Next Article in Journal
A Microbial Endocrinology-Designed Discovery Platform to Identify Histamine-Degrading Probiotics: Proof of Concept in Poultry
Previous Article in Journal
Advances in Donkey Disease Surveillance and Microbiome Characterization in China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Molecular Epidemiology of Salmonella enterica Serotype Dublin Isolated from 2011 to 2022 from Veal and Dairy Cattle in Pennsylvania
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Neisseria gonorrhoeae—Susceptibility Trends and Basic Molecular Mapping of Isolates Collected in Israel in 2016–2022

1
National Public Health Laboratory, Public Health Directorate, Ministry of Health, Tel Aviv 6810416, Israel
2
Central District Department of Health, Ministry of Health, Ramla 7243003, Israel
3
School of Health Sciences, Ashkelon Academic College, Ashkelon 7821100, Israel
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2025, 13(4), 750; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13040750
Submission received: 18 February 2025 / Revised: 26 February 2025 / Accepted: 4 March 2025 / Published: 26 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Molecular Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases)

Abstract

:
Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) is a globally significant sexually transmitted infection (STI) with increasing antimicrobial resistance (AMR), posing a serious threat to public health. Between 2016 and 2022, the Israeli National NG Reference Center (INNGRC) comprehensively analyzed NG isolates in Israel to determine AMR patterns and sequence types (STs). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was performed on 1205 NG isolates using E-test gradient strips, and NG-MAST analysis was conducted on 279 isolates via Sanger sequencing and whole genome sequencing (WGS). Surveillance revealed high resistance rates to ciprofloxacin (54.4%), azithromycin (41.3%), tetracycline, and benzylpenicillin, while all isolates remained susceptible to ceftriaxone and spectinomycin. Multi-drug resistance (MDR) was observed in 8.6% of isolates, and 3% were classified as extensively drug-resistant (XDR). NG-MAST analysis identified 72 distinct STs, with ST292, ST4269, and ST5441 being the most prevalent. ST19665 and ST11461 predominated in 2022, while ST292, ST5441, and ST16169 were more abundant in 2018. The findings highlight the increasing prevalence of AMR in NG in Israel and underscore the importance of continuous surveillance and molecular characterization by reference laboratories like the INNGRC to inform treatment strategies and public health interventions, ultimately reducing the burden of this critical STI.

1. Introduction

Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) is the second-most prevalent bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI) worldwide. It has developed antimicrobial resistance (AMR) to all previous first-line drugs, such as penicillin, tetracycline, and fluoroquinolones [1,2], leaving the expanded-spectrum cephalosporins ceftriaxone and cefixime as the only antibiotics recommended for the treatment of gonococcal infections [3,4].
The evolution of AMR in NG has emerged as a critical global health challenge over the past decade. This Gram-negative pathogen has demonstrated an exceptional ability to develop resistance to multiple classes of antibiotics, severely limiting treatment options and raising concerns about potentially untreatable gonorrhea infections [5].
One of the most alarming trends has been the increasing resistance to extended-spectrum cephalosporins (ESCs), particularly ceftriaxone, which has long been considered the last line of defense against gonorrhea [6].
In New Zealand, surveillance reports from 2018 to 2022 have tracked the proportion of gonococcal isolates with reduced susceptibility to ceftriaxone [7]. These data provide valuable insights into the evolution of AMR patterns over time and across different demographic groups.
Many nations have observed a steady rise in azithromycin resistance, compromising its effectiveness as part of dual therapy regimens [8].
Ciprofloxacin resistance among NG has remained high globally, with rates exceeding 50% in numerous countries [8].
The emergence of MDR and XDR strains is particularly concerning [9]. These strains often carry multiple resistance determinants, severely limiting treatment options and posing a significant challenge to public health efforts.
N. gonorrhoeae achieves MDR/XDR status through chromosomal mutations and plasmid-mediated resistance. Chromosomal mutations modify antibiotic targets, enhance efflux systems, and alter membrane permeability. Plasmids enable the production of antibiotic-inactivating enzymes and protective proteins. These changes result in four core resistance mechanisms: target modification, enzymatic inactivation, increased efflux, and decreased influx, collectively conferring resistance to multiple antibiotic classes [10].
The COVID-19 pandemic led to decreased testing capacity for NG cultures in many countries, affecting surveillance efforts [11].
There has been notable inter-study variability and frequently small sample sizes in AMR studies, particularly in Africa, making appropriate inter-study and inter-country comparisons difficult [11].
These trends underscore the urgent need for continued global surveillance, the development of new treatment options, and the implementation of effective strategies to combat the growing threat of AMR in NG.
The sequence types (STs) of NG play a significant role in determining the patterns of AMR observed in different regions. The NG ST is defined through molecular analysis based on por and tbpB gene alleles using the NG multi-antigen sequence typing method (NG-MAST) [9,12].
The most common STs of NG associated with antimicrobial resistance include the following:
1.
Globally Prevalent Resistant Sequence Types: ST1901 is frequently associated with decreased susceptibility or resistance to extended-spectrum cephalosporins, particularly ceftriaxone [13,14]. ST1901 has been identified in multiple countries across different continents, indicating its global spread [15].
ST7363 is linked to decreased susceptibility to ceftriaxone and resistance to multiple other antibiotics, and ST-7363 has emerged as a concerning strain, especially in Asian countries [11,16]. ST1407 is associated with multi-drug resistance, including resistance to cephalosporins and azithromycin [12,16].
2.
Emerging Resistant Sequence Types: ST13871 is associated with high-level azithromycin resistance, and ST-13871 has been reported in multiple European countries and the United States [16,17]. ST14422 has been identified as a prevalent sequence type in some regions, and ST14422 has been associated with resistance to multiple antibiotics, including tetracycline and ciprofloxacin [13,17]. ST11210 has been linked to decreased susceptibility to extended-spectrum cephalosporins and resistance to fluoroquinolones in some studies [13,16].
The Israeli National NG Reference Center (INNGRC) of the Ministry of Health (MOH) collects all positive NG isolates from all Israeli healthcare organizations (IHOs). It is important to note that Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) for the diagnosis of NG in urine have replaced the traditional methods of microbiological cultures, resulting in fewer NG isolates.
The aim of this study was to describe and analyze the phenotypic AMR patterns and trends of NG isolates collected in Israel, between 2016 and 2022, in conjunction with their NG-MAST results.
Our study describes for the first time the STs and antimicrobial resistance of NG in Israel. Our results may contribute to the understanding of the global spread of specific STs as well as to better treatment and infection containment in Israel.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population and Sample Collection

Clinical isolates of NG were collected by the INNGRC, from all IHOs: health maintenance organizations (HMOs), hospitals’ laboratories (HLs), and STI walk-in clinics (SL). In total, 1205 samples were collected, analyzed, and stored between 2016 and 2022.

2.2. Bacterial Growth and Testing

Isolates were cultured on NYC Medium [18] and incubated for 24 h at 35 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere.
NG isolates were identified by colony morphology, Gram staining, oxidase, catalase, and nitrate tests, and Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption–Ionization Time-Of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) [19]. All the isolates were stored at −80 °C on Protect Micro-organism Preservation Beads in Cryovial of Technical Service Consultants Ltd. (Heywood, UK) [20]. ATCC NG strain 49226 was used as an internal control for all test methods [21].

2.3. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST)

A panel of 7 antimicrobials—benzylpenicillin (BEN), ceftriaxone (CTR), cefixime (CIX), azithromycin (AZI), ciprofloxacin (CIP), tetracycline (TET), and spectinomycin (SPE)—was tested by using E-test gradient strips (bioMérieux Marcy-l’E’toile, France) [22]; Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) (mg/L) were interpreted according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing clinical breakpoints (EUCAST) [23] for sensitivity (S), intermediate resistance (I), and resistance (R).
NG MDR/XDR susceptibility was defined accordingly:
1.
Decreased susceptibility to cephalosporins or resistance to azithromycin, along with resistance to at least two other antimicrobials, was defined as MDR-NG;
2.
Decreased susceptibility to a cephalosporin plus resistance to azithromycin as well as resistance to at least two other antimicrobials was defined as XDR-NG [24].
All isolates were suspended on Mueller Hinton Broth and cultured on GC Medium Base Agar [14].

2.4. Molecular Characterization Using NG-MAST Genotyping

Sixty-seven isolates from 2017 were characterized by the NG multi-antigen sequence typing (NG-MAST) system as described [17]. The allele numbers of por and tbpB and the sequence types (STs) were assigned using a publicly accessible database on the NG-MAST website “https://pubmlst.org/”.
Two hundred and twelve isolates from the years 2018 and 2022 were characterized by whole genome sequencing (WGS). DNA Paired-end libraries were prepared using the Illumina Nextera XT DNA Library Preparation Kit according to Illumina protocols [25]. For sequencing, we utilized the Illumina MiSeq platform using a MiSeq Reagent Kit v2 (500-cycles) (catalog MS-102-2003) or a MiSeq Reagent Kit v3 (600-cycle), (catalog MS-102-3003).
Raw short reads were quality-analyzed with FastQC v0.11.9 [26] and then trimmed with Trimmomatic v0.39 [27] using the parameters “SLIDINGWINDOW: 4:15 MINLEN: 50”. De novo assembly of the short reads was performed using the SPAdes v3.13.1 [28] assembler. The analysis included 1000 ultrafast bootstrap replicates, and the resulting phylogenetic tree was visualized in iTOL. NG-MAST [12] STs were assigned to each isolate using the MLST v2.23.0 [https://github.com/tseemann/mlst accessed on 26 February 2025] tool.
The raw WGS data were submitted to the NCBI SRA for ST confirmation: the Bioproject ID for 2018 is PRJNA1217336 and for 2022 is PRJNA1217803.

3. Results

3.1. The Demographic Characteristics of the Study Group

A total of 1205 samples were collected and analyzed throughout the study period. All isolates underwent both phenotypic and molecular testing and were identified as NG based on characteristic colony growth on selective agar media, the microscopy of Gram-negative diplococci, biochemical activity tests, and MALDI-TOF MS. The basic demographic information is summarized in Table 1, “Gender distribution”.
Among the 1205 examined samples, 82.9% of the isolates were from males, 9.7% from females, and 7.4% from an unknown gender. The median age of all patients was 33 years for males and 30 years for females across the entire testing period. The gender and age distribution trends for the patients from all IHOs are illustrated in Figure 1, “Gender and age distribution of patients from IHOs”.
This study compares the number of NG-positive isolates collected at the INNGRC with the total number of NG-positive cases reported to the MOH’s Department of Epidemiology (Figure 2).
The number of reported cases was four times higher than the number of NG isolates identified.

3.2. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST)

A panel of seven antibiotics—cefixime (CIX), azithromycin (AZI), tetracycline (TET), benzylpenicillin (BEN), spectinomycin (SPE), ciprofloxacin (CIP), and ceftriaxone (CTR)—was employed for AST on all NG isolates collected at the INNGRC.
The antimicrobial resistance profile of the 1205 isolates is summarized in Table 2, “NG isolates’ phenotypic antimicrobial resistance profile”.
Notably, 54.4% of the isolates exhibited phenotypic resistance to CIP, 41.3% to AZI, 8.7% to CIX, 27.6% to TET, and 15.9% to BEN, while no resistance was observed for SPE and CTR.
Figure 3, “Trends in antimicrobial resistance of NG tested in Israel: 2016–2022 (%)”, presents the antimicrobial resistance profile for each antibiotic individually.
There was no observed resistance to CTR and SPE, and from 82% up to 99% of the samples were sensitive to CIX. For certain antibiotics such as BEN, AZI, CIP, and TET, three levels of susceptibility were noted: resistant (R), sensitive (S), and intermediate resistance (I). The intermediate resistance level was predominant for BEN (60–90%) and TET (40–60%), while fluctuations in R/S/I levels for other drugs did not show clear trends. An analysis of the combined effect of various antibiotics indicated that 104 isolates were classified as NG-MDR (8.6%) and 36 isolates as NG-XDR (3%). The distribution of NG MDR/XDR isolates is illustrated in Figure 4, “NG MDR/XDR distribution in Israel: 2016–2022”, showing a low level of NG-MDR isolates (5%) with no NG-XDR detected in the last two years of the study (2021–2022).

3.3. Molecular Characterization by NG-MAST Genotyping

Seventy-two different NG-MAST sequence types were identified among the 279 sequenced isolates collected during the years 2017–2018 and 2022. Only for 2017 were the NG-MAST results for all samples identified according to the numbers of the two alleles (por and tbpB), and for 2018 and 2022, NG-MAST results were obtained from WGS data. The full WGS data of NG isolates in Israel will appear in a separate article. Of these, 36 were represented by a single isolate, 11 by double isolates, and 4 by triple isolates. Twenty-one clusters contained more than four NG isolates. Notably, eight (11.3%) of the STs had not been previously reported in other countries. The interruption of NG-MAST characterization from 2019 to 2021 was due to all molecular testing resources being redirected to COVID-19 diagnosis and characterization.
All sequence type clusters comprising at least four identical STs are presented in Table 3, “Distribution of NG-MAST sequence types in Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates in Israel: 2017–2018 and 2022”.
Twelve of the most common STs are shown in Figure 5, “Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates collected in 2018 and 2022 in Israel”.
This phylogenetic tree was constructed to visualize the relationships among isolates. The most abundant STs were ST19665 (31), ST11461 (30), ST4269 (16), ST292 (16), ST14994 (14), ST5441 (13), ST19762 (10), and ST2318 (9), accounting for a significant proportion of the typed isolates. Notably, the distribution of STs varied among the sampled years. ST19665 and ST11461 predominated in 2022, whereas ST292, ST5441, and ST16169 were more abundant in 2018. While some STs formed tight clusters on the tree, indicating close phylogenetic relationships, other branches and ST distributions demonstrated substantial genetic diversity.
The most common NG-MAST types and their corresponding antimicrobial resistance results are summarized in Table 4.
The most frequently observed STs in Israel included the following: ST19665 (n = 31), ST11461 (n = 25), ST292 (n = 16), ST4269 (n = 16), ST5441 (n = 13), ST14994 (n = 10), and ST2318 (n = 9).

4. Discussion

Our study provides the first comprehensive overview of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles in Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) isolates collected over a seven-year period (2016–2022) in Israel, along with the inaugural genetic characterization using NG-MAST methodology. While previous research examined various aspects of STIs in Israel, including gonococcal antibiotic sensitivity [29,30,31], one notable study [32] analyzed antibiotic susceptibility patterns from two major healthcare providers (HMOs and SL). Our current research expands upon these findings through a more comprehensive temporal analysis and genetic characterization, enhancing our understanding of NG epidemiology and evolution in Israel.

4.1. Demographic Patterns and Surveillance

The NG AMR monitoring system revealed distinctive demographic patterns. Male samples constituted 84.2% across all Israeli health organizations (IHOs), yielding a male-to-female ratio of 12.3:1. This disparity likely reflects the prevalence of asymptomatic infections in females [33,34]. Female representation in Israel (8.4%) was notably lower than in European data (15.5%), with a higher median age (33 versus 25 years) compared to European surveillance (2009–2017) [2]. This age difference may reflect Israel’s universal military conscription and post-service travel patterns.
Age distribution analysis showed that 76% of isolates came from individuals aged 21–40, with 15% from those aged 41–60. Previous research suggests potential engagement with sex workers among these age groups [35].

4.2. Surveillance Systems and Reported Trends

As a notifiable disease in Israel [29], reported gonorrhea cases exceeded INNGRC isolates fourfold (Figure 2), primarily due to the widespread adoption of molecular diagnostic methods [36]. While these methods offer rapid, reliable results without bacterial culture, live cultures remain essential for phenotypic AST, cluster identification, and genomic analyses [37].
The World Health Organization’s target of reducing gonorrhea incidence by 90% [38]—adopted by Israel’s national STI program for 2025 [26]—faces significant challenges. Our data show no substantial decrease in reported cases between 2016 and 2022, mirroring European trends [39]. Contributing factors include the following:
1.
International travel-mediated pathogen importation;
2.
Evolving sexual behaviors;
3.
Reduced condom use, potentially linked to increased PrEP adoption;
4.
Enhanced anonymous testing availability;
5.
Establishment of dedicated sexual health clinics within HMOs.

4.3. Non-Endemic Status and AMR Implications

Israel’s non-endemic status significantly influences AMR trend interpretation. The observed patterns likely reflect imported strains and limited local transmission, supported by the following:
1.
Travel-associated gonorrhea prevalence [10,40];
2.
High genetic diversity in NG-MAST results [41];
3.
Variable resistance profiles consistent with imported strain patterns [42].
Despite these considerations, our AMR findings align with global research [43,44,45], suggesting Israel’s integration into the global NG transmission network. Similarly to European monitoring [46], we found no resistance to ceftriaxone (CTR) or spectinomycin (SPE). Current guidelines recommend single-dose injectable CTR for NG treatment in Israel [47].

4.4. Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns

Ciprofloxacin resistance has increased significantly to 54.4% ± 13.4%—more than double the 2002–2007 rate of 26.1%—aligning with global trends [48,49,50,51]. The monitoring of intermediate (I) resistance alongside resistant (R) and susceptible (S) levels proved crucial, as demonstrated by benzylpenicillin patterns showing increased intermediate resistance (62% to 86%) despite decreased full resistance. Similar patterns were documented in Northern Spain [52], where BEN resistance rates were R = 1.3%, I = 81.7%, and S = 17.0%, with tetracycline also exhibiting high intermediate resistance (I = 43.1%).
To combat antibiotic resistance, personalized antibiotic therapies show promise, incorporating AI-driven prediction models and rapid diagnostics for tailored treatments based on individual profiles and local resistance patterns [53]. Prompt, appropriate antibiotic therapy with the minimal recommended duration can reduce MDR strain emergence [54].

4.5. Multi-Drug Resistance Trends

We observed a decreasing trend in XDR and MDR levels from 2016 to 2022. MDR-NG rates decreased from 23.4% to approximately 4% (2021–2022), while XDR-NG cases (9.9% in 2016) have been absent in recent years, comparable to Canadian findings [21,55]. Global resistance to ceftriaxone and azithromycin has been documented in the United Kingdom, Australia [56], and France, particularly in patients with a travel history to Cambodia [57].

4.6. Genetic Diversity and Sequence Types

Our analysis revealed a high degree of genetic diversity among N. gonorrhoeae isolates, as illustrated in the phylogenetic tree (Figure 5). A clear temporal shift was observed in the dominant sequence types, with ST292 and ST5441 prevalent in 2018, while ST19665 and ST11461 predominated in 2022, alongside the significant presence of ST14994 and ST19762. This shift suggests either rapid clonal expansion or the successful establishment of new strains.
Between 2016 and 2022, we identified 27 NG-MAST sequence types circulating in Israel, reflecting a diverse genetic landscape. These types were also previously documented in European surveys from 2009 to 2010 and 2013. Several prevalent Israeli sequence types (ST4269, ST5441, ST2318, ST2997, ST11547, ST16169) were under-represented in recent Euro-GASP surveys [2,46]. In contrast, six of the most prevalent European sequence types (ST21, ST292, ST2992, ST5624, ST5793) were detected in Israel [58,59].
Notably, ST4269, classified as XDR/MDR, was absent in 2022, while other XDR/MDR-NG clusters (such as ST4269 and ST2318) were identified in 2017–2018 and 2017–2022. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) diversity within these clusters varied significantly. For instance, ST1993 exhibited full sensitivity, while ST19972 demonstrated 50% resistance to azithromycin.
Analyzing the correlations between genotypes, clinical presentations, and international comparisons not only enhances our understanding of NG epidemiology in Israel but also underscores the critical importance of maintaining molecular surveillance to detect emerging resistant strains, potentially imported through international travel.
At this stage, we were unable to collect detailed clinical data. However, previous research has linked specific sequence types to distinct clinical presentations and antimicrobial resistance profiles. For example, ST1901 is frequently associated with decreased susceptibility to ceftriaxone, while ST7363 has been linked to decreased susceptibility to ceftriaxone and resistance to multiple other antibiotics. Although ST1901 and ST7363 were not identified in our collection, the high rates of resistance to ciprofloxacin (54.4%) and azithromycin (41.3%) observed in our isolates suggest the presence of other resistant sequence types.
Further studies correlating the identified sequence types (e.g., ST292, ST4269, ST5441, ST19665, and ST11461) with patient demographics, clinical outcomes, and detailed resistance profiles are needed to fully understand the clinical implications of these circulating strains in Israel. Such research would provide valuable insights for the development of targeted treatment strategies and inform public health interventions.

4.7. Future Directions and Recommendations

The WHO recommends ongoing AMR surveillance as an early warning mechanism for community resistance. Israel currently lacks a national AMR NG monitoring strategy, unlike established programs such as WHO’s GASP, Euro-GASP, and others [50,60,61]. Implementing an annual GASP/GISP-like program could be crucial for monitoring Israel’s STI landscape and for the early detection of resistant strains.

5. Conclusions

This study reveals significant NG antimicrobial resistance rates, with high resistance to ciprofloxacin (54.4%), azithromycin (41.3%), and tetracycline (27.6%) while maintaining susceptibility to ceftriaxone and spectinomycin. Among the 72 distinct NG-MAST sequence types identified, ST19665, ST11461, ST292, and ST4269 predominated. While 8.6% of isolates showed MDR and 3% exhibited XDR, resistant strain prevalence decreased over the study period.

6. Study Limitations and Strengths

This study faces several constraints. The sample predominantly consists of isolates from men, limiting gender representation. Geographic coverage is incomplete, and the source of all isolates cannot be definitively confirmed as IHOs. The inability to link behavioral data with laboratory findings restricts the interpretation of results. The shift toward molecular diagnostics has reduced the availability of cultured isolates, and only a portion underwent NG-MAST analysis, potentially limiting the genetic diversity of the data.
Despite these limitations, this study exhibits notable strengths. It analyzes 1205 Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates over seven years (2016–2022) from three distinct IHOs. The research employs a multifaceted approach, combining phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing with NG-MAST genotyping. This robust methodology, coupled with the study’s extensive dataset and diverse sampling, provides current and relevant antimicrobial resistance data. Consequently, the findings offer valuable insights for updating treatment guidelines, making a significant contribution to N. gonorrhoeae epidemiology and resistance surveillance in Israel.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: E.R., Z.M., I.N., T.A. and Z.D.; Investigation: Z.D., T.A. and A.M.; Data curation: T.A. and Z.D.; Writing—original draft preparation: Z.D.; Writing—review and editing: Z.D., A.M., I.N., Z.M. and E.R.; Supervision: Z.D.; Project administration: E.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original data presented in this study are openly available at NCBI SRA Bioproject 1 at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=PRJNA1217336 (accessed on 26 February 2025) and at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=PRJNA1217803 (accessed on 26 February 2025).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank M. Rubinstein and Y. Losev.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Unemo, M.; Shafer, W.M. Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the 21st century: Past, evolution, and future. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2014, 27, 587–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Gonococcal Antimicrobial Susceptibility Surveillance in Europe—Results Summary 2017; ECDC: Stockholm, Sweden, 2019; Available online: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/Euro-GASP-2017.pdf (accessed on 26 February 2025).
  3. Barry, P.; Klausner, J. The use of cephalosporins for gonorrhea: The impending problem of resistance. Expert. Opin. Pharmacother. 2009, 10, 555–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ison, C.A.; Hussey, J.; Sankar, K.N.; Evans, J.; Alexander, S. Gonorrhoea treatment failures to cefixime and azithromycin in England, 2010. Euro Surveill. 2011, 16, 19833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Aniskevich, A.; Shimanskaya, I.; Boiko, I. Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates and gonorrhoea treatment in the Republic of Belarus, Eastern Europe, 2009–2019. BMC Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tapsall, J. Multidrug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae. CMAJ 2009, 180, 268–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae in New Zealand 2022 surveillance Report. In Report; The Institute of Environmental Science and Research Ltd.: Wellington, New Zealand, 2023; Available online: https://www.esr.cri.nz/media/jt2f3hzt/esr-antimicrobial-resistance-in-neisseria-gonorrhoeae-surveillance-report-2022.pdf (accessed on 26 February 2025).
  8. Hooshiar, M.H.; Sholeh, M.; Beig, M.; Azizian, K.; Kouhsari, E. Global trends of antimicrobial resistance rates in Neisseria gonorrhoeae: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Pharmacol. 2024, 15, 1284665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Schaeffer, J.; Lippert, K.; Pleininger, S.; Stöger, A.; Hasenberger, P.; Stadlbauer, S.; Heger, F.; Eigentler, A.; Geusau, A.; Indra, A.; et al. Association of Phylogenomic Relatedness among Neisseria gonorrhoeae Strains with Antimicrobial Resistance. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2016, 28, 1694–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Unemo, M.; Nicholas, R.A. Emergence of multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and untreatable gonorrhea. Future Microbiol. 2012, 7, 1401–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kakooza, F.; Kiggundu, R.; Mboowa, G.; Kateete, P.D.; Nsangi, O.T.; Kabahita, J.M.; Ssentalo Bagaya, B.; Golparian, D.; Unemo, M. Antimicrobial susceptibility surveillance and antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Africa from 2001 to 2020: A mini-review. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Martin, I.M.; Ison, C.A.; Aanensen, D.M.; Fenton, K.A.; Spratt, B.G. Rapid sequence-based identification of gonococcal transmission clusters in a large metropolitan area. J. Infect. Dis. 2004, 189, 1497–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hadad, R.; Golparian, D.; Velicko, I.; Ohlsson, A.K.; Lindroth, Y.; Ericson, E.L.; Fredlund, H.; Engstrand, L.; Unemo, M. First National Genomic Epidemiological Study of Neisseria gonorrhoeae Strains Spreading Across Sweden in 2016. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 820998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Agbodzi, B.; Duodu, S.; Dela, H.; Kumordjie, S.; Yeboah, C.; Behene, E.; Ocansey, K.; Yanney, J.N.; Boateng-Sarfo, G.; Kwofie, S.K.; et al. Whole genome analysis and antimicrobial resistance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates from Ghana. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1163450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mitchev, N.; Singh, R.; Allam, M.; Kwenda, S.; Ismail, A.; Garrett, N.; Ramsuran, V.; Niehaus, A.J.; Mlisana, K.P. Antimicrobial Resistance Mechanisms, Multilocus Sequence Typing, and NG-STAR Sequence Types of Diverse Neisseria gonorrhoeae Isolates in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2021, 65, e0075921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Unemo, M.S.W. Antimicrobial Resistance Expressed by Neisseria gonorrhoeae: A Major Global Public Health Problem in the 21st Century. Microbiol. Spectr. 2016, 4, 213–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Molecular Typing of Neisseria Gonorrhoeae—Results from a Pilot Study 2010–2011; European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control: Solna, Sweden, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zimbro, M.J. Difco & BBL Manual: Manual of Microbiological Culture Media; BD Diagnostic: Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  19. Carroll, K.C. Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 12th ed.; ASM Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  20. Protect Microorganism Preservation System Store It, Preserve It, Protect It. Available online: http://www.tscswabs.co.uk/uploads/images/PDF-Downloads/TSC_ProtectFlyerV5.pdf (accessed on 26 February 2025).
  21. Ng, L.K.; Martin, I.E. The laboratory diagnosis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 2005, 16, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. ETEST, Trusted Leader in MIC Gradient Strips Technology. Available online: https://www.biomerieux.com/content/dam/biomerieux-com/03----our-offer/clinical/in-hospital--in-lab/products/etest%C2%AE-telavancin/documents/prn_056750_rev_03.a_etest_brochure_final_art_2.pdf.coredownload.pdf (accessed on 26 February 2025).
  23. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint Tables for Interpretation of MICs and Zone Diameters. Version 15.0. 2025. Available online: https://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Breakpoint_tables/v_15.0_Breakpoint_Tables.pdf (accessed on 26 February 2025).
  24. National Surveillance of Antimicrobial Susceptibilities of Neisseria Gonorrhoeae Annual Summary 2019. Government of Canada. Published Online 2021. Available online: https://www.canada.ca/en/services/health/publications/drugs-health-products/national-surveillance-antimicrobial-susceptibilities-neisseria-gonorrhoeae-annual-summary-2019.html (accessed on 26 February 2025).
  25. Nextera® DNA Library Prep Reference Guide. Available online: https://support.illumina.com/content/dam/illumina-support/documents/documentation/chemistry_documentation/samplepreps_nextera/nexteradna/nextera-dna-library-prep-reference-guide-15027987-01.pdf (accessed on 26 February 2025).
  26. Andrews, S. FastQC: A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data [Online]. Published Online 2010. Available online: http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ (accessed on 26 February 2025).
  27. Bolger, A.M.; Lohse, M.; Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2114–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  28. Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.; Prjibelski, A.D.; et al. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chemtob, D. A national strategic plan for reducing the burden of sexually transmitted infections in Israel by the year 2025. Isr. J. Health Policy Res. 2017, 6, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Green, M.; Anis, E.; Gandacu, D.; Grotto, I. The fall and rise of gonorrhoea incidence in Israel: An international phenomenon? Sex. Transm. Infect. 2003, 79, 116–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kridin, K.; Ingram, B.; Becker, D.; Shiloah, N.; Azrad, M.; Habib, S.; Peretz, A. Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Northern Israel: Insights From a Large Referral Laboratory. J. Low. Genit. Tract Dis. 2023, 27, 51–55. [Google Scholar]
  32. Dan, M.; Mor, Z.; Gottliev, S.; Sheinberg, B.; Shohat, T. Trends in Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Israel, 2002 to 2007, With Special Reference to Fluoroquinolone Resistance. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2010, 37, 451–453. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Walker, C.K.; Sweet, R.L. Gonorrhea infection in women: Prevalence, effects, screening, and management. Int. J. Women’s Health 2011, 3, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Martín-Sánchez, M. Clinical presentation of asymptomatic and symptomatic women who tested positive for genital gonorrhoea at a sexual health service in Melbourne, Australia. Epidemiol. Infect. 2020, 148, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Levi, I.; Mor, Z.; Anis, E.; Maayan, S.; Leshem, E.; Pollack, S.; Chowers, M.; Mor, O.; Riesenberg, K.; Sthoeger, Z.; et al. Men Who Have Sex With Men, risk behavior and HIV infection: Integrative analysis of clinical, epidemiological and laboratory databases. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011, 51, 1363–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Meyer, T.; Buder, S. The Laboratory Diagnosis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: Current Testing and Future Demands. Pathogens 2020, 9, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ghanem, K.G. Clinical Manifestations and Diagnosis of Neisseria Gonorrhoeae Infection in Adults and Adolescents. Available online: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/clinical-manifestations-and-diagnosis-of-neisseria-gonorrhoeae-infection-in-adults-and-adolescents (accessed on 26 February 2025).
  38. WHO. Global Health Sector Strategy on Sexually Transmitted Infections 2016–2021. Available online: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/246296/WHO-RHR-16.09-eng.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed on 26 February 2025).
  39. Chidiac, O.; AlMukdad, S.; Harfouche, M.; Harding-Esch, E.; Abu-Raddad, L.J. Epidemiology of gonorrhoea: Systematic review, meta-analyses, and meta-regressions, World Health Organization European Region, 1949 to 2021. Euro Surveill. 2024, 29, 2300226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Clifton, S.; Bolt, H.; Mohammed, H.; Town, K.; Furegato, M.; Cole, M.; Campbell, O.; Fifer, H.; Hughes, G. Prevalence of and factors associated with MDR Neisseria gonorrhoeae in England and Wales between 2004 and 2015: Analysis of annual cross-sectional surveillance surveys. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, 923–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Harris, S.R.; Cole, M.J.; Spiteri, G.; Sánchez-Busó, L.; Golparian, D.; Jacobsson, S.; Goater, R.; Abudahab, K.; Yeats, C.A.; Bercot, B.; et al. Public health surveillance of multidrug-resistant clones of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Europe: A genomic survey. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 758–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kirkcaldy, R.D.; Weston, E.; Segurado, A.C.; Hughes, G. Epidemiology of gonorrhoea: A global perspective. Sex. Health 2019, 16, 401–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wi, T.; Lahra, M.M.; Ndowa, F.; Bala, M.; Dillon, J.A.; Ramon-Pardo, P.; Eremin, S.R.; Bolan, G.; Unemo, M. Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae: Global surveillance and a call for international collaborative action. PLoS Med. 2017, 17, e1002344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Unemo, M.; Lahra, M.M.; Cole, M.; Galarza, P.; Ndowa, F.; Martin, I.; Dillon, J.A.R.; Ramon-Pardo, P.; Bolan, G.; Wi, T. World Health Organization Global Gonococcal Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (WHO GASP): Review of new data and evidence to inform international collaborative actions and research efforts. Sex. Health 2019, 16, 412–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Williamson, D.A.; Chen, M.Y. Emerging and Reemerging Sexually Transmitted Infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 2023–2032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cole. The European gonococcal antimicrobial surveillance program (Euro-GASP) appropriately reflects the antimicrobial resistance situation for Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the European Union/ European Economic Area. BMC Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Workowski, K.A.; Bachmann, L.H.; Chan, P.A.; Johnston, C.M.; Muzny, C.A.; Park, I.; Reno, H.; Zenilman, J.M.; Bolan, G.A. Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021. MMWR Recomm. Rep. 2021, 70, 1–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. World Health Organization. Global Action Plan to Control the Spread and Impact of Antimicrobial Resistance in Neisseria Gonorrhoeae. Published Online 2012. Available online: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/44863/9789241503501_eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 26 February 2025).
  49. World Health Organization. Enhanced Gonococcal Antimicrobial Surveillance Programme (EGASP): General Protocol. Published Online 2021. Available online: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/341333/9789240021341-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 26 February 2025).
  50. Kirkcaldy, R.D.; Kidd, S.; Weinstock, H.S.; Papp, J.R.; Bolan, G.A. Trends in antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the USA: The Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project (GISP), January 2006–June 2012. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2013, 89, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lahra, M.M.; Hogan, T.R.; Shoushtari, M.; Armstrong, B.H. Australian Gonococcal Surveillance Programme Annual Report, 2020. Commun. Intell. 2018, 45, 20220121566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. García, U.I. Epidemiological surveillance study of gonococcal infection in Northern Spain. Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clın. 2020, 38, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Murray-Watson, R.E.; Grad, Y.H.; St Cyr, S.B.; Yaesoubi, R. Personalizing the empiric treatment of gonorrhea using machine learning models. PLoS Digit. Health 2024, 3, e0000549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Buonsenso, D.; Sodero, G.; Mariani, F.; Lazzareschi, I.; Proli, F.; Zampino, G.; Pierantoni, L.; Valentini, P.; Rendeli, C. Comparison between short therapy and standard therapy in pediatric patients hospitalized with urinary tract infection: A single center retrospective analysis. Children 2022, 9, 1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Martin, I.; Sawatzky, P.; Allen, V. Multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Canada, 2012–2016. Can Commun Rep. 2019, 45, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Assessment Rapidrisk. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Extensively Drug-Resistant (XDR) Neisseria Gonorrhoeae in the United Kingdom and Australia—7 May 2018; European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control: Solna, Sweden, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  57. Maubaret, C.; Caméléna, F.; Mrimèche, M.; Braille, A.; Liberge, M.; Mainardis, M.; Guillaume, C.; Noel, F.; Bébéar, C.; Molina, J.M.; et al. Two cases of extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection combining ceftriaxone-resistance and high-level azithromycin resistance. Eurosurveillance 2022, 28, 2300456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Młynarczyk-Bonikowska, B.; Majewska, A.; Malejczyk, M.; Młynarczyk, G.; Majewski, S. Multiresistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae: A new threat in second decade of the XXI century. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 2020, 209, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Kandinov, I.; Dementieva, E.; Kravtsov, D.; Chestkov, A.; Kubanov, A.; Solomka, V.; Deryabin, D.; Gryadunov, D.; Shaskolskiy, B. Molecular Typing of Neisseria gonorrhoeae Clinical Isolates in Russia, 2018–2019: A Link Between penA Alleles and NG-MAST Types. Pathogens 2020, 9, 941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project (GISP) and Enhanced GISP (eGISP), 2021. Published Online 2021. Available online: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/03/08/2021-04671/proposed-data-collection-submitted-for-public-comment-and-recommendations (accessed on 26 February 2025).
  61. Kirkcaldy, R.D.; Harvey, A.; Papp, J. Neisseria gonorrhoeae Antimicrobial Susceptibility Surveillance—The Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project, 27 Sites, United States, 2014. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2016, 65, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Gender and age distribution of patients from IHOs.
Figure 1. Gender and age distribution of patients from IHOs.
Microorganisms 13 00750 g001
Figure 2. Comparison of reported cases and received positive isolates.
Figure 2. Comparison of reported cases and received positive isolates.
Microorganisms 13 00750 g002
Figure 3. Trends in antimicrobial resistance of NG tested in Israel: 2016–2022 (%).
Figure 3. Trends in antimicrobial resistance of NG tested in Israel: 2016–2022 (%).
Microorganisms 13 00750 g003
Figure 4. NG MDR/XDR distribution in Israel: 2016–2022.
Figure 4. NG MDR/XDR distribution in Israel: 2016–2022.
Microorganisms 13 00750 g004
Figure 5. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates collected in 2018 and 2022 in Israel.
Figure 5. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates collected in 2018 and 2022 in Israel.
Microorganisms 13 00750 g005
Table 1. Gender distribution.
Table 1. Gender distribution.
YearNumber of IsolatesRatio—Male to FemaleMedian Age—Female/Male
201611114.727/29
20172286.831/30
20181575.831/29
201920014.641/31
202014316.146/29
20211528.933/28.5
202221415.330/32
All years120510 *33 */30 *
12.3 **32/30 **
*—average result. **—median result.
Table 2. NG isolates’ phenotypic antimicrobial resistance profile.
Table 2. NG isolates’ phenotypic antimicrobial resistance profile.
YearNumber of
Isolates
Resistance *
CIXAZITETBENSPECIPCTR
201611120 (18.0%)56 (50.5%)50 (46.3%)37 (33.3%)079 (71.2%)0
201722838 (16.7%)76 (33.3%)58 (25.4%)54 (23.7%)0105 (46.1%)0
201815718 (11.5%)52 (33.1%)36 (22.9%)17 (10.8%)062 (39.5%)0
201920014 (7.0%)75 (37.5%)56 (28.0%)35 (17.5%)0109 (54.5%)0
202014311 (7.7%)64 (44.8%)43 (30.1%)19 (13.3%)0105 (73.4%)0
20211522 (1.3%)68 (44.7%)36 (23.7%)11 (7.2%)085 (55.9%)0
20222142 (0.9%)106 (49.5%)53 (24.8%)18 (8.4%)0111 (51.9%)0
Total (Ave% ± SD)1205105 (8.7% ± 6.3)497 (41.2% ± 7.1)332 (27.6% ± 8.7)191 (15.9% ± 9.6)0656 (54.4% ± 13.4)0
Abbreviations: cefixime = CIX; azithromycin = AZI; tetracycline = TET; benzylpenicillin = BEN; spectinomycin = SPE; ciprofloxacin = CIP; ceftriaxone = CTR. The data are the number of isolates, with % where relevant. * Resistance breakpoints determined by EUCAST.
Table 3. Distribution of NG-MAST sequence types in Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates in Israel: 2017–2018 and 2022.
Table 3. Distribution of NG-MAST sequence types in Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates in Israel: 2017–2018 and 2022.
YearNumber of
Isolates
Number of NG-MAST STs Most Common NG-MAST
STs (Number of Isolates) *
20177872ST4269 (13), ST2318 (7), ST2997 (7), ST5441 (6), ST5049 (5), ST292 (4), ST5624 (4)
20187772ST292 (12), ST5441 (6), ST16169 (6), ST2992 (5), ST11547 (5), ST11461 (4)
202212472ST19665 (31), ST11461 (25), 14994 (10), 19762 (10), 17972 (8), 14764 (5)
Total27972ST19665 (31), ST11461 (30), ST4269 (16), ST292 (16), ST14994 (14), ST5441 (13), ST19762 (10), ST2318 (9), ST17972 (8), ST2992 (7), ST11547 (7), ST2997 (7), ST16169 (6), ST5049 (5), ST9208 (5), ST14764 (5), ST3935 (4), ST14760 (4), ST14051 (4), ST5624 (4), ST12302 (4)
* Represented by at least 4 isolates.
Table 4. Distribution of most prevalent STs’ antimicrobial patterns.
Table 4. Distribution of most prevalent STs’ antimicrobial patterns.
NG-MASTn *MDR,%XDR,%CIP **BEN **TET **AZI **CIX **
ST196653100S(96.8%)
R(3.2%)
IS(3.2%)
I(93.5%)
R(3.2%)
S(9.7%)
R(90.3%)
S(96.8%)
R(3.2%)
ST114613000S(83.3%)
R(16.7%)
IS(3.3%)
I(13.3%)
R(83.3%)
S(86.7%)
R(13.3%)
S
ST2921600SIS(25.0%)
I(75.0%)
S(87.5%)
I(6.2%)
R(6.2%)
S
ST42691629.464.7RI(17.6%)
R(82.4%)
I(5.9%)
R(94.1%)
I(5.9%)
R(94.1%)
S(29.4%)
R(70.6%)
ST149941400RI(92.9%)
R(7.1%)
S(50.0%)
I(50.0%)
S(85.7%)
I(7.1%)
R(7.1%)
S
ST54411300SS(7.7%)
I(92.3%)
SS(30.8%)
I(30.8%)
R(38.5%)
S
ST1976210100RIS(10.0%)
I(80.0%)
R(10.0%)
S(20.0%)
R(80.0%)
S
ST2318945.59.1S(9.1%)
R(90.9%)
I(81.8%)
R(18.2%)
I(18.2%)
R(81.8%)
S(27.3%)
R(72.7%)
S(90.9%)
R(9.1%)
ST17972812.50RII(87.5%)
R(12.5%)
S(25.0%)
R(75.0%)
S
ST2997700SII(71.4%)
R(28.6%)
I(14.3%)
R(85.7%)
S
ST2992700S(85.7%)
I(14.3%)
IS(14.3%)
I(85.7%)
I(28.6%)
R(71.4%)
S
ST11547714.30RI(85.7%)
R(14.3%)
S(28.6%)
I(71.4%)
S(71.4%)
I(14.3%)
R(14.3%)
S(14.3%)
R(85.7%)
ST16169600RIS(33.3%)
I(66.7%)
S(66.7%)
R(33.3%)
S
ST9208500SIS(40.0%)
I(60.0%)
S(40.0%)
I(20.0%)
R(40.0%)
S
ST5049500SII(80.0%)
R(20.0%)
RS
ST14764500RIIRS
ST14760400SS(25.0%)
I(50.0%)
R(25.0%)
S(50.0%)
I(50.0%)
SS
ST123024500I(25.0%)
R(75.0%)
II(50.0%)
R(50.0%)
RS
ST140514500RII(25.0%)
R(75.0%)
S(50.0%)
R(50.0%)
S
ST56244500RI(50.0%)
R(50.0%)
IRS
ST3935400SIIRS
* Represented by n = 4 isolates. ** Abbreviations: ciprofloxacin = CIP; tetracycline = TET; azithromycin = AZI; benzylpenicillin = BEN; cefixime = CIX.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dveyrin, Z.; Alon, T.; Makhon, A.; Nissan, I.; Mor, Z.; Rorman, E. Neisseria gonorrhoeae—Susceptibility Trends and Basic Molecular Mapping of Isolates Collected in Israel in 2016–2022. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 750. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13040750

AMA Style

Dveyrin Z, Alon T, Makhon A, Nissan I, Mor Z, Rorman E. Neisseria gonorrhoeae—Susceptibility Trends and Basic Molecular Mapping of Isolates Collected in Israel in 2016–2022. Microorganisms. 2025; 13(4):750. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13040750

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dveyrin, Zeev, Tal Alon, Andrei Makhon, Israel Nissan, Zohar Mor, and Efrat Rorman. 2025. "Neisseria gonorrhoeae—Susceptibility Trends and Basic Molecular Mapping of Isolates Collected in Israel in 2016–2022" Microorganisms 13, no. 4: 750. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13040750

APA Style

Dveyrin, Z., Alon, T., Makhon, A., Nissan, I., Mor, Z., & Rorman, E. (2025). Neisseria gonorrhoeae—Susceptibility Trends and Basic Molecular Mapping of Isolates Collected in Israel in 2016–2022. Microorganisms, 13(4), 750. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13040750

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop