Synergic Effect of Fluconazole and Quinoline Derivatives Combination Against Cryptococcus spp., Mechanisms of Action and Toxicity
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Strains and Growth Medium
2.2. Antifungal Drugs
2.3. Antimicrobial Sensitivity Test (AST)
2.4. Checkerboard Combination Assay
2.5. Modified Time–Kill Combination Curves
2.6. Inhibition of Melanization
2.7. Inhibition of Urease Production
2.8. UV/Vis Detection of FLZ and CQ/8HQ by Experimental Design
2.9. Hen’s Egg Test–Chorioallantoic Membrane (HET-CAM)
2.10. Cytotoxicity Assay
2.11. Acute Toxicity Tests on Tenebrio Molitor Larvae
3. Results
3.1. Inhibitory Concentration of Antifungal Drugs
3.2. Drug Interaction Response by Checkerboard Assay
3.3. Evaluation of Modified Time–Kill Combination Curves
3.4. Melanin Inhibition Assay
3.5. Results for Urease Inhibition
3.6. Quantification of FLZ and CQ/8HQ in RPMI Medium After Incubation
3.7. Irritability Test (HET-CAM)
3.8. Toxicity Results in 3T3 Cells
3.9. Acute Toxicity Tests on Tenebrio Molitor
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bermas, A.; Geddes-McAlister, J. Combatting the evolution of antifungal resistance in Cryptococcus neoformans. Mol. Microbiol. 2020, 114, 721–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Fegahli, C.; Fegahli, E. Cryptococcus gattii infection in an immunocompetent patient. Radiol. Case Rep. 2025, 20, 5484–5487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- May, R.C.; Stone, N.R.; Wiesner, D.L.; Bicanic, T.; Nielsen, K. Cryptococcus: From environmental saprophyte to global pathogen. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 14, 106–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Zhao, Y.; Lin, J.; Fan, Y.; Lin, X. Life cycle of Cryptococcus neoformans. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 73, 17–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Setianingrum, F.; Rautemaa-Richardson, R.; Denning, D.W. Pulmonary cryptococcosis: A review of pathobiology and clinical aspects. Med. Mycol. 2019, 57, 133–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Rajasingham, R.; Smith, R.M.; Park, B.J.; Jarvis, J.N.; Govender, N.P.; Chiller, T.M.; Denning, D.W.; Loyse, A.; Boulware, D.R. Global burden of disease of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis: An updated analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 873–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Chang, C.C.; Harrison, T.S.; Bicanic, T.A.; Chayakulkeeree, M.; Sorrell, T.C.; Warris, A.; Hagen, F.; Spec, A.; Oladele, R.; Govender, N.P.; et al. Global guideline for the diagnosis and management of cryptococcosis: An initiative of the ECMM and ISHAM in cooperation with the ASM. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2024, 24, e495–e512, Erratum in Lancet Infect. Dis. 2024, 24, E485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Dao, A.; Kim, H.Y.; Garnham, K.; Kidd, S.; Sati, H.; Perfect, J.; Sorrell, T.C.; Harrison, T.; Rickerts, V.; Gigante, V.; et al. Cryptococcosis—A systematic review to inform the World Health Organization fungal priority pathogens list. Med. Mycol. 2024, 62, myae043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Moreira, I.M.B.; Sousa, N.S.O.; Almeida, J.D.R.; de Almeida, J.D.R.; Filho, R.L.L.R.; Cruz, K.S.; Matsuura, A.B.J.; Melhem, M.d.S.C.; de Souza, É.S.; Frickmann, H.; et al. Fluconazole resistance and heteroresistance in Cryptococcus spp.: Mechanisms and implications. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2025, 58, e00200-2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Sionov, E.; Chang, Y.C.; Garraffo, H.M.; Kwon-Chung, K.J. Heteroresistance to fluconazole in Cryptococcus neoformans is intrinsic and associated with virulence. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 2804–2815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Konagaya, M. SMON: Toxicity of clioquinol and the status quo. Brain Nerve 2015, 67, 49–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Perez, D.R.; Sklar, L.A.; Chigaev, A. Clioquinol: To harm or heal. Pharmacol. Ther. 2019, 199, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ritchie, C.W.; Bush, A.I.; Mackinnon, A.; Macfarlane, S.; Mastwyk, M.; MacGregor, L.; Kiers, L.; Cherny, R.; Li, Q.-X.; Tammer, A.; et al. Metal-protein attenuation with iodochlorhydroxyquin (clioquinol) targeting Abeta amyloid deposition and toxicity in Alzheimer disease: A pilot phase 2 clinical trial. Arch. Neurol. 2003, 60, 1685–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Schimmer, A.; Jitkova, Y.; Gronda, M. A phase I study of the metal ionophore clioquinol in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies. Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2012, 12, 330–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Odingo, J.O.; Early, J.V.; Smith, J.; Johnson, J.; Bailey, M.A.; Files, M.; Guzman, J.; Ollinger, J.; Korkegian, A.; Kumar, A.; et al. 8-hydroxyquinolines are bactericidal against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Drug Dev. Res. 2019, 80, 566–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Srisung, S.; Suksrichavalit, T.; Prachayasittikul, S.; Ruchirawat, S.; Prachayasittikul, V. Antimicrobial activity of 8-hydroxyquinoline and transition metal complexes. Int. J. Pharmacol. 2013, 9, 170–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Richards, M.N.; Johnson, G.R.; Lum, J.S.; McDonald, R.; Salter, W.B.; Simpson, K.; Stote, R.E.; Owens, J.R. Investigating surface binding effects: Antibacterial efficacy of bound 8-hydroxyquinoline against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 131, 2212–2222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Kos, J.; Ku, C.F.; Kapustikova, I.; Oravec, M.; Zhang, H.J.; Jampilek, J. 8-hydroxyquinoline-2-carboxanilides as antiviral agents against avian influenza virus. ChemistrySelect 2019, 4, 4582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lai, H.; Prasad, G.S.; Padmanabhan, R. Characterization of 8-hydroxyquinoline derivatives containing aminobenzothiazole as inhibitors of dengue virus type 2 protease in vitro. Antivir. Res. 2013, 97, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Lima, S.K.S.; Jesus, J.A.; Raminelli, C.; Laurenti, M.D.; Passero, L.F.D. High selectivity of 8-hydroxyquinoline on Leishmania (Leishmania) and Leishmania (Viannia) species correlates with a potent therapeutic activity in vivo. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Duarte, M.C.; Lage, L.M.R.; Lage, D.P.; Mesquita, J.T.; Salles, B.C.S.; Lavorato, S.N.; Menezes-Souza, D.; Roatt, B.M.; Alves, R.J.; Tavares, C.A.P.; et al. An effective in vitro and in vivo antileishmanial activity and mechanism of action of 8-hydroxyquinoline against Leishmania species causing visceral and tegumentary leishmaniasis. Vet. Parasitol. 2016, 217, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Li, L.; Wu, H.; Wang, J.; Ji, Z.; Fang, T.; Lu, H.; Yan, L.; Shen, F.; Zhang, D.; Jiang, Y.; et al. Discovery of novel 8-hydroxyquinoline derivatives with potent in vitro and in vivo antifungal activity. J. Med. Chem. 2023, 66, 16364–16376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Joaquim, A.R.; Reginatto, P.; Lopes, M.S.; Bazana, L.C.G.; Gionbelli, M.P.; De Cesare, M.A.; Kaminski, T.F.A.; Teixeira, M.L.; Abegg, M.A.; Fuentefria, A.M.; et al. New 8-hydroxyquinoline derivatives highlight the potential of this class for treatment of fungal infections. New J. Chem. 2021, 45, 18158–18170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sharma, R.; Sharma, A.; Borah, A.; Chandra, R.; Singh, S. Synthesis of 8-hydroxyquinoline derivatives: A revolutionary target in medicinal chemistry (2020–2025). ChemistrySelect 2025, 10, e03182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Schmidt, G.; Thorp, P. The effect of chemotherapeutic agents upon the growth of Cryptococcus neoformans. J. Infect. Dis. 1958, 103, 142–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Helsel, M.E.; White, E.J.; Razvi, S.Z.A.; Alies, B.; Franz, K.J. Chemical and functional properties of metal chelators that mobilize copper to elicit fungal killing of Cryptococcus neoformans. Metallomics 2017, 9, 69–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Polacheck, I.; Hearing, V.J.; Kwon-Chung, K.J. Biochemical studies of phenoloxidase and utilization of catecholamines in Cryptococcus neoformans. J. Bacteriol. 1982, 150, 1212–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Rossi, S.A.; de Oliveira, H.C.; Agreda-Mellon, D.; Lucio, J.; Mendes-Giannini, M.J.S.; García-Cambero, J.P.; Zaragoza, O. Identification of off-patent drugs that show synergism with amphotericin B or that present antifungal action against Cryptococcus neoformans and Candida spp. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e01921-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Cuenca-Estrella, M. Combinations of antifungal agents in therapy—What value are they? J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2004, 54, 854–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Tillotson, J.; Tillotson, G.S. The regulatory pathway for antifungal drugs: A US perspective. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2015, 61, S678–S683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Method for the Determination of Broth Dilution Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations of Antifungal Agents for Yeasts. EUCAST E.DEF 7.3.2. 2020. Available online: https://www.eucast.org/astoffungi/methodsinantifungalsusceptibilitytesting/susceptibility_testing_of_yeasts/ (accessed on 20 November 2021).
- Odds, F.C. Synergy, antagonism, and what the chequerboard puts between them. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2003, 52, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Bellio, P.; Fagnani, L.; Nazzicone, L.; Celenza, G. New and simplified method for drug combination studies by checkerboard assay. MethodsX 2021, 8, 101543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Di Veroli, G.Y.; Fornari, C.; Wang, D.; Mollard, S.; Bramhall, J.L.; Richards, F.M.; Jodrell, D.I. Combenefit: An interactive platform for the analysis and visualization of drug combinations. Bioinformatics 2016, 32, 2866–2868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Prasad, S.; Francis Saleshier, M.; Krishnan, S.; Bharathi, P. Synthesis, spectroscopic studies, antibacterial activity, and colorimetric evaluation of the time-killing assay for newly synthesized chalcones using resazurin. Pharm. Chem. J. 2018, 52, 518–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Baker, R.P.; Chrissian, C.; Stark, R.E.; Casadevall, A. Cryptococcus neoformans melanization incorporates multiple catecholamines to produce polytypic melanin. J. Biol. Chem. 2022, 298, 101519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Rodrigues Dos Santos Junior, S.; Stempinski, P.R.; de Araujo, M.V.; Rojas, K.; Gerbig, G.R.; Liporagi Lopes, L.C.; Smith, D.F.Q.; Wear, M.P.; Casadevall, A. Cryptococcus neoformans serotype A virulence and pathogenicity are capsular glucuronoxylomannan (GXM) motif composition dependent. mBio 2025, 16, e02646-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ramos, H.A.; Arruda, I.E.S.; Alencar Danda, L.J.D.; Sales, R.F.; Fernandes, J.M.; Soares, M.F.D.L.R.; Amigo, J.M.; Pimentel, M.F.; Soares Sobrinho, J.L. Quantification of antibiotics in multicomponent drug formulations using UV–Vis spectrometer with PLS and MCR-ALS. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2025, 260, 105354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM). The Hen’s Egg Test–Chorioallantoic Membrane (HET-CAM) Test Method; National Toxicology Program; Research Triangle Park: Durham, NC, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Giordani, C.F.A.; Campanharo, S.; Wingert, N.R.; Bueno, L.M.; Manoel, J.W.; Costa, B.; Cattani, S.; Arbo, M.D.; Garcia, S.C.; Garcia, C.V.; et al. In vitro toxic evaluation of two gliptins and their main impurities of synthesis. BMC Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2019, 20, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- de Souza, P.C.; Morey, A.T.; Castanheira, G.M.; Bocate, K.P.; Panagio, L.A.; Ito, F.A.; Furlaneto, M.C.; Yamada-Ogatta, S.F.; Costa, I.N.; Mora-Montes, H.M.; et al. Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) as an alternative host to study fungal infections. J. Microbiol. Methods 2015, 118, 182–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Usui, K.; Nishida, S.; Sugita, T.; Ueki, T.; Matsumoto, Y.; Okumura, H.; Sekimizu, K. Acute oral toxicity test of chemical compounds in silkworms. Drug Discov. Ther. 2016, 10, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Molloy, S.F.; Kanyama, C.; Heyderman, R.S.; Loyse, A.; Kouanfack, C.; Chanda, D.; Mfinanga, S.; Temfack, E.; Lakhi, S.; Lesikari, S.; et al. Antifungal combinations for treatment of cryptococcal meningitis in Africa. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 378, 1004–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Rajasingham, R.; Govender, N.P.; Jordan, A.; Loyse, A.; Shroufi, A.; Denning, D.W.; Meya, D.B.; Chiller, T.M.; Boulware, D.R. The global burden of HIV-associated cryptococcal infection in adults in 2020: A modelling analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2022, 22, 1748–1755, Erratum in Lancet Infect. Dis. 2023, 23, e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Miot, J.; Leong, T.; Takuva, S.; Parrish, A.; Dawood, H. Cost-effectiveness analysis of flucytosine as induction therapy in the treatment of cryptococcal meningitis in HIV-infected adults in South Africa. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2021, 21, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Cahoon, L. The curious case of clioquinol. Nat. Med. 2009, 15, 356–359, Erratum in Mol. Gen. Genet. 2009, 15, 469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Mills, D. 8-hydroxyquinoline inhibition of DNA synthesis and intragenic recombination during yeast meiosis. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1978, 162, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- You, Z.; Zhang, C.; Ran, Y. The effects of clioquinol in morphogenesis, cell membrane and ion homeostasis in Candida albicans. BMC Microbiol. 2020, 20, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Pippi, B.; Machado, G.D.R.M.; Bergamo, V.Z.; Alves, R.J.; Andrade, S.F.; Fuentefria, A.M. Clioquinol is a promising preventive morphological switching compound in the treatment of Candida infections linked to the use of intrauterine devices. J. Med. Microbiol. 2018, 67, 1655–1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- You, Z.; Ran, X.; Dai, Y.; Ran, Y. Clioquinol, an alternative antimicrobial agent against common pathogenic microbes. J. Mycol. Med. 2018, 28, 492–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Reichert-Lima, F.; Busso-Lopes, A.F.; Lyra, L.; Peron, I.H.; Taguchi, H.; Mikami, Y.; Kamei, K.; Moretti, M.L.; Schreiber, A.Z. Evaluation of antifungal combination against Cryptococcus spp. Mycoses 2016, 59, 585–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Barchiesi, F.; Spreghini, E.; Schimizzi, A.M.; Maracci, M.; Giannini, D.; Carle, F.; Scalise, G. Posaconazole and amphotericin B combination therapy against Cryptococcus neoformans infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 3312–3316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Serena, C.; Fernández-Torres, B.; Pastor, F.J.; Trilles, L.; Lazéra, M.d.S.; Nolard, N.; Guarro, J. In vitro interactions of micafungin with other antifungal drugs against clinical isolates of four species of Cryptococcus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 2994–2996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Zaragoza, O.; Chrisman, C.J.; Castelli, M.V.; Frases, S.; Cuenca-Estrella, M.; Rodríguez-Tudela, J.L.; Casadevall, A. Capsule enlargement in Cryptococcus neoformans confers resistance to oxidative stress suggesting a mechanism for intracellular survival. Cell Microbiol. 2008, 10, 2043–2057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Garcia-Rubio, R.; de Oliveira, H.C.; Rivera, J.; Trevijano-Contador, N. The fungal cell wall: Candida, Cryptococcus, and Aspergillus species. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 2993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Pippi, B.; Lopes, W.; Reginatto, P.; Silva, F.É.K.; Joaquim, A.R.; Alves, R.J.; Silveira, G.P.; Vainstein, M.H.; Andrade, S.F.; Fuentefria, A.M. New insights into the mechanism of antifungal action of 8-hydroxyquinolines. Saudi Pharm. J. 2019, 27, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Silva, M.G.; Schrank, A.; Bailão, E.F.L.C.; Bailão, A.M.; Borges, C.L.; Staats, C.C.; Parente, J.A.; Pereira, M.; Salem-Izacc, S.M.; Mendes-Giannini, M.J.S.; et al. The homeostasis of iron, copper, and zinc in Paracoccidioides brasiliensis, Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii, and Cryptococcus gattii: A comparative analysis. Front. Microbiol. 2011, 2, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Kim, J.; Cho, Y.J.; Do, E.; Choi, J.; Hu, G.; Cadieux, B.; Chun, J.; Lee, Y.; Kronstad, J.W.; Jung, W.H. A defect in iron uptake enhances the susceptibility of Cryptococcus neoformans to azole antifungal drugs. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2012, 49, 955–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Li, C.; Wang, J.; Zhou, B. The metal chelating and chaperoning effects of clioquinol: Insights from yeast studies. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2010, 21, 1249–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Rodríguez-Santiago, L.; Alí-Torres, J.; Vidossich, P.; Sodupe, M. Coordination properties of a metal chelator clioquinol to Zn(2+) studied by static DFT and ab initio molecular dynamics. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 13582–13589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Lepesheva, G.I.; Hargrove, T.Y.; Kleshchenko, Y.; Nes, W.D.; Villalta, F.; Waterman, M.R. CYP51: A major drug target in the cytochrome P450 superfamily. Lipids 2008, 43, 1117–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Honorato Siqueira, T.; Martínez, L. Molecular simulations of fluconazole-mediated inhibition of sterol biosynthesis. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2020, 38, 1659–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Craven, R.J.; Mallory, J.C.; Hand, R.A. Regulation of iron homeostasis mediated by the heme-binding protein Dap1 via the P450 protein Erg11/Cyp51. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 36543–36551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Santos, J.R.; Gouveia, L.F.; Taylor, E.L.; Resende-Stoianoff, M.A.; Pianetti, G.A.; César, I.C.; Santos, D.A. Dynamic interaction between fluconazole and amphotericin B against Cryptococcus gattii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 2553–2558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Faux, N.G.; Ritchie, C.W.; Gunn, A.; Rembach, A.; Tsatsanis, A.; Bedo, J.; Harrison, J.; Lannfelt, L.; Blennow, K.; Zetterberg, H.; et al. PBT2 rapidly improves cognition in Alzheimer’s disease: Additional phase II analyses. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2010, 20, 509–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Villemagne, V.L.; Rowe, C.C.; Barnham, K.J.; Cherny, R.; Woodward, M.; Bozinosvski, S.; Salvado, O.; Bourgeat, P.; Perez, K.; Fowler, C.; et al. A randomized, exploratory molecular imaging study targeting amyloid β with a novel 8-OH quinoline in Alzheimer’s disease: The PBT2-204 IMAGINE study. Alzheimers Dement. 2017, 3, 622–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- da Rocha, L.F.; Pippi, B.; Joaquim, A.R.; de Andrade, S.F.; Fuentefria, A.M. 8-hydroxyquinoline-5-(N-4-chlorophenyl)sulfonamide and fluconazole combination as a preventive strategy for Candida biofilm in haemodialysis devices. J. Med. Microbiol. 2021, 70, 001377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Demidenko, E.; Miller, T.W. Statistical determination of synergy based on Bliss definition of drugs independence. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0224137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Greco, W.R.; Bravo, G.; Parsons, J.C. The search for synergy: A critical review from a response surface perspective. Pharmacol. Rev. 1995, 47, 331–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]









| Run | FLZ (%) | 8HQ/CQ (%) | FLZ (µg·mL−1) | 8HQ/CQ (µg·mL−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 32 | 0 |
| 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
| 3 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 16 | 4 |
| 4 | 0.75 | 0.25 | 24 | 2 |
| 5 | 0.25 | 0.75 | 8 | 6 |
| 6 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 28.8 | 0.8 |
| 7 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 3.2 | 7.2 |
| 8 | 0.95 | 0.05 | 30.4 | 0.4 |
| 9 | 0.05 | 0.95 | 1.6 | 7.6 |
| 10 | 0.99 | 0.01 | 31.68 | 0.08 |
| 11 | 0.01 | 0.99 | 0.32 | 7.92 |
| 12 | 0.5 | 0 | 16 | 0 |
| 13 | 0 | 0.5 | 0 | 4 |
| 14 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 19.2 | 3.2 |
| 15 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 12.8 | 4.8 |
| Strains | FLZ | AMB | 8HQ | CQ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IC50/R2 | IC90/R2 | IC50/R2 | IC90/R2 | IC50/R2 | IC90/R2 | |
| H99 | 2.67/0.97 | 0.40/0.95 | 0.75/0.95 | 1.19/0.93 | 0.3/0.98 | 0.38/0.99 |
| MYA4093 | 3.39/0.95 | 0.36/0.95 | 0.57/0.92 | 2.08/0.95 | 0.32/0.97 | 0.42/0.98 |
| LB218 | 5.53/0.95 | 0.3/0.95 | 0.33/0.90 | 0.43/0.91 | 0.62/0.96 | 0.82/0.98 |
| LB619 | 1.52/0.9 | 0.31/0.97 | 2.27/0.88 | 2.42/92 | 0.47/0.92 | 0.64/0.93 |
| LB141 | 2.83/0.81 | 0.45/0.91 | 2.23/0.95 | 2.41/0.96 | 0.3/0.99 | 0.5/0.99 |
| B3501 | 1.09/0.93 | 0.19/0.97 | 0.29/0.91 | 0.47/0.94 | 0.26/0.93 | 0.39/0.95 |
| ATCC 32045 | 1.15/0.94 | 0.15/0.91 | 1.31/0.96 | 1.87/97 | 0.38/0.95 | 0.48/0.95 |
| Urea Conversion | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drug [ ] | CQ | Drug [ ] | FLZ | Drug [ ] | FLZ/CQ | ||||||
| 8 | N/C | N/C | N/C | 64 | N/C | N/C | N/C | 4/8 | N/C | N/C | N/C |
| 4 | N/C | N/C | N/C | 32 | N/C | N/C | N/C | 2/4 | N/C | N/C | N/C |
| 2 | N/C | N/C | N/C | 16 | N/C | N/C | N/C | 1/2 | N/C | N/C | N/C |
| 1 | N/C | N/C | N/C | 8 | N/C | C | C | 0.5/1 | C | C | C |
| 0.5 | N/C | N/C | N/C | 4 | C | C | C | 0.25/0.5 | C | C | C |
| 0.25 | N/C | C | C | 2 | C | C | C | 0.125/0.25 | C | C | C |
| 0.125 | C | C | C | 1 | C | C | C | 0.065/0.125 | C | C | C |
| 0.065 | C | C | C | 0.5 | C | C | C | 0.031/0.065 | C | C | C |
| Urea Inhibition | |||||||||||
| Drug [ ] | CQ | Drug [ ] | FLZ | Drug [ ] | FLZ/CQ | ||||||
| 1 | I | I | I | 8 | N/I | N/I | N/I | 0.5/1 | N/I | N/I | N/I |
| 0.5 | I | I | I | 4 | N/I | N/I | N/I | 0.25/0.5 | N/I | N/I | N/I |
| 0.25 | N/I | N/I | N/I | 2 | N/I | N/I | N/I | 0.125/0.25 | N/I | N/I | N/I |
| 0.125 | N/I | N/I | N/I | 1 | N/I | N/I | N/I | 0.065/0.125 | N/I | N/I | N/I |
| 0.065 | N/I | N/I | N/I | 0.5 | N/I | N/I | N/I | 0.031/0.065 | N/I | N/I | N/I |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Genz Bazana, L.C.; Carvalho, Â.R.; Foss da Silva, R.; Garcia, S.C.; Arbo, M.D.; Lettieri Teixeira, M.; Fuentefria, A.M. Synergic Effect of Fluconazole and Quinoline Derivatives Combination Against Cryptococcus spp., Mechanisms of Action and Toxicity. Microorganisms 2026, 14, 1654. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14081654
Genz Bazana LC, Carvalho ÂR, Foss da Silva R, Garcia SC, Arbo MD, Lettieri Teixeira M, Fuentefria AM. Synergic Effect of Fluconazole and Quinoline Derivatives Combination Against Cryptococcus spp., Mechanisms of Action and Toxicity. Microorganisms. 2026; 14(8):1654. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14081654
Chicago/Turabian StyleGenz Bazana, Luana Candice, Ânderson Ramos Carvalho, Rodrigo Foss da Silva, Solange Cristina Garcia, Marcelo Dutra Arbo, Mario Lettieri Teixeira, and Alexandre Meneghello Fuentefria. 2026. "Synergic Effect of Fluconazole and Quinoline Derivatives Combination Against Cryptococcus spp., Mechanisms of Action and Toxicity" Microorganisms 14, no. 8: 1654. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14081654
APA StyleGenz Bazana, L. C., Carvalho, Â. R., Foss da Silva, R., Garcia, S. C., Arbo, M. D., Lettieri Teixeira, M., & Fuentefria, A. M. (2026). Synergic Effect of Fluconazole and Quinoline Derivatives Combination Against Cryptococcus spp., Mechanisms of Action and Toxicity. Microorganisms, 14(8), 1654. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14081654

