Probiotic Properties In Vitro of Bacillus velezensis FJAT-57093 with Antibacterial Activity Against the Aquatic Pathogen Aeromonas hydrophila
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Strains, Culture Conditions, and Reagents
2.2. Screening of Antibacterial Bacillus-like Strains Against A. hydrophila
2.3. Genome Sequencing and Analyses of B. velezensis FJAT-57093
2.4. Extraction and Activity Assessment of FJAT-57093 Antibacterial Compounds
2.5. Hemolytic Activity Assay
2.6. Antibiotic Susceptibility Tests
2.7. Anti-Pathogen Spectrum Tests
2.8. Assessment of Bile Salt Tolerance
2.9. Assessment of Gastric and Intestinal Fluid Tolerance
2.10. Determination of Aggregation Ability
2.11. Determination of Antioxidant Activity
2.12. Determination of Digestive Enzyme-Producing Ability
2.13. Data Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Screening of Probiotic Candidates with Antibacterial Activities Against A. hydrophila
3.2. Genomic Analyses of the Strain B. velezensis FJAT-57093
3.3. Hemolytic Activity of the Strain FJAT-57093
3.4. Antibiotic Susceptibilities of the Strain FJAT-57093
3.5. Anti-Pathogen Spectra of the Strain FJAT-57093
3.6. Bile Salt Tolerance of the Strain FJAT-57093
3.7. Gastric and Intestinal Fluid Tolerance of the Strain FJAT-57093
3.8. Aggregation Ability of the Strain FJAT-57093
3.9. Antioxidant Activity of the Strain FJAT-57093
3.10. Extracellular Digestive Enzyme-Producing Ability of the Strain FJAT-57093
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Golden, C.D.; Koehn, J.Z.; Shepon, A.; Passarelli, S.; Free, C.M.; Viana, D.F.; Matthey, H.; Eurich, J.G.; Gephart, J.A.; Fluet-Chouinard, E.; et al. Aquatic foods to nourish nations. Nature 2021, 598, 315–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, R.; Li, J.; Jiang, C.; Yu, Y.; Li, D.D.; Xie, X.H.; Lei, Y.; Yao, L.G. Antibacterial activity of baicalein against Aeromonas hydrophila: In vitro and in vivo evaluation. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1615029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, X.; Lin, Y.; Wang, Y.; Qin, L.; Liu, S.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, X.; Li, Y. Antibacterial mechanisms of PLA on Aeromonas hydrophila and its application in fish disease resistance and fish preservation. Food Biosci. 2025, 65, 106064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, H.C.; Wang, M.; Qianv, W.; Xu, T.T.; Du, Y.H.; Li, H.Y.; Qian, C.Q.; Yin, Z.Q.; Wang, L.; Yi, W.; et al. Identifying genetic diversity of O antigens in Aeromonas hydrophila for molecular serotype detection. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0203445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abdella, B.; Shokrak, M.N.; Abozahra, A.N.; Elshamy, Y.M.; Kadira, H.I.; Mohamed, R.A. Aquaculture and Aeromonas hydrophila: A complex interplay of environmental factors and virulence. Aquac. Int. 2024, 32, 7671–7681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kavitha, M.; Raja, M.; Perumal, P. Evaluation of probiotic potential of Bacillus spp. isolated from the digestive tract of freshwater fish Labeo calbasu (Hamilton, 1822). Aquac. Rep. 2018, 11, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, S.; Kaur, H.; Kaur, B.; Kumar, B.T.N.; Tyagi, A.; Singh, P.; Tanuj; Dubey, S.; Munang’andu, H.M. Isolating pathogenic multidrug-resistant Aeromonas hydrophila from diseased fish and assessing the effectiveness of a novel lytic Aeromonas veronii bacteriophage (AVP3) for biocontrol. Microb. Pathog. 2024, 196, 106914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hrabar, J.; Babić, I.; Jozić, S.; Trumbić, Ž.; Pioppi, A.; Nielsen, L.J.D.; Maravić, A.; Tomašević, T.; Kovacs, Á.T.; Mladineo, I. Prospecting microbiota of Adriatic fish: Bacillus velezensis as a potential probiotic candidate. Anim. Microbiome 2025, 7, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kong, Y.D.; Li, M.; Li, R.M.; Shan, X.; Wang, G. Evaluation of cholesterol lowering property and antibacterial activity of two potential lactic acid bacteria isolated from the intestine of snakehead fish (Channa argus). Aquac. Rep. 2020, 17, 100342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, X.L.; Chen, Y.Y.; Feng, J.C.; Huang, M.; Zhang, J. Amelioration of Cd-induced bioaccumulation, oxidative stress and immune damage by probiotic Bacillus coagulans in common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Aquac. Rep. 2021, 20, 100678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.; Jeon, H.; Han, H.S.; Hur, J.W. Evaluation of Bacillus albus SMG-1 and B. safensis SMG-2 isolated from Saemangeum Lake as probiotics for aquaculture of white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Aquac. Rep. 2021, 20, 100743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghalwash, H.R.; Salah, A.S.; El-Nokrashy, A.M.; Abozeid, A.M.; Zaki, V.H.; Mohamed, R.A. Dietary supplementation with Bacillus species improves growth, intestinal histomorphology, innate immunity, antioxidative status and expression of growth and appetite-regulating genes of Nile tilapia fingerlings. Aquac. Rep. 2021, 53, 1378–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, X.R.; Zhou, W.J.; Lu, X.C.; Cao, C.Y.; Sheng, D.; Ren, X.; Jin, N.L.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, Z.X.; Cao, S.N.; et al. Screening of antagonistic bacteria against three aquatic pathogens and characterization of lipopeptides in Bacillus cereus BA09. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024, 34, 2023–2032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, J.; Li, C.; Chen, Z.; Guo, F.; Dou, J.; Wang, T.; Xu, Z.S. Progress of research and application of Heyndrickxia coagulans (Bacillus coagulans) as probiotic bacteria. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2024, 14, 1415790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- James, G.; Radhakrishnan, V.; Jamal, M.J.; Prasannan-Geetha, P.; Pillai, D.; Vattiringal Jayadradhan, R.K. Exploring the probiotic potential of B.cereus and B. velezensis associated with mangrove sediments in aquaculture. Discov. Ocean. 2025, 2, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, M.; Devi, W.M.; Choudhury, T.G.; Kamilya, D.; Monsang, S.J.; Irungbam, S.; Saha, R.K. Unraveling the bioactivities and immunomodulatory potential of postbiotics derived from Bacillus subtilis and B. amyloliquefaciens for aquaculture. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2025, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shivani, D.G.; Ganapathi, N.M.; Amogha, K.R.; Dheeraj, S.B.; Jaya, N.; Girisha, S.K.; Manjappa, N.; Lakshmipathi, M.T. Probiotic potential of dietary Bacillus amyloliquefaciens in enhancing health parameters of amur common carp (Cyprinus carpio haematopterus). J. Adv. Biol. Biotechnol. 2025, 28, 1041–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Villegas-Escobar, V.; Gonzalez-Jaramillo, L.M.; Ramırez, M.; Moncada, R.N.; Sierra-Zapata, L.; Orduz, S.; RomeroTabarez, M. Lipopeptides from Bacillus sp. EACB0959: Active metabolites responsible for in vitro and in vivo control of Ralstonia solanacearum. Biol. Control 2018, 125, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oluwajoba, S.O.; Akinyosoye, F.A.; Oyetayo, V.O. In vitro screening and selection of probiotic lactic acid bacteria isolated from spontaneously fermenting kunu-zaki. Adv. Microbiol. 2013, 3, 309–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, H.; Shi, C.P.; Liu, L.M.; Han, J.C.; Yang, Q.Q.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.D.; Fu, W.Y.; Gao, H.; Huang, H.S.; et al. Majorbio Cloud Update single-cell and multiomics workflows. iMeta 2024, 3, e217. [Google Scholar]
- Yoon, S.H.; Ha, S.M.; Lim, J.M.; Kwon, S.J.; Chun, J.A. Large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2017, 110, 1281–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.; Oh, H.S.; Park, S.C.; Chun, J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2014, 64, 346–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, B.; Zheng, D.; Zhou, S.; Chen, L.; Yang, J. VFDB 2022: A general classification scheme for bacterial virulence factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50, D912–D917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alcock, B.P.; Huynh, W.; Chalil, R.; Smith, K.W.; Raphenya, A.R.; Wlodarski, M.A.; Edalatmand, A.; Petkau, A.; Syed, S.A.; Tsang, K.K.; et al. CARD 2023: Expanded curation, support for machine learning, and resistome prediction at the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, D690–D699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bu, C.F.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, F.N.; Liang, W.H.; Gao, H.; Zhao, J.; Lv, F.M.; Xue, R.K.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, Z.W.; et al. PGAP2: A comprehensive toolkit for prokaryotic pan-genome analysis based on fine-grained feature networks. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 9865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blin, K.; Shaw, S.; Augustijn, H.E.; Reitz, Z.L.; Biermann, F.; Alanjary, M.; Fetter, A.; Terlouw, B.R.; Metcalf, W.W.; Helfrich, E.J.N.; et al. AntiSMASH 7.0: New and improved predictions for detection, regulation, chemical structures and visualisation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, W46–W50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, M.C.; Wang, J.P.; Zhu, Y.J.; Liu, B.; Yang, W.J.; Ruan, C.Q. Antibacterial activity against Ralstonia solanacearum of the lipopeptides secreted from the Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain FJAT-2349. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 126, 1519–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, J.; Sun, H.Y.; Cho, K.W.; Oh, S.J.; Kim, S.; Chun, T.; Kim, B.; Whang, K.Y. Evaluation of probiotic characteristics of newly isolated Lactobacillus spp.: Immune modulation and longevity. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 148, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Argyri, A.A.; Zoumpopoulou, G.; Karatzas, G.K.; Tsakalidou, E.; Nychas, G.J.; Panagou, E.Z.; Tassou, C.C. Selection of potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria from fermented olives by in vitro tests. Food Microbiol. 2013, 33, 282–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahire, J.J.; Patil, P.K.; Chaudhari, L.B.; Chincholkar, S.B. A potential probiotic culture ST2 produces siderophore 2,3-dihydroxybenzoylserine under intestinal conditions. Food Chem. 2011, 127, 387–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jang, W.J.; Hasan, M.T.; Lee, G.H.; Lee, B.J.; Kong, I.S. Comparison of spore or vegetative Bacillus sp. supplementation on physiological changes and gut microbiota of the olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). Aquaculture 2021, 535, 736355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Z.; Wang, J.C.; Yan, L.Y.; Chen, W.; Liu, X.M.; Zhang, H.P. In vitro comparison of probiotic properties of Lactobacillus casei Zhang, a potential new probiotic, with selected probiotic strains. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 42, 1640–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, S.; Mohanty, U.; Majumdar, R.K. Isolation and characterization of lactic acid bacteria from traditional fermented fish product Shidal of India with reference to their probiotic potential. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 146, 111641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, S.; Dong, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, H. Screening of potential probiotic properties of Lactobacillus fermentum isolated from traditional dairy products. Food Control 2010, 21, 695–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giri, S.S.; Jun, J.W.; Yun, S.; Kim, H.J.; Kim, S.G.; Kang, J.W.; Kim, S.W.; Han, S.J.; Park, S.C.; Sukumaran, V. Characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from the gut of Cyprinus carpio that may be effective against lead toxicity. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2019, 11, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Modasiya, I.; Mori, P.; Maniya, H.; Chauhan, M.; Grover, C.R.; Kumar, V.; Sarkar, A.K. In vitro screening of bacterial isolates from dairy products for probiotic properties and other health-promoting attributes. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024, 12, 10756–10769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uyar, F.; Porsuk, I.; Kizil, G.; Yilmaz, E.I. Optimal conditions for production of extracellular protease from newly isolated Bacillus cereus strain CA15. EurAsian J. Biosci. 2011, 5, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nair, A.V.; Vijayan, K.K.; Chakraborty, K.; Antony, M.L. Diversity and characterization of antagonistic bacteria from tropical estuarine habitats of Cochin, India for fish health management. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 28, 2581–2592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nashad, M.; Mujeeb-Rahiman, K.M.; Ajin, A.M.; Mohamed-Hatha, A.A. Probiotic potential of gut associated bacteria from indigenous fresh water ornamental fishes of kerala, south India. Int. J. Aquac. 2015, 5, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evangelista, A.G.; de Melo, N.T.; Luz, C.; Dopazo, V.; Moreno, A.; Riolo, M.; Meca, G.; Luciano, F.B. The probiotic potential and metabolite characterization of bioprotective Bacillus and Streptomyces for applications in animal production. Animals 2024, 14, 388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nabila, M.; Krishnan, K. Streptomyces sp. Vitnk9 derived compound against fish bacterial pathogens. Biomed. Biotechnol. Res. 2022, 6, 494–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adlin Jenifer, J.S.C.; Selva Donio, M.B.; Michaelbabu, M.; Vincent, S.G.P.; Citarasu, T. Haloalkaliphilic Streptomyces spp. AJ8 isolated from solar salt works and its’ pharmacological potential. AMB Express 2015, 5, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aini, N.; Putri, R.Y.S.D.; Achhlam, H.D.; Fatimah, F.; Andriyono, S.; Hariani, D.; Do, H.D.K.; Wahyuningsih, S.P.A. Supplementation of Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacillus casei to increase growth performance and immune system of catfish (Clarias gariepinus) due to Aeromonas hydrophila infection. Vet. World 2024, 17, 602–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tilwani, Y.M.; Sivagnanavelmurugan, M.; Lakra, A.K.; Jha, N.; Arul, V. Enhancement of growth, innate immunity, and disease resistance by probiotic Enterococcus faecium MC-5 against Aeromonas hydrophila in Indian major carp Cirrhinus mrigala. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2022, 253, 110503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.H.; Luo, L.J.; Yang, Q.L.; Zhang, W.; Tang, X.; Yu, X.; Wu, Z. Bacillus methylotrophicus WM-1 enhances the immunity of grass carp against Aeromonas hydrophila. Aquac. Res. 2022, 53, 2464–2471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sam-On, M.F.S.; Mustafa, S.; Yusof, M.T.; Hashim, A.M.; Abbasiliasi, S.; Zulkifly, S.; Jahari, M.A.; Roslan, M.A.H. Evaluation of three Bacillus spp. isolated from the gut of giant freshwater prawn as potential probiotics against pathogens causing Vibriosis and Aeromonosis. Microb. Pathog. 2022, 164, 105417–105428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, M.R.; Su, X.; Yun, L.L.; Shen, Y.H.; Feng, J.C.H. Evaluation of probiotic characteristics and whole genome analysis of Bacillus velezensis R-71003 isolated from the intestine of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) for its use as a probiotic in aquaculture. Aquac. Rep. 2022, 25, 101254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elshaghabee, F.M.F.; Rokana, N.; Gulhane, D.R.; Sharma, C.; Panwar, H. Bacillus as potential probiotics: Status, concerns, and future perspectives. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuebutornye, F.K.A.; Lu, Y.S.; Abarike, E.D.; Wang, Z.W.; Li, Y.; Sakyi, M.E. In vitro assessment of the probiotic characteristics of three Bacillus species from the gut of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2020, 12, 412–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yasmin, I.; Saeed, M.; Khan, A.W.; Khaliq, A.; Chughtai, M.F.J.; Iqbal, R.; Tehseen, S.; Naz, S.; Liaqat, A.; Mehmood, T.; et al. In vitro probiotic potential and safety evaluation (hemolytic, cytotoxic activity) of bifidobacterium strains isolated from raw camel milk. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amoah, K.; Dong, X.H.; Tan, B.P.; Zhang, S.; Kuebutornye, F.K.A.; Chi, S.Y.; Yang, Q.H.; Liu, H.Y.; Zhang, H.T.; Yang, Y.Z. In vitro assessment of the safety and potential probiotic characteristics of three Bacillus strains isolated from the intestine of hybrid grouper (Epinephelus fuscoguttatus♀ × Epinephelus lanceolatus♂). Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 675962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaktcham, P.M.; Temgoua, J.B.; Zambou, F.N.; Diaz-Ruiz, G.; Wacher, C.; Pérez-Chabela, M.L. In vitro evaluation of the probiotic and safety properties of bacteriocinogenic and non-bacteriocinogenic lactic acid bacteria from the intestines of Nile tilapia and common carp for their use as probiotics in aquaculture. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2018, 10, 98–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Y.Y.; Zhang, H.P.; Zhang, L.; Liu, W.J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.C.; Sun, T.S. In vitro assessment of probiotic properties of Bacillus isolated from naturally fermented congee from Inner Mongolia of China. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 26, 1369–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amin, F.A.Z.; Sabri, S.; Ismail, M.; Chan, K.W.; Ismail, N.; Esa, N.M.; Lila, M.A.M.; Zawawi, N. Probiotic properties of bacillus strains isolated from stingless bee (heterotrigona itama) honey collected across malaysia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 17, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, D.H. Gut microbiota-mediated pharmacokinetics of ginseng saponins. J. Ginseng. Res. 2018, 42, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shinde, T.; Vemuri, R.; Shastri, D.M.; Perera, A.P.; Tristram, S.; Stanley, R.; Eri, R. Probiotic Bacillus coagulans MTCC 5856 spores exhibit excellent in-vitro functional efficacy in simulated gastric survival, mucosal adhesion and immunomodulation. J. Funct. Foods 2019, 52, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, M.; Liu, G.B.; Lu, M.X.; Ke, X.L.; Liu, Z.G.; Gao, F.Y.; Cao, J.M.; Zhu, H.P.; Yi, M.M.; Yu, D.G. Effect of Bacillus cereus as a water or feed additive on the gut microbiota and immunological parameters of Nile tilapia. Aquac. Rep. 2017, 48, 3163–3173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuebutornye, K.F.A.; Abarike, E.D.; Lu, Y.S. A review on the application of Bacillus as probiotics in aquaculture. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019, 87, 820–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.I.R.; Choudhury, T.G.; Kamilya, D.; Monsang, S.J.; Parhi, J. Characterization of Bacillus spp. isolated from intestine of Labeo rohita: Towards identifying novel probiotics for aquaculture. Aquac. Rep. 2021, 52, 822–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.X.; Huang, M.Y.; Feng, J.C.; Chen, Y.; Chang, X. Effects of dietary Bacillus licheniformis on growth performance, intestinal morphology, intestinal microbiome, and disease resistance in common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Aquac. Int. 2021, 29, 1343–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ray, A.; Ghosh, K.; Ring, E. Enzyme-producing bacteria isolated from fish gut: A review. Aquac. Nutr. 2012, 18, 465–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- NavinChandran, M.; Iyapparaj, P.; Moovendhan, S.; Ramasubburayan, R.; Prakash, S.; Immanuel, G.; Palavesam, A. Influence of probiotic bacterium Bacillus cereus isolated from the gut of wild shrimp Penaeus monodon in turn as a potent growth promoter and immune enhancer in P. monodon. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2014, 36, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, J.C.; Zhang, D.F.; Wang, Y.J.; Liu, Z.J.; Liu, L.J.; Shi, C.B. Probiotic effects of the Bacillus velezensis GY65 strain in the mandarin fish, Siniperca chuatsi. Aquac. Rep. 2021, 21, 100902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]









| Strain Number | Species Name 1 | Inhibition Zone Diameter (mm) 2 |
|---|---|---|
| FJAT-57093 | Bacillus velezensis | 20.83 ± 0.92 |
| FJAT-2349 | Bacillus velezensis | 18.59 ± 0.53 |
| FJAT-17931 | Bacillus velezensis | 17.54 ± 0.06 |
| FJAT-57419 | Bacillus atrophaeus | 16.16 ± 0.07 |
| FJAT-57444 | Bacillus pumilus | 15.56 ± 0.2 |
| FJAT-57117 | Bacillus velezensis | 15.22 ± 2.28 |
| FJAT-57108 | Bacillus thuringiensis | 15.14 ± 0.06 |
| FJAT-57446 | Bacillus atrophaeus | 14.15 ± 0.15 |
| FJAT-57104 | Bacillus rugosus | 13.46 ± 0.4 |
| FJAT-57440 | Bacillus haynesii | 13.08 ± 0.3 |
| FJAT-57102 | Bacillus swezeyi | 12.44 ± 0.92 |
| FJAT-57417 | Bacillus pumilus | 12.17 ± 0.69 |
| FJAT-57439 | Bacillus velezensis | 11.32 ± 0.36 |
| FJAT-57100 | Bacillus zhangzhouensis | 10.97 ± 0.03 |
| FJAT-57118 | Bacillus thuringiensis | 10.58 ± 0.28 |
| FJAT-46513 | Bacillus amyloliquefacien | 10.42 ± 0 |
| Antibiotics | Content per Tablet/μg | Judgement Standard/mm 1 | Inhibition Zone Diameter 2 | Sensitivity | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drug Tolerance (R) | Inhibition (I) | High Sensitivity (S) | ||||
| cefaclor | 30 | ≦14 | 15–17 | ≧18 | 35.21 ± 0.45 | S |
| erythromycin | 15 | ≦13 | 14–22 | ≧23 | 31.99 ± 0.77 | S |
| chloramphenicol | 30 | ≦12 | 13–17 | ≧18 | 29.71 ± 0.77 | S |
| enrofloxacin | 10 | ≦22 | 23–27 | ≧28 | 28.15 ± 0.65 | S |
| gentamicin | 10 | ≦12 | 13–14 | ≧15 | 25.61 ± 0.58 | S |
| doxycycline | 30 | ≦12 | 13–15 | ≧16 | 23.92 ± 0.75 | S |
| neomycin | 30 | ≦12 | 13–16 | ≧17 | 22.28 ± 0.60 | S |
| kanamycin | 30 | ≦13 | 14–17 | ≧18 | 20.03 ± 0.85 | S |
| tetracycline | 30 | ≦14 | 15–18 | ≧19 | 17.43 ± 0.18 | I |
| polymyxin B | 300 | ≦8 | 8–11 | ≧12 | 8.40 ± 0.06 | I |
| streptomycin | 10 | ≦11 | 12–14 | ≧15 | 8.76 ± 0.27 | R |
| penicillin G | 10 | ≦19 | 20–27 | ≧28 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | R |
| ampicillin | 10 | ≦13 | 14–16 | ≧17 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | R |
| Strain Number | Species Name | Inhibition Zone Diameter of Fermentation Broth (mm) | Inhibition Zone Diameter of Positive Control (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| FJAT-52715 | Aeromonas hydrophila | 20.83 ± 0.92 | 13.72 ± 0.18 |
| FJAT-52714 | Photobacterium damselae | 20.81 ± 0.19 | 17.46 ± 0.06 |
| FJAT-52713 | Edwardsiella tarda | 24.25 ± 0.17 | 17.41 ± 0.13 |
| FJAT-2503 | Vibrio parahaemolyticus | 16.54 ± 0.21 | 10.45 ± 0.15 |
| FJAT-52716 | Vibrio vulnificus | 14.45 ± 0.13 | 12.54 ± 0.15 |
| FJAT-2510 | Vibrio harveyi | 0 | 14.62 ± 0.25 |
| FJAT-2512 | Vibrio alginolyticus | 0 | 9.93 ± 0.13 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Chen, Y.; Li, S.; Li, W.; Zheng, X.; Chen, M.; Liu, X.; Lan, J.; Wang, J. Probiotic Properties In Vitro of Bacillus velezensis FJAT-57093 with Antibacterial Activity Against the Aquatic Pathogen Aeromonas hydrophila. Microorganisms 2026, 14, 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14010041
Chen Y, Li S, Li W, Zheng X, Chen M, Liu X, Lan J, Wang J. Probiotic Properties In Vitro of Bacillus velezensis FJAT-57093 with Antibacterial Activity Against the Aquatic Pathogen Aeromonas hydrophila. Microorganisms. 2026; 14(1):41. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14010041
Chicago/Turabian StyleChen, Yanping, Suyi Li, Wenjie Li, Xuefang Zheng, Meichun Chen, Xin Liu, Jianglin Lan, and Jieping Wang. 2026. "Probiotic Properties In Vitro of Bacillus velezensis FJAT-57093 with Antibacterial Activity Against the Aquatic Pathogen Aeromonas hydrophila" Microorganisms 14, no. 1: 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14010041
APA StyleChen, Y., Li, S., Li, W., Zheng, X., Chen, M., Liu, X., Lan, J., & Wang, J. (2026). Probiotic Properties In Vitro of Bacillus velezensis FJAT-57093 with Antibacterial Activity Against the Aquatic Pathogen Aeromonas hydrophila. Microorganisms, 14(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14010041
