR Premix EX TaqTM II (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Dalian, China). GAPDH was used as internal reference gene. The relative expression of other genes were calculated according to the former research [19]. The primer sequences used to determine the expressions of claudin-1, occludin, mucin-2, IFN-γ, TLR2, TLR4, NF-κB, MyD88 and GAPDH were designed by Primer-BLAST (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast) of NCBI and are listed in the Table 2.
2.7. Statistical Analysis
The data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA using the GLM in SPSS17.0 software (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, United States). The difference between the main effect and the interaction effect was tested; p < 0.05 indicated that the difference was significant. Duncan’s test was used to make multiple comparisons among groups in the presence of interaction effects. The spearman rank correlation analysis of the relative abundance of intestinal bacteria and other indicators of the intestines was carried out by the packages Corrplot and Gplots in R for Windows 3.5.1 software (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
3. Results
3.1. Growth Performance
For days 1–14, the feed intake and body weight gain in the Anti G− group were significantly higher than that in the Anti G+ group. S. typhimurium increased the feed conversion ratio (Table 3). S. typhimurium reduced body weight gain and feed intake for days 1–21 (p < 0.05). The intestinal bacterial community and S. typhimurium had an interaction effect on the feed conversion ratio (p < 0.05). The CONS group was significantly higher than the Anti G− group (p < 0.05). The feed conversion ratio of the diet and Salmonella in days 1 to 42 had a significant interaction effect. The feed conversion ratio of the CON group was significantly lower than that of other groups (p < 0.05), but the difference between CON and Anti G−S was not significant.
3.2. Ileal Morphology
The effects of the intestinal bacterial community on the intestinal morphology are shown in Table 4. The differences of the villus height and the crypt depth among the treatment groups were not significant. The ratio of villus height to the crypt depth (V/C) in the CON group was significantly higher than that in the Anti G− group on the 14th day (p < 0.05). S. typhimurium significantly reduced the V/C measurements on the 14th day and 21st day (p < 0.05).
3.3. Ileal Gene Expression on the 14th Day
On the 14th day, the effects of intestinal bacterial communities and S. typhimurium on gene expressions in the intestines are shown in Table 5. The intestinal bacterial community can significantly affect the expressions of mucin-2, IFN-γ and NF-κB. The Anti G+ group had the highest expression of mucin-2 gene, while the CON group had the highest expression of the IFN-γ gene. The Anti G− group had the highest expression of the NF-κB gene. S. typhimurium significantly inhibited the gene expressions of claudin-1, occludin, NF-κB and MyD88 (p < 0.05), and significantly increased the gene expressions of IFN-γ(p < 0.05).
3.4. Ileal Gene Expression on the 21st Day
On the 21st day, the type of intestinal bacterial community and the presence of S. typhimurium had an interactive effect on mucin-2, IFN-γ and TLR2 gene expressions (Table 6). The expression of the mucin-2 gene in the Anti G−S group was significantly higher than that in the other treatment group, except in the Anti G−S group (p < 0.05). The IFN-γ gene expression in Anti G− group was significantly higher than in the CONS and Anti G−S groups (p < 0.05). The expression of the TLR2 gene in the Anti G−S group was significantly higher than that in Anti G+ and Anti G− groups (p < 0.05). S. typhimurium significantly inhibited the gene expressions of the claudin-1 and occludin, and increased the TLR4 gene’s expression (p < 0.05).
3.5. Intestinal Permeability and MPO Activity
The results of intestinal permeability and MPO activity are presented in Figure 1. On the 14th day, the intestinal permeability in the Anti G+ group was significantly higher than in the other groups (p < 0.05). The MPO activity in the CON group was significantly lower than in the other groups, except for the Anti G+ group (p < 0.05). On the 21st day, the difference in intestinal permeability between the CON and the Anti G+ groups was not significant, while the intestinal permeabilities in the Anti G− group and the S. typhimurium group were significantly higher than those in the CON and Anti G+ groups, and the MPO activity in the CON group was significantly lower than that in the Anti G−S group (p < 0.05).
3.6. Alpha Diversity Analysis
The effect of diet on the ileal bacterial diversity index is shown in Figure 2; the three diversity indices in S. typhimurium groups were significantly lower when compared to the unfilled S. typhimurium groups (p < 0.05). The observed_species index in the CONS group was significantly lower than in the Anti G−S and Anti G+S groups (p < 0.05). The chao1 index in Anti G+ group was significantly higher than in the CON and Anti G− groups (p < 0.05). The Shannon index in the Anti G− group was significantly higher than that in the CON group, while the CONS group had one significantly lower than the Anti G−S group’s (p < 0.05).
3.7. Taxonomic Analysis
The relative abundance of ileal bacteria in each treated group are presented in Figure 3. Firmicutes and Proteobacteria were the predominant bacteria at the phylum level, accounting for about 40.2% and 39.4% of the total bacteria, respectively. There were significant differences in the relative abundance of the two main bacteria in each group. Compared with the CON group, the Anti G− and Anti G+ groups had lower relative abundance of Firmicutes and higher relative abundance of Firmicutes. The Anti G+S and Anti G−S groups increased the relative abundance of Firmicutes and reduced the relative abundance of Proteobacteria. The Anti G− group had the lowest abundance of Firmicutes which accounted for about 24%. The Anti G−S had the highest abundance of Firmicutes about 66% and the lowest relative abundance of Proteobacteria accounted for about 22%. The CONS group had the highest relative abundance of Proteobacteria phylum.
At the family level, Lactobacillaceae and Helicobacteraceae were the main dominant bacteria, accounting for 35.4% and 26.8% of all the samples, respectively. The Anti G− and Anti G+ groups had lower Lactobacillaceae family compared to the CON group. The relative abundance of Lactobacillaceae in Anti G−S and Anti G+S increased after the challenge with S. typhimurium. Lactobacillaceae in the Anti G− group had the lowest proportion at 21.4%, while the Anti G−S group had the highest proportion at 57.4%. Helicobacteraceae in the Anti G−S group had the lowest proportion at 16.7%, while the CONS group had the highest proportion at 43.6%.
3.8. Beta Diversity
The principal component analysis (PCA) of the treatments showed significant clustering between unfilled S. typhimurium groups and S. typhimurium groups. PC1 and PC2 showed 34.01% and 33.52% of the explanatory degrees, respectively (Figure 4). At the same time, the PCA also showed clustering of the bacteria in each diet treatment group.
3.9. Correlation Analysis
The correlation analysis between the relative abundances of intestinal bacteria and the expressions of intestinal genes is shown in Figure 5. Intestinal genes’ expressions were associated with the relative abundances of a variety of gut bacteria. Occludin, claudin-1, mucin-2 and IFN-γ were significantly related to the multiple bacteria in the ilea, while the feed intake, body weight gain and crypt depth were not significantly related to the gut bacteria.
4. Discussion
There is no doubt that the chicken model has been used for the studies of different diseases. But little was known about the resistance to S. typhimurium infections in different intestinal bacterial structures of broiler chickens during the early stages. Prior to S. typhimurium infection in this study, flavomycin and colistin sulfate were used to create intestinal Anti G+ and Anti G− chickens, respectively.
Although some studies have shown the positive effects of antibiotic growth promoters on poultry production [15,20], this study found that short-term supplementation of antibiotic growth promoters in the early stages did not improve growth performance. That has also been reported before [21]. However, compared with the Anti G+ group, the Anti G− group can increase body weight gain and feed intake. This may be due to the ability of the Anti G− group to suppress the infection of S. typhimurium, which belongs to the Gram-negative group. The results of the present study substantiated the adverse impacts of S. typhimurium on the growth performance of the broiler chickens; parameters indicating that included body weight gain, feed intake and feed conversion ratio. Our values were similar to those of previous findings [14,22]. S. typhimurium infection in several day old chicks can cause a severe inflammatory response and intestinal lesions [23]. However, since the immune system improve and the gut microbes mature, older chickens can resist S. typhimurium infection. Therefore, S. typhimurium can have different results in different gut microbiome structures. In the results of this study, compared with the Anti G+ group, the intestinal bacterial community of Anti G− was more conducive to protecting gut health against S. typhimurium infection and improving the growth performance.
In this study, the Anti G+ and Anti G− bacterial communities were not able to promote the improvement of intestinal villus height and crypt depth, which departs from previous studies’ results. Other studies have shown that the whole long-term feeding of flavomycin can increase villus height [15] or have no effect [24]. The Anti G+ group built in the first 5 days did not change the intestinal shape. Although the Anti G− reduced the ratio of villus height to crypt depth by the 14th day, the difference was not significant on the 21st day. This shows that the pre-constructed intestinal bacterial community has a negative effect on intestinal morphology, but the effect of the pre-stage was weakening with increasing age. The S. typhimurium reduced the ratio of villus height to crypt depth, which indicated that S. typhimurium infection inhibited the digestion and absorption of nutrients, leading to a reduction in feed conversion ratio.
The Toll-like receptors (TLRs) 2 and 4 are the receptors for lipopolysaccharides, which are produced by Gram-negative bacteria in the cytoderm, such as S. typhimurium. Those lead to a surplus in the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines by starting and activating the downstream signaling cascades, such as nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) [25,26]. MyD88 can be used as an adapter to transmit upstream and downstream connections during the above process [27]. In this study, both the intestinal bacterial community and the infection of S. typhimurium had effects on the NF-κB gene’s expression and performed differently between 0–14 and 14–21 days. Compared to the control group, Anti G− promoted NF-κB gene expression on the 14th day, while Anti G+ increased this gene expression on the 21st day. This shown that both Anti G- and Anti G+ can cause inflammation of the intestines through the repression of TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signaling pathway. Gene IFN-γ is important in the immune response of the intestinal epithelial, and S. typhimurium induces these gene expressions. Although inflammation is protective to S. typhimurium infection, uncontrolled inflammatory response can lead to tissue damage and high nutritional consumption [28]. The result was in accordance with recent studies [14,29]. The Anti G− bacteria can promote intestinal health by inhibiting the inflammatory response of the intestines.
The integrity of intestinal mucosa and the perfection of intestinal epithelial cell function are of great significance to maintain intestinal health and ensure animal production performance. Mucin-2 as the main component of the intestinal mucus, is produced mainly by goblet cells in small and large intestinal epithelial cells. It plays a key protective function [30]. The claudin-1 and occludin as the mucous membrane epithelial tight junctions has an important role to prevent microorganisms and toxins from invading animal intestinal tissue [31]. The Anti G− and Anti G+ constructed in the early part of this study had no effect on the damage of the tight junctions of claudin-1 and occludin. S. typhimurium infection were in accordance with previous study [32], the Anti G+ promoted the expression of mucoprotein genes during the S. typhimurium infection.
MPO, as a derivative leucocyte enzyme, can catalyze the production of many reactive oxidants and diffusible radical substances [33]. MPO efficiently removes the spread H2O2 in the surface of phagosomal S. typhimurium and converts it into a highly active HOCl [34]. In the current study, the immune response caused by S. typhimurium increased the MPO level. The tight junction damage of intestinal epithelial cells, which is caused by the inflammatory reaction to S. typhimurium infection, can led to an increase in the permeability of epithelial cells. That was evidenced by the increase of FITC concentration.
Diets play a key role in regulating intestinal bacteria, the substances that are not digested and absorbed by the host can provide nutrients to gut bacteria. At the same time, complex and perfect gut microbes are essential for the intestinal immunity and health of broiler chickens. The diversity of intestinal bacteria is beneficial to maintaining the balance of intestinal bacteria, to maintaining the stability of the environment in the intestines and to resisting the invasion of pathogenic bacteria. S. typhimurium infection in this study significantly reduced the diversity index of enterobacteria, suggesting that S. typhimurium not only caused inflammation of the gut itself, but also improved the intestinal susceptibility by reducing the diversity of gut bacteria. It is worth noting that the observed_species and Shannon diversity indices in Anti G−S were significantly higher than those in the CONS group, indicating that Anti G− bacteria were able to defend against S. typhimurium infection to some extent by maintaining the balance of intestinal bacteria.
On the composition of ileal bacteria, the data in this study are consistent with the results of most previous studies [35,36]; the Firmicutes and Proteobacteria phyla are the main advantageous ones in broiler chicken [37,38]. Unlike in previous studies, the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes in this study was less than 1%. Moreover, Firmicutes, being the main Gram-positive bacteria in the Anti G+ group, was not the least present. Proteobacteria, as the main Gram-negative bacteria in the Anti G− group proportion was not the least present. Those results indicated that the pre-constructed bacterial community was not always invariant, especially during S. typhimurium infection. Cyanobacteria, as the third largest bacterial phylum in the S. typhimurium group, was significantly higher than that in the unfilled S. typhimurium group; the relative abundance of those bacteria was reduced under heat stress [39].
At the family level, Lactobacillaceae was the dominant family in the ileum of the broiler chicken, which has previously been reported [40]. Lactobacillaceae can biosynthetic biotin to inhibit the proliferation of other bacteria. Moreover, it can ferment to produce lactic acid, reduce intestinal pH, inhibit the activity of pathogenic bacteria such as E. coli [41,42]. In this study, Anti G− and Anti G+ can reduce the relative abundance of Lactobacillaceae. While the Anti G−S and Anti G+S groups can increase the relative abundance of Lactobacillaceae. This may be one of the reasons that the S. typhimurium group had a lower diversity index, because Lactobacillaceae reduces the number of other bacteria. The difference in the relative abundance of these dominant bacteria directly led to a significant classification between S. typhimurium groups and unfilled S. typhimurium groups in PCA.
In the correlation analysis between the intestinal bacterial community and the intestinal gene expression. It is interesting that the three main dominant bacterial families were not significantly related to any indicator, indicating that the intestinal health is not regulated by a single dominant bacterium. The bacteria of high abundance have a more complex effect on the intestine. Those significant correlation may be due to the direct or indirect involvement of microorganisms on pathways that affect gene expression and intestinal cell metabolism. For example, there was a positive correlation between Xanthomonadaceae family and gene expression of Claudin-1 and Occludin. Studies have shown that the members of Xanthomonadaceae family are the main bacteria in the intestinal mucosa and can promote the activity of esterase, lipase, and urease in the hindgut [43,44]. These effects can improve the expression of closely connected genes.
5. Conclusions
The results of this study show that the Anti G+ and Anti G− intestinal bacterial communities, when constructed in the early stages, can react differently to S typhimurium infection. S. typhimurium infection in broiler chicken can reduce the diversity index of intestinal bacteria, cause a wide range of inflammatory reactions and reduce the production performance. The above-mentioned adverse symptoms can be effectively alleviated by building the bacterial community in the early stage. An Anti G− intestinal bacterial community can increase the diversity of an intestinal bacterial community to improve the stability of intestinal bacteria. Anti G− also inhibited the inflammatory response that is caused by S. typhimurium. Anti G−S improved the tight junctions of the intestinal epithelia, reduced the permeability of FITC and ultimately increased body weight gain.
Author Contributions
Resources, Y.Y.; data curation, Y.D.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.H.; writing—review and editing, Y.Y. and Y.D.; visualization, C.Y.; supervision, B.Z.; project administration, B.Z.; funding acquisition, B.Z.
Funding
This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31672443), the Chinese Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2019TQ0350) and the Technology of the Chinese Agricultural University Education Foundation (2017DKA002).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
References
- Pulido-Landinez, M. Food safety-Salmonella update in broilers. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 2019, 250, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lamas, A.; Miranda, J.M.; Regal, P.; Vázquez, B.; Franco, C.M.; Cepeda, A. A comprehensive review of non- enterica subspecies of Salmonella enterica. Microbiol. Res. 2018, 206, 60–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thung, T.Y.; Mahyudin, N.A.; Basri, D.F.; Radzi, C.W.J.W.; Nakaguchi, Y.; Nishibuchi, M.; Radu, S. Prevalence and antibiotic resistance of Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium in raw chicken meat at retail markets in Malaysia. Poult. Sci. 2016, 95, 1888–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lamas, A.; Fernandez-No, I.C.; Miranda, J.M.; Vazquez, B.; Cepeda, A.; Franco, C.M. Prevalence, molecular characterization and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella serovars isolated from northwestern Spanish broiler flocks (2011–2015). Poult. Sci. 2016, 95, 2097–2105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wyrsch, E.R.; Hawkey, J.; Judd, L.M.; Haites, R.; Holt, K.E.; Djordjevic, S.P.; Billman-Jacobe, H. Z/I1 Hybrid Virulence Plasmids Carrying Antimicrobial Resistance genes in S. Typhimurium from Australian Food Animal Production. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Willis, W.L.; King, K.; Iskhuemhen, O.S.; Ibrahim, S.A. Administration of mushroom extract to broiler chickens for bifidobacteria enhancement and Salmonella reduction. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2009, 18, 658–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- LeBlanc, D.; de Moreno, A.; Castillo, N.A.; Perdigon, G. Anti-infective mechanisms induced by a probiotic Lactobacillus strain against Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium infection. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010, 138, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, S.; Guo, L. Flavomycin and its applications in the breeding industry. Nat. Prod. Res. Dev. 2004, 16. [Google Scholar]
- Yuan, L.; Li, W.; Huo, Q.; Du, C.; Wang, Z.; Yi, B.; Wang, M. Effects of xylo-oligosaccharide and flavomycin on the immune function of broiler chickens. Peerj 2018, 6, e4435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Witte, W. Impact of Antibiotic use in Animal Feeding on Resistance of Bacterial Pathogens in Humans. Ciba Found. Symp. 2007, 207, 61–71. [Google Scholar]
- Ateya, A.I.; Arafat, N.; Saleh, R.M.; Ghanem, H.M.; Naguib, D.; Radwan, H.A.; Elseady, Y.Y. Intestinal gene expressions in broiler chickens infected with Escherichia coli and dietary supplemented with probiotic, acidifier and synbiotic. Vet. Res. Commun. 2019, 43, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lorenzo, C.; de Jesús, J.; Ramirez, A.M.; Muñoz, Y.G. Polimixinas en la era de la multidrogorresistencia. Rev. De Enferm. Infecc. En Pediatría 2011, 24, 66–70. [Google Scholar]
- Sui, O.; Matsumoto, K.; Okubo, M.; Yokoyama, Y.; Kizu, J. Development of HPLC with fluorescent detection using NBD-F for the quantification of colistin sulfate in rat plasma and its pharmacokinetic applications. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2018, 32, e4167. [Google Scholar]
- Dar, M.A.; Urwat, U.; Ahmad, S.M.; Ahmad, R.; Kashoo, Z.A.; Dar, T.A.; Bhat, S.A.; Mumtaz, P.T.; Shabir, N.; Shah, R.A.; et al. Gene expression and antibody response in chicken against Salmonella Typhimurium challenge. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 2008–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ni, J.J.; Ju, T.T.; Piao, X.S. Effect of Flavomycin on Performance, Gut Morphology and Intestinal Microflora in Broilers. J. Ani. Vet. Adv. 2012, 11, 1669–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.L.; Shi, M.; Xu, X.; Pan, L.; Zhao, P.F.; Ma, X.K.; Tian, Q.Y.; Piao, X.S. Effects of Flavomycin, Bacillus licheniformis and Enramycin on Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, Gut Morphology and the Intestinal Microflora of Broilers. J. Poult. Sci. 2016, 53, 128–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caporaso, J.G.; Kuczynski, J.; Stombaugh, J.; Bittinger, K.; Bushman, F.D.; Costello, E.K.; Fierer, N.; Pena, A.G.; Goodrich, J.K.; Gordon, J.I.; et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods. 2010, 7, 335–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vicu, A.E.A.; Kuttappan, V.A.; Tellez, G.; Hernandez-Velasco, X.; Seeber-Galarza, R.; Latorre, J.D.; Faulkner, O.B.; Wolfenden, A.D.; Hargis, B.M.; Bielke, L.R. Dose titration of FITC-D for optimal measurement of enteric inflammation in broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 2015, 94, 1353–1359. [Google Scholar]
- Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamid, H.; Zhao, L.H.; Ma, G.Y.; Li, W.X.; Shi, H.Q.; Zhang, J.Y.; Ji, C.; Ma, Q.G. Evaluation of the overall impact of antibiotics growth promoters on broiler health and productivity during the medication and withdrawal period. Poult. Sci. 2019, 107, 1479–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tayeri, V.; Seidavi, A.; Asadpour, L.; Phillips, C.J.C. A comparison of the effects of antibiotics, probiotics, synbiotics and prebiotics on the performance and carcass characteristics of broilers. Vet. Res. Commun. 2018, 42, 195–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- El-Sharkawy, H.; Tahoun, A.; El-Gohary, A.E.A.; El-Abasy, M.; El-Khayat, F.; Gillespie, T.; Kitade, Y.; Hafez, H.M.; Neubauer, H.; El-Adawy, H. Epidemiological, molecular characterization and antibiotic resistance of Salmonella enterica serovars isolated from chicken farms in Egypt. Gut Pathog. 2017, 9, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Withanage, G.; Kaiser, P.; Wigley, P.; Powers, C.; Mastroeni, P.; Brooks, H.; Barrow, P.; Smith, A.; Maskell, D.; McConnell, I. Rapid expression of chemokines and proinflammatory cytokines in newly hatched chickens infected with Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium. Infect. Immun. 2004, 72, 2152–2159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guo, S.; Cheng, Q.; Li, Y.; Duan, R.; Hou, Y.; Yi, D.; Ding, B. Effects of dietary coated-oleum cinnamomi supplementation on the immunity and intestinal integrity of broiler chickens. Anim. Sci. J. 2018, 89, 1581–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiutang, L.; Verma, I.M. NF-kappaB regulation in the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2002, 2, 725. [Google Scholar]
- Vallabhapurapu, S.; Karin, M. Regulation and Function of NF-κB Transcription Factors in the Immune System. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2009, 27, 693–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kawai, T.; Adachi, O.; Ogawa, T.; Takeda, K.; Akira, S. Unresponsiveness of MyD88-Deficient Mice to Endotoxin. Immunity 1999, 11, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asa, H.; Goran, M. Gut Microbiota and Inflammation. Nutrients 2011, 3, 637–682. [Google Scholar]
- Li, J.; Hao, H.; Cheng, G.; Wang, X.; Ahmed, S.; Shabbir, M.A.B.; Liu, Z.; Dai, M.; Yuan, Z. The effects of different enrofloxacin dosages on clinical efficacy and resistance development in chickens experimentally infected with Salmonella Typhimurium. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sluis, M.V.D.; De Koning, B.A.E.; De Bruijn, A.C.J.M.; Velcich, A.; Meijerink, J.P.P.; Van Goudoever, J.B.; Büller, H.A.; Dekker, J.; Van Seuningen, I.; Renes, I.B.; et al. Muc2-Deficient Mice Spontaneously Develop Colitis, Indicating That MUC2 Is Critical for Colonic Protection. Gastroenterology 2006, 131, 117–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barmeyer, C.; Fromm, M.; Schulzke, J. Active and passive involvement of claudins in the pathophysiology of intestinal inflammatory diseases. Pflug. Arch. Eur. J. Phy. 2017, 469, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shao, Y.; Guo, Y.; Wang, Z. beta-1,3/1,6-Glucan alleviated intestinal mucosal barrier impairment of broiler chickens challenged with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Poult. Sci. 2013, 92, 1764–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nicholls, S.J.; Hazen, S.L. Myeloperoxidase and cardiovascular disease. Arter. Thromb Vasc. Biol. 2005, 25, 1102–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schürmann, N.; Forrer, P.; Casse, O.; Li, J.; Felmy, B.; Burgener, A.; Ehrenfeuchter, N.; Hardt, W.; Recher, M.; Hess, C.; et al. Myeloperoxidase targets oxidative host attacks to Salmonella and prevents collateral tissue damage. Nat. Microbiol. 2017, 2, 2869–2881. [Google Scholar]
- Islam, M.R.; Lepp, D.; Godfrey, D.V.; Orban, S.; Ross, K.; Delaquis, P.; Diarra, M.S. Effects of wild blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium) pomace feeding on gut microbiota and blood metabolites in free-range pastured broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 3739–3755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, J.H.; Lee, K.; Kim, D.W.; Kil, D.Y.; Kim, G.B.; Cha, C.J. Influence of dietary avilamycin on ileal and cecal microbiota in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2018, 97, 970–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mancabelli, L.; Ferrario, C.; Milani, C.; Mangifesta, M.; Turroni, F.; Duranti, S.; Lugli, G.A.; Viappiani, A.; Ossiprandi, M.C.; van Sinderen, D.; et al. Insights into the biodiversity of the gut microbiota of broiler chickens. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 18, 4727–4738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.A.; Rubinelli, P.M.; Park, S.H.; Ricke, S.C. Ability of Arkansas LaKast and LaKast Hybrid Rice Bran to Reduce Salmonella Typhimurium in Chicken Cecal Incubations and Effects on Cecal Microbiota. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, D.; Bai, L.; Qu, Q.; Zhou, S.; Yang, M.; Guo, S.; Li, Q.; Liu, C. Impact of gut microbiota structure in heat-stressed broilers. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 2405–2413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, D.; Yu, Z. Intestinal microbiome of poultry and its interaction with host and diet. Gut Microbes 2014, 5, 108–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neal-Mckinney, J.M.; Lu, X.; Duong, T.; Larson, C.L.; Call, D.R.; Shah, D.H.; Konkel, M.E. Production of organic acids by probiotic Lactobacilli can be used to reduce pathogen load in poultry. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e43928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Murry, A.C., Jr.; Hinton, A., Jr. Inhibition of Growth of Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, and Clostridia perfringens on Chicken Feed Media by Lactobacillus salivarius and Lactobacillus plantarum. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2004, 3, 101–112. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, L.; Wu, W.; Lee, Y.; Xie, J.; Zhang, H. Spatial Heterogeneity and Co-occurrence of Mucosal and Luminal Microbiome across Swine Intestinal Tract. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1730–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Vogel, H.; Shukla, S.P.; Engl, T.; Weiss, B.; Fischer, R.; Steiger, S.; Heckel, D.G.; Kaltenpoth, M.; Vilcinskas, A. The digestive and defensive basis of carcass utilization by the burying beetle and its microbiota. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15186–15198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1.
The effects of intestinal bacterial communities on the mucosal permeability of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) on the 14th (a) and 21st days (c), and myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity on the 14th (b) and 21st (d) days in broiler chickens. Small alphabetic letters show significance (p < 0.05).
Figure 1.
The effects of intestinal bacterial communities on the mucosal permeability of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) on the 14th (a) and 21st days (c), and myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity on the 14th (b) and 21st (d) days in broiler chickens. Small alphabetic letters show significance (p < 0.05).
Figure 2.
The effects of intestinal bacterial community on the ileal bacterial community diversity indexes of observed_species (a), chao1 (b), and Shannon (c) on the 21st day. Small alphabetic letters show significance when (p < 0.05).
Figure 2.
The effects of intestinal bacterial community on the ileal bacterial community diversity indexes of observed_species (a), chao1 (b), and Shannon (c) on the 21st day. Small alphabetic letters show significance when (p < 0.05).
Figure 3.
The effects of intestinal bacterial communities on the relative abundances of ileal bacteria at the phylum level (a) and family level (b) on the 21st day.
Figure 3.
The effects of intestinal bacterial communities on the relative abundances of ileal bacteria at the phylum level (a) and family level (b) on the 21st day.
Figure 4.
Principal component analysis (PCA) of ileal bacteria communities based on weighted UniFrac distances on the 21st day.
Figure 4.
Principal component analysis (PCA) of ileal bacteria communities based on weighted UniFrac distances on the 21st day.
Figure 5.
The correlations between the ileal bacteria communities and intestinal genes’ expressions. The lattices were colored based on Spearman’s rank correlation analysis. A red cell indicates a positive correlation, and the blue color cell indicates a negative correlation. * indicates a significant correlation (p < 0.05).
Figure 5.
The correlations between the ileal bacteria communities and intestinal genes’ expressions. The lattices were colored based on Spearman’s rank correlation analysis. A red cell indicates a positive correlation, and the blue color cell indicates a negative correlation. * indicates a significant correlation (p < 0.05).
Table 1.
The nutrient composition of the control diet.
| Ingredients (%) | Content | Chemical Composition | Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yellow corn | 56.34 | ME (Kcal/kg) | 2.96 |
| Soybean meal | 33.5 | Crude protein (%) | 21 |
| Corn gluten meal (60%) | 3 | Calcium (%) | 1 |
| Soybean oil | 2.9 | Nonphytate P (%) | 0.45 |
| Limestone | 1.25 | Tryptophan | 0.23 |
| Dicalcium phosphate | 1.9 | Methionine (%) | 0.5 |
| Vitamin premix 1 | 0.02 | Lysine (%) | 1.15 |
| Mineral premix 2 | 0.2 | Threonine (%) | 0.78 |
| Salt | 0.35 | ||
| dl-methionine | 0.19 | ||
| l-lysine Hcl | 0.12 | ||
| Choline chloride | 0.2 | ||
| Ethoxyquin | 0.03 |
1 The trace mineral premix provides the following per kg in the diet: copper: 8 mg; ferrum: 80 mg; manganese: 100 mg; selenium: 0.15 mg; iodine: 0.35 mg. 2 The vitamine premix provides the following per kg in the diet: vitamin A: 9500 IU; vitamin D3: 62.5 µg; vitamin E: 30 IU; vitamin K3: 2.65 mg; vitamin B1: 2 mg; vitamin B6 6 mg; vitamin B12: 0.025 mg; biotin: 0.0325 mg; folic acid: 1.25 mg; pantothenic acid: 12 mg; nicotinic acid: 50 mg.
Table 2.
The primer sequences used for quantitative real time PCR.
| Gene Name | Primer Sequence (5‘–3′) | GenBank |
|---|---|---|
| claudin-1 | F: CATACTCCTGGGTCTGGTTGGT | AY750897.1 |
| R:GACAGCCATCCGCATCTTCT | ||
| occludin | F:ACGGCAGCACCTACCTCAA | D21837.1 |
| R:GGGCGAAGAAGCAGATGAG | ||
| mucin-2 | F:TTCATGATGCCTGCTCTTGTG | XM_421035 |
| R:CCTGAGCCTTGGTACATTCTTGT | ||
| IFN-γ | F:AGCTGACGGTGGACCTATTATT | Y07922 |
| R:GGCTTTGCGCTGGATTC | ||
| TLR2 | F:CTGGGAAGTGGATTGTGGA | AB050005.2 |
| R:AAGGCGAAAGTGCGAGAAA | ||
| TLR4 | F:AGTCTGAAATTGCTGAGCTCAAAT | NM-001030693 |
| R:GCGACGTTAAGCCATGGAAG | ||
| NF-κB | F:GTGTGAAGAAACGGGAACTG | NM-205129 |
| R:GGCACGGTTGTCATAGATGG | ||
| MyD88 | F:CTGGCATCTTCTGAGTAGT | NM-001030962 |
| R:TTCCTTATAGTTCTGGCTTCT | ||
| GAPDH | F:CCTAGGATACACAGAGGACCAGGTT | NM-204305 |
| R:GGTGGAGGAATGGCTGTCA |
Table 3.
The effects of intestinal microflora on growth performance in broiler chickens.
| Treatment | 1–14 d | 8–14 d | 1–21 d | 15–21 d | 1–42 d | 1–42 d | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body Weight Gain (g) | Feed Intake (g) | Feed Conversion Ratio | Mortality (%) | Body Weight Gain(g) | Feed Intake(g) | Feed Conversion Ratio | Mortality (%) | Body Weight Gain (g) | Feed Intake (g) | Feed Conversion Ratio | Mortality (%) | ||
| CON | 242.98 | 333.47 | 1.39 | 0 | 533.26 | 879.29 | 1.63 ab | 0 | 2436.8 | 5145.4 | 2.09 a | 0 | |
| Anti G+ | 220.24 | 321.9 | 1.42 | 0 | 499.96 | 844.23 | 1.68 ab | 0 | 2431.8 | 5293.3 | 2.2 b | 0 | |
| Anti G− | 244.29 | 346.33 | 1.4 | 0 | 549.74 | 893.06 | 1.59 a | 0 | 2412.5 | 5321.0 | 2.24 b | 0 | |
| CONS | 222.3 | 321.77 | 1.47 | 0 | 483.93 | 808.05 | 1.72 b | 3.03 | 2365.9 | 5093.8 | 2.24 b | 3.85 | |
| Anti G+S | 222.96 | 319.23 | 1.43 | 1.52 | 490.47 | 804.4 | 1.65 ab | 0 | 2324.3 | 5281.5 | 2.22 b | 2.56 | |
| Anti G−S | 239.52 | 337.05 | 1.44 | 0 | 511.35 | 865.56 | 1.68 ab | 0 | 2386.9 | 5045.5 | 2.15 ab | 0 | |
| SEM | 3.14 | 3.18 | 0.01 | 0 | 6.39 | 11.37 | 0.01 | 0 | 19.38 | 37.37 | 0.02 | 0.01 | |
| Main effect | |||||||||||||
| Bacterial community | CON | 232.64 ab | 327.62 ab | 1.43 | 0 | 508.59 ab | 843.67 | 1.68 | 1.52 | 2401.4 | 5119.6 | 2.17 | 1.93 |
| Anti G+ | 221.60 a | 320.56 a | 1.43 | 0.76 | 495.22 a | 824.31 | 1.67 | 0 | 2378.0 | 5287.4 | 2.21 | 1.28 | |
| Anti G− | 241.90 b | 341.69 b | 1.42 | 0 | 530.55 b | 879.31 | 1.64 | 0 | 2399.7 | 5183.2 | 2.20 | 0 | |
| S. typhimurium | − | 235.32 | 334.76 | 1.4 | 0 | 527.25 | 873.8 | 1.64 | 0 | 2426.9 | 5259.5 | 2.18 | 0 |
| + | 227.89 | 326.7 | 1.45 | 0.01 | 495.59 | 822.17 | 1.69 | 0.01 | 2361.5 | 5155.9 | 2.20 | 2.14 | |
| p value | |||||||||||||
| Feed | 0.02 | 0.019 | 0.902 | 0.38 | 0.027 | 0.114 | 0.253 | 0.099 | 0.895 | 0.166 | 0.504 | 0.436 | |
| S. typhimurium | 0.182 | 0.184 | 0.005 | 0.325 | 0.004 | 0.035 | 0.012 | 0.124 | 0.114 | 0.156 | 0.435 | 0.091 | |
| Bacterial community * S. typhimurium | 0.233 | 0.815 | 0.135 | 0.38 | 0.281 | 0.668 | 0.02 | 0.099 | 0.711 | 0.295 | 0.007 | 0.436 | |
Means in the same row with different superscript letters differ significantly (p < 0.05). Bacterial community * S. typhimurium: the interaction effect between the bacterial community and S. typhimurium.
Table 4.
The effects of intestinal bacterial communities on ileal morphology in broiler chickens.
| Treatment | 14 d | 21 d | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Villus Height (μm) | Crypt Depth (μm) | V/C | Villus Height (μm) | Crypt Depth (μm) | V/C | ||
| CON | 561.84 | 155.89 | 3.67 | 600.61 | 166.34 | 3.66 | |
| Anti G+ | 544.6 | 159.13 | 3.51 | 571.76 | 160.8 | 3.64 | |
| Anti G− | 557.2 | 159.86 | 3.52 | 571.92 | 160.36 | 3.52 | |
| CONS | 554.1 | 164.33 | 3.49 | 551.91 | 157.29 | 3.42 | |
| Anti G+S | 548.22 | 157.3 | 3.47 | 554.59 | 163.61 | 3.47 | |
| Anti G−S | 524.91 | 157.15 | 3.44 | 592.39 | 176.23 | 3.42 | |
| SEM | 5.16 | 1.61 | 0.02 | 6.37 | 2.32 | 0.03 | |
| Main effect | |||||||
| Bacterial community | CON | 557.97 | 157.52 | 3.58 a | 570.95 | 161.81 | 3.54 |
| Anti G+ | 550.86 | 158.22 | 3.49 ab | 563.18 | 161.04 | 3.54 | |
| Anti G− | 543.01 | 155.36 | 3.48 b | 582.15 | 169.5 | 3.48 | |
| S. typhimurium | − | 554.14 | 158.08 | 3.57 | 580.69 | 162.13 | 3.61 |
| + | 541.57 | 160.08 | 3.47 | 566.30 | 166.31 | 3.44 | |
| p value | |||||||
| Feed | 0.421 | 0.875 | 0.025 | 0.418 | 0.421 | 0.358 | |
| S. typhimurium | 0.253 | 0.702 | 0.002 | 0.219 | 0.482 | 0.003 | |
| Bacterial community * S. typhimurium | 0.381 | 0.305 | 0.184 | 0.090 | 0.109 | 0.494 | |
Means in the same row with different superscript letters differ significantly (p < 0.05). V/C: the ratio of villus height to the crypt depth. Bacterial community * S. typhimurium: the interaction effect between the bacterial community and S. typhimurium.
Table 5.
The effects of intestinal bacterial communities on tight junction, mucin-2 and immune-related genes’ expressions in broiler chickens on the 14th day.
Table 5.
The effects of intestinal bacterial communities on tight junction, mucin-2 and immune-related genes’ expressions in broiler chickens on the 14th day.
| Treatment | claudin-1 | occludin | mucin-2 | IFN-γ | TLR2 | TLR4 | NF-κB | MyD88 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | 1.03 | 1.02 | 1.02 ab | 1.02 | 1.04 | 1.02 | 0.9 | 1.01 | |
| Anti G+ | 0.8 | 0.84 | 0.99 ab | 1.25 | 1.01 | 1.35 | 0.85 | 0.86 | |
| Anti G− | 0.87 | 1.11 | 0.89 a | 1.24 | 0.87 | 1.18 | 1.06 | 0.94 | |
| CONS | 0.51 | 0.77 | 1.67 c | 1.21 | 1.06 | 1.26 | 1.69 | 1.58 | |
| Anti G+S | 0.43 | 0.75 | 2.12 d | 1.52 | 1.39 | 1.26 | 1.91 | 1.59 | |
| Anti G−S | 0.62 | 0.79 | 1.35 bc | 1.28 | 0.98 | 1.24 | 1.95 | 1.71 | |
| SEM | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.07 | |
| Main effect | |||||||||
| Bacterial community | CON | 0.77 | 0.89 | 1.34 ab | 1.11 a | 1.05 | 1.14 | 1.33 b | 1.24 |
| Anti G+ | 0.62 | 0.79 | 1.55 a | 1.38 b | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.39 ab | 1.18 | |
| Anti G− | 0.74 | 0.95 | 1.12 b | 1.26 ab | 0.92 | 1.21 | 1.55 a | 1.32 | |
| S. typhimurium | − | 0.91 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 1.15 | 0.98 | 1.17 | 0.95 | 0.94 |
| + | 0.53 | 0.77 | 1.69 | 1.32 | 1.13 | 1.25 | 1.86 | 1.62 | |
| p value | |||||||||
| Feed | 0.203 | 0.060 | <0.001 | 0.024 | 0.055 | 0.182 | 0.040 | 0.469 | |
| S. typhimurium | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.035 | 0.058 | 0.342 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| Bacterial community * S. typhimurium | 0.268 | 0.164 | 0.004 | 0.499 | 0.222 | 0.194 | 0.281 | 0.393 | |
Means in the same row with different superscript letters differ significantly (p < 0.05). Bacterial community * S. typhimurium: the interaction effect between the bacterial community and S. typhimurium.
Table 6.
The effects of differing intestinal bacterial communities on tight junction, mucin-2 and immune-related genes’ expressions in broiler chickens on the 21st day.
Table 6.
The effects of differing intestinal bacterial communities on tight junction, mucin-2 and immune-related genes’ expressions in broiler chickens on the 21st day.
| Treatment | claudin-1 | occludin | mucin-2 | IFN-γ | TLR2 | TLR4 | NF-κB | MyD88 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | 1.04 | 1.02 | 1.02 a | 1.04 a | 1.03 ab | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.02 | |
| Anti G+ | 1.12 | 0.93 | 1.20 a | 1.37 ab | 0.88 a | 1.24 | 1.33 | 1.27 | |
| Anti G− | 0.89 | 0.94 | 1.28 a | 1.26 a | 0.95 a | 1.1 | 1.09 | 1.19 | |
| CONS | 0.71 | 0.69 | 1.01 a | 1.74 b | 1.08 ab | 1.32 | 0.98 | 0.96 | |
| Anti G+S | 0.52 | 0.78 | 1.74 b | 1.80 b | 1.32 a | 1.54 | 1.15 | 1.27 | |
| Anti G−S | 0.64 | 0.93 | 1.40 ab | 1.32 ab | 1.15 ab | 1.5 | 1.1 | 1.06 | |
| SEM | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.03 | |
| Main effect | |||||||||
| Bacterial community | CON | 0.88 | 0.85 | 1.01 a | 1.39 ab | 1.06 | 1.17 | 1.00 a | 0.99 a |
| Anti G+ | 0.82 | 0.85 | 1.47 b | 1.59 a | 1.1 | 1.39 | 1.24 b | 1.27 b | |
| Anti G− | 0.77 | 0.93 | 1.34 b | 1.29 b | 1.05 | 1.3 | 1.11 ab | 1.12 ab | |
| S. typhimurium | − | 1.02 | 0.96 | 1.16 | 1.22 | 0.95 | 1.11 | 1.14 | 1.15 |
| + | 0.63 | 0.81 | 1.35 | 1.62 | 1.18 | 1.46 | 1.08 | 1.10 | |
| p value | |||||||||
| Feed | 0.448 | 0.481 | <0.001 | 0.026 | 0.742 | 0.054 | 0.009 | <0.001 | |
| S. typhimurium | <0.001 | 0.017 | 0.008 | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.299 | 0.256 | |
| Bacterial community * S. typhimurium | 0.137 | 0.135 | 0.018 | 0.012 | 0.045 | 0.841 | 0.426 | 0.568 | |
Means in the same row with different superscript letters differ significantly (p < 0.05). Bacterial community * S. typhimurium: the interaction effect between the bacterial community and S. typhimurium.
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
He, Y.; Yang, Y.; Dong, Y.; Yan, C.; Zhang, B. The Effects of Flavomycin and Colistin Sulfate Pre-Treatment on Ileal Bacterial Community Composition, the Response to Salmonella typhimurium and Host Gene Expression in Broiler Chickens. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7110574
AMA Style
He Y, Yang Y, Dong Y, Yan C, Zhang B. The Effects of Flavomycin and Colistin Sulfate Pre-Treatment on Ileal Bacterial Community Composition, the Response to Salmonella typhimurium and Host Gene Expression in Broiler Chickens. Microorganisms. 2019; 7(11):574. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7110574
Chicago/Turabian StyleHe, Yang, Yanyan Yang, Yuanyang Dong, Changliang Yan, and Bingkun Zhang. 2019. "The Effects of Flavomycin and Colistin Sulfate Pre-Treatment on Ileal Bacterial Community Composition, the Response to Salmonella typhimurium and Host Gene Expression in Broiler Chickens" Microorganisms 7, no. 11: 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7110574
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
