Next Article in Journal
Multi-Method Combined Screening of Agarase-Secreting Fungi from Sea Cucumber and Preliminary Analyses on Their Agarases and Agar-Oligosaccharide Products
Previous Article in Journal
Clostridioides difficile in Animal Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A One Health Perspective on Emerging Zoonotic Threats
Previous Article in Special Issue
Alleviating Overgrazing Stress and Promoting Grassland Plant Regeneration via Root Exudate-Mediated Recruitment of Beneficial Bacteria
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Harnessing the Rhizosphere Microbiome for Selenium Biofortification in Plants: Mechanisms, Applications and Future Perspectives

1
School of Biology and Food, Shangqiu Normal University, Shangqiu 476000, China
2
College of Agriculture, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2025, 13(6), 1234; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13061234
Submission received: 24 April 2025 / Revised: 22 May 2025 / Accepted: 26 May 2025 / Published: 28 May 2025

Abstract

:
The rhizosphere microbiome plays a critical role in promoting crop health and productivity. Selenium (Se), a beneficial trace element for plants, not only enhances resistance to both abiotic and biotic stresses but also modulates soil microbial communities. Se biofortification of crops grown in seleniferous soils using selenobacteria represents an eco-friendly and sustainable biotechnological approach. Crops primarily absorb selenium from the soil in its oxidized forms, selenate and selenite, and subsequently convert it into organic Se compounds. However, the role of Se-oxidizing bacteria in soil Se transformation, bioavailability, and plant uptake remains poorly understood. In this review, systematic collection and analysis of research on selenobacteria, including both Se-oxidizing and Se-reducing bacteria, are therefore essential to elucidate their functions in enhancing crop growth and health. These insights can (i) deepen our mechanistic understanding of microbially mediated Se cycling and stress resilience and (ii) offer a novel framework for nanomicrobiome engineering aimed at promoting sustainable food production.

1. Introduction

Selenium (Se), a trace element with essential biological functions, plays a pivotal role in human health (e.g., participating in the synthesis of glutathione peroxidase) and significantly enhances crop stress resistance and nutritional quality by modulating plant antioxidant systems and photosynthetic efficiency. Selenium exists in nature in four common oxidation states: Se(−II), Se(0), Se(IV), and Se(VI), while Se(−I) is a rare oxidation state seldom encountered in nature [1,2]. Selenium shares very similar chemical and physical properties with sulfur, including identical oxidation states [3]. Notably, the biotoxicity of these selenium species varies considerably: Se(IV) exhibits the highest toxicity, followed by Se(VI), while elemental Se(0) and organic forms (e.g., selenomethionine) show minimal toxicity [4]. Globally, in soil the selenium concentrations exhibit pronounced spatial heterogeneity, with an average of approximately 0.40 mg/kg. Clays, carboniferous and pyritic shales, phosphatic rocks, mineralized organic matter, and coal deposits are highly enriched in selenium, with observed concentrations of Se ranging from 1 to 700 mg/kg [5].
In China, selenium levels range widely (0.01–16.24 mg/kg) but remain generally below the global average in soil [6]. Of particular note, Enshi City in Hubei has received considerable attention as the location of the world’s only known independent selenium deposit, which contains the highest selenium reserves and bioavailable selenium resources globally, earning it the title “The World Capital of Selenium” [7].
In soils, selenium predominantly exists in inorganic forms such as selenite and selenate, which are readily absorbed and utilized by roots [8]. In contrast, organic Se species (e.g., selenoamino acids) are mainly found in anaerobic environments, originating from the microbial degradation of Se-containing organic matter [9,10]. Due to the high chemical similarity between Se and S, plant Se uptake primarily depends on sulfate transporters. For example, selenate (Se6+) is taken up by high-affinity sulfate transporters (e.g., Sultr1;1, Sultr1;2, and Sultr1;3) and subsequently translocated to aerial tissues for metabolic assimilation. In contrast, selenite (Se4+) uptake likely occurs through phosphate transporters, with most of the absorbed Se(IV) being converted into organic selenium forms within the root cells [7]. Interestingly, a pronounced antagonistic interaction exists between Se and S uptake: elevated sulfate concentrations significantly inhibit Se(IV) absorption, whereas under sulfur-deficient conditions, Se(IV) may promote sulfate transmembrane transport [11]. Moreover, the sulfur-containing amino acid cysteine plays a vital role in the production of volatile Se species in Pseudomonas tolaasii under aerobic conditions [12].
Current researches on microbially mediated selenium cycling have primarily focused on reductive processes (Figure 1) [13], while the mechanisms underlying Se oxidation remain poorly understood. Studies have shown that bacterial-mediated selenium oxidation proceeds at remarkably slow rates—three to four orders of magnitude lower than those of reductive reactions [14,15]. In 1972, Torma and Habashi first reported the catalytic oxidation of copper selenide by Thiobacillus ferrooxidans [16]. Later, in 1981, Sarathchandra and Watkinson demonstrated that Bacillus megaterium could oxidize elemental selenium to selenite, providing a foundational benchmark for subsequent research on selenium oxidation by soil microorganisms [15].
Globally, approximately 15% of the population suffers from selenium deficiency [17], with over 50% of China’s population being affected [18]. Therefore, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a daily dietary Se intake of 40 μg for adults [19]. Given the uneven global distribution of soil selenium and the widespread prevalence of selenium deficiency, enhancing the bioavailable selenium content in soils and improving crop selenium uptake efficiency are pivotal strategies for increasing agricultural productivity and food quality. As one of the world’s most important staple crops, wheat is considered an ideal vehicle for selenium biofortification due to its strong selenium accumulation capacity. Selenium biofortification has become a widely adopted agricultural practice and is currently regarded as one of the most effective methods for improving human selenium intake [20]. The rhizosphere microbiome, as the “second genome of plants”, offers a novel route to enhance crop selenium uptake efficiency through the formation of functional plant–microbe holobionts that co-evolve with their host plants. These microorganisms not only represent essential biological resources for ensuring food and nutritional security but also provide foundational support for agricultural technological innovation and the development of modern seed industries.
Soil salinization poses a major ecological threat to global agricultural sustainability. According to the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), saline-alkali soils cover approximately 932 million hectares worldwide [21]. Reclaiming just 1% of these soils could theoretically boost global grain production by nearly 50 million tons—enough to meet the annual food demand of 120 million people. Recent studies have highlighted that rhizospheric Bacillus spp., as key members of halotolerant microbial communities, can alleviate salt stress through multiple mechanisms [22]: (i) secretion of extracellular polysaccharides (EPS) to form protective biofilms; (ii) synthesis of auxins such as indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) to stimulate root development; and (iii) production of osmoprotectants (e.g., proline, trehalose) to maintain cellular osmotic homeostasis. Notably, recent research has shown that selenium nanoparticles (SeNPs) synthesized by Se-transforming bacteria in the maize rhizosphere not only directly enhance plant stress tolerance but also selectively enrich plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) such as Bacillus spp. by modulating root exudate composition [23]. These findings offer new insights into microbe–plant interaction networks and provide a theoretical basis for the targeted manipulation of rhizosphere microecosystems.
Plants exposed to diverse biotic and abiotic stressors actively recruit functionally specialized microorganisms to the rhizosphere to enhance their adaptability. In response to pathogen invasion, plants utilize a “cry for help” strategy to recruit specific beneficial microbes that suppress disease development [24], whereas abiotic stresses (e.g., salinity, drought) selectively enrich the microbiomes capable of mitigating environmental stress [25]. In contrast to these dynamic and context-dependent recruitment patterns, certain probiotic microbes can stably colonize host plants throughout their lifecycle, flexibly modulating their functional traits in response to root exudate composition to meet the host’s physiological needs at different developmental stages [26]. This finely tuned plant–microbe interplay provides important insights for the development of next-generation microbial fertilizers.
In this review, we systematically examine the pivotal roles of microbially mediated selenium (Se) biogeochemical cycling in soil–plant systems, with particular emphasis on how Se-oxidizing/reducing bacteria regulate Se speciation transformations, bioavailability, and crop uptake efficiency. We also focus on the biosynthetic mechanisms of selenium nanoparticles (SeNPs) and their potential agricultural applications, including biofortification and stress mitigation (e.g., salinity, drought). Furthermore, we propose sustainable agricultural strategies based on rhizosphere microbiome engineering, encompassing microbial inoculants and nanofertilizer development.

2. Harnessing the Rhizosphere Microbiome to Enhance Plant Selenium Nutrition

2.1. Selenium Biogeochemical Cycle

The primary input of selenium into soil appears to be the deposition and mineralization of organic matter [27], though the deposition of selenium from the atmosphere, either as particulate Se(0) and Se(−II) or as Se(IV) and Se(VI) in rainwater, constitutes substantial inputs as well [28]. Soil selenium predominantly exists in five major forms: organic Se, selenides, elemental Se, selenite, and selenate (Figure 1). Among these, selenite (SeO32−) and selenate (SeO42−) are the principal inorganic selenium species available for plant uptake [8]. Selenite typically accounts for more than 40% of total soil selenium and serves as the dominant inorganic form absorbed by plants. It is primarily found in acidic and anaerobic soils, where it exhibits high solubility and bioavailability [5]. However, selenite readily forms insoluble complexes with iron (Fe) and aluminum (Al) oxides, limiting its effective availability to plants [29,30]. In contrast, selenate is more prevalent in alkaline and well-aerated soils, characterized by its high mobility and plant availability. Nonetheless, due to its extensive water solubility, selenate is prone to leaching losses, resulting in relatively low soil concentrations [30].
Organic selenium, mainly derived from anaerobic microbial degradation, constitutes a crucial bioavailable Se pool. Selenium bound to fulvic acids is readily accessible to plants, whereas humic acid-bound selenium is largely unavailable. Organic selenium, mostly in the Se(−II) oxidation state, originates from the decomposition of plant and animal residues as well as microbial activity [9,10]. Elemental selenium and selenides, typically found in trace amounts in Se-rich mineral deposits, are insoluble in water and thus unavailable to plants [20]. The general order of Se species mobility and bioavailability is as follows: Se(−II) > Se(0) > Se(IV) > Se(VI). Microorganisms are capable of a range of transformations of selenium species, encompassing reduction, oxidation, methylation, and demethylation.

2.2. Reduction and Methylation of Selenium

Microorganisms play a central role in driving soil selenium cycling, where the bioavailability of selenium is collectively regulated by three major transformation processes: reduction, methylation, and oxidation (Figure 1). Through the reductive pathway, bacteria convert high-valent selenate or selenite into lower-valent forms such as elemental selenium and selenides. The dissimilatory reduction mechanisms of Se(IV) and Se(VI) exhibit substantial phylogenetic diversity across bacterial species. Even within individual microorganisms, Se(IV) reduction often involves multiple independent enzymatic pathways. Notably, the predominant metabolic end products of both Se(IV) and Se(VI) respiration are SeNPs, which may assemble extracellularly or intracellularly under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Several distinct Se(IV) reduction pathways have been studied: (i) the Painter-type reaction involving thiol oxidation, (ii) the thioredoxin–thioredoxin reductase system, (iii) siderophore-associated reduction, (iv) sulfide-coupled reduction, and (v) dissimilatory respiratory reduction. These mechanisms vary in their enzymatic requirements, energy yields, and ecological distribution [31,32].
Generally, Se(VI) and Se(IV) reductases exhibit significant phylogenetic divergence. Intriguingly, all reported respiratory reductases specifically catalyzing the reduction of Se(IV) and Se(VI) exclusively belong to the dimethyl sulfoxide reductase (DMSOR) family and cluster together phylogenetically. These reductases are distinguished by the presence of a molybdenum cofactor (MoCo), a pterin-based prosthetic group essential for their catalytic activity [33]. In most cases, bacterial reduction of selenite to SeNPs occurs in the periplasm and cytoplasm. However, extracellular reduction of Se(IV) has also been observed when bacteria generate and excrete reductive substances [34].
Particularly under high-Se conditions, reductive transformation becomes crucial for microbial detoxification. For instance, certain Se-resistant bacteria specifically reduce selenite into SeNPs to mitigate selenium toxicity [35]. Bacillus cereus has been shown to enhance selenium volatilization in soil–plant systems, demonstrating the importance of plant–microbe synergism in selenium phytoremediation [36]. However, the higher the content of selenium in soils where the bacteria were isolated from, the fewer Se(IV)-reducing bacterial species were obtained [13].
Concurrently, the methylation pathway represents another essential route for detoxifying soluble selenate and selenite in soils. Various microorganisms including Escherichia coli, the microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, phototrophic non-sulfur bacteria, and lactic acid bacteria can convert inorganic Se into volatile methylated species (e.g., dimethyl selenide) [37,38]. These microbial-mediated methylation processes not only supply organic selenium to soils but also represent the dominant route for selenium volatilization and global selenium flux from the soil to the atmosphere [39]. Nonetheless, remediating Se-contaminated soils remains challenging due to the limited understanding of Se biogeochemical dynamics and the high costs of soil remediation.
Studies reveal that under anaerobic conditions, the transcriptional regulator FNR (fumarate and nitrate reductase) in Enterobacter cloacae SLD1a-1 specifically modulates selenate reductase activity, facilitating selenium nanoparticle biosynthesis (Table 1) [40]. Remarkably, Providencia rettgeri HF16, isolated from coal mine soil, exhibits extraordinary Se tolerance, withstanding selenite concentrations as high as 800 mM—the highest microbial selenite resistance reported to date. This strain not only shows extreme tolerance but also efficiently converts selenite into SeNPs [41]. Mechanistic investigations suggest that bacterial SeNP synthesis involves multiple cellular components, including intra- and extracellular proteins (e.g., flagellin FliC and porin OmpF), lipids, and polysaccharides, which collectively stabilize nanoparticle formation [42]. Furthermore, thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) in Bacillus spp. has been confirmed to utilize NADPH as an electron donor for direct Se(IV) reduction into SeNPs [43]. In summary, Se-reducing and methylating bacteria represent valuable biological resources for improving the efficiency of selenium phytoremediation in seleniferous soils.

2.3. Oxidation of Selenium

Microbial-mediated oxidation of selenium can significantly enhance the concentration of bioavailable selenium in soils (Figure 1). However, compared with the highly efficient selenium reduction processes, oxidation occurs at much slower rates, and it remains a relatively underexplored area of research [44]. It is intriguing to note that biogenic Se(0) was oxidized more readily than abiogenic Se(0) [15,45]. Recent studies revealed that the Agrobacterium sp. T3F4 can oxidize elemental Se into soluble selenite (Table 1). Under soil conditions amended with 5 mg/kg Se(0), strain T3F4 notably enhanced selenium uptake efficiency in pak choi [46]. Subsequently, the same research group isolated four Se-oxidizing bacterial strains from Se-rich soils, each capable of oxidizing selenomethionine, selenocysteine, selenourea, or elemental selenium into selenite. This study offers the first experimental evidence supporting microbial participation in organic selenium oxidation in soils, thereby improving selenium bioavailability and plant uptake. These findings provide critical insights for developing Se biofortification strategies in agriculture [47]. Further investigation is needed to elucidate how microbial activity influences the fate of organic or elemental selenium, which may undergo mineralization or transformation into bioavailable organic forms (e.g., Se-methionine), thus enhancing crop selenium accumulation.
Notably, plants can actively modulate the structure and function of the rhizosphere microbiome through the secretion of root exudates, thereby selectively enriching specific functional microbial groups to increase nutrient bioavailability. Such plant-mediated recruitment often leads to significantly higher bioavailable selenium concentrations in rhizosphere soils compared with bulk soils. Therefore, future research should focus on unraveling the microbial responses to selenium dynamics, including how selenium shapes the microbial community composition and functional gene expression. Meta-omics approaches, such as metagenomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics, will be instrumental in these efforts.

2.4. Biosynthesis of Microbial SeNPs

Microbial-synthesized SeNPs are regarded as the optimal selenium form for agricultural and biomedical applications due to their exceptional stability, potent bioactivity, efficient biotransformation, and environmental friendliness. SeNPs exhibit diverse biological activities in organisms, including antioxidant, antimicrobial, antiviral, and antitumor properties [42,48]. Notably, Bacillus spp. can reduce selenite to SeNPs via selenate reductase- and glutathione reductase-mediated pathways, employing transmembrane electron transport chains to progressively reduce Se(IV) into elemental Se, which is subsequently secreted as stable extracellular nanoparticles (Figure 1) [49,50]. However, in the presence of Se(IV) and heavy metals such as Pb, Cd, and Cu, microorganisms tend to reduce Se(IV) to nanostructured metal selenides instead of SeNPs [51,52,53].
In soils, SeNPs can function as slow-release selenium sources, providing sustained selenium supplementation for crops and showing promise as sustainable nanofertilizers. Studies have demonstrated that selenium content in wheat grains is strongly influenced by the rhizosphere, where microbial communities modulate selenium speciation and uptake efficiency; SeNP application has been shown to increase selenium accumulation in pak choi by up to 338% [54]. Chitinophaga sp. and Comamonas testosteroni, both capable of reducing Se(IV), enhanced selenium uptake in rice by solubilizing soil-bound selenium under pot cultivation conditions [55]. Additionally, inoculation of the endophytic Se(VI)-reducing bacterium Herbaspirillum sp. into tea seedlings via stem injection significantly increased leaf selenium content compared with uninoculated controls in Se-enriched soils [56]. Under 150 mM NaCl stress, SeNPs synthesized by B. cereus were shown to reduce the Na+/K+ ratio in wheat rhizospheres, significantly improving seed germination rates and mitigating ionic toxicity [57]. Thus, SeNPs play multifaceted roles in enhancing plant stress resistance, including the activation of antioxidant enzymes (e.g., CAT, SOD, GPX) to scavenge reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated under salt stress, thereby protecting cellular metabolism and improving plant resilience.
Beyond stress mitigation, microbial SeNPs can act as “microbial recruiters” that reshape the rhizosphere microbiome. In maize, root-secreted p-coumarate activates the rpoS gene in Pseudomonas sp. ZY71, promoting SeNP biosynthesis. These SeNPs attract PGPRs (e.g., Bacillus spp.) in a dose-dependent manner and stimulate biofilm formation, revealing a host-driven strategy for rhizomicrobiome engineering [23]. Similarly, Bacillus sp. E5, isolated from wheat roots, converts Se(IV) into organic selenium and SeNPs while alleviating drought stress, thereby enhancing wheat selenium biofortification [58]. The combined application of Se-transforming microbes and SeNPs shows synergistic potential in improving plant health and stress tolerance.

2.5. Plant Selenium Uptake Mechanisms

Microbial inoculation has been proven effective in enhancing organic selenium accumulation in crops. The core mechanisms include the following: (i) microbial secretion of organic acids to solubilize elemental selenium, thereby expanding the bioavailable selenium pool; (ii) modulation of plant selenium transporter gene expression (e.g., Sultr and phosphate transporters) by rhizosphere microbiomes to optimize selenium uptake efficiency; and (iii) microbial-mediated transformation of toxic selenite into less toxic organic selenium (e.g., selenomethionine), reducing phytotoxicity. Overall, microorganisms enhance plant growth by improving selenium tolerance and minimizing the accumulation of toxic selenium species (Figure 1).
Plant species exhibit marked differences in selenium uptake and utilization capacities [59]. While low selenium doses promote growth, excessive levels are inhibitory [60]. Currently, agronomic selenium biofortification primarily employs foliar spraying or soil application. Notably, selenium bioavailability is regulated by multiple factors, including soil organic matter content, pH, redox potential, and interactions with other nutrients [30]. Environmental conditions determine selenium speciation: acidic soils favor the formation of insoluble Se(0) and Se(−II), whereas alkaline conditions promote the availability of soluble Se(IV) and Se(VI) [29,30]. Additionally, adsorption by Fe oxides and clay minerals limits Se(IV) mobility, while phosphate (PO43−) competes for binding sites, thereby enhancing Se release [5].
Soil selenium application effectively increases both total and bioavailable selenium levels, leading to elevated selenium accumulation in grains, fruits, and vegetables. Comparative studies show notable differences in bioavailability among selenium species: while both SeMet and SeCys2 improve selenium content in winter wheat grains, SeCys2 demonstrates superior enrichment efficiency [61]. In buckwheat, supplementation with 20 μM of Se(VI), Se(IV), or MeSeCys enhances growth, with Se(IV) accumulating more in roots and Se(VI) more efficiently translocated to shoots [62]. Recent research further confirms that selenite application not only optimizes rhizosphere microbial communities and boosts soil enzymatic activity, but also improves salt tolerance in salt-sensitive soybean varieties without yield loss [63]. These findings underscore the importance of precisely tailoring selenium species and dosages for crop-specific biofortification strategies.
Table 1. Strain resources of representative selenobacteria.
Table 1. Strain resources of representative selenobacteria.
SelenobacteriaFunctionReference
Agrobacterium sp. T3F4Oxidation of Se(0) into Se(IV); isolated from seleniferous soil.[46]
Autotrophic bacteriaOxidation of selenium to selenic acid[64]
Bacillus megateriumOxidation of Se(0) to Se(IV); isolated from soil.[15]
Dyella spp. LX-1Oxidation of SeMet, SeCys2, selenourea, and Se(0) to Se(IV); isolated from seleniferous soil.[47]
Thiobacillus ferrooxidansOxidation of copper selenide.[16]
Micrococcus selenicusUsing selenide (Se(−II)) as an electron donor, during aerobic respiration.[65]
Rhodanobacter spp. LX-100Oxidation of SeMet, SeCys2, selenourea, and Se(0) to Se(IV); isolated from seleniferous soil.[47]
Acinetobacter sp. SW30Synthesis of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and SeNPs.[66]
Alcaligenes faecalispineReduction of Se(IV) to Se(0); isolated from the gut of the pine sawyer beetle. [67]
Bacillus selenitireducensReduction of Se(IV) to Se(0) or Se(0) to Se(−II); utilizing Se(IV) or Se(0) as an electron acceptor in anaerobic respiration; isolated from Mono Lake, a soda lake in California.[68]
Chitinophaga sp. SE06Synthesis of SeNPs; the first report of Se reduction by Chitinophaga.[55]
Comamonas testosterone SE26 Synthesis of SeNPs.[55]
Enterobacter cloacae SLD1a-1 Synthesis of SeNPs.[40]
Providencia rettgeri HF16Reduction of Se(IV) to Se(0); isolated from coal mine soil.[41]
Pseudomonas sp. ZY71 Synthesis of SeNP promoted by p-coumarate activates the rpoS gene.[23]
Streptomyces sp. ES2-5Reduction of Se(IV) to Se(0); isolated from a selenium mine soil.[69]

3. Rhizosphere Se-Transforming Microbes in Crop Stress Alleviation

Functional rhizosphere microbes are essential for promoting plant growth and health. The development of these microbes into biofertilizers or inoculants requires effective root colonization as a prerequisite for their beneficial effects [70]. Colonization typically follows a sequential process involving rhizosphere chemotaxis, root surface attachment, and biofilm formation, during which bacteria must evade or suppress plant immune responses [71]. Root exudates play a dual role by serving as both nutrient sources and signaling molecules that mediate microbe–plant interactions [72]. These exudates, mainly composed of amino acids, organic acids, and sugars, act as chemoattractants that guide microbial colonization. Recent studies have shown that the assembly of root-associated microbiomes is determined more by the dominant compounds and their corresponding microbial receptors than by the cumulative effects of multiple exudate components [73,74]. Successful colonizers rapidly utilize root exudates as carbon sources and compete effectively for limited resources such as iron, which is crucial for establishing a stable niche in the rhizosphere [75]. Under environmental stress, plants enhance the recruitment of beneficial microbes through the “cry for help” mechanism [76].
In addition to soluble compounds, root-emitted volatile organic compounds (rVOCs) serve as long-distance signals that modulate microbial behavior. These rVOCs diffuse readily through the soil matrix, promote quorum sensing, attract antifungal microbes during pathogen attack, and facilitate biofilm formation. For instance, the volatile compound dipropyl disulfide released by Allium species modifies tomato root exudate profiles, leading to the enrichment of beneficial rhizobacteria [77]. A recent study demonstrated that surfactin production enables Bacillus subtilis to stably colonize synthetic microbial communities without altering community composition while significantly reshaping the overall metabolic profile [78]. This finding provides new insights into the design and optimization of microbial agents for sustainable agriculture.
Selenium is a beneficial element for plants that can alleviate adverse conditions such as salinity, drought, high temperature, freezing damage, and heavy-metal stress. Numerous studies have indicated that selenium in the soil can improve the synthesis of plant antioxidant substances, activate antioxidant enzymes, enhance the ability of plant cells to scavenge free radicals, prevent membrane lipid peroxidation, and protect the plant cell membrane system, thereby mitigating the detrimental effects of both abiotic and biotic stresses on plant health [63,79,80,81]. The plant growth-promoting effects of bacteria vary depending on the metabolic capacities and stress tolerance traits of the specific bacterial strains involved [82]. PGPR mediates a wide range of physiological responses in plants, including the biosynthesis of proline and the production of IAA, a key phytohormone that also contributes to bacterial stress adaptation [83]. IAA production notably peaks under drought stress conditions [84]. In parallel, proline functions as a multifunctional osmolyte, maintaining redox homeostasis and acting as a reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenger [83].
Recently, a novel strategy has been proposed to improve plant selenium uptake while mitigating the absorption of highly toxic metalloids through the application of Se-oxidizing bacteria. For instance, selenium-oxidizing Agrobacterium sp. T3F4 significantly reduced arsenic accumulation in Brassica rapa L. grown in naturally contaminated soils [9]. The application of selenium can enhance soybean salt tolerance by optimizing the rhizosphere microbial community and improving the salt tolerance of salt-sensitive soybean [63].

4. Future Perspectives

In summary, researchers have increasingly focused not only on the remediation of selenium pollution but also on biofortification strategies and dietary supplementation due to the widespread occurrence of selenium deficiency. Establishing a direct biochemical pathway connecting selenium biogeochemical cycling with specific biomarker genes or metagenomic signatures remains challenging. This difficulty arises from the abundance of genes encoding nonspecific selenate/selenite reductases and the currently limited characterization of enzymes involved in both the methylation and oxidation pathways of selenium. In addition, future studies are expected to prioritize elucidating the diverse enzymatic mechanisms underlying microbial oxidation of selenium (e.g., organic Se, elemental Se).
Soil salinization poses a critical threat to global agricultural production, compromising food security, agricultural sustainability, and ecosystem health. Rhizosphere selenium-transforming microorganisms significantly contribute to plant selenium biofortification and salt-alkali tolerance. Specifically, selenium-reducing bacteria synthesize microbial SeNPs, while co-inoculation with selenium-oxidizing bacteria enhances salinity tolerance and selenium content in wheat seedlings. These insights provide a theoretical foundation for (i) utilizing saline-alkali lands, (ii) improving wheat yield/quality via selenium biofortification, and (iii) elucidating rhizosphere microbial symbiosis mechanisms. Such advances are vital for achieving stable microbial colonization and promoting crop resilience.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, manuscript preparation, and writing and editing, R.F. and H.F.; data curation, M.Z. and Y.Z.; critical revision of manuscript and editing, supervision, funding acquisition, R.F., J.L. and H.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province (242300421100; 242300421586; 242300421533), the Science and Technology Research Project of Henan Province (242102320358), and the Project for Youth Talent Lifting of Henan Province (2024HYTP008).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wells, M.; Stolz, J.F. Microbial Selenium Metabolism: A Brief History, Biogeochemistry and Ecophysiology. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2020, 96, fiaa209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sharma, V.K.; McDonald, T.J.; Sohn, M.; Anquandah, G.A.K.; Pettine, M.; Zboril, R. Biogeochemistry of Selenium. A Review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2015, 13, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Reich, H.J.; Hondal, R.J. Why Nature Chose Selenium. ACS Chem. Biol. 2016, 11, 821–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, Y.; Liu, Z.; Zeng, W.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, D.; Zhang, Y.; Jia, X. Screening and Identification of Soil Selenium-Enriched Strains and Application in Auricularia Auricula. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fernández-Martínez, A.; Charlet, L. Selenium Environmental Cycling and Bioavailability: A Structural Chemist Point of View. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2009, 8, 81–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jones, G.D.; Droz, B.; Greve, P.; Gottschalk, P.; Poffet, D.; McGrath, S.P.; Seneviratne, S.I.; Smith, P.; Winkel, L.H.E. Selenium Deficiency Risk Predicted to Increase under Future Climate Change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 2848–2853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Guo, Q.; Ye, J.; Zeng, J.; Chen, L.; Korpelainen, H.; Li, C. Selenium Species Transforming along Soil–Plant Continuum and Their Beneficial Roles for Horticultural Crops. Hortic. Res. 2023, 10, uhac270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zhou, Y.; Nie, K.; Geng, L.; Wang, Y.; Li, L.; Cheng, H. Selenium’s Role in Plant Secondary Metabolism: Regulation and Mechanistic Insights. Agronomy 2024, 15, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. An, L.; Zhou, C.; Zhao, L.; Wei, A.; Wang, Y.; Cui, H.; Zheng, S. Selenium-Oxidizing Agrobacterium Sp. T3F4 Decreases Arsenic Uptake by Brassica rapa L. under a Native Polluted Soil. J. Environ. Sci. 2024, 138, 506–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jiang, D.; Yu, F.; Huang, X.; Qin, H.; Zhu, Z. Effects of Microorganisms on Soil Selenium and Its Uptake by Pak Choi in Selenium-Enriched Lateritic Red Soil. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023, 257, 114927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. White, P.J.; Bowen, H.C.; Parmaguru, P.; Fritz, M.; Spracklen, W.P.; Spiby, R.E.; Meacham, M.C.; Mead, A.; Harriman, M.; Trueman, L.J.; et al. Interactions between Selenium and Sulphur Nutrition in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Exp. Bot. 2004, 55, 1927–1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Liu, Y.; Hedwig, S.; Schäffer, A.; Lenz, M.; Martinez, M. Sulfur Amino Acid Status Controls Selenium Methylation in Pseudomonas Tolaasii: Identification of a Novel Metabolite from Promiscuous Enzyme Reactions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 87, e0010421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, D.; Rensing, C.; Zheng, S. Microbial Reduction and Resistance to Selenium: Mechanisms, Applications and Prospects. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 421, 126684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Eswayah, A.S.; Smith, T.J.; Gardiner, P.H.E. Microbial Transformations of Selenium Species of Relevance to Bioremediation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 4848–4859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sarathchandra, S.; Watkinson, J. Oxidation of Elemental Selenium to Selenite by Bacillus Megaterium. Science 1981, 211, 600–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Torma, A.E.; Habashi, F. Oxidation of Copper (II) Selenide by Thiobacillus Ferrooxidans. Can. J. Microbiol. 1972, 18, 1780–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, D.; Zhou, F.; Yang, W.; Peng, Q.; Man, N.; Liang, D. Selenate Redistribution during Aging in Different Chinese Soils and the Dominant Influential Factors. Chemosphere 2017, 182, 284–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dinh, Q.T.; Cui, Z.; Huang, J.; Tran, T.A.T.; Wang, D.; Yang, W.; Zhou, F.; Wang, M.; Yu, D.; Liang, D. Selenium Distribution in the Chinese Environment and Its Relationship with Human Health: A Review. Environ. Int. 2018, 112, 294–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sakr, T.M.; Korany, M.; Katti, K.V. Selenium Nanomaterials in Biomedicine—An Overview of New Opportunities in Nanomedicine of Selenium. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2018, 46, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kang, Y.; Ming, J.; Fu, W.; Long, L.; Wen, X.; Zhang, Q.; Xiang, J.; Zhu, Y.; Yin, H. Selenium Fertilizer Improves Microbial Community Structure and Diversity of Rhizospheric Soil and Selenium Accumulation in Tomato Plants. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2024, 55, 1430–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yang, J.S.; Yao, R.J. Management and Efficient Agricultural Utilization of Salt-Affected Soil in China. Bull. Chin. Acad. Sci. 2015, 30, 417–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Valencia-Marin, M.F.; Chávez-Avila, S.; Guzmán-Guzmán, P.; Orozco-Mosqueda, M.d.C.; de los Santos-Villalobos, S.; Glick, B.R.; Santoyo, G. Survival Strategies of Bacillus spp. in Saline Soils: Key Factors to Promote Plant Growth and Health. Biotechnol. Adv. 2024, 70, 108303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sun, C.; Sun, B.; Chen, L.; Zhang, M.; Lu, P.; Wu, M.; Xue, Q.; Guo, Q.; Tang, D.; Lai, H. Harnessing Biosynthesized Selenium Nanoparticles for Recruitment of Beneficial Soil Microbes to Plant Roots. Cell Host Microbe 2024, 32, 2148–2160.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bakker, P.; Pieterse, C.M.J.; de Jonge, R.; Berendsen, R.L. The Soil-Borne Legacy. Cell 2018, 172, 1178–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Trivedi, P.; Leach, J.E.; Tringe, S.G.; Sa, T.; Singh, B.K. Plant–Microbiome Interactions: From Community Assembly to Plant Health. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 18, 607–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Feng, H.; Fu, R.; Luo, J.; Hou, X.; Gao, K.; Su, L.; Xu, Y.; Miao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Xu, Z.; et al. Listening to Plant’s Esperanto via Root Exudates: Reprogramming the Functional Expression of Plant Growth-promoting Rhizobacteria. New Phytol. 2023, 239, 2307–2319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Oram, L.L.; Strawn, D.G.; Marcus, M.A.; Fakra, S.C.; Möller, G. Macro- and Microscale Investigation of Selenium Speciation in Blackfoot River, Idaho Sediments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 6830–6836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lidman, F.; Mörth, C.-M.; Björkvald, L.; Laudon, H. Selenium Dynamics in Boreal Streams: The Role of Wetlands and Changing Groundwater Tables. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 2677–2683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cartes, P.; Gianfreda, L.; Mora, M.L. Uptake of Selenium and Its Antioxidant Activity in Ryegrass When Applied as Selenate and Selenite Forms. Plant Soil 2005, 276, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nakamaru, Y.M.; Altansuvd, J. Speciation and Bioavailability of Selenium and Antimony in Non-Flooded and Wetland Soils: A Review. Chemosphere 2014, 111, 366–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nancharaiah, Y.V.; Lens, P.N.L. Ecology and Biotechnology of Selenium-Respiring Bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2015, 79, 61–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ojeda, J.J.; Merroun, M.L.; Tugarova, A.V.; Lampis, S.; Kamnev, A.A.; Gardiner, P.H.E. Developments in the Study and Applications of Bacterial Transformations of Selenium Species. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2020, 40, 1250–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Miralles-Robledillo, J.M.; Torregrosa-Crespo, J.; Martínez-Espinosa, R.M.; Pire, C. DMSO Reductase Family: Phylogenetics and Applications of Extremophiles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Dwivedi, S.; AlKhedhairy, A.A.; Ahamed, M.; Musarrat, J. Biomimetic Synthesis of Selenium Nanospheres by Bacterial Strain JS-11 and Its Role as a Biosensor for Nanotoxicity Assessment: A Novel Se-Bioassay. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e57404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Schiavon, M.; Pilon-Smits, E.A.H. Selenium Biofortification and Phytoremediation Phytotechnologies: A Review. J. Environ. Qual. 2017, 46, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Karna, R.R.; Kumara, S.T.; McCracken, V.J.; Fowler, T.J.; Lin, Z.Q. Enhancement on Selenium Volatilization for Phytoremediation: Role of Plant and Soil Microbe Interaction. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1504528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Vriens, B.; Behra, R.; Voegelin, A.; Zupanic, A.; Winkel, L.H.E. Selenium Uptake and Methylation by the Microalga Chlamydomonas Reinhardtii. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 711–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Martínez, F.G.; Moreno-Martin, G.; Pescuma, M.; Madrid-Albarrán, Y.; Mozzi, F. Biotransformation of Selenium by Lactic Acid Bacteria: Formation of Seleno-Nanoparticles and Seleno-Amino Acids. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pei, G.; Li, Y.; Li, H. Impacts of Selenium Supplementation on Soil Mercury Speciation, Soil Properties and Mercury-Resistant Microorganisms and Resistant Genes. Agronomy 2024, 14, 1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yee, N.; Ma, J.; Dalia, A.; Boonfueng, T.; Kobayashi, D.Y. Se(VI) Reduction and the Precipitation of Se(0) by the Facultative Bacterium Enterobacter cloacae SLD1a-1 Are Regulated by FNR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 1914–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Huang, S.; Wang, Y.; Tang, C.; Jia, H.; Wu, L. Speeding up Selenite Bioremediation Using the Highly Selenite-Tolerant Strain Providencia Rettgeri HF16-A Novel Mechanism of Selenite Reduction Based on Proteomic Analysis. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 406, 124690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Li, K.; Xu, Q.; Gao, S.; Zhang, S.; Ma, Y.; Zhao, G.; Guo, Y. Highly Stable Selenium Nanoparticles: Assembly and Stabilization via Flagellin FliC and Porin OmpF in Rahnella Aquatilis HX2. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 414, 125545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yasir, M.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, Z.; Luo, M.; Wang, G. NAD(P)H-Dependent Thioredoxin-Disulfide Reductase TrxR Is Essential for Tellurite and Selenite Reduction and Resistance in Bacillus sp. Y3. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2020, 96, fiaa126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Qu, L.; Xu, J.; Dai, Z.; Elyamine, A.M.; Huang, W.; Han, D.; Dang, B.; Xu, Z.; Jia, W. Selenium in Soil-Plant System: Transport, Detoxification and Bioremediation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 452, 131272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Losi, M.E.; Frankenberger, W.T. Microbial Oxidation and Solubilization of Precipitated Elemental Selenium in Soil. J. Environ. Qual. 1998, 27, 836–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhu, D.; Niu, Y.; Fan, K.; Zhang, F.; Wang, Y.; Wang, G.; Zheng, S. Selenium-Oxidizing Agrobacterium sp. T3F4 Steadily Colonizes in Soil Promoting Selenium Uptake by Pak Choi (Brassica campestris). Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 791, 148294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Luo, X.; Wang, Y.; Lan, Y.; An, L.; Wang, G.; Li, M.; Zheng, S. Microbial Oxidation of Organic and Elemental Selenium to Selenite. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 833, 155203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Selmani, A.; Ulm, L.; Kasemets, K.; Kurvet, I.; Erceg, I.; Barbir, R.; Pem, B.; Santini, P.; Marion, I.D.; Vinković, T.; et al. Stability and Toxicity of Differently Coated Selenium Nanoparticles under Model Environmental Exposure Settings. Chemosphere 2020, 250, 126265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fischer, S.; Krause, T.; Lederer, F.; Merroun, M.L.; Shevchenko, A.; Hübner, R.; Firkala, T.; Stumpf, T.; Jordan, N.; Jain, R. Bacillus safensis JG-B5T Affects the Fate of Selenium by Extracellular Production of Colloidally Less Stable Selenium Nanoparticles. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 384, 121146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Xue, S.J.; Zhang, X.T.; Li, X.C.; Zhao, F.Y.; Shu, X.; Jiang, W.W.; Zhang, J.Y. Multi-Pathways-Mediated Mechanisms of Selenite Reduction and Elemental Selenium Nanoparticles Biogenesis in the Yeast-like Fungus Aureobasidium Melanogenum I15. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 470, 134204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yan, Z.; Qian, J.; Gu, Y.; Su, Y.; Ai, X.; Wu, S. Green Biosynthesis of Biocompatible CdSe Quantum Dots in Living Escherichia coli Cells. Mater. Res. Express 2014, 1, 15401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Qi, S.; Yang, S.; Yue, L.; Wang, J.; Liang, X.; Xin, B. Extracellular Biosynthesis of Cu2-XSe Nanocrystallites with Photocatalytic Activity. Mater. Res. Bull. 2019, 111, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Jacob, J.M.; Sharma, S.; Balakrishnan, R.M. Exploring the Fungal Protein Cadre in the Biosynthesis of PbSe Quantum Dots. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 324, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wang, C.; Yue, L.; Cheng, B.; Chen, F.; Zhao, X.; Wang, Z.; Xing, B. Mechanisms of Growth-Promotion and Se-Enrichment in Brassica chinensis L. by Selenium Nanomaterials: Beneficial Rhizosphere Microorganisms, Nutrient Availability, and Photosynthesis. Environ. Sci. Nano 2022, 9, 302–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Huang, C.; Wang, H.; Shi, X.; Wang, Y.; Li, P.; Yin, H.; Shao, Y. Two New Selenite Reducing Bacterial Isolates from Paddy Soil and the Potential Se Biofortification of Paddy Rice. Ecotoxicology 2021, 30, 1465–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Xu, X.; Cheng, W.; Liu, X.; You, H.; Wu, G.; Ding, K.; Tu, X.; Yang, L.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; et al. Selenate Reduction and Selenium Enrichment of Tea by the Endophytic Herbaspirillum sp. Strain WT00C. Curr. Microbiol. 2020, 77, 588–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ghazi, A.A.; El-Nahrawy, S.; El-Ramady, H.; Ling, W. Biosynthesis of Nano-Selenium and Its Impact on Germination of Wheat under Salt Stress for Sustainable Production. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Liu, Y.; Yue, Z.; Sun, Z.; Li, C. Harnessing Native Bacillus spp. for Sustainable Wheat Production. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2023, 89, e0124722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Johnson, C.C.; Fordyce, F.M.; Rayman, M.P. Symposium on “Geographical and Geological Influences on Nutrition”: Factors Controlling the Distribution of Selenium in the Environment and Their Impact on Health and Nutrition. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2010, 69, 119–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Qing, X.; Zhao, X.; Hu, C.; Wang, P.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, P.; Shi, H.; Jia, F.; Qu, C. Selenium Alleviates Chromium Toxicity by Preventing Oxidative Stress in Cabbage (Brassica campestris L. ssp. Pekinensis) Leaves. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 114, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Labunskyy, V.M.; Hatfield, D.L.; Gladyshev, V.N. Selenoproteins: Molecular Pathways and Physiological Roles. Physiol. Rev. 2014, 94, 739–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Liu, R.; Zhao, L.; Li, J.; Zhang, C.; Lyu, L.; Man, Y.B.; Wu, F. Influence of Exogenous Selenomethionine and Selenocystine on Uptake and Accumulation of Se in Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Xinong 979). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2023, 30, 23887–23897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Wang, Y.; Hu, C.; Wang, X.; Shi, G.; Lei, Z.; Tang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Wuriyanghan, H.; Zhao, X. Selenium-Induced Rhizosphere Microorganisms Endow Salt-Sensitive Soybeans with Salt Tolerance. Environ. Res. 2023, 236, 116827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lipman, J.G.; Waksman, S.A. The Oxidation of Selenium by a New Group of Autotrophic Microorganisms. Science 1923, 57, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Levine, V.E. The Reducing Properties of Microorganisms Withspecial Reference to Selenium Compounds. J. Bacteriol. 1925, 10, 217–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wadhwani, S.A.; Shedbalkar, U.U.; Singh, R.; Chopade, B.A. Biosynthesis of Gold and Selenium Nanoparticles by Purified Protein from Acinetobacter sp. SW 30. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2018, 111, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wang, Y.; Shu, X.; Zhou, Q.; Fan, T.; Wang, T.; Chen, X.; Li, M.; Ma, Y.; Ni, J.; Hou, J.; et al. Selenite Reduction and the Biogenesis of Selenium Nanoparticles by Alcaligenes Faecalis Se03 Isolated from the Gut of Monochamus Alternatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Herbel, M.J.; Blum, J.S.; Oremland, R.S.; Borglin, S.E. Reduction of Elemental Selenium to Selenide: Experiments with Anoxic Sediments and Bacteria That Respire Se-Oxyanions. Geomicrobiol. J. 2003, 20, 587–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tan, Y.; Yao, R.; Wang, R.; Wang, D.; Wang, G.; Zheng, S. Reduction of Selenite to Se(0) Nanoparticles by Filamentous Bacterium Streptomyces sp. ES2-5 Isolated from a Selenium Mining Soil. Microb. Cell Fact. 2016, 15, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Liu, Y.; Xu, Z.; Chen, L.; Xun, W.; Shu, X.; Chen, Y.; Sun, X.; Wang, Z.; Ren, Y.; Shen, Q.; et al. Root Colonization by Beneficial Rhizobacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2024, 48, fuad066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Shu, L.J.; Kahlon, P.S.; Ranf, S. The Power of Patterns: New Insights into Pattern-Triggered Immunity. New Phytol. 2023, 240, 960–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Feng, H.; Fu, R.; Hou, X.; Lv, Y.; Zhang, N.; Liu, Y.; Xu, Z.; Miao, Y.; Krell, T.; Shen, Q.; et al. Chemotaxis of Beneficial Rhizobacteria to Root Exudates: The First Step towards Root—Microbe Rhizosphere Interactions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 6655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Feng, H.; Zhang, N.; Fu, R.; Liu, Y.; Krell, T.; Du, W.; Shao, J.; Shen, Q.; Zhang, R. Recognition of Dominant Attractants by Key Chemoreceptors Mediates Recruitment of Plant Growth-promoting Rhizobacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 21, 402–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Feng, H.; Lv, Y.; Krell, T.; Fu, R.; Liu, Y.; Xu, Z.; Du, W.; Shen, Q.; Zhang, N.; Zhang, R. Signal Binding at Both Modules of Its DCache Domain Enables the McpA Chemoreceptor of Bacillus Velezensis to Sense Different Ligands. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2201747119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Liu, Y.; Shu, X.; Chen, L.; Zhang, H.; Feng, H.; Sun, X.; Xiong, Q.; Li, G.; Xun, W.; Xu, Z.; et al. Plant Commensal Type VII Secretion System Causes Iron Leakage from Roots to Promote Colonization. Nat. Microbiol. 2023, 8, 1434–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Rolfe, S.A.; Griffiths, J.; Ton, J. Crying out for Help with Root Exudates: Adaptive Mechanisms by Which Stressed Plants Assemble Health-Promoting Soil Microbiomes. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2019, 49, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zhou, X.; Zhang, J.; Shi, J.; Khashi u Rahman, M.; Liu, H.; Wei, Z.; Wu, F.; Dini-Andreote, F. Volatile-Mediated Interspecific Plant Interaction Promotes Root Colonization by Beneficial Bacteria via Induced Shifts in Root Exudation. Microbiome 2024, 12, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Lozano-Andrade, C.N.; Dinesen, C.; Wibowo, M.; Bach, N.A.; Hesselberg-Thomsen, V.; Jarmusch, S.A.; Strube, M.L.; Kovács, Á.T. Surfactin Facilitates Establishment of Bacillus Subtilis in Synthetic Communities. ISME J. 2025, 19, wraf013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Tavanti, T.R.; de Melo, A.A.R.; Moreira, L.D.K.; Sanchez, D.E.J.; Silva, R. dos S.; Silva, R.M. da; Reis, A.R. dos Micronutrient Fertilization Enhances ROS Scavenging System for Alleviation of Abiotic Stresses in Plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 160, 386–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Nie, M.; Wu, C.; Tang, Y.; Shi, G.; Wang, X.; Hu, C.; Cao, J.; Zhao, X. Selenium and Bacillus Proteolyticus SES Synergistically Enhanced Ryegrass to Remediate Cu–Cd–Cr Contaminated Soil. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 323, 121272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Liu, K.; Cai, M.; Hu, C.; Sun, X.; Cheng, Q.; Jia, W.; Yang, T.; Nie, M.; Zhao, X. Selenium (Se) Reduces Sclerotinia Stem Rot Disease Incidence of Oilseed Rape by Increasing Plant Se Concentration and Shifting Soil Microbial Community and Functional Profiles. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 254, 113051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Benabdellah, K.; Abbas, Y.; Abourouh, M.; Aroca, R.; Azcón, R. Influence of Two Bacterial Isolates from Degraded and Non-Degraded Soils and Arbuscular Mycorrhizae Fungi Isolated from Semi-Arid Zone on the Growth of Trifolium Repens under Drought Conditions: Mechanisms Related to Bacterial Effectiveness. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2011, 47, 303–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Liu, Y.; Xun, W.; Chen, L.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, N.; Feng, H.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, R. Rhizosphere Microbes Enhance Plant Salt Tolerance: Toward Crop Production in Saline Soil. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2022, 20, 6543–6551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Marulanda, A.; Barea, J.-M.; Azcón, R. Stimulation of Plant Growth and Drought Tolerance by Native Microorganisms (AM Fungi and Bacteria) from Dry Environments: Mechanisms Related to Bacterial Effectiveness. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2009, 28, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. An overview of harnessing the rhizosphere microbiome for selenium biofortification in plants.
Figure 1. An overview of harnessing the rhizosphere microbiome for selenium biofortification in plants.
Microorganisms 13 01234 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fu, R.; Zhu, M.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Feng, H. Harnessing the Rhizosphere Microbiome for Selenium Biofortification in Plants: Mechanisms, Applications and Future Perspectives. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 1234. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13061234

AMA Style

Fu R, Zhu M, Zhang Y, Li J, Feng H. Harnessing the Rhizosphere Microbiome for Selenium Biofortification in Plants: Mechanisms, Applications and Future Perspectives. Microorganisms. 2025; 13(6):1234. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13061234

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fu, Ruixin, Mengyuan Zhu, Yanrong Zhang, Junmin Li, and Haichao Feng. 2025. "Harnessing the Rhizosphere Microbiome for Selenium Biofortification in Plants: Mechanisms, Applications and Future Perspectives" Microorganisms 13, no. 6: 1234. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13061234

APA Style

Fu, R., Zhu, M., Zhang, Y., Li, J., & Feng, H. (2025). Harnessing the Rhizosphere Microbiome for Selenium Biofortification in Plants: Mechanisms, Applications and Future Perspectives. Microorganisms, 13(6), 1234. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13061234

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop