Next Article in Journal
Co-Expression of Transcriptional Regulators and Housekeeping Genes in Streptomyces spp.: A Strategy to Optimize Metabolite Production
Next Article in Special Issue
Fluorescent Nanoparticle Uptake by Myzocytosis and Endocytosis in Colpodella sp. ATCC 50594
Previous Article in Journal
Lipid Accumulation in Blastocystis Increases Cell Damage in Co-Cultured Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Molecular Detection and Phylogenetic Analyses of Babesia spp. and Theileria spp. in Livestock in Bangladesh
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 11
Issue 6
10.3390/microorganisms11061584
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecular Phylogenies of Leeches and Haemoparasites Infecting Freshwater Turtles in Aquatic Ecosystems of Northern Africa Suggest Phylogenetic Congruence between Placobdella costata Sensu Lato and Haemogregarina stepanowi Sensu Lato

by
Olivier Verneau
1,2,3,*,
Sirine Melliti
1,4,
Latifa Kimdil
1,5,
El Hassan El Mouden
5,
Mohamed Sghaier Achouri
4 and
Rachid Rouag
6
1
Centre de Formation et de Recherche sur les Environnements Méditerranéens, University of Perpignan Via Domitia, UMR 5110, F-66860 Perpignan, France
2
CNRS, Centre de Formation et de Recherche sur les Environnements Méditerranéens, UMR 5110, F-66860 Perpignan, France
3
Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, Private Bag X6001, Potchefstroom 20520, South Africa
4
Laboratoire de Diversité, Gestion et Conservation des Systèmes Biologiques, LR18ES06, Faculté des Sciences de Tunis, Université Tunis-El Manar, Tunis 2092, Tunisia
5
Laboratory of Water, Biodiversity and Climatic Change, Faculty of Sciences, Semlalia, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakech 40000, Morocco
6
Laboratoire de Recherche Biodiversité et Pollution des Ecosystèmes, Faculté des Sciences de la Nature et de la Vie, Université Chadli Bendjedid El-Tarf, BP73, El-Tarf 36000, Algeria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2023, 11(6), 1584; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11061584
Submission received: 8 May 2023 / Revised: 10 June 2023 / Accepted: 13 June 2023 / Published: 15 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Current View on Apicomplexan Parasites: Structure, Function, Evolution)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Haemogregarines are blood parasites with a life-cycle involving a vertebrate as the intermediate host and an invertebrate as the definitive host and vector. Extensive phylogenetic investigations based on 18S-rRNA gene sequences have shown that Haemogregarina stepanowi (Apicomplexa: Haemogregarinidae) is able to infest a large diversity of freshwater turtle species, including the European pond turtle Emys orbicularis, the Sicilian pond turtle Emys trinacris, the Caspian turtle Mauremys caspica, the Mediterranean pond turtle Mauremys leprosa, and the Western Caspian turtle Mauremys rivulata, among others. From the same molecular markers, H. stepanowi is further considered to be a complex of cryptic species predisposed to infect the same host species. While Placobdella costata is known to be the unique vector of H. stepanowi, it is only recently that independent lineages within P. costata have been illustrated—suggesting the presence of at least five unique leech species across Western Europe. The aims of our study were therefore to investigate from mitochondrial markers (COI) the genetic diversity within haemogregarines and leeches infecting freshwater turtles of the Maghreb, in order to identify processes of parasite speciation. We showed that H. stepanowi consists of at least five cryptic species in the Maghreb, while two Placobella species were identified in the same area. Although an Eastern–Western speciation pattern was apparent for both leeches and haemogregarines, we cannot make definitive conclusions regarding co-speciation patterns between parasites and vectors. However, we cannot reject the hypothesis of a very strict host–parasite specificity within leeches.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Haemogregarines are blood parasites of the phylum Apicomplexa with a life-cycle involving a vertebrate as an intermediate host and an invertebrate as a definitive host and vector. They are currently classified into four families: the Haemogregarinidae which comprise three genera, namely Haemogregarina, Cyrilia, and Desseria; the Hepatozoidae with a single genus, Hepatozoon; the Karyolysidae with two genera, namely Hemolivia and Karyolysus; and the Dactylosomatidae, also with two genera, Babesiosoma and Dactylosoma [1]. Whereas the intermediate host encompasses all types of vertebrates, i.e., fishes, mammals, amphibians, reptiles, and birds, the vector host encompasses solely leeches and acarines. Since Siddall [2] and his work based on a cladistic approach of morphological characters, the systematics of haemogregarines have been greatly improved. Siddal [2] was the first to show Haemogregarina as a polyphyletic taxon. He thus transferred all species infecting snakes, lizards, crocodilians, and birds, which were originally described as Haemogregarina spp., into the genus Hepatozoon and retained all other species infecting fishes, amphibians, and chelonians in the genus Haemogregarina sensu lato. In addition, based on other informative characters, the distinction of Haemogregarina sensu stricto was allowed to accommodate mostly Haemogregarina spp. infecting chelonians. Smith [3] completed the classification revised by Siddall [2] in transferring certain haemogregarine species from one genus to another. Following the advent of molecular data in phylogenetics by the end of the 1990s, certain haemogregarines have been investigated for their phylogenetic position within the Apicomplexa—more particularly, species of Hepatozoon [4,5,6]. The first comprehensive study that included the taxa of the four recognized families was conducted by Barta et al. [7], although Hepatozoon species were still over-represented in their phylogeny in comparison to the other taxa, namely Hemolivia, Dactylosoma, Bebesiosoma, and Haemogregarina. Later on, the non-monophyly of Hepatozoon species was evidenced [8,9,10] following an investigation of the phylogenetic relationships of species of the four haemogregarine familes. In addition to the paraphyly of Hepatozoon species, the paraphyly of the Karyolysidae was also illustrated [11].
While the monophyly of particular genera and their relationships within the Adeleorina remain to be investigated using molecular markers, numerous questions have been raised regarding the genetic diversity of haemogregarines infecting vertebrate hosts, especially freshwater chelonians. Extensive phylogenetic investigations during the ten past years on Haemogregarina stepanowi Danilewsky 1885 have demonstrated that this species is able to infest a large diversity of the turtle species of North Africa and Western Europe: among others, the European pond turtle Emys orbicularis (Linnaeus); and the Sicilian pond turtle Emys trinacris Fritz, Fattizzo, Guicking, Tripepi, Pennisi, Lenk, Joger, and Wink of the Emydidae; the Caspian turtle Mauremys caspica (Gmelin); the Mediterranean pond turtle Mauremys leprosa (Schweigger); and the Western Caspian turtle Mauremys rivulata (Valenciennes) of the Geoemydidae [12,13,14]. Although the intermediate host specificity for this parasite was believed to be very low, Attia El Hili et al. [15] further evidenced from 18S-rRNA gene sequences the occurrence of distinct species of Haemogregarina within the same chelonian host species, in both M. leprosa and E. orbicularis turtles, thus suggesting coinfection. Based on genetic data, one of these haemogregarine species could be considered with certainty to be H. stepanowi. All of these results were soon confirmed from an analysis of target COI sequences obtained from the same isolates of blood samples [16]. Nine distinct COI haplotypes were revealed corresponding to three molecular lineages, each corresponding to a distinct Haemogregarina species, as previously advocated from an analysis of nuclear markers [15]. A similarly high Haemogregarina genetic diversity has since been evidenced from mitochondrial markers within the Savanna side-necked turtle Podocnemis vogli Müller [17], as well as from nuclear markers within the yellow-spotted Amazon river turtle Podocnemis unifilis Troschel [18] and E. orbicularis [19]. Due to the low host specificity of H. stepanowi against its intermediate host on the one hand [12,13,14] and the high diversity of Haemogregarina spp. in certain turtle species on the other [16,17,18,19], the host specificity of Haemogregarina could act against leeches—namely Placobdella as the definitive host—as claimed earlier by Attia El Hili et al. [16].
Placobdella is a widespread genus of blood-feeding leeches belonging to the family Glossiphoniidae (Clitellata, Hirudinea, Rhynchobdellida). It includes 25 recognized species [20], most of which display a Nearctic distribution [21]. Placobdella leeches are common ectoparasites of freshwater vertebrates. It has been shown that host specificity differs among Placobdella spp. Certain leeches exhibit an opportunistic generalist behavior with a wide range of host species: for instance, Placobdella montifera Moore 1906 [22,23] and Placobdella phalera (Graf 1899) [24] which infest a great many species; Placobdella multilineata Moore 1953 which has been reported in 17 species and subspecies of reptiles, such as alligators, crocodiles, snakes, and turtles, as well as in amphiumas [25]; and Placobdella ornata (Verrill 1872) which infests turtles, as well as fish, amphibians, birds, and humans [22]. In contrast, certain other leeches exhibit a very strict host specificity. This is the case for Placobdella cryptobranchii (Johnson and Klemm 1977) [26] which has been reported from a single amphibian host species, i.e., the Ozark hellbender Cryptobranchus alleganiensis bishopi Grobman [22,24,26], although Moser et al. [27] claimed an additional host species, i.e., the Mudpuppy Necturus maculosus (Rafinesque). This was also the case for Placobdella appalachiensis Moser and Hopkins 2014 which was reported from a single host species, i.e., the Eastern hellbender Cryptobranchus alleganiensis (Daudin) [28]. Placobdella costata (Fr Müller 1846), the type species of the genus Placobdella, was considered as the only European representative of the genus until Soors et al. [29] reported Placobdella ornata (Verril 1872) in Europe following the introduction of its host. While it was first thought to infect a single turtle species, i.e., E. orbicularis across its entire geographical distribution, from Western Europe to Russia [30], as well as in Algeria [31] and Tunisia [15], P. costata is now known to infect certain other turtles. This has indeed been reported from M. caspica in Iran [32,33], from E. trinacris in Sicilia [34], and from M. leprosa in Spain [35,36], Morocco [37], and Tunisia [15]. While it is now well received from the investigation of molecular markers that Placobdella is a monophyletic genus, certain cryptic diversity was evidenced within several species, among which are Placobdella mexicana Moore 1898 and Placobdella ringueleti López-Jiménez and Oceguera-Figueroa 2009 [38]. Based on COI and ITS1 genetic variations, Kvist et al. [39] also illustrated seven independent lineages within P. costata, suggesting at least five unique leech species across Central and Eastern Europe, as well as in Algeria. Independent phylogenetic relationships were shown among Italian populations of P. costata and their two host species E. orbicularis and E. trinacris [40]; thus, Kvist et al. [39] concluded that species diversity and speciation within P. costata were likely not the result of speciation, isolation, or dispersal of the host species.
Hence, considering the low specificity of H. stepanowi towards its intermediate chelonian hosts, the high diversity of Haemogregarina spp. within turtles, as well as the cryptic species diversity within P. costata, we aimed to investigate the genetic diversity within haemogregarines and leeches infecting North African freshwater turtles. Our objectives were to compare phylogenetic patterns between hosts and their parasites in order to identify processes of parasite speciation.

2. Materials and Methods

Field-work investigations were carried out on 2019 and 2020, mainly in freshwater aquatic environments of Morocco, Algeria, and Tunisia suitable for E. orbicularis and M. leprosa (see Figure 1 and Table 1 for GPS localities). Sampling sessions were conducted during the peak activity period of both turtles, from March to November. Traps were baited with fish and set in waters with plastic bottles to maintain them at the surface water and to prevent turtles’ drowning. They were firmly attached to the bank of the water bodies with a solid rope and checked every day, usually between one to three days, before being removed. Trapped turtles were marked individually on the marginal scutes for further capture–mark–recapture procedures. They were sexed, measured, weighted, and checked for ectoparasites. Leeches usually occur at the base of the anterior and/or posterior limbs. When present, they were collected and preserved in 70% alcohol for molecular systematic studies. Blood was also collected from each specimen from the dorsal coccygeal vein running in the midline of the turtle’s tail with the help of 1-mL insulin syringes. A drop of blood was immediately spread out on a glass slide, fixed with a few drops of methanol after air drying, and stored temporarily until staining in the lab. Of the remaining blood, one half was stored in 90% ethanol for molecular systematic studies of the host and their haemoparasites, and the second half was preserved into two distinct Microtainer® tubes with anticoagulant that were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen before being transported to the lab where they were finally stored at −80 °C for further biochemical analyses. Investigated turtles were released at the same place of capture in the field.
Blood smears on slides were stained with 10% Giemsa for 20 min in the laboratory, air dried, and examined by optical microscopy using a ×40 objective for the first screening. A Leica digital camera using a ×100 objective was used to capture images for biometric measurements and developmental-stage identification according to Dvoráková et al. [12,41]. A total of 422 blood smears were prepared and examined, including 406 from M. leprosa collected at 12 localities of Morocco, six of Algeria, and 14 of Tunisia, and 16 from E. orbicularis collected at five localities of Algeria.
DNA extractions were performed with the E.Z.N.A Tissue DNA Kit (Omega bio-tek, Norcross, GA, USA) following recommendations of the supplier for blood and tissue samples preserved in ethanol. DNA extracts were resuspended in approximately 200 µL of Tris-EDTA 1X elution buffer before use for PCR. The cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) of leeches was amplified using the forward LCO Plac 5′-AYTCAACTAATCAYAAAGAYATTGG-3′ and reverse HCO Plac 5′-TADACTTCWGGRTGACCAAAAAATCA-3′ primers which were designed for Placobdella spp. [38]. The COI of haemogregarines was amplified using the forward HemoFor4 5′-TGGACATTATACCCACCTTTAAG-3′ and reverse HemoRev4 5′-ATACAACCCATAGCTAGTATCAT-3′ primers which were designed for Haemogregarina spp. [16]. PCR assays of COI were conducted in a final volume of 25 μL comprising 1X buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 0.4 mM primers, 0.75 units GoTaq Polymerase (Promega, Charbonnières-les-Bains, France), and DNA (3 µL) under the following conditions: an initial step of 5 min at 95 °C for long denaturation; followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C for denaturation, 30 s at 48 °C for annealing, and 1 min at 72 °C for elongation; with a final step of 10 min at 72 °C for terminal extension. The success of the PCR amplifications was controlled following electrophoresis in gels of 1% agarose stained with ethidium bromide. When amplifications were successful, they yielded PCR fragments of approximately 700 bp for the COI of leeches and 465 bp for the COI of haemogregarines which were subsequently sequenced by the Genoscreen Company (Lille, France).
COI chromatograms were edited with Chromas 2.2.6 (Technelysium Pty Ltd., Brisbane, Australia), and the resulting new sequences obtained for leeches and haemogregarines were respectively grouped in two distinct files with certain others that were extracted from GenBank. The final COI leech data set included 78 COI sequences corresponding to 23 distinct Placobdella species on the one hand and two Helobdella species used for outgroup comparisons on the other. At this stage, P. costata was considered as a single species and referred as P. costata sensu lato. Conversely, the final COI protozoan data set included 86 COI sequences corresponding to seven species of Piroplasmida, 17 species of Haemosporida, and 30 species of Eucoccidiorida, including nine putative Haemogregarina species from two South American turtles, and Scrippsiella sweeneyae Balech 1965 used for outgroup comparisons [16]. At this stage, H. stepanowi was considered as a single species and referred as H. stepanowi sensu lato. The COI sequences included in both data sets were aligned independently using Clustal W [42] implemented in MEGA7 [43] under default parameters.
For the Bayesian analysis, a GTR + I + G model was selected independently for the two COI partitions following the hierarchical likelihood ratio tests (hLRTs) implemented in Modeltest 3.06 [44]. Therefore, six types of substitutions and invariable-gamma rates with four gamma rate categories were applied for each partition, evolutionary parameters being estimated independently. The leech COI partition included 689 characters, while the protozoan COI partition included 448 characters. Bayesian analyses were run using MrBayes 3.04b [45], with four chains running for five million generations and sampled every 100 cycles. Consensus trees for both data sets were drawn, after removing the first 5000 trees as the burn-in phase, and opened with TreeGraph 2 [46]. These were converted into a phylogram, and only nodes supported by more than 0.75 posterior probabilities were shown.
For the parsimony approach, a bootstrap test with 1000 replicates was applied for each data set following a heuristic search under PAUP* Version 4.0 b10 [47] on the parsimony-informative characters, gaps being treated as missing data. The nearest neighbor interchange (NNI) branch-swapping option was used to find trees of minimal length. In order not to weight down the illustrated trees, only bootstrap proportions higher than 75% were indicated next to the branches within the clades P. costata sensu lato and H. stepanowi sensu lato.
For the distance analysis, a bootstrap test with 5000 replicates was applied for each data set. Minimum evolution (ME) trees were searched using the close-neighbor-interchange (CNI) algorithm [48] at a search level of one for each replication based on Kimura two-parameter distances [49] that were computed under the pairwise-deletion option. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA7 [43]. Regarding parsimony, only bootstrap proportions higher than 75% were indicated next to the branches for the two clades of interest.
A total of 22 COI sequences from Placobdella rugosa (Verrill 1874) were retrieved from GenBank in order to investigate the molecular threshold within Placobdella. All of these sequences correspond to distinct leech specimens that were sampled at separate sites across Canada, which represents most of the geographic range of that species; thus, we expected that the intra-average distances measured within all these specimens may reflect the average genetic variations within each Placobdella species. Pairwise p-distances were calculated within P. rugosa and the average distance with its standard deviation (SD) was then estimated and given with the minimum and maximum distances between all investigated specimens. Finally, pairwise p-distances were calculated within and between haploclades of P. costata sensu lato to explore the species diversity.
The interspecific average pairwise COI p-distance was estimated to about 2.1% between two closely related valid distinct species, namely Eimeria lancasterensis Joseph 1969 and Eimeria sciurorum Galli-Valerio 1922, and further considered as the molecular threshold within Haemogregarina [16]. Therefore, pairwise p-distances were calculated within and between haploclades of H. stepanowi sensu lato to explore the species diversity based on the molecular threshold.

3. Results

Following field-work investigations, M. leprosa was sampled in 12 localities of Morocco, among which five showed the presence of leeches attached to turtles. Following blood observations, haemogregarines were observed within turtles in five localities: only three of them had leeches, the other two did not. The prevalence of haemogregarine infection varied from approximately 11% to 80% in localities where turtles were found to be infected (Table 1). In Algeria, M. leprosa was sampled in six localities, among which three showed the presence of leeches attached to turtles. Following blood observations, haemogregarines were observed within turtles in five localities: only three of them had leeches, the other two did not. The prevalence of haemogregarine infection varied from approximately 25% to 75% in localities where turtles were found to be infected. Emys orbicularis was also sampled in five localities of Algeria—three times in syntopy with M. leprosa—among which three localities showed the presence of leeches attached to turtles. Haemogregarines were observed within turtles in three localities, a single one had leeches, the other two did not. The prevalence of haemogregarine infection varied from approximately 50% to 75% in localities where turtles were found to be infected (Table 1). In Tunisia, M. leprosa was sampled in 14 localities, among which three showed the presence of leeches attached to turtles. Following blood observations, haemogregarines were observed within turtles in three localities: only two of them had leeches, the last one did not. The prevalence of haemogregarine infection varied from approximately 58% to 67% in localities where turtles were found to be infected (Table 1).
In total, 31 leeches were processed for their COI, 11 collected from M. leprosa sampled from four localities of Morocco, 15 collected from M. leprosa and E. orbicularis sampled from six localities of Algeria, and five collected from M. leprosa sampled from three localities of Tunisia (Table 2). They were characterized by six distinct haplotypes, C8a to C8c in Morocco, C5a to C5c in Algeria, and C5a to C5b in Tunisia. According to the phylogenetic reconstruction shown in Figure 2, P. costata sensu lato constitutes a robust clade that can be split into six distinct lineages, namely haploclades C1 + C7, C3, C4, C5, and C6 based on [39], and Haploclade C8 based on the present results. Conversely, due to technical difficulties in amplifying the COI of haemogregarines from blood samples, only 13 sequences were obtained from M. leprosa sampled from two localities of Morocco, from one locality of Algeria, and from two localities of Tunisia (Table 3). These were characterized by nine distinct haplotypes: 4a to 4d in Morocco, 1c in Algeria, and 3g to 3i and 5a in Tunisia. According to the phylogenetic reconstruction shown in Figure 3, H. stepanowi sensu lato constitutes a robust clade that can be split into five distinct lineages, namely haploclades 1 to 3 based on Attia El Hili et al. [16], and haploclades 4 and 5 based on the present results.
Regarding the average p-distance that was estimated within P. rugosa, the COI molecular threshold can be considered as approximately 0.90% pairwise substitutions ± 0.0042 within Placobdella (Table 4). Therefore, according to the average p-distances that were estimated within haploclades of P. costata sensu lato on the one hand, which varied from 0.30% for the minimal average distance to 1.44% for the maximal average distance (Table 4), and between haploclades of P. costata sensu lato on the other, which varied from 4.19% for the minimal average distance to 8.15% for the maximal distance (Table 5), each haploclade can be considered as a distinct species, which is in agreement with Kvist et al. [39]. If Haploclade C6 can be considered as P. costata sensu stricto according to Kvist et al. [39] (see Figure 2), leeches that were collected from M. leprosa and E. orbicularis of Algeria and Tunisia can be regarded as the undescribed species corresponding to Haploclade C5 that was previously identified [39]. Similarly, leeches that were collected from M. leprosa of Morocco can be regarded as another undescribed species corresponding to Haploclade C8 identified here for the first time.
Considering the importance of molecular COI of 2.1% pairwise substitutions [16], the average p-distances that were estimated within haploclades of H. stepanowi sensu lato on the one hand, which varied from 0.43% for the minimal average distance to 1.61% for the maximal average distance (Table 6), and between haploclades of H. stepanowi sensu lato on the other, which varied from 6.71% for the minimal average distance to 8.21% for the maximal distance (Table 7), suggest that each haploclade can be considered as a distinct species. While it is still difficult to assign one haplotype to H. stepanowi sensu stricto, haploclades 1 and 3 characterizing haemogregarines sampled from M. leprosa of Algeria and Tunisia, respectively, were previously identified in Attia El Hili et al. [16]. Conversely, haploclades 4 and 5 characterizing haemogregarines sampled from M. leprosa of Morocco and Tunisia, respectively, were identified here for the first time.

4. Discussion

Regarding the genetic diversity of P. costata leeches sampled in Morocco, Algeria, and Tunisia, we can consider that two species are well differentiated in the Maghreb. According to Kvist et al. [39], P. costata is phylogenetically split into seven independent lineages in the Northern Mediterranean basin, Tunisia, and Algeria—at least five of which correspond to distinct species based on COI genetic variations. Among the mitochondrial haploclades that were illustrated in [39], the C5 haploclade, which groups three different haplotypes characterizing leeches collected in Algeria and Tunisia, was also recovered in our study from leeches sampled in the same area (Haplotypes C5a–c), C5a–b being found in Algeria and Tunisia, and C5c being restricted to Algeria. In addition, we identified a new distinct haploclade that for convenience we named Haploclade C8. The latter also contained three distinct haplotypes (C8a–c) that characterized leeches that were collected in four distant localities of Morocco: C8a being found in three distinct localities, and C8b–c being restricted in the fourth locality. While the levels of COI variation clearly indicated that the C8 haploclade could also be considered as a distinct species, the phylogenetic relationships between all haploclades did not allow the resolution of the deepest nodes in the tree as already illustrated in [39], thus suggesting a rapid diversification of leeches. Based on phylogeographic studies of several amphibian and reptile species across their geographical distribution area in the Maghreb (Morocco, Algeria, and Tunisia), an Eastern–Western speciation pattern was evidenced for most of the investigated species [50]. This speciation pattern was very similar to the phylogeography of M. leprosa that supported its northwestern origin before the species colonized Europe [51]. It was impossible to consider a sister group relationship between the C5 and C8 haploclades, and at least two leech species infect M. leprosa in its home range of Africa; thus, it is very unlikely that leeches in the Maghreb co-diverged along with their chelonian hosts. Furthermore, C5b was found in both turtle species, i.e., M. leprosa and E. orbicularis, thus strengthening the conclusions of Vecchioni et al. [40] who clearly showed that the speciation of P. costata leeches infecting E. orbicularis and E. trinacris in Italy was not the result of co-divergence processes.
Regarding the COI genetic diversity of H. stepanowi revealed during this study on the blood of freshwater turtles from Morocco, Algeria, and Tunisia, and that already evidenced in [16], we can assume that at least five haemogregarine species are well differentiated in the Maghreb. Based on our phylogenetic tree, H. stepanowi sensu lato was phylogenetically split into five independent lineages in the Southern Mediterranean basin: Haploclades 2, 3, and 5 being restricted to Tunisia, Haploclade 1 to Tunisia and Algeria, and Haploclade 4 to Morocco. From the same mitochondrial marker, three independent lineages within the host P. vogli of South America were also reported [17]. Surprisingly, a fourth molecular lineage infecting the Rio Magdalena River turtle Podocnemis lewyana Duméril was found nested within that complex of haploclades [17], thus suggesting the occurrence of at least four undescribed species infecting two distinct host species (see Figure 3). While levels of COI genetic variations clearly indicate the occurrence of several haemogregarine species within the same host species in sympatry, even in syntopy, which is illustrated by numerous cases of coinfections, it is still extremely difficult to link a particular molecular lineage to a specific morphological species, as also reported in [17]. While the first molecular investigations on Haemogregarina have shown from nuclear markers that H. stepanowi possesses a wide distribution though Europe, Turkey, and the Middle East to Iran with a very low host-specificity [12], the most recent advents in molecular systematics of H. stepanowi have shown that this species could be actually split into a great number of distinct cryptic haemogregarine species [15,19,52,53], infecting E. orbicularis and M. leprosa on the one hand and additional hosts such as M. rivulata and the invasive turtle species Trachemys scripta (Thunberg) [19] on the other. Therefore, one may wonder whether the haemogregarine distribution is correlated to that of its definitive host, namely the Placobdella leech.
Investigating the links between host and parasite diversities to assess evolutionary processes requires well-resolved host and parasite phylogenies. It is also of utmost importance to set up exhaustive sampling procedures as far as possible in order to reduce the biases due to missing data in the field. Regarding leech and haemogregarine phylogenies, while a single leech species was found in Morocco (Haploclade C8), a single haemogregarine species was also evidenced in the same geographical area (Haploclade 4). Neither of these two haploclades were found in Algeria and Tunisia, suggesting a close correspondence between the parasite and its definitive host in Morocco. However, given the technical difficulties encountered in amplifying the COI of the haemoparasites, we did not obtain any information about parasite genotypes infecting turtles in Oued Zat and Oued Sebou localities—while we did for leeches. Additional data would therefore be needed to make conclusions. Concerning the eastern part of the investigated area, Algeria and Tunisia, while a single leech species was found across the sampled turtles (Haploclade C5), three distinct haemogregarine species were evidenced in the same geographical area, i.e., Haploclade 1 in Lac Noir (Algeria), Haploclade 3 in Ghayada (Tunisia), and Haploclade 5 in El Garia (Tunisia). Although none of these parasite haploclades were ever evidenced in Morocco, such as the host haploclade that was restricted to Algeria and Tunisia, it is still difficult to make conclusions regarding a close correspondence between the parasite and its definitive host in the eastern part of Maghreb because of the occurrence of the three distinct parasite lineages. However, it should be noted that no leeches were recovered from El Garia (Tunisia), which prevented linking Parasite Lineage 5 to a particular leech haploclade. Similarly, and as explained above, the difficulties encountered in amplifying the COI of haemogregarines did not allow for the genotyping of parasites in the Algerian Madjen Belhriti, Brabtia, and Lac Tonga, or Tunisian El Hania localities, while the genotypes of leeches were recovered. Additional data should help to provide conclusions regarding strict host (leech) and parasite (haemogregarine) specificity.
Although an Eastern–Western speciation pattern is apparent for both leeches and haemogregarines, with a certain level of geographical host fidelity for parasites, we cannot make definitive conclusions regarding co-speciation patterns between haemoparasites and leeches. The diversity of haemogregarines is the highest in the eastern part of the Maghreb; thus, we may also expect a higher leech diversity in that area, which is currently not the case. For this reason, deeper sampling should be conducted to collect more leeches on the one hand, and in as many localities as possible on the other. Lastly, the genotyping of haemogregarines was performed directly from blood samples of turtles; thus, we recommend that future studies genotype haemogregarines directly from leech blood extracts. Indeed, while host–parasite specificity seems to be very low within turtles, we still cannot reject the hypothesis of a very strict host–parasite specificity within leeches.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, O.V., R.R., M.S.A. and E.H.E.M.; methodology, S.M., L.K., R.R. and O.V.; validation, O.V.; formal analysis, S.M., L.K. and O.V.; data curation, S.M., L.K. and O.V.; writing—original draft preparation, O.V.; writing—review and editing, O.V.; supervision, O.V., R.R., M.S.A. and E.H.E.M.; project administration, O.V.; funding acquisition, O.V. and E.H.E.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was funded by the Fonds Départemental de Coopération Extérieure, 2018, Département des Pyrénées-Orientales, as part of the project “Parasites, émergence des maladies à transmission vectorielle et changement climatique: Conséquences écologiques et évolutives” and by the PHC (Partenariat Hubert Curien) Maghreb project 19MAG50/41431WD.

Data Availability Statement

All sequences were submitted to GenBank under Accession Numbers OR098850 to OR098880 and OR117287 to OR117299.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. O’Donoghue, P. Haemoprotozoa: Making biological sense of molecular phylogenies. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2017, 6, 241–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Siddall, M.E. Phylogeny of Adeleid blood parasites with a partial systematic. Revision of the haemogregarine complex. J. Euk. Microbiol. 1995, 42, 116–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Smith, T.G. The genus Hepatozoon (Apicomplexa: Adeleina). J. Parasitol. 1996, 8, 565–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Criado-Fornelio, A.; Ruas, J.L.; Casado, N.; Farias, N.A.R.; Soares, M.P.; Müller, G.; Brum, J.G.W.; Berne, M.E.A.; Buling-Saraňa, A.; Barba-Carretero, J.C. New molecular data on mammalian Hepatozoon species (Apicomplexa: Adeleorina) from Brazil and Spain. J. Parasitol. 2006, 92, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kopečná, J.; Jirků, M.; Oborník, M.; Tokarev, Y.S.; Lukĕs, J.; Modrỷ, D. Phylogenetic analysis of coccidian parasites from invertebrates: Search for missing links. Protist 2006, 157, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rubini, A.S.; dos Santos Paduan, K.; Perez, R.R.; Ribolla, P.E.M.; O’Dwyer, L.H. Molecular characterization of feline Hepatozoon species from Brazil. Vet. Parasitol. 2006, 137, 168–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Barta, J.R.; Ogedengbe, J.D.; Martin, D.S.; Smith, T.G. Phylogenetic position of the adeleorinid Coccidia (Myzozoa, Apicomplexa, Coccidia, Eucoccidiorida, Adeleorina) inferred using 18S rDNA sequences. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 2012, 59, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kvičerová, J.; Hypša, V.; Dvořáková, N.; Mikulíčeke, P.; Jandzik, D.; Gardner, M.G.; Javanbakht, H.; Tiar, G.; Širokỷ, P. Hemolivia and Hepatozoon: Haemogregarines with tangled evolutionary relationships. Protist 2014, 165, 688–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Netherlands, E.C.; Cook, C.A.; Du Preez, L.H.; Vanhovee, M.P.M.; Brendonck, L.; Smit, N.J. An overview of the Dactylosomatidae (Apicomplexa: Adeleorina: Dactylosomatidae), with the description of Dactylosoma kermiti n. sp. parasitising Ptychadena anchietae and Sclerophrys gutturalis from South Africa. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2020, 11, 246–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zechmeisterová, K.; Prřibyl, M.; Nguyen, H.M.; Nosková, E.; Širokỷ, P. Haemogregarines of the genera Haemogregarina, Hemolivia, and Hepatozoon infecting Vietnamese freshwater turtles, with additional notes on primer specificity and primer-template mismatches affecting diagnostic success. Protist 2022, 173, 125884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Úngari, L.P.; Netherlands, E.C.; Quagliatto Santos, A.L.; de Alcantara, E.P.; da Silva, E.E.R.J.; O’Dwyer, L.H. A new species, Dactylosoma piperis n. sp. (Apicomplexa, Dactylosomatidae), from the pepper frog Leptodactylus labyrinthicus (Anura, Leptodactylidae) from Mato Grosso State, Brazil. Parasite 2020, 27, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Dvořáková, N.; Kvičerová, J.; Papoušek, I.; Javanbakht, H.; Tiar, G.; Kami, H.; Široký, P. Haemogregarines from western Palaearctic freshwater turtles (genera Emys, Mauremys) are conspecific with Haemogregarina stepanowi Danilewsky, 1885. Parasitology 2014, 141, 522–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Arizza, V.; Sacco, F.; Russo, D.; Scardino, R.; Arculeo, M.; Vamberger, M.; Marrone, F. The good, the bad and the ugly: Emys trinacris, Placobdella costata and Haemogregarina stepanowi in Sicily (Testudines, Annelida and Apicomplexa). Folia Parasitol. 2016, 63, 029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Úngari, L.P.; Quagliatto Santos, A.L.; O’Dwyer, L.H.; da Silva, M.R.L.; de Melo Fava, N.N.; Moreira Paiva, G.C.; de Melo Costa Pinto, R.; Cury, M.C. Haemogregarina podocnemis sp. nov.: Description of a new species of Haemogregarina Danilewsky 1885 (Adeleina: Haemogregarinaidae) in free-living and captive yellow-spotted river turtles Podocnemis unifilis (Testudines: Podocnemididae) from Brazil. Parasitol. Res. 2018, 117, 1535–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Attia El Hili, R.; Achouri, M.S.; Verneau, O. The genetic diversity of blood parasites within the freshwater turtles Mauremys leprosa and Emys orbicularis in Tunisia reveals coinfection with Haemogregarina spp. Parasitol. Res. 2020, 119, 3315–3326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. El Hili, R.A.; Achouri, M.S.; Verneau, O. Cytochrome c oxydase I phylogenetic analysis of Haemogregarina parasites (Apicomplexa, Coccidia, Eucoccidiorida, Haemogregarinidae) confirms the presence of three distinct species within the freshwater turtles of Tunisia. Parasitol. Int. 2021, 82, 102306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gutierrez-Liberato, G.A.; Lotta-Arévalo, I.A.; González, L.P.; Vargas-Ramírez, M.; Rodríguez-Fandiňo, O.; Cepeda, A.S.; Ortiz-Moreno, M.L.; Matta, N.E. The genetic and morphological diversity of Haemogregarina infecting turtles in Colombia: Are mitochondrial markers useful as barcodes for these parasites? Infect. Genet. Evol. 2021, 95, 105040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Úngari, L.P.; Quagliatto Santos, A.L.; da Silva, R.J.; O’Dwyer, L.H. Hemogregarine diversity infecting Brazilian turtles with a description of six new species of Haemogregarina (Apicomplexa: Adeleorina: Haemogregarinidae). Diversity 2023, 15, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Maričić, M.; Danon, G.; Faria, J.F.; Harris, D.J. Molecular screening of haemogregarine hemoparasites (Apicomplexa: Adeleorina: Haemogregarinidae) in populations of native and introduced Pond Turtles in Eastern Europe. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Fan, S.L.; de Carle, D.; Kvist, S. Placobdella akahkway n. sp. (Clitellata: Hirudinea: Glossiphoniidae), a new leech species from central Canada. Zootaxa 2022, 5159, 265–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Moser, W.E.; Govedich, F.R.; Oceguera-Figueroa, A.; Richardson, D.J.; Phillips, A.J. Phylum Annelida. Subclass Hirudinida. In Thorp and Covich’s Freshwater Invertebrates: Key to Nearctic Fauna, 4th ed.; Thorp, J.H., Rogers, D.C., Eds.; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 2016; Volume 2, pp. 244–259. [Google Scholar]
  22. Moser, W.E.; Richardson, D.J.; Wheeler, B.A.; Irwin, K.J.; Daniels, B.A.; Trauth, S.E.; Klemm, D.J. Placobdella cryptobranchii (Rhynchobdellida: Glossiphoniidae) on Cryptobranchus alleganiensis bishopi (Ozark Hellbender) in Arkansas and Missouri. Comp. Parasitol. 2008, 75, 98–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Schulz, C.A.; Thomas, M.V.; Fitzgerald, S.; Faisal, M. Leeches (Annelida: Hirudinida) parasitizing fish of lake St. Clair, Michigan, U.S.A. Comp. Parasitol. 2011, 78, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Moser, W.E.; Klemm, D.J.; Richardson, D.J.; Wheeler, B.A.; Trauth, S.E.; Daniels, B.A. Leeches (Annelida: Hirudinida) of Northern Arkansas. JAAS 2006, 60, 84–95. [Google Scholar]
  25. Moser, W.E.; Richardson, D.J.; McAllister, C.T.; Briggler, J.T.; Hammond, C.I.; Trauth, S.E. New host and distribution records of the leech Placobdella multilineata Moore, 1953 (Hirudinida:Glossiphoniidae). JAAS 2014, 68, 163–166. [Google Scholar]
  26. Johnson, G.M.; Klemm, D.J. A new species of leech, Batracobdella cryptobranchii n. sp. (Annelida: Hirudinea), parasitic on the Ozark hellbender. Trans. Am. Micros. Soc. 1977, 96, 327–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Moser, W.E.; Briggler, J.T.; Richardson, D.J.; Schuette, C.D.; Hammond, C.I.; Hopkins, W.A.; Lazo-Wasem, E.A. Redescription and molecular characterization of Placobdella cryptobranchii (Johnson & Klemm, 1977) (Glossiphoniidae, Hirudinida). ZooKeys 2013, 338, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hopkins, W.A.; Moser, W.E.; Garst, D.W.; Richardson, D.J.; Hammond, C.I.; Lazo-Wasem, E.A. Morphological and molecular characterization of a new species of leech (Glossiphoniidae, Hirudinida): Implications for the health of its imperiled amphibian host (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis). ZooKeys 2014, 378, 83–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Soors, J.; Mertens, J.; Moser, W.E.; Richardson, D.J.; Hammond, C.I.; Lazo-Wasem, E.A. Molecular confirmation of the North American leech Placobdella ornata (Verrill, 1872) (Hirudinida: Glossiphoniidae) in Europe. BioInvasions Rec. 2015, 4, 185–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bielecki, A.; Cichocka, J.M.; Jabloński, A.; Jeleń, I.; Ropelewska, E.; Biedunkiewicz, A.; Terlecki, J.; Nowakowski, J.J.; Szlachciak, J. Coexistence of Placobdella costata (Fr. Müller, 1846) (Hirudinida: Glossiphoniidae) and mud turtle Emys orbicularis. Biologia 2012, 67, 731–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fediras, S.; Rouag, R.; Ziane, N.; Olivier, A.; Béchet, A.; Benyacoub, S. Prevalence of Placobdella costata (Fr. Mûller, 1846) (Hirudinida: Glossiphoniidae) on the European pond turtle (Emys orbicularis) in northeast Algeria. Herpetol. Notes 2017, 10, 3–8. [Google Scholar]
  32. Yadollahvand, R.; Kami, H.G. Habitat changes and its impacts on the Caspian Pond Turtle (Mauremys caspica) population in the Golestan and Mazandaran provinces of Iran. J. Aquac. Res. Dev. 2014, 5, 1000232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Bashirichelkasari, N.; Yadollahvandmiandoab, R. Placobdella costata an ectoparasite for Mauremys caspica in North of Iran. J. Aquac. Res. Dev. 2017, 8, 1000506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Marrone, F.; Sacco, F.; Kehlmaier, C.; Arizza, V.; Arculeo, M. Some like it cold: The glossiphoniid parasites of the Sicilian endemic pond turtle Emys trinacris (Testudines, Emydidae), an example of ‘parasite inertia’? J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 2016, 54, 60–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Romero, D.; Duarte, J.; Narváez-Ledesma, L.; Farfán, M.A.; Real, R. Presence of the leech Placobdella costata in the south of the Iberian Peninsula. Acta Parasitol. 2014, 59, 259–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Domínguez, J.; Villarán, A. Presencia de hirudíneos sobre Mauremys leprosa. Bol. Asoc. Herpetol. Esp. 2017, 28, 17–22. [Google Scholar]
  37. Laghzaoui, E.-M.; Abbad, A.; El Mouden, E.H. Host-parasite association of Placobdella costata (Glossiphoniidae: Hirudinea) and Mauremys leprosa (Geoemydidae: Testudinoidea) in aquatic ecosystems of Morocco. Parasitol. Res. 2020, 119, 3459–3467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. De Carle, D.; Oceguera-Figueroa, A.; Tessler, M.; Siddall, M.E.; Kvist, S. Phylogenetic analysis of Placobdella (Hirudinea: Rhynchobdellida: Glossiphoniidae) with consideration of COI variation. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2017, 114, 234–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kvist, S.; Utevsky, S.; Marrone, F.; Ben Ahmed, R.; Gajda, Ł.; Grosser, C.; Huseynov, M.; Jueg, U.; Khomenko, A.; Oceguera-Figueroa, A.; et al. Extensive sampling sheds light on species-level diversity in Palearctic Placobdella (Annelida: Clitellata: Glossiphoniiformes). Hydrobiologia 2022, 849, 1239–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Vecchioni, L.; Marrone, F.; Liuzzo, M.; Seglie, D.; Cavalcante, R.; Bazan, G.; Arizza, V.; Arculeo, M. New molecular data attest to the absence of cospeciation patterns between Placobdella costata (Fr. Müller, 1846) (Hirudinea) and freshwater turtles (Emys spp.) in Italy. Eur. Zool. J. 2021, 88, 959–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dvořáková, N.; Kvičerová, J.; Hostovský, M.; Široký, P. Haemogregarines of freshwater turtles from Southeast Asia with a description of Haemogregarina sacaliae sp. n. and a redescription of Haemogregarina pellegrini Laveran and Pettit, 1910. Parasitology 2015, 142, 816–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Thompson, J.D.; Higgins, D.G.; Gibson, T.J. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22, 4673–4680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Posada, D.; Crandall, K.A. Modeltest: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 1998, 14, 817–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Huelsenbeck, J.P.; Ronquist, F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 2001, 17, 754–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Stöver, B.C.; Müller, K.F. TreeGraph 2: Combining and visualizing evidence from different phylogenetic analyses. BMC Bioinform. 2010, 11, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Swofford, D.L. PAUP*, Version 4.0 b10; Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (* and Other Methods); Sinauer: Sunderland, MA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  48. Nei, M.; Kumar, S. Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  49. Kimura, M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 1980, 16, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Beddek, M.; Zenboudji-Beddek, S.; Geniez, P.; Fathalla, R.; Sourouille, P.; Arnal, V.; Dellaoui, B.; Koudache, F.; Telailia, S.; Peyre, O.; et al. Comparative phylogeography of amphibians and reptiles in Algeria suggests common causes for the east-west phylogeographic breaks in the Maghreb. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0201218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fritz, U.; Barata, M.; Busack, S.D.; Fritzsch, G.; Castilho, R. Impact of mountain chains, sea straits and peripheral populations on genetic and taxonomic structure of a freshwater turtle, Mauremys leprosa (Reptilia, Testudines, Geoemydidae). Zool. Scr. 2006, 35, 97–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Laghzaoui, E.-M.; Perera, A.; Harris, D.J.; El Mouden, E.H. Characterization and identification of haemogregarine hemoparasites (Apicomplexa: Adeleina: Hpatozoidae) in natural populations of Mauremys leprosa leprosa and M. leprosa saharica from Morocco. Syst. Parasitol. 2021, 98, 547–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Harris, D.J.; Damas-Moreira, I.; Velo-Antoón, G.; Cordero-Rivera, A.; Perera, A. Blood parasite diversity (Apicomplexa: Haemogregarinidae) within the western populations of the European pond turtle Emys orbicularis. Syst. Parasitol. 2022, 99, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Microorganisms 11 01584 g001 550
Figure 1. Distribution map of localities (1 to 34) where turtles were collected for haemogregarines. Yellow dots indicate field stations where leeches were found attached to limbs of turtles; blue dots indicate the absence of leeches. GPS coordinates are depicted in Table 1.
Figure 1. Distribution map of localities (1 to 34) where turtles were collected for haemogregarines. Yellow dots indicate field stations where leeches were found attached to limbs of turtles; blue dots indicate the absence of leeches. GPS coordinates are depicted in Table 1.
Microorganisms 11 01584 g001
Microorganisms 11 01584 g002 550
Figure 2. Bayesian phylogram inferred from analysis of COI, representing the phylogenetic relationships of Placobdella costata sensu lato. Only nodes which support posterior probabilities higher than 0.75 are shown. Values next to branches for P. costata (bold face) indicate, from left to right, Bayesian posterior probabilities, parsimony, and distance bootstrap proportions.
Figure 2. Bayesian phylogram inferred from analysis of COI, representing the phylogenetic relationships of Placobdella costata sensu lato. Only nodes which support posterior probabilities higher than 0.75 are shown. Values next to branches for P. costata (bold face) indicate, from left to right, Bayesian posterior probabilities, parsimony, and distance bootstrap proportions.
Microorganisms 11 01584 g002
Microorganisms 11 01584 g003 550
Figure 3. Bayesian phylogram inferred from analysis of COI, representing the phylogenetic relationships of Haemogregarina stepanowi sensu lato. Only nodes which support posterior probabilities higher than 0.75 are shown. Values next to branches for H. stepanowi (bold face) indicate, from left to right, Bayesian posterior probabilities, parsimony, and distance bootstrap proportions.
Figure 3. Bayesian phylogram inferred from analysis of COI, representing the phylogenetic relationships of Haemogregarina stepanowi sensu lato. Only nodes which support posterior probabilities higher than 0.75 are shown. Values next to branches for H. stepanowi (bold face) indicate, from left to right, Bayesian posterior probabilities, parsimony, and distance bootstrap proportions.
Microorganisms 11 01584 g003
Table
Table 1. Sampling localities of M. leprosa and E. orbicularis, leeches, and their haemogregarines.
Table 1. Sampling localities of M. leprosa and E. orbicularis, leeches, and their haemogregarines.
Regional LocalityCountryGPS CoordinatesTurtle SpeciesNumber of Turtles ExaminedPresence of LeechNumber of Turtles InfectedPrevalence of Infection (%)
Oued Ksob (1)Morocco31°27′50.72″ N/9°45′13.94″ WM. leprosa25+00
Ain Lahjar (2)Morocco31°38′44.80″ N/9°35′06.69″ WM. leprosa5−00
Oued Tensift (3)Morocco31°44′16.08″ N/8°21′36.68″ WM. leprosa13−00
Dar Bouaza (4)Morocco33°32′42.03″ N/7°45′42.49″ WM. leprosa10+00
Oued Zat (5)Morocco31°32′34.40″ N/7°37′13.20″ WM. leprosa21+1361.9
Bzou (6)Morocco32°04′11.60″ N/7°02′29.40″ WM. leprosa30−1963.3
Oued Tissakht (7)Morocco32°00′39.10″ N/6°42′55.00″ WM. leprosa6−00
Oued Tigrigra (8)Morocco33°25′07.10″ N/5°16′29.40″ WM. leprosa20+1680
Lac Zerouka (9)Morocco33°32′52.31″ N/5°05′44.98″ WM. leprosa20−00
Dayet Aoua (10)Morocco33°38′57.52″ N/5°00′46.68″ WM. leprosa26−00
Oued Boukrareb (11)Morocco34°04′29.92″ N/4°56′21.56″ WM. leprosa9−111.1
Oued Sebou (12)Morocco34°04′0.91″ N/4°54′35.98″ WM. leprosa20+840
Madjen Belhriti (13)Algeria36°26′09.0″ N/7°05′12.00″ EM. leprosa10+550
Lac Cité Rym (14)Algeria36°52′43.0″ N/7°43′36.00″ EE. orbicularis2+00
Ben Amar (15)Algeria36°46′59.98″ N/7°47′59.99″ EM. leprosa8−225
E. orbicularis4−250
Lac des oiseaux (16)Algeria36°46′44.00″ N/8°07′21.68″ EM. leprosa1−00
Lac noir (17)Algeria36°51′17.00″ N/8°12′20.00″ EM. leprosa12+541.6
Brabtia (18)Algeria36°51′09.00″ N/8°19′52.00″ EM. leprosa16+531.2
E. orbicularis4−375
Oued Bou Hchicha (19)Algeria36°48′47.00″ N/8°24′11.00″ EE. orbicularis1+00
Lac Tonga (20)Algeria36°51′37.00″ N/8°29′52.00″ EM. leprosa4−375
E. orbicularis5+360
Ouechtata (21)Tunisia36°56′52.04″ N/9°00′14.50″ EM. leprosa13−00
Nefza (22)Tunisia36°59′46.06″ N/9°04′56.56″ EM. leprosa11−00
Ghayadha (23)Tunisia36°59′48.36″ N/9°04′25.71″ EM. leprosa10+660
Bou Rouis (24)Tunisia36°09′35.40″ N/9°07′20.14″ EM. leprosa8−00
El Hania (25)Tunisia37°05′55.40″ N/9°13′17.19″ EM. leprosa12+758.3
Ain El Melha (26)Tunisia36°04′42.27″ N/9°17′47.90″ EM. leprosa12−00
Oued Silian (27)Tunisia36°06′40.96″ N/9°23′0.45″ EM. leprosa12−00
Béni Toun (28)Tunisia37°11′32.55″ N/9°43′14.54″ EM. leprosa15+00
Menzel Bourguiba (29)Tunisia37°08′29.29″ N/9°48′17.53″ EM. leprosa13−00
El Alia (30)Tunisia37°11′19.10″ N/10°02′06.75″ EM. leprosa14−00
El Garia (31)Tunisia37°13′18.26″ N/10°03′12.56″ EM. leprosa12−866.6
Kalaate Andalouss (32)Tunisia37°04′17.64″ N/10°07′11.50″ EM. leprosa11−00
Bou Achir (33)Tunisia36°27′28.24″ N/10°21′05.52″ EM. leprosa3−00
Oued Chiba (34)Tunisia36°39′10.59″ N/10°54′31.59″ EM. leprosa4−00
Note: Numbers in brackets refer to localities mapped in Figure 1.
Table
Table 2. Genetic diversity of leeches.
Table 2. Genetic diversity of leeches.
Regional LocalityLeech Sample CodeTurtle SpeciesTurtle Sample CodeLeech 12S GenBank Accession NumberHaplocladeHaplotype
Oued Ksob (1)MiAPL-7 *M. leprosaMl-57OR098850 *C8C8a
Oued KsobMiAPL-8M. leprosaMl-74OR098851C8C8a
Oued KsobMiAPL-27M. leprosaMl-63OR098852C8C8a
Oued KsobMiAPL-28M. leprosaMl-68OR098853C8C8a
Oued Zat (5)MiAPL-10M. leprosaMl-113OR098854C8C8a
Oued Tigrigra (8)MiAPL-1 *M. leprosaMl-151OR098855 *C8C8b
Oued TigrigraMiAPL-12M. leprosaMl-157OR098856C8C8b
Oued TigrigraMiAPL-16M. leprosaMl-152OR098857C8C8b
Oued TigrigraMiAPL-30 *M. leprosaMl-163OR098858 *C8C8c
Oued Sebou (12)MiAPL-2M. leprosaMl-175OR098859C8C8a
Oued SebouMiAPL-13M. leprosaMl-168OR098860C8C8a
Madjen Belhriti (13)MiAPL-39M. leprosaMl-11OR098861C5C5b
Madjen BelhritiMiAPL-40M. leprosaMl-4OR098862C5C5b
Lac Cité Rym (14)MiAPL-33E. orbicularisEo-1OR098863C5C5b
Lac Noir (17)MiAPL-32M. leprosaMl-20OR098864C5C5b
Lac NoirMiAPL-34M. leprosaMl-22OR098865C5C5b
Lac NoirMiAPL-35M. leprosaMl-22OR098866C5C5b
Lac NoirMiAPL-36M. leprosaMl-22OR098867C5C5b
Lac NoirMiAPL-37M. leprosaMl-7OR098868C5C5b
Brabtia (18)MiAPL-17M. leprosaMl-13OR098869C5C5a
Oued Bou Hchicha (19)MiAPL-18E. orbicularisEo-1OR098870C5C5b
Lac Tonga (20)MiAPL-15 *M. leprosaMl-4OR098871 *C5C5b
Lac TongaMiAPL-41 *E. orbicularisEo-3OR098872 *C5C5c
Lac TongaMiAPL-42E. orbicularisEo-3OR098873C5C5b
Lac TongaMiAPL-43E. orbicularisEo-7OR098874C5C5b
Lac TongaMiAPL-44E. orbicularisEo-1OR098875C5C5b
Ghayadha (23)MiAPL-21M. leprosaMl-102OR098876C5C5a
GhayadhaMiAPL-22 *M. leprosaMl-108OR098877 *C5C5a
El Hania (25)MiAPL-23M. leprosaMl-116OR098878C5C5a
El HaniaMiAPL-24M. leprosaMl-119OR098879C5C5a
Béni Toun (28)MiAPL-19M. leprosaMl-75OR098880C5C5b
Note: Numbers in brackets refer to localities mapped in Figure 1; * sequences used for phylogenetic analyses.
Table
Table 3. Genetic diversity of haemogregarines.
Table 3. Genetic diversity of haemogregarines.
Regional LocalityHaemogregarines Sample CodeTurtle SpeciesTurtles Sample CodeCOI GenBank Accession NumberHaplocladeHaplotype
Bzou (6)MiAJ3 *M. leprosaMl-35OR117287 *44a
BzouMiAJ4M. leprosaMl-36OR11728844a
BzouMiAJ5M. leprosaMl-37OR11728944a
BzouMiAJ93M. leprosaMl-24OR11729044a
BzouMiAJ94M. leprosaMl-22OR11729144a
Oued Tigrigra (8)MiAJ7 *M. leprosaMl-155OR117292 *44b
Oued TigrigraMiAJ10 *M. leprosaMl-158OR117293 *44c
Oued TigrigraMiAJ91 *M. leprosaMl-148OR117294 *44d
Lac Noir (17)MiAM17 *M. leprosaMl-11OR117295 *11c
Ghayadha (24)MiAK47 *M. leprosaMl-105OR117296 *33g
GhayadhaMiAK54 *M. leprosaMl-102OR117297 *33h
GhayadhaMiAK51 *M. leprosaMl-106OR117298 *33i
El Garia (31)MiAK-45 *M. leprosaMl-93OR117299 *55a
Note: Numbers in brackets refer to localities mapped in Figure 1; * sequences used for phylogenetic analyses.
Table
Table 4. Pairwise p-distances within haploclades of Placobdella rugosa and Placobdella costata sensu lato.
Table 4. Pairwise p-distances within haploclades of Placobdella rugosa and Placobdella costata sensu lato.
HaplocladesMinimum DistanceMaximum DistanceAverage Distance ± SD
P. rugosa0.00150.01820.009 ± 0.0042
Placobdella costata sensu lato
(C1 + C7)0.00000.01670.0109 ± 0.0055
C3NANANA
C40.00300.0030NA
C50.00150.00620.0030 ± 0.0013
C60.00160.02350.0144 ± 0.0083
C80.00000.00610.0035 ± 0.0026
Note: NA = not available.
Table
Table 5. Pairwise p-distances between haploclades of Placobdella costata sensu lato.
Table 5. Pairwise p-distances between haploclades of Placobdella costata sensu lato.
HaplocladesMinimum DistanceMaximum DistanceAverage Distance ± SD
(C1 + C7)/C30.05350.06050.0565 ± 0.0027
(C1 + C7)/C40.06070.06990.0662 ± 0.0028
(C1 + C7)/C50.05560.07380.0647 ± 0.0047
(C1 + C7)/C60.04440.05620.0517 ± 0.0030
(C1 + C7)/C80.05330.05620.0525 ± 0.0023
C3/C40.06690.07010.0685 ± 0.0016
C3/C50.07970.08280.0815 ± 0.0010
C3/C60.05560.06370.0610 ± 0.0040
C3/C80.05890.05900.0589 ± 0.0000
C4/C50.06990.07560.0724 ± 0.0018
C4/C60.05170.05810.0547 ± 0.0019
C4/C80.05320.05630.0547 ± 0.0015
C5/C60.05330.06030.0566 ± 0.0021
C5/C80.05320.06130.0571 ± 0.0023
C6/C80.03950.04710.0419 ± 0.0022
Table
Table 6. Pairwise p-distances within haploclades of Haemogregarina stepanowi sensu lato.
Table 6. Pairwise p-distances within haploclades of Haemogregarina stepanowi sensu lato.
HaplocladesMinimum DistanceMaximum DistanceAverage Distance ± SD
10.00270.01090.0070 ± 0.0032
30.00270.01110.0043 ± 0.0029
40.00480.02880.0161 ± 0.0129
Table
Table 7. Pairwise p-distances between haploclades of Haemogregarina stepanowi sensu lato.
Table 7. Pairwise p-distances between haploclades of Haemogregarina stepanowi sensu lato.
HaplocladesMinimum DistanceMaximum DistanceAverage Distance ± SD
1/20.06940.07000.0726 ± 0.0045
1/30.06020.07900.0693 ± 0.0046
1/40.07430.09290.0842 ± 0.0058
1/50.07050.07140.0706 ± 0.0004
2/30.07230.08760.0808 ± 0.0048
2/40.06730.07420.0702 ± 0.0024
2/50.07310.0731NA
3/40.06670.09110.0821 ± 0.0060
3/50.06320.07050.0671 ± 0.0025
4/50.06790.07590.0720 ± 0.0029
Note: NA = not available.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Verneau, O.; Melliti, S.; Kimdil, L.; El Mouden, E.H.; Achouri, M.S.; Rouag, R. Molecular Phylogenies of Leeches and Haemoparasites Infecting Freshwater Turtles in Aquatic Ecosystems of Northern Africa Suggest Phylogenetic Congruence between Placobdella costata Sensu Lato and Haemogregarina stepanowi Sensu Lato. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1584. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11061584

AMA Style

Verneau O, Melliti S, Kimdil L, El Mouden EH, Achouri MS, Rouag R. Molecular Phylogenies of Leeches and Haemoparasites Infecting Freshwater Turtles in Aquatic Ecosystems of Northern Africa Suggest Phylogenetic Congruence between Placobdella costata Sensu Lato and Haemogregarina stepanowi Sensu Lato. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(6):1584. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11061584

Chicago/Turabian Style

Verneau, Olivier, Sirine Melliti, Latifa Kimdil, El Hassan El Mouden, Mohamed Sghaier Achouri, and Rachid Rouag. 2023. "Molecular Phylogenies of Leeches and Haemoparasites Infecting Freshwater Turtles in Aquatic Ecosystems of Northern Africa Suggest Phylogenetic Congruence between Placobdella costata Sensu Lato and Haemogregarina stepanowi Sensu Lato" Microorganisms 11, no. 6: 1584. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11061584

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop