Next Article in Journal
Unraveling the Potential Antiviral Activity of Isoxazoline-Carbocyclic Monophosphate Nucleotides Against Echovirus 11
Previous Article in Journal
Influence Pattern and Mechanism of Increased Nitrogen Deposition and AM Fungi on Soil Microbial Community in Desert Ecosystems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Youngimonas ophiurae sp. nov., a Quorum-Quenching Marine Bacterium Isolated from a Brittle Star in the South China Sea, and Reclassification of Lutimaribacter litoralis as Youngimonas litoralis comb. nov.

1
Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Marine Bioresource and Eco-Environmental Science, Shenzhen Engineering Laboratory for Marine Algal Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518055, China
2
College of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
3
Key Laboratory of Marine Genetic Resources, Third Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xiamen 361005, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2025, 13(12), 2661; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13122661
Submission received: 16 October 2025 / Revised: 19 November 2025 / Accepted: 20 November 2025 / Published: 22 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Microbiology)

Abstract

Two novel bacterial strains, designated S70T and S69A, were isolated from a marine brittle star collected in the South China Sea. These strains are Gram-stain-negative, non-motile, aerobic, and rod-shaped. A phylogenomic analysis indicated that strains S70T and S69A formed a distinct branch with Youngimonas vesicularis CC-AMW-ET and Lutimaribacter litoralis JCM 17792T. The DNA G+C content of both strains was 61.5%. The digital DNA–DNA hybridization values with the closest relatives were 21.8, and 21.2%, respectively. Furthermore, the average nucleotide identity (ANIb) values between strain S70T and these two reference strains were 74.9% and 74.6%, respectively, both well below the 95–96% threshold for dividing prokaryotic species. The major fatty acids of strain S70T were summed feature 8 (C18:1 ω6c and/or C18:1 ω7c). Functional genomic analysis revealed that strain S70T possesses potential for hydrocarbon degradation and may play a significant role in sulfur metabolism. Additionally, strain S70T exhibited broad-spectrum AHL-degrading activity and, most notably, significantly inhibited soft rot caused by Pectobacterium carotovorum in potato tuber assays. Genomic comparisons further support the reclassification of Lutimaribacter litoralis into the genus Youngimonas.

1. Introduction

In marine ecosystems, particularly in biodiverse regions like the South China Sea, invertebrates harbor diverse microbial communities that contribute to host health, nutrient dynamics, and the production of bioactive metabolites [1,2,3]. Although the South China Sea exhibits high marine biodiversity and unique ecological conditions [4,5], its microbial diversity remains poorly characterized. Most studies of invertebrate-associated microbiota have focused on corals [6,7,8], sponges [9,10,11], sea cucumbers [12,13,14], bryozoans [15,16], and sea anemones [17], with fewer investigations into other invertebrate groups. In our previous study, a total of 197 bacterial strains were isolated from the invertebrate Onchidium sp. collected in Dapeng Bay, South China Sea [18]. Among these, five strains were identified and validated as novel species through comprehensive taxonomic analysis [19,20,21,22,23]. Phylogenomic and phenotypic analyses not only confirmed their taxonomic novelty but also elucidated adaptive traits relevant to the intertidal zone. These results highlight the South China Sea as a valuable reservoir of microbial diversity, warranting further systematic exploration of underrepresented marine invertebrates.
Brittle stars (Ophiuroidea) inhabit diverse marine environments, from coastal zones to the deep sea, and are notable for their regenerative abilities [24,25]. Recent studies suggest they may also host unique microbial symbionts, though this aspect remains underexplored. Despite their ecological prevalence and intriguing biological traits, the symbiotic bacterial communities associated with brittle stars remain largely uncharacterized. To our knowledge, only one bacterial strain isolated from a brittle star has been taxonomically described to date [26], underscoring a substantial knowledge gap in marine microbial ecology and symbiosis research. Compared to well-studied groups like corals, sponges, and sea cucumbers, brittle stars have received far less attention, underscoring the need for focused research on their microbial communities and host interactions.
During a screening for symbiotic bacteria associated with the brittle star Ophiactis savignyi from Qixing bay in the South China Sea, two strains, designated S70T and S69A, were isolated. Preliminary 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis indicated their closest relatives belong to the genus Thalassovita, a recently proposed (2023) replacement for the illegitimate genus Thalassobius [27], which currently comprises 13 validly published species (https://lpsn.dsmz.de/genus/thalassovita (accessed on 10 October 2025)). However, phylogenomic analysis revealed that strains S70T and S69A form a distinct cluster with members of the genera Youngimonas (one valid species) [28] and Lutimaribacter (five valid species) [29], both belonging to the family Roseobacteraceae. Genomic comparisons also suggested a re-evaluation of the taxonomic placement of Lutimaribacter litoralis JCM 17792T, as it shared higher average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) values with Youngimonas species than with its current genus, reinforcing its potential reassignment to Youngimonas. Given the overall taxonomic complexity and close phylogenetic interrelationship among these genera, a comprehensive polyphasic taxonomic study was undertaken.
Acyl-homoserine lactone-based quorum sensing (AHL-QS) is the most well-studied QS mechanism in Proteobacteria [30]. In the recently proposed family Roseobacteraceae, approximately 56% of members are predicted to possess AHL-QS systems [31], highlighting the widespread and conserved nature of this trait within the group [32]. Functional genomic analysis of strain S70T identified three lactone biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs), suggesting not only the potential for AHL production but also the capacity for signal degradation through encoded quorum-quenching (QQ) enzymes, a feature that may contribute to competitive fitness in its symbiotic niche. We therefore propose that this QQ activity likely contributes to the observed inhibition of soft rot disease through disruption of the QS-dependent virulence mechanisms in Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum (Pcc). Given its potent inhibition of this potato pathogen, strain S70T represents a promising candidate for biocontrol.
In this study, we aimed to (i) resolve the taxonomic status of strains S70T and S69A using a polyphasic taxonomic approach that integrated phylogenetic, phylogenomic, phenotypic and chemotaxonomic analyses, (ii) elucidate the ecological role of strain S70T through functional genomic analysis; and (iii) characterize its QQ activity and assess its biotechnological potential. Collectively, our findings highlight the potential of these symbionts as a promising source of novel enzymes, antibacterial agents, and other bioactive molecules, thereby expanding the biotechnological value of echinoderm-associated microbes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains and Isolation

Strains S70T and S69A were isolated from the brittle star Ophiactis savignyi collected on 6 April 2023, from Qixing Bay (22°33′ N, 114°32′ E), a coastal region of the South China Sea in Shenzhen, China. For strain isolation in July 2023, the brittle star was washed three times with sterile seawater, to remove loosely associated environmental bacteria. The washed specimen was then homogenized using a sterile mortar and pestle. Subsequently, the resulting homogenate was diluted (1:1, v/v) in a sterile cryoprotective agent containing 70% (w/v) deionized water, 10% (w/v) trehalose, and 20% (w/v) glycerol for preservation. A 20 μL aliquot of the suspension was aseptically spread onto Marine Agar plates (MA, BD Difco™, Sparks, MD, USA) and incubated for 3 days at 28 °C, yielding pure cultures of strains S70T and S69A, which were subsequently maintained on MA medium at 28 °C for routine cultivation. The reference strains Lutimaribacter litoralis JCM 17792T, Thalassovita autumnalis LMG 29904T and Thalassovita mediterraneus DSM 16398T were obtained from the Japan Collection of Microorganisms (JCM), LMG Bacteria Collection (LMG), and Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH (DSMZ), respectively.

2.2. 16S rRNA Gene Sequence Analysis

For genomic DNA extraction, cell biomass of strain S70T and S69A was obtained from cultures grown in MB medium at 30 °C for 3 days to late exponential phase. The 16S rRNA gene was amplified by PCR with two universal primers (27F, 5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′ and 1492R, 5′-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′). Then the fragments were ligated into pClone007 Versatile Simple Vector (Tsingke Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). And the genes were sequenced by Beijing Ruibo Xingke Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). The 16S rRNA gene sequences of strain S70T and S69A comprised 1427 nt., which are almost complete, and the sequences have been deposited in GenBank, the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) and the DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ; accession number: PV549654 and PV951576).
Sequence homology values between the 16S rRNA genes from strain S70T and S69A and closely related type strains were calculated using the EZBioCloud server (http://www.ezbiocloud.net/ (accessed on 20 April 2024)) [33]. Multiple alignments of the 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain S70T and S69A with those of related strains were performed using the CLUSTAL_X [34]. Phylogenetic trees were constructed by the neighbor-joining (NJ), maximum-likelihood (ML) and maximum-parsimony (MP) algorithms using MEGA12 [35], and were analyzed using bootstrapping [36] based on 1000 re-samplings.

2.3. Whole Genome Sequencing and Comparison

Whole-genome sequencing was performed on the Illumina HiSeq PE150 platform. Library construction was conducted by Beijing Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). High-quality paired-end reads were assembled into scaffolds using the SOAP denovo [37,38], followed by gap-closing procedures refine the assembly. The whole genome shotgun projects of S70T and S69A have been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession numbers JBNAGJ000000000 (GCF_049803795.1) and JBRAZY000000000 (GCF_052799205.1), respectively.
To elucidate the phylogenomic relationships between strains S70T, S69A and their closest relatives, two complementary phylogenomic approaches were employed. A broader-scale phylogenomic analysis was performed with the EasyCGTree pipeline [39] (https://github.com/zdf1987/EasyCGTree4 (accessed on 22 August 2025)), which integrates four marker gene sets (bac120, rhodo268, rp1, and rp2) to construct a supermatrix (SM) for maximum likelihood inference under automatically selected best-fit substitution models using FastTree.
Genomic similarities between strains S70T, S69A and their closest relatives were evaluated using pairwise average nucleotide identities (Ortho ANIu and ANIb), calculated via ChunLab’s online ANI calculator and the JSpecies Web Server (JSpeciesWS) [40,41]. Additionally, average amino acid identity (AAI) was calculated using the EzAAI pipeline [42]. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH) values were estimated using the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator (GGDC) 3.0 (DSMZ) [43], with formula 2 applied for incomplete genomes. The R package pheatmap (version 1.0.12) was used to generate heatmaps with average linkage clustering using Euclidean distance.

2.4. Pangenome and Functional Genomics Analysis

Pangenome analysis was conducted using the Integrated Prokaryotic Genome Atlas (IPGA) platform [44] (https://nmdc.cn/ipga/ (accessed on 20 October 2025)) under default parameters. The analysis comprised two main procedures: a pan-genome profiling procedure and a phylogenetic analysis procedure. The draft genome of strain S70T was annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) [45]. Tandem repeats were identified using Tandem Repeat Finder (TRF version 4.09) [46]. CRISPR arrays were predicted with the web-based tool CRISPRone [47]. Genomic islands were detected with IslandPath-DIMOB (version 1.0.0) [48], and putative prophage regions were predicted using online web server PHASTER [49].
Biosynthetic gene clusters (BCGs) involved in secondary metabolism were predicted by antiSMASH bacterial version 7.1 under default parameters [50]. For metabolic pathway annotation, sulfur metabolism pathways and hydrocarbon degradation pathways were analyzed by querying the KEGG database (release 115.0) using KofamKOALA [51]. The resulting pathways were visualized with KEGG Mapper (https://www.genome.jp/kegg/mapper/reconstruct.html (accessed on 1 June 2024)). The ggplot2 package (version 3.5.2) was employed to create the bubble plot.
Additionally, potential hydrocarbon-degrading genes were identified using the HMMER algorithm in conjunction with the CANT-HYD hidden Markov models [52]. Putative quorum quenching genes were identified by performing BLASTP (version 2.12.0) searches against known reference proteins (e-value < 1 × 10−10). Sequence similarity networks (SSNs) of these genes were subsequently constructed using the EFI-Enzyme Similarity Tool (EFI-EST) [53], applying an e-value cutoffs of 10−20 to generate the full networks graphs.

2.5. Phenotypic Characterization

Cell morphology was examined using a tungsten filament transmission electron microscope (HT7700, HITACH, Tokyo, Japan) after negative staining with phosphotungstic acid. Growth at various temperatures (4, 10, 12, 15, 20, 24, 28, 30, 37, 40 and 45 °C) was assessed on MA medium over a period 2 weeks to determine the optimal growth temperature and the temperature range supporting growth. To assess the NaCl requirement, bacterial growth was evaluated in modified marine broth medium (MB, BD DifcoTM, Sparks, MD, USA) containing NaCl concentrations ranging from 0.5% to 10% (w/v, in 0.5% increments) at 28 °C for 2 weeks. The pH range for growth was determined at 28 °C in MB medium adjusted to pH 2–12 (at intervals of 1 pH unit), using the following buffer systems: Na2HPO4/citric acid (pH 2.0–6.0), Tris/HCl (pH 7.0–8.0) and Na2CO3/NaHCO3 (pH 9.0–12.0). All pH values were verified after autoclaving. Phenotypic characteristics were assessed using standard methods [54], including catalase and oxidase activities, hydrolysis of starch, DNA, casein, and Tweens (20, 40, 60, and 80), as well as indole and H2S production. Enzymatic activities were further analyzed using the API ZYM and API 20NE systems (bioMérieux, Mexico City, Mexico), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Carbon source utilization was assessed using the GEN III MicroPlate (BIOLOG, Cat. No. 1030, Hayward, CA, USA). Antibiotic susceptibility was tested on MA plates using the following antibiotic concentrations: ampicillin (10 μg), amoxicillin (30 μg), carbenicillin (100 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), clarithromycin (15 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), imipenem (10 μg), kanamycin (30 μg), lincomycin (15 μg), nalidixic acid (30 μg), neomycin (30 μg), novobiocin (30 μg), penicillin G (10 μg), streptomycin (10 μg), tetracycline (30 μg) and vancomycin (30 μg).

2.6. Chemotaxonomic Analysis

The isoprenoid quinone of strain S70T was analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) following the method of Collins [55]. The analysis was performed on a YMC ODS-A column (4.6 mm× 150 mm) with a mobile phase comprising acetonitrile and isopropanol (3:1, v/v). Polar lipids of strain S70T were extracted using a chloroform/methanol solvent system and analyzed by one- and two-dimensional thin-layer chromatography (TLC) according to the procedure described by Kates [56]. The analysis was performed on Merck silica gel 60 F254 aluminum-backed plates. For two-dimensional TLC, the plates were first developed with chloroform–methanol–water (65:25:4, v/v/v) and then in the second dimension with chloroform–methanol–acetic acid–water (80:12:15:4, v/v/v/v). Total lipid material was visualized using molybdophosphoric acid, while specific lipid classes were identified using selective spray reagents. For cellular fatty acid analysis, cell biomass was collected from strain S70T and three reference strains (Lutimaribacter litoralis JCM 17792T, Thalassovita autumnalis LMG 29904T and Thalassovita mediterraneus DSM 16398T), and the major fatty acids were analyzed under identical conditions. Fatty acids were saponified, methylated, and extracted following the standard protocol of the MIDI system (Sherlock Microbial Identification System, version 6.0). The analysis was performed by gas chromatography, and fatty acids were identified using the TSBA 6.0 database of the Microbial Identification System [57].

2.7. Measurement of AHL Degradative Activity by S70T

Strains S70T were pre-cultured in MB medium at 30 °C with shaking until reaching the exponential growth phase (OD600 ≈ 0.6). Cells were then harvested by centrifugation (8000 rpm, 10 min), washed three times with 100 μM sterile PIPES buffer (pH 7.0), and resuspended in the same buffer to an OD600 of 0.6. For the degradation assay, bacterial suspension was supplemented with various N-acyl homoserine lactones (AHLs), including C6-HSL, C8-HSL, C10-HSL, and C12-HSL, at a final concentration of 10 μM. The negative control comprised AHLs in PIPES buffer in the absence of bacterial suspension. All reaction mixtures were incubated on a rotatory shaker at 30 °C and 700 rpm for 24 h. Residual AHL was assessed using the reporter strains Chromobacterium violaceum CV026 and VIR24 [58,59], and degradation status were determined by measuring the violacein production at OD550.

2.8. Inhibition of Bacterial-Induced Potato Tuber Decay Assay

The phytopathogenic bacterium Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum PC1 [60], along with the experimental strain S70T, were individually cultured in MB medium with shaking until reaching an OD600 ≈ 0.6 (approximately 108 CFU/mL). Bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation, washed twice, and resuspended in 100 μM sterile PIPES buffer (pH 7.0) to standardize cell density. Subsequently, suspensions of strain S70T and PC1 were mixed at a 1:1 (v/v) ratio and pre-incubated at 30 °C to facilitate potential bacterial interactions before plant inoculation. Surface-sterilized potato tubers (Solanum tuberosum L.) were aseptically cut into uniform discs approximately 1 cm thick. Each disc was inoculated at the center of the exposed surface with 10 μL of the corresponding bacterial suspension according to the following treatment groups: the co-culture of PC1 and S70T, PC1 alone (positive control for maceration), and S70T alone (negative control for pathogenicity). All inoculated slices were placed in sterile Petri dishes and incubated at 25 °C in the dark. After incubation, the maceration area on each disc was measured using ImageJ software (version 1.48v). Each treatment was performed in triplicate, and the entire experiment was repeated three times independently.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. 16S rRNA Gene Phylogeny

For phylogenetic analyses, the 16S rRNA gene sequences of strains S70T and S69A exhibited similarity values of 96.7%, 96.6%, 96.2% and 96.2% to the type strains Thalassovita autumnalis LMG 29904T, Thalassobvita mediterraneus DSM 16398T, Tritonibacter litoralis SM1979T, and Aliiroseovarius marinus A6024T, respectively. Notably, the genus Thalassovita was recently proposed to replace the illegitimate prokaryotic genus name Thalassobius [27]. Consequently, all 14 strains previously classified under Thalassobius (https://lpsn.dsmz.de/genus/thalassobius (accessed on 10 October 2025)) were included in the phylogenetic analysis. According to the List of Prokaryotic Names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN), 9 of these 14 strains were taxonomically reassigned as follows: three to the genus Shimia (S. byssi DSM 100673T, S. aestuarii DSM 15283T, and S. aquaeponti GJSW-22T), two to the genus Cognatishimia (C. active CETC 5113T and C. maritima DSM 28223T), and one each to the genera Ruegeria (R. gelatinovorans corrig. DSM 5887T), Litorimicrobium (L. taeanensis DSM 22007T), Lutimaribacter (L. litoralis JCM 17792T), and Youngimonas (Y. vesicularis CC-AMW-ET). Given the high 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity between strain S70T and representatives of the genera Aliiroseovarius and Tritonibacter—the latter of which includes strains now reclassified into the genus Epibacterium—all three genera were included in the comparative analysis.
To resolve the phylogenetic positions of strains S70T and S69A among related genera (Thalassovita, Aliiroseovarius, Tritonibacter, Epibacterium, Lutimaribacter, Youngimonas, Ruegeria, Litorimicrobium, Shimia, and Cognatishimia), 16S rRNA gene-based phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using representative type strains. In the neighbor-joining (NJ) tree, strains S70T and S69A formed a robust cluster with the type strains Thalassovita autumnalis LMG 29904T and Thalassovita mediterraneus DSM 16398T (Figure S1). This clustering pattern was consistently supported by maximum-likelihood (ML) and maximum-parsimony (MP) analyses (Figures S2 and S3). Additionally, these four strains form a large branch with the other three strains (Thalassovita mangrovi GS-10T, Thalassovita aquimarina KMM 8518T, and R. gelatinovorans corrig. DSM 5887T, which is consistent with the ML and MP trees (Figures S1–S3). Collectively, based on 16S rRNA gene sequence alignment and phylogenetic analyses (NJ, ML, and MP trees), strains S70T and S69A showed the closest phylogenetic relationship with the type strains T. autumnalis LMG 29904T and T. mediterraneus DSM 16398T.

3.2. Genome-Based Phylogeny

Although 16S rRNA gene phylogeny initially placed strains S70T and S69A within the genus Thalassovita, their precise taxonomic classification remains uncertain owing to the high intrafamily diversity of the family Roseobacteraceae. This family exhibits extensive genetic and ecological variation, which limits the resolution of 16S rRNA-based phylogeny and has historically resulted in polyphyletic or paraphyletic genera [31]. Therefore, higher-resolution genomic analyses are essential for accurate genus-level identification of strains S70T and S69A.
The genome of strain S70T was assembled into 18 scaffolds with a total length of 3,707,035 bp and an N50 of 444,623 bp, achieving a median read coverage of 364.7x. Similarly, the genome of strain S69A comprised 19 scaffolds totaling 3,684,717 bp, with an N50 of 444,640 bp and a median read coverage of 379.1x. Both genomes have a GC content of 61.5%. Functional annotation of the S70T genome, based on Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) categories, is provided in Table S1.
To complement the 16S rRNA gene phylogeny, we performed a phylogenomic analysis using four core gene marker sets (bac120, rhodo268, rp1, and rp2), including strains S70T, S69A, and 65 reference type strains (Figure 1 and Figure S4; genome assembly details are provided in Table S2). The phylogenomic trees revealed a robust clade comprising strains S70T, S69A, Y. vesicularis CC-AMW-ET, and L. litoralis JCM 17792T (Figure 1 and Figure S4). This core group further clustered with five additional type strains: T. mediterraneus DSM 16398T, T. autumnalis LMG 29904T, T. mangrovi GS-10T, T. aquimarina KMM 8518T, and R. gelatinovorans corrig. DSM 5887T. Notably, this phylogenomic clustering pattern exhibited significant discordance with the 16S rRNA gene-based phylogeny (Figures S1–S3), wherein strains S70T and S69A appeared distantly related to Y. vesicularis and L. litoralis.
In the broader phylogenetic context, the genus Lutimaribacter was polyphyletic. Although L. degradans, L. pacificus, and L. saemankumensis formed a distinct, monophyletic branch, the type strain L. litoralis JCM 17792T consistently grouped outside this cluster and instead clustered within the Youngimonas clade (Figure 1 and Figure S4). Likewise, L. marinistellae KCTC 42911T consistently associated with members of the genus Ruegeria (Figure 1 and Figure S4), and R. gelatinovorans DSM 5887T clustered within the Thalassovita clade (Figure 1 and Figures S1–S4), suggesting that these strains may require taxonomic reclassification.
The consistent and well-supported clustering of S70T, S69A, Y. vesicularis CC-AMW-ET, and L. litoralis JCM 17792T across all phylogenomic analyses indicates their close genomic relatedness and supports that their assignment to a single genus.
Crucially, strain S70T demonstrated 100% identity with strain S69A across all genomic metrics (OrthoANIu, ANIb, AAI, and dDDH), confirming their conspecific status. To further elucidate the phylogenetic placement of S70T, we performed comparative genomic analyses against 65 type strains. The ANIb-based heatmap revealed clustering with 12 type strains (Figure S5), while the ezAAI analysis displayed a similar clustering pattern, encompassing 11 type strains (Figure S6). General genomic features of strain S70T, S69A and these 12 type strains are presented in Table 1. Both S70T and S69A have a DNA G+C content of 61.5%, consistent with that of the other strains, with the exception of L. pacificus DSM 29620T (65.5%).
Comparison genomic analysis of strain S70T with the 12 type strains using three established indices (OrthoANIu, ezAAI, and dDDH) consistently supported its distinct taxonomic status (Figure 2). OrthoANIu values (72.9–79.6%) and ezAAI values (69.6–81.2%) were all well below respective species delineation thresholds (95–96%) [61], with the highest but still subthreshold affinities to CC-AMW-ET (79.6% OrthoANIu, 80.9% ezAAI) and JCM 17792T (78.3% OrthoANIu, 81.2% ezAAI) (Figure 2a,b). Notably, these two type strains shared higher pairwise similarity (82.3% ezAAI, 22% dDDH) than either showed with S70T. The dDDH values (18.6–21.8%) further confirmed this distinction (Figure 2c), being well below the 70% species cutoff [62]. The combined genomic evidence provides definitive support for the classification of strain S70T as representing a novel species. This conclusion is further corroborated by phylogenomic analysis (Figure 1), which consistently places S70T within a distinct phylogenetic lineage. Strain S70T forms a robust clade separate from its closest relatives, strains CC-AMW-ET and JCM 17792T, thereby confirming its novel taxonomic status.

3.3. Pangenome Analyses

Pangenome analysis was conducted to compare functional gene content between strain S70T and twelve type strains (Figure 3). Integrated Prokaryotes Genome and pan-genome Analysis (IPGA) identified 20,052 orthologous genes after genome pooling (Figure 3a). Core gene clusters primarily associated with metabolism, information storage and processing, cellular processes, and signaling, poorly characterized and unannotated (Figure 3a). Among the 20,052 gene clusters, only shared 729 (3.6%) were shared among all thirteen strains (Figure 3a). Strain S70T shared 1861 (42.4%) core gene clusters with strain CC-AMW-ET, and these two strains together shared 1652 (28.7%) core gene cluster with strain JCM 17792T (Figure 3a).
A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based phylogenetic tree further resolved inter-strain relationships, showing S70T clustering most closely with JCM 17792T, and subsequently with strain CC-AMW-ET (Figure 3b). Cumulative pangenome curves were generated to assess genomic diversity. The total gene cluster curve continued to rise with each added genome, indicating ongoing incorporation of accessory genes (Figure 3c). In contrast, the core gene cluster curve declined sharply after the first few genomes, reflecting the limited shared gene set, all genome pairs shared fewer than 1600 core gene clusters (Figure 3d). While the SNP phylogeny firmly establishes the close evolutionary relationship among S70ᵀ, JCM 17792ᵀ, and CC-AMW-ET, their pangenome architecture reveals significant genomic divergence, suggesting niche-specific adaptation within this clade.

3.4. Morphological, Physiological, and Chemotaxonomic Properties

3.4.1. Cellular Morphology

Strains S70T and S69A were aerobic, Gram-stain-negative, and non-motile rods (Figure 4a). Cells of S70T measured 0.4–0.7 μm in width and 1.1–5.2 μm in length, with mean dimensions of 0.52 ± 0.22 μm by 2.56 ± 1.57 μm (mean ± SD; n = 18). Similarly, cells of S69A ranged from 0.4 to 0.7 μm in width and from 1.6 to 4.1 μm in length, with mean dimensions of 0.57 ± 0.07 μm by 2.32 ± 0.69 μm (mean ± SD; n = 18). Notably, a vesicle (approximately 0.2 μm × 0.7 μm) was observed adjacent to a cell of S70T (Figure 4b), a feature also reported in strain CC-AMW-ET [28].
Strain JCM 17792T exhibited pleomorphic rod-shaped cells as previously described [63], whlie strain CC-AMW-ET was also rod-shaped, typically measuring of 2.9–4.3 μm in length and 0.6–0.8 μm in diameter, and frequently occurring as paired rods or filamentous forms up to 8–16 μm long [28]. These observations indicate a close morphological resemblance between the two strains. In contrast, the remaining reference strains displayed distinct morphologies: LMG 29904T displayed a coccobacillary morphology [64], and DSM 16398T showed pleomorphism ranging from coccoid to rod-shaped cells [65]. All strains, including the four reference strains, were non-motile. Morphologically, S70T and S69A are more similar to JCM 17792T and CC-AMW-ET.
Based on genomic analyses showing that L. litoralis JCM 17792T clusters with strains S70T and CC-AMW-ET, we futher analyzed the morphological features of other Lutimaribacter species. Most described species are long rods, including L. saemankumensis DSM 28010T and L. degradans EGI FG00013T [29,66]. In contrast, L. pacificus was reported to be short rods, 1.0–1.2 μm long and 0.6–0.7 μm wide [67]. Notably, L. marinistellae KCTC 42911T celles are short-rod and motile by means of flagella [68], whereas other Lutimaribacter strains are non-motile. Given that motility is observed in some members of the genus Ruegeria, suggesting that strain KCTC 42911T require taxonomic reclassification. Collectively, the morphological characteristics of strains S70T and S69A are more similar to strains CC-AMW-ET and JCM 17792T.

3.4.2. Physiological and Chemotaxonomic Characteristics

Strains S70T and S69A grew at 12–37 °C, pH 6.0–9.0, and in the presence of 0.5–6.0% (w/v) NaCl, with optimal growth observed at 28–30 °C, pH 7.0, and 2.0–3.0% (w/v) NaCl, respectively (Table 2). Both strains were positive for the reduction of nitrate to nitrogen, whereas all four reference type strains were negative for nitrate reduction. In terms of enzyme activity, S70T and S69A were positive for urease, consistent with JCM 17792T, but unlike the other three strains, they also hydrolyzed tyrosine, a trait shared with JCM 17792T and LMG 29904T, but not with CC-AMW-ET or DSM 16398T. Hydrolysis of DNA was observed only in LMG 29904T and DSM 16398T, and was absent in the other four strains. Similarly, aesculin hydrolysis was positive only in CC-AMW-ET and LMG 29904T, and negative in the remaining strains. Biochemical and enzymatic profiling was performed using the API 20NE and API ZYM systems (bioMérieux) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The results revealed distinct phenotypic differences among the bacterial strains tested (Table 2). Notably, β-galactosidase activity was detected exclusively to strain LMG 29904T. In addition, the ability to oxidize potassium gluconate was unique to strain CC-AMW-ET. A shared enzymatic profile, positive for esterase (C4), esterase lipase (C8), and naphthol AS-BI phosphohydrolase, was observed in strains S70T, S69A, CC-AMW-ET, and JCM 17792T.
The results showed that strain S70T and S69A were susceptible to ampicillin, streptomycin, penicillin G, ceftriaxone, clarithromycin, carbenicillin, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, trimethoprim, and polymyxin B. Resistant to kanamycin (w), imipenem, cefalexin, nalidixic acid, neomycin (w), vancomycin, furantoin, gentamicin (w), tetracycline, amoxicillin, lincomycin, fusidic acid, colistin, troleandomycin, rifamycin SV, aztreonam, and minocycline (including BIOLOG GEN III system). BIOLOG GEN III results showed that S70T could utilized dextrin, D-maltose, D-trehalose, gentiobiose, sucrose (weakly), D-turanose, stachyose, D-raffinose, α-D-glucose (weakly), myo-inositol, D-Fructose-6-PO4, glycyl-L-proline, L-aspartic acid, L-glutamic acid (weakly), pectin, D-galacturonic acid (weakly), L-galactonic acid (weakly), glucuronamide, p-hydroxy-phenylacetic, Tween 40, acetoacetic acid, acetic acid, and formic acid.
In addition, the predominant ubiquinone detected in strain S70T was ubiquinone-10 (Q-10), which was same as other most relative type strains. The major polar lipids of strain S70T were PG, DPG, PE, PME, PC, AL and five unidentified polar lipids (Figure S7). And the major fatty acid (>10%) detected in strain S70T was summed feature 8 (C18:1 ω6c and/or C18:1 ω7c) (75.1%), which is quite similar to the four reference strains (Table S3).

3.5. Functional Genomic Analysis

The draft genome sequence of strain S70T was annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP, version 6.10) [45]. Based on the PGAP results, the draft genome of S70T contains 3671 coding sequences, 64 RNAs and 21 pseudogenes. Genome information for the closest related strains can be found in Table S2.

3.5.1. Secondary Metabolite Biosynthetic Gene Clusters (BGCs)

The BGCs search results of strain S70T revealed the presence of nine BGCs, which exhibited low homology to known BGCs in MIBiG (Minimum Information about a Biosynthetic Gene cluster) databases, indicating considerable potential for the production of diverse secondary metabolites (Figure 5).
Among the BGCs, the analysis predicted a diverse array of biosynthetic pathways: a ribosomal synthesized and post-translationally modified peptide-like (RiPP-like) cluster (cluster 1); a non-ribosomal peptide synthetase-like (NRPS-like) cluster (cluster 2); a betalactone-related cluster (cluster 3) potentially encoding enzymatically inhibitory molecules; a terpene biosynthesis cluster (cluster 4); and a cluster involved in redox-cofactor metabolism (cluster 5). A particularly noteworthy hybrid cluster (cluster 6) was identified, featuring both type I polyketide synthase (T1PKS) and NRPS-like domains, which significantly expands its potential for generating structurally unique hybrid metabolites (Figure 5).

3.5.2. Hydrocarbon Degradation

Given the reported polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH)-degradation activity of Lutimaribacter degradans EGI FJ00013T [66], and the close phylogenetic relationship of strain S70T (Figure 1), we characterized its genetic repertoire for hydrocarbon metabolism. Specifically, marker genes associated with hydrocarbon degradation were systematically identified and annotated using the customized HMM (Hidden Markov Model) database of KEGG Orthologs (KOfam) and the Calgary approach to ANnoTating HYDrocarbon degradation genes (CANT-HYD) [52] (Table S4). Genomic analysis of S70T and related strains revealed the presence of both aerobic (AlkB) and anaerobic (AhyA) degradation pathway. This complementary genetic repertoire suggests a broad substrate range and an ability to degrade hydrocarbons under diverse redox conditions.
Additionally, genes associated with the aerobic degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were partially identified, including ring-hydroxylating dioxygenases such as MAH_alpha, NdoB, and non_NdoB_type (Figure 6, Table S5). The high CANT-HYD HMM scores of naphthalene dioxygenase components (NdoB and non-NdoB types) in the genomes of strains S70T, JCM 17792T, DSM 16398T, and GS10T, strongly suggest their capability to degrade naphthalene and potentially other PAHs. Taken together, this genomic evidence points to a previously unrecognized biodegradation capacity in these strains that merits further experimental investigation.

3.5.3. Sulfite Oxidation and DMSP Degradation Pathways

The genomic analysis of S70T reveals a versatile and specialized genetic repertoire for sulfur metabolism (Figure 7, Table S6). The strain harbors a complete sox gene cluster (soxAXBYZCD), which encodes the thiosulfate-oxidizing sulfur-oxidizing enzyme (SOX) system, thereby conferring the capacity for inorganic sulfur oxidation and the potential for chemolithoautotrophic growth under energy-limited conditions. In the Sox complex, SoxAX is a heterodimeric c-type cytochrome that mediates electron transfer; soxB encodes a hydrolase that catalyzes the hydrolysis of cysteinyl S-thiosulfonate to cysteinyl persulfide and sulfate; soxCD encodes the essential sulfur dehydrogenase involved in the reaction mechanism; and soxYZ encodes a scaffold protein that binds the substrate (Figure 7a, Table S6). Genes encoding assimilatory sulfite reductase (cysI) and thiosulfate sulfurtransferase (sseA) were also identified, indicating the strain’s capacity for efficient incorporation of sulfur into biomass (Figure 7a).
Notably, strain S70T exhibits a specialized strategy for organosulfur metabolism, characterized by a genetic predisposition toward dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) cleavage rather than sulfur assimilation. Although it encodes a DMSP lyase (dddL), a trait also reported in related strains CC-AMW-ET and JCM 17792T [69], S70T also possesses an incomplete dmd operon, lacking dmdA but retaining dmdBCD, which is insufficient to support the sulfur-retentive demethylation pathway (Figure 7b). This genomic profile indicates that S70T obligately relies on DddL-mediated cleavage of DMSP to dimethyl sulfide (DMS) and acrylate [70], prioritizing rapid carbon and energy acquisition over sulfur conservation. Consequently, S70T is classified as an obligate producer of DMS—a key climate-active gas—underscoring its potential role in marine sulfur cycling.
The metabolic versatility of strain S70T extends beyond sulfur transformations to encompass pathways for hydrocarbon degradation. The co-occurrence of inorganic sulfur oxidation and organosulfur compound cleavage facilitates adaptation to fluctuating sulfur availability, whereas the concurrent capacity for hydrocarbon degradation likely confers a competitive advantage in the nutrient-rich microenvironment of its brittle star host, Ophiactis savignyi. Through these integrated metabolic capabilities, strain S70T may contribute to host energy acquisition and modulate local biogeochemical fluxes of sulfur and carbon in marine ecosystems.

3.6. Quorum Quenching Capacity of Strain S70T

Notably, three distinct BGCs (clusters 7, 8, and 9) were annotated as homoserine lactone (AHL) synthases, highlighting a pronounced genetic capacity for quorum-sensing (QS) signal molecule synthesis (Figure 8a). This remarkable abundance of AHL-related BGCs implies that S70T may play a pivotal role in orchestrating microbial communication within its ecological niche.
Building upon the finding that strain S70T possesses an AHL-based quorum sensing (AHL-QS) system, we hypothesized that it may also encode enzymes for AHL degradation, potentially involved in quorum quenching (QQ) to modulate signaling dynamics. This hypothesis was confirmed as strain S70T exhibits broad-spectrum AHL-degrading activity, efficiently utilizing N-hexanoyl-L-homoserine lactone (C6-HSL), N-octanoyl-L-homoserine lactone (C8-HSL), N-decanoyl-L-homoserine lactone (C10-HSL), and N-dodecanoyl-L-homoserine lactone (C12-HSL) (Figure 8b).
Given that the pathogenic strain Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum PC1 relies on QS to regulate virulence and maceration enzymes [71], we evaluate the biocontrol potential of strain S70T against potato soft rot. As expected, inoculation with PC1 alone induced severe tissue maceration. In contrast, co-inoculation of PC1 with S70T significantly attenuated the severity of soft rot symptoms (Figure 8c), supporting the conclusion that S70T degrades AHL signals produced by PC1, thereby interfering with its QS-controlled pathogenicity. These results indicate the presence of functional lactonase(s) or acylase(s) responsible for signal inactivation in S70T (Figure 8c).
To identify the underlying QQ enzymes, we analyzed the genome of S70T and identified several candidate proteins: two putative AHL acylases (WP_425096394.1 and WP_425096161.1), three metallo-β-lactamases (WP_425094154.1, WP_425095734.1, and WP_425095133.1), and three RND-type efflux transporter proteins (WP_425094496.1, WP_425094607.1, and WP_425094113.1). To further explore their potential roles, we compared the sequences of these candidate proteins with those of characterized homologs using sequence similarity network (SSN) analysis (Figure 8d, Table S7). In the SSN, WP_425096394.1 clusters with the experimentally validated AHL acylases QuiP [72], HacB [73], and PfmA [74] (all sharing 27% amino acid identity), and belongs to penicillin G acylase family within the N-terminal nucleophile (Ntn) hydrolase superfamily. Protein WP_425096161.1 shares 52% amino acid identity with GqqA, a quorum-quenching enzyme homologous to prephenate dehydratases. The putative AHL lactonases WP_425094154.1, WP_425095734.1, and WP_425095133.1 belong to the metallo-β-lactamase superfamily and cluster in the SSN with the marine bacterium-derived lactonase RmmL [75] (32%, 34%, and 28% identity, respectively) and the terrestrial bacterium-derived lactonase AdiC [76] (23%, 26%, and 25% identity, respectively) (Figure 8d). RmmL has been demonstrated to hydrolyze the lactone ring of a broad range of AHL signal molecules, thereby inactivating quorum-sensing communication [75]. In the SSN, WP_425094496.1, WP_425094607.1, and WP_425094113.1 cluster with QsdH [77] and are annotated as RND-type efflux transporters (Figure 8d). Unlike QsdH, which contains an N-terminal SGNH hydrolase domain responsible for hydrolysis of the AHL ring, these three proteins lack this catalytic domain, suggesting that they are unlikely to exhibit AHL-degrading activity. Given the narrow substrate specificity of AHL acylases for long-chain signals compared to the broad substrate range of lactonases [78], the QQ activity in S70T is likely primarily mediated by lactonases, with acylases playing a secondary role. Nevertheless, their specific QQ activities and biochemical mechanisms require further experimental validation.
The interplay between QS signaling and QQ plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of diseases in marine invertebrates. These invertebrates harbor bacteria capable of producing QQ activities as a defense against pathogen colonization [79]. Strain S70T was isolated from the marine invertebrate brittle star and exhibits QQ activity, suggesting a potential ecological role in maintaining host–microbe homeostasis.

4. Conclusions

In this study, two bacterial strains, designated S70ᵀ and S69A, were isolated from a South China Sea brittle star. Phylogenomic analyses consistently placed both strains in a distinct clade along with Youngimonas vesicularis CC-AMW-ET and Lutimaribacter litoralis JCM 17792T. Notably, the JCM 17792T strain did not cluster with other members of genus Lutimaribacter, suggesting a misclassification. This phylogenetic positioning was further supported by genomic relatedness indices, including ANI, AAI, and dDDH, which confirmed the close relationship among S70ᵀ, S69A, CC-AMW-ET and JCM 17792T. Based on these consistent findings, we propose that both strain S70ᵀ and JCM 17792T should be reclassified under the genus Youngimonas. Functional genomic analysis of strain S70ᵀ suggests its potential for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon biodegradation and sulfur metabolism, underscoring its diverse metabolic functions in marine ecosystems. Furthermore, the genome harbors numerous putative biosynthetic gene clusters, many of which share limited homology to known clusters. Together, these findings collectively suggest that strain S70ᵀ represents a promising source for discovering novel secondary metabolites. In addition, the strain exhibited inhibitory activity against the plant pathogen Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum, suggesting the presence of quorum-quenching enzymes. These traits highlight the potential of Youngimonas spp. as a promising source of novel bioactive agents, warranting further investigation into their ecological roles and biotechnological potential.
Description of Youngimonas ophiurae sp. nov.
Youngimonas ophiurae (o.phi.u′rae. N.L. gen. n. ophiurae of Ophiura, a class of invertebrates belonging to the Ophiuroidea, the source of isolation of the type strain).
The detailed description is provided in the Supplementary Material (see Description of Youngimonas ophiurae sp. nov.). The type strain, S70T (=KCTC 8975T = MCCC 1K09707T), was isolated from a brittle star collected in the South China Sea, Shenzhen, China. G+C content is 61.5%. The GenBank accession numbers for the type strain are JBNAGJ01 (genome) and PV549654 (16S rRNA gene).
Description of Youngimonas litoralis comb. nov.
Basonym: Lutimaribacter litoralis Iwaki et al. 2013 [63]. The description is as given for L. litoralis [63]. Genomic, phylogenetic, and phenotypic evidence strongly support the placement of this species in the genus Youngimonas. The type strain is KU5D5T (=JCM 17792T = KCTC 23600T). G+C content is 59.1%. The GenBank accession numbers for the type strain are FXTO01 (genome) and AB627076 (16S rRNA gene).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms13122661/s1, Figure S1: Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of 16S rRNA gene sequences, showing the position of strains S70T and S69A among representatives of the Roseobacteraceae; Figure S2: Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of 16S rRNA gene sequences, showing the position of strains S70T and S69A among representatives of the Roseobacteraceae; Figure S3: Maximum-parsimony phylogenetic tree of 16S rRNA gene sequences, showing the position of strains S70T and S69A among representatives of the Roseobacteraceae; Figure S4: Consensus trees based on the super-matrix (SM) trees of the gene sets rhodo268 and rp2, respectively; Figure S5: The pyANIb heatmap with hierarchical clustering was constructed using genomic data retrieved from the NCBI database; Figure S6: The ezAAI-based heatmap with hierarchical clustering was generated using genomic data obtained from the NCBI database; Figure S7: Polar lipids of strain S70T separated by two-dimensional TLC; Table S1: Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories for strain S70T; Table S2: Genome assembly numbers of the strains used in this study; Table S3: Cellular fatty acid composition (%) of strain S70T and its phylogenetically closest strains. Table S4: Number of marker genes associated with hydrocarbon degradation; Table S5: Genes associated with hydrocarbon degradation; Table S6: Key genes functioning in sulfite oxidation and DMSP degradation pathways across S70T and related strains; Table S7: Putative quorum quenching proteins in strain S70T and previously characterized QQ enzymes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.L. and S.X.; methodology, S.X. and M.Z.; software, Z.L.; validation, Z.L., S.X. and M.Z.; formal analysis, S.X., Q.L. and M.Z.; investigation, Z.L., Q.L. and S.X.; resources, Y.X. and M.Z.; data curation, Z.L. and S.X.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.L. and S.X.; writing—review and editing, S.X.; visualization, Z.L. and S.X.; supervision, Z.L. and S.X.; project administration, S.X.; funding acquisition, Y.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Key Project of Department of Education of Guangdong Province (No. 2024ZDZX4017) and the Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (JCYJ20241202124403006, JCYJ20250604182515020).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The authors declare that all relevant data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article. The whole genome shotgun sequencing projects for S70T and S69A have been deposited in the DDBJ/ENA/GenBank databases under the accession numbers JBNAGJ000000000 and JBRAZY000000000, respectively. The accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene sequences of strain S70T and S69A are PV549654 and PV951576, respectively.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ANIAverage Nucleotide Identity
AAIAverage Amino Acid Identity
dDDHDigital DNA–DNA hybridization
BGCBiosynthetic Gene Cluster
LPSNList of Prokaryotic Names with Standing in Nomenclature
AHLAcyl-Homoserine Lactone
QSQuorum Sensing
QQQuorum Quenching
NJNeighbor-Joining
MLMaximum-Likelihood
MPMaximum-Parsimony
CANT-HYDCalgary approach to ANnoTating HYDrocarbon Degradation Genes
NRPS-likeNonribosomal Peptide Synthetase-Like
RiPP-likeRibosomal Synthesized and Post-Translationally Modified Peptide-Like
T1PKSType I Polyketide Synthase
DMSDimethylsulfide
DMSPDimethylsulfoniopropionate
HMMHidden Markov Model
PAHPolycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
SSNSequence Similarity Network

References

  1. Qi, S.; Ma, X. Antifouling compounds from marine invertebrates. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lo Giudice, A.; Rizzo, C. Bacteria associated with benthic invertebrates from extreme marine environments: Promising but underexplored sources of biotechnologically relevant molecules. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Romano, G.; Almeida, M.; Varela Coelho, A.; Cutignano, A.; Gonçalves, L.G.; Hansen, E.; Khnykin, D.; Mass, T.; Ramšak, A.; Rocha, M.S. Biomaterials and bioactive natural products from marine invertebrates: From basic research to innovative applications. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Diao, C.; Jia, H.; Guo, S.; Hou, G.; Xian, W.; Zhang, H. Biodiversity exploration in autumn using environmental DNA in the South China sea. Environ. Res. 2022, 204, 112357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yin, X.; Chen, H.; Jiang, K.; Zhang, B.; Li, R.; Zhu, X.; Sun, L.; Ng, Z.L.; Su, M. Distribution characteristics of nitrogen-cycling microorganisms in deep-sea surface sediments of Western South China Sea. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hernandez-Agreda, A.; Gates, R.D.; Ainsworth, T.D. Defining the core microbiome in corals’ microbial soup. Trends Microbiol. 2017, 25, 125–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Maire, J.; Blackall, L.L.; van Oppen, M.J. Intracellular bacterial symbionts in corals: Challenges and future directions. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Sang, V.T.; Dat, T.T.H.; Vinh, L.B.; Cuong, L.C.V.; Oanh, P.T.T.; Ha, H.; Kim, Y.H.; Anh, H.L.T.; Yang, S.Y. Coral and coral-associated microorganisms: A prolific source of potential bioactive natural products. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. McCauley, E.P.; Piña, I.C.; Thompson, A.D.; Bashir, K.; Weinberg, M.; Kurz, S.L.; Crews, P. Highlights of marine natural products having parallel scaffolds found from marine-derived bacteria, sponges, and tunicates. J. Antibiot. 2020, 73, 504–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Knobloch, S.; Jóhannsson, R.; Marteinsson, V. Co-cultivation of the marine sponge Halichondria panicea and its associated microorganisms. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 10403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Devkar, H.U.; Thakur, N.L.; Kaur, P. Marine-derived antimicrobial molecules from the sponges and their associated bacteria. Can. J. Microbiol. 2022, 69, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wibowo, J.T.; Kellermann, M.Y.; Versluis, D.; Putra, M.Y.; Murniasih, T.; Mohr, K.I.; Wink, J.; Engelmann, M.; Praditya, D.F.; Steinmann, E. Biotechnological potential of bacteria isolated from the sea cucumber Holothuria leucospilota and Stichopus vastus from Lampung, Indonesia. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chen, L.; Wang, X.-Y.; Liu, R.-Z.; Wang, G.-Y. Culturable microorganisms associated with sea cucumbers and microbial natural products. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pan, W.; Wang, X.; Ren, C.; Jiang, X.; Gong, S.; Xie, Z.; Wong, N.-K.; Li, X.; Huang, J.; Fan, D. Sea cucumbers and their symbiotic microbiome have evolved to feed on seabed sediments. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 8825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lopanik, N.B.; Targett, N.M.; Lindquist, N. Isolation of two polyketide synthase gene fragments from the uncultured microbial symbiont of the marine bryozoan Bugula neritina. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 7941–7944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Carroll, A.R.; Copp, B.R.; Davis, R.A.; Keyzers, R.A.; Prinsep, M.R. Marine natural products. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2019, 36, 122–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, Y.; Zhou, L.; Pan, X.; Liao, Z.; Qi, N.; Sun, M.; Zhang, H.; Ju, J.; Ma, J. Metabolic blockade-based genome mining of sea anemone-associated Streptomyces sp. S1502 identifies Atypical angucyclines WS-5995 A–E: Isolation, identification, biosynthetic investigation, and bioactivities. Mar. Drugs 2024, 22, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hao, L.; Liang, J.; Chen, S.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, Y. MzmL, a novel marine derived N-acyl homoserine lactonase from Mesoflavibacter zeaxanthinifaciens that attenuates Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum virulence. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1353711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yin, Q.; Song, Z.; Liang, J.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, X.; Li, S.; Xu, Y. Pseudooceanicola onchidii sp. nov., isolated from a marine invertebrate from the South China Sea. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 1224–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liang, J.; Yin, Q.; Zheng, X.; Wang, Y.; Song, Z.-M.; Zhang, Y.; Hao, L.; Xu, Y. Muricauda onchidii sp. nov., isolated from a marine invertebrate from South China Sea, and transfers of Flagellimonas algicola, Flagellimonas pacifica and Flagellimonas maritima to Muricauda algicola comb. nov., Muricauda parva nom. nov. and Muricauda aurantiaca nom. nov., respectively, and emended description of the genus Muricauda. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2021, 71, 004982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yin, Q.; Liang, J.; Zheng, X.; Wang, Y.; Song, Z.-M.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, Y. Algibacter onchidii sp. nov., a symbiotic bacterium isolated from a marine invertebrate. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2021, 71, 005102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Xu, S.; Lai, Q.; Liu, Z.; Xu, Y. Paracoccus onchidii sp. nov., a moderately halophilic bacterium isolated from a marine invertebrate from the South China Sea. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2023, 116, 801–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yang, P.; Liang, J.; Yin, Q.; Li, G.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Hao, L. Pacificoceanicola onchidii gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from a marine invertebrate from the South China Sea. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2023, 73, 006103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Loubet-Senear, K.; Srivastava, M. Brittle star genome provides information on the evolution of regeneration. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2024, 8, 1385–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Afshar, A.; Khoradmehr, A.; Nowzari, F.; Baghban, N.; Zare, M.; Najafi, M.; Keshavarzi, S.Z.; Zendehboudi, F.; Mohebbi, G.; Barmak, A. Tissue extract from brittle star undergoing arm regeneration promotes wound healing in rat. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Romanenko, L.A.; Uchino, M.; Frolova, G.M.; Mikhailov, V.V. Marixanthomonas ophiurae gen. nov., sp. nov., a marine bacterium of the family Flavobacteriaceae isolated from a deep-sea brittle star. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2007, 57, 457–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Deshmukh, U.B.; Oren, A. Proposal of Thalassovita gen. nov. and Alloyangia gen. nov. as replacement names for the illegitimate prokaryotic generic names Thalassobius and Yangia, respectively. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2023, 73, 006025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hameed, A.; Shahina, M.; Lin, S.; Nakayan, P.; Liu, Y.; Lai, W.; Hsu, Y. Youngimonas vesicularis gen. nov., sp. nov., of the family Rhodobacteraceae, isolated from surface seawater, reclassification of Donghicola xiamenensis Tan et al. 2009 as Pseudodonghicola xiamenensis gen. nov., comb. nov. and emended description of the genus Donghicola Yoon et al. 2007. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2014, 64, 2729–2737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yoon, J.; Kang, S.; Lee, J.; Oh, T. Lutimaribacter saemankumensis gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from a tidal flat of the Yellow Sea. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2009, 59, 48–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  30. Case, R.J.; Labbate, M.; Kjelleberg, S. AHL-driven quorum-sensing circuits: Their frequency and function among the Proteobacteria. ISME J. 2008, 2, 345–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liang, K.Y.; Orata, F.D.; Boucher, Y.F.; Case, R.J. Roseobacters in a sea of poly-and paraphyly: Whole genome-based taxonomy of the family Rhodobacteraceae and the proposal for the split of the “Roseobacter clade” into a novel family, Roseobacteraceae fam. nov. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 683109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cude, W.N.; Buchan, A. Acyl-homoserine lactone-based quorum sensing in the Roseobacter clade: Complex cell-to-cell communication controls multiple physiologies. Front. Microbiol. 2013, 4, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Chalita, M.; Kim, Y.O.; Park, S.; Oh, H.; Cho, J.H.; Moon, J.; Baek, N.; Moon, C.; Lee, K.; Yang, J. EzBioCloud: A genome-driven database and platform for microbiome identification and discovery. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2024, 74, 006421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Thompson, J.D.; Gibson, T.J.; Plewniak, F.; Jeanmougin, F.; Higgins, D.G. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 4876–4882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Suleski, M.; Sanderford, M.; Sharma, S.; Tamura, K. MEGA12: Molecular Evolutionary Genetic Analysis version 12 for adaptive and green computing. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2024, 41, msae263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Felsenstein, J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39, 783–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, R.; Li, Y.; Kristiansen, K.; Wang, J. SOAP: Short oligonucleotide alignment program. Bioinformatics 2008, 24, 713–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, R.; Zhu, H.; Ruan, J.; Qian, W.; Fang, X.; Shi, Z.; Li, Y.; Li, S.; Shan, G.; Kristiansen, K. De novo assembly of human genomes with massively parallel short read sequencing. Genome Res. 2010, 20, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, D.; He, W.; Shao, Z.; Ahmed, I.; Zhang, Y.; Li, W.; Zhao, Z. EasyCGTree: A pipeline for prokaryotic phylogenomic analysis based on core gene sets. BMC Bioinf. 2023, 24, 390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yoon, S.; Ha, S.; Lim, J.; Kwon, S.; Chun, J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2017, 110, 1281–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Richter, M.; Rosselló-Móra, R.; Oliver Glöckner, F.; Peplies, J. JSpeciesWS: A web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 2016, 32, 929–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kim, D.; Park, S.; Chun, J. Introducing EzAAI: A pipeline for high throughput calculations of prokaryotic average amino acid identity. J. Microbiol. 2021, 59, 476–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Meier-Kolthoff, J.P.; Auch, A.F.; Klenk, H.-P.; Göker, M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinf. 2013, 14, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Liu, D.; Zhang, Y.; Fan, G.; Sun, D.; Zhang, X.; Yu, Z.; Wang, J.; Wu, L.; Shi, W.; Ma, J. IPGA: A handy integrated prokaryotes genome and pan-genome analysis web service. Imeta 2022, 1, e55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tatusova, T.; DiCuccio, M.; Badretdin, A.; Chetvernin, V.; Nawrocki, E.P.; Zaslavsky, L.; Lomsadze, A.; Pruitt, K.D.; Borodovsky, M.; Ostell, J. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 6614–6624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Benson, G. Tandem repeats finder: A program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27, 573–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, Q.; Ye, Y. Not all predicted CRISPR–Cas systems are equal: Isolated cas genes and classes of CRISPR like elements. BMC Bioinf. 2017, 18, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bertelli, C.; Brinkman, F.S. Improved genomic island predictions with IslandPath-DIMOB. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, 2161–2167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Arndt, D.; Grant, J.R.; Marcu, A.; Sajed, T.; Pon, A.; Liang, Y.; Wishart, D.S. PHASTER: A better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, W16–W21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Blin, K.; Shaw, S.; Augustijn, H.E.; Reitz, Z.L.; Biermann, F.; Alanjary, M.; Fetter, A.; Terlouw, B.R.; Metcalf, W.W.; Helfrich, E.J. antiSMASH 7.0: New and improved predictions for detection, regulation, chemical structures and visualisation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, W46–W50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Aramaki, T.; Blanc-Mathieu, R.; Endo, H.; Ohkubo, K.; Kanehisa, M.; Goto, S.; Ogata, H. KofamKOALA: KEGG Ortholog assignment based on profile HMM and adaptive score threshold. Bioinformatics 2020, 36, 2251–2252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Khot, V.; Zorz, J.; Gittins, D.A.; Chakraborty, A.; Bell, E.; Bautista, M.A.; Paquette, A.J.; Hawley, A.K.; Novotnik, B.; Hubert, C.R. CANT-HYD: A curated database of phylogeny-derived hidden Markov models for annotation of marker genes involved in hydrocarbon degradation. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 764058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zallot, R.; Oberg, N.; Gerlt, J.A. The EFI web resource for genomic enzymology tools: Leveraging protein, genome, and metagenome databases to discover novel enzymes and metabolic pathways. Biochemistry 2019, 58, 4169–4182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Tindall, B.; Sikorski, J.; Smibert, R.; Krieg, N. Phenotypic characterization and the principles of comparative systematics. In Methods for General and Molecular Microbiology; Reddy, C., Beveridge, T.J., Breznak, J.A., Marzluf, G., Eds.; American Society of Microbiology: Washington, DC, USA, 2007; pp. 330–393. [Google Scholar]
  55. Collins, M. Isoprenoid quinone analyses in bacterial classification and identification. In Chemical Methods in Bacterial Systematics; Goodfellow, M., Minnikin, D.E., Eds.; Academic Press: London, UK, 1985; pp. 267–287. [Google Scholar]
  56. Kates, M. Techniques of Lipidology, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1986; pp. 106–107, 241–246. [Google Scholar]
  57. Sasser, M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids; MIDI Technical Note 101; MIDI, Inc.: Newark, DE, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  58. Remuzgo-Martínez, S.; Lázaro-Díez, M.; Mayer, C.; Aranzamendi-Zaldumbide, M.; Padilla, D.; Calvo, J.; Marco, F.; Martínez-Martínez, L.; Icardo, J.M.; Otero, A. Biofilm formation and quorum-sensing-molecule production by clinical isolates of Serratia liquefaciens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 3306–3315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Someya, N.; Morohoshi, T.; Okano, N.; Otsu, E.; Usuki, K.; Sayama, M.; Sekiguchi, H.; Ikeda, T.; Ishida, S. Distribution of N-acylhomoserine lactone-producing fluorescent Pseudomonads in the phyllosphere and rhizosphere of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Microbes Environ. 2009, 24, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Haque, M.; Oliver, M.; Nahar, K.; Alam, M.Z.; Hirata, H.; Tsuyumu, S. CytR homolog of Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum controls air-liquid biofilm formation by regulating multiple genes involved in cellulose production, c-di-GMP signaling, motility, and type III secretion system in response to nutritional and environmental signals. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 972. [Google Scholar]
  61. Richter, M.; Rosselló-Móra, R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 19126–19131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Meier-Kolthoff, J.P.; Klenk, H.-P.; Göker, M. Taxonomic use of DNA G+C content and DNA–DNA hybridization in the genomic age. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2014, 64, 352–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Iwaki, H.; Yasukawa, N.; Fujioka, M.; Takada, K.; Hasegawa, Y. Isolation and characterization of a marine cyclohexylacetate-degrading bacterium Lutimaribacter litoralis sp. nov., and reclassification of Oceanicola pacificus as Lutimaribacter pacificus comb. nov. Curr. Microbiol. 2013, 66, 588–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Pujalte, M.J.; Lucena, T.; Rodrigo-Torres, L.; Arahal, D.R. Comparative genomics of Thalassobius including the description of Thalassobius activus sp. nov., and Thalassobius autumnalis sp. nov. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 2645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Arahal, D.; Macián, M.; Garay, E.; Pujalte, M. Thalassobius mediterraneus gen. nov., sp. nov., and reclassification of Ruegeria gelatinovorans as Thalassobius gelatinovorus comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 2371–2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Gao, L.; Fang, B.; Liu, Y.; Jiao, J.; Li, M.; Alkhalifah, D.H.M.; Hozzein, W.N.; Li, W. Comparative genomic analyses of Lutimaribacter degradans sp. nov. With the ability to PAHs-biodegradation and transformation. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2023, 176, 105505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yuan, J.; Lai, Q.; Wang, B.; Sun, F.; Liu, X.; Du, Y.; Li, G.; Gu, L.; Zheng, T.; Shao, Z. Oceanicola pacificus sp. nov., isolated from a deep-sea pyrene-degrading consortium. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2009, 59, 1158–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  68. Zhang, Y.; Tang, P.; Xu, Y.; Fang, W.; Wang, X.; Fang, Z.; Xiao, Y. Lutimaribacter marinistellae sp. nov., isolated from a starfish. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 3675–3680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Hameed, A.; Suchithra, K.V.; Lin, S.-Y.; Stothard, P.; Young, C. Genomic potential for inorganic carbon sequestration and xenobiotic degradation in marine bacterium Youngimonas vesicularis CC-AMW-ET affiliated to family Paracoccaceae. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2023, 116, 1247–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Curson, A.; Rogers, R.; Todd, J.; Brearley, C.; Johnston, A. Molecular genetic analysis of a dimethylsulfoniopropionate lyase that liberates the climate-changing gas dimethylsulfide in several marine α-proteobacteria and Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 10, 757–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Li, B.; Huang, J.; Yi, Y.; Liu, S.; Liu, R.; Xiao, Z.; Li, C. Effects of rhapontigenin as a novel quorum-sensing inhibitor on exoenzymes and biofilm formation of Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum and its application in vegetables. Molecules 2022, 27, 8878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Huang, J.J.; Petersen, A.; Whiteley, M.; Leadbetter, J.R. Identification of QuiP, the product of gene PA1032, as the second acyl-homoserine lactone acylase of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 1190–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wahjudi, M.; Papaioannou, E.; Hendrawati, O.; van Assen, A.H.G.; van Merkerk, R.; Cool, R.H.; Poelarends, G.J.; Quax, W.J. PA0305 of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a quorum quenching acylhomoserine lactone acylase belonging to the Ntn hydrolase superfamily. Microbiology 2011, 157, 2042–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Liu, N.; Yu, M.; Zhao, Y.; Cheng, J.; An, K.; Zhang, X. PfmA, a novel quorum-quenching N-acylhomoserine lactone acylase from Pseudoalteromonas flavipulchra. Microbiology 2017, 163, 1389–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Cai, X.; Yu, M.; Shan, H.; Tian, X.; Zheng, Y.; Xue, C.; Zhang, X. Characterization of a novel N-Acylhomoserine lactonase RmmL from Ruegeria mobilis YJ3. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wang, W.; Morohoshi, T.; Someya, N.; Ikeda, T. AidC, a novel N-acylhomoserine lactonase from the potato root-associated Cytophaga-Flavobacteria-Bacteroides (CFB) group bacterium Chryseobacterium sp. strain StRB126. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 7985–7992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Huang, W.; Lin, Y.; Yi, S.; Liu, P.; Shen, J.; Shao, Z.; Liu, Z. QsdH, a novel AHL lactonase in the RND-type inner membrane of marine Pseudoalteromonas byunsanensis strain 1A01261. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e46587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zhu, X.; Chen, W.J.; Bhatt, K.; Zhou, Z.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, L.H.; Chen, S.; Wang, J. Innovative microbial disease biocontrol strategies mediated by quorum quenching and their multifaceted applications: A review. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1063393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Coolahan, M.; Whalen, K.E. A review of quorum-sensing and its role in mediating interkingdom interactions in the ocean. Commun. Biol. 2025, 8, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Consensus trees based on the supermatrix (SM) trees of the gene sets bac120 (a), and rp1 (b), respectively. Blue dots indicate that the branching was supported by two trees (bac120 and rhodo268), pink dots indicate that the branching was supported by two trees (rp1 and rp2).
Figure 1. Consensus trees based on the supermatrix (SM) trees of the gene sets bac120 (a), and rp1 (b), respectively. Blue dots indicate that the branching was supported by two trees (bac120 and rhodo268), pink dots indicate that the branching was supported by two trees (rp1 and rp2).
Microorganisms 13 02661 g001
Figure 2. Heatmaps of OrthoANIu (a), ezAAI (b) and dDDH (c) values between strain S70T and 12 close type strains.
Figure 2. Heatmaps of OrthoANIu (a), ezAAI (b) and dDDH (c) values between strain S70T and 12 close type strains.
Microorganisms 13 02661 g002
Figure 3. Pangenome analysis of S70T and twelve type strains. (a) Pangenome profile showing the functional distribution of core gene clusters and unique genes. The blue numbers indicate the count of genes shared among the different strains; the black numbers indicate the total gene count. (b) A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based tree showing the relationships between S70T and twelve type strains. (c) Accumulative curve of the number of total gene clusters and the number of genomes. (d) Accumulative curve of the number of core gene clusters and the number of genomes.
Figure 3. Pangenome analysis of S70T and twelve type strains. (a) Pangenome profile showing the functional distribution of core gene clusters and unique genes. The blue numbers indicate the count of genes shared among the different strains; the black numbers indicate the total gene count. (b) A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based tree showing the relationships between S70T and twelve type strains. (c) Accumulative curve of the number of total gene clusters and the number of genomes. (d) Accumulative curve of the number of core gene clusters and the number of genomes.
Microorganisms 13 02661 g003
Figure 4. Transmission electron micrograph of negatively stained cells of S70T after incubation in MB for 3 days at 28 °C. (a) General cell morphology of S70T. (b) A detailed view of a vesicle (indicated by the arrow).
Figure 4. Transmission electron micrograph of negatively stained cells of S70T after incubation in MB for 3 days at 28 °C. (a) General cell morphology of S70T. (b) A detailed view of a vesicle (indicated by the arrow).
Microorganisms 13 02661 g004
Figure 5. BGC biosynthesis clusters of S70T found in antiSMASH.
Figure 5. BGC biosynthesis clusters of S70T found in antiSMASH.
Microorganisms 13 02661 g005
Figure 6. Assessment of hydrocarbon degradation potential in S70T and 12 closely related strains by Hmmer. KofamKOALA HMMs (e-value cutoff 10−50) and CANT-HYD HMM (scores ≥ noise cutoff) was used to filter results. Each bubble represents the number of KO/CANT-HYD HMM hits (x-axis) per genome (y-axis), with bubble size corresponding to the number of gene hits. The color-coded bubbles represent genes associated with distinct degradation pathways: blue for aerobic alkane, green for aerobic aromatic, yellow for anaerobic alkane, and orange for anaerobic aromatic degradation. The black circle indicates the hit of CANT-HYD HMM. All HMMs are grouped by substrate type and degradation pathway. Details of the HMMs and underlying data are provided in Tables S4 and S5.
Figure 6. Assessment of hydrocarbon degradation potential in S70T and 12 closely related strains by Hmmer. KofamKOALA HMMs (e-value cutoff 10−50) and CANT-HYD HMM (scores ≥ noise cutoff) was used to filter results. Each bubble represents the number of KO/CANT-HYD HMM hits (x-axis) per genome (y-axis), with bubble size corresponding to the number of gene hits. The color-coded bubbles represent genes associated with distinct degradation pathways: blue for aerobic alkane, green for aerobic aromatic, yellow for anaerobic alkane, and orange for anaerobic aromatic degradation. The black circle indicates the hit of CANT-HYD HMM. All HMMs are grouped by substrate type and degradation pathway. Details of the HMMs and underlying data are provided in Tables S4 and S5.
Microorganisms 13 02661 g006
Figure 7. Schematic representation of the sulfur metabolism pathways in strain S70T. (a) Overview of assimilatory sulfate reduction and organic sulfur metabolism in S70T. (b) Detailed pathways of dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) degradation: the cleavage pathway and the demethylation pathway. The solid arrows indicate confirmed enzymatic reactions present in S70T; dashed arrows indicate pathways absent or not detected in the strain.
Figure 7. Schematic representation of the sulfur metabolism pathways in strain S70T. (a) Overview of assimilatory sulfate reduction and organic sulfur metabolism in S70T. (b) Detailed pathways of dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) degradation: the cleavage pathway and the demethylation pathway. The solid arrows indicate confirmed enzymatic reactions present in S70T; dashed arrows indicate pathways absent or not detected in the strain.
Microorganisms 13 02661 g007
Figure 8. Quorum-quenching (QQ) capacity and anti-phytopathogenic activity of strain S70T. (a) Identification of putative QS biosynthetic gene cluster (BGCs) in the S70T genome using antiSMASH analysis. (b) QQ activity of the S70T culture supernatant against four N-acyl homoserine lactones (AHLs), assessed using the biosensor strains Chromobacterium violaceum CV026 and VIR24. NC, negative control. (c) Biocontrol effect of S70T against soft rot disease caused by Pcc on potato tubers. (d) Sequence similarity network (SSN) of putative and characterized QQ enzymes (e-value < 10−20), visualized using Cytoscape (version 3.10.3). Predicted QQ enzymes from the S70T genome are marked with red squares, and known QQ enzyme homologs are indicated with blue circles. Data are represented as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3 biological replicates). Statistical significance was determined using Student’s t-test (** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Figure 8. Quorum-quenching (QQ) capacity and anti-phytopathogenic activity of strain S70T. (a) Identification of putative QS biosynthetic gene cluster (BGCs) in the S70T genome using antiSMASH analysis. (b) QQ activity of the S70T culture supernatant against four N-acyl homoserine lactones (AHLs), assessed using the biosensor strains Chromobacterium violaceum CV026 and VIR24. NC, negative control. (c) Biocontrol effect of S70T against soft rot disease caused by Pcc on potato tubers. (d) Sequence similarity network (SSN) of putative and characterized QQ enzymes (e-value < 10−20), visualized using Cytoscape (version 3.10.3). Predicted QQ enzymes from the S70T genome are marked with red squares, and known QQ enzyme homologs are indicated with blue circles. Data are represented as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3 biological replicates). Statistical significance was determined using Student’s t-test (** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Microorganisms 13 02661 g008
Table 1. General genomic features of strains S70T, S69A and the closest type strains.
Table 1. General genomic features of strains S70T, S69A and the closest type strains.
Strains1234567891011121314
Genomic size (Mb)3.73.73.84.14.43.44.84.24.04.03.64.43.85.1
GC (%)61.561.563.559.06058.562.56458.560.56365.56362
Protein36713648369439574133321841573965377538223448429237414639
Gene37573734378941024212329442604027385939193545437538424760
rRNA12125333345533334
tRNA4949474854464444444245434644
Other RNA33333333333333
Pseudogene2121409119245210314746344970
Tandem repeats10610694498362123168801121231267082
Genomic islands11000001000100
Prophage54454121542323
CRISPR
System
Number00201141020101
cas gene3/3402/4/0/333/393
TypeNANANANANANAINA
Strain: 1, S70T; 2, S69A; 3, Y. vesicularis CC-AMW-ET; 4, L. litoralis JCM 17792T; 5, T. autumnalis LMG 29904T; 6, T. medi-terranea DSM 16398T; 7, T. aquimarina KMM 8518T; 8, T. mangrovi GS-10T; 9, R. gelatinovora corrig. DSM 5887T; 10, L. taeanensis DSM 22007T; 11, L. degradans EGI FJ00013T; 12, L. pacificus DSM 29620T; 13, L. saemankumensis DSM 28010T; 14, L. marinistellae KCTC 42911T.
Table 2. Differential characteristics between strain S70T, S69A and their phylogenetically closest type strains.
Table 2. Differential characteristics between strain S70T, S69A and their phylogenetically closest type strains.
Characteristic123 a456
Colony color on MAPale yellowPale yellowIvory-coloredPale yellow bBrown diffusible pigment cNon-pigmented d
Cell shapeRod shapedRod shapedRod shapedPleomorphic rods bCoccobacillary shapedCoccoid to rod shaped d
Cell size (μm)0.4–0.6 × 1.1–5.20.4–0.7 × 1.6–4.10.6–0.8 × 2.9–4.30.4–1.2 × 2.0–at
least 10.0 b
NR0.5–0.8 × 0.5–2.0 d
Growth temperature
(Optimal)
12–37 °C
(28–30 °C)
12–37 °C
(28–30 °C)
20–37 °C
(30 °C)
10–37 °C
(24–30 °C)
15–37 °C
(24–28 °C)
12–37 °C
(24–28 °C)
NaCl (%) (Optimal)0.5–6 (2–3)0.5–6 (2–3)1–10 (NR)0.5–6 (2–4)1–5.5 (2)1–5.5 (2–4)
pH (Optimal)6–9 (7–8)6–9 (7)6–9 (7)6–9 (7)6–9 (7)6–9 (7)
Nitrate reductionN2N2
Hydrolysis of
Tween 20wNGNGwNG
Tween 40++NR+w+
Tween 60+NR++
Tween 80NG
DNase++
Aesculin++
Gelatinw
L-tyrosine++++
Urea+ww
Assimilation tests (API 20NE)
PNPG+
Potassium gluconate+
Enzyme activity (API ZYM)
Alkaline phosphatasew++
Esterase (C4)++++
Esterase lipase (C8)w+++
Acid phosphatase+
α-Chymotrypsin+
N-acetyl-glucosaminasew
Naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase+++++
a Data from previous study [28]; b Data from previous study [63]; c Data from previous study [64]; d Data from previous study [65]. Strains: 1, S70T; 2, S69A; 3, Y. vesicularis CC-AMW-ET; 4, L. litoralis JCM 17792T; 5, T. autumnails LMG 29904T; 6, T. mediterraneus DSM 16398T; all data were generated in this study unless mentioned. All of these strains are Gram-stain-negative and non-motile; positive for activities of oxidase, catalase and leucine arylamidase. All of these strains are negative for lipase (C14), arginine dihydrolase, valine arylamidase, cystine arylamidase, α-glucosidase and β-galactosidase, hydrolysis of starch and casein, production of indole and H2S; do not ferment carbohydrates (glucose, arabinose, maltose, mannitol, mannose, N-acetylglucosamine, capric acid, adipic acid, malic acid, citric acid and phenylacetic acid). +, positive; −, negative; w, weakly positive; NR, not reported; NG, no growth.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Z.; Zhang, M.; Lai, Q.; Xu, S.; Xu, Y. Youngimonas ophiurae sp. nov., a Quorum-Quenching Marine Bacterium Isolated from a Brittle Star in the South China Sea, and Reclassification of Lutimaribacter litoralis as Youngimonas litoralis comb. nov. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 2661. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13122661

AMA Style

Liu Z, Zhang M, Lai Q, Xu S, Xu Y. Youngimonas ophiurae sp. nov., a Quorum-Quenching Marine Bacterium Isolated from a Brittle Star in the South China Sea, and Reclassification of Lutimaribacter litoralis as Youngimonas litoralis comb. nov. Microorganisms. 2025; 13(12):2661. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13122661

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Zengzhi, Meng Zhang, Qiliang Lai, Shanshan Xu, and Ying Xu. 2025. "Youngimonas ophiurae sp. nov., a Quorum-Quenching Marine Bacterium Isolated from a Brittle Star in the South China Sea, and Reclassification of Lutimaribacter litoralis as Youngimonas litoralis comb. nov." Microorganisms 13, no. 12: 2661. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13122661

APA Style

Liu, Z., Zhang, M., Lai, Q., Xu, S., & Xu, Y. (2025). Youngimonas ophiurae sp. nov., a Quorum-Quenching Marine Bacterium Isolated from a Brittle Star in the South China Sea, and Reclassification of Lutimaribacter litoralis as Youngimonas litoralis comb. nov. Microorganisms, 13(12), 2661. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13122661

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop