Next Article in Journal
Dynamic Response Mechanisms of Anammox Reactors Under Nitrogen-Loading Fluctuations: Nitrogen Removal Performance, Microbial Community Succession, and Metabolic Functions
Previous Article in Journal
Aeromonas caviae subsp. aquatica subsp. nov., a New Multidrug-Resistant Subspecies Isolated from a Drinking Water Storage Tank
Previous Article in Special Issue
Epidemiological, Pathological, and Molecular Studies on Sheeppox Disease Outbreaks in Karnataka, India
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

The Role of Vulture (Accipitriformes) Cutaneous Microbiota in Infectious Disease Protection

Microorganisms 2025, 13(4), 898; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13040898
by Miriam Lobello 1, Roberto Bava 1, Fabio Castagna 1, Francesca Daniela Sotgiu 2, Fiammetta Berlinguer 2 and Bruno Tilocca 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Microorganisms 2025, 13(4), 898; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13040898
Submission received: 18 March 2025 / Revised: 1 April 2025 / Accepted: 11 April 2025 / Published: 14 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emerging Infectious Diseases in Humans and Animals)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear Authors,

The manuscript certainly touches upon an interesting topic. However, the connection between the vulture microbiota and disease prevention still remains under many questions. The connection with humans also needs to be expanded. The title of the manuscript should be supplemented with a clarification on taxonomy, as this clarifies the essence of the study. The text of the manuscript in different parts needs to be supplemented and rewritten. In many methodological aspects, the authors omit important information. It should be added. When comparing the microbiota of different vulture species, there is a lack of graphic material. The comparative part in the discussion needs to be expanded and additional literature sources on other species of birds of prey should be cited. The authors conducted a review of the topic of study, but did not touch on some aspects. In particular, the microbiota of vulture feces is of interest. After all the comments are eliminated, the manuscript can be reviewed again.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

The Authors gratefully acknowledge the Reviewer for the thorough revision of the manuscript and the constructive comments. The revised version of the manuscript provided is amended accordingly, along with the Reviewer1 revision file, which includes a point-to-point response.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The present review aimed to examine the composition and functional importance of the vulture skin microbiota, exploring its role in pathogen exclusion, immune system modulation and environmental adaptation.

The manuscript is interesting, although the authors could perhaps make the review more attractive by including tables.

Some specific points are shown below.

L.211. Figure 1. It would be good to include examples of each type of barrier involved in the skin since the figure is somewhat simple.

L.213-215. This information is somewhat repetitive as it is mentioned in L.204-206.

L.249. Figure 3 is not mentioned in the text.

L.287. It would be good to include a table with the list of skin microorganisms and their effect against pathogenic bacteria and/or their toxins.

L.391. this thesis???

Author Response

The Authors acknowledge the Reviewer for the detailed revision of the manuscript. The revised version of the manuscript is amended according to this Reviewer's suggestion.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear Authors,

I am satisfied with the revision of the manuscript. Additional data and corrections have been added to the manuscript. The role of skin microbiota of vultures (Accipitriformes) in protection against infectious diseases is substantiated and convincingly presented in this manuscript. All possible aspects of interaction are revealed. The review of the research results was selected appropriately. The article takes into account the comments on the methodology. The analysis and conclusion for each chapter are sufficient and do not raise objections. References to sources of literature have been adjusted. The results of previous studies by other authors have been taken into account. I recommend it for the journal Microorganisms.

Back to TopTop