Next Article in Journal
Crustose Calicioid Lichens and Fungi in Mountain Cloud Forests of Tanzania
Previous Article in Journal
Assembly and Analysis of the Genome Sequence of the Yeast Brettanomyces naardenensis CBS 7540

Microorganisms 2019, 7(11), 490;

The Endophytic Fungus Chaetomium cupreum Regulates Expression of Genes Involved in the Tolerance to Metals and Plant Growth Promotion in Eucalyptus globulus Roots
Laboratorio de Biorremediación, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Forestales, Universidad de La Frontera, Francisco Salazar 01145, Temuco, Chile
Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias Mención Biología Celular y Molecular Aplicada, Universidad de La Frontera, Francisco Salazar 01145, Temuco, Chile
Centro de Biotecnología Vegetal, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago, Chile
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 12 September 2019 / Accepted: 24 October 2019 / Published: 26 October 2019


The endophytic strain Chaetomium cupreum isolated from metal-contaminated soil was inoculated in Eucalyptus globulus roots to identify genes involved in metal stress response and plant growth promotion. We analyzed the transcriptome of E. globulus roots inoculated with C. cupreum. De novo sequencing, assembly, and analysis were performed to identify molecular mechanisms involved in metal stress tolerance and plant growth promotion. A total of 393,371,743 paired-end reads were assembled into 135,155 putative transcripts. It was found that 663 genes significantly changed their expression in the presence of treatment, of which 369 were up-regulated and 294 were down-regulated. We found differentially expressed genes (DEGs) encoding metal transporters, transcription factors, stress and defense response proteins, as well as DEGs involved in auxin biosynthesis and metabolism. Our results showed that the inoculation of C. cupreum enhanced tolerance to metals and growth promotion on E. globulus. This study provides new information to understand molecular mechanisms involved in plant–microbe interactions under metals stress.
Chaetomium cupreum; endophyte; Eucalyptus globulus roots; metal stress; transcriptome

1. Introduction

In Chile, copper (Cu) mining has generated an over-accumulation of metals in areas surrounding Cu smelters, and Puchuncaví Valley (Valparaíso region, Chile) is a recognized place by the high environmental pollution originated mainly for Cu smelting. The toxicity of metals can generate losses of vegetal diversity and functionality of species, leading to a change of the soil characteristics and difficulty to establish vegetation [1]. However, it is known that prolonged exposure to metals can generate a selection of resistant/tolerant plant populations [2]. Eucalyptus spp. has been reported as a metal-tolerant species and used for phytoremediation process due to it fast growth; high biomass production; wide adaptability; and accumulation of high amounts of metals such as Cu, Zn, Pb, and Cd [3].
Soil microorganisms play an important role in the restoration of environments affected by contamination of metals, promoting plant growth through different mechanisms such as indole acetic acid (IAA) production, siderophores, organic acids, biosurfactants, and phosphate solubilization [4]. Among these, endophytic fungi may confer physiological and ecological benefits to the host, including enhanced growth, protection from attack of pathogens, help establishment in degraded ecosystems, and tolerate different types of stress [5].
Previous reports have shown that endophytic fungi inoculation enhances plant growth and tolerance in hosts under metal stress [6]. For example, endophytic fungus C. cupreum enhances growth and tolerance to Cu in E. globulus plants cultivated in soils with high concentrations of metals and metalloids [7]. The inoculation of the strain Penicillium funiculosum LHL06 to Glycine max plants reduces metal accumulation and activates signaling of stress-response and antioxidant systems [8]. While the inoculation of Gaeumannomyces cylindrosporus increased root length and biomass under lead stress, moreover, it altered translocation and accumulation of lead in Zea mays plants [9].
The development of new sequencing technologies has contributed to characterizing molecular responses to abiotic stress in several plants [10,11]. Among them, RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) has been successfully applied in transcriptomic studies providing information about levels of transcripts and changes in gene expression even in non-model species [12,13,14]
Recent studies have delved into the molecular mechanisms involved in the tolerance of plants to metal stress. However, only a few transcriptomic studies have focused on understanding how the inoculation of endophytic microorganisms in plants can contribute to the response to metal stress, considering that there are some microorganisms that provide beneficial effects for the growth and productivity of plants through different molecular mechanisms [15].
On the other hand, several studies have described mechanisms involved in Cu tolerance in plants, including: i) a reduction of the uptake of Cu by the plant or ii) an increase of the efflux of Cu [16], iii) sequestration and compartmentalization [17], iv) extracellular precipitation [18], and v) high regulation of antioxidant defense systems [19]. Recently, Wang, et al. [12] described genes involved in Cu tolerance in Paeonia ostii finding that genes related to Cu transporters, plant hormone, signal transduction, transcription factors, and antioxidant systems play an important role in Cu stress response.
The understanding of plant–microbe interactions at the molecular level is an important aspect for the development of new phytoremediation alternatives based on the use of native microorganisms adapted to metal stress.
In the present research, we analyzed the transcriptomic response of E. globulus inoculated with C. cupreum growing in a multi-contaminated soil with metals. Analysis were carried out with de novo assembly of the transcriptomics of E. globulus roots tissues. The aim of this study was to identify genes involved in plant growth promotion and metal stress response, which provide important molecular information to understand plant–microbe–metal interactions and contribute to new strategies that can be used in phytoremediation processes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Experiment Design

Clonally propagated E. globulus seeds were acquired from a commercial nursery (Semillas Imperial, Los Ángeles, Chile). Seeds were germinated in vermiculite in a plant growth chamber at room temperature. After 4 weeks, uniform plants were selected and transplanted to 300 cc plastic pots with a mixture of Puchuncaví Valley soil: vermiculite (1:1 v/v) as a substrate. The soil is classified as an Entisol (Chilicauquén series) and has a pHw of 5.54 and Cu, Zn, Pb, As and Cd content (in mg Kg−1) of 385, 183, 135, 52 and 1.1 respectively. Pots were randomly divided into two groups, without microbial inoculation as control while the other group was inoculated with fungal strain C. cupreum according to Almonacid, et al. [20], where one slant of active mycelia was diluted in 40 mL of sterile distilled water then homogenized and vigorously agitated (10 mL of this suspension were inoculated, equivalent to 70 mg of dry mycelium). Plants were grown in a greenhouse with supplementary light provided by incandescent cool white lamps (400 umol m−2 s−1, 400–700 nm) (Sylvania®, Wilmigton, MA) with a 16/8 h day/night cycle at 24/16 °C and 50% relative humidity. After 90 days post-inoculation (dpi), all plants were harvested and five biological samples were dried in an air-forced oven at 70°C for 48 h and then were weighted to determine the biomass production. Entire roots systems were collected from five biological replicates of the control and inoculated plants. All these samples were rinsed thoroughly with distilled water, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until RNA extraction.

2.2. Fungus Detection in Roots by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

For fungus visualization, six root segments collected at the end of the experiment (90 dpi) from non-inoculated and inoculated plants were cut into 1-cm pieces. Segments were obtained from the upper part (near to stem) and lower part (lateral roots). Samples were observed by SEM (Hitachi SU 3500, Japan).

2.3. RNA Extraction, Sequencing and Illumina Reads Processing

Total RNA was extracted from 70 mg of root tissue collected at the end of the experiment (90 dpi) using Spectrum Plant Total RNA kit (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The yield and quality of the RNA isolation samples was measured using a Qubit® 2.0 Fluorometer (Life Technolology, Carlsbad, CA), and Fragment Analyzer Automated CE System (Analytical Advanced Technologies, Ames, IA). To obtain good coverage of the E. globulus transcriptome, equal quantities of individual RNAs from root tissues of five biological replicate plants were used for library construction. Complementary DNA (cDNA) libraries were constructed using the TruSeq RNA Sample Preparation kit v2 (Illumina®, San Diego, CA) following the Illumina manufacturer’s instructions and subsequently sent for sequencing to Macrogen Inc (Seoul, Korea). A total of 10 samples were sequenced in a single lane of an Illumina HiSeq 4000 platform (Illumina) in paired-end mode for 101 cycles. The resulting FASTQ files containing Illumina raw sequences were analyzed and trimmed using NGSQC Toolkit v2.3 [21], removing adaptors and low-quality reads, based on their Q-score composition, removing all reads with a content of Q>30 lower than 70% of bases.

2.4. De novo Transcriptome Assembly

Due to the endophytic nature of C. cupreum, high-quality reads were aligned with Eucalyptus grandis genome using BLASTN. Matching reads were used to construct a de novo assembly using Trinity software v2.8.3 [22]. Transcriptome was assembled on an Amazon Web Service Linux instance m4.16xlarge and downstream analysis were carried out at Centro de Modelación y Computación Científica (CMCC, Universidad de La Frontera, Chile). Refinement of transcriptome was carried out mapping reads to assembled transcripts, and relative abundance in FPKM value (Fragments per kilobase per transcript per million mapped reads) was calculated with RSEM v1.2.26 [23]. Poorly supported transcripts were removed, keeping all transcripts with a relative abundance of at least 1 FPKM for downstream analysis. Highly similar and redundant transcripts were clustered using CD-HIT-EST with a threshold of 95% [24]. In order to validate the integrity of this de novo assembly, a comparison between E. globulus assembled transcriptome was carry out by BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs) against OrthodBv9 database (embryophyte), to identify highly conserved orthologous genes [25].

2.5. Functional Annotation of the Transcriptome

The resulting transcripts were aligned into the SwissProt database using BLAST+ with an e-value filter of 1-e−10 as threshold, and evaluated in hidden Markov profiles to identify any family membership and conserved domains in PFAM-A database [26]. Functional annotation and Gene Ontology (GO) terms classification (Cellular component, Biological process and Molecular function and) were performed with PANTHER system [27], using as input gene lists obtained from blast top hit using reference proteomes collection from EMBL as database.

2.6. Differential Expression Analysis

The relative abundance was calculated using RSEM through script and the resulting abundance for each sample were merged in a matrix and analyzed with script, which involves the Bioconductor package DESeq2 in R statistical environment [28]; both scripts were contained in the Trinity package. To judge the significance of gene expression, a False Discovery Rate value (FDR) lower than 0.05 and a minimum fold change (FC) of 2 were set as thresholds. Main DEGs related to metal response and plant growth promotion were analyzed through a heat map using log10 ratio values of expression levels.

3. Results

3.1. Plant Biomass and Fungus Detection in Roots

After 90 dpi, inoculated plants showed significantly higher dry biomass as compared to the control, and increased 37% in shoots and 45% in roots in relation to non-inoculated plants (Figure 1). According to SEM images, no structures were observed in the roots of non-inoculated plants of E. globulus after harvest, while in all plants inoculated, fungal hyphae were observed (Figure 2).

3.2. Sequence Data, de novo Transcriptome Assembly and Annotation

Ten libraries, which include five control samples and five samples inoculated with C. cupreum (90 dpi), with a total of 460.158.421 paired-end reads, were obtained. After sequence trimming for adapter and filtering low quality reads, it resulted in 393.371.743 high quality reads (Table 1). De novo transcriptome assembly after trimming, where transcripts with an estimated abundance lower than 1 FPKM and highly similar or redundant transcripts with a sequence similarity higher than 95% were removed, resulted in 135.155 transcripts. Transcriptome statistics such as N50 and average length values can be observed in Table 1.
Transcripts of the final assembly were aligned to the Swissprot database; the homology search presented results for 37.667 sequences, corresponding to 27.9% of the total. De novo transcriptome was compared against BUSCO database, which contains information about highly conserved orthologous genes. Of the 1440 BUSCO genes, 1133 complete (78.7%), 108 fragmented (7.5%), and 199 missing genes (13.8%) were found in our assembly (Table 2).

3.3. Differential Expression Analysis

Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were estimated using a fold change ≥ 2 and a FDR < 0.05 as cut-off between control and treatment conditions. In total, we found 709 DEGs (Figure 3), of which 403 were up-regulated and 306 were down-regulated in response to C. cupreum inoculation. However, those genes that did not match in annotation with Blast hit were removed and discarded. Therefore, we obtained 663 DEGs of which 369 were up-regulated and 294 down-regulated under C. cupreum inoculation. From DEGs, we investigated their functions carry out gene ontology analysis and classified them into three major GO terms (Figure 4). Between the annotated transcripts, cell and organelle had the two greatest number of transcripts in cellular component terms. For the biological process term, metabolic process, cellular process, and biological regulation had the most transcripts. Within molecular function, most transcripts showed catalytic activity, binding and transporter activity. According to the PHANTER classification system, we observed that the functional class transport and transcription factor were down-regulated in treatment compared to control, where a greater number of transcripts was presented (Figure 5).
Among identified DEGs, we explore those involved in response to metal stress, metal transport and plant growth promotion (Table 3). In the inoculated condition, we found down-regulated genes that play an important role against metal stress, among them: metallothionein-like protein 1, peroxidase 10 precursor and heavy metal-associated isoprenylated plant protein 28 included in GO terms: metal ion binding (GO:0046872), response to oxidative stress (GO:0006979) and metal ion transport (GO:0030001), respectively. Other down-regulated genes were related to metals transport, Natural resistance-associated macrophage protein 1 (Nramp1), Nramp3, Nramp5, Nramp 6, Metal tolerance protein 4 (MTP4), and Putative Multidrug Resistance Protein (MRP) among others. Also, genes implicated in nutrient transport were down-regulated, including high affinity nitrate transporter 2.5 (Nitrate transport, GO:0015706), Inorganic phosphate transporter 1-1 (Phosphate ion transmembrane transporter activity, GO:0015114), Potassium transporter 5 (Potassium ion transport, GO:0006813), Sodium transporter HKT1 (Response to osmotic stress, GO: 0006970; Sodium transporter, GO:0006814), Magnesium transporter MRS 2-3 (Magnesium ion transport, GO:0015693), and Ammonium transporter 1 member 1 (Ammonium transmembrane transport, GO:0072488). However, Sugar transporter ERD6-like 6, aquaporin TIP 2-1 and probable aquaporin PIP2-2 were up-regulated.
In addition, genes related to other abiotic and biotic stress were identified; transcription factors MYB 102, MYB 74 and probable WRKY transcription factor 72 were down-regulated. While MYB 86, Snakin-2 and Disease resistance protein RPP4 were up-regulated.
Several up-regulated genes involved in plant growth promotion via auxin production were identified, including: Auxin-induced protein 22A, auxin-induced protein 22D, auxin-induced protein AUX22, auxin-responsive protein IAA3, auxin-responsive protein IAA4, auxin efflux carrier component 2, auxin-induced in root cultures protein 12 precursor, auxin-responsive protein SAUR50, auxin-responsive protein SAUR78, and índole-3-acetic acid-amino synthetase GH3.17, which were mainly included in GO terms: Auxin-activated signaling pathway (GO:0009734), response to auxin (GO:0009733), positive regulation of cell growth (GO:0030307), auxin homeostasis (GO:0010252) and root development (GO:0048364).
Expression patterns between control and treatment conditions of the most important DEGs related to metal response and plant growth promotion are shown in Figure 6.

4. Discussion

Within abiotic stress types, metal toxicity is one of the factors that causes serious deleterious effects in plants. Nevertheless, the alleviation of heavy metal toxicity by endophytic fungi could be an efficient strategy to enhance heavy metal tolerance in plants [9]. In this study, colonization of C. cupreum was detected at the end of the experiment in samples of lateral roots and near to the stem of plants, which suggests that inoculation of C. cupreum is persistent over time. Endophytic fungi establish a chemical communication with the host through sugars, fatty acids, amino acids, polysaccharides, flavonoids, among others [29], and enters the plant through degradation of the cell wall or by fissure on roots [30]. Once inside the plant, the endophytic fungi can produce different chemical compounds with a beneficial effect on the performance of plants under heavy metal stress.
Exposure to metals causes the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in plants, which leads to an imbalance in redox homeostasis [16]. Plants can counteract these negative effects by intracellular mechanisms such as the action of metal chelating peptides (metallothioneins and phytochelatins) and by activating antioxidant mechanisms. In our study, it was observed that inoculation of C. cupreum caused a down-regulation of genes involved in the detoxification of metals including, metallothionein-like protein 1 that acts by sequestering metals through thiol groups of their cysteine residues, whose distribution influences the capacity of union and sequestration of metals to maintain homeostasis [31]. The metallochaperone heavy metal-associated isoprenylated plant protein 28 (HIPP28), that acts against the excess of metals, binding them through their cysteine residues and transporting them to intracellular compartments, helping with the detoxification of metals and maintaining homeostasis [32], and peroxidase 10 precursor acts decomposing hydrogen peroxide generated in response to oxidative stress in addition to participating in the oxidation of reducing toxins, lignin biosynthesis, suberization and auxin metabolism, were also down-regulated [33].
On the other hand, several genes associated with the transport of metals were also down-regulated, among them: Nramp1, Nramp3, Nramp5, Nramp 6, MTP4 and MRP. Nramp genes play an important role in the uptake and translocation of a wide range of metal ions to the plant that include Cd, Zn, Fe, Cu and Mn, and it has been described that an up-regulation of these genes improves the accumulation of metals in Arabidopsis thaliana [34]. MTP4 has been described as a divalent cation efflux transporter that acts in the cytoplasm, being essential for the maintenance of metal homeostasis [35] and MRP realizes a similar role transporting metal ions to the vacuole as a detoxification mechanism of plants [36].
This suggests that the inoculation of C. cupreum prevents the metals present in the soil from being translocated to the roots of the plants of E. globulus, a finding which agrees with previous works where C. cupreum inoculation contributes positively to decreasing indicators of stress such as lipid peroxidation level and proline content because metal ions were adsorbed in the cell wall of the fungus [7]. However, this response mechanism depends directly on the plant–microorganism interaction, and on the type of host plant, because other studies showed that other endophytic species such as Mucor sp. despite having a protective effect on Arabidopsis arenosa plants by accumulating a lower amount of metals compared to the non-inoculated control, promotes translocation of metals from roots to shoots, which is reflected in an up-regulation of genes associated with metal transport and distribution such as HMA3, PCR2, ZIF1, and MTP1 [37]. Other transporters down-regulated were high affinity nitrate transporter 2.5, inorganic phosphate transporter 1-1, potassium transporter 5, sodium transporter HKT1, magnesium transporter MRS2-3, ammonium transporter 1 member 1 and high affinity sulfate transporter 1, which are directly related to plant nutrition. According to this, an increase in plant growth is not being promoted by an improvement in nutrient uptake. Other studies under C. cupreum inoculation reported similar results attributing the improvement in plant growth to a probable action of auxins [38]. Conversely, recent reports have shown an improvement in the absorption of nutrients under colonization of endophyte fungi. For example, the endophyte fungus Serendipita indica improved absorption and assimilation of phosphorus and nitrogen in Cunninghamia lanceolata plants under phosphorus starvation [39]. Similarly, S. indica increased the expression of genes encoding nitrate reductase in Arabidopsis thaliana [40]. While the endophyte fungus Mucor sp. increased the expression of genes related to phosphorous homeostasis in A. arenosa plants that developed in mining tailings [37]. Metalliferous environments are characterized by scarce vegetation, acid soils severely eroded and show high concentrations of metals, in addition to having a scarce supply of water and nutrients, which directly affects the development of plants [1]. In our study, sugar transporter ERD6-like 6, aquaporin TIP 2-1 and probable aquaporin PIP2-2 were up-regulated; these genes have important functions at the physiological level of the plant including nutrition and growth, providing energy through hexose accumulation and facilitating water transport respectively, besides participating in the adaptation to several types of stress [41,42]. The storage of osmoprotectants such as sugars and amino acids allows to maintain the cellular turgor pressure necessary for cell expansion under stressful conditions [43]. Previous reports suggest that endophytic fungi can promote sugar accumulation in adverse conditions, which improves plant fitness, limiting water losses by decreasing the transpiration rate and through an osmotic adjustment [44]. This could explain the up-regulation of genes related to sugar and water transport as well as Transcription factor (TF) MYB86 that regulates the stomatic aperture.
In addition, DEGs related to other types of stress were identified, including TF MYB102 and MYB74 (down-regulated), which were involved in the response to osmotic and saline stress respectively, and MYB86 (up-regulated) in the regulation of stomatal movement. It is well known that TFs can modulate the expression of genes, allowing them to respond and adapt to different environmental stimuli. MYB proteins participate in several important physiological processes, including control of the cell cycle, regulation of metabolism, synthesis of hormones, and response to several types of biotic and abiotic stresses [45]. Other genes were directly involved in plant defense response, among them, Probable WRKY transcription factor 72 (down-regulated), whose expression is induced in the presence of pathogens and also under saline and osmotic stress [46]. The role of WRKY transcription factor 72 has been described to modulate the resistance against Xanthomonas oryzae pathovar oryzae in rice plants [47]. Snakin-2 (up-regulated), a peptide with antimicrobial activity, which acts drilling membranes of the microbial cells of pathogens [48]. Wherewith, it is inferred that the inoculation of C. cupreum not only gives benefits to the plant in terms of protection against metal stress, but also plays an important role in regulating the expression of genes related to other types of biotic and abiotic stress.
In our study, we found genes related to biosynthesis and metabolism of auxins, which are responsible for the division, elongation and differentiation of the plant cell, and therefore, are directly involved with the growth of plants. We observed that genes classified as early response to auxins were up-regulated, whose function is to regulate cellular responses to different levels of auxins present in the plant [49]. Thereby, once the presence of auxins inside the cell is detected, several processes are triggered that modulate the expression of auxin response genes where two main families of proteins are involved, Auxin/Índole-3-acetic acid (Aux/IAA) and Auxin response factor (ARF). When there are low auxin concentrations, the repressor proteins Aux/IAA (Auxin- induced protein AUX22, Auxin- induced protein 22D, Auxin- induce protein 22A, Auxin- responsive protein IAA3 and Auxin- responsive protein IAA4) form complexes with ARF proteins which regulate the expression of auxin-responsive genes, preventing their actions as transcription factors; while, when the auxin concentration increases, it binds to other receptors (TIR1 / AFB) together with other proteins (ASK1, CUL1 and RBX) and forms a complex of ubiquitination that binds to the AUX / IAA repressor proteins and degrades them in the 26S proteasome, releasing the ARF proteins to activate or repress the transcription again [50]. Other overexpressed genes were Indole-3-acetic acid amino synthetase GH3 which were involved in the synthesis of IAA conjugates, providing a mechanism for the plant to counteract the excess of auxin, auxin efflux carrier component 2, which transports this phytohormone between different cells and tissues of the plant. Small auxin upregulated RNAs (SAURs) are the largest family of genes for early response to auxins and are closely related to cell expansion and plant growth along with regular abiotic stress tolerance responses such as saline and drought [51]. Auxin-induced roots cultures protein 12 (AIR12) was also overexpressed and has been described as an induced auxin involved in the development of lateral roots [52]. In previous studies, we observed that under the inoculation of fungal strain, plant growth is stimulated [7] what was reflected in lateral roots proliferation and biomass production respect to control, demonstrating the plant growth promoting effect of fungus C. cupreum.

5. Conclusions

Transcriptome changes in E. globulus inoculated with C. cupreum resulted in the detection of several genes involved in stress response to heavy metals and plant growth promotion. The protective effect showed by the inoculation of C. cupreum against metal stress is mainly due to the repression of metal transporters in the plant, which added to the ability of C. cupreum to fix metal ions on its cell surface (biosorption), preventing the generation of a ROS imbalance that subsequently triggers the activation of metal chelation mechanisms and activates the antioxidant system. Furthermore, it was found that the promoter effect of plant growth is given by a complex regulation of auxin biosynthesis and metabolism, not by an improvement in nutrient uptake.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: J.O. and C.A.; methodology: J.O., J.S., A.F., and H.H.; validation: J.O., C.M. and C.A.; formal analysis: J.O., and C.A.; investigation: J.O. and A.F.; data curation: J.O. and A.F.; writing—original draft preparation: J.O., H.H. and C.A.; visualization: J.O., C.M., and J.S.; supervision: C.A.; funding acquisition: C.A.


This research was funded by Fondo Nacional De Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico (FONDECYT), grant number 1170931 to C.A. and the Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (CONICYT), doctoral Fellowship 21150615.


We thank the Centro de Biotecnología Vegetal (Universidad Andrés Bello), the Scientific and Technological Bioresource Nucleus (BIOREN-Universidad de La Frontera) and Centro de Modelación y Computación Científica (CMCC, Universidad de La Frontera) for equipment support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.


  1. Ginocchio, R. Effects of a copper smelter on a grassland community in the Puchuncaví Valley, Chile. Chemosphere 2000, 41, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gisbert, C.; Clemente, R.; Navarro-Aviñó, J.; Baixauli, C.; Ginér, A.; Serrano, R.; Walker, D.J.; Bernal, M.P. Tolerance and accumulation of heavy metals by Brassicaceae species grown in contaminated soils from Mediterranean regions of Spain. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2006, 56, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Arriagada, C.; Aranda, E.; Sampedro, I.; García-Romera, I.; Ocampo, J. Contribution of the saprobic fungi Trametes versicolor and Trichoderma harzianum and the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Glomus deserticola and G. claroideum to arsenic tolerance of Eucalyptus globulus. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 6250–6257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rajkumar, M.; Sandhya, S.; Prasad, M.; Freitas, H. Perspectives of plant-associated microbes in heavy metal phytoremediation. Biotechnol. Adv. 2012, 30, 1562–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kane, K.H. Effects of endophyte infection on drought stress tolerance of Lolium perenne accessions from the Mediterranean region. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2011, 71, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Deng, Z.; Cao, L. Fungal endophytes and their interactions with plants in phytoremediation: A review. Chemosphere 2017, 168, 1100–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ortiz, J.; Soto, J.; Almonacid, L.; Fuentes, A.; Campos-Vargas, R.; Arriagada, C. Alleviation of metal stress by Pseudomonas orientalis and Chaetomium cupreum strains and their effects on Eucalyptus globulus growth promotion. Plant Soil 2019, 436, 449–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bilal, S.; Shahzad, R.; Khan, A.L.; Al-Harrasi, A.; Kim, C.K.; Lee, I.-J. Phytohormones enabled endophytic Penicillium funiculosum LHL06 protects Glycine max L. from synergistic toxicity of heavy metals by hormonal and stress-responsive proteins modulation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 379, 120824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ban, Y.; Xu, Z.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Chen, H.; Tang, M. Effect of Dark Septate Endophytic Fungus Gaeumannomyces cylindrosporus on Plant Growth, Photosynthesis and Pb Tolerance of Maize (Zea mays L.). Pedosphere 2017, 27, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Peng, H.; He, X.; Gao, J.; Ma, H.; Zhang, Z.; Shen, Y.; Pan, G.; Lin, H. Transcriptomic changes during maize roots development responsive to Cadmium (Cd) pollution using comparative RNAseq-based approach. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 464, 1040–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Guan, Q.; Yu, J.; Zhu, W.; Yang, B.; Li, Y.; Zhang, L.; Tian, J. RNA-Seq transcriptomic analysis of the Morus alba L. leaves exposed to high-level UVB with or without dark treatment. Gene 2018, 645, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, Y.; Dong, C.; Xue, Z.; Jin, Q.; Xu, Y. De novo transcriptome sequencing and discovery of genes related to copper tolerance in Paeonia ostii. Gene 2016, 576, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gu, C.; Xu, S.; Wang, Z.; Liu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Deng, Y.; Huang, S. De novo sequencing, assembly, and analysis of Iris lactea var. chinensis roots’ transcriptome in response to salt stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 125, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xu, L.; Wang, Y.; Liu, W.; Wang, J.; Zhu, X.; Zhang, K.; Yu, R.; Wang, R.; Xie, Y.; Zhang, W.; et al. De novo sequencing of root transcriptome reveals complex cadmium-responsive regulatory networks in radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Plant Sci. 2015, 236, 313–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Avis, T.J.; Gravel, V.; Antoun, H.; Tweddell, R.J. Multifaceted beneficial effects of rhizosphere microorganisms on plant health and productivity. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2008, 40, 1733–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hossain, M.A.; Piyatida, P.; Da Silva, J.A.T.; Fujita, M. Molecular Mechanism of Heavy Metal Toxicity and Tolerance in Plants: Central Role of Glutathione in Detoxification of Reactive Oxygen Species and Methylglyoxal and in Heavy Metal Chelation. J. Bot. 2012, 2012, 1–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sessitsch, A.; Kuffner, M.; Kidd, P.; Vangronsveld, J.; Wenzel, W.W.; Fallmann, K.; Puschenreiter, M. The role of plant-associated bacteria in the mobilization and phytoextraction of trace elements in contaminated soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2013, 60, 182–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fuentes, A.; Almonacid, L.; Ocampo, J.A.; Arriagada, C. Synergistic interactions between a saprophytic fungal consortium and Rhizophagus irregularis alleviate oxidative stress in plants grown in heavy metal contaminated soil. Plant Soil 2016, 407, 355–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xie, X.; Fu, J.; Wang, H.; Liu, J. Heavy metal resistance by two bacteria strains isolated from a copper mine tailing in China. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 9, 4056–4066. [Google Scholar]
  20. Almonacid, L.; Fuentes, A.; Ortiz, J.; Salas, C.; García-Romera, I.; Ocampo, J.; Arriagada, C.; Garcia-Romera, I. Effect of mixing soil saprophytic fungi with organic residues on the response of Solanum lycopersicum to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Use Manag. 2015, 31, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Patel, R.K.; Jain, M. NGS QC Toolkit: A Toolkit for Quality Control of Next Generation Sequencing Data. PLOS ONE 2012, 7, e30619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Grabherr, M.G.; Haas, B.J.; Yassour, M.; Levin, J.Z.; Thompson, D.A.; Amit, I.; Adiconis, X.; Fan, L.; Raychowdhury, R.; Zeng, Q.; et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 644–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, B.; Dewey, C.N. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinform. 2011, 12, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Huang, Y.; Niu, B.; Gao, Y.; Fu, L.; Li, W. CD-HIT Suite: A web server for clustering and comparing biological sequences. Bioinform. 2010, 26, 680–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Simão, F.A.; Waterhouse, R.M.; Ioannidis, P.; Kriventseva, E.V.; Zdobnov, E.M. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinform. 2015, 31, 3210–3212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Punta, M.; Coggill, P.C.; Eberhardt, R.Y.; Mistry, J.; Tate, J.; Boursnell, C.; Pang, N.; Forslund, K.; Ceric, G.; Clements, J.; et al. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic acids research 2012, 40, D290–D301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mi, H.; Muruganujan, A.; Casagrande, J.T.; Thomas, P.D. Large-scale gene function analysis with the PANTHER classification system. Nat. Protoc. 2013, 8, 1551–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Love, I.M.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Boil. 2014, 15, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mehmood, A.; Hussain, A.; Irshad, M.; Hamayun, M.; Iqbal, A.; Rahman, H.; Tawab, A.; Ahmad, A.; Ayaz, S. Cinnamic acid as an inhibitor of growth, flavonoids exudation and endophytic fungus colonization in maize root. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 135, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dastogeer, K.M.G.; Li, H.; Sivasithamparam, K.; Jones, M.G.K.; Wylie, S.J. A simple and rapid in vitro test for large-scale screening of fungal endophytes from drought-adapted Australian wild plants for conferring water deprivation tolerance and growth promotion in Nicotiana benthamiana seedlings. Arch. Microbiol. 2017, 199, 1357–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ali, H.; Khan, E.; Sajad, M.A. Phytoremediation of heavy metals—Concepts and applications. Chemosphere 2013, 91, 869–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Khan, I.U.; Rono, J.K.; Zhang, B.Q.; Liu, X.S.; Wang, M.Q.; Wang, L.L.; Wu, X.C.; Chen, X.; Cao, H.W.; Yang, Z.M. Identification of novel rice (Oryza sativa) HPP and HIPP genes tolerant to heavy metal toxicity. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 175, 8–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Pandey, V.P.; Awasthi, M.; Singh, S.; Tiwari, S.; Dwivedi, U.N. A Comprehensive Review on Function and Application of Plant Peroxidases. Biochem. Anal. Biochem. 2017, 06. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, C.; Chen, X.; Yao, Q.; Long, D.; Fan, X.; Kang, H.; Zeng, J.; Sha, L.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, Y.; et al. Overexpression of TtNRAMP6 enhances the accumulation of Cd in Arabidopsis. Gene 2019, 696, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Migocka, M.; Kosieradzka, A.; Papierniak, A.; Maciaszczyk-Dziubinska, E.; Posyniak, E.; Garbiec, A.; Filleur, S. Two metal-tolerance proteins, MTP1 and MTP4, are involved in Zn homeostasis and Cd sequestration in cucumber cells. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 1001–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Klein, M.; Burla, B.; Martinoia, E. The multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP/ABCC) subfamily of ATP-binding cassette transporters in plants. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580, 1112–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rozpądek, P.; Domka, A.; Ważny, R.; Nosek, M.; Jędrzejczyk, R.; Tokarz, K.; Turnau, K. How does the endophytic fungus Mucor sp. improve Arabidopsis arenosa vegetation in the degraded environment of a mine dump? Environ. Exp. Bot. 2018, 147, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Haruma, T.; Yamaji, K.; Masuya, H.; Hanyu, K. Root endophytic Chaetomium cupreum promotes plant growth and detoxifies aluminum in Miscanthus sinensis Andersson growing at the acidic mine site. Plant Species Biol. 2018, 33, 109–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wu, C.; Li, B.; Wei, Q.; Pan, R.; Zhang, W. Endophytic fungus Serendipita indica increased nutrition absorption and biomass accumulation in Cunninghamia lanceolata seedlings under low phosphate. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2019, 39, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sherameti, I.; Shahollari, B.; Venus, Y.; Altschmied, L.; Varma, A.; Oelmüller, R. The Endophytic Fungus Piriformospora indica Stimulates the Expression of Nitrate Reductase and the Starch-degrading Enzyme Glucan-water Dikinase in Tobacco and Arabidopsis Roots through a Homeodomain Transcription Factor That Binds to a Conserved Motif in Their Promoters. J. Boil. Chem. 2005, 280, 26241–26247. [Google Scholar]
  41. Rodrigues, M.I.; Bravo, J.P.; Sassaki, F.T.; Severino, F.E.; Maia, I.G. The tonoplast intrinsic aquaporin (TIP) subfamily of Eucalyptus grandis: Characterization of EgTIP2, a root-specific and osmotic stress-responsive gene. Plant Sci. 2013, 213, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bolouri Moghaddam, M.R.; Van den Ende, W. Sugars and plant innate immunity. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 3989–3998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Dastogeer, K.M.; Li, H.; Sivasithamparam, K.; Jones, M.G.; Du, X.; Ren, Y.; Wylie, S.J. Metabolic responses of endophytic Nicotiana benthamiana plants experiencing water stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2017, 143, 59–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Molina-Montenegro, M.A.; Oses, R.; Torres-Diaz, C.; Atala, C.; Zurita-Silva, A.; Ruiz-Lara, S. Root-endophytes improve the ecophysiological performance and production of an agricultural species under drought condition. AoB Plants 2016, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chen, N.; Yang, Q.; Pan, L.; Chi, X.; Chen, M.; Hu, D.; Yang, Z.; Wang, T.; Wang, M.; Yu, S. Identification of 30 MYB transcription factor genes and analysis of their expression during abiotic stress in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Gene 2014, 533, 332–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chen, L.; Song, Y.; Li, S.; Zhang, L.; Zou, C.; Yu, D. The role of WRKY transcription factors in plant abiotic stresses. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2012, 1819, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Viana, V.E.; Busanello, C.; Da Maia, L.C.; Pegoraro, C.; De Oliveira, A.C. Activation of rice WRKY transcription factors: an army of stress fighting soldiers? Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2018, 45, 268–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Herbel, V.; Sieber-Frank, J.; Wink, M. The antimicrobial peptide snakin-2 is upregulated in the defense response of tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum) as part of the jasmonate-dependent signaling pathway. J. Plant Physiol. 2017, 208, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Matthes, M.S.; Best, N.B.; Robil, J.M.; Malcomber, S.; Gallavotti, A.; McSteen, P. Auxin EvoDevo: Conservation and Diversification of Genes Regulating Auxin Biosynthesis, Transport, and Signaling. Mol. Plant 2019, 12, 298–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ljung, K. Auxin metabolism and homeostasis during plant development. Dev. 2013, 140, 943–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Guo, Y.; Jiang, Q.; Hu, Z.; Sun, X.; Fan, S.; Zhang, H. Function of the auxin-responsive gene TaSAUR75 under salt and drought stress. Crop. J. 2018, 6, 181–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gibson, S.W.; Todd, C.D. Arabidopsis AIR12 influences root development. Physiol. Mol. Boil. Plants 2015, 21, 479–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Effect of inoculation of endophytic strain Chaetomium cupreum on shoot and root dry weight of Eucalyptus globulus (90 days post-inoculation). Values are expressed as means ± standard error. Statistical significance was evaluated with t-student test *(p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 1. Effect of inoculation of endophytic strain Chaetomium cupreum on shoot and root dry weight of Eucalyptus globulus (90 days post-inoculation). Values are expressed as means ± standard error. Statistical significance was evaluated with t-student test *(p ≤ 0.05).
Microorganisms 07 00490 g001
Figure 2. Detection of Chaetomium cupreum in roots of inoculated plants of Eucalyptus globulus (90 days post inoculation) observed under scanning electron microscopy. Black arrows show fungal hyphae.
Figure 2. Detection of Chaetomium cupreum in roots of inoculated plants of Eucalyptus globulus (90 days post inoculation) observed under scanning electron microscopy. Black arrows show fungal hyphae.
Microorganisms 07 00490 g002
Figure 3. Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes between control (without microbial inoculation) and treatment (with microbial inoculation) conditions in Eucalyptus globulus roots transcriptome. In red, differentially expressed genes; in black, genes without variation in expression.
Figure 3. Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes between control (without microbial inoculation) and treatment (with microbial inoculation) conditions in Eucalyptus globulus roots transcriptome. In red, differentially expressed genes; in black, genes without variation in expression.
Microorganisms 07 00490 g003
Figure 4. Gene ontology distribution of Eucalyptus globulus transcripts according to level 1 categories: GO, Cellular Component (CC), Biological Process (BP) and Molecular Function (MF). Genes are differentially expressed in treatment compared to control condition.
Figure 4. Gene ontology distribution of Eucalyptus globulus transcripts according to level 1 categories: GO, Cellular Component (CC), Biological Process (BP) and Molecular Function (MF). Genes are differentially expressed in treatment compared to control condition.
Microorganisms 07 00490 g004
Figure 5. Distribution of differentially expressed genes according PHANTER classification system. The bars show the number of genes in each protein functional class. Genes are differentially expressed in treatment compared to control condition.
Figure 5. Distribution of differentially expressed genes according PHANTER classification system. The bars show the number of genes in each protein functional class. Genes are differentially expressed in treatment compared to control condition.
Microorganisms 07 00490 g005
Figure 6. Heat map showing differential expression of the most important up/downregulated genes between control (without microbial inoculation) and inoculated treatment (with fungal inoculation) conditions in Eucalyptus globulus roots transcriptome.
Figure 6. Heat map showing differential expression of the most important up/downregulated genes between control (without microbial inoculation) and inoculated treatment (with fungal inoculation) conditions in Eucalyptus globulus roots transcriptome.
Microorganisms 07 00490 g006
Table 1. Summary of de novo assembly statistics of Eucalyptus globulus roots by Trinity software.
Table 1. Summary of de novo assembly statistics of Eucalyptus globulus roots by Trinity software.
Eucalyptus globulus
Number of transcripts131.155
Number of components81.210
Size147.15 Mbp
N104469 bp
N203580 bp
N303002 bp
N402540 bp
N502128 bp
Average length 1121.97 bp
Median580 bp
Table 2. Summary of evaluation of the de novo assembly of Eucalyptus globulus roots by BUSCO.
Table 2. Summary of evaluation of the de novo assembly of Eucalyptus globulus roots by BUSCO.
Complete BUSCOs 113378.7%
-Single-copy BUSCOs 57439.9%
-Duplicated BUSCOs 55938.8%
Fragmented BUSCOs 1087.5%
Missing BUSCOs 19913.8%
Total BUSCO genes1.440100.0%
Table 3. Details of differential expression genes involved in response to heavy metals stress and plant growth promotion in Eucalyptus globulus roots transcriptome.
Table 3. Details of differential expression genes involved in response to heavy metals stress and plant growth promotion in Eucalyptus globulus roots transcriptome.
Gene DescriptionOntologyFPKM ControlFPKM Treatmentp-ValueUp/Down
Stress responses
Metallothionein-like protein 1MF: Metal ion binding (GO:0046872)69932.9832933.828.65 × 10−7Down
Peroxidase 10 precursorMF: Metal ion binding (GO:0046872), BP: Response to oxidative stress (GO:0006979)1370.02615.981.61 × 10−135Down
Probable 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenaseBP: Metal ion binding (GO:0046872), Cellular response to toxic substances (GO:0097237)1049.91451.0911.63 × 10−6Down
Protein Cobra precursorBP: Response to salt stress (GO:0006950)85.181617.250Up
Protein High arsenic content 1, mitochondrialBP: Detoxification of arsenic-containing substance (GO:0071722)1046.34318.955.68 × 10−34Down
Protein sensitive to proton rhizotoxicity 2MF: Metal ion binding (GO:0046872)234.41103.584.83 × 10−103Down
Putative Multidrug resistance proteinMF: ATPase activity, coupled to transmembrane movement of substances (GO:0042626)161.0971.713.79 × 10−41Down
Metal tolerance protein 4MF: Cation transmembrane transporter activity (GO:0008324)723.47280.760Down
Transcription factor MYB102BP: Response to osmotic stress (GO:0006970), response to salt stress (GO:0009651)120.8731.994.63 × 10−68Down
Transcription factor MYB74BP: Response to salt stress (GO:0009651)181.21662.09 × 10−9Down
Transcription factor MYB86BP: Regulation of stomatal movement (GO:0010119)35.69153.433.96 × 10−23Up
Heat stress transcription factor A-2BP: Cellular response to heat (GO:0034605)298.08124.757.8 × 10−30Down
Universal stress protein A-like proteinMF: AMP binding (GO:0016208)62.2124.32.78 × 10−10Down
Probable WRKY transcription factor 72BP: Defense response (GO:0006952)344.1589.654.22 × 10−62Down
Disease resistance protein RPS4BBP: Defense response signaling pathway (GO:0009870)269.97960.330.003Up
Disease resistance-like protein DSC1MF: Defense response to bacterium (GO:0042742)269.97960.331.48 × 10−5Up
Snakin-2 precursorBP: Defense response (GO:0006952)70.25323.335.25 × 10−21Up
Disease resistance response protein 206BP: Defense response (GO:0006952), response to biotic stimulus (GO:0009607)75.24308.475.89 × 10−76Up
3,9-dihydroxypterocarpan 6A-monooxygenaseBP: Defense response (GO:0006952)234.721139.561.69 × 10−25Up
Cysteine protease X CP2 precursorMF: Defense response to bacterium (GO:0042742)403.51270.230Up
Disease resistance protein RPP4BP: Defense response (GO:0006952)239.78628.327.88 × 10−22Up
Ethylene-responsive transcription factor ERF043BP: Ethylene-activated signaling pathway (GO:0009873)42.47147.731.04 × 10−40Up
Cell transport
Metal transporter Nramp1BP: Iron ion homeostasis (GO:0055072), iron ion transmembrane transport (GO:0034755)1849.04706.191.68 × 10−23Down
Metal transporter Nramp3BP: Iron ion transmembrane transport (GO:0034755)1613.53378.213.64 × 10−34Down
Metal transporter Nramp5BP: Iron ion homeostasis (GO:0055072)1849.04706.190Down
Metal transporter Nramp6BP: Iron ion transmembrane transport (GO:0034755)1613.53378.217.81 × 10–6Down
Heavy metal-associated isoprenylated plant protein 28MF: Metal ion binding (GO:0046872), BP: Metal ion transport (GO:0030001)2010.9911.058.38 × 10–25Down
High affinity nitrate transporter 2.5BP: Cellular response to nitrate (GO:0071249), nitrate transport (GO:0015706)156.453.164.63 × 10−22Down
High-affinity nitrate transporter 3.2BP: Nitrate assimilation (GO:0042128), nitrate transport (GO:0015706)7323.213085.338.34 × 10−49Down
Inorganic phosphate transporter 1-1BP: Phosphate ion transmembrane transporter activity (GO:0015114)2858.4650.928.77 × 10−27Down
Potassium transporter 5BP: Potassium ion transport (GO:0006813)2330.51570.914.86 × 10−34Down
Sodium transporter HKT1BP: Response to osmotic stress (GO:0006970), sodium ion transport (GO:0006814)116.3150.951.17 × 10−23Down
Magnesium transporter MRS2-3BP: Magnesium ion transport (GO:0015693)924.34365.836.95 × 10−139Down
Ammonium transporter 1 member 1BP: Ammonium transmembrane transport (GO:0072488)3059.061050.290Down
High affinity sulfate transporter 1MF: Secondary activate sulfate transmembrane transporter activity (GO:0008271)433.26100.611.59 × 10−10Down
Aluminum-activated malate transporter 10BP: Malate transport (GO:0015743)379.74126.83.78 × 10−22Down
Sugar transporter ERD6-like 6BP: Glucose homeostasis (GO:0042593)28.58102.733.24 × 10−36Up
Probable Aquaporin PIP2-2MF: Water channel activity (GO:0015250), BP: Response to water deprivation (GO:0009414)78.131168.641.39 × 10−55Up
Aquaporin TIP1-3MF: Water channel activity (GO:0015250), BP: Water transport (GO:0006833)64.88252.78.49 × 10−32Up
Plant growth
Auxin-induced protein AUX22MF: Auxin-activated signaling pathway (GO:0009734)106.53349.042.86 × 10−20Up
Auxin-responsive protein IAA3BP: Auxin-activated signaling pathway (GO:0009734), response to auxin (GO:0009733)18.84167.765.82 × 10−40Up
Auxin-responsive protein IAA4BP: Auxin-activated signaling pathway (GO:0009734)18.84167.763.26 × 10−45Up
Auxin-induced protein 22DBP: Auxin-activated signaling pathway (GO:0009734)18.84167.761.33 × 10−57Up
Auxin efflux carrier component 2BP: Auxin-activated signaling pathway (GO:0009734), auxin efflux (GO:0010315)10.46115.460Up
Auxin-induced in root cultures protein 12BP: Auxin-activated signaling pathway (GO:0009734)142.02772.684.19 × 10−48Up
Auxin-responsive protein SAUR50BP: Auxin-activated signaling pathway (GO:0009734), regulation of growth (GO:0040008)18.44108.181.11 × 10−15Up
Auxin-responsive protein SAUR78BP: Positive regulation of cell growth (GO:0030307), responsive to auxin (GO:0009733)46.66107.162.42 × 10−22Up
Auxin- induced protein 22ABP: Auxin-activated signaling pathway (GO:0009734)147.72441.661.15 × 10−60Up
Indole-3-acetic acid-amino synthetase GH3.17BP: Auxin homeostasis (GO:0010252)41.6137.520Up
Transcription factor MYB61BP: Response to auxin (GO:0009733), root development (GO:0048364)35.69153.431.29 × 10−88Up
Protein RALF-like 24 precursorMF: Hormone activity (GO:0005179), BP: Cell-cell signaling (GO:0007267)182.13487.293.06 × 10−23Up
Laccase-15 precursorMF: Copper ion binding (GO:0005507), oxidoreductase activity (GO:0016491)590.3718856.34 × 10−14Up
Laccase-14 precursorMF: Copper ion binding (GO:0005507), oxidoreductase activity (GO:0016491)675.652738.339.02 × 10−51Up
Laccase-16 precursorMF: Copper ion binding (GO:0005507), oxidoreductase activity (GO:0016491)675.652738.331.01 × 10−110Up
Back to TopTop