Previous Article in Journal
Whole Genome Sequencing of Drug-Resistant Vibrio cholerae Serotype Ogawa from an Outbreak in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Five-Year Slaughterhouse-Based Surveillance of Echinococcus granulosus in Sheep from Yili, Northwest Xinjiang, China

1
NHC Key Laboratory of Parasite and Vector Biology, National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research), Shanghai 200025, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Pathogenesis, Prevention and Treatment of High Incidence Diseases in Central Asia, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830054, China
3
WHO-Collaborating Centre for Prevention and Care Management of Echinococcosis, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830054, China
4
Jiangsu Agri-Animal Husbandry Vocational College, Taizhou 225300, China
5
Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830011, China
6
Key Laboratory of Animal Parasitology of Ministry of Agriculture, Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Animal Products on Biohazards (Shanghai) of the Ministry of Agriculture, Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 200241, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Pathogens 2026, 15(1), 40; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15010040 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 18 September 2025 / Revised: 13 December 2025 / Accepted: 17 December 2025 / Published: 29 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Topic Advances in Infectious and Parasitic Diseases of Animals)

Abstract

Background: Cystic echinococcosis (CE) remains a significant zoonotic burden in the pastoral regions of China. Yili Prefecture in Xinjiang is a high-risk area, yet comprehensive data are lacking on the prevalence and molecular characteristics of Echinococcus granulosus in its primary intermediate host, sheep. Methods: From 2020 to 2024, a total of 2700 sheep livers were visually inspected for hydatid cysts infection at one randomly selected slaughterhouse in each of the nine counties of Yili Prefecture. Ninety cyst-positive samples were subjected to morphological examination and molecular genotyping by amplifying and sequencing the nad2 gene. Results: The overall prevalence of E. granulosus was 22.0% (594/2700). County-level prevalence ranged from 18.3% (Zhaosu County) to 25.7% (Huocheng County), with no significant differences observed among the counties (p > 0.05) except between Huocheng and Zhaosu. Temporally, the annual prevalence fluctuated between 20.2% and 24.2% without a consistent downward trend. Genotyping revealed that the G1 genotype was overwhelmingly dominant (95.2%, 79/83), with a minor circulation of the G3 genotype (4.8%, 4/83). Fourteen haplotypes were identified; Hap1 was the central and predominant haplotype (47.0%, 39/83), found in all counties. Network analysis suggested a recent population expansion of the parasite. Conclusion: This five-year surveillance study reveals a persistently high prevalence and complex genetic diversity of E. granulosus in sheep in Yili Prefecture. The dominance of the zoonotic G1 genotype indicates a substantial public health threat. Our findings provide crucial data for contributing to the development of local control strategies. However, the specific reasons for the high infection rate in sheep remain unclear, as this study did not include examinations of definitive hosts or environmental samples; this gap should be addressed in future research.

1. Introduction

Echinococcus granulosus is a zoonotic cestode whose larval stage is the causative agent of cystic echinococcosis (CE), a severe parasitic disease affecting both livestock and humans [1]. The parasite has a global distribution, with endemic foci predominantly located in the Northern Hemisphere, including extensive regions of Asia, Europe, and North America [2,3]. In these endemic areas, the annual human incidence of CE ranges from less than 1 to 200 cases per 100,000 individuals [4]. This disease imposes a substantial burden on public health, accounting for an estimated global loss of 285,500 disability-adjusted life years annually (DALYs) [5,6]. China has an estimated 30 million livestock infected with CE and 7 million new annual infections, over 70% of which occur in sheep. These infections result in annual economic losses of approximately 1 billion CNY (RMB), primarily due to decreased body weight, reduced milk production, and deteriorated meat and wool quality [7]. In response to its significant impact, the World Health Organization (WHO) has classified echinococcosis as a neglected tropical disease (NTD) [8]. Since 2005, China has intensified its national echinococcosis control efforts through central government funding and policies, with the goal of controlling and eliminating the disease by 2030 [8].
China is a highly endemic area for both alveolar echinococcosis (AE) and CE, with CE having a higher prevalence [9]. The disease is hyperendemic in western and northwestern pastoral regions [10]. Humans and livestock acquire E. granulosus infection by ingesting eggs from environments contaminated by feces of infected definitive hosts (e.g., dogs) [11]. Following ingestion, the released oncospheres form metacestode cysts in internal organs, primarily the liver (~90%) and lungs (~10%) [11,12]. The interconnected transmission cycle among animals, humans, and the environment underscores the importance of the One Health approach for effective control [13].
Sheep husbandry constitutes a primary economic pillar in these pastoral areas. Despite their importance, the epidemiology of E. granulosus infection in sheep remains poorly characterized, with existing studies being sporadic and geographically limited. Conducting continuous monitoring of E. granulosus in sheep provides insights into the control status of echinococcosis in China. In Xinjiang, Guo et al. [14,15] reported infection rates of 3.5% (44/1270) in northern Xinjiang and 4.5% (131/2898) in the Altai region, identifying two genotypes (G1 and G3). A higher prevalence was reported by Lan et al. [16], who found the prevalence of E. granulosus in sheep in Xinjiang to be as high as 17.1% (58/340), and two genotypes (G1 and G3) were detected. A comparative serosurvey by Zhang et al. [17] employing ELISA revealed a significantly higher seroprevalence in sheep from Qinghai Province than from Xinjiang. Similarly, an examination of cysts from slaughtered livestock by Su et al. [18] found that 56.2% (41/73) of E. granulosus cysts were from sheep and yaks, and genetic analysis detected three genotypes (sheep strains G1 and G3, and camel strain G6). Furthermore, Yang et al. [19] demonstrated an age-associated increase in prevalence in sheep and goats in western Sichuan Province, from 38% in 1–6-year-olds to 70% in 10–12-year-olds, with only the G1 genotype identified in the region.
However, comprehensive epidemiological data on E. granulosus infection in sheep within Yili Kazak Autonomous Prefecture (Yili Prefecture) remain scarce. Since CE infections in sheep are predominantly asymptomatic and reliable antemortem diagnostic techniques are lacking, direct postmortem inspection of the liver represents a more accurate method for determining the true prevalence of the disease. Therefore, the objectives of this study were twofold: (i) to conduct the first comprehensive assessment of E. granulosus prevalence in slaughterhouse-sampled sheep from nine counties across Yili Prefecture between 2020 and 2024 and (ii) to genetically characterize the circulating strains of E. granulosus using morphological and molecular analyses. Our findings provide critical baseline data to inform and refine future CE control strategies in this highly endemic region.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

This study was conducted in Yili Prefecture, located between 40°14′–49°10′ N and 80°09′–91°01′ E. The prefecture encompasses a total area of 56,500 km2, which includes 47.26 million acres of grassland and 9.67 million acres of forest land, making it the largest pastoral region in Xinjiang. According to official government statistics, the total mutton production from 2020 to 2024 was 370,700 tons, with an annual average of 74,140 tons. Production ranged from 55,300 tons in 2020 to a peak of 81,700 tons in 2023. From 2022 to 2024, the sheep inventory was 6.4 million, 5.9 million, and 5.2 million, respectively, while the number of sheep slaughtered was 4.3 million, 4.6 million, and 4.4 million, respectively (Supplementary Table S1).

2.2. Sample Collection and Visual Inspection

Sample collection was conducted uniformly across all counties in October each year. Inspections took place at slaughterhouses with a daily throughput exceeding 100 animals. Between fifty and eighty samples were inspected in each slaughterhouse, and the number of E. granulosus positive cases was recorded. Liver samples showing severe lesions-especially those with prominent surface cysts (including calcified cysts)-were transported to the laboratory for molecular testing.
During visual inspection, E. granulosus infection was diagnosed based on the presence of characteristic spherical cysts with thick, laminated, whitish walls and clear fluid or daughter cysts within. These features allow for a clear distinction from the biliary fibrosis and calcification caused by Fasciola hepatica and from the thin-walled, transparent vesicles attached to the hepatic surface caused by Cysticercus tenuicollis. Liver samples showing severe lesions (cysts larger than 5 cm) were transported to the laboratory for molecular testing.
From 2020 to 2024, a total of 2700 sheep livers were visually inspected for cystic lesions during slaughterhouse surveillance across 9 counties in Yili Prefecture of Xinjiang. The surveyed counties included Chabuchaer Xibo Autonomous County (Chabuchaer; n = 300), Gongliu County (n = 300), Huocheng County (n = 280), Nileke County (n = 310), Tekesi County (n = 300), Xinyuan County (n = 300), Yining City (n = 300), Yining County (n = 310), and Zhaosu County (n = 300) (Figure 1).

2.3. Morphological Characterization

Ninety severely infected cystic liver samples (including calcified cysts) were first washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and their surfaces were carefully wiped with 75% alcohol. Hydatid fluid was aseptically aspirated from the cysts using a 10 mL sterile syringe and then transferred to a 50 mL centrifuge tube for natural sedimentation. The protoscolices (PSCs) were pelleted via centrifugation at 500× g for 5 min, washed three times with PBS, and finally resuspended in 30 mL of PBS. For viability assessment, a 100 μL aliquot of the PSC suspension was stained with 1% methylene blue for 1 min and examined under a light microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). For molecular analysis, 1 mL aliquots of the PSC suspension were stored at −20 °C until DNA extraction.

2.4. DNA Extraction and PCR Amplification

The frozen PSC suspensions were thawed and homogenized using an orbital shaker (Jingxin Biotech, Shanghai, China). The samples were then centrifuged at 5000× g for 10 min, and the supernatant was carefully discarded. Genomic DNA was extracted using the TIANamp Genomic DNA Kit (TianGen Biotech, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The DNA was eluted in 100 μL of preheated (55 °C) elution buffer and stored at −20 °C until further analysis.
The NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 (nad2) gene (~1500 bp) of E. granulosus was amplified using primers previously described by Guo et al. [20]: forward 5′-ATTTTGCGGTCGTCTCTGAT-3′ and reverse 5′-TCCACGAGACCAAGGATACC-3′. PCR was performed in a 25 μL reaction mixture containing 12.5 μL of 2× PCR buffer mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 8.5 μL of nuclease-free water, 1 μL of each primer (10 μM), and 2 μL of template DNA. Amplification was carried out in a thermal cycler (Bio-Rad T100™, Hercules, CA, USA) under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min; 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 56 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 2 min; and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. Each PCR run included both positive (genomic DNA from a confirmed E. granulosus sample) and negative (nuclease-free water instead of template DNA) controls.

2.5. Phylogenetic Analyses

PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis on 1.0% agarose gels. Amplicons that yielded a band of the expected size were purified and sent for Sanger sequencing (Sunny Biotech, Shanghai, China). The obtained nad2 sequences were compared to known sequences in the GenBank database using the BLAST algorithm (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) (accessed on 28 May 2025). Multiple sequence alignment was performed using Clustal W with default parameters, and the alignments were manually refined using MEGA X (version 10.2.6). A phylogenetic tree was reconstructed based on the aligned sequences using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method. All phylogenetic analyses employed the Kimura 2-parameter model, and the robustness of the inferred topology was assessed with 1000 bootstrap replicates.
A median-joining haplotype network was constructed using PopArt software (version 1.7) to visualize the relationships among mitochondrial DNA haplotypes (Haps). Genetic diversity indices, including the number of Haps, haplotype diversity (Hd), and nucleotide diversity (π), were calculated using DnaSP software (v6). Neutrality tests, including Tajima’s D and Fu’s Fs, were performed to detect deviations from population equilibrium. Population genetic structure was evaluated by calculating pairwise fixation indices (Fst) in Arlequin software (version 3.5.2.2). All unique nad2 sequences generated in this study were deposited in the GenBank database under accession numbers PX430486 to PX430498.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The prevalence of E. granulosus infection in sheep livers, expressed as a percentage with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), was calculated for each of the nine study counties. Differences in prevalence across counties and years were assessed using Pearson’s chi-square test (χ2), while year and county as risk factors were assessed by multivariable logistic regression. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (version 22.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The statistical analyses for Tajima’s D, Fu’s Fs, and Fst values across different counties were performed automatically by the respective software modules. Specifically, Tajima’s D and Fu’s Fs were evaluated using repeated data simulations, while the Fst values were assessed via a permutation test. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all analyses.

3. Results

3.1. Morphological Characteristics

Hydatid cysts, the larval stage of E. granulosus, were predominantly observed in the livers of infected sheep. The cysts, varying in size, were embedded on the hepatic surface. Upon dissection, these cysts were found to contain turbid hydatid fluid and numerous PSCs, which settled as a white sediment. The PSCs exhibited elliptical or gourd-like morphologies, with an average diameter ranging from 70 to 80 μm. When stained with 1% methylene blue, the PSCs took up the dye slightly. The characteristic hooks were observed in the center of the elliptical PSCs and at the rostellar end of the gourd-shaped forms (Figure 2).

3.2. Overall Prevalence of E. granulosus in Sheep Across Different Districts

A five-year (2020–2024) longitudinal surveillance study was conducted to investigate the prevalence of E. granulosus in sheep across nine counties of Yili Prefecture. Visual inspection of 2700 sheep livers identified 594 positive cases, resulting in an overall infection prevalence of 22.0% (594/2700) (Table 1). The county-level prevalence ranged from 18.3% to 25.7%. The highest prevalence was recorded in Huocheng County (25.7%, 72/280), followed by Yining County (24.2%, 75/310). Chabuchaer County, Xinyuan County, and Yining City exhibited a similar prevalence of 23.0% (69/300 each). Lower prevalence rates were observed in Tekesi County (21.0%, 63/300), Gongliu County (20.7%, 62/300), and Nileke County (19.4%, 60/310). The lowest prevalence was found in Zhaosu County (18.3%, 55/300). Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference in prevalence between Huocheng County and Zhaosu County (p < 0.05), while no significant differences were observed among the other counties (p > 0.05) (Table 1, Figure 3a,b).

3.3. Temporal Variation in E. granulosus Prevalence in Sheep from 2020 to 2024

Annual surveillance data from 2020 to 2024 revealed fluctuations in prevalence rates, although these changes were not statistically significant. The highest prevalence was observed in 2021 (24.2%, 195/806), followed by 2020 (23.5%, 106/450), 2023 (21.9%, 118/540), and 2022 (21.1%, 152/720). The lowest prevalence was recorded in 2024 (20.2%, 109/540). Statistical analysis confirmed that the interannual variations in prevalence were not significant (p > 0.05) (Table 2, Figure 3c).

3.4. Temporal Variation in E. granulosus Prevalence Within Individual Counties

Analysis of year-to-year fluctuations within each county revealed considerable heterogeneity in prevalence trends. The prevalence remained above 20% across all five years in Huocheng County (range: 21.2–36.0%) and Yining City (range: 20.0–27.5%). In contrast, Gongliu, Nileke, and Zhaosu counties recorded prevalence rates below 20% in three out of the five study years. Isolated instances of annual prevalence dropping below 20% were observed in Chabuchaer (18.3% in 2024), Tekesi (11.3% in 2022), Xinyuan (16.0% in 2020), and Yining County (16.7% in 2024). Statistical analysis indicated that significant interannual variation (p < 0.05) occurred only in Tekesi County; no significant temporal fluctuations were detected in the other eight counties (p > 0.05) (Table 3, Figure 3a).

3.5. Spatial Variation in E. granulosus Prevalence Within Individual Years

The spatial distribution of prevalence across the nine counties was analyzed for each year. The widest range of prevalence was observed in 2020 (from 16.0% in Xinyuan County to 36.0% in Huocheng County) and in 2022 (from 11.3% in Tekesi County to 27.5% in Yining City). In 2021, the prevalence exceeded 20% in all counties (range: 20.0–28.0%) except Zhaosu County (18.0%, 9/50). In 2023, Gongliu and Nileke counties shared an identical prevalence of 16.7% (10/60), while prevalence in the remaining seven counties was above 20% (range: 20.0–28.3%). In 2024, four counties exhibited a prevalence above 20%: Huocheng (25.0%, 15/60), Tekesi (28.3%, 17/60), Xinyuan (23.3%, 14/60), and Yining City (20.0%, 12/60). The prevalence in the other five counties was below 20% (range: 15.0–18.3%). Significant differences in prevalence among counties were detected in 2020 and 2022 (p < 0.05), but not in other years (Table 3).

3.6. Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis of Risk Factors for E. granulosus Prevalence

Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that Huocheng County had the highest infection risk (OR = 1.56), which was significantly different from Zhaosu County (the reference group, which had the lowest infection rate). In contrast, no statistically significant differences were observed between the other counties and Zhaosu County (p > 0.05; Table 4). Additionally, using the first year (2020) as the reference, no significant differences in infection risk were found across the study years (p > 0.05; Table 5). Both the spatial and temporal results were consistent with the chi-square analysis.

3.7. Molecular Identification and Phylogenetic Relationships

Following macroscopic inspection, 90 severely infected liver samples were selected for molecular analysis. PCR amplification of the nad2 gene was successful for 83 samples (92.2% success rate). Sequencing and subsequent genotyping identified 79 samples (95.2%) as E. granulosus sensu stricto (s. s.) genotype G1 and 4 samples (4.8%) as genotype G3 (Table 6). The G1 genotype was ubiquitous, detected in all nine counties. The G3 genotype was found in four counties: Gongliu, Nileke, Tekesi, and Yining (Table 6).
Analysis of the 83 nad2 sequences defined 14 distinct haplotypes (Hap1–Hap14). Hap1 was the dominant haplotype, identified in all nine counties and comprising 47.0% (39/83) of all sequences. Hap2 was the second most prevalent, detected in eight counties and accounting for 21.7% (18/83) of sequences (Table 7). The distribution of haplotype diversity varied by county. Yining City harbored the greatest number of haplotypes (n = 7), followed by Nileke County (n = 6). In contrast, Huocheng and Xinyuan counties contained the fewest, with only three haplotypes each (Table 8). Phylogenetic reconstruction confirmed that Hap7 and Hap9 clustered within the G3 genotype, while other Haps were associated with the G1 genotype (Figure 4).

3.8. Population Genetic Diversity of E. granulosus s.s. Across Counties

Genetic diversity indices for the nad2 gene of E. granulosus s. s. were calculated for each county using DnaSP v6 (Table 9). Overall, Hd ranged from 0.607 to 0.911, and π ranged from 0.00143 to 0.00284. Yining City exhibited the highest genetic diversity, with the maximum Hd value (0.911) and a high π value (0.00277). In contrast, Huocheng County displayed the lowest genetic diversity, with both the minimum Hd (0.607) and π (0.00143). Nileke County also demonstrated high diversity, possessing the highest π value (0.00284) and a high Hd (0.833). Conversely, Xinyuan County showed a relatively low Hd (0.722) coupled with a moderate π value (0.00228).
Neutrality tests yielded mostly negative values for both Tajima’s D and Fu’s Fs across most counties, though none were statistically significant (p > 0.05). Tajima’s D was negative in eight counties, with a positive value observed only in Xinyuan (Tajima’s D = 0.497). Similarly, Fu’s Fs was negative in seven counties, with Yining City showing the most strongly negative value (Fu’s Fs = −2.590). Huocheng and Xinyuan counties were exceptions, showing positive Fu’s Fs values (0.671 and 1.855, respectively) (Table 9).
Pairwise fixation index (Fst) analysis revealed a lack of significant genetic differentiation among any of the county subpopulations (p > 0.05). All Fst values were negligible, ranging from −0.0996 (between Nileke and Yining) to 0.0110 (between Huocheng and Yining), indicating high gene flow and a panmictic population structure (Table 10).

3.9. Haplotype Network Analysis

A median-joining network was reconstructed to elucidate the genealogical relationships among the 14 identified E. granulosus haplotypes (Figure 5). The network topology revealed a star-like structure, with the most abundant haplotype, Hap1, occupying a central position. Hap1 was directly connected to seven other haplotypes (Hap2, Hap5, Hap8, Hap10, Hap11, Hap12, and Hap14), suggesting their recent derivation from this common ancestor. Hap11 functioned as a secondary hub, linking Hap1 to four additional haplotypes (Hap3, Hap4, Hap7, and Hap13). The other dominant haplotype, Hap2, exhibited a simpler connection pattern, linked only to Hap1 and Hap9. Hap6 was the most peripherally located haplotype, separated from the central Hap1 by multiple mutational steps, with Hap9 and Hap2 acting as intermediate nodes. The presence of inferred, unsampled (missing) haplotypes was suggested by the reticulate connections, particularly those forming triangular loops between Hap4, Hap11, and an unnamed node (indicated by a black dot in Figure 5).

4. Discussion

The Yili River Valley is a pivotal sheep breeding base in Xinjiang and a nationally significant livestock hub, possessing exceptional natural conditions for pastoralism. Despite this, the region has consistently documented persistently high rates of echinococcosis. This endemicity is likely driven by a confluence of factors, including a harsh climate, extensive pastoral systems, suboptimal veterinary public health infrastructure, and frequent cross-border livestock movements. Previous localized studies have reported E. granulosus infection rates in sheep that exceed the national average by two to six-fold [16,21]. Nonetheless, comprehensive, longitudinal surveillance data at a prefecture-wide scale have been lacking. This knowledge gap has obscured the dynamic epidemiological trends of CE and hindered an accurate assessment of transnational transmission risks, underscoring the critical need for the present study.
Our findings address a significant gap in the epidemiological surveillance of E. granulosus in sheep. While many previous studies have focused primarily on genotyping and genetic polymorphism using PCR-confirmed samples, our approach integrated large-scale, longitudinal monitoring with macroscopic examination. Through a five-year surveillance program across nine counties in Yili Prefecture, we documented a consistently high overall prevalence of 22.0% (95% CI: 20.5–23.6). This prevalence is markedly higher than infection rates previously reported in northern Xinjiang. For instance, it substantially exceeds the 3.9% (14/361) reported in Yili Prefecture and 4.5% (131/2898) in the Altai Region by Guo et al. [14,15], as well as the 2.3% (390/17,215) documented in Emin County of Tacheng Region by Yang et al. [22]. The higher prevalence observed in our study is likely attributable to the inclusion of early and mild infections that were detected macroscopically but are often missed by PCR. This is supported by our practical experience: when we attempted molecular genotyping on a subset of our macroscopically positive samples, PCR amplification was consistently unsuccessful in samples with minimal pathological changes, suggesting a low parasitic DNA load below the assay’s detection limit.
Previous studies have indicated that the infection rate of E. granulosus in sheep is generally higher in pastoral areas than in agricultural regions of Xinjiang [23]. However, our investigation in the Yili Prefecture revealed no significant difference in sheep infection rates across its various counties (the total infection rates fluctuating from 18.3% to 25.7%). This homogeneity may be attributed to the prefecture’s distinctive topography and mixed farming–pastoral landscape. Located in northwestern Xinjiang and bordering Kazakhstan, Yili Prefecture is surrounded by mountains on three sides, with the Yili River Valley serving as its core geographical unit [24]. Agricultural and pastoral areas are interwoven and indistinctly demarcated throughout the prefecture, often exhibiting a mixed “agro-pastoral” pattern, which may explain the relatively uniform spatial distribution of E. granulosus infections. On the other hand, significant year-to-year variations were observed in some areas, with prevalence rates ranging from, for example, 11.3% in Tekesi County (2022) to 36.0% in Huocheng County (2020). A potential explanation for this disparity lies in the heterogeneous origins of the sheep, given that control strategies likely vary from one pasture to another. On the contrary, five years of surveillance data from 2020 to 2024 revealed no significant differences in annual prevalence rates (p > 0.05). This may be attributed to the relative stability of the annual CE control strategies in the Yili region, as the prevention and control measures were strictly implemented in accordance with the annual guidelines issued by the Department of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of Xinjiang, primarily consisting of dog deworming and lamb vaccination. However, this study primarily focused on adult sheep (mostly aged 1–4 years) from slaughterhouses, in which the protective immunity from earlier vaccination may have waned or diminished. Furthermore, the vast grasslands in the Yili region are frequented by wildlife such as foxes and wolves, which serve as significant reservoirs of infection. Relying solely on deworming domestic dogs may therefore be insufficient to disrupt the transmission cycle at its source. The persistently high prevalence can seriously affect sheep health, leading to issues such as sheep death, slow growth, prolonged time to slaughter, organ discards and increased rearing costs [25]. Given that multiple factors, such as livestock farming scale and annual climatic variations, can influence the transmission of CE, it is necessary to develop control strategies through multi-sectoral collaboration [26,27].
Furthermore, a notably higher infection rate was observed in Yining City (23.0%), and the highest genetic diversity (Hd = 0.911, π = 0.00277) was also found in this city, likely associated with its unique geographical and socioeconomic role. As the capital and most populous city of Yili Prefecture, Yining City has the highest daily sheep slaughter volume in the region. Although it is not a major agricultural or pastoral production area itself, most of the sheep slaughtered in the city are sourced from various counties across Yili Prefecture. This influx of animals from multiple origins may contribute to the higher observed infection rate and genetic diversity in Yining City.
Molecular genotyping of hydatid cysts, targeting the nad2 gene, confirmed the exclusive circulation of the E. granulosus s. s. G1 genotype in our samples. This finding is consistent with the global predominance of this livestock-adapted strain. The dominance of G1 aligns with recent reports from the East Tianshan Mountains in Xinjiang [28] and is well-documented across other endemic provinces in China, including the Altai region of northern Xinjiang [15], Xizang Autonomous Region [18,29,30,31], Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region [32], and Sichuan Province [19]. Globally, the G1 genotype is notorious for its pronounced zoonotic potential, constituting a major public health threat from the Mediterranean Basin [33] to Pakistan [34], Kenya [35], and North Africa [36]. The shared global genotype profile suggests the possibility of cross-border transmission pathways. However, validating the direction and intensity of such transmission requires future high-resolution population genetic studies (e.g., using microsatellite or SNP-based haplotyping). Furthermore, as this study primarily analyzed samples with more severe lesions (including calcified cysts), the findings may be subject to selection bias. Future studies should therefore include and successfully analyze samples with mild lesions to comprehensively validate the present results.
The dominance of the G1 genotype in sheep reservoirs directly amplifies the human health risk within a One Health framework. This is critically relevant to Yili, as human CE cases in Xinjiang are mainly caused by the G1 genotype [23,37], and the prevalence of Echinococcus in dogs can reach 5.8% (5557/200,165) in Xinjiang [38]. These factors sustain a pernicious transmission cycle involving dogs (definitive hosts), the environment (eggs), and both sheep and humans (intermediate hosts) [39]. This cycle is profoundly amplified by traditional slaughter practices, where infected offal is routinely fed to dogs. This dangerous feedback loop mirrors transmission dynamics observed in other endemic regions such as Kenya and Pakistan [35,40,41], highlighting a universal challenge in CE control [42]. However, this study did not examine environmental or canine fecal samples. Therefore, it remains unclear whether the persistently high prevalence of ovine CE in Yili is associated with dogs. Future studies are needed to investigate E. granulosus infections in dogs in Yili.
Our study identified 14 Haps of E. granulosus s.s. circulating in sheep across Yili Prefecture. This level of haplotype diversity is broadly consistent with several previous reports from Xinjiang and other endemic regions in China. For instance, studies targeting the cox1 gene identified 12 Haps in Hejing County [16] and 16 Haps in the Altai region [15], while 13 Haps were reported in sheep from Xizang [43]. In contrast, other studies have reported lower haplotype diversity within Xinjiang. Guo et al. [14] found only seven Haps across a wide geographical area encompassing Urumqi, Yili, Tacheng, and Altai. Similarly, Yan et al. [44] documented 10 Haps in Yili Prefecture and 9 Haps in Changji Hui Autonomous Prefecture of Xinjiang. The discrepancies in reported haplotype diversity across studies are likely multifactorial. Key influencing variables include the sample size (with larger, more comprehensive surveys like ours capturing greater diversity), the geographical scale and sampling strategy (targeting a single prefecture vs. multiple pooled regions), the choice of genetic marker (nad2 in our study vs. cox1 in others), and potential temporal fluctuations in parasite population structure.
The Fst values, which were all negligible and not significantly different from zero (range: −0.09964 to 0.01099; p > 0.05), indicate a pronounced lack of genetic differentiation among E. granulosus populations across the nine counties of Yili Prefecture. Notably, the lowest Fst value was observed between Nileke and Yining County (Fst = −0.09964), suggesting particularly frequent genetic exchange between these two populations. Actually, the two counties are adjacent (Figure 1), which is likely the reason for the minimal genetic variation in E. granulosus between them. Similarly, pairwise comparisons involving the central hub of Yining City (e.g., with Xinyuan and Yining County) and other counties (e.g., Xinyuan with Zhaosu) yielded values asymptotically approaching zero, further reinforcing the genetic homogeneity of the parasite population throughout the region. This panmixia is most parsimoniously explained by the extensive movement of infected intermediate hosts (sheep) through regional livestock trade and pastoral migration patterns.
This study has several limitations that should be considered when interpreting the results. First, the reliance on animals presented for slaughter means the sample may not be fully representative of the general sheep population in the region, as factors such as age, health, and management practices of slaughtered animals could introduce a potential selection bias. Second, the absence of age and sex-stratified data prevented the analysis of associated risk factors, which is crucial for understanding transmission dynamics. For future research, serological surveys in farms, combined with environmental sampling and the testing of feces from definitive host dogs, are recommended to enable a comprehensive assessment of CE in Yili, Xinjiang.

5. Conclusions

This five-year, comprehensive surveillance study establishes a persistently high burden (22.0%) of E. granulosus infection in sheep within China’s key pastoral region of Yili Prefecture, identifying Huocheng County and Yining City as particular hyperendemic foci. Molecular characterization revealed a striking genetic homogeneity, with the zoonotically significant G1 genotype (E. granulosus s. s.) accounting for 95.2% of infections. Population genetic analysis identified 14 haplotypes, with the dominant and centrally located Hap1 indicative of a recently expanded and interconnected parasite population. Therefore, the dominance of the G1 genotype, coupled with the high infection pressure in sheep reservoirs, indicates a substantial and ongoing zoonotic risk to human populations in the region. Collectively, our findings underscore the entrenched nature of CE transmission in northwestern China. These findings highlight the endemicity of echinococcosis in the region and provide critical genetic insights for guiding future control strategies.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens15010040/s1, Table S1: Statistics on mutton production and sheep numbers in Yili Prefecture from 2020 to 2024.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.W., R.M., and B.G.; methodology, C., X.Z., and L.Z.; software, R.M., B.G., and C., validation, K.A. and B.D.; formal analysis, D.N. and L.Z.; investigation, C., X.Z., L.Z., K.A., B.D., and D.N.; data curation, C.; writing—original draft preparation, C. and X.Z.; writing—review and editing, B.G., R.M., and L.W.; visualization, C. and X.Z.; supervision, B.D.; project administration, C. and L.W.; funding acquisition, C., B.G., R.M., and L.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported in part by the NHC Key Laboratory of Parasite and Vector Biology (National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Diseases Control and Prevention (Grant No. NHCKFKT2023-01), National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2023YFD1801305), and Key Research and Development Projects in Xinjiang (Grant No. 2022B03013-2).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted in full compliance with the Chinese Laboratory Animal Administration Act (1988) and received approval from the Ethical Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University. All animal and laboratory experiments were performed under the authorization of ethical approval numbers 20191219-10 (19 December 2019) and IACUC-JT-20250930-12 (30 September 2025).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the slaughterhouse staff in the nine counties of Yili Prefecture.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Manterola, C.; Totomoch-Serra, A.; Rojas, C.; Riffo-Campos, A.L.; Garcia-Mendez, N. Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato genotypes in different hosts worldwide: A systematic review. Acta Parasitol. 2022, 67, 161–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Budke, C.M.; Deplazes, P.; Torgerson, P.R. Global socioeconomic impact of cystic echinococcosis. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2006, 12, 296–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Massolo, A.; Simoncini, A.; Romig, T. The ‘bridge effect’ by intermediate hosts may explain differential distributions of Echinococcus species. Trends Parasitol. 2022, 38, 501–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shams, M.; Khazaei, S.; Naserifar, R.; Shariatzadeh, S.A.; Anvari, D.; Montazeri, F.; Pirestani, M.; Majidiani, H. Global distribution of Echinococcus granulosus genotypes in domestic and wild canids: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Parasitology 2022, 149, 1147–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wen, H.; Vuitton, L.; Tuxun, T.; Li, J.; Vuitton, D.A.; Zhang, W.; McManus, D.P. Echinococcosis: Advances in the 21st Century. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2019, 32, e18–e75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Eckert, J.; Deplazes, P. Biological, epidemiological, and clinical aspects of echinococcosis, a zoonosis of increasing concern. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2004, 17, 107–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Fu, M.; Han, S.; Xue, C.; Wang, X.; Liu, B.; Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Wei, S.; Cui, X.; Zhang, T.; et al. Contribution to the echinococcosis control programme in China by NIPD-CTDR. Adv. Parasitol. 2020, 110, 107–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Wang, X.; Kui, Y.; Xue, C.; Wang, Q.; Zheng, C.; Zhao, J.; Yang, Y.; Jiang, X.; Gong-Sang, Q.; Ma, X.; et al. Past, present and future epidemiology of echinococcosis in China based on nationwide surveillance data 2004-2022. J. Infect. 2025, 90, 106445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Gu, H.; Hu, Y.; Guo, S.; Jin, Y.; Chen, W.; Huang, C.; Hu, Z.; Li, F.; Liu, J. China’s prevention and control experience of echinococcosis: A 19-year retrospective. J. Helminthol. 2024, 98, e16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Li, K.; Shahzad, M. Epidemiology of cystic echinococcosis in China (2004–2016). Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2019, 33, 101466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Craig, P.S.; Hegglin, D.; Lightowlers, M.W.; Torgerson, P.R.; Wang, Q. Echinococcosis: Control and prevention. Adv. Parasit. 2017, 96, 55–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Larrieu, E.J.; Frider, B. Human cystic echinococcosis: Contributions to the natural history of the disease. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 2001, 95, 679–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tian, T.; Miao, L.; Wang, W.; Zhou, X. Global, regional and national burden of human cystic echinococcosis from 1990 to 2019: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2024, 9, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Guo, B.; Zhang, Z.; Zheng, X.; Guo, Y.; Guo, G.; Zhao, L.; Cai, R.; Wang, B.; Yang, M.; Shou, X.; et al. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto in Northern Xinjiang, China. Korean J. Parasitol. 2019, 57, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Guo, B.; Zhao, L.; Zhao, L.; Mi, R.; Zhang, X.; Wang, B.; Guo, G.; Ren, Y.; Qi, W.; Zhang, Z. Survey and molecular characterization of Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto from livestock and humans in the Altai Region of Xinjiang, China. Pathogens 2023, 12, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lan, Q.; Bianba, Z.; Mo, X.; Zheng, G.; Bold, B.; He, G.; Gao, H.; Hu, W.; Zhang, T.; Zhou, X. Echinococcus infection and metacestode fertility in yaks and sheep-four provincial-level administrative divisions, Northwestern China, 2023. China CDC Weekly 2025, 7, 614–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zhang, X.; Wei, C.; Lv, Y.; Mi, R.; Guo, B.; Rahman, S.U.; Zhang, Y.; Cheng, L.; Jia, H.; Huang, Y.; et al. EgSeverin and Eg14-3-3zeta from Echinococcus granulosus are potential antigens for serological diagnosis of echinococcosis in dogs and sheep. Microb. Pathogenesis 2023, 179, 106110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Su, Z.; Wang, D.; Sizhu, S.; Luo, R.; Wang, Q.; Shi, B.; Tang, W. Study on the genotypes of Echinococcus granulosus in yaks and sheep from Langkazi County in Tibet Autonomous Region of China based on mitochondrial cox1 and nad1. Parasitol. Res. 2024, 123, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Yang, Y.R.; McManus, D.P.; Huang, Y.; Heath, D.D. Echinococcus granulosus infection and options for control of cystic echinococcosis in Tibetan communities of Western Sichuan Province, China. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2009, 3, e426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Guo, B.; Cairen; Zhao, L.; Aimulajiang, K.; Tang, W.; Wu, C.; Yimingjiang, M.; Wu, J.; Mi, R.; Wen, H. First report of Echinococcus granulosus genotype 1 in a wild boar (Sus scrofa) from China. Parasitol. Res. 2024, 123, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Wang, Z.; Wang, X.; Liu, X. Echinococcosis in China, a review of the epidemiology of Echinococcus spp. Ecohealth 2008, 5, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yang, S.; Wu, W.; Tian, T.; Zhao, J.; Chen, K.; Wang, Q.; Feng, Z. Prevalence of cystic echinococcosis in slaughtered sheep as an indicator to assess control progress in Emin County, Xinjiang, China. Korean J. Parasitol. 2015, 53, 355–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Meng, Q.; Qiao, J. Epidemiology and control strategies of hydatid disease in Xinjiang. Prog. Vet. Med. 2023, 44, 112–116. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Huang, Q.; Zhao, Y.; He, Q. The daily variation characteristics of summer precipitation over the Yili River Valley, Xinjiang. J. Glaciol. Geocryol. 2015, 37, 369–375. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  25. Ma, J.; Liu, X.; He, Z.; Zhang, H.; Ma, Y.; Fan, Z.; Zhao, X.; Zhi, J.; Cao, Q.; Xue, H.; et al. Optimization of echinococcosis control measures based on system dynamics. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2025, 21, e1013186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ma, W.; Zhang, Q.; Cui, Q.; Duan, H. Spatial-temporal distribution and influencing factors analysis of human echinococcosis in mainland china from 2004 to 2020. Acta Trop. 2025, 270, 107817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Yang, Z.; Liu, K.; Wen, B.; Fu, T.; Qin, X.; Li, R.; Lu, M.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Shao, Z.; et al. Changes in the global epidemiological characteristics of cystic echinococcosis over the past 30 years and projections for the next decade: Findings from the global burden of disease study 2019. J. Glob. Health 2024, 14, 4056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kamali, W.; Wang, S.; Luo, W.; Liu, S.; Zhao, L.; Pan, X.; Wang, B.; Mu, Y.; Jiawuti, T.; Aierken, K.; et al. Epidemiology and genetic diversity of Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto in the East Tianshan Mountains, Xinjiang, China. Parasitol. Res. 2024, 123, 388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ohiolei, J.A.; Xia, C.; Li, L.; Liu, J.; Tang, W.; Wu, Y.; Danqulamu; Zhu, G.; Shi, B.; Fu, B.; et al. Genetic variation of Echinococcus spp. in yaks and sheep in the Tibet Autonomous Region of China based on mitochondrial DNA. Parasit. Vectors 2019, 12, 608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wei, Y.; Li, W.; Shao, C.; Zhao, H.; Hu, Y.; Liu, H.; Cao, J. The polymorphic analysis of cox1 and cob genes of Echinococcus granulosus in the Ngari region of Tibet in China. Acta Trop. 2023, 239, 106803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhao, Y.; Gesang, D.; Wan, L.; Li, J.; Qiangba, G.; Danzeng, W.; Basang, Z.; Renzhen, N.; Yin, J.; Gongsang, Q.; et al. Echinococcus spp. and genotypes infecting humans in Tibet Autonomous Region of China: A molecular investigation with near-complete/complete mitochondrial sequences. Parasit. Vectors 2022, 15, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yang, Y.R.; Clements, A.C.; Gray, D.J.; Atkinson, J.A.; Williams, G.M.; Barnes, T.S.; McManus, D.P. Impact of anthropogenic and natural environmental changes on Echinococcus transmission in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, the People’s Republic of China. Parasit. Vectors 2012, 5, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bosco, A.; Alves, L.C.; Cociancic, P.; Amadesi, A.; Pepe, P.; Morgoglione, M.E.; Maurelli, M.P.; Ferrer-Miranda, E.; Santoro, K.R.; Nascimento, R.R.; et al. Epidemiology and spatial distribution of Echinococcus granulosus in sheep and goats slaughtered in a hyperendemic European Mediterranean area. Parasit. Vectors 2021, 14, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Alvi, M.A.; Ohiolei, J.A.; Saqib, M.; Li, L.; Tayyab, M.H.; Alvi, A.A.; Wu, Y.T.; Fu, B.Q.; Yan, H.B.; Jia, W.Z. Echinococcus granulosus (sensu stricto) (G1, G3) and E. ortleppi (G5) in Pakistan: Phylogeny, genetic diversity and population structural analysis based on mitochondrial DNA. Parasit. Vectors 2020, 13, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Odongo, D.O.; Tiampati, C.M.; Mulinge, E.; Mbae, C.K.; Bishop, R.P.; Zeyhle, E.; Magambo, J.; Wasserman, M.; Kern, P.; Romig, T. Prevalence and genotyping of Echinococcus granulosus in sheep in Narok County, Kenya. Parasitol. Res. 2018, 117, 2065–2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Alkhaldi, A.A.M. Echinococcus granulosus comparative genotyping in sheep in Saudi Arabia and Egypt. Open Vet. J. 2024, 14, 866–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hua, R.Q.; Du, X.D.; He, X.; Gu, X.B.; Xie, Y.; He, R.; Xu, J.; Peng, X.R.; Yang, G.Y. Genetic diversity of Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato in China: Epidemiological studies and systematic review. Transbound Emerg. Dis. 2022, 69, e1382–e1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gong, Q.L.; Ge, G.Y.; Wang, Q.; Tian, T.; Liu, F.; Diao, N.C.; Nie, L.B.; Zong, Y.; Li, J.M.; Shi, K.; et al. Meta-analysis of the prevalence of Echinococcus in dogs in China from 2010 to 2019. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2021, 15, e9268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Possenti, A.; Manzano-Roman, R.; Sanchez-Ovejero, C.; Boufana, B.; La Torre, G.; Siles-Lucas, M.; Casulli, A. Potential risk factors associated with human cystic echinococcosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016, 10, e5114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Khan, A.; Ahmed, H.; Simsek, S.; Afzal, M.S.; Cao, J. Spread of cystic echinococcosis in Pakistan due to stray dogs and livestock slaughtering habits: Research priorities and public health importance. Front. Public Health 2019, 7, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Khan, S.; Cable, J.; Masud, N.; Hailer, F.; Younus, M.; Hussain, N.; Asif Idrees, M.; Rashid, M.I.; Akbar, H. Epidemiological and genotypic assessment of cystic echinococcosis in ruminant populations of Northern Punjab, Pakistan: A neglected zoonotic disease. Parasitol. Res. 2025, 124, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Yu, Q.; Xiao, N.; Han, S.; Tian, T.; Zhou, X. Progress on the national echinococcosis control programme in China: Analysis of humans and dogs population intervention during 2004–2014. Infect. Dis. Poverty 2020, 9, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Fan, S.; Zhao, X.; Danqulamu; Shi, B.; Tang, W.; Dong, H.; Xia, C. Genetic diversity and haplotype analysis of yak and sheep echinococcal cysts isolates from the mitochondrial cox1 gene in parts of Tibet, China. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 1016972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yan, B.; Liu, X.; Wu, J.; Zhao, S.; Yuan, W.; Wang, B.; Wureli, H.; Tu, C.; Chen, C.; Wang, Y. Genetic diversity of Echinococcus granulosus genotype G1 in Xinjiang, Northwest of China. Korean J. Parasitol. 2018, 56, 391–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Map of sampling locations in the nine counties of Yili Prefecture. The numbers of total samples, positive samples, and infection rates are shown on the map.
Figure 1. Map of sampling locations in the nine counties of Yili Prefecture. The numbers of total samples, positive samples, and infection rates are shown on the map.
Pathogens 15 00040 g001
Figure 2. The detection of sheep hydatidosis with the naked eye with the pathology and morphology characteristics: (a) cyst characteristics, embedded on the surface of the sheep liver; (b) liver with cavities caused by E. granulosus cysts; (c) an internal cyst that could be dragged out from E. granulosus cysts, which was full of a large amount of hydatid fluid and PSCs; (d) PSCs (200×) stained with methylene blue.
Figure 2. The detection of sheep hydatidosis with the naked eye with the pathology and morphology characteristics: (a) cyst characteristics, embedded on the surface of the sheep liver; (b) liver with cavities caused by E. granulosus cysts; (c) an internal cyst that could be dragged out from E. granulosus cysts, which was full of a large amount of hydatid fluid and PSCs; (d) PSCs (200×) stained with methylene blue.
Pathogens 15 00040 g002
Figure 3. Prevalence of sheep CE across nine counties in Yili Prefecture (2020–2024): (a) number of positive samples per region (color-coded by year); (b) violin plots showing positive rates in different regions, where * indicates a significant difference (p < 0.05); (c) violin plots showing annual prevalence across the study period. The middle dashed line in the figures represents the median, which is the value in the middle position after sorting all the data from smallest to largest.
Figure 3. Prevalence of sheep CE across nine counties in Yili Prefecture (2020–2024): (a) number of positive samples per region (color-coded by year); (b) violin plots showing positive rates in different regions, where * indicates a significant difference (p < 0.05); (c) violin plots showing annual prevalence across the study period. The middle dashed line in the figures represents the median, which is the value in the middle position after sorting all the data from smallest to largest.
Pathogens 15 00040 g003
Figure 4. Phylogenetic relationships among Echinococcus spp. inferred via neighbor-joining analysis using the NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 (nad2) gene.
Figure 4. Phylogenetic relationships among Echinococcus spp. inferred via neighbor-joining analysis using the NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 (nad2) gene.
Pathogens 15 00040 g004
Figure 5. Haplotype networks were generated from the nad2 gene of E. granulosus. A circular icon represents Haps containing the same sequence, and the circle size is proportional to the number of individuals showing such specific Haps in this study. Black dot indicate potential haplotype that was not identified in this study. Slashes represent SNP sites, with the number of slashes corresponding to the possible number of SNP sites at that position (one slash for one site, two slashes for two sites, and so on).
Figure 5. Haplotype networks were generated from the nad2 gene of E. granulosus. A circular icon represents Haps containing the same sequence, and the circle size is proportional to the number of individuals showing such specific Haps in this study. Black dot indicate potential haplotype that was not identified in this study. Slashes represent SNP sites, with the number of slashes corresponding to the possible number of SNP sites at that position (one slash for one site, two slashes for two sites, and so on).
Pathogens 15 00040 g005
Table 1. The total infection rates of E. granulosus in sheep from different counties.
Table 1. The total infection rates of E. granulosus in sheep from different counties.
CountyNo. SampleNo. PositivePositive Rate (%)95% CI
Chabuchaer3006923.018.4–28.2
Gongliu3006220.716.2–25.7
Huocheng2807225.720.7–31.3
Nileke3106019.415.1–24.2
Tekesi3006321.016.5–26.1
Xinyuan3006923.018.4–28.2
Yining City3006923.018.4–28.2
Yining County3107524.219.5–29.4
Zhaosu3005518.3%14.1–23.2
Total270059422.0%20.5–23.6
Table 2. The total infection rates of E. granulosus in sheep from different years.
Table 2. The total infection rates of E. granulosus in sheep from different years.
YearNo. SampleNo. PositivePositive Rate (%)95% CI
202045010623.619.7–27.8
202145010924.220.3–28.5
202272015221.118.2–24.3
202354011821.918.4–25.6
202454010920.216.9–23.8
Total270059422.0%20.5–23.6
Table 3. The infection rates of E. granulosus in sheep across 9 counties from 2020 to 2024.
Table 3. The infection rates of E. granulosus in sheep across 9 counties from 2020 to 2024.
CountyYear [Positive Rate (%), No. Positive/No. Sample]
20202021202220232024
Chabuchaer20.0%, 10/5026.0%, 13/5025.0%, 20/8025.0%, 15/6018.3%, 11/60
Gongliu18.0%, 9/5028.0%, 14/5023.8%, 19/8016.7%, 10/6016.7%, 10/60
Huocheng36.0%, 18/5026.7%, 8/3021.2%, 17/8023.3%, 14/6025.0%, 15/60
Nileke22.0%, 11/5025.0%, 15/6018.8%, 15/8016.7%, 10/6015.0%, 9/60
Tekesi28.0%, 14/5020.0%, 10/5011.3%, 9/8021.7%, 13/6028.3%, 17/60
Xinyuan16.0%, 8/5024.0%, 12/5022.5%, 18/8028.3%, 17/6023.3%, 14/60
Yining City22.0%, 11/5024.0%, 12/5027.5%, 22/8020.0%, 12/6020.0%, 12/60
Yining County26.0%, 13/5026.7%, 16/6026.3%, 21/8025.0%, 15/6016.7%, 10/60
Zhaosu24.0%, 12/5018.0%, 9/5013.8%, 11/8020.0%, 12/6018.3%, 11/60
Table 4. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of E. granulosus infection by county.
Table 4. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of E. granulosus infection by county.
CountyOR95% CIp-Value
Zhaosu1.00//
Chabuchaer1.330.89–1.980.16
Gongliu1.160.77–1.740.47
Huocheng1.561.05–2.320.03
Nileke1.060.71–1.600.76
Tekesi1.190.79–1.770.41
Xinyuan1.330.89–1.980.16
Yining City1.330.89–1.980.16
Yining County1.420.96–2.090.08
Table 5. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of E. granulosus infection by year.
Table 5. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of E. granulosus infection by year.
YearOR95% CIp-Value
20201.00//
20211.050.77–1.430.76
20220.900.68–1.190.45
20230.860.64–1.160.32
20240.800.59–1.090.15
Table 6. The genotypes of E. granulosus in sheep across different counties.
Table 6. The genotypes of E. granulosus in sheep across different counties.
CountyMolecular Test NumberSuccessfully Amplified NumberE. granulosus Genotypes (%)
G1G3
Chabuchaer1099 (100.0)0
Gongliu10109 (90.0)1 (10.0)
Huocheng1088 (100.0)0
Nileke1098 (88.9)1 (11.1)
Tekesi10109 (90.0)1 (10.0)
Xinyuan1099 (100.0)0
Yining City101010 (100.0)0
Yining County1087 (87.5)1 (12.5)
Zhaosu101010 (100.0)0
Total908379 (95.2)4 (4.8)
Table 7. Geographical distribution of the E. granulosus haplotypes.
Table 7. Geographical distribution of the E. granulosus haplotypes.
HaplotypeGenotypeNumberGeographical Distribution (No.)
Hap1G139Chabuchaer (4), Gongliu (5), Huocheng (5), Nileke (4), Tekesi (5), Xinyuan (4), Yining City (3), Yining County (5), Zhaosu (4)
Hap2G118Chabuchaer (2), Gongliu (2), Huocheng (2), Nileke (1), Tekesi (3), Xinyuan (3), Yining City (2), Zhaosu (3)
Hap3G15Chabuchaer (1), Nileke (1), Tekesi (1), Xinyuan (2)
Hap4G14Nileke (1), Yining City (1), Yining County (1), Zhaosu (1)
Hap5G13Chabuchaer (1), Yining County (1), Zhaosu (1)
Hap6G13Gongliu (1), Huocheng (1), Yining City (1)
Hap7G33Gongliu (1), Nileke (1), Yining County (1)
Hap8G12Nileke (1), Zhaosu (1)
Hap9G31Tekesi (1)
Hap10G11Yining City (1)
Hap11G11Gongliu (1)
Hap12G11Yining City (1)
Hap13G11Yining City (1)
Hap14G11Chabuchaer (1)
Table 8. The distribution of E. granulosus haplotypes in different counties.
Table 8. The distribution of E. granulosus haplotypes in different counties.
CountyHaplotype Types (No.)Haplotypes Distribution (No.)
Chabuchaer5Hap1 (4), Hap2 (2), Hap3 (1), Hap5 (1), Hap14 (1)
Gongliu5Hap1 (5), Hap2 (2), Hap6 (1), Hap7 (1), Hap11 (1)
Huocheng3Hap1 (5), Hap2 (2), Hap6 (1)
Nileke6Hap1 (4), Hap2 (1), Hap3 (1), Hap4 (1), Hap7 (1), Hap8 (1)
Tekesi4Hap1 (5), Hap2 (3), Hap3 (1), Hap9 (1)
Xinyuan3Hap1 (4), Hap2 (3), Hap3 (2)
Yining City7Hap1 (3), Hap2 (2), Hap4 (1), Hap6 (1), Hap10 (1), Hap12 (1), Hap13 (1)
Yining County4Hap1 (5), Hap4 (1), Hap5 (1), Hap7 (1)
Zhaosu5Hap1 (4), Hap2 (3), Hap4 (1), Hap5 (1), Hap8 (1)
Total14Hap1 (39), Hap2 (18), Hap3 (5), Hap4 (4), Hap5 (3), Hap6 (3), Hap7 (3), Hap8 (2), Hap9 (1), Hap10 (1), Hap11 (1), Hap12 (1), Hap13 (1), Hap14 (1)
Table 9. Diversity and neutrality indices for different populations of E. granulosus subpopulations from different counties of Yili Prefecture.
Table 9. Diversity and neutrality indices for different populations of E. granulosus subpopulations from different counties of Yili Prefecture.
Countyn 1h 2Hd 3π 4Tajima’s DStatistical SignificanceFu’s Fs
Chabuchaer950.73970.103395−0.68479p = 0.254−1.00932
Gongliu1050.75560.114815−1.53425p = 0.068−0.52754
Huocheng830.60710.071429−0.72673p = 0.2610.67071
Nileke960.83330.141975−1.42187p = 0.081−1.54903
Tekesi1040.71110.079012−0.78318p = 0.245−0.14158
Xinyuan930.72220.1141980.49704p = 0.7121.85521
Yining City1070.91110.138272−1.31156p = 0.096−2.58952
Yining County840.64290.107143−1.35929p = 0.1010.08149
Zhaosu1050.80000.074074−0.98485p = 0.209−1.54678
1 Number of isolates examined; 2 number of Haps; 3 haplotype diversity; 4 nucleotide diversity.
Table 10. FST Values of nad2 gene of E. granulosus from different counties of Yili Prefecture.
Table 10. FST Values of nad2 gene of E. granulosus from different counties of Yili Prefecture.
CountyChabuchaerGongliuHuochengNilekeTekesiXinyuanYining CityYining CountyZhaosu
Chabuchaer0.00000
Gongliu−0.034180.00000
Huocheng−0.01408−0.085970.00000
Nileke−0.07756−0.07679−0.036390.00000
Tekesi−0.09337−0.05087−0.04269−0.075790.00000
Xinyuan−0.08647−0.01369−0.00573−0.06714−0.085270.00000
Yining City−0.01066−0.05453−0.08472−0.03168−0.02924−0.003560.00000
Yining County−0.05736−0.066140.01099−0.09964−0.035380.00349−0.007260.00000
Zhaosu−0.03242−0.04938−0.06938−0.04472−0.05174−0.00078−0.05006−0.014670.00000
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cairen; Zhang, X.; Zhang, L.; Aimulajiang, K.; Daoerji, B.; Namuka, D.; Guo, B.; Mi, R.; Wang, L. Five-Year Slaughterhouse-Based Surveillance of Echinococcus granulosus in Sheep from Yili, Northwest Xinjiang, China. Pathogens 2026, 15, 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15010040

AMA Style

Cairen, Zhang X, Zhang L, Aimulajiang K, Daoerji B, Namuka D, Guo B, Mi R, Wang L. Five-Year Slaughterhouse-Based Surveillance of Echinococcus granulosus in Sheep from Yili, Northwest Xinjiang, China. Pathogens. 2026; 15(1):40. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15010040

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cairen, Xiaoli Zhang, Li Zhang, Kalibixiati Aimulajiang, Batubayier Daoerji, Daoerji Namuka, Baoping Guo, Rongsheng Mi, and Liying Wang. 2026. "Five-Year Slaughterhouse-Based Surveillance of Echinococcus granulosus in Sheep from Yili, Northwest Xinjiang, China" Pathogens 15, no. 1: 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15010040

APA Style

Cairen, Zhang, X., Zhang, L., Aimulajiang, K., Daoerji, B., Namuka, D., Guo, B., Mi, R., & Wang, L. (2026). Five-Year Slaughterhouse-Based Surveillance of Echinococcus granulosus in Sheep from Yili, Northwest Xinjiang, China. Pathogens, 15(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15010040

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop