Next Article in Journal
Changes in Lake Sturgeon Gut Microbiomes Relative to Founding Origin and in Response to Chemotherapeutant Treatments
Next Article in Special Issue
Diversity, Abundance and Leishmania infantum Infection Rate of Phlebotomine Sandflies in an Area with Low Incidence of Visceral Leishmaniasis in Northern Tunisia
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of a Novel Chromogenic Medium for the Detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Respiratory Samples from Patients with Cystic Fibrosis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Culicoides segnis and Culicoides pictipennis Biting Midges (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae), New Reported Vectors of Haemoproteus Parasites
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Parasite Load of Trypanosoma cruzi Modulates Feeding and Defecation Patterns of the Chagas Disease Vector Triatoma infestans

by
Francisco Chacón
1,2,†,
Antonella Bacigalupo
1,3,†,
Bárbara Álvarez-Duhart
1,
Pedro E. Cattan
1,
Rigoberto Solís
1,* and
Catalina Muñoz-San Martín
4,5,*
1
Laboratorio de Ecología, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8820808, Chile
2
Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias Silvoagropecuarias y Veterinarias, Campus Sur, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8820808, Chile
3
Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
4
Escuela de Medicina Veterinaria, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Bernardo O’Higgins, Santiago 8370854, Chile
5
Núcleo de Investigaciones Aplicadas en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas, Universidad de las Américas, Campus Providencia, Santiago 7500975, Chile
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Microorganisms 2022, 10(5), 1003; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10051003
Submission received: 14 March 2022 / Revised: 4 May 2022 / Accepted: 5 May 2022 / Published: 10 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vector-Parasite Relationships)

Abstract

:
Trypanosoma cruzi is the causal agent of Chagas disease, a parasitic zoonosis transmitted mainly through the feces of triatomine insects. Triatoma infestans is the main triatomine vector of this disease in South America. Previous research has shown that T. cruzi infection modifies the behavior of triatomines. We evaluated, for the first time, the effect of parasite load on feeding and defecation behavior, which we quantified by using real-time PCR. The detection time of the host was shorter in infected individuals, and the number of bites increased, while the dejection time was reduced when compared with the non-infected group. A significant correlation between the parasite load and the behavioral changes registered in the infected triatomines was found. These results would indicate that the intensity of T. cruzi infection modulates the feeding and defecation behavior of T. infestans, increasing the vector competence of this triatomine vector.

1. Introduction

Parasites can cause a wide range of behavioral modifications in hosts [1]. Performance modifications of vector feeding appear to be a common strategy to improve parasite circulation in many host–hematophagous vector associations [2]. Chagas disease is caused by the flagellated protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi (Chagas, 1909) (Trypanosomatida: Trypanosomatidae), which is transmitted mainly through the dejections of triatomine insects (Hemiptera: Reduviidae), commonly known as kissing bugs [3]. Triatomines are primarily hematophagous, feeding on the species available in their habitat, and their most studied behavior relates to orientation towards the host, ingestion of blood, and defecation [4,5]. In triatomines, the search for a blood meal is related to the detection of the host’s main signals, odors and heat [6,7], activating their appetitive search and orientation. Water vapor constitutes a short-range orientation cue [8] along with other chemical signals, especially carbon dioxide, which can stimulate triatomines to be attracted to and follow a concentration gradient [9,10]. Odors and heat are also used by triatomines to locate the host’s blood vessels [6,7]. Triatoma infestans (Klug, 1834) is a triatomine insect that feeds more quickly than other triatomine species, with higher rates of blood ingestion, resulting in better blood-feeding efficiency [11]. Additionally, T. infestans is one of the triatomine species that is characterized by defecating during or shortly after blood ingestion [12].
Trypanosoma cruzi infects the host through skin wounds, such as those caused by triatomine bites, directly through mucous membranes [13], and by oral transmission due to contamination of food and drinks with triatomines or their dejections, the latter mode of transmission being increasingly reported in certain areas of Latin America [14]. The vectorial transmission of the parasite to vertebrates would be impaired if the vector leaves the host before defecating, so the time that the triatomine takes to excrete its first dejection is important from an epidemiological point of view [15,16]. Prolonged feeding increases the contact time between the host and the vector, increasing the probability of T. cruzi acquisition by the triatomine contact between the parasite and the host [16]; its downside is the enhanced chance of predation by the host of the vector, which in turn could result in oral transmission of T. cruzi [17].
Previous evidence shows that triatomines exhibit changes in feeding and defecation behavior that is associated with their infection status. Trypanosoma cruzi-infected T. infestans defecate in half the time and in greater quantity than non-infected ones [15]. Infected Mepraia spinolai (Porter, 1934) detects the host in half the time, increases the number of bites, and defecates earlier than in non-infected individuals [18]. In contrast, T. cruzi-infected Rhodnius prolixus (Stal, 1859) nymphs feed less frequently than non-infected nymphs [19]. In R. prolixus, Triatoma pallidipennis (Stal, 1872), Triatoma longipennis (Usinger, 1939), M. spinolai, and T. infestans, there are also reports on modification of their locomotor behavior [20,21,22,23,24].
Classically, T. cruzi load was quantified by counting parasites in a Neubauer chamber with a microscope. In a study comparing two groups of T. pallidipennis that were infected with different strains of T. cruzi, differences were observed in the parasite load, fertility rates, and body size [25]. Another study that quantified T. cruzi by Neubauer counting observed that T. infestans singly infected with epimastigotes or trypomastigotes of four different strains of T. cruzi, belonging to three discrete typing units (DTU), resulted in different parasite loads for each strain throughout the digestive tract [26]. The use of molecular assays based on a quantitative technique such as real-time PCR allows for a more sensitive analysis than conventional parasitological techniques, since it is capable of specifically amplifying the parasite DNA sequence [27,28]; the highly conserved satellite DNA is used as a target for amplification in T. cruzi, providing accurate measurements of the parasite load [29,30]. Using real-time PCR, the T. cruzi load was quantified in each segment of the intestine of R. prolixus, showing differences in the loads depending on the days post-infection: After two weeks, the load in the anterior midgut decreased to a few dozen parasites; in contrast, in the posterior midgut and in the hindgut, the loads remained constant at 103 and 104 parasite equivalents, respectively [31]. Likewise, an increase in T. cruzi parasite load was observed by performing real-time PCR in fifth instar nymphs of R. prolixus, depending on antioxidant treatments, showing a significant increase in the posterior midgut and rectum when using N-acetylcysteine and urate [32]. Trypanosoma cruzi load has also been quantified from dejection samples of xenodiagnosis of T. infestans by real-time PCR, evaluating the groups of microscopically negative and positive xenodiagnosis samples separately, obtaining on average 15 and 752 par-eq/mL, respectively [33].
Triatoma infestans presents high adaptability to the domiciliary environment [3,34]; it is considered to be the main vector of Chagas disease in Brazil, Argentina, Bolivia, Uruguay, Perú, Paraguay, and Chile. In Chile, it is mostly limited to sylvatic environments due to the control of domiciliary vectors by the “Initiative for the Elimination of T. infestans in the Southern Cone Countries” [35,36]. Chile, Uruguay, and Brazil have already certified the interruption of the domiciliary vector transmission by this species [37], but it continues to be a relevant Chagas disease vector in other countries without those levels of control.
So far, there are no previous reports of the relation between the parasite load of T. cruzi and the feeding and defecation behavior of T. infestans. In this study, we evaluated the behavior of the feeding and defecation activity of T. infestans according to T. cruzi infection status, and we tested if there is a relation between behavioral changes and the parasite load in these vectors.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Triatomine Insects

Triatoma infestans specimens were obtained from the Laboratorio de Ecología, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias, Universidad de Chile, where a colony of insects was maintained under controlled environmental conditions (light/dark cycles of 12 h each, 25 ± 2 °C, 70 ± 10% relative humidity and monthly feeding).

2.2. Mammal Hosts Infection

Fifteen naturally infected Octodon degus (Molina, 1782) (Rodentia: Octodontidae) were used as hosts to generate part of the infected T. infestans group, which was authorized by the Bioethics Committee of the Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias, Universidad de Chile (protocol N° 18169-VET-UCH). These rodents are frequently found to be infected by T. cruzi [38,39,40]. They were captured from reported foci of T. infestans and M. spinolai, in the Valparaíso region [41], using Rodentrap™ live-traps baited with rolled oats, and provided with cotton bedding, which was authorized by the Servicio Agrícola y Ganadero (SAG permit 3242/2017), and their infection status was confirmed at the time of capture by real-time PCR as described [42], 18 months before this experiment, so that all the individuals were considered as chronically infected, given that they were not exposed to infected vectors during that period.
Three Mus musculus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Rodentia: Muridae) of the BALB/c strain, from the Bioterio Central, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, were used as acutely infected hosts under laboratory conditions to generate the rest of the infected T. infestans group, which was authorized by the Bioethics Committee of the Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile (protocol N° 19262-MED-UCH). The infection process of the mice consisted of an intraperitoneal inoculation of the Dm28c strain (DTU TcI) of T. cruzi obtained from cell cultures (Vero cells, 60–70% confluence) as previously described [43], at a concentration of 1000 parasites in 100 microliters of RPMI 1640 medium (Biological Industries™, Beit Haemek, Israel). Infection of the mice was confirmed by the inspection of blood samples by light microscopy using a Neubauer chamber, measuring the concentration and viability of parasites from day 7 post-infection until reaching ranges between 80,000 and 500,000 parasites/mL.
Rodent hosts were kept in mesh-covered acrylic cages, with food and water ad libitum, and wood chips as bedding, with a room temperature of 20 to 25 °C and relative humidity between 40 and 70%.

2.3. Triatomine Infection

We fed two groups of T. infestans on infected rodents: One group was composed of 39 third instar and 17 fourth instar nymphs that were fed on naturally infected O. degus, and the second group was composed of 26 fifth instar nymphs that were fed on experimentally infected M. musculus. The hosts were anesthetized during the feeding of triatomines as described [24].
The control group consisted of 26 third instar nymphs fed on four non-infected M. musculus. This group was complemented by those individuals that, after feeding on an infected host, did not acquire the infection (as measured by real-time PCR).
Nymphal instars were determined following Brewer et al. [44], without differentiation by sex, since it is only possible to differentiate them visually in alive T. infestans adults. Each triatomine was individually maintained in labeled plastic jars with perforated lids, with folded paper as a shelter, within a climatic chamber with controlled environmental conditions: Light/dark cycles of 12 h each, temperature of 27 ± 1 °C, and 70 ± 10% relative humidity.
All triatomine insects used in this study were subjected to a behavioral analysis of their locomotor activity for 24 h, as reported [24]. After that, each insect was returned to its individual plastic jar in the climatic chamber and was maintained there for 5 ± 2 days before starting the feeding and defecation activity experiments.

2.4. Feeding and Defecation Activity

The triatomine behavioral experiments were performed in a square glass experimental arena (24 × 16 × 6.5 cm) provided with white filter paper at the bottom. Experiments were performed by maintaining 25 ± 2 °C, 40 ± 10% relative humidity, were always performed during the morning (9–11 a.m.), by keeping a distance of more than 1 m from the experimental arena, and by always using mask, gloves, goggles, and appropriate clothing to minimize the interaction with the insects. Each triatomine was weighed on an analytical balance (±0.0001 g), before being introduced into the experimental arena. Non-infected white M. musculus were anesthetized with ketamine (100 mg/kg)/xylazine (10 mg/kg) and used as a blood source [45]. One mouse was positioned at the center of the experimental arena. The starting point of the triatomine in the arena was randomly assigned among nine quadrants before each of the experiments. After a 2 min period of habituation of the triatomine, in which the insect remained movement-restricted on the arena using a 3 cm diameter opaque tubular container, the container was removed, marking the start of the recording. The movements of the insect were recorded on video until the triatomine deposited the dejection (Figure 1) or until 60 min were completed, whichever occurred first. The triatomine was weighed again and returned to its labeled container. The video record was captured to 30 FPS at a resolution of 1080 pixels using a Sony CX130 camera, with an indirect light source (40 w bulb–65 lux) to avoid shadows, and frame-by-frame analysis was performed in Windows 10 © (Microsoft Corp, Redmon, WC, USA) with Vegas pro 18 ® (Sony Corp, Tokyo, Japan) and VLC media player 3.0 ® (VideoLAN Org, Paris, France) software. During the recording, the same person was present near the arena, always in the same location, and observing the experiment, to monitor both the mouse anesthesia and the duration of the experiment.
Based on methods previously used in the analysis of feeding and defecation activity patterns of M. spinolai and T. infestans [15,18], the following data were obtained:
Regarding the feeding activity, the variables measured were:
(I) Host detection: Time elapsed—in seconds—since the triatomine begins to mobilize in the arena until the moment when the insect starts walking towards the host;
(II) First approach: Time elapsed—in seconds—between the moment when the insect starts walking towards the host and when it takes the first bite, i.e., pierces the skin of the mouse with the stylet;
(III) Number of bites: Total number of bites performed;
(IV) Feeding time: Time elapsed—in seconds—between the first bite and the end of blood intake of the last bite, including the intervals between bites, when the vector detached from the host.
(V) Weight difference: Subtraction of the initial weight (before starting the experiment) from the final weight (after dejection or at 60 min from the start, whichever occurred first), in milligrams.
The variables regarding the defecation activity were:
(VI) Distance of the dejection: Distance to the host of the released dejection, in centimeters.
(VII) Defecation time: Time elapsed—in seconds—between the end of the blood intake and the start of the dejection release.

2.5. Quantification of Trypanosoma Cruzi DNA

The triatomines were euthanized by freezing immediately after finishing the feeding and defecation experiment. DNA extraction, detection, and quantification were performed as previously described [24]: T. cruzi was quantified using its nuclear satellite DNA as a target, with primers Cruzi 1 (5′-ASTCGGCTGATCGTTTTCGA-3′) and Cruzi 2 (5′-AATTCCTCCAAGCAGCGGATA-3′) [28]; the endogenous control targeting the conserved region of rDNA of T. infestans was quantified using primers 18S For (5′-TCCTTCGTGCTAGGAATTGG-3′) and 18S Rev (5′-GTACAAAGGGCAGGGACGTA-3′ [46].

2.6. Statistical Analyses

Each variable was tested for normality using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and for homogeneity of variance using the Levene test. We used the Kruskal–Wallis test and the Dunn test for pairwise multiple-comparisons, adjusted by the Bonferroni correction for detecting differences among nymphal instars. We applied the Mann–Whitney U test to analyze the differences between infected and non-infected T. infestans. We assessed the correlation between the parasite load and each behavioral variable with the Spearman test. For all tests, a 95% confidence interval (α = 0.05) was used in IBM SPSS Statistics v26 software. For figures, outliers were calculated as previously reported in Chacón et al. (2022) [24].

3. Results

After applying the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, the results indicated that the data were not normally distributed, both for the variables measuring feeding activity and defecation activity (Table S1). Subsequently, we applied non-parametric methods.

3.1. Infection Status and Parasite Load Quantification

From the 82 T. infestans that fed on infected hosts, 26 of those that fed on chronically infected O. degus were not infected. These individuals were added to the control group in posterior analyses, as they showed no significant differences when compared to the non-infected M. musculus-fed insects (Table S2). A reduction in infectiousness to triatomines has been reported previously for O. degus [47]. The 56 T. cruzi-positive triatomines presented parasite loads ranging from 0.8 to 4,867,678 parasite-equivalents per mg (par-eq/mg) of T. infestans DNA, with a median of 4046.9 par-eq/mg, a quartile one (Q1) of 79.8 par-eq/mg and a quartile three (Q3) of 45,127.5 par-eq/mg. Detailed results for the real-time PCR runs and parasite loads are available in the Supplementary Materials (Table S3).

3.2. Feeding Activity of Triatoma Infestans

We compared all the feeding activity data between infected and non-infected individuals (Table 1). The host detection ranged from 0 to 196 s; the first approach ranged from 1 to 3314 s; the number of bites ranged from 0 to 43 events; the feeding time ranged from 108 to 3600 s; the weight difference ranged from 0 to 310 mg. Individual results for the feeding activity of T. infestans are available in the Supplementary Materials (Table S3).
We observed significant differences in host detection (Mann–Whitney U test p = 0.024), the number of bites (Mann–Whitney U test p = 0.025), and weight difference (Mann–Whitney U test p < 0.001) according to their T. cruzi infection status (Figure 2). Differences were also observed in the rest of the variables, but they were not significant (first approach, Mann–Whitney U test p = 0.810; feeding time, Mann–Whitney U test p = 0.144).
Once we established that there were differences in the feeding activity of infected and non-infected T. infestans, we evaluated the relationship between the parasite load of T. cruzi-positive individuals and the significantly different variables. For the host detection, there was a negative and significant relation (rs = −0.584; p < 0.001). Conversely, for the number of bites, there was a positive and significant relation (rs = 0.515; p < 0.001; Figure 3). However, there was no significant relations between the parasite load and the weight difference among the infected triatomines (rs = 0.078; p = 0.567; Supplementary Figure S1). There were significant differences between the nymphal instars and the weight difference (Kruskal–Wallis test p < 0.001), with IV and V instars showing higher blood intake than instar III (Dunn test: III–IV p < 0.001; III–V p < 0.001; IV–V p = 0.299; p-values presented were adjusted by the Bonferroni correction). There were no significant differences between the nymphal instars in the rest of the measured variables (Table S4). We also compared the origin of the infection (whether they fed on chronically infected O. degus or on acutely infected M. musculus), without significant differences being found in any of the variables measured, except in weight difference (Mann–Whitney U test p < 0.001; Table S5).

3.3. Defecation Activity of Triatoma Infestans

Among all the individuals, only three did not release their dejections during the 60 min period; from these, one was infected and two were non-infected. Regarding the distance of the released dejections to the host, it ranged from 0.2 to 11.9 cm, with no significant differences according to their T. cruzi infection status (Mann–Whitney U test p = 0.216; Table 2). None of the triatomines released their dejections on the mouse. Individual results for the defecation activity of T. infestans are available in the Supplementary Material (Table S3).
The earliest defecation occurred two seconds after the end of blood intake and the latest happened 3464 s after the end of blood intake. When we compared the defecation time between infected (median: 675 s) and non-infected (median: 1045.5 s) triatomines, the difference between both was significant (Mann–Whitney U test p < 0.001; Figure 4). Afterwards, we evaluated the defecation time in relation to the parasite load of T. cruzi-positive individuals, showing a negative and significant correlation (rs = −0.779; p < 0.001) between the defecation time and the parasite load (Figure 5).

4. Discussion

As far as we know, this is the first study where the feeding and defecation behavior of the Chagas disease vector T. infestans has been evaluated in relation to its T. cruzi load. We performed the analysis of feeding and defecation behavioral variables on 108 T. infestans—52 non-infected and 56 infected. We found significant differences between infected and non-infected individuals in the host detection, number of bites, blood ingested, and defecation time. Infected triatomines with a higher T. cruzi load showed a decreased host detection time, an increased number of bites, and decreased defecation time.
Behavioral changes have been observed previously in different insect species infected with trypanosomatids, such as Glossina morsitans (Wiedemann, 1830) (Diptera: Glossinidae) infected with Trypanosoma brucei (Bruce, 1895), which showed more attempts to bite and required more time to ingest blood than for non-infected tsetse flies [48]. Phlebotomus doboscqi (Neveu-Lemaire, 1906) (Diptera: Psychodidae) infected with Leishmania major (Yakimoff and Schokhor, 1914) has been reported to bite more frequently, but with a lower blood intake than non-infected sand flies [49].
Our results show that the median time of detection of the host by infected T. infestans decreases from 28.5, in non-infected individuals, to 12.5 s. We observed that the distribution pattern of the detection time in relation to the parasite load of the infected T. infestans showed a decrease in the detection time that was particularly evident in the triatomines with larger T. cruzi loads. Previously, it was observed that infected M. spinolai nymphs detect the vertebrate host twice as fast as non-infected nymphs [18]. In our work, we observed that the median number of bites increased from 4.5 bites in non-infected triatomines to 8 bites in infected ones, unlike previous studies indicating that T. cruzi-infected R. prolixus and T. infestans did not show differences in bite attempts [15,50]. However, D’Alessandro and Mandel [19] indicated that T. cruzi- and Trypanosoma rangeli-infected R. prolixus increased the number of bite attempts when compared to non-infected triatomines. In infections with T. rangeli, this increase in the number of bites of infected R. prolixus can be explained by a pathological response in the salivary glands of the triatomine, altering the ability of the vector to find blood vessels and affecting the salivary anti-hemostatic properties [51]; however, as T. cruzi only infects the digestive tract of triatomines, this explanation, as far as we know, would not apply in this vector–parasite relation.
As proposed before by several other authors [6,17,21,52,53], a hypothesis to explain the increase in the number of bites and the decrease in host detection time, which was more evident in triatomines with a higher T. cruzi load, could be a competition between the triatomine and T. cruzi for the nutrients in the ingested blood, leading these insects to a more advanced state of starvation when compared to individuals with a lower parasite load, and those who are non-infected. Triatomines in this state may become more receptive to stimuli: They do not sit and wait until a host appears or move randomly in search of signals; instead, they orient themselves with the air streams to capture smells of interest [7,54]. Another response that may increase due to the lack of nutrients is sensitivity to ammonia that is present in the urine and sweat of hosts, which serves as an attraction factor in T. infestans [55]; this response has been measured in the antennae of R. prolixus, and it increases during starvation [56]. Finally, another receptive ability that could be increased in infected T. infestans is the detection of heat emitted by the host, regardless of its size, even up to two meters away [6,57]. An example of a behavioral change related to the decrease in nutrients promoted by the infection is what was observed in a field study with wild M. spinolai, using humans to attract triatomines: A greater number of T. cruzi-infected insects were captured in the first hour of exposure; in addition, these vectors had a lower body mass index when compared to non-infected triatomines [52]. This, in turn, would increase the risk of T. cruzi infection, given the shorter time that highly parasitized insects take to detect the host and the greater number of skin wounds caused by their bites that could become contaminated with the insect’s dejections [18]. All this evidence together with our results strongly suggest that the parasite lowers the perceptual thresholds of the host.
We also detected a significant difference regarding T. cruzi infection status in their weight differences, corresponding to the blood that was ingested and retained by the triatomine after the experiment, with infected T. cruzi showing a median weight difference of 88 mg, being 23 mg in non-infected ones. In M. spinolai, laboratory individuals infected with T. cruzi increased the number of bites, while the amount of blood ingested was not affected by T. cruzi infection [18,58]. Verly et al. (2020) [59], observed that Triatoma rubrovaria (Blanchard, 1843) infected with T. cruzi ingested about 25% more blood than non-infected insects. Our results and others [17] show that there seems to be a taxon-specific effect of the infection, as infected T. infestans show the same tendency to increase the number of bites, but also to ingest and retain more blood, unlike other triatomine species. The amount of blood ingested seems to be positively influenced by the T. cruzi infection [59]. It is probable that this increase in blood consumption in infected individuals occurs as a way to compensate for the nutrients consumed by the parasites. Previously, it has been documented that the nutritional status of M. spinolai individuals infected with T. cruzi is lower than that of non-infected individuals [52]. An increase in the intake of infected individuals implies a behavioral change that would favor the transmission of T. cruzi to vertebrate hosts [60,61,62,63].
Modification of the defecation pattern is of great importance at the epidemiological level due to the role of this process in the natural transmission of T. cruzi to the vertebrate host, where one of the most relevant variables is the time span between feeding and the start of defecation [16]. Our results indicate that the time it takes for infected T. infestans to deposit the dejection is shorter—with a median of 675.0 s—than that of non-infected individuals—median 1045.5 s—which agrees with previous studies showing that T. cruzi infected nymphs of T. infestans defecate in less time; they also documented that the volume of the dejections was greater than those from non-infected ones [15]. Unfortunately, we did not register the volume of the dejection in this study. A similar result than ours was reported for M. spinolai, where T. cruzi-infected individuals deposited the dejection three minutes earlier than the non-infected ones, on average [18]. In a previous study of infected and non-infected R. prolixus, no significant differences were found in the number of bites, feeding time, blood consumed, and defecation time in live host trials [50]. In addition to the infection effect, we observed a significant negative relation of the dejection time with the parasite load, where the higher the load, the less time it took them to defecate. Previously, it has been described that defecation patterns are associated with feeding patterns. The amount of blood consumed is negatively correlated with defecation time and, on the contrary, is positively correlated with the volume of defecation [64,65,66,67]. If T. cruzi-positive insects with higher loads consume more blood, they would release increased dejection volumes; on the contrary, those with reduced parasite loads, would ingest less blood, so their dejections would be smaller, which would equate to the blood retained in the infected group regardless of their parasite load, but they would still ingest more than the non-infected group due to their need to incorporate nutrients that are sequestered by T. cruzi [68,69,70]. It is possible that this relation explains our findings: We detected a difference in the blood ingested by infected and non-infected individuals, but within the infected, there was no correlation with the parasite load.
The observation that the individuals did not defecate on the mouse when they were fed may be related to the fact that the most accessible points for biting (fewer hairs) and sources of emission of cues used for their detection (temperature, CO2, etc.) [6,7,8,9,10] were perceived at the level of the triatomine, in its horizontal plane of displacement.
Regardless of the video system used, it was necessary to complement it with the physical presence of the researcher during recordings because of the anesthetic management and to avoid suffocation of the host. However, the interaction of the responsible re-searcher with the triatomines was avoided as much as possible. Despite this, it is not possible to rule out any effect due to the radiated heat or the CO2 expelled by the research-er. Nevertheless, none of the evaluated triatomines directed themselves towards the hu-man present during the experiment (data not shown). In our study, we were only certain of the DTU infecting laboratory mice, but not of those in naturally infected wild rodents. A model of the behavior of triatomines should take into account both the parasite load and its lineage, as this could be useful to predict the behavior of T. infestans in areas with different circulating DTUs, which has been described for T. infestans [71].
The incongruences observed between our results and other reports, which are focused on the feeding and defecation behavior, could be associated, among others, with the different vector and parasite (T. cruzi/T. rangeli) combinations or genotypes, their parasite load, their starvation time, time after infection, or different pre-experimental and experimental blood sources [15,16,17,18,19,26,50]. Although these differences make direct comparisons difficult, all of these investigations confirm that T. cruzi modifies the behavior of their hosts.
Our results support the hypothesis that the parasite can modify the behavior of the triatomine insect, increasing the transmission rate of T. cruzi, which would constitute manipulation of the vector behavior [72]. The observed modifications in behavior reported here, when added to the increased daily activity pattern of infected T. infestans described previously by Chacón et al. [24] in the same individuals, could favor the transmission of T. cruzi to mammalian hosts, with faster host detection, increased ingestion of blood, which could imply an increased detriment for the host, and more bites that entail more potential wounds for parasite contamination from the dejections, which would be released earlier. In addition, most of these variables would be associated with the T. cruzi parasite load of T. infestans, where the higher the load, the greater would be the vector efficiency, favorably modulating the vector competence of this species [14,60,73,74].

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms10051003/s1, Figure S1: Weight difference of Triatoma infestans according to Trypanosoma cruzi parasite load; Parasite load (LOG10) in relation to weight difference in milligrams, Table S1: Results of the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for normality and the Levene test for homogeneity of variance, for each feeding and defecation behavioral variables studied, comparing Trypanosoma cruzi infected with non-infected Triatoma infestans, Table S2: Results of the Mann–Whitney U test comparing each feeding and defecation behavioral variables studied between non-infected T. infestans fed O. degus and non-infected T. infestans control group, Table S3: Compiled database with all individuals tested for each of the variables analyzed, Table S4: Results of the Kruskal–Wallis test comparing each feeding and defecation behavioral variables studied between nymphal instars (III, IV, and V), Table S5: Results of the Mann–Whitney U test, comparing each feeding and defecation behavioral variable studied between the group of T. infestans infected with chronically infected O. degus and the group of T. infestans infected with acutely infected M. musculus.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.M.-S.M., A.B., R.S. and P.E.C.; methodology, F.C., A.B., C.M.-S.M. and R.S.; formal analysis, F.C., B.Á.-D. and R.S.; investigation, F.C. and A.B.; resources, R.S. and P.E.C.; data curation, F.C. and A.B.; writing—original draft preparation, F.C. and A.B.; writing—review and editing, F.C., C.M.-S.M., A.B., B.Á.-D., R.S. and P.E.C.; visualization, F.C.; supervision, C.M.-S.M., R.S. and P.E.C.; project administration, A.B.; funding acquisition, P.E.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo (ANID), FONDECYT grant number 1180940 (C.M.-S.M., A.B., R.S., P.E.C.), FONDECYT Postdoctorado grant number 3170799 (C.M.-S.M.), and Programa Becas-Beca Doctorado Nacional ANID 2017–grant number 21171903 (F.C.), Doctorado Becas Chile 2019–grant number 72200391 (A.B.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Comité Institucional de Cuidado y Uso de Animales (CICUA) from Universidad de Chile (8169-VET-UCH) on 19 June 2018.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article or Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Miguel Saavedra for triatomine rearing and providing useful comments; to Sofía Ortiz Barahona for the care of rodents; to Carla González and Luna Gómez-León for participating in the triatomine infection process, in the behavioral experiments, and for their willingness to help; to Andrés Trejo and Ricardo Muñoz for their work in DNA extraction and behavioral analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Poulin, R.; Thomas, F. Phenotypic variability induced by parasites: Parasitol. Today 1999, 15, 28–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hurd, H. Manipulation of medically important insect vectors by their parasites. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2003, 48, 141–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. WHO. Chagas Disease (Also Known as American Trypanosomiasis). Available online: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/chagas-disease-(american-trypanosomiasis) (accessed on 8 May 2021).
  4. Noireau, F.; Diosque, P.; Jansen, A.M. Trypanosoma cruzi: Adaptation to its vectors and its hosts. Veter. Res. 2009, 40, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Guarneri, A.A.; Schaub, G.A. Interaction of triatomines with their bacterial microbiota and trypanosomes. In Triatominae-The Biology of Chagas Disease Vectors; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 345–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lazzari, C.R. Orientation towards hosts in haematophagous insects: An integrative perspective. Adv. Insect Physiol. 2009, 37, 1–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lazzari, C.R. The behaviour of kissing bugs. In Triatominae-The Biology of Chagas Disease Vectors; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 215–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Barrozo, R.B.; Manrique, G.; Lazzari, C.R. The role of water vapour in the orientation behaviour of the blood-sucking bug Triatoma infestans (Hemiptera, Reduviidae). J. Insect. Physiol. 2003, 49, 315–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Barrozo, R.B.; Lazzari, C.R. The response of the blood-sucking bug Triatoma infestans to carbon dioxide and other host odours. Chem. Senses 2004, 29, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Barrozo, R.B.; Reisenman, C.E.; Guerenstein, P.; Lazzari, C.R.; Lorenzo, M.G. An inside look at the sensory biology of triatomines. J. Insect. Physiol. 2017, 97, 3–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Araújo, R.F.; José Mendonça, V.; Rosa, J.A.; Matos, J.F.; Lima, S.C.; de Araújo Figueiredo, M.A. Description of a newly discovered Triatoma infestans (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) Foci in Ibipeba, State of Bahia, Brazil. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2014, 47, 513–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Zeledon, R.; Beard, C.B.; Dias, J.P.; Leiby, D.A.; Dorn, P.; Coura, J.R. Chapter 2—Triatomine vectors. In An Appraisal of the Status of Chagas Disease in the United States; Elsevier: Walthm, MA, USA, 2012; pp. 5–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fernandes, M.C.; Andrews, N.W. Host cell invasion by Trypanosoma cruzi: A unique strategy that promotes persistence. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 36, 734–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Xavier, S.C.; Roque, A.L.; Bilac, D.; de Araújo, V.A.; da Costa Neto, S.F.; Lorosa, E.S.; da Silva, L.F.; Jansen, A.M. Distantiae transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi: A new epidemiological feature of acute Chagas disease in Brazil. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2014, 8, e2878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Pereyra, N.; Lobbia, P.A.; Mougabure-Cueto, G. Effects of the infection with Trypanosoma cruzi on the feeding and excretion/defecation patterns of Triatoma infestans. Bull. Entomol. Res. 2020, 110, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zeledón, R.; Alvarado, R.; Jirón, L.F. Observations on the feeding and defecation patterns of three triatomine species (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). Acta Trop. 1977, 34, 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Marliére, N.P.; Lorenzo, M.G.; Guarneri, A.A. Trypanosoma cruzi-infected Rhodnius prolixus endure increased predation facilitating parasite transmission to mammal hosts. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2021, 15, e0009570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Botto-Mahan, C.; Cattan, P.E.; Medel, R. Chagas disease parasite induces behavioural changes in the kissing bug Mepraia spinolai. Acta Trop. 2006, 98, 219–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. D’Alessandro, A.; Mandel, S. Natural infections and behavior of Trypanosoma rangeli and Trypanosoma cruzi in the vector Rhodnius prolixus in Colombia. J. Parasitol. 1969, 55, 846–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fellet, M.R.; Lorenzo, M.G.; Elliot, S.L.; Carrasco, D.; Guarneri, A.A. Effects of infection by Trypanosoma cruzi and Trypanosoma rangeli on the reproductive performance of the vector Rhodnius prolixus. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e105255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Marliére, N.P.; Latorre-Estivalis, J.M.; Lorenzo, M.G.; Carrasco, D.; Alves-Silva, J.; Rodrigues, J.e.O.; Ferreira, L.e.L.; Lara, L.e.M.; Lowenberger, C.; Guarneri, A.A. Trypanosomes modify the behavior of their insect hosts: Effects on locomotion and on the expression of a related gene. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2015, 9, e0003973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Pérez, G.; Muñoz-San Martín, C.; Chacón, F.; Bacigalupo, A.; Cattan, P.E.; Solís, R. Modification of the daily activity pattern of the diurnal triatomine Mepraia spinolai (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) Induced by Trypanosoma cruzi (Trypanosomatida: Trypanosomatidae) Infection. J. Med. Entomol. 2021, 58, 2474–2478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ramírez-González, M.G.; Flores-Villegas, A.L.; Salazar-Schettino, P.M.; Gutiérrez-Cabrera, A.E.; Rojas-Ortega, E.; Córdoba-Aguilar, A. Zombie bugs? Manipulation of kissing bug behavior by the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi. Acta Trop. 2019, 200, 105177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chacón, F.; Muñoz-San Martín, C.; Bacigalupo, A.; Álvarez-Duhart, B.; Solís, R.; Cattan, P.E. Trypanosoma cruzi parasite load modulates the circadian activity pattern of Triatoma infestans. Insects 2022, 13, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cordero-Montoya, G.; Flores-Villegas, A.L.; Salazar-Schettino, P.M.; Vences-Blanco, M.O.; Rocha-Ortega, M.; Gutiérrez-Cabrera, A.E.; Rojas-Ortega, E.; Córdoba-Aguilar, A. The cost of being a killer’s accomplice: Trypanosoma cruzi impairs the fitness of kissing bugs. Parasitol. Res. 2019, 118, 2523–2529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Paranaiba, L.F.; Soares, R.P.; Guarneri, A.A. Triatoma infestans susceptibility to different Trypanosoma cruzi strains: Parasite development and early escape from anterior midgut. Parasitology 2021, 148, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Cummings, K.L.; Tarleton, R.L. Rapid quantitation of Trypanosoma cruzi in host tissue by real-time PCR. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2003, 129, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Piron, M.; Fisa, R.; Casamitjana, N.; López-Chejade, P.; Puig, L.; Vergés, M.; Gascón, J.; Gómez i Prat, J.; Portús, M.; Sauleda, S. Development of a real-time PCR assay for Trypanosoma cruzi detection in blood samples. Acta Trop. 2007, 103, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Elias, M.C.; Vargas, N.; Tomazi, L.; Pedroso, A.; Zingales, B.; Schenkman, S.; Briones, M.R. Comparative analysis of genomic sequences suggests that Trypanosoma cruzi CL Brener contains two sets of non-intercalated repeats of satellite DNA that correspond to T. cruzi I and T. cruzi II types. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2005, 140, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Elias, M.C.; Vargas, N.S.; Zingales, B.; Schenkman, S. Organization of satellite DNA in the genome of Trypanosoma cruzi. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2003, 129, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dias, F.D.A.; Guerra, B.; Vieira, L.R.; Perdomo, H.D.; Gandara, A.C.P.; Amaral, R.J.V.D.; Vollú, R.E.; Gomes, S.A.O.; Lara, F.A.; Sorgine, M.H.F.; et al. Monitoring of the parasite load in the digestive tract of Rhodnius prolixus by combined qPCR analysis and imaging techniques provides new insights into the trypanosome life cycle. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2015, 9, e0004186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Nogueira, N.P.; Saraiva, F.M.; Sultano, P.E.; Cunha, P.R.; Laranja, G.A.; Justo, G.A.; Sabino, K.C.; Coelho, M.G.; Rossini, A.; Atella, G.C.; et al. Proliferation and differentiation of Trypanosoma cruzi inside its vector have a new trigger: Redox status. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0116712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Saavedra, M.; Zulantay, I.; Apt, W.; Castillo, J.; Araya, E.; Martínez, G.; Rodríguez, J. Quantification by real-time PCR of Trypanosoma cruzi DNA in samples of Triatoma infestans used in xenodiagnosis of chronic Chagas disease patients. Parasit. Vectors 2016, 9, 382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Noireau, F.; Bastrenta, B.; Catala, S.; Dujardin, J.P.; Panzera, F.; Torres, M.; Perez, R.; Galvao, C.; Jurberg, J. Sylvatic population of Triatoma infestans from the Bolivian Chaco: From field collection to characterization. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2000, 95 (Suppl. 1), 119–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. PAHO. Información General: Enfermedad de Chagas. Available online: https://www3.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=5856:2011-informacion-general-enfermedad-chagas&Itemid=40370%E2%9F%A8=fr (accessed on 7 March 2022).
  36. Dias, J.C.; Silveira, A.C.; Schofield, C.J. The impact of Chagas disease control in Latin America: A review. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2002, 97, 603–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Abad-Franch, F.; Diotaiuti, L.; Gurgel-Gonçalves, R.; Gürtler, R.E. Certifying the interruption of Chagas disease transmission by native vectors: Cui bono? Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2013, 108, 251–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Campos, R.; Botto-Mahan, C.; Ortiz, S.; Acuña, M.; Cattan, P.E.; Solari, A. Trypanosoma cruzi detection in blood by xenodiagnosis and polymerase chain reaction in the wild rodent Octodon degus. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2007, 76, 324–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Botto-Mahan, C.; Campos, R.; Acuna-Retamar, M.; Coronado, X.; Cattan, P.E.; Solari, A. Temporal variation of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in native mammals in Chile. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2010, 10, 317–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Botto-Mahan, C.; Bacigalupo, A.; Correa, J.P.; Oda, E.; Solari, A. Field assessment of Trypanosoma cruzi infection and host survival in the native rodent Octodon degus. Acta Trop. 2012, 122, 164–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bacigalupo, A.; Torres-Pérez, F.; Segovia, V.; García, A.; Correa, J.P.; Moreno, L.; Arroyo, P.; Cattan, P.E. Sylvatic foci of the Chagas disease vector Triatoma infestans in Chile: Description of a new focus and challenges for control programs. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2010, 105, 633–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Yefi-Quinteros, E.; Muñoz-San Martín, C.; Bacigalupo, A.; Correa, J.P.; Cattan, P.E. Trypanosoma cruzi load in synanthropic rodents from rural areas in Chile. Parasit. Vectors 2018, 11, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Valenzuela, L.; Sepúlveda, S.; Ponce, I.; Galanti, N.; Cabrera, G. The overexpression of TcAP1 endonuclease confers resistance to infective Trypanosoma cruzi trypomastigotes against oxidative DNA damage. J. Cell Biochem. 2018, 119, 5985–5995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Brewer, M.; Garay, M.; Gorla, D.; Murua, F.; Favot, R. Caracterización de los estadios ninfales del genero Triatoma Laporte 1833 I. Triatoma infestans Klug, 1834 (Hemiptera, Reduviidae). Rev. Soc. Entomol. Argent. 1981, 40, 91–102. [Google Scholar]
  45. Erickson, R.L.; Terzi, M.C.; Jaber, S.M.; Hankenson, F.C.; McKinstry-Wu, A.; Kelz, M.B.; Marx, J.O. Intraperitoneal Continuous-Rate Infusion for the Maintenance of Anesthesia in Laboratory Mice (Mus musculus). J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 2016, 55, 548–557. [Google Scholar]
  46. Paim, R.M.; Pereira, M.H.; Di Ponzio, R.; Rodrigues, J.O.; Guarneri, A.A.; Gontijo, N.F.; Araújo, R.N. Validation of reference genes for expression analysis in the salivary gland and the intestine of Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera, Reduviidae) under different experimental conditions by quantitative real-time PCR. BMC Res. Notes 2012, 5, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Rojo, G.; Sandoval-Rodríguez, A.; López, A.; Ortiz, S.; Correa, J.P.; Saavedra, M.; Botto-Mahan, C.; Cattan, P.E.; Solari, A. Within-host temporal fluctuations of Trypanosoma cruzi discrete typing units: The case of the wild reservoir rodent Octodon degus. Parasites Vectors 2017, 10, 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Jenni, L.; Molyneux, D.H.; Livesey, J.L.; Galun, R. Feeding behaviour of tsetse flies infected with salivarian trypanosomes. Nature 1980, 283, 383–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Beach, R.; Kiilu, G.; Leeuwenburg, J. Modification of sand fly biting behavior by Leishmania leads to increased parasite transmission. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1985, 34, 278–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Takano-Lee, M.; Edman, J.D. Lack of manipulation of Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) vector competence by Trypanosoma cruzi. J. Med. Entomol. 2002, 39, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Garcia, E.S.; Mello, C.B.; Azambuja, P.; Ribeiro, J.M.C. Rhodnius prolixus: Salivary antihemostatic components decrease with Trypanosoma rangeli infection. Exp. Parasitol. 1994, 78, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Estay-Olea, D.; Correa, J.P.; de Bona, S.; Bacigalupo, A.; Quiroga, N.; San Juan, E.; Solari, A.; Botto-Mahan, C. Trypanosoma cruzi could affect wild triatomine approaching behaviour to humans by altering vector nutritional status: A field test. Acta Trop. 2020, 210, 105574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Schaub, G.A.; Lösch, P. Parasite/host-interrelationships of the trypanosomatids Trypanosoma cruzi and Blastocrithidia triatomae and the reduviid bug Triatoma infestans: Influence of starvation of the bug. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 1989, 83, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sabelis, M.W.; Schippers, P. Variable wind directions and anemotactic strategies of searching for an odour plume. Oecologia 1984, 63, 225–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Taneja, J.; Guerin, P.M. Ammonia attracts the haematophagous bug Triatoma infestans: Behavioural and neurophysiological data on nymphs. J. Comp. Physiol. 1997, 181, 21–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Reisenman, C.E. Hunger is the best spice: Effects of starvation in the antennal responses of the blood-sucking bug Rhodnius prolixus. J. Insect. Physiol. 2014, 71, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Lazzari, C.R.; Núñez, J. The response to radiant heat and the estimation of the temperature of distant sources in Triatoma infestans. J. Insect. Physiol. 1989, 35, 525–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Botto-Mahan, C. Trypanosoma cruzi induces life-history trait changes in the wild kissing bug Mepraia spinolai: Implications for parasite transmission. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2009, 9, 505–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Verly, T.; Costa, S.; Lima, N.; Mallet, J.; Odêncio, F.; Pereira, M.; Moreira, C.J.C.; Britto, C.; Pavan, M.G. Vector competence and feeding-excretion behavior of Triatoma rubrovaria (Blanchard, 1843) (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) infected with Trypanosoma cruzi TcVI. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2020, 14, e0008712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lent, H.; Wygodzinsky, P.W. Revision of the Triatominae (Hemiptera, Reduviidae), and their significance as vectors of Chagas’ disease. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 1979, 163, 130–138. [Google Scholar]
  61. Gürtler, R.E.; Fernández, M.D.P.; Cecere, M.C.; Cohen, J.E. Body size and hosts of Triatoma infestans populations affect the size of bloodmeal contents and female fecundity in rural northwestern Argentina. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, e0006097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Rabinovich, J.E. Vital statistics of Triatominae (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) under laboratory conditions. I. Triatoma infestans Klug. J. Med. Entomol. 1972, 9, 351–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Schenone, H.; Rojas Mercado, A.; Castillo, D. Estudio comparativo de la sensibilidad y mortalidad de las ninfas III y IV de Triatoma infestans usadas en el xenodiagnóstico de pacientes crónicos. Bol. Chil. Parasitol. 2000, 55, 14–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Trumper, E.V.; Gorla, D.E. Density-dependent timing of defaecation by Triatoma infestans. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1991, 85, 800–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Crocco, L.B.; Catalá, S.S. Feeding and defaecation patterns in Triatoma sordida. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 1996, 91, 409–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Rodríguez, C.S.; Carrizo, S.A.; Crocco, L.B. Comparison of feeding and defecation patterns between fifth-instar nymphs of Triatoma patagonica (Del Ponte, 1929) and Triatoma infestans (Klug, 1934) under laboratory conditions. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2008, 41, 330–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Piesman, J.; Sherlock, I.A. Factors controlling the volume of feces produced by triatomine vectors of Chagas’ disease. Acta Trop. 1983, 40, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Sterkel, M.; Oliveira, J.H.M.; Bottino-Rojas, V.; Paiva-Silva, G.O.; Oliveira, P.L. The Dose Makes the Poison: Nutritional overload determines the life traits of blood-feeding arthropods. Trends Parasitol. 2017, 33, 633–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Melo, R.d.F.P.; Guarneri, A.A.; Silber, A.M. The Influence of environmental cues on the development of Trypanosoma cruzi in triatominae Vector. Front Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. de Oliveira, A.B.B.; Alevi, K.C.C.; Imperador, C.H.L.; Madeira, F.F.; Azeredo-Oliveira, M.T.V.d. Parasite-vector interaction of Chagas disease: A mini-review. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2018, 98, 653–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ihle-Soto, C.; Costoya, E.; Correa, J.P.; Bacigalupo, A.; Cornejo-Villar, B.; Estadella, V.; Solari, A.; Ortiz, S.; Hernández, H.J.; Botto-Mahan, C.; et al. Spatio-temporal characterization of Trypanosoma cruzi infection and discrete typing units infecting hosts and vectors from non-domestic foci of Chile. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Poulin, R. Parasite manipulation of host behavior: An update and frequently asked questions. Adv. Study Behav. 2010, 41, 151–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Goddard, J. Infectious Diseases and Arthropods, 3rd ed.; Humana Press: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 33–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Libersat, F.; Delago, A.; Gal, R. Manipulation of host behavior by parasitic insects and insect parasites. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2009, 54, 189–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Images of Triatoma infestans during feeding and defecation activity. (A) Fifth nymphal instar of T. infestans biting an anesthetized Mus musculus during the recording of feeding behavior activity. (B) Fifth nymphal instar of T. infestans releasing dejections after the blood intake.
Figure 1. Images of Triatoma infestans during feeding and defecation activity. (A) Fifth nymphal instar of T. infestans biting an anesthetized Mus musculus during the recording of feeding behavior activity. (B) Fifth nymphal instar of T. infestans releasing dejections after the blood intake.
Microorganisms 10 01003 g001
Figure 2. Feeding activity according to the Trypanosoma cruzi infection status of Triatoma infestans. (A) Host detection time, in seconds, of T. cruzi-infected and non-infected T. infestans. Host detection is defined as the time elapsed since the triatomine begins to mobilize in the arena until the moment when the insect starts walking towards the host. (B) The number of bites performed by T. cruzi-infected and non-infected T. infestans. The number of bites is defined as the total number of bites performed. (C) The weight difference, in milligrams, of T. cruzi-infected and non-infected T. infestans. The weight difference is defined as the subtraction of the initial experimental weight from the final weight. The circles represent outliers and the asterisks represent extreme outliers, calculated as previously reported [24].
Figure 2. Feeding activity according to the Trypanosoma cruzi infection status of Triatoma infestans. (A) Host detection time, in seconds, of T. cruzi-infected and non-infected T. infestans. Host detection is defined as the time elapsed since the triatomine begins to mobilize in the arena until the moment when the insect starts walking towards the host. (B) The number of bites performed by T. cruzi-infected and non-infected T. infestans. The number of bites is defined as the total number of bites performed. (C) The weight difference, in milligrams, of T. cruzi-infected and non-infected T. infestans. The weight difference is defined as the subtraction of the initial experimental weight from the final weight. The circles represent outliers and the asterisks represent extreme outliers, calculated as previously reported [24].
Microorganisms 10 01003 g002
Figure 3. Feeding activity of Triatoma infestans according to Trypanosoma cruzi parasite load. (A) Parasite load (LOG10) in relation to host detection time, in seconds. Host detection is defined as the time elapsed since the triatomine begins to mobilize in the arena until the moment when the insect starts walking towards the host. (B) Parasite load (LOG10) in relation to the number of bites performed by the vector. Number of bites is defined as the total number of bites performed.
Figure 3. Feeding activity of Triatoma infestans according to Trypanosoma cruzi parasite load. (A) Parasite load (LOG10) in relation to host detection time, in seconds. Host detection is defined as the time elapsed since the triatomine begins to mobilize in the arena until the moment when the insect starts walking towards the host. (B) Parasite load (LOG10) in relation to the number of bites performed by the vector. Number of bites is defined as the total number of bites performed.
Microorganisms 10 01003 g003
Figure 4. Defecation time, in seconds, of Trypanosoma cruzi-infected and non-infected Triatoma infestans. Defecation time is defined as the time elapsed between the end of the blood intake and the start of the dejection release. The circles represent outliers, calculated as previously reported [24].
Figure 4. Defecation time, in seconds, of Trypanosoma cruzi-infected and non-infected Triatoma infestans. Defecation time is defined as the time elapsed between the end of the blood intake and the start of the dejection release. The circles represent outliers, calculated as previously reported [24].
Microorganisms 10 01003 g004
Figure 5. Defecation activity of Triatoma infestans according to Trypanosoma cruzi parasite load. Parasite load (LOG10) in relation to defecation time, in seconds. Defecation time is defined as the time elapsed between the end of the blood intake and the start of the dejection release.
Figure 5. Defecation activity of Triatoma infestans according to Trypanosoma cruzi parasite load. Parasite load (LOG10) in relation to defecation time, in seconds. Defecation time is defined as the time elapsed between the end of the blood intake and the start of the dejection release.
Microorganisms 10 01003 g005
Table 1. Summary values of the feeding activity according to Trypanosoma cruzi infection status of Triatoma infestans.
Table 1. Summary values of the feeding activity according to Trypanosoma cruzi infection status of Triatoma infestans.
Infection StatusN 1UnitsMedianQ1 2Q3 3
Host Detection *Infected56Seconds12.56.225.5
Non-infected52Seconds28.58.347.3
First ApproachInfected55Seconds9.06.027.0
Non-infected50Seconds12.06.827.1
Number of Bites *Infected56Events8.03.015.0
Non-infected52Events4.52.08.0
Feeding TimeInfected55Seconds872.0557.01187.0
Non-infected50Seconds711.0441.81051.0
Weight Difference ***Infected56Milligrams88.030.0138.3
Non-infected52Milligrams22.111.054.3
1 Number of individuals, 2 Quartile 1, 3 Quartile 3, Significant difference * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001.
Table 2. Summary values of the defecation activity according to Trypanosoma cruzi infection status of Triatoma infestans.
Table 2. Summary values of the defecation activity according to Trypanosoma cruzi infection status of Triatoma infestans.
Infection StatusN 1UnitsMedianQ1 2Q3 3
Dejection Time ***Infected55Seconds675.0262.01277.0
Non-infected50Seconds1045.5765.02323.5
Distance of the
Dejection
Infected55Centimeters 7.103.89.6
Non-infected50Centimeters8.14.89.9
1 Number of individuals, 2 Quartile 1, 3 Quartile 3, Significant difference *** p < 0.001.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chacón, F.; Bacigalupo, A.; Álvarez-Duhart, B.; Cattan, P.E.; Solís, R.; Muñoz-San Martín, C. The Parasite Load of Trypanosoma cruzi Modulates Feeding and Defecation Patterns of the Chagas Disease Vector Triatoma infestans. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1003. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10051003

AMA Style

Chacón F, Bacigalupo A, Álvarez-Duhart B, Cattan PE, Solís R, Muñoz-San Martín C. The Parasite Load of Trypanosoma cruzi Modulates Feeding and Defecation Patterns of the Chagas Disease Vector Triatoma infestans. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(5):1003. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10051003

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chacón, Francisco, Antonella Bacigalupo, Bárbara Álvarez-Duhart, Pedro E. Cattan, Rigoberto Solís, and Catalina Muñoz-San Martín. 2022. "The Parasite Load of Trypanosoma cruzi Modulates Feeding and Defecation Patterns of the Chagas Disease Vector Triatoma infestans" Microorganisms 10, no. 5: 1003. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10051003

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop