Next Article in Journal
Peptidoglycan Endopeptidase from Novel Adaiavirus Bacteriophage Lyses Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains as Well as Arthrobacter globiformis and A. pascens Bacteria
Next Article in Special Issue
Isolation and Identification of Microorganisms and Antibiotic Resistance Microorganisms from Beehives Located in Palm, Corn and Longan Plantations, Thailand
Previous Article in Journal
Primary Production in the Kara, Laptev, and East Siberian Seas
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Polychlorinated Biphenyl Transformation, Peroxidase and Oxidase Activities of Fungi and Bacteria Isolated from a Historically Contaminated Site

by
Flavien Maucourt
1,2,
Bastien Doumèche
3,
David Chapulliot
1,
Laurent Vallon
1,
Sylvie Nazaret
1 and
Laurence Fraissinet-Tachet
1,*
1
Université de Lyon, Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, INRAE, VetAgro Sup, UMR Ecologie Microbienne, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France
2
ENVISOL, 2-4 Rue Hector Berlioz, F-38110 La Tour du Pin, France
3
Université de Lyon, Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS 5246 ICBMS, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2023, 11(8), 1887; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11081887
Submission received: 9 June 2023 / Revised: 13 July 2023 / Accepted: 21 July 2023 / Published: 26 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of Microbes in Contaminated Environments)

Abstract

:
Causing major health and ecological disturbances, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are persistent organic pollutants still recovered all over the world. Microbial PCB biotransformation is a promising technique for depollution, but the involved molecular mechanisms remain misunderstood. Ligninolytic enzymes are suspected to be involved in many PCB transformations, but their assessments remain scarce. To further inventory the capabilities of microbes to transform PCBs through their ligninolytic enzymes, we investigated the role of oxidase and peroxidase among a set of microorganisms isolated from a historically PCB-contaminated site. Among 29 isolated fungi and 17 bacteria, this work reports for the first time the PCB-transforming capabilities from fungi affiliated to Didymella, Dothiora, Ilyonectria, Naganishia, Rhodoturula, Solicoccozyma, Thelebolus and Truncatella genera and bacteria affiliated to Peribacillus frigotolerans, Peribacillus muralis, Bacillus mycoides, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus toyonensis, Pseudarthrobacter sp., Pseudomonas chlororaphis, Erwinia aphidicola and Chryseobacterium defluvii. In the same way, this is the first report of fungal isolates affiliated to the Dothiora maculans specie and Cladosporium genus that displayed oxidase (putatively laccase) and peroxidase activity, respectively, enhanced in the presence of PCBs (more than 4-fold and 20-fold, respectively, compared to controls). Based on these results, the observed activities are suspected to be involved in PCB transformation.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are synthetic compounds manufactured by humans and used from 1929 to their prohibition at the end of 1980s. Mainly found in electrical transformer devices, paints, plasticizers or flame retardants [1], they were classified as persistent organic pollutants according to the Stockholm Convention from 2001. Breivik et al. (2002) have estimated that approximately 13 million tons of PCBs were synthetized worldwide, with 20% to 35% released in ecosystems [1,2]. Recognized as endocrine disruptors and carcinogenic substances [3,4], they represent ecological and health concerns. Due to their chemical characteristics, they are stable and persistent molecules that accumulate in ecosystems and the food web through their bioaccumulation and biomagnification, making their degradation a challenge [5,6].
Composed of biphenyl and chlorine atoms that differ in number (up to 10) and position on the phenyl rings, 209 theoretical chlorinated forms exist [6]. Currently, many physical and chemical methods have been developed to depollute PCB-contaminated matrices such as burning or use of solvents, but they are long, expensive and generate some toxic by-products. Therefore, bioremediation was simultaneously investigated [7]. This last technique emerged as a low-cost and theoretically healthier alternative and revealed the PCB-transforming capabilities of several microbes such as filamentous fungi and bacteria [8,9]. Because of their hyphal structure, also named “fungal highway”, filamentous fungi are suggested to be good candidates to easily penetrate polluted matrices in order to access poorly bio-accessible pollutants and also act as a dispersion vector for bacteria [10]. These PCB-transforming fungi are mainly ligninolytic Ascomycota and Basidiomycota from the white-rot functional guild. Among these white-rot fungi, the most well-known degrading species belong to Bjerkandera adusta, Irpex lacteus, Pycnoporus cinnabarinus, Phanerochaete magnoliae [11], Phanerochaete chrysosporium [12], Lentinus edodes [13], Trametes versicolor [14] and the most documented and efficient PCB transformers Pleurotus ostreatus [11,15]. Concerning the bacteria, only two bacterial metabolic pathways are described for PCB transformation. The first one occurs in anaerobic condition. Reductive dehalogenases (EC 1.97.1.8) are the key enzymes of this dechlorinated process and encoded by the rdh genes [16]. The prominent PCB-transforming anaerobic bacteria belong to the genera Dehalogenimonas and Dehalococcoides [8]. The second pathway named bph pathway (bph = biphenyl), confers the ability to use biphenyls as carbon sources [17] through the action of the biphenyl dioxygenase, a multi-component enzyme. However, the bph pathway may generate toxic dead-end products such as chlorobenzoic acid (CBA) [17]. In vitro studies showed its accumulation in culture media and the inability of many bacteria to grow with this subproduct [18]. The most frequently bacterial aerobic genera reported to transform PCBs are Burkholderia, Pseudomonas, Comamonas, Sphingomonas, Cupriavidus, Rhodococcus, Acidovorax, Acinetobacter, Arthrobacter, Bacillus and Corynebacterium [8].
Among the studies focusing on new PCB-transforming pathways, ligninolytic enzymes seem to be promising. These enzymes are represented by two groups named laccases and peroxidases and are produced by organisms including fungi and bacteria [19]. Whether produced by bacteria or fungi, they are suspected to be involved in PCB transformation. In addition to their metabolic versatility to transform many molecules structurally close to PCBs, such as chlorophenol, tetraguaïacol, methoxychlor [20,21,22,23,24,25], purified fungal laccases from Coprinus comatus [26], Pycnoporus cinnabarinus, Myceliophthora thermophila [27], Cladosporium sp. [28], Trametes versicolor and Pleurotus ostreatus [29,30], have been reported so far to transform PCBs in vitro. Fungal peroxidases from Acremonium sclerotigenum have also been observed to be more active in the presence of PCBs [31], and plant peroxidase displayed PCB-transforming capabilities [32]. Because data about this field remain scarce, more studies are needed to fully reveal the PCB-transforming capabilities of the ligninolytic enzymes.
To answer the question of the potential ability of fungal and bacterial species to be involved in PCB transformation through their laccase and peroxidase activities, we screened a collection of soil heterotrophic fungi and bacteria isolated from a long-term PCB-contaminated site. We analyzed (i) their ability to transform PCBs in individual isolate culture media, (ii) the presence of laccase and peroxidase encoding genes in their genomes versus bph genes for bacterial isolates and (iii) their capacity to produce and secrete active oxidases and peroxidases in culture media.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Microbial Isolation

The microorganisms used in this study were isolated from a PCB-contaminated brownfield (a former paint factory) where iPCB (see below) concentration reached 31 mg.kg−1 of dry soil. This brownfield is located at Pont-de-Claix, Isère, France (45,136578° N 5,697205° E) and managed by a collaborative society of collective interest, the SCIC CRISALID. Ten soil cores were randomly sampled on a sampling grid and separated by at least 4 m in the brownfield. Briefly, 375 g of sieved soil was collected for each soil sample, and a homogenized aliquot of 2 g from each sample was suspended in 5 mL of NaCl (1.2 M, 70% w/v) solution, diluted until 10−3 dilution, spread on solid Dichloran Rose Bengale Chloramphenicol (DRBC) medium or solid CYM media and incubated at 24 °C for fungi and on solid LB medium at 30 °C for bacteria. One liter of DRBC medium was made of polypeptone (5 g), glucose (10 g), monopotassium phosphate (1 g), MgSO4 (0.5 g), dichloran (0.2 g), rose bengale (0.25 g), chloramphenicol (0.5 g), chlortetracycline (0.5 g), ZnSO4 (0.1 g), CuSO4 (0.05 g), tergitol (1 mL), agar (12.4 g). Solid CYM media contained the following for 1 L: maltose (10 g), glucose (20 g), yeast extract (2 g), KH2PO4 (4.6 g), MgSO4 (0.5 g), agar (15 g). Furthermore, 146 fungi and 83 bacterial colonies were then isolated, all based on their morphotype differences to optimize taxonomic diversity.

2.2. PCR Amplification, Gene Sequencing and Taxonomic Affiliation

Fungal DNA extractions were conducted for each isolate as described by Liu et al. [33]. The PCRs were carried out according to the conventional protocols using a Biorad C1000 thermal cycler (Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA), using 4 µL of HOT FIREPol® Blend Master Mix Ready to Load (5X) (Solis Biodyne, Tartu, Estonia), 0.8 μM of each primer and 20 ng of fungal genomic DNA or small amount of a bacterial colony picked up using a sterile toothpick, in a final volume of 25 μL. ITS and 16S rDNA amplicons, obtained with the ITS1F (5′-CTTGGTVATTTAGAGGAAGTAA-3′) and ITS4 (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′) primer pair and the pA (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTCGCTCAG-3′) and pH (5′-AAGGAGGTGATCCAGCCGCA-3′) primer pair, respectively, were sequenced (Microsynth France, Vaulx-en-Velin, France https://www.microsynth.com/standard-services.html, accessed on 19 April 2023). For taxonomic affiliation, fungal isolates were first identified according to general morphotype principles of fungal classification. Then, ITS sequences were compared against tree databases: the rRNA/ITS databases with fungi (taxid:4751) as organism option using Blastn+ [34]; the UNITE and the INSD databases using massBLASTer (BLAST+ 2.13.0) in PlutoF [35]. For bacteria, the 16S rDNA sequences were compared to the Refseq genome database using Blastn+ [34]. The 16S rDNA sequences were further aligned with reference sequences and phylogenetic trees using the Maximum Likelihood method, and a Kimura 2-parameter model with 1000 replicates was constructed using Seaview [36]. Amplicons of laccase-encoding genes were obtained using the degenerate primer pairs Cu1BF/Cu2R targeting laccase-encoding genes from Basidiomycota and Cu1AF/Cu2R targeting Ascomycota ones [37]. Fungal dye-peroxidases and Basidiomycota class II peroxidase genes were amplified using DYP360F/DYP485R [38] and AA2-F and AA2-R [39] primer pairs, respectively. The F_DYPR and R_DYPR primers from Tian et al. 2016 were used to target bacterial Dye-Peroxidase genes [40]. The bacterial bphA gene was amplified using the 4 different pairs of primers from Correa et al. 2010 [41]. All positive amplicons were cloned using TOPO ® TA Cloning® Kit for Sequencing (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA), and ten clones per amplicon were analyzed after sequencing by Microsynth France.

2.3. PCB Transformation Analysis

Each fungal isolate was grown on Petri dishes with CYM media. In triplicate, 10 calibrated fresh mycelial inocula (diameter 5 mm) were added to a liquid minimal media [42,43]. After incubation for 2 days at 24 °C on a rotary shaker (120 rpm), Aroclor 1254 (25 mg·L−1 dissolved in methanol (Sigma-Aldrich®, Saint Quentin Fallavier, France) was added, and each culture was incubated for 3 additional days under the same conditions. After incubation, cultures were frozen at −80 °C. Each bacterial isolate was cultivated in quadruplicate in liquid LB medium until mid-exponential growth time and washed 3-times with NaCl 0.9% (1.2 M, 70% w/v) solution. Then, 50% of washed cells were transferred in glass tube containing 5 mL of a media (Yeast extract 10 g·L−1, NH4Cl 2 g·L−1, NaCl 1 g·L−1, KH2PO4 6 g·L−1, Na2HPO4 25.6 g·L−1 and Aroclor 1254 25 mg·L−1 (Sigma-Aldrich, dissolved in methanol)), incubated during 48 h at 30 °C on a rotary shaker (120 rpm). After incubation, cultures were frozen at −80 °C. Indicator PCB (iPCB) assays of the whole culture (including extracellular medium and microbial cells) were performed using gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) (AGROLAB FRANCE SARL, Dijon, France). Positive controls without fungal or bacterial cells and with Aroclor 1254 were also assayed in triplicate. iPCBs correspond to PCB congeners 28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153 and 180 found to be the most abundant PCB congeners in environmental and biological matrices and the most common and easily determined congeners [44]. The percent of iPCB transformation efficiency was calculated for each isolate by subtracting the average iPCB quantity of each isolate to the positive control. The results were then transformed in percentages by considering control as 100%. Comparison of iPCB amount between controls and biotransformation assays was conducted using a Pairwise Wilcoxon test using the R software (https://www.r-project.org/, accessed on 18 November 2023).

2.4. Oxidase and Peroxidase Activity Assay

Each fungal isolate was cultivated as described above except that minimum media was supplemented with Aroclor 1254 1 mg·L−1 (dissolved in 5 µL methanol), methanol (5 µL) or no supplementation for control conditions. Each bacterial isolate was cultivated in a media containing Yeast Carbon Base—NutriSelect® 11.7 g·L−1, (NH4)2SO4 3.5 g·L−1, CH3COCOOH 10 g·L−1 supplemented with Aroclor 1254 1 mg·L−1 (dissolved in 5 µL methanol), methanol (5 µL) or no supplementation for both control conditions. After a total of 7 days of incubation, cells were centrifuged 10 min at 4000 g. For oxidase activity assay, 50 µL of supernatant was transferred in 96-well plate preloaded with 200 µL of phosphate citrate buffer pH 4 containing ABTS (2,2’-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)) (5.8 mM) or Guaiacol (53 mM) as substrates (Sigma-Aldrich®). The same protocol was used for peroxidase activity except that H2O2 (100 µM) was added to each well. Oxidase and peroxidase activities were quantitatively determined by measuring absorption change of each substrate for 4 h using TECAN infinite 200® PRO microtiter plate reader (Tecan, Salzburg, Austria) at 740 nm and 470 nm for ABTS and Guaiacol, respectively. Molar extinction coefficients of ABTS and Guaiacol (ɛM) were obtained by measuring their full oxidation in the concentration range from 10 µM to 1000 µM at the previously mentioned wavelength. The estimation of total excreted proteins was measured with Coomassie (Bradford) Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific, Illkirch, France). Specific activities are expressed in μmol of substrate oxidized per minute and per mg of total excreted proteins (µmol·min−1·µg−1). A pairwise Wilcoxon test in R software was conducted to compare oxidase activities measured in the presence of PCBs compared to controls (with or without methanol).

3. Results

First, 146 fungi and 83 bacteria were isolated from a PCB-contaminated brownfield, taxonomically characterized and assayed for their PCB-transformation capacity. Among them, the 29 fungal isolates listed in Table 1 and the 17 bacterial isolates listed in Table 2 were selected with respect to their taxonomic diversity and for their highest PCB-transformation efficiency, i.e., presenting more than 30% or 10% of iPCB depletion in 3 or 2 days for fungi or bacteria, respectively.
Regarding the fungal taxonomic affiliations, most of the isolates (24 exactly) are affiliated to Ascomycota phylum. They belong to Alternaria sp. (CRIS_F20 and F22), Aspergillus sp. (CRIS_F8, F11, F12 and F23), Cladosporium sp. (isolates CRIS_F24, F25, F26, F27 and F29), Didymella sp. (CRIS_F16), Dothiora maculans (CRIS_F2, F9 and F13), Fusarium sp. (CRIS_F5, F6), F. oxysporum (CRIS_F10), Ilyonectria sp. (CRIS_F28), Penicillium sp. (CRIS_F3), Thelebolus sp. (CRIS_F14), Trichoderma sp. (CRIS_F7), T. harzanium (CRIS_F18) and Truncatella angustata (CRIS_F19). The 5 remaining fungi, all isolated in their yeast state, are affiliated to Basidiomycota phylum and belong to Naganishia sp. (isolates CRIS_F4, and F17), Rhodoturula mucilaginosa (CRIS_F1), Solicoccozyma sp. (CRIS_F15) and S. aeria (CRIS_F21).
Regarding the blast bacterial species affiliation (Table 2) and the bacterial phylogenetic trees (Figure 1), the bacterial isolates are phylogenetically close to Arthrobacter sp. (CRIS_B6), Bacillus cereus (CRIS_B2—Figure 1B), B. mycoides (CRIS_B1—Figure 1B), B. toyonensis (CRIS_B14 and B16—Figure 1B), Chryseobacterium defluvii (CRIS_B5—Figure 1F), Erwinia aphidicola (CRIS_B10—Figure 1E), Peribacillus frigoritolerans (CRIS_B7, B8 and B10—Figure 1A), Peribacillus muralis (CRIS_B15—Figure 1A), Pseudarthrobacter sp. (CRIS_B4, B12 and B13—Figure 1C), Pseudomonas chlororaphis (CRIS_B9—Figure 1D) and Pseudomonas sp. (CRIS_B17—Figure 1D). Their iPCB transformation efficiencies vary from 31.6% (±10.2%) to 96.2% (±2.84%) for fungal isolates (Table 1) and from 17.4% (±3.49) to a maximum of 58% (±8.65) for bacterial isolates (Table 2) supported by a pairwise Wilcoxon test indicated significant differences (p-value < 0.001) between controls and biotransformation assays. It is worth noting that isolates able to transform iPCBs with an efficiency of more than 90% mainly belong to Cladosporium genera. Concerning genomic DNA ligninolytic gene amplification confirmed by sequencing, laccase encoding genes were amplified in only 6 fungal isolates belonging to Dothiora sp. and Dothiora maculans (isolates CRIS_F2 and F13, respectively), Fusarium sp. (CRIS_F6), Alternaria sp. (CRIS_F20 and F22) and Cladosporium sp. (CRIS_F27). In the same way, dye-peroxidase encoding gene was observed for only one fungal isolate (CRIS_F12) belonging to Aspergillus. Concerning the bacterial isolates, no ligninolytic and bph enzyme-encoding gene was amplified.
Regarding oxidase activities, fungal isolates CRIS_F2, F8, F18, F20, F22, F24, F25, F26 and CRIS_F27, respectively affiliated to Dothiora sp., Aspergillus sp., Trichoderma harzianum, Alternaria sp., Alternaria sp. and Cladosporium sp. for the last three, showed average oxidase activities in any conditions for ABTS and/or Guaiacol varying from 15.21 to 255.92 µmol·min−1·µg−1. Average oxidase activities (ABTS as substrate) from fungal isolates CRIS_F29 and CRIS_F13, respectively affiliated to Cladosporium sp. and Dothiora maculans, were both enhanced in the presence of PCBs (578.01 and 30.50 µmol·min−1·µg−1, respectively) compared to controls (36.42 and 1.96 µmol·min−1·µg−1 in the presence of methanol only, respectively, and 16.19 and 7.73 µmol·min−1·µg−1 for the control without additive, respectively), supported by a p-value of 0.029 and 0.0065, respectively (Figure 2). Guaiacol oxidase activity was enhanced only from the fungal isolate CRIS_F29 in the presence of PCBs (1.7 × 102 µmol·min−1·µg−1) compared to controls (39.48 and 623.8 µmol·min−1·µg−1 for control in the presence of methanol only and control without additives, respectively) supported by a p-value of 0.019 (Figure 2). Regarding peroxidase, ABTS peroxidase activity was enhanced only from the Cladosporium sp. isolate, CRIS_F29, in the presence of PCBs (4.1 × 105 µmol·min−1·µg−1) compared to controls (2.3 × 104 and 1.5 × 104 µmol·min−1·µg−1 for control in the presence of methanol only and control without additives, respectively) supported by a p-value of 0.0055 (Figure 2). All other fungal isolates (up to 18) were without oxidase or peroxidase activity. Bacterial isolates showed neither oxidase nor peroxidase activity.

4. Discussion

While PCBs remain a major health and ecological issue, microbial PCB bioremediation processes are an attractive way to depollute contaminated matrices. However, molecular mechanisms performed by microbes to transform PCBs are still misunderstood. Among the new PCB-transforming pathway, ligninolytic enzymes that are produced by fungi and bacteria are good candidates to be responsible for PCB transformation. Indeed, several fungal purified laccases have been observed to transform some PCBs [19,27,28,45,46]. In this way, to further investigate the distribution of potential PCB-transforming laccases and peroxidases among fungal and bacterial taxa, the present work aimed to inventory microbial isolates involved in PCB transformation, taxonomically characterize them, amplify ligninolytic genes on their genomic DNA and measure their secreted oxidase and peroxidase activities in the presence and the absence of PCBs. In addition, the bph gene PCR amplification was performed on bacterial DNA in order to determine which bacterial isolate is able to transform PCB through the well-known bph pathway and those potentially using another biochemical pathway.
Among the 29 fungal isolates analyzed, this is the first report of PCB transformation ability for fungal isolates belonging to Didymella, Dothiora, Ilyonectria, Naganishia, Rhodoturula, Solicoccozyma, Thelebolus and Truncatella genera (Table 1). In the same way, among the 17 bacterial isolates, this is the first report of PCB-transforming capabilities from bacteria phylogenetically close to Peribacillus frigotolerans, Peribacillus muralis, Bacillus mycoides, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus toyonensis, Pseudarthrobacter sp., Pseudomonas chlororaphis, Erwinia aphidicola and Chryseobacterium defluvii (Table 2 and Figure 1). This is also the first report of PCB-enhanced peroxidase activities from a fungal isolate affiliated to Cladosporium sp. and PCB-enhanced oxidase activities from an isolate closely related to Dothiora maculans (more than 20 and 4-fold, respectively). Concerning fungal peroxidases and according to the literature, only one study reports enhanced peroxidase activity by PCBs from Acremonium sclerotigenum [31]. This supports the need of more investigation regarding peroxidase activity from fungi with PCB-transforming capabilities that might reveal a new PCB transforming pathway through peroxidases. On the contrary, laccases (that are oxidases) activities from Pleurotus ostreatus, Fusarium solani, Thermothelomyces thermophila, Pleurotus sajor-caju LBM 105, Cladosporium sp. and Trametes versicolor have been already observed to be enhanced by PCBs [28,31,43,47,48]. In this way, the enhanced oxidase activity in the presence of PCBs from fungal isolates CRIS_F13 phylogenetically close to Dothiora maculans and from CRIS_F29 affiliated to Cladosporium sp. suggests that this measured oxidase activity is likely due to the presence of laccases. This hypothesis is supported by the laccase gene amplification from the fungal isolate CRIS_F13. These PCB-enhanced peroxidase and oxidase activities also suggest that the PCB transformation observed for these two isolates might be due to laccases and peroxidases. The substrate proximity of laccase and peroxidase and purified laccases that displayed PCB-transforming abilities supports this hypothesis [26,27,28,29,30]. In addition, even if laccase activities of fungal isolates CRIS_F2, F8, F18, F20 F22, F24, F25, F26 and CRIS_F27 are not specifically enhanced by PCBs, they might be involved in observed PCB transformations. In any case, these hypotheses must be confirmed by testing purified laccases and peroxidases from those fungal isolates in PCB-transformation assays.
Concerning the bacterial isolates, it is surprising that no bph gene amplification was observed among those affiliated to Pseudomonas sp. (CRIS_B17), Pseudomonas chlororaphis (CRIS_B9), Peribacillus frigoritolerans (CRIS_B3, B7, B8 and B11), Bacillus cereus (CRIS_B1), B. mycoides (CRIS_B2) and B. toyonensis (CRIS_B14 and B16). Indeed, there is a wide distribution of bph gene in Pseudomonas and Bacillus PCB-transforming bacteria [49,50,51], and the recent new Peribacillus genus was formerly Bacillus [52]. This suggests that primers used in this study might not be able to amplify all bph genes, or that still unknown PCB-transforming pathways are involved in the PCB-transformation realized by those isolates.
This last hypothesis can also be applied to the other fungal and bacterial isolates that transform PCB with the lack of oxidase and peroxidase activities or bph gene (for bacteria only). It is particularly true for the first report through this work of the PCB-transforming fungal isolates affiliated to Didymella, Ilyonectria, Naganishia, Rhodoturula, Solicoccozyma, Thelebolus and Truncatella genera and to the PCB-transforming bacterial isolates affiliated to Chryseobacterium defluvii and Pseudarthrobacter sp. with no bph genes reported so far for phylogenetically close strains. This highlights that further investigations about the PCB-transforming capabilities of these species are required to reveal new PCB-transforming pathways and to participate to better understand the PCB biotransformation process operated by the microorganisms.

5. Conclusions

For the first time, this study reports direct PCB transformation capabilities of fungal isolates belonging to Didymella, Dothiora, Ilyonectria, Naganishia, Rhodoturula, Solicoccozyma, Thelebolus and Truncatella genera and to bacterial isolates affiliated to Peribacillus frigotolerans, Bacillus mycoides, B. cereus, B. toyonensis, Pseudarthrobacter sp., Pseudomonas chlororaphis, Chryseobacterium defluvii Erwinia aphidicola and Peribacillus muralis. Concerning oxidase and peroxidase activities, only two fungal isolates showed PCB-enhanced activities with a first report of PCB-enhanced peroxidase activity from a fungal isolate affiliated to Cladosporium sp. and PCB-enhanced oxidase activity from another closely related to Dothiora maculans (more than 20 and 4-fold respectively). These activities suggest the involvement of laccases and peroxidases in the PCB-transforming action of those fungal isolates. The unobserved oxidase and peroxidase activities for 18 fungal isolates out of 29 and all the bacteria (added to no bph gene amplification for these last), suggest that still-unknown PCB-transformation pathways operate. In this way, further investigations focusing on PCB-transforming capabilities are required to reveal new PCB-transformation pathways, especially for fungal isolates affiliated to Didymella, Ilyonectria, Naganishia, Rhodoturula, Solicoccozyma, Thelebolus and Truncatella genera and to the PCB-transforming bacterial isolates affiliated to Chryseobacterium defluvii and Pseudarthrobacter sp. The next step of this work is to characterize at the species level the most efficient iPCB transformers and those showing an enhanced enzymatic activity in the presence of PCBs. For this purpose, PCB up-regulated peroxidases and laccases encoding genes from these isolates will be identified by RNA seq to further predict in silico how they could transform iPCBs by modeling Protein Ligand Docking on PCBs and up-regulated enzymes. Other enzyme encoding genes that could be identified as possible PCB transformers will undergo the same process. Then, the enzyme-PCB binding would have to be confirmed in vitro using purified enzymes from these isolates and by chemically characterizing the releasing PCB byproducts.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: L.F.-T.; Methodology: L.F.-T., S.N., B.D. and F.M.; Validation: L.F.-T., S.N., F.M., B.D., D.C. and L.V.; Formal Analysis: F.M.; Investigation: F.M., D.C. and L.V.; Data Curation: F.M.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation: F.M.; Writing—Review & Editing, L.F.-T., S.N., F.M. and B.D.; Visualization, F.M. and B.D.; Supervision, L.F.-T. and S.N.; Project Administration, L.F.-T.; Funding Acquisition, L.F.-T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the French MITI-CNRS (urban ecosystem—AAP 2019 “EMU-DPCB”), the French EC2CO—CNRS (CNRS INSU—AAP 2020 “LigninoPCB”) and French Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes AURA Region (Pack Ambition Recherche 2021 “FunDePCB”) programs. FM PhD was supported by a Research and Technology French National association ANRT and Envisol fellowship.

Data Availability Statement

All data that support findings of this study have been deposited in National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) under reference PRJNA924245 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA924245, accessed on 16 January 2023) for fungal isolates and under reference PRJNA924227 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA924227, accessed on 16 January 2023) for bacterial isolates.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Melymuk, L.; Blumenthal, J.; Sáňka, O.; Shu-Yin, A.; Singla, V.; Šebková, K.; Pullen Fedinick, K.; Diamond, M.L. Persistent Problem: Global Challenges to Managing PCBs. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 9029–9040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Breivik, K.; Sweetman, A.; Pacyna, J.; Jones, K. Towards a Global Historical Emission Inventory for Selected PCB Congeners—A Mass Balance Approach1. Global Production and Consumption. Sci. Total Environ. 2002, 290, 181–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Faroon, O.M.; Samuel Keith, L.; Smith-Simon, C.; De Rosa, C.T.; World Health Organization. Polychlorinated Biphenyls: Human Health Aspects; Weltgesundheitsorganisation, International Programme on Chemical Safety, Inter-Organization Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals; Consise International Chemical Assessment Document; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2003; ISBN 978-92-4-153055-2. [Google Scholar]
  4. Pointing, S. Feasibility of Bioremediation by White-Rot Fungi. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001, 57, 20–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Fagervold, S.K.; May, H.D.; Sowers, K.R. Microbial Reductive Dechlorination of Aroclor 1260 in Baltimore Harbor Sediment Microcosms Is Catalyzed by Three Phylotypes within the Phylum Chloroflexi. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 3009–3018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Maucourt, F.; Cébron, A.; Budzinski, H.; Le Menach, K.; Peluhet, L.; Czarnes, S.; Melayah, D.; Chapulliot, D.; Vallon, L.; Plassart, G.; et al. Prokaryotic, Microeukaryotic, and Fungal Composition in a Long-Term Polychlorinated Biphenyl-Contaminated Brownfield. Microb. Ecol. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Arbon, R.E.; Mincher, B.J.; Knighton, W.B. .gamma.-Ray Destruction of Individual PCB Congeners in Neutral 2-Propanol. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1994, 28, 2191–2196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Khalid, F.; Hashmi, M.Z.; Jamil, N.; Qadir, A.; Ali, M.I. Microbial and Enzymatic Degradation of PCBs from E-Waste-Contaminated Sites: A Review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 10474–10487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pieper, D.H.; Seeger, M. Bacterial Metabolism of Polychlorinated Biphenyls. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 15, 121–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kohlmeier, S.; Smits, T.H.M.; Ford, R.M.; Keel, C.; Harms, H.; Wick, L.Y. Taking the Fungal Highway: Mobilization of Pollutant-Degrading Bacteria by Fungi. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 4640–4646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Čvančarová, M.; Křesinová, Z.; Filipová, A.; Covino, S.; Cajthaml, T. Biodegradation of PCBs by Ligninolytic Fungi and Characterization of the Degradation Products. Chemosphere 2012, 88, 1317–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kamei, I.; Kogura, R.; Kondo, R. Metabolism of 4,4′-Dichlorobiphenyl by White-Rot Fungi Phanerochaete chrysosporium and Phanerochaete sp. MZ142. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 72, 566–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ruiz-aguilar, G.M.L.; Fern, J.M.; Rodrıguez-vazquez, R.; Poggi-Varaldo, H. Degradation by White-Rot Fungi of High Concentrations of PCB Extracted from a Contaminated Soil. Adv. Environ. Res. 2002, 6, 559–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Plačková, M.; Svobodová, K.; Cajthaml, T. Laccase Activity Profiling and Gene Expression in PCB-Degrading Cultures of Trametes Versicolor. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2012, 71, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chun, S.C.; Muthu, M.; Hasan, N.; Tasneem, S.; Gopal, J. Mycoremediation of PCBs by Pleurotus ostreatus: Possibilities and Prospects. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Timothy, M. PCB Dechlorination Hotspots and Reductive Dehalogenase Genes in Sediments from a Contaminated Wastewater Lagoon. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 25, 16376–16388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xiang, Y.; Xing, Z.; Liu, J.; Qin, W.; Huang, X. Recent Advances in the Biodegradation of Polychlorinated Biphenyls. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 36, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Adebusoye, S.A.; Picardal, F.W.; Ilori, M.O.; Amund, O.O. Influence of Chlorobenzoic Acids on the Growth and Degradation Potentials of PCB-Degrading Microorganisms. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 24, 1203–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kumar, A.; Chandra, R. Ligninolytic Enzymes and Its Mechanisms for Degradation of Lignocellulosic Waste in Environment. Heliyon 2020, 6, e03170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hammel, K.E.; Tardone, P.J. The Oxidative 4-Dechlorination of Polychlorinated Phenols Is Catalyzed by Extracellular Fungal Lignin Peroxidases. Biochemistry 1988, 27, 6563–6568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hirai, H.; Nakanishi, S.; Nishida, T. Oxidative Dechlorination of Methoxychlor by Ligninolytic Enzymes from White-Rot Fungi. Chemosphere 2004, 55, 641–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Limura, Y.; Hartikainen, P.; Tatsumi, K. Dechlorination of Tetrachloroguaiacol by Laccase of White-Rot Basidiomycete Coriolus versicolor. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1996, 45, 434–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Minard, R.D.; Liu, S.-Y.; Bollag, J.M. Oligomers and Quinones from 2,4-Dichlorophenol. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1981, 29, 250–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Roy-Arcand, L.; Archibaldt, F.S. Direct Dechiorination of Chiorophenolic Compounds by Laccases from Trametes (Coriolus) Versicolor. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1991, 13, 194–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Valli, K.; Gold, M.H. Degradation of 2,4-Dichlorophenol by the Lignin-Degrading Fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium. J. Bacteriol. 1991, 173, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Li, N.; Xia, Q.; Niu, M.; Ping, Q.; Xiao, H. Immobilizing Laccase on Different Species Wood Biochar to Remove the Chlorinated Biphenyl in Wastewater. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 13947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kordon, K.; Mikolasch, A.; Schauer, F. Oxidative Dehalogenation of Chlorinated Hydroxybiphenyls by Laccases of White-Rot Fungi. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2010, 64, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nikolaivits, E.; Siaperas, R.; Agrafiotis, A.; Ouazzani, J.; Magoulas, A.; Gioti, A.; Topakas, E. Functional and Transcriptomic Investigation of Laccase Activity in the Presence of PCB29 Identifies Two Novel Enzymes and the Multicopper Oxidase Repertoire of a Marine-Derived Fungus. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 775, 145818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Keum, Y.S.; Li, Q.X. Fungal Laccase-Catalyzed Degradation of Hydroxy Polychlorinated Biphenyls. Chemosphere 2004, 56, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jiang, G.X.; Niu, J.F.; Zhang, S.P.; Zhang, Z.Y.; Xie, B. Prediction of Biodegradation Rate Constants of Hydroxylated Polychlorinated Biphenyls by Fungal Laccases from Trametes versicolor and Pleurotus ostreatus. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2008, 81, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Germain, J.; Raveton, M.; Binet, M.N.; Mouhamadou, B. Screening and Metabolic Potential of Fungal Strains Isolated from Contaminated Soil and Sediment in the Polychlorinated Biphenyl Degradation. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 208, 111703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sellami, K.; Couvert, A.; Nasrallah, N.; Maachi, R.; Abouseoud, M.; Amrane, A. Peroxidase Enzymes as Green Catalysts for Bioremediation and Biotechnological Applications: A Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 806, 150500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Liu, D.; Coloe, S.; Baird, R.; Pedersen, J. Rapid Mini-Preparation of Fungal DNA for PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2000, 38, 471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Camacho, C.; Coulouris, G.; Avagyan, V.; Ma, N.; Papadopoulos, J.; Bealer, K.; Madden, T.L. BLAST+: Architecture and Applications. BMC Bioinform. 2009, 10, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Abarenkov, K.; Tedersoo, L.; Nilsson, R.H.; Vellak, K.; Saar, I.; Veldre, V.; Parmasto, E.; Prous, M.; Aan, A.; Ots, M.; et al. PlutoF—A Web Based Workbench for Ecological and Taxonomic Research, with an Online Implementation for Fungal ITS Sequences. Evol. Bioinform. 2010, 6, EBO.S6271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gouy, M.; Guindon, S.; Gascuel, O. SeaView Version 4: A Multiplatform Graphical User Interface for Sequence Alignment and Phylogenetic Tree Building. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010, 27, 221–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Kellner, H.; Luis, P.; Schlitt, B.; Buscot, F. Temporal Changes in Diversity and Expression Patterns of Fungal Laccase Genes within the Organic Horizon of a Brown Forest Soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2009, 41, 1380–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kellner, H.; Luis, P.; Pecyna, M.J.; Barbi, F.; Kapturska, D.; Krüger, D.; Zak, D.R.; Marmeisse, R.; Vandenbol, M.; Hofrichter, M. Widespread Occurrence of Expressed Fungal Secretory Peroxidases in Forest Soils. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e95557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Barbi, F.; Bragalini, C.; Vallon, L.; Prudent, E.; Dubost, A.; Fraissinet-Tachet, L.; Marmeisse, R.; Luis, P. PCR Primers to Study the Diversity of Expressed Fungal Genes Encoding Lignocellulolytic Enzymes in Soils Using High-Throughput Sequencing. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e116264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tian, J.-H.; Pourcher, A.-M.; Klingelschmitt, F.; Le Roux, S.; Peu, P. Class P Dye-Decolorizing Peroxidase Gene: Degenerated Primers Design and Phylogenetic Analysis. J. Microbiol. Methods 2016, 130, 148–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Correa, P.A.; Lin, L.; Just, C.L.; Hu, D.; Hornbuckle, K.C.; Schnoor, J.L.; Van Aken, B. The Effects of Individual PCB Congeners on the Soil Bacterial Community Structure and the Abundance of Biphenyl Dioxygenase Genes. Environ. Int. 2010, 36, 901–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Galzy, P.; Slonimski, P.P. Variations physiologiques de la levure au cours de la croissance sur l’acide lactique comme seule source de carbone. Comptes Rendus Hebd. Séances Académie Sci. 1957, 245, 2423–2426. [Google Scholar]
  43. Périgon, S.; Massier, M.; Germain, J.; Binet, M.-N.; Legay, N.; Mouhamadou, B. Metabolic Adaptation of Fungal Strains in Response to Contamination by Polychlorinated Biphenyls. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 14943–14950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mouhamadou, B.; Faure, M.; Sage, L.; Marçais, J.; Souard, F.; Geremia, R.A. Potential of Autochthonous Fungal Strains Isolated from Contaminated Soils for Degradation of Polychlorinated Biphenyls. Fungal Biol. 2013, 117, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fujihiro, S.; Higuchi, R.; Hisamatsu, S.; Sonoki, S. Metabolism of Hydroxylated PCB Congeners by Cloned Laccase Isoforms. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 82, 853–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Schultz, A.; Jonas, U.; Hammer, E.; Schauer, F. Dehalogenation of Chlorinated Hydroxybiphenyls by Fungal Laccase. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 4377–4381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Gayosso-Canales, M. PCBs Stimulate Laccase Production and Activity in Pleurotus ostreatus Thus Promoting Their Removal. Folia Microbiol. 2012, 57, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sadañoski, M.A.; Benítez, S.F.; Fonseca, M.I.; Velázquez, J.E.; Zapata, P.D.; Levin, L.N.; Villalba, L.L. Mycoremediation of High Concentrations of Polychlorinated Biphenyls with Pleurotus sajor-caju LBM 105 as an Effective and Cheap Treatment. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 103453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tandlich, R.; Bre, B. The Effect of Terpenes on the Biodegradation of Polychlorinated Biphenyls by Pseudomonas stutzeri. Chemosphere 2001, 44, 1547–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Villacieros, M.; Whelan, C.; Mackova, M.; Molgaard, J.; Sánchez-Contreras, M.; Lloret, J.; de Cárcer, D.A.; Oruezábal, R.I.; Bolaños, L.; Macek, T.; et al. Polychlorinated Biphenyl Rhizoremediation by Pseudomonas fluorescens F113 Derivatives, Using a Sinorhizobium meliloti Nod System to Drive Bph Gene Expression. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 2687–2694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Kimura, N.; Watanabe, T.; Suenaga, H.; Fujihara, H.; Futagami, T.; Goto, M.; Hanada, S.; Hirose, J. Pseudomonas furukawaii sp. Nov., a Polychlorinated Biphenyl-Degrading Bacterium Isolated from Biphenyl-Contaminated Soil in Japan. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 1429–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Patel, S.; Gupta, R.S. A Phylogenomic and Comparative Genomic Framework for Resolving the Polyphyly of the Genus Bacillus: Proposal for Six New Genera of Bacillus Species, Peribacillus Gen. Nov., Cytobacillus Gen. Nov., Mesobacillus Gen. Nov., Neobacillus Gen. Nov., Metabacillus Gen. Nov. and Alkalihalobacillus Gen. Nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 406–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic trees by Maximum Likelihood method and Kimura 2-parameter based on 16S rRNA gene sequences of the isolates from this study surrounded by red boxes and reference sequences from genera (A) Peribacillus, (B) Bacillus, (C) Pseudarthrobacter, (D) Pseudomonas, (E) Erwinia, (F) Chryseobacterium. Bootstrap values shown at branch nodes are generated from 1000 replicates and expressed as percentage.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic trees by Maximum Likelihood method and Kimura 2-parameter based on 16S rRNA gene sequences of the isolates from this study surrounded by red boxes and reference sequences from genera (A) Peribacillus, (B) Bacillus, (C) Pseudarthrobacter, (D) Pseudomonas, (E) Erwinia, (F) Chryseobacterium. Bootstrap values shown at branch nodes are generated from 1000 replicates and expressed as percentage.
Microorganisms 11 01887 g001
Figure 2. Oxidases and peroxidases specific activities of CRIS_F13 and CRIS_F29, using ABTS, guaiacol (oxidase activity) or ABTS and hydrogen peroxide (peroxidase activity) regarding the presence of PCB (in methanol), methanol or no additive during the culture.
Figure 2. Oxidases and peroxidases specific activities of CRIS_F13 and CRIS_F29, using ABTS, guaiacol (oxidase activity) or ABTS and hydrogen peroxide (peroxidase activity) regarding the presence of PCB (in methanol), methanol or no additive during the culture.
Microorganisms 11 01887 g002
Table 1. Identification name (ID), phylum and species blast taxonomic affiliation of the ITS region (with percent of identity), the database used for taxonomic affiliation and average degradation efficiency ± the standard deviation in percent for each assayed isolate.
Table 1. Identification name (ID), phylum and species blast taxonomic affiliation of the ITS region (with percent of identity), the database used for taxonomic affiliation and average degradation efficiency ± the standard deviation in percent for each assayed isolate.
IDPhylumBlast Result (% Identity)Data BaseiPCB Degradation
Efficiency (%)
CRIS_F1BasidiomycotaRhodoturula mucilaginosa(100%)INSD31.63 ± 10.2
CRIS_F2AscomycotaDothiora sp.(97%)NCBI48.58 ± 16
CRIS_F3AscomycotaPenicillium sp.(100%)UNITE56.49 ± 15.1
CRIS_F4BasidiomycotaNaganishia sp.(99.83%)NCBI62.71 ± 11.1
CRIS_F5AscomycotaFusarium sp.(100%)INSD64.06 ± 19
CRIS_F6AscomycotaFusarium sp.(100%)INSD64.4 ± 11.8
CRIS_F7AscomycotaTrichoderma sp.(100%)NCBI65.36 ± 8.02
CRIS_F8AscomycotaAspergillus sp.(100%)NCBI66.44 ± 25.1
CRIS_F9AscomycotaDothiora maculans(100%)INSD68.36 ± 14.6
CRIS_F10AscomycotaFusarium oxysporum(100%)INSD72.54 ± 21.6
CRIS_F11AscomycotaAspergillus sp.(100%)NCBI72.76 ± 19.3
CRIS_F12AscomycotaAspergillus sp.(100%)NCBI76.61 ± 20
CRIS_F13AscomycotaDothiora maculans(100%)INSD77.01 ± 14.8
CRIS_F14AscomycotaThelebolus sp.(100%)INSD78.53 ± 9.29
CRIS_F15BasidiomycotaSolicoccozyma sp.(97.85%)INSD79.37 ± 7.4
CRIS_F16AscomycotaDidymella sp.(99.81%)INSD82.82 ± 13.5
CRIS_F17BasidiomycotaNaganishia sp.(100%)NCBI83.61 ± 1.19
CRIS_F18AscomycotaTrichoderma harzanium(100%)INSD85.72 ± 14.9
CRIS_F19AscomycotaTruncatella angustata(100%)NCBI85.87 ± 14.2
CRIS_F20AscomycotaAlternaria sp.(99.66%)INSD86.55 ± 14.8
CRIS_F21BasidiomycotaSolicoccozyma aeria(100%)NCBI88.13 ± 11.8
CRIS_F22AscomycotaAlternaria sp.(100%)NCBI88.47 ± 5.11
CRIS_F23AscomycotaAspergillus sp.(100%)NCBI88.87 ± 5.24
CRIS_F24AscomycotaCladosporium sp.(100%)NCBI90.86 ± 7.88
CRIS_F25AscomycotaCladosporium sp.(100%)NCBI92.38 ± 6.49
CRIS_F26AscomycotaCladosporium sp.(100%)NCBI92.48 ± 1.92
CRIS_F27AscomycotaCladosporium sp.(100%)NCBI92.71 ± 1.88
CRIS_F28AscomycotaIlyonectria sp.(99.25%)NCBI94.6 ± 7.97
CRIS_F29AscomycotaCladosporium sp.(100%)NCBI96.29 ± 2.84
Table 2. Identification name (ID) and blast taxonomic affiliation of the 16S rRNA gene (with percentage of identity) for each assayed isolate with remaining iPCB concentration, transformation efficiency and bphA presence.
Table 2. Identification name (ID) and blast taxonomic affiliation of the 16S rRNA gene (with percentage of identity) for each assayed isolate with remaining iPCB concentration, transformation efficiency and bphA presence.
IDBlast Result (% Identity)iPCB µg·L−1
(Mean ± sd)
Transformation
Efficiency (%)
Control- 5197 ± 390-
CRIS_B1Bacillus mycoides(99.80%)4292 ± 181.4117.4 ± 3.49
CRIS_B2Bacillus cereus(99.87%)3935.83 ± 43.6924.3 ± 0.84
CRIS_B3Peribacillus frigoritolerans(99.60%)3602.5 ± 192.6230.7 ± 3.71
CRIS_B4Pseudarthrobacter sp.(99.46%)3595.35 ± 602.8630.8 ± 11.6
CRIS_B5Chryseobacterium defluvii(100%)3339.93 ± 828.6135.7 ± 15.94
CRIS_B6Arthrobacter sp.(99.60%)3227.03 ± 195.8037.9 ± 3.77
CRIS_B7Peribacillus frigoritolerans(99.60%)3194.7 ± 220.7638.5 ± 4.25
CRIS_B8Peribacillus frigoritolerans(99.67%)3103.25 ± 200.7140.3 ± 3.86
CRIS_B9Pseudomonas chlororaphis(99.87%)3085.86 ± 465.5740.6 ± 8.96
CRIS_B10Erwinia aphidicola(99.47%)3046.66 ± 790.3441.4 ± 15.21
CRIS_B11Peribacillus frigoritolerans(99.67%)3023.3 ± 388.4341.8 ± 7.47
CRIS_B12Pseudarthrobacter sp.(99.73%)2956.33 ± 575.3343.1 ± 11.07
CRIS_B13Pseudarthrobacter sp.(99.60%)2950.46 ± 481.8843.2 ± 9.27
CRIS_B14Bacillus toyonensis(99.80%)2925.33 ± 283.6043.7 ± 5.46
CRIS_B15Peribacillus muralis(99.67%)2887.5 ± 205.9544.4 ± 3.96
CRIS_B16Bacillus toyonensis(99.60%)2404.76 ± 512.8553.7 ± 9.87
CRIS_B17Pseudomonas sp.(99.80%)2180.16 ± 449.4258 ± 8.65
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Maucourt, F.; Doumèche, B.; Chapulliot, D.; Vallon, L.; Nazaret, S.; Fraissinet-Tachet, L. Polychlorinated Biphenyl Transformation, Peroxidase and Oxidase Activities of Fungi and Bacteria Isolated from a Historically Contaminated Site. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1887. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11081887

AMA Style

Maucourt F, Doumèche B, Chapulliot D, Vallon L, Nazaret S, Fraissinet-Tachet L. Polychlorinated Biphenyl Transformation, Peroxidase and Oxidase Activities of Fungi and Bacteria Isolated from a Historically Contaminated Site. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(8):1887. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11081887

Chicago/Turabian Style

Maucourt, Flavien, Bastien Doumèche, David Chapulliot, Laurent Vallon, Sylvie Nazaret, and Laurence Fraissinet-Tachet. 2023. "Polychlorinated Biphenyl Transformation, Peroxidase and Oxidase Activities of Fungi and Bacteria Isolated from a Historically Contaminated Site" Microorganisms 11, no. 8: 1887. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11081887

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop