Local Heat Transfer Analysis of Dual Sweeping Jet, Double Sweeping Jets, and Double Circular Jets Impinging at a Flat Surface
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsDear Authors,
Thank you for the work. Overall, I don't have any major objection to this work. However, I believe a big mistake was unintentionally made in this work. This must be fixed. The authors clearly state in a couple of places that Dual Sweeping Jet (DSJ) device is developed by Wen (same author with the current manuscript) and the reference for this is a PoF paper by Wen. Wen cites in that PoF paper that the design is proposed by Tomac and Gregory. However, in the current manuscript it was stated that Wen developed such design. There is patent (US 11,085,469 with a priority date of Oct. 2017) and AIAA J paper titled 'Phase-synchronized fluidic oscillator pair'. The literature is very clear that the design is developed by other people than Wen. Therefore, please fix these mistakes and properly cite the original developers with both their patent and the paper.
Thank you.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for Authors
Basically, I have no comments on the research and experiments carried out. It accepts the results obtained in the adopted method of simplifying heat transfer.
I have the following comments, which do not need to be included, they are in the nature of a discussion:
1. How to practically use this research and what changes it brings to the current state of knowledge
2. I agree with the conclusion that the shapes and angles of surface inclination are important, but also the type of material, it is a pity that this was not shown in the article,
3. Using an additional heat flux sensor could be useful to determine the coefficients.
4. In the analysed temperature ranges, the heat stream can take various forms: convection, conduction and radiation; it is worth determining their percentage share and when each form is important.
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsDear Authors,
Thank you for this work. There is a couple of minor issues that can be fixed before the publication. Such as:
- Line 81 'The Wen' should be 'Wen'
- Please check the manuscript mainly for the use of articles.
- Ref. 35 patent date should be 2021 not 2017.
Thank you.
Author Response
Comment1: Line 81 'The Wen' should be 'Wen'
Response1: Corrected. Thanks indeed.
Comment2: Please check the manuscript mainly for the use of articles.
Response2: The whole manuscript has been re-checked and corrected accordingly. Thanks indeed.
Comment3: Ref. 35 patent date should be 2021 not 2017.
Response3: Corrected. Thanks indeed.
