Next Article in Journal
COVID-19 Transmission Potential and Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions in Maine During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Previous Article in Journal
Influenza D Virus Circulation Among Bovines, Swine, Equines, and Wild Boars in Italy: A Sero-Epidemiological Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 14
Issue 9
10.3390/pathogens14090894
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Transplacental Transmission of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) in Pregnant Women with Positive Anti-CMV IgG and Negative Anti-CMV IgM in Highly CMV Seropositive Region

by
Jie Tang
1,2,†,
Hongxia Wei
3,†,
Yimin Dai
4,
Yuqian Luo
5,
Yali Hu
4,
Yi-Hua Zhou
5,6,
Nacheng Lin
4,* and
Aimin Liu
1,2,*
1
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University, Changzhou 213017, China
2
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Wujin Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Changzhou 213017, China
3
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China
4
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China
5
Department of Core Laboratory, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China
6
Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Pathogens 2025, 14(9), 894; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14090894
Submission received: 16 August 2025 / Revised: 24 August 2025 / Accepted: 27 August 2025 / Published: 5 September 2025
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

Primary or recurrent infection of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in pregnant women may cause transplacental transmission to fetuses. We aimed to investigate the rate of transplacental CMV transmission in women with positive anti-CMV IgG and negative anti-CMV IgM and its impact on newborns. Pregnant women with positive anti-CMV IgG and negative anti-CMV IgM during the first or second trimester who delivered by Cesarean section were included. Amniotic fluid collected during the Cesarean section was tested for CMV DNA with quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. CMV IgG and IgM were measured with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. A total of 695 pregnant women were enrolled between April 2019 and February 2023. Of them, 567 (81.6%) were single pregnancies and 128 (18.4%) were twin pregnancies, and 594 (85.5%) were full-term pregnancies and 101 (14.5%) were premature pregnancies. Of the 823 newborns, 7 (0.9%) were CMV DNA positive in amniotic fluid, demonstrating the transplacental CMV transmission. One of these seven neonates was diagnosed with intrauterine growth restriction at gestation week 25+1 and at birth at a gestational age of 30+2 weeks. However, all seven children had normal hearing, vision, and neurodevelopment at the age of 18–56 months. Transplacental CMV transmission may occur in offspring of pregnant women with positive anti-CMV IgG and negative anti-CMV IgM, but the long-term sequelae appear to be minimal.

1. Introduction

Maternal infection during pregnancy may cause adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes [1,2]. Infection of human cytomegalovirus (CMV), a member of the Herpesviridae family, is characterized by its latent nature like other herpes viruses, the absence of viral progeny, and little harmful outcome in immunocompetent individuals. However, reactivation of the preexisting virus or reinfection of a new CMV isolate may occur during pregnancy because of suppressed T cell immune functions. Transplacental transmission of maternal CMV to the fetus is a main cause of non-genetic fetal/neonatal abnormalities in industrialized countries [3]. Approximately half of women at childbearing age in these countries are seronegative for CMV and are prone to primary infection during pregnancy [4], and an estimated 9.9–15.4% of severe neonatal adverse outcomes may be associated with congenital CMV infection [5,6]. Transplacental CMV transmission is also an important cause for fetal/neonatal abnormalities in the developing world [7,8], although the proportion of CMV infection in terminated fetuses with severe malformation appeared to be relatively low [9].
Transplacental CMV transmission mainly occurs in pregnant women with active infection, which is defined by positive CMV IgG and IgM. Active CMV infection may be primary or non-primary. Transplacental CMV transmission rate is estimated at 30–40% in pregnancy with primary infection and 1–2% in pregnancy with non-primary infection [10,11,12], which includes either reactivation or reinfection. However, non-primary active infection is not necessarily characterized by the presence of CMV IgM and may consequently be positive for CMV IgG alone. Pregnant women with positive CMV IgG alone are considered less likely to have transplacental transmission. A recent study of 9661 newborns of women with preconception immunity in Italy showed that the congenital CMV infection rate was as low as 0.19% [13]. However, the data on transplacental CMV transmission in pregnant women with positive CMV IgG alone in high seroprevalence regions are scant, and the long-term influence of the transplacental transmission on the outcomes of fetuses/neonates under such circumstances is less studied. In the present study, we investigated the transplacental CMV transmission in pregnant women with positive CMV IgG alone by detection of CMV DNA in amniotic fluid collected during the Cesarean section.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population and Sample Collection

Renal epithelium is one of the main targets of CMV replication. Amniotic fluid is mainly composed of fetal urine. Virions excreted in the fetal urine may accumulate in amniotic fluid. Thus, detection of CMV DNA in amniotic fluid by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is considered highly sensitive to define transplacental CMV transmission. Amniotic fluid collected during spontaneous delivery is inevitably contaminated by vaginal secretion, which may contain CMV [14,15]. Therefore, in the present study, we collected amniotic fluid during Cesarean section to detect CMV DNA so that the contamination by vaginal secretion may be avoided.
This was a prospective cohort study conducted at two tertiary hospitals in Jiangsu province, China. Based on the incidence of 1–2% transplacental CMV transmission [16], a range of from 409 to 497 participants would be required with the maximum allowable error at 1–1.5%. Pregnant women who were CMV IgG positive and CMV IgM negative and tested during the first (the first prenatal care during gestation, 12 weeks) or second (gestation 13–27 weeks) trimester and who underwent Cesarean section were eligible for this study. Those who were HIV positive or received immunosuppression therapy were excluded.
Peripheral blood samples (~5 mL) of the pregnant women were collected on the day of (elective Cesarean section) or just (emergency Cesarean section) before the surgery. Amniotic fluid samples (~10 mL) were collected with a syringe with or without a needle, depending upon whether the amniotic cavity was opened or not during the Cesarean section, with caution not to injure the fetus. Cord blood samples (~5 mL) were collected from the placental umbilical cord vessel immediately after the placenta was delivered. To ensure as many amniotic fluid and cord blood samples as possible were collected, an additional nurse was arranged to collect the samples during each Cesarean section. The blood samples were separated into serum and coagulated part by centrifugation at 4 °C, and the serum samples were aliquoted in 1.5 mL tubes and kept at −30 °C. Amniotic fluid samples were directly aliquoted in 1.5 mL tubes and stored at −30 °C.
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Ethics Committee of Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University on 3 February 2021, and the ethical approval of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital was applied later and approved on 13 August 2024. However, we performed this study in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Since we just tested CMV IgG and IgM and CMV DNA in the participants and did not take any other intervention during pregnancy, and Cesarean section was determined based on medical indications, but not for this study, all pregnancies went to term without harm to both pregnant women and their offspring. In addition, the cost for testing anti-CMV IgG and IgM and CMV DNA was covered by fundings, but not by the pregnant women. Written informed consent was obtained from each pregnant woman during hospitalization before the Cesarean section.

2.2. Serological Tests of CMV IgG and IgM

Serum samples were tested for CMV IgG and IgM with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits (Bell Biological Technology, Beijing, China) as described previously [15]. The performance (specificity and sensitivity) of the kits is comparable to that of the kits manufactured by Dia.Pro Diagnostic Bioprobes (Milano, Italy) that were used in our previous investigation [8,9,17]. The microplate in the CMV IgG kit was coated with purified inactivated CMV, and CMV IgG was detected with horseradish-conjugated mouse anti-human IgG. The microplate in the CMV IgM kit was coated with mouse anti-human IgM (μ chain), and CMV IgM was detected by horseradish-conjugated recombinant CMV p52 and p65 proteins. Each serum was diluted 1:11. Based on the manufacturer’s instructions, the cut-off value for CMV IgG and IgM was equal to or higher than the sum of 0.1 and the average values of optical density at a wavelength of 450 nm (OD450) of three negative controls in each independent assay.
CMV IgG avidity index (AI) was tested by urea denaturation with the CMV IgG kit (Bell Biological Technology) as described elsewhere [8,9,18,19]. IgG AI < 30% was considered as low, 30–50% as intermediate, and >50% as high.

2.3. Detection of CMV DNA

CMV DNA in amniotic fluid was measured by a commercially available CMV qPCR diagnostic kit (Aikang, Hangzhou, China) on an ABI StepOne Plus Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) as described previously [9,20]. Briefly, one milliliter of amniotic fluid was centrifuged at 15,000× g at 4 °C for 15 min, and 0.1 mL of pellet suspension was used to extract total DNA by the extraction agents in the kit. For detection of CMV DNA in the blood samples, 0.1 mL serum was used to extract total DNA. The positive control, negative control, and six calibrations (2–7 log copies/mL) were included in each test.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Continuous data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Categorical variables were reported as number and percentage and compared by the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test where appropriate. A two-sided p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 25.0 (Chicago, IL, USA).

3. Results

3.1. General Characteristics of Participants

During the period of 1 April 2019 to 31 March 2020 in a hospital, a total of 679 pregnant women who were CMV IgG positive and CMV IgM negative, tested in the first or second trimester, and who received a Cesarean section were eligible for the study (Figure 1). Of them, amniotic fluid and cord blood samples were collected from each of the 64 single pregnancies and 113 twin pregnancies with live birth (Figure 1). During the period of 1 April 2021 through 28 February 2023, a total of 782 pregnant women in another hospital were eligible for the study (Figure 1). Of them, amniotic fluid samples were collected from 518 pregnant women (15 twin pregnancies), yet the cord blood samples were not collected (Figure 1). Thus, a total of 695 pregnant women were enrolled, with 567 (81.6%) single pregnancies and 128 (18.4%) twin pregnancies. Their average age was 30.6 ± 4.7 years. The most common indications for Cesarean section were scarred uterus (48.1%) and twin pregnancy (19.7%) (Table S1). Of them, 585 (84.2%) were elective Cesarean sections and 110 (15.8%) were emergency Cesarean sections, and 594 (85.5%) were full-term deliveries and 101 (14.5%) were premature deliveries. The premature delivery rate (55.5%, 76/137) of twin pregnancy was significantly higher than that (4.5%, 25/558) of single pregnancy (χ2 = 230.29, p < 0.001).

3.2. Positive Rate of CMV DNA in Amniotic Fluid

In total, 695 women had 823 live newborns because of the 128 women with twin pregnancies. Of the 823 amniotic fluid samples, 7 (0.9%) were CMV DNA positive (Figure 1). Among these seven newborns, three were singletons and four (two pairs) were twins. The transplacental transmission rate (1.6%, 4/256) in twin infants was slightly higher than that (0.5%, 3/567) in singleton infants, although the difference was not statistically significant (χ2 = 1.128, p = 0.288). The viral load ranged from 2.54 × 102 to 5.81 × 107 copies/mL (Table 1). All three single births were full term, and the four twins (two pairs) were preterm at gestational ages 30+2 and 36+1 weeks, respectively (Table 1).
In addition, all five mothers of seven newborns with positive CMV DNA in amniotic fluid had no detectable CMV DNA in their peripheral blood collected just before Cesarean section. The cord blood samples from five infants (one singleton and four twins) were also CMV DNA negative.

3.3. CMV IgG and IgM Status in Pregnant Women and Newborns with Positive CMV DNA

While we enrolled pregnant women with CMV IgG positive and CMV IgM negative during the first or second trimester, we further tested CMV IgG and IgM in them just before the Cesarean section. All 695 pregnant women were still CMV IgG positive, and 11 (1.6%) of them became positive for CMV IgM. The OD450 values of these 11 samples ranged from 0.1540 to 0.4106, while the cut-off value for the positive CMV IgM ranged from 0.1500 to 0.1522 in the performance of the assays. Thus, all these 11 serum samples collected just before the Cesarean section were weakly positive for CMV IgM. On the other hand, all five women with positive CMV DNA in their newborn infants’ amniotic fluid were negative for CMV IgM just before delivery.
We further measured the CMV IgG avidity index in the serum samples from the 11 women who showed CMV IgM positive just before delivery and from the 5 women whose newborns were CMV DNA positive. The CMV IgG avidity index of each serum was higher than 50%.
Moreover, the umbilical serum samples from five (one singleton and two pairs of twins) of the seven newborns with positive CMV DNA were available, and we tested the CMV IgG and IgM. While all five samples were CMV IgG positive, three (one singleton and one pair of twins) samples were also CMV IgM positive (Table 1). The OD450 values of these three samples were 0.2537 and 0.2732 (one pair of twins) and 1.3817 (the singleton), respectively. Another pair of twins were CMV IgM negative with OD450 values of 0.0545 and 0.0495, much lower than the cut-off value.

3.4. Antenatal and Neonatal Features and Follow-Up Outcomes of CMV-Infected Children

Among the five women with positive CMV DNA in their amniotic fluid, routine prenatal B ultrasound screening revealed intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) in one of the twins in a pregnant woman (#1) at gestation week 25+1 and did not reveal obviously abnormal findings in four other pregnant women (Table 1). This woman then underwent weekly prenatal B ultrasound screening, and abnormal umbilical blood flow had been observed in this fetus with IUGR at gestation week 29+5. The pregnancy in this woman was terminated by elective Cesarean section at gestation week 30+2.
The birth weight, body length, and Apgar scores of the seven neonates with positive CMV DNA in amniotic fluid are shown in Table 1. None of the seven neonates had petechiae, tachypnea, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, thrombocytopenia, seizures, microcephaly, or hypotonia at birth. The hearing tests within 3 days after birth were all normal. However, both twin neonates born to a woman (#1) developed neonatal pneumonia and respiratory distress syndrome. Thus, they were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit in a referral neonate center. During hospitalization, both of them developed necrotizing enteritis, and the neonate with IUGR underwent ileum perforation. Neither of them received antiviral therapy against CMV based on the negative results of CMV DNA in their blood samples. These two infants were discharged from the hospital after comprehensive treatments for 20 and 46 days, respectively.
All seven children were followed up at least once at the age of 18–56 months (Table 1). They had normal vision, hearing, and mental development, and none of them had neurological sequelae.

4. Discussion

This study estimated the rate of transplacental CMV transmission in pregnant women with positive CMV IgG and negative CMV IgM by detecting CMV DNA in amniotic fluid collected during Cesarean section. We revealed that transplacental CMV transmission occurred in 0.9% (7/823) of newborns. While a pair of preterm twins had severe clinical manifestations shortly after birth, all seven children had no severe sequelae at the age of 18 to 56 months. Our results indicate that transplacental CMV transmission in pregnant women with positive CMV IgG and negative CMV IgM may have minimal severe long-term sequelae.
Transplacental CMV transmission rate varies worldwide, depending upon the different countries and different populations, ranging from less than 1% in developed countries to 1–5% in developing countries [16]. In China, the overall seroprevalence of CMV infection in pregnant women is over 98% [8,20]; thus, primary CMV infection during pregnancy is rare, and transplacental CMV transmission mostly occurs in pregnant women with recurrent CMV infection. Because of the different assays used to define the transmission, the reported rates varied considerably in China, from as low as 0.23% (4/1756) based on the detection of CMV DNA in umbilical blood samples [21] to 1.59% (107/6733) determined by CMV DNA in saliva collected within 3 days after birth [22]. Recently, Huang et al. reported that the transmission rate was 1.33% (83/6228) based on testing CMV DNA in urine and/or saliva 13 days after birth [20]; however, a considerable proportion of positive CMV DNA in saliva may be false positive because the same authors reported a much lower defined transmission rate [23]. This situation is also reported by other studies [13,24]. In other parts of the world with CMV seroprevalence > 95% among pregnant women, the transplacental transmission rate was 1.08% (87/8047) [25]. Generally, it is considered that 1–2% of pregnant women with recurrent infection may have transplacental CMV transmission [10,12]. In the present study, we revealed a transmission rate of 0.9% in pregnant women with positive CMV IgG and negative CMV IgM. Because of the high sensitivity and almost 100% specificity, detection of CMV DNA in amniotic fluids has been recognized as the gold standard for prenatal diagnosis of transplacental CMV transmission [26,27]. Thus, the 0.9% transmission rate determined by testing CMV DNA in amniotic fluids collected during Cesarean section in the present study should reliably reflect the real situation of transplacental CMV in the pregnant women with positive CMV IgG and negative CMV IgM. In addition, similar to the finding that more congenital CMV infections occurred in twin infants in Brazil [28], we found that the transmission of CMV in twin pregnancy was somewhat higher than that in singleton pregnancy, although the difference was not statistically significant.
In pregnant women with preexisting CMV IgG, transplacental CMV transmission is generally considered the consequence of recurrent CMV infection during pregnancy. Clinically, positive CMV IgM is a marker for recurrent CMV infection in pregnant women with preexisting CMV IgG. However, we found in this study that pregnant women with positive CMV IgG alone still transmitted CMV to their offspring in utero, which was also observed previously [13,20,25,29]. This indicates that reactivation or reinfection of CMV may not be positive for CMV IgM, as studies showed that CMV IgM appears to have no association with non-primary infection [30]. Nevertheless, pregnant women with preexisting CMV IgG may cause transplacental CMV transmission, regardless of positive or negative CMV IgM.
Traditionally, it is considered that transplacental CMV transmission following primary infection during pregnancy causes many more symptomatic CMV infections in newborns and severe long-term sequelae than that after recurrent infection [31]. Recently, it is considered that once transplacental CMV transmission occurs, severe long-term sequelae such as sensorineural hearing loss and neurodevelopmental impairment are similar between maternal primary and non-primary infection [32,33]. However, in our study, none of the seven children with transplacental CMV infection had long-term sequelae, indicating that previous CMV infection may provide partial protection to lower the risk of transplacental transmission and to alleviate the severity of diseases [31]. Thus, more studies in highly CMV seroprevalence populations are required to clarify whether transplacental CMV infection in pregnant women with preexisting CMV IgG causes similar severe long-term sequelae as that in pregnant women with primary CMV infection.
There are several limitations in our study. First, we did not test CMV DNA in the urine of newborns within 14 days after birth to confirm the transplacental CMV infection. However, we measured CMV IgM in five umbilical blood samples, and three of them were positive, adding more evidence of the transplacental infection. Second, the timing of blood collection may affect the results of CMV IgG and IgM. In primary infection, CMV IgM antibodies usually appear within 1–2 weeks after infection and may become undetectable after 4–12 weeks, whereas CMV IgG antibodies develop a few days after the appearance of IgM and persist for life [11]. Thus, the pregnant women who tested positive for CMV IgG and negative for CMV IgM in the second trimester had the potential to be primarily infected with CMV in the first trimester. In addition, we did not measure the CMV IgG avidity during the pregnancy to ascertain the non-primary CMV infection, since a small proportion of primary CMV may not produce detectable specific IgM, or the specific IgM may become undetectable after 4–12 weeks [18,34]. However, we considered that the pregnant women included in this study were less likely to have had primary CMV infection during pregnancy, since nearly 100% of the Chinese women of reproductive age have had a previous CMV infection [35]. Third, the timing of transplacental CMV transmission in the seven infected children was unknown.

5. Conclusions

We revealed that transplacental CMV transmission occurs in approximately 1% of pregnant women with positive CMV IgG and negative CMV IgM. However, the affected newborns appear to have no severe long-term neurological sequelae and have normal development. Whether transplacental CMV transmission resulting from the non-primary infection has the same severe long-term sequelae as those caused by the primary infection merits further investigation.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens14090894/s1: Table S1: Indications for Cesarean section in 695 pregnant women.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.T., H.W., Y.D., N.L., Y.-H.Z. and A.L.; data curation, Y.L., N.L. and Y.-H.Z.; funding acquisition, J.T.; investigation, N.L. and A.L.; methodology, J.T., H.W. and Y.L.; resources, Y.D. and Y.H.; supervision, Y.-H.Z. and A.L.; writing—original draft, J.T. and H.W.; writing—review and editing, Y.H., N.L. and Y.-H.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by grants from the Science and Technology Department of Changzhou City (CJ20220009) and from the Science and Technology Department of Jiangsu Province (BK20221169), Jiangsu Province, China.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital (2024-516-01) and Changzhou Wujin People’s Hospital (2021-SR-103).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data are available upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
CMVCytomegalovirus
qPCRquantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction
AIAvidity index
SDStandard deviation

References

  1. Auriti, C.; Bucci, S.; De Rose, D.U.; Coltella, L.; Santisi, A.; Martini, L.; Maddaloni, C.; Bersani, I.; Lozzi, S.; Campi, F.; et al. Maternal–Fetal Infections (Cytomegalovirus, Toxoplasma, Syphilis): Short-Term and Long-Term Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Children Infected and Uninfected at Birth. Pathogens 2022, 11, 1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yu, W.; Hu, X.; Cao, B. Viral Infections During Pregnancy: The Big Challenge Threatening Maternal and Fetal Health. Matern. Fetal Med. 2021, 4, 72–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Salomè, S.; Corrado, F.R.; Mazzarelli, L.L.; Maruotti, G.M.; Capasso, L.; Blazquez-Gamero, D.; Raimondi, F. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection: The state of the art and future perspectives. Front. Pediatr. 2023, 11, 1276912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Greye, H.; Wex, T.; Taneva, E.; Redlich, A.; Costa, S.D.; Rissmann, A. Cytomegalovirus seronegativity rate in pregnant women and primary cytomegalovirus infection during pregnancy in rural Germany. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023, 23, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Misono, S.; Sie, K.C.; Weiss, N.S.; Huang, M.L.; Boeckh, M.; Norton, S.J.; Yueh, B. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection in pediatric hearing loss. Arch. Otolaryngol. Neck Surg. 2011, 137, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Iwasenko, J.M.; Howard, J.; Arbuckle, S.; Graf, N.; Hall, B.; Craig, M.E.; Rawlinson, W.D. Human cytomegalovirus infection is detected frequently in stillbirths and is associated with fetal thrombotic vasculopathy. J. Infect. Dis. 2011, 203, 1526–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Payne, H.; Barnabas, S. Congenital cytomegalovirus in Sub-Saharan Africa—A narrative review with practice recommendations. Front. Public Health 2024, 12, 1359663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, S.; Hu, L.; Chen, J.; Xu, B.; Zhou, Y.H.; Hu, Y. Cytomegalovirus seroprevalence in pregnant women and association with adverse pregnancy/neonatal outcomes in Jiangsu Province, China. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e107645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lin, X.; Wang, J.; Wang, Z.; Ru, T.; Dai, Y.; Li, J.; Zhu, X.; Liu, J.; Ye, X.; Zhu, B.; et al. Rare detection of cytomegalovirus in severe fetal malformations in China. J. Clin. Virol. 2016, 79, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kenneson, A.; Cannon, M.J. Review and meta-analysis of the epidemiology of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Rev. Med. Virol. 2007, 17, 253–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Choodinatha, H.K.; Jeon, M.R.; Choi, B.Y.; Lee, K.N.; Kim, H.J.; Park, J.Y. Cytomegalovirus infection during pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. Sci. 2023, 66, 463–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. D’Alberti, E.; Rizzo, G.; Khalil, A.; Mappa, I.; Pietrolucci, M.E.; Capannolo, G.; Alameddine, S.; Sorrenti, S.; Zullo, F.; Giancotti, A.; et al. Counseling in fetal medicine: Congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2024, 295, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lilleri, D.; Tassis, B.; Pugni, L.; Ronchi, A.; Pietrasanta, C.; Spinillo, A.; Arossa, A.; Achille, C.; Vergani, P.; Ornaghi, S.; et al. Prevalence, outcome, and prevention of congenital cytomegalovirus infection in neonates born to women with preconception immunity (CHILd Study). Clin. Infect. Dis. 2023, 76, 513–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gianella, S.; Redd, A.D.; Grabowski, M.K.; Tobian, A.A.; Serwadda, D.; Newell, K.; Patel, E.U.; Kalibbala, S.; Ssebbowa, P.; Gray, R.H.; et al. Vaginal cytomegalovirus shedding before and after initiation of antiretroviral therapy in Rakai, Uganda. J. Infect. Dis. 2015, 212, 899–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ju, D.; Li, X.Z.; Shi, Y.F.; Li, Y.; Guo, L.Q.; Zhang, Y. Cytomegalovirus shedding in seropositive healthy women of reproductive age in Tianjin, China. Epidemiol. Infect. 2020, 148, e34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Manicklal, S.; Emery, V.C.; Lazzarotto, T.; Boppana, S.B.; Gupta, R.K. The “silent” global burden of congenital cytomegalovirus. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 26, 86–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, J.; Zhou, Y.; Tang, J.; Xu, C.; Chen, L.; Xu, B.; Dai, Y.; Hu, Y.; Zhou, Y.H. Minimal adverse outcomes of postnatal cytomegalovirus infection in term or moderate and late preterm infants. Front. Pediatr. 2023, 11, 1048282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chen, J.; Hu, L.; Wu, M.; Zhong, T.; Zhou, Y.H.; Hu, Y. Kinetics of IgG antibody to cytomegalovirus (CMV) after birth and seroprevalence of anti-CMV IgG in Chinese children. Virol. J. 2012, 9, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, S.; Zhou, Y.H.; Li, L.; Hu, Y. Monitoring human cytomegalovirus infection with nested PCR: Comparison of positive rates in plasma and leukocytes and with quantitative PCR. Virol. J. 2010, 7, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Huang, Y.; Li, T.; Yu, H.; Tang, J.; Song, Q.; Guo, X.; Wang, H.; Li, C.; Wang, J.; Liang, C.; et al. Maternal CMV seroprevalence rate in early gestation and congenital cytomegalovirus infection in a Chinese population. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2021, 10, 1824–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Beijing Cooperation Group of Maternal and Infant Cytomegalovirus Infection Investigation. Investigation of cytomegalovirus infection in mothers and infants in Beijing. Chin. J. Perinat. Med. 2012, 15, 459–461. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  22. Wang, H.; Zhang, L.; Wang, C.; Yu, B.; Han, X. Saliva sample for screening of congenital cytomegalovirus. Chin. J. Perinat. Med. 2013, 15, 485–488. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  23. Huang, Y.; Wang, H.; Li, T.; Li, C.; Tang, J.; Yu, H.; Guo, X.; Song, Q.; Wei, F.; Wang, J.; et al. Comparison of detection strategies for screening and confirming congenital cytomegalovirus infection in newborns in a highly seroprevalent population: A mother-child cohort study. Lancet Reg. Health West. Pac. 2021, 12, 100182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Eventov-Friedman, S.; Manor, H.; Bar-Oz, B.; Averbuch, D.; Caplan, O.; Lifshitz, A.; Bdolah-Abram, T.; Wolf, D.G. Saliva real-time polymerase chain reaction for targeted screening of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J. Infect. Dis. 2019, 220, 1790–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Mussi-Pinhata, M.M.; Yamamoto, A.Y.; Moura Brito, R.M.; de Lima Isaac, M.; de Carvalho e Oliveira, P.F.; Boppana, S.; Britt, W.J. Birth prevalence and natural history of congenital cytomegalovirus infection in a highly seroimmune population. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2009, 49, 522–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Revello, M.G.; Gerna, G. Diagnosis and management of human cytomegalovirus infection in the mother, fetus, and newborn infant. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2002, 15, 680–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Leruez-Ville, M.; Foulon, I.; Pass, R.; Ville, Y. Cytomegalovirus infection during pregnancy: State of the science. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 223, 330–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Marin, L.J.; Dos Santos, P.R.; Ramos, F.C.; Dos Santos, U.R.; Marques, M.; de Carvalho, L.D.; Gadelha, S.R.; Aquino, V.H. Congenital CMV infection in a Brazilian neonatal intensive care unit: High prevalence among twin newborns. Virol. J. 2024, 21, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Letamendia-Richard, E.; Périllaud-Dubois, C.; de La Guillonnière, L.; Thouard, I.; Cordier, A.G.; Roque-Afonso, A.M.; de Luca, D.; Benachi, A.; Vauloup-Fellous, C. Universal newborn screening for congenital cytomegalovirus infection: Feasibility and relevance in a French type-III maternity cohort. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2022, 129, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zelini, P.; d’Angelo, P.; De Cicco, M.; Achille, C.; Sarasini, A.; Fiorina, L.; Cirasola, D.; Marazzi, V.; Piccini, S.; Furione, M.; et al. Human cytomegalovirus non-primary infection during pregnancy: Antibody response, risk factors and newborn outcome. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2022, 28, 1375–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Permar, S.R.; Schleiss, M.R.; Plotkin, S.A. Advancing our understanding of protective maternal immunity as a guide for development of vaccines to reduce congenital cytomegalovirus infections. J. Virol. 2018, 92, e00030-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Maltezou, P.G.; Kourlaba, G.; Kourkouni, Ε.; Luck, S.; Blázquez-Gamero, D.; Ville, Y.; Lilleri, D.; Dimopoulou, D.; Karalexi, M.; Papaevangelou, V. Maternal type of CMV infection and sequelae in infants with congenital CMV: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Virol. 2020, 129, 104518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mussi-Pinhata, M.M.; Yamamoto, A.Y. Natural history of congenital cytomegalovirus infection in highly seropositive populations. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 221 (Suppl. S1), S15–S22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Revello, M.G.; Vauloup-Fellous, C.; Grangeot-Keros, L.; van Helden, J.; Dickstein, Y.; Lipkin, I.; Mühlbacher, A.; Lazzarotto, T. Clinical evaluation of new automated cytomegalovirus IgM and IgG assays for the Elecsys® analyser platform. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2012, 31, 3331–3339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Huang, Y.; Guo, X.; Song, Q.; Wang, H.; Yu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Qiao, E.; Xue, W.; Li, X.; Zhuang, S.; et al. Cytomegalovirus shedding in healthy seropositive female college students: A 6-month longitudinal study. J. Infect. Dis. 2018, 217, 1069–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pathogens 14 00894 g001
Figure 1. Flow chart of subject enrollment. AF, amniotic fluid.
Figure 1. Flow chart of subject enrollment. AF, amniotic fluid.
Pathogens 14 00894 g001
Table 1. Characteristics of pregnant women and children with positive CMV DNA in amniotic fluid.
Table 1. Characteristics of pregnant women and children with positive CMV DNA in amniotic fluid.
Subject 1Subject 2Subject 3Subject 4Subject 5
Maternal characteristics
Age (y)2928362927
Gestational week (GW)30+236+138+237+539+4
Pregnancy/deliveryG2P1G2P0G4P3G2P0G1P0
Twin/singletonTwinTwinSingletonSingletonSingleton
Reasons for Cesarean sectionAbnormal umbilical blood flow in one of the twinsScarred uterusScarred uterus, preeclampsia, macrosomiaPreeclampsia Abnormal fetal position
Neonatal features and follow-up outcomes
Infant No1a1b2a2b345
CMV DNA in amniotic fluid (copies/mL)4.18 × 1041.19 × 1047.88 × 1062.13 × 1045.81 × 1071.34 × 1032.54 × 102
CMV IgG in cord bloodpositivepositivepositivepositivepositiveNot availableNot available
CMV IgM in cord bloodpositivepositivepositivenegativenegativeNot availableNot available
Prenatal ultrasoundNormalIUGR at GW 25+1, abnormal umbilical blood flow at GW 29+5NormalNormalNormalNormalNormal
Apgar score (1/5 min)8/98/99/109/109/109/109/10
Birth weight (g)2180139030402920417529803300
Birth length (cm)44395048525050
Clinical features after birth *Neonatal pneumonia and respiratory distress syndrome,
necrotizing enteritis 		IUGR, neonatal pneumonia and respiratory distress syndrome, necrotizing enteritis, ileum perforationNoNoNoNeonatal hyperbilirubinemiaNo
Children follow-up (months) †Normal (56)Normal (56)Normal (54)Normal (54)Normal (49)Normal (35)Normal (18)
* None of the infants showed CMV-related signs such as petechiae, tachypnea, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, thrombocytopenia, seizures, microcephaly, or hypotonia at birth. † All seven children had normal vision, hearing, and mental development and had no neurological sequelae at the follow-up. IUGR: intrauterine growth restriction.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tang, J.; Wei, H.; Dai, Y.; Luo, Y.; Hu, Y.; Zhou, Y.-H.; Lin, N.; Liu, A. Transplacental Transmission of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) in Pregnant Women with Positive Anti-CMV IgG and Negative Anti-CMV IgM in Highly CMV Seropositive Region. Pathogens 2025, 14, 894. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14090894

AMA Style

Tang J, Wei H, Dai Y, Luo Y, Hu Y, Zhou Y-H, Lin N, Liu A. Transplacental Transmission of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) in Pregnant Women with Positive Anti-CMV IgG and Negative Anti-CMV IgM in Highly CMV Seropositive Region. Pathogens. 2025; 14(9):894. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14090894

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tang, Jie, Hongxia Wei, Yimin Dai, Yuqian Luo, Yali Hu, Yi-Hua Zhou, Nacheng Lin, and Aimin Liu. 2025. "Transplacental Transmission of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) in Pregnant Women with Positive Anti-CMV IgG and Negative Anti-CMV IgM in Highly CMV Seropositive Region" Pathogens 14, no. 9: 894. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14090894

APA Style

Tang, J., Wei, H., Dai, Y., Luo, Y., Hu, Y., Zhou, Y.-H., Lin, N., & Liu, A. (2025). Transplacental Transmission of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) in Pregnant Women with Positive Anti-CMV IgG and Negative Anti-CMV IgM in Highly CMV Seropositive Region. Pathogens, 14(9), 894. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14090894

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop