Next Article in Journal
Gut Microbiota and Neurodevelopment in Preterm Infants: Mechanistic Insights and Prospects for Clinical Translation
Previous Article in Journal
When Precision Matters: Bone Marrow Cytology Meets qPCR in a Pilot Study Quantifying Leishmania infantum Load in Dogs
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecular Insights into Ammonium Sulfate-Induced Secretome Reprogramming of Bacillus subtilis Czk1 for Enhanced Biocontrol Against Rubber Tree Root Rot

1
Environment and Plant Protection Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China
2
Sanya Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Sanya 572025, China
3
Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management on Tropical Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Haikou 571101, China
4
Hainan Key Laboratory for Detection and Control of Tropical Agricultural Pests, Haikou 571101, China
5
Hainan Engineering Research Center for Biological Control of Tropical Crops Diseases and Insect Pests, Haikou 571101, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2025, 13(9), 2212; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13092212
Submission received: 15 July 2025 / Revised: 14 September 2025 / Accepted: 18 September 2025 / Published: 21 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Microbe Interactions)

Abstract

Root rot diseases caused by Ganoderma pseudoferreum and Pyrrhoderma noxium inflict substantial economic losses in rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) cultivation, while conventional control methods face environmental and resistance challenges. This study aimed to specifically investigate the molecular mechanisms by which ammonium sulfate enhances the biocontrol efficacy of Bacillus subtilis Czk1. Using label-free quantitative proteomics (LC-MS/MS), we characterized ammonium sulfate-induced alterations in the secretory proteome of Czk1. A total of 351 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were identified, with 329 significantly up-regulated and 22 down-regulated. GO functional enrichment analysis indicated that up-regulated DEPs were associated with metabolic pathways (glyoxylate/dicarboxylate, arginine/proline, cofactor biosynthesis) and extracellular localization (13 proteins), while down-regulated DEPs were linked to small molecule catabolism. KEGG pathway annotation identified DEP involvement in 124 pathways, including secondary metabolite biosynthesis and membrane transport. These findings demonstrate that ammonium sulfate remodels the Czk1 secretome to enhance the expression of key antagonistic proteins, thereby providing crucial molecular targets and a scientific foundation for developing effective biofungicides against rubber root rot, with clear practical implications for sustainable disease management.

1. Introduction

The rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.), a perennial tropical crop, is a key source of high-quality natural rubber. It serves as a vital economic pillar for natural rubber production and significantly contributes to the livelihoods of smallholder farmers in developing countries [1,2,3]. Root rot disease is one of the three most devastating diseases in natural rubber production and is serious and widespread in rubber-growing areas around the world. It is also a major biological constraint limiting rubber yield growth in China [4]. A total of seven distinct types of rubber root diseases have been documented in China, including red root rot disease (Ganoderma pseudoferreum (Wakef.) Over et Steinm.), brown root rot disease (Pyrrhoderma noxium (Corner) L.W. Zhou & Y.C. Dai), purple root rot disease (Helicobasidium compactum Boed), stink root rot disease (Sphaerostilbe repens Berk. et Br.), white root rot disease (Rigidoprus lignosus (Klotzsch) Imaz), black root rot disease (Poria hypobrunnea Petch.) and ustulina root rot disease (Ustulina deusta (Hoffmm et Fr.) Petrak), of which red root rot and brown root rot are the most harmful [5]. Among these, red root rot and brown root rot are prevalent in various rubber plantation areas in China. These two diseases are prevalent across Chinese rubber plantations, with severe infection prevalence exceeding 4.0%. Without timely intervention, mortality rates can reach 100% [6,7,8,9].
The diagnosis of rubber tree root disease remains heavily labor-dependent. Early detection systems are often inadequate, resulting in inefficient monitoring and delayed responses. By the time symptoms become visible in the aboveground parts of the tree, the infection is usually already severe, leading to high control costs and limited effectiveness. At present, the primary management strategies include agricultural and chemical controls. Agricultural methods mainly consist of trench isolation, which serves only as a preventive measure and is both time-consuming and labor-intensive. Chemical control has long relied on the application of thirteen morpholine for root irrigation [10,11,12,13]. However, this approach poses significant risks such as pathogen resistance, pesticide residues, and environmental pollution.
Biological control is an eco-friendly strategy that employs naturally occurring microorganisms and their metabolites to manage plant diseases [14,15]. The metabolites produced by biocontrol bacteria are relatively stable in the environment and less influenced by external conditions, making them among the most successfully commercialized biocontrol products to date. The use of antimicrobial compounds derived from microorganisms thus represents a pioneering green approach to plant disease management. Numerous microorganisms have been exploited for the development of biopesticides on a commercial scale. Among these, Bacillus spp. have proven to be a highly effective source of antifungal agents and are widely employed as biocontrol organisms [16,17,18]. A key advantage of Bacillus spp. lies in their ability to produce diverse bioactive compounds with agricultural applications, including antimicrobial metabolites, surfactants, and plant defense stimulators [19,20,21].
Proteomics, an integral component of functional genomics, enables the isolation of protein complexes and functional characterization, offering critical insights into biological systems [22,23]. Among its advanced methodologies, label-free quantitative proteomics stands out as a cost-effective and scalable approach. This technique leverages modern high-resolution mass spectrometry to analyze enzymatically digested peptide mixtures without isotope labeling, thereby facilitating large-scale comparative studies of proteome dynamics [24,25]. This technique has been widely applied to dissect molecular mechanisms across disciplines. In plant–pathogen interactions, for instance, Yu et al. (2019) demonstrated that nitrogen starvation in Phytophthora infestans—the pathogen responsible for potato late blight—upregulated virulence-related effector proteins, thereby enhancing pathogenicity [26]. In abiotic stress studies, Liu et al. (2021) identified N-glycans as critical modulators of salt stress tolerance in Arabidopsis through regulation of stress-responsive proteins [27]. Similarly, Song et al. (2022) revealed proteomic adaptations in Dendrobium huoshanense under salt stress, highlighting key proteins involved in osmotic adjustment and antioxidant defense [28]. Beyond plant biology, label-free proteomics has advanced applications in food science: Zhang et al. (2024) systematically linked freezing–thawing methods (e.g., liquid nitrogen, immersion, and air freezing) to protein denaturation and quality deterioration in perch filets [29], whereas Menezes et al. (2024) demonstrated that sourdough fermentation significantly reduces allergenic wheat components, such as glutenins and α-amylase inhibitors [30]. Collectively, these applications highlight the versatility and impact of label-free proteomics in advancing molecular understanding and supporting innovation across biological and industrial fields.
The Bacillus subtilis Czk1 strain, isolated from the roots of the rubber tree in our laboratory, exhibits potent antifungal activity against several major pathogens, including G. pseudoferreum, P. noxium, H. compactum, R. lignosus, S. repens and C. gloeosporioides [31,32]. To characterize the protein composition of its fermentation broth and investigate the molecular basis of its biocontrol activity, we employed liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) coupled with label-free quantitative proteomics. This approach allowed us to identify differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) in response to ammonium sulfate treatment compared to an untreated control. Subsequent bioinformatic analyses focused on characterizing secreted proteins and those associated with biocontrol functions. The primary objective of this study was to investigate how ammonium sulfate modulates the synthesis and secretion of key effector proteins in Czk1, thereby providing crucial proteome-level insights that can guide the rational design of more effective biocontrol formulations against rubber tree root diseases.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Extraction and Activity Detection of Antifungal Protein Crude Extract

The single colony of B. subtilis Czk1 was inoculated into sterile LB liquid medium and cultured at 28 °C with 180 rpm agitation for 12 h to prepare a seed culture. The seed culture was then transferred to fresh LB medium at 7% (v/v) inoculum density and incubated under identical conditions (28 °C, 180 rpm) for 60 h. Bacterial cells were subsequently removed by centrifugation at 12,000× g for 30 min at 4 °C. To specifically analyze the existing secreted proteins without further stimulating live bacteria, solid ammonium sulfate was directly added to the cell-free supernatant with continuous stirring until saturation. This approach allows efficient precipitation of already secreted proteins for proteomic analysis while avoiding potential changes in bacterial gene expression that could occur if ammonium sulfate were introduced during active fermentation. The mixture was maintained at 4 °C for 24 h to allow complete precipitation, followed by centrifugation at 12,000× g for 30 min at 4 °C. The resulting pellet containing crude proteins was resuspended in a minimal volume of phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) and subjected to dialysis for desalting. This crude protein extract was used for proteomic analysis.

2.2. Protein Extraction

Frozen samples were thawed on ice and transferred to sterile tubes. An appropriate amount of protein lysate (8 M urea, 1% SDS, containing protease inhibitors) was added. The samples were homogenized using a high-throughput tissue mill with three cycles of 40 s each time, followed by lysis on ice for 30 min with periodic vortexing (5–10 s every 5 min). The lysates were then centrifuged at 12,000× g for 30 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected, and its protein concentration was determined using the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay kit (Pierce, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, a standard curve was prepared using bovine serum albumin (BSA) at concentrations ranging from 0 to 2.0 mg/mL. Each sample (2 µL) was diluted with 18 µL distilled water, mixed with 200 µL BCA working reagent, and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min with shaking. Absorbance was measured at 562 nm using a SPECTRA MAX microplate reader. Protein extraction quality was assessed by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE) [33,34].

2.3. Protein Digestion and Peptide Desalting

A 100 μg protein aliquot was first denatured in 100 mM triethylammonium bicarbonate (TEAB) buffer. Reduction was performed with 10 mM tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP) at 37 °C for 60 min, followed by alkylation using 40 mM iodoacetamide (IAM) for 40 min at 25 °C in the dark. Proteins were then precipitated with six volumes of pre-chilled acetone and incubated at −20 °C for 4 h. The pelleted material were collected by centrifugation at 10,000× g for 20 min at 4 °C. and subsequently resuspended in 100 μL of 100 mM TEAB. Trypsin was added at an enzyme-to-protein ratio of 1:50 (w/w) and digestion proceeded at 37 °C for 16 h.
The resulting peptides were dried under vacuum, reconstituted in 0.1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), and desalted using HLB solid-phase extraction cartridges. After vacuum drying again, peptide concentration was determined with a quantitative peptide assay kit (Thermo Scientific, Cat. No. 23275). Finally, samples were prepared for LC–MS/MS analysis by dissolving dried peptides in loading buffer to a final concentration of 0.25 μg/μL [35].

2.4. LC-MS/MS Analysis

Tryptic peptides were analyzed using an EASY nLC-1200 system (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) coupled online to a Q Exactive HF-X quadrupole Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). After being solubilized in mass spectrometry-compatible buffer, the peptides were loaded onto a C18 reversed-phase analytical column (75 μm × 25 cm, Thermo Scientific) equilibrated with solvent A (2% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid). Separation was performed using a linear gradient with solvent B (80% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid) at a flow rate of 300 nL/min under the following conditions: 0–45 min, 0% to 3% B; 45–50 min, 3% to 28% B; 50–55 min, 28% to 44% B; 55–60 min, 44% to 90% B.
Mass spectrometry acquisition was conducted in data-dependent mode. Full-scan MS spectra (m/z 350–1500) were acquired in the Orbitrap at a resolution of 60,000 with an automatic gain control (AGC) target of 3 × 106 and a maximum injection time of 20 ms. The top 20 most intense precursor ions were selected for fragmentation via higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD) with a normalized collision energy setting of 28%. MS/MS spectra were acquired at a resolution of 15,000 (at m/z 100), with an AGC target of 1 × 105, a maximum injection time of 50 ms, and a dynamic exclusion duration of 18 s [36].

2.5. Protein Discovery Results

Raw MS data were processed using ProteomeDiscoverer™ Software (v 2.2, Thermo Scientific). Database searching was performed using MaxQuant [37] (v 2.0.3.1) with the following parameters: carbamidomethylation was designated as a fixed modification, while methionine oxidation was designated as a variable modification; trypsin was designated as the protease; the precursor mass tolerance was set to ±10 ppm; and the false discovery rate (FDR) for peptide identification was set to 1% (FDR ≤ 0.01). Only proteins containing at least one unique peptide were considered confidently identified.
To evaluate global sample relationships, principal component analysis (PCA) [38] was performed on the protein abundance matrix using the R programming environment (v 4.2.1). Abundance values were log2-transformed and scaled to unit variance prior to PCA. The analysis was conducted using the prcomp function, and the resulting scores were visualized in a two-dimensional plot to assess overall sample distribution and group clustering.
The protein abundance information obtained from the library search was used to analyze the statistical test for differential proteins. Student’s t-test was employed to calculate the significance of the difference between samples, and proteins exhibiting a fold change (FC) ≥ 1.2 or ≤0.83 and a p-value < 0.05 were designated as differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) [27,28].

2.6. Bioinformatics Analysis

2.6.1. Functional Annotation and Enrichment Analysis

Functional annotation of the target proteins was performed using a combination of bioinformatics tools and databases [39]. KEGG [40] pathway annotations were assigned with KOBAS (v 2.1.1). Homologous gene clustering and functional classification were carried out using EggNOG (v 2020.06) [41]. Gene Ontology (GO) annotation was conducted with Blast2GO (v 2.5.0) [42] based on the Gene Ontology database (v 2022.0915). Protein domain analyses were performed using the Pfam database (v 35.0) [43]. Subcellular localization of differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) was predicted using ngloc (2023 version) by comparison against reference subcellular localization databases.
To identify functionally enriched terms and pathways, GO enrichment analysis was carried out with goatools (v 0.6.5) across the three major GO categories: biological process, cellular component, and molecular function. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis was performed using custom Python scripts (v 3.8.10).

2.6.2. Metabolic Pathway Visualization

Global metabolic pathway mapping and visualization were conducted using iPath3.0 [44] to illustrate systemic metabolic networks and functional interactions among the annotated proteins.

3. Results

3.1. Extraction and Identification of Secreted Protein

The culture medium of B. subtilis Czk1 was debuffered, concentrated, and separated by SDS-PAGE (Figure 1). Electrophoretic analysis revealed that Czk1 secretes a diverse array of proteins.

3.2. Peptide Segment Information

Post-quality control statistical analysis of identified peptides included visualization of peptide count and length distributions. Figure 2 illustrates the number of peptides identified per protein, indicating robust proteome coverage.

3.3. Distribution of Protein Identified by B. subtilis Czk1

Venn diagram analysis (Figure 3) revealed distinct proteomic profiles between ammonium sulfate-treated B. subtilis Czk1 and the untreated control (CK). The Czk1 group expressed a total of 394 proteins, while the CK group expressed 106 proteins. Among these, 106 proteins were common to both groups. Notably, 288 proteins were exclusively identified in the Czk1 treatment group, suggesting a substantial alteration in the proteome in response to ammonium sulfate stress.

3.4. Sample Correlation Heat Map

Correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the similarity in protein composition among the biological replicates of the ammonium sulfate-treated B. subtilis Czk1 and the untreated control (CK) groups. As illustrated in Figure 4, high correlation coefficients (ranging from 0.996 to 0.997) were observed within the Czk1 replicates, indicating excellent reproducibility. Similarly, strong correlations (0.998–0.999) were detected within the CK group replicates. In contrast, the correlation coefficients between the Czk1 and CK groups were substantially lower (0.337–0.340), demonstrating pronounced divergence in their proteomic profiles and a marked treatment effect.

3.5. Principal Component Analysis

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed to identify overall differences between sample groups, despite the limited sample size, as it effectively visualizes group segregation. Distinct sample clustering was observed in the PCA score plot (Figure 5), with clear separation between Czk1 and CK groups. All samples resided within the 95% confidence interval, confirming significant group segregation.

3.6. Analysis of Differentially Expressed Proteins

Differential expression analysis of proteins was conducted based on spectral processing and database searching. Differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) between B. subtilis Czk1 and the control (CK) group were identified using thresholds of |fold change| > 1.2 (up-regulated > 1.2, down-regulated < 0.83) and a significance level of p < 0.05. As shown in Figure 6, a total of 351 DEPs were identified, among which 329 were significantly up-regulated and 22 were down-regulated in the Czk1 group compared to CK. The marked predominance of up-regulated proteins suggests a robust proteomic response to ammonium sulfate treatment.

3.7. GO Function Annotation of Differentially Expressed Proteins

GO annotation analysis was performed to categorize the functional roles of DEPs identified in B. subtilis Czk1 under ammonium sulfate treatment, using a significance threshold of p < 0.05. GO annotation categorized DEPs into Biological Process (BP), Cellular Component (CC), and Molecular Function (MF) ontologies (Figure 7). In the BP category, Up-regulated DEPs were significantly enriched in a wide range of processes including biological regulation, metabolic process, reproduction, cellular process, developmental process, localization, signaling, response to stimulus. Conversely, down-regulated DEPs exhibited expression solely in the metabolic process and cellular process. Within the CC category, both up- and down-regulated DEPs were represented in protein-containing complexes and cellular anatomical entities. Within MF, down-regulated DEPs were exclusively associated with binding and catalytic activity. Up-regulated DEPs were expressed in a number of other activities, including translation regulator activity, transcription regulator activity, structural molecule activity, ATP-dependent activity, protein folding chaperone, antioxidant activity, transporter activity, small molecule sensor activity, and binding and catalytic activity.
These results indicate that ammonium sulfate treatment triggers extensive functional responses in B. subtilis Czk1, particularly enhancing regulatory, transport, antioxidant, and transcriptional activities.

3.8. KEGG Metabolic Pathway of Differentially Expressed Proteins

To elucidate the functional pathways involved in the response of B. subtilis Czk1 to ammonium sulfate treatment, KEGG pathway enrichment analysis was performed on DEPs. The DEPs were categorized into five classes: Cellular Processes, Human Diseases, Genetic Information Processing, Environmental Information Processing, and Metabolism (Figure 8). Within Cellular Processes, DEPs were associated with Cell motility and Cellular community—prokaryotes. Human Diseases has metabolic pathways was Drug resistance: antimicrobial. Genetic Information Processing comprised folding, sorting and degradation; replication and repair; and translation. Similarly, the field of Environmental Information Processing is characterized by two metabolic pathways: signal transduction and membrane transport. Metabolism encompasses 12 distinct metabolic pathways, including Global and overview maps, Carbohydrate metabolism, Amino acid metabolism, Metabolism of cofactors and vitamins, Lipid metabolism, Energy metabolism, Metabolism of other amino acids, Nucleotide metabolism, Biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites, Glycan biosynthesis and metabolism, Metabolism of terpenoids and polyketides, Xenobiotics biodegradation and metabolism.
The up-regulated DEPs were expressed in the aforementioned pathways, whereas the down-regulated DEPs only detected in a limited number of pathways, including folding, sorting and degradation (under Genetic Information Processing), signal transduction (under Environmental Information Processing), and amino acid metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, energy metabolism, global and overview maps, glycan biosynthesis and metabolism, lipid metabolism, metabolism of cofactors and vitamins and metabolism of terpenoids and polyketides (under Metabolism).
These findings suggest that ammonium sulfate treatment extensively reprograms cellular metabolic and regulatory activities in B. subtilis Czk1, with a pronounced up-regulation of proteins involved in diverse biosynthetic, energy-yielding, and stress-responsive pathways.

3.9. EggNOG Annotation

EggNOG functional annotation revealed distinct patterns between up- and down-regulated differentially expressed proteins (DEPs). Among the 224 up-regulated DEPs, annotations spanned 17 functional categories (Figure 9), covering processes such as energy production and conversion (C), amino acid transport and metabolism (E), nucleotide transport and metabolism (F), carbohydrate transport and metabolism (G), coenzyme transport and metabolism (H), lipid transport and metabolism (I), translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis (J), transcription (K), replication, recombination and repair (L), cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis (M), cell motility (N), posttranslational modification, protein turnover, and chaperones (O), inorganic ion transport and metabolism (P), secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism (Q), signal transduction mechanisms (T), intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport (U), and defense mechanisms (V).
The most enriched categories included amino acid transport and metabolism (E, 38 proteins), energy production and conversion (C, 32 proteins), carbohydrate transport and metabolism (G, 29 proteins), and cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis (M, 23 proteins). This enrichment pattern suggests enhanced biosynthesis of protein precursors, upregulated energy metabolism, altered glycolytic pathways, and active cellular remodeling, potentially related to adaptation or defense.
In contrast, the 15 down-regulated DEPs were mapped to only six functional categories, which were predominantly associated with core metabolic processes: energy production and conversion (C), amino acid transport and metabolism (E), nucleotide transport and metabolism (F), carbohydrate transport and metabolism (G), coenzyme transport and metabolism (H), and lipid transport and metabolism (I).

3.10. Pfam Classification

The DEPs were analyzed against the Pfam database to characterize their functional domains (Figure 10). Among the up-regulated proteins, 82 were annotated to 20 distinct functional domains, including amidohydro_1, amidase_2, alpha-amylase, aldo-ket-red, aldedh, AP-endonus, peptidase_M20, peptidase_M42, lactamase_B, Glu_dehyd C, Aminotran-1-2, ADH-zinc-N-2, adh-short-C2, peptidase-S8, nitroreductase, KR, ADH-zinc-N, ADH-N, glyoxalase, and adh-short. In contrast, only two down-regulated proteins were annotated, corresponding to two functional domains: peptidase_M20 and Glyoxalase.
The identified domains are predominantly categorized as oxidoreductases, which catalyze essential redox reactions, and hydrolases, which play a pivotal role in cleaving peptide, glycosidic, and amide bonds. Furthermore, key biosynthetic and metabolic functions are underscored by domains such as aminotransferases, beta-ketoacyl synthases, and the CoA-ligase/AMP-binding enzyme family. Collectively, these functional capabilities underpin primary metabolic processes, maintain cell envelope integrity, and facilitate critical environmental interactions.

3.11. Subloc Annotation

The subcellular localization information of DEPs were obtained by comparing the subcellular localization database, and its annotations in the database were statistically analyzed. As shown in Figure 11, the Czk1 DEPs were divided into three subcellular compartments: Extracellular (EXT), plasma membrane (PLA), and cytoplasm (CYT). The results of this analysis revealed that there were 13 up-regulated proteins in the EXT, 10 up-regulated proteins in the PLA, and 306 up-regulated proteins in the CYT. Conversely, 22 down-regulated DEPs were localized exclusively to PLA.
Quantitative analysis revealed a distinct distribution pattern among up-regulated DEPs. The majority (306 proteins) were localized to the CYT, suggesting a pronounced activation of intracellular metabolic or signaling processes. Additionally, 13 and 10 up-regulated proteins were identified in the EXT and PLA compartments, respectively, indicating potential modifications in secretory functions or membrane-related activities. In contrast, down-regulated DEPs exhibited a strikingly specific localization pattern, with all 22 significantly decreased proteins residing exclusively in the PLA. This strong bias implies a targeted suppression of pathways associated with membrane integrity, nutrient transport, cell adhesion, or signal transduction.

3.12. GO Enrichment

The GO function enrichment analysis of the DEPs were performed to clarify the biological processes involved in the protein, the cell components, and the molecular functions achieved at the functional level, and to clarify the main GO functions of the protein (Figure 12). For the up-regulated DEPs, molecular function terms were prominently enriched. Specifically, 36 proteins were associated with transferase activity, and 23 proteins were implicated in nucleic acid binding. Among the down-regulated DEPs, notable enrichment was observed in specific biological processes and molecular functions. In biological processes, three proteins were assigned to small molecule catabolic process and two to organic acid catabolic process. In molecular functions, 2 proteins each were enriched in the following terms: oxidoreductase activity, acting on the CH-CH group of donors, with a flavin as acceptor, acyl-CoA dehydrogenase activity,4 iron, 4 sulfur cluster binding and oxidoreductase activity, acting on the CH-CH group of donors. Additionally, 3 proteins were enriched each in iron-sulfur cluster binding, metal cluster binding, hydro-lyase activity and carbon-oxygen lyase activity.
Significant enrichment was identified for eight functional terms: small molecule catabolic process, oxidoreductase activity, acting on the CH-CH group of donors, with a flavin as acceptor, acyl-CoA dehydrogenase activity, iron-sulfur cluster binding, metal cluster binding, hydro-lyase activity,4 iron, 4 sulfur cluster binding, carbon-oxygen lyase activity.

3.13. KEGG Pathway Enrichment

KEGG pathway enrichment analysis revealed distinct metabolic signatures for DEPs (Figure 13). The up-regulated DEPs were mainly enriched in Glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism, Arginine and proline metabolism, Biosynthesis of cofactors, Biosynthesis of nucleotide sugars, Biotin metabolism, Butanoate metabolism, Chloroalkane and chloroalkene degradation, Cysteine and methionine metabolism, Fatty acid biosynthesis, Fatty acid degradation, Fatty acid metabolism, Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism, Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis, Porphyrin metabolism, Riboflavin metabolism, Sulfur metabolism, Tyrosine metabolism, Ubiquinone and other terpenoid-quinone biosynthesis, Vitamin B6 metabolism and beta-Alanine metabolism. The down-regulated DEPs showed significant enrichment in Thiamine metabolism, Microbial metabolism in diverse environments, Lysine biosynthesis, 2-Oxocarboxylic acid metabolism, Metabolic pathways, Biosynthesis of amino acids, Monobactam biosynthesis, Sulfur relay system, Glutathione metabolism, Peptidoglycan biosynthesis, Terpenoid backbone biosynthesis, Pentose phosphate pathway, C5-Branched dibasic acid metabolism, Citrate cycle (TCA cycle), Arginine biosynthesis, Histidine metabolism, Two-component system, Glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism, Biosynthesis of secondary metabolites and Carbon metabolism.
These results indicate a broad rewiring of metabolic activity, with up-regulated DEPs enhancing energy production and anabolic processes, while down-regulated DEPs reflect a reduction in basal metabolic and biosynthetic functions.

4. Discussion

The future trajectory of sustainable agriculture will be increasingly shaped by the adoption of biological control strategies for plant disease management. B. subtilis is a prominent biocontrol bacterium, valued for its capacity to produce diverse antimicrobial proteins (AMPs). These metabolites offer advantages such as chemical stability, sustained efficacy, and broad-spectrum activity, conferring significant application potential. A deeper understanding of the antimicrobial proteome of B. subtilis is essential for elucidating its biocontrol mechanisms, improving its efficacy, and informing novel disease management strategies.
Recent advances in proteomics technologies, synergized with expanding genomic databases, have precipitated proteomics analysis to the forefront of scientific inquiry as a highly efficacious means to explore protein expression levels, protein modifications, and protein–protein interactions in diverse biological systems [45]. Among emerging techniques, label-free proteomics has emerged as a robust LC-MS/MS methodology that enables comparative protein quantification through spectral analysis of enzymatically digested peptides, eliminating the need for isotopic [46,47]. This technique provides an unbiased platform for systematic protein profiling under diverse physiological conditions. Previous studies have successfully applied label-free proteomics in diverse contexts: Wang et al. (2018) employed this approach to detect alterations in protein levels in B. cereus spores treated with HPP-SAEW [48]. Panda et al. (2020) conducted label-free quantitative proteomic analysis on shoots of Haloxylon salicornicum to unravel functional protein networks associated with salt tolerance [49]. Yang et al. (2022) employed label-free proteomics to elucidate the impact of harvest time on photosynthetic apparatus quality in the red alga Porphyra dentata [50]. Zhao et al. (2023) conducted comparative label-free quantitative analysis of the milk fat globule membrane profiles in porcine colostrum versus mature milk [51]. In this study, we implemented label-free quantitative proteomics to investigate ammonium sulfate-induced dynamics of the secretory protein in B. subtilis Czk1. A total of 351 DEPs were identified between treated and control groups. Bioinformatic analyses (KEGG and GO enrichment) revealed significant reprogramming of metabolic pathways closely linked to biocontrol functions. Crucially, ammonium sulfate induction enhanced the expression of proteins involved in antagonistic activities, including secondary metabolite synthesis, amino acid metabolism, and cofactor biosynthesis, while repressing pathways related to primary catabolism. This shift suggests a metabolic reallocation from growth to defense-related protein secretion, providing a proteomic basis for the enhanced antifungal effects observed.
Proteins in living systems operate within coordinated networks of biochemical pathways to execute biological functions. Pathway analysis is therefore essential for a holistic and systematic interpretation of cellular processes. Recent proteomic studies underscore its utility across biological models. For example, Jia et al. (2023) used data-independent acquisition (DIA) proteomics to show that energy transduction pathways were downregulated in Bacillus cereus spores under combined stress, suggesting a metabolic slowdown that promotes survival [52]. Wang et al. (2024) integrated HPLC-MS/MS with label-free proteomics to identify DEPs in Lactobacillus plantarum after bacteriocin exposure, noting enrichment in peptidoglycan catabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, and nucleotide biosynthesis [53]. In Czk1, we observed notable enrichment in oxidoreductase activities and small molecule catabolism, which are known to contribute to plant resistance and pathogen inhibition.
KEGG analysis revealed that the up-regulated DEPs participated in 95 pathways, while down-regulated DEPs participated in 29. Key enriched pathways included amino acid metabolism (glyoxylate/dicarboxylate, arginine/proline, cysteine/methionine, glycine/serine/threonine), cofactor biosynthesis (biotin, riboflavin, pantothenate/CoA, porphyrin, ubiquinone, vitamin B6), carbohydrate/fatty acid metabolism, and secondary metabolite biosynthesis. This reprogramming suggests that ammonium sulfate induction shifts central carbon and nitrogen metabolism in Czk1 toward the synthesis and secretion of antimicrobial compounds, such as secondary metabolites, amino acid derivatives, and enzyme cofactors. Concurrent down-regulation of core catabolic pathways—including the TCA cycle, amino acid biosynthesis, and carbohydrate metabolism—further indicates a metabolic transition from primary growth functions toward specialized metabolite production.
In conclusion, our integrated proteomic and bioinformatic analyses reveal that ammonium sulfate induction promotes a metabolic reconfiguration in B. subtilis Czk1, favoring the production and secretion of antimicrobial compounds over growth-associated processes. These insights not only clarify the mechanistic basis for improved biocontrol performance but also offer actionable molecular targets for designing effective Bacillus-based biofungicides. Future work should validate the functional roles of key DEPs and assess their efficacy in field applications to translate these proteomic discoveries into practical disease management solutions.

5. Conclusions

This study employed label-free quantitative proteomics to analyze ammonium sulfate-induced alterations in the secretory proteome of the biocontrol agent Bacillus subtilis Czk1. A total of 351 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were identified, including 329 up-regulated and 22 down-regulated proteins. GO enrichment analysis highlighted eight significantly enriched functional terms, largely associated with metabolic enzymes and catabolic processes. KEGG analysis assigned the DEPs to 124 distinct pathways, with significant enrichment in pathways central to amino acid metabolism, cofactor biosynthesis, glyoxylate/dicarboxylate metabolism, and secondary metabolite production. Crucially, 13 up-regulated proteins were predicted to be extracellular, directly implicating them in the secreted biocontrol arsenal. This work establishes a robust label-free quantitative-based workflow for secretome profiling in biocontrol bacteria. Our results demonstrate that ammonium sulfate induction markedly reprograms the secretome of strain Czk1, promoting the expression of key proteins involved in antimicrobial metabolic pathways. These findings provide crucial molecular targets for understanding and enhancing the biocontrol mechanisms of B. subtilis Czk1, facilitating the development of more effective biofungicides against economically devastating rubber tree root rot diseases caused by Ganoderma pseudoferreum and Pyrrhoderma noxium. Future work should focus on validating the antifungal activity of the identified secretory proteins and optimizing fermentation conditions to maximize their production for large-scale biocontrol applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.L. (Yanqiong Liang), W.W. and C.H.; resources S.T., Y.L. (Ying Lu), H.C.; formal analysis, X.H. and Y.L. (Ying Lu); data curation, H.C. and X.H.; writing—original draft, Y.L. (Yanqiong Liang); writing—review and editing, Y.L. (Yanqiong Liang), W.W. and C.H.; supervision, S.T., C.H. and K.Y.; project administration, S.T. and W.W.; funding acquisition, Y.L. (Yanqiong Liang), W.W. and K.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Innovational Fund for Scientific and Technological Personnel of Hainan Province (KJRC2023B18), Hainan provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (322QN360, 324MS108) and the Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System, grant number (CARS-33-BC1).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this article are not readily available due to privacy reasons. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chao, J.; Yang, S.; Chen, Y.; Tian, W.M. Evaluation of Reference Genes for Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis of the Gene Expression in Laticifers on the Basis of Latex Flow in Rubber Tree (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.). Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jayashree, R.; Nazeem, P.A.; Rekha, K.; Sreelatha, S.; Thulaseedharan, A.; Krishnakumar, R.; Kala, R.G.; Vineetha, M.; Leda, P.; Jinu, U.; et al. Over-expression of 3-hydroxy-3- methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase 1 (hmgr1) gene under super-promoter for enhanced latex biosynthesis in rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 127, 414–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Men, X.; Wang, F.; Chen, G.Q.; Zhang, H.B.; Xian, M. Biosynthesis of Natural Rubber: Current State and Perspectives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Meng, X.; Cai, H.; Luo, Y.; Zhao, X.; Fu, Y.; Zou, L.; Zhou, Y.; Tu, M. Biocontrol Potential of Endophytic Bacillus velezensis LSR7 Against Rubber Red Root Rot Disease. J. Fungi 2024, 10, 849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gu, Z.; Yin, J.; Wu, H.; Liang, Y.; Wu, W.; Lu, Y.; Li, R.; Tan, S.; He, C.; Yi, K. Synergistic mechanism of Bacillus subtilis Czk1 combined with propiconazole and tebuconazole mixtures against Pyrrhoderma noxium. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2023, 10, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, Y.X.; Shi, Y.P.; Dai, L.M.; Li, L.L.; Cai, Z.Y. Screening, identification and fermentation optimization of an antimicrobial actinomycete strain 17-7 to Phellinus noxius. Microbiol. China 2020, 47, 118–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tu, M.; Zhu, Z.; Zhao, X.; Cai, H.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, Y.; Yin, K.; Sha, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, G.; et al. The versatile plant probiotic bacterium Bacillus velezensis SF305 reduces red root rot disease severity in the rubber tree by degradingthe mycelia of Ganoderma pseudoferreum. J. Integr. Agric. 2024, 24, 3112–3126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Qin, Y.; Tu, M.; Yang, M.; Qi, J.; Tang, C. Antagonistic Effect of Eight Strains of Trichoderma on Ganoderma pseudoferreum Causing Red Root Rot of Rubber Tree. Chin. J. Trop. Agric. 2015, 3, 41–45+53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, T.Y.; Chen, C.H.; Yang, Y.L.; Tsai, I.J.; Ho, Y.N.; Chung, C.L. The brown root rot fungus Phellinus noxius affects microbial communities in different root-associated niches of Ficus trees. Environ. Microbiol. 2022, 24, 276–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liao, T.Z.; Chen, Y.H.; Tsai, J.N.; Chao, C.; Huang, T.P.; Hong, C.F.; Wu, Z.C.; Tsai, I.J.; Lee, H.H.; Klopfenstein, N.B.; et al. Translocation of Fungicides and Their Efficacy in Controlling Phellinus noxius, the Cause of Brown Root Rot Disease. Plant Dis. 2023, 107, 2039–2053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, Y.; Meng, H.; Gu, V.; Gu, J. Molecular diagnosis of the brown root rot disease agent Phellinus noxius on trees and in soil by rDNA ITS analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 1, 81–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Peng, Y.; Li, S.J.; Yan, J.; Tang, Y.; Cheng, J.P.; Gao, A.J.; Yao, X.; Ruan, J.J.; Xu, B.L. Research progress on phytopathogenic fungi and their role as biocontrol agents. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 670135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Qiu, D.; Ke, M.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, F.; Lu, T.; Sun, L.; Qian, H. Response of microbial antibiotic resistance to pesticides: An emerging health threat. Sci. Tot. Environ. 2022, 850, 158057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Köhl, J.; Kolnaar, R.; Ravensberg, W.J. Mode of Action of Microbial Biological Control Agents Against Plant Diseases: Relevance Beyond Efficacy. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bonaterra, A.; Badosa, E.; Daranas, N.; Francés, J.; Roselló, G.; Montesinos, E. Bacteria as Biological Control Agents of Plant Diseases. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Devi, S.I.; Kiesewalter, H.T.; Kovács, R.; Frisvad, J.C.; Weber, T.; Larsen, T.O.; Kovács, Á.T.; Ding, L. Depiction of secondary metabolites and antifungal activity of Bacillus velezensis DTU001. Synth. Syst. Biotechnol. 2019, 4, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Khan, M.H.; Salman, M.; Jan, S.A.; Shinwari, Z.K. Biological control of fungal phytopathogens: A comprehensive review based on Bacillus species. MOJ Biol. Med. 2021, 6, 90–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tuyến, Đ.T.; Trung, N.T.; Thảo, N.T.; Thanh, N.S.L.; Nguyen, N.P.D.; Tuyết, N.T.; Cuong, N.T.; Chan, S.S.; Khoo, K.S.; Show, P.L. Antifungal activity of secondary metabolites purified from Bacillus subtilis isolated in Vietnam and evaluated on in vitro and in vivo models. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2023, 179, 105558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fira, D.; Dimkić, I.; Berić, T.; Lozo, J.; Stanković, S. Biological control of plant pathogens by Bacillus species. J. Biotechnol. 2018, 285, 44–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Jiang, C.; Li, Z.; Shi, Y.; Guo, D.; Pang, B.; Chen, X.; Shao, D.; Liu, Y.; Shi, J. Bacillus subtilis inhibits Aspergillus carbonarius by producing iturin A, which disturbs the transport, energy metabolism, and osmotic pressure of fungal cells as revealed by transcriptomics analysis. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020, 330, 108783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kaspar, F.; Neubauer, P.; Gimpel, M. Bioactive Secondary Metabolites from Bacillus subtilis: A Comprehensive Review. J. Nat. Prod. 2019, 82, 2038–2053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mann, M.; Jensen, O.N. Proteomic analysis of post-translational modifications. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 2, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mertins, P.; Qiao, J.; Patel, J.; Udeshi, N.D.; Clauser, K.R.; Mani, D.R.; Burgess, M.; Gillette, M.A.; Jaffe, J.D.; Carr, S.A. Integrated proteomic analysis of post-translational modifications by serial enrichment. Nat. Methods 2013, 10, 634–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Nikolovski, N.; Shliaha, P.V.; Gatto, L.; Dupree, P.; Lilley, K.S. Label-Free Protein Quantification for Plant Golgi Protein Localization and Abundance. Plant Physiol. 2014, 166, 1033–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Toprakcioglu, Z.; Challa, P.K.; Xu, C.K.; Knowles, T.P.J. Label-Free Analysis of Protein Aggregation and Phase Behavior. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 13940–13948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Yu, P.; Dong, C.; Yao, C.; Ding, Y.; Zhou, X. Preliminary Analysis of Secreted Proteins of Phytophthora infestans Under Nitrogen Starvation Condition Based on Label Free Quantitative Proteomics. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci. 2019, 32, 2324–2329. [Google Scholar]
  27. Liu, C.; Niu, G.; Li, X.; Zhang, H.; Chen, H.; Hou, D.; Lan, P.; Hong, Z. Comparative Label-Free Quantitative Proteomics Analysis Reveals the Essential Roles of N-Glycans in Salt Tolerance by Modulating Protein Abundance in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 646425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Song, C.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, R.; Zhu, F.; Wei, P.; Pan, H.; Chen, C.; Dai, J. Label-Free Quantitative Proteomics Unravel the Impacts of Salt Stress on Dendrobium huoshanense. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 874579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, Z.; Li, X.; Ge, X.; Min, L.; Wang, J.; Zhou, P. Effects of liquid nitrogen freezing, immersion freezing, and air freezing on properties of Perca fluviatilis fillets and analysis of potential protein markers based on label-free proteomics. Food Biosci. 2024, 59, 104262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Menezes, L.A.A.; Pimentel, M.; Alves, T.D.O.; Nascimento, T.P.D.; Evaristo, J.A.M.; Nogueira, F.C.S.; Ferreira, M.S.L.; Lindner, J.D.D. Label-free quantitative proteomics to exploit the impact of sourdough fermentation on reducing wheat allergenic fractions. Food Chem. 2024, 430, 137037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. He, C.P.; Fan, L.Y.; Wu, W.H.; Liang, Y.Q.; Li, R.; Tang, W.; Zheng, X.L.; Xiao, Y.N.; Liu, Z.X.; Zheng, F.C. Identification of lipopeptides produced by Bacillus subtilis Czk1 isolated from the aerial roots of rubber trees. Genet. Mol. Res. 2017, 16, gmr16018710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Liang, Y.; Wu, W.; Li, R.; Lu, Y.; Wang, G.; Tang, S.; Chen, H.; Xi, J.; Xing, H.; He, C.; et al. Evaluation of Bacillus subtilis Czk1 Metabolites by LC–MS/MS and Their Antifungal Potential Against Pyrrhoderma noxium Causing Brow Rot Disease. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shi, Y.; Wang, X.; Huang, A. Proteomic analysis and food-grade enzymes of Moringa oleifer Lam. a Lam. flower. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 115, 883–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Galindo-Luján, R.; Pont, L.; Minić, Z.; Berezovski, M.V.; Sanz-Nebot, V.; Benavente, F. Characterization and differentiation of quinoa seed proteomes by label-free mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics. Food Chem. 2021, 363, 130250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yeung, J.; Gadjeva, M.; Geddes-McAlister, J. Label-Free Quantitative Proteomics Distinguishes General and Site-Specific Host Responses to Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection at the Ocular Surface. Proteomics 2020, 20, e1900290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Singh, L.K.; Pandey, M.; Baithalu, R.K.; Fernandes, A.; Ali, S.A.; Jaiswal, L.; Pannu, S.; Neeraj; Mohanty, T.K.; Kumaresan, A.; et al. Comparative Proteome Profiling of Saliva Between Estrus and Non-Estrus Stages by Employing Label-Free Quantitation (LFQ) and Tandem Mass Tag (TMT)-LC-MS/MS Analysis: An Approach for Estrus Biomarker Identification in Bubalus bubalis. Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 867909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cox, J.; Mann, M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26, 1367–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xu, J.; Xu, J.; Tong, Z.; Du, B.; Liu, B.; Mu, X.; Guo, T.; Yu, S.; Liu, S.; Gao, C.; et al. Performance of feature extraction method for classification and identification of proteins based on three-dimensional fluorescence spectrometry. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2023, 285, 121841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ibrahim, K.A. AI-driven detection and analysis of label-free protein aggregates. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2024, 25, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kanehisa, M.; Furumichi, M.; Tanabe, M.; Sato, Y.; Morishima, K. KEGG: New perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, D353–D361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cantalapiedra, C.P.; Hernández-Plaza, A.; Letunic, I.; Bork, P.; Huerta-Cepas, J. eggNOG-mapper v2: Functional Annotation, Orthology Assignments, and Domain Prediction at the Metagenomic Scale. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 5825–5829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Conesa, A.; Götz, S.; García-Gómez, J.M.; Terol, J.; Talón, M.; Robles, M. Blast2GO: A universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 2005, 21, 3674–3676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Paysan-Lafosse, T.; Andreeva, A.; Blum, M.; Chuguransky, S.R.; Grego, T.; Pinto, B.L.; Salazar, G.A.; Bileschi, M.L.; Llinares-López, F.; Meng-Papaxanthos, L.; et al. The Pfam protein families database: Embracing AI/ML. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025, 53, D523–D534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Darzi, Y.; Letunic, I.; Bork, P.; Yamada, T. iPath3.0: Interactive pathways explorer v3. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W510–W513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, H.; Chen, B.; Hu, S.; Liang, X.; Lu, X.; Shao, Y. Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of Germination of Nosema bombycis Spores under Extremely Alkaline Conditions. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rooden, E.J.V.; Florea, B.I.; Deng, H.; Baggelaar, M.P.; Esbroeck, A.C.M.V.; Zhou, J.; Overkleeft, H.S.; Stelt, M.V.D. Mapping in vivo target interaction profiles of covalent inhibitors using chemical proteomics with label-free quantification. Nat. Protoc. 2018, 13, 752–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yu, X.; Wang, Y.; Kohnen, M.V.; Piao, M.; Tu, M.; Gao, Y.; Lin, C.; Zuo, Z.; Gu, L. Large Scale Profiling of Protein Isoforms Using Label-Free Quantitative Proteomics Revealed the Regulation of Nonsense-Mediated Decay in Moso Bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis). Cells 2019, 8, 744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, P.; Xia, Q.; Li, Y. Label free-based proteomic analysis of proteins in Bacillus cereus spores regulated by high pressure processing and slightly acidic electrolyzed water treatment. Food Control 2018, 90, 392–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Panda, A.; Rangani, J.; Parida, A.K. Comprehensive proteomic analysis revealing multifaceted regulatory network of the xero-halophyte Haloxylon salicornicum involved in salt tolerance. J. Biotechnol. 2020, 324, 143–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yang, M.; Ma, L.; Yang, X.; Li, L.; Chen, S.; Qi, B.; Wang, Y.; Li, C.; Wei, Y.; Zhao, Y. Photosynthetic Protein-Based Edible Quality Formation in Various Porphyra dentata Harvests Determined by Label-Free Proteomics Analysis. Cells 2022, 11, 1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Zhao, H.; Liang, X.; Zhu, Q.; Liu, A.; Bi, J.; Quan, Z.S.; Luo, X.; Zheng, Y.; Yang, N.; Yue, X.; et al. Label-free quantitative proteomic analysis of milk fat globule membrane proteins in porcine colostrum and mature milk. Food Chem. 2023, 426, 136447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jia, Z.; Zhou, J.; Han, J.; Liu, D.; Lv, R. Proteomics-based analysis of the stress response of Bacillus cereus spores under ultrasound and electrolyzed water treatment. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2023, 98, 106523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wang, T.; Lai, H.; Zhao, W.; Cui, M.; Zhang, X. Antibacterial mechanism of bacteriocin from Lactobacillus plantarum YP36 based on proteomics technology. China Brew. 2024, 43, 98–104. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. SDS-PAGE analysis of secreted proteins from B. subtilis Czk1 culture supernatant. (Lane M, protein marker (10–180 kDa); Lane 1–2: Czk1 sample protein, Lane 3–4: CK control sample protein).
Figure 1. SDS-PAGE analysis of secreted proteins from B. subtilis Czk1 culture supernatant. (Lane M, protein marker (10–180 kDa); Lane 1–2: Czk1 sample protein, Lane 3–4: CK control sample protein).
Microorganisms 13 02212 g001
Figure 2. Characterization of the identified peptides. (a) Distribution of the number of peptides per protein. (b) Distribution of peptide lengths.
Figure 2. Characterization of the identified peptides. (a) Distribution of the number of peptides per protein. (b) Distribution of peptide lengths.
Microorganisms 13 02212 g002
Figure 3. Venn diagram of proteins identified in the B. subtilis Czk1 group versus the control (CK) group. Note: The overlapping part of the figure represents the number of proteins shared between the groups, the non-overlapping part represents the number of proteins unique to the group, and the number represents the number of corresponding proteins.
Figure 3. Venn diagram of proteins identified in the B. subtilis Czk1 group versus the control (CK) group. Note: The overlapping part of the figure represents the number of proteins shared between the groups, the non-overlapping part represents the number of proteins unique to the group, and the number represents the number of corresponding proteins.
Microorganisms 13 02212 g003
Figure 4. Heatmap of sample correlation coefficients for the Czk1 group and CK group. Note: The right and lower sides of the figure are the sample names. Each grid in the graph represents the correlation between two samples, and different colors represent the size of the correlation coefficient between samples.
Figure 4. Heatmap of sample correlation coefficients for the Czk1 group and CK group. Note: The right and lower sides of the figure are the sample names. Each grid in the graph represents the correlation between two samples, and different colors represent the size of the correlation coefficient between samples.
Microorganisms 13 02212 g004
Figure 5. PCA score scatter plot of Czk1 group and CK group. Note: Following the completion of the dimension reduction analysis, the relative coordinate points on the principal component plane are identified. The distance between each sample point represents the degree of similarity between the samples. A shorter distance indicates a higher degree of similarity between the samples.
Figure 5. PCA score scatter plot of Czk1 group and CK group. Note: Following the completion of the dimension reduction analysis, the relative coordinate points on the principal component plane are identified. The distance between each sample point represents the degree of similarity between the samples. A shorter distance indicates a higher degree of similarity between the samples.
Microorganisms 13 02212 g005
Figure 6. Summary of differentially expressed proteins (DEPs). Note: The abscissa represents the difference between the comparison groups. The default red color represents the protein that has been shown to be up-regulated in the different comparison group, while the blue color represents the protein that has been demonstrated to be down-regulated.
Figure 6. Summary of differentially expressed proteins (DEPs). Note: The abscissa represents the difference between the comparison groups. The default red color represents the protein that has been shown to be up-regulated in the different comparison group, while the blue color represents the protein that has been demonstrated to be down-regulated.
Microorganisms 13 02212 g006
Figure 7. GO functional annotation analysis of DEPs. Note: Each column in the figure represents a multi-level classification of GO, and the higher the column, the more proteins in this multi-level classification; the abscissa represents the multi-level classification term of GO, and the ordinate represents the number of differential proteins annotated to the multi-level classification.
Figure 7. GO functional annotation analysis of DEPs. Note: Each column in the figure represents a multi-level classification of GO, and the higher the column, the more proteins in this multi-level classification; the abscissa represents the multi-level classification term of GO, and the ordinate represents the number of differential proteins annotated to the multi-level classification.
Microorganisms 13 02212 g007
Figure 8. KEGG pathway annotation analysis of DEPs. Note: The ordinate in the figure is the name of the KEGG metabolic pathway, and the abscissa is the number of proteins annotated to the pathway. Paths of different colors represent different categories to which they belong.
Figure 8. KEGG pathway annotation analysis of DEPs. Note: The ordinate in the figure is the name of the KEGG metabolic pathway, and the abscissa is the number of proteins annotated to the pathway. Paths of different colors represent different categories to which they belong.
Microorganisms 13 02212 g008
Figure 9. EggNOG functional classification of DEPs. Note: The abscissa represents the functional classification of EggNOG (represented by capital letters C–V), and the ordinate represents the number of proteins with this function. (C) Energy production and conversion; (E) Amino acid transport and metabolism; (F) Nucleotide transport and metabolism; (G) Carbohydrate transport and metabolism; (H) Coenzyme transport and metabolism; (I) Lipid transport and metabolism; (J) Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis; (K) Transcription; (L) Replication, recombination and repair; (M) Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis; (N) Cell motility; (O) Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones; (P) Inorganic ion transport and metabolism; (Q) Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism; (T) Signal transduction mechanisms; (U) Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport; (V) Defense mechanisms.
Figure 9. EggNOG functional classification of DEPs. Note: The abscissa represents the functional classification of EggNOG (represented by capital letters C–V), and the ordinate represents the number of proteins with this function. (C) Energy production and conversion; (E) Amino acid transport and metabolism; (F) Nucleotide transport and metabolism; (G) Carbohydrate transport and metabolism; (H) Coenzyme transport and metabolism; (I) Lipid transport and metabolism; (J) Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis; (K) Transcription; (L) Replication, recombination and repair; (M) Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis; (N) Cell motility; (O) Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones; (P) Inorganic ion transport and metabolism; (Q) Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism; (T) Signal transduction mechanisms; (U) Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport; (V) Defense mechanisms.
Microorganisms 13 02212 g009
Figure 10. Pfam domain classification of DEPs. Note: The ordinate is the abbreviation of the functional domain (domain), and the abscissa is the number of proteins annotated to each domain.
Figure 10. Pfam domain classification of DEPs. Note: The ordinate is the abbreviation of the functional domain (domain), and the abscissa is the number of proteins annotated to each domain.
Microorganisms 13 02212 g010
Figure 11. Subcellular localization prediction of DEPs. Note: The abscissa is the name of different subcellular organelles, and the ordinate is the number of proteins annotated to the subcellular organelles. Localization class and corresponding code are CYT: Cytoplasm, PLA: Plasma Membrane, EXC: Extracellular.
Figure 11. Subcellular localization prediction of DEPs. Note: The abscissa is the name of different subcellular organelles, and the ordinate is the number of proteins annotated to the subcellular organelles. Localization class and corresponding code are CYT: Cytoplasm, PLA: Plasma Membrane, EXC: Extracellular.
Microorganisms 13 02212 g011
Figure 12. GO enrichment analysis of DEPs. Note: The abscissa represents the GO term, and the ordinate represents the enrichment rate (calculated as the number of DEPs enriched in the term divided by the number of background proteins annotated to that term). A higher value indicates greater enrichment. The column color gradient represents the significance of the enrichment, where p or FDR < 0.05 is marked as *.
Figure 12. GO enrichment analysis of DEPs. Note: The abscissa represents the GO term, and the ordinate represents the enrichment rate (calculated as the number of DEPs enriched in the term divided by the number of background proteins annotated to that term). A higher value indicates greater enrichment. The column color gradient represents the significance of the enrichment, where p or FDR < 0.05 is marked as *.
Microorganisms 13 02212 g012aMicroorganisms 13 02212 g012b
Figure 13. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of DEPs.
Figure 13. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of DEPs.
Microorganisms 13 02212 g013aMicroorganisms 13 02212 g013b
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liang, Y.; Tan, S.; Lu, Y.; Chen, H.; Huang, X.; Yi, K.; He, C.; Wu, W. Molecular Insights into Ammonium Sulfate-Induced Secretome Reprogramming of Bacillus subtilis Czk1 for Enhanced Biocontrol Against Rubber Tree Root Rot. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 2212. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13092212

AMA Style

Liang Y, Tan S, Lu Y, Chen H, Huang X, Yi K, He C, Wu W. Molecular Insights into Ammonium Sulfate-Induced Secretome Reprogramming of Bacillus subtilis Czk1 for Enhanced Biocontrol Against Rubber Tree Root Rot. Microorganisms. 2025; 13(9):2212. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13092212

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liang, Yanqiong, Shibei Tan, Ying Lu, Helong Chen, Xing Huang, Kexian Yi, Chunping He, and Weihuai Wu. 2025. "Molecular Insights into Ammonium Sulfate-Induced Secretome Reprogramming of Bacillus subtilis Czk1 for Enhanced Biocontrol Against Rubber Tree Root Rot" Microorganisms 13, no. 9: 2212. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13092212

APA Style

Liang, Y., Tan, S., Lu, Y., Chen, H., Huang, X., Yi, K., He, C., & Wu, W. (2025). Molecular Insights into Ammonium Sulfate-Induced Secretome Reprogramming of Bacillus subtilis Czk1 for Enhanced Biocontrol Against Rubber Tree Root Rot. Microorganisms, 13(9), 2212. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13092212

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop