Next Article in Journal
Antiprotozoal Effects of Pediococcus acidilactici-Derived Postbiotic on Blastocystis Subtypes ST1/ST3
Previous Article in Journal
Baicalein and Berberine Inhibit the Growth and Virulence of Clostridioides difficile
Previous Article in Special Issue
Molecular and Genetic Analysis of the Increased Number of Genes for Trypanosoma cruzi Microtubule Associated Proteins in the Class Kinetoplastida
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Cathelicidins Limit Intracellular Neospora caninum-Infection in Macrophages

1
Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, National University of Mar Del Plata, Balcarce B7620, Argentina
2
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
3
Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
4
Institute of Innovation for Agricultural Production and Sustainable Development (IPADS), Balcarce B7620, Argentina
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2025, 14(7), 663; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14070663
Submission received: 22 May 2025 / Revised: 30 June 2025 / Accepted: 3 July 2025 / Published: 5 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetics and Molecular Evolution of Parasitic Protozoa)

Abstract

Infections with the protozoan Neospora caninum cause abortion in cattle, likely due to the parasite’s replication and excessive inflammation in the placenta. Cathelicidins are host defense peptides known for their antimicrobial and immunomodulatory functions, but their role in N. caninum infections remains elusive. Using bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) isolated from mice expressing (wild-type, Camp+/+) and lacking (Camp/−) cathelicidins, we investigated the role of endogenous cathelicidin in infections with N. caninum. We show that Camp/− macrophages primed with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) had an increased number of intracellular N. caninum tachyzoites, and these macrophages released higher amounts of IL-1β and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), a marker of cytotoxicity. These findings indicate that cathelicidins contribute to intracellular N. caninum control and inflammation by limiting the activation of the inflammasome, particularly under LPS-induced conditions. This insight reveals the immunomodulatory role of cathelicidins in controlling N. caninum-associated pathologies.

1. Introduction

Infections with cyst-forming apicomplexan Neospora caninum cause abortions in livestock worldwide [1]. This disease, neosporosis, is a leading cause of reproductive losses and abortions in cattle [2]. Although the intrinsic abortigenic mechanisms are still elusive, the pregnancy losses and fetal expulsion are likely driven by a disrupted shift in maternal immune cells from a tolerant state to a proinflammatory phenotype [3,4]. The inflammatory response elicited by macrophages could be essential in promoting the inflammatory stage during abortions. The NLR family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome pathway is activated in macrophages in response to related protozoa, Toxoplasma gondii, Plasmodium, and Leishmania [5,6,7]. Moreover, N. caninum triggers NLRP3 inflammasome activation in peritoneal macrophages, bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs), and bovine macrophages, leading to caspase-1 activation and secretion of IL-1β and IL-18 [8,9,10,11]. Pyroptosis has also been promoted in macrophages exposed to N. caninum, as a lytic and proinflammatory form of programmed cell death [12]. While macrophage responses can be beneficial in limiting the replication of intracellular pathogens, this excessive inflammatory and pyroptotic activity would contribute to placental and fetal damage and abortion [13,14,15,16,17].
Cathelicidins are cationic antimicrobial and immunomodulatory peptides [18,19,20] encoded by the Camp gene [21] and produced by multiple species, including mice, chickens, horses, pigs, and cattle [22]. Cathelicidins have been shown to regulate inflammation and tissue damage during infections [23,24,25]. The sole human cathelicidin, LL-37, encoded by the CAMP gene, inhibits caspase-1 activation and suppresses inflammasome activation and pyroptosis in macrophages [26]. Moreover, stimulating human THP-1 macrophages with synthetic murine cathelicidin (cathelicidin-related antimicrobial peptide; CRAMP) reduces the load of intracellular N. caninum tachyzoites [27] and Mycobacterium paratuberculosis [28]. However, the role of endogenous cathelicidin in macrophage defense against intracellular pathogens, like N. caninum, remains elusive. In this study, we analyze the N. caninum infection in BMDMs isolated from mice deficient in cathelicidins (Camp/−) to demonstrate that endogenous cathelicidin limits a deleterious inflammatory and inflammasome response in macrophages.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Design and Animal Models

This study investigated the role of cathelicidins in the innate immune response to N. caninum infection using an in vitro macrophage model. BMDMs were isolated from male 8-week-old wild-type Camp+/+ and cathelicidin-null Camp/− C57BL/6 mice (B6.129X1-Camptm1Rlg/J; The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA) [21]. Mice were housed in a pathogen-free environment provided by the University of Calgary, and humanely euthanized to collect bone marrow. The present study was conducted following regulations specified by the Canadian Guidelines for Animal Welfare (CGAW) and was approved by the University of Calgary Health Sciences Animal Care Committee (AC24-0045).
Camp+/+ and Camp/− BMDMs were seeded separately on 24-well plates and were either left untreated (RPMI control) (n: 4) or infected with N. caninum tachyzoites (n: 4). Previous studies have demonstrated the essential role of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) pretreatment in N. caninum-induced IL-1β release in BMDM supernatants [9]. Therefore, a group stimulated with LPS (n: 4) or LPS-primed and N. caninum-infected BMMDs (n: 4) were added in this study. All treatments were applied to both Camp+/+ and Camp/− BMDMs and analyzed at 12 and 24 h post-infection (hpi). It was a 2 × 4 factorial design (two genotypes: Camp+/+ and Camp/−; and had four treatment conditions: Control (Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 medium (RPMI)), LPS only, N. caninum only, and LPS + N. caninum, resulting in eight experimental groups. The experimental design is shown (Figure 1).
To assess the impact of cathelicidin deficiency on infection and inflammation, BMDM supernatants were removed and immediately stored at −20 °C for the measurement of IL-1β secretion and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) as indicators of inflammasome activation and cell membrane integrity, respectively. Intracellular tachyzoite load was quantified, and confocal microscopy was used to visualize parasite–host cell interactions. Those assays were conducted in technical duplicates and in a blinded manner to reduce observer bias.

2.2. Cell Isolation and Culture Protocols

BMDMs were isolated from femurs and tibias aseptically removed from Camp+/+ and Camp/− mice following a previously published protocol [29]. Upon isolation, cells were counted and seeded separately on 24-well plates at 2.3 × 105 cells/well and inspected daily by light microscopy. Cells were cultures for 6 days for macrophage lineage differentiation in RPMI supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mM L-glutamine, 50 μM 2-mercaptoethanol, 10 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.4), 1% penicillin (100 U mL−1)/streptomycin (100 μg mL−1), and 10% conditioned media from L929 cells as a source of macrophage colony-stimulating factor. The medium was changed to complete medium (RPMI) plus 1% FBS for experiments. BMDMs were pre-treated with LPS (100 ng/mL; 3 h) [9], washed twice with PBS, and infected with N. caninum at multiplicities of infection (MOI) 3:1 (parasite–cell) for 12 and 24 hpi. BMDMs treated with medium alone were negative controls. An additional group of BMDMs was infected with N. caninum (MOI 3:1) without prior LPS treatment.

2.3. Parasite Preparation and Infection Procedures

N. caninum tachyzoites (Liverpool strain, Nc Liv) constitutively expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) were utilized in this study [30]. Parasites were maintained by serial passages in human foreskin fibroblasts (HFFs) in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin and incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. For parasite purification, infected monolayers were washed with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), detached by trypsinization, and subjected to mechanical disruption using repeated passages through a 27-G needle. The suspension was passed through a 5.0 μm pore-size filter (Millipore Sigma, Darmstadt, Germany) to remove host cell debris. Purified tachyzoites were washed twice with RPMI-1640, counted using a hemocytometer, and subsequently used to infect BMDMs.

2.4. Quantification of Intracellular Parasite Load

To quantify intracellular N. caninum tachyzoites in Camp+/+ and Camp/− BMDMs at 12 and 24 hpi, infected cell monolayers were gently washed with PBS and scraped using a sterile plastic cell scraper. The resulting suspension was subjected to mechanical disruption by repeated passage through a 27-G needle to release intracellular parasites. To eliminate host cell debris, the suspension was passed through a 5.0-μm pore-size filter (Millipore Sigma, Darmstadt, Germany). Tachyzoites were then counted using trypan blue exclusion in a Neubauer hemocytometer. Briefly, 10 μL of the suspensions were loaded onto a cleaned hemocytometer. Tachyzoites were counted under a light microscope at 40 × magnification in five large squares, applying standard inclusion rules. The mean number of tachyzoites per square was calculated, and parasite concentration was estimated using the following formula: average count per square × 104 × dilution factor. Results were expressed as the number of viable tachyzoites/mL.

2.5. Confocal Microscopy

BMDMs were plated on coverslips in 6-well plates, pre-treated with LPS (100 ng/mL; 3 h), and stimulated with GFP Nc Liv tachyzoites (MOI  =  3) for 12 and 24 h. Cells were rinsed with PBS and fixed in formaldehyde solution 3.7% (v/v), rinsed in cold PBS, blocked with PBS and 1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (20 min, RT), and rinsed with PBS. Cells were incubated with Alexa Fluor® 568 phalloidin (A12380, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) (20 min, RT), rinsed in cold PBS, and blotted (30 min, RT) with nuclei counterstained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Thermo Fisher). Sections were rinsed with cold PBS and mounted with ProLong® Gold reagent (Thermo Fisher). Slides were examined using a FluoView FV1000 confocal immunofluorescence microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japón).

2.6. Cytokine and Lactate Dehydrogenase Determinations

BMDM culture supernatants were collected at 12 and 24 hpi to analyze cytokine secretion and cell death via lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release (Roche Diagnostics) (Figure 1). Lactate dehydrogenase release was expressed as a percentage, calculated using the following formula: (LDH from infected samples–LDH from uninfected controls)/(LDH from total cell lysis–LDH from uninfected controls) × 100. The remaining supernatants were aliquoted and stored at −20 °C until determination of secreted IL-1β by murine-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (eBioscienceTM, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using Prism 5.0 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., Boston, MA, USA) and presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The D’Agostino–Pearson test was used to assess the normality of the data. Differences between groups were determined using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s test for data with residuals of normal distribution and homoscedastic variances, as observed in Bartlett’s test. A p-value <  0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Cathelicidin Deficiency Modulates Intracellular N. caninum Burden in Macrophages

To assess the impact of cathelicidin on N. caninum infection, BMDMs from Camp+/+ and Camp−/− mice were challenged with N. caninum. Camp−/− macrophages pre-treated with LPS showed a higher number of intracellular tachyzoites than the Camp+/+ counterparts at 12 hpi (p < 0.05) (Figure 2). N. caninum load in Camp+/+ macrophages exposed to LPS was elevated compared to Camp+/+ macrophages infected by N. caninum without previous LPS (p < 0.01) (Figure 2). Camp+/+ and Camp−/− macrophages without LPS stimulation performed similarly (p > 0.05) (Figure 2). A similar response was observed at a late stage, 24 hpi, with the highest parasite burden in infected Camp−/− macrophages pre-treated with LPS (p > 0.05) (Figure 2). Macrophages without LPS also exhibited higher parasite loads than the Camp+/+ counterparts (p < 0.0001) (Figure 2). Using confocal microscopy, we confirmed increased intracellular parasite burden in Camp−/− macrophages. A higher intracellular GFP-positive N. caninum tachyzoite burden was visualized in LPS-primed Camp−/− macrophages than in the Camp+/+ counterparts (Figure 3).

3.2. Cathelicidin Deficiency Exacerbates the Secretion of IL-1β and Cell Damage in Response to N. Caninum

Under basal conditions and in the presence of N. caninum, secreted IL-1β levels remained comparably low in Camp+/+ and Camp−/− macrophages (p > 0.05) (Figure 4). In contrast, in LPS-primed macrophages, released IL-1β production was higher in Camp−/− macrophages than the Camp+/+ counterparts at 12 h (p < 0.0001) (Figure 4). Secreted IL-1β response in LPS-primed Camp−/− macrophages was higher that the Camp+/+ counterparts at 24 hpi with N. caninum (Figure 4). Levels of IL-1β dropped between 12 and 24 hpi in Camp+/+ macrophages, but remained high in Camp−/− macrophages (p < 0.0001).
To evaluate the cell membrane integrity and cytotoxicity of these macrophages exposed to N. caninum, the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) released by N. caninum-infected BMDMs was quantified. In unstimulated conditions, regardless of infection with N. caninum, LDH levels remained comparatively low in Camp+/+ and Camp−/− macrophages (p > 0.05), indicating minimal baseline cytotoxicity (Figure 4). LPS-primed Camp−/− macrophages secreted higher amounts of LDH than the Camp+/+ counterparts in sham conditions (p < 0.0001) and after being challenged by N. caninum (p < 0.05) (Figure 4).

4. Discussion

This study determined a critical role for endogenous cathelicidins in the innate immune response to N. caninum infection. Using primary BMDMs, which are physiologically relevant as they mimic real-life immune responses, we show that cathelicidins limit the intracellular parasite burden and secretion of IL-1β, while preventing exaggerated cytotoxicity in macrophages. The modulatory effects of cathelicidins were particularly evident under LPS-induced inflammatory conditions, indicating that these peptides may help limit parasite invasion or regulate inflammation during active infection processes.
Our observations suggest that the endogenous synthesis of cathelicidin encompasses not only antimicrobial activities but also regulates the inflammasome. The inflammasome is a complex machinery that produces active caspase-1, the enzyme that cleaves pro-IL-1β into active IL-1β and triggers an inflammatory form of programmed cell death: pyroptosis [30]. We demonstrated that the absence of cathelicidin in LPS-primed macrophages resulted in elevated levels of IL-1β in response to N. caninum. Furthermore, the Camp+/+ macrophages reduced IL-1β synthesis by 24 hpi, while Camp−/− macrophages maintained elevated cytokine production. Additionally, there was increased LDH release in Camp−/− macrophages, indicating cell membrane damage linked to pyroptosis. Consistently, human cathelicidin (LL-37) decreased IL-1β levels and enhanced survival in murine bacterial sepsis models [31]. The role of cathelicidin in regulating the inflammasome and limiting inflammasome-driven cytotoxicity is crucial, as excessive inflammasome activation is associated with pathological and chronic inflammation. Our observed higher intracellular N. caninum tachyzoite burden in Camp−/− macrophages also indicates that cathelicidin is essential to limit protozoan infection. Cathelicidins have been shown to impair the intracellular survival of protozoal pathogens, including Leishmania and N. caninum [6,27,32]. Endogenous cathelicidin limited cutaneous infections with Leishmania [33], while equine cathelicidin (eCath1) inhibited in vitro the survival of a bloodstream form of trypomastigotes from related protozoa (Trypanosoma brucei brucei, Trypanosoma evansi, and Trypanosoma equiperdum) through structural alterations to the parasite’s membrane [34]. Thus, cathelicidins may act as negative regulators of sustained inflammation, promoting its timely resolution. Additionally, their antiprotozoal effects may involve immunomodulatory and microbicidal roles in the host. Regarding neosporosis and reproductive losses, placental cells express a variety of antimicrobial peptides, including cathelicidin [35]. The source of cathelicidin expression originates from trophoblasts and infiltrating leukocytes [35], such as neutrophils, which store larger quantities of this peptide in secondary granules [36,37,38]. Thus, the influx of leukocytes during placentitis and the release of endogenous cathelicidin could limit the damage to the placenta and fetus, as well as the N. caninum infection. Conversely, the loss of this peptide would contribute to uncontrolled maternal inflammation, characterized by increased production of interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and heightened cytotoxic activity of CD4+ T cells [39,40,41] and, eventually, abortions in N. caninum-infected cattle [42]. While the small sample size limited statistical power to detect more significant biological differences, this in vitro model provides mechanistic insight into the macrophage response in neosporosis. Still, studies should focus on the complexity of the placenta and the maternal–fetal interface to further understand the role of cathelicidins in systemic and reproductive pathogenesis during N. caninum infection. In summary, cathelicidins are essential regulators of the macrophage response to N. caninum, limiting parasite burden and inflammasome-mediated inflammation. These innate effectors, such as cathelicidin, may maintain immune balance in the placenta during neosporosis, controlling N. caninum-induced immunopathology and abortions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.F., P.J.B., E.R.C. and D.P.M.; methodology, F.F., P.L. and R.P.; investigation, F.F. and P.L.; formal analysis, F.F.; writing—original draft, F.F.; writing—review & editing, P.J.B., R.P., D.P.M. and E.R.C.; supervision, E.R.C.; funding acquisition, E.R.C. and D.P.M.; project administration, E.R.C. and D.P.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Fund for Scientific and Technological Research (FONCyT) through the project “Role of macrophages in the immunopathology of bovine neosporosis” (PICT-2019-I-A and PICT 2019-047). This work received support from grants awarded by Eduardo R. Cobo, including the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery (RGPAS-2024), the Alberta Government Major Innovation Fund (RCP-19-003-MIF), and the Alberta Provincial Government Agriculture Funding Consortium/Results Driven Agriculture Research (RDAR) (2023F205R and 2024F2443R). Additionally, this study received partial support from the NIH/NIAID grant R01 AI123360 awarded to P.J. Bradley.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by Canadian Guidelines for Animal Welfare (CGAW) and was approved by the University of Calgary Health Sciences Animal Care Committee (AC24-0045).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank Rita Hannawaya and Karina Cirone for their technical assistance. Immunofluorescence studies were conducted at the Live Cell Imaging Facility, supported by the Snyder Institute for Chronic Diseases at the Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Lindsay, D.S. Neosporosis, Toxoplasmosis, and Sarcocystosis in Ruminants: An Update. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2020, 36, 205–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Reichel, M.P.; Ayanegui-Alcérreca, M.; Gondim, L.F.P.; Ellis, J.T. What Is the Global Economic Impact of Neospora Caninum in Cattle—The Billion Dollar Question; Australian Society for Parasitology Inc.: Smithfield, Australia, 2013; Volume 43. [Google Scholar]
  3. Raghupathy, R. Th1-Type Immunity Is Incompatible with Successful Pregnancy. Immunol. Today 1997, 18, 478–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Koga, K.; Aldo, P.B.; Mor, G. Toll-like Receptors and Pregnancy: Trophoblast as Modulators of the Immune Response. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2009, 35, 191–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fehervari, Z. NLRP3 Shapes Immunity to Leishmania. Nat. Immunol. 2015, 16, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Crauwels, P.; Bank, E.; Walber, B.; Wenzel, U.A.; Agerberth, B.; Chanyalew, M.; Abebe, M.; König, R.; Ritter, U.; Reiling, N.; et al. Cathelicidin Contributes to the Restriction of Leishmania in Human Host Macrophages. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 469899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wang, Z.X.; Jiao, W.J.; Yang, Y.; Liu, H.L.; Wang, H.L. Role of Inflammasomes in Toxoplasma and Plasmodium Infections. Parasites Vectors 2024, 17, 466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, X.; Gong, P.; Zhang, N.; Li, L.; Chen, S.; Jia, L.; Liu, X.; Li, J.; Zhang, X. Inflammasome Activation Restrains the Intracellular Neospora Caninum Proliferation in Bovine Macrophages. Vet. Parasitol. 2019, 268, 16–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, X.; Gong, P.; Zhang, X.; Wang, J.; Tai, L.; Wang, X.; Wei, Z.; Yang, Y.; Yang, Z.; Li, J.; et al. NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation in Murine Macrophages Caused by Neospora Caninum Infection. Parasites Vectors 2017, 10, 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Li, L.; Wang, X.-C.; Gong, P.-T.; Zhang, N.; Zhang, X.; Li, S.; Li, X.; Liu, S.-X.; Zhang, X.-X.; Li, W.; et al. ROS-Mediated NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation Participates in the Response against Neospora Caninum Infection. Parasites Vectors 2020, 13, 449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, X.; Li, X.; Gong, P.; Zhang, N.; Li, L.; Ouyang, H.; Jia, L.; Li, J.; Zhang, X. Pyroptosis Executioner Gasdermin D Contributes to Host Defense and Promotes Th 1 Immune Response during Neospora Caninum Infection. Vet. Parasitol. 2020, 286, 109254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shi, J.; Gao, W.; Shao, F. Pyroptosis: Gasdermin-Mediated Programmed Necrotic Cell Death. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2017, 42, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gao, Y.L.; Zhai, J.H.; Chai, Y.F. Recent Advances in the Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Pyroptosis in Sepsis. Mediat. Inflamm. 2018, 2018, 5823823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wei, Y.; Yang, L.; Pandeya, A.; Cui, J.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Z. Pyroptosis-Induced Inflammation and Tissue Damage. J. Mol. Biol. 2022, 434, 167301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vasudevan, S.O.; Behl, B.; Rathinam, V.A. Pyroptosis-Induced Inflammation and Tissue Damage. Semin. Immunol. 2023, 69, 101781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Imre, G. Pyroptosis in Health and Disease. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2024, 326, C784–C794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, Y.; Ye, X.; Escames, G.; Lei, W.; Zhang, X.; Li, M.; Jing, T.; Yao, Y.; Qiu, Z.; Wang, Z.; et al. The NLRP3 Inflammasome: Contributions to Inflammation-Related Diseases. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 2023, 28, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Brown, K.L.; Hancock, R.E.W. Cationic Host Defense (Antimicrobial) Peptides. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2006, 18, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Hancock, R.E.W.; Sahl, H.G. Antimicrobial and Host-Defense Peptides as New Anti-Infective Therapeutic Strategies. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006, 24, 1551–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hilchie, A.L.; Wuerth, K.; Hancock, R.E.W. Immune Modulation by Multifaceted Cationic Host Defense (Antimicrobial) Peptides. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2013, 9, 761–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Galloo, R.L.; Kim, K.J.; Bernfield, M.; Kozak, C.A.; Zanetti, M.; Merluzzi, L.; Gennaro, R. Identification of CRAMP, a Cathelin-Related Antimicrobial Peptide Expressed in the Embryonic and Adult Mouse. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 13088–13093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kościuczuk, E.M.; Lisowski, P.; Jarczak, J.; Strzałkowska, N.; Jóźwik, A.; Horbańczuk, J.; Krzyżewski, J.; Zwierzchowski, L.; Bagnicka, E. Cathelicidins: Family of Antimicrobial Peptides. A Rev. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2012, 39, 10957–10970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zanetti, M. Cathelicidins, Multifunctional Peptides of the Innate Immunity. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2004, 75, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wu, W.K.K.; Wong, C.C.M.; Li, Z.J.; Zhang, L.; Ren, S.X.; Cho, C.H. Cathelicidins in Inflammation and Tissue Repair: Potential Therapeutic Applications for Gastrointestinal Disorders. Acta. Pharmacol. Sin. 2010, 31, 1118–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Guerra, M.E.S.; Vieira, B.; Calazans, A.P.C.T.; Destro, G.V.; Melo, K.; Rodrigues, E.; Waz, N.T.; Girardello, R.; Darrieux, M.; Converso, T.R. Recent Advances in the Therapeutic Potential of Cathelicidins. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1405760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hu, Z.; Murakami, T.; Suzuki, K.; Tamura, H.; Reich, J.; Kuwahara-Arai, K.; Iba, T.; Nagaoka, I. Antimicrobial Cathelicidin Peptide LL-37 Inhibits the Pyroptosis of Macrophages and Improves the Survival of Polybacterial Septic Mice. Int. Immunol. 2016, 28, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Boucher, E.; Marine, M.; Holani, R.; Young-Speirs, M.; Moore, D.M.; Cobo, E.R. Characteristic Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines and Host Defence Cathelicidin Peptide Produced by Human Monocyte-Derived Macrophages Infected with Neospora Caninum. Parasitology 2018, 145, 871–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cirone, K.M.; Lahiri, P.; Holani, R.; Tan, Y.L.; Arrazuria, R.; De Buck, J.; Barkema, H.W.; Cobo, E.R. Synthetic Cathelicidin LL-37 Reduces Mycobacterium Avium Subsp. Paratuberculosis Internalization and pro-Inflammatory Cytokines in Macrophages. Cell Tissue Res. 2020, 379, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Toda, G.; Yamauchi, T.; Kadowaki, T.; Ueki, K. Preparation and Culture of Bone Marrow-Derived Macrophages from Mice for Functional Analysis. STAR Protoc. 2021, 2, 100246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xi, H.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Yang, W.Y.; Jiang, X.; Sha, X.; Cheng, X.; Wang, J.; Qin, X.; Yu, J.; et al. Caspase-1 Inflammasome Activation Mediates Homocysteine-Induced Pyrop-Apoptosis in Endothelial Cells. Circ. Res. 2016, 118, 1525–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rivera-Fernández, N.; Anacleto-Santos, J.; Casarrubias-Tabarez, B.; López-Pérez, T.d.J.; Rojas-Lemus, M.; López-Valdez, N.; Fortoul, T.I. Bioactive Peptides against Human Apicomplexan Parasites. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kulkarni, M.M.; Barbi, J.; Mcmaster, W.R.; Gallo, R.L.; Satoskar, A.R.; Mcgwire, B.S. Mammalian Antimicrobial Peptide Influences Control of Cutaneous Leishmania Infection. Cell. Microbiol. 2011, 13, 913–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Cauchard, S.; Van Reet, N.; Büscher, P.; Goux, D.; Grötzinger, J.; Leippe, M.; Cattoir, V.; Laugier, C.; Cauchard, J. Killing of Trypanozoon Parasites by the Equine Cathelicidin ECATH1. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 2610–2619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Klaffenbach, D.; Friedrich, D.; Strick, R.; Strissel, P.L.; Beckmann, M.W.; Rascher, W.; Gessner, A.; Dötsch, J.; Meißner, U.; Schnare, M. Contribution of Different Placental Cells to the Expression and Stimulation of Antimicrobial Proteins (AMPs). Placenta 2011, 32, 830–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gudmundsson, G.H.; Agerberth, B.; Odeberg, J.; Bergman, T.; Olsson, B.; Salcedo, R. The Human Gene FALL39 and Processing of the Cathelin Precursor to the Antibacterial Peptide LL-37 in Granulocytes. Eur. J. Biochem. 1996, 238, 325–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Holani, R.; Babbar, A.; Blyth, G.A.D.; Lopes, F.; Jijon, H.; McKay, D.M.; Hollenberg, M.D.; Cobo, E.R. Cathelicidin-Mediated Lipopolysaccharide Signaling via Intracellular TLR4 in Colonic Epithelial Cells Evokes CXCL8 Production. Gut Microbes 2020, 12, 1785802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sørensen, O.E.; Follin, P.; Johnsen, A.H.; Calafat, J.; Sandra Tjabringa, G.; Hiemstra, P.S.; Borregaard, N. Human Cathelicidin, HCAP-18, Is Processed to the Antimicrobial Peptide LL-37 by Extracellular Cleavage with Proteinase 3. Blood 2001, 97, 3951–3959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Dubey, J.P.; Buxton, D.; Wouda, W. Pathogenesis of bovine neosporosis. J. Comp. Pathol. 2006, 134, 267–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Buxton, D.; McAllister, M.M.; Dubey, J.P. The comparative pathogenesis of neosporosis. Trends Parasitol. 2002, 18, 546–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Khan, I.A.; Schwartzman, J.D.; Fonseka, S.; Kasper, L.H. Neospora Caninum: Role for Immune Cytokines in Host Immunity. Exp. Parasitol. 1997, 85, 24–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Innes, E.A.; Andrianarivo, A.G.; Björkman, C.; Williams, D.J.L.; Conrad, P.A. Immune Responses to Neospora Caninum and Prospects for Vaccination. Trends Parasitol. 2002, 18, 497–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Quinn, H.E.; Ellis, J.T.; Smith, N.C. Neospora caninum: A cause of immune-mediated failure of pregnancy? Trends Parasitol. 2002, 18, 391–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the experimental design. Bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) from Camp+/+ (wild-type) and Camp−/− (cathelicidin-deficient) mice were cultured and assigned to four experimental conditions: untreated (Control), lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimu-lation, green fluorescent protein (GFP)-N. caninum Liverpool (Nc Liv) tachyzoites infection (Nc), and LPS pre-treatment followed by GFP N. caninum infection (Nc). Supernatants and cell lysates were collected at 12 and 24 h post-infection (hpi) for lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) cytotoxicity assay, IL-1β ELISA, and quantification of intracellular tachyzoites. Each group included four biological replicates. Confocal microscopy was performed to visualize the parasites.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the experimental design. Bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) from Camp+/+ (wild-type) and Camp−/− (cathelicidin-deficient) mice were cultured and assigned to four experimental conditions: untreated (Control), lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimu-lation, green fluorescent protein (GFP)-N. caninum Liverpool (Nc Liv) tachyzoites infection (Nc), and LPS pre-treatment followed by GFP N. caninum infection (Nc). Supernatants and cell lysates were collected at 12 and 24 h post-infection (hpi) for lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) cytotoxicity assay, IL-1β ELISA, and quantification of intracellular tachyzoites. Each group included four biological replicates. Confocal microscopy was performed to visualize the parasites.
Pathogens 14 00663 g001
Figure 2. N. caninum tachyzoite burden in Camp+/+ and Camp/− bone marrow-derived macrophages. Bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) from Camp+/+ and Camp−/− (cathelicidin-deficient) mice were left untreated (Control) or subjected to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation, N. caninum infection (Nc), or LPS pre-treatment followed by infection (LPS + Nc). Intracellular tachyzoites were quantified at 12 (a) and 24 (b) hours post-infection (hpi). Representative microscopy images of BMDMs at 12 hpi (c) and 24 hpi (d) illustrate the intracellular parasite burden. Intracellular tachyzoites are indicated by solid triangles, while dashed circles mark extracellular parasites. Data represent the mean ± SD of four independent replicates per condition. * p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Scale bars = 50 μm.
Figure 2. N. caninum tachyzoite burden in Camp+/+ and Camp/− bone marrow-derived macrophages. Bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) from Camp+/+ and Camp−/− (cathelicidin-deficient) mice were left untreated (Control) or subjected to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation, N. caninum infection (Nc), or LPS pre-treatment followed by infection (LPS + Nc). Intracellular tachyzoites were quantified at 12 (a) and 24 (b) hours post-infection (hpi). Representative microscopy images of BMDMs at 12 hpi (c) and 24 hpi (d) illustrate the intracellular parasite burden. Intracellular tachyzoites are indicated by solid triangles, while dashed circles mark extracellular parasites. Data represent the mean ± SD of four independent replicates per condition. * p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Scale bars = 50 μm.
Pathogens 14 00663 g002
Figure 3. Visualization of intracellular N. caninum tachyzoites in Camp+/+ and Camp/− bone marrow-derived macrophages. Confocal microscopy images of bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) from Camp+/+ and Camp−/− (cathelicidin-deficient) mice pre-treated with lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and subsequently infected with GFP-expressing Neospora caninum tachyzoites (LPS + Nc). Cells were fixed and stained at 12 and 24 h post-infection (hpi). F-actin filaments were visualized using Alexa Fluor® 568-conjugated phalloidin (red), nuclei were counterstained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, blue), and tachyzoites were detected via green fluorescent protein (GFP, green). Scale bar = 50 μm. Representative images illustrate parasite localization within the host cell cytoplasm and associated cytoskeletal structures.
Figure 3. Visualization of intracellular N. caninum tachyzoites in Camp+/+ and Camp/− bone marrow-derived macrophages. Confocal microscopy images of bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) from Camp+/+ and Camp−/− (cathelicidin-deficient) mice pre-treated with lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and subsequently infected with GFP-expressing Neospora caninum tachyzoites (LPS + Nc). Cells were fixed and stained at 12 and 24 h post-infection (hpi). F-actin filaments were visualized using Alexa Fluor® 568-conjugated phalloidin (red), nuclei were counterstained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, blue), and tachyzoites were detected via green fluorescent protein (GFP, green). Scale bar = 50 μm. Representative images illustrate parasite localization within the host cell cytoplasm and associated cytoskeletal structures.
Pathogens 14 00663 g003
Figure 4. IL-1β secretion and lactate dehydrogenase release in Camp+/+ and Camp−/− bone marrow-derived macrophages exposed to N. caninum. Bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) from Camp+/+ and Camp−/− (cathelicidin-deficient) mice were exposed to one of the following conditions: medium alone (Control), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), N. caninum (Nc), or LPS followed by N. caninum infection (Nc + LPS). Supernatants were collected at 12 and 24 h post-infection (hpi) to quantify IL-1β and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Each experimental condition included four biological replicates (n = 4). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and is indicated by an asterisk (*).
Figure 4. IL-1β secretion and lactate dehydrogenase release in Camp+/+ and Camp−/− bone marrow-derived macrophages exposed to N. caninum. Bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) from Camp+/+ and Camp−/− (cathelicidin-deficient) mice were exposed to one of the following conditions: medium alone (Control), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), N. caninum (Nc), or LPS followed by N. caninum infection (Nc + LPS). Supernatants were collected at 12 and 24 h post-infection (hpi) to quantify IL-1β and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Each experimental condition included four biological replicates (n = 4). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and is indicated by an asterisk (*).
Pathogens 14 00663 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fiorani, F.; Lahiri, P.; Puentes, R.; Bradley, P.J.; Moore, D.P.; Cobo, E.R. Cathelicidins Limit Intracellular Neospora caninum-Infection in Macrophages. Pathogens 2025, 14, 663. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14070663

AMA Style

Fiorani F, Lahiri P, Puentes R, Bradley PJ, Moore DP, Cobo ER. Cathelicidins Limit Intracellular Neospora caninum-Infection in Macrophages. Pathogens. 2025; 14(7):663. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14070663

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fiorani, Franco, Priyoshi Lahiri, Rodrigo Puentes, Peter John Bradley, Dadin Prando Moore, and Eduardo Ruben Cobo. 2025. "Cathelicidins Limit Intracellular Neospora caninum-Infection in Macrophages" Pathogens 14, no. 7: 663. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14070663

APA Style

Fiorani, F., Lahiri, P., Puentes, R., Bradley, P. J., Moore, D. P., & Cobo, E. R. (2025). Cathelicidins Limit Intracellular Neospora caninum-Infection in Macrophages. Pathogens, 14(7), 663. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14070663

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop