Next Article in Journal
Bacteroides fragilis Toxin Induces Sequential Proteolysis of E-Cadherin and Inflammatory Response in Mouse Intestinal Epithelial Cell Line
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Two Selected Levels of Padina gymnospora Biowaste and Enteric Methane Emission, Nutrient Digestibility, and Rumen Metagenome in Growing Sheep
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phylogenetic Analysis, Pulse-Amplitude-Modulated (PAM) Fluorometry Measuring Parameter Optimization, and Cell Wall Disintegration of Chlorella vulgaris K-01
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Isolation and Characterization of Beauveria caledonica (Ascomycota: Hypocreales) Strains for Biological Control of Odoiporus longicollis Oliver (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

Microorganisms 2025, 13(4), 782; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13040782
by Mingbi Ding 1,2, Li Wu 1,2, Hongwei Yu 1,2, Huacai Fan 1, Zhixiang Guo 1, Shengtao Xu 1, Jianhui Chun 2, Yongfen Wang 1,3,* and Si-Jun Zheng 1,4,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Reviewer 4:
Microorganisms 2025, 13(4), 782; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13040782
Submission received: 10 December 2024 / Revised: 9 February 2025 / Accepted: 22 March 2025 / Published: 28 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Beneficial Microbes: Food, Mood and Beyond, 2nd Edition)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The manuscript undoubtedly represents an exhaustive and detailed work. In addition to the above, the methodology has been carefully developed and adequately presented in the text, which is reflected in the results. However, in addition to some observations that I submit, I suggest a slight revision of the language in order to improve the work.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Why did the author use a scanning electron microscope to observe mycelial morphology? The sample preparation for scanning electron microscopes involves a drying process, which could change the original morphology. Could the author provide morphological observation under an optical microscope?

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The article contains important information that can be used in practice. The manuscript is interesting, but I would like to suggest some minor changes.

The chapter 'Introduction" contains infromation about banana industry and pests that damage crops. I think that some detailed information about Odoiporus longicollis should be added. Information about morphology and life cycle is needed.

Research methods have been presented sufficiently. The charts are clear and most of the results are presented in detail and clearly, but there are concerns about the photos, which do not show clearly the symptoms of the pest's feeding. The quality of the photos should be improved so that the results of the observations can be seen.

Systematic affinity of all mentioned species should be complemented  both in the title and in the text.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 4 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

In this paper the authors isolate four strains of Beauveria caledonica and evaluate their potential as insect control treatments for banana plantations.  The authors find that the identified strains are pathogenic to the major banana plague Odoiporus longicollis.  

 

Major comments: 

  1. I recommend changing the title to "Isolation and Characterization of Beauveria caledonica strains for Biological Control of Odoiporus longicollis (Oliver) 

 

  1. The abstract must be rewritten, following the structure of scientific abstracts (i.e., background, methods, results and conclusions). 

 

  1. How was the Fungal DNA extracted (line 148)? 

 

  1. The description of the PCR method is incomplete. The concentrations of primers and template are missing (line 151 and 152). Which MasterMix was used? Commercial? 

 

  1. Which strains are shown in Fig.5 C-F, Fig 6 C-F and Fig 7C-H? 

 

  1. Which strain were used in the pathogenicity test (Fig. 8)? 

 

  1. What do the a and b mean on Fig. 9A and Fig 9B? 

 

  1. The method to inoculate the fungi into the insect is very different from what it could be achievable in a real-world application. How realistic is it to achieve significant insect infection in a real-world scenario. I think it would be interesting to discuss this point. 

 

  1. Can insects infect each other with the fungi? It might be interesting discuss this point in the discussion. 

 

  1. The authors identify the fungi in BPW from a banana plantation. Was that banana plantation performing better than other non-Bc ones?

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 4 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors have addressed satisfactorily all my concerns. 

Back to TopTop