Emergent Candida Species on Healthcare Surfaces: Abiotic Reservoirs as a Source of Invasive Candidiasis
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
4.1. Candida Colonisation and Infection: The Interplay Between Fungal Surface Properties and Adhesins
4.2. Dry Surface Biofilms (DSBs)
4.3. Environmental Survival and Persistence of Candida
| Authors (Year) [Reference] | Assay | Comments | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species | Inoculum | Material (Surface) | Assay Time | ||
| Rangel-Frausto et al. (1994) [75] | C. albicans | 100 µL of 5 × 105 CFU/mL (McFarland 1.0 density suspension) | Sterile plastic lids | 24 h | C. albicans persists on inanimate surfaces for >24 h. Transmission rates from plastic to hands remain high (90%) even 1 h post-inoculation, underscoring significant cross-infection potential. |
| Neely & Orloff (2001) [60] | C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. krusei, C. parapsilosis | 10 µL aliquot containing 104 to 105 CFU | Fabrics: 100% cotton, cotton terry, cotton-polyester blends, polyester, spandex/nylon. Plastics: Polyethylene and polyurethane. | Up to 31 days | C. parapsilosis exhibits significantly prolonged survival (median 30 days) compared to other species (~4 days). Persistence is enhanced on synthetic materials (polyester, plastic) versus natural fibres, implicating these substrates as critical transmission fomites. |
| Traoré et al. (2002) [13] | C. albicans, C. parapsilosis | 10 µL of 109 CFU/mL suspension (containing a soil load) | Non-porous: Glass vials and stainless-steel discs. Porous: 100% cotton and cotton/polyester blend fabrics. Biotic: Human skin (finger pads). | 14 days (surfaces) 60 min (hands) | C. parapsilosis outlasts C. albicans on non-porous surfaces (14 vs. 3 days). Conversely, fabrics facilitate C. albicans survival (up to 14 days), likely due to moisture retention. On hands, viability is maintained for up to 60 min. |
| Weaver et al. (2010) [76] | C. albicans | 20 µL drop containing 2.9 × 107 cells | Copper (C11000) and aluminium coupons | 24 days (576 h) | While C. albicans persists on aluminium (>24 days), copper surfaces exhibit rapid fungicidal activity (eradication within 24 h), mediated by germination inhibition and metabolic disruption. |
| Welsh et al. (2017) [14] | C. auris, C. parapsilosis | 10 µL of 5 × 106 cells/mL suspended in artificial test soil (ATS) | PVC acrylic alloy plastic coupons (Kydex-T) | 28 days | C. auris remains culturable for ≥14 days and metabolically active (esterase activity) for 28 days, indicating entry into a VBNC state. Recovery from complex communities necessitates high-salinity/high-temperature enrichment to prevent false negatives. |
| Piedrahita et al. (2017) [17] | C. auris, C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis | 10 µL containing 106 CFU suspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) | Non-porous steel discs and moist non-nutrient agar sections | 7 days (sampled at 2 h, 1, 2, and 7 days) | Examined species persist for 7 days on both dry and moist surfaces. However, environmental sampling yields significantly higher recovery from moist sites (e.g., sinks), identifying them as primary transmission reservoirs. |
| Biswal et al. (2017) [77] | C. auris | 100 µL of 106 CFU/mL | Hospital linen and blankets | Up to 10 days | C. auris survives on dry hospital linens for up to 7 days, confirming the role of textiles in facilitating rapid pathogen propagation within ICUs. |
| Short et al. (2019) [21] | C. auris (aggregating and single-cell phenotypes), C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis | Standardised cell suspension of 1 × 108 cells/mL | Thermanox™ coverslips | 14 days | The aggregative phenotype significantly enhances survival (>14 days) and tolerance to sodium hypochlorite (1000 ppm) compared to single-celled isolates. Resilience correlates with the upregulation of biofilm-associated genes (adhesion, matrix, efflux). |
| Ledwoch & Maillard (2019) [20] | C. auris (DSM 21092) | 1 mL suspension of 1 × 106 CFU/mL (in organic load) | Stainless steel discs (AISI 430) | 12 days (alternating hydration/desiccation cycles) | C. auris develops resilient Dry Surface Biofilms (DSBs) on stainless steel via sequential hydration/desiccation cycles (12 days), rendering them recalcitrant to standard elimination protocols. |
| Horton et al. (2020) [71] | C. auris, C. albicans | Plastic: 200 µL of 1 × 106 cells/mL Porcine skin: 10 µL of 1 × 107 cells/mL | Polystyrene microtiter plates, coverslips, and ex vivo porcine skin | Up to 14 days | In synthetic sweat, C. auris forms high-burden biofilms (10-fold biomass vs C. albicans) resistant to desiccation. Efficient proliferation in multilayer biofilms on porcine skin elucidates its propensity for cutaneous colonisation and nosocomial spread. |
| Khodadadi et al. (2022) [73] | C. auris, C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, C. glabrata | Solutions of 104 CFU/mL | Sheets of cotton textile, polystyrene, paper, aluminium, glass, latex, and dried Sabouraud dextrose agar | Up to 120 days (sampled at 1, 2, 7, 14, 30, 45, 60, and 120 days) | Latex and polystyrene act as high-risk matrices supporting persistence for up to 30 days. Organic soiling (e.g., dried nutrient residues) extends survival to >120 days, significantly amplifying environmental persistence. |
| Dire et al. (2023) [16] | C. auris (clinical isolates), C. albicans | 100 µL of 106 CFU/mL | Polypropylene plastic, glass, timber wood, cotton fabric, and stainless steel (grade 304) | 21 days (3 weeks) | C. auris survives > 21 days on diverse surfaces, with wet wood uniquely promoting active growth. Intermittent exposure to sub-lethal disinfectant concentrations induces adaptive resistance via efflux pump activation. |
| Akinbobola et al. (2024) [25] | C. auris (aggregating and non-aggregating phenotypes) | Surfaces: 300 µL suspension (in sterile human faecal material) Microbeads: 1 × 106 CFU/mL | HDPE sheets, polyethylene microbeads, glass microbeads, and glass slides | 30 days | Plastic contaminants serve as a novel environmental reservoir, supporting C. auris survival for >30 days in aquatic settings. Transfer from microplastics to beach sand occurs, particularly under moist conditions, posing an emerging public health risk. |
| Ware et al. (2025) [27] | C. auris | 1 × 106 cells/mL standardised in RPMI | Polystyrene microtiter plates and Thermanox coverslips | 12 days (3 cycles of 48 h hydrated/48 h dry conditions) | DSBs develop adaptive tolerance to sodium hypochlorite through repeated exposure cycles. Transcriptomics reveals that upregulation of efflux pumps (CDR1, CDR4) and iron acquisition pathways drives persistence, compromising the efficacy of standard disinfection against mature biofilms. |
4.4. Strategies for Environmental Control and Disinfection
5. Conclusions and Future Perspectives
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| ABC | ATP-binding cassette |
| Als | Agglutinin-like sequence |
| ATS | Artificial test soil |
| DSB | Dry Surface Biofilm |
| HAI | Healthcare-Associated Infections |
| HDPE | High-Density PolyEthylene |
| ICU | Intensive Care Unit |
| MDRA | MultiDrug-Resistance |
| MRSA | Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus |
| NAC | non-Candida albicans |
| PAA | Peracetic acid |
| PBS | Phosphate-buffered saline |
| PVC | Polyvinyl chloride |
| QAC | Quaternary Ammonium Compounds |
| Ra | Roughness Average |
| Scf1 | Surface Colonisation Factor 1 |
| VBNC | Viable But Non-Culturable |
References
- Rice, L.B. Federal Funding for the Study of Antimicrobial Resistance in Nosocomial Pathogens: No ESKAPE. J. Infect. Dis. 2008, 197, 1079–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bongomin, F.; Gago, S.; Oladele, R.O.; Denning, D.W. Global and Multi-National Prevalence of Fungal Diseases-Estimate Precision. J. Fungi 2017, 3, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- World Health Organization. WHO Fungal Priority Pathogens List to Guide Research, Development and Public Health Action; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022.
- Fisher, M.C.; Denning, D.W. The WHO fungal priority pathogens list as a game-changer. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2023, 21, 211–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cortegiani, A.; Misseri, G.; Fasciana, T.; Giammanco, A.; Giarratano, A.; Chowdhary, A. Epidemiology, clinical characteristics, resistance, and treatment of infections by Candida auris. J. Intensive Care 2018, 6, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, Y.; Chew, S.Y.; Than, L.T.L. Candida glabrata: Pathogenicity and Resistance Mechanisms for Adaptation and Survival. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quindós, G.; Marcos-Arias, C.; San-Millán, R.; Mateo, E.; Eraso, E. The continuous changes in the aetiology and epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: From familiar Candida albicans to multiresistant Candida auris. Int. Microbiol. 2018, 21, 107–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takashima, M.; Sugita, T. Taxonomy of Pathogenic Yeasts Candida, Cryptococcus, Malassezia, and Trichosporon. Med. Mycol. J. 2022, 63, 119–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bays, D.J.; Jenkins, E.N.; Lyman, M.; Chiller, T.; Strong, N.; Ostrosky-Zeichner, L.; Hoenigl, M.; Pappas, P.G.; Thompson, G.R. Epidemiology of Invasive Candidiasis. Clin. Epidemiol. 2024, 16, 549–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Satoh, K.; Makimura, K.; Hasumi, Y.; Nishiyama, Y.; Uchida, K.; Yamaguchi, H. Candida auris sp. nov., a novel ascomycetous yeast isolated from the external ear canal of an inpatient in a Japanese hospital. Microbiol. Immunol. 2009, 53, 41–44, Erratum in Microbiol. Immunol. 2018, 62, 205. https://doi.org/10.1111/1348-0421.12568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Omardien, S.; Teska, P. Skin and hard surface disinfection against Candida auris—What we know today. Front. Med. 2024, 11, 1312929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bandara, H.M.H.N.; Samaranayake, L.P. Emerging strategies for environmental decontamination of the nosocomial fungal pathogen Candida auris. J. Med. Microbiol. 2022, 71, 001548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Traoré, O.; Springthorpe, V.S.; Sattar, S.A. A quantitative study of the survival of two species of Candida on porous and non-porous environmental surfaces and hands. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2002, 92, 549–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Welsh, R.M.; Bentz, M.L.; Shams, A.; Houston, H.; Lyons, A.; Rose, L.J.; Litvintseva, A.P. Survival, Persistence, and Isolation of the Emerging Multidrug-Resistant Pathogenic Yeast Candida auris on a Plastic Health Care Surface. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2017, 55, 2996–3005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Prigitano, A.; Perrone, P.M.; Esposto, M.C.; Carnevali, D.; De Nard, F.; Grimoldi, L.; Principi, N.; Cogliati, M.; Castaldi, S.; Romanò, L. ICU environmental surfaces are a reservoir of fungi: Species distribution in northern Italy. J. Hosp. Infect. 2022, 123, 74–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dire, O.; Ahmad, A.; Duze, S.; Patel, M. Survival of Candida auris on environmental surface materials and low-level resistance to disinfectant. J. Hosp. Infect. 2023, 137, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piedrahita, C.T.; Cadnum, J.L.; Jencson, A.L.; Shaikh, A.A.; Ghannoum, M.A.; Donskey, C.J. Environmental Surfaces in Healthcare Facilities are a Potential Source for Transmission of Candida auris and Other Candida Species. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2017, 38, 1107–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramage, G.; Kean, R.; Rautemaa-Richardson, R.; Williams, C.; Lopez-Ribot, J.L. Fungal biofilms in human health and disease. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2025, 23, 355–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malinovská, Z.; Čonková, E.; Váczi, P. Biofilm Formation in Medically Important Candida Species. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ledwoch, K.; Maillard, J. Candida auris Dry Surface Biofilm (DSB) for Disinfectant Efficacy Testing. Materials 2018, 12, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Short, B.; Brown, J.; Delaney, C.; Sherry, L.; Williams, C.; Ramage, G.; Kean, R. Candida auris exhibits resilient biofilm characteristics in vitro: Implications for environmental persistence. J. Hosp. Infect. 2019, 103, 92–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, M.; Xu, L.; Zhang, R.; Zhou, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Su, X.; Shen, C.; Sun, F.; Hashmi, M.Z.; Lin, H.; et al. Viable but Nonculturable State of Yeast Candida sp. Strain LN1 Induced by High Phenol Concentrations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 87, e01110-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De-la-Pinta, I.; Cobos, M.; Ibarretxe, J.; Montoya, E.; Eraso, E.; Guraya, T.; Quindós, G. Effect of biomaterials hydrophobicity and roughness on biofilm development. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2019, 30, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Klotz, S.A.; Drutz, D.J.; Zajic, J.E. Factors governing adherence of Candida species to plastic surfaces. Infect. Immun. 1985, 50, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Akinbobola, A.; Kean, R.; Quilliam, R.S. Plastic pollution as a novel reservoir for the environmental survival of the drug resistant fungal pathogen Candida auris. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2024, 198, 115841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Özmen, B.Ö.; Türkegün Şengül, M.; Özdem, S.; Aldaş, Ş.; Akçalı, M.; Şimşek, H. Healthcare-associated Candida infections in neonates: A clinical perspective on risk and outcome. J. Neonatal Perinat. Med. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ware, A.; Johnston, W.; Delaney, C.; Butcher, M.C.; Ramage, G.; Price, L.; Butcher, J.; Kean, R. Dry Surface Biofilm Formation by Candida auris Facilitates Persistence and Tolerance to Sodium Hypochlorite. APMIS 2025, 133, e70022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quindós, G. Epidemiology of candidaemia and invasive candidiasis. A changing face. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2014, 31, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tanriverdi, E.S.; Yakupogullari, Y.; Duman, Y.; Tekerekoglu, M.S.; Otlu, B. Shift in Candida species causing candidemia: A seven-year study from a university hospital and evaluation of the rise of Candida parapsilosis sensu stricto. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2025, 42, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ponde, N.O.; Lortal, L.; Ramage, G.; Naglik, J.R.; Richardson, J.P. Candida albicans biofilms and polymicrobial interactions. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 47, 91–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giannella, M.; Lanternier, F.; Dellière, S.; Groll, A.H.; Mueller, N.J.; Alastruey-Izquierdo, A.; Slavin, M.A.; ECCMID Study Groups on Invasive Fungal Infection and Infection in Immunocompromised Hosts. Invasive fungal disease in the immunocompromised host: Changing epidemiology, new antifungal therapies, and management challenges. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2025, 31, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garcia-Bustos, V.; Cabañero-Navalon, M.D.; Ruiz-Gaitán, A.; Salavert, M.; Tormo-Mas, M.Á.; Pemán, J. Climate change, animals, and Candida auris: Insights into the ecological niche of a new species from a One Health approach. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2023, 29, 858–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Denning, D.W. Global incidence and mortality of severe fungal disease. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2024, 24, e428–e438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Arendrup, M.C.; Arikan-Akdagli, S.; Jørgensen, K.M.; Barac, A.; Steinmann, J.ö.; Toscano, C.; Arsenijevic, V.A.; Sartor, A.; Lass-Flörl, C.; Hamprecht, A.; et al. European candidaemia is characterised by notable differential epidemiology and susceptibility pattern: Results from the ECMM Candida III study. J. Infect. 2023, 87, 428–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pemán, J.; Cantón, E.; Quindós, G.; Eraso, E.; Alcoba, J.; Guinea, J.; Merino, P.; Ruiz-Pérez-de-Pipaon, M.T.; Pérez-del-Molino, L.; Linares-Sicilia, M.J.; et al. Epidemiology, species distribution and in vitro antifungal susceptibility of fungaemia in a Spanish multicentre prospective survey. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2012, 67, 1181–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lortholary, O.; Renaudat, C.; Sitbon, K.; Madec, Y.; Denoeud-Ndam, L.; Wolff, M.; Fontanet, A.; Bretagne, S.; Dromer, F.; French Mycosis Study Group. Worrisome trends in incidence and mortality of candidemia in intensive care units (Paris area, 2002-2010). Intensive Care Med. 2014, 40, 1303–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pfaller, M.A.; Diekema, D.J. Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: A persistent public health problem. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2007, 20, 133–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jenkins, E.N.; Gold, J.A.; Benedict, K.; Lockhart, S.R. Population-Based Active Surveillance for Culture-Confirmed Candidemia—10 Sites, United States, 2017–2021. MMWR Surveill. Summ. 2025, 74, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puig-Asensio, M.; Ruiz-Camps, I.; Fernández-Ruiz, M.; Aguado, J.M.; Muñoz, P.; Valerio, M.; Delgado-Iribarren, A.; Merino, P.; Bereciartua, E.; Fortún, J.; et al. Epidemiology and outcome of candidaemia in patients with oncological and haematological malignancies: Results from a population-based surveillance in Spain. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2015, 21, 491.e1–491.10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Díaz-García, J.; Marina, M.; Alcalá, L.; Elena, R.; Pérez-Ayala, A.; de la Pedrosa, E.G.-G.; Gónzalez-Romo, F.; Cuétara, M.S.; García-Esteban, C.; Quiles-Melero, I.; et al. Trends in antifungal resistance in Candida from a multicenter study conducted in Madrid (CANDIMAD study): Fluconazole-resistant C. parapsilosis spreading has gained traction in 2022. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2023, 67, 986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schroeder, M.; Weber, T.; Denker, T.; Winterland, S.; Wichmann, D.; Rohde, H.; Ozga, A.; Fischer, M.; Kluge, S. Epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and outcome of candidemia in critically ill patients in Germany: A single-center retrospective 10-year analysis. Ann. Intensive Care 2020, 10, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meyer, E.; Geffers, C.; Gastmeier, P.; Schwab, F. No increase in primary nosocomial candidemia in 682 German intensive care units during 2006 to 2011. Eur. Surveill. 2013, 18, 20505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nationales Referenzzentrum für Surveillance von nosokomialen Infektionen. Modul ITS-KISS: Referenzdaten Januar 2019 bis Dezember 2023; Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin: Berlin, Germany, 2024; pp. 1–5.
- UK Health Security Agency. Laboratory Surveillance of Fungaemia Due to Yeasts in England: 2024; Health Protection Report; UK Health Security Agency: London, UK, 2025; Volume 19, pp. 1–21.
- Bretagne, S.; Sitbon, K.; Desnos-Ollivier, M.; Garcia-Hermoso, D.; Letscher-Bru, V.; Cassaing, S.; Millon, L.; Morio, F.; Gangneux, J.; Hasseine, L.; et al. Active Surveillance Program to Increase Awareness on Invasive Fungal Diseases: The French RESSIF Network (2012 to 2018). mBio 2022, 13, e00920-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hesstvedt, L.; Gaustad, P.; Andersen, C.T.; Haarr, E.; Hannula, R.; Haukland, H.H.; Hermansen, N.; Larssen, K.W.; Mylvaganam, H.; Ranheim, T.E.; et al. Twenty-two years of candidaemia surveillance: Results from a Norwegian national study. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2015, 21, 938–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Simonsen, G.S.; Blix, H.S.; Helgesen, K.O.; Urdahl, A.M. NORM/NORM-VET 2024: Usage of Antimicrobial Agents and Occurrence of Antimicrobial Resistance in Norway; Norwegian Institute of Public Health & Norwegian Veterinary Institute: Arboretveien, Sweden, 2025; pp. 1–161. [Google Scholar]
- Lass-Flörl, C.; Kanj, S.S.; Govender, N.P.; Thompson, G.R., 3rd; Ostrosky-Zeichner, L.; Govrins, M.A. Invasive candidiasis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2024, 10, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Meneghello, S.; Bernabè, G.; Di Pietra, G.; Di Sopra, S.; Del Vecchio, C.; Cattelan, A.M.; Castagliuolo, I.; Brun, P. Prevalence, Species Distribution and Resistance of Candidemia in Pediatric and Adult Patients in a Northeast Italy University Hospital. J. Fungi 2024, 10, 707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Busscher, H.J.; Rinastiti, M.; Siswomihardjo, W.; van der Mei, H.C. Biofilm formation on dental restorative and implant materials. J. Dent. Res. 2010, 89, 657–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramage, G.; Rajendran, R.; Sherry, L.; Williams, C. Fungal biofilm resistance. Int. J. Microbiol. 2012, 2012, 528521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoyer, L.L.; Cota, E. Candida albicans Agglutinin-Like Sequence (Als) Family Vignettes: A Review of Als Protein Structure and Function. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wächtler, B.; Citiulo, F.; Jablonowski, N.; Förster, S.; Dalle, F.; Schaller, M.; Wilson, D.; Hube, B. Candida albicans-epithelial interactions: Dissecting the roles of active penetration, induced endocytosis and host factors on the infection process. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e36952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kean, R.; Brown, J.; Gulmez, D.; Ware, A.; Ramage, G. Candida auris: A Decade of Understanding of an Enigmatic Pathogenic Yeast. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eguia, A.; Arakistain, A.; De-la-Pinta, I.; López-Vicente, J.; Sevillano, E.; Quindós, G.; Eraso, E. Candida albicans biofilms on different materials for manufacturing implant abutments and prostheses. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal 2020, 25, e13–e20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Absolom, D.R.; Lamberti, F.V.; Policova, Z.; Zingg, W.; van Oss, C.J.; Neumann, A.W. Surface thermodynamics of bacterial adhesion. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1983, 46, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Van Oss, C.J. Interfacial Forces in Aqueous Media, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- de Groot, P.W.J.; Bader, O.; de Boer, A.D.; Weig, M.; Chauhan, N. Adhesins in human fungal pathogens: Glue with plenty of stick. Eukaryot. Cell 2013, 12, 470–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klis, F.M.; Mol, P.; Hellingwerf, K.; Brul, S. Dynamics of cell wall structure in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2002, 26, 239–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neely, A.N.; Orloff, M.M. Survival of some medically important fungi on hospital fabrics and plastics. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2001, 39, 3360–3361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panagoda, G.J.; Samaranayake, L.P. The relationship between the cell length, adhesion to acrylic and relative cell surface hydrophobicity of Candida parapsilosis. Med. Mycol. 1998, 36, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santana, D.J.; Anku, J.A.E.; Zhao, G.; Zarnowski, R.; Johnson, C.J.; Hautau, H.; Visser, N.D.; Ibrahim, A.S.; Andes, D.; Nett, J.E.; et al. A Candida auris-specific adhesin, Scf1, governs surface association, colonization, and virulence. Science 2023, 381, 1461–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bing, J.; Guan, Z.; Zheng, T.; Zhang, Z.; Fan, S.; Ennis, C.L.; Nobile, C.J.; Huang, G. Clinical isolates of Candida auris with enhanced adherence and biofilm formation due to genomic amplification of ALS4. PLoS Pathog. 2023, 19, e1011239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borman, A.M.; Szekely, A.; Johnson, E.M. Comparative Pathogenicity of United Kingdom Isolates of the Emerging Pathogen Candida auris and Other Key Pathogenic Candida Species. mSphere 2016, 1, e00189-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sherry, L.; Ramage, G.; Kean, R.; Borman, A.; Johnson, E.M.; Richardson, M.D.; Rautemaa-Richardson, R. Biofilm-Forming Capability of Highly Virulent, Multidrug-Resistant Candida auris. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2017, 23, 328–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kean, R.; McKloud, E.; Townsend, E.M.; Sherry, L.; Delaney, C.; Jones, B.L.; Williams, C.; Ramage, G. The comparative efficacy of antiseptics against Candida auris biofilms. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2018, 52, 673–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Busscher, H.J.; van der Mei, H.C. How do bacteria know they are on a surface and regulate their response to an adhering state? PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8, e1002440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Quirynen, M.; Bollen, C.M.L. The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man. J. Clin. Periodontol. 1995, 22, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Topaloğlu, O.; Gurbuz, A.; Murat, S. Influence of Surface Properties on Candida albicans Adhesion to Denture Base Materials Fabricated by Different Techniques. Cumhur. Dent. J. 2025, 28, 427–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryu, H.S.; Lee, E.; Kwon, H.; Lim, Y.; Lee, S.; Kim, M. The effects of fabrication methods and build orientation on Candida albicans adhesion on 3D-printed and conventional denture resin: An in vitro comparative study. BMC Oral Health 2025, 25, 1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horton, M.V.; Johnson, C.J.; Kernien, J.F.; Patel, T.D.; Lam, B.C.; Cheong, J.Z.A.; Meudt, J.J.; Shanmuganayagam, D.; Kalan, L.R.; Nett, J.E. Candida auris Forms High-Burden Biofilms in Skin Niche Conditions and on Porcine Skin. mSphere 2020, 5, e00910-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dixit, S.; Varshney, S.; Gupta, D.; Sharma, S. Textiles as fomites in the healthcare system. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2023, 107, 3887–3897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khodadadi, H.; Taghizadeh, M.; Zomorodian, K.; Nasr, R.; Hosseinpour, S. P358 Candida auris survival on common medical supply surfaces under different environmental conditions. Med. Mycol. 2022, 60, myac072P358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kramer, A.; Lexow, F.; Bludau, A.; Köster, A.M.; Misailovski, M.; Seifert, U.; Eggers, M.; Rutala, W.; Dancer, S.J.; Scheithauer, S. How long do bacteria, fungi, protozoa, and viruses retain their replication capacity on inanimate surfaces? A systematic review examining environmental resilience versus healthcare-associated infection risk by “fomite-borne risk assessment”. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2024, 37, e00186-23, Erratum in Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2025, 38, e0012925. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00129-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rangel-Frausto, M.S.; Houston, A.K.; Bale, M.J.; Fu, C.; Wenzel, R.P. An experimental model for study of Candida survival and transmission in human volunteers. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 1994, 13, 590–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weaver, L.; Michels, H.T.; Keevil, C.W. Potential for preventing spread of fungi in air-conditioning systems constructed using copper instead of aluminium. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 50, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biswal, M.; Rudramurthy, S.M.; Jain, N.; Shamanth, A.S.; Sharma, D.; Jain, K.; Yaddanapudi, L.N.; Chakrabarti, A. Controlling a possible outbreak of Candida auris infection: Lessons learnt from multiple interventions. J. Hosp. Infect. 2017, 97, 363–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cadnum, J.L.; Shaikh, A.A.; Piedrahita, C.T.; Sankar, T.; Jencson, A.L.; Larkin, E.L.; Ghannoum, M.A.; Donskey, C.J. Effectiveness of Disinfectants Against Candida auris and Other Candida Species. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2017, 38, 1240–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Norville, P.; Dangleben, S.; Hardy, S. Biofilms and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare: Evaluating chlorine dioxide as a candidate to protect patient safety. J. Hosp. Infect. 2025, 162, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guridi, A.; Sevillano, E.; de la Fuente, I.; Mateo, E.; Eraso, E.; Quindós, G. Disinfectant Activity of A Portable Ultraviolet C Equipment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]


Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
De-la-Pinta, I.; Marcos-Arias, C.; Sevillano, E.; Eraso, E.; Quindós, G. Emergent Candida Species on Healthcare Surfaces: Abiotic Reservoirs as a Source of Invasive Candidiasis. Microorganisms 2026, 14, 367. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14020367
De-la-Pinta I, Marcos-Arias C, Sevillano E, Eraso E, Quindós G. Emergent Candida Species on Healthcare Surfaces: Abiotic Reservoirs as a Source of Invasive Candidiasis. Microorganisms. 2026; 14(2):367. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14020367
Chicago/Turabian StyleDe-la-Pinta, Iker, Cristina Marcos-Arias, Elena Sevillano, Elena Eraso, and Guillermo Quindós. 2026. "Emergent Candida Species on Healthcare Surfaces: Abiotic Reservoirs as a Source of Invasive Candidiasis" Microorganisms 14, no. 2: 367. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14020367
APA StyleDe-la-Pinta, I., Marcos-Arias, C., Sevillano, E., Eraso, E., & Quindós, G. (2026). Emergent Candida Species on Healthcare Surfaces: Abiotic Reservoirs as a Source of Invasive Candidiasis. Microorganisms, 14(2), 367. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14020367

