Next Article in Journal
Gut Microbiome Dynamics in Food Allergy Development Across the Lifespan: Microbial Mechanisms, Host Interactions, and Therapeutic Perspectives
Previous Article in Journal
Synergistic Inhibition of Acinetobacter baumannii Biofilm Formation and Reduction of Lung Inflammation In Vivo by Combination of α-Pinene and Meropenem
Previous Article in Special Issue
Virome and Microbiome of Florida Bats Illuminate Viral Co-Infections, Dietary Viral Signals, and Gut Microbiome Shifts
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Human Virome in Infectious Diseases: Insights from Chronic and Acute Infections Across Body Sites—A Narrative Review

1
National PhD Programme in One Health Approaches to Infectious Diseases and Life Science Research, Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
2
Department of Infectious, Tropical Diseases and Microbiology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2026, 14(5), 969; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14050969
Submission received: 20 February 2026 / Revised: 15 April 2026 / Accepted: 22 April 2026 / Published: 25 April 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Viral Metagenomics, 2nd Edition)

Abstract

The human virome, comprising eukaryotic viruses, bacteriophages, and viral genetic material, is a dynamic component of the microbiome with growing relevance in infectious diseases. This narrative review is structured to: (i) summarize the general composition of the human virome and methodological challenges, including the fraction of unclassified viral “dark matter”; (ii) describe virome alterations in chronic infections; and (iii) explore site-specific virome dynamics across respiratory, intestinal, and genito-urinary tracts in both chronic and acute infections. In chronic viral infections such as HIV, HBV, HCV, and HPV, a recurrent feature is the expansion of Anelloviridae—particularly torque teno virus—reflecting impaired immune surveillance rather than direct pathogenicity, suggesting their potential as surrogate biomarkers of immune competence. Evidence on virome changes in chronic bacterial and parasitic infections remains limited, highlighting a critical knowledge gap. Acute infections are associated with compartment-specific shifts in eukaryotic viruses and bacteriophage communities, often paralleling changes in bacterial populations and inflammatory responses, with implications for disease severity. Despite advances in metagenomic approaches, a substantial proportion of viral sequences remains unclassified, limiting functional interpretation. Nevertheless, virome profiling provides an ecosystem-level perspective, offering insights beyond single-pathogen detection and supporting emerging applications in diagnostics, immune monitoring, prognosis, and infectious disease surveillance.

1. Literature Review Methodology

Literature searches were conducted in PubMed to identify articles published over the past 15 years, up to February 2026. The following search terms were used: “virome”, “microbiome”, “metagenomics”, “next generation sequencing”, “infectious diseases”, “respiratory infection”, “intestinal infection”, “chronic infection”, “sepsis”, and “parasitic infection”.
All retrieved articles were screened to ensure that they focused on metagenomic approaches, with particular focus on virome, and that full-text versions were available in English.
Once identified, relevant studies were further assessed for eligibility, and their bibliography were manually reviewed to identify additional studies.

2. Introduction

The human body constitutes a highly dynamic ecosystem inhabited by a diverse consortium of microorganisms. This diverse consortium includes bacteria, archaea, fungi, parasites and viruses that play critical roles in health and disease [1,2,3,4]. This consortium is not a simple collection of organisms but a complex and interactive system that influences everything from our metabolism to our immune system [5,6,7]. The microbiome refers to the collective genetic material of these microorganisms and represents a complex, interactive system rather than a simple assemblage of species. Within the microbiome, the virome represents a distinct and functionally unique subcomponent (Figure 1 and Table S1), rather than merely a collection of pathogenic viruses.
Studying the virome is crucial, especially in the context of disease. Beyond their effects on bacterial populations, viruses may also modulate host immune responses through direct interactions with epithelial and immune cells [8]. Bacteriophages and their components can interact directly with host cells, potentially modulating immune responses and contributing to homeostasis of different districts (e.g., intestinal) [9,10,11]. Experimental evidence indicates that bacteriophages can access host tissues via enteric epithelial or immune cell uptake [12], where their components may activate innate immune pathways, including Toll-like receptors (e.g., TLR9), cytosolic DNA sensing via the cGAS-STING pathway, and NOD-like or RIG-I-like receptors leading to downstream activation of inflammasomes (e.g., NLRP3, AIM2) and the NF-kB pathway, thereby modulating mucosal and systemic immune responses [10,13]. However, most of the current evidence derives from in vitro systems and animal models, with comparatively limited and largely associative data in humans [9,11,12,14]. In the literature, the majority of virome studies are observational; however, thanks to the increase in high-throughput sequencing technologies and advanced bioinformatic tools, virome characterization is shifting from exploratory research toward clinical application, particularly in the context of recurrent or chronic infections, immunocompromised patients, and cancer prevention [15,16,17,18,19]. Understanding virome dynamics in different infectious contexts may improve diagnosis, treatment selection and disease monitoring, especially where standard virological diagnostics fail to explain clinical symptoms [20,21].
The overall aim of this narrative review is to summarize and describe reported patterns of virome composition across infectious conditions. The review is structured to describe the virome in the context of chronic and acute infections and within different body districts (intestinal, respiratory, genito-urinary), providing a comprehensive overview of this nascent aspect of human healthcare.

3. General Composition of the Human Virome

The human microbiome is a complex and heterogeneous ecosystem composed of multiple subdomains, including the bacteriome, archaeaome, mycobiome, parasitome and virome (including phageome) (Figure 1). Each of these components contributes to host physiology and reflects a distinct taxonomic and functional diversity.
From a methodological perspective, this complexity is mirrored by the diversity of sequencing approaches used to characterize the different microbiome components. Briefly, the bacteriome is commonly profiled through 16S rRNA gene sequencing [22,23]. Similarly, the archaeaome is often investigated using 16S rRNA and additionally functional genes such as mcrA [24,25]. The mycobiome is characterized using internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions and 18S rRNA markers [26,27], and the parasitome relies on markers including ITS, cox1, and 18S rDNA [28,29]. In contrast, the virome is typically explored using both targeted and untargeted approaches, including shotgun metagenomics of DNA and RNA, to capture the full spectrum of viral diversity [30,31].
Within this framework, the virome encompasses the totality of viral nucleic acids, including single- and double-stranded DNA and RNA genomes [32]. The composition of the virome is highly individualized and influenced by host genetics, age, diet, lifestyle, and health status, thereby constituting a dynamic and personalized biological signature [33,34,35]. The human virome is not composed exclusively of pathogenic viruses: a substantial fraction consists of commensal or persistent viruses that establish long-term, often asymptomatic associations with the host [35].
Viruses colonize diverse anatomical sites, including the gastrointestinal tract, skin and oral cavity, and have been detected in a wide range of biological specimens such as blood, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), respiratory specimens (i.e., saliva, nasopharyngeal swab, broncho-alveolar lavage fluid), feces, urine and vaginal and cervical secretions [35,36].
Our body harbors an enormous number of viruses (around 1013 viral particles) most of which are located in the gut [37]. The human virome can be broadly classified into three major categories: eukaryotic viruses (which infect human cells), prokaryotic viruses commonly known as bacteriophages or phages (which infect bacteria) [38,39] and archaeal viruses (which infect archaea) [35,40]. Studies on viruses infecting archaea are still relatively limited; however, these viruses display remarkable structural and genetic diversity, reflecting adaptation to archaeal hosts that often thrive in extreme environments [3,4]. Eukaryotic viruses include both persistent viruses—such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), herpesviruses, and papillomaviruses—which can establish latent infections and remain in the host for life, and transient viruses, such as noroviruses and enteroviruses, which typically cause acute infections. Bacteriophages represent the largest fraction of the human virome [41,42] and are particularly abundant in the gastrointestinal tract, where they play a crucial role in maintaining microbial homeostasis by modulating bacterial populations through lytic and lysogenic pathways [11,43,44,45].

4. Virome, Its ‘Dark Matter’ and Methodological Challenges

A defining feature of virome studies is that a substantial proportion of detected viral sequences cannot be taxonomically classified. This fraction, commonly referred to as viral “dark matter”, reflects the limits of current knowledge [46].
Unlike bacteria, parasites or fungi, viruses lack universal genetic markers and may persist in latent or low-replicative states, making their detection and characterization particularly challenging [40]. This knowledge gap is largely attributable to the extraordinary variability of viral genomes and to historical technical limitations in viral detection and annotation.
Traditional molecular diagnostics rely on targeted amplification of known pathogens and therefore underestimate viral communities. In contrast, virome characterization mainly relies on shotgun metagenomic sequencing, often preceded by viral particle enrichment, filtration, nuclease digestion of host nucleic acids, and random amplification [35,47]. Subsequent bioinformatic analysis combines reference-based alignment, de novo assembly, protein homology searches and, more recently, machine-learning classifiers to infer viral origin [48,49]. Protein homology searches and machine-learning approaches are increasingly used not only for detection but also to infer putative functions of unclassified viral sequences, by identifying conserved domains and predictive sequence patterns linked to viral activity [50,51,52].
Collectively, these advances are increasingly helping to clarify not only the composition but also the function of the virome as a dynamic indicator of the physiological state of the host in both health and disease, and recent studies are showing how infections can be associated with changes in viral composition [47,52].
Additionally, it is important to acknowledge key methodological limitations, including the risk of laboratory and environmental contamination [53,54], amplification biases introduced during sample processing [55,56], and strong dependence on incomplete or uneven reference databases [57,58], all of which can affect viral detection, classification accuracy, and downstream interpretation.

5. The Virome and Immunology: Anelloviridae as Biomarkers of Immune Competence

The human virome is increasingly recognized as an integral component of host–immune system interactions, extending beyond its traditional description as a collection of pathogenic and commensal viruses. Among its constituents, members of the Anelloviridae family, particularly torque teno virus (TTV), represent the most consistently detected viruses across anatomical sites and clinical conditions [59].
Anelloviruses are highly prevalent, non-enveloped, single-stranded DNA viruses that establish persistent infections in humans without evidence of direct pathogenicity [60]. Their replication appears to be regulated by host immune surveillance, particularly cell-mediated immunity. Accordingly, multiple studies have reported higher anellovirus loads in conditions associated with impaired immune function, including chronic viral infections, transplantation, and immunodeficiency states [61,62,63].
In this context, anelloviruses have been proposed as surrogate biomarkers of immune function, reflecting host immune control over persistent viral replication. However, their clinical utility is limited by several factors. First, anellovirus loads lack disease specificity, as increased levels are observed across heterogeneous conditions associated with immune modulation [64,65]. Second, substantial inter-individual variability and compartment-dependent dynamics have been reported, influenced by host factors such as age, genetic background, and environmental exposures [66]. Third, methodological heterogeneity in sampling, sequencing, and bioinformatic workflows limits comparability across studies [64,65,67]. Finally, current evidence remains largely associative, with limited mechanistic understanding of virus–host immune interactions.
Given their recurrent detection across multiple infectious contexts, anelloviruses—particularly TTV—are frequently referenced throughout this review and should therefore be interpreted in light of the methodological and biological considerations outlined above.

6. The Virome in Chronic Infections

Virome analysis has emerged as a powerful tool for investigating the complex interplay between viruses and chronic diseases, providing insights that go beyond the identification of single pathogenic agents [68,69,70,71,72,73]. Chronic infections—whether viral, bacterial, or parasitic—represent a major clinical challenge due to their long-term impact on host physiology, immune function, and microbiome homeostasis [74,75]. Among viral infections, HBV, hepatitis C virus (HCV), HIV, Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), and human papillomavirus (HPV) are among the most clinically impactful, being associated not only with persistent inflammation and immune exhaustion but also with oncogenic transformation and metabolic dysregulation [76,77,78,79,80,81].
Similarly, recent studies showed that chronic bacterial infections caused by Helicobacter pylori and Mycobacteria can drive sustained inflammatory responses, alter mucosal immunity and promote microbial alterations in the gut and respiratory tract [82,83,84], highlighting the importance of integrating microbiome including virome analyses in clinical studies. Notably, despite the growing interest in virome research, studies specifically investigating the human host virome in the context of chronic parasitic infections remain limited. For pathogens such as Plasmodium spp. and Leishmania spp., studies on the virome are essentially limited to the viral infection of parasites themselves and vectors, rather than the human host, leaving a knowledge gap regarding potential viral contributions to human disease [85,86]. Overall, understanding the virome in these chronic contexts could reveal previously unrecognized mechanisms of disease pathogenesis and identify novel therapeutic targets.

Anellovirus Abundance as a Hallmark of Chronic Viral Infections

Increasing evidence indicates that chronic viral infections are associated with profound and persistent remodeling of the human virome across multiple body sites, with a particularly consistent modulation of anelloviruses, reflecting alterations in host immune homeostasis. These changes appear to represent a common biological response to long-term viral persistence rather than infection-specific phenomena. Such alterations are not confined to a single infection but recur across different chronic conditions such as HIV, HBV, HCV and HPV, which collectively represent major global health burdens associated with long-term viral persistence and immune modulation [87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98].
Across these infections, a number of shared features have emerged. The most consistent finding is the frequent detection and dynamic modulation of anelloviruses, particularly TTV [47,59,99,100]. These viruses may serve as context-dependent biomarkers of impaired immune control, although their clinical interpretation remains influenced by host status, sample type, and study design [61,62,63,101]. This pattern is evident across diverse biological compartments—from plasma and broncho-alveolar lavage to stool, cervical, and semen samples—where anelloviruses often dominate the viral community when immune surveillance is compromised.
In the context of systemic infections such as HIV, metagenomic analyses of plasma and respiratory mucosal sites reveal complex viral communities comprising not only the primary pathogen but also other viruses such as hepatitis G virus, endogenous retroviruses (HERV), herpesviruses, adenoviruses, and anelloviruses [18,47,102,103,104,105,106,107,108]. This increased virome complexity parallels progressive immune dysfunction and is frequently accompanied by shifts in bacterial microbiota composition, particularly in the gut, indicating a profound reshaping of host-associated microbial networks [109]. A similar phenomenon is observed in chronic liver diseases, where HBV- or HCV-infected patients exhibit co-detection of Anelloviridae [110,111]. Although Hepadnaviridae or Flaviviridae dominate by read count, Anelloviridae are consistently the most frequently detected family, underscoring their remarkable persistence and sensitivity to host immunological tone rather than tissue tropism or disease etiology.
Interestingly, even in infections driven by tissue-specific viruses such as HPV, the virome reflects comparable community dynamics. Samples from individuals with chronic HPV infection harbor a variety of co-infecting viruses, including EBV, BK polyomavirus (BKPyV), molluscum contagiosum virus (MCV), and TTV [112]. The relative abundance of these viruses appears to fluctuate in response to HPV dominance, suggesting competitive, permissive, or immune-mediated interactions among viral species sharing the same anatomical niche, rather than simple passive co-presence.
Collectively, these findings support the view that chronic viral infections are associated with ecosystem-level perturbations of the human virome. Rather than isolated infections, they can entail complex and dynamic interactions among multiple viral, bacterial, and host components. The recurrent expansion of anelloviruses across disparate diseases and body sites points to a shared immunological signature of chronic infection—one characterized by reduced immune surveillance and the consequent reduction in control over commensal or latent viruses.
Importantly, this responsiveness to changes in host immunity also underlies the emerging clinical relevance of anelloviruses as potential biomarkers of immune function and therapeutic response. In several settings, including HIV infection, chronic hepatitis, and especially transplantation medicine, TTV abundance has been shown to correlate with immune reconstitution, disease progression, and response to antiviral or immunomodulatory therapies [7,20,113,114,115]. Thus, anellovirus dynamics may provide integrative information on host immune competence that complements conventional virological and immunological markers. Understanding these common virome alterations opens avenues for the use of metagenomic profiling as a diagnostic and prognostic tool, capable of revealing not only the primary etiologic agent but also the broader viral context that shapes disease progression, therapeutic responsiveness, and long-term host outcomes.

7. The Virome in Distinct Body Sites

Methodologically, the characterization of site-specific viromes relies primarily on metagenomic sequencing (shotgun or targeted approaches) of nucleic acids extracted from a wide range of biological specimens, including blood, saliva, nasopharyngeal swabs, broncho-alveolar lavage fluid, feces, urine, vaginal and cervical secretions, and skin swabs [35,36]. To date, the virome of the CSF remains poorly characterized, in part because CSF has traditionally been considered a sterile or near-sterile compartment [116]. As a result, most metagenomic studies have focused on pathogen detection in neurological infections [117,118,119,120], whereas systematic and longitudinal characterization of the CSF virome has received limited attention.
Analyses of the hematic virome, as we reported in the previous sections, frequently reveal a dominance of anelloviruses, reflecting systemic immune status [63,99], whereas mucosal and epithelial sites such as the respiratory, gastrointestinal, and genital tracts display highly variable virome structures shaped by local microbial communities, host barriers, and environmental exposures [35,39,121,122,123,124].
These differences highlight that the human virome is not a uniform entity but a network of semi-independent niches interconnected through host physiology and immune regulation [38,125].
From a clinical perspective, the study of compartmentalized viromes holds substantial promise. Understanding how viral communities vary across body sites may identify site-specific biomarkers, guide sampling strategies for diagnostic viromics, and help elucidate how localized viral communities contribute to systemic inflammation, chronic disease progression, or therapeutic response [17,19,71,126,127].
The following sections, including Table 1 and Figure 2, summarize the most recent and available evidence on the virome characterization across key anatomical compartments that are involved in human infections. Particular attention is given to the respiratory, intestinal, and urogenital tracts, which represent major interfaces between the host and the external environment.

7.1. The Virome in Respiratory Infections

The respiratory tract, a primary interface with the external environment, harbors a dynamic and diverse viral community [135,136,137,138]. While traditional diagnostics for respiratory infections focus on a single causative agent or a panel of pathogens in syndromic approach testing, a broader virome perspective reveals a complex viral ecology whose composition is intrinsically linked to host immunity and disease outcomes [139]. Studies on the virome in acute and chronic respiratory illnesses, including COVID-19 and other common infections, are shedding light on these intricate viral–host and viral–viral interactions.
The virome provides a crucial context for understanding the pathogenesis of acute respiratory infections (ARIs) [12,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147]. Across acute respiratory infections of viral or bacterial origin, the respiratory virome reflects interactions among host immunity, microbial communities, and infection severity. Current evidence is mainly associative; therefore, its role should be described as potentially contributory rather than definitively causal [148,149]. Metagenomic studies in ARI consistently identify a high diversity and richness of eukaryotic viral families (Paramyxoviridae, e.g., RSV and human metapneumovirus, Picornaviridae, e.g., rhinoviruses, Orthomyxoviridae, e.g., influenza, Adenoviridae, Anelloviridae, Polyomaviridae, Parvoviridae, Coronaviridae, Herpesviridae, Astroviridae and Papillomaviridae) showing correlations between viral abundance and disease severity (e.g., pneumoniae) compared to that of asymptomatic or healthy controls [52,62,136,139,148,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158]. A consistent observation across multiple studies is the expansion of specific viral families—notably Anelloviridae, Adenoviridae and Polyomaviridae—particularly in severe or immunologically compromised settings, suggesting that acute viral infection may disrupt the virome and reduce immune control over commensal or persistent viruses [52,136,150,151,155,159,160].
In particular, anelloviruses appear to follow a biphasic dynamic, with a transient decrease often observed during the acute infection phase, likely reflecting increased immune activation, followed by an increase in abundance in cases of severe disease or immunodeficiency conditions, consistent with their dependence on host immune control [52]
In parallel, alterations in the bacteriophage community have also been observed, indicating a close interplay between viral and bacterial components of the airway microbiome. Changes in bacteriophage populations are thought to reflect and potentially alter bacterial community structure, thereby contributing to airway inflammation and tissue pathology [52,161,162,163]. Supporting this view, a longitudinal study of children with recurrent respiratory tract infections reported an increased abundance of Propionibacterium-associated bacteriophages compared to children with single infection episodes over a six-year period, consistent with persistent alterations in microbial communities [52,159].
The coexistence or exclusion of certain viral species may indicate that competitive and synergistic interactions among viruses may influence both infection dynamics and clinical outcomes [144,158,163]. In SARS-CoV-2 infection, the perturbation of the respiratory virome extends beyond the airways [161,164,165,166,167,168], engaging the gut–lung axis and causing systemic virome alterations detectable in the blood [169]. The elevation of circulating anellovirus load consistently correlates with disease severity and immune exhaustion, reinforcing its potential as a universal biomarker of immune competence across diverse clinical contexts [147,148,169,170].
An interesting recent work reported that a specific viral signature precedes hospital-acquired pneumonia onset in intubated critically ill patients, characterized by a decrease in viral beta diversity (which evaluates differences between communities) evolving into a bacteriophage-dominated lung virome enriched in Caudoviricetes. This was followed by an increase in eukaryotic viruses, among which Alphatorquevirus was the most abundant [128].
From a clinical perspective, these converging findings highlight that virome analysis transcends traditional pathogen detection. Instead of identifying a single etiologic agent, it provides a comprehensive snapshot of the respiratory ecosystem, revealing how viral communities respond to and shape host physiology. Incorporating virome profiling into clinical practice could therefore enhance differential diagnosis, enable risk stratification, and support personalized therapeutic strategies, especially in patients with complex or recurrent respiratory diseases.

7.2. The Virome in Intestinal Infections

Local infections affecting the intestinal tract are accompanied by profound alterations in the virome, reflecting the close interplay between enteric viruses, bacteriophages, and the bacterial microbiota. Across infections of different etiologies—whether viral, parasitic, or bacterial—a common pattern emerges: acute or chronic intestinal alterations are associated with a shift from a bacteriophage-dominated community characterized by greater viral diversity and compositional stability to a community with an increased representation of eukaryotic viruses and less stability.
In acute viral gastroenteritis, for instance, rotavirus infection [171] induces a dramatic restructuring of the intestinal virome. Comparative analyses of fecal samples from children infected with Rotavirus A and uninfected controls, using alpha diversity (which assesses species richness within a community) and beta diversity (which evaluates differences between communities), revealed distinct beta diversity profiles despite similar alpha diversity values [172]. Infected individuals exhibited a marked predominance of eukaryotic viruses—mainly from the Adenoviridae, Astroviridae, Caliciviridae, and Picornaviridae families—accompanied by a depletion of bacteriophages belonging to Microviridae and Caudovirales [172]. This replacement of bacteriophage-rich communities by enteric eukaryotic viruses suggests that active viral replication may drive a shift in viral composition, likely through inflammation-mediated disruption of bacterial hosts and niche competition. Our understanding of the inter-kingdom interactions is currently emerging from various organism classifications and their prospective influence on shaping the gut micro-ecology. For instance, the role of non-bacterial agents, especially viral and fungal agents in the pathogenesis of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) or NEC-like symptoms has recently been postulated [173]. Specifically, eukaryotic viruses are observed to cause clinical illness in newborns, in contrast to the other components of the gut virome, namely bacteriophages [173].
Comparable patterns of virome remodeling are observed in non-viral intestinal diseases. Infections by the protozoan Giardia duodenalis, for example, are associated with significant changes in the bacteriophage population, particularly those targeting members of the Proteobacteria phylum, such as Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Shigella, and Yersinia [129]. The selective enrichment of these bacteriophages in Giardia-positive individuals implies that parasitic infection modifies the gut environment in a way that favors specific viral–bacterial interactions, with potential effects on microbial community structure and shaping host inflammatory responses.
Similarly, Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI)—often associated with antibiotic-induced disruption of the gut bacterial populations [130,174]—shows a distinct signature of virome imbalance. CDI patients display an expansion of Caudovirales phages and elevated Anelloviridae abundance, coupled with reduced overall diversity and a depletion of Microviridae species [130,131,132,175]. The normal negative correlation observed between Caudovirales, Microviridae, and Anelloviridae in healthy individuals is lost during infection, indicating a breakdown in the equilibrium of the intestinal virome [175]. The profound disruption of virome homeostasis observed in CDI underpins the clinical efficacy of fecal transplantation in restoring both bacterial and viral community balance, and supports the growing interest in bacteriophage therapy as a targeted approach to counteract C. difficile overgrowth while preserving ecosystem stability [21,175,176].
Taken together, these observations highlight the virome as a sensitive and dynamic component of intestinal homeostasis. Whether triggered by viral, parasitic, or bacterial pathogens, infection-induced disturbances consistently manifest as altered viral community structure, loss of bacteriophage-mediated microbial regulation, and over-representation of specific viral taxa. Such signatures may suggest the virome’s dual role as both a marker and active participant of intestinal ecosystem health, offering new perspectives for the diagnosis and understanding of gut-associated diseases.

7.3. The Virome in Urinary and Genital Infections

The long-standing belief that the genito-urinary tract is sterile has been overturned by metagenomic research revealing a diverse microbial ecosystem that includes a resident virome [177]. Virome profiling is now providing crucial insights into the etiology, progression and persistence of urinary and genital tract infections, supporting a paradigm shift in urogenital infectious disease research. Metagenomic studies have revealed that both urinary and genital environments harbor a rich and dynamic viral ecosystem, which includes bacteriophages as well as eukaryotic viruses [133]. Understanding how these viral communities interact with local microbiota and the host immune system is now recognized as essential for characterizing disease onset, progression and persistence.
Across both the urinary tract and the cervicovaginal environment, bacteriophages constitute the major component of the virome and appear to contribute to microbial homeostasis. In the urine, approximately 107 viruses per milliliter have been reported, the majority belonging to bacteriophage taxa [178,179]. Eukaryotic viruses such as non-oncogenic HPVs are also commonly detected, with prevalence reaching up to 95% even in individuals without urinary tract infection (UTI) symptoms [180]. These observations undermine the assumption that viral detection necessarily reflects active pathology and instead suggest persistence and commensalism as common features of the urogenital virome.
Clinical conditions are associated with distinct shifts in viral community structure, particularly within the vaginal microbiome. While bacteriophages dominate in eubiotic states—closely mirroring the presence of protective Lactobacillus species—conditions such as vaginitis and bacterial vaginosis exhibit increased proportions of pathogenic eukaryotic viruses, notably Papillomaviridae, accompanied by reduced viral alpha diversity and increased beta diversity [133,134]. These viral changes occur alongside alterations in bacterial communities, highlighting a strong functional interdependence between bacteriophage dynamics and the stability of the bacterial microbiota. In contrast, viral shifts during urinary infections tend to be less pronounced than bacterial changes, suggesting greater stability of the urinary virome under inflammation [180].
Beyond their role in microbial balance, viral communities within the cervicovaginal tract have been implicated in the persistence and oncogenic evolution of HPV infections. Anelloviruses, including TTV, show significant correlation with genital HPV-positive status and have been linked to enhanced tumor progression in HPV-associated cancers [181,182]. These viruses are considered markers of immune dysregulation and may facilitate a co-pathogenic environment that promotes cervical cancer progression. Moreover, trans-kingdom interactions involving bacteriophages and their bacterial hosts are emerging as potential contributors to viral oncogenesis and mucosal immunity [183].
Taken together, these findings may indicate that the urogenital virome is not a passive occupant but an active component influencing microbial equilibrium, infection susceptibility and disease outcome [113,133,184]. The shared presence of abundant bacteriophage communities, the widespread yet often non-pathological detection of eukaryotic viruses, and the interplay between viral shifts and local changes represent key commonalities across the urinary and genital compartments [178,179]. Clinically, this calls for a refined interpretation of viral presence—particularly for HPV and TTV—and for the development of virome-based diagnostic markers capable of differentiating transient colonization from pathogenic progression. Furthermore, the virome represents a promising therapeutic target: manipulating bacteriophage populations to restore microbial balance could offer innovative treatment strategies for recurrent UTIs, vaginitis and HPV-associated diseases.

8. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

This review highlights the virome as an integral component of host–microbial interactions in infectious diseases. Our exploration across various body districts and infection types reveals several key themes. In chronic infections like HIV, the proliferation of ubiquitous viruses, particularly anelloviruses, serves as a potential indicator of host immune system compromise. This suggests that the virome’s composition can provide a real-time snapshot of the host’s immunological state, offering valuable prognostic information. Moreover, virome analysis highlights the frequent occurrence of co-infections (e.g., rhinovirus with SARS-CoV-2, TTV with HPV) that can influence disease severity and progression. This virome-based perspective shifts our understanding from a single causative agent to a community of viruses whose combined effects determine clinical outcomes.
The bacteriophage community—the largest fraction of the virome—is not a passive bystander. It can actively shape the bacterial microbiome, and its alteration is a hallmark of many diseases. The dramatic shifts in bacteriophage populations observed in CDI and M. pneumoniae infections underscore the critical role of these viral–bacterial interactions in disease pathogenesis.
A major limitation of current virome research is the predominance of associative data without adequate mechanistic integration. While many studies report correlations between virome composition and clinical outcomes, the underlying immune-mediated mechanisms driving these associations remain poorly understood. This highlights the need for integrating virome profiling with immune correlates to better elucidate causal pathways of virome modulation in infectious diseases.
The field of virome research is still in its nascent stages, and significant challenges remain. The vast majority of viral sequences remain unclassified, representing a “dark matter” that requires more comprehensive characterization. However, the insights gained thus far point to several promising directions for future research and clinical applications. The development of virome-based biomarkers could improve diagnostics. A viral signature, such as an anelloviruses’ load, can be a standard clinical metric for assessing immune status or predicting disease severity. Understanding the virome opens the door to novel therapeutic strategies. For instance, bacteriophage therapy is showing great potential in selectively modulating the bacterial microbiome in conditions like CDI, or to combat antibiotic-resistant infections.
While the virome’s role is an active area of investigation in chronic inflammatory and autoimmune conditions, metabolic disorders and cancer progression, this review focused on infectious diseases, and future research is needed to explore these connections and elucidate the virome’s systemic influence on human physiology.
An important and still underexplored area concerns chronic bacterial and parasitic infections. Infections such as tuberculosis, H. pylori gastritis, leishmaniosis and chronic helminthic infestations involve long-term host–pathogen coexistence, immune tolerance and incomplete microbial clearance, processes that are likely influenced by baseline microbial ecosystem stability. In this context, virome composition may provide additional insights into infection control, progression to tissue damage, or post-treatment relapse.
Future investigations could benefit from longitudinal and compartment-specific approaches integrating virome profiling with the bacterial microbiome and host immune parameters to better define its clinical relevance. In this context, virome profiling may also support longitudinal monitoring in settings such as chronic infection, intensive care, and transplantation, where shifts in viral communities could reflect treatment response or changes in immune control, corroborating its potential as a complementary clinical biomarker.
However, the translation of virome profiling into routine clinical practice remains challenging, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Key barriers include the high costs of metagenomic sequencing, the need for specialized infrastructure and technical expertise, and the complexity of data analysis and interpretation. Addressing these limitations will require the development of cost-effective, standardized, and scalable approaches to ensure broader accessibility and clinical applicability, especially in settings where infectious diseases are most prevalent.
Continued improvements in sequencing technologies, bioinformatics pipelines and standardized protocols will be essential to fully catalog the virome and unlock its full potential for clinical and scientific discovery, highlighting the virome’s utility as both a diagnostic and epidemiological resource.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms14050969/s1, Table S1. Key concepts of the microbiome.

Author Contributions

E.P., R.F., A.M. and C.C. conceptualized the review. E.P. and R.F. conducted the literature search, analyzed the relevant studies, and drafted the manuscript. A.M., A.Z. and C.C. contributed to manuscript revision and critical interpretation of the content. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by EU funding within the MUR PNRR Extended Partnership Initiative on Emerging Infectious Diseases (Project No. PE00000007, INF-ACT),by the Italian Ministry of Health “Fondi 5 per mille 2023” under the project “5MIL-VISA” and by the Italian Ministry of Health “Fondi Ricerca Corrente” to IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital—Linea 1.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

HIVHuman immunodeficiency virus
HBVHepatitis B virus
HCVHepatitis C virus
HPVHuman papillomavirus
CSFCerebrospinal fluid
EBVEpstein–Barr virus
CMVCytomegalovirus
TTVTorque teno virus
HERVHuman endogenous retroviruses
BKPyVBK polyomavirus
MCVMolluscum contagiosum virus
ARIsAcute respiratory infections
NECNecrotizing enterocolitis
CDIClostridioides difficile infection
UTIUrinary tract infection
ITSInternal transcribed spacer

References

  1. Rouse, B.T.; Sehrawat, S. Immunity and immunopathology to viruses: What decides the outcome? Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2010, 10, 514–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chatterjee, A.; Duerkop, B.A. Beyond Bacteria: Bacteriophage-Eukaryotic Host Interactions Reveal Emerging Paradigms of Health and Disease. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Krupovic, M.; Cvirkaite-Krupovic, V.; Iranzo, J.; Prangishvili, D.; Koonin, E.V. Viruses of archaea: Structural, functional, environmental and evolutionary genomics. Virus Res. 2018, 244, 181–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wirth, J.; Young, M. The intriguing world of archaeal viruses. PLoS Pathog. 2020, 16, e1008574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Haynes, M.; Rohwer, F. The Human Virome. In Metagenomics of the Human Body; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 63–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gilbert, J.A.; Blaser, M.J.; Caporaso, J.G.; Jansson, J.K.; Lynch, S.V.; Knight, R. Current understanding of the human microbiome. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 392–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Schmidt, L.; Jensen, B.O.; Walker, A.; Keitel-Anselmino, V.; di Cristanziano, V.; Böhm, M.; Knops, E.; Heger, E.; Kaiser, R.; de Luca, A.; et al. Torque Teno Virus plasma level as novel biomarker of retained immunocompetence in HIV-infected patients. Infection 2021, 49, 501–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cianci, R.; Caldarelli, M.; Brani, P.; Bosi, A.; Ponti, A.; Giaroni, C.; Baj, A. Role of the Virome in Vaccine-Induced Immunization. Vaccines 2025, 13, 895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Keen, E.C.; Dantas, G. Close Encounters of Three Kinds: Bacteriophages, Commensal Bacteria, and Host Immunity. Trends Microbiol. 2018, 26, 943–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Van Belleghem, J.D.; Dąbrowska, K.; Vaneechoutte, M.; Barr, J.J.; Bollyky, P.L. Interactions between Bacteriophage, Bacteria, and the Mammalian Immune System. Viruses 2018, 11, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sausset, R.; Petit, M.A.; Gaboriau-Routhiau, V.; De Paepe, M. New insights into intestinal phages. Mucosal Immunol. 2020, 13, 205–215, Erratum in Mucosal Immunol. 2020, 13, 559. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41385-020-0260-3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Nguyen, S.; Baker, K.; Padman, B.S.; Patwa, R.; Dunstan, R.A.; Weston, T.A.; Schlosser, K.; Bailey, B.; Lithgow, T.; Lazarou, M.; et al. Bacteriophage Transcytosis Provides a Mechanism To Cross Epithelial Cell Layers. mBio 2017, 8, 10-1128, Erratum in mBio 2018, 9, e02207-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02207-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Carroll-Portillo, A.; Lin, H.C. Bacteriophage and the Innate Immune System: Access and Signaling. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gogokhia, L.; Buhrke, K.; Bell, R.; Hoffman, B.; Brown, D.G.; Hanke-Gogokhia, C.; Ajami, N.J.; Wong, M.C.; Ghazaryan, A.; Valentine, J.F.; et al. Expansion of Bacteriophages Is Linked to Aggravated Intestinal Inflammation and Colitis. Cell Host Microbe 2019, 25, 285–299.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tan, S.K.; Relman, D.A.; Pinsky, B.A. The Human Virome: Implications for Clinical Practice in Transplantation Medicine. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2017, 55, 2884–2893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hannigan, G.D.; Duhaime, M.B.; Ruffin, M.T.t.; Koumpouras, C.C.; Schloss, P.D. Diagnostic Potential and Interactive Dynamics of the Colorectal Cancer Virome. mBio 2018, 9, e02248-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tamayo-Trujillo, R.; Guevara-Ramírez, P.; Cadena-Ullauri, S.; Paz-Cruz, E.; Ruiz-Pozo, V.A.; Zambrano, A.K. Human virome: Implications in cancer. Heliyon 2023, 9, e14086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, H.; Xu, S.; Li, S.; Su, B.; Sherrill-Mix, S.; Liang, G. Virome in immunodeficiency: What we know currently. Chin. Med. J. 2023, 136, 2647–2657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yadegar, A.; Bar-Yoseph, H.; Monaghan, T.M.; Pakpour, S.; Severino, A.; Kuijper, E.J.; Smits, W.K.; Terveer, E.M.; Neupane, S.; Nabavi-Rad, A.; et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation: Current challenges and future landscapes. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2024, 37, e0006022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. García-Álvarez, M.; Berenguer, J.; Alvarez, E.; Guzmán-Fulgencio, M.; Cosín, J.; Miralles, P.; Catalán, P.; López, J.C.; Rodríguez, J.M.; Micheloud, D.; et al. Association of torque teno virus (TTV) and torque teno mini virus (TTMV) with liver disease among patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2013, 32, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Raeisi, H.; Noori, M.; Azimirad, M.; Mohebbi, S.R.; Asadzadeh Aghdaei, H.; Yadegar, A.; Zali, M.R. Emerging applications of phage therapy and fecal virome transplantation for treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection: Challenges and perspectives. Gut Pathog. 2023, 15, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Case, R.J.; Boucher, Y.; Dahllöf, I.; Holmström, C.; Doolittle, W.F.; Kjelleberg, S. Use of 16S rRNA and rpoB genes as molecular markers for microbial ecology studies. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 278–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wensel, C.R.; Pluznick, J.L.; Salzberg, S.L.; Sears, C.L. Next-generation sequencing: Insights to advance clinical investigations of the microbiome. J. Clin. Investig. 2022, 132, e154944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pausan, M.R.; Csorba, C.; Singer, G.; Till, H.; Schöpf, V.; Santigli, E.; Klug, B.; Högenauer, C.; Blohs, M.; Moissl-Eichinger, C. Exploring the Archaeome: Detection of Archaeal Signatures in the Human Body. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Duller, S.; Vrbancic, S.; Szydłowski, Ł.; Mahnert, A.; Blohs, M.; Predl, M.; Kumpitsch, C.; Zrim, V.; Högenauer, C.; Kosciolek, T.; et al. Targeted isolation of Methanobrevibacter strains from fecal samples expands the cultivated human archaeome. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 7593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. McTaggart, L.R.; Copeland, J.K.; Surendra, A.; Wang, P.W.; Husain, S.; Coburn, B.; Guttman, D.S.; Kus, J.V. Mycobiome Sequencing and Analysis Applied to Fungal Community Profiling of the Lower Respiratory Tract During Fungal Pathogenesis. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. El Jaddaoui, I.; Sehli, S.; Al Idrissi, N.; Bakri, Y.; Belyamani, L.; Ghazal, H. The Gut Mycobiome for Precision Medicine. J. Fungi 2025, 11, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Hino, A.; Maruyama, H.; Kikuchi, T. A novel method to assess the biodiversity of parasites using 18S rDNA Illumina sequencing; parasitome analysis method. Parasitol. Int. 2016, 65, 572–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kounosu, A.; Murase, K.; Yoshida, A.; Maruyama, H.; Kikuchi, T. Improved 18S and 28S rDNA primer sets for NGS-based parasite detection. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 15789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Pogka, V.; Papadopoulou, G.; Valiakou, V.; Sgouras, D.N.; Mentis, A.F.; Karamitros, T. Targeted Virome Sequencing Enhances Unbiased Detection and Genome Assembly of Known and Emerging Viruses-The Example of SARS-CoV-2. Viruses 2022, 14, 1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sandybayev, N.; Beloussov, V.; Strochkov, V.; Solomadin, M.; Granica, J.; Yegorov, S. Next Generation Sequencing Approaches to Characterize the Respiratory Tract Virome. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 2327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Carding, S.R.; Davis, N.; Hoyles, L. Review article: The human intestinal virome in health and disease. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2017, 46, 800–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Minot, S.; Sinha, R.; Chen, J.; Li, H.; Keilbaugh, S.A.; Wu, G.D.; Lewis, J.D.; Bushman, F.D. The human gut virome: Inter-individual variation and dynamic response to diet. Genome Res. 2011, 21, 1616–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Shkoporov, A.N.; Clooney, A.G.; Sutton, T.D.S.; Ryan, F.J.; Daly, K.M.; Nolan, J.A.; McDonnell, S.A.; Khokhlova, E.V.; Draper, L.A.; Forde, A.; et al. The Human Gut Virome Is Highly Diverse, Stable, and Individual Specific. Cell Host Microbe 2019, 26, 527–541.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Liang, G.; Bushman, F.D. The human virome: Assembly, composition and host interactions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 19, 514–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Bai, G.H.; Lin, S.C.; Hsu, Y.H.; Chen, S.Y. The Human Virome: Viral Metagenomics, Relations with Human Diseases, and Therapeutic Applications. Viruses 2022, 14, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liang, G.; Cobián-Güemes, A.G.; Albenberg, L.; Bushman, F. The gut virome in inflammatory bowel diseases. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2021, 51, 190–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zárate, S.; Taboada, B.; Yocupicio-Monroy, M.; Arias, C.F. Human Virome. Arch. Med. Res. 2017, 48, 701–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tiamani, K.; Luo, S.; Schulz, S.; Xue, J.; Costa, R.; Khan Mirzaei, M.; Deng, L. The role of virome in the gastrointestinal tract and beyond. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2022, 46, fuac027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Matijašić, M.; Meštrović, T.; Paljetak, H.; Perić, M.; Barešić, A.; Verbanac, D. Gut Microbiota beyond Bacteria-Mycobiome, Virome, Archaeome, and Eukaryotic Parasites in IBD. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Guerin, E.; Hill, C. Shining Light on Human Gut Bacteriophages. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rybicka, I.; Kaźmierczak, Z. The human phageome: Niche-specific distribution of bacteriophages and their clinical implications. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2025, 91, e0178824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Knowles, B.; Silveira, C.B.; Bailey, B.A.; Barott, K.; Cantu, V.A.; Cobián-Güemes, A.G.; Coutinho, F.H.; Dinsdale, E.A.; Felts, B.; Furby, K.A.; et al. Lytic to temperate switching of viral communities. Nature 2016, 531, 466–470, Erratum in Nature 2016, 539, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mahmud, M.R.; Tamanna, S.K.; Akter, S.; Mazumder, L.; Akter, S.; Hasan, M.R.; Acharjee, M.; Esti, I.Z.; Islam, M.S.; Shihab, M.M.R.; et al. Role of bacteriophages in shaping gut microbial community. Gut Microbes 2024, 16, 2390720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ding, B.; Fan, M.; Shi, Y.P.; Chen, X.; Duan, Y. Mechanistic roles and therapeutic potential of bacteriophages in inflammatory gastrointestinal diseases. Microbiome Res. Rep. 2025, 4, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Krishnamurthy, S.R.; Wang, D. Origins and challenges of viral dark matter. Virus Res. 2017, 239, 136–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Cesanelli, F.; Scarvaglieri, I.; De Francesco, M.A.; Alberti, M.; Salvi, M.; Tiecco, G.; Castelli, F.; Quiros-Roldan, E. The Human Virome in Health and Its Remodeling During HIV Infection and Antiretroviral Therapy: A Narrative Review. Microorganisms 2025, 14, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Gregory, A.C.; Gerhardt, K.; Zhong, Z.P.; Bolduc, B.; Temperton, B.; Konstantinidis, K.T.; Sullivan, M.B. MetaPop: A pipeline for macro- and microdiversity analyses and visualization of microbial and viral metagenome-derived populations. Microbiome 2022, 10, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Popov, N.; Sonets, I.; Evdokimova, A.; Molchanova, M.; Panova, V.; Korneenko, E.; Manolov, A.; Ilina, E. AliMarko: A Pipeline for Virus Identification Using an Expert-Guided Approach. Viruses 2025, 17, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ren, J.; Song, K.; Deng, C.; Ahlgren, N.A.; Fuhrman, J.A.; Li, Y.; Xie, X.; Poplin, R.; Sun, F. Identifying viruses from metagenomic data using deep learning. Quant. Biol. 2020, 8, 64–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Tampuu, A.; Bzhalava, Z.; Dillner, J.; Vicente, R. ViraMiner: Deep learning on raw DNA sequences for identifying viral genomes in human samples. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0222271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Purcell, M.; Ackland, J.; Staples, K.J.; Freeman, A.; Wilkinson, T.M.A. The respiratory tract virome: Unravelling the role of viral dark matter in respiratory health and disease. Eur. Respir. Rev. 2025, 34, 240284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Salter, S.J.; Cox, M.J.; Turek, E.M.; Calus, S.T.; Cookson, W.O.; Moffatt, M.F.; Turner, P.; Parkhill, J.; Loman, N.J.; Walker, A.W. Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses. BMC Biol. 2014, 12, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kim, D.; Hofstaedter, C.E.; Zhao, C.; Mattei, L.; Tanes, C.; Clarke, E.; Lauder, A.; Sherrill-Mix, S.; Chehoud, C.; Kelsen, J.; et al. Optimizing methods and dodging pitfalls in microbiome research. Microbiome 2017, 5, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Roux, S.; Brum, J.R.; Dutilh, B.E.; Sunagawa, S.; Duhaime, M.B.; Loy, A.; Poulos, B.T.; Solonenko, N.; Lara, E.; Poulain, J.; et al. Ecogenomics and potential biogeochemical impacts of globally abundant ocean viruses. Nature 2016, 537, 689–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Kim, K.H.; Bae, J.W. Amplification methods bias metagenomic libraries of uncultured single-stranded and double-stranded DNA viruses. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 7663–7668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Paez-Espino, D.; Eloe-Fadrosh, E.A.; Pavlopoulos, G.A.; Thomas, A.D.; Huntemann, M.; Mikhailova, N.; Rubin, E.; Ivanova, N.N.; Kyrpides, N.C. Uncovering Earth’s virome. Nature 2016, 536, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Roux, S.; Adriaenssens, E.M.; Dutilh, B.E.; Koonin, E.V.; Kropinski, A.M.; Krupovic, M.; Kuhn, J.H.; Lavigne, R.; Brister, J.R.; Varsani, A.; et al. Minimum Information about an Uncultivated Virus Genome (MIUViG). Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Focosi, D.; Antonelli, G.; Pistello, M.; Maggi, F. Torquetenovirus: The human virome from bench to bedside. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2016, 22, 589–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sabbaghian, M.; Gheitasi, H.; Shekarchi, A.A.; Tavakoli, A.; Poortahmasebi, V. The mysterious anelloviruses: Investigating its role in human diseases. BMC Microbiol. 2024, 24, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Maggi, F.; Focosi, D.; Statzu, M.; Bianco, G.; Costa, C.; Macera, L.; Spezia, P.G.; Medici, C.; Albert, E.; Navarro, D.; et al. Early Post-Transplant Torquetenovirus Viremia Predicts Cytomegalovirus Reactivations in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 15490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Porto, B.N. Insights Into the Role of the Lung Virome During Respiratory Viral Infections. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 885341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Focosi, D.; Spezia, P.G.; Maggi, F. The Emerging Tool of the Human Anellovirome. Viruses 2024, 16, 990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Dal Lago, S.; Brani, P.; Ietto, G.; Dalla Gasperina, D.; Gianfagna, F.; Giaroni, C.; Bosi, A.; Drago Ferrante, F.; Genoni, A.; Manzoor, H.Z.; et al. Torque Teno Virus: A Promising Biomarker in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 7744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Albert, E.; Giménez, E.; Hernani, R.; Piñana, J.L.; Solano, C.; Navarro, D. Torque Teno Virus DNA Load in Blood as an Immune Status Biomarker in Adult Hematological Patients: The State of the Art and Future Prospects. Viruses 2024, 16, 459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Gore, E.J.; Gard, L.; Niesters, H.G.M.; Van Leer Buter, C.C. Understanding torquetenovirus (TTV) as an immune marker. Front. Med. 2023, 10, 1168400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Cinti, L.; Spezia, P.G.; Roberto, P.; Russo, G.; Lai, Q.; Carillo, C.; Frasca, F.; Antonelli, G.; Maggi, F. Assessment of Torquetenominivirus (TTMV) and Torquetenomidivirus (TTMDV) as Complementary Biomarkers to Torquetenovirus (TTV). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Lopetuso, L.R.; Ianiro, G.; Scaldaferri, F.; Cammarota, G.; Gasbarrini, A. Gut Virome and Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2016, 22, 1708–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yang, K.; Niu, J.; Zuo, T.; Sun, Y.; Xu, Z.; Tang, W.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, J.; Ng, E.K.W.; Wong, S.K.H.; et al. Alterations in the Gut Virome in Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Gastroenterology 2021, 161, 1257–1269.e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Chen, C.; Zhang, Y.; Yao, X.; Li, S.; Wang, G.; Huang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, A.; Liu, C.; Zhu, D.; et al. Characterizations of the Gut Bacteriome, Mycobiome, and Virome in Patients with Osteoarthritis. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e0171122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kong, C.; Liu, G.; Kalady, M.F.; Jin, T.; Ma, Y. Dysbiosis of the stool DNA and RNA virome in Crohn’s disease. J. Med. Virol. 2023, 95, e28573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Megremis, S.; Constantinides, B.; Xepapadaki, P.; Yap, C.F.; Sotiropoulos, A.G.; Bachert, C.; Finotto, S.; Jartti, T.; Tapinos, A.; Vuorinen, T.; et al. Respiratory eukaryotic virome expansion and bacteriophage deficiency characterize childhood asthma. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 8319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Liu, Y.; Huang, Q.; Zhuang, Z.; Yang, H.; Gou, X.; Xu, T.; Liu, K.; Wang, J.; Liu, B.; Gao, P.; et al. Gut virome alterations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Microbiol. Spectr. 2024, 12, e0428723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Frebel, H.; Richter, K.; Oxenius, A. How chronic viral infections impact on antigen-specific T-cell responses. Eur. J. Immunol. 2010, 40, 654–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Li, Y.; He, C.; Lu, N. Impacts of Helicobacter pylori infection and eradication on gastrointestinal microbiota: An up-to-date critical review and future perspectives. Chin. Med. J. 2024, 137, 2833–2842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Saeidi, A.; Zandi, K.; Cheok, Y.Y.; Saeidi, H.; Wong, W.F.; Lee, C.Y.Q.; Cheong, H.C.; Yong, Y.K.; Larsson, M.; Shankar, E.M. T-Cell Exhaustion in Chronic Infections: Reversing the State of Exhaustion and Reinvigorating Optimal Protective Immune Responses. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Szymonowicz, K.A.; Chen, J. Biological and clinical aspects of HPV-related cancers. Cancer Biol. Med. 2020, 17, 864–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Yang, T.; You, C.; Meng, S.; Lai, Z.; Ai, W.; Zhang, J. EBV Infection and Its Regulated Metabolic Reprogramming in Nasopharyngeal Tumorigenesis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 935205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Galati, L.; Chiantore, M.V.; Marinaro, M.; Di Bonito, P. Human Oncogenic Viruses: Characteristics and Prevention Strategies-Lessons Learned from Human Papillomaviruses. Viruses 2024, 16, 416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Müller, L.; Di Benedetto, S. Immunosenescence and Cytomegalovirus: Exploring Their Connection in the Context of Aging, Health, and Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Pérez, S.E.; Gooz, M.; Maldonado, E.N. Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Metabolic Disturbances Induced by Viral Infections. Cells 2024, 13, 1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Li, Y.; Xu, X.; Peng, C.; Liu, Y.; Lu, N.; Zhu, Y.; He, C. Comprehensive characterization of gastrointestinal microbiota dysbiosis in patients with refractory Helicobacter pylori infection. mSystems 2025, 10, e0109025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Oh, J.Y.; Ko, Y.K.; Jeon, M.H.; Doo, H.M.; Roh, S.; Gim, J.A. Distinguishing tuberculosis from non-tuberculous mycobacteria and other respiratory conditions by microbiome patterns. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 36129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Thompson, R.N.; Blumenthal, A.; Morrison, M.; Thomson, R.M. The microbiome and gut-lung axis in nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease. PLoS Pathog. 2025, 21, e1013603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Charon, J.; Grigg, M.J.; Eden, J.S.; Piera, K.A.; Rana, H.; William, T.; Rose, K.; Davenport, M.P.; Anstey, N.M.; Holmes, E.C. Novel RNA viruses associated with Plasmodium vivax in human malaria and Leucocytozoon parasites in avian disease. PLoS Pathog. 2019, 15, e1008216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Wang, J.; Gou, Q.Y.; Luo, G.Y.; Hou, X.; Liang, G.; Shi, M. Total RNA sequencing of Phlebotomus chinensis sandflies in China revealed viral, bacterial, and eukaryotic microbes potentially pathogenic to humans. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2022, 11, 2080–2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Liang, T.J. Hepatitis B: The virus and disease. Hepatology 2009, 49, S13–S21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Insinga, R.P.; Perez, G.; Wheeler, C.M.; Koutsky, L.A.; Garland, S.M.; Leodolter, S.; Joura, E.A.; Ferris, D.G.; Steben, M.; Hernandez-Avila, M.; et al. Incident cervical HPV infections in young women: Transition probabilities for CIN and infection clearance. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2011, 20, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Mosley, R.T.; Edwards, T.E.; Murakami, E.; Lam, A.M.; Grice, R.L.; Du, J.; Sofia, M.J.; Furman, P.A.; Otto, M.J. Structure of hepatitis C virus polymerase in complex with primer-template RNA. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 6503–6511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Satterwhite, C.L.; Torrone, E.; Meites, E.; Dunne, E.F.; Mahajan, R.; Ocfemia, M.C.; Su, J.; Xu, F.; Weinstock, H. Sexually transmitted infections among US women and men: Prevalence and incidence estimates, 2008. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2013, 40, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Mbita, Z.; Hull, R.; Dlamini, Z. Human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1)-mediated apoptosis: New therapeutic targets. Viruses 2014, 6, 3181–3227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Groves, I.J.; Coleman, N. Pathogenesis of human papillomavirus-associated mucosal disease. J. Pathol. 2015, 235, 527–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Burd, E.M.; Dean, C.L. Human Papillomavirus. Microbiol. Spectr. 2016, 4, 177–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Rajoriya, N.; Combet, C.; Zoulim, F.; Janssen, H.L.A. How viral genetic variants and genotypes influence disease and treatment outcome of chronic hepatitis B. Time for an individualised approach? J. Hepatol. 2017, 67, 1281–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Tsukuda, S.; Watashi, K. Hepatitis B virus biology and life cycle. Antivir. Res. 2020, 182, 104925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Santella, B.; Schettino, M.T.; Franci, G.; De Franciscis, P.; Colacurci, N.; Schiattarella, A.; Galdiero, M. Microbiota and HPV: The role of viral infection on vaginal microbiota. J. Med. Virol. 2022, 94, 4478–4484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Asandem, D.A.; Segbefia, S.P.; Kusi, K.A.; Bonney, J.H.K. Hepatitis B Virus Infection: A Mini Review. Viruses 2024, 16, 724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Augestad, E.H.; Holmboe Olesen, C.; Grønberg, C.; Soerensen, A.; Velázquez-Moctezuma, R.; Fanalista, M.; Bukh, J.; Wang, K.; Gourdon, P.; Prentoe, J. The hepatitis C virus envelope protein complex is a dimer of heterodimers. Nature 2024, 633, 704–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Frye, B.C.; Bierbaum, S.; Falcone, V.; Köhler, T.C.; Gasplmayr, M.; Hettich, I.; Dürk, T.; Idzko, M.; Zissel, G.; Hengel, H.; et al. Kinetics of Torque Teno Virus-DNA Plasma Load Predict Rejection in Lung Transplant Recipients. Transplantation 2019, 103, 815–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Xie, Y.; Xue, Q.; Jiao, W.; Wu, J.; Yu, Y.; Zhao, L.; Xu, Y.; Deng, X.; Fang, G.; Zheng, Y.; et al. Associations Between Sputum Torque Teno Virus Load and Lung Function and Disease Severity in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 618757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Shibayama, T.; Masuda, G.; Ajisawa, A.; Takahashi, M.; Nishizawa, T.; Tsuda, F.; Okamoto, H. Inverse relationship between the titre of TT virus DNA and the CD4 cell count in patients infected with HIV. AIDS 2001, 15, 563–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Thom, K.; Petrik, J. Progression towards AIDS leads to increased Torque teno virus and Torque teno minivirus titers in tissues of HIV infected individuals. J. Med. Virol. 2007, 79, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Li, L.; Deng, X.; Linsuwanon, P.; Bangsberg, D.; Bwana, M.B.; Hunt, P.; Martin, J.N.; Deeks, S.G.; Delwart, E. AIDS alters the commensal plasma virome. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 10912–10915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Young, J.C.; Chehoud, C.; Bittinger, K.; Bailey, A.; Diamond, J.M.; Cantu, E.; Haas, A.R.; Abbas, A.; Frye, L.; Christie, J.D.; et al. Viral metagenomics reveal blooms of anelloviruses in the respiratory tract of lung transplant recipients. Am. J. Transplant. 2015, 15, 200–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Twigg, H.L., 3rd; Weinstock, G.M.; Knox, K.S. Lung microbiome in human immunodeficiency virus infection. Transl. Res. 2017, 179, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Siqueira, J.D.; Curty, G.; Xutao, D.; Hofer, C.B.; Machado, E.S.; Seuánez, H.N.; Soares, M.A.; Delwart, E.; Soares, E.A. Composite Analysis of the Virome and Bacteriome of HIV/HPV Co-Infected Women Reveals Proxies for Immunodeficiency. Viruses 2019, 11, 422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Li, Y.; Altan, E.; Pilcher, C.; Hartogensis, W.; Hecht, F.M.; Deng, X.; Delwart, E. Semen virome of men with HIV on or off antiretroviral treatment. AIDS 2020, 34, 827–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Monaco, C.L. HIV, AIDS, and the virome: Gut reactions. Cell Host Microbe 2022, 30, 466–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Shrivastav, K.; Nasser, H.; Ikeda, T.; Nema, V. Possible Crosstalk and Alterations in Gut Bacteriome and Virome in HIV-1 Infection and the Associated Comorbidities Related to Metabolic Disorder. Viruses 2025, 17, 990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Law, J.; Jovel, J.; Patterson, J.; Ford, G.; O’Keefe, S.; Wang, W.; Meng, B.; Song, D.; Zhang, Y.; Tian, Z.; et al. Identification of hepatotropic viruses from plasma using deep sequencing: A next generation diagnostic tool. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e60595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Thijssen, M.; Tacke, F.; Van Espen, L.; Cassiman, D.; Naser Aldine, M.; Nevens, F.; Van Ranst, M.; Matthijnssens, J.; Pourkarim, M.R. Plasma virome dynamics in chronic hepatitis B virus infected patients. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1172574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Sasivimolrattana, T.; Chantratita, W.; Sensorn, I.; Chaiwongkot, A.; Oranratanaphan, S.; Bhattarakosol, P. Human Virome in Cervix Controlled by the Domination of Human Papillomavirus. Viruses 2022, 14, 2066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Madsen, C.D.; Eugen-Olsen, J.; Kirk, O.; Parner, J.; Kaae Christensen, J.; Brasholt, M.S.; Ole Nielsen, J.; Krogsgaard, K. TTV viral load as a marker for immune reconstitution after initiation of HAART in HIV-infected patients. HIV Clin. Trials 2002, 3, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ruiz, P.; Martínez-Picola, M.; Santana, M.; Muñoz, J.; Pérez-Del-Pulgar, S.; Koutsoudakis, G.; Sastre, L.; Colmenero, J.; Crespo, G.; Navasa, M. Torque Teno Virus Is Associated with the State of Immune Suppression Early After Liver Transplantation. Liver Transplant. 2019, 25, 302–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Tarancon-Diez, L.; Carrasco, I.; Montes, L.; Falces-Romero, I.; Vazquez-Alejo, E.; Jiménez de Ory, S.; Dapena, M.; Iribarren, J.A.; Díez, C.; Ramos-Ruperto, L.; et al. Torque teno virus: A potential marker of immune reconstitution in youths with vertically acquired HIV. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 24691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Ghose, C.; Ly, M.; Schwanemann, L.K.; Shin, J.H.; Atab, K.; Barr, J.J.; Little, M.; Schooley, R.T.; Chopyk, J.; Pride, D.T. The Virome of Cerebrospinal Fluid: Viruses Where We Once Thought There Were None. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Anh, N.T.; Nhu, L.N.T.; Hong, N.T.T.; Phuc, T.M.; Tam, P.T.T.; Huong, D.T.; Anh, T.T.; Deng, X.; Nghia, H.D.T.; Nguyen, T.T.; et al. Viral Metagenomic Analysis of Cerebrospinal Fluid from Patients with Acute Central Nervous System Infections of Unknown Origin, Vietnam. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2021, 27, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Carmona, R.C.C.; Cilli, A.; da Costa, A.C.; Reis, F.C.; Leal, É.; Dos Santos, F.C.P.; Machado, B.C.; Lopes, C.S.; Afonso, A.M.S.; Timenetsky, M. Pegivirus Detection in Cerebrospinal Fluid from Patients with Central Nervous System Infections of Unknown Etiology in Brazil by Viral Metagenomics. Microorganisms 2023, 12, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Tang, J.; Wang, K.; Xu, H.; Han, J. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing of cerebrospinal fluid: A diagnostic approach for varicella zoster virus-related encephalitis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2024, 14, 1509630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Zhang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Li, W.; Xu, J.; Chen, Y.; Yang, S.; Wu, P.; Li, Y.; Zhou, C.; Zhang, W. Viromic analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples identified an unclassified RNA virus exhibiting an atypical genomic architecture. BMC Microbiol. 2025, 25, 776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Holtz, L.R.; Cao, S.; Zhao, G.; Bauer, I.K.; Denno, D.M.; Klein, E.J.; Antonio, M.; Stine, O.C.; Snelling, T.L.; Kirkwood, C.D.; et al. Geographic variation in the eukaryotic virome of human diarrhea. Virology 2014, 468–470, 556–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Mukhopadhya, I.; Segal, J.P.; Carding, S.R.; Hart, A.L.; Hold, G.L. The gut virome: The ‘missing link’ between gut bacteria and host immunity? Ther. Adv. Gastroenterol. 2019, 12, 1756284819836620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Zhang, Y.; Wang, R. The human gut phageome: Composition, development, and alterations in disease. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1213625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Lathakumari, R.H.; Vajravelu, L.K.; Gopinathan, A.; Vimala, P.B.; Panneerselvam, V.; Ravi, S.S.S.; Thulukanam, J. The gut virome and human health: From diversity to personalized medicine. Eng. Microbiol. 2025, 5, 100191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Pavia, G.; Marascio, N.; Matera, G.; Quirino, A. Does the Human Gut Virome Contribute to Host Health or Disease? Viruses 2023, 15, 2271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Mousa, W.K.; Chehadeh, F.; Husband, S. Microbial dysbiosis in the gut drives systemic autoimmune diseases. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 906258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Conradie, T.; Caparros-Martin, J.A.; Egan, S.; Kicic, A.; Koks, S.; Stick, S.M.; Agudelo-Romero, P. Exploring the Complexity of the Human Respiratory Virome through an In Silico Analysis of Shotgun Metagenomic Data Retrieved from Public Repositories. Viruses 2024, 16, 953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Anani, H.; Destras, G.; Bulteau, S.; Castain, L.; Semanas, Q.; Burfin, G.; Petrier, M.; Martin, F.P.; Poulain, C.; Dickson, R.P.; et al. Lung virome convergence precedes hospital-acquired pneumonia in intubated critically ill patients. Cell reports. Med. 2025, 6, 102289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Gomes, N.; Ferreira-Sa, L.; Alves, N.; Dallago, B.; Moraes, A.; Carvalho, J.L.; Nitz, N.; Hagström, L.; Braz, S.; Machado, E.R.; et al. Uncovering the effects of Giardia duodenalis on the balance of DNA viruses and bacteria in children’s gut microbiota. Acta Trop. 2023, 247, 107018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Napolitano, L.M.; Edmiston, C.E., Jr. Clostridium difficile disease: Diagnosis, pathogenesis, and treatment update. Surgery 2017, 162, 325–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Zhu, D.; Sorg, J.A.; Sun, X. Clostridioides difficile Biology: Sporulation, Germination, and Corresponding Therapies for C. difficile Infection. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Herrera, G.; Paredes-Sabja, D.; Patarroyo, M.A.; Ramírez, J.D.; Muñoz, M. Updating changes in human gut microbial communities associated with Clostridioides difficile infection. Gut Microbes 2021, 13, 1966277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Jakobsen, R.R.; Haahr, T.; Humaidan, P.; Jensen, J.S.; Kot, W.P.; Castro-Mejia, J.L.; Deng, L.; Leser, T.D.; Nielsen, D.S. Characterization of the Vaginal DNA Virome in Health and Dysbiosis. Viruses 2020, 12, 1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Lu, X.; Lu, Q.; Zhu, R.; Sun, M.; Chen, H.; Ge, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, W.; et al. Metagenomic analysis reveals the diversity of the vaginal virome and its association with vaginitis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2025, 15, 1582553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Nokso-Koivisto, J.; Kinnari, T.J.; Lindahl, P.; Hovi, T.; Pitkäranta, A. Human picornavirus and coronavirus RNA in nasopharynx of children without concurrent respiratory symptoms. J. Med. Virol. 2002, 66, 417–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Wylie, K.M.; Mihindukulasuriya, K.A.; Sodergren, E.; Weinstock, G.M.; Storch, G.A. Sequence analysis of the human virome in febrile and afebrile children. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e27735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Pérez-Brocal, V.; Moya, A. The analysis of the oral DNA virome reveals which viruses are widespread and rare among healthy young adults in Valencia (Spain). PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0191867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Naureen, Z.; Dautaj, A.; Anpilogov, K.; Camilleri, G.; Dhuli, K.; Tanzi, B.; Maltese, P.E.; Cristofoli, F.; De Antoni, L.; Beccari, T.; et al. Bacteriophages presence in nature and their role in the natural selection of bacterial populations. Acta Biomed. 2020, 91, e2020024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Zhang, C.; Liu, T.; Wang, Y.; Chen, W.; Liu, J.; Tao, J.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, X.; Zhang, Z.; Ming, M.; et al. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from children with severe pneumonia in pediatric intensive care unit. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1082925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Jain, S.; Williams, D.J.; Arnold, S.R.; Ampofo, K.; Bramley, A.M.; Reed, C.; Stockmann, C.; Anderson, E.J.; Grijalva, C.G.; Self, W.H.; et al. Community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization among U.S. children. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 372, 835–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Havers, F.P.; Hicks, L.A.; Chung, J.R.; Gaglani, M.; Murthy, K.; Zimmerman, R.K.; Jackson, L.A.; Petrie, J.G.; McLean, H.Q.; Nowalk, M.P.; et al. Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing for Acute Respiratory Infections During Influenza Seasons. JAMA Netw. Open 2018, 1, e180243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Obando-Pacheco, P.; Justicia-Grande, A.J.; Rivero-Calle, I.; Rodríguez-Tenreiro, C.; Sly, P.; Ramilo, O.; Mejías, A.; Baraldi, E.; Papadopoulos, N.G.; Nair, H.; et al. Respiratory Syncytial Virus Seasonality: A Global Overview. J. Infect. Dis. 2018, 217, 1356–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Li, Z.J.; Zhang, H.Y.; Ren, L.L.; Lu, Q.B.; Ren, X.; Zhang, C.H.; Wang, Y.F.; Lin, S.H.; Zhang, X.A.; Li, J.; et al. Etiological and epidemiological features of acute respiratory infections in China. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 5026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Rajagopala, S.V.; Bakhoum, N.G.; Pakala, S.B.; Shilts, M.H.; Rosas-Salazar, C.; Mai, A.; Boone, H.H.; McHenry, R.; Yooseph, S.; Halasa, N.; et al. Metatranscriptomics to characterize respiratory virome, microbiome, and host response directly from clinical samples. Cell Rep. Methods 2021, 1, 100091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Staadegaard, L.; Caini, S.; Wangchuk, S.; Thapa, B.; de Almeida, W.A.F.; de Carvalho, F.C.; Fasce, R.A.; Bustos, P.; Kyncl, J.; Novakova, L.; et al. Defining the seasonality of respiratory syncytial virus around the world: National and subnational surveillance data from 12 countries. Influenza Other Respir. Viruses 2021, 15, 732–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Blau, D.M.; Caballero, M.T.; Feikin, D.R.; Gill, C.J.; Madhi, S.A.; Omer, S.B.; Simões, E.A.F.; Campbell, H.; et al. Global, regional, and national disease burden estimates of acute lower respiratory infections due to respiratory syncytial virus in children younger than 5 years in 2019: A systematic analysis. Lancet 2022, 399, 2047–2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Zhang, D.; Cao, Y.; Dai, B.; Zhang, T.; Jin, X.; Lan, Q.; Qian, C.; He, Y.; Jiang, Y. The virome composition of respiratory tract changes in school-aged children with Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Virol. J. 2025, 22, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Guo, Q.; Li, L.; Wang, C.; Huang, Y.; Ma, F.; Cong, S.; Tan, J.; Yao, L.; Chen, A.; Zheng, L. Comprehensive virome analysis of the viral spectrum in paediatric patients diagnosed with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. Virol. J. 2022, 19, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Raghuram, A.; Furmanek, S.; Chandler, T.; Rashid, S.; Mattingly, W.; Ramirez, J. Description of a Current Outbreak of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in the United States. Pathogens 2025, 14, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Lysholm, F.; Wetterbom, A.; Lindau, C.; Darban, H.; Bjerkner, A.; Fahlander, K.; Lindberg, A.M.; Persson, B.; Allander, T.; Andersson, B. Characterization of the viral microbiome in patients with severe lower respiratory tract infections, using metagenomic sequencing. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e30875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Wang, Y.; Zhu, N.; Li, Y.; Lu, R.; Wang, H.; Liu, G.; Zou, X.; Xie, Z.; Tan, W. Metagenomic analysis of viral genetic diversity in respiratory samples from children with severe acute respiratory infection in China. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2016, 22, 458.e1–458.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Zhou, Y.; Fernandez, S.; Yoon, I.K.; Simasathien, S.; Watanaveeradej, V.; Yang, Y.; Marte-Salcedo, O.A.; Shuck-Lee, D.J.; Thomas, S.J.; Hang, J.; et al. Metagenomics Study of Viral Pathogens in Undiagnosed Respiratory Specimens and Identification of Human Enteroviruses at a Thailand Hospital. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2016, 95, 663–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Liu, Y.; Wang, H.; Yang, J.; Zeng, J.; Sun, G.M. Virome of respiratory secretion from children with unknown etiological acute respiratory disease revealed recombinant human parechovirus and other significant viruses. Virol. J. 2021, 18, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Mao, Q.; Sun, G.; Qian, Y.; Qian, Y.; Li, W.; Wang, X.; Shen, Q.; Yang, S.; Zhou, C.; Wang, H.; et al. Viral metagenomics of pharyngeal secretions from children with acute respiratory diseases with unknown etiology revealed diverse viruses. Virus Res. 2022, 321, 198912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Ogunbayo, A.E.; Mogotsi, M.T.; Sondlane, H.; Nkwadipo, K.R.; Sabiu, S.; Nyaga, M.M. Metagenomic Analysis of Respiratory RNA Virome of Children with and without Severe Acute Respiratory Infection from the Free State, South Africa during COVID-19 Pandemic Reveals Higher Diversity and Abundance in Summer Compared with Winter Period. Viruses 2022, 14, 2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Chang, C.; Wang, H.; Zhang, L.; Hao, J.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Qi, F.; Lou, J.; Zhao, J.; Dong, J. Clinical Efficiency of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in Sputum for Pathogen Detection of Patients with Pneumonia According to Disease Severity and Host Immune Status. Infect. Drug Resist. 2023, 16, 5869–5885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Rovira Rubió, J.; Megremis, S.; Pasioti, M.; Lakoumentas, J.; Constantinides, B.; Xepapadaki, P.; Bachert, C.; Finotto, S.; Jartti, T.; Andreakos, E.; et al. Respiratory virome profiles reflect antiviral immune responses. Allergy 2023, 78, 1258–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Cui, S.; Guo, R.; Chen, C.; Zhang, Y.; Meng, J.; Liu, L.; Li, Y.; Kang, Z.; Li, S.; Yan, Q.; et al. Next-Generation Sequencing for Characterizing Respiratory Tract Virome and Improving Detection of Viral Pathogens in Children with Pneumonia. Influenza Other Respir. Viruses 2024, 18, e13362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Li, Y.; Fu, X.; Ma, J.; Zhang, J.; Hu, Y.; Dong, W.; Wan, Z.; Li, Q.; Kuang, Y.Q.; Lan, K.; et al. Altered respiratory virome and serum cytokine profile associated with recurrent respiratory tract infections in children. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Cao, L.; Ma, Y.; Wan, Z.; Li, B.; Tian, W.; Zhang, C.; Li, Y. Longitudinal anellome dynamics in the upper respiratory tract of children with acute respiratory tract infections. Virus Evol. 2023, 9, vead045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Ferravante, C.; Sanna, G.; Melone, V.; Fromentier, A.; Rocco, T.; D’Agostino, Y.; Lamberti, J.; Alexandrova, E.; Pecoraro, G.; Pagliano, P.; et al. Nasopharyngeal virome analysis of COVID-19 patients during three different waves in Campania region of Italy. J. Med. Virol. 2022, 94, 2275–2283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Lu, X.; Wang, H.; Zhang, J.; Jin, K.; Ma, L.; Wang, Y.; Yang, S.; Wang, X.; Shen, Q.; Zhou, T.; et al. Comparison of Gut Viral Communities in Atopic Dermatitis and Healthy Children. Front. Med. 2022, 9, 835467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Xu, P.; Pan, C.; Yuan, M.; Zhu, Y.; Wei, S.; Lu, H.; Zhang, W. Viral metagenomics reveals diverse viruses in the fecal samples of children with acute respiratory infection. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1564755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Cao, J.; Wang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Lei, G.; Xu, K.; Zhao, N.; Lu, J.; Meng, F.; Yu, L.; Yan, J.; et al. Integrated gut virome and bacteriome dynamics in COVID-19 patients. Gut Microbes 2021, 13, 1887722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Kim, K.W.; Deveson, I.W.; Pang, C.N.I.; Yeang, M.; Naing, Z.; Adikari, T.; Hammond, J.M.; Stevanovski, I.; Beukers, A.G.; Verich, A.; et al. Respiratory viral co-infections among SARS-CoV-2 cases confirmed by virome capture sequencing. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 3934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Lu, Z.H.; Zhou, H.W.; Wu, W.K.; Fu, T.; Yan, M.; He, Z.; Sun, S.W.; Ji, Z.H.; Shao, Z.J. Alterations in the Composition of Intestinal DNA Virome in Patients with COVID-19. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 790422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Zuo, T.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, F.; Yeoh, Y.K.; Wan, Y.; Zhan, H.; Lui, G.C.Y.; Chen, Z.; Li, A.Y.L.; Cheung, C.P.; et al. Temporal landscape of human gut RNA and DNA virome in SARS-CoV-2 infection and severity. Microbiome 2021, 9, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Piazzesi, A.; Pane, S.; Del Chierico, F.; Romani, L.; Campana, A.; Palma, P.; Putignani, L. The pediatric gut bacteriome and virome in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2024, 14, 1335450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Sasa, N.; Kojima, S.; Koide, R.; Hasegawa, T.; Namkoong, H.; Hirota, T.; Watanabe, R.; Nakamura, Y.; Oguro-Igashira, E.; Ogawa, K.; et al. Blood DNA virome associates with autoimmune diseases and COVID-19. Nat. Genet. 2025, 57, 65–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Merenstein, C.; Liang, G.; Whiteside, S.A.; Cobián-Güemes, A.G.; Merlino, M.S.; Taylor, L.J.; Glascock, A.; Bittinger, K.; Tanes, C.; Graham-Wooten, J.; et al. Signatures of COVID-19 Severity and Immune Response in the Respiratory Tract Microbiome. mBio 2021, 12, e0177721, Erratum in mBio 2022, 13, e0229322. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.02293-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Taniguchi, K.; Komoto, S. Genetics and reverse genetics of rotavirus. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2012, 2, 399–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Bao, S.; Wang, H.; Li, W.; Wu, H.; Lu, C.; Yong, L.; Zhang, Q.; Lu, X.; Zhao, M.; Lu, J.; et al. Viral metagenomics of the gut virome of diarrheal children with Rotavirus A infection. Gut Microbes 2023, 15, 2234653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Jawale, N.; Shenberger, J.S.; Rodriguez, R.J.; Shetty, A.K.; Garg, P.M. The Nonbacterial Infant Microbiome and Necrotizing Enterocolitis. Am. J. Perinatol. 2025, 42, 1836–1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Smits, W.K.; Lyras, D.; Lacy, D.B.; Wilcox, M.H.; Kuijper, E.J. Clostridium difficile infection. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2016, 2, 16020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Zuo, T.; Wong, S.H.; Lam, K.; Lui, R.; Cheung, K.; Tang, W.; Ching, J.Y.L.; Chan, P.K.S.; Chan, M.C.W.; Wu, J.C.Y.; et al. Bacteriophage transfer during faecal microbiota transplantation in Clostridium difficile infection is associated with treatment outcome. Gut 2018, 67, 634–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Heuler, J.; Fortier, L.C.; Sun, X. Clostridioides difficile phage biology and application. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2021, 45, fuab012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Zhang, J.; Lei, Y.; Du, H.; Li, Z.; Wang, X.; Yang, D.; Gao, F.; Li, J. Exploring urinary microbiome: Insights into neurogenic bladder and improving management of urinary tract infections. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2025, 15, 1512891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Salabura, A.; Łuniewski, A.; Kucharska, M.; Myszak, D.; Dołęgowska, B.; Ciechanowski, K.; Kędzierska-Kapuza, K.; Wojciuk, B. Urinary Tract Virome as an Urgent Target for Metagenomics. Life 2021, 11, 1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Wehedy, E.; Murugesan, S.; George, C.R.; Shatat, I.F.; Al Khodor, S. Characterization of the Urinary Metagenome and Virome in Healthy Children. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 2412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Santiago-Rodriguez, T.M.; Ly, M.; Bonilla, N.; Pride, D.T. The human urine virome in association with urinary tract infections. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Szládek, G.; Juhász, A.; Kardos, G.; Szoke, K.; Major, T.; Sziklai, I.; Tar, I.; Márton, I.; Kónya, J.; Gergely, L.; et al. High co-prevalence of genogroup 1 TT virus and human papillomavirus is associated with poor clinical outcome of laryngeal carcinoma. J. Clin. Pathol. 2005, 58, 402–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Li, Y.; Cao, L.; Han, X.; Ma, Y.; Liu, Y.; Gao, S.; Zhang, C. Altered vaginal eukaryotic virome is associated with different cervical disease status. Virol. Sin. 2023, 38, 184–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Kaelin, E.A.; Skidmore, P.T.; Łaniewski, P.; Holland, L.A.; Chase, D.M.; Herbst-Kralovetz, M.M.; Lim, E.S. Cervicovaginal DNA Virome Alterations Are Associated with Genital Inflammation and Microbiota Composition. mSystems 2022, 7, e0006422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Orton, K.L.; Monaco, C.L. The Vaginal Virome in Women’s Health and Disease. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Structure of the human microbiome. The human microbiome is composed of multiple distinct subdomains: the ‘bacteriome’, representing the dominant bacterial fraction; the ‘mycobiome’, encompassing the genomic content of fungi; the ‘parasitome’, representing parasites; the ‘archaeome’, including the genomic content of archaea; and the ‘virome’, which comprises viral genomes. Within the virome, the ‘phageome’ consists of bacteriophages that specifically infect resident bacteria. This subdivision highlights the complexity of microbial communities. Each subdomain is represented along with some representative taxa and the main sequencing approaches used for their characterization, including targeted markers (genomic DNA, nuclear and mitochondrial) and shotgun metagenomics of DNA and RNA. Created in BioRender. Rebecca Feletti. (2026) https://BioRender.com/.
Figure 1. Structure of the human microbiome. The human microbiome is composed of multiple distinct subdomains: the ‘bacteriome’, representing the dominant bacterial fraction; the ‘mycobiome’, encompassing the genomic content of fungi; the ‘parasitome’, representing parasites; the ‘archaeome’, including the genomic content of archaea; and the ‘virome’, which comprises viral genomes. Within the virome, the ‘phageome’ consists of bacteriophages that specifically infect resident bacteria. This subdivision highlights the complexity of microbial communities. Each subdomain is represented along with some representative taxa and the main sequencing approaches used for their characterization, including targeted markers (genomic DNA, nuclear and mitochondrial) and shotgun metagenomics of DNA and RNA. Created in BioRender. Rebecca Feletti. (2026) https://BioRender.com/.
Microorganisms 14 00969 g001
Figure 2. Observed virome patterns across infections. Respiratory tract infections often show dynamic fluctuations of Anelloviridae abundance (with levels decreasing ↓ during acute infections and increasing ↑ with disease severity) and greater presence of Adenoviridae, Polyomaviridae and Propionibacterium phages. Intestinal tract infections are typically linked to an increase in Adenoviridae, Astroviridae, Caliciviridae, and Picornaviridae, and a decrease in Microviridae and Caudovirales; notably, Caudovirales are an exception, showing enrichment only during Clostridioides difficile (CD) infection. In the urogenital tract, infections in this area are linked to an increased abundance of Papillomaviridae and Anelloviridae. These observations highlight how infections can influence the virome across the three major body sites. Created in BioRender. Rebecca Feletti. (2026) https://BioRender.com/.
Figure 2. Observed virome patterns across infections. Respiratory tract infections often show dynamic fluctuations of Anelloviridae abundance (with levels decreasing ↓ during acute infections and increasing ↑ with disease severity) and greater presence of Adenoviridae, Polyomaviridae and Propionibacterium phages. Intestinal tract infections are typically linked to an increase in Adenoviridae, Astroviridae, Caliciviridae, and Picornaviridae, and a decrease in Microviridae and Caudovirales; notably, Caudovirales are an exception, showing enrichment only during Clostridioides difficile (CD) infection. In the urogenital tract, infections in this area are linked to an increased abundance of Papillomaviridae and Anelloviridae. These observations highlight how infections can influence the virome across the three major body sites. Created in BioRender. Rebecca Feletti. (2026) https://BioRender.com/.
Microorganisms 14 00969 g002
Table 1. Main changes in human virome reported across infectious diseases.
Table 1. Main changes in human virome reported across infectious diseases.
InfectionMain Virome Change ObservedProposed ImplicationReferences
Acute respiratory infections/hospital-acquired pneumoniaReduced viral diversity evolving toward bacteriophage-dominated community followed by eukaryotic virus expansionVirome may reflect inflammatory respiratory tract ecosystem and could be associated with prognosis rather than pathogen identity[52,128]
G. duodenalis infectionEnrichment of bacteriophages targeting ProteobacteriaParasite-driven remodeling of the bacterial microbiome[129]
C. difficile infectionMajor shifts in bacteriophage populationsBacteriophage–bacteria interactions can contribute to persistence and recurrence[130,131,132]
Chronic viral infections (HIV, HBV, HCV, HPV)Expansion of AnelloviridaePotential marker of impaired immune surveillance rather than direct pathogenicity[59,111,112]
Urogenital infection Shift from bacteriophage dominance to pathogenic eukaryotic viruses (e.g., Papillomaviridae) in vaginitis and bacterial vaginosisVirome indicates ecosystem alteration but not etiologic diagnosis; potential for bacteriophage-based therapy[133,134]
Footnote: HIV, Human immunodeficiency virus; HBV, Hepatitis B virus; HCV, Hepatitis C virus; HPV, Human papillomavirus.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Feletti, R.; Mori, A.; Zaffagnini, A.; Castilletti, C.; Pomari, E. The Human Virome in Infectious Diseases: Insights from Chronic and Acute Infections Across Body Sites—A Narrative Review. Microorganisms 2026, 14, 969. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14050969

AMA Style

Feletti R, Mori A, Zaffagnini A, Castilletti C, Pomari E. The Human Virome in Infectious Diseases: Insights from Chronic and Acute Infections Across Body Sites—A Narrative Review. Microorganisms. 2026; 14(5):969. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14050969

Chicago/Turabian Style

Feletti, Rebecca, Antonio Mori, Amina Zaffagnini, Concetta Castilletti, and Elena Pomari. 2026. "The Human Virome in Infectious Diseases: Insights from Chronic and Acute Infections Across Body Sites—A Narrative Review" Microorganisms 14, no. 5: 969. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14050969

APA Style

Feletti, R., Mori, A., Zaffagnini, A., Castilletti, C., & Pomari, E. (2026). The Human Virome in Infectious Diseases: Insights from Chronic and Acute Infections Across Body Sites—A Narrative Review. Microorganisms, 14(5), 969. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14050969

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop