Next Article in Journal
Genetic Diversity and Molecular Epidemiology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Clinical Isolates in New Brunswick, Canada—A Retrospective Chart Review
Next Article in Special Issue
An Examination of Gross Lesions Associated with Bovine Tuberculosis in the U.S.
Previous Article in Journal
Detection of Benzimidazole-Resistant Haemonchus contortus in Domestic and Wild Ruminants in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Infections in Animals: A Comprehensive Review of Species Distribution and Laboratory Diagnostic Methods
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Congenital Tuberculosis in a Stillborn Calf

by
María Fiorella Alvarado Pinedo
1,
Adrián Di Paolo
1,
Martín Zumárraga
2,
Federico Illanes
1,
Damián Moyano
2,
Luis María Peralta
1 and
Gabriel Travería
1,*
1
Centro de Diagnóstico e Investigaciones Veterinarias (CEDIVE), Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata 1900, Buenos Aires, Argentina
2
Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA-CONICET), Hurlingham 1686, Buenos Aires, Argentina
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2026, 15(1), 114; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15010114
Submission received: 22 December 2025 / Revised: 16 January 2026 / Accepted: 16 January 2026 / Published: 20 January 2026

Abstract

Bovine tuberculosis is a zoonotic infectious disease of cattle caused by the bacterium Mycobacterium bovis. In adult cattle, transmission is mainly via the respiratory route, whereas, in young calves, oral infection is also common. Congenital tuberculosis is rare. The purpose of this study was to describe in utero infection of a bovine stillbirth. The fetus was necropsied and tissue samples were processed for histopathology, bacteriology and PCR; a sample of the isolated strain was genotyped using spoligotyping. The whole herd was tuberculin skin tested and the dam’s serum was also assessed for the presence of antibodies against bovine tuberculosis with indirect ELISA. The macroscopic findings in different organs were consistent with tuberculosis. The histopathology demonstrated typical granulomatous lesions in the liver, spleen, hepatic and mediastinal lymph nodes. Acid-fast bacilli were observed in the smears stained using the Ziehl–Neelsen method. The colonies isolated were PCR-positive for IS6110 and the spoligotype corresponded to SB0140. The dam of the stillborn was positive for indirect ELISA and reacted to a single caudal skin test with bovine tuberculin. The fetal infection in utero with Mycobacterium bovis was confirmed through necropsy, histopathology and bacteriology, reinforcing the importance of testing young animals.

1. Introduction

Bovine tuberculosis, also known as mammalian tuberculosis, is a chronic disease of cattle caused by a group of closely related mycobacteria members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, mainly Mycobacterium bovis [1,2], which also affect a wide range of animal species, including humans [3]. This disease is a zoonosis with a significant economic burden on the cattle industry due to its direct and indirect costs, such as those related to animal testing, slaughtering, replacement, etc. [4]. In Argentina, bovine tuberculosis is currently under mandatory national control (Servicio Nacional de Sanidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria; SENASA). The control is based on testing and culling after the identification of reactor cattle with a single caudal bovine tuberculin test. The rationale of the control relies on the culling of infected animals before infectious individuals can transmit the mycobacterium to another susceptible animal [5]. Due to the chronic condition of this disease, most infected animals are subclinical. This chronic character and the lack of sensitivity in diagnostic tests hinder bovine tuberculosis eradication [6]. The transmission of bovine tuberculosis varies with the age of the animals. In adult cattle, transmission occurs mainly via the respiratory route [7], whereas milking calves are mainly infected via the oral route through the ingestion of contaminated colostrum or milk from a tuberculous cow [8]. Also, wildlife can pose a risk of transmission of bovine tuberculosis, acting as hosts [9,10]. Other forms of transmission are not commonly described. For instance, congenital transmission is exceptional in all species and is seldom reported [11]. Due to some epidemiological data, other ways of transmission are under debate [12]. The present study aims to describe a bovine stillborn with a lesion compatible with tuberculosis and isolation of Mycobaterium bovis.

2. Materials and Methods

History of the herd: One stillborn calf from a five-year-old cow, belonging to a beef herd consisting of 102 Aberdeen Angus cows with no recorded history of tuberculosis, was subjected to necropsy and gross examination. The circumstances of the stillborn’s dam delivery were not disclosed by the owner of the farm located in the Province of Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Necropsy and sampling: The necropsy was performed according to standard procedures [13]. For histopathological examination, samples of heart, brain, kidney, lung, liver, spleen, mediastinal and liver lymph nodes were cut into 0.5 cm-wide sections and fixed by immersion in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 24 h. The fixed tissues were embedded in paraffin, cut into 4 µm thick sections, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E).
Bacteriology: Samples of liver, spleen, mediastinal and hepatic lymph nodes were collected under sterile conditions and stained with the conventional Ziehl–Neelsen method [14]. The samples were decontaminated with sodium hydroxide according to Petroff’s method [15], and, after decontamination, 100 μL of the samples was seeded onto Stonebrink and Lowenstein Jensen medium and incubated at 37 °C for 60 days [16].
PCR: The DNA was extracted from colonies isolated in Stonebrink medium, and a loop of scraped bacterial soma was diluted in 200 mL of distilled DNAse-free water, heated in a dry bath for 40 min at 98 °C, and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min [17]. The DNA obtained was stored at −20 °C for subsequent analysis. The detection of IS6110, specific to Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, was performed by Touch Down PCR (IS6110 TD-PCR) [18] using primers INS1 (5′cgtgagggcatcgaggtggc3′) and INS2 (5′gcgtaggcgtcggtgacaaa3′), as previously described [19,20], which amplify a 245 base pair DNA fragment. The PCR products were submitted to horizontal electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel in 1× TAE buffer stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under ultraviolet transilluminator.
Spoligotyping: The spoligotyping of the Mycobaterium bovis isolates was performed following the instructions previously published [21]. The PCR products were hybridized on a spoligotyping membrane with oligo-nucleotides of spacer sequences, using a miniblotter according to the manufacturer’s instructions (MapMyGenome). The membrane was incubated with streptavidin–peroxidase and the spacers were detected by ECL chemiluminescence (Pierce ECL Western Blotting Substrate, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), followed by exposure of an X-ray film to the membrane. The patterns visualized in the X-ray film were compared with those contained in the database on the Mycobacterium bovis website of the Complutense University of Madrid, Spain (http://www.mbovis.org). To analyze and visualize the hypothetical relationship of genetic patterns of the strains, we applied an eBURST algorithm by using the PhyloViz free software (https://online.phyloviz.net/index, accessed on 22 December 2025).
Immunological tests: Serum from the dam of the stillborn calf was subjected to in-house indirect ELISA, as previously described [22]. An intradermal tuberculin test was performed on the rest of the herd in accordance with local regulations [23].

3. Results

Necropsy: The stillborn calf was a male, weighing 11 kg, with mild autolysis, and of gestational age at term. Gross pathology revealed multifocal granulomatous hepatitis; the lesions were mainly located on the diaphragmatic face of the right lobe, below the Glisson’s capsule, generating a slight protrusion of it (Figure 1A). These lesions had a circular shape, with a white surface, and a size that varied between a few millimeters and up to 3 cm in diameter. Sections of the granulomas exhibited a caseous center, and some showed varying degrees of calcification (Figure 1B). The spleen presented focal granulomatous splenitis. This lesion, about 3 cm in diameter, was located on the parietal surface, close to the hilum (Figure 1C,D). The hepatic, mediastinal, cranial sternal and thoracic aortic lymph nodes presented multifocal or focal granulomatous lymphadenitis, with lesions of variable size, with a caseified center and, in some cases, a calcified one.
Bacteriology: The Ziehl–Neelsen staining method revealed a scarce presence of acid-fast bacilli similar to the range scale 1 described by García-Jiménez et al. [24]. After 2 months of incubation in Stonebrink medium, the colonies resembling mycobacteria were subjected to the Ziehl–Neelsen staining method, confirming the presence of acid-fast bacilli, and then subjected to PCR.
Molecular detection: The presence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex from the culture was confirmed by IS6110 TD-PCR results. The spoligotyping showed the characteristic spoligotype of Mycobacterium bovis and was identified as SB0140.
Histopathology: The histopatological examination revealed foci of caseous necrosis with zones of mineralization in the spleen and lymph nodes, with the evident presence of numerous Langhans multinucleated giant cells and epithelioid cells surrounding the necrotic areas. A few occasional foci of epithelioid cells surrounded by lymphocytes were observed in the alveolar parenchyma of the lung. The liver showed extensive foci of caseous necrosis, with peripheral infiltration of lymphocytes and Langhans multinucleated giant cells. Some small inflammatory foci made up of a few epithelioid cells and lymphocytes were also found (Figure 2).
Immunological tests: 5 out of the 102 animals skin tested with tuberculin were positive to tuberculin, including the dam of the stillborn. In addition, two were suspicious, and the dam was also positive for tuberculosis according to indirect ELISA.

4. Discussion

The presentation of stillborns with tuberculosis is uncommon. However, a few cases have been described in a 45-day-old calf [25], a 15-day-old calf [26], a 25-day-old calf [27], and a 21-day-old calf [28]. In adult cattle, the primary route of infection is usually the respiratory route, through inhalation of aerosolized mycobacteria in droplets [29,30]. In calves, the oral route is common after ingestion of contaminated milk. If the infection progresses, regardless of the primary route, mycobacteria may reach other organs by hematogenous or lymphatic routes [29]. In some cases, mycobacteria may also reach the female genital tract [31]. The outcomes of infection in utero will depend on the stage of gestation: infection at early stages usually ends in fetal mortalities, whereas infection at later stages causes abortion or perinatal mortalities [32]. In the present study, we describe visible lesions compatible with tuberculous granulomas in the liver and spleen of a stillborn calf, suggesting that the infection occurred approximately after 125 days of gestation, after the development of fetal immune antigen recognition capacity [32]. At necropsy, visible lesions of diverse sizes were localized in the spleen and liver. In a previous study, visible lesions were observed in the abdomen of 2-week-old calves, 20 weeks after challenge with Mycobacterium bovis [12]. In humans, previous studies have proposed transplacental transmission via the umbilical vein with the primary complex in the liver, followed by secondary hematogenous spread, as well as through the ingestion or aspiration of infected amniotic fluid with the formation of the primary complex in the gastrointestinal tract or the lungs [26,33].
In this case, the fetal capacity to mount an immune response in the uterus able to develop granulomas similar to those seen in calves and adult cattle is remarkable. This capacity is demonstrated by the microscopic findings that revealed the presence of granulomas with Langhans multinucleated giant cells, epithelioid cells, lymphocytes, and foci of caseous necrosis, in different organs. In some zones, the microscopic findings also showed mineralization classified between stages III and IV based on lesions from adult cattle [34]. Under experimental conditions, these stages were found to occur 35-90 days after infection [35]. In the present study, the isolation of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in Stonebrink medium was confirmed by TD-PCR, and genotyping using the spoligotype method allowed the Mycobacterium bovis spoligotype SB0140, which is the prevailing spoligotype in Argentina, to be identified [17,36,37]. The dam of the stillborn belongs to a tuberculin-positive herd, identified as positive from the tuberculin test and with detectable antibodies against bovine tuberculosis using ELISA. This is in agreement with previous studies that have correlated humoral responses with increased pathology and disseminated disease [38,39].
To prevent the dissemination of the disease, the confirmation of tuberculosis in this stillborn reinforces the importance of testing at an early age before infected animals transmit the disease to other susceptible animals. The presence of lesions demonstrates the capacity of the fetus to mount delayed-type hypersensitivity at an early age. Previous works have mentioned how tuberculin performance varies with many factors and stresses the importance of testing young animals as good responders to tuberculin with the highest lesion confirmation risk [28,40,41]. In some instances, the failure of the tuberculin test-based eradication programs stems from the presence of anergic animals. The occurrence of this complicated phenomenon increases if an infected animal is not identified as soon as the diseases progresses [42,43].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.F.A.P., L.M.P., M.Z. and D.M.; methodology, M.F.A.P., A.D.P. and F.I.; formal analysis, F.I. and A.D.P.; investigation, D.M., M.Z. and M.F.A.P.; writing—original draft preparation, G.T., M.Z. and M.F.A.P.; writing—review and editing, G.T., M.F.A.P., M.Z. and L.M.P.; supervision, F.I. and A.D.P.; project administration, G.T. and L.M.P.; funding acquisition, L.M.P., M.F.A.P. and G.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Proyectos de Investigación y Desarrollo (I+D) y Programas de Incentivos a la Investigación (PPID) de la Universidad Nacional de La Plata, grant 11V293.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The ethics committee: CICUAL Comité Institucional para el cuidado y uso de animales de laboratorio approved this study. Approval Code: No. 250910-9, Approval Date: 15 September 2025.

Data Availability Statement

Any further information related to the current study is available from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. WOAH, World Organisation for Animal Health. Chapter 3.1. 13. 2023. Mammalian Tuberculosis (Infection with Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Complex). Available online: https://www.woah.org/en/disease/mammalian-tuberculosis/ (accessed on 2 December 2025).
  2. Brites, D.; Loiseau, C.; Menardo, F.; Borrell, S.; Boniotti, M.B.; Warren, R.; Dippenaar, A.; Parsons, S.D.C.; Beisel, C.; Behr, M.A.; et al. A new phylogenetic framework for the animal-adapted Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Olea-Popelka, F.; Muwonge, A.; Perera, A.; Dean, A.S.; Mumford, E.; Erlacher-Vindel, E.; Forcella, S.; Silk, B.J.; Ditiu, L.; El Idrissi, A.; et al. Zoonotic tuberculosis in human beings caused by Mycobacterium bovis a call for action. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2023, 17, e21–e25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Barnes, A.P.; Moxey, A.; Brocklehurst, S.; Barratt, A.; McKendrick, I.J.; Innocent, G.; Ahmadi, B.V. The consequential costs of bovine tuberculosis (bTB) breakdowns in England and Wales. Prev. Vet. Med. 2023, 211, e105808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Collins, J.D. Tuberculosis in cattle: Strategic planning for the future. Vet. Microbiol. 2006, 112, 369–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Borham, M.; Oreiby, A.; El-Gedawy, A.; Hegazy, Y.; Al-Gaabary, M. Tuberculin test errors and its effect on detection of bovine tuberculosis. J. Hellenic Vet. Med. Soc. 2021, 72, 3263–3270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pritchard, D.G. A century of bovine tuberculosis 1888–1988: Conquest and controversy. J. Comp. Pathol. 1988, 99, 357–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Palmer, M.V.; Whipple, D.L.; Rhyan, J.C.; Bolin, C.A.; Saari, D.A. Granuloma development in cattle after intratonsilar inoculation with Mycobacterium bovis. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1999, 60, 310–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Atkins, P.J.; Robinson, P.A. Bovine tuberculosis and badgers in Britain: Relevance of the past. Epidemiol. Infect. 2013, 141, 1437–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Barandiaran, S.; Marfil, M.J.; La Sala, L.F.; Tammone, A.; Condori, W.E.; Winter, M.; Abate, S.; Rosas, A.C.; Ponce, L.; Carpinetti, B.; et al. Tuberculosis in Wild Pigs from Argentina. Ecohealth 2024, 1, 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zoonotic Tuberculosis in Mammals, Including Bovine and Caprine Tuberculosis. 2019. Available online: http://www.cfsph.iastate.edu/Factsheets/pdfs/bovine_tuberculosis.pdf (accessed on 2 December 2025).
  12. Serrano, M.; Sevilla, I.A.; Fuertes, M.; Geijo, M.; Risalde, M.Á.; Ruiz-Fons, J.F.; Gortazar, C.; Juste, R.A.; Domínguez, L.; Elguezabal, N.; et al. Different lesion distribution in calves orally or intratracheally challenged with Mycobacterium bovis: Implications for diagnosis. Vet. Res. 2018, 49, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. King, J. The Necropsy Book: A Guide for Veterinary Students, Residents; Clinicians, Pathologists and Biological Researchers, 7th ed.; Charles Louis Foundation: Ithaca, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 1–259. [Google Scholar]
  14. Krishna, M.; Gole, S.G. Comparison of Conventional Ziehl-Neelsen Method of Acid Fast Bacilli with Modified Bleach Method in Tuberculous Lymphadenitis. J. Cytol. 2017, 34, 188–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Forbes, B.A.; Hall, G.S.; Miller, M.B.; Novak, S.M.; Rowlinson, M.C.; Salfinger, M.; Somoskövi, A.; Warshauer, D.M.; Wilson, M.L. Practical Guidance for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: Mycobacteria. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2018, 31, e00038-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Koneman, E.W.; Allen, S.D.; Landa, W.M.; Schreckenberger, P.C.; Winn Junior, W.C. Micobacterias. In Diagnóstico Microbiologico Texto y Atlas Colorido, 6th ed.; Panamericana: Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2006; pp. 1016–1076. ISBN 978-950-06-0895-4. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zumárraga, M.J.; Arriaga, C.; Barandiaran, S.; Cobos-Marín, L.; de Waard, J.; Estrada-Garcia, I.; Figueiredo, T.; Figueroa, A.; Gimenez, F.; Gomes, H.M.; et al. Understanding the relationship between Mycobacterium bovis spoligotypes from cattle in Latin American countries. Res. Vet. Sci. 2013, 94, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zumárraga, M.J.; Meikle, V.; Bernardelli, A.; Abdala, A.; Tarabla, H.; Romano, M.I.; Cataldi, A. Use of touch-down polymerase chain reaction to enhance the sensitivity of Mycobacterium bovis detection. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2005, 17, 232–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hermans, P.W.; van Soolingen, D.; Dale, J.W.; Schuitema, A.R.; McAdam, R.A.; Catty, D.; van Embden, J.D. Insertion element IS986 from Mycobacterium tuberculosis: A useful tool for diagnosis and epidemiology of tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1990, 28, 2051–2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ramos, D.F.; Silva, A.B.; Fagundes, M.Q.; Groll, A.V.; Silva, P.E.; Dellagostin, O.A. Molecular typing of Mycobacterium bovis isolated in the south of Brazil. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2014, 45, 657–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  21. Kamerbeek, J.; Schouls, L.; Kolk, A.; Van Agterveld, M.; Van Soolingen, D.; Kuijper, S.; Van Embden, J. Simultaneous detection and strain differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for diagnosis and epidemiology. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1997, 35, 907–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Griffa, N.; Moyano, R.D.; Canal, A.M.; Travería, G.E.; Santangelo, M.P.; Alonso, N.; Romano, M.I. Development and diagnostic validation of an ELISA based on an antigenic mixture for the detection of bovine tuberculosis. Vet. J. 2020, 256, e105426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. SENASA. Servicio Nacional de Sanidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria. 2012. Available online: https://www.argentina.gob.ar/senasa/programas-sanitarios/cadena-animal/bovinos-y-bubalinos/bovinos-y-bubalinos-producci%C3%B3n-primaria/tuberculosis-bovina (accessed on 3 December 2025).
  24. García-Jiménez, W.L.; Benítez-Medina, J.M.; Fernández-Llario, P.; Abecia, J.A.; García-Sánchez, A.; Martínez, R.; Risco, D.; Ortiz-Pelaez, A.; Salguero, F.J.; Smith, N.H.; et al. Comparative pathology of the natural infections by Mycobacterium bovis and by Mycobacterium caprae in wild boar (Sus scrofa). Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2013, 60, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vural, S.A.; Tunca, R. Generalized tuberculosis in a 45 day-old calf. Dtsch. Tierarztl. Wochenschr. 2001, 108, 468–470. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ozyigit, M.O.; Senturk, S.; Akkoc, A. Suspected congenital generalized tuberculosis in a newborn calf. Vet. Rec. 2007, 160, 307–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Espejel, M.D.C.; Del Rio, J.C.; Medrano, A.; Santillan, M.A.; Morales, J.F. Congenital tuberculosis in a 25-day-old female calf. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2018, 42, 135–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mekonnen, G.A.; Gumi, B.; Berg, S.; Conlan, A.J.K.; Ameni, G.; Wood, J.L.N. A case of early neonate bovine tuberculosis in Ethiopia. Clin. Case Rep. 2020, 9, 487–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Neill, S.D.; Bryson, D.G.; Pollock, J.M. Pathogenesis of tuberculosis in cattle. Tuberculosis 2001, 81, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Pfrommer, E.; Dreier, C.; Gabriel, G.; Dallenga, T.; Reimer, R.; Schepanski, K.; Scherließ, R.; Schaible, U.E.; Gutsmann, T. Enhanced tenacity of mycobacterial aerosols from necrotic neutrophils. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 9159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Schlafer, D.H.; Foster, R.A. Female genital system. In Jubb, Kennedy & Palmer’s Pathology of Domestic Animals, 6th ed.; Maxie, M.G., Ed.; WB Saunders: St. Louis, MI, USA, 2016; p. 358.e464. [Google Scholar]
  32. Mee, J.F.; Hayes, C.; Stefaniak, T.P.; Jawor, P. Review: Bovine foetal mortality—Risk factors, causes, immune responses and immuno-prophylaxis. Animal 2023, 17, 100774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hagemen, J.; Shulman, S.; Schreiber, M.; Luck, S.; Yogev, R. Congenital tuberculosis: Critical reappraisal of clinical findings and diagnostic procedures. Pediatrics 1980, 66, 980–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wangoo, A.; Johnson, L.; Gough, J.; Ackbar, R.; Inglut, S.; Hicks, D.; Spencer, Y.; Hewinson, G.; Vordermeier, M. Advanced granulomatous lesions in Mycobacterium bovis-infected cattle are associated with increased expression of type I procollagen, gammadelta (WC1+) T cells and CD 68+ cells. J. Comp. Pathol. 2005, 133, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Palmer, M.V.; Kanipe, C.; Boggiatto, P.M. The Bovine Tuberculoid Granuloma. Pathogens 2022, 11, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Garbaccio, S.; Macias, A.; Shimizu, E.; Paolicchi, F.; Pezzone, N.; Magnano, G.; Zapata, L.; Abdala, A.; Tarabla, H.; Peyru, M.; et al. Association between spoligotype-VNTR types and virulence of Mycobacterium bovis in cattle. Virulence 2014, 5, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Shimizu, E.; Macías, A.; Paolicchi, F.; Magnano, G.; Zapata, L.; Fernández, A.; Zumárraga, M. Genotyping Mycobacterium bovis from cattle in the Central Pampas of Argentina: Temporal and regional trends. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 2014, 109, 236–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Welsh, M.D.; Cunningham, R.T.; Corbett, D.M.; Girvin, R.M.; McNair, J.; Skuce, R.A.; Bryson, D.G.; Pollock, J.M. Influence of pathological progression on the balance between cellular and humoral immune responses in bovine tuberculosis. Immunology 2005, 114, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Klepp, L.I.; Blanco, F.C.; Bigi, M.M.; Vázquez, C.L.; García, E.A.; Sabio, Y.; García, J.; Bigi, F.B. Cell and Antibody Responses in Bovine Tuberculosis. Antibodies 2024, 13, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Byrne, A.W.; Barrett, D.; Breslin, P.; Fanning, J.; Casey, M.; Madden, J.M.; Lesellier, S.; Gormley, E. Bovine tuberculosis in youngstock cattle: A narrative review. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, e1000124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. O’Hagan, M.J.; Courcier, E.A.; Drewe, J.A.; Gordon, A.W.; McNair, J.; Abernethy, D.A. Risk factors for visible lesions or positive laboratory tests in bovine tuberculosis reactor cattle in Northern Ireland. Prev. Vet. Med. 2015, 120, 283–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Houlihan, M.G.; Dixon, F.W.; Page, N.A. Outbreak of bovine tuberculosis featuring anergy to the skin test, udder lesions and milkborne disease in young calves. Vet. Rec. Sep. 2008, 163, 357–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Lepper, A.W.; Pearson, C.W.; Corner, L.A. Anergy to tuberculin in beef cattle. Aust. Vet. J. 1977, 53, 214–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (A): Macroscopic visualization of the liver showing three granulomas protruding from the surface. (B): Macroscopic visualization of the liver with cut surface showing a granuloma. (C): Macroscopic visualization of the spleen showing a granuloma inside the parenchyma. (D): Macroscopic visualization of the spleen with a closer approach to the cut surface showing a granuloma with a reddish center. The black arrows point to the granulomas.
Figure 1. (A): Macroscopic visualization of the liver showing three granulomas protruding from the surface. (B): Macroscopic visualization of the liver with cut surface showing a granuloma. (C): Macroscopic visualization of the spleen showing a granuloma inside the parenchyma. (D): Macroscopic visualization of the spleen with a closer approach to the cut surface showing a granuloma with a reddish center. The black arrows point to the granulomas.
Pathogens 15 00114 g001
Figure 2. Liver granuloma: the black star at the bottom right side depicts the center of the granuloma with extensive foci of caseous necrosis, with peripheral infiltration of epithelioid cells, lymphocytes and Langhans multinucleated giant cells (H&E 100×). Insert: higher magnification of a Langhans multinucleated giant cell (H&E 450×).
Figure 2. Liver granuloma: the black star at the bottom right side depicts the center of the granuloma with extensive foci of caseous necrosis, with peripheral infiltration of epithelioid cells, lymphocytes and Langhans multinucleated giant cells (H&E 100×). Insert: higher magnification of a Langhans multinucleated giant cell (H&E 450×).
Pathogens 15 00114 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alvarado Pinedo, M.F.; Di Paolo, A.; Zumárraga, M.; Illanes, F.; Moyano, D.; Peralta, L.M.; Travería, G. Congenital Tuberculosis in a Stillborn Calf. Pathogens 2026, 15, 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15010114

AMA Style

Alvarado Pinedo MF, Di Paolo A, Zumárraga M, Illanes F, Moyano D, Peralta LM, Travería G. Congenital Tuberculosis in a Stillborn Calf. Pathogens. 2026; 15(1):114. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15010114

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alvarado Pinedo, María Fiorella, Adrián Di Paolo, Martín Zumárraga, Federico Illanes, Damián Moyano, Luis María Peralta, and Gabriel Travería. 2026. "Congenital Tuberculosis in a Stillborn Calf" Pathogens 15, no. 1: 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15010114

APA Style

Alvarado Pinedo, M. F., Di Paolo, A., Zumárraga, M., Illanes, F., Moyano, D., Peralta, L. M., & Travería, G. (2026). Congenital Tuberculosis in a Stillborn Calf. Pathogens, 15(1), 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15010114

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop