Next Article in Journal
First Report on the Seroprevalence and Risk Factors Associated with Toxocara Infection in Blood Donors from Romania
Previous Article in Journal
Identification and Validation of Promising Targets and Inhibitors of Biofilm Formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Bioinformatics, Virtual Screening, and Biological Evaluation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genetic Factors of Campylobacter jejuni Required for Its Interactions with Free-Living Amoeba
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

AI-Enhanced FT-IR Spectroscopy: Evaluation of a Novel Tool for High-Throughput Serovar Typing of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica in Croatia

1
Laboratory for Bacterial Zoonoses and Molecular Diagnostics of Bacterial Diseases, Department for Bacteriology and Parasitology, Croatian Veterinary Institute, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
2
Department for Respiratory System Infections, and Skin and Soft Tissue Infections, Clinical Microbiology Service, Andrija Štampar Teaching Institute of Public Health, Clinical Microbiology Service, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
3
Laboratory for Food Microbiology, Department for Veterinary Public Health, Croatian Veterinary Institute, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
4
Laboratory for General Bacteriology and Mycology, Department for Bacteriology and Parasitology, Croatian Veterinary Institute, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
5
University Hospital for Infectious Diseases Dr. Fran Mihaljević, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
6
Institute for Microbiology and Parasitology, Veterinary Faculty, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
7
Microbiology & Infection Diagnostics Division, Eastern Europe, Bruker Daltonics GmbH & Co. KG, 28359 Bremen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2025, 14(9), 856; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14090856
Submission received: 12 August 2025 / Revised: 19 August 2025 / Accepted: 21 August 2025 / Published: 28 August 2025

Abstract

Rapid and accurate serotyping of Salmonella (S.) enterica subsp. enterica serovars is essential for effective public health surveillance, outbreak control, and food safety management. Traditional serotyping, although considered the gold standard, is time-consuming, technically demanding, and costly. This study aimed to evaluate the applicability of artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy using an IR Biotyper (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) for the rapid and accurate serotyping of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica isolates in Croatia. Materials and Methods: A total of 143 isolates representing different S. enterica serovars of human and food origin were analysed using the IR Biotyper. Each strain was tested in three biological and at least three technical replicates. The obtained results were compared with traditional serotyping according to the Kauffmann–White–Le Minor scheme. Isolate identification at the genus level was further confirmed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Results: The IR Biotyper demonstrated high reproducibility and complete concordance with standard serotyping methods, enabling accurate differentiation of the most prevalent S. enterica serovars in Croatia. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate the applicability of FT-IR in routine laboratory work, with the potential to reduce typing time, reduce the number of strains, and lower overall costs required for epidemiological surveillance within the One Health approach.

1. Introduction

Infections with Salmonella (S.) enterica subsp. enterica serotypes are still considered Europe’s second-most prevalent foodborne gastrointestinal zoonosis. Despite the integration of farm-to-fork control programmes, it continues to pose a significant public health burden in both resource-limited and developed countries across Europe [1,2,3].
Based on the polysaccharide portion of the lipopolysaccharide layer (O-antigen) and/or the filamentous portion of the flagella (H-antigen) presented on the surface of bacteria, there are more than 2600 serovars and around 50 serogroups that S. enterica encompasses [4,5,6]. Various S. enterica serovars exhibit differences in their pathogenicity, virulence, and susceptibility to antimicrobial treatment. Therefore, a wide variety of S. enterica serovars have the potential to cause infections in both humans and animals. However, only a limited number of these serovars are responsible for most human diseases, with many serotypes being host-specific or unable to cause infection in humans [5,7,8]. The severity of the infection depends on the specific combination of the infectious dose of the involved Salmonella serotype and the host’s immune status, with the infection classified into two types: typhoidal and non-typhoidal [2,9,10].
As a zoonotic disease, Salmonella outbreaks are often linked to the consumption of contaminated food products, including poultry, poultry products, cattle, and dairy products. However, more recently, an increasing number of outbreaks have been associated with contaminated fruits and fresh vegetables. By this means, it is connected with both endemic and epidemic scenarios [2,11].
According to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), approximately 91,000 human salmonellosis cases are reported annually in the European Union (EU) [6,12]. In Croatia alone, the number of confirmed cases in 2022 was 1047, resulting in a rate of 27.1 cases per 100,000 population. That makes Croatia one of the top five countries with the highest notification rates of human salmonellosis in the EU. While common Salmonella serovars remain a persistent public health issue, Croatia has also reported cases of rare Salmonella strains, such as S. Mikawasima. The Mikawasima serovar was involved in a significant outbreak in neonatal and maternal wards at the University Hospital of Split, becoming endemic until the end of 2024. The outbreak was characterised by the presence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing S. Mikawasima in stool. S. Mikawasima is a common cause of hospital-acquired infections and is usually present in animals and contaminated environmental and food samples. These occurrences highlight the importance of continuous surveillance and rapid response strategies to prevent the spread of both common and rare Salmonella serovars [13].
Also in 2022, the most frequently isolated serovars in the EU were S. Enteritidis (54.6%), S. Typhimurium (11.4%), and a monophasic variant of S. Typhimurium (8.8%), whereas S. Enteritidis is commonly associated with poultry and products, while S. Typhimurium has a wider species range, including pigs and cattle as well as poultry [12,14]. Other notable serovars included S. Infantis (2.0%) and S. Derby (0.93%), with S. Derby being closely followed by S. Coeln (0.91%) [14].
Differentiation of S. enterica subsp. enterica at the subspecies/serovar level is crucial for epidemiological studies, managing foodborne outbreaks, vaccine development, disease detection, and treatment modality decisions [15]. For that reason, a wide variety of typing methods have been used for the identification and differentiation. Among them, serotyping based on the agglutination reaction with specific antisera targeting the somatic O-antigen and flagellar H-antigens is the most widely used method for classifying S. enterica serovars (Kauffmann–White–Le Minor scheme). Nevertheless, the method is time-consuming, labour-intensive, requires experience and specialised equipment, and is highly expensive [2,16]. On the other hand, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has become the gold-standard method for bacterial typing due to its higher discriminatory power and increased accessibility. It is used for outbreak investigations and targeting control measures, and allows the detection of virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance genes. Hence, it is expensive, time-consuming, and technically demanding [17,18,19]. Additionally, MALDI-TOF MS (matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry) has been employed to identify Salmonella. However, it is unsuitable for identifying Salmonella on the serovar level [20]. Therefore, there is always a need to develop accurate and rapid strain typing methodologies, which will be indispensable for the effective management and control of infections and other related challenges in routine work.
Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) has been used in analytical chemistry for decades to determine the chemical composition of a wide range of samples. FT-IR has been successfully used for the discrimination and classification of bacteria at different taxonomic levels, from genera down to strain level, based on the differences in the infrared absorption patterns of microbial cells and/or outer membrane cell components (carbohydrates, lipids, nucleic acids, protein and lipopolysaccharides) [2,3,21,22,23,24]. Due to variations in the cell’s composition and structure, absorption will differ. Therefore, FT-IR will produce unique fingerprint-like signatures for each microbial cell, which can be compared to other spectra using hierarchical or non-hierarchical clustering to investigate their similarity [24,25,26]. For this purpose, machine learning algorithms have been employed, including artificial neural networks (ANNs) and support vector machines (SVMs), as well as an outlier detector [26,27].
Due to its low analytical costs, short per-sample hands-on time, high throughput, rapidity, and cost-effectiveness, FT-IR is rapidly expanding in research areas, especially in the investigation of Salmonella microorganisms [2,25,26,28]. Since S. enterica exhibits high antigenic diversity and varying clinical relevance, it has been an ideal candidate for studying with Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy. In addition to the different lengths of somatic antigens and the high diversity of carbohydrate composition in O-units, which contribute to the surface cell structure, this enables greater differentiation based on FT-IR methodology [20]. Several studies have been conducted and shown that FT-IR has high discriminatory power, enabling differentiation at the serogroup/serovar level [1,2,3,16,20,21,29].
In this study, our main objective was to analyse a collection of the most frequent and clinically relevant S. enterica subsp. enterica isolates. We aimed to determine the discriminatory power of FT-IR using IR Biotyper (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) in combination with multivariate data analysis and MALDI-TOF MS to identify and discriminate different S. enterica subsp. enterica serovars accurately. The ultimate goal was to provide evidence for the potential application of FT-IR diagnostics on clinical pathogenic samples.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Collection

The isolates were obtained from the microbial culture collection of the Laboratory of Food Microbiology, established at the Croatian Veterinary Institute in Zagreb, Croatia, and originated from human and food samples.
A total of 143 isolates of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica of human and food-related origins were analysed by FT-IR. The collection of investigated isolates included the most common Salmonella O-serogroups, such as O:4, O:7, O:8, and O:9. These serogroups comprise nine clinically and epidemiologically relevant serovars: S. Enteritidis, S. Typhimurium, and monophasic S. Typhimurium, which are among the most frequently reported in Croatia and worldwide. Additionally, others considered in the dataset were S. Derby, S. Infantis, S. Mbandaka, S. Hadar, and S. Coeln.
All isolates were previously confirmed at the serovar level by traditional serotyping (HRN EN ISO-6579-1:2017/A1:2020) at the Laboratory of Food Microbiology, Croatian Veterinary Institute (Kauffmann–White–Le Minor scheme). The laboratory serves as the national reference laboratory for salmonellosis and holds accreditation for the applied method.
Additionally, all isolates were confirmed at the genus level by MALDI-TOF MS as Salmonella spp. The MALDI-TOF MS analysis was performed on the MALDI-Biotyper system, which consists of an LT microflex mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany).
To evaluate the specificity and reliability of the classifier, a set of 30 non-Salmonella isolates, such as Escherichia coli, Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis, and Staphylococcus aureus, was included in the analysis. These isolates served as negative controls, allowing assessment of the model’s ability to differentiate non-Salmonella species from S. enterica subsp. enterica strains. This step was essential to ensure that the classifier did not misclassify unrelated bacterial species as Salmonella, thereby validating its reliability and specificity. The isolates were prepared the same way as S. enterica subsp. enterica strains, following the manufacturer’s instructions [30].

2.2. Strain Preparation

Pure and selected bacterial strains were cultured on blood agar medium (Blood Agar Base No. 2 (Oxoid, Hampshire, UK) with 5% defibrinated blood and 1% esculin, adjusted to pH 7.4 ± 0.2 at 25 °C). All isolates were cultured in three independent biological replicates to obtain more comprehensive spectra for each serovar. The biological replicates of each strain were three subcultures from the original “mother” plate cultured on the blood agar medium for 22 ± 2 h at 37 °C. When subculturing, no specific colony selection criteria were applied beyond ensuring that the selected colonies were single and pure.
IRBT sample preparation was carried out in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions using the IR Biotyper kit (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) [30]. Three loops of bacterial cells were resuspended in 50 μL of freshly prepared 70% ethanol (EMSURE Ethanol, absolute (Merck, Rathway, NJ, USA)) solution in 1.5 mL tubes filled with beads supplied in the manufacturer’s kit (IR Biotyper kit, Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). After vortexing, 50 μL of sterile Milli-Q water (in-house) was added, and the solution was vortexed. The tubes were briefly spun down in a centrifuge to avoid cross-contamination. Before placing 15 μL of each bacterial suspension on one spot of a silicon IR Biotyper plate, each sample was mixed by pipetting to ensure that a homogenous solution was being analysed. The first three rounds of 30 samples were tested in three technical replicates. In the last two rounds of samples, each sample was tested in five technical replicates. The silicon plate with suspensions was dried for 30 min at room temperature before being placed in the IR Biotyper for the reading.
The quality control InfraRed Test Standards (IRTS 1 and IRTS 2) of the IR Biotyper kit (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) were used as quality controls prior to sample spectra acquisition in each run. IRTS1 and IRTS2 were prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions. First, the standards were resuspended in 100 μL of deionised water. After extensive vortexing, the suspension was incubated for 30 min in a thermomixer (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) at approximately 1,500 rpm at room temperature. Afterwards, 60 μL of absolute ethanol was added and gently mixed by pipetting, followed by brief vortexing. Ten μL of each IRTS was spotted in duplicate onto two spots of the IR Biotyper silicon plate and left to dry as described for the samples. Additionally, one blank spot was left on the IR Biotyper silicon plate as a background control.

2.3. Spectra Acquisition and Analysis

The IR Biotyper spectrometer measures absorption spectra in transmission mode in the spectral range of 4000–500 cm−1 (mid-IR). The silicon plate with dried suspensions of samples and controls was inserted into the instrument. The instrument operates under ambient environmental conditions without specific purge requirements (e.g., no controlled humidity or gas purge system is employed).
After measurement, the resulting spectra are subjected to a Quality Test (QT) by the instrument’s software (IR Biotyper® Client software V3.0, Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). Each spectrum, including both background and sample measurements, was acquired with 32 scans. Spectra of poor quality (inadequate minimum and maximum absorbance values and signal-to-noise ratio) were excluded. In contrast, spectra with acceptable quality were used for further analyses. After smoothing the spectra with the Savitzky–Golay algorithm, the second derivative was calculated over 9 datapoints. The purpose of the Savitzky–Golay algorithm is to smooth and denoise the spectrum in FT-IT for the multicomponent hydrocarbon spectrum reconstruction in the mixed gas spectra analysis. The main performance index of the Savitzky–Golay smoothing filter was determined by the polynomial order and frame size when the Savitzky–Golay filter was used for smoothing. The spectra were then cut to the relevant spectral window of 1300–800 cm−1 (the oligo- and polysaccharide region). Finally, all spectra were vector-normalised to account for preparation-related variance in biomass and hence absorption [3,31]. All qualitatively acceptable spectra were classified using the Salmonella O-groups v3 classifier integrated into the IR Biotyper Client software version 3.0. The serogroup classification of each spectrum was compared to its original NRL-Salmonella serovar allocation, and no discrepancies were recorded. An exploratory data analysis was conducted on the entire dataset using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) to generate 2D and 3D scatter plots, visualising the distribution of Salmonella serogroups and serovars. These algorithms are implemented in the IR Biotyper software. PCA provides a rapid overview and is calculated over the 501 datapoints which form the spectral region used for the analysis (1300–800 cm−1). On the other hand, LDA enables deeper resolution, particularly within complex serogroups, and is calculated using the first principal components that together comprise 95% of the variance. No statistical analysis was performed to assess PCA/LDA results.

3. Results

Accurate identification and differentiation of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serogroups and serovars are critical for epidemiological surveillance, food safety, and clinical diagnostics. This study assessed the performance of the IR Biotyper system in distinguishing between O-serogroups and their constituent serovars. Therefore, a single-laboratory validation study was performed on a commercially available classifier with IR Biotyper.
Through this study, a consistent spectral splicing methodology, combined with multivariate analysis (PCA and LDA), was applied, with additional support from Bruker’s integrated classifier.

3.1. Discrimination Between Serogroups of S. enterica subsp. enterica

All 1985 absorption spectra from 143 S. enterica subsp. enterica isolates were recorded and submitted for classification using the Salmonella O-group v3 classifier provided by Bruker Daltonics (Bremen, Germany).
For each isolate, one independent biological replicate was analysed. Each biological replicate consisted of three technical replicates, which were independently conducted and measured over three days. The region of the IR spectrum that proved to be the best for discriminating S. enterica isolates was the region from 1300 to 700 cm−1.
Only spectra of acceptable quality [0.4 < absorption < 2, signal/noise >40, signal/water >20, fringes (×10−6) < 100] were used for further analyses, while spectra of poor quality were excluded. The resulting spectra were subjected to a serogroup allocation by the classifier. The FT-IR classifier v3.0 analysed each spectrum obtained from the Salmonella isolate, allowing for a comparison of the resulting serogroup allocation with the known serotype to assess concordance.
Out of a total n = 1985 spectra derived from n = 143 isolates, all spectra passed the quality control criteria and none were discarded. Furthermore, all spectra were correctly classified by the model, yielding a positive agreement of 100%. Similarly, the negative agreement of the negative control was 100%, indicating that all spectra originating from different sets of non-Salmonella isolates were correctly excluded (i.e., not misclassified as target). These results demonstrate the high discriminatory performance of the model, with both positive and negative agreement of 100% (Figure 1).
Using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) alone (0.95/20), a clear separation of the four O-serogroups included in the dataset was observed (Figure 2). The application of Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) (1.00/30) significantly improved this separation. However, while inter-group discrimination improved, the ability to resolve serovars within each group decreased when all groups were analysed simultaneously. This necessitated a targeted, group-specific (“zoom-in”) analysis for intra-group differentiation. Nevertheless, the exploratory analysis with PCA and LDA enabled clear differentiation of serogroups.
Additionally, the Bruker classifier also demonstrated effective real-time identification of serogroups during the analysis run, highlighting its potential for automated classification in routine workflows.

3.2. Discrimination Within S. enterica subsp. enterica Serogroups (Serovar Identification)

The O:9 serogroup included one S. Typhi isolate and multiple S. Enteritidis strains. With LDA (1.00/30), a clear separation of these two serovars was enabled. In the O:9 serogroup, only one S. Typhi isolate was available, yet it was distinctly separated from S. Enteritidis strains, as seen in Figure 3.
Most isolates within the O:7 group were separated reliably. While some overlaps were observed in scatter plots, deviation plots using multiple LD planes (e.g., LD1 vs. LD2 vs. LD3 or LD5) revealed clear separation (Figure 4).
The O:8 serogroup comprised only the S. Hadar serovar and was resolved. This finding demonstrates a good baseline for group homogeneity. A larger number of isolates within this group should be considered for future investigation to confirm these observations.
The serogroup that posed the most significant challenge for serovar separation was O:4. Nevertheless, deviation plots highlighted distinct separation between serovars such as S. Paratyphi and S. Coeln from the rest in the LD2, LD3, and LD4 axes. Visual clarity was limited in 2D scatter plots, emphasising the utility of higher-dimensional projections. A refined analysis with LDA revealed two distinct groups within the O:4 group, provisionally labelled as O:4-I and O:4-II. O:4-I showed good separation between S. Derby and S. Typhimurium (Figure 5, top image), while O4-II showed perfectly separated S. Coeln, S. Paratyphi, and S. Typhimurium (Figure 5, bottom image).

4. Discussion

Accurate identification and differentiation of Salmonella enterica isolates is essential in clinical microbiology, veterinary medicine, and food safety. Depending on the application, Salmonella typing may require different levels of resolution—from serogroup or serovar determination to precise strain characterisation in outbreak settings. Therefore, there is a constant need for enhancing identification and detection methods capable of identifying and typing this pathogen and preventing outbreaks [3,25]. Conventional serotyping, although widely used, has several drawbacks. It is labour-intensive, typically requires at least two days to complete, and remains partly subjective since results depend on the skill and experience of the staff performing the assays. Moreover, the use of expensive antisera and the need to work with live Salmonella cultures also increase both the cost and the biosafety risks of the procedure. While high-resolution methods such as whole-genome sequencing (WGS) offer powerful discriminatory capacity, they are likewise resource-intensive and laborious. In this context, Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy is gaining attention as a promising alternative, offering speed, cost-effectiveness, and high throughput for sub-serogroup typing [3,25,26].
Therefore, this study evaluated whether AI-enhanced FT-IR spectroscopy using the IR Biotyper is suitable for rapid, accurate, and user-friendly identification and differentiation of S. enterica subsp. enterica serovars. The strain collection included the most common serovars in Croatia—S. Typhimurium (and its monophasic variant), S. Enteritidis, S. Typhi, S. Paratyphi, S. Infantis, S. Mbandaka, S. Coeln, S. Derby, and S. Hadar. The IR Biotyper achieved 100% overall agreement in differentiating Salmonella O-serogroups and serovars, with no misclassifications. These findings are consistent with previous studies [3,20,21,32,33,34,35,36] and confirm that, when combined with high-dimensional data analysis, the IR Biotyper can effectively distinguish Salmonella at both the serogroup and serovar levels.
Nonetheless, the study has limitations. This study focused on the most commonly isolated serovars in Croatia, many of which are also among the most prevalent in the EU. Also, the number of isolates within some serogroups was limited. For example, in the O:8 serogroup, only the S. Hadar serovar was available, and in the O:9 group, although there was clear separation between S. Typhi and S. Enteritidis, only a single S. Typhi isolate was analysed. Therefore, future work should include larger numbers of isolates overall, representatives from every serogroup, and a more diverse panel of serovars, including rare and emerging ones.
Previous reports [18,22,26,37,38,39] have shown that FT-IR can be used for real-time surveillance: for example, a 2024 study demonstrated that FT-IR correctly determined the clonal relatedness of E. coli isolates during an ongoing outbreak, in agreement with WGS results [40]. Another study showed that the IR Biotyper accurately clustered Klebsiella pneumoniae strains, producing typing results almost entirely concordant with PFGE and WGS [41]. Such evidence supports the potential of the IR Biotyper as a novel real-time typing tool for various microorganisms, including the detection of clonal spread in healthcare settings. While such evidence underscores the IR Biotyper’s potential for real-time surveillance, our study did not assess its biotyping capacities directly against WGS—the current gold standard for high-resolution typing. This comparison will be an important focus of future work.
It is also worth mentioning several factors that can affect the reproducibility in FT-IR-based typing. FT-IR spectral profiles can be affected by variations in growth medium composition, incubation time and temperature, colony purity, and sample handling steps such as ethanol concentration, bead-beating consistency, and spotting volume. These factors may introduce variability in the spectra, underscoring the importance of standardised sample preparation, data acquisition, and analysis protocols to ensure the reliability and reproducibility [27]. While strict protocols were followed in the present study to minimise these variables, broader inter-laboratory evaluations are needed to assess the robustness of the IR Biotyper system under different operating conditions. However, a very small number of laboratories have access to the IR Biotyper device, and such evaluations are being planned for future dates.
Although standardisation and broader validation are still needed, the present findings highlight important practical implications. In clinical microbiology, the IR Biotyper can reduce turnaround time for serovar identification, which would help laboratories deliver faster diagnoses and initiate outbreak control measures more quickly. In veterinary settings, applying this approach to routine monitoring of livestock and poultry could aid in detecting and controlling Salmonella spread before it reaches the food chain. For food safety, its capacity to analyse many isolates at low cost makes it a valuable option for surveillance laboratories and for tracing sources during suspected outbreaks. By linking applications across human, animal, and food health sectors, AI-enhanced FT-IR spectroscopy aligns with the principles of the One Health framework.

5. Conclusion

This study demonstrates that AI-enhanced FT-IR spectroscopy using the IR Biotyper (Bruker Daltonics, Germany) is a reliable and highly discriminatory method for serotyping Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica. It achieved complete agreement with conventional serotyping and MALDI-TOF MS for the most prevalent serovars in Croatia. While these results are promising, they were obtained under single-laboratory conditions with a limited number of serovars, so broader validation, including rare isolates and inter-laboratory comparisons, is required.
Given its speed, low cost, and high throughput, the method has the potential value for clinical, veterinary, and food safety applications within a One Health framework. Future work should compare FT-IR against whole-genome sequencing and evaluate its performance during real outbreak scenarios.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation: M.D., S.Š. (Sandra Šuto), D.T., S.Š. (Silvio Špičić), M.Z.T., I.R., A.H., G.K., S.Š.S., B.P., A.M. and S.D. Formal Analysis: M.D., I.R., A.M. and S.D. Investigation: M.D., S.Š. (Sandra Šuto), D.T., L.H., L.P., I.R., A.H., G.K., S.Š.S. and S.D. Methodology: M.D., S.Š. (Sandra Šuto), D.T., L.H., L.P., I.R., A.H., G.K., S.Š.S. and S.D. Project Administration: S.Š. (Silvio Špičić), M.Z.T., A.H. and S.D. Supervision: S.Š. (Sandra Šuto), S.Š. (Silvio Špičić), M.Z.T., I.R., A.H., G.K., J.A., A.M. and S.D. Validation: M.D., S.Š. (Sandra Šuto), A.M. and S.D. Writing—original draft: M.D. and S.D. Writing: review & editing: M.D., S.Š. (Sandra Šuto), D.T., L.H., L.P., S.Š. (Silvio Špičić), M.Z.T., I.R., A.H., G.K., S.Š.S., B.P., J.A., A.M. and S.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the European Union’s NextGenerationEU initiative and supported by the Ministry of Science, Education, and Youth of Republic of Croatia through the Croatian Veterinary Institute project NPOO-2: “Epidemiological typing of bacteria Salmonella sp. in the Republic of Croatia through the “One Health” approach—SalmoSAFE”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable. Only strains collected and stored over the years by the Laboratory of Food Microbiology of the Croatian Veterinary Institute in Zagreb were used in the study. Patients and animals were in no way included in the testing.

Informed Consent Statement

No applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No data created in this manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This study was made possible through the collaboration with Andrija Štampar Teaching Institute of Public Health, Clinical Microbiology Service, Department for Respiratory System Infections, and Skin and Soft Tissue Infections.

Conflicts of Interest

The author Andrzej Mikolajczak is employed by Microbiology & Infection Diagnostics Divisionhad, no commercial interest. He provided technical support, helped with the analysis and validation of the results. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Alvarez-Ordóñez, A.; Halisch, J.; Prieto, M. Changes in Fourier transform infrared spectra of Salmonella enterica serovars Typhimurium and Enteritidis after adaptation to stressful growth conditions. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010, 142, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Preisner, O.E.; Menezes, J.C.; Guiomar, R.; Machado, J.; Lopes, J.A. Discrimination of Salmonella enterica serotypes by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Food Res. Int. 2012, 45, 1058–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cordovana, M.; Mauder, N.; Join-Lambert, O.; Gravey, F.; LeHello, S.; Auzou, M.; Pitti, M.; Zoppi, S.; Buhl, M.; Steinmann, J.; et al. Machine learning-based typing of Salmonella enterica O-serogroups by the Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy-based IR Biotyper system. J. Microbiol. Methods 2022, 201, 106564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chattaway, M.A.; Langridge, G.C.; Wain, J. Salmonella nomenclature in the genomic era: A time for change. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 7494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Han, J.; Ljahdali, N.; Zhao, S.; Tang, H.; Harbottle, H.; Hoffmann, M.; Frye, J.G.; Foley, S.L. Infection biology of Salmonella enterica. EcoSal Plus 2024, 12, eesp-0001-2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lamichhane, B.; Mawad, A.M.M.; Saleh, M.; Kelley, W.G.; Harrington, P.J.; Lovestad, C.W.; Amezcua, J.; Sarhan, M.M.; El Zowalaty, M.E.; Ramadan, H.; et al. Salmonellosis: An Overview of Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Innovative Approaches to Mitigate the Antimicrobial Resistant Infections. Antibiotics 2024, 13, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Antunes, P.; Mourão, J.; Campos, J.; Peixe, L. Salmonellosis: The role of poultry meat. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2016, 22, 110–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ferrari, R.G.; Rosario, D.K.A.; Cunha-Neto, A.; Mano, S.B.; Figueiredo, E.E.S.; Conte-Junior, C.A. Worldwide Epidemiology of Salmonella Serovars in Animal-Based Foods: A Meta-analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 85, e00591-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abuhasna, S.; Al Jundi, A.; Rahman, M.U.; Said, W. Non-typhoidal Salmonella group D bacteremia and urosepsis in a patient diagnosed with HIV Infection. J. Glob. Infect. Dis. 2012, 4, 218–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Andino, A.; Hanning, I. Salmonella enterica: Survival, Colonization, and Virulence Differences among Serovars. Sci. World J. 2015, 1, 520179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kaavya, R.; Pandiselvam, R.; Abdullah, S.; Sruthi, N.U.; Jayanath, Y.; Ashokkumar, C.; Chandra Khanashyam, A.; Kothakota, A.; Ramesh, S.V. Emerging non-thermal technologies for decontamination of Salmonella in food. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 112, 400–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA); European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). The European Union One Health 2022 Zoonoses Report. EFSA J. 2023, 21, e8442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Novak, A.; Dzelalija, M.; Goic-Barisic, I.; Kovacic, A.; Pirija, M.; Maravic, A.; Radic, M.; Marinovic, J.; Rubic, Z.; Carev, M.; et al. Phenotypic and Molecular Characterization of a Hospital Outbreak Clonal Lineage of Salmonella enterica Subspecies enterica serovar Mikawasima Containing blaTEM-1B and blaSHV-2 That Emerged on a Neonatal Ward, During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Microb. Drug Resist. 2024, 30, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hugas, M.; Beloeil, P.A. Controlling Salmonella along the food chain in the European Union—Progress over the last ten years. Eurosurveillance 2014, 19, 20804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tang, S.; Orsi, R.H.; Luo, H.; Ge, C.; Zhang, G.; Baker, R.C.; Stevenson, A.; Wiedmann, M. Assessment and Comparison of Molecular Subtyping and Characterization Methods for Salmonella. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gómez-Montaño, F.J.; Orduña-Díaz, A.; Avelino-Flores, M.C.G.; Avelino-Flores, F.; Ramos-Collazo, F.; Reyes-Betanzo, C.; López-Gayou, V.; Instituto Politécnico Nacional. Detection of Salmonella enterica on silicon substrates biofunctionalized with anti-Salmonella IgG, analyzed by FTIR spectroscopy. Rev. Mex. De Ing. Química 2020, 19, 1175–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hu, L.; Cao, G.; Brown, E.W.; Allard, M.W.; Ma, L.M.; Zhang, G. Whole genome sequencing and protein structure analyses of target genes for the detection of Salmonella. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 20887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. McGalliard, R.; Muhamadali, H.; AlMasoud, N.; Haldenby, S.; Romero-Soriano, V.; Allman, E.; Xu, Y.; Roberts, A.P.; Paterson, S.; Carrol, E.D.; et al. Bacterial discrimination by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, MALDI-mass spectrometry and whole-genome sequencing. Future Microbiol. 2024, 19, 795–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Li, B.; Liu, B.; Wu, G.; Ibrahim, M.; Xie, G.; Li, H.; Sun, G. Differentiation in MALDI-TOF MS and FTIR spectra between two closely related species Acidovorax oryzae and Acidovorax citrulli. BMC Microbiol. 2012, 12, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cordovana, M.; Mauder, N.; Kostrzewa, M.; Wille, A.; Rojak, S.; Hagen, R.M.; Ambretti, S.; Pongolini, S.; Soliani, L.; Justesen, U.S.; et al. Classification of Salmonella enterica of the (Para-)Typhoid Fever Group by Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Campos, J.; Sousa, C.; Mourão, J.; Lopes, J.; Antunes, P.; Peixe, L. Discrimination of non-typhoid Salmonella serogroups and serotypes by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy: A comprehensive analysis. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2018, 285, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Curtoni, A.; Pastrone, L.; Cordovana, M.; Bondi, A.; Piccinini, G.; Genco, M.; Bottino, P.; Polizzi, C.; Cavallo, L.; Mandras, N.; et al. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy Application for Candida auris Outbreak Typing in a Referral Intensive Care Unit: Phylogenetic Analysis and Clustering Cut-Off Definition. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Passaris, I.; Mauder, N.; Kostrzewa, M.; Burckhardt, I.; Zimmermann, S.; van Sorge, N.M.; Slotved, H.C.; Desmet, S.; Ceyssens, P.J. Validation of Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy for Serotyping of Streptococcus pneumoniae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2022, 60, e00325-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang-Wang, J.H.; Bordoy, A.E.; Martró, E.; Quesada, M.D.; Pérez-Vázquez, M.; Guerrero-Murillo, M.; Tiburcio, A.; Navarro, M.; Castellà, L.; Sopena, N.; et al. Evaluation of Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy as a First-Line Typing Tool for the Identification of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Outbreaks in the Hospital Setting. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 897161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Martak, D.; Valot, B.; Sauget, M.; Cholley, P.; Thouverez, M.; Bertrand, X.; Hocquet, D. Fourier-Transform InfraRed Spectroscopy Can Quickly Type Gram-Negative Bacilli Responsible for Hospital Outbreaks. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Vogt, S.; Löffler, K.; Dinkelacker, A.G.; Bader, B.; Autenrieth, I.B.; Peter, S.; Liese, J. Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy for Typing of Clinical Enterobacter cloacae Complex Isolates. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Muchaamba, F.; Stephan, R.A. Comprehensive Methodology for Microbial Strain Typing Using Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy. Methods Protoc. 2024, 7, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dourou, D.; Grounta, A.; Argyri, A.A.; Froutis, G.; Tsakanikas, P.; Nychas, G.J.E.; Doulgeraki, A.I.; Chorianopoulos, N.G.; Tassou, C.C. Rapid Microbial Quality Assessment of Chicken Liver Inoculated or Not With Salmonella Using FTIR Spectroscopy and Machine Learning. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 623788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yu, C.; Irudayaraj, J. Identification of Pathogenic Bacteria in Mixed Cultures by FTIR Spectroscopy. Trans. ASABE 2006, 49, 1623–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Daltonics, Bruker GmbH & Co. KG (Bremen, Germany). Instructions for Use—IR Biotyper Kit; REF 1851760, (Doc. no. 5023357 Revision B); Daltonics, Bruker GmbH & Co. KG: Bremen, Germany, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  31. Daltonics, Bruker GmbH & Co. KG (Bremen, Germany). IR Biotyper Software User Manual; REF 1845471, (Doc. no. 5025119 Revision F); Daltonics, Bruker GmbH & Co. KG: Bremen, Germany, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  32. Oberreuter, H.; Cordovana, M.; Dyk, M.; Rau, J. Establishment and Thorough External Validation of a FTIR Spectroscopy Classifier for Salmonella Serogroup Differentiation. bioRxiv 2025, 643663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fredes-García, D.; Jiménez-Rodríguez, J.; Piña-Iturbe, A.; Caballero-Díaz, P.; González-Villarroel, T.; Dueñas, F.; Wozniak, A.; Adell, A.D.; Moreno-Switt, A.I.; García, P. Development of a robust FT-IR typing system for Salmonella enterica, enhancing performance through hierarchical classification. Microbiol. Spectr. 2025, 13, e00159-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Oberreuter, H.; Rau, J. Artificial neural network-assisted Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy for differentiation of Salmonella serogroups and its application on epidemiological tracing of Salmonella Bovismorbificans outbreak isolates from fresh sprouts. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2019, 366, fnz193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Oberreuter, H.; Dyk, M.; Rau, J. Validated differentiation of Listeria monocytogenes serogroups by FTIR spectroscopy using an Artificial Neural Network based classifier in an accredited official food control laboratory. Clin. Spectrosc. 2023, 5, 100030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Napoleoni, M.; Ceschia, S.; Mitri, E.; Beneitez, E.E.; Silenzi, V.; Staffolani, M.; Rocchegiani, E.; Blasi, G.; Gurian, E. Identification of Salmonella Serogroups and Distinction Between Typhoidal and Non-Typhoidal Salmonella Based on ATR-FTIR Spectroscopy. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 2318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kassem, A.; Abbas, L.; Coutinho, O.; Opara, S.; Najaf, H.; Kasperek, D.; Pokhrel, K.; Li, X.; Tiquia-Arashiro, S. Applications of Fourier Transform-Infrared spectroscopy in microbial cell biology and environmental microbiology: Advances, challenges, and future perspectives. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1304081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Al-Fraihat, E.; Barker, K.R.; Tadros, M. The IR Biotyper as a tool for typing organisms of significance for hospital epidemiology- A subject review. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2025, 111, 116676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lurie-Weinberger, M.N.; Temkin, E.; Kastel, O.; Bechor, M.; Bychenko-Banyas, D.; Efrati-Epchtien, R.; Levi, G.D.; Rakovitsky, N.; Keren-Paz, A.; Carmeli, Y. Use of a national repository of Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy spectra enables fast detection of silent outbreaks and prevention of spread of new antibiotic-resistant sequence types. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control. 2025, 14, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kon, H.; Lurie-Weinberger, M.N.; Lugassy, C.; Chen, D.; Schechner, V.; Schwaber, M.J.; Hussein, K.; Alon, T.; Tarabeia, J.; Hamo, M.; et al. Use of Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy for real-time outbreak investigation of OXA-48-producing Escherichia coli. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2024, 79, 349–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hu, Y.; Zhou, H.; Lu, J.; Sun, Q.; Liu, C.; Zeng, Y.; Zhang, R. Evaluation of the IR Biotyper for Klebsiella pneumoniae typing and its potentials in hospital hygiene management. Microb. Biotechnol. 2021, 14, 1343–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A confusion matrix illustrating the overall agreement of the classifier derived from the spectra of the tested Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica isolates. All spectra were correctly classified. The class recall (which corresponds to sensitivity) and class precision (which corresponds to specificity) are both 100% for all Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica isolates.
Figure 1. A confusion matrix illustrating the overall agreement of the classifier derived from the spectra of the tested Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica isolates. All spectra were correctly classified. The class recall (which corresponds to sensitivity) and class precision (which corresponds to specificity) are both 100% for all Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica isolates.
Pathogens 14 00856 g001
Figure 2. LDA 3D scatter plot showing the distribution of four O-serogroups of S. enterica subsp. enterica isolates in IR spectral space. Thirty principal components were used to create an LDA by O-groups, which improved separation. O-serogroups colour the spectra, and the shapes correspond to individual isolates. The LDA model proved to be very robust in separating the serogroups.
Figure 2. LDA 3D scatter plot showing the distribution of four O-serogroups of S. enterica subsp. enterica isolates in IR spectral space. Thirty principal components were used to create an LDA by O-groups, which improved separation. O-serogroups colour the spectra, and the shapes correspond to individual isolates. The LDA model proved to be very robust in separating the serogroups.
Pathogens 14 00856 g002
Figure 3. LDA 3D scatter plot showing the separation of the S. Enteritidis isolates (in red) from the S. Typhi isolates (in grey). LDA was performed based on variance and by assessing the isolates as a group identifier. Each point represents the spectrum of one strain.
Figure 3. LDA 3D scatter plot showing the separation of the S. Enteritidis isolates (in red) from the S. Typhi isolates (in grey). LDA was performed based on variance and by assessing the isolates as a group identifier. Each point represents the spectrum of one strain.
Pathogens 14 00856 g003
Figure 4. LDA of the O:7 serogroup. S. Infantis (red colour) isolates are separated from S. Mbandaka (grey colour). Each point represents the spectrum of one strain.
Figure 4. LDA of the O:7 serogroup. S. Infantis (red colour) isolates are separated from S. Mbandaka (grey colour). Each point represents the spectrum of one strain.
Pathogens 14 00856 g004
Figure 5. Three-dimensional scatter, showing a clear separation of serovars of Salmonella serogroup O:9 species in IR spectral space. The spectra are coloured according to the serovars. In the picture above, red triangles represent S. Typhimurium, while grey circles represent S. Derby. In the picture below, there is a clear separation of three serovars: S. Paratyphi (cyan triangles), S. Coeln (grey circles), and S. Typhimurium (red squares). Every symbol represents a different isolate.
Figure 5. Three-dimensional scatter, showing a clear separation of serovars of Salmonella serogroup O:9 species in IR spectral space. The spectra are coloured according to the serovars. In the picture above, red triangles represent S. Typhimurium, while grey circles represent S. Derby. In the picture below, there is a clear separation of three serovars: S. Paratyphi (cyan triangles), S. Coeln (grey circles), and S. Typhimurium (red squares). Every symbol represents a different isolate.
Pathogens 14 00856 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dopuđ, M.; Šuto, S.; Tomašković, D.; Hlebić, L.; Peinović, L.; Špičić, S.; Zdelar Tuk, M.; Reil, I.; Humski, A.; Kompes, G.; et al. AI-Enhanced FT-IR Spectroscopy: Evaluation of a Novel Tool for High-Throughput Serovar Typing of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica in Croatia. Pathogens 2025, 14, 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14090856

AMA Style

Dopuđ M, Šuto S, Tomašković D, Hlebić L, Peinović L, Špičić S, Zdelar Tuk M, Reil I, Humski A, Kompes G, et al. AI-Enhanced FT-IR Spectroscopy: Evaluation of a Novel Tool for High-Throughput Serovar Typing of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica in Croatia. Pathogens. 2025; 14(9):856. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14090856

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dopuđ, Maja, Sandra Šuto, Dora Tomašković, Lucija Hlebić, Lovran Peinović, Silvio Špičić, Maja Zdelar Tuk, Irena Reil, Andrea Humski, Gordan Kompes, and et al. 2025. "AI-Enhanced FT-IR Spectroscopy: Evaluation of a Novel Tool for High-Throughput Serovar Typing of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica in Croatia" Pathogens 14, no. 9: 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14090856

APA Style

Dopuđ, M., Šuto, S., Tomašković, D., Hlebić, L., Peinović, L., Špičić, S., Zdelar Tuk, M., Reil, I., Humski, A., Kompes, G., Strugar, S. Š., Papić, B., Avberšek, J., Mikolajczak, A., & Duvnjak, S. (2025). AI-Enhanced FT-IR Spectroscopy: Evaluation of a Novel Tool for High-Throughput Serovar Typing of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica in Croatia. Pathogens, 14(9), 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14090856

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop