Next Article in Journal
Effects of Biological Nitrogen Fixation and Nitrogen Deposition on Soil Microbial Communities in Karst Grassland Ecosystems
Previous Article in Journal
Development of Green Fluorescent Protein-Tagged Strains of Fusarium acuminatum via PEG-Mediated Genetic Transformation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Determination of Technological Properties and CRISPR Profiles of Streptococcus thermophilus Isolates Obtained from Local Yogurt Samples

1
Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, Yıldız Technical University, 34220 İstanbul, Türkiye
2
Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Science and Letters, İstanbul Technical University, 34485 İstanbul, Türkiye
3
Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Science and Letters, Yıldız Technical University, 34220 İstanbul, Türkiye
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2024, 12(12), 2428; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122428
Submission received: 31 October 2024 / Revised: 18 November 2024 / Accepted: 21 November 2024 / Published: 25 November 2024

Abstract

:
The aim of this study was to obtain data on Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) profiles of Streptococcus thermophilus (S. thermophilus) isolates resulting from acquired immune memory in addition to their technological starter properties for the selection of potential starter cultures from local yogurt samples. A total of 24 S. thermophilus isolates were collected from six local yogurt samples including Afyon/Dinar, Uşak, Konya/Karapınar, and Tokat provinces of Türkiye. Strain-specific CRISPR I-II-III and IV primers were used to determine the CRISPR profiles of the isolates. The isolates commonly had CRISPR II and IV profiles, while only one isolate had a CRISPR III profile. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based and culture-based analyses were also carried out to obtain data on the technological properties of the isolates. The PCR analyses were performed for the prtS gene for protease activity, the ureC gene for urease enzyme, the gdh gene for glutamate dehydrogenase, the cox gene for competence frequency, the csp gene involved in heat-shock stress resistance of the isolates with specific primers. Culture-based analyses including antimicrobial activity and acid-production ability of the isolates were completed, and proteolytic and lipolytic properties were also screened. Native spacer sequences resulting from acquired immune memory were obtained for CRISPR IV profiles of yogurt samples from the Konya-Karapınar and Tokat provinces and CRISPR III profiles of yogurt samples from the Uşak province. In conclusion, our study results suggest that it is possible to select the isolates with the desired level of technological characteristics, prioritizing the ones with the most diverse CRISPR profiles and with native spacers for potential industrial application as starter cultures. We believe that this study provides data for further biological studies on the impact of centuries of human domestication on evolutionary adaptations and how these microorganisms manage survival and symbiosis.

1. Introduction

Studies evaluating potential starter cultures isolated from dairy products have provided extensive insights into their technological properties. These include acid-development potential, lactic acid quantification, exopolysaccharide locus sequence (EPS) isolation and purification, monosaccharide composition analysis of EPSs, antimicrobial activity, antibiotic susceptibility, and acid-forming capacity. However, there is a lack of comparable data based on Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) profiles that preserve the resistance capabilities of potential starters against phages, which are common in fermentation technology and are known to cause product losses both by lytic and lysogenic infection. In the context of optimizing starter cultures, modifications to adaptive immune mechanisms are extensively utilized. In this regard, it is of utmost importance to provide data obtained from microbial and genetic analysis methods. Identifying native spacer sequences will be particularly valuable for establishing a comprehensive collection of local potential starter cultures for the dairy industry.
Following the identification of the first phages specific to Lactococcus lactis strains by Whitehead and Cox in 1935, research in the dairy industry has increasingly focused on strategies to minimize losses in batch fermentations, comprising culture rotation, improved sanitation practices, and the use of starter cultures with enhanced phage resistance [1,2,3,4]. The isolation of bacteriophage-insensitive Streptococcus thermophilus (S. thermophilus) mutants (BIMs) is crucial for the dairy industry; however, mutations in phages that occur in response to CRISPR systems have been identified [5]. Non-CRISPR-mediated BIMs obtained by the transformation of industrial starter cultures with a constructed plasmid carrying antisense RNA, which binds to the targeted phage or phages’ mRNA and blocks translation, effectively inhibits phage replication and confers resistance to the starter culture. Studies conducted by McDonnell and colleagues reported that non-CRISPR-mediated BIMs obtained by the antisense RNA CRISPR-Cas silencing approach exhibited certain advantages in phage sensitivity tests compared to CRISPR-mediated BIMs derived from the same strain [6].
The CRISPR, known as adaptive immunity in bacteria and archaea, and the associated genes (cas), were first discovered in the Escherichia coli (E. coli) genome in 1987 during an analysis of genes involved in phosphate metabolism [7,8].
The sequences in the CRISPR region are usually similar to the sequences in bacteriophage (phage) genomes and plasmids that previously infected the microorganism, and the number of palindromic repeats determines the level of resistance [9,10,11,12,13].
The CRISPR profiles resulting from this acquired immune memory in microorganisms can also be used as a novel molecular characterization technique, as they vary at the species and subspecies levels [14,15,16]. The CRISPR systems are classified into six main types (types I–VI) and multiple subtypes. Type I, type II, and type V systems target deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), and type VI systems target single-stranded ribonucleic acids (RNAs), while type III systems have the ability to cleave both DNA and RNA [11,17,18,19].
The Cas9 protein recognizes the species-specific protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence adjacent to the protospacer in the DNA and prevents the expression of the bacteriophage DNA by cutting it. The difference in type I is that crRNA combines with cascade and Cas3 to cleave the phage DNA. In type III, crRNA works together with Cmr/Cas10 or Csm/Cas10, and it is not PAM-dependent. In addition, CRISPR IV is known to originate from plasmids [20]. Multiple CRISPR systems can coexist within a single microorganism.
To date, the CRISPR profiles and genes associated with technological traits in various lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have been thoroughly investigated [21,22,23,24]. The diversity of the adaptive immune mechanism in starter cultures, indicated by an extensive CRISPR profile, supports a range of essential technological properties. These include proteolytic activity, nitrogen and carbohydrate metabolism, transport systems, antimicrobial activity, resistance to various phages, flavor and aroma development, EPS production, urease activity, siderophore acquisition, and acid-forming capacity [21,22,25]. CRISPR gene modifications are widely applied in LAB for industrial use, and genetic modifications of adaptive immune mechanisms are also the subject of various microbiota studies for therapeutic purposes in LAB. Currently, CRISPR I, CRISPR II, CRISPR III, and CRISPR IV and their subtypes are commonly found in complete genome analyses and bioinformatic studies in LAB [16,26].
In the present study, to gain a better understanding of some technological properties of the isolates, polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based analyses were conducted owing to their operational simplicity, and we completed the prtS gene, for protease activity, the ureC gene for urease enzyme, the gdh gene coding for glutamate dehydrogenase, the cox gene for frequency of competency, and the csp gene involved in strain heat-shock stress resistance and the EPS gene cluster, targeting the EPS by specific primers.

1.1. Protease (prtS Gene)

Casein degradation is one of the important stages affecting the product’s texture and taste. Similarly, targeting the proteolytic system can prevent the formation of an undesired bitter flavor caused by some particular peptides [27]. Proteases are necessary enzymes for the protein hydrolysis activity of the microorganisms. S. thermophilus, like other LAB, has its own proteolytic system. Proteases are found and have various roles in different steps of the proteolytic system.

1.2. Urease (ureC Gene)

Urease is an enzyme that catalyzes the hydrolysis of urea into ammonia and carbonic acid. First, urea is broken down into ammonia and carbamate; then, carbamate further decomposes into ammonia and carbonic acid. Due to the production of ammonia, the pH of the environment rises. Urease also plays a crucial role in nitrogen metabolism by assisting the usage of urea as a nitrogen source [28,29,30]. Quick acidification of milk during dairy fermentation can be significant to the quality of the final product. Lactic acid produced by LAB lowers pH and coagulates milk proteins to give the desired texture. However, as the ammonia produced by urea hydrolysis raises pH and slows down acidification, urease activity may prevent this process, leading to irregularities in the fermentation process and an undesirable effect on the finished product’s flavor and texture. Since they do not hinder milk acidification, urease-negative strains of S. thermophilus are therefore preferred in the dairy industry [28,29].

1.3. Glutamate Dehydrogenase (gdh Gene)

Glutamate dehydrogenase (gdh) is an enzyme that plays an important role in amino acid metabolism. This enzyme catalyzes the reversible reaction of converting glutamate into alpha-ketoglutarate. Therefore, GDH is involved in both the catabolic and anabolic processes. The transamination reaction is seen as crucial, particularly during cheese making [31].

1.4. Cold Shock Proteins (csp)

Many types of bacteria can grow at temperatures well below their optimum growth temperature. In some bacteria, cold shock proteins (csps), which help bacteria adapt to cold conditions, are induced as the temperature drops. The csps are proteins that make up a small, highly conserved chaperone family that bind to nucleic acids, ensuring transcription and translation functions correctly at low temperatures. Therefore, freeze survival capacity is an essential metric in the dairy industry [32]. The S. thermophilus is one of the most important LAB used in dairy processing plants.

1.5. Competence Frequency (cox Gene)

The presence of the comX alternative sigma factor activity is considered to be related to the conjugation ability of Streptococci [33]. Sigma factors play a key role in the initiation of transcription of second-class genes, also known as late genes, which are necessary for the DNA uptake and integration machinery.
To further diversify the data obtained in our study, we selected four additional technological analyses that would provide faster and beneficial results. Accordingly, antimicrobial activity and acid-production capacities of the isolates were examined, and their proteolytic and lipolytic properties were screened.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Microbial Analyses

2.1.1. Isolation of S. Thermophilus Isolates

Six different local yogurt samples were collected from different provinces of Türkiye including Afyon/Dinar, Uşak, Konya/Karapınar, and Tokat provinces for this study. A total of 10 g of yogurt samples was mixed with 90 mL of sterile 0.1% (w/v) peptone water (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Dilutions from 10−1 to 10−8 were prepared, M17 Agar (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was cooled to 65 °C, and 1 mL of diluted samples from 10−6 to 10−8 was used for the double-layer pour-plate technique. After incubations at 42 °C for 48 h under anaerobic conditions, single colonies were picked from plates and subcultured three times until pure colonies were obtained. Purity was confirmed by colony morphology and microscopic observations. Parallel 20% (v/v) glycerol stocks were prepared for long-term preservation of cultures. The cultures were stored at −80 °C.

2.1.2. Acid-Production Ability

The acid-production ability of the isolates was measured as previously described by Bulut et al., 2005, with minor modifications. Each isolate was incubated overnight, and 100 μL of culture was inoculated into 10 mL skim milk (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) (10 g/L) and incubated at 42 °C [34]. Titratable acidity and pH measurements of each isolate were recorded for 2 mL of culture samples following incubation at 3, 6, and 9 h, respectively.

2.1.3. Proteolytic and Lipolytic Activity

The proteolytic activity of the isolates was screened by using 1% skim milk powder, and 0.8 g/L nutrient agar (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was added [35]. Isolates with clear transparent haloes were recorded as positive proteolytic activity. Lipolytic activity of the isolates was detected by using 10 g/L tween 20 or tween 80 plates including 0.1 g/L CaCl2 and 0.8 g/L nutrient agar (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Isolates were spotted onto agar plates after incubation at 42 °C, and screening results at 72 h were recorded [36].

2.1.4. Antimicrobial Activity

Antimicrobial activity of the isolates against Bacillus cereus CCM 99, E. coli ATTC 25922 was observed by a well-diffusion assay with minor modifications [37]. One hundred μL E. coli (107 cfu/mL) were poured on Mueller–Hinton agar (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Wells were cut on the plates, and 100 μL of overnight cultures of S. thermophilus isolates was filled into the well and incubated at 42 °C for 48 h. Diameters of zones were recorded according to antimicrobial properties.

2.2. Genetic Analysis

2.2.1. CRISPR Profiles of the Isolates

Bacterial DNA isolation of 24 isolates was completed by an Intron G-Spin DNA extraction kit (iNtRON Biotechnology, headquartered in Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea) with catalog number 17045. CRISPR I-II-III and IV profiles of the isolates were detected by using S. thermophilus strain-specific primers (Sentebiolab Biotechnology, Istanbul, Türkiye) [4,16] targeting repeat/spacer loci (Table 1). The PCR conditions of pre-denaturation were 5 min at 95 °C; 40 cycles were carried out for 1 min at 95 °C; the annealing procedure was carried out for 1 min at a suitable temperature for each CRISPR primer pair; the extension procedure was carried out for 1 min at 72 °C; and the final extension procedure was carried out for 10 min at 72 °C. The PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on agarose 3.0% gels (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Following purification, they were sequenced (Medsantek, Istanbul, Türkiye) using the ABI 3500 XL Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with the BIG-DYE cycle sequencing kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Acquired adaptive immunity is established by the positioning of spacer regions derived from exogenous nucleic acid (phage or plasmid) sources within the CRISPR region. Therefore, to quantify the number of native spacers of each isolate, sequences were aligned in BioEdit sequence alignment editor v7.2.5 (12 November 2013). To analyze the aligned sequence results, a web-based tool called CRISPR Finder (https://crisprcas.i2bc.paris-saclay.fr/CrisprCasFinder/Index, accessed on 1 May 2024) was used. The sequences were saved as native sequences, except when they matched the sequences previously recorded in the database.

2.2.2. Technologically Important Proteins of the Isolates

The presence of genes encoding for technologically important proteins was analyzed using specific primers. For the presence of the prtS gene, coding for proteases involved in milk casein breakdown [38,39], the ureC gene related to urease enzyme [30,39]; the gdh gene, coding for GDH [39,40]; the csp gene, involved in the strain heat-shock stress resistance [32,39]; and the comx gene for frequency for competency [33] were selected (Table 2).

3. Results

3.1. Microbial Analyses

3.1.1. Isolation of S. thermophilus Isolates

Twenty-four isolates from Afyon/Dinar, Uşak, Konya/Karapınar, and Tokat provinces of Türkiye using M17 agar plates were obtained. Colonies in spherical and oval morphology observed in the Petri dishes and cocci isolates with short- and long-chain structures were confirmed by microscopic observations. Parallel glycerol stocks were prepared for 24 purified isolates stored at −80 °C. A list of 24 S. thermophiles selected from 137 isolates obtained from six different yogurt samples from Afyon/Dinar, Uşak, Konya/Karapınar, and Tokat is presented in Table 3.

3.1.2. Acid-Production Ability

S. thermophilus isolates in this study reduce the pH of the series to 3, 6, and 24 h, and they are limited acid producers (Table 4). Acid-production values of the isolates are presented in Table 4, and most of the isolates lowered the pH below 6 following 24 h incubation in this study. During all measurement periods, strain K31 increased the acidity the most, reaching 3.98. The slowest pH declines were as follows: K31 (6.52) and T6–9 (6.47) at 3 h; T6.9 (6.3) and T3.10 (6.22) at 6 h; and the B5 strain with pH values of 4.7 at 24 h.

3.1.3. Proteolytic and Lipolytic Activity

Proteolytic activities were detected in all of our isolates, whereas lipolytic activity could not be observed for any of the isolates.

3.1.4. Antimicrobial Activity

In our study, antimicrobial activity could not be observed against Bacillus cereus CCM 99 and E. coli ATTC 25922 for any of the isolates.

3.2. Genetic Analysis

3.2.1. CRISPR Profiles of the Isolates

The isolates commonly had CRISPR II (20%) and IV (75%) profiles, while only one isolate had a CRISPR III (4%), and one of the isolates (4%) had both CRISPR II and CRISPR IV profiles. The CRISPR profiles of the isolates detected based on PCR results are listed in Table 5. According to sequencing results, most of the native spacers were obtained from the isolates with the CRISPR IV profile from the Konya province, except for one of the isolates with the CRISPR III profile isolated from the same province (Table 6).

3.2.2. Technologically Important Proteins of the Isolates

All of the 24 isolates were subjected to PCR analysis for technologically important proteins, and the results are summarized in Table 7. The Prts (milk casein breakdown) gene PCR was positive for 20 isolates (83%). Comx (frequency of competency)-gene PCR was positive for 14 isolates (58%). For the gdh gene, PCR was positive only for 2 (8%) isolates. Any of the isolates were PCR positive for the csp (heat-shock stress resistance) gene and urease gene (Table 7).

4. Discussion

In recent years, fermented products have become increasingly important in nutrition. Originally developed to preserve foods for extended periods, fermentation methods have evolved and diversified across cultures to enhance the nutritional value of foods, improve sensory qualities, and incorporate culturally specific techniques for culinary purposes [41]. Currently, yogurt is used as an easily accessible protein source and particularly to protect the intestinal microbiota [39,42]. Therefore, conducting microbial and genetic research on LAB is crucial for developing starter culture libraries. It is necessary to acquire more data for the technological properties and CRISPR profiles of LAB occurring by natural horizontal gene transfer that defines how the resistance abilities against phages, which are common in fermentation technology and known to cause product losses, are preserved [9,43].
In terms of technological characteristics, acidifying capacity, proteolytic and lipolytic activities, and antimicrobial activity were investigated in a total of 24 S. thermophilus isolates collected from six local yogurt samples from the Afyon/Dinar, Uşak, Konya/Karapınar, and Tokat provinces of Türkiye (Table 3). The acidifying capacity of LAB is important for the production of aroma and texture formation in dairy products. Industrial yogurt production is based on the symbiosis between S. thermophilus and Lb. bulgaricus, an equilibrium ratio adjusted to 1:1 or 2:3 to distribute the colloidal calcium phosphate to complete dissolution, dissolved caseins, and a yogurt gel matrix obtained within 282 to 330 min [44,45]. Acidifying capacities of the isolates selected for the study were investigated, and it was confirmed that all isolates lowered the pH below 6, and strain K31 was recorded as increasing the acidity the most, reaching 3.98 (Table 4). Both intracellular and extracellular enzymes including proteolytic and lipolytic activity have an important role in texture and aroma development during dairy fermentation processes. Various studies have shown that S. thermophilus strains typically exhibit limited protease and lipase production, resulting in minimal contribution to lipid and milk-protein hydrolysis. This becomes more evident when compared to other LAB, such as Lactobacillus or Lactococcus species, which demonstrate higher protease and lipase activity. All isolates were screened for extracellular proteolytic and lipolytic activity. All of the isolates had extracellular proteolytic activity, but extracellular lipolytic activity could not be detected as was consistent with the literature. The antimicrobial activities of the isolates were investigated to evaluate their inhibitory effects against pathogenic microorganisms or other bacteria that cause food spoilage. It is well documented in the literature that the antimicrobial properties of S. thermophilus are rarely observed. In line with previous studies, the isolates in this study were unable to inhibit Bacillus cereus CCM 99 and E. coli ATCC 25922.
PCR-based methods were also used for the screening of technological properties including protease activity, urease enzyme, glutamate dehydrogenase, competence frequency, heat-shock stress resistance, and exopolysaccharide genes with specific primers. Most of the isolates in this study were recorded as prtS positive (79%). The enzyme in S. thermophilus is encoded by the gene cluster ureABC, which also includes accessory genes ureEFGD and ureI that control the biogenesis of urease. Although urease is expressed by the majority of S. thermophilus strains, some urease-negative mutants have been created that show faster acidification in milk, which makes them more appropriate for industrial yogurt production [29,30,46]. The UREC-negative status of all our isolates further supports their ability to regulate pH during fermentation. In the production of dairy products, the GDH enzyme contributes to protein breakdown and the production of aromatic compounds. LAB, particularly during the fermentation process, help the production of free amino acids from milk proteins and the formation of compounds that play an important role in product taste and flavor. Isolates K31 and H35 were found to be promising LAB candidates for further dairy applications due to both technological and probiotic properties.
According to Karaman, mutations in the comX gene have a strong relationship with competence frequency and conjugation capacity [33]. The comX gene is critical in terms of increasing quality and efficiency in yogurt- and cheese-production processes where S. thermophilus and Streptococcus salivarius bacteria are used, as it provides natural competence [47]. The potential starter properties of the isolates are confirmed by the presence of comX genes, which are responsible for DNA preservation and successful genetic transformation in 60% of the isolates demonstrating natural conjugation capacity.
However, the presence of cold shock protein (csp) genes seems to have adapted the bacteria to cope with stress during commercial production [48]. Several studies have also tested the freezing tolerance of S. thermophilus after a cold-shock treatment. Overall, the results indicate that different strains and treatment conditions (temperature and time) yield variable results [49]. Nonetheless, further genomic and proteomic studies are needed to better understand their potential for cold adaptability. Cold stress is thought to be critical for the survival of frozen starter cultures and for fermentation occurring at low temperatures [50]. None of the isolates were detected as csp-positive in this study. The relationship between ecological factors and the evolution of microbial immune strategies and the increasing diversity of known prokaryotic defense systems has been investigated [51,52]. Based on genetic analysis, the CRISPR profiles of the isolates were investigated, and five of the isolates had CRISPR II (20%), 18 of the isolates had a CRISPR IV (75%) profile, and one of the isolates had a CRISPR III (4%) profile. The coexistence of multiple CRISPR systems within a single microorganism enhances the starter culture potential of these isolates. In particular, one of the isolates (4%) named as HC1.3 was found to be a promising candidate LAB for further dairy applications due to harboring both CRISPR II and IV genes. Based on the sequence results, native spacers were recorded for the isolates with CRISPR IV and CRISPR III profiles. Native spacer sequences were not recorded for the isolates with the CRISPR II profile. The alignment of spacer sequences in isolates with the CRISPR II profile to existing database entries indicates pre-existing acquired immunity against specific phages [1]. However, spacer sequences that do not match any database entries do not provide conclusive evidence that these isolates have encountered unknown or mutant phages. Instead, this more likely suggests that the corresponding phage sequences have yet to be entered into the database, as it is evident that more data on CRISPR sequences in LAB is urgently needed. The plasmid-encoded nature of CRISPR IV suggests that this could be the underlying reason for its widespread occurrence in the isolates. In light of these data, it is possible to select the isolates with the desired level of technological characteristics, prioritizing the ones with the most diverse CRISPR profiles and with native spacers for potential industrial application as starter cultures. We did not observe a specific CRISPR profile in strains with a higher number of positive technological characteristics, indicating that the selected traits are not directly correlated.
We believe that this study provides data for further biological studies on the impact of centuries of human domestication on evolutionary adaptations and how these microorganisms manage survival and symbiosis.
In this study, microbial and genetic analyses were conducted to evaluate the starter potential of isolates from different provinces of Türkiye. While culture-based screening methods are useful for the initial differentiation of isolates, whole-genome analysis demonstrates potential as a precise and feasible solution for obtaining more detailed data in future studies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.S.C. and M.Z.D.; methodology and investigation, H.S.C. and M.Z.D.; data curation, H.S.C. and M.Z.D.; formal analysis, H.S.C. and M.Z.D.; writing—original draft preparation, H.S.C., İ.T., D.O. and M.Z.D.; writing—review and editing, H.S.C., İ.T., D.O. and M.Z.D.; visualization, H.S.C., İ.T., D.O. and M.Z.D.; project administration, H.S.C. and M.Z.D.; funding acquisition, H.S.C. and M.Z.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the Research Fund of the Yıldız Teknik University (Project No: FDK-2022-4649).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our thanks to Esra Çetintaş and Zeynep Gani for the article review and proofreading of the manuscript and Mert Sudağıdan (Konya), Emel Gücüncü (Tokat), and Seda Amati Daloğlu (Uşak) and Erdogan Maralı (Afyon/Dinar) for providing local yogurt samples from different provinces of Türkiye.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Shi, A.; Fan, F.; Broach, J.R. Microbial adaptive evolution. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 49, kuab076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Whitehead, H.R.; Cox, G.A. The Occurrence of Bacteriophage in Cultures of Lactic Streptococci: A Preliminary Note; Government Printer: Wellington, NZ, USA, 1935; pp. 319–320.
  3. Sturino, J.M.; Klaenhammer, T.R. Antisense RNA Targeting of Primase Interferes with Bacteriophage Replication in Streptococcus thermophilus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 1735–1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Sturino, J.M.; Klaenhammer, T.R. Engineered bacteriophage-defence systems in bioprocessing. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2006, 4, 395–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Deveau, H.; Barrangou, R.; Garneau, J.E.; Labonte, J.; Fremaux, C.; Boyaval, P.; Romero, D.A.; Horvath, P.; Moineau, S. Phage Response to CRISPR-Encoded Resistance in Streptococcus thermophilus. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 190, 1390–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. McDonnell, B.; Mahony, J.; Hanemaaijer, L.; Kouwen, T.R.H.M.; Van Sinderen, D. Generation of Bacteriophage-Insensitive Mutants of Streptococcus thermophilus via an Antisense RNA CRISPR-Cas Silencing Approach. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 84, e01733-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ishino, Y.; Shinagawa, H.; Makino, K.; Amemura, M.; Nakata, A. Nucleotide sequence of the iap gene, responsible for alkaline phosphatase isozyme conversion in Escherichia coli, and identification of the gene product. J. Bacteriol. 1987, 169, 5429–5433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ishino, Y.; Krupovic, M.; Forterre, P. History of CRISPR-Cas from Encounter with a Mysterious Repeated Sequence to Genome Editing Technology. J. Bacteriol. 2018, 200, e00580-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Godde, J.S.; Bickerton, A. The repetitive DNA elements called CRISPRs and their associated genes: Evidence of horizontal transfer among prokaryotes. J. Mol. Evol. 2006, 62, 718–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jansen, R.; Van Embden, J.D.A.; Gaastra, W.; Schouls, L.M. Identification of genes that are associated with DNA repeats in prokaryotes. Mol. Microbiol. 2002, 43, 1565–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Makarova, K.S.; Wolf, Y.I.; Alkhnbashi, O.S.; Costa, F.; Shah, S.A.; Saunders, S.J.; Barrangou, R.; Brouns, S.J.J.; Charpentier, E.; Haft, D.H.; et al. An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR–Cas systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2015, 13, 722–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Forde, B.M.; Neville, B.A.; Donnell, M.M.O.; Riboulet-Bisson, E.; Claesson, M.J.; Coghlan, A.; Ross, R.P.; Toole, P.W.O. Genome sequences and comparative genomics of two Lactobacillus ruminis strains from the bovine and human intestinal tracts. Microb. Cell Factories 2011, 10, S13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Barrangou, R.; Marraffini, L.A. CRISPR-CAS Systems: Prokaryotes upgrade to adaptive immunity. Mol. Cell 2014, 54, 234–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Beauruelle, C.; Treluyer, L.; Pastuszka, A.; Cochard, T.; Lier, C.; Mereghetti, L.; Glaser, P.; Poyart, C.; Lanotte, P. CRISPR Typing Increases the Discriminatory Power of Streptococcus agalactiae Typing Methods. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 675597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Quiberoni, A.; Moineau, S.; Rousseau, G.M.; Reinheimer, J.; Ackermann, H.-W. Streptococcus thermophilus bacteriophages. Int. Dairy J. 2010, 20, 657–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Horvath, P.; Romero, D.A.; CouTé-Monvoisin, A.-C.; Richards, M.; Deveau, H.; Moineau, S.; Boyaval, P.; Fremaux, C.; Barrangou, R. Diversity, Activity, and Evolution of CRISPR Loci in Streptococcus thermophilus. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 190, 1401–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Haft, D.H.; Selengut, J.; Mongodin, E.F.; Nelson, K.E. A guild of 45 CRISPR-Associated (CAS) protein families and multiple CRISPR/CAS subtypes exist in prokaryotic genomes. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2005, 1, e60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Makarova, K.S.; Grishin, N.V.; Shabalina, S.A.; Wolf, Y.I.; Koonin, E.V. A putative RNA-interference-based immune system in prokaryotes: Computational analysis of the predicted enzymatic machinery, functional analogies with eukaryotic RNAi, and hypothetical mechanisms of action. Biol. Direct 2006, 1, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Makarova, K.S.; Haft, D.H.; Barrangou, R.; Brouns, S.J.J.; Charpentier, E.; Horvath, P.; Moineau, S.; Mojica, F.J.M.; Wolf, Y.I.; Yakunin, A.F.; et al. Evolution and classification of the CRISPR–Cas systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2011, 9, 467–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pinilla-Redondo, R.; Russel, J.; Mayo-Muñoz, D.; Shah, S.A.; Garrett, R.A.; Nesme, J.; Madsen, J.S.; Fineran, P.C.; Sørensen, S.J. CRISPR-Cas systems are widespread accessory elements across bacterial and archaeal plasmids. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 50, 4315–4328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Alexandraki, V.; Kazou, M.; Blom, J.; Pot, B.; Papadimitriou, K.; Tsakalidou, E. Comparative Genomics of Streptococcus thermophilus Support Important Traits Concerning the Evolution, Biology and Technological Properties of the Species. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bonham, K.S.; Wolfe, B.E.; Dutton, R.J. Extensive horizontal gene transfer in cheese-associated bacteria. eLife 2017, 6, e22144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Plavec, T.V.; Berlec, A. Safety aspects of genetically modified lactic acid bacteria. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Pan, M.; Nethery, M.A.; Hidalgo-Cantabrana, C.; Barrangou, R. Comprehensive mining and characterization of CRISPR-CAS systems in bifidobacterium. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wu, Q.; Tun, H.M.; Leung, F.C.-C.; Shah, N.P. Genomic insights into high exopolysaccharide-producing dairy starter bacterium Streptococcus thermophilus ASCC 1275. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 4974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Horvath, P.; Barrangou, R. CRISPR/CAS, the immune system of bacteria and archaea. Science 2010, 327, 167–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kunji, E.R.S.; Mierau, I.; Hagting, A.; Poolman, B.; Konings, W.N. The proteotytic systems of lactic acid bacteria. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 1996, 70, 187–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mora, D.; Fortina, M.G.; Parini, C.; Ricci, G.; Gatti, M.; Giraffa, G.; Manachini, P.L. Genetic diversity and technological properties of Streptococcus thermophilus strains isolated from dairy products. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2002, 93, 278–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mora, D.; Maguin, E.; Masiero, M.; Parini, C.; Ricci, G.; Manachini, P.L.; Daffonchio, D. Characterization of urease genes cluster of Streptococcus thermophilus. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 96, 209–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mora, D.; Monnet, C.; Parini, C.; Guglielmetti, S.; Mariani, A.; Pintus, P.; Molinari, F.; Daffonchio, D.; Manachini, P.L. Urease biogenesis in Streptococcus thermophilus. Res. Microbiol. 2005, 156, 897–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. De Cadiñanos, L.P.G.; Peláez, C.; Martínez-Cuesta, M.C.; García-Cayuela, T.; Requena, T. Identification and characterization of glutamate dehydrogenase activity in wild Lactococcus lactis isolated from raw milk cheeses. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2017, 244, 603–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wouters, J.A.; Rombouts, F.M.; De Vos, W.M.; Kuipers, O.P.; Abee, T. Cold Shock Proteins and Low-Temperature Response of Streptococcus thermophilus CNRZ302. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 4436–4442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yazdiç, F.C.; Karaman, A.; Akyol, İ.; Ekinci, M.S.; Özköse, E. Doğal Streptococcus thermophilus İzolatlarında comX Gen Varlığına Bağlı DNA Transfer Frekansının Belirlenmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Fen Derg. 2018, 44, 9–23. [Google Scholar]
  34. Bulut, C.; Gunes, H.; Okuklu, B.; Harsa, S.; Kilic, S.; Coban, H.S.; Yenidunya, A.F. Homofermentative lactic acid bacteria of a traditional cheese, Comlek peyniri from Cappadocia region. J. Dairy Res. 2005, 72, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. De Almeida Júnior, W.L.G.; Da Silva Ferrari, Í.; De Souza, J.V.; Da Silva, C.D.A.; Da Costa, M.M.; Dias, F.S. Characterization and evaluation of lactic acid bacteria isolated from goat milk. Food Control 2015, 53, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ateşlier, Z.B.B.; Metin, K. Production and partial characterization of a novel thermostable esterase from a thermophilic Bacillus sp. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2005, 38, 628–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Akpinar, A.; Yerlikaya, O.; Kiliccedil, S. Antimicrobial activity and antibiotic resistance of Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus strains isolated from Turkish homemade yoghurts. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2011, 5, 675–682. [Google Scholar]
  38. Courtin, P.; Monnet, V.; Rul, F. Cell-wall proteinases PrtS and PrtB have a different role in Streptococcus thermophilus/Lactobacillus bulgaricus mixed cultures in milk. Microbiology 2002, 148, 3413–3421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Quero, G.M.; Fusco, V.; Cocconcelli, P.S.; Owczarek, L.; Borcakli, M.; Fontana, C.; Skapska, S.; Jasinska, U.T.; Ozturk, T.; Morea, M. Microbiological, physico-chemical, nutritional and sensory characterization of traditional Matsoni: Selection and use of autochthonous multiple strain cultures to extend its shelf-life. Food Microbiol. 2013, 38, 179–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tanous, C.; Kieronczyk, A.; Helinck, S.; Chambellon, E.; Yvon, M. Glutamate dehydrogenase activity: A major criterion for the selection of flavour-producing lactic acid bacteria strains. In Lactic Acid Bacteria: Genetics, Metabolism and Applications; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2002; pp. 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Siddiqui, S.A.; Erol, Z.; Rugji, J.; Taşçı, F.; Kahraman, H.A.; Toppi, V.; Musa, L.; Di Giacinto, G.; Bahmid, N.A.; Mehdizadeh, M.; et al. An overview of fermentation in the food industry—Looking back from a new perspective. Bioresour. Bioprocess 2023, 10, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Caplice, E.; Fitzgerald, G.F. Food fermentations: Role of microorganisms in food production and preservation. Int. J. Food. Microbiol. 1999, 50, 131–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ji, W.; Lee, D.; Wong, E.; Dadlani, P.; Dinh, D.; Huang, V.; Kearns, K.; Teng, S.; Chen, S.; Haliburton, J.; et al. Specific Gene Repression by CRISPRi System Transferred through Bacterial Conjugation. ACS Synth. Biol. 2014, 3, 929–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. De Brabandere, A.G.; De Baerdemaeker, J.G. Effects of process conditions on the pH development during yogurt fermentation. J. Food Eng. 1999, 41, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Uzunsoy, I.; Budak, S.O.; Sanli, T.; Taban, B.; Aytac, A.; Yazihan, N.; Bas, A.L.; Ozer, B. Observation of the Suitability of Single Strains of Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus Isolated from Local Dairy Sources in Turkey as Yogurt Starter Combinations. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2023, 13, e9241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zotta, T.; Ricciardi, A.; Rossano, R.; Parente, E. Urease production by Streptococcus thermophilus. Food Microbiol. 2007, 25, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Fontaine, L.; Boutry, C.; De Frahan, M.H.; Delplace, B.; Fremaux, C.; Horvath, P.; Boyaval, P.; Hols, P. A Novel Pheromone Quorum-Sensing System Controls the Development of Natural Competence in Streptococcus thermophilus and Streptococcus salivarius. J. Bacteriol. 2009, 192, 1444–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Goh, Y.J.; Goin, C.; O’Flaherty, S.; Altermann, E.; Hutkins, R. Specialized adaptation of a lactic acid bacterium to the milk environment: The comparative genomics of Streptococcus thermophilus LMD-9. Microb. Cell Factories 2011, 10, S22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kim, W.S.; Dunn, N.W. Identification of a cold shock gene in lactic acid bacteria and the effect of cold shock on cryotolerance. Curr. Microbiol. 1997, 35, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Woufers, J.A.; Sander, J.-W.; Kok, J.; De Vos, W.M.; Kuipers, O.P.; Abee, T. Clustered organization and transcriptional analysis of a family of five csp genes of Lactococcus/actis MGl363. Microbiology 1998, 144, 2885–2893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Weissman, J.L.; Laljani, R.M.R.; Fagan, W.F.; Johnson, P.L.F. Visualization and prediction of CRISPR incidence in microbial trait-space to identify drivers of antiviral immune strategy. ISME J. 2019, 13, 2589–2602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, S.; Yang, B.; Ross, R.P.; Stanton, C.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, H.; Chen, W. Comparative Genomics Analysis of Lactobacillus ruminis from Different Niches. Genes 2020, 11, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. List of primers selected for CRISPR profile PCR analysis [4,16].
Table 1. List of primers selected for CRISPR profile PCR analysis [4,16].
PrimerSequence (5′-3′)Target Gene
CR1-fwd (yc70)TGCTGAGACAACCTAGTCTCTCCRISPR I
CR1-revTAAACAGAGCCTCCCTATCC
CR2-fwdTTAGCCCCTACCATAGTGCTGCRISPR II
CR2-revTTAGTCTAACACTTTCTGGAAGC
CR3-fwdCTGAGATTAATAGTGCGATTACGCRISPR III
CR3-revGCTGGATATTCGTATAACATGTC
CRP4-fwdGATTCAGTTCCTCATAGAGCCRISPR IV
CRP4-revGACCTCAACCAATCGATTG
Table 2. List of primers selected for screening technologically important proteins of the isolates [33,39].
Table 2. List of primers selected for screening technologically important proteins of the isolates [33,39].
Primer NameAmplicon
Size (bp)
Primer DNA SequenceReference
ComXF497ATGGAACAAGAAGTTTTTGTTAAGGC[33]
ComXRTCAGTCTTCTTCATTACATGGATCAA
ureC-F1340GGGGATAGCGTACGTCTTGG[39]
ureC-RTCAGCCAGCATCACCCATAACAC
cspF119TTATTACCTCTGAAGATGG[39]
cspRACGTTGACCTACTTCAACAT
gdhf1353TTGCCAAAGCTTCATGACTG[39]
gdhrACATGGGAAAGCCAAGTCAG
prtsF1501GTGAGGCTTTGGCAGCTAAC[39]
prtsRTCGCGATATAGACCGGATTC
Table 3. List of the isolates.
Table 3. List of the isolates.
Isolate NumberSampling Location
B5Uşak
B6Uşak
B8Uşak
T2.1Konya-Karapınar
T3.10Konya-Karapınar
T3.1Konya-Karapınar
T3.9Konya-Karapınar
T6.9Konya-Karapınar
T4.1Konya-Karapınar
T6.5Konya-Karapınar
T6.7Konya-Karapınar
T6.4Konya-Karapınar
T6.13Konya-Karapınar
T6.14Konya-Karapınar
T6.1Konya-Karapınar
T3.2 Konya-Karapınar
Tokat 2.7Tokat
Tokat 3.7Tokat
K31AFYON Dinar
KF30AFYON Dinar
HC1.3AFYON Dinar
A142AFYON Dinar
H35AFYON Dinar
ALAFYON Dinar
Table 4. pH-reduction abilities of the isolates.
Table 4. pH-reduction abilities of the isolates.
Isolate Number3 h6 h24 h
B56.095.724.7
B66.295.794.5
B86.285.684.41
T2.16.46.184.11
T3.106.46.224.58
T3.16.165.464.07
T3.96.285.664.18
T6.96.476.35.1
T4.16.426.14.11
T6.56.315.834.04
T6.76.345.934.08
T6.46.235.654.37
T6.136.326.134.72
T6.146.135.524.35
T6.16.225.564.04
T3.2 6.295.854.09
Tokat 2.76.085.584.5
Tokat 3.76.315.864.06
K316.526.163.98
KF306.035.674.39
HC1.36.135.674.47
A1426.15.584.39
H355.895.444.11
AL6.095.64.48
Table 5. CRISPR profiles of the isolates.
Table 5. CRISPR profiles of the isolates.
Isolate NumberLocationCRISPR 1CRISPR 2CRISPR 3CRISPR 4
B5Uşak+
B6Uşak+
B8Uşak+
T2.1Konya-Karapınar+
T3.10Konya-Karapınar+
T3.1Konya-Karapınar+
T3.9Konya-Karapınar+
T6.9Konya-Karapınar+
T4.1Konya-Karapınar+
T6.5Konya-Karapınar+
T6.7Konya-Karapınar+
T6.4Konya-Karapınar+
T6.13Konya-Karapınar+
T6.14Konya-Karapınar+
T6.1Konya-Karapınar+
T3.2 Konya-Karapınar+
T2.7Tokat +
T3.7Tokat +
K31Afyon-Dinar+
KF30Afyon-Dinar+
HC1.3Afyon-Dinar++
A14.2Afyon-Dinar+
H35Afyon-Dinar+
ALAfyon-Dinar
Table 6. Isolates with native spacer sequence.
Table 6. Isolates with native spacer sequence.
Isolate Location, NumberCRISPR ProfileNumber of Native Spacers
Usak, Isolate B6CRISPR 313 native spacer sequences
Konya-Karapınar, Isolate T6.7 CRISPR 411 native spacer sequences
Konya-Karapınar, Isolate T6.14 CRISPR 413 native spacer sequences
Konya-Karapınar, Isolate T6.9 CRISPR 46 native spacer sequences
Tokat, Isolate T3.7 CRISPR 42 native spacer sequences
Konya-Karapınar, Isolate T6.13 CRISPR 49 native spacer sequences
Table 7. PCR results obtained from technologically important proteins.
Table 7. PCR results obtained from technologically important proteins.
Isolate Number comxureCprtsgdhcsp
B5+
B6+
B8+
T2.1+
T3.1+
T3.2+
T3.9+
T3.10+
T4.1+
T6.1
T6.4+
T6.5++
T6.7+
T6.9+
T6.13++
T3.14 ++
Tokat 2.7+
Tokat 3.7+
K31++++
KF30++
HC1.3++
A14.2++
H35++
AL++
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Coban, H.S.; Olgun, D.; Temur, İ.; Durak, M.Z. Determination of Technological Properties and CRISPR Profiles of Streptococcus thermophilus Isolates Obtained from Local Yogurt Samples. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 2428. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122428

AMA Style

Coban HS, Olgun D, Temur İ, Durak MZ. Determination of Technological Properties and CRISPR Profiles of Streptococcus thermophilus Isolates Obtained from Local Yogurt Samples. Microorganisms. 2024; 12(12):2428. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122428

Chicago/Turabian Style

Coban, Hatice Sevgi, Dicle Olgun, İnci Temur, and Muhammed Zeki Durak. 2024. "Determination of Technological Properties and CRISPR Profiles of Streptococcus thermophilus Isolates Obtained from Local Yogurt Samples" Microorganisms 12, no. 12: 2428. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122428

APA Style

Coban, H. S., Olgun, D., Temur, İ., & Durak, M. Z. (2024). Determination of Technological Properties and CRISPR Profiles of Streptococcus thermophilus Isolates Obtained from Local Yogurt Samples. Microorganisms, 12(12), 2428. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122428

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop