1. Introduction
Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) is an isothermal nucleic acid amplification technology that operates without the need for complex instrumentation and provides high analytical sensitivity. Since its introduction, it has been widely adopted for the detection of bacterial, viral, and parasitic pathogens [
1,
2].
Bacillus stearothermophilus DNA polymerase (
Bst DNA polymerase) is the essential enzyme for LAMP reactions. However, the wild-type enzyme possesses suboptimal thermal stability, limited tolerance to inhibitors, and inadequate sensitivity to low-copy targets, which collectively constrain its broader application [
3].
Efforts to improve the performance of wild-type
Bst DNA polymerase have been reported, and multiple patents have been filed concerning its purification and modification. Representative strategies include polyethylene glycol (PEG) conjugation, mutagenesis guided by fluorescence-activated droplet sorting (FADS) technology, and fusion with heterologous proteins [
3,
4,
5,
6]. Despite these advances, the demand for more effective modification approaches and enzymes with superior functional properties remains unmet. Therefore, novel modification strategies should be systematically explored to enhance the enzyme’s performance, robustness, and applicability in LAMP-based diagnostics. Traditional research on DNA polymerase molecular engineering has primarily relied on three classical strategies: rational design, irrational design, and semi-rational design. Rational design refers to the use of knowledge regarding the structure and functional properties of the target enzyme, combined with computational modeling and simulation frameworks, to predict mutations, insertions, or deletions aimed at improving enzyme performance. This precise modification approach is highly dependent on a comprehensive understanding of protein structure–function relationships and entails a high technical threshold [
7]. Irrational design, by contrast, does not require explicit structural knowledge of the protein. Instead, it simulates natural evolutionary processes to obtain target mutants. However, its major limitation lies in the need to construct a large mutant library [
8]. Semi-rational design provides scientists with a smaller and more intelligent mutant library, making it a cost-effective and time-saving strategy superior to irrational design [
9]. Its limitation is the requirement for accurate structural information, and there remains room for improvement in terms of efficiency and cost [
10]. The shortcomings of these strategies essentially stem from their reliance on traditional computational models or random experimental screening, without fully leveraging the predictive power of deep learning. Therefore, the integration of deep learning technology is expected to overcome the bottlenecks of traditional molecular engineering, enabling the identification of a broader range of enzyme variants and improving both the efficiency and success rate of enzyme modification [
8].
The CL7 protein is a mutant form of the CE7 nuclease (Colicin E7 DNase) that has lost nuclease activity while retaining DNA-binding capability [
11]. CL7 can be utilized as a fusion tag that can significantly enhance the expression level, solubility, and activity of target proteins. Additionally, the CL7 domain can function as a chaperone, facilitating the correct folding of target proteins [
12]. Fusing CL7 to
Taq DNA polymerase improved thermostability, amplification rate, and template sensitivity [
13]. A novel recombinase, FEN1-
Bst DNA polymerase, was developed by Ye et al. [
14], conferring DNA synthesis, strand displacement, and cleavage activity. In previous work, Paik et al. [
15] engineered Br512 by fusing the villin HP47 domain to the
N-terminus of
Bst DNA polymerase, which demonstrated retained thermostability at 72 °C.
Previous studies have improved LAMP performance primarily by optimizing primer design. However, the reaction system conditions (component concentrations and temperature) are also critical: even minor deviations can cause nonspecific amplification or reduced enzyme activity [
4]. Furthermore, different enzymes or targets may require distinct reaction conditions. Notably, little research has focused on optimizing LAMP conditions for crudely extracted samples, which can limit the effectiveness of on-site pathogen detection.
In response to these issues, we combined deep learning with semi-rational design to engineer Bst DNA polymerase. A deep learning model was used for high-throughput screening of candidate sequences, identifying A0A150MFP3 as a promising variant for further engineering. We then applied site-directed mutagenesis and fusion protein techniques to create a CL7-Bst mutant with enhanced enzymatic activity, thermal stability, and inhibitor tolerance relative to the wild-type. Finally, we systematically optimized the LAMP reaction parameters for the mutant enzyme and evaluated its application in foodborne pathogen detection, using Escherichia coli O157:H7 as a representative target, including detection from crudely extracted samples.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Bacterial Strains
Geobacillus stearothermophilus was obtained from the Guangdong Microbial Culture Collection Center (GDMCC). The plasmid pET-28a was supplied by Prof. Junfang Lin at the College of Food Science, South China Agricultural University. Escherichia coli DH5α and Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) were purchased from Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). E. coli O157:H7 ATCC 35150 and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) ATCC 14028 were preserved by the research group.
2.2. Protein Selection
Protein sequences meeting the filtering criteria, including enzyme name, gene type, and protein sequence length, were retrieved from the UniProt database using Python v.3.7.6, and the relevant files were generated. Substrate structural information was obtained from the PubChem compound database using the English name of the substrate, and the corresponding simplified molecular input line entry specification (SMILES) strings were recorded. The retrieved enzyme sequences and substrate information were then subjected to high-throughput
kcat prediction using the DLKcat deep learning tool, which combines a graph neural network (GNN) for substrate representation and a convolutional neural network (CNN) for protein representation. In this model, substrate structures were represented as molecular graphs converted from SMILES strings, while protein sequences were split into overlapping continuous amino acid subsequences composed of
n elements and converted into vectors. The attention mechanism was used to extract and visualize important signals from the neural networks, and model parameters, including the number of vertices in the r-radius substrate subgraph, the feature vector dimension of n-gram amino acids, the number of time steps in the GNN, and the number of layers in the CNN, were optimized using the training dataset. Finally, automated Python scripts were used to batch simulate all protein sequences obtained in step (1) with the substrate and predict the corresponding
kcat values, following the published DLKcat workflow [
16].
2.3. DNA Extraction
Total DNA was extracted as follows: 3 mL of an overnight bacterial culture was centrifuged at 10,000× g rpm for 1 min, and the supernatant was discarded. The pellet was resuspended in 180 μL Lysozyme solution by pipetting and incubated at 37 °C in a metal bath for 30 min. After adding 20 μL Proteinase K with thorough pipette mixing, 250 μL Buffer GB was introduced and mixed similarly, followed by 10 min incubation at 70 °C in a metal bath.
Subsequently, 180 μL absolute ethanol was added with vortex mixing, and the mixture was briefly centrifuged to collect residual liquid from tube walls. The entire solution was transferred to a FastPure gDNA Mini Columns III (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) adsorption column and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 1 min (flow-through discarded). The column was washed with 500 μL Buffer PB (centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 1 min, flow-through discarded), followed by two washes with 600 μL Buffer PW under identical centrifugation conditions. The column was recentrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 2 min in an empty collection tube. Finally, DNA was eluted by applying 50 μL pre-warmed (55 °C) ddH2O to the center of the membrane, incubating at room temperature for 2 min, and centrifuging at 12,000 rpm for 1 min into a sterile 1.5 mL tube. This elution step was repeated once. DNA concentration was measured using NanoDrop One (1 μL aliquot), and the product was stored at −20 °C.
2.4. Vector Construction
DNA fragments (for sequences A0A023CMU9, A9X455, and v5.9; Milligan et al., 2018) [
17] were synthesized by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) and each was ligated into the pET-28a vector. The A0A150MFP3 DNA fragment was amplified with gene-specific primers (
Table S1). The 50 μL PCR mixture was prepared containing 2 μL of DNA, 25 μL of 2× Phanta Flash Master Mix (Dye Plus) (Vazyme, Nanjing, China), 21 μL of ddH
2O, and 1 μL of each primer. Amplification was performed under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min; 30 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 10 s; followed by a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The amplified products were purified using the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). The products were ligated into the pET-28a vector using
EcoR I and
Xho I digestion followed by T4 DNA ligase, and the four vectors were transformed into
E. coli strain BL21.
2.5. Mutant Site Selection
The tertiary structure of A0A150MFP3 DNA polymerase large fragment was predicted using the SWISS-MODEL online server (
https://swissmodel.expasy.org/, accessed on 22 August 2025). Model validation was performed through the SAVES server (
https://saves.mbi.ucla.edu/, accessed on 22 August 2025) and Discovery Studio 4.0. Active sites were predicted via COACH (
https://zhanggroup.org/COACH/, accessed on 22 August 2025) and HotSpot-Wizard (
https://loschmidt.chemi.muni.cz/hotspotwizard/, accessed on 22 August 2025). Alanine scanning (in Discovery Studio) was performed on all residues within 3 Å of the ligand; key mutations with ΔΔG > 0.5 kcal/mol were flagged for further analysis. Saturation mutagenesis was then performed on these critical residues to screen beneficial variants. Twenty mutation hotspots were prioritized based on consensus predictions from COACH and HotSpot-Wizard. Primers for the 20 mutants were designed using the QuikChange Primer Design tool (
https://www.agilent.com/store/primerDesignProgram.jsp, accessed on 22 August 2025). Detailed primer information is provided in
Table S1. The plasmid pET28a-A0A150MFP3 (hereafter referred to as pET28a-
Bst) vector was then transformed into
E. coli strain BL21 and verified by DNA sequencing.
2.6. CL7-Bst Mutant Vector Construction
Coding sequence of CL7 protein derived from E. coli and the sequence of Linker were synthesized by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The CL7-Linker fragment was ligated into the pET-28a vector using BamH I and Sac II digestion followed by T4 DNA ligase. In the pET28a-Bst mutant plasmid, the nucleotide at position 313 of the Bst gene was mutated from thymine (T) to adenine (A).
2.7. Expression and Purification of Bst DNA Polymerases
E. coli strain BL21 carrying the plasmids was cultured in liquid Luria–Bertani (LB) medium with 50 μg/mL kanamycin overnight at 37 °C with shaking. Then 5 mL of culture was added to 1 L of liquid LB medium and incubated to OD600 = 0.6–0.8 at 37 °C with shaking. Then, the culture was subjected to shake-flask fermentation with 0.2 mmol/L isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) overnight at 18 °C with shaking. The cells were then collected via centrifugation at 4000× g for 20 min and stored at −80 °C. The cell pellets were resuspended in 30 mL lysis buffer (containing 50 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 50 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol), then they were sonicated (3 s ON, 5 s OFF, 165 W) for 20 min in an ice bath. The lysate was then centrifuged at 36,000× g for 30 min at 10 °C to obtain a clarified lysate.
Purification of the target protein was performed using nickel affinity chromatography followed by ion exchange chromatography [
6].
Bst DNA polymerases were loaded onto a 1 mL HiTrap
TM Chelating HP column (Cytiva, Hangzhou, China) pre-equilibrated with lysis buffer. Subsequently, the column was washed with 25 mL of lysis buffer. Bound proteins were fractionated through linear gradient elution (50–500 mM imidazole in lysis buffer), with target protein eluting at approximately 100 mM imidazole. Target protein-containing fractions were pooled and loaded onto a 5 mL HiTrap™ Capto™ Q column (Cytiva Hangzhou, China) pre-equilibrated with lysis buffer. A steep NaCl gradient (100 mM to 1 M) in elution buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0; 5% glycerol) was applied, resulting in recombinant protein elution at ~200 mM NaCl.
Eluates containing the enzyme were collected and dialyzed against dialysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM KCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 50% glycerol, pH 8.0) at 4 °C for 12 h. The dialyzed recombinant enzyme was subsequently solubilized in storage buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM KCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 2 mM DTT, 0.15% Triton X-100, 50% glycerol, pH 8.0) at a 1:1 (v/v) ratio and stored at −20 °C. All fractions obtained throughout the purification process were analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Protein concentrations of chimeric Bst DNA polymerases were quantified using a BCA Protein Assay Kit (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China).
2.8. Real-Time LAMP Reaction System
Each 25 μL real-time LAMP reaction contained 2.5 μL of 10× buffer (final: 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.8, 10 mM KCl, 10 mM (NH4)2SO4, 2 mM MgSO4, 0.1% Triton X-100), 0.8 μM each inner primer (FIP, BIP), 0.4 μM each loop primer (LF, LB), 0.2 μM each outer primer (F3, B3), 0.5 μL of additional MgSO4, 3.5 μL of 10 mM dNTP mix, 1 μL of Bst DNA polymerase, 1.25 μL of 10× SYTO-9 fluorescent dye, and 2 μL of DNA template. Reactions were incubated at 64 °C for 40 min on a StepOnePlusTM Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), with fluorescence signals acquired at 1 min intervals to monitor amplification progress. All experiments were performed in triplicate; representative amplification curves are shown.
2.9. Amplification Performance of Bst DNA Polymerases in LAMP Reaction System
Genomic DNA extracted from S. typhimurium ATCC 14028 served as the template. The genomic DNA was isolated using a Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Guangzhou Double Helix Gene Technology Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. LAMP primers targeting the invA gene were designed using PrimerExplorer V5 (Eiken Chemical Co., Tokyo, Japan). Reaction mixtures were subsequently assembled to evaluate enzymatic activity of recombinant proteins in the supernatants of the following expression constructs: pET28a-Bst, pET28a-A9X455, pET28a-A0A023CMU9, and pET28a-v5.9.
2.10. DNA Polymerase Activity Assay
Polymerase activity was determined according to established methodologies [
18] using a CFX96 Touch
TM Real-Time PCR System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The initial fluorescence increase rate was calculated as the slope of fluorescence intensity versus time during the linear amplification phase, which exhibits direct proportionality to enzyme concentration. For samples, the initial fluorescence increase rate of polymerase-catalyzed reactions was measured and converted to enzymatic activity units based on a standard calibration curve.
One unit of DNA polymerase activity is defined as the amount of enzyme required to incorporate 10 nmol of dNTPs into acid-insoluble precipitates within 30 min at 60 °C [
19].
2.11. Optimization of LAMP Reaction System Composition and Concentration
The reaction system was optimized by varying the concentration of the following components: Tris-HCl (10–80 mmol/L), KCl (0–140 mmol/L), (NH4)2SO4 (0–60 mmol/L), Triton X-100 (0.1–0.6%), MgSO4 (4–14 mmol/L), dNTPs (0.4–2.4 mmol/L), and SYBR Green I (0.2×–1×).
2.12. Thermal Stability
The recombinant protein was incubated at 20–90 °C (in 10 °C increments) for 2 h, then immediately cooled on ice. The residual enzyme activity was detected according to the method described in
Section 2.9. The enzyme activity without incubation was set as 100%, then the relative enzyme activity was calculated.
2.13. Determination of the Inhibitor Tolerance
In order to examine the tolerance of CL7-Bst mutant to inhibitors, Real-time LAMP assays were performed in the presence of various potential inhibitors at different concentrations: ethanol (0–8% v/v), SDS (0–0.2‰ w/v), NaCl (0–140 mmol/L), and EDTA (0–1 mmol/L). The tolerance of the CL7-Bst mutant was compared to that of a commercial Bst DNA Polymerase Large Fragment (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) under these conditions.
2.14. Determination of Optimal Concentration of CL7-Bst Mutant Recombinant Protein
Using the reaction system optimized in
Section 2.11, the final concentration of CL7-
Bst mutant recombinant protein was adjusted to 0.08, 0.12, 0.16, 0.20, 0.24, 0.28, and 0.32 U/μL, respectively. Ultrapure water served as the negative control.
2.15. Determination of Optimal Reaction Temperature
Using the previously optimized conditions (
Section 2.11 and
Section 2.14), LAMP reactions were performed at temperatures from 61 °C to 65 °C (1 °C increments). The amplification efficiency at each temperature was measured to determine the optimal reaction temperature for the CL7-
Bst LAMP system.
2.16. Determination of Optimal Reaction pH
Using the previously optimized conditions (
Section 2.11 and
Section 2.14), the reaction pH was varied between 7.0 and 9.5 (in increments of 0.5 pH units). Amplification efficiency was evaluated at each pH to identify the optimal value.
2.17. Application to Pathogen Detection of the CL7-Bst Mutant
In order to confirm the feasibility of CL7-
Bst mutant for practical pathogen detection, the real-time LAMP assay was carried out to evaluate detection efficiency and sensitivity for
E. coli O157:H7. Total DNA of
E. coli O157:H7 was extracted by two methods: a refined extraction (
Section 2.3) and a crude Chelex 100 extraction. Refined extraction was performed as
Section 2.3. Crude extraction using Chelex 100 was performed as follows: A 3 mL aliquot of an overnight
E. coli O157:H7 culture was centrifuged at 12,000×
g rpm for 2 min. The supernatant was discarded and the pellet retained. To the pellet, 200 μL of Chelex 100 (5%
w/
v) and 10 μL Proteinase K (20 mg/mL) were added, followed by incubation at 56 °C for 30 min. The sample was then heated at 99 °C in a metal bath for 10 min. After centrifugation at 13,000×
g rpm for 10 min, the supernatant was collected as template DNA for subsequent detection.
Using the optimized LAMP conditions (from
Section 2.11,
Section 2.12,
Section 2.13,
Section 2.14,
Section 2.15 and
Section 2.16), we compared the detection performance of the CL7-
Bst LAMP assay (primer information in
Table S3) with a standard quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay (primer information in
Table S4) for
E. coli O157:H7. Each 20 μL qPCR reaction contained 10 μL of 2× ChamQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China), 1 μL of forward primer (10 μM), 1 μL of reverse primer (10 μM), 2 μL of DNA template, and 6 μL of ddH
2O. Amplification was performed with an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s, 56 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 40 s. Both crudely extracted DNA and refined DNA at concentrations of 1 × 10
2, 1 × 10
3, 1 × 10
4, 1 × 10
5, and 1 × 10
6 CFU/mL were used as templates, with sterile ultrapure water as the negative control, to investigate the limit of detection (LOD) of the LAMP system.
4. Discussion
The engineering of Bst DNA polymerase with improved catalytic efficiency and robustness is of considerable importance for expanding the practical utility of LAMP-based detection systems. In the present study, we combined deep learning with semi-rational design to engineer Bst DNA polymerase. This workflow enabled the rapid identification of a beneficial mutation and the construction of a CL7-Bst mutant with superior thermostability and inhibitor tolerance. The results highlight the value of combining computational prediction with experimental verification in enzyme engineering, particularly for accelerating the development of polymerases suitable for rapid and on-site molecular diagnostics.
kcat serves as a crucial parameter for understanding an organism’s metabolism, proteome allocation, growth, and physiology [
20,
21]. Using the DLKcat deep learning model, this study predicted the
kcat values of numerous
Geobacillus polymerase sequences. It was previously reported that the
Bst fragment originates from
Geobacillus stearothermophilus GIM1.543 [
22]. The results of this study confirm that A0A150MFP3 is in fact the
Bst large fragment gene from
G. stearothermophilus GIM1.543. Nonetheless, although the DLKcat model has been validated in
E.
coli, yeast, and fungi [
16], certain deviations may occur when applying this model to other species. Therefore, predictions for
Geobacillus enzymes may have larger errors. In this study, the deep learning model was mainly used to narrow the range of candidate enzymes, whereas the final selection still relied on subsequent experimental screening and validation. Although some candidates showed higher predicted
kcat values, they were not successfully obtained under the current expression conditions. We thus proceeded to experimentally validate these candidates rather than relying solely on in silico data.
Isothermal amplification reactions require DNA polymerases to possess strong stability to ensure normal reaction progression. Enhanced thermostability of DNA polymerase correlates with greater reaction sustainability; therefore, investigating the thermostability of DNA polymerases is of significant importance. It has been reported that the wild-type
Bst retains only 80% activity after 2 h at 60 °C, declining to 35% after 2 h at 70 °C [
23]. The CL7-
Bst mutant maintained activity until incubation at 80–90 °C for 2 h, demonstrating significantly enhanced thermostability. However, because fused and unfused forms with and without the L105M substitution were not compared side by side, the respective contributions of the mutation and the fusion partner to the thermal improvement could not be separately evaluated in this study.
Residual substances from food additives, sample preparation, and nucleic acid extraction processes are often found to inhibit nucleic acid amplification reactions. Therefore, the tolerance of DNA polymerases to common inhibitors should be rigorously evaluated. Enhanced inhibitor tolerance is considered to be directly associated with the reliability of on-site detection. During sample preparation and nucleic acid extraction, ethanol residues are commonly observed and have been reported to interfere with amplification reactions [
24]. SDS, as a typical component of lysis buffer, has been shown to significantly reduce amplification efficiency when present as a residual contaminant [
25]. NaCl, frequently used as a food additive in processed foods, is known to suppress amplification reactions at elevated concentrations [
26]. EDTA is commonly employed during nucleic acid extraction to stabilize DNA and prevent degradation [
27]. In this study, these four common inhibitors—ethanol, SDS, NaCl, and EDTA—were selected to evaluate the inhibitor tolerance of the CL7-
Bst mutant during amplification. Our results confirm that the CL7-
Bst mutant has markedly improved tolerance to these inhibitors, which is beneficial for field applications with minimally processed samples. As with thermostability, the improved inhibitor tolerance observed here reflects the overall performance of the engineered construct, and the individual effects of L105M and CL7 were not distinguished.
Besides engineering the enzyme itself, systematic optimization of the LAMP reaction system was also necessary to fully exploit the performance of the CL7-
Bst mutant. Optimization of the LAMP reaction system is primarily achieved through modified primer design [
28]. However, existing optimizations of reaction systems typically rely on empirical adjustments, often without consideration of the potential need for enzyme-specific reaction conditions. In this study, the LAMP reaction system with the CL7-
Bst mutant was systematically optimized by modulating the pH, the concentrations of Tris-HCl, KCl, (NH
4)
2SO
4, Triton X-100, Mg
2+, dNTPs, SYBR Green I, and the CL7-
Bst mutant. Real-time LAMP was used to compare the amplification performance of the engineered polymerase. Compared with conventional endpoint LAMP, real-time LAMP can monitor the amplification process continuously and provide the threshold time (Tt). This makes it more convenient for comparing reaction efficiency under different conditions.
The practical value of the optimized CL7-Bst system was demonstrated using E. coli O157:H7 as a model foodborne pathogen. Under the optimized conditions, the CL7-Bst-based LAMP assay showed lower Tt values than the commercial enzyme for both crude and purified DNA templates, while maintaining a detection limit of 1 × 103 CFU/mL. In addition, the assay could be completed within 40 min, whereas qPCR required more than 60 min. These results indicate that the engineered polymerase and optimized reaction system can improve both speed and sensitivity for pathogen detection, even when crude DNA templates are used. Such performance is particularly valuable for food microbiology, rapid screening, and field-based surveillance, where short turnaround time and simplified operation are highly desirable. At the same time, the commercial comparison in this study was limited, and inclusion of other widely used Bst derivatives would allow a broader evaluation of the practical performance of the engineered enzyme.
Non-specific amplification is a common problem in LAMP assays. In this study, the main focus was on the activity, thermostability, and inhibitor tolerance of the CL7-Bst mutant. The effect of the CL7-Bst mutant on non-specific amplification was not further evaluated. This issue still needs to be investigated in future studies.
Overall, this study demonstrates that combining deep learning and semi-rational design for Bst DNA polymerase engineering, together with reaction system optimization, is an effective strategy for improving the performance of Bst DNA polymerase for microbial detection. The resulting CL7-Bst mutant showed enhanced enzymatic activity, thermostability, and inhibitor tolerance, while the optimized LAMP system enabled rapid and sensitive detection of E. coli O157:H7 from both purified and crude DNA templates. Further work will be helpful to evaluate prediction accuracy within this enzyme family more systematically, to distinguish the effects of the L105M substitution and CL7 fusion more clearly, and to compare the engineered enzyme with a wider range of commercial Bst derivatives. These findings provide not only a promising engineered polymerase for LAMP-based detection of foodborne pathogens, but also a useful framework for the development of robust and field-deployable molecular tools in microbiological diagnostics.