Next Article in Journal
N-Acetylcysteine as a Host-Directed Therapy Against Clarithromycin-Resistant Mycobacterium abscessus
Previous Article in Journal
Unraveling Dysgeusia in SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Clinical and Laboratory Insights from Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients in Romania
Previous Article in Special Issue
Prevalence of Non-Viral Bloodborne Pathogens Among Healthy Blood Donors in Western Mexico: Problems and Failures of Public Health Policy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 14
Issue 4
10.3390/pathogens14040301
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Influence of Occult Hepatitis B Infection on Blood Transfusion Safety and Its Countermeasures

by
Meng Yi
1,†,
Shuchang Dai
1,2,†,
Lin Fang
1,2,3,†,
Bo Pan
1,2,
Bin Fan
1,
Yiming Pan
1,2 and
Zhong Liu
1,2,4,*
1
Institute of Blood Transfusion, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Chengdu 610052, China
2
China Key Laboratory of Transfusion Adverse Reactions, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Chengdu 610052, China
3
School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230032, China
4
School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Pathogens 2025, 14(4), 301; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14040301
Submission received: 12 February 2025 / Revised: 11 March 2025 / Accepted: 13 March 2025 / Published: 21 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Transfusion-Transmitted Infections)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Occult hepatitis B infection (OBI) is a serious public health issue. Although a number of effective hepatitis B vaccines are available, hepatitis B still poses a threat to global public health. Patients with OBI are usually asymptomatic, but there may be active HBV DNA present in their blood, leading to the risk of virus transmission during blood transfusions or organ transplantation, constituting a hazard to the health of recipients and increasing the risk of liver cirrhosis and liver cancer. Although China has progressed in the development of blood-screening technology, OBI is still a significant hidden danger to blood transfusion safety. Therefore, in blood screening and blood transfusion, strengthening the monitoring and management of OBI is crucial to ensure blood safety and protect public health.

1. Introduction

Although an effective vaccine against hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection has been available for more than 30 years, hepatitis B resulting from HBV infection remains a significant worldwide public health issue [1]. Research indicates that around 25% of cases of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) may progress to cirrhosis or hepatocellular cancer [2,3]. As per the World Health Organization’s (WHO) statistics for 2021, approximately 296 million individuals worldwide suffered from chronic infection with the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in 2019, resulting in around 820,000 annual fatalities due to HBV-related liver fibrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with Africa and the Western Pacific exhibiting the highest prevalence rates [4,5].
Transfusion-transmitted HBV continues to be a serious public health concern, and blood-borne transmission is still a major route by which HBV is contracted worldwide. The WHO 2023 report states that the prevalence rates of transfusion-associated HBV infection are 0.02% in high-income countries and 2.81% in low-income countries [6]. Despite the WHO’s recommendations for universal HBV testing of all donated blood, HBV persists as a major threat to blood safety, particularly in resource-limited settings where gaps in the implementation of screening protocols and diagnostic sensitivity exacerbate transmission risks.
Occult HBV infection (OBI) is described as the presence of replication-competent HBV DNA in the blood and/or liver of individuals who test negative for HBsAg using the existing techniques [7]. Despite significant reductions in transfusion-transmitted HBV risks through current blood-screening measures, OBI persists as the predominant residual threat due to its HBsAg-negative profile. A meta-analysis estimates the global prevalence of OBI to be 0.82% among the general population, with marked disparities across nations. Countries with a high Sociodemographic Index (SDI) exhibit a prevalence of 0.36%, contrasting sharply with 3.094% in low-SDI countries [8]. A systematic retrospective analysis indicates that the rate of OBI among blood donors mirrors the overall prevalence of HBV at 0.98% (0.44–1.72) in high-prevalence countries, 0.12% (0.04–0.23) in medium-prevalence countries, and 0.06% (0.00–0.26) in low-prevalence countries (I2 = 97·72%; p-value for heterogeneity between groups was 0.0012) [9].
Based on the serum anti-HBc status, OBI is often categorized into serologically positive OBI and serologically negative OBI [10]. OBI usually presents as an asymptomatic infection that cannot be identified by current serological testing methods [11]. Research indicates that HBV DNA present in the bloodstream of patients with OBI is detectable only occasionally, with concentrations typically below 200 IU/mL (about 1000 copies/mL) [12]. A defining characteristic of OBI is the persistence of minute quantities of covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) of HBV within hepatocytes, in the context of suppressed immune function in the host [13]. In situations where the host’s immune system becomes impaired, HBV may resume replicative processes, thereby increasing the likelihood of developing cirrhosis and HCC within the host organism. Simultaneously, it may facilitate the inadvertent transmission of HBV, as in the cases of organ donation and blood transfusion [14].Blood screening is essential in mitigating the transmission of infectious diseases through blood transfusions. The advancements in blood-screening techniques, blood safety monitoring, and pathogen inactivation technologies have significantly enhanced blood safety. Nonetheless, existing detection tools render OBI a significant concern in blood safety.
To examine the status of the research on OBI and its impact on blood transfusion safety, we employed key terms such as “occult hepatitis B infection”, “blood transfusion”, “occult HBV infection”, “pathogenic mechanism”, and “diagnostic methods“ to search for pertinent studies in the MEDLINE, Web of Science, and other databases from 2015 to 2024, while also incorporating significant early research into the analysis. We assessed 53 studies by filtering the retrieved data, excluding those that did not clearly specify the sample size and positivity rate, including the most recent research from both high-prevalence regions (Africa, India, etc.) and low-prevalence regions (the United States, Canada, etc.). The recent advancements in the pathophysiology and diagnostic techniques related to OBI were also examined. This work evaluates and synthesizes the virological and epidemiological attributes of OBI, the current state of research on detection methodologies, and experiences in the management of blood donations from patients with OBI while underscoring the risks posed by OBI to blood transfusion safety.

2. Virology and Epidemiology of OBI

The enduring stability and efficient replication of cccDNA in hepatocytes have consistently been regarded as the primary molecular foundation of OBI [15]. It is widely recognized that there are two distinct equilibrium states in HBV infection within the human body [16]: 1—the equilibrium between viral replication within hepatocytes and the clearance of virus particles from the circulatory system; and 2—the harmonious state between the production and degradation processes of the cccDNA pool. While the host’s immunological response and pharmacological intervention primarily disrupt the first equilibrium, they exert less influence on the latter [17,18]. The half-life of cccDNA in vivo may extend up to 26 months, depending on both the host’s immunological states and treatment regimen, whereas HBV-infected cells may persist for as long as 100 days [19,20,21]. Due to the inadequacy of host immunological regulation and the constraints of antiviral pharmacotherapy, current antiviral treatments cannot entirely inhibit the creation of viral DNA in hepatic cells [22,23]. Even when HBsAg-negative for 30 years, HBV DNA may still be detectable in the liver of some people [24,25].As this demonstrates, following HBV infection, the cccDNA or OBI status in the liver may persist for an extended duration, potentially for a lifetime.
Recent research has demonstrated that the epigenetic regulation of HBV cccDNA is significant in the etiology of OBI. Table 1 illustrates that epigenetic modifications occurring after translation, encompassing methylation of both histones and non-histone proteins, interactions with host cellular transcription factors, as well as ubiquitination processes exert significant impacts on the transcriptional activity and replication dynamics of cccDNA. SIRT3 functions as a crucial host determinant, suppressing replication by impairing the interaction between RNA polymerase II and cccDNA [26]. Nonetheless, SIRT1, the TIP60 complex, HDAC11, and HAT1 may promote OBI activation [27]. SIRT1 is a class III histone deacetylase that facilitates HBV replication in hepatocytes [27]. The TIP60 complex further binds to the HBV promoter, inhibiting HBV transcription induced by the pre-core/core promoter [28]. Specific enzymes modulate the replication and transcription of HBV cccDNA by modulating the histone methylation state, including LSD1, PRMT5, and NIRF. Research indicates that a reduction in LSD1 levels will restrict the expression of viral genes. This discovery pertains to the methylation of the transcription repressor H3K9 and the decrease in activation indicators H3 and H3K4 on the viral promoter [29]. PRMT5 negatively regulates HBV replication by inhibiting cccDNA transcription and disrupting the development of pre-genomic RNA [30]. Recent studies indicate that the intricate modulation of HBV cccDNA in patients is the key driver of OBI [13,31,32].
Moreover, HBV in the OBI population often exhibits mutations. A study sequenced 104 OBI plasma samples and 524 HBsAg-positive samples from 29 blood centers, investigating the high-frequency mutation of the S protein transmembrane domain (TMD) among the OBI community [38]. The TMD mutation of the S protein may produce OBI by decreasing HBsAg secretion, altering HBsAg hydrophobicity, and facilitating HBsAg accumulation in the cell membrane. Current detection techniques may be inadequate for identifying the HBsAg mutant protein, potentially resulting in missed detections [38]. For instance, a Japanese study reported a high OBI prevalence in HIV-infected patients, identifying common mutations in the S protein TMD and core protein. These mutations may help cause OBI by changing the viral antigenicity and preventing immune recognition [39]. Another study emphasized how key protein mutations contribute to the development of OBI, making its diagnosis and treatment even more challenging [40]. The need for prolonged antiviral therapy in individuals chronically infected with HBV contributes to the formation of immunological complexes between free HBsAg in peripheral blood and anti-HBs, a significant factor in the ineffectiveness of current HBsAg detection techniques [41]. Consequently, the protracted nature and complexity of HBV infection, along with insufficient comprehension of the pathogenic mechanisms and restricted detection tools, have led OBI to be identified as a significant concern with regard to blood safety.
Recent domestic research indicates that the frequency of OBI significantly differs among patients with varying HBV serological statuses [9,42,43]: the detection rate of serum HBV DNA is 15.61% in anti-HBe (+)/anti-HBc (+) patients. In comparison, it is 1.87% in anti-HBs (+)/anti-HBc (+) patients [43]. The findings indicate that the serological detection rates of anti-HBs and OBI show a negative correlation in Asia but a positive correlation in Africa, consistent with the effects of anti-HBs and anti-HBe. This is attributable to anti-HBs acting as a protective antibody, whereas anti-HBe signifies a robust immune response, indicating that the individual remains in the immune clearance or recovery phase [44,45]. A study by Candotti et al. suggests that even with a sensitive nucleic acid detection technique (detection limit: 3.4 IU/mL) for three consecutive assessments, blood donors testing negative for HBsAg and HBV DNA are still susceptible to HBV transmission through blood transfusions [46].
There are notable disparities in OBI frequency among blood donors across various groups and countries. Table 2 summarizes the relevant studies on OBI among blood donors from 2015 to date. The prevalence of OBI in affluent nations, such as the United States and Switzerland, is around 0.05%. The prevalence of OBI in poor regions, such as India, Nigeria, and Africa, is often elevated due to factors such as inadequate medical infrastructure and a high incidence of HBV. Furthermore, the true prevalence may be underestimated due to study limitations. Since 2015, China has increasingly focused on the prevalence rate of OBI among blood donors. Table 3 indicates that the frequency of OBI among blood donors in China has shown a declining trend since 2015, approaching the figures seen in industrialized nations. The prevalence rate varies significantly across various areas of China, with a more significant incidence of OBI in the southern regions (Shenzhen, Guangzhou, etc.) compared to the northern areas (Beijing, Liaoning, etc.).
The transfusion of OBI-derived blood may further elevate supplementary dangers. The recipients’ immunological function and underlying disorders may reactivate OBI, particularly in immunosuppressed individuals [86]. Additionally, the research indicates that OBI is strongly associated with HBV-related cirrhosis and HCC, and the interplay between HBV DNA and HCC-related genes may facilitate the progression of HCC [87]. Although no direct research indicates that transfusions of OBI-derived blood present an elevated risk to recipients with fundamental liver diseases, studies have suggested that such patients may struggle to eradicate low-level HBV infections due to their compromised immune function or abnormal liver function [88]. Concurrently, HBV DNA in OBI is inclined to integrate into hepatocyte DNA, potentially exacerbating the illness’s fundamental pathological alterations and intricacy, elevating the hepatic burden, and hastening the disease progression [89]. Consequently, it is essential to focus more on the dangers associated with OBI while administering blood transfusions to patients with underlying liver conditions.

3. Detection Method of OBI and Blood Transfusion Safety

The definitive and indispensable criterion for establishing a diagnosis of OBI involves the identification of HBV DNA with replicative capacity in the liver tissues or bloodstreams of patients who are HBsAg-negative [7]. The definitive diagnostic criterion is the detection of HBV DNA in liver tissue; nevertheless, its implementation remains challenging. The conventional approach for diagnosing OBI is the detection of HBV DNA in the blood, while detecting anti-HBc in the blood is an alternative method.
In developed areas such as the United States and European nations, NAT has emerged as the standard for blood screening due to its increased sensitivity and specificity, with accuracy maintained by frequent updates of detection guidelines and stringent quality control of equipment [90]. A combination screening technique including HBsAg, anti-HBc, and anti-HBs was presented in response to the need for blood screening in impoverished regions [91]. This technique has superior sensitivity and cost-effectiveness compared to costly ID-NAT and Minipool NAT, which exhibit a significant false-negative rate, making it a more viable option.
Over the last several decades, the HBV screening protocol for blood donors in China has evolved through three phases [92,93,94]: The first phase encompassed the era of voluntary blood donation before the enactment of China’s Blood Donation Law in 1998. Before blood donation, HBsAg was identified in the laboratory using reverse hemagglutination. Between 1990 and 1998, this technique was gradually replaced by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Individuals who receive a negative test result could donate without further testing. In the second phase, spanning from 1998 to 2015, a comprehensive campaign to encourage voluntary blood donation was implemented nationwide. This initiative was complemented by a comprehensive assessment, which encompassed a questionnaire probing into risky behaviors and substance abuse, a thorough physical examination, as well as pre- and post-donation dual screening for HBsAg.
Since 2010, several nucleic acid testing (NAT) technologies have been assessed in many pilot blood facilities in China. The third phase spans from 2015 to the present. Prospective blood donors often undergo swift HBsAg screening before donation, while the blood obtained from eligible donors is subsequently tested using two distinct ELISA methods, and NAT also analyzes HBV DNA.
Despite the prevalent use of NAT and serology for HBV detection, OBI remains a significant risk [95,96]. The challenge of OBI blood screening is excluding samples with low viral loads. The nucleic acid test findings of low viral load samples have a Poisson distribution, indicating that “detected” samples may provide negative results upon re-examination, complicating the differentiation between false negatives and true negatives [97]. Moreover, samples exhibiting a very low viral load present difficulties for identification and may result in transfusion-related HBV infection owing to the transfusion of such blood. Candotti et al. documented a case of HBV infection in Slovenia resulting from the transfusion of blood products collected from OBI blood donors with minimal viral loads. The study investigated three individuals who were recurrent blood donors, having tested negative for HBsAg and exhibited negative results for HBV DNA through NAT. Nine recipients developed confirmed HBV infection after the transfusion of blood components, with seven infections originating from fresh frozen plasma and two from red blood cells containing plasma. The analysis of viral sequences indicated that the sequences from five receivers exhibited over 99% congruence with those of the donors. This research demonstrates that the minimal threshold of HBV infection may be revised from 20 IU/mL to around 3.0 IU/mL of HBV DNA. The lower detection limit of NAT sensitivity required to avert HBV transmission by blood transfusion is 0.15 IU/mL [46]. Consequently, despite the sensitivity of current HBV screening techniques and the safety of blood recipients, OBI remains a significant risk to the safety of blood transfusions.
Recent research on novel biomarkers for OBI diagnosis includes serum HBV RNA, a promising candidate [89]. Serum HBV RNA mainly consists of pgRNA (pre-genomic RNA), regarded as direct evidence of the transcriptional activity of HBV cccDNA. Compared to other biomarkers like HBV DNA and HBsAg, it may provide a more direct and effective means of identifying viral activity in individuals exhibiting viral inhibition (particularly OBI) post-treatment. Nonetheless, the molecular attributes of serum HBV RNA remain poorly understood, and the absence of standardized detection techniques results in restricted comparability across various study findings. The connection between serum HBV RNA and cccDNA significantly varies between studies, perhaps impacted by variables such as patient characteristics and detection methodologies. The clinical use of serum HBV RNA, particularly in comparison to the current indicators, requires more investigation [98].

4. Strategies to Mitigate the Risk of OBI During Blood Transfusions

Summarizing, comparing, and deriving insights from advanced experiences would enhance the management efficacy of OBI blood transfusion and assure transfusion safety. Through extensive practice, nations globally have amassed considerable expertise in the administration of blood donation for OBI patients, primarily in the following areas.

4.1. Enhance the Sensitivity and Specificity of Detection

In China and most nations in Europe and America, NAT is used as a blood-screening technique, significantly decreasing the risk of OBI [99]. The blood management organization will consistently revise testing guidelines and rigorously oversee the quality of testing equipment to guarantee the use of the newest technologies and standards as well as the reliability of testing outcomes [79,80]. Simultaneously, nations are augmenting investments in researching and developing more precise and effective detection methodologies. Research indicates that digital PCR (ddPCR) has greater sensitivity and accuracy than real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR (qPCR) in identifying low viral loads [100]. The use of ddPCR technology is anticipated to enhance the precision and safety of blood screening, hence offering a more dependable assurance for blood safety management [101]. Nowadays, several ddPCR platforms have been commercialized, such as Raindrop Digital PCR, the Bio-Rad QX200 Droplet Digital System, and the Naica System. However, to complete an assay using these platforms, most require the synergy of several pieces of equipment, such as a droplet generator, droplet reader, and PCR thermocycler [102,103]. In addition, due to the high price of detection equipment and low detection throughput, ddPCR technology has not yet been promoted to clinical applications and is still in the scientific research stage [104]. Table 4 shows the advantages and limitations of the three assays, ELISA, NAT, and ddPCR.

4.2. Strict Blood Donor Screening and Feedback System

A thorough health exam is required for all American blood donors. This rigorous regulation reduces the OBI risk [107]. China’s blood donation policy is also improving. However, regional screening standards vary owing to economic and resource restrictions. European and American blood monitoring and feedback systems are excellent, allowing them to detect and fix blood donation issues promptly. Blood donors will be traced after OBI cases are found, and screening procedures will be revised to ensure blood safety. China has improved data monitoring recently. However, countrywide data integration and real-time monitoring require improvement, and most blood donor management systems lack complete information exchange, which delays OBI case detection and feedback [108].

4.3. Prevention Through Vaccination

One of the main methods for preventing HBV infection is active immunization. Among vaccinated blood donors, the incidence of HBV has been significantly reduced [109]. Nevertheless, OBI remains an undeniable residual risk [110]. In the United States, a small proportion of vaccinated donors exhibit HBV DNA positivity despite testing negative for HBsAg, demonstrating the persistence of OBI even in regions with a high vaccination coverage [111]. Cai et al. identified OBI in a subset of vaccinated donors, further underscoring this concern [43]. These findings indicate that while hepatitis B vaccination has achieved remarkable success in reducing HBV prevalence, OBI may still occur, signifying that vaccination is not completely effective. Sustained surveillance and enhanced screening technologies remain critical safeguards against transfusion transmission. It must be emphasized that although vaccination-based prevention strategies do not entirely eliminate OBI, they remain essential given the current absence of superior alternatives. Vaccination continues to be a necessary intervention to mitigate the population-level HBV burden while we await advanced preventive measures.

4.4. Engage in Public Education Initiatives

China is likewise behind wealthy nations in public education. In the United States and other European countries, public education often encompasses fundamental understanding of the transmission pathways, prevention strategies, and possible health hazards associated with HBV. Community lectures, online courses, publications, and other multi-channel educational initiatives provide extensive information to the public. Moreover, tailored educational programs are implemented for specific demographics (such as high-risk populations) to improve their comprehension of OBI. Public health organizations in several countries will collaborate with NGOs to implement focused health promotion initiatives [112]. In China, the curriculum of public education is progressively being enhanced. However, it remains comparatively limited. While several cities have conducted awareness campaigns for hepatitis B, most of the content emphasizes fundamental understanding and preventative strategies, lacking comprehensive details about OBI and associated risks. Furthermore, owing to disparities in regional development, public educational resources and information access avenues in rural locations remain limited. The interaction is minimal, and most educational initiatives remain one-dimensional, characterized by a lack of substantive engagement with the public.

5. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Despite the ongoing efforts to mitigate OBI blood transfusion risks in China, numerous urgent issues persist, including the constraints of screening technology, inadequate public awareness, uneven regional development, and incomplete information integration and monitoring systems. Consequently, to address the issues posed by OBI, China’s future developmental trajectory may begin with the following aspects: 1. Enhance the sensitivity and accuracy of current detection techniques (such as NAT technology) while simultaneously developing and implementing new technologies. 2. Enhance the quality of public education and awareness. 3. Enhance the dissemination of information about HBV and OBI through multiple channels (such as online platforms, community initiatives, and educational institutions), mainly targeting high-risk populations, and develop tailored educational strategies to improve their self-screening awareness. 4. Enhance regional collaboration and resource consolidation. In particular, enhancing resource sharing and collaboration across various areas is essential. Establishing a regional blood safety network may facilitate data and experience sharing, thereby enhancing overall management efficacy.
This study has certain limitations: Despite the increasing focus on the detection, management, and treatment of occult hepatitis B infection in various countries, regional prevalence disparities and the efficacy of detection technology continue to pose significant challenges to mitigating the risk of OBI to blood transfusion safety. The sample sizes from various investigations remain limited, perhaps failing to accurately represent the actual frequencies of OBI among blood donors in the regions sampled. Furthermore, study findings in the same area across various periods indicate a shifting trend. It is crucial to consistently analyze an extensive sample size to ascertain the prevalence rate of OBI among blood donors. However, it is challenging to accurately study the situation, and the analysis of the available data in this work may be skewed relative to reality owing to the paucity of research in Africa and the small sample sizes of the research that is currently available. Enhancing studies in undeveloped regions like Africa will significantly contribute to a thorough understanding of the impact of OBI on global blood transfusion safety. Consequently, with technological advancements and heightened public health awareness, the risk that OBI presents to blood transfusion safety is anticipated to diminish progressively.

Author Contributions

M.Y.: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. S.D.: data curation, methodology, writing—original draft. L.F.: data curation, methodology, writing—original draft. B.P.: data curation, methodology, writing—original draft. B.F.: data curation, methodology. Y.P.: data curation, methodology. Z.L.: conceptualization, methodology, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) (2021-I2M-1-060).

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank everyone who contributed to the public dataset used in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jeng, W.-J.; Papatheodoridis, G.V.; Lok, A.S.F. Hepatitis B. Lancet 2023, 401, 1039–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hsu, Y.-C.; Nguyen, M.H. Curing chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2023, 23, 392–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hsu, Y.-C.; Huang, D.Q.; Nguyen, M.H. Global burden of hepatitis B virus: Current status, missed opportunities and a call for action. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2023, 20, 524–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. WHO. Global Progress Report on HIV, Viral Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2021. Available online: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/341412/9789240027077-eng.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed on 22 February 2025).
  5. GBD 2019 Hepatitis B Collaborators. Global, Regional, and National Burden of Hepatitis B, 1990–2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022, 7, 796–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. WHO. Blood Safety and Availability. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/blood-safety-and-availability (accessed on 22 February 2025).
  7. Raimondo, G.; Locarnini, S.; Pollicino, T.; Levrero, M.; Zoulim, F.; Lok, A.S. Update of the statements on biology and clinical impact of occult hepatitis B virus infection. J. Hepatol. 2019, 71, 397–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ji, D.-Z.; Pang, X.-Y.; Shen, D.-T.; Liu, S.-N.; Goyal, H.; Xu, H.-G. Global prevalence of occult hepatitis B: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Viral Hepat. 2022, 29, 317–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Im, Y.R.; Jagdish, R.; Leith, D.; Kim, J.U.; Yoshida, K.; Majid, A.; Ge, Y.; Ndow, G.; Shimakawa, Y.; Lemoine, M. Prevalence of occult hepatitis B virus infection in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022, 7, 932–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wu, T.; Kwok, R.M.; Tran, T.T. Isolated anti-HBc: The Relevance of Hepatitis B Core Antibody-A Review of New Issues. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 112, 1780–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Saravanan, S.; Shankar, E.M.; Vignesh, R.; Ganesh, P.S.; Sankar, S.; Velu, V.; Smith, D.M.; Balakrishnan, P.; Viswanathan, D.; Govindasamy, R.; et al. Occult hepatitis B virus infection and current perspectives on global WHO 2030 eradication. J. Viral Hepat. 2024, 31, 423–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fu, M.X.; Simmonds, P.; Andersson, M.; Harvala, H. Biomarkers of transfusion transmitted occult hepatitis B virus infection: Where are we and what next? Rev. Med. Virol. 2024, 34, e2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. He, P.; Zhang, P.; Fang, Y.; Han, N.; Yang, W.; Xia, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Shen, J. The role of HBV cccDNA in occult hepatitis B virus infection. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2023, 478, 2297–2307. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Bucio-Ortiz, L.; Enriquez-Navarro, K.; Maldonado-Rodríguez, A.; Torres-Flores, J.M.; Cevallos, A.M.; Salcedo, M.; Lira, R. Occult Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Hepatic Diseases and Its Significance for the WHO’s Elimination Plan of Viral Hepatitis. Pathogens 2024, 13, 662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nassal, M. HBV cccDNA: Viral persistence reservoir and key obstacle for a cure of chronic hepatitis B. Gut 2015, 64, 1972–1984. [Google Scholar]
  16. Zoulim, F.; Testoni, B. Eliminating cccDNA to cure hepatitis B virus infection. J. Hepatol. 2023, 78, 677–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wei, L.; Ploss, A. Mechanism of Hepatitis B Virus cccDNA Formation. Viruses 2021, 13, 1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dandri, M.; Petersen, J. cccDNA Maintenance in Chronic Hepatitis B—Targeting the Matrix of Viral Replication. Infect. Drug Resist. 2020, 13, 3873–3886. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Xia, Y.; Guo, H. Hepatitis B virus cccDNA: Formation, regulation and therapeutic potential. Antiviral Res. 2020, 180, 104824. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. Dandri, M.; Murray, J.M.; Lutgehetmann, M.; Volz, T.; Lohse, A.W.; Petersen, J. Virion half-life in chronic hepatitis B infection is strongly correlated with levels of viremia. Hepatology 2008, 48, 1079–1086. [Google Scholar]
  21. Nowak, M.A.; Bonhoeffer, S.; Hill, A.M.; Boehme, R.; Thomas, H.C.; McDade, H. Viral dynamics in hepatitis B virus infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 4398–4402. [Google Scholar]
  22. Tsukuda, S.; Watashi, K. Hepatitis B virus biology and life cycle. Antiviral Res. 2020, 182, 104925. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lucifora, J.; Protzer, U. Attacking hepatitis B virus cccDNA—The holy grail to hepatitis B cure. J. Hepatol. 2016, 64, S41–S48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Testoni, B.; Scholtès, C.; Plissonnier, M.L.; Paturel, A.; Berby, F.; Facchetti, F.; Villeret, F.; Degasperi, E.; Scott, B.; Hamilton, A.; et al. Quantification of circulating HBV RNA expressed from intrahepatic cccDNA in untreated and NUC treated patients with chronic hepatitis B. Gut 2024, 73, 659–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bläckberg, J.; Kidd-Ljunggren, K. Occult hepatitis B virus after acute self-limited infection persisting for 30 years without sequence variation. J. Hepatol. 2000, 33, 992–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ren, J.-H.; Hu, J.-L.; Cheng, S.-T.; Yu, H.-B.; Wong, V.K.W.; Law, B.Y.K.; Yang, Y.-F.; Huang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Chen, W.-X.; et al. SIRT3 restricts hepatitis B virus transcription and replication through epigenetic regulation of covalently closed circular DNA involving suppressor of variegation 3–9 homolog 1 and SET domain containing 1A histone methyltransferases. Hepatology 2018, 68, 1260–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ren, J.-H.; Tao, Y.; Zhang, Z.-Z.; Chen, W.-X.; Cai, X.-F.; Chen, K.; Ko, B.C.B.; Song, C.-L.; Ran, L.-K.; Li, W.-Y.; et al. Sirtuin 1 regulates hepatitis B virus transcription and replication by targeting transcription factor AP-1. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 2442–2451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Nishitsuji, H.; Ujino, S.; Harada, K.; Shimotohno, K. TIP60 Complex Inhibits Hepatitis B Virus Transcription. J. Virol. 2018, 92, e01788-01717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Alarcon, V.; Hernández, S.; Rubio, L.; Alvarez, F.; Flores, Y.; Varas-Godoy, M.; De Ferrari, G.V.; Kann, M.; Villanueva, R.A.; Loyola, A. The enzymes LSD1 and Set1A cooperate with the viral protein HBx to establish an active hepatitis B viral chromatin state. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 25901. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhang, W.; Chen, J.; Wu, M.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, M.; Yue, L.; Li, Y.; Liu, J.; Li, B.; Shen, F.; et al. PRMT5 restricts hepatitis B virus replication through epigenetic repression of covalently closed circular DNA transcription and interference with pregenomic RNA encapsidation. Hepatol. (Baltim. Md.) 2017, 66, 398–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Muto, J.; Sugiyama, M.; Shirabe, K.; Mukaide, M.; Kirikae-Muto, I.; Ikegami, T.; Yoshizumi, T.; Yamashita, Y.I.; Maehara, Y.; Mizokami, M. Frequency and Characteristics of Occult Hepatitis B Infection Among Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients in Japan. Ann. Hepatol. 2018, 17, 596–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kumar, R.; Pérez-Del-Pulgar, S.; Testoni, B.; Lebossé, F.; Zoulim, F. Clinical relevance of the study of hepatitis B virus covalently closed circular DNA. Liver Int. 2016, 36 (Suppl. S1), 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Qian, G.; Hu, B.; Zhou, D.; Xuan, Y.; Bai, L.; Duan, C. NIRF, a Novel Ubiquitin Ligase, Inhibits Hepatitis B Virus Replication Through Effect on HBV Core Protein and H3 Histones. DNA Cell Biol. 2015, 34, 327–332. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Salerno, D.; Chiodo, L.; Alfano, V.; Floriot, O.; Cottone, G.; Paturel, A.; Pallocca, M.; Plissonnier, M.-L.; Jeddari, S.; Belloni, L.; et al. Hepatitis B protein HBx binds the DLEU2 lncRNA to sustain cccDNA and host cancer-related gene transcription. Gut 2020, 69, 2016–2024. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Chong, C.K.; Cheng, C.Y.S.; Tsoi, S.Y.J.; Huang, F.-Y.; Liu, F.; Fung, J.; Seto, W.-K.; Lai, K.K.Y.; Lai, C.-L.; Yuen, M.-F.; et al. HBV X protein mutations affect HBV transcription and association of histone-modifying enzymes with covalently closed circular DNA. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 802. [Google Scholar]
  36. Xu, L.; Wu, Z.; Tan, S.; Wang, Z.; Lin, Q.; Li, X.; Song, X.; Liu, Y.; Song, Y.; Zhang, J.; et al. Tumor suppressor ZHX2 restricts hepatitis B virus replication via epigenetic and non-epigenetic manners. Antivir. Res. 2018, 153, 114–123. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Zhang, Y.; He, S.; Guo, J.-J.; Peng, H.; Fan, J.-H.; Li, Q.-L. Retinoid X Receptor α-Dependent HBV Minichromosome Remodeling and Viral Replication. Ann. Hepatol. 2017, 16, 501–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jiang, X.; Chang, L.; Yan, Y.; Ji, H.; Sun, H.; Xiao, Y.; Song, S.; Feng, K.; Nuermaimaiti, A.; Wang, L. Role of S protein transmembrane domain mutations in the development of occult hepatitis B virus infection. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2022, 11, 2184–2196. [Google Scholar]
  39. Mitsumoto-Kaseida, F.; Murata, M.; Takayama, K.; Toyoda, K.; Ogawa, E.; Furusyo, N.; Hayashi, J. Prevalence and characteristics of occult hepatitis B virus infection in Japanese human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. J. Infect. Chemother. 2020, 26, 28–32. [Google Scholar]
  40. Chen, J.; Liu, B.; Tang, X.; Zheng, X.; Lu, J.; Zhang, L.; Wang, W.; Candotti, D.; Fu, Y.; Allain, J.P.; et al. Role of core protein mutations in the development of occult HBV infection. J. Hepatol. 2021, 74, 1303–1314. [Google Scholar]
  41. Yan, Y.; Sun, H.; Chang, L.; Ji, H.; Jiang, X.; Song, S.; Xiao, Y.; Feng, K.; Nuermaimaiti, A.; Lu, Z.; et al. Circulating immune complexes and mutations of HBsAg are associated with the undetectable HBsAg in anti-HBs and HBeAg positive occult hepatitis B virus infection. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 1063616. [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang, C.; Xue, R.; Wang, X.; Xiao, L.; Xian, J. High-sensitivity HBV DNA test for the diagnosis of occult HBV infection: Commonly used but not reliable. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1186877. [Google Scholar]
  43. Cai, J.; Wu, W.; Wu, J.; Chen, Z.; Wu, Z.; Tang, Y.; Hu, M. Prevalence and clinical characteristics of hepatitis B surface antigen-negative/hepatitis B core antibody-positive patients with detectable serum hepatitis B virus DNA. Ann. Transl. Med. 2022, 10, 25. [Google Scholar]
  44. Allain, J.P.; Owusu-Ofori, S.; Ye, X.; Bisseye, C.; Chaar, M.E.; Li, C. Hepatitis B Virus Chronic Infection in Blood Donors from Asian and African High or Medium Prevalence Areas: Comparison According to Sex. Viruses 2022, 14, 673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. de Almeida Pondé, R.A. Dynamic profile of the HBeAg-anti-HBe system in acute and chronic hepatitis B virus infection: A clinical-laboratory approach. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2021, 48, 843–854. [Google Scholar]
  46. Candotti, D.; Assennato, S.M.; Laperche, S.; Allain, J.P.; Levicnik-Stezinar, S. Multiple HBV transfusion transmissions from undetected occult infections: Revising the minimal infectious dose. Gut 2019, 68, 313–321. [Google Scholar]
  47. Asim, M.; Ali, R.; Khan, L.A.; Husain, S.A.; Singla, R.; Kar, P. Significance of anti-HBc screening of blood donors and its association with occult hepatitis B virus infection: Implications for blood transfusion. Indian. J. Med. Res. 2010, 132, 312–317. [Google Scholar]
  48. Yuen, M.F.; Wong, D.K.; Lee, C.K.; Tanaka, Y.; Allain, J.P.; Fung, J.; Leung, J.; Lin, C.K.; Sugiyama, M.; Sugauchi, F.; et al. Transmissibility of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection through blood transfusion from blood donors with occult HBV infection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011, 52, 624–632. [Google Scholar]
  49. García-Montalvo, B.M.; Ventura-Zapata, L.P. Molecular and serological characterization of occult hepatitis B infection in blood donors from Mexico. Ann. Hepatol. 2011, 10, 133–141. [Google Scholar]
  50. Lovrantova, E.; Pijak, M.R.; Selcanova, S.A.; Csibova, V. Prevalence of occult hepatitis B virus infection among blood donors with hypertransaminasemia in Slovak Republic. Hepatology 2011, 54, 891A. [Google Scholar]
  51. Kim, M.J.; Park, Q.; Min, H.K.; Kim, H.O. Residual risk of transfusion-transmitted infection with human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, and hepatitis B virus in Korea from 2000 through 2010. BMC Infect Dis 2012, 12, 160. [Google Scholar]
  52. El-Ghitany, E.M.; Farghaly, A.G.; Hashish, M.H. Occult hepatitis B virus infection among hepatitis C virus seropositive and seronegative blood donors in Alexandria, Egypt. J. Egypt. Public. Health Assoc. 2013, 88, 8–13. [Google Scholar]
  53. Said, Z.N.; Sayed, M.H.; Salama, I.I.; Aboel-Magd, E.K.; Mahmoud, M.H.; Setouhy, M.E.; Mouftah, F.; Azzab, M.B.; Goubran, H.; Bassili, A.; et al. Occult hepatitis B virus infection among Egyptian blood donors. World J. Hepatol. 2013, 5, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Alizadeh, Z.; Milani, S.; Sharifi, Z. Occult hepatitis B virus infection among Iranian blood donors: A preliminary study. Arch. Iran. Med. 2014, 17, 106–107. [Google Scholar]
  55. Muselmani, W.; Habbal, W.; Monem, F. Prevalence of “anti-HBc alone” among Syrian blood donors. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2014, 8, 1013–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Niazi, S.K.; Bhatti, F.A.; Salamat, N.; Ghani, E.; Tayyab, M. Impact of nucleic acid amplification test on screening of blood donors in Northern Pakistan. Transfusion 2015, 55, 1803–1811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Oluyinka, O.O.; Tong, H.V.; Bui Tien, S.; Fagbami, A.H.; Adekanle, O.; Ojurongbe, O.; Bock, C.T.; Kremsner, P.G.; Velavan, T.P. Occult Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Nigerian Blood Donors and Hepatitis B Virus Transmission Risks. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0131912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Grabarczyk, P.; Kopacz, A.; Sulkowska, E.; Kubicka-Russel, D.; Mikulska, M.; Brojer, E.; Łętowska, M. Blood donors screening for blood born viruses in Poland. Przegl. Epidemiol. 2015, 69, 473–477. [Google Scholar]
  59. Pisano, M.B.; Blanco, S.; Carrizo, H.; Ré, V.E.; Gallego, S. Hepatitis B virus infection in blood donors in Argentina: Prevalence of infection, genotype distribution and frequency of occult HBV infection. Arch. Virol. 2016, 161, 2813–2817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Keechilot, C.S.; Shenoy, V.; Kumar, A.; Biswas, L.; Vijayrajratnam, S.; Dinesh, K.; Nair, P. Detection of occult hepatitis B and window period infection among blood donors by individual donation nucleic acid testing in a tertiary care center in South India. Pathog. Glob. Health 2016, 110, 287–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mardian, Y.; Yano, Y.; Wasityastuti, W.; Ratnasari, N.; Liang, Y.; Putri, W.A.; Triyono, T.; Hayashi, Y. Genetic polymorphisms of HLA-DP and isolated anti-HBc are important subsets of occult hepatitis B infection in Indonesian blood donors: A case-control study. Virol. J. 2017, 14, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Athira, K.P.; Vanathy, K.; Kulkarni, R.; Dhodapkar, R. The prevalence of occult hepatitis B infection among the blood donors in a tertiary care hospital, Puducherry. Indian J. Med. Microbiol. 2018, 36, 426–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Dodd, R.Y.; Nguyen, M.L.; Krysztof, D.E.; Notari, E.P.; Stramer, S.L. Blood donor testing for hepatitis B virus in the United States: Is there a case for continuation of hepatitis B surface antigen detection? Transfusion 2018, 58, 2166–2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Alzahrani, F.M.; Shaikh, S.S.; Alomar, A.I.; Acharya, S.; Elhadi, N. Prevalence of Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Among Blood Donors in Eastern Saudi Arabia: Results From a Five-Year Retrospective Study of HBV Seromarkers. Ann. Lab. Med. 2019, 39, 81–85. [Google Scholar]
  65. Zbinden, A.; Ries, J.; Redli, P.M.; Shah, C.; Glauser, A.; Goslings, D.; Huzly, D.; Böni, J.; Gottschalk, J.; Frey, B.M. Prevalence of Occult Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Blood Donors with Negative ID-NAT in Switzerland. Transfus. Med. Hemother 2022, 49, 338–345. [Google Scholar]
  66. O’Brien, S.F.; Reedman, C.N.; Osiowy, C.; Bolotin, S.; Yi, Q.L.; Lourenço, L.; Lewin, A.; Binka, M.; Caffrey, N.; Drews, S.J. Hepatitis B Blood Donor Screening Data: An Under-Recognized Resource for Canadian Public Health Surveillance. Viruses 2023, 15, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ondigui, J.L.N.; Kenmoe, S.; Kengne-Ndé, C.; Ebogo-Belobo, J.T.; Takuissu, G.R.; Kenfack-Momo, R.; Mbaga, D.S.; Tchatchouang, S.; Kenfack-Zanguim, J.; Fogang, R.L.; et al. Epidemiology of occult hepatitis B and C in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Infect. Public Health 2022, 15, 1436–1445. [Google Scholar]
  68. Liu, Y.; Li, P.; Li, C.; Zhou, J.; Wu, C.; Zhou, Y.-H. Detection of hepatitis B virus DNA among accepted blood donors in Nanjing, China. Virol. J. 2010, 7, 193. [Google Scholar]
  69. Sang, L.-Y.; Fu, L.-Q.; Fang, F.; Zhuang, P.-F. Genotyping and mutational analysis of occult hepatitis B virus infection in blood donors of Shaoxing. Zhonghua Shi Yan He Lin. Chuang Bing. Du. Xue Za Zhi 2011, 25, 470–473. [Google Scholar]
  70. Dong, J.; Wu, Y.; Zhu, H.; Li, G.; Lv, M.; Wu, D.; Li, X.; Zhu, F.; Lv, H. A pilot study on screening blood donors with individual-donation nucleic acid testing in China. Blood Transfus. 2014, 12, 172–179. [Google Scholar]
  71. Zhou, S.; Du, P.; Zheng, X.; Ye, X.-L.; Zeng, J.-F.; Lu, L.; Zhu, W.-G.; Yang, B.-C.; Li, T.-T.; LI, C.-Y. Molecular virological characteristics of occult hepatitis B virus infection in blood donors in Shenzhen from 2010 to 2012. Chin. J. Infect. Dis. 2015, 33, 150–153. [Google Scholar]
  72. Lin, H.; Chen, X.; Zhu, S.; Mao, P.; Zhu, S.; Liu, Y.; Huang, C.; Sun, J.; Zhu, J. Prevalence of Occult Hepatitis C Virus Infection among Blood Donors in Jiangsu, China. Intervirology 2016, 59, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  73. Liu, C.; Chang, L.; Ji, H.; Guo, F.; Zhang, K.; Lin, G.; Zhang, R.; Li, J.; Wang, L. Prevalence of HBV DNA among 20 million seronegative blood donations in China from 2010 to 2015. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 36464. [Google Scholar]
  74. Liao, H.; Liu, Y.; Chen, J.; Ding, W.; Li, X.; Xu, Z.; Yang, Y.; Chen, R.; Si, L.; Xu, X.; et al. Characterization of hepatitis B virus (HBV) preS/S gene mutations in blood donors with occult HBV infection in the Baoji area of North China. Transfusion 2017, 57, 857–866. [Google Scholar]
  75. Ye, X.; Li, T.; Xu, X.; Du, P.; Zeng, J.; Zhu, W.; Yang, B.; Li, C.; Allain, J.P. Characterisation and follow-up study of occult hepatitis B virus infection in anti-HBc-positive qualified blood donors in southern China. Blood Transfus. 2017, 15, 6–12. [Google Scholar]
  76. Lin, H.; Zhao, H.; Tang, X.; Hu, W.; Jiang, N.; Zhu, S.; Huang, C. Serological Patterns and Molecular Characterization of Occult Hepatitis B Virus Infection among Blood Donors. Hepat. Mon. 2016, 16, e40492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Tang, X.; Allain, J.P.; Wang, H.; Rong, X.; Chen, J.; Huang, K.; Xu, R.; Wang, M.; Huang, J.; Liao, Q.; et al. Incidence of hepatitis B virus infection in young Chinese blood donors born after mandatory implementation of neonatal hepatitis B vaccination nationwide. J. Viral Hepat. 2018, 25, 1008–1016. [Google Scholar]
  78. Ye, X.; Li, T.; Shao, W.; Zeng, J.; Hong, W.; Lu, L.; Zhu, W.; Li, C.; Li, T. Nearly half of Ultrio plus NAT non-discriminated reactive blood donors were identified as occult HBV infection in South China. BMC Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 574. [Google Scholar]
  79. Ye, X.; Liu, L.; Chen, L.; Nie, X.; Huang, L.; Ye, D.; Zeng, J.; Li, T.; Li, B.; Xu, M.; et al. High-Frequency Notable HBV Mutations Identified in Blood Donors With Occult Hepatitis B Infection From Heyuan City of Southern China. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 754383. [Google Scholar]
  80. Chen, J.; Ma, Z.; Wu, D.; Zuo, Q.; Wang, F.; Xiao, C.; Chen, F.; Li, P. Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of low-level HBV DNA screening in occult hepatitis B infection donors: A study from Shandong Blood Center, China. Heliyon 2023, 9, e18609. [Google Scholar]
  81. Deng, X.; Liu, D.; Delcourt, M.P.; Gao, H.; Zhou, L.; Candotti, D. No Hepatitis Delta Virus Seropositivity among Blood Donors with Overt and Occult Hepatitis B Infection in Dalian, Liaoning Province, China. Viruses 2023, 15, 1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Wang, R.; Xue, X.-N.; Xiao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Yu, Y. The prevalence of occult hepatitis B infection among the blood donors in a donation center in Beijing. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2024, 109, 116240. [Google Scholar]
  83. Mo, Y.; Jin, F.; Li, D.; Zou, W.; Zhong, J.; Tong, Z.; Wang, W.; Qian, F. Prevalence and molecular characteristics of occult hepatitis B virus infection among blood donors in Huzhou City, eastern China. Gene 2024, 927, 148718. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  84. Ni, X.; Xu, L.; Li, J.; Sun, Y.; Mao, H.; Wu, J. Serological and virological epidemiology characterization of occult hepatitis B virus infection in Jiaxing volunteer blood donors. Chin. J. Blood Transfus. 2017, 30, 780–784. [Google Scholar]
  85. Jing, Y.; Cai, B.; Guo, Y.; Li, J.; Ye, S.; Duan, Y. The sero-prevalence and multivariable analysis on risk factors of blood donors with occult HBV infection in Xi’an. Chin. J. Blood Transfus. 2015, 28, 168–171. [Google Scholar]
  86. Morozov, S.; Batskikh, S. Reactivation of hepatitis B virus infection—An important aspect of multifaceted problem. World J. Gastroenterol. 2024, 30, 3193–3197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Wong, D.K.; Cheng, S.C.Y.; Mak, L.L.; To, E.W.; Lo, R.C.; Cheung, T.T.; Seto, W.K.; Fung, J.; Man, K.; Lai, C.L.; et al. Among Patients with Undetectable Hepatitis B Surface Antigen and Hepatocellular Carcinoma, a High Proportion Has Integration of HBV DNA into Hepatocyte DNA and No Cirrhosis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 18, 449–456. [Google Scholar]
  88. Theofilopoulos, A.N.; Kono, D.H.; Baccala, R. The multiple pathways to autoimmunity. Nat. Immunol. 2017, 18, 716–724. [Google Scholar]
  89. Liu, S.; Zhou, B.; Valdes, J.D.; Sun, J.; Guo, H. Serum Hepatitis B Virus RNA: A New Potential Biomarker for Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection. Hepatology 2019, 69, 1816–1827. [Google Scholar]
  90. Cappy, P.; Boizeau, L.; Candotti, D.; Le Cam, S.; Martinaud, C.; Pillonel, J.; Tribout, M.; Maugard, C.; Relave, J.; Richard, P.; et al. Insights on 21 Years of HBV Surveillance in Blood Donors in France. Viruses 2022, 14, 2507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Athalye, S.; Patil, A.; Khargekar, N.; Shinde, S.; Chavan, S.; Dixit, A.; Shankarkumar, A.; Madkaikar, M.; Banerjee, A. Efficacy of combined HBsAg, anti-HBc and anti-HBs screening in minimizing transfusion transmission risk of hepatitis B infection in low resource setting. Heliyon 2024, 10, e25805. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  92. World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Blood Safety and Availability 2016; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  93. Deng, X.; Zang, L.; Wang, X.; Chen, H.; Liu, J.; Gao, Y.; Xu, S.; Wang, L.; Fan, Y.; Candotti, D.; et al. Follow-up program for blood donors with unconfirmed screening results reveals a high false-positive rate in Dalian, China. Transfusion 2020, 60, 334–342. [Google Scholar]
  94. Li, L.; Li, K.-Y.; Yan, K.; Ou, G.; Li, W.; Wang, J.; Song, N.; Tian, L.; Ji, X.; Chen, Y.; et al. The History and Challenges of Blood Donor Screening in China. Transfus. Med. Rev. 2017, 31, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Wang, M.; Xu, R.; Huang, J.; Liao, Q.; Tang, X.; Shan, Z.; Zhong, H.; Rong, X.; Fu, Y. Molecular characteristics of the full-length genome of occult hepatitis B virus from blood donors in China. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 8194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Tang, X.; Yang, L.; Zhang, P.; Wang, C.; Luo, S.; Liu, B.; Fu, Y.; Candotti, D.; Allain, J.P.; Zhang, L.; et al. Occult Hepatitis B Virus Infection and Liver Fibrosis in Chinese Patients. J. Infect. Dis. 2023, 228, 1375–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Klein, D. Quantification using real-time PCR technology: Applications and limitations. Trends Mol. Med. 2002, 8, 257–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Huang, H.; Wang, J.; Li, W.; Chen, R.; Chen, X.; Zhang, F.; Xu, D.; Lu, F. Serum HBV DNA plus RNA shows superiority in reflecting the activity of intrahepatic cccDNA in treatment-naïve HBV-infected individuals. J. Clin. Virol. 2018, 99–100, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Fu, M.X.; Simmonds, P.; Andreani, J.; Baklan, H.; Webster, M.; Asadi, R.; Golubchik, T.; Breuer, J.; Ijaz, S.; Ushiro-Lumb, I.; et al. Ultrasensitive PCR system for HBV DNA detection: Risk stratification for occult hepatitis B virus infection in English blood donors. J. Med. Virol. 2023, 95, e29144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Bertinelli, G.; Tizzani, L.; Luigi, M.; Monticelli, S.; Ilardi, V. Development and Validation of One-Step Reverse Transcription-Droplet Digital PCR for Plum Pox Virus Detection and Quantification from Plant Purified RNA and Crude Extract. Plants 2024, 13, 3276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wu, J.; Wang, M.X.; Kalvapalle, P.; Nute, M.; Treangen, T.J.; Ensor, K.; Hopkins, L.; Poretsky, R.; Stadler, L.B. Multiplexed Detection, Partitioning, and Persistence of Wild-Type and Vaccine Strains of Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Viruses in Wastewater. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024, 58, 21930–21941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Liang, X.; Shi, Y.-F.; Zhang, J.-W. Establishment of Nucleic Acid Detection Methods for Large-scale Screening of Viruses. J. Med. Res. 2024, 53, 24–29. [Google Scholar]
  103. Perkins, G.; Lu, H.; Garlan, F.; Taly, V. Droplet-Based Digital PCR: Application in Cancer Research. Adv. Clin. Chem. 2017, 79, 43–91. [Google Scholar]
  104. Olmedillas-López, S.; Olivera-Salazar, R.; García-Arranz, M.; García-Olmo, D. Current and Emerging Applications of Droplet Digital PCR in Oncology: An Updated Review. Mol. Diagn. Ther. 2022, 26, 61–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Tong, Q. Comparison of the application effect of nucleic acid test and ELISA test in the screening of hepatitis B virus(HBV)in blood samples of unpaid blood donations. China Contemp. Med. 2021, 27, 151–152. [Google Scholar]
  106. Bio-Red. Automated Droplet Generator #1864101. Available online: https://www.bio-rad.com/webroot/web/pdf/lsr/literature/10043138.pdf (accessed on 3 March 2025).
  107. Ramachandran, S.; Groves, J.A.; Xia, G.L.; Saá, P.; Notari, E.P.; Drobeniuc, J.; Poe, A.; Khudyakov, N.; Schillie, S.F.; Murphy, T.V.; et al. Recent and occult hepatitis B virus infections among blood donors in the United States. Transfusion 2019, 59, 601–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Deng, X.; Zang, L.; Candotti, D. Re-Entry Evaluation of Chinese Blood Donors with Unconfirmed Hepatitis B Screening Results. Viruses 2022, 14, 2545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Chimparlee, N.; Oota, S.; Phikulsod, S.; Tangkijvanich, P.; Poovorawan, Y. Hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus in Thai blood donors. Southeast. Asian J. Trop. Med. Public. Health 2011, 42, 609–615. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  110. Delghandi, S.; Raoufinia, R.; Shahtahmasbi, S.; Meshkat, Z.; Gouklani, H.; Gholoobi, A. An overview of occult hepatitis B infection (OBI) with emphasis on HBV vaccination. Heliyon 2024, 10, e37097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Stramer, S.L.; Glynn, S.A.; Kleinman, S.H.; Strong, D.M.; Caglioti, S.; Wright, D.J.; Dodd, R.Y.; Busch, M.P. Detection of HIV-1 and HCV infections among antibody-negative blood donors by nucleic acid-amplification testing. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 351, 760–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Zaaijer, H.L. Prevention of Transfusion-Transmitted Infections: Dilemmas. Front. Med. 2017, 4, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Epigenetics of cccDNA in OBI.
Table 1. Epigenetics of cccDNA in OBI.
TypeTargetHBV cccDNAHBV DNAHBsAgReference
HistoneNIRF−−−[33]
LSD1−−−[29]
PRMT5−−−[30]
Regulatory proteinHBx++−[34]
HBx mutations+−−[35]
Transcription factor regulationZHX2+−−[36]
RXRα++−[37]
AcetylationSIRT3+−−[26]
SIRT1−+−[27]
TIP60−−−[28]
“+” positive correlation; “−” negative correlation; NIRF Np95/ICBP90-like RING finger protein; LSD1 histone lysine demethylase-1; PRMT5 protein arginine methyltransferase 5; HBx HBV regulatory protein X; ZHX2 zinc fingers and homeoboxes 2; RXRα retinoic acid X receptor α; SIRT3 silent mating type information regulation 2 homolog 3; SIRT1 silent mating-type information regulation 2 homolog 1; TIP60 histone acetyltransferase Tip60.
Table 2. Characteristics of OBI prevalence in international blood donors.
Table 2. Characteristics of OBI prevalence in international blood donors.
Fist AuthorPublication YearLocationOBI InfectionSample SizeOBI Prevalence
Asim M [47]2010New Delhi, India3121751.42529%
Yuen MF [48]2011Hong Kong, China67217,5950.03079%
Maria GM [49]2011Mexico2420,3280.11806%
Lovrantova E [50]2011Slovak1565,0100.02307%
Kim MJ [51]2012South Korea23149,4710.01538%
El-Ghitany [52]2013Alexandria, Egypt215084.13385%
Zeinab NS [53]2013Egypt5231671.64193%
Alizadeh Z [54]2014Iran25000.4%
Muselmani W [55]2014Syria538960.12834%
Niazi SK [56]2015Northern Pakistan71956,7720.01266%
Oluyinka O [57]2015Nigerian7242916.78322%
Graba P [58]2015Poland2421,4470.00047%
Belen P [59]2016Córdoba, Argentina470,1020.0057%
Cinzia SK [60]2016South India424,3380.01644%
Mardian Y [61]2017Indonesia174563.72807%
Athira KP [62]2018India5211024.71869%
Dodd RY [63]2018USA43322,370,2710.00194%
Alzahrani FM [64]2019Eastern Saudi Arabia1222,8420.05253%
Andrea Z [65]2022Switzerland711,4320.06123%
Sheila OB [66]2023Canada611,401,6030.00435%
Ondigui JLN [67]2022Africa276018,57914.8%
Table 3. Characteristics of OBI prevalence in Chinese blood donors.
Table 3. Characteristics of OBI prevalence in Chinese blood donors.
Fist AuthorPublication YearLocationOBI InfectionSample SizeOBI Prevalence
Liu Y [68]2010Nanjing, China529720.16824%
Lie YS [69]2011Shaoxing, China886920.09204%
Dong J [70]2014Hangzhou, China86178,4470.04819%
Zhou S [71]2015Shenzhen, China99310,1670.03192%
Lin H [72]2016Jiangsu, China81157,1190.05155%
Liu C [73]2016Beijing, China1355120,084,1870.06747%
Liao H [74]2017Baoji, China60110,8430.05413%
Ye XL [75]2017Shenzhen, China611340.5291%
Lin H [76]2017Jiangsu, China80134,4950.05948%
Tang X [77]2018Guangzhou, China1014,9370.06695%
Ye XL [78]2019Shenzhen, China162123,2800.1314%
Ye XL [79]2022Heyuan, China7044,5920.15698%
Chen JF [80]2023Shandong, China69220,4450.0313%
Deng XL [81]2023Liaoning, China451869,6330.05186%
Wang R [82]2024Beijing, China76212,1340.03583%
Mo YP [83]2024Huzhou, China3144,2560.07004%
Ni XW [84]2017Jiaxing, China4752,6980.089%
Jing YY [85]2015Xi’an171263,5010.06%
Table 4. Comparison of three detection methods.
Table 4. Comparison of three detection methods.
TechniqueELISANATddPCR
TargetAntigen or antibodyNucleic acidNucleic acid
TheoryAntigen–antibody reactionNucleic acid amplification (e.g., PCR, RT-PCR) to detect DNA or RNA of pathogensThe samples were divided into many independent reaction chambers for PCR amplification and fluorescence signal detection, and the copy number of the target molecule was calculated based on the Poisson distribution
Sensitivitypg/mLThe sensitivity of HBV nucleic acid detection was 100% [105]It can detect rare mutations or single-copy nucleic acids as low as 0.001% [104]
SpecificityLow specificity and possible cross-reactivityHighHigh
Time of detection1.5–4 h1.5–2.5 h4–6 h
Detection fluxHigh throughput (96-well plate)Medium (requires tube-by-tube amplification)Low (droplet generation efficiency-dependent) [106]
CostLowHighHighest (expensive equipment, high cost of reagents)
GeneralizabilitySuitable for mass screening, especially in resource-limited settingsDependent on professional and laboratory conditionsSpecialized training and data interpretation are required
For OBICombined test (HBsAg + anti-HBc + anti-HBs) is used for initial screening in resource-limited areas, but window period existsShortening the window period and supporting typing is the gold standard for diagnosisNo need for standard curve, accurate calculation of viral copy number, currently applicable to scientific research, accurate monitoring of OBI viral loads
ELISA Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; NAT Nucleic acid testing; ddPCR Droplet digital PCR; PCR Polymerase chain reaction; RT-PCR Reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction; HBV Hepatitis B virus; HBsAg Hepatitis B virus surface antigen; anti-HBc Anti-hepatitis B core antigen; anti-HBs Anti-hepatitis B surface antigen; OBI Occult hepatitis B infection.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yi, M.; Dai, S.; Fang, L.; Pan, B.; Fan, B.; Pan, Y.; Liu, Z. Influence of Occult Hepatitis B Infection on Blood Transfusion Safety and Its Countermeasures. Pathogens 2025, 14, 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14040301

AMA Style

Yi M, Dai S, Fang L, Pan B, Fan B, Pan Y, Liu Z. Influence of Occult Hepatitis B Infection on Blood Transfusion Safety and Its Countermeasures. Pathogens. 2025; 14(4):301. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14040301

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yi, Meng, Shuchang Dai, Lin Fang, Bo Pan, Bin Fan, Yiming Pan, and Zhong Liu. 2025. "Influence of Occult Hepatitis B Infection on Blood Transfusion Safety and Its Countermeasures" Pathogens 14, no. 4: 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14040301

APA Style

Yi, M., Dai, S., Fang, L., Pan, B., Fan, B., Pan, Y., & Liu, Z. (2025). Influence of Occult Hepatitis B Infection on Blood Transfusion Safety and Its Countermeasures. Pathogens, 14(4), 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14040301

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop