Next Article in Journal
Genomics-Based Exploration of Virulence Determinants and Host-Specific Adaptations of Pseudomonas syringae Strains Isolated from Grasses
Next Article in Special Issue
Heat Shock Proteins: Intestinal Gatekeepers that Are Influenced by Dietary Components and the Gut Microbiota
Previous Article in Journal
Live Genomics for Pathogen Monitoring in Public Health
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Natural Antimicrobial Enzyme Lysozyme is Up-Regulated in Gastrointestinal Inflammatory Conditions
Open AccessArticle

Evaluation of Automated Ribosomal Intergenic Spacer Analysis for Bacterial Fingerprinting of Rumen Microbiome Compared to Pyrosequencing Technology

Department of Ruminant Science, Institute of Animal Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, PO Box 6, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
Department of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology , The George S. Wise Faculty of Life Science, Tel Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv 69978, Israel
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2014, 3(1), 109-120;
Received: 24 November 2013 / Revised: 18 December 2013 / Accepted: 9 January 2014 / Published: 22 January 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gut Microbiome)
The mammalian gut houses a complex microbial community which is believed to play a significant role in host physiology. In recent years, several microbial community analysis methods have been implemented to study the whole gut microbial environment, in contrast to classical microbiological methods focusing on bacteria which can be cultivated. One of these is automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA), an inexpensive and popular way of analyzing bacterial diversity and community fingerprinting in ecological samples. ARISA uses the natural variability in length of the DNA fragment found between the 16S and 23S genes in different bacterial lineages to infer diversity. This method is now being supplanted by affordable next-generation sequencing technologies that can also simultaneously annotate operational taxonomic units for taxonomic identification. We compared ARISA and pyrosequencing of samples from the rumen microbiome of cows, previously sampled at different stages of development and varying in microbial complexity using several ecological parameters. We revealed close agreement between ARISA and pyrosequencing outputs, especially in their ability to discriminate samples from different ecological niches. In contrast, the ARISA method seemed to underestimate sample richness. The good performance of the relatively inexpensive ARISA makes it relevant for straightforward use in bacterial fingerprinting analysis as well as for quick cross-validation of pyrosequencing data. View Full-Text
Keywords: ARISA; pyrosequencing; rumen microbiome ARISA; pyrosequencing; rumen microbiome
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Jami, E.; Shterzer, N.; Mizrahi, I. Evaluation of Automated Ribosomal Intergenic Spacer Analysis for Bacterial Fingerprinting of Rumen Microbiome Compared to Pyrosequencing Technology. Pathogens 2014, 3, 109-120.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop