Environmental Persistence and Genotypic and Phenotypic Characterization of Salmonella Minnesota in Poultry Slaughterhouses
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Sample Collection
2.2. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing and Phenotypic Profile of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase Production
2.3. Evaluation of Biofilm Formation on Polystyrene Plates
2.4. Evaluation of Biofilm Formation on Stainless Steel Surface
2.5. Detection of Virulence and Resistance Genes
2.6. Thermal Tolerance
2.7. Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE)
2.8. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profile and Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase Production
3.2. Biofilm Formation on Polystyrene Plates
3.3. Biofilm Formation on Stainless Steel Surface
3.4. Virulence and Resistance Genes
3.5. Thermal Tolerance of Salmonella Minnesota Isolates
3.6. Genetic Relatedness by Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE)
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| ATCC | American Type Culture Collection |
| BHI | Brain Heart Infusion |
| bp | Base pairs |
| CFU/mL | Colony-Forming Units per milliliter |
| CLSI | Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute |
| ESBL | Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase |
| SM | Salmonella Minnesota |
| MDR | Multidrug Resistance |
| PBS | Phosphate-Buffered Saline |
| PCR | Polymerase Chain Reaction |
| PFGE | Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis |
| SPI | Salmonella Pathogenicity Island |
| Tm | Melting temperature |
| TSB | Tryptic Soy Broth |
Appendix A
| Target Gene | Primer Name | Sequence (5′–3′) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| adrA | adrA forward | CGTCAATATGTTGCCTGCCG | This study |
| adrA reverse | AAGAGAGCGTGACTTCCAGC |
References
- Lamichhane, B.; Mawad, A.M.M.; Saleh, M.; Kelley, W.G.; Harrington, P.J.; Lovestad, C.W.; Amezcua, J.; Sarhan, M.M.; El Zowalaty, M.E.; Ramadan, H.; et al. Salmonellosis: An Overview of Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Innovative Approaches to Mitigate the Antimicrobial Resistant Infections. Antibiotics 2024, 13, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pigłowski, M. Pathogenic and Non-Pathogenic Microorganisms in the Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kipper, D.; Mascitti, A.K.; Carli, S.D.; Carneiro, A.M.; Streck, A.F.; Fonseca, A.S.K.; Ikuta, N.; Lunge, V.R. Emergence, Dissemination and Antimicrobial Resistance of the Main Poultry-Associated Salmonella Serovars in Brazil. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Voss-Rech, D.; Vaz, C.S.L.; Alves, L.; Coldebella, A.; Leão, J.A.; Rodrigues, D.P.; Back, A. A Temporal Study of Salmonella enterica Serotypes from Broiler Farms in Brazil. Poult. Sci. 2015, 94, 433–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rabello, R.F.; Bonelli, R.R.; Penna, B.A.; Albuquerque, J.P.; Souza, R.M.; Cerqueira, A.M.F. Antimicrobial Resistance in Farm Animals in Brazil: An Update Overview. Animals 2020, 10, 552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, H.; De Reu, K.; Gabriël, S.; Mattheus, W.; De Zutter, L.; Rasschaert, G. Salmonella Prevalence and Persistence in Industrialized Poultry Slaughterhouses. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 100991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, R.A.; Eade, C.R.; Wiedmann, M. Embracing Diversity: Differences in Virulence Mechanisms, Disease Severity, and Host Adaptations Contribute to the Success of Nontyphoidal Salmonella as a Foodborne Pathogen. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Melo, R.T.; dos Reis Cardoso, T.; Peres, P.A.B.M.; Braz, R.F.; Monteiro, G.P.; Rossi, D.A. Salmonella enterica Serovar Minnesota Biofilms, Susceptibility to Biocides, and Molecular Characterization. Pathogens 2021, 10, 581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dula, S.; Ajayeoba, T.A.; Ijabadeniyi, O.A. Bacterial Biofilm Formation on Stainless Steel in the Food Processing Environment and Its Health Implications. Folia Microbiol. 2021, 66, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, S.; Mohler, J.; Mahajan, S.D.; Schwartz, S.A.; Bruggemann, L.; Aalinkeel, R. Microbial Biofilm: A Review on Formation, Infection, Antibiotic Resistance, Control Measures, and Innovative Treatment. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gerstel, U.; Römling, U. The csgD Promoter, a Control Unit for Biofilm Formation in Salmonella typhimurium. Res. Microbiol. 2003, 154, 659–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aleksandrowicz, A.; Carolak, E.; Dutkiewicz, A.; Błachut, A.; Waszczuk, W.; Grzymajlo, K. Better together–Salmonella biofilm-associated antibiotic resistance. Gut Microbes 2023, 15, 2229937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruhal, R.; Kataria, R. Biofilm Patterns in Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 251, 126829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.Y.; Prentice, E.L.; Webber, M.A. Mechanisms of Antimicrobial Resistance in Biofilms. npj Antimicrob. Resist. 2024, 2, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, S.; Zhan, Z.; Cui, Y.; Shi, X.; He, S. Emergence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella Minnesota in chicken meat imported to China. J. Future Foods 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silveira, L.; Nunes, A.; Pista, Â.; Isidro, J.; Belo Correia, C.; Saraiva, M.; Batista, R.; Castanheira, I.; Machado, J.; Gomes, J.P. Characterization of Multidrug-Resistant Isolates of Salmonella enterica Serovars Heidelberg and Minnesota from Fresh Poultry Meat Imported to Portugal. Microb. Drug Resist. 2021, 27, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brasão, S.C.; de Melo, R.T.; Prado, R.R.; Monteiro, G.P.; dos Santos, F.A.L.; Braz, R.F.; Rossi, D.A. Characterization and Control of Biofilms of Salmonella Minnesota of Poultry Origin. Food Biosci. 2021, 39, 100811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, J.; Alzahrani, K.O.; Zhou, G.; Alsalman, S.A.; Alsufyani, A.T.; Alotaibi, N.M.; Al-Akeel, S.I.; Alajlan, A.A.; Mukhtar, L.E.; Almansour, A.M.; et al. Genomic Survey of Multidrug Resistant Salmonella enterica Serovar Minnesota Clones in Chicken Products. npj Antimicrob. Resist. 2025, 3, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dos Santos, A.M.P.; Panzenhagen, P.; Ferrari, R.G.; Portes, A.B.; de Jesus, A.C.; Ochioni, A.; Rodrigues, D.; Toro, M.; Meng, J.; Allard, M.; et al. Genomic Characterization of a Clonal Emergent Salmonella Minnesota Lineage in Brazil Reveals the Presence of a Novel Megaplasmid of Resistance and Virulence. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2024, 90, e0157924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, T.; Liu, Y.; Qin, X.; Aspridou, Z.; Zheng, J.; Wang, X.; Li, Z.; Dong, Q. The Prevalence and Epidemiology of Salmonella in Retail Raw Poultry Meat in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Foods 2021, 10, 2757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chia, T.W.R.; Goulter, R.M.; McMeekin, T.; Dykes, G.A.; Fegan, N. Attachment of different Salmonella serovars to materials commonly used in a poultry processing plant. Food Microbiol. 2009, 26, 853–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carvalho, D.; Chitolina, G.Z.; Wilsmann, D.E.; Lucca, V.; Emery, B.D.; Borges, K.A.; Furian, T.Q.; Santos, L.R.; Moraes, H.L.S.; Nascimento, V.P. Development of Predictive Modeling for Removal of Multispecies Biofilms of Salmonella enteritidis, Escherichia coli, and Campylobacter jejuni from Poultry Slaughterhouse Surfaces. Foods 2024, 13, 1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, D.; Wang, Z.; Tian, Y.; Kang, X.; Meng, C.; Chen, X.; Pan, Z.; Jiao, X. Prevalence of Salmonella Isolates and Their Distribution Based on Whole-Genome Sequence in a Chicken Slaughterhouse in Jiangsu, China. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Morar, A.; Sala, C.; Imre, K. Occurrence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Salmonella Isolates Recovered from the Pig Slaughter Process in Romania. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2015, 9, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Bai, L.; Lan, R.; Zhang, X.; Cui, S.; Xu, J.; Guo, Y.; Li, F.; Zhang, D. Prevalence of Salmonella Isolates from Chicken and Pig Slaughterhouses and Emergence of Ciprofloxacin- and Cefotaxime-Co-Resistant Salmonella enterica Serovar Indiana in Henan, China. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0144532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (M100), 35th ed.; CLSI: Wayne, PA, USA, 2025; Available online: https://clsi.org/shop/standards/m100/ (accessed on 5 January 2026).
- Magiorakos, A.-P.; Srinivasan, A.; Carey, R.B.; Carmeli, Y.; Falagas, M.E.; Giske, C.G.; Harbarth, S.; Hindler, J.F.; Kahlmeter, G.; Olsson-Liljequist, B.; et al. Multidrug-Resistant, Extensively Drug-Resistant and Pandrug-Resistant Bacteria: An International Expert Proposal for Interim Standard Definitions for Acquired Resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 268–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Ornellas Dutka Garcia, K.C.; de Oliveira Corrêa, I.M.; Pereira, L.Q.; Silva, T.M.; de Souza Ribeiro Mioni, M.; de Moraes Izidoro, A.C.; Vellano Bastos, I.H.; Marietto Gonçalves, G.A.; Okamoto, A.S.; Andreatti Filho, R.L. Bacteriophage Use to Control Salmonella Biofilm on Surfaces Present in Chicken Slaughterhouses. Poult. Sci. 2017, 96, 3392–3398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Oliveira, D.C.V.; Fernandes Júnior, A.; Kaneno, R.; Silva, M.G.; Araújo Júnior, J.P.; Silva, N.C.C.; Rall, V.L.M. Ability of Salmonella spp. to Produce Biofilm Is Dependent on Temperature and Surface Material. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2014, 11, 478–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stepanovic, S.; Vukovic, D.; Dakic, I.; Savic, B.; Svabic-Vlahovic, M. A Modified Microtiter-Plate Test for Quantification of Staphylococcal Biofilm Formation. J. Microbiol. Methods 2000, 40, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Webber, B.; Borges, K.A.; Furian, T.Q.; Rizzo, N.N.; Tondo, E.C.; dos Santos, L.R.; Rodrigues, L.B.; Nascimento, V.P.d. Detection of Virulence Genes in Salmonella Heidelberg Isolated from Chicken Carcasses. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. São Paulo 2019, 61, e36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.; Feng, Z.; Sun, H.; Zhang, R.; Qin, T.; Peng, D. Biofilm-Formation-Related Genes csgD and bcsA Promote the Vertical Transmission of Salmonella enteritidis in Chicken. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 625049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menck-Costa, M.F.; Baptista, A.A.S.; Gazal, L.E.d.S.; Justino, L.; Sanches, M.S.; de Souza, M.; Nishio, E.K.; Queiroz dos Santos, B.; Cruz, V.D.; Berbert, J.V.M.; et al. High-Frequency Detection of fosA3 and blaCTX–M–55 Genes in Escherichia coli From Longitudinal Monitoring in Broiler Chicken Farms. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 846116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robicsek, A.; Strahilevitz, J.; Sahm, D.F.; Jacoby, G.A.; Hooper, D.C. Qnr Prevalence in Ceftazidime-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Isolates from the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 2872–2874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock (MAPA). Ordinance No. 210, of 10 November 1998. Technical Regulation for the Technological and Hygienic–Sanitary Inspection of Poultry Meat. Official Gazette of the Federative Republic of Brazil: Brasília, Brazil, 1998. Available online: https://www.gov.br/agricultura/pt-br/assuntos/inspecao/produtos-animal/empresario/arquivos/Portaria2101998.pdf/view (accessed on 22 December 2025).
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Standard Operating Procedure for PulseNet PFGE of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Escherichia coli non-O157 (STEC), Salmonella serotypes, Shigella sonnei and Shigella flexneri; CDC PulseNet: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2017; Volume PNL05, pp. 1–16. Available online: https://www.pulsenetinternational.org/assets/PulseNet/uploads/pfge/PNL05_Ec-Sal-ShigPFGEprotocol.pdf (accessed on 7 June 2025).
- Marin, C.; Cerdà-Cuéllar, M.; González-Bodi, S.; Lorenzo-Rebenaque, L.; Vega, S. Research Note: Persistent Salmonella Problems in Slaughterhouses Related to Clones Linked to Poultry Companies. Poult. Sci. 2022, 101, 101968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lunara Santos Pavelquesi, S.; Carolina Almeida de Oliveira Ferreira, A.; Fernandes Silva Rodrigues, L.; Maria de Souza Silva, C.; Cristina Rodrigues da Silva, I.; Castilho Orsi, D. Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella spp. Isolated From Chilled Chicken Meat Commercialized at Retail in Federal District, Brazil. J. Food Prot. 2023, 86, 100130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yu, K.; Huang, Z.; Xiao, Y.; Gao, H.; Bai, X.; Wang, D. Global Spread Characteristics of CTX-M-Type Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamases: A Genomic Epidemiology Analysis. Drug Resist. Updates 2024, 73, 101036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hornish, R.; Katarski, S. Cephalosporins in Veterinary Medicine—Ceftiofur Use in Food Animals. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2002, 2, 717–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Verrette, L.; Fairbrother, J.M.; Boulianne, M. Effect of Cessation of Ceftiofur and Substitution with Lincomycin-Spectinomycin on Extended-Spectrum-β-Lactamase/AmpC Genes and Multidrug Resistance in Escherichia coli from a Canadian Broiler Production Pyramid. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 85, e00037-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Health Organization (WHO). Critically Important Antimicrobials for Human Medicine, 6th ed.; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019; Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241515528 (accessed on 17 December 2025).
- Redgrave, L.S.; Sutton, S.B.; Webber, M.A.; Piddock, L.J.V. Fluoroquinolone Resistance: Mechanisms, Impact on Bacteria, and Role in Evolutionary Success. Trends Microbiol. 2014, 22, 438–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costa, G.A.; Dias, T.S.; Fialho, D.S.; Silva, L.a.M.; Figueira, A.A.; Cunha, N.C.; Pereira, V.L.A.; Abreu, D.L.C. Resistance Profile of Salmonella spp. to Third Generation Cephalosporins and Quinolones in Chicken Carcasses from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 2024, 26, eRBCA-2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Y.; Zhao, H.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, X.; Wang, J.; Liu, T.; Beier, R.C.; Hou, X. Characterization of Quinolone Resistance in Salmonella enterica Serovar Indiana from Chickens in China. Poult. Sci. 2015, 94, 454–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agostinho Davanzo, E.F.; dos Santos, R.L.; Castro, V.H.d.L.; Palma, J.M.; Pribul, B.R.; Dallago, B.S.L.; Fuga, B.; Medeiros, M.; Titze de Almeida, S.S.; da Costa, H.M.B.; et al. Molecular Characterization of Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes Strains from Biofilms in Cattle and Poultry Slaughterhouses Located in the Federal District and State of Goiás, Brazil. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0259687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brasileiro, A.C.M.; Sá, C.V.G.C.d.; Rodrigues, C.S.; Oliveira, A.; Nicolino, R.; Haddad, J.P.A. Risk Factors and Prevalence of Salmonella spp. in Poultry Carcasses in Slaughterhouses Under Official Veterinary Inspection Service in Brazil. Animals 2025, 15, 2377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rau, R.B.; Ribeiro, A.R.; dos Santos, A.; Barth, A.L. Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella from Poultry Meat in Brazil: Results of a Nationwide Survey. Epidemiol. Infect. 2021, 149, e228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, L.; Wu, X.; Wu, G.; Wu, Y.; Li, H.; Shao, B. Association Analysis of Antibiotic and Disinfectant Resistome in Human and Foodborne Escherichia coli in Beijing, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 944, 173888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walczak, Ł.J.; Kwiatkowska, M.; Twarowski, B.; Kubacka, M.; Paluch, J.; Herbet, M. Disinfectant-Induced Bacterial Resistance and Antibiotic Cross-Resistance—Mechanisms and Clinical Relevance. Clin. Exp. Med. 2026, 26, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yue, M.; Schifferli, D.M. Allelic variation in Salmonella: An underappreciated driver of adaptation and virulence. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 4, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Obe, T.; Nannapaneni, R.; Sharma, C.S.; Kiess, A. Homologous Stress Adaptation, Antibiotic Resistance, and Biofilm Forming Ability of Salmonella enterica Serovar Heidelberg ATCC8326 on Different Food-Contact Surfaces Following Exposure to Sublethal Chlorine Concentrations1 1This Publication Is a Contribution of the Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station. Poult. Sci. 2018, 97, 951–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giorgio, R.T.; Helaine, S. Antibiotic-Recalcitrant Salmonella during Infection. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2025, 23, 276–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cadena, M.; Kelman, T.; Marco, M.L.; Pitesky, M. Understanding Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) Profiles of Salmonella Biofilm and Planktonic Bacteria Challenged with Disinfectants Commonly Used during Poultry Processing. Foods 2019, 8, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flemming, H.-C.; Wingender, J.; Szewzyk, U.; Steinberg, P.; Rice, S.A.; Kjelleberg, S. Biofilms: An Emergent Form of Bacterial Life. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 14, 563–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amanatidou, E.; Matthews, A.C.; Kuhlicke, U.; Neu, T.R.; McEvoy, J.P.; Raymond, B. Biofilms Facilitate Cheating and Social Exploitation of β-Lactam Resistance in Escherichia coli. npj Biofilms Microbiomes 2019, 5, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Harrell, J.E.; Hahn, M.M.; D’Souza, S.J.; Vasicek, E.M.; Sandala, J.L.; Gunn, J.S.; McLachlan, J.B. Salmonella Biofilm Formation, Chronic Infection, and Immunity Within the Intestine and Hepatobiliary Tract. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 10, 624622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Borges, K.A.; Furian, T.Q.; Souza, S.N.; Menezes, R.; Tondo, E.C.; Salle, C.T.P.; Moraes, H.L.S.; Nascimento, V.P. Biofilm Formation Capacity of Salmonella Serotypes at Different Temperature Conditions. Pesq. Vet. Bras. 2018, 38, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vice, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Chitlapilly Dass, S.; Wang, R. Microscopic Analysis of Temperature Effects on Surface Colonization and Biofilm Morphology of Salmonella enterica. Foods 2025, 14, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, S.-H.; Jyung, S.; Kang, D.-H. Comparative study of Salmonella typhimurium biofilms and their resistance depending on cellulose secretion and maturation temperatures. LWT 2022, 154, 112700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ban-Cucerzan, A.; Imre, K.; Morar, A.; Marcu, A.; Hotea, I.; Popa, S.-A.; Pătrînjan, R.-T.; Bucur, I.-M.; Gașpar, C.; Plotuna, A.-M.; et al. Persistent Threats: A Comprehensive Review of Biofilm Formation, Control, and Economic Implications in Food Processing Environments. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schonewille, E.; Nesse, L.; Hauck, R.; Windhorst, D.; Hafez, H.; Vestby, L. Biofilm Building Capacity of Salmonella enterica Strains from the Poultry Farm Environment. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2012, 65, 360–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dias, M.R.; Cavicchioli, V.Q.; Camargo, A.C.; Lanna, F.G.P.A.; Pinto, P.S.d.A.; Bersot, L.d.S.; Nero, L.A. Molecular Tracking of Salmonella spp. in Chicken Meat Chain: From Slaughterhouse Reception to End Cuts. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 53, 1084–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, Y.; Yu, C.; Zhong, S.; Chen, G.; Liu, L. Roughness-Controlled Cell-Surface Interactions Mediate Early Biofilm Development in Drinking Water Systems. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 110101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shineh, G.; Mobaraki, M.; Perves Bappy, M.J.; Mills, D.K. Biofilm Formation, and Related Impacts on Healthcare, Food Processing and Packaging, Industrial Manufacturing, Marine Industries, and Sanitation—A Review. Appl. Microbiol. 2023, 3, 629–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kranjc, K.; Avberšek, J.; Šemrov, N.; Zorman-Rojs, O.; Barlič-Maganja, D. Salmonella Infantis Adhesion to Various Surfaces and In Vitro Antimicrobial Efficacy of Commercial Disinfectants. Pathogens 2024, 13, 999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holden, E.R.; Yasir, M.; Turner, A.K.; Charles, I.G.; Webber, M.A. Comparison of the Genetic Basis of Biofilm Formation between Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli. Microb. Genom. 2022, 8, 000885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, Z.; Niu, H.; Wu, S.; Huang, R. CsgD Regulatory Network in a Bacterial Trait-Altering Biofilm Formation. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2014, 3, e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sokaribo, A.S.; Hansen, E.G.; McCarthy, M.; Desin, T.S.; Waldner, L.L.; MacKenzie, K.D.; Mutwiri, G.; Herman, N.J.; Herman, D.J.; Wang, Y.; et al. Metabolic Activation of CsgD in the Regulation of Salmonella Biofilms. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Musa, L.; Toppi, V.; Stefanetti, V.; Spata, N.; Rapi, M.C.; Grilli, G.; Addis, M.F.; Di Giacinto, G.; Franciosini, M.P.; Casagrande Proietti, P. High Biofilm-Forming Multidrug-Resistant Salmonella Infantis Strains from the Poultry Production Chain. Antibiotics 2024, 13, 595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dantas, S.T.A.; Rossi, B.F.; Bonsaglia, E.C.R.; Castilho, I.G.; Hernandes, R.T.; Fernandes, A.; Rall, V.L.M. Cross-Contamination and Biofilm Formation by Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis on Various Cutting Boards. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2018, 15, 81–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MacKenzie, K.D.; Wang, Y.; Shivak, D.J.; Wong, C.S.; Hoffman, L.J.L.; Lam, S.; Kröger, C.; Cameron, A.D.S.; Townsend, H.G.G.; Köster, W.; et al. Bistable Expression of CsgD in Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Connects Virulence to Persistence. Infect. Immun. 2015, 83, 2312–2326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammed, B.T. Identification and Bioinformatic Analysis of invA Gene of Salmonella in Free Range Chicken. Braz. J. Biol. 2024, 84, e263363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Giacomodonato, M.N.; Noto Llana, M.; Aya Castañeda, M.d.R.; Buzzola, F.R.; Sarnacki, S.H.; Cerquetti, M.C. AvrA Effector Protein of Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis Is Expressed and Translocated in Mesenteric Lymph Nodes at Late Stages of Infection in Mice. Microbiology 2014, 160, 1191–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wright, M.; Kaur, M.; Thompson, L.K.; Cox, G. A Historical Perspective on the Multifunctional Outer Membrane Channel Protein TolC in Escherichia coli. npj Antimicrob. Resist. 2025, 3, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Z.; Jiang, X. Thermal Resistance and Gene Expression of Both Desiccation-Adapted and Rehydrated Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Cells in Aged Broiler Litter. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83, e00367-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fiedler, G.; Nöbel, S.; Matzen, S.; Samtlebe, M.; Franz, C.M.A.P. Thermal Inactivation of the Heat-Resistant Pathogens Salmonella senftenberg 775W and Escherichia coli AW1.7 in Whey Concentrate. Appl. Microbiol. 2024, 4, 510–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mughini-Gras, L.; van Hoek, A.H.A.M.; Cuperus, T.; Dam-Deisz, C.; van Overbeek, W.; van den Beld, M.; Wit, B.; Rapallini, M.; Wullings, B.; Franz, E.; et al. Prevalence, Risk Factors and Genetic Traits of Salmonella Infantis in Dutch Broiler Flocks. Vet. Microbiol. 2021, 258, 109120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dantas, S.T.A.; Camargo, C.H.; Tiba-Casas, M.R.; Vivian, R.C.; Pinto, J.P.A.N.; Pantoja, J.C.F.; Hernandes, R.T.; Fernandes Júnior, A.; Rall, V.L.M. Environmental Persistence and Virulence of Salmonella spp. Isolated from a Poultry Slaughterhouse. Food Res. Int. 2020, 129, 108835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rasschaert, G.; Houf, K.; De Zutter, L. Impact of the Slaughter Line Contamination on the Presence of Salmonella on Broiler Carcasses. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 103, 333–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rasschaert, G.; Houf, K.; Godard, C.; Wildemauwe, C.; Pastuszczak-Fra̧k, M.; De Zutter, L. Contamination of Carcasses with Salmonella during Poultry Slaughter. J. Food Prot. 2008, 71, 146–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boubendir, S.; Arsenault, J.; Quessy, S.; Thibodeau, A.; Fravalo, P.; Thériault, W.P.; Fournaise, S.; Gaucher, M.-L. Salmonella Contamination of Broiler Chicken Carcasses at Critical Steps of the Slaughter Process and in the Environment of Two Slaughter Plants: Prevalence, Genetic Profiles, and Association with the Final Carcass Status. J. Food Prot. 2021, 84, 321–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mandelli, J.; Ehrhardt, A.; Manto, L.; Borges, K.; Furian, T.; Weber, B.; Rodrigues, L.; Santos, L. Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Production and Biofilm Formation in Salmonella Serovars Resistant to Antimicrobial Agents. Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 2019, 21, eRBCA-2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]




| Antimicrobial Category | Antimicrobials | Origen | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carcass % (n/N) | Cecum % (n/N) | Slaughterhouse Chiller Water % (n/N) | p-Value | ||
| Amionoglycosides | GEN | 42.31 (11/26) | 60 (15/25) | 45.45 (5/11) | 0.566 |
| N | 38.46 (10/26) | 32 (8/25) | 18.18 (2/11) | 0.496 | |
| Sulfonamides | SXT | 7.69 (2/26) | 12 (3/25) | 18.18 (2/11) | 0.659 |
| Tetracyclines | TET | 61.54 (16/26) | 60 (15/25) | 72.73 (8/11) | 0.762 |
| Fluoroquinolones | CP | 65.38 (17/26) | 52 (15/25) | 54.55 (6/11) | 0.617 |
| NOR | 7.69 (2/26) | 0 (0/25) | 0 (0/11) | 0.248 | |
| ENR | 65.38 (17/26) | 68 (17/25) | 63.64 (7/11) | 0.964 | |
| Phenicols | CL | 0 (0/26) | 8 (2/25) | 0 (0/11) | 0.224 |
| Fosfomycin | FOS | 11.54 (3/26) | 0 (0/25) | 0 (0/11) | 0.116 |
| 2nd Generation Cephalosporins | FOX | 69.23 (18/26) | 56 (14/25) | 63.64 (11/11) | 0.631 |
| Penicillin | AMP | 100 (26/26) | 96 (24/25) | 90.91 (10/11) | 0.357 |
| Carbapenems | ETP | 0 (0/26) | 0 (0/25) | 0 (0/11) | - |
| β-lactam combination agents | AMC | 65.38 (17/26) | 60 (15/25) | 63.64 (7/11) | 0.924 |
| 4th Generation Cephalosporins | CPM | 42.31 (11/26) | 48 (12/25) | 36.36 (4/11) | 0.807 |
| Monobactams | ATM | 57.69 (15/26) | 76 (19/25) | 63.64 (6/11) | 0.390 |
| CRO | 100 (26/26) | 92 (23/25) | 81.82 (9/11) | 0.113 | |
| 3rd Generation Cephalosporins | CTX | 100 (26/26) | 96 (24/25) | 81.82 (9/11) | 0.060 |
| XNL | 69.23 (18/26) b | 96 (24/25) a | 72.73 (8/11) ab | 0.040 | |
| CAZ | 100 (26/26) | 96 (24/25) | 81.82 (9/11) | 0.060 | |
| Biofilm Production Category | Origin | p-Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carcass % (n/N) | Cecum % (n/N) | Slaughterhouse Chiller Water % (n/N) | ||
| Non-producer | 11.54 (3/26) | 4 (1/25) | 0 (0/11) | 0.357 |
| Weak | 15.38 (4/26) b | 24 (6/25) ab | 54.55 (6/11) a | 0.043 |
| Moderate | 46.15 (12/26) | 56 (14/25) | 36.36 (4/11) | 0.543 |
| Strong | 26.92 (7/26) | 16 (4/25) | 9.10 (1/11) | 0.403 |
| Profile | Temperature | Origin | p-Value | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 °C | 16 °C | 35 °C | Carcass | Cecum | Slaughterhouse Chiller Water | Temperature | Origin | Interaction | |
| Non adherent % (n/N) | 11.29 (7/62) b | 9.68 (6/62) b | 38.71 (24/62) a | 21.79 (17/78) | 18.67 (14/75) | 18.18 (6/33) | 0.000 | 0.844 | 0.368 |
| Weak % (n/N) | 46.77 (29/62) | 62.90 (39/62) | 61.29 (38/62) | 60.26 (47/78) | 52 (39/75) | 60.61 (20/33) | 0.224 | 0.529 | 0.463 |
| Moderate % (n/N) | 25.81 (16/62) a | 25.81 (16/62) a | 0 (0/62) b | 11.54 (9/78) | 22.67 (17/75) | 18.18 (6/33) | 0.000 | 0.162 | 0.710 |
| Strong % (n/N) | 16.13 (10/62) a | 1.61 (1/62) b | 0 (0/62) b | 6.41 (5/78) | 6.67 (5/75) | 3.03 (1/33) | 0.001 | 0.725 | 0.855 |
| Samples (n) | 62 | 62 | 62 | 78 | 75 | 33 | |||
| Genes | Functional Category | Origin | p-Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carcass % (n/N) | Cecum % (n/N) | Slaughterhouse Chiller Water % (n/N) | |||
| sefA | Fimbriae | 0 (0/26) | 0 (0/25) | 0 (0/11) | - |
| agfA | 100 (26/26) | 92 (23/25) | 100 (11/11) | 0.224 | |
| lpfA | 38.46 (10/26) | 44 (11/25) | 18.19 (2/11) | 0.341 | |
| sipA | T3SS—Effector proteins | 88.46 (23/26) | 96 (24/25) | 90.91 (10/11) | 0.620 |
| avrA | 100 (26/26) | 100 (25/25) | 90.91 (10/11) | 0.097 | |
| adrA | Regulatory proteins/biofilm | 100 (26/26) | 100 (25/25) | 100 (11/11) | - |
| luxS | 8.06 (5/26) | 36 (9/25) | 0 (0/11) | 0.051 | |
| csgD | 100 (26/26) | 100 (25/25) | 100 (11/11) | - | |
| spaN | T3SS—Structure | 92.30 (24/26) | 96 (24/25) | 90.91 (10/11) | 0.357 |
| invA | Marker/invasion | 100 (26/26) | 100 (25/25) | 100 (11/11) | - |
| tolC | Intracellular survival/efflux | 96.15 (25/26) | 76 (19/25) | 90.90 (10/11) | 0.093 |
| Genes | Origin | p-Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carcass % (n/N) | Cecum % (n/N) | Slaughterhouse Chiller Water % (n/N) | ||
| qnrS | 3.85 (1/26) | 4 (1/25) | 0 (0/11) | 0.807 |
| qnrA | 0 (0/26) | 0 (0/25) | 0 (0/11) | - |
| qnrB | 69.23 (18/26) | 68 (17/25) | 54.55 (6/11) | 0.678 |
| blaCTX-M-1 | 15.38 (4/26) | 20 (5/25) | 18.19 (2/11) | 0.914 |
| blaCTX-M-2 | 38.46 (10/26) | 52 (13/25) | 45.46 (5/11) | 0.636 |
| blaCTX-M-8 | 3.85 (1/26) | 0 (0/25) | 0 (0/11) | 0.507 |
| blaCTX-M-9 | 0 (0/26) | 0 (0/25) | 0 (0/11) | - |
| blaCTX-M-25 | 0 (0/26) | 0 (0/25) | 0 (0/11) | - |
| fosA3 | 0 (0/26) | 0 (0/25) | 0 (0/11) | - |
| Treatment Temperature/Time | Origin | p-Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cecum | Carcass | Slaughterhouse Chiller Water | ||
| 4 °C/30 min | 9.139 ab | 9.084 b | 9.247 a | 0.034 |
| 10 °C/30 min | 9.134 | 9.114 | 9.175 | 0.590 |
| 37 °C/30 min | 9.172 | 9.130 | 9.218 | 0.371 |
| 50 °C/3 min | 9.123 | 9.072 | 9.124 | 0.550 |
| 65 °C/3 min | 2.162 a | 1.647 b | 1.987 ab | 0.041 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Justino, L.; Baptista, A.A.S.; de Carvalho, R.H.; Casella, T.; Sano, E.L.; da Silva Costa, J.V.; da Costa, A.R.; Menck-Costa, M.F.; Marques Pilli, M.F.; Bergamo Benteo, A.C.; et al. Environmental Persistence and Genotypic and Phenotypic Characterization of Salmonella Minnesota in Poultry Slaughterhouses. Pathogens 2026, 15, 247. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15030247
Justino L, Baptista AAS, de Carvalho RH, Casella T, Sano EL, da Silva Costa JV, da Costa AR, Menck-Costa MF, Marques Pilli MF, Bergamo Benteo AC, et al. Environmental Persistence and Genotypic and Phenotypic Characterization of Salmonella Minnesota in Poultry Slaughterhouses. Pathogens. 2026; 15(3):247. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15030247
Chicago/Turabian StyleJustino, Larissa, Ana Angelita Sampaio Baptista, Rafael Humberto de Carvalho, Tiago Casella, Evelin Lurie Sano, João Vitor da Silva Costa, Arthur Roberto da Costa, Maísa Fabiana Menck-Costa, Maria Fernanda Marques Pilli, Ana Carolina Bergamo Benteo, and et al. 2026. "Environmental Persistence and Genotypic and Phenotypic Characterization of Salmonella Minnesota in Poultry Slaughterhouses" Pathogens 15, no. 3: 247. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15030247
APA StyleJustino, L., Baptista, A. A. S., de Carvalho, R. H., Casella, T., Sano, E. L., da Silva Costa, J. V., da Costa, A. R., Menck-Costa, M. F., Marques Pilli, M. F., Bergamo Benteo, A. C., de Souza, M., Hirata, A. K., Dalle Mole, C. A., Costalonga Andrade, R. M., Andreatti Filho, R. L., & Oba, A. (2026). Environmental Persistence and Genotypic and Phenotypic Characterization of Salmonella Minnesota in Poultry Slaughterhouses. Pathogens, 15(3), 247. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15030247

